TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DBrozeLiveFree
@DBrozeLiveFree - Derrick Broze
@_whitneywebb Whitney understands the importance of opting out before the Technocratic State is complete. Coincidentally, I wrote a book called How to Opt Out of the Technocratic State in early 2020 (updated in 2022) that gives you ideas on how to start: https://www.theconsciousresistance.com/howto
How To Opt-Out of the Technocratic State - The Conscious Resistance Network
How to Opt-Out of the Technocrat State (2nd Edition)
theconsciousresistance.com
@DBrozeLiveFree - Derrick Broze
@_whitneywebb @aaronscryptoac1 also some statements by Charles Hoskinson that are alarming relating to blockchains, digital ID, and social impact finance. https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/coming-terror-social-impact-finance-social-credit-scores/
@DBrozeLiveFree - Derrick Broze
Scientists Consistently Saw IQ Deficits in Children After Fluoride Exposure #FluorideLawsuit Dr. Bruce Lanphear: "Well, what we found... in every case, we saw IQ deficits in the children." Full video: https://odysee.com/@theconsciousresistance:7/drlanphear-fluoride:7
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found that exposure to fluoride during pregnancy, whether through urinary fluoride, water fluoride, or estimated fluoride intake, resulted in IQ deficits in children. This effect was observed in boys specifically, which raises questions about the reasons behind this gender difference. Although we cannot fully explain these findings at this point, the consistency of our results with other high-quality studies has led to concerns about practices like community fluoridation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we found whether we looked at urinary fluoride from the mom as a measure of exposure or water fluoride or an estimate of fluoride intake during pregnancy. In every case, we saw IQ deficits in the children. For the urinary fluoride, it was only for the boys, and that's raised some questions. Why only in the boys? We can't explain everything at this point.
It raises more questions, but the consistency across those three different ways of measuring fluoride and the consistency with other really high quality studies has really raised questions about practices like community fluoridation.
Dr. Bruce Lanphear Speaks Out Against Corrupted Fluoride Science
Journalist Derrick Broze interviews Dr. Bruce Lanphear about his testimony in the #FluorideLawsuit. Derrick also asks Dr. Lanphear about work on pesticides in Canada.
odysee.com
@DBrozeLiveFree - Derrick Broze
Yesterday I interviewed @Peterhotez at the @TexasTribune #TribFest23 In this clip I ask him about what Science Mag has called "Long Vaxx", post vaxx persistent adverse reactions. All of a sudden he had to go. Watch the full interview here: https://theconsciousresistance.com/dr-peter-hotez-vaers/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Science Magazine recently published articles about long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines, referred to as "long vaxx." The speaker acknowledges the importance of these stories and highlights the robust post-licensure monitoring systems in place, such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. However, the speaker emphasizes that VAERS is a preliminary system and does not establish cause and effect. They mention that there are other parallel systems, including those operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which thoroughly investigate such concerns. The speaker clarifies that they have never dismissed people's concerns and encourages listening to them, but also emphasizes the existing mechanisms for investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the time and, you mentioned, Science Magazine. I noticed that Science Magazine actually recently published some they're calling it long we have long COVID and they're saying there's some evidence of long vaxx of people who are dealing with symptoms post vaccine for long periods of time. Do you think those stories are worth hearing or are those people that are anti vaxxers we should
Speaker 1: just ignore it or
Speaker 0: drop down or censor?
Speaker 1: I don't think I don't think They're ignored. Remember, we have one of the most sophisticated post licensure, and post authorization monitoring systems the world's ever seen. We have the vaccine and reverse events reporting system, vaccine safety
Speaker 0: data link The VAERS is showing the number of vaccine injuries showing up on there.
Speaker 1: Well, remember, anything VAERS is just, a top level, top top level. It doesn't find cause and effect. It's sort of hypothesis generating and then use the other systems to find it. And so far that I've not seen evidence for, strong links of vaccines in in in any of those things. And it and it does work.
It's identified some very rare events.
Speaker 0: But do you think science the fact that science has brought it up now, like, it's okay, a sort of mainstream in publication has mentioned that, hey, some people dealing with shots are dealing with after effects that are going on for months at a time. Is that something that should be given more attention? Because the reason I ask is I feel like we're kind of dismissing the legit science.
Speaker 1: You need Science Magazine for that. There is a mechanism that's already in place Yeah. Through the Centers For Disease Control. That that's and and the other and and the FDA and that system, That very detailed system that's already looking into,
Speaker 0: is this something other than VAERS or you're talking about VAERS?
Speaker 1: VAERS vaccine safety data link. There's about 4 or 5 Parallel systems.
Speaker 0: So but yet also at the same time, you said they're not really kind of it's the 1st layer, right? So if somebody does review and say, hey, I've been dealing with long vaxxed for a couple months. I got the vaxxed but I'm still dealing with whatever they may be dealing with. Will that be followed up with? Or because I guess the concern is people like yourself are going on TV and saying a
Speaker 1: little too hot for me.
Speaker 0: People like yourself are going on TV and saying that we shouldn't listen to people when they have those concerns.
Speaker 1: No. I I don't think I've ever said no to listen to people. I'm saying we have we've got a system in place.
Speaker 0: But you call it anti vaxx aggression and maybe somebody who'd been injured by the vaxx by your terms would be labeled that even though they have the
Speaker 1: I've I've never labeled that. Yeah. I use that term to, those who have a, or either using monetary gain monetizing the
Dr. Peter Hotez Encourages Vaxx-Injured to Report to VAERS - The Conscious Resistance Network
Listen to this article https://pinecast.com/listen/49b08da8-d9d8-43fa-ac43-385b743ac57f.mp3 On Saturday September 23rd, journalist Derrick Broze caught up with Dr. Peter Hotez at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, Texas. Broze and Hotez discuss the doctor’s new book, The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science, the Proximal Origin paper, “long vaxx”, and more. The Conscious Resistance Network is an independent media […]
theconsciousresistance.com