TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DavidKrayden
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the newest outrage from the BC ostrich farm—the mess left by Inspection Canada, RCMP, and BCRCMP: hundreds of hay bales opened, supposedly contaminated with avian-flu blood and guts so wild birds could nest. Is this what CFIA calls bio-containment? Grass can't grow through all these bales.
@DavidKrayden - David Krayden
Newest outrage from the BC ostrich farm. This is the mess the @InspectionCan and @rcmpgrcpolice @BCRCMP left on the farm. Opened all the hundreds of bales of hay theoretically contaminated with blood and guts from avian flu so the wild birds 🦅 could nest in it. Is this what @MarkJCarney @CornwallHeath CFIA calls bio-containment? 👇 Grass cannot grow through all the bales they opened up.
@DavidKrayden - David Krayden
WATCH Veterinarian speaks out. What @MarkJCarney @InspectionCan is doing “just doesn’t make sense”. The Shocking TRUTH Abt the Universal Ostriches Immunity | Stand on Guard CLIP An independent outside opinion on @OstrichFarmBC ostriches health and science. https://t.co/t71BkYkPa0
Video Transcript AI Summary
"They've obviously developed some type of natural immunity because they're not clinically sick." "The worry is the virus can mutate, become even more pathogenic, cause much more disease." "Their solution? Just kill them all, wipe it out." "But it's now in the wild bird population." "How is it that you know we can wipe out all these big healthy birds on a farm and somehow think we're going to control that disease?" "Destroy the birds, you destroy the science." "Cruelty to animals, it violates the criminal code of Canada." "Couldn't the ostriches just been quarantined where they are, it's a very isolated spot, repeatedly tested for the avian flu?" "Why can there not be some type of flexibility?" "Risk science it's here. Too bad all your birds are gonna die." "In my opinion, yeah there really could have been and should have been and should be."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just doesn't make sense. What about the ethics of this? All these healthy now surviving, you know, 100 ostriches. They're eating, they're drinking. They've obviously developed some type of natural immunity because they're not clinically sick.
They're not showing any signs of the flu. They're 100% normal. So they went through the court process. They asked for leniency. They kind of moved up different levels of the courts.
In all cases, even when they've gone and had an appeal, things have eventually been denied. So now we're at the point where they've exhausted all the court processes, they've exhausted all their appeals, and you know the CFIA inspectors and those who are gonna do the mass call were on the farm as of yesterday. The CFIA they say it's about stopping the virus before it spreads. Their worry is the virus can mutate, become even more pathogenic, cause much more disease. And yes in some cases it can jump to people and yes that's happened.
So their solution? Just kill them all, wipe it out. We're gonna stamp out this disease. But it's now in the wild bird population, right? We're not going to gather the hundreds of millions of Canada geese and like wipe them all out.
They're around the world. It's endemic in the wild bird population. So how is it that you know we can wipe out all these big healthy birds on a farm and somehow think we're going to control that disease? That is not realistic. There's activists.
There are literally thousands of people across North America to make high profile figures. RFK, The US Health Secretary, has spoken about this. Doctor Oz has spoken about this. There are thousands and thousands of people really opposed to what's happening. One of the arguments is let's look at these birds from the point of view from science.
I mean how did they develop this immunity? Like could we not study these surviving birds and learn something about how birds can then develop immunity to avian flu? How did they fight that off? Destroy the birds, you destroy the science. And then the obvious argument about seeing this avian flu being endemic in the wild bird population, like just doesn't make any sense.
Like you're not going to control that disease by just wiping out these individual farm herds when it's like endemic. It's all on this wild bur population. And these ostriches, they're in a very isolated part of the world. This teeny little community are tucked into the mountains. Doesn't make sense.
What about the ethics of this? It obviously isn't just about science. Mean I first of all like killing 400 healthy animals? From a veterinarian point of view I understand the need like we've got serious infectious disease. We don't want other people being exposed to serious infectious disease.
We don't expose other animals to it. But it doesn't mean that we take like a healthy animal that's recovered from an illness, we just kill them. My god they didn't really teach us that in vet school. She was quoted as saying she didn't see how they can kill this many large large animals humanely. As she rightfully said, cruelty to animals, it violates the criminal code of Canada.
Specifically the act says that an animal owner cannot cause unnecessary injury, pain or suffering to any animal. She said it's not possible to kill via shooting all these large and heavy birds without causing this big mass panic. They don't have an easy enclosed space. You can't just round them all up and slit their throats. Because the point of euthanasia is doing it humanely in terms of where we're not causing any ill or distress to these animals.
And I don't know, you're not going to humanely euthanize 400 big, big ostriches. A bunch of alternatives were proposed none of those are accepted. Couldn't the ostriches just been quarantined where they are, it's a very isolated spot, repeatedly tested for the avian flu? And could they not have just culled, essentially euthanized just those that tested positive? And now you've got this herd of 400 animals which look 100% healthy?
You know, population exposed to a disease, they develop the ability to fight off that disease, develop antibodies in response to the virus. They're looking pretty darn healthy now. Yet the CFIA says like there can be no exceptions. Like if you make one exception then what do you know, everybody is going to want us to not kill their burs if they test positive for avian flu. Like okay, is that really a bad thing?
Why can there not be some type of flexibility? Why does it have to be so like black or white or rigid? Isn't that what we're trying to get to period? Isn't that some of our problems right now as a society? It's all kind of black or white.
It's got to be this or else. Like okay, there's probably some middle ground we could reach and applying some common sense and if we plied it in this case probably these 400 animals wouldn't be dying. Really what we're trying to do is balance science, risk, compassion. Obviously that's not happening. They're just saying like, Risk science it's here.
Too bad all your birds are gonna die. Whether it's humanely or not, who knows? Do these animals really have to die or could there have been another way? In my opinion, yeah there really could have been and should have been and should be.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it would be unfortunate for Katie's ostrich to go viral, giving these tyrants unwanted fame. I'm committed to supporting Katie and the Universal Ostrich Farm's dancing ostrich. It's time for the authorities to step back and let the farmers care for their healthy ostriches.
@DavidKrayden - David Krayden
Wouldn't it be a shame to make Katie's ostrich go viral and make these tyrants become famous around the world. Resolve to resist by standing up for #savetheostriches. Stand by Katie and the Universal Ostrich farm's dancing ostrich @OstrichFarmBC @InspectionCan & @rcmpgrcpolice & @MarkJCarney need to stand down so the farmers can feed their healthy ostriches! @elonmusk
@DavidKrayden - David Krayden
NEW PARLIAMENTARY REPORT RELEASED NOV. 5, 2024 👇👇 https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/CACN/Reports/RP13349277/cacnrp08/cacnrp08-e.pdf THE NEXUS BETWEEN SCIENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN CANADA: THE CASE OF THE NATIONAL MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORY IN WINNIPEG. Interim Report of the Special Committee on the Canada People’s Republic of China Relationship
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing a breaking report suggesting that the Trudeau government may have compromised Canada's security to hide a secret Chinese operation. This report was released on November 5, 2024, coinciding with the U.S. election, possibly to distract Donald Trump from noticing it.
@DavidKrayden - David Krayden
BREAKING! The Canada Connection Trudeau Does NOT Want YOU to Know About | WATCH Stand on Guard CLIP Did the Trudeau Government put Canada's security at risk to cover up this secret Chinese operation? NEW Report released November 5, 2024, released on the USA election day, because Justin Trudeau does not want Donald Trump, the USA President elect to notice this. We provide you with the Stand on guard Receipts below in the reply. 🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent report revealed that two Chinese spies worked at the Winnipeg microbiology lab, sending sensitive materials to the People's Liberation Army. Despite warnings from CSIS, the Canadian government took no action until the spies were quietly sent back to China, coinciding with a snap election in 2021. Questions arise about potential quid pro quo arrangements between the Trudeau government and China, especially regarding election financing. The report suggests that the spies participated in the 1,000 Talents Program, aimed at transferring knowledge back to China. There are concerns about the implications of this espionage, including the origins of COVID-19. The government has failed to comply with requests for documents related to the case, raising further questions about accountability and national security. The situation calls for vigilance and a demand for transparency in the face of potential cover-ups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I want to get to a story here that broke yesterday. Nothing in the mainstream media about it yet. This report is incredible, and you're gonna hear more about this when I have a chance to digest this because I've I've written about this extensively the last March for the postmillennial, and I reported on it on this program. And this, of course, is the scandal that we had 2 Chinese spies working in the
Speaker 1: Winnipeg microbiology lab.
Speaker 0: It's a top secret lab. We had 2 spies working there who were dedicated communists. They were sending back material and documentation
Speaker 1: to the People's Liberation Army of China. You might remember the story. CSIS warned the
Speaker 0: government about this months in advance.
Speaker 1: Nothing was done. Trudeau did nothing. The minister of health did nothing. The minister of public safety did nothing.
Speaker 0: Finally, these 2 were told, you better go home. There's a problem here. And suddenly, we had a snap election in 2021. Why do you suppose that was? Was there a quid pro quo between China and
Speaker 1: the Liberal government that if nothing was said and these two were just booted back to China, everything would be okay? And by the way, maybe you could help finance the election. It's poly your polyam conservative leader has already said. That's why we had that snap election.
Speaker 0: Now my friend Sam Cooper, who's been on this show twice to talk about Chinese election interference, was first at bat writing about this, saying, ceases ward health Canada of
Speaker 1: insider threat from Wuhan Institute and scientists
Speaker 0: and lethal Ebola was sent to China. Now the question, of course, you're all wondering was, does that mean COVID might have been manufactured in Canada? I don't know, and I can't categorically make that statement or make that accusation. But it's sure looking more like that the more we know about this story. Now this parliamentary report
Speaker 1: from the committee that was charged with looking into Chinese interference released
Speaker 0: this on November 5th, the day of the presidential election. Do you find that just a bit suspicious?
Speaker 1: Do you think perhaps they wanted to bury this report
Speaker 0: because it's potentially hugely embarrassing,
Speaker 1: catastrophically embarrassing, if this means that these guys were actually doing what potentially they could have been. And this is the question we need answered. Thanks. Can't
Speaker 0: put my glasses on and read this one. See the program that these 2 were here for include the 1,000 talents program which uses incentives such as salaries, research funding, and laboratory space to encourage the Chinese researchers abroad to transmit knowledge to the People's Republic of China. You can't state it any clearer than this, and this is from the report. And the and and to be and and if you wanted to be eligible for the 1,000 talents program, you had to have a special passion for the socialist motherland, meaning you had to be really enthusiastic about communist China. And what do they do?
They send you overseas and the Trudeau government says, come on into our lab and go ahead. You can send material back to China. And that's exactly what they did. Nobody really wanted to call this espionage when this story was released in March. I called it espionage.
Clearly, that's what they were doing, spying.
Speaker 1: When you take material or documents,
Speaker 0: you remove them from the lab and you send them back to your home country, that's called spying. That's called espionage. Now these 2 resurfaced back in China, of course. They were sent back, probably given a medal for doing such a great job, but we know the COVID vaccine sorry. The COVID virus emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
We know that. We don't know a 100% that it was on purpose.
Speaker 1: Could have been an accident, but it
Speaker 0: could have been on purpose. It could have been a bioweapon produced by the Chinese to create international chaos and carnage, killing millions of people, causing economic catastrophe, leading to authoritarian governments, leading to things like the COVID mandates and lockdowns in Canada, leading to the Emergencies Act declaration by Justin Trudeau because people were sick and tired of those mandates and he pushed them down. Think of the effects of COVID. And this is all documented in this report. On 31st March 2021, the House of Commons special committee on the Canada People's Republic of China relationship adopted a motion ordering the release of unredacted PHAC documents relating to the dismissal of these two doctors.
The government failed to comply with the order, and so the special committee subsequently adopted a second order for the documents. Again, the government failed to comply. The speaker of the house was sued, if you recall, by
Speaker 1: the Trudeau government because he told the government to release the documents. You recall that?
Speaker 0: And here here are these scientists, aka spies, who worked in Canada at the Winnipeg by, microbiology lab. Top secret place. Top secret laboratory. And
Speaker 1: the question we need to know now is what were they really
Speaker 0: up to? We need more evidence, but clearly the 2021 of snap election
Speaker 1: was a direct result
Speaker 0: of this scandal, of this cover up. The Trudeau government has been covering this up now for over 3 years 4 years. Sorry. And this is an absolute. Not it's not just a scandal.
It goes beyond scandal. This is a disgrace. This is a national disgrace, especially if this goes as far as it might. And this is what we have to determine here, folks. How grievous was this total breakdown in security and intelligence?
And it only was a breakdown not because and I don't often praise the work of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. They're far too focused on social conservatives, pro life activists, and parental rights supporters. But CSIS was doing its job here, and it reported a huge problem. So there was espionage going on in this lab, and the government should do something about it. The government ignored that advice for 7 months.
During that 7 months, anything, almost literally anything could have happened in that lab. Now, how would you feel Canada was indicted
Speaker 1: as being responsible in any way for the production of COVID. I'm not
Speaker 0: saying it happened. I can't say that yet, but that's where this intelligence, that's where this information is headed. And it makes me extremely angry that the Trudeau government covered this up, did not want questions asked and wanted a snap election
Speaker 1: right after this occurred. Was there a quid pro quo?
Speaker 0: I've asked that in the past. I'll ask it again. Was there? Did the government get something back from China for allowing these 2 to go quietly back, for saying absolutely nothing about what happened here. And if absolutely nothing meant a cover up about the production of the pandemic, that is incredible.
And that's what we need to know right now, folks. That's what we need to get, I hate to say it, to the bottom of. I wrote this story for the postmillennial way back in March here
Speaker 1: because Polya at the time was putting 2 and 2 together and saying, Hold it.
Speaker 0: Why did we have a snap election
Speaker 1: right after this? Right after these 2 are suddenly sent back to China and we and we know
Speaker 0: that information was being sent back
Speaker 1: to the People's Liberation Army. Why did we suddenly have an election? Now, Polyov hasn't made the accusation that there was a quid pro quo,
Speaker 0: But I think he should at least ask the question of whether there was a link between these 2 and whether or not the liberal government received assistance from China, because we know Chinese election interference has included the support of liberal MPs in
Speaker 1: the Greater Toronto Area. We know that. We know that's what this that's why we had the whole inquiry, which is really I don't think it's going to ever come to any logical conclusion.
Speaker 0: But that's why we had the whole inquiry. Not because we were worried about India, but because we know that China was helping Justin Trudeau. That's why Justin Trudeau doesn't wanna talk
Speaker 1: about this issue at all.
Speaker 0: So we're gonna be hearing more about this in
Speaker 1: the next few days and can't wait to have Kyle Kemper
Speaker 0: on the show. We'll be talking about what the election of Donald Trump means for Canada, Yes. And for the US. But also what it means for freedom around the world, for freedom of speech, for perhaps the end of more COVID mandates or more pandemic mandates or more infringement upon our basic right to decide what we do with our lives. And, damn it, the conservative party of Canada had better stand up and take notice of what happened this week in the United States.
It's good news for Canada. You're gonna see the mainstream media continue to talk about this being a catastrophe, about this being devastating for Canada. It's going to mean horrible consequences. But the mainstream media is on its last legs. It probably won't be around, as I said, and even a minimized form of what it is today because people no longer watch it.
People no longer read it. People no longer believe it. People no longer trust it because it skews lies and projects that on everybody else. They are the kings of misinformation, but yet they accuse everybody else of spreading misinformation and disinformation just like Justin Trudeau.
Speaker 1: The times, they are a changing folks. And with Donald Trump in the White House, we might have a chance for peace. We might
Speaker 0: have a chance not to have a nuclear war, to have a 3rd world war, which was, I think, a very real possibility had Donald Trump lost this election. We just have to keep an eye on the deep state right now in terms of how they are going to move against President-elect Trump before he becomes president on January 20th. Don't drink the Kool Aid folks. Don't listen to Justin Trudeau. We need this kind of attitude right now because let me tell you, Justin Trudeau will fight tooth and nail to stay as leader of the Liberal Party and as prime minister of Canada, and he will use every trick in the Liberal handbook to do that.
So we have to be vigilant, and we have to be have to have perseverance to fight this battle to the end. As I've been saying since this station went on the air. We need to resolve to resist, And we need to fight for our free speech and our democratic rights to say what we believe. To speak. As John Diefenbaker said, and don't forget that t shirt that's available out there in the store, I speak as a free Canadian.
Free to speak, free to believe in what I choose. And Justin Trudeau is not going to interfere with that. Thanks for being a part of the Krayden's Right resistance, and we'll see you again soon. So we are in a very precarious position in this country. We need a political change, but we also need to resolve to resist.