reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DeSantisWarRoom
@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊
MSNBC: It’s pretty great that Biden wants to give money to border security, right? DeSantis: “He’s not actually providing money that would STOP the problem. He’s providing money to PROCESS more illegal aliens in.” https://t.co/k1uH18J00A
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president's bill includes support for Israel, Ukraine, the southern border, and Taiwan. It seems like a favorable bill for both Republicans and Democrats. Regarding Ukraine, the question is whether the United States should fund it at the levels proposed by President Biden. However, it's worth noting that the money allocated for the border aims to process more illegal immigrants rather than address the root of the problem, potentially worsening the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, the in, the the president's bill, we've got support for Israel, support for Ukraine, money for the southern border. What's what's the 4th thing? What am I forgetting here? Taiwan. We we Ukraine.
Israel, Sweden, and China, Taiwan. And China. That's right. China, Taiwan. It sounds like a pretty good bill, I mean, for Republicans and Democrats.
I I wanted to ask you, though, specifically about Ukraine. How should the United States move forward on funding for Ukraine. Do you support funding Ukraine at the levels, that president Biden has suggested in this bill?
Speaker 1: Well, first, just on the border, I just gotta point out, he's not actually providing money that would stop the problem. He's providing money to process more illegal aliens Coming in, which I think would probably end up exacerbating and inviting the problem
@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊
NEW: Trump praises Hezbollah, calling the Iran-backed terror group “very smart” hours after they attacked Israel. Disgusting.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two nights ago, I read Biden's security team's concerns about Hezbollah attacking from the north, which they considered a vulnerable spot. I acknowledged that Hezbollah is smart, just like President Xi of China, who controls a vast population with an iron fist. However, the press criticized me for praising President Xi. Anyway, Hezbollah's national defense minister expressed hope that they wouldn't be attacked from the north. But the next morning, they were indeed attacked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then 2 nights ago, I read all of Biden's security people. Can you imagine? National defense people. And they said, gee, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack from the north because that's civil's vulnerable spot. I said, wait a minute.
You know, Hezbollah is very smart. They're all very smart. The press doesn't like when they say, you know, I said that president Xi of China, 1,400,000,000 people, he controls it with an iron fist. I said, he's a very smart man. They killed me the next day.
I said he was smart. Whatever I get to say. But, Hesper, they're very smart. And they have a national defense minister or somebody saying, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack us from the north. So the following morning, they attacked.
@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊
@jrpsaki is still trying to fact check @RonDeSantis for pointing out that Democrats support abortion until birth. Jen, it’s on tape.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video express their support for unrestricted access to abortion. They believe that it is a woman's right to choose and that there should be no limitations on when in the pregnancy a woman can have an abortion. They argue that it is a healthcare decision and should be left up to the woman. They also mention specific instances where abortion would be allowed, such as when a woman is about to give birth. Some lawmakers and governors in different states have passed or proposed bills to remove restrictions on abortion, including late-term abortions. Overall, the speakers emphasize the importance of a woman's autonomy in making decisions about her own body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you support any restrictions on abortion? I don't. I've always believed Even in the 3rd trimester? Do you think there should be any limitation on abortion?
Speaker 1: No. I do not.
Speaker 0: Up till now, my understanding is there wasn't a limit on when in the pregnancy a woman could receive believe in abortion. Have you set any limit? There are no limits. Is there a cutoff for you before that point?
Speaker 1: No. To me, it's it's a reproductive. It's a health care decision. It's up to women to make that do.
Speaker 2: Where it's obvious that a woman is about to give birth, that she has physical signs of that she is about to give a birth. Would that still be a point at which she could request an abortion if she was so certified.
Speaker 0: My bill would allow that. Yes.
Speaker 1: Virginia's governor says he has no regrets on his comments earlier this week I abortion even as a baby is being born. If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly, what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if if that's what the, mother and the family desired.
And then induction would ensue between the physicians and the mothers.
Speaker 0: Are you for the what he said or late term abortion or the moments that he was talking about where you would keep a woman Comfortable after she was giving birth in case she wanted to abort her 3rd term child? I don't know all his comments but what I do know is that I am for a woman having the to make a choice about our own body. State lawmakers in New York approved a law permitting abortion in the state up until birth. Cuomo applauded legislation and marks the occasion by lighting the spire of the One World Trade Center PACE to celebrate. 8 months into pregnancy.
Speaker 1: Should a woman be allowed legally to have an abortion, again, I've told you I believe woman's right to choose, period.
Speaker 0: At the Capitol today, a house committee approved a bill that would remove restrictions on abortions performed in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: Bill would erase the requirements such as I notification for that clinics can only handle 1st trimester abortions, that patients be told about possible links to cancer, and do. The 24 hour waiting period to the bill would repeal a law that requires doctors to save any baby born alive during an abortion.
Speaker 0: Those In favor of prop one include governor Newsom, the California Democratic Party, and abortion rights groups such as the Planned Parenthood Affiliates As of California. It would remove all restrictions on abortion, allowing for late term abortion even up until the At the moment of birth, even if both mother and baby are healthy. He is vowing to fight here and says this new law makes it very clear where California stands on the issue As a sanctuary for abortion care. Governor Gavin Newsom announced a new abortion marketing website Establishing California as the nation's taxpayer funded abortion state. The president is prepared The women's health protection act, the so called women's health protection act that would have nullified states and religious freedom laws across The country with respect to abortions and allowed late term abortions without any notable restrictions in most cases.
Speaker 1: Does he support any limits on abortion?
Speaker 0: He supports The right of a woman to make choices about her own body. Do you support any limitation on abortion or does it do you think that women should have the right to have an abortion all the way up to 9 months. That should be a choice made between a doctor and a woman. You do it by not setting arbitrary Gestational limits.
Speaker 1: Do you believe at any point in pregnancy, whether it's a 6 weeks or 8 weeks or 24 I weeks or whenever that there should be any limit on a woman's right to have an abortion. I trust women to draw the line. Senator Warren, would you put limits on, any limits on abortion.
Speaker 0: I would make certain that every woman has access to the full range of reproductive health Care services and that includes birth control. It includes abortion.
Speaker 1: Any kind of, limit for abortion. Where? Where do you go? At 15 weeks? Do you what do you do?
Where do you go?
Speaker 0: Look. There is no one size fits all limit. You would veto do. Any law with any limit on abortion? I would veto any additional restrictions on abortion that are sent to my desk as governor.
Yes. Do you believe that a woman should be able to terminate a pregnancy up until the moment of birth.
Speaker 3: Look, I think that that happens very, very rarely. But at the end of the day, I believe that the decision over abortion belongs to a woman and a physician.
Speaker 1: My question is about any limits to Abortion. At any point, you know, late term, anything? You you you gotta leave it up to the to the woman.
Speaker 0: Do you believe There should be any restrictions on abortion? I I don't.
Speaker 4: I was born September 8, 1989, and I wanna know if you think on September 7, 1989, 89, my life had no value.
Speaker 1: This is a decision that neither you do. Nor I nor the United States government should be making. That's a decision for the woman to make.
@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊
SHOCKING: Space Force Lt. Gen. DeAnna Burt admits the U.S. military discriminates against Floridians when considering promotions — leading to “less qualified” officers — because @RonDeSantis banned trans surgeries for KIDS. DeSantis will end this woke insanity on Day One.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 400 anti LGBTQ+ laws have been introduced at the state level this year, posing a danger to service members, their families, and overall force readiness. When selecting candidates for positions like squadron command, job performance and relevant experience are considered, but personal circumstances and family are also important. If a candidate doesn't feel safe or their family could be denied healthcare due to discriminatory laws in a certain state, alternative candidates may be chosen, even if they are less qualified. These barriers threaten readiness and directly impact the well-being of our most important asset, our people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since January of this year, more than 400 anti LGBTQ plus laws have been introduced at the state level. That number is rising and demonstrates a trend that could be dangerous for service members, their families, and the readiness of the force as a whole. When I look at potential candidates, say for squadron command, I strive to match the right person to the right job. I consider their job performance and relevant experience first. However, I also look at their personal circumstances, and their family is also an important factor.
If a good match for a job does not feel safe being themselves and performing at their highest potential at a given location, Or if their family could be denied critical healthcare due to the laws in that state, I am compelled to consider a different candidate and perhaps less qualified. Those barriers are a threat to our readiness, and they have a direct correlation to the resiliency and well-being of our most important operational advantage, our people.
@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊
DESANTIS: “If you’re taking off the private parts of some 15-year-old kid, you should go to jail.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We passed a bill to criminalize the mutilation of minors undergoing sex change operations by rogue physicians. Testimony from adults who went through this as minors was heartbreaking. Last year, we banned it administratively, revoking licenses of doctors who performed such procedures. But we felt more needed to be done. We included a provision in the bill allowing victims to sue these physicians for irreversible damage caused by violating the Hippocratic Oath. Putting ideology before evidence-based medicine is fundamentally wrong in Florida.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then we also did a bill, which is sad that we're even having discussed this, to criminalize the mutilation of minors who are undergoing these sex change operations by these really rogue ideological physicians. And we've had heartbreaking testimony from people that have gone through this when they were minors. Now they're adults, and this is something they're now having to overcome really for the rest of their lives because irreversible changes were made. We banned this administratively last year through our medical board. So if a medical doctor did this, they lose the license in Florida, which is appropriate, but we felt you had to do more.
I mean, if you're taking off the private parts of some 15 year old kid, you know, you should go to jail for that. This just totally unacceptable. One of the things we did in that bill though, is we're giving the victims the ability to sue the physicians. So if you've gone through this as a 16 year old or a 15 year old. Now you're 24, 25, and you have all this irreversible damage.
You bring suit against them because they violated the Hippocratic Oath. They put their ideology ahead of evidence based medicine, and we just think that's fundamentally wrong in the State of Florida.