reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DanteTheDon

DanteTheDon
Posted - April 17, 2026 at 11:39 AM
Saved - April 23, 2026 at 7:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion traces Dr. Amy Eskridge’s claims that anti-gravity research has repeatedly been discovered and suppressed. She says she was warned by agencies and died at 34, officially ruled a suicide with no public investigation. The thread links her to a pattern of scientists’ deaths, critiques Puthoff and Elizondo, and argues she preferred open, public research to avoid being absorbed into black budgets. The dialogue connects supporting evidence and further context.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Amy Eskridge Mystery Thread - The anti-gravity propulsion researcher claimed antigravity has been discovered 4 different times. And each time, was shut down and dismantled. In this interview, she says on camera she was warned THREE separate times by agencies and officials to stop her anti-gravity research. Shortly after this interview in 2022, she was found dead at 34. 'Self-inflicted gunshot wound.' No investigation details ever released. She is now the 11th scientist linked to this suspicious pattern. Watch this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes that it has been independently discovered four other times, and that it “has been said, it has been suppressed every single fucking time.” He says he doesn’t think they’ll suppress it this time and that “I think you're in the clear.” He asserts they obviously know about you because he has had multiple both protective and threatening interactions with various agency affiliations. He states, “If you haven't had a US government agent come to you and say, stop. Shut the fuck up. Stop. Shut the fuck up,” then they’re going to let you do it. He claims there are people waiting, saying, “there are SSP motherfuckers that are fucking twiddling their thumbs. Like, is Amy not gonna publish soon? God. We've been influencing this bitch forever.” He adds that on the other side, multiple parties are looking at each other wondering, “Didn't we tell this bitch three years ago that we kill people for this? Is she not listening? What is she doing? She's still doing it? What? We told her we were gonna kill her three years ago.” He describes two constant scenarios in his life: one where people are urging, “do it. Do it. You're the one. Do it.” and another where people are warning, “they're gonna kill you. Don't do it. They're gonna kill you.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been independently discovered four other times. He said, it has been said, it has been suppressed every single fucking time. And he said, I don't think they're gonna suppress it this time. He said, I think you're in the clear. He said they obviously know about you because I've had multiple both protective and threatening interactions with various agency affiliations, whatever. He was like, if if you haven't had a US government agent come to you and say, stop. Shut the fuck up. Stop. Shut the fuck up. If that hasn't happened, they're gonna let you do it. They're waiting. They're like, there there are SSP motherfuckers that are fucking twiddling their thumbs. Like, is Amy not gonna publish soon? God. We've been influencing this bitch forever. Doesn't she know we want her to publish? Jesus. Like, there's multiple people doing that right now. And on the other side of the fence, there's multiple parties looking at each other like, didn't we tell this bitch three years ago that we kill people for this? Is she not listening? What is she doing? She's still doing it? What? We told her we were gonna kill her three years ago. So I have these two like, I have these two different scenarios floating constantly in my life where I have people being like, do it. Do it. Do it. You're the one. Do it. And then I have multiple people people being like, they're gonna kill you. Don't do it. They're gonna kill you.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Dr. Amy Eskridge. Army Weapons Science Directorate. Co-founder of an anti-gravity startup with her retired NASA engineer father. She deliberately built her research companies to operate in public because she believed black budget programs were swallowing scientists and destroying breakthroughs the world would never see. Here in this clip, she describes anti-gravity propulsion prototypes that were melted down for scrap metal. Literally. Auctioned off to scrap metal companies, and melted down. She also said that “disclosure would come out of Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama.” Trump moved Space Force Command there last year, three years after she died. She was found dead at 34. Officially ruled a 'suicide.' No investigation was made public. A retired British intelligence officer concluded it wasn't. She is the 11th scientist tied to this pattern.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Disclosure is gonna come out of Huntsville, Alabama, out of Redstone Arsenal. Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama is the biggest fucking deal that you've never heard of. It's the biggest fucking deal that you have never heard of. Because the fact is that we have deep and wide extensive credibility that no one knows about because you're not supposed to know about it. Because it's in Alabama, it's obscure. You're not supposed to know about it. That's the point. People don't know what Huntsville is. Amy should don't know what Huntsville is? Is that what you're saying? People don't know what Huntsville is. Huntsville is the biggest fucking deal on the planet that you have never heard of. Now, like, is the Silicon Valley of government national security technology and intelligence community technology and aerospace technology. Huntsville is like the hub. Like, we are number three on the first strike launch list. If first strike happens, three targets, Huntsville will be one of them. Allafuckingbama. Allafuckingbama. This is Alabama dude in the Deep South. We're in the top three first strike. We're in the top three first strike because you haven't heard of us. That's why. It's on purpose. I started the institute for one reason. One reason, the institute. I started it as a public facing persona to disclose antigravity technology through because I told Mark this, if you stick your neck out in public, at least someone notices if your head gets chopped off. If you stick your neck out in private, fuck you. They will bury you. They will burn down your house while you're sleeping in your bed, and it won't even make the news.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Disclosure is gonna come out of Huntsville, Alabama, out of Redstone Arsenal. Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama is the biggest fucking deal that you've never heard of. It's the biggest fucking deal that you have never heard of. Because the fact is that we have deep and wide extensive credibility that no one knows about because you're not supposed to know about it. Because it's in Alabama, it's obscure. You're not supposed to know about it. That's the point. People don't know what Huntsville is. Amy should don't know what Huntsville is? Is that what you're saying? People don't know what Huntsville is. Huntsville is the biggest fucking deal on the planet that you have never heard of. Now, like, is the Silicon Valley of government national security technology and intelligence community technology and aerospace technology. Huntsville is like the hub. Like, we are number three on the first strike launch list. If first strike happens, three targets, Huntsville will be one of them. Allafuckingbama. Allafuckingbama. This is Alabama dude in the Deep South. We're in the top three first strike. We're in the top three first strike because you haven't heard of us. That's why. It's on purpose. I started the institute for one reason. One reason, the institute. I started it as a public facing persona to disclose antigravity technology through because I told Mark this, if you stick your neck out in public, at least someone notices if your head gets chopped off. If you stick your neck out in private, fuck you. They will bury you. They will burn down your house while you're sleeping in your bed, and it won't even make the news.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Here is Dr. Amy Eskridge standing in front of a conference room full of people trying to find anyone willing to help her research anti-gravity propulsion. You can see it in her face. She knows what's coming. She told people she'd been warned and told several times to stop. She told people her harassment was escalating. She built public-facing companies because she believed going dark meant disappearing. She was found dead at 34. No investigation released. The 11th scientist connected to this pattern. She didn't hide. They killed her anyway.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to focus on funding as the central thread running through the discussions. The speakers discuss private money as a partial source, but highlight a broader funding landscape that includes black budgets, academic budgets, and private interests. - The dialogue identifies funding or lack thereof as the common denominator, with questions about available money and private investment, including whether angel investors are involved. - Speaker 1 explains the banking and funding landscape: black budgets are well funded; academic budgets are nonexistent because they’re considered acceptable to be so; and there are random billionaires who fund anti-gravity or fringe projects because they want recognition beyond their primary business. They mention several examples of private funders: - The church’s fried chicken billionaire funded the Hathaway Lab. - Robert Bigelow, associated with Bigelow Aerospace, is another billionaire funder. - There are other anonymous or less well-known funders who support such projects. - The core problem identified is consistent: money is the barrier, not technology or talent. The project team has observed government and academic research, noting that funding is the persistent obstacle. - To address this, Speaker 1 describes building an institute that pools money from these hobbyist billionaires into a large, stable pot. The goal is a safe, well-funded sandbox for bright people to pursue research without being affected by government budget cycles, tenure concerns, or a single investor’s changing interest or withdrawal. - This institute would select promising projects to fund, creating a new vehicle for financing this type of research. The idea is to avoid overreliance on a single wealthy patron and to maintain stability. - The conversation touches on the strategic value of private funding in the “black world” versus an open, illuminated world, noting that the illuminated world can be a spawning ground for ideas that may eventually benefit broader programs. There is a suggestion that it’s not in the black world’s interest to keep everything completely closed, given potential cross-pollination of ideas. There is mention of Griffin’s position and his connection to DARPA and UAH, implying overlapping influence or interest. - The speakers reflect on whether NASA is still a research organization, and discuss the risk to innovators who fear disappearing when working in public or private sectors. - Speaker 1 notes that ether in space is claimed by some, and expresses interest in talking to more people who hold similar views. - A concluding thread from Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 reiterates the tension between public and private funding, the need for stable, diverse funding sources, and the ongoing interest in discussions about ether and related space phenomena.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We talked about funding, and that that that seems to be the common denominator of all this stuff. Yes. Funding or lack of it? Yeah. Who's where is there any money? Do you know are are you aware of any private money that's being spent on this? Speaker 1: Or Yes. Speaker 0: Is anybody talking to angel investors or that sort of stuff? Speaker 1: Or Let me give you the down low on the banking situation. So you've got your black budgets that obviously is well funded, and then you have your academic budget, which is nonexistent because they think it's okay. And then you have your random billionaires who have a hobby. Right? And they made their money doing something else, but they are applying their money towards weird anti gravity stuff just because they wanna be known for something other than what they made their money in. So there's several there's a handful of, like, random billionaires running around who fund these types of things. The church's fried chicken, the billionaire, funded the Hathaway Lab. The American Best Inn and Suites billionaire Robert Bigelow, of course, is Bigelow Aerospace. There are some others that I know of, but we're we're really trying to address that problem with the institute that we're doing because I've I've been in I've seen government research. I've seen academic research. I've seen private research, and money is always the problem. The technology is never the problem. The technology is there, and the talent is there. The money is never there. So what we've done with the institute is we've we've sort of assembled some of these random people with big budgets and a hobby, and we've said, hey. Can can we, like, pool money into, like, a big stable pot of money so that we can have, like, a safe, well funded sandbox for people smart people to play in and not have to worry about government election cycles affecting their budget or tenure affecting their budget or even when you find your billionaire, like, sometimes the billionaire runs out of money or loses interest or run their you know, disappears. So you can't just be dependent on one wealthy investor. You need a big pot of money that's stable that you know isn't going anywhere. So that's what we're trying to do with the institute is just fund the institute and then pick projects that we think are promising and then fund those. So we're kinda creating, a new vehicle for funding this type of research. That that's that's kind of the approach I'm taking right now. Speaker 0: Is there any possibility Speaker 1: Yeah. We noticed that. Anytime. Yeah. Speaker 0: And they disappear. But, I mean, it's to the black world's advantage to keep the illuminated world going because that acts as a spawning ground for ideas that they might not have in Blackwood. So it's it's not necessarily their advantage to keep it completely executive. And and and potentially, since Griffin is now at the pinnacle of the group that that controls DARPA, he has a history that goes through UAH, Yeah. Speaker 1: I've thought about that. The the combination of the private and the and the, you know, public private institution and then kind of working with the the blacker budget. Speaker 0: A quote from Griffin. Speaker 1: A quote from Griffin. Speaker 0: NASA is no longer by any means a research organization. What about the innovator who's afraid of disappearing? Speaker 1: That's a whole another problem. I think doing it in the public is better in that case. That that's a different Speaker 0: It does mean you will disappear. Even if you do it in the public, it still don't mean that the emitter won't disappear for a lot of reasons. But mainly. Mhmm. Do you see to an inventor who claims ether in space? Ether does exist Speaker 1: I I know a lot of people like that too, and I'm interested in talking to more of them.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

More from the interview - https://t.co/yxwubUDFdP

@PaulSmi04395825 - Paul Smith

Dr. Amy Eskridge: 'The Manna World Holdings Trust claim to be anti-cabal but really they are a freaking criminal Russian gang and collect intel on scientists.' 👎 ACTUALLY it's a CIA CULT run through a Dissociative Graduate known as Kimberly Ann Goguen! https://t.co/yzJgSEXhtS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses an organization called Mana World Holdings Trust, which they assert presents itself as the anti cabal. According to the speaker, this group is, in reality, a Russian criminal gang. The gang purportedly collects intelligence on scientists and engages with potential targets via email, claiming, “We’re the Anti Cabal, and we’re in a, like, outside nation state banking jurisdiction, and we have all the gold from the Crusades, and we would like to fund you for a $100,000,000.” The gang’s stated aim is to obtain the potential target’s white paper, and the speaker notes that, despite proclaiming themselves the anti cabal, the true activity is a recruitment or coercion scheme rather than a genuine anti-cabal effort. The speaker emphasizes that the group’s communications are designed to lure researchers with promises of significant funding while they seek to acquire technical or strategic documents in the form of the target’s white paper. They describe a hierarchical process: the Russian gangs first “scope you out for intel” and, if they decide you’re worth pursuing, they refer you to “the operational groups.” These operational groups, the speaker claims, are the ones responsible for more invasive activities. According to the speaker, once referred to the operational groups, the target faces more direct and alarming actions. The operational groups are described as moving into the apartment across the parking lot from the target and physically stalking them in their hometown. The transition from the self gathering group to the operational group is portrayed as a significant escalation, with the speaker stressing that this referral step marks a dangerous shift in the nature of the targeting. Key points highlighted include: - Mana World Holdings Trust claims to be the anti cabal but is characterized by the speaker as a Russian criminal gang. - The gang collects intelligence on scientists and uses email outreach to lure targets with promises of large funding and access to “outside nation state banking jurisdiction” resources. - They claim to possess “all the gold from the Crusades” and offer funding of $100,000,000 in exchange for the target’s white paper. - The objective appears to be obtaining the target’s white paper rather than genuine collaboration. - A two-tier process is described: initial self gathering group that scopes targets, followed by referral to operational groups. - The operational groups allegedly engage in physical stalking, moving into the target’s vicinity, such as an apartment across the parking lot, and stalking in the hometown. The speaker warns that, when referred from the self gathering group to the operational group, the situation becomes “really bad.” The overall narrative portrays a process of deception, recruitment, and aggressive, physical intimidation by a criminal network masquerading as an anti cabal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever talked to a group that claims to be the anti cabal? Okay. The Mana World Holdings Trust is they claim to be the anti cabal, but, really, they're just a freaking Russian criminal gang. And they they they collect intel basically on scientists. And they, like, email you, and they're like, hey. We're the Anti Cabal, and we're we're in a, like, outside nation state banking jurisdiction, and we have all the gold from the Crusades, and we would like to fund you for a $100,000,000. And then we talked to them, and they just want your white paper. They just want your white paper. And they're like, we're the anti cabal. There's gonna be a a dark financial flip where, like, the whole background flips, but, like, the public people are still the same for government. We're the anti cabal. It's Manoworld Holdings Trust, but, like, it's really just a Russian criminal gang that's, like, scooping you out. And what happens is, like, the Russian gangs that, like, scope you out for intel, if they decide that you're worth looking into, they refer you to the operational groups. And then the operational groups are the ones that fucking, like, move into the apartment across the parking lot from you and stalk you physically in your hometown. Like, when you get referred from the self gathering group to the operational group, it's really bad.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

People keep asking why Amy Eskridge called Hal Puthoff and Lue Elizondo "evil" before she died. Here's why- Puthoff is a high ranking physicist and "former" CIA contractor who ran the government's psychic espionage program at SRI International, then embedded himself in every major UAP research effort for decades. Top security clearances. Briefed Congress. Also, the Vice President of Tom DeLonge's To The Stars Academy. Elizondo is a former Army counterintelligence agent who claims he ran AATIP, the Pentagon's UAP investigation program. Went public in 2017 as a 'whistleblower,' appeared on 60 Minutes, wrote a bestseller, and became the face of the disclosure movement. Most people see these two as heroes fighting for transparency. Amy Eskridge saw them as the opposite. She believed they were gatekeepers. Not fighting the system. Running it. Controlling what gets out and what stays buried. Putting themselves at the front of the disclosure parade so they could decide where it marches. Her whole thesis was that anti-gravity technology had been discovered and suppressed repeatedly. "Antigravity's been found a dozen times, and suppressed every time." She believed that classified aerospace contractors absorbed scientists and their breakthroughs into black-budget programs that would never see the light of day. That's why she built her research companies in public. She believed working in the shadows meant disappearing. Figuratively and literally. So when Elizondo showed up offering to fund her work and "protect her bismuth breakthroughs from Beijing," she didn't see a genuine ally. She saw the exact absorption pattern she'd been warning others and worrying about. Classified guys show up, offer to "protect your research", and suddenly your work disappears into a SCIF and you never publish again. She didn't trust them because she believed the 'disclosure movement' itself was a containment strategy. A controlled drip and a managed narrative. They give just enough to keep people interested, never enough to actually change anything. While the researchers doing real work in the open kept getting threatened. https://t.co/6Zpk9TWmmp

@RealArea503 - Area503

Amy Eskridge belived that Hal Puthoff and @LueElizondo are "EVIL" She also had some (not so) nice things to say about Robert Bigelow. Very interesting.🤔 #ufowtitter #ufox #uapx #uaptwitter

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Low energy, low pressure, room temperature, brachiocovalent bond. That sounds like John Hutchinson, though. He was telekinetic, though. He didn't have any science. I'm not so sure about I I don't trust Hal put up for shit. Hal says he's telekinetic. I heard it from his face. Yeah. Yeah. And and Hal you know you know who Hal really is? A liar, though. Hal is the doctor from Stranger Things who, like, will torture a little alien kid. Get all the juice out of their brain. You just actually extremely evil. Yes. No. I've met the man. He's extremely evil. He's very quiet. He listens more than he talks. But you can tease things out of him, but it's only what he wants you to tease out of him. He's like a nice old grandpa. Like, you talk to him and he's, like, quiet and sweet and gentle like a nice old grandpa, but he's evil as fuck. It's creepy. Lou is evil. Brandenburg is evil. Brandenburg is, like, super evil. Evil. I have I know people that have worked for Bob Bob Bigelow, like Tim Pickens, like, one of my technical advisers, and I had a intro offer for Bob Bigelow. And I was like, I called Tim. I know you worked for Bob. Should I pitch Bob? Should I pitch Bob? And Tim's like, no. Tim's like, no. No. No. I was his head of propulsion. I did these other projects for him. And he was like, Bob will nickel and dime you to fucking death. He'll take over your budget. He'll want final approval over everything. He'll want majority equity. He'll take over your project and it's not yours anymore. It's his. And then I called Jan because I knew that Jan had worked with him. I was like, hey, Jan. Should I pitch Bob Bigelow? And Jan was like, no. He'll nickel and dime you to death. He'll take over your project. He'll, like, take control of your budget. No. Don't pitch Bob. So yeah."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Low energy, low pressure, room temperature, brachiocovalent bond. That sounds like John Hutchinson, though. He was telekinetic, though. He didn't have any science. I'm not so sure about I I don't trust Hal put up for shit. Hal says he's telekinetic. I heard it from his face. Yeah. Yeah. And and Hal you know you know who Hal really is? A liar, though. Hal is the doctor from Stranger Things who, like, will torture a little alien kid. Get all the juice out of their brain. You just actually extremely evil. Yes. No. I've met the man. He's extremely evil. He's very quiet. He listens more than he talks. But you can tease things out of him, but it's only what he wants you to tease out of him. He's like a nice old grandpa. Like, you talk to him and he's, like, quiet and sweet and gentle like a nice old grandpa, but he's evil as fuck. It's creepy. Lou is evil. Brandenburg is evil. Brandenburg is, like, super evil. Evil. I have I know people that have worked for Bob Bob Bigelow, like Tim Pickens, like, one of my technical advisers, and I had a intro offer for Bob Bigelow. And I was like, I called Tim. I know you worked for Bob. Should I pitch Bob? Should I pitch Bob? And Tim's like, no. Tim's like, no. No. No. I was his head of propulsion. I did these other projects for him. And he was like, Bob will nickel and dime you to fucking death. He'll take over your budget. He'll want final approval over everything. He'll want majority equity. He'll take over your project and it's not yours anymore. It's his. And then I called Jan because I knew that Jan had worked with him. I was like, hey, Jan. Should I pitch Bob Bigelow? And Jan was like, no. He'll nickel and dime you to death. He'll take over your project. He'll, like, take control of your budget. No. Don't pitch Bob. So yeah.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Here she is with her boyfriend at the time, scientist Mark Sokol, conversing about the two- https://t.co/3xn5TGHXI4

@RedPandaKoala - Red Panda Koala

"Hal is actually extremely evil. Lue is evil." Amy Eskridge, anti-gravity scientists who died under suspicious circumnstances in 2022, said that Hal Puthoff and Lue Elizondo are "evil". https://t.co/yZ8taCqlkf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hal is the doctor from Stranger Things who tortures a little alien kid to get all the juice out of their brain. He is actually extremely evil. I’ve met the man. He’s extremely evil. He’s very quiet; he listens more than he talks, but you can tease things out of him, and it’s only what he wants you to tease out of him. He’s like a nice old grandpa—quiet and sweet and gentle like a nice old grandpa, but he’s evil as fuck. Lou is evil. Brandenburg is evil. Brandenburg is super evil.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. And and Hal you know you know who Hal really the liar, though. Hal is the doctor from Stranger Things who, like, will torture a little alien kid. No. He is. Get all the juice out of their brain. You just is actually extremely evil. Yes. No. I've met the man. He's extremely evil. He's very quiet. He listens more than he talks. But you can tease things out of him, but it's only what he wants you to tease out of him. He's like a nice old grandpa. Like, you talk to him and he's, like, quiet and sweet and gentle like a nice old grandpa, but he's evil as fuck. It's creepy. Lou is evil. Brandenburg is evil. Brandenburg is, like, super evil.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

And for context, here's who they're talking about- https://t.co/Gm3Q9VgSNF

@RedPandaKoala - Red Panda Koala

In this version of Lue’s story of using psychic attacks on Guantanamo detainees Hal Puthoff was the “boss” overseeing it

@RedPandaKoala - Red Panda Koala

Guantanamo Bay Official says US used psychic attacks on detainees

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was running portions of Guantanamo Bay involving high value detainees. We decided to conduct an experiment where a few of us would get into a skiff. We had a brown bag lunch, and we maybe thought we could try to remove you. I had been to the detention facility before. I got to be really careful what I say here. I can get a hell of a lot of trouble. Not realizing if we were effective or not, and then, lo and behold, not too long later, a major news media article came out, I'm not gonna say which one, that detailed this detainee's experience with what apparently the detainee perceived as five white figures over his bed, shaking his bed. That's And so I called up Hal Pudoff and I told him, hey, boss, I, you know, I think we need to stop because now the front page of the newspaper that might not have been the front page, but one of the front pages of the sections there. And he kind of chuckled and he says, Yeah.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was running portions of Guantanamo Bay involving high value detainees. And we decided to conduct an experiment where a few of us would get into a skiff. We had a brown bag lunch, and we maybe thought we could try to remove you. And I had been to the detention facility before. I got to be really careful what I say here. I can get a hell of a lot of trouble. Not realizing if we were effective or not, and then, lo and behold, not too long later, a major news media article came out, I'm not gonna say which one, that detailed this detainee's experience with what apparently the detainee perceived as as five white figures over his bed, shaking his bed. That's And so so I called up Hal Pudoff and I told him, I said, hey, boss, I, you know, I think we need to stop because now the front page of the newspaper that might not have been the front page, but one of the front pages of the sections there. And he kind of chuckled and he says, Yeah.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

and - https://t.co/6sfpbcOiNo

@RedPandaKoala - Red Panda Koala

This detainee who claims satanic rituals were performed on GITMO detainees specifically names the US Remote Viewing program “Project Stargate” as one of the sources of US knowledge of black magic

@RedPandaKoala - Red Panda Koala

Guantanamo Bay Detainee says the US uses satanic and black magic on prisoners "They took some of the prisoners and put them in a hexagram star in a dark room. And they stuck there sexually explicit pictures and pictures of children with their heads cut off and other body

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Here from the same interview, is Dr. Amy Eskridge describing the intimidation and threats she endured, and a cyber-security specialist confirming "she wasn't crazy" about what was happening. https://t.co/whtTbgdlgF

@PaulSmi04395825 - Paul Smith

Dr. Amy Eskridge: 'I hired this cyber security company run by the former CIO of Northrop Grumman (Travis Garriss). And he was like, 'Hey, I've been spending 35 years in counter-espionage specifically for the Navy - specifically for advanced propulsion.' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqKEgAVGxEU https://t.co/8rwRH9hRyv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The narrator hired a new cybersecurity company run by the former CIO of Northrop Grumman, who has “thirty five years in counter espionage specifically for the navy, specifically for advanced propulsion,” and was the chief information officer for Northrop Grumman. The narrator promised the CIO a series of “really crazy ass stories” about electronic and physical surveillance, stalking, and “weird ass death and sexual threats” and asked him to reserve judgment until the end, ready to hear if they were insane or not. The CIO told him, “I wish I could tell you that you were insane, but you're totally not.” He apologized, saying he was trying to let him down gently, and that the stories he’d heard were not unique: “the stories you've told me, I've heard from other young women in technology positions.” They do it “on purpose” to make you feel you can’t tell anyone, and they “pose as, like, agents on their own government.” He urged the narrator to protect herself and to tell others, but he waits until he has five or six “smoking guns” before speaking up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're like so I hired this new cybersecurity company, and it's run by the c the former CIO of Northrop Grumman. I was referred to him for a reason. And he's like, hey. I've been spending thirty five years in counter espionage specifically for the navy, specifically for advanced propulsion, and I was the the chief information officer for Northrop Grumman. And I was like, okay. I'm gonna tell you a series of really crazy ass stories, and can you please reserve judgment until the end? And I told him a bunch of stories about, like, electronic and physical surveillance and stalking and, like, weird ass death and sexual threats and shit. And I got to the end, and I was like, okay. I'm ready. Tell me I'm crazy. I'm here. I'm ready. I'm insane. Tell me I'm sane. I'm I'm ready for it. Tell me. And this guy was like, I wish I could tell you that you were insane, but you're totally not. I'm so he was like, I'm so fucking sorry. He was like, trying to let me down gently. He was trying to let me down gently, and he was like, the stories you've told me, I've heard from other young women in technology positions. And he was like, they do it on purpose. They do, like, crazy ass shit to you that is unbelievable just so that you feel like you can't tell anyone. And they pose as, like, agents on their own government. Is that I tell everyone. And I tell people, like, protect yourself. I tell people, but I wait until I have five or six smoking guns before I open my mouth.

@DanteTheDon - Dante

And here in this clip, Dr. Amy Eskridge describes her vision for sharing her world-changing discovery with the world- FOR FREE - via open source libraries. This is most likely what got her killed https://t.co/J8REVOQE0z

@AshtonForbes - Ashton Forbes

**Amy Eskridge - Disclosure** Amy Eskridge was a scientist who researched anti-gravity technology and wanted to help the world. She is tragically not with us anymore, but we can still learn from her. Disclosure doesn't come from the top down. We need to wake people up. Amy believed we could disclose advanced technology in an open source fashion via libraries to get the information out to the public. She realized that gatekeepers control the flow of information in peer-reviewed journals. Amy understood the politics of UFO disclosure. "You can't be calling these people like, 'can I disclose UFOs tomorrow?'" You need credible people in the media that are brave enough to tell people the hard truths. She calls out one such journalist by name: Tucker Carlson. We need Tucker Carlson to tell the masses, "There is more to this world than we've been led to believe." To Amy: Rest in Peace. We'll take it from here. #MH370x #UFOtwitter #UFOx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses a vision for disclosure centered on distributing information through libraries on a specific day. He states his plan to publish the paper on archive.com, arguing that it cannot be published in a peer-reviewed journal because “the peer review committee will laugh you out of there, but they'll send it to all of their friends.” Speaker 1 outlines a aggressive media strategy: assemble a group of all possible media vendors they can control, provide them with all the information at once, and “spam the Internet with it.” Speaker 0 emphasizes the need for partnerships well in advance of the disclosure window. He says you cannot ask people to disclose UFOs tomorrow; you have to be in talks with them already. He notes that they need to select the most credible person they can get who will publish it and talk about it on TV, and he mentions Tucker Carlson as the person they were considering.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So my vision of disclosure, I like the library thing, sending it to libraries on a certain day. What I had sort of envisioned is I want to publish the paper on archive.com because you absolutely fucking lutely cannot publish this in a peer reviewed journal because the peer review committee will laugh you out of there, but they'll send it to all of their friends. Speaker 1: We need to reach out. We need to have a group of all of the media vendors that we can possibly control and ask them all to pitch in. Give them all the information all at once and just spam the Internet with it. Speaker 0: We need partnerships well ahead of time period. Like you can't be calling these people to be like, can I disclose UFOs tomorrow? You have to be like in talks with these people. And so we we need to pick Mark and I have been talking about this already. We need to pick the most credible person we can possibly get who will publish it and talk about it on TV. I was thinking Tucker Carlson

@DanteTheDon - Dante

Here was Dr. Amy Eskridge, in her anti-gravity propulsion presentation, talking about a fellow propulsion scientist who mysteriously disappeared after receiving threats. “What about the innovator that’s afraid of disappearing?… That’s a whole other problem… Like Dr. Ning Li”. Around the 1:02:53 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmhFKiq6FG8&t=1s

@DanteTheDon - Dante

This is a text message Amy Eskridge sent before she died. Her hands are burned red like gloves. She said it 'hit my whole upper body as I was typing on my computer.' She wasn't near a stove. She wasn't in a lab. She was sitting at home working on her computer. https://t.co/jgj3V5SrWW

View Full Interactive Feed