TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DailyCaller
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
🚨 WATCH: Sen. Elizabeth Warren reacts to the death of Charlie Kirk & calls for more gun control legislation. She then attacks Pres. Trump for seemingly 'turning up the temperature' in the United States. Footage from @AndiNapier https://t.co/vk7TYjvXQA
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is just wrong. And my heart goes out to his family, to his friends, but we just cannot be a country that turns to violence when we disagree. Senator Warren says Congress can act on gun safety after every killing, noting "we have more gun deaths than most other nations" and that Massachusetts rules could reduce fatalities nationwide. She asks what Republicans will do following this Denver shooting and says "School shootings happen every single day." She urges modest steps like background checks that most of America supports. She argues Republicans bend to Trump and the gun industry and that "And the United States Congress could act and so far simply refuses." The risks have escalated, and Congress could act.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is just wrong. And my heart goes out to his family, to his friends, but we just cannot be a country that turns to violence when we disagree.
Speaker 1: We just can't. What can congress do about it, senator?
Speaker 0: Well, one thing congress can do is gun safety. And every time there's a killing, the republicans say this is not the time to talk about gun safety. And yet we have to as a nation. We have more gun deaths than most other nations, and we don't keep our children, our friends, our neighbors safe by just putting ordinary gun safety rules in place. You know, I just wanna say this coming from Massachusetts.
If the rest of the country would just follow the rules we follow in Massachusetts, we could reduce fatalities all over this country. And plenty of people who are hunters and who use guns for sport still have lots of activities in Massachusetts. But at least we make it a little tougher to use guns for harming other human beings. What do
Speaker 1: you say to people who saying the Democrats need to lower the temperatures or talking to maybe even, you know
Speaker 0: Right. Why don't you start with the president of The United States? Right. And every ugly meme he has posted and every ugly word. He is the leader of this nation.
And I think that when he's posting things like he did just a couple of days ago, trying to show an entire city on fire and a reference to helicopters in in effect, throwing people out of helicopters and showing himself as some kind of big chest beating of of of threat, then I just don't wanna hear this from the Republicans.
Speaker 1: Do you think politicians on both sides have a role to play here though in trying to turn the rhetoric down?
Speaker 0: I think what we have to say is, a, violence is not the answer, and we are willing to take steps so that violence in this country is not so legal. Do we have a single Republican who will stand up and join us following this school shooting out in Denver at the same time? School shootings happen every single day. They have become commonplace in this country. It's hard now to actually get attention when someone has been mowed down with a gun, and congress could change that and should change that.
Speaker 1: I just asked senator Cassidy that same question before you, and you said you Congress can't change the heart of a man. You
Speaker 0: can change whether or not they have a lethal weapon in their hands, and the likelihood that they will be able to kill another person or to kill themselves goes up if they have a lethal weapon. It just those are the facts. And Republicans wanna turn their backs on that because it is more politically expedient. But they are not making anybody safer.
Speaker 1: A lot of people are saying that political violence has no place in our country, but it clearly does have some place in our country. Life now. Yeah. It's a fact is it just a fact of life now that there's
Speaker 0: a I don't want it to be a fact of life. And that's what we have to keep say we have to keep saying no violence, but we also need to back it up with actions. And backing it up with actions means just taking some modest steps for gun safety. And and remember here, most of America agrees with us on modest steps on gun safety, on things like background checks. This is what America wants to do to protect our children.
And yet, the Republican Party, just as they bend a knee to Donald Trump, bends a knee to a gun industry that continues to make money by stirring everyone up and making sure that everyone has access to every possible lethal weapon. And that puts all of us at risk. It puts our children at risk. It puts leaders at risk, and that's a real mistake for our country.
Speaker 1: Senator Warren, do you feel safe given all this violence? How
Speaker 0: can anybody feel safe today? I I worry when I send my grandchildren off to school. Who doesn't? If you're if you're alive and breathing in The United States right now, you understand that the risks have simply escalated. And the United States Congress could act and so far simply refuses.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Murder of Iryna Zarutska: Charlie Kirk VS. Van Jones https://t.co/sGyUbRLNbN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that."
Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country."
Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong."
Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass."
Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why."
Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A war of words has erupted between Charlie Kirk and CNN's esteemed intellectual, Van Jones, over the Charlotte stabbing. Let's get into it.
Speaker 1: The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that. In fact, it's the exact opposite. White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country.
Speaker 2: People like Charlie Kirk, Fan, they've been looking for opportunities to make this some sort of, like, reciprocal George Floyd situation. And that's the part that I think he's almost giving away the game, and it it's sad to see a lot of people going along with it.
Speaker 3: We don't know why that man did what he did. And for Charlie Kirk to say, we know he did it because she's white, when there's no evidence of that, it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong.
Speaker 0: Alright. Time out. I swear. It's amazing how uninformed these people that do these shows are, but let's clue Van into the obvious here before we continue.
Speaker 1: Jack doesn't let it go. Jack let it go. I can probably believe it.
Speaker 3: Then he says that if something like that had happened the other way, there'd be sweeping changes imposed on society. Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass. Even when you had a white police officer murder a black man on live television, the whole world saw
Speaker 0: According to the courts, yes, a murder. But according to our two eyes and functioning brain, a fentanyl overdose by a low life criminal. But go on.
Speaker 3: It's about the fact that we don't know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this was hurting. Hurt people hurt people.
Speaker 0: Yes. He was just a hurt person. So you see, we should have some empathy for him. Okay? We don't know what he was going through.
That could have been you or I having a bad day and deciding to stab a woman in the neck over it. Charlie Kirk, your response.
Speaker 1: Race hustler, Marxist, Van Jones. When a white person is murdered, we don't burn down the country. But when George Floyd overdosed on drugs, it's Floyd a palooza. Van Jones, he puts race in almost every situation where it doesn't exist. For example, with the death of George Floyd, Van Jones repeatedly said that was a racist attack.
You know who didn't say that? Keith Ellison, who is the attorney general of Minnesota at the time, said that race did not play any role in the actions that happened with George Floyd's death. All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media. And then Van Jones goes on television and calls me a race hustler for even calling up the facts and the specifics around this case. Van Jones, he wants to keep on trying to find racial motors that don't exist, and he ignores them when they're in broad daylight in front of him on recorded video and a horrendous attack such as this.
The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
WATCH: Rep. Matt Gaetz responds on Tucker Carlson Tonight to allegations of sexual misconduct: He says a former DOJ official named David McGee is trying to extort is family for money He says that the FBI and DOJ have audio recordings that will prove his innocence. https://t.co/J95AEFtxsr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz claims he is being extorted by a former Department of Justice official, David McGee, who demanded $20 million to stop sex trafficking allegations from surfacing. Gaetz says his father contacted the FBI, who then asked him to wear a wire during interactions with McGee. Gaetz is demanding the DOJ and FBI release audio recordings that he says will prove his innocence.
Gaetz denies the New York Times report that he traveled with a 17-year-old woman, calling it "verifiably false." He believes the leak to the New York Times was intended to derail the investigation into McGee, who allegedly claimed connections to the Biden White House and offered a potential pardon. Gaetz also claims the FBI threatened a female friend of his to try to implicate him in a "pay for play scheme." He says the allegations are false and part of a smear campaign against him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just a couple of hours ago, late this afternoon, the New York Times ran a story saying that Florida congressman Matt Gaetz is under federal investigation for playing some role in sex trafficking and potentially having a relationship with a 17 year old girl. There are very few details in major news outlets tonight about this story. We have no background on it all and not even any very informed questions. Instead, we've invited congressman Gates on the show to respond to these stories and give us his view of them. Congressman, thanks so much for coming on.
Appreciate it. So this is obviously a serious allegation. Tell us what the truth is from your perspective.
Speaker 1: It is a horrible allegation and it is a lie. The New York Times is running a story that I have traveled with a 17 year old woman and that is verifiably false. People can look at my travel records and see that that is not the case. What is happening is an extortion of me and my family involving a former Department of Justice official. On March 16, my father got a text message demanding a meeting wherein a person demanded 20,000,000 in exchange for making horrible sex trafficking allegations against me go away.
Our family was so troubled by that, we went to the local FBI. And the FBI and the Department of Justice were so concerned about this attempted extortion of a member of congress that they asked my dad to wear a wire, which he did with the former Department of Justice official. Tonight, I am demanding that the Department of Justice and the FBI release the audio recordings that were made under their supervision and at their direction, which will prove my innocence and that will show that these allegations aren't true. They're merely intended to try to bleed my family out of money. And this former Department of Justice official tomorrow was supposed to be contacted by my father so that specific instructions could be given regarding the wiring of $4,500,000 as a down payment on this bribe.
I don't think it's a coincidence that tonight, somehow, The New York Times is leaking this information, smearing me, and ruining the investigation that would likely result in one of the former colleagues of the current DOJ being brought to justice for trying to extort me and my family.
Speaker 0: So a cup a couple of obvious questions that come to mind, and again, just to restate, this just happened, don't have any information beyond what we've already said and you have said. Who first of all, who is this Department of Justice former employee who's trying to extort the money from you, you say?
Speaker 1: His name is David McGee. He was a top official in the leadership the Northern District Of Florida as a prosecutor. He currently works at the Beggs and Lane law firm. As a matter of fact, one of the recordings that was made at the FBI and Department of Justice request occurred at that law firm, and the money that was supposed to be paid today that would have shown even more evidence of David McGee's work in this extortion scheme, that was foiled by the New York Times story, and I believe that's why this this horrible information and these terrible allegations have been used this evening.
Speaker 0: So you're and and I'll get to the investigation in a sec. But but you're saying that David McGee was motivated by greed. He was trying to extort money from your family. That's his motivation, you're saying?
Speaker 1: I know that there was a demand for money in exchange for a commitment that he could make this investigation go away along with his co conspirators. They even claimed to have specific connections inside the Biden White House. Now, I don't know if that's true. They were promising that Joe Biden would pardon me. Obviously, I don't need a pardon.
I'm not seeking a pardon. I've not done anything improper or wrong. But what I am troubled by, is the real motivation for all of this. You know, just tonight, Ted Lou, a Democrat, is calling on me to be removed from the House Judiciary committee. And I believe we are in an era of our politics now, Tucker, where people are smeared to try to take them out of the conversation.
I'm not the only person on screen right now who's been falsely accused of a terrible sex act. You were accused of something that you did not do, and so you know what this feels like. You know the pain it can bring to your family, and you know how it just puts people on defense when you're accused of something so salacious and awful, but it did not happen. It is not true. And the fact that it is the basis of this attempt to extort my family tells a lot.
And if the FBI and Department of Justice will release the tapes that they are in possession of, the American people will see what is really going on.
Speaker 0: You just referred to a mentally ill viewer who accused me of a sex crime twenty years ago, and it of course, it was it was not true. Never met the person. But but I I do agree with you that being accused falsely is one of the worst things that can happen, and you do see it a lot. Let's go back to the investigation. You you say that it was, that it was or is underway.
There was an investigation. What is the basis of that investigation? What is the allegation? Is that really not very clear from these news stories?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, I only know what I've read in the New York Times. I can say that actually you and I went to dinner, about two years ago. Your wife was there and I brought a friend of mine. You'll remember her.
And she was actually threatened by the FBI, told that if she wouldn't cop to the fact that somehow I was involved in some pay for play scheme, that she could face trouble. And so I do believe that there are people at the Department of Justice who are trying to smear me, you know, providing for flights and hotel rooms for people that you're dating who are of legal age is not a crime. And I'm just troubled that the lack of any sort of legitimate investigation into me would then permute, would then convert into this extortion attempt.
Speaker 0: I I I don't remember the the woman you're speaking of or the context at all honestly, but I I would like to know who, so they're saying there is a 17 year old girl who, you had a relationship with. Is that true? And who are they who is this girl? What are they talking about in the New York Times?
Speaker 1: The person doesn't exist. I have not had a relationship with a 17 year old. That is totally false. The allegation as I read in the New York Times, is that I've traveled with some 17 year old in some relationship. That is false, and records will bear that out to be false.
Speaker 0: How how long has this investigation been going on? Do you know?
Speaker 1: I I don't know.
Speaker 0: When were you first informed of it?
Speaker 1: You know, again, I I I really saw this as a deeply troubling challenge for my family on March 16 when people were, you know, talking about a minor and that there were pictures of me with child prostitutes. That's obviously false. There will be no such pictures because no such thing happened. But really on March 16 was when this got going from the extortion standpoint.
Speaker 0: So what what happens next? I mean, you you can see there is this investigation, I guess a criminal investigation. I'm not quite sure where the sex trafficking part comes in. I don't again, for the fifth time, I don't really understand the story very well. But where does it go from here?
I mean, you're you've made an allegation against someone by name on the air and accused him of trying to extort millions of dollars from your family. What happens tomorrow?
Speaker 1: Well, what was supposed to happen, was the transfer of this money that would have implicated the former colleague of these current DOJ officials. But that's obviously not going to happen tomorrow because the New York Times story was leaked in order to quell that investigative effort. So here's what needs to happen next. The FBI and the Department of Justice must release the tapes that are in their possession that were done at their direction. Those tapes will show that I am innocent and that the whole concept of sex charges against me was really just a way to try to bleed my family out of money and probably smear my name because I am a well known outspoken conservative, and I guess that's out of style in a lot of parts of the country right now.
Speaker 0: Matt Gaetz, I appreciate you coming on tonight.
Speaker 1: So Thanks for giving me the chance to tell the truth. I appreciate it.
Speaker 0: It's a more interesting and complicated story than I knew from reading about. Thank you very much. So we have just been informed that we may have
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Cindy Hyde-Smith Breaks Mississippi’s Glass Ceiling As She Becomes The State’s First Female Elected To Congress https://trib.al/lByZwoD
SocialFlow
trib.al
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
HANNITY: "Do you condemn people that call for assassination?" LORENZ: "Gosh, you're gonna ask me if I condemn Hamas next, this is crazy!" https://t.co/DP8FsGowfV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to condemn those who call for assassination. Speaker 1 responds that they condemn the violence of the system and wants Speaker 0 to acknowledge that. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 condemns people that call for assassination, and Speaker 1 says they would love for Speaker 0 to acknowledge what they're actually saying.
Speaker 1 states that 70% of Americans believe that insurance company practices are responsible in part for Thompson's death. Speaker 0 says anyone who wants to assassinate anyone is wrong. Speaker 1 says that to prevent further deaths and gun violence, one needs to understand motives and ideology. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to condemn those who want to be involved in assassination. Speaker 1 says they are describing his supporters who do believe that, and it's important to understand the ideology of anyone that would advocate for violence.
Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 condemns his supporters. Speaker 1 says they believe in free speech. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 condemns those that support violence. Speaker 1 says people are exercising their right to free speech and talking about the fact that over 320,000 people died from lack of health insurance in the first two years of the pandemic alone. Speaker 1 says we have a violent health care system that needs reform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: K. Simple question. Very done that.
Speaker 1: Able to mock
Speaker 0: Can you take a moral stand and condemn that?
Speaker 1: Want to I what I condemn is the violence of our system, and I would love for you to acknowledge that. I would
Speaker 0: love to Can condemn the system? Do you con Taylor, do you condemn people that call for assassination?
Speaker 1: Gonna ask if I condemn Hamas next. This is crazy. I would love for you to acknowledge what I'm actually saying, Sean, and you we seem to be talking past each other. I wanna talk about the fact
Speaker 0: that half of the are like because
Speaker 1: of cost. We need to talk about that 70% of Americans, by the way, believe that the insurance company practices are responsible in part for Thompson's death. These are signs of an unhelpful
Speaker 0: put a rationalization. I am saying anybody that wants to assassinate anyone in some person is wrong. I don't care if it's a democrat or republican or a father or a husband, and I speak that that is a simple truth that anyone with a heart would would easily say on national TV that you're having a hard time with.
Speaker 1: If you want to prevent further deaths and you don't want gun violence in the street, which I think we both are aligned in in wanting. Right? We want peace. We do not want violence in this country no matter what side of the political aisle it's coming from. You need to understand motives, and you need to understand ideology that people have.
And that is what what my job
Speaker 0: is basics. I'm gonna help you out. Why don't you first condemn those that wanna be involved in assassination and stop talking about them being handsome and smart and intelligent and
Speaker 1: I'm not I didn't say what I believe, but I
Speaker 0: it's just right.
Speaker 1: I am describing his supporters who do believe that, and I think it's very important. Just the way that I would try to understand the ideology
Speaker 0: of his supporters last last question.
Speaker 1: Unite the right rally. I would try to understand the ideology of any of anyone that would advocate for violence in
Speaker 0: this country. What is supporters?
Speaker 1: Once again, I believe in free speech. I believe in free speech. If they have not committed any crimes, whose supporters are outside just saying things. They're not committing any sort
Speaker 0: of acts of violence. You won't condemn his supporters. You won't say what they're doing is repulsive.
Speaker 1: Once again, Sean, I believe in free speech and the right to free expression. I I seem to be in the minority.
Speaker 0: The difference between assassination and speech, do you condemn those that support violence and, in this case, praise Louis Luigi Mangione?
Speaker 1: You asked again, the people that are showing up outside
Speaker 0: We're going around the meeting. I gotta go.
Speaker 1: Exercising their free their right to free speech. They are talking about the fact that over three hundred and twenty thousand people died from lack of health insurance in the first two years of the pandemic
Speaker 0: alone. With us.
Speaker 1: Are things that we need to acknowledge if we ever wanna fix our system. We have a violent, violent health care system, Sean, and it needs reform, and that's what we should be focusing on. That's the violence we should center.
Speaker 0: And people that have a platform like yours should speak out loudly and clearly and unambiguously, and you won't do it. Appreciate you being on. When we come back
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
WATCH: State Dept. Spokesman Ned Price and Reporter Matt Lee get into full-blown shouting match over the government's track record of broken foreign policy promises https://t.co/31z6bVnY8j
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government claims Russia is engaging in disinformation campaigns and planning a false flag operation in Eastern Ukraine, including a propaganda film. This information is based on declassified intelligence.
A reporter challenges the claim, demanding evidence beyond statements from the US government. He likens the unproven claims to "crisis actors" and "Alex Jones territory."
The US government official states that releasing the specific intelligence information would compromise sources and methods. The goal of publicizing the intelligence is to deter Russia and, failing that, to expose Russia's attempt to fabricate a pretext for action. The reporter insists that without evidence, the claims are unprovable and require the public to simply believe the US government's statements. The US government counters that declassification occurs only when confident in the information's credibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, that's quite a mouthful there. So you said actions such as these suggest otherwise. Suggest meaning that they suggest they're not interested in talks and they're gonna go ahead with some kind of a what action are you talking about?
Speaker 1: One, the actions I've just pointed to. The
Speaker 0: fact What action?
Speaker 1: What the fact that Russia continues to engage, in disinformation
Speaker 2: campaigns. Made an allegation that they might do that.
Speaker 0: Have they actually done it?
Speaker 1: What we know, Matt, is what we what I have just said, that they have engaged in this activity, in this planning activity. But but let me let me because because, obviously, this is not this is not the first time we've made, these reports public. You'll remember that just a few weeks ago.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. You made made what report public?
Speaker 1: If you let me finish, I will tell you what report
Speaker 2: we made public.
Speaker 1: We told you a few weeks ago that we have information indicating Russia also has already prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct a false flag operation in Eastern Ukraine. So that, Matt, to your question, is an action that Russia has already taken.
Speaker 2: It's an action that you say that they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to to to to confirm that. And I'm gonna get to the next question here, which is what is the evidence that they I mean, this is, like, crisis actors, really. This is like, Alex Jones territory you're getting into now. What evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the in in the making?
Speaker 1: Matt, this is derived from information known to the US government, intelligence information that we have declassified. I think you
Speaker 2: have Okay. Well, where where is it? Where where is this information?
Speaker 1: It is intelligence information that we have declassified.
Speaker 2: Well, where is it? Where is the declassified information? I just delivered it. No. You made a series of allegations
Speaker 1: and statements. Would you like us to print out the topper? Because you will see a transcript of this briefing that you can print out for yourself.
Speaker 2: That's not evidence, Ned. That's you saying it. That's not evidence. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: What would you like, Matt?
Speaker 2: I I I would like to see some proof that you that that that that that that you can show that that Matt, you have been that that shows that that that shows that the Russians are doing it. Ned, I've been doing this for
Speaker 1: a while. I know. That was my past. You you have you you have been doing this for quite a while. You know that when we declassify intelligence
Speaker 2: information That's right. We do so
Speaker 1: in in a means wreck. Do so we do so with an eye to protecting sources and methods.
Speaker 2: Not gonna fall. I I remember a lot of things. So where where where is the declassified information other than you coming out here and saying?
Speaker 1: Matt, I'm sorry you don't like the format, but we have declassified
Speaker 2: format is the content.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you don't like the content. I'm sorry you I'm sorry you are doubting the information that is in the possession of the US government.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: I What I'm telling you is that this is information that's available to us. We are making it available to you, in order, for a couple reasons. One is to attempt to deter the Russians Russians from going ahead with this activity. Two, in the event we're not able to do that, in the event the Russians do go ahead with this, to make it clear as day, to lay bare the fact that this has always been an attempt on the part of the Russian Federation to fabricate a pretext.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But you don't have any any evidence to back it up other than what you're saying. It's like you're saying, we think we we we have evidence information the Russians may do this, but you won't tell us what the information is. And then when when you're That
Speaker 1: that is the idea behind deterrence, Matt. That is the idea behind deterrence. And when you hope that the Russians don't go forward with this. Is
Speaker 2: you say, I just gave it to you. But that's not what
Speaker 1: You you seem not to understand you seem not to understand the idea
Speaker 2: of deterrence. Are trying to deter
Speaker 1: the Russians from moving forward with this type of activity. That is why we're making it public today. If the Russians don't go forward with this, that is not, ipso facto, an indication that they never had plans to do so.
Speaker 2: But then it's unprovable. I mean, my god. What is the evidence that you have that suggests that that that the Russians are even planning this?
Speaker 1: Not yet.
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm not saying that they're not, but you just come out and say this and expect us just to to to believe it without you showing a shred of evidence that it's actually true other than when I ask or when anyone else asks, what's the information? You said, well, I just gave it to you, which was just you making a statement.
Speaker 1: Matt, you said yourself, you've been in this business for quite a long time. You know that when we make information intelligence information public, we do so in a in a way that protects sensitive sources and methods. You also know that we do so, we declassify information only when we're confident in that information. If you doubt if you doubt the the credibility of the US government, of the British government, of other governments and wanna, you know, find solace in information that the Russians are putting out, that is that is for you to do.
Speaker 2: I'm not asking what what the Russian government is putting out. And what do we what is this supposed to be?
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
🚨 SHOT and CHASER. Joy Behar falsely claimed on the View today that Elon Musk supported apartheid in South Africa. Later in the show, she attempted to walk back her comments admitting that she didn't know if they were true and said "don't be suing me, okay, Elon?" https://t.co/f9pajFjlc4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't think that we ever wanted the responsibility of the job, and frankly, he's not bright enough to handle it. Elon Musk kisses up to him, stroking his ego, so he gets to nap while this guy runs things.
But this guy wasn't even born here. He was born under apartheid in South Africa and I understand he was pro-apartheid, so he has that mentality going on. And now he's a naturalized citizen. How did he even do that? Did he come over the border legally?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that's true. I think that's true. I don't think we ever wanted really the responsibility of the job. He he's not really bright enough to handle the job. And and Elon Musk kisses his butt and strokes his his tiny ego or big ego, whatever it is.
And and he doesn't get to do he can take a nap while the guy was not born in this country, who was born under a apartheid in South Africa. Mhmm. So has that mentality going on. He was pro apartheid as I understand it. He's a naturalized citizen.
Right. He's a naturalized citizen. Now he's a naturalized citizen. Oh, really? How did he do that?
Did he come over the border legally?
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't know for sure if Musk was pro-apartheid. He grew up when apartheid was happening before Nelson Mandela fixed it. Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. He might have been too young. I don't want to get sued. Others can say any lie they want, but we have to be really strict. That's why this show is important.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say that now I'm getting some flat because I said that, Musk was pro apartheid. I don't really know what for sure if he was. He grew up at that time when, apartheid was in was in full bloom before the great Nelson Mandela fixed that. He was around at that time, but maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. He might have been a young guy too.
Might have been. So don't be suing me. Okay, Elon? They're allowed to say any lie they want, but we have to be really strict. That's why this show is important.
Yeah.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
The Old Border Czar VS The New Border Czar
Video Transcript AI Summary
To the millions of illegal aliens being released, it's time to start packing. We've been to the border, and the claims of a crisis are exaggerated. Mass deportation can happen without separating families; families can be deported together. The narrative of an invasion is a fabrication. Criminal cartels are responsible for significant drug trafficking and violence, and they will face severe consequences. There's a notable increase in sex trafficking and terrorism at the border, marking a major national security issue. The current administration's approach is seen as a vanity project, and I will not support building a wall. We need effective solutions, not just a wall, to address this situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got a message to the millions of illegal aliens that Joe Biden's releasing our country in violation of federal law. You better start packing now.
Speaker 1: We are going to the border. We've been to the border. So this whole this whole this whole thing about the border, we've been to the border. We've been to the border.
Speaker 0: You haven't been to the border?
Speaker 2: And I haven't been to Europe. And I mean, I don't I don't understand the point that you're making.
Speaker 3: I hear a lot of people say, you know, the talk of a mass deportation is racist. It's, it's threatening to immigrant community. It's not threatening to the immigrant community. It should be threatening to the illegal immigrant community.
Speaker 2: Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without separating families?
Speaker 0: Courses.
Speaker 3: Families can be deported together.
Speaker 2: It is not an emergency. We are not facing a crisis. We have a president in the United States who has created a fiction about a crisis at the border, and he has held up the United States government and its workers around his vanity project called the law.
Speaker 3: To the
Speaker 0: criminal cartels in Mexico, you smuggled enough fentanyl across this country to kill a 100 and 48,000 young Americans. You have killed more Americans than every terrorist organization in the world combined. And that's when president Trump gets back in office. He's gonna designate you a terrorist organization. He's gonna wipe you off the face of the earth.
You're done. You're done.
Speaker 2: This the idea that he is trying to say that we have people that are trying to invade our country to commit mass crime is a crisis of his own making. I specialize in transnational criminal organizations. That's that law ain't gonna stop them. No. No.
No.
Speaker 0: There's a 600% increase in sex trafficking in women and children. Arrested more terrorists coming across the border in 1 month than Trump had in 4 years. This is the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever had. Donald Trump will be the president. I'll be in the middle of running the biggest deportation operation this country's ever seen.
Speaker 2: I am not for a wall. We don't need to build a wall. This is a crisis of his own making. The president of the United States has a vanity project that he doesn't wanna give up. It's the president's vanity project.
Mhmm. This issue is about a vanity project for this president. Right. The president's vanity project. Let me be very clear.
I'm not gonna vote for a wall under any circumstances. It will not end with a wall. It will not end with a wall. It will
Speaker 0: not end with a wall? No. Alright. He comes back. I come back.
We fix his shit.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Read more from Daily Caller White House Correspondent @reaganreese_ HERE: https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/11/donald-trump-tom-homan-border-czar/
Trump Appoints Tom Homan As ‘Border Czar’
Trump announced Sunday night that his former acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director will serve as “border czar” in his second administration.
dailycaller.com
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
'You Lied': Josh Hawley Confronts Biden Agency Chief Over Alleged Involvement With Lethal 'Terrorism' https://t.co/drU1w8bdup
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't understand why the committee skipped over 30 years of my career and focused on a past incident from graduate school. We should be looking at the last three and a half years because people were killed in a terrorist act. The special agent found that I was involved and I apologize for lying to the committee. I was fired for it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Curious, I I understand why, this committee jumped over 30 years of my career in considering my nomination and went to a salacious moment from graduate school where I where I tried to protect people. What I don't understand is why we're not looking at the last three and a half years now. Here's why, senator. Because people are killed in these kind of incidents. It is an act of terrorism.
Is expired. A special agent in charge found that you were involved. You lied to this committee in saying that you were never Senator, I apologize. Investigation. In fact, you were.
Your time. You lied to us latently. Fired. And you know it.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Here is the rest of Tucker's segment where he talks about the evidence that has been presented of voter fraud in this election. https://t.co/oOIM2hp3Tv
Video Transcript AI Summary
To lower tensions and unite the country, we must investigate election irregularities. Allegations include ballots being backdated in Detroit, late unsealed ballots counted for Democrats, and deceased individuals voting. Whistleblowers in Nevada reported witnessing voter fraud. An election official in Georgia admitted to finding illegal and double voters on the rolls. False claims of fraud are harmful, so we must approach this issue carefully and responsibly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Voluntary arrangement. Telling voters to shut up is never enough. So in this case, tonight, there's only one way to lower the national temperature and unite the country. We need to find out exactly what happened in this election. And there are questions.
And that means we have to answer them. For example, in Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Michigan, the Trump campaign has now collected signed affidavits that attest to criminal activity during the voting process. In the city of Detroit, witnesses have alleged under oath that ballots were improperly backdated and counted without matching signatures. 1 poll watcher alleges that 40,000 late unsealed absentee ballots were counted orally, and all of them went for Democrats. In the state of Nevada, 8 whistle blowers from within the Nevada election department say they witnessed voter fraud abetted by other election officials and by their supervisors.
According to one affidavit, a poll worker saw people bringing handfuls of ballots to Biden Harris campaign van. Those ballots were then filled out at the van placed in return envelopes. Eventually, Biden's supporters formed a wall to block outsiders from seeing what they were doing. Meanwhile, according to voting records, people who were not even alive still somehow managed to vote on Tuesday. In New York, deceased voters caps to ask absentee ballots.
On October 9th in Nevada, a man called Fred Stokes junior mailed in his vote. The only problem was Fred Stokes junior died 3 years ago at the age of 92. The Republican Party of Nevada says it is aware of 100 of other potential cases of dead people casting ballots. In Pennsylvania, records show turnout from several people who were born in the 19th century. They apparently rose from their graves to vote.
Now all of that is real. We spent all weekend checking it. False claims of fraud can be every bit as destructive as the fraud itself. So we need to be careful and responsible. All of us.
But what we just told you is true. And there's more of it. Just hours ago in the state of Georgia, an election official admitted they will find illegal and double voters when they check the voter rolls. Let me be perfectly clear on another point.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Attorney for Bryan Malinowski, a Little Rock airport exec who was killed in an ATF raid testified before the House Judiciary Committee. @Jim_Jordan: “Cover up the doorbell, no body-cams, what are they trying to hide?” https://t.co/IAHuQypTsb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Brian Malinowski, the highest-paid city employee in Little Rock, was targeted by ATF agents despite not selling firearms as his principal livelihood. He was fatally shot during a raid at his home, raising questions about the necessity and handling of the operation. The agents' treatment of his spouse and the lack of body cams further fuel suspicions of misconduct. The motive behind the raid and the lack of transparency in the investigation remain unclear.
Translation: Brian Malinowski, a city official in Little Rock, was killed during a raid despite not being a gun seller. The circumstances of the raid and the agents' actions are under scrutiny for potential misconduct and lack of transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Cummings, what was, what was Brian Malinowski's principal livelihood?
Speaker 1: He was the highest paid city employee in the city of Little Rock as the executive director of the, Little Rock Airport and its matter of public record. I think he made about $260,000 a year.
Speaker 0: So it wasn't selling guns? No, sir. This was, a And the rule at the time the law the law at the time says, if your principal livelihood is not in selling firearms, you do not need an FFL. Is that is is that accurate?
Speaker 1: That's my understanding to the best you can have. So what what
Speaker 0: did he What was the crime? What did he do wrong? You'd have
Speaker 1: to ask ATF. They decided that he'd committed maybe he'd committed a crime even though.
Speaker 0: Now, this this standard has changed, but the new rule didn't take effect until this this past Monday. Is that right? That's correct. And even under the new standard, there's a question of whether he was in violation of the law. Is that accurate?
A huge question. Huge question. But under the old standard, it was pretty simple. Is your principal livelihood selling firearms? That's correct.
And for Brian Malinowski, it wasn't. Obviously not. It wasn't. And yet, at 6:0:2 on March 19th, 10 cars pull up to his home into the gentlelady behind you's home, come up to the door in tactical gear, and put a tape across the doorbell camera, so no one can see what's gonna go on. Correct.
Now, that's scary to me. I'm sorry. If the guy had done if he had if he had for sure done something wrong in crime, okay. But they do that. And then 57 seconds later, gunshots erupt, and Brian Malinowski is no longer with us.
A good man by your you knew the guy. Served your community. Highest paid city official in Little Rock. What the heck do you think is going on here?
Speaker 1: That's the question on the lips of every person in Arkansas that's asked that's contacted me, and that's a a large number of people.
Speaker 0: And is isn't it true that a week before, these same agents were there in the Walmart parking lot, close by the Malinowski home, going to go execute the search warrant, and then decided not to because Brian Malinowski wasn't home? Why was this so critical that he'd be home?
Speaker 1: I don't know, mister chairman. It's it it was a search warrant. They in fact, they could have waited till nobody was home and come and they wanted to kick the door down. They could have come at noon and kicked the door down when mayor and Brian were both gone.
Speaker 0: And searched and found whatever they were looking for. Exactly. And anything they wanted on mister Malinowski, if they wanted his phone or anything, they could've served that warrant. They could have got a warrant for that. I'm sure the judge would have given it to him, and they could have done that at the airport.
Correct. At his principal livelihood. At the airport. Correct? Correct.
Then they add insult to injury. This is the part that just, I I know, infuriates mister Hill as your member of Congress. And I would bet any American to add insult to injury the way they treated his spouse. Missus Malinowski, sitting behind you, the way they treated her at a moment that maybe the most high anxiety moment in any individual's life, their spouse has just been shot. That to me is, like, unbelievable.
What she had to go through.
Speaker 1: It makes me very angry.
Speaker 0: Well, it should. It should make all of us angry. Dude, I think it makes a Democrat. There's no there's no explanation for that. That to me and and if and if you and I keep coming back to was this done for some kind of intimidate we've seen this from other agencies, frankly.
Intimidation. We had the FBI, mister Hauck, come in, arrest him in front of his wife and children. Same thing. Pre dawn raid, 7 kids there, take him away. When his attorney said, we'll be happy to work with you.
You'd have been happy to work with these guys if they had contacted you or any Absolutely. That's the part that gets us. That's the part that what was his principal livelihood? It was not selling firearms. I can't figure out what the crime is.
And they oh, by by the way, any of the guns, any of the firearms that mister Malinowski sold as part of his hobby excuse me. Any of them ever be used were were any of them were ever used in a crime?
Speaker 1: The affidavit alleges that they were they were found in crimes, but the crimes were 3 traffic stops where there was marijuana and a firearm in the car. So that was a crime. And But the crime 2 other ones, but they were never fired in the commission of a crime.
Speaker 0: Themselves were never used in the
Speaker 1: They were never used in the commission of a crime according to the affidavit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So you you asked it in your testimony, you said the right thing. Why? Why did they do it? Why did this happen so far?
That's what that's what we're gonna try to find out tomorrow. Mister Dunelbach will be sitting right where you guys are sitting. We're gonna ask some questions about this. He's probably gonna say ongoing investigation, but we're gonna push him as hard as we can. If we're trying to figure out why they would behave in this way, and why they didn't wear body cams.
It's almost like, what are they trying to hide? Cover up the doorbell, no body cams. What are they trying to hide?
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
A group of undecided voters were told "raise your hand if you think President Trump’s policies on the economy would be better for your family" Every single one raised their hand. https://t.co/cxhTqRdgGL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Undecided voters feel President Biden has been disastrous for the economy. They believe President Trump's economic policies would benefit their families more. All voters agree with this sentiment.
Translation: Undecided voters believe President Biden has been bad for the economy and prefer President Trump's economic policies for their families. All voters agree.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The undecided voters were also asked how they think president Biden is doing on the economy. Take a listen. I think he's been absolutely disastrous for the economy. Mhmm. I agree.
So raise your hand if you think president Trump's policies on the economy would be better for your family personally. Raise your hand. Alright. So that is everybody.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
BOBULINSKI: "Hunter confirmed his uncle perjured himself in front of this committee" https://t.co/96saF0NoIH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden and Jim Biden both lied during their transcribed interviews. Hunter demanded money from CFC in text messages, using his father's presence to pressure them. Jim denied meeting with Hunter and Joe Biden at the Beverly Hilton in May 2017, despite evidence proving otherwise. Hunter admitted to the meeting, confirming his uncle's perjury. The truth will be told.
Translation: Both Hunter Biden and Jim Biden lied during their interviews. Hunter demanded money from CFC in text messages, using his father's presence to pressure them. Jim denied meeting with Hunter and Joe Biden at the Beverly Hilton in May 2017, despite evidence proving otherwise. Hunter admitted to the meeting, confirming his uncle's perjury. The truth will be told.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gave his transcribed interview on February 28th and lied throughout his testimony. Here's just one egregious example of Hunter's perjury. He lied to the committee, on important details concerning his money demands and threats to CFC in text messages on July 30 5th 31, 2017. He leveraged his father's presence next to him in that infamous text to strong-arm CFC to paying Hunter immediately. Jim Biden also lied extensively throughout his transcribed interview on February 21st and perjured himself.
An example of that, on page 100 of his transcript, Jim has asked specifically, do you recall having a meeting with Hunter Biden, Tony Bobolinski, and Joe Biden? Jim's response, absolutely not. The committee was so shocked by his perjury that they asked him the same question multiple times. Each time, he denied meeting with me and Joe Biden. After the committee showed him text messages confirming that I met with Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and Jim Biden at the Beverly Hilton in May 2017, Jim Biden, with a former US attorney lawyer sitting next to him, still denied that meeting took place.
Hunter Biden in his own transcribed interview confirmed that that meeting took place. Hunter confirmed his uncle perjured himself in front of this committee. I'm simply here to tell the truth to
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
A whopping 70% of Haley voters in the New Hampshire primary weren't registered Republicans https://t.co/yxpy6c2qDv
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker discusses the differences between Republican primary voters who support Donald Trump and those who support Nikki Haley. According to exit polls, 70% of Trump voters are registered Republicans, while 27% are undeclared or independents. In contrast, 70% of Haley voters are registered undeclared, with only 27% being registered Republicans. The speaker also mentions that 80% of Trump voters believe that Joe Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election, whereas 83% of Haley voters believe he did. This highlights the contrasting views of the two candidate's supporters. The video concludes with the speaker expressing fascination with the diverse opinions of the voters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About how the rest of the night might play out. Let's go back to David Chalian with that. And, David, you're getting more on the ways that Republican primary voters don't see eye to eye?
Speaker 1: Yes. That's right, Jake. In these exit poll results, you see a Mars and Venus universe for Haley and Trump here. Take a look at the numbers. Among Trump voters, 70% of them, according to our exit polls, are registered Republicans.
Donald Trump, His support, 27% of his voters, are registered undeclared or independents. 3 Percent were unregistered before today. Look at how that compares with Nikki Haley. It's a complete reversal. It's an alternate universe.
Among Haley voters, 70% registered undeclared. Only 27% are registered Republicans. We also see this with when asking people, did Joe Biden legitimately win the 2020 election, which he did. Among Trump voters, 80% say no. They Say it wrongly.
No. Joe Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election. Haley voters, it's the complete opposite. 83% of Haley voters say Correctly that Joe Biden was the legitimate winner in 2020. Only 15% of our voters say wrongly that he was not.
This is the Trump Hailey Mars Venus election tonight in New New Hampshire.
Speaker 0: Alright, David. Thank you so much. Interesting stuff. Anderson, quite a thing to behold. All those people
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
FBI Secretly Recorded Joe Biden’s Brother As Part Of Bribery Probe: REPORT https://dailycaller.com/2023/12/18/fbi-record-james-biden-bribery-probe-report/
FBI Secretly Recorded Joe Biden’s Brother As Part Of Bribery Probe: REPORT
The FBI secretly recorded conversations featuring President Joe Biden's brother, James Biden, as part of a bribery probe.
dailycaller.com
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
John Fetterman rips fellow Dems for blaming Israel for hospital strike https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/19/john-fetterman-pro-israel-rhetoric-hamas-attack/
‘Truly Disturbing’: John Fetterman Claps Back At Far-Left Lawmakers Who Blamed Israel For Hospital Strike
John Fetterman has criticized fellow Democrats for their quick decision to blame Israeli Defense Forces for a missile attack on a hospital in Gaza.
dailycaller.com
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
TRUMP: "The recent terror attacks are also a reminder of the deadly dangers...we face from Joe Biden's DEMOLITION of our own borders... Under Biden, the same people that attacked Israel, killing, raping, torturing...innocent civilians are...pouring into our once beautiful USA."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The recent terror attacks serve as a reminder of the dangers we face due to Joe Biden's border policies. People who have attacked Israel and committed heinous acts are now entering the USA. Our once beautiful country has drastically changed in just three years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very interesting. The recent terror attacks are also a reminder of the deadly dangers that we face from Joe Biden's demolition of our own borders here on American soil. Can you imagine what's happening with these people pouring in under Biden? The same people that attacked Israel, killing, raping, torturing, and maiming innocent civilians are right now pouring into our once beautiful USA. I have to say that once beautiful because what's happened to our country in 3 years is not even to be believed.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
.@KariLake confronts Democrat opponent on the border LAKE: “ I’m not working together with you, I’m going to beat you.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We met when you were on TV. Our border is wide open and we need to address it. Fentanyl is killing young people. Under President Trump, we had a secure border. You have the fastest growing homeless population in your district. You voted to cut veterans. Let's go to the border together and find solutions. We should finish the wall, add more border control, and ports of entry. President Trump was close to finishing the wall. Mexico helped us with soldiers. Joe Biden gave away $300 million in border wall materials. We can work together on this, but I'm going to beat you. We're going to save Arizona.
Full Transcript
We met once when you were actually still on TV. As a journalist, yeah. Look forward to it. I think you're going to have a great race. It's going to be a knock-down drag-out. And unfortunately, our border is wide open. Me, Will, Kirsten have had a lot of time to do something about it. And even the Democrats are upset about it, Reuben. I think there's a lot we can still do. We've been doing some good work. I think there's some common ground I could find on. Look, we need to figure out how to get people here legally so they don't go through the illegal manner. We've got plenty of people here. The problem is we have plenty of people here right now. We have millions of people here. Fentanyl. Fentanyl. Fentanyl has killed more young people. And you've had an opportunity to vote. This is Reuben Gallego. Our border is wide open. He's trying to run for Senate. Our border is wide open. Fentanyl is killing our young people. No, it's coming all over. But that's not acceptable. Under President Trump, we had a secure border. And I'm telling you. But look, I look forward to working together if we can. And obviously we're going to have more conversations about this. Well, we're going to have conversations. I think it's great that we're going to have a civil conversation too. Civil, absolutely. But you know what's not civil? People dying on the streets. And in your district. Our state. In your district. Our state. No, it's your district. You have the fastest growing homeless population in the country. My district also has the fastest growing economy in the country. And this is our state. This is our problem. So you're okay. No, I have a solution for our homeless population. And I look forward to working together. You did. And this guy wants to destroy our country. He really does. You have the fastest growing homeless population in the country. In your district. You've got veterans dying. And you're voting to cut veterans. That's absolutely not true. That is absolutely true. I just saw your vote. I just passed the PAC Act. I've worked as a veteran. I've received VA benefits myself. Thank you. Good to see you. I appreciate your service to our country. But I sure wish that you'd care more about our border. We're a border state. I do care about the border. As a matter of fact, I will go down the border with you. Let's talk to the mayors. Let's get together. I'm glad that you finally are going down to the border. Because you've had a chance to vote on it. You've had a chance to vote on it. Look, let's go down the border together. Let's get the mayors together. Let's talk about some really sane solutions that aren't just easy answers. You know what we're saying? You know what we're saying? Putting up more border. Ruben. Ruben. Ruben. Ruben. Helping out more background checks. Ruben, we have to finish the wall. You do realize Joe Biden. That's not a simple answer. You do realize. Yes, it is simple. You do realize that Joe Biden. There's a lot of things we could do. We should do some border wall. We should add some more border control. We should add some ports of entries. There's a lot of things we could do. But just one thing does not answer it at all. You do realize that President Trump was on the verge of finishing the border wall. He was doing it without support. Right. May I finish? No. Or would you just like to interrupt? You just want to interrupt? I believe it was only 50 miles. And Mexico was supposed to pay for it, and he never did. Mexico helped us immensely with tens of thousands of soldiers. They did not pay for it. Ruben. So let's be clear. Joe Biden, your hero, gave away $300 million in border wall materials. You know that. For nothing. That is absolutely true. We're still waiting for Mexico to pay for it. You know what? Mexico chipped in. This is something that you and I can work together on. No, I'm not working together with you. I'm going to beat you. I'm going to beat you. We're going to save Arizona.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Viktor Shokin - The Ukrainian Prosecutor Joe Biden BRAGGED about getting FIRED speaks out SHOKIN: "The fact that Joe Biden gave away one billion dollars - in exchange for my dismissal, my firing. - Is that alone a case of corruption?"
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe they were being bribed. Joe Biden giving away $1 billion in exchange for my firing, isn't that corruption?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do not want to deal in unproven facts, but my firm personal conviction is that, yes, this was the case. They were being bribed. The fact that Joe Biden gave away $1,000,000,000 in U. S. Money in exchange for my dismissal, my firing, isn't that alone a case of corruption?
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Biden claims he wanted to be Vice President so he and his family could have Secret Service Protection BIDEN: "I didn't want to be VP. But had I known that as VP, I get Secret Service...I would have fought even harder for it...Grandchildren - they all have Secret Service...It's just wonderful!" Do ALL of your grandchildren have Secret Service?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Years ago, John Kerry, the Democratic Party's presidential nominee, approached me about the possibility of being his vice president. I declined the offer, not realizing that being vice president would come with the perk of having Secret Service protection for myself, my daughters, and my granddaughters. If I had known, I would have fought harder for them. Now, all my grandchildren and my daughter have Secret Service protection, and it's truly wonderful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, this is a little ad lit. Years ago when John Kerry was the nominee for the, for president of the Democratic Party, he talked with me about the possibility of being vice president and is on his take it. It wasn't we just we're all friends. I said, no, I didn't want to be vice president. But had I known that as vice president I get Secret Service and had I known that meant my daughters had Secret Service and my granddaughters, I would have fought even harder for them at the time.
And, and now my I have a bunch of grandchildren. They all have secret service and my daughter has secret service and, You know, it's it's just wonderful.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
WHY IS HE WHISPERING??
Video Transcript AI Summary
Solar panels are not widely used in American homes due to their cost and the convenience of getting energy from the grid. However, it is important to convince Americans that choosing the environmentally friendly option is worth it. The solution is simple: just do it. Affordability is not an issue as there are options to weatherize homes and make them more energy-efficient. This includes preventing heat loss and ensuring homes are well-insulated. By taking these steps, Americans can contribute to a more sustainable future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's move on to solar panels because they aren't cheap, fewer than 5% of American homes have them, and it's still cheaper, easier just to get your energy from the grid. How do you convince Americans that the hard thing to do might be the right thing to do for the environment?
Speaker 1: To do it. That's what they do. You can afford to do it, and you can afford to weatherize your home. We're paying people to get to go out and make their homes more solid in the sense that they're not they're not letting out heat. They're not letting out
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
BREAKING @pdoocy confronts President Biden on Archer Testimony DOOCY: "There's this testimony now where one of your son's former business associates is claiming that you were on speaker phone a lot talking business." BIDEN: "I never talked business...I knew you'd have a lousy question." DOOCY: "Why is that a lousy question?" BIDEN: "Because it's not true."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about a testimony where their son claims they were frequently on speaker phone discussing business with a business associate. Speaker 1 denies ever speaking to the gentleman and dismisses the question as lousy. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1, addressing them as Mr. President.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's this testimony now where one of your sons from our business associates is claiming that you were on speaker phone a lot with them talking business. Is that what
Speaker 1: We never talked to this gentleman. And I I know you'd have a lousy question. Well, what
Speaker 0: do you it's why is that That allows the
Speaker 1: question. Thank you,
Speaker 0: mister president.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
.@Varneyco: "Hunter Biden's former business partner Eric Schwerin made at least 36 visits to the Obama White House and then Vice President Joe Biden's residence." Just to talk about the weather, of course.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
REPORTER: "If the Secret Service determines who brought the cocaine into the White House, does the White House support the prosecution of this individual?" JEAN-PIERRE: "I'm just not gonna get into hypotheticals."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House refuses to comment on whether they would support the prosecution of the person responsible for bringing cocaine into the White House. They defer to the Secret Service, who are investigating the matter. The White House is confident that the Secret Service will uncover the truth. They decline to provide any further information at this time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the, Secret Service determines, the who brought the cocaine into the White House, does the White House support the prosecution of this individual? I'm just not gonna get into hypotheticals from here. Let let the Secret Service do their job. It's under their purview. We are confident that they'll get to the bottom of it.
I'm just not gonna get ahead of this right this time.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
@TulsiGabbard: "There is LITERALLY no greater expression of hatred and hostility towards women than to erase us as an entire category of people." Tulsi also took to Twitter to say that Democrats are 'normalizing pedophilia.'
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party for using identity politics to divide people based on race, gender, and sex. They argue that this goes against Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream of judging individuals by their character rather than their skin color. The speaker also mentions a woman named Riley Gaines who represents the consequences of Democrats rejecting objective truth. They claim that Democrats deny the existence of women, despite advocating for women's rights in the past. The speaker believes that erasing women as a category of people is a form of hostility and hatred towards women.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The byproduct, unfortunately, of today's Democratic Party's blind pursuit of power and their rejection of this truth that we are all God's children is that they reduce each of us to the color of our skin or our gender or our sex, and they're using identity politics to tear us apart, fomenting anti white racism and fanning the flames of divisiveness just so they can score a few political points. What's so disturbing about all of this is this is not something they're trying to hide. They're proud of it. They celebrate it. They promote unity, even though what they are actually doing is betraying the dream of Martin Luther King Junior.
Their actions betray his wish that we would be judged not by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character. They have become in doing so the racist that they claim to hate. You heard from Riley Gaines earlier, what an incredibly brave and courageous woman who embodies the consequence of what happens when the Democrats reject the existence of objective truth. They reject the truth that we as women exist and even as they continue to claim that they are the ones who were champions for women. They are the ones my my pred not my predecessor, but the woman who who held the seat that I served in in Congress, she was one of the leading advocates for the passage of Title IX over 50 years ago.
And you look at what they're doing now, spitting in the face of every woman and girl who has benefited from the passage of title 9 by saying that actually women don't exist. That we're just a construct of someone's mind that anybody at any any time can say, well, you know what, I'm a woman too. There's literally no greater expression of hatred and hostility towards women than to erase us as an entire category of people.
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Hunter Biden might be seeing the inside of a cell soon https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/07/judge-threatens-hunter-biden-six-months-jail-paternity-case/
Judge Threatens Hunter Biden With Six Months In Jail
An Arkansas judge threatened Hunter Biden with up to six months in jail if he fails to show up in court to face questioning related to his paternity case.
dailycaller.com
@DailyCaller - Daily Caller
Trump is getting support from literally everyone https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/13/we-support-president-trump-smollett-hoax-brothers-defend/
‘We Support President Trump’: Smollett Hoax Brothers Defend Trump
The brothers involved in the Smollett hoax said that they support former President Donald Trump and warned black voters consume too much "propaganda."
dailycaller.com