TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DeAngelisCorey

Saved - January 14, 2026 at 5:18 AM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The Chicago Teachers Union doesn't know how to spell "Governor." https://t.co/FLJAJz3AbQ

Saved - January 2, 2026 at 5:23 AM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: An independent journalist just confronted someone at place listed as a "childcare center" in Washington state. They said it WASN'T A CHILDCARE CENTER. Records show they've received $864,000 in taxpayer money since mid-2023. They're registered for THREE kids. https://t.co/7XYz7HH0Pk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video documents a visit to what is alleged to be Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington. Speaker 0 asks, “Hi. Is this is this Halauli childcare?,” and is told, “No. No? There’s no childcare here?” They respond, “No childcare. Okay. God. Thank you so much. Have a good one.” The clip repeats, “There’s no childcare,” and notes that they were at Halauli, described as “what’s allegedly Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington,” which is “right behind me right here.” The speaker says they went to the door and mentions that the exact address listed on the state website shows the center receiving over $800,000 in 2023. The closing remark reiterates, “They claim there’s no child care here.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Is this is this Halauli childcare? No. No? There's no childcare here? No childcare. Okay. God. Thank you so much. Have a good one. There's no childcare. Alright, guys. We were just at Halauli, what's allegedly Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington, which is right behind me right here. I went to the door. The exact address listed on the state website, receiving over $800,000 in 2023. They claim there's no child care here.
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 4:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am the Director of Race and Equity at UCLA, and my recent posts have stirred controversy. I expressed strong opinions about certain individuals, including comments on free speech and the death of public figures. I noted that my role involves revolutionizing DEI in higher education. After facing backlash for my remarks, particularly regarding Charlie Kirk, I deactivated my BlueSky account. Additionally, there have been issues with the UCLA EDI website, which is currently showing an error page.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

He is the Director of Race and Equity at UCLA. https://t.co/kn2mbppb7C

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Guess I'm evil, then." https://t.co/P0zI0RrJAG

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"It is all white people." https://t.co/e5CoylXtje

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"It's all white people." https://t.co/aQZalpwqkP

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Director of Race and Equity" at @UCLA. https://t.co/dyq1HH1AjX

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "Typical white" https://t.co/0Jw1OTXv2N

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "I'm currently being paid to preserve and, really, revolutionize 'DEI' in higher ed." https://t.co/cEY57Phe8U

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "Why shouldn't he be dead?" https://t.co/kdeHZeEm73

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "Good riddance." https://t.co/lm1QcXiXcw

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "Dude made this bed; reaped what he sowed; chickens coming home to roost, etc." https://t.co/8SegTzGAZc

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "I'm always glad when bigots die, so." https://t.co/YWWNly4sQA

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "F*ck Around and Find Out is really doing its thing, lately." https://t.co/7KlJLSKZhu

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "If Hell is real, Charlie Kirk is certainly in it now." https://t.co/YqTOFuLAv5

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA "Fun weekend." https://t.co/UxcX0GnjIV

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA Link to his Bluesky post: https://bsky.app/profile/johnathanperk.bsky.social/post/3lyqgjlw46k2d https://t.co/0g1MFqpmCh

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The @UCLA Race and Equity director says free speech doesn’t apply "if you're Black."

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

He previously posted that "[we all] hope Clarence Thomas dies" when the Supreme Court justice was in the hospital. @UCLA didn't do anything about it. https://t.co/j4IaZ1FHmR

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA This error page now shows up when you go to @UCLA's "Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI)" website: https://t.co/t5XQFCh76k

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@UCLA BREAKING: The "Director of Race and Equity" at @UCLA just DEACTIVATED his BlueSky account after being exposed for his disgusting comments about Charlie Kirk’s assassination. https://t.co/KU4nfvzliu

Saved - August 20, 2025 at 9:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Undercover journalists confronted Byron Thetford, the Dean of Students at the University of West Alabama, about circumventing the state's DEI ban. He initially denied seeking loopholes but later admitted to using payroll funds for DEI, acknowledging that most come from state funds. Thetford described their approach as "mindful" and a "marketing thing," suggesting employees would continue DEI work under different titles. When asked about taxpayer concerns regarding loopholes, he expressed uncertainty. The journalists are affiliated with Accuracy in Media.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught the Dean of Students at the University of West Alabama circumventing the state’s DEI ban. He said "we can't directly fund DEI programming so we have been looking for loopholes." They confronted him about it. I have the video. Buckle up🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The administrator says "we can't directly fund DEI programming so we have been looking for loopholes." He's the Dean of Students at @univwestalabama.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

A journalist confronts the Dean of Students about him saying they're "looking for loopholes" to get around the DEI ban. He denies it at first. The @univwestalabama administrator's name is Byron Thetford.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Byron Thedford? That's me. Oh, we received a report that you were pushing DEI in defiance of the state law and seeking loopholes to get around the law. Is that true? It's not. No, sir. You've never talked about pushing loopholes to get around the law? I haven't. No. What about this video?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Byron Thedford? That's me. Oh, we received a report that you were pushing DEI in defiance of the state law and seeking loopholes to get around the law. Is that true? It's not. No, sir. You've never talked about pushing loopholes to get around the law? I haven't. No. What about this video?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist then reveals he has undercover video evidence and shows it to the Dean of Students. The journalist gets him to admit using payroll funds for DEI still uses state funds for DEI. "Payroll funds come from the state, do they not?" "Most of them do, yes."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on a video in which Speaker 1 acknowledges, "We can't directly fund DEI programming. So we have been looking for loopholes." He confirms, "That is me." He adds, "Part of this position would be working with some of that. We have some funds through our PBI grant that we would like to dedicate to that." He also says, "we do still have a chief diversity officer currently they're flexing out of that role because we have to for state purposes. If we want to continue to have state funding we had to discontinue the law DEIP." The other participant notes, "Just it going go like Florida when you're not having to completely go away it's just that you can't use state funds." They discuss payroll funds: "Part of that would be payroll funds." "Payroll funds are funds that are used to pay people. They come from the state, do they not?" "Most of them do. Yes." "Well, then they are state funds being used for DE."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about this video of you right here specifically saying? Speaker 1: So we have been looking for Speaker 0: loopholes. I mean, that does look like you. Correct? Speaker 1: That is me. Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. And you said right here that you were searching searching for loopholes in the law. What did you mean by that? Speaker 1: Can you replay the video? Speaker 0: Sure. Sure. Speaker 1: We can't directly fund DEI programming. So we have been looking for loopholes. Part of this position would be working with some of that. We have some funds through our PBI grant that we would like to dedicate to that and we do still have a chief we have somebody who's serving as our chief diversity officer currently they're flexing out of that role because we have to for state purposes If we want to continue to have state funding we had to discontinue the law DEIP. Gotcha. Speaker 0: I guess that was my question. Like that's my question. Speaker 1: Is Just it going go like with Florida when you're not having to completely go away it's just that you can't use state funds. Speaker 0: So Okay. Speaker 1: Part of that would be payroll funds. Speaker 0: What does that mean? Payroll funds? Speaker 1: Payroll funds are funds that are used Speaker 0: to pay people. They come from the state, do they not? Speaker 1: Most of them do. Yes. Speaker 0: Well, then they are state funds being used for DE.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist asks what he meant by "looking for loopholes." The administrator says "we're still looking for ways that we can provide for our students any way that we can."

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"We're just being more mindful of how we go about it. It's a marketing thing." He agrees with the statement that employees "will continue doing 'the work,' just under a different title."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Partnering to work together to offer programming and events for those certain things. We're just being more mindful about how we go about it. It's a marketing thing essentially. It's just 90 from a communication standpoint you understand that. But she'll continue doing the work just under a different title. It's just all in how you present it to get people to understand. Ours is already being funded through our PBI program, is a federally funded initiative. Oh, okay. Okay. Yeah, that's great. So, obviously federal, we're getting more open to those type of things. It's just Right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Partnering to work together to offer programming and events for those certain things. We're just being more mindful about how we go about it. Yeah, okay. It's a marketing thing essentially. Okay. It's just 90 from a communication standpoint you understand that. Right, right. But she'll continue doing the work just under a different title. Okay. It's just all in how you present it to get people to understand. Ours is already being funded through our PBI program, is a federally funded initiative. Oh, okay. Okay. Yeah, that's great. So, obviously federal, we're getting more open to those type of things. It's just Right.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist asks him if he thinks taxpayers would be worried about someone finding "loopholes" to "circumvent state law." The administrator says, "They very well might be. I'm not really prepared to comment on that at this time."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Do you think that the taxpayers may be worried about an individual who's trying to circumvent state law by finding loopholes? Speaker 1: They very well might be. I'm I'm not really, prepared to comment on that at this time. Speaker 0: Do you think taxpayers will be thrilled about that? Speaker 1: I don't know. I guess they would need to contact us to talk about it. Oh, we'll we'll encourage them to do so.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that the taxpayers may be worried about an individual who's trying to circumvent state law by finding loopholes? Speaker 1: They very well might be. I'm I'm not really, prepared to comment on that at this time. Speaker 0: Do you think taxpayers Speaker 1: will be Speaker 0: thrilled about that? Speaker 1: I don't know. I guess they would need to contact us to talk Speaker 0: about it. Oh, we'll we'll encourage them to do so.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The Dean of Students at University of West Alabama (@univwestalabama) is Byron Thetford. He has been there for over 11 years.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalists are at Accuracy in Media. Follow them at @AccuracyInMedia.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

You can watch the full undercover video by @AccuracyInMedia here: https://youtu.be/d0nl8soqVjk

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Send a message to the relevant authorities about this administrator "looking for loopholes" around the state's DEI ban: http://deiinalabama.com

DEI in Alabama's Universities Alabama universities are pushing DEI in defiance of the law. Click here to stop them. speak4.app

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist confronting the administrator is @adamguillette. He is the President of Accuracy in Media. https://t.co/U7VOQOQoJn

Saved - July 27, 2025 at 3:57 PM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Randi Weingarten just announced "a partnership with the World Economic Forum to create a curriculum.." https://t.co/BrVV6BBvh8

Saved - July 25, 2025 at 6:52 PM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@NEAToday The nation's largest teachers union blocked me. https://t.co/kSzBuc29G9

Saved - July 22, 2025 at 8:54 PM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

I just found the National Education Association's 2025 handbook.

Saved - June 9, 2025 at 3:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I paid for a political advertisement against Trump in major newspapers nationwide. The event is calling for "a nationwide day of defiance," urging people to "rise up" on June 14th.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Christy Walton paid for this political advertisement against Trump in major newspapers nationwide. The event calls for "a nationwide day of defiance" and for people to "rise up" on June 14th. She is a Walmart heiress. https://t.co/axVLdMdFS4

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

They are calling for people to "rise up" for "a nationwide day of defiance." https://t.co/iZjOsLq0X1

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

https://t.co/8Mv6kIWiJI

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Major newspapers all across the country. https://t.co/80o5ln4jTa

Saved - May 29, 2025 at 2:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking video of an administrator at UNC Charlotte, Janique Sanders, discussing how DEI initiatives continue despite being banned. She casually mentioned "finessing" language and doing "covert" work, implying that while explicit DEI positions are absent, the efforts persist under different terms. When confronted, university provost Jennifer Troyer quickly avoided questions, leaving the public wondering about the transparency of these practices. I'm eager to hear UNC Charlotte's official response to this situation.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned. She says staff just "FINESSE" the language. They do "work that is COVERT." The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted. I have the video. Buckle up 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The University of North Carolina - Charlotte administrator is Janique Sanders. She is their assistant director of leadership and community engagement. https://t.co/II2HGHRLhI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses changes to a DEI policy, including the establishment of a CDO presence on campus. The speaker prefaces their explanation by requesting honesty and expressing confidence that the listener will not reveal the information shared.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It sounds like you guys can't even do that here. It sounds like It's been a lot of changes. What do they call it? Replace and repeal. Oh. Oh, yeah. Oh, hey, doc. Decision, basically. So we had a former, like, guess you consider it a DEI policy. Yeah. It also established a CDO presence on this campus. I'm I'm just gonna give you a real spiel Yeah. About the Heidegger. Please. Have a honest I I have a general feeling that you're fine, and that you won't go back and say, like, hey. She told me about all the stuff.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The administrator whispers and jokes about how she isn't supposed to say that DEI is still happening at the university. She says "We've renamed, we've reorganized, we've recalibrated so to speak." https://t.co/iYDXqCtytS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Equity work is still happening on campus. There have been renamings, revisions, and recalibrations of news.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those things happening? Yes. Oh, love. Okay. So it's equity work is still happening on campus. No worries. So we've renamed. Revised. We've re Okay. Calibrated news, so to speak. Mhmm. Yeah. Because

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Because language changes, right? But the people who have to be in the presence of and in the space don't change." "We don't have to call them 'diverse groups of people.' We can just say 'everybody has different stocks of knowledge.'" https://t.co/BK9yWjp4lf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Language changes. To lead diverse groups, leaders must understand those groups. Everyone possesses different knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Because language changes. Yeah. Right? But the people who have to be in the presence of in the middle space, don't they? Don't know. No. So So smart. I think the guys that is like leadership in order to lead diverse groups of people, you have to know about diverse groups of people. Mhmm. We don't have to call them diverse groups of people, but we can just say that everybody has different stocks of knowledge.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The administrator says "the word of the year is 'FINESSE.'" "There are certain things that I can't say. And I haven't said them this whole time. I'm pretty good at learning how to be PC." https://t.co/ujaRLpRhDZ

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"I could care less about whatever you want to call my office." https://t.co/kLiHSvQcF4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes dedication to ensuring students feel loved and supported, expressing indifference towards their office's future, as changes are inevitable. They note that language, like themselves, always evolves, and that language is always changing. The speaker considers how to address issues and conversations, while ensuring people are seen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just it really dedicated, I guess, how to say the word, to making sure that our students feel loved and supported. I could care less about whatever you wanna call my office. Come on. All of that's gonna change regardless. Exactly. Wanna merge or shift or change. Something. Maybe in fifteen years, like, it was gonna be something different anyway. Language. Just like me. Always. It evolves. Always. We don't use the same language we used five years ago. Exactly. Always evolves. Yep. Even though some people still want to. But with that being said, you know, but with that being said, one of the things that I always think about is how can we address those issues and those conversations, but I know people with us be seen. Did

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

She says explicit "DEI positions" don't exist, but that there are ways to do "work that is covert." https://t.co/bOaGbWMqBN

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are no outward DPI positions available, but COVID-related work exists. This work relates to student success and student retention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To happen. If you're looking for, like, a outward DPI position not to Yeah. Okay. But it's But if you are interested in doing work that is COVID. Mhmm. There are opportunities. Okay. So COVID like Yeah. What does that look like? Like, think about See. Okay. This way. We're thinking of student student success Okay. Student retention. So just cool.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist confronts the university provost, Jennifer Troyer. She immediately runs away. https://t.co/q3fSIqoX4E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Adam Killeb from Accuracy and Media states he received a report that the staff is pushing DEI despite the board of trustees ban. He then addresses someone as Janique Sanders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Adam Killeb with Accuracy and Media. How are you? Good. We received a report that some of your staff is still pushing DEI in defiance of the board of trustees ban. I'm not talking to you. I I don't know why you So this is Janique Sanders.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Undercover journalist Adam Guillette asks the provost if she thinks this information would bother the Board of Regents. She keeps scurrying away. https://t.co/TGs7HZdzVB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether the board of regents would be bothered to learn that university staff are allegedly circumventing the university's claim of eliminating DEI by continuing to promote it under different names.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think the board of regents would be bothered knowing the fact that even though that the university claims that they've gotten rid of DEI, your staff is openly flouting that they're still pushing DEI just under other names?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Undercover journalist: "What do you say to the taxpayers who don't want DEI at their publicly funded universities?" No response. Runs away. https://t.co/eY6nhTRUZX

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalists are at Accuracy in Media. Follow them at @AccuracyInMedia: https://t.co/1XHegqgMqm

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The University of North Carolina Charlotte administrator caught on video is Janique Sanders. Her LinkedIn says she uses She/Her pronouns and she is "dedicated to advancing equity." https://t.co/2iXYYP1zLf

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The university provost is Jennifer Troyer. https://t.co/6kstEXjveW

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Watch the full undercover video by @AccuracyInMedia here: https://youtu.be/1zkkCg83h8w?si=4kfmYDhU7GJvQQdM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

What is your response, @unccharlotte? https://t.co/3mROpDjI7Z

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@unccharlotte Why did you run away, @jtroyer55? What is your response? https://t.co/Av4ZZUo7z4

Saved - April 5, 2025 at 1:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw that Colorado House Democrats passed a bill that classifies misgendering your own child as child abuse, potentially leading to loss of custody if you don't affirm your child's chosen gender. This is part of the broader Colorado House Bill 25-1312 for legal protections for transgender individuals.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Colorado House Democrats just passed a bill that classifies "misgendering" your own child as child abuse. It could cause you to LOSE CUSTODY if you don't "affirm" your child's chosen gender. https://t.co/pSDY7f1Liz

Video Transcript AI Summary
House Bill thirteen twelve is under consideration. An "aye" vote is recorded. A "no" vote is recorded. The "aye" votes prevail. House Bill thirteen twelve has passed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question before us is the passage of House Bill thirteen twelve. All those in favor, say aye. Aye. All those opposed, say no. No. The ayes have it. House Bill thirteen twelve has passed.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Colorado House Bill 25-1312: "Legal Protections for Transgender Individuals" https://t.co/ObUsePd8z9

Saved - April 4, 2025 at 12:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I rallied against a Democrat bill in Illinois aimed at regulating homeschooling, which I believe unfairly targets parents and could lead them into the criminal justice system. Despite over 42,000 people registering their opposition, the bill passed out of committee on a party-line vote. I appreciate the support from those who stand with homeschool families, and I urge more Democrats to join us in opposing this authoritarian measure.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Democrat Representative La Shawn Ford just rallied AGAINST a Democrat bill to REGULATE homeschooling in Illinois. "This bill is a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents, and I can’t stand for that. How can we criminalize parents for wanting to love their children?" https://t.co/8Jv80Y2u77

Video Transcript AI Summary
This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this bill is a pipeline to a criminal justice system for parents, and I can't stand for that. How can we criminalize parents for wanting to love their children?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Over 42,000 people registered AGAINST the bill. Illinois Democrats passed it out of committee anyway on a party-line 8 to 4 vote two weeks ago. https://t.co/T4SFo45bo3

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here is the Illinois Democrat Representative that stood up for homeschool families today. Thank you, @RepFord8. More Democrats need to step up and lock arms with Republicans to block this authoritarian bill. https://t.co/WEqW5JcP99

Saved - March 16, 2025 at 7:24 AM

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The government school system has become more of a jobs program for adults than an education initiative for kids. https://t.co/aWd1jKhqFv

@JBPpod - The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

Public Schools and the Battle For Children | Corey DeAngelis @DeAngelisCorey https://t.co/PN5TQcdVZK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on school choice as a solution to the failing public education system, which speakers characterize as a monopoly plagued by Marxist ideology and union influence. They highlight geographic, state-mandated, and teacher certification monopolies that stifle competition and innovation. Corey DeAngelis, an education policy expert, advocates for "funding students, not systems," arguing it shifts the focus to parental rights and better outcomes. Research suggests school choice leads to reduced crime, teenage pregnancy, and increased graduation rates. Studies also indicate that competition from private and charter schools can improve public school performance. Speakers criticize faculties of education for low academic standards and leftist bias, perpetuating ineffective teaching methods like whole-word learning and self-esteem training. They note the teachers' unions' disproportionate financial support for the Democratic Party, hindering bipartisan progress on school choice. The conversation touches on the impact of COVID-19, which exposed the ideological leanings within schools and mobilized parents. They discuss the success of universal school choice programs in states like Arizona and Florida. Concerns about low-income families being left behind are addressed with data showing that school choice benefits these families and increases parental involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there's a geographic monopoly and there's a state mandated monopoly because you have to send your kids to And then there's a teacher certification monopoly. Speaker 1: And that trickles down from the university level into the k through 12 system. Speaker 0: The findings were less pregnancy, less crime and higher probability of graduating. Speaker 1: I'd also say on the teenage pregnancy thing, found a reduction in crime but also a 38% reduction in paternity disputes which could be caused by out of wed lock births or teenage pregnancies. Another separate study in New York City was a charter school experiment. They found that winning a lottery to go to a charter school in New York City decreased the likelihood of crime for male students by a %. Speaker 0: Republicans don't have a hope in hell of ever winning the culture war if they allow faculties of education to maintain their hammerlock on teacher certification. Everything else as far as I'm concerned, it's blowing in the wind. Speaker 1: And if Democrats Democrats are smart, the way that we can get towards bipartisanship on school choice is through. Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. I'm speaking today to doctor Corey D'Angeles. He has a PhD in education policy, which under normal circumstances wouldn't necessarily be a good thing. But he graduated from the Department of Educational Reform at the University of Arkansas, and that's one of the rare schools, maybe the singular schools, that isn't, you know, terribly bloody Marxist in its fundamental orientation with, you know, a smattering of incompetence thrown in there just for just for good measure. I've been following doctor D'Angeles Corey on X for a good long time. He's one of these one man wrecking balls, one person wrecking balls like Leila Micklewate who's fighting the good fight against Pornhub and Robbie Starbuck who's a complete bloody army in relationship to calling corporations out for their foolishness of their DEI policies. And Corey's been distributing the word in relationship to school choice. And school choice is a matter that's bigger than you might think, even though it has become quite a hot political issue. Because the school system, the public school system is a failure in many ways. It's extraordinarily expensive. It's expansive. And it does an absolutely dismal job of what it should be doing, which is educating children. At least teaching them to read, let's say a bare minimal standard of literacy. And although it turns out to be quite effective as a propaganda machine, there's a variety of reasons that it's rotten to the core. But the fact that it's a monopoly is definitely one of them and we delved into that topic in great detail. If you're a parent and you're concerned about your children's future, if you're concerned about your rights as a parent, if you want to have the option to find a educational institution of high quality so that you can give your children the start they need in life and also to protect them against a substantial amount of ideological warping, then the issue of school choice should be something that's paramount in your attention as it has become for for for many people in The United States. In any case, we delved into the rationale for school choice from the free market and libertarian perspective, but also from the perspective of parents' rights. I suppose a cardinal question of our time is, well, just whose children are they? And I think the right answer to that question is children should be watched over by those who have their best interests most firmly at heart, and that's inevitably going to be parents. And so it's in the service of children that parents have the rights right to determine the educational pathway that they can pursue. And even though parents might not be able to do that on their own, because educating children is a difficult job, they're certainly in the best position to make intelligent choices about the direction to take if those choices are available to them. And so Corey's been working very hard on making that possibility a reality for parents. And so that's what we talked about today. Well, Doctor. DeAngeles, hey, I got to make sure I'm pronouncing that exactly right. Am I pronouncing that exactly right? Speaker 1: Yeah. DeAngeles like Los Angeles, but I'm not I'm not a real doctor. I'm more like a Jill Biden doctor. Got a PhD in education policy. Oh, yes. Where from? University of Arkansas. Speaker 0: I see. When did you get that? Speaker 1: Pretty recently, actually. Well, I'm getting older now. It's 2018 or so. I got the PhD, and I studied school choice How many people brainwashed? I didn't. It was actually the Department of Education Reform. So, 99% of education PhDs are Marxist institutions. Yes. This one was housed in the College of Education, but not a lot of people liked us there because it was the Department of Education Reform. Just the very name of the department implied that we're trying to shake things up to try to improve the education. Speaker 0: You said 99% of education PhDs are Marxists? I think it's higher than that. Speaker 1: 99.5%. Speaker 0: Yeah, And the rest of them are socialists. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And so how did that institution come to exist and why does it still exist? Speaker 1: I think it originally was funded by a grant from the Walton Family Foundation and it still exists. There's professors there, my advisor's named Patrick Wolf and the journal of school choice is actually housed in that department. And Patrick Wolf did a lot of the early evaluations of voucher programs like in DC for example. They were able to use random lottery to determine the different outcomes for kids in the public schools versus the private schools. Much like a medical trial, you do the placebo for the kids who lose the lottery, which is the public school system business as usual. If you win the lottery to get a voucher to go to a private school, Wolf's evaluation for example in 2013 found about a thirty percent increase in the likelihood of graduating from high school from getting more educational opportunities through the voucher. Can see That was random? Yeah. Randomized control trial. So, you can say with a big enough sample with certainty that this is not because of the family characteristic of the students, not because of the student's racial background or their income, it's because of them getting a better opportunity to go to a better school. So, I did that research when I started. My first study was actually with Doctor. Wolf and we found that the Milwaukee voucher program that started in 1990, we found a huge reduction in crime later on in life. So, shouldn't shouldn't be very surprising. Get a you're more likely graduation rates? Didn't control for graduation, but it's probably closely linked. If you're more likely to graduate, you're probably going to be more likely to get a job, less likely to be involved with the criminal justice system. Speaker 0: Yeah. Oh, well, okay. Let's back up and do a big picture overview. You should perhaps let everybody know. Well, two things. You've authored or co authored two relatively recent books. Right? One of these, this is The Parent Revolution. And that's this year's twenty Speaker 1: Twenty twenty four. Speaker 0: Twenty '20 '4. Wow. So essentially this Pretty recent. Yeah. And then there was another one that you co authored. What's the title of that? Speaker 1: Mediocrity. Right? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: 40 Ways Government Schools Are Failing Today's Students. And it was on the fortieth anniversary of the Nation at Risk Report, which came out, which basically said that, Look, our outcomes are horrendous and things haven't gotten any better since then. In some cases, they've gotten worse and we spend a lot more money than we did back then. Speaker 0: Well, that's better, at least Speaker 1: for the people who have the unions. We spend about $20,000 per student per year now, which is about 52% higher than average private school tuition in this country. That spending in the government schools has increased by about 164% inflation adjusted since 1970. Have the outcomes gotten 164% better? No, obviously not. But it's because they're not focusing on math and reading, they're focusing on gender ideology and critical race theory in the schools. And if you're focusing on those things and teaching kids to hate your country, it shouldn't surprise us that the academic outcomes aren't getting any better. Speaker 0: Yeah. So why don't you explain exactly what problem you are attempting to address? How would you characterize your because there's you're you're an interesting person because lots of people are focusing on the dismal plight of the schools, let's say, and their dreadful expensiveness. You know, 50% of US state budgets are spent on K-twelve education. Right? 50%. So that means essentially that the teachers unions have a hammerlock on 50% of the state budgets. It's worse than that. It means that the faculties of education, we can talk about them in some detail, because they have a monopoly on teacher certification, basically have their what would you say? Their status is subsidized by half the money that Americans spend at the state level. Yeah. Right? And it's the only way they can survive because I don't know if there's a more dismal faculty than the faculties of education. Social work might compete. Speaker 1: They have the lowest scores on all the SATs and other academic credentials and they also have a monopoly, a geographic monopoly when it comes to the K-twelve government school system where in most places in America, you live where you live and you're assigned to a school just based on your address, which gives them no incentive to spend additional dollars wisely. I mean, just imagine if you had to shop at a government grocery store that you were assigned to based on where you lived and they had empty shelves, no food. When they did have food, imagine if you got food poisoning where it was expired. If you wanted to go somewhere else, they'd tell you to go complain to the grocery board who wouldn't listen to you and would try to cut off your mic, which is what happens with the school boards right now. If you had to just move houses to get access to a better grocery store, that would make zero sense. Or if you had to pay twice, basically once through taxes for the government grocery store you're not using, and then again out of pocket for a grocery store that actually provided you with healthy food. That's what we have with the government school system today. You cannot go somewhere else unless you pay twice essentially, and low income families are basically just screwed in the worst failure factories that we call public schools today. In places like Chicago, they have like 33 public schools with 0% math proficiency rates and they spend about $30,000 per kid. Guess what? Their teachers union boss, Stacy Davis Gates, she sends her own kid to a private school. She knows better than anybody else that their schools are not working for kids. And that's the main problem that I see and everything else trickles out from that monopoly issue. They don't have an incentive There's a Speaker 0: number of different monopolies operating that you just described. There's geographic monopoly, and that's a good analogy. So there's no competition. The problem with no competition is that when there's no choice, there's no real incentive to do the hard work that produces improvement. And there's actually no possibility even for comparison between different systems, right? So without competition, you don't have any possibility of really head to head evaluation, right, and no necessary incentive for innovation. So there's a geographic monopoly, which you just described. You send your kids to the school that's in your location and that's that. And then there's a state mandated monopoly because you have to send your kids to And then there's a teacher certification monopoly. So we actually Speaker 1: And that trickles down from the university level into the k to 12 system. Speaker 0: Right. Right. Okay. And now so you've fundamentally concentrated and does this include your doctoral research? You fundamentally concentrated on the issue of choice per se? And were you interested in choice as an economist might be interested in choice or why were you Speaker 1: interested in Yeah. Did my bachelor's and master's in economics. Oh, yeah. And I had a professor there, John Merrifield was his name. He's now a retired professor, but he was probably the only free market professor at the University Texas San Antonio that I knew of and I had him, I took all of his classes, he was my advisor. He was affiliated with the Friedman Foundation at the time, which is now called Ed Choice, is a school choice advocacy group. He was the one who directed me or suggested to me at least three different times, Hey, you should probably do this PhD program. And I ultimately took his advice and I'm glad that I did. And that's how I look at the school system. I see it as one of the most socialist institutions that we have in America today where the government operates the means of production, the schools that you have, whether you want to call it the local, state or federal government, they all have their hands into the government school system and taxpayers have to fund it and there's a monopoly. Monopoly. Speaker 0: They there's no competition. What's the percentage of Democrat Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Financial support from teachers' unions across The US? Speaker 1: Yeah. If you look Speaker 0: at It's in the high nineties if I Speaker 1: remember 99.9% of Randy Weingarten's union. She's the head of the American Federation of Teachers. She lobbied the CDC to make it more difficult to reopen schools during COVID. That's another story altogether. They knew they could hold children's education hostage to get billions of dollars in ransom payments and so called COVID relief that started in 2020 because they knew if they were closed, they could say, We need more money because we're closed. It's the same story as we see with the test scores. They say, We're failing because we need more money. It's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Speaker 0: They're not doing the same thing because they keep ramping up the mounted costs. Yeah. Right? So it's worse than the same thing. Speaker 1: Their same thing is always give us more money and it never improves Speaker 0: anymore. Smaller classes, more money. Speaker 1: Yes. And in every other industry, if you think about what smaller class sizes actually means, that means lower units of production output for the same inputs. Yeah. Everywhere else, you increase your production over time with more technology. Speaker 0: Well, in principle, you'd assume that much of the heavy lifting could have been done by computational technology. Think that's particularly true if it was applied properly for you know when you're teaching children basic skills, likely reading is the best example of this. So when children learn to read contrary to the whole word theorists who are also a product of the faculties of education and devastated literacy in their theoretical stupidity. So English obviously is a phonetic language and the way you learn to read is that you learn to associate sounds with letters and that's actually a rather dull process. There's nothing intrinsically not there's little that's intrinsically interesting about that. Some kids will treat it like a puzzle. Some children can associate letters with sounds very rapidly and some take much more practice. That's IQ dependent fundamentally, although it's there are other contributing factors. You can have high IQ kids with dyslexia, but it's basically an IQ phenomenon. But what you wanna do with little kids is continual exposure and practice because they need to produce little neural circuits that recognize each letter and that use the conjunction between the visual system and the auditory system in the brain to tag each letter with a sound. Letters first, two letter combinations, three letters, small words. Then as you develop expertise, phrases, you get in a single glance and maybe even sentences if you start to become stunningly proficient. Right? Computers are unbelievably good at the first part of that. Mhmm. Right? Because they're they're incredibly patient and they can give you immediate feedback. And so at least in principle, it would be possible to augment teachers with appropriate technology and increase their efficiency and we've seen none of that. Right? Speaker 2: None of that. In business isn't just about offering an amazing product or service though that's certainly essential. What truly sets thriving companies apart is having powerful reliable tools working behind the scenes to streamline every aspect of the selling process. These are the systems that turn the complex challenge of reaching customers and processing sales into something that feels effortless and natural. That's exactly where Shopify enters the picture, transforming the way businesses operate in the digital age. Nobody does selling better than Shopify. They're home to the number one checkout on the planet. And here's the game changer. With shop pay, they're boosting conversions up to 50%. That means fewer abandoned carts and more sales going to your bottom line. In today's world, your business needs to be everywhere your customers are. Whether that's scrolling through social media, shopping online, or walking into a physical store. Shopify powers it all, seamlessly connecting your business across the web, your store, customer feeds, and everywhere in between. And here's the truth, businesses that sell more sell on Shopify. Join over 2,000,000 entrepreneurs who have already discovered the power of unified commerce with Shopify's all in one platform. Upgrade your business to the same checkout we use with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com/jbp, all lowercase. Head to shopify.com/jbp to upgrade your selling today. That's shopify.com/jbp. Speaker 1: And the reason that we see so many of people in the Democratic party fighting against things like school choice where families can take their money somewhere else other than the government run school is because of that money laundering operation that we just addressed where the teachers unions send almost all of their money, 99.9% to one party, the Democrat And so even though Democrat voters want a better education for their kid and they want choice as well, The teachers' unions influence those elected officials. It's special interest politics at its worst. They also influence them to close the schools as long as possible. You had the Chicago Teachers' Union tweet out during COVID that the push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny. Speaker 0: Yeah. But everything is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny. Threw every buzzword at the wall. Every Genderism, you know. Speaker 1: And I'm glad that that's not working anymore. I think that unions actually stepped on a rake. They overplayed their hand during the COVID era and that showed families what the heck was happening in the classroom. We wouldn't have known a lot of this Marx ism was in the government run schools. Maybe some families saw it here and there, but for the first time ever as a country, we were able to at large scale get a peek into some of the far left lunatics who are running the government run school system through remote learning, which let's be really should have just called it remotely learning. There wasn't a lot of learning going on, but families have been mobilized more than they've ever been before. Since COVID, we've had 14 states now, all controlled by Republican legislatures, go all in on school choice. Arizona is one of them, one of the first actually, to allow families to take that money that would have gone to their government school to a private or charter school or Okay. Speaker 0: Let's take apart this issue of choice because it would be easy to assume that you're an advocate of something approximating parental freedom, That parents have the right to choose, let's say, the value set that defines the education of their children. But it sounds to me more that your primary concern wasn't so much the freedom of parents to choose as it was your observation of the fact that in the absence of competition, so in the presence of a monopoly, particularly a government run monopoly, the probability of low quality is a %. Is that is that It's Speaker 1: both of those things. Actually more so than the outcomes, it's more so about parental rights and who gets to direct the upbringing of their children. I got into this as a libertarian, a limited government Speaker 0: Okay. So you're making two arguments. One is It's Speaker 1: an outcome based and also yeah. Values as well. Whose children are they? They're not the government's kids. They're not the teachers union's kids even though they just posted recently right before we came here that we got to protect our kids. They always use language of ownership of a it's a communist ideology and I think that's what woke up so many people with recent elections too. You look at the Trump versus Harris election, Republicans typically don't do well in education because they don't throw more money at the problem. But right before the election, there were two nationally representative surveys by Atlas Intel, was the most accurate pollster in 2020, and they correctly predicted Trump winning all the swing states in 2024. They both found that Trump was beating Kamala Harris on education, and I think that's because it's changed from a conversation about who's going to throw more money at the problem to who's going to respect my right as a parent and Trump won the parent vote by nine points too. Speaker 0: All right. So back to the issue of let's see, we've covered school choice on an economic grounds. We've covered school choice on a parent's right ground. The next issue might be let's talk a little bit about the Marxist element. Okay. So I'd like to focus for a moment on the faculties of education. Okay. As I intimated earlier, I don't think there is there is a more corrupt and intellectually bankrupt faculty than the faculties of education. My experience with faculties of education as a psychologist is that the worst of all psychological theories are always picked up and amplified, magnified, publicized by educational psychologists. Okay. So let's take that apart a little bit. Whole word learning is a good example. Right? So whole word learning was predicated on the idea that expert readers read words at a glance. They don't sound them out or phrases even. And so since the experts do it that way, it would be reasonable to teach children to do it that way right from the beginning. Now that presumes that experts read when they learn to read the same way they learn they read as experts, which is a completely preposterous idea neurologically, but that didn't seem to occur to any of the people who are pushing it. And the introduction of whole word reading, if I remember correctly, into the California school system knocked California from number one in childhood literacy to number 50, if I remember that correctly. Okay. So whole word learning's been a complete bloody disaster, but it's still often utilized. And then there's the self esteem training. There's another terrible idea from psychology. First of all, the idea that there is such a thing as self esteem. So you can model self esteem with extraversion and neuroticism. So people with high self esteem are low in neuroticism. That's the primary issue. So they they're they are less likely to feel negative emotion, and that's a temperamental trait. Maybe there's some environmental contribution, but not a lot. And then they're more likely to be extroverted because that's positive emotion. And so if you're low in self esteem, you tend to feel a lot of negative emotion, particularly in women negative emotion is self directed. So women with high negative emotion have a lot of bodily concerns for example. They're self conscious. Right? And that's that's not it's not an attitude. It's not a cognitive set. It's a temperamental feature. And the evidence that you can do something about that with something like self esteem training, well not only is it thin to say the least, there's reasonable evidence to presume that teaching children to concentrate on their emotional experience actually makes them worse. So the psychologists who laid out the big five personality template using statistics to begin with, the most common measure is the Neo PIR and its measure of neuroticism, negative emotion, has facets. One facet is literally self consciousness. So thinking about yourself and being miserable are so tightly associated that you can't distinguish them statistically. So if you get children to dwell on their negative emotional experiences, then then you tend to exacerbate the problem. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Speaker 0: Yeah. So So anyways, you can't use self esteem training to Speaker 1: So when we started seeing the videos from Libs at TikTok and other words otherwise with of critical race theory in the classroom and teachers bragging about how they were injecting gender ideology into the schools. A lot of people would ask me how prevalent is this stuff anyway and it's like I'm seeing it all the time and parents are complaining about it at the school boards where they were later labeled as domestic terrorists for doing so and they had their mics cut off. But there was a nationally representative survey that just came out earlier this year in January that found that 36% of kids in high school reported that their teacher often or almost daily said that America is a fundamentally racist country. There were a lot of other findings in that survey as well as by Education Next and that was the first that I saw that this is actually a wide scale phenomenon. My first reaction Speaker 0: It's the norm. Yeah. Speaker 1: When people would like I didn't have like a data point to point to and I had to set When was Speaker 0: this? When did you figure this This Speaker 1: survey was January. This just happened. Speaker 0: Oh, oh. So, you didn't realize how widespread it was until that You Speaker 1: know, because I get asked this all the time like, Corey, is it really a big problem? And I'd say, well, we're hearing about it all the time. If it's a big problem for this parent, then this is a big enough deal us to change something, right? If that parent is unhappy, they should have a choice to go somewhere else even if it's only 1% of the time. Well, now we know it's not just 1% of the time. Speaker 0: It's all Speaker 1: the It's everywhere and Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, conceptualizing it as a problem in some sense is misleading because a problem implies that there's a normal course of events and some aberrations. That's just not the case. The the the entire education system, and this is a consequence of the operation of the faculties of education, is radically resentfully leftist Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: At its core. The aberration is any learning that happens outside of that philosophy. And so I want to tell you about a study we did because this is relevant to the faculties of education. So I Speaker 1: did Speaker 0: this study with a student of mine, Christine Brophy, master's student. We were gonna follow-up on it, my academic career exploded shortly thereafter. But it was a good study. The first thing we wanted to do was to assess how political beliefs clump together. You can do that statistically by looking at the you can say imagine you ask a large number of people a large number of questions. You can see across people whether answering one question predicts in a given direction predicts answering another question in a given direction. So then you can clump the questions, and so you can you can analyze how belief statements aggregate. So the first question we wanted to ask answer was it was there a coherent set of politically correct political beliefs? Because back in 02/2015, the idea of political correctness that there was a coherent body of beliefs was parodied or pilloried as a right wing conspiracy theory, which, you know, was on the face of it absurd, but it still needed to be demonstrated. We actually found that there was two forms of politically correct belief systems. One was more like classic left wing liberalism. Right? But there was a smaller group of left wing totalitarians, authoritarians. And so those were people who adopted progressive policies, so called progressive policies, but were also willing to implement them with force essentially. So there was a tyrannical aspect to it. Okay. So once you establish that these groups of beliefs exist, you can look at the correlates or the predictors. Right? So and there's a standard set of features that you would look for in a psychological study. You know this undoubtedly. If you're trying to predict behavior, one of them would be general cognitive ability. So which is essentially IQ, which is essentially something like rate of learning, temperament, big five temperament, and then sex, and then environmental history. And so we used those variables and we found that the best predictor of being a politically correct authoritarian, that's radical left wing authoritarian attitude, was low verbal IQ. Right. So you you can imagine that people will default to a particular kind of simple minded worldview if they can't think critically very well. It was a very powerful predictor. It was the major predictor by a lot. It was better predictor than the relationship between general cognitive ability and grades. Speaker 1: So you're you're less likely to tolerate others beliefs and think of them as a as a as a person. Speaker 0: No. I don't think it's tolerance. No. I don't think it's I think what it is is preference for a maximally simple explanation. So Yeah. Because you can't explain, well, maybe they Speaker 1: have good motivations behind what they're thinking because they can't come up with those alternative Speaker 0: can't critic you can't critic like, America is a racist society. All inequalities are a consequence of systemic oppression. Well, that's one sentence. It's one Yes. For the whole world. Well, that's attractive. Like, we like belief. People like belief systems that collapse into something simple. Okay. There are other predictors. Okay. Being female. Yep. Having a feminine temperament. That was an additional predictor over and above Speaker 1: being That was after controlling This Speaker 0: is controlling for intelligence and being female. The next was having a feminine temperament. Agreeableness in particular, trait agreeableness, empathy essentially. And the next predictor was ever having taken even one politically correct course. Okay. So now why am I telling you this? Well, partly because it's a useful thing to know, But the other reason is is that the students in faculties of education, as you said, have the lowest SAT scores. Okay. Now the SAT purveyors don't like to describe the test as an intelligence test, but it's an intelligence Yeah. It's correlated at like point nine. It's an IQ test. It's just not corrected for age. I wonder Speaker 1: I wonder if why there's selection into the education academia based on these predictors? Is it because going into the school system is seen as an easier job with pretty good benefits and so Speaker 0: Well, that's a good question. Speaker 1: That could be it. Speaker 0: Well, think first of all the admission criteria are low to absent, right? So you can get in. Speaker 1: That barrier to entry. Speaker 0: Right. And it's very frequently the case that if you don't know what you could do, that's a degree that will more or less guarantee you a job. And then the the other potential problem, and I don't know of any research bearing on this specifically, is that the the the security and the holidays, my suspicions are attracts people who are lower in conscientiousness. And one of the best predictors, by the way, of teaching ability apart from general cognitive ability, right, because hopefully you'd have smart teachers, is conscientiousness. Now and conscientiousness also predicts conservative political leaning, not liberal political leaning. Right. So you have kind of a perfect storm in the faculties of education is that they they educate their academic standards are very low for admission, which really matters. Right? And then they tilt radically to the left, which is also something that would be attractive to people who have decreased cognitive ability. They select against conscientiousness because of the work hours and the security. I mean, these are all things. Speaker 1: I had also seen a study that selection into education, you know, degrees was associated with risk aversion too. So if you know you have a union protecting you, you're not going to you have job security even if it's not the highest pay, you're going to have a pension when you retire, you can't get fired if you do a bad job, you're not going to get paid any less if you're not doing as well as the person across the hallway. Speaker 0: Right, you said, I believe, I think it was in the Parent Revolution, I read your both your books in the last week and I don't so I don't remember where this stat came from, but you said that the New York State dispensed with a dozen teachers over what do you remember the period of time? Was that a ten year period? Was it a one year period? Speaker 1: I don't recall. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, the fundamentals very Speaker 1: low. Very low. Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. Speaker 2: Are you tired of being held back by one size fits all health care? Of having your concerns dismissed or being denied that comprehensive lab work, you need to truly understand your health. I wanna tell you about Merrick Health, the premier health optimization platform that's revolutionizing how we approach wellness and longevity. What sets Meric apart isn't just their cutting edge diagnostic labs or concierge health coaching, it's their commitment to treating you as an individual. Their expert clinical team stays at the forefront of medical research, creates personalized evidence based protocols that evolve with you. Unlike other services that rely on cookie cutter solutions, Merrick Health goes the extra mile. They consider your unique lifestyle, blood work, and goals to craft recommendations that actually work for you. Whether that's through lifestyle modifications, supplementation, or prescription treatments. And with a remarkable 4.9 out of five rating on Trustpilot, you know you're in great hands. The best part is you can get 10% off your order today. Just head to marichealth.com and use code Peterson at checkout. That's marichealth.com code Peterson for 10% off. Stop guessing and start optimizing your health today with Merrick Health because your best life starts with your best health. Speaker 0: There's virtually no assessment of teachers for effectiveness. Right? You need No. Speaker 1: No merit pay. So the best teachers leave. The best teachers say to heck with this. We're not there's a person across the hall showing videos all day and they're getting paid the same or more than more than me. But just because they've been around the system longer. They reward years of service. Yeah. Not much. I mean, I mentioned earlier that spending has gone up by a 64% in real terms since 1970. Teacher salaries on average have actually only increased by about 3% in Speaker 0: real So where's the bulk of the money going? Speaker 1: So I think it's also going to pensions and other benefits too, but it's going towards administrative. Speaker 0: Yeah, yeah. So the same thing that happened at the universities Speaker 1: Same in healthcare. Since February, we have data on this in The US and we've seen that enrollment for students has increased in this public school system by about 5% since February. The number of teachers in the system has increased about twice that rate by about 10%. Yeah. Administrators have increased by about 95%. Speaker 0: Yeah, right. So, it's exactly the same pattern as in higher education. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's become a jobs program for Speaker 0: a Yeah. Well, it's a weird thing. The the administrative issue is a very complicated one because the the problem with the managerial strata, let's say, is that it's very difficult to parameterize the demand. You know, if you're in a complex system, can always see that more could be done regardless of the direction you happen to be moving in. And what that implies is that there's a there's no limit to the number of potential administrative contributions. Right? And then the question is, well, what would limit the growth of the administration? And in a competitive environment, free market principles essentially limit because you run out of money. Right? So you can only hire as many people as you can afford to hire. This isn't a problem with administrative bureaucracies that have an unlimited source of funding. So they're just gonna continue to grow it. I don't know what it is. Five to 7% a year or something like that. Speaker 1: And there's actually been four studies on this. Not a lot, but it's what we have. It's a really niche area of research that the more private and charter school competition in the area, all else equal after they control for all the usual characteristics, the public school teacher salary slightly go up. And now a lot of people say, oh, that's counterintuitive because it's stealing money from the public schools they say, which the money doesn't belong to the schools, it's for the kids. But all that aside, the the because there's also competition, they start to allocate those additional dollars instead of towards administrators, they start to allocate them towards the classroom, towards the teachers, so the teachers who remain actually end better Speaker 0: teachers moving into the private room? Speaker 1: Going to the private sector, stop the kids from going to the private sector because now if you have there's a monopsony situation and a monopoly situation. Monopsy is a monopoly in the labor market. With the government school system, if you want to be a teacher, you basically got to take what they give you. But now if you have more competition in the labor market too, competing for your excellence if you're doing a good job, then the public schools have to say, you know what, we got to treat the teachers better too. So some teachers are underpaid, some teachers are overpaid. Yeah. Depends on, you know, we try to treat everything as one size fits all in our current system, but that's an interesting finding that actually benefits teachers, but also we found in places like Florida, there is a control group of you mentioned earlier about how do we compare systems. In Florida, there's 11 academic studies on this topic, 10 of them find positive effects of competition on the outcomes in the public schools. It's been a rising tide that lifts all boats and just over time you can see it work out in Florida too. So a couple of decades ago, they were at the bottom of the pack on what we call the nation's report card, the math and reading scores. Now, US News and World Report has ranked Florida number one on education. They're at the top of the rankings for the nation's report card and it's not because they pump more money into the system. They spend 27% less than the national average in Florida, but they have school choice for everybody. Same here in Arizona, they have school choice for everybody. If you like your public school, you can keep your public school for real this time unlike with your doctor. Thanks Obama for lying about that. But the public schools in this case actually do get better in response to competition and we have studies all across Speaker 0: the state. Well, it's funny that you even have to make that case. I mean, it's so absurd that Well that we'd have to sit here and discuss whether having more provider of a given mandatory service is going to improve quality. Like, well, how what else would improve quality? What wishful thinking or more money? Well, you can you can spend an indefinite amount of money stupidly and counterproductively. So obviously Speaker 1: I also did one more study on this issue and I haven't brought it up in a long time because I've done like 40 peer reviewed articles on school choice, which is really tough in the academia for The peers are your enemies, not your Yeah, Speaker 0: that's for sure. I'm amazed you managed that. Speaker 1: So I mentioned that first study I did about school choice reducing crime later on in life. It was a very good study, the first of its kind. Long term data, student level data, very rigorous study. One of the reviewers and one of the first places we sent it was a journal called Urban Education. One of the reviewers said, We like the methods and we buy that it's a causal relationship, but they said, You called the students urban students. You can't say that. Are students in urban areas. So, it's like a politically correct thing. Journal. The only reason we said that was because they said urban students in their own About the Journal, total hypocrites on the issue. Why were they allowed to say it? But I wasn't allowed to say it, but they went further than that. They also said that we had to reject this because you didn't talk about how the results relate to whiteness, structural oppression and power. I mean, it's just so ridiculous, but the study I wanted to bring up about competition was actually my home state of Texas. I did a survey experiment with my co authors, so I randomly assigned different surveys to public school leaders in Texas. And one of the treatment group had a randomized note that said on one of the questions, you're going to have a new charter school that's expected Speaker 0: to open Speaker 1: nearby. And I was asking them where they were going to put their money next year, where were they going to allocate resources And the treatment of having a charter school competing with you had the effect of reducing administrative allocations and having more of that money going to the classroom. Any idea why? Well, because they know that they might have they might have to think about where they're going to spend money if they have a competitor. Because if they waste the money, families are going go But Speaker 0: their argument usually is is that obviously it's got to be something like more administrators make for a more effective school system. Speaker 1: That's what they tell you publicly, but privately they know that's all BS, which is what that study because they didn't know what the study was doing. They just thought I'm answering a simple survey question Right. And they didn't know whether the treatment group or not. Speaker 0: Right. How did you manage to You said 40 studies? Speaker 1: Yeah. Peer reviewed. Well, then what other reasons are peer reviewed, but I almost think peer review is a negative indicator at this point. Yeah. Yeah. Peers that are looking at Speaker 0: your study. Yes. Yeah. But but in your case, that's probably not the the truth because the probability that you're going to publish something that challenges the absolutely, man. So the fact that this is exactly what I'm asking you is like how many over how many years did you publish 40 studies? Speaker 1: Twenty sixteen, I want to say it was my first. So what is this? Nine or so years. Speaker 0: So you've published four, five studies a Yeah. Speaker 1: And a lot of them were at the very beginning when I was in grad school because I thought that that mattered for getting an academic job. Speaker 0: Well, matter. Did matter. Speaker 1: But and I I was on the job market, but I I applied to like three schools and most people will apply to like a hundred. Yeah. You're serious. But I knew I was probably going to go into a think tank where I'd be rewarded for my ideas as opposed to being punished with Speaker 0: all You mean when you were on the job market? Speaker 1: When I was on the job market, my first think tank was called the Cato Institute. It's a libertarian think Yeah. I moved to DC while I was finishing my PhD like two and a half years into the program. I ended up finishing it and I've slowed down publications since then, but some of these lefty departments didn't even give me a call. I had like nearly a dozen peer reviewed publications that few years into my PhD program. How do you do that? Speaker 0: So just for everybody watching and listening, so you can you can draw a rough equivalent between number of publications and a given degree. So for example Yeah. With one publication, you you have a master's degree essentially. Although most master's students don't even have one publication. With three, you have a PhD and you have 40. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: Right. And you said you had a dozen of them two and a half years into your PhD. Okay. Speaker 1: So that's And some of the far lefty departments won't even call me. Yeah. And because they select based on ideology. They don't they don't select based on productivity or intelligence or anything like that. Peer review articles are not the same thing as intelligence, I'll say that. But I found out really quickly that and I'm glad I had a fork in the road. I did have an offer from one academic institution. It was Kennesaw State University in Georgia. Uh-huh. And I think they had like a free market center there, so they were friendly. Speaker 0: How many publications sorry. How many publications did you have when you entered the job market Speaker 1: Approximately. Nearly a dozen. Speaker 0: A dozen. So in principle, you should have been a very hot prospect because dozen publications in most institutions Speaker 1: would give you pretty serious I publish in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. It wasn't like the Speaker 0: Yeah, still, dozens a lot. You know, dozens a lot and that would give you serious consideration for promotion to associate professor at many educational institutions. So, they should have been lining up at your door. Okay. Speaker 1: I also didn't do it seriously. Applying to three schools just to put my feet in the water to see what would happen is not the same thing as what most people do with, they're applying to 100 different schools. True. And so, you know. Speaker 0: Okay. So you didn't have a full test of whether Yeah. Speaker 1: So it it might have not it it might have been I might have gotten more of a fair shake if I actually did a real Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Fair enough. Alright. So another mystery about you, I would say, is you've had a lot of impact. Speaker 1: How old are you? 33. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So you're pretty early on in what would be an academic career, let's And you've you've had a lot of impact, on public policy, but more on public consciousness. And so not only have you produced a remarkable body of research, but you you're very good at public communication. That's a rare combination of skills. So I guess the first thing I'd like to know is I mean, I know about you. I'm probably more prone to follow find and follow people like you. Tell me about how you understand your public influence. Like, how broad an influence do you have? How well are your books selling? And what are your other major dimensions of communication? Speaker 1: Yeah. So this one hit the national bestseller list, USA Today. The New York Times, they didn't put me on their list for some reason, but Trump endorsed the book, Vivek Ramaswamy, Pete Hegseth, Ted Cruz, my senator from Texas, he actually says on the back, you can ruin Randy Weingarten's day by reading this book. So there's that, but I also went to government schools all through K through 12, so I don't know how I did any of this. You can just check out my handwriting in the beginning. It's very horrible. I blame it on my government school education. It's to you, Jordan. I'm going to give it to you right after the recording. But I think the way that I really started to change the narrative when it came to school choice was talking about it differently. These days we can just say school choice and you and I know what we're talking about. But when I first entered the think tank world, I made a deliberate shift to talk about funding students not systems. Oh, is that your phrase? That's my phrase I came up with. Speaker 0: It's good to have a phrase. Speaker 1: It puts the other side on defense because now if you want to argue with me, you have to say why we should fund the system and not the student. So, changes the burden of proof to be on them whereas the school choice supporters for a long time have been trying to explain ourselves as to why families should have a choice as opposed to the other side explaining why Well, Speaker 0: yeah. You should never let the side that you're opposing define the terms of engagement. Conservatives are very bad at that. They're always on the I'll give you an example. So in the last Canadian federal election, I think there were in the debate, the leaders debate, I think there were five topics that were debated. All five of them were picked by the left. Right? So one of them, for example, I Speaker 1: think on their turf already. Speaker 0: While 40% of the debate was about climate change. Right? And so as soon as you debate that, you lose. Right? Because the fact that you're even talking about it means that it's one of your priorities. And so, yeah, you got to get the question right. So you said tell me your phrase again. Speaker 1: Funding students, not systems. It's more transparent. People know like this is the concept of the money Well, they are Speaker 0: the consumer. Speaker 1: Yep. Yeah. And the other thing that is very useful in how I changed talking about this was that it really pointed out the hypocrisy of a lot of the Democrats, not just because they send their own kids to private school, but also because Democrats and other people who are supported by the teachers union, some of the rhinos will support programs where the money follows the individual. Think about it. When we have grocery stores, which I mentioned earlier, we have food stamps. Yeah. We don't say the food stamps must be spent at a assigned Walmart or Speaker 0: a assigned That's a good analogy. Speaker 1: And so we also do this with higher It's not just that we do this with other industries, we do this with education too, higher ed. We have Pell Grants in The US. We have other, the GI Bill. These are taxpayer dollars that can be used at private universities if you want and it follows the decision of the So it's Speaker 0: the equivalent of money essentially, although a little more narrowly targeted. Speaker 1: Yeah, because the status quo would always say we need public money for public schools and my quick response is, will you support public taxpayer dollars for private everything else when it comes to higher ed? You support Pell Grants that go to private religious universities. You support the vouchers when it comes to hospitals. We have Medicaid vouchers. You can take that to a religiously affiliated hospital if you want. We do this with pre k. We have the head start programs. All the democrats support it. It's a pre k program where the money follows your decision to a private provider of pre k, even a religious one. Speaker 3: Did you know that Andre Bocelli, Steph Curry, Justin Bieber, and Tim Thibault share something remarkable? Each of their mothers faced pressure to end their pregnancies, yet chose life. When women experience unplanned pregnancies, they often find themselves at a crossroads, wanting to make the right decision while facing societal pressure. This is where Preborn makes a difference. Their network of clinics provides a compassionate care and essential support for women considering their options, including free ultrasounds. It's incredible how hearing a baby's heartbeat can transform a mother's perspective. Women who see their ultrasound are twice as likely to choose life for their child. If you believe in supporting women through difficult decisions and protecting unborn lives, consider partnering with Preborn. Your contribution directly helps empower women with the resources they need. Just $28 funds one ultrasound, and one 40 can help five mothers choose life for their babies. Monthly donors receive updates with stories and photos showing the impact their generosity. To make a difference today, dial 250 and say baby, or visit preborn.com/Jordan. Again, just dial 250 and say the keyword baby, or visit preborn.com/Jordan. Together, we can support mothers and transform families and futures. Speaker 0: Has that helped Head Start? Do you know? Has it improved its quality? Speaker 1: Head Starts the the Head Start evaluations are horrible. They find that it spends a lot of money. And they don't improve outcomes. Most of the results are no results. Speaker 0: They improve some outcomes. They people are more likely to graduate and they're less likely to be thrown in prison or get pregnant. They don't improve cognitive Speaker 1: I don't think that was the RCT though. I think that was more of like a regression with controls, which Speaker 0: could be still something. Well, the crucial issue is there's no evidence that Head Start improves academic performance, and that's a consequence multiple reviews. And it's really a catastrophe that it's the case. Speaker 1: And the latest pre K evaluation statewide was in Tennessee. Speaker 0: Yeah. When was that? Speaker 1: That was a few years ago. Followed them through sixth grade. Speaker 0: Oh, Speaker 1: yeah. And it was a randomized control trial. They found that those who won the lottery were worse off academically and behaviorally by the end of sixth grade. Speaker 0: Okay. Won the lottery meaning? Speaker 1: You won a lottery to get a scholarship to go to pre K relative to the families who lost the lottery and stayed with their parents. Maybe because their parents So they were worse Speaker 0: behaviorally as well. Speaker 1: Maybe because the parents have a a an advantage at raising their own kids. Maybe they're better at Oh, that's interesting. Because kids at home. Speaker 0: I did a very programmatic review of Head Start in the eighties. So that's quite a long time ago, but the programs had been operating for a very long time. And there were, I think, five major reviews. And at that time, the findings were that Head Start accelerated cognitive performance, so test scores, for a year or two following the interventions, but that by grade six there was no there was no effect, but that the longer term effects seemed to be behavioral and so reduced crime. No. No. They were positive. Speaker 1: They were Speaker 0: positive. Were positive. Less pregnancy, less crime, and higher probability of graduating. So and the the the relevant issue with regards to graduation in principle was that because the kids who had gone to head start behaved better, they were less likely to be held back. But you're saying that the more recent Speaker 1: The recent Tennessee experiment, which is the latest one. Yeah. RCT negative effects on academics and behavior through sixth grade, which is the last year of the study. I'd also say on the teenage pregnancy thing, that's another important outcome that we looked at in our follow-up crime study that was published in the Journal of Private Enterprise. We found a reduction in crime, but also a thirty eight percent reduction in paternity disputes which could be caused by out of wedlock births or, you know, teenage pregnancies. And we also had a there is an Speaker 0: RC That was with Choice. Speaker 1: That was with a voucher program in Milwaukee. Uh-huh. One was not an RCT. We did the best we could with, you know, we even controlled for neighborhood and like single parent households and religiosity. All the all like as many demographics as you could get to control for. But another separate study in New York City was a charter school experiment by Roland Fryer and his co author published in the Journal of Political Economy, I believe in 2015. They found that winning a lottery to go to a charter school in New York City decreased the likelihood of crime for male students because they were the ones causing all the trouble by a 100%. It was a complete elimination for lottery winners through the study period. I don't remember how long they covered, it might not have lasted forever. But through the study period, it was like five percent were incarcerated for the control group in the public schools, lottery winners who got into the charter schools 0%. So all this to say on the Head Start thing, I don't bring up these analogies to say that we should I'm not saying that I support Head Start or Pell Grants or food stamps. I'm saying if we're going to spend the money, we might as well fund the people as opposed to Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. I understand. Well, I sidetracked a little bit into Head Start because doing that review for me was actually very disheartening. Because the thing about Head Start, and this can allow us to talk about political issues more broadly or conceptual issues, nobody liked the fact that poverty tended to persist multi generationally. And there were reason to assume that if you gave so called disadvantaged kids a head start that a) that might work, but b) that it might even have self reinforcing consequences, right? Because the idea was we take the disadvantaged kids, you give them a bit of an academic boost when they're three or four, and the consequence of that compounds with time. And so they're actually farther ahead of their peers by grade six because they got this head start, you know, and that didn't happen. And that was a catastrophe for the right and the left politically as far as I was concerned because it was a reasonably motivated endeavor. Now I did some arithmetic calculations with regards to Head Start to try to figure out how many adult minutes a Head Start program actually bought a given child, And the answer is virtually none. And also the head start programs were also used as employment programs. So the probability that a given head start teacher had any qualification was extremely low. You know, when you're dealing with three and four year olds, let's say, it's very hard to especially in groups, it's very hard to spend time teaching them anything because just taking care of three and four year olds is such Yeah. Just take Speaker 1: care of Speaker 0: Well, And often not a good one. Now, when I was looking at the positive results, say in the nineteen eighties, the hypothesis was Head Start might not have been good for most kids and probably not good at all for kids who had decent families, but for kids in absolutely Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Well, maybe you Speaker 1: you Whereas if you're taking them away from parents that are already doing a good job Right. You're kind of nudging them in that direction, they're gonna be worse off. Speaker 0: Right. So but you were convinced that the Tennessee data, that's don't Speaker 1: know the That's the latest experiment and it's peer Speaker 0: reviewed Oh, that's usually too bad. Speaker 1: And the head starts that I've seen as far as the RCTs had the fade Yeah. One more thing that I think that I added that was really important to the conversation about school choice. I mean, thing it's not all me, right? It was COVID that helped open the eyes of parents. I was just there with the right ideas laying around at the time as Milton Friedman famously put it. Yeah. That we were taking a bipartisan strategy for a long time to get school choice and I'm sure you've heard this before where people say like school choice is the civil rights issue of our time. We still have elected officials saying these things using left leaning arguments to advance school choice, which I think they're all good arguments. It's true that the lowest income are in the worst schools, that they would benefit the most. School choice is an equalizer, but there's also right leaning arguments you can make about choosing schools that align with your values. The public schools are Marxist, we don't want gender ideology, we want schools that teach you that America is a great country, not a horrible country. And so you can make all these different types of arguments, but when you go into a red state making blue state arguments, these lefty arguments, you might alienate some of the Republican legislators who might say, this isn't my issue, so you know, I'm not going lead on it. And then the Democrats, they're controlled by the teachers unions anyway, you're not going to make much ground with them regardless of the argument you're making. They respond to power, not logic. And then if you alienate the Republicans, we weren't really getting school choice passed in blue states or red states in a meaningful way, but now it's become more of a GOP litmus test issue. Voters have gone to the ballot box and Republicans accountable for being against school choice in Texas, my home We we failed on school choice last year because we had 21 Republicans join all the Democrats in the house to kill school choice. They came up with their arguments about how they were in rural areas and they didn't need to vote for this, but after the primaries, now 14 of them are gone. That was a political earthquake and now for the first time in Texas history, the House has 76 co sponsors to pass the school choice bill, which has never happened and you need 76 votes to pass the school Speaker 0: choice bill. What did you have to do with what happened in Virginia? Speaker 1: Well, in Virginia, we had mister Terry, I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach McAuliffe on the debate stage. He was the former governor of Virginia and he said that at the final debate, he was up in the polls by a lot. It flipped right after that because parents were pissed. Virginia closed their schools just about more than any other state. They were as bad as California when it came to reopening the schools in Virginia and Glenn Youngkin turned that into an opportunity. He laid out a blueprint for success for Republicans going forward and Glenn Youngkin ended up winning that election by six points with education voters, and that was the number two issue in that election, which is a big deal because education is usually at the bottom. Voters, they rank jobs, the economy, crime at the top. Education was number two, and a Republican won on that issue in Speaker 0: a Well, given that 50% of the bloody state budgets go to K to 12 education, it should be like number one or number two all the time. Speaker 1: You would You would think, but I think for a long time people thought things were fine, right? Before they saw I mean, if you're a high income parent and you're sending your kid to the assigned public school and it's consistently getting A ratings, your kids coming home with A's on their report card, they get into great universities that Speaker 0: are for a long time. Like, when I went to school as a kid, like I hated school. It bored me to death. And but I have to say that my teachers didn't teach me insane things. Right? And so we don't just have to either. Somewhere around mid around 02/2010 things really went sideways. They went sideways in the universities too. Like I saw that blip of political correctness in the nineteen nineties when I was teaching in Boston, but it was mostly outliers. You know, it was the radical fringe. Yeah. Although a lot of them were in the educational psychology departments, but they weren't they didn't have the upper hand. And somewhere around 2010 that flipped hard. I think that those that sort of thing flips partly too. You said you talked about good teachers leaving. Well, one of the things that does happen as an enterprise disintegrates is that it'll hit a point of no return where it becomes so unbearable for anyone competent to be in the system, they all leave. Right? And then, well, then you're just left with the worst of the worst. Right? And then they hire people who are even worse than they are and the whole thing's, you know, going off its railings. And so I guess part of the reason that this has become an issue is because the student the schools moved from merely like traditional incompetence, traditional socialist incompetence, let's say, to absolute bloody insanity and then people started to notice and it was likely the gender issue that And I Speaker 1: think the more that we talk about and see that there's a lot of left leaning bias in the schools that might attract more people to want to change other people's children's views in that direction to select Oh, yeah. So, it's almost like it's a reinforced it's Speaker 0: it's Well, it's I've I've spoken to Republican governors about this on multiple occasions. Speaker 1: Think I met you at RGA, by the way. That's Yes. Speaker 0: That's right. That's right. You know, and I've been beating the drum on this issue not very successfully, would say, that Republicans don't have a hope in hell of ever winning the culture war if they allow faculties of education to maintain their hammerlock on teacher certification, and if they continue to spend half the state's money on k through 12 education essentially that's dominated by progressive Marxists. Like, everything else that is happening is, as far as I'm concerned, it's blowing in the wind. And so I wanna challenge you on a couple of things because I'd like your opinion. See, I can understand the rationale, the logic for your choice approach, and I can see it from the free market perspective. So let's say the libertarian perspective. I can see it from the parents' right perspective. And I appreciate the data that you've you've described in terms of demonstrating that when you do open the market up to competition, you get an increment in quality even on the public side and a decrease in administrative spending. Great. All of that makes sense. But I am wondering if you've hit the nail squarely on the head because I'm and I genuinely want your opinion on this. It seems to me that the fundamental weakness in the system is still that faculties of education have a hammerlock on teacher certification. So because, you know, I know people who are sending their kids to private schools, but the private schools are full of woke teachers too. Right? The Catholic schools are full of woke teachers. Like, it's a pervasive problem. And so I I I wanna know your thoughts on the teacher certification issue because I think what the Republicans should do is just they should just take the monopoly away from the Yeah. Speaker 1: Need alternative certification. So I think you're right that we have to have a multi pronged approach. School choice isn't the silver bullet for everything and neither is alternative certification. We should fight the battle on multiple fronts. And some people do set up this false dichotomy. They'll say, Oh, you're saying school choice will cure everything. Well, not exactly. We should also reform the public school system. You should still go to your school board and try to change things because a lot of kids are still going to go to the public schools whether you have school choice or not. But we also need an escape valve. I mean, example, if you only try to change the system from the top down, which is what we've done partially in my home state of Texas, some good tweaks. They've banned critical race theory. They're talking about banning DEI in public schools this year as well. Have Trump with his executive orders helping out as well, but we have undercover video from a group called Accuracy in Media. They've gone into all these public school districts in red states like my home state of Texas where they've they've gotten these administrators to admit on undercover video that they're still teaching things that are banned. Sure. Of course they are. And they they're they're proud about it. They're like, what what yeah. We're still doing CRT, but we're just gonna tell Speaker 0: it something else. How do you ban ideas? Like this is this is Speaker 1: Behind closed doors, they they continue to do what they want. Speaker 2: What does the future holds for business? Ask Nine experts, you'll get 10 different answers. Bull market, bear market, inflation up, inflation down. Could someone please invent a crystal ball? Well, until then, over 41,000 businesses have future proofed their operations with NetSuite by Oracle, the number one cloud ERP, bringing accounting, financial management, inventory, and HR into one fluid platform. With one unified business management suite, there's one source of truth giving you the visibility and control you need to make quick Think about it, with real time insight and forecasting, you're essentially peering into the future with actionable data. When you're closing your books in days instead of weeks, you're spending less time looking backward and more time focused on what's next. For any business owner looking to streamline their operations, NetSuite is the solution I'd recommend. Whether your company's earning millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you respond to immediate challenges and seize your biggest opportunities. Speaking of opportunity, download the CFO's guide to AI and machine learning at netsuite.com/jbp. This guide is free to you at netsuite.com/jbp. Again, that's netsuite.com/jbp. Speaker 0: Well, you see this in the universities too. It's like, well, we're we're going to scrap our DEI programs. It's like they're not scrapping. They just say renaming them. They move they just retitle this person and they continue to do exactly the same thing. And you can camouflage what you're doing with words. No problem. It'll take people years to figure it out. So, this is another part. Okay. So So, Speaker 1: I'm not saying that we shouldn't try because it's it isn't perfect enforcement, but we should have both of these. We need down accountability, but also bottom up If you're a parent, you get a whiff of these things happening, even if you can't prove it before a judge and change the school system that way, you need to be able to say, You know what? Screw this. I'm sending my kids somewhere else. Speaker 0: Somewhere else. Yeah. Speaker 1: I think that would give a pressure for the public schools to say, Let's knock it off. I don't want irritate anybody on the left or the right. I'm going to focus on the basics, math, reading and writing and then you're not going have all of them. And so you might say, well, what about the private schools? Some of them, they also operate in this small market right now already when you don't have choice. But when you unleash the market and families can vote with their feet, you'll have a different supply of private schools pop up as well. Especially right now, we're pushing something called education savings accounts. It's like a voucher where you can use it for a private school, but you can also use it for homeschooling, micro schooling. They were calling them pandemic pods during the COVID era where five to 10 children were getting together in a household, like the one room schoolhouse idea. Those are more likely to sprout up and you're more likely to have a thousand flowers blooming. Yeah. Yeah. If you have these low cost options and this has happened in Arizona too. Speaker 0: Think the diversity of school proliferation then eventually solve the ideological Yeah, Speaker 1: because if you only have a couple elite private schools and they're captured by the left, it's kind of like, okay, what can I do now? I'd say that's still better than the status quo where you have zero choices, but at least now you can take the funding. Let's say, if you want to just homeschool your own kids and use it for the curriculum or private tutors, that is a step in the right direction even if it's not maybe Speaker 0: for most of the school choice programs set up so that you could set up a micro school and educate your own children? Speaker 1: Most them now are. And Arizona has an education savings account. They've had one for over a decade. They just went all in in 2022 making available to everybody. They actually crashed the government website in Arizona because so many families signed up right when they opened up the gates. Speaker 0: It's an interesting twist on paying women to have children Cause in some sense that's what you set it up. Right? Well, yeah. Yeah. Because a lot Speaker 1: of Which is what the public school system is already. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. It's subsidy Speaker 1: for But it's it's a failing system that not a lot of people don't see it as benefit. Well, Speaker 0: if it's $20,000 a year per child and the typical family has two children, the woman has to make $40,000 a year to justify the subsidy. And so that that's after expenses. And so that's that's a very Speaker 1: it's very about a classroom of, you know, 30 kids at $600,000 where's all money going? If the teachers are only making 60,000 a year on average, where's the rest? And it's Yeah. Well, you could figure what, 60 Speaker 0: for overhead in terms of physical plant, something like that. That's only Speaker 1: a hundred 20,000. Know, a lot of them make more than the president of The United States. We have a less a half a dozen or so who make over $400,000 a year. Speaker 0: So, does well, so tell me, where does the so Speaker 1: A of They love building new schools and stadiums. Yeah. So, one of the school districts in Texas, La Jolla ISD made headlines recently because they had a big like a like a big water park at their campus. So maybe that improves, you know, the self esteem of the kids or whatever the teachers are trying to do these days, but it's just frivolous things. And you see this at the university level too, They have these extravagant water parks and tuitions going up to cover these things and also subsidies from the government too. But these micro schools are really shaking things up. The factory model itself is frightened because of this. In fact, when Trend Micro Schools in Arizona was reporting just huge increases in enrollment during COVID because the government schools were closed, so families were figuring it out and a lot of them went to these microschools. The NEA, which is the largest labor union in the country, the National Education Association, they also lobbied the CDC to close the schools longer. They put out an opposition research sheet on Prenda Microschools and their founder, Kelly Smith, because they were so afraid of them basically providing something that they weren't providing to students. They knew they were going to lose funding because public schools are funded based on enrollment counts. And so if you lose some students, you're going to lose some money whether you have a school choice program or not. And in Arizona, you can use those education savings accounts to pay for Prenda microschools and other ones too. Speaker 0: Define microschool. Speaker 1: It's a miniature school and there's a lot of different definitions for it, but basically a miniature private school. And during COVID era, it was basically five to 10 children getting together in households to economize on homeschooling. And you can either do it with one of the parents, you can take turns with the parents doing different subjects or you can even hire a private tutor to do it. Which could Speaker 0: do if it's $20,000 per So what's What is the amount of the typical voucher if school student expenditure Yeah. Speaker 1: It saves taxpayer money and most of these bills are passed at the state level. Yeah. In The US, we're funded in the public school system in every state by the federal level which should not exist at all. The word education is not in our constitution. It's an unconstitutional waste of time and money. But that's only about 8% of the total spending, 8% to 10%. The other 45, 40 five are state and local dollars. These bills are typically passed in state legislatures, so it's about half of the total that follows the students. So let's say on average 10,000 versus the 20,000 that's spent in the government schools. Speaker 0: Is any of that happening locally as well to pull in the rest Speaker 1: of that There have been some local vouchers that have passed in Colorado, a blue state. There was Douglas County had at once a couple decades ago passed the voucher program. It got nixed in the court by a lefty judge and that program is no longer on the books. New Hampshire, which passed a state level program, also proposed a bill a year or two ago in their legislature to also allow the local districts to have the money fall of the child if they opted in as That bill got tabled, that was one that was Speaker 0: So Speaker 1: that revolution has built a think that's the next step in the revolution, but at the same time, if the private schools are doing it for less and if the micro schools are doing a good job for less, do we want all the dollars following the student? I think it should be equal across sectors. If we're going to spend the money, I think the state and local should follow the student, not just the state, but the reality is it's mostly basically everywhere at this point. Speaker 0: Well, know the reality is, as you pointed out, Speaker 1: that there's enough money at Speaker 0: the state level to produce economic incentive for the micro schools, for example. You know, you could imagine five kids together, that's $50,000 a year. That's a pretty good supplement for a given parent's income. So okay. So let's talk about let's see where where should we go now? Yeah. Okay. Effects. So I want to talk a little bit more about your means of communication. You've been working for these think tanks, but your work has received broad public attention. Okay. So now you also said that that was in part because you were in the right place at the Speaker 1: right time. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. That makes a difference. And you've done the background research. Right? So you had a message that was saleable given the state of the zeitgeist, let's say. Okay. Well, that's crucially important. Right? But it's also important to be able to capitalize on that. Okay. So what how would you characterize the consequences of your work so far? What have you what have you seen shifting that you would attribute at least in part to the message that you've been disseminating? Speaker 1: Yeah, changing the way people talk about school choice in terms of the money following the child. There have been a lot of legislators on the House floor, Senate floor talking about funding students not systems, so they've developed my arguments and I think a lot of them follow me on social media and politicians, again, they want to get reelected, they want to look good and so when they're following different influencers on social media, they want to look good in the public eye when they're debating the issue against the Democrats on the House and Senate floor. And so, I think they've adopted some of some of the language and arguments and studies that I've conducted and also cited Is X your most effective? It is for sure. Yeah. I have Facebook and Instagram, but they're not nearly I have over 200,000 followers on X. It's not like crazy, but it's ballooned in a short amount of time and it's Who Speaker 0: follows you? Like, do you You follow me. Yes. I certainly do. Yeah. Speaker 1: Tulsi Gabbard, Pete Hegseth, lot of the know, Vivek Ramaswamy. There's a lot of influential people who follow me. Lives at TikTok, lot of big accounts. Donald Trump doesn't follow me. Maybe after he sees this episode, he'll jump on the bandwagon. Speaker 0: State governors, state treasurers? Speaker 1: Yeah. So Doug Ducey, who's here in Arizona, he was the first state to go all in on school choice and I have a good relationship with him. He's no longer the governor. He's now Katie Hobbs in Arizona who's hypocrite on school choice. She went to Catholic school and now she opposes school choice for other families, but Doug Ducey was a leader and you needed one state to do it first to show the rest of the states they could. He often uses the analogy of when the first person broke the four minute mile. Yeah. Before the first person did it, I don't remember his name, people thought it was impossible for a human being to run below a four minute mile, but once the first person did it, you had just this cascade effect of tons of people breaking. Now, with school choice, no one thought that any state could do it where it's every family because for a long time, there was an incremental approach on the school choice front. It was decades we're hitting our head against the wall. It was small incremental wins where maybe the lowest income families here, maybe just in the city though they're going to do it, maybe just for special needs kids. But now the barometer of success is do you have a universal program meaning for everybody regardless of income, which these are the types of programs I support. One, because it allows for more competition, allows for a bigger supply side response, more of a market response, but also we're paying for public schools for high and low income families, they should be able to benefit from school choice as well. We don't discriminate based on income for the public schools, we shouldn't discriminate based on income for school choice either. And politics again is all about organized interest pushing for what they want. If you have a small program that not a lot of people are benefiting from, well, the problem there is if Democrats get in charge, they're going to be more likely to be able to take it away because low income families are not as politically active Speaker 0: and Yeah. So let me ask you about that. I've discussed school choice with some of my more intelligent liberal friends and one of their objections has been that the I think you'll be able to address this given what you already said, but I'm gonna lay it out anyways. Parents who are involved in their children's future, in their children's educational options. Given the vouchers, they're gonna do the research and they're going to find the best school to suit their children. But then there'll be the children whose parents can't or won't involve themselves, and they're going to default to the public school system. And if it collapses as a consequence or degenerates as a consequence of funding being distributed widely, then don't we risk setting up a group of kids who are already suffering because their parents aren't involved to fail even worse because they're going to exist within the confines of a degenerating public school system. Speaker 1: You already have that inequality baked into the government school system. You have Baltimore. They have 40% of their high schools have 0% math proficiency rate. You see the same thing in places like Chicago and so they shouldn't make perfect the enemy of the good. And this fear mongering hasn't happened with school choice. The public schools, if anything, have gotten better. I cited in Florida, but we also have nationwide data on this. 26 of the 29 studies on this nationwide find statistically significant positive effects of private school choice competition on the outcomes in the public schools. Even enemies of school choice who are in academia who have any form of honesty at all, they admit that the studies on the competitive effects are positive. The main argument that the unions put forward the worst argument in terms of it being supported by the evidence. But a lot of people respond to fear mongering and so they do Yeah. Speaker 0: It's a reasonable hypothesis, but the fact that the studies have already been done indicating that the Speaker 1: There's one other study on this topic that I think is really important and it was done by Cornell researchers published in 2018 and they actually found that when school choice was introduced, peer reviewed study, when school choice was introduced, the number of searches online for different private education providers spiked. Doesn't seem like a surprising finding to me, probably not. If you have choice now, you can exercise it, you're going to look. The point is school choice increases parental involvement by definition. Yes, there'll be the parents who are involved anyway, but on the margins, the parents who just felt like they were depressed being in the school system where they didn't have any other Now, all of a sudden, you give them $10,000 to seek out a better option, they're not going to be depressed by looking at the private school, so they're going to look they're exercise that Well, it's definitely the case too. Speaker 0: Like I remember reviewing studies probably about the same time I was looking at Head Start on attitudes of the underclass towards their children's education. And look, if people are going to be motivated by anything, they're going to be motivated by the thoughts that their children might have a better future. Right? So and so most parents, for example, regardless of their own literacy levels, would like to have children who are literate and well educated. And they might not know how to do it, but Speaker 1: They know their kids better than anybody Speaker 0: else. They actually care as Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, they care as much as they care about anything and they care far more about their kids than anyone else is likely to. Right. Okay. But the critical issue is, as you already pointed out, if these studies and you think the studies that show a salutary effect on public school quality because of increased competition, you think those are reliable. Speaker 1: Yeah. They're they're rigorous studies. There's you can't randomly assign Yeah. It's as good as you can get. And I've cited all the studies on that topic. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So let's end with this. Let's end this portion of the discussion. I think what we'll do I Speaker 1: wanted to hit one more thing. I just Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, is what I want to give you the opportunity to do that. So if there's anything else you'd like to bring up, do it do it now and then we'll turn to the dataware On Speaker 1: the issue of whether low income families are benefiting from this, I already talked about the theoretical about how they're in the worst schools already. So they had the most to benefit, most to gain from having more options in their kids' education. In DC, they have a voucher program which I think Obama was against even though he sent his own kids to Sidwell Friends, a private school. School choice for me but not Speaker 0: for Speaker 1: the Again, strikes again, it's everywhere. But we looked at the data most recently in DC and the average family, their average household income was about $30,000 per year for the entire household in the District Of Columbia, which is a higher cost of living area than the average in The United States I believe about 95% of the kids were black or Hispanic. So, this goes completely counter to the narrative that the left is saying about how this is only for rich white kids using the program. In Florida as well, there's a really interesting story about how DeSantis actually won in 2018. He actually barely won the governor's race in 2018 and the headline in the Wall Street Journal the next day was that school choice moms tipped the governor's race for DeSantis. So they looked at exit polling from CNN of all places and they found that black moms in particular came out in force for DeSantis much higher than expected after his opponent Andrew Gillum who was a black democrat called to get rid of their private school choice program that was already benefiting over a hundred thousand kids at the time and those kids were disproportionately low income and non white kids. So this is another way that one, republicans can make inroads with groups that they hadn't reached out to before and it's also it shows you that this shouldn't be a partisan issue and if Democrats are smart, if they're going to bleed votes on this issue to people like Ron DeSantis in Florida, they should come along too and this is something I point out in the book that the way that we can get towards bipartisanship on school choice is through hyper partisanship in the short run because the more that the Democrats lose on the issue like we saw with Terry McAuliffe, Andrew Gillum in Florida, the more they're going to scratch their head and you'll have some defectors and say, I'm going join the kids union and listen to them, the parents, as opposed to just the teachers union. Speaker 0: Well, isn't an obviously partisan issue. It shouldn't. Well, it's like cost cutting in government. It isn't obvious at all why that default left winger would be against getting rid of fraud in the in the political system and political spending. Right? Because then at least in principle, more money could be spent on other projects. Actually work. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah, exactly. And this seems to be I mean you can make a perfectly cogent case as you have I would say for how broadening choice It might even preferentially benefit people who are poor and dispossessed. That seems to be highly likely to me because as you pointed out, the worst schools are the ones that are serving the people who are trapped in the in admired in poverty often multi generationally, and I don't see any way out of that than the multiplication of of supply. And it's also the case that the money of a poor person is just as good as the money of a rich person. And so if they have that money at hand, their children are more likely to be valued by people who would like to get paid for their efforts. Right. Right. Right. Alright. So I think we'll turn to the Daily Wire side now, and I think I'll talk to you about a couple of things. I'd like to know about your future plans, strategic and conceptual. Where do you go next? I'd like to know what it's been like for you to deal with the new administration federally and and particularly on the federal level. And I'd like to talk to you more about any pitfalls you see emerging on the school choice side. So we'll talk about the future, we'll talk about strategy, we'll talk about the new administration, we'll talk about potential risks that you might see maybe in the hyper partisan approach, but also in the school choice conceptual domain per se. So we'll turn to that on the Daily Wire side. Everybody watching and listening, you're more than welcome to join us for an additional half an hour behind the Daily Wire paywall. Thank you very much for coming. Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It's really good to have you here and appreciate it. And, you know, you're you're spending your time educating people too and letting them know, well, exactly how they should be thinking about the fact that their children are sent to a pathologically unproductive monopoly. Right? That eats up half the resources at the state level. Right? It's really something. It's really something to see. So alright, everybody. You can join us there.
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Texas school administrator, Arthur Elizondo, was caught on video stating that parents are the source of problems in schools. When confronted by an undercover journalist about allowing a biological boy to play in girls' sports, he suggested the parent might not want to draw attention to the situation. Despite initially denying his comments, he later became defensive and even shoved the journalist. Elizondo works for the San Antonio ISD's Office of Family Engagement, and this incident is part of a series of exposés by Accuracy In Media.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A Texas school administrator told an undercover journalist that PARENTS are "who creates all the problems." He then PUSHED the journalist who confronted him about it. He works for the school district's Office of Family Engagement. I have the video. Buckle up 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist tells the administrator that her biological boy wants to play in girls' sports. The administrator says PARENTS are "who creates all the problems." https://t.co/8Kcv8BrID2

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

A journalist later confronted him and the administrator immediately denied everything and ran off. "No, I'm not going to say anything! I don't know any of you guys! I don't know what you're talking about!" https://t.co/AhQBEmsfLU

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not going to comment. I don't know any of you or what this is about.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I'm not gonna say anything. I don't know any of you guys. I don't know what you're talking about.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist asks the administrator if he said that parents "cause all the problems." He denies it: "I've NEVER said that!" The journalist then reveals he has the footage. https://t.co/yYHtxTlNMH

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district administrator then SHOVES the journalist for asking too many questions 🚨 https://t.co/CaMLL71si4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you saying parents cause problems? Should someone in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? I don't know what you're talking about. Is that me in that video? I have no idea. I have no comment, so stand back. You can keep your hands off me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many parents cause problems? Speaker 1: I'm not talking Speaker 0: Should somebody in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? Speaker 1: I don't know what Speaker 0: you're talking about. I don't know. Is that you in that video? I have no idea. You can stand back there. I have no comment on me. So Stand back. You can keep your hands off me, sir.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist posing as a parent told the administrator that her biological boy's birth certificate had been changed to female. The administrator then suggested that the parent might not want to "call attention to it." https://t.co/FRzmaV9QTg

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are birth certificate laws and they've been changed in Virginia for her. I'm not sure how that transfers, but it is a legal court document, so that's what I would bring when you register. Since her name has been legally changed and it's part of her enrollment documents, I don't know if you even need to mention anything to athletics. If you have a legally binding document with her changed name, I can't advise you on whether to say anything. If she's already transitioned with hormones and everything, I don't know if I would call attention to it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's, birth certificate laws here, and it's been changed for her in Virginia. And I don't know what that looks like as far as the transfer, but I mean, it's a birth certificate. So It's a legal court document. Right. Right. That's what I would bring. That's what I would bring when you register. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So I honestly don't know if I even need to, like, mention it honestly because it has been changed and it will be part of her documents when I enroll her. Do I even need to, like, do anything as far as talking to someone in athletics? I don't know. I, if you have a legal document where it's her name's been, changed, and that is, I mean, a legally binding. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I I can't advise you on that. I don't know. Okay. I don't know whether to to say and, you you know, because if if she's already transit, you know, making that transition, already transitioned. Hormones and everything. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, then I don't know if I would Call attention to it. Yeah.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The administrator continued to suggest it might be okay for the boy to play in girl's sports since the birth certificate was changed to female. https://t.co/aKGPaSYqB2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maybe I'm drawing too much attention by asking athletic directors if she can play. You could ask a general question, but if she has all the paperwork and legal documents and she's already passing and has gone from one stage to the next, then I don't know. The only thing would be when they go to the locker room to change and all of those things. But if she's already got experience with that, she usually comes already outfitted and doesn't need the locker room to avoid issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Maybe I'm calling too much attention to it by asking athletic directors whether or not she can play. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you could you could ask a general question, but, I mean, if she's got all the Speaker 0: Documents. Speaker 1: Paperwork and legal documents, and she's already and then forgive me for the bitch. She's already Speaker 0: Passing. Speaker 1: Right. She's already gone from, you know, one stage to the to the next stage. Mhmm. You know, I don't know. The the only thing would be, you know, I guess, when they go to the locker room and change and all those things. But if if she's already Speaker 0: Yeah. Experience with that. She usually comes already outfitted and, like, not needing the locker room just to avoid issues.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover parent journalist said she was going to move forward and submit the altered birth certificate so her biological boy could play girls' sports. The administrator then said, "I don't think anybody's going to raise any problems with that." https://t.co/NdkkObkXJ4

Video Transcript AI Summary
I plan to enroll my child in sports and submit the altered birth certificate we have. It's a legal document, so I probably won't mention the alteration again. I don't anticipate any issues arising from it, but you never know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And as far as the sports are concerned, I think I'm just gonna get her enrolled, submit the birth certificate that we have, which has been altered. But it is a Yeah. Legal document. And probably not mentioned it after this. Yeah. They're not I mean, they're not gonna they're not gonna now, you know, I don't think anybody's gonna gonna raise any problems, you know, with that. Okay. You know, you never know.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district administrator is Arthur Elizondo. He is a constituent specialist at the Office of Family and Community Engagement. He works at San Antonio ISD in Texas (@SAISD). https://t.co/TBcR2bk6f7

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district is San Antonio ISD (@SAISD) in Texas. https://t.co/pIIugBj1ag

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalists are at @AccuracyInMedia. This is the 5th Texas school district they've exposed in the past month. The journalist confronting the administrator is @adamguillette. https://t.co/2Lira4N6Q9

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

You can watch the full undercover video by @AccuracyInMedia here: https://youtu.be/Cn2MxdemBYA?si=1YFeuAIb-1adlCog

Saved - January 27, 2025 at 6:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A New York public school teacher, Pamila Pahuja, has been placed on leave after making inflammatory remarks wishing harm on Trump supporters. She expressed a desire for them to "slowly wither away" and stated she would "pray for it to last longer." Pahuja, who earned $164,494 in 2023 and was part of the teachers union, was described by the union as a "true gem." The principal confirmed her absence from school until further notice.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A public school teacher in New York wished for "all Trump supporters" to "slowly wither away while struggling to gasp" and to "suffer long." She's now on leave. She was paid $164,494 in 2023. Her name is Pamila Pahuja. She was in the teachers union. Buckle up 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's the post from Pamila Pahuja who wished "all Trump supporters" would choke and suffer a slow death. "I'll pray for it to last longer." https://t.co/08PYCDd3KR

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The teachers union posted, "Pamila Pahuja is a true gem to the Three Village CommUNITY!" https://t.co/FXuITp0y5H

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's the graphic from the teachers union post about Pamila Pahuja. https://t.co/t2ur0N8vrj

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The teacher made $164,494 in 2023. https://t.co/1Wcn94ddCg

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The principal sent out this letter about the teacher yesterday. "Ms. Pahuja will be out of school until further notice." https://t.co/0AC4AVb3a5

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district is @3vcsd in New York. https://t.co/xKvqDQZOaF

Saved - January 17, 2025 at 1:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered a shocking situation at Richardson ISD, where the DEI administrator, Angie Lee, discussed how biological boys could share rooms with girls on overnight trips. During an undercover conversation, she mentioned that arrangements are made on a case-by-case basis, often without parental approval. When confronted later, Lee denied the conversation and walked away. The district's communications director also struggled to clarify policies. This raises serious questions about transparency and parental rights in school policies.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A Texas public school administrator told an undercover journalist how her biological boy could room with girls on overnight school trips. The DEI administrator said, "At the end of the day, we haven't ended up on the news." I have the video. Buckle up 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist tells the public school administrator that she has a "transgender daughter" and wants to know the district’s related policies. The administrator caught on video is Angie Lee, the executive director of DEI for Richardson ISD (near Dallas) 🚨 https://t.co/Fm4npkuhj4

Video Transcript AI Summary
My daughter is transgender, and we're seeking a school district that is accepting. I've heard your district is diverse, and we have family in the greater Dallas area. Can you share your policies regarding transgender students?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So my daughter is transgender, and we're looking for a school district that would be accepting towards her. And I heard your district is very diverse. We have some family in the greater Dallas area. So we're just wondering, I guess, what are your policies towards transgender students?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district’s executive director of DEI goes on to explain how biological boys could room with girls on overnight school trips. "We see a lot of the bigger things at the high school level, like.. can you have mixed rooms?" https://t.co/QG7GcIGHpe

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the high school level, there are significant considerations regarding travel, especially when it involves overnight stays. One key question is whether mixed-gender rooms are permissible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See a lot of the bigger things at the high school level like, they're traveling and they're gonna do an overnight stay somewhere and, you know, can you have mixed rooms?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The DEI director explains how it's possible for boys to stay overnight with girls on school trips. "I think that there's been times when that has been worked out." "I'm just going on the cases I know about." "The other students who were in the room, they were all friends." https://t.co/p9U6Vt5yGa

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are considerations for transgender students traveling and staying with peers. Each situation is handled on a case-by-case basis. In some instances, arrangements have been successfully made, especially when the students involved are friends and their parents are supportive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was travel with the transgender like, would my transgender daughter be able to travel and stay with the rest of the girls? Or is that something that you'd have to figure out case by case? Speaker 1: I think it's case by case. I think that there's been, times when that has been worked out. But then, but the student and I'm just going on the cases I know about. But then the student, the the other students who were in the room Mhmm. They were all friends. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Speaker 1: And so they knew and the parents were okay with it. You see what I'm saying? Okay.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist asks for clarification on whether the girls' parents would have to approve. "It's just a case by case." "Sometimes.. you have one parent who is against it.. it depends on the custodial agreement, too.. is it joint custody? .. it just kind of depends." https://t.co/lj9RVduUv8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Approval from other parents is typically handled on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes one parent may oppose a decision, and the situation can vary depending on the custodial agreement. Factors such as whether there is joint custody or if one parent holds all educational rights play a significant role in the decision-making process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So the other parents would have to approve then or something like that or case by case? Speaker 1: Just It's just a case by case. Sometimes, you know, you have one parent who is against it, but then that parent it depends on the the custodial agreement too. Like, you know, is it joint custody or is it, this is the custodial parent with all the education rights. Mhmm. It just it just kinda depends.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"We've kind of seen it all.. and at the end of the day, we haven't ended up on the news." https://t.co/6Fggwxo1X8

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've encountered a wide range of situations, and our general counsel has experienced nearly everything. Despite facing various challenges, we have managed to avoid any negative media attention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just seen it all. Yeah. Our general counsel has pretty much seen it all. Mhmm. You know? And so I'm say I say all that to say it's we've probably dealt with all of it to some degree. Okay. And at the end of the day Mhmm. We haven't ended up on the news.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BUSTED: A journalist confronted the DEI director at the school district offices. As soon as she realizes what the conversation is about, she denies it and walks away 🚨 https://t.co/nzoAGcQFdE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Did you coach a parent on how their biological son could spend the night in hotel rooms with girls during field trips? No, that did not happen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We received a report that you were coaching a parent on how their biological son could spend overnight in hotel rooms with girls on field trips. Is that true? No. It's not. That didn't happen?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Journalist: "When the parents are involved, do they even sign permission slips? How do you know that they're absolutely okay with biological boys sharing a room with the girls?" The DEI director won't respond. https://t.co/KND6CmBffn

Video Transcript AI Summary
When parents are involved, how can we be sure they consent to biological boys sharing rooms with girls? If one parent opposes it, does the custodial agreement matter? It varies based on custody arrangements. For instance, in joint custody situations, both parents may need to agree, while in sole custody, the custodial parent may have the final say regarding educational rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the parents are involved, do they even sign permission slips? How do you know that they're absolutely okay with biological boys sharing a room with the girls? And you mentioned how if some of the parents don't have full custody, they don't necessarily have to sign off. Is that true? Speaker 1: Sometimes, you know, you have one parent who is against it, but then that parent it depends on the the custodial agreement too. Like, you know, is it joint custody or is it, this is the custodial parent with all the education rights. Mhmm. It just it just kinda depend.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The DEI director walks away as the journalist asks her, "What do you say to the parents who don't want biological boys sharing rooms with the girls?" Great work by @adamguillette confronting the school district officials. https://t.co/C2tpPLopjA

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The journalist then confronts the district’s communications director, Tim Clark. Accuracy in Media had a mobile billboard of the undercover footage playing on repeat outside the district offices. https://t.co/Mn3v06JRPz

Video Transcript AI Summary
I need to see the video before I can comment on what Angie Lee said or didn't say. Let me show it to you right now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before I can comment or provide any information on the video or what Angie Lee said or didn't say, I'm gonna need to actually see Sure. Let me show it to you right now. You know, what I'd like to do Well, let me grab a

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The district’s comms director can't even tell the journalist what the district policy is on boys sharing rooms with girls in overnight trips. "I don't know, right now, specifically what every district policy is, related to every aspect of district operations." Gaslighting. https://t.co/tcreAMurXq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Can you clarify the district policy on boys sharing hotel rooms with girls? I'm not sure about the specific district policies regarding this matter. I can send you the video, but I need to know if that's the policy. I don't have the details on every district policy related to all operations at the moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you tell me what the district policy is on boys sharing hotel rooms with girls? Speaker 1: Once again, I'm asking you if you could send me the video. Speaker 0: I'm happy to send it to you, but I wanna know if that's the district policy or not. Speaker 1: I don't know right now specifically what every district policy is related to every aspect of district operations.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Angie Lee is listed at the Executive Director of "Equity, Diversity and Inclusion" on the Richardson ISD website. https://t.co/CB22qn77Pz

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Angelia Lee made $125,572 at Richardson ISD in 2023. https://t.co/Mu4NB0U1t3

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district is @RichardsonISD near Dallas, Texas. https://t.co/f578hEDrw4

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school district has an X account for their "Department of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion." The account is @RISD_Equity. https://t.co/2uvsDciztQ

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The investigative journalists are at @AccuracyInMedia. The full undercover video of the journalists talking to the DEI director: https://youtu.be/XrUpaIW_MgM?si=QZFGhrIkenfvgBd3

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's the full video including the confrontation with the school district’s DEI and comms directors: https://youtu.be/UWciqoWN3X8?si=sIfZq579Qi-1LqbD

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

UPDATE: The school district's "Senior Executive Director of Leadership and Intervention" just blocked me (@BallastShawna). https://t.co/1T5Tuj8HTz

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@BallastShawna UPDATE: The school district's "Senior Executive Director of Leadership and Intervention" just went private. https://t.co/zXCACl0h9b

Saved - January 14, 2025 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across a video where a Texas public school administrator, Mahoganie Gaston, discussed how a biological boy could play in girls' sports by exploiting legal loopholes. She expressed her willingness to face jail time for what she believes is saving a child's life. When questioned about potential injuries to girls, she assured support under Title IX and dismissed concerns about getting caught, citing the ACLU as backup. The situation escalated when a journalist confronted her, leading to security being called to remove him from the premises.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A Texas public school administrator told an undercover journalist that her biological boy could play in girls' sports by finding "loopholes" in the law. The LGBTQ Youth Coordinator said, "I will go to jail for saving their child's life" I have the video Buckle up 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist poses as a parent who wants her biological boy to play in girls' sports. The Dallas ISD LGBTQ Youth Program Coordinator caught on video is Mahoganie Gaston. https://t.co/1rzuuoVCaK

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm considering moving to Texas, particularly this area, and I'm seeking guidance about the community since my daughter is transgender. You're very brave for reaching out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the reason why I was, told to come to you is because I'm looking to potentially move to Texas, potentially in this area. And, my daughter is transgender, and I heard that you'd be able to help with that, kind of help with getting me a feel for the community. Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. So as you know, well, one, you're very brave. Oh, well, thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist says she wants her biological boy to play on the girls' soccer team. The public school administrator says Texas passed a law against that "unless you have an updated birth certificate." 🚩 https://t.co/jOPJenQkZw

Video Transcript AI Summary
My daughter is an athlete who wants to play on the girls' soccer team, but we've faced some bigotry in Arlington and New Jersey. We thought people would be more progressive, but that hasn't been the case. Is there a way for her to play? Unfortunately, if the league is governed by UIL regulations, Texas has a law that requires students to participate in sports based on the gender listed on their birth certificate. This could limit her options significantly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One big concern that we have is that my daughter is an athlete and she played soccer. And she's very into yeah. She obviously wants to play in the girls team, and there was some bigotry against her where we're from in the the Arlington area and then also in New Jersey where their family is. And do you think these people would be kinda more progressive, but they ended up not being as such, but, I mean, would there be a way for her to play? Speaker 1: So, unfortunately, if it's, like, UYAL Sports Mhmm. University I Speaker 0: don't know Speaker 1: if they had it in all states. So university, intergalactic league. So if they're under the UIL, Texas passed a law that, students can't participate in the sport that's listed on the Speaker 0: birth certificate. Speaker 1: Okay. Election of update. Birth certificate.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The parent asks if her biological boy could play on the girls' team if she had an updated birth certificate. The LGTBQ Youth Coordinator said they were "always refining" and that "they find the loopholes in everything." "They didn't say 'original' or 'updated,' I mean..." https://t.co/U7ZeXQQim9

Video Transcript AI Summary
In New Jersey and Virginia, it's possible to update a birth certificate to include an "X" gender marker. However, there are challenges if the original order isn't available. It seems there are ways to navigate these issues, but it can be complicated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we had an updated birth certificate and and so we're able to do that in New Jersey and I think also in Virginia, we can put I believe we can put even x on the birth certificate. Would that be fine? They said birth certificate. They didn't have original order. I mean Okay. I was just finding. You know? Okay. They find the loopholes and everything.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalist says some people might be concerned if her biological boy injured a girl on the field and asks if the district would support her biological boy. The LGBTQ Youth Coordinator chuckles about it and says "Absolutely. Yes.. We still have to follow Title IX." https://t.co/JofrSogjVw

Video Transcript AI Summary
My daughter plays sports, but there are concerns about fairness because she's bigger than other kids. When she performs well, some people claim it's unfair due to her being transgender. Incidents, like injuries, lead to accusations against her participation. We're trying to prevent such situations. If an accident occurs, would you support her? Absolutely. Is there any discrimination because she's transgender? No. We still need to adhere to Title IX regulations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My daughter was playing sports. People were like, well, that's not fair because she's bigger than everyone. And even if she if she, like, did anything on the field, people were like, no. That's not fair. Even there was, like, an accident or an incident where, like, a kid got injured, they'd be like, no. That's not fair because she's transgender. You can't do that. You can't do that. Yeah. So we're just trying to prevent something like that happening. I mean, like, if she were to be, like, on the field and if there were, like, an accident and people trying to make a whole big deal about it, would you guys be there to support her? That's kind of Absolutely. Okay. Okay. Yes. Okay. So would it be like any discrimination because she's No. Okay. We still have to follow Title 9.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"I tell people all the time. I will go to jail for saving their child's life. I guess no conservative kids come out gay." https://t.co/UKfGyly8nB

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The public school administrator suggests she wouldn't be worried about getting caught. "How would that look on the news? 'LGBTQ advocate arrested for protecting a child.' Think I'm going to get in any trouble getting bailed out?" She cites the ACLU as potential help. https://t.co/wCUyUZTO1l

Video Transcript AI Summary
You ever think about how you'd look on the news if you got arrested for protecting a child? I doubt it would be a problem getting bailed out. Many people would support you for standing up for what's right. The ACLU and others would likely step in to help.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know problems with any of your kids no matter what? No. Okay. I seriously, how would y'all look on the news? Mhmm. LGBTQ advocate arrested for protecting a child. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Think I'm gonna have any any trouble getting bailed out. No. No. I I'm sure I'm sure a lot of people will come bail you out because you're fighting the fucking good fight. Yeah. Yeah. I'm sure a lot of ACLU. I'm sure some people have to be filed. Yeah.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

A journalist confronts the LGBTQ Youth Coordinator for helping the parent find "loopholes" to the law to allow a biological boy to play in girls' sports. She SLAMS THE DOOR in his face. He is then escorted downstairs after she refused to talk. https://t.co/dkuAKGjLoc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, I'm Adam Gillette with Accuracy and Media. I heard you were coaching a parent on how to break laws regarding biological boys and girls in sports. Is that true? No response. Is there someone else we should talk to? You can check with security downstairs. We're fine waiting here to possibly speak with her further. No? Okay, great.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, how are you? I'm Adam Gillette with Accuracy and Media. I received a report that you were coaching a parent on how to break laws related to biological boys and girls sports. Is that true? No response. That's interesting. Is there someone else we should speak with? Downstairs, we're security and ask Downstairs? Okay. We're we're happy to hang out here. That way, we can maybe chat with her further. No. Okay. Great.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

School district officials then get security to kick the reporter out of the building for asking questions 🚨 https://t.co/lviJtBc9Vi

Video Transcript AI Summary
I love your jacket! Thank you! I love yours too!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We speak. All right. No problem. I love your jacket, by the way. Thank you. I love your jacket, by the way. Thank you. I love your ones. All right. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The undercover journalists also parked a mobile billboard displaying the video outside the Dallas school district offices. The group is called Accuracy in Media (@AccuracyInMedia). The journalist confronting the school officials was @adamguillette. https://t.co/jEhzGznX5Y

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The public school official caught by the undercover journalists is Mahoganie Gaston. Here is her LinkedIn. She has worked at Dallas ISD for 10 years. https://t.co/Jke8IhvYBI

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The full undercover video exposing Dallas ISD by @AccuracyInMedia: https://youtu.be/FPHS7FJdz68?si=XBg1A2nxp-myfkwY

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@AccuracyInMedia The school district is Dallas ISD (@dallasschools). https://t.co/wJdZiDxWMO

Saved - December 9, 2024 at 12:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A public school teacher, Cody Richison, was arrested by the FBI for possessing child pornography and admitted to having sexual contact with a friend's 10-year-old foster son. Disturbing text messages revealed his interest in engaging in pedophilia. Richison expressed intentions to become a foster parent and received numerous abusive images of children. The superintendent of Holdenville Schools stated that the community is devastated and confused, while the State Board of Education plans to review his teaching certificate. The investigation is ongoing.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A public school teacher was arrested by the FBI for possessing child porn. Agents say he admitted to having sex with a friend's 10-year-old foster son & confessed to receiving 100 photos/videos of child porn. He talked about becoming a foster parent. Buckle up👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Federal agents say the teacher admitted to having more than just child pornography, but had sex with a young child." https://t.co/HpcGajbbes

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cody Richardson, a teacher in Holdenville, is revealed to have a troubling past. Federal agents report that he not only possessed child pornography but also admitted to having sexual relations with a young child.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Document reveals Cody Richardson wasn't the beloved teacher in Holdenville everyone thought. In here, federal agents say the teacher admitted to having more than just child pornography, but had sex with a young child.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's a video of the teacher who was arrested. His name is Cody Richison, a 34-year-old agriculture teacher at Holdenville High School in Oklahoma. https://t.co/8n9uSzt1d7

Video Transcript AI Summary
FFA is not limited to rural or farm kids; it's for anyone wanting to be part of an organization that fosters personal growth and community involvement. Recently, a Holdenville ag teacher was arrested by US Marshals on charges of possessing child pornography.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fay isn't just for rural kids. It's not just for farm kids. It's for people who want to be involved in an organization that makes them bigger than themselves. That is the Holdenville ag teacher accused of possessing child porn who was taken away by US Marshals this

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Agents say they found text messages from January 2024 between Cody Richison and a man named Joseph Sampson. The messages are disturbing 👇🚨 https://t.co/RF16ChF7zG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal agents began investigating Cody Richardson in August after examining the phone of another suspect involved in similar crimes. The FBI discovered text conversations on that phone in which Richardson allegedly admitted to having sexual relations with a friend's foster son, who was only 10 years old.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Documents obtained by KOCO reveal federal agents began investigating Cody Richardson back in August after going through the phone of another suspect accused of similar crimes. On that phone, the FBI found text conversations with the AG teacher, where he allegedly admitted to having sex with a friend's foster son, who was just 10 years old.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Sampson: "You really want to do the pedo family thing?" Richison: "Yes I do. Do you?" S: "God yes .. You f***ed an underage? .. Whats youngest youve been in?" Richison: "10 .. A buddy’s foster son .. There’s a guy in henryetta that has a 3-4 yo"

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Agents say he told them he recently talked about becoming a foster parent himself 🚨 And that he received "100 photos and videos of children being sexually abused" that "included children as young as infants." And that he knew what happened to child molesters in prison. https://t.co/0Jao5veo9E

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Superintendent Randy Davenport: "We were assured once again by them that it had nothing to do with any students at Holdenville Schools which we were very thankful for" https://t.co/Nipte8JnKY

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Superintendent Randy Davenport: "Our kids are, for a lack of a better word, devastated. They’re confused and frustrated. We are going to do everything in our power to fulfill all the obligation for them. We will proceed on." https://t.co/9UMnlyrWTF

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are committed to fulfilling all our obligations and will continue to move forward despite any frustrations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And frustrated, and we're gonna do everything in our power to fulfill all the obligations, for them. We will proceed on.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"The State Board of Education plans to review Mr. Richison's teaching certificate at the next board of education meeting, likely suspending that certificate." https://t.co/MAnDkmp7hI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The state board of education will review Mr. Richardson's teaching certificate at the next meeting, which may lead to its suspension. The superintendent stated that no students have reported any inappropriate behavior from their former teacher.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the superintendent says the state board of education plans to review mister Richardson's teaching certificate at the next board of education meeting likely suspending that certificate. Today, the superintendent tells us none of his students have come forward, alleging inappropriate behavior with their former teacher. Reporting live, Kylie Thomas, KOCL 5 News.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"The charges against this teacher are deeply disturbing and the situation is under investigation by OSDE. As with any concern of inappropriate, abusive, or criminal behavior in a school, parents and the public are urged to file a complaint.. so our agency may investigate." https://t.co/0FUalO46ju

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Cody Richison is still listed as faculty on the Holdenville High School website. https://t.co/tEA1vSczLZ

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's the teacher's Facebook. https://t.co/5KSjcn1ZxA

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Here's the teacher's LinkedIn. https://t.co/cXGp4fUxSW

Saved - November 20, 2024 at 11:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Two New Hampshire Senate Democrats lost their seats, leading to a Republican supermajority in the Senate and an expanded majority in the House. The new Governor-elect, Kelly Ayotte, won by over 9 points and supports universal school choice, a key part of the GOP platform. Both defeated Democrats, Donna Soucy and Shannon Chandley, were backed by the teachers' union and opposed school choice. Currently, New Hampshire's school choice initiative is limited to certain income levels, but Ayotte advocates for universal education freedom for all families.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Two New Hampshire Senate Democrats lost their seats this election. The Republicans now have a supermajority in the Senate. They expanded their majority in the House. The Republican Governor-elect won by more than 9 points. It's time for UNIVERSAL school choice 👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The GOP went from a 14–10 majority in the Senate to a 16–8 veto-proof majority. Republicans went from a 197-191 majority in the House to a 222–178 majority. School choice is on the Republican Party Platform. They should expand their school choice initiative to ALL families. https://t.co/8iqt8nW8yO

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The leader of the New Hampshire Senate Democrats lost her seat. Donna Soucy*: 48.5% 🔵 Victoria Sullivan: 51.5% 🔴 (+3) Donna was endorsed by the state affiliate of Randi Weingarten’s union. Victoria supports school choice. https://t.co/pwNjQfrdFq

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

New Hampshire Senate Democrat Shannon Chandley lost her seat. Shannon Chandley*: 49.1% 🔵 Tim McGough: 50.9% 🔴 (+1.8) Shannon was endorsed by the state affiliate of Randi Weingarten’s union. Tim supports school choice. https://t.co/BazlIU3hZy

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The next Republican Governor of New Hampshire, Kelly Ayotte, won her race by 9.3 points. @KellyAyotte supports UNIVERSAL school choice. Democrat Joyce Craig was endorsed by the teachers union and opposed school choice. It's time for New Hampshire to go all-in on school choice. https://t.co/thI54qpWnI

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

New Hampshire already has a school choice initiative. BUT it's limited to families with incomes at or below 350% of the poverty line. No more picking winners and losers. Governor-elect Kelly Ayotte: "I support universal education freedom." https://t.co/gCb8vGSoeD

Saved - November 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Two teachers in Oregon have been arrested for sexually abusing students, leading to the resignation of the school board chair and the suspension of the superintendent and principal. Students and parents expressed outrage at a school board meeting, demanding accountability and resignations. Allegations date back to 2016, with claims that the district ignored warnings about the teachers' behavior. The choir teacher, Eric Stearns, faces multiple charges, while the district is criticized for its handling of the situation and for previously honoring Stearns. The school has closed amid protests.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Two public school teachers have been arrested & charged with sexually abusing 9 students in Oregon. The Superintendent & Principal were put on leave & the board chair RESIGNED Students and parents WENT OFF at the school board meeting. Here's the video Buckle up👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Student: "What was your reaction to finding out that [choir teacher] Eric Stearns was an active p*dophile with immediate access to minors for two months? You need to RESIGN." https://t.co/loUshcY7RO

Video Transcript AI Summary
What was your reaction upon discovering that Aaron Stern was an active pedophile for two months? You need to take immediate action to address the issues here and consider resigning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You feel about the school? What was your what was your reaction instead of finding out that Aaron Stern was an active pedophile with an immediate active to be minor for 2 months? You need to take 2 actions. You need to fix your problems here, and you need to resign.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Student: "When I first moved here, I was told by him that I could come to him for absolutely anything, that he could be MY FATHER.. He told me that he was MY FATHER if I needed him to be." https://t.co/7lo3t2Gtwh

Video Transcript AI Summary
When I first arrived, he assured me I could rely on him for anything, offering his support like a father figure. He expressed his willingness to step into that role if I needed him. I recognize at least three of you here with me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I first moved here. I was told by him that I can come to him for absolutely anything, that he could be my father and help me. Yes. He is hoping that he was my father if I needed him to be. I know at least 3 of you standing up here.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Student: "He hugged me, kissed me on the head, and told me that he loved me.. my mom specifically made complaints about Mr. Stearns putting his hand around my neck as a 'vocal exercise' – that, too, went swept under the rug.. you are all to blame. You are all guilty." https://t.co/ybWTsonHnu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Freshman year was terrifying due to bullying, harassment, and assault from another student. My only refuge was choir class, where I connected with Mr. Stearns, who became my safe person. As a vulnerable 14-year-old, I accepted his hugs and affection, not realizing the inappropriateness. Despite my mother's concerns about our closeness, I felt alone and naive. The school district had a history of covering up sexual abuse by staff, and my reports of bullying were dismissed due to lack of evidence. My mom complained about Mr. Stearns' inappropriate behavior, but it was ignored. We eventually hired an attorney, but the response was dismissive, suggesting we were mentally unwell. The school claims to foster a safe environment while blaming the victims. The accountability lies with the administration, and change is desperately needed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Freshman year was filled with fear as I was bullied, harassed, and assaulted by another student for months. The only outlet where I felt like I could breathe into my choir class. After the as the bullying progressed, my mental health was increasingly getting worse. I found that my safe person at school was mister Stearns. Mister Stearns and I would talk during lunch together quite often alone in his classroom. As a vulnerable 14 year old girl, I didn't find that it was weird that he'd hug me, kiss me on the head, and tell me that he loves me. I felt alone in this world, and I needed somebody, didn't I? I didn't question it. In fact, I didn't question it when my own mom read up her concerns about our closeness. I was vulnerable I was vulnerable, and I was naive. And the school district had covered up many past previous sexual abuse from former staff members, but this will be the last. I went through 4 months of bullying, and we were never helped by Adam. And we were told there was no evidence because the bullying happened primarily in the bathroom. The school approved mister Shirts to be my safety person. It got so bad we had to hire an attorney. I'm surprised Adam had had the courage to show their face tonight. My mom specifically made complaints about mister Strand putting his hand around my neck as a vocal exercise. That too went swept under the rug. He was my mentor, and I was a young, vulnerable girl. They didn't do anything when students reported her and other students reported stirs or even each other for sexual abuse, sexual assault, and sexual behavior. Saying that we want to foster a safe environment, yet you blame the accusers of being mentally unwell or perclaps. We hired an attorney. Your guys' attorney said, well, what do you expect? It's Columbia County. Wow. Expect to happen now. Yeah. Where did Scott Stockwell? Yeah. Students who were ever being timid because of your guys' arrogance, and you are all to blame. You are all guilty. Burn into the ground start fresh.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Parent: "You guys and the teachers – they have normalized this behavior. You're part of the grooming process. I hope you hear us. Because you didn't hear our children." https://t.co/kbAKOL491M

Video Transcript AI Summary
They have normalized certain behaviors, and this has become part of the grooming process. People are expressing their demands, and it's crucial that you listen, as our children have not been heard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have normalized no. Let me rephrase that. This and them. You guys Normalize. And the teachers, they have normalized these behaviors. You're part of the grooming process. People are showing what we want and what we demand, and I hope you hear us because you didn't hear our children.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"I am so beyond mad that you guys willingly and knowingly put my daughter at risk. You guys need to be held just as accountable as the p*dophil*s that you let in the schools." https://t.co/mhormaiofg

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am extremely upset that you knowingly put my daughter at risk. You need to be held accountable just like the individuals who pose a threat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She has been in music history with Stern since the beginning of the year. And for anybody that doesn't know, apparently, Colin still works for them, but he's been substituting through Stephanie Shaw. I am so beyond mad that you guys willingly and knowingly put my daughter at risk. You guys need to be held just as accountable as the pedophiles that you let me pull.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Each and every single one of you needs to RESIGN. If you guys don't step down, when you do come up for election, I'm going to be the loudest one out there talking about how you let this go down." https://t.co/Na8wYVmPnh

Video Transcript AI Summary
You all need to resign. If you don’t step down, I will be the loudest voice against you when election time comes. This situation is unacceptable, and I will hold each of you accountable for allowing this to happen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think that the thing that needs to happen to each and every single one of you is to resign. Yes. Are you sure that if you guys don't step down, when you do come up for election or however that works, I'm gonna be the loudest one out there talking about how you let this go down. All time you're looking. Every single one of you. This is unacceptable.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Student: "I am just disgusted with you guys for letting him near me and my friends.. they were let around a p*dophil*." https://t.co/dx3bo4ujGx

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am appalled that you allowed a pedophile near me and my friends, who have already faced unimaginable challenges. It's unacceptable that there are still teachers at my school who make many uncomfortable. Changes are necessary for my sake and for my cousin, who just started middle school and could encounter these individuals. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am just disgusted with you guys for letting him near me and my friends because they have been through stuff that are unimaginable, and they were let around a pedophile. That is disgusting. And how many teachers who are like that that are still at my school that my friends and so many other people I know have been uncomfortable with? You guys need to change for my sake and for my cousin's sake, who has now just moved into the middle school and might have to deal with the creeps you've allowed in. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Two months this teacher was at the school in contact with minors and children.. if you were aware of this situation, notified through police and investigators, why was he still allowed on school grounds?" https://t.co/e76ruUA7HL

Video Transcript AI Summary
A teacher was in contact with minors for two months, raising concerns about their presence at the school. If the police and investigators were informed about the situation, why was the teacher still permitted on school grounds?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So 2 months, this teacher was at the school in contact with minors and children, our children, and I would like to understand if my one question to you all. If you were aware of the situation, notified through police and investigators, why was he still allowed on school grounds?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

A student brings up other teachers still on campus. "Why was he allowed back on campus at all? .. he's still a coach here!" "You guys have all known about it for years.. Why haven't you done anything? .. [We] don't want to be around p*dophil*s." https://t.co/0p3c1ZRSmd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Concerns have been raised about the lack of action regarding individuals like Desmond Shipper and Desmond Stottomire, who have faced serious allegations involving minors. Despite evidence and numerous complaints over the years, these individuals remain in positions within the school. Questions arise about the disparity in disciplinary actions, as some students face expulsion for minor offenses while these individuals continue to be allowed in the environment. The ongoing presence of such individuals raises serious concerns about the safety and protection of students, highlighting a need for accountability and action to ensure a safe educational environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So as Jason asked, if you guys have known, I I probably got made his name in TikTok, but he had shown evidence that he had sent you this email months ago. And another that people. And another question, why has nothing been done about Desmond Shipper? Someone who's been lit on fire. No. Not not just Shonda Meyer, but Desmond Shipper. Someone who's had many allegations of 11 year olds, 10 year olds, 12 year olds. Why has nothing been done about him when he just caused so many fights? When I was spreading expulsion for much less, why was she allowed to come back to school? Why was I for an expulsion over something much smaller? And not just to mention, Desmond Stottlemeyer, a coach who was caught mentioning 17 year old girls, 16 year old girls. Why was he allowed back in camps at all? Why yeah. He's still a coach here. He's still enrolled as coach here. And not mister mister Newsom, why is he allowed here after 20 years of teaching, after 20 years of allegations, 20 years of people coming out against him, of his racist comments, of his sexual comments, upon young minors? It is absolutely outrageous that we allow these people to stay here, and you guys have all known about it for years. For Houston, we've Desmond Shaffer has had so many points over the years. Desmond Stottomire, you guys have known about that. There's been so many complaints. You guys have all known about it. I wanna know why. Why haven't you done anything to protect our kids? It's like me. People like me who go to high school don't wanna be around petabytes. We wanna be protected.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"When I went to the high school.. and I talked to the principal, and she brushed it off like it was nothing!" https://t.co/9doFvc6dtG

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been waiting for parents of child victims to speak out, but many are embarrassed and reluctant. What frustrates me the most is when I approached the high school principal about police reports regarding these incidents, and she dismissed them as unimportant. It raises the question of when she will be held accountable for her actions and inaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have been waiting for the day where where parents who have children who have been victims I don't know other parents that have kids that are victims because the kids are embarrassed, and they don't want us coming and speaking in to the other ones. So the one thing I have to say that probably pissed me off more than anything was when I went to the high school, my we also had police reports, And I talked to the principal, and she brushed it off like it was nothing. Yeah. Like it was nothing. When is she gonna be held accountable for her role and bring her hit the other way? But I'm only gonna.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"This has been going on since 2016.. You guys knew about it. We knew you knew about it and you did nothing about it." https://t.co/h1xF7cUiJp

Video Transcript AI Summary
This issue isn't recent; it has been ongoing since 2000. There are more problems that have persisted since 2016 and earlier. You were aware of these issues, and yet you did nothing to address them. The government ignored them, and those responsible faced no consequences. This situation is unacceptable, and I am extremely angry about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just to clarify, this is not something happening in the last 6 weeks. This has been going on since 2,000 Yeah. You guys are moving on to the insurance. There are more items that has been going on since 2016 and earlier. You guys knew about it. We knew you knew about it and you did nothing about it. Nothing. It's got run I mean, it got run out of the government. Nothing to be ignored. They were punished. And I'm not gonna tell them that. I am so angry about this. Furious.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Our teachers and staff used to be the ones we trusted our children with and now they are the least trusted." https://t.co/IcjJg3z1Cd

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are the statistic. Our teachers and staff, once trusted, are now among the least trusted. We need to take accountability and work to restore that trust. If we allow our children to be victims, we are complicit in the abuse. I urge everyone to reflect on what they can do to create a safe and supportive environment for students. If you cannot contribute to this change, consider stepping aside for someone who can. Actions speak louder than words, and simply sending messages to parents will not resolve this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are the statistic. Our teachers and staff used to be the ones we trusted our children with, and now they they are the least trusted. We have a lot of work to turn this around and right the ship. Leadership must be held accountable. Teachers and staff must be held accountable. If we continue to allow our children to be victims, we're no better than the one blame abusing them. I implore each and every one of you to look at yourself, ask what you can do to make change. What can you do to make make these students feel safe and supported? And if you can't, then resign and let somebody else that can. And like those of these questions, I'll remind those in this written, matching speak louder than words. Sending out all the parents who are messages will not fix this issue.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Our school district doesn't have the best record of having p*dophil*s in our schools.. we seem to attract p*dophil*s to our school district.." https://t.co/uFG1Yp7x12

Video Transcript AI Summary
The school district has a troubling history with pedophiles, raising concerns about student safety. Questions are being asked about what measures are being taken to prevent these incidents and how staff have allowed this culture to persist for years. There is frustration over the continued presence of individuals with questionable backgrounds, such as a wrestling coach still interacting with students. As a parent of two daughters, one currently attending the school, there is a strong desire for assurance regarding their protection. The community seeks accountability and transparency in addressing these serious issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The police to see investigation, but say how the school district doesn't have the best record of having pedophiles in our schools, so we should have not listed the police. Data. I just wanna know what's being done. We seem to attract pedophiles from school district. What's being done to prevent that? What's being done with the staff that's allowed that to happen for a decade? You have created a welcome to culture. I mean, I we can tick off all the people that have happened. Somehow, you've been convicted. The wrestling coach is still with the students in the Right. No longer involved in serving. I mean, I have 2 daughters that have gone to the school. 1's still currently there, and I wanna know if she's being protected. You're not. You're not being protected. I'm there. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"[Eric] Stearns is facing 7 counts of second-degree sex abuse and 1 count of third-degree sex abuse involving six different students. [Mark] Collins is facing 2 counts of second-degree sex abuse and 1 count of attempted second-degree sex abuse." Stearns is shown on the left. https://t.co/U5F4w5kvIC

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The @StHelensSD school board chair, Ryan Scholl, said law enforcement advised the district to keep the choir teacher accused of sexually abusing students in the classroom. The police chief says that isn't true. The board chair has resigned. https://t.co/1aclMZnS5X

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@StHelensSD St. Helens School District Superintendent Scot Stockwell and Principal Katy Wagner were both put on paid leave. Salary: $189,745 The district is @StHelensSD. https://t.co/8o5JUpDM4Y

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@StHelensSD "St. Helens High School has closed its doors early Thursday and will remain closed through Monday after protesters gathered outside the campus following an investigation that led two teachers to be accused of sexual abuse." @StHelensSD https://t.co/H9TL3gKHD2

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@StHelensSD "Top law enforcement officials in Columbia County say the St. Helens School District received allegations that two high school teachers sexually abused students over a period of several years and failed to share that information with authorities." @StHelensSD https://t.co/8P9r0Nn18Z

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@StHelensSD The school district (@StHelensSD) gave Eric Stearns the "Tire-Less Teacher Award" in 2022. https://t.co/bzcKrTT1XP

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"The police said the St. Helens School District was informed of the abuse allegations as early as 2019 but officials failed to alert the authorities." https://t.co/U6XLmoMYqQ

Saved - November 13, 2024 at 11:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Parents are outraged over a California teacher's meltdown after Trump's victory, calling his comments racist and demanding his firing. A Hispanic mother expressed her offense, emphasizing her identity and family support for Trump. The school board allegedly censored opposing views during a meeting, but a parent recorded the incident. The situation has gained significant media attention, with over 25 million views, and has drawn comments from notable figures, highlighting the need for accountability in schools.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: Parents WENT OFF on the California public school teacher who had a meltdown in class after Trump won. They said he "made the most racist comment" and "should be FIRED." Parents are "offended," "put [the school board] on notice " & MORE. I have the video. Buckle up👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

The school board hid the video of anyone speaking against them last night. But they showed video of people speaking favorably about them. I've never seen anything like it. Thankfully, a parent who supports Trump brought their own camera and tripod. Here is that video.👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Hispanic mom GOES OFF on teacher who had a meltdown in class after Trump won: "To say that a Hispanic man wants to be White .. I'm offended. Yo soy Mexicana. I am Chicana. I am indigenous, and my family voted for Trump .. [the teacher] should be FIRED .. You are put on notice." https://t.co/EQsjPcKSxY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Can you guarantee that children of parents who supported Trump will not be bullied in your classrooms? Schools must have zero tolerance for hate speech. Statements like calling a Hispanic man a derogatory term are unacceptable. As a Chicana and indigenous person, I find such remarks offensive. My family has diverse political views, but that doesn't justify racial attacks. This teacher should be fired for their behavior. You need to remember that you are public servants, funded by the community, and can be removed if necessary. What steps will you take to prevent bullying stemming from this teacher's rhetoric? You are now legally on notice; any harassment of children due to this hate speech must be addressed. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: School. Can you ensure every parent that is in the teacher's classroom that did all of those racial outbursts will not be bullied? Can you guarantee that no child that has that teacher, that father or grandfather voted for president Trump, will they be bullied? And if so, what are you going to do about it? It is time that the schools, the school district, stop tolerating hate speech in class. There should be zero tolerance for hate speech to say that a Hispanic man wants to be wiped. That is a racial sorry. I'm offended. I am Chicana. I am indigenous, and my family voted for Trump. I have family members that also voted for Kamala Harris, but does that give me an excuse or anyone else a reason to racially attack them? No. It doesn't. What are you going to do about this teacher? Because he should be fired. There should be zero tolerance for hate speech. And, ma'am, you really need to stop with the gritting. All I see is a room full of parents that are very angry. You need to be respectful. All of you need to be reminded you are public servants. The people pay for you to be there, and the people can remove you quickly. You need to remind yourself that what are you going to do when children start being bullied because of the hate speech that this teacher was saying in the classroom? Again, can you guarantee any of the parents that their child will not be bullied? Because now you are put on notice. If any child is harassed because of the disgusting rhetoric that was put in the class, now you are legally put on notice. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"The majority of your student population is Hispanic .. What [Mr. Perez] just did is make the most RACIST comment, to tell them that their fathers, that if they voted for Trump, that they only did it because they wish they were White. That is the worst of it all. SHAME ON HIM." https://t.co/EaiZyg5VFT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The comments made by Mr. Perez are unacceptable. While some students admire him as a teacher, he must adhere to a higher standard. Accusing students, particularly in a predominantly Hispanic school, of being influenced by their families' political views is deeply offensive. Suggesting that students who voted for Trump did so out of a desire to be white is a racist remark. This behavior is shameful, and I trust that appropriate actions will be taken. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what I wanna say here and say is the bad words that were being spoken by mister Perez is bad enough. I've heard students sit here and say how how they admire him as a teacher. That may be so. But when you're in a position like that, you are held up to a bigger standard. What's good for the goose is what's good for the gander. You wanna sit there and accuse people that they will be that if you sit there and call other students when the majority of your student population is Hispanic, that they know politics in their household, these students. And what you just did is make the most racist comment to tell them that their fathers, blessed to have their fathers in their home like myself, that if they voted for Trump, that they only did because they wish they were white. That is the worst of it all. Shame on him, and I know you will do your due process. Thank you. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"This thing went viral of this teacher, Mr. Perez .. he went crazy .. he's cussing, he's calling people like us that are conservative, that we want to be White. This is a RACIAL RANT .. REMOVE HIM of his duties." https://t.co/PFVLQmREGc

Video Transcript AI Summary
A teacher named Mr. Perez went viral after expressing anger over a student's avoidance of a question related to Trump. His outburst included cursing and labeling conservative views negatively, which many found inappropriate. The discussion also touched on the recent policy to establish a Native American Heritage Day, highlighting that many Latinos have Native ancestry. This contradiction in Mr. Perez's actions was noted, suggesting that if he cannot collaborate effectively with the school, he should be relieved of his duties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, this thing went viral. This teacher, mister Perez, I guess his name is. He, I guess he figured out that somebody avoided the Trump, and he he got pretty upset, and he, and he went crazy. So I don't know. You Speaker 1: know, man that question went white. Speaker 2: And I'll never admit it to you. Lot of Speaker 1: your fathers. Lot of your mumbles. Lot of your grandpa. God, they want you right so bad. They never will. What? Hate that. Speaker 0: Okay. So so so that's the example. Right? He's cussing. He's calling people like other conservative. That we wanna be white. This is a racial, rant. Right? And just right now, you guys, you guys resolved the policy to make a a November Native American Heritage Day. The Latinos were part native. Speaker 2: You know, Speaker 0: we have native blood in us. So he literally assaulted the policy he just created. So I I say you in order to be removed, I say you strip them. If you can't work with the schools anymore, remove all of these duties. Thanks so much. God bless Speaker 2: you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"I'm Mexican-American .. What that teacher did was unacceptable. He said things that should have never been said. He used profane language .. He has a right to say those things, but not at our schools. That was just crossing the line .. there needs to be some MAJOR CONSEQUENCES." https://t.co/K7p8E62mIl

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Mexican American and I attend school board meetings to stay nonpartisan. However, what that teacher said in the audio was unacceptable and crossed the line. He has the right to express himself, but not in our schools. There should be consequences for his actions, and while I'm not sure if he should be fired, there needs to be serious repercussions. Additionally, I've noticed that the meetings aren't being broadcast properly, which is frustrating. I plan to record these non-agenda items on my channel, Reno Valley First, to promote transparency. It's unacceptable that previous meetings were deleted, and I will continue to advocate for change until this improves. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. Let me start off with saying I'm Mexican American. And anytime that I go to these school board meetings, I don't let people know where I stand. You know, I try to stay nonpartisan. What that teacher did was unacceptable. He said things at the on the audio that should never been said. He used profane language and it's just unacceptable. I felt that I should wear my Trump shirt because of the things that he said in that audio. And, you know, he has the right to say those things but not at our schools. That was just crossing the line, and he never should have done that. Don't have any language. I'm just surprised. There's there's gotta be consequences. Consequences for things that you do, consequences for things that you say. And, I'm not sure if you should get fired, you know, but I'm really to that level where there needs to be some major consequences. The other thing that, I'm here for is, you know, I've been at Cal Verde most of my time over there at those school board meetings. But I'm seeing I try to watch these meetings and no one's being broadcast their faces. Why is that? I have no respect for you guys. I wanna know why that's happening. Why it went to that point? Now what I'm gonna do in my little channel, Reno Valley First, on Facebook, on Instagram, I'm gonna come here and record every time that we're doing these non agenda items. And I wanna make sure that it changes because until it doesn't, I'm gonna ask Donovan, Sadiq to come here and do the same thing. He was here last time. We're gonna do our 1st amendment writing to record. You guys need to be transparent. You need to have I don't know why all those meetings got deleted, but that's that's ridiculous. Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should do it. Yeah. That's ridiculous. So I'm gonna be here recording, and I hope you change it so I don't have to bring my little tripod here and do this. Thank you.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"We have attracted the attention of the world's richest man, @elonmusk, Corey DeAngelis, one of the top education experts .. SIX-ALARM DUMPSTERFIRE .. we're world famous on something and it's not very good .. this looks worse than a CLOWN CAR THREE-RING CIRCUS ... KNOCK IT OFF!" https://t.co/9havbFVddV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk and education expert Corey Gilangelis are here to witness the ongoing issues in our school district, which have persisted for decades without significant improvement. The situation, particularly at Edgemont Elementary, is dire and has been raised repeatedly over the years. Attempts to silence discussions and intimidate students are unacceptable. The First Amendment guarantees the right to speak freely, and it should be upheld in our schools. It's crucial to address these problems urgently before they escalate further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have attracted the attention of the world's richest man, Elon Musk, Corey Gilangelis, one of the top education experts. We even have a board member from a competing or neighboring school district here tonight. Why they're here? Looking at the absolutely Yeah. 6 alarm dumpster fire that's been going on in the school district for decades, and you have not done hardly anything to correct it. Now the world knows. We're world famous on something and it's not very good. You talk about student achievement, especially at Edgemont Elementary and what the problem is. You've heard it for decades. CJ can testify. He's been on this board 14 years, and I brought it up for every one of those and before. There is no possible way. That's why this looks like worse than a clown car, 3 ring circus going on here. Then you cut our time. You try to intimidate us. Please bring it on. Then you try to intimidate the kids and the students Yes. Of telling them, oh, you can't talk about that. Have you ever heard of Baca versus Moreno Valley Unified School District? You come up here and say whatever you want to. It's called the first amendment to the constitution. You ought to teach it in this school. Maybe we wouldn't have the problems we do. Knock it off. Get your act together, please, before you burn this thing clear to the ground.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"That's ghetto! They're talking about this Mr. Perez. I'm surprised .. How many times have you people buried things under the rug? From assault to sexual molestation .. we pay record amount of money for that crap that you didn't take care of." https://t.co/3zwKC8T9y5

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man at the podium criticized the audience for unprofessional behavior, specifically calling out a husband for his actions. He expressed frustration over past issues, suggesting that the board has a history of ignoring serious matters, including assault and sexual misconduct. He highlighted that significant amounts of money have been spent to cover up these problems, indicating a lack of accountability. He urged the board to address these issues rather than bury them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another thing. There was a gentleman going back that was standing at the podium. He turns it around and he's yelling at the audience. Her husband. You know, that's ghetto. You're supposed to be professional people here. So, man, you know, you need to and you'll continue it. You know, they're talking about this, mister Perez. I'm surprised and I don't know nothing about it. But how many times have you people and boards before buried things under the rug? From assault to, sexual molestation, it's been done. There's record we paid record amount of money for that crap that you didn't take care of. Okay. Get in the the lawsuit.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

After my posts went viral Friday – viewed over 25 million times – this teacher's anti-Trump meltdown has already been covered outlets including Fox News, NBC, ABC, CBS, Los Angeles Times, Daily Mail, Blaze TV, Sky News, & The Daily Beast. X holds schools accountable, @elonmusk. https://t.co/u3zKyechtF

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

More headlines about the teacher's anti-Trump meltdown in class. We are the media now, @elonmusk. https://t.co/5awhaCND8G

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@elonmusk Subscribe to me here on X to support my work: https://t.co/BPpNzKRkF1

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@elonmusk Latino men shifted 35 points to Trump since 2020. https://t.co/J4VfQgxPdH

Saved - November 9, 2024 at 2:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A California public school teacher, Mr. Perez, had a heated outburst in class, expressing strong anti-Trump sentiments and making alarming comparisons to Hitler. He criticized students for their voting choices and discussed issues of privilege and patriarchy, emphasizing systemic racism. The school district acknowledged the incident, stating they do not condone such behavior. I also found details about Mr. Perez's role in promoting mental health resources and his salary, as well as the superintendent's high compensation, raising concerns about accountability in the district.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: A California public school teacher had a total meltdown in class because Trump won. He compared Trump to Hitler, told kids they could end up in concentration camps, called them privileged, said Kamala lost because of racism/sexism & MORE I have the audio Buckle up👇🧵

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

WARNING: This guy is verbally abusing these children 🚨 "This sh*t is not a f*cking game.. Can you end up in a concentration camp in your lifetime? YES! Can you end up with no human rights? YES! .. has Donald Trump quoted Hitler? YES! Does he embody some of Hitler's ideas? YES!" https://t.co/lNF0IXU4Lm

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a serious matter. It's important to understand that concentration camps and the loss of human rights are possible. While it's unlikely to happen to most people, the potential exists. Donald Trump has quoted Hitler and reflects some of his ideas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This shit is not a fucking game. Does that make sense, everybody? I can't emphasize this enough. Can you end up in a concentration camp in your lifetime? Yes. Yes. Can you end up with no human rights? Yes. Yes. Will it happen to you? Most likely not, which is a good thing. But has Donald Trump quoted Hitler? Yes. Does he embody some of Hitler's ideas? Yes.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Donald Trump won.. because Black men and Brown men didn't show up to vote for Kamala Harris. I know a lot of Latino men on this campus that love Donald Trump and he has called their mothers rapists. He has called their fathers rapists.. and they did vote for him." https://t.co/a8VKaaZ2Jw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump won due to low voter turnout, particularly among white women and black and brown men who did not support Kamala Harris. Many Latino men, despite Trump's derogatory remarks about their families, still chose to vote for him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump won because we have low voter turnout. People didn't wanna vote. He won because white women didn't show up and vote for Kamala Harris. He won because black men and brown men didn't show up and vote for Kamala Harris. Let me tell you, I know a lot of Latino men on this campus, adults and students that love Donald Trump. And he's called their mothers rapists. He's called their fathers rapists. He's called them criminals. He called them the blood of our the poison in the blood of our country. They wanna vote for him, and they did vote for him.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"I know a lot of Latino men that wish they were White.. A lot of your fathers. A lot of your uncles. A lot of your grandfathers. God they wanna be White so bad but they never will be. I hate that sh*t. I hate Latino men that oppress the women in their family, their own daughters" https://t.co/6et46mKdkW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many Latino men secretly wish they were white, but they won't admit it. This desire often leads to the oppression of women in their families, including their daughters. It's frustrating to see them support men who perpetuate this oppression. Despite these issues, I take pride in being Mexican American and love my community. However, I strongly oppose the patriarchy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know a lot of Latino men that wish they were white, and they'll never admit it to you. A lot of your fathers, a lot of your uncles, a lot of your grandfathers. God, they wanna be white so bad. They never will be. Hate that shit. I hate Latino men that oppress the women in their family, their own daughters, and they turn around and vote for men that wanna oppress them. I love being Mexican American. I love my community. God, I fucking hate the patriarchy.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"God I f*cking hate the patriarchy. If you're a young man right now in front of me, I hope you hate it too.. you get the privilege of not being born with a uterus.." https://t.co/f90cZWlgHt

Video Transcript AI Summary
I hate the patriarchy, and if you're a young man, I hope you feel the same. It's not just a women's issue; it's hurting everyone you care about. You may have the privilege of not being directly affected, but it's impacting those around you. You deserve better, and I’m truly sorry for the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: God, I fucking hate the patriarchy. If you're a young man right now in front of me, I hope you hate it too because it's not hurting you. It's hurting everyone you love. You get the privilege of not being born with uterus, so it doesn't affect you. It's affecting everyone else. I'm so fucking sorry, guys. You deserve better. Look at me. You deserve better.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Do you have privilege because you live here? YES! .. You got a f*ck ton of privilege living in this great state." https://t.co/Uj365u7cJX

Video Transcript AI Summary
You have privilege by living here. Consider a 5-year-old Black girl in Arkansas, the only African American in her class, whose great-grandfather was lynched during the civil rights movement. Your circumstances provide you with significant advantages. This upcoming election will impact billions of people. Remember, there are individuals facing harsh realities, like a Palestinian boy in Michigan who might experience violence today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have privilege because you live here? Yes. You're not a 5 year old black girl in Arkansas who's the only African American in her class and his great grandfather was lynched to death during the civil rights movement. You got a fuck ton of privilege living in this great state. This election is gonna affect billions of people. You're very lucky to be where you're at because there is some poor Palestinian boy in Michigan that's gonna get beat up today, an assault and then his nose broken.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Trump said people who fight for the military are stupid cowards. He got drafted into Vietnam and faked medical paperwork to get out of it. Is that someone you idolize? Why did he win the election? A rapist draft dodging coward. Treasonous scum. Why would he win?" https://t.co/NKnYREHt6K

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump has made derogatory comments about military service members, calling them stupid and cowardly. He avoided serving in Vietnam by allegedly faking medical documents. This raises questions about why he is idolized despite these actions. His wealth allowed him to evade military service, which contrasts sharply with the sacrifices made by veterans. The perception of him as a draft dodger and a coward contributes to a negative view of his character, yet he still won the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because Trump said people that fight for the military are stupid cowards and they're idiots. He got trapped into Vietnam and faked medical paperwork to get out of it. Is that someone you idolize? Calls veterans idiots and uses his daddy's money to get out serving in the military? Why did he win the election? A rapist, draft dodging, coward, treasonous scum. Why wouldn't he win?

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"Why would he win? Why did he win them? WHY DID HE WIN THEM? She [Kamala] has a vagina and uterus.. she has melanin." https://t.co/OJvoAx6mpc

Video Transcript AI Summary
He won key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. The question arises: why would voters in Wisconsin choose Joe Biden, an older candidate with a controversial past, over Kamala Harris, a younger candidate with a clean record and forward-thinking policies? The frustration stems from the perception that identity factors, such as gender and race, may have influenced voter decisions. This situation leads to feelings of disappointment and confusion, but not surprise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why would he win? Why did he win? He won several key states common laws. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona. These key battleground states. Why did he win them? Look. Why did he win them? Why would someone who in Wisconsin would vote for Joe Biden, a geriatric old Republican racist who's running as a Democrat? Why would they all of a sudden not vote for Pamela Harris, a young person who has no bad record and who has effective policy for the future? Dry up. She has a vagina, if I use a different word. She has vagina and uterus and what else? She's melanin. She's mixed. Race. I'm upset. I'm disappointed. I'm not surprised.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"When Joe Biden dropped out and Kamala took over, I cried for a week nonstop. I knew that there were White people and non-White people that were men that would show up and would rather vote for literally anybody except someone with a uterus who has melanin." https://t.co/4Sfb7THMU8

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm upset and disappointed but not surprised. Back in July, when Joe Biden stepped down and Kamala took over, I cried for a week. I realized that even if the best candidate was a woman of color, many would still choose to vote for anyone else. There are men, both white and non-white, who would rather support anyone other than a woman with melanin. Female students of color understand this struggle firsthand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm upset. I'm disappointed. I'm not surprised. That's because back in July when Joe Biden dropped down and Kamala took over. I cried for a week nonstop. Because I knew what? I knew what? I knew that if we got the best candidate in the entire country and it was a brown woman, people wouldn't vote for her. I knew that there were white people and non white people that were men that would show up and would rather vote for literally anybody except someone with a uterus who has melanin. And those female students of color in this room know exactly what I'm talking about because they live

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"We all deserve better. You know know what this country is. Is our country racist? Is our country patriarchal? Can we change it? Maybe." https://t.co/F0qBWz9CMs

Video Transcript AI Summary
We all deserve better. Our country has issues with racism and patriarchy. While systemic change may be challenging, you can make a difference in your immediate environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all deserve better. You now know what this country is. Is our country racist? Yes. Is our country patriarchal? Yes. Can we change it? Maybe. But can you change your immediate surroundings? Yes.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

I've obtained an email from the principal to a parent indicating that the incident involved "Mr. Perez's AP World History Class" at Valley View High School in Moreno Valley Unified School District. "We do not condone the behavior that was exhibited in class [Wednesday]" https://t.co/YTU7O3JL0o

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@MorenoValleyUSD UNBELIEVABLE: A "Mr. M. Perez" is listed as the school's advisor for the "AP Mental Club." Purpose: "To focus on mental health and social resources for those students in an advanced placement course.. To experience social emotional wellness firsthand." https://t.co/8tTrmmKA3O

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

Total Pay & Benefits: $106,442 https://t.co/wPjkF483cu

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

2020 Medium article on lesson plans: "I was able to talk about cultural erasure, colonialism, systemic racism, the fight.. against white and capitalistic American forces." "The evidence and activities are centered around the understanding of inherit racism and white supremacy" https://t.co/wn6hUHmyGy

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

I just obtained an email from the @MorenoValleyUSD Superintendent Alejandro Ruvalcaba to a parent "Personnel matters are highly confidential. Please trust that the matter will be addressed and appropriate action taken as deemed necessary." Just trust they'll do the right thing? https://t.co/EFvC7B1pc5

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@MorenoValleyUSD Superintendent Alejandro Ruvalcaba's base salary is $356,000. @MorenoValleyUSD https://t.co/cdJv123ilr

Saved - September 15, 2023 at 2:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Randi Weingarten faces backlash for comparing school choice to segregation. She denies making the comparison, but critics argue otherwise. The ideological battle intensifies as opponents resort to unfounded smears. However, supporters of school choice claim victory, freeing families from teachers unions. DeAngelis criticizes Weingarten's policy, calling it the real segregation. Weingarten inadvertently advances school choice.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BACKPEDALING

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

here's what she said

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

this isn't the first time Randi tried to compare school choice to segregation

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BACKPEDAL by Randi Weingarten: "I never made the comparison."

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"You know you've won the ideological battle when your opponent resorts to unfounded smears about racism. We're freeing families from the clutches of the teachers unions once and for all and there's nothing Randi Weingarten can do about it. She is desperate and it shows. Good. We're winning this war she waged on parents and their children."

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

"DeAngelis concluded by slamming Weingarten’s policy of 'trapping poor kids in failing government schools with government force' as the 'real segregation.'"

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

thank you for inadvertently doing more to advance school choice than anyone could have ever imagined, @rweingarten. https://www.foxnews.com/media/randi-weingarten-denies-comparing-parental-rights-advocates-segregationists-podcast-interview

Randi Weingarten denies comparing 'parental rights' advocates to segregationists during podcast interview Teachers union boss Randi Weingarten recalled the SPLC comparing school choice advocates to segregationists during a podcast episode released on Tuesday. foxnews.com
Saved - May 24, 2023 at 8:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper has declared a state of emergency to fight against school choice, despite sending his own child to a private school. Critics argue that this move is an attempt to maintain control over the minds of other people's children. Families are being freed from the clutches of teachers unions, and there is nothing Cooper can do about it.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

BREAKING: North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper declares a STATE OF EMERGENCY to fight against school choice. This hypocrite sent his own kid to a private school. We're freeing families from the clutches of the teachers unions once and for all & there's nothing he can do about it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am declaring a state of emergency to inform you about the current situation regarding public schools in North Carolina. It is crucial that you take immediate action to prevent further damage that could negatively impact our schools for years to come. In the upcoming weeks, there is a plan to allocate your tax money towards private schools through a voucher scheme. This could have detrimental effects on our public education system. It is important to voice your concerns and urge them to reconsider this decision.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm declaring this state of emergency because you need to know what's happening. If you care about public schools in North Carolina, it's time to take immediate action and tell them to stop the damage that will set back our schools for a generation. Here's what's happening in the next few weeks. Their private school voucher scheme will pour your tax money into private schools that better on

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

we now have a Democrat Governor declaring school choice a "State of Emergency." they're losing control over the minds of other people's children and they can't handle it. good. cry harder, @RoyCooperNC.

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

You can vote on the pending Community Note on hypocrite Governor Roy Cooper's tweet here:

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6328152633112

NC Gov. Cooper is a ‘hypocrite’ when it comes to school choice: Corey DeAngelis | Fox News Video  American Federation for Children senior fellow Corey DeAngelis reacts to N.C. Gov. Roy Cooper declaring a state of emergency to block a school choice bill from passing. foxnews.com

@DeAngelisCorey - Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

hey @RoyCooperNC if private schools are so "unaccountable" then why did you send your own kid to one?

Video Transcript AI Summary
North Carolina has declared a state of emergency over a school choice bill. Critics argue that the Republican legislature is trying to undermine public education. Corey Deangelis, a senior fellow for the American Federation For Children, believes that this is a state of emergency for special interests who want to keep children in failing government schools. He argues that parents should have more say in their children's education and accuses Governor Cooper of being a hypocrite on school choice. Deangelis states that Republicans have the power to override a veto and will empower all families with school choice in North Carolina.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A state of emergency has been declared in North Carolina over a school choice bill. Speaker 1: It's time to declare a state of emergency for public education in North Carolina. There's no executive order like with a hurricane or the pandemic, but it's no less important. It's clear that the Republican legislature is aiming to choke the life out of public education. Speaker 0: Okay. They got, joining us right now, senior fellow for the American Federation For Children, Corey Deangelis, joins us right now. Corey, good morning to you. A Hey. Good morning. Hey. There is a state of emergency in North Carolina. It's for special interests. You know, suddenly, the Republicans don't wanna a Pay the teachers as much as they wanna give school vouchers so everybody can take their kid to a school that actually works, and the teachers don't like that. Speaker 2: Yeah. Look, this is a state of emergency for special interests who want to trap kids in failing government schools, but it's a state of serendipity for parents who want more of a say in their own kids' education. And look, Governor Cooper here is flailing. He's having a temper tantrum, a total meltdown Because him and his party are losing control over the minds of other people's children and there's not a dang thing they can do about it, Especially in North Carolina where Governor Cooper, a hypocrite on school choice, who sent his own kid to private school, does not sign. I have, the power to override a veto because Republicans control 3 fifths of each chamber. So he could just go cry harder because we're going to empower all families a with school choice this year in North Carolina.
View Full Interactive Feed