TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Death6102
@Death6102 - Death
The Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun 🎸🤙🏻💀 https://t.co/Y79KoC8Ewp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun, discovered in 2005, is believed to be over 35,000 years old, making it the oldest pyramid in the world. Despite evidence of artificial construction, mainstream archaeology dismisses it as a hoax. Excavations have revealed underground tunnels, stone blocks, and artifacts, but lack of official funding has slowed progress. The pyramid's alignment, unique features, and surrounding structures suggest it may be a significant ancient site worth further investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, the real pharaoh's curse is that we haven't built a pyramid bigger than Giza yet. I mean just look at it, this thing is massive, and it's over 4 1000 years old. Oh, but we do have a pyramid bigger than that, and nobody's talking about it. The Great Pyramid of Giza is peanuts against the buried pyramid of the sun in Bosnia, and you will not believe what they found there. In 2005, archaeologist Doctor.
Samiros Monogic realized, hey, this hill in the small Bosnian city of Veselco is oddly shaped like a pyramid, and shaped like a pyramid was an understatement. This hill has virtually every characteristic of a real pyramid, and we continue to ignore it. To start, it has 4 triangular sides. That's it. Pyramid confirmed.
We're done. Joking, but it's got even great slopes and corners that connect perfectly under the foliage. Along with an apex at the very top, the exact shape of a pyramid, but, oh, it don't end there, Johnny boy. It's also perfectly aligned to the cardinal directions, northeast, south, and west, much like Giza. In fact, this one is even more aligned to true north than Giza being only 1 300th of a degree off from perfect north, whereas Giza is 2 60ths of a degree off.
They even took EMF, electromagnetic frequency readers to the top and saw readings of 60 times more of what is normally expected on Earth. Another phenomenon that tends to occur at the pyramids, and the reason why is so mind baffling that we'll have to save that for a future video. This hill was aptly named the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun, the first pyramid of its kind in Europe, taller than the Great Pyramid of Giza, even bigger than the biggest pyramid of the world, Cholula, in Mexico, with 4 other smaller hills around it that are also suspected to be pyramids or some other structures, as is usually the case at these ancient sites. Sure, it might just look like a hill covered in trees, but have a look at what the pyramid of the sun in Teotihuacan, Mexico looked like before it was excavated and after. Same with Machu Picchu and after and Chichen Itza and after.
Any ancient site that isn't in the desert is typically covered with overgrowth, and the Bosnian pyramid is looking a lot like that before stage. And just have a look at these drone shots and tell me these formations look natural to you. So doctor Osmanage began the excavations, and now get this, radiocarbon analysis taken from the rocks hidden beneath the vegetation revealed that this pyramid would be over 35000 years old. The oldest pyramid in the world by a long shot, over 30000 years older than Giza. During a time in which traditional history claims only tribes and cave men incapable of erecting such monuments roamed the earth, far before any civilizations began to form or so we think.
For reference, here's a timeline of all major ancient civilizations and structures pyramid would stand in that timeline. Excavations also revealed huge blocks of 7 tons each stacked with geopolymer binding, which is an ancient type of cement and perfect placement, along with perfectly landscaped terraces and other obvious architectural design, but oh, no. These are all natural. Note that this was all uncovered up to a meter underground as would be expected of a pyramid over 35,000 years old. And of course, the archaeological gatekeepers of the world insisted this is just coincidental.
With some even going as far as saying doctor Osmanagech purposely placed these carved stones here to deceive the public. And famed Egyptologist, Zahi Hawass, who oversees most of the Egyptian pyramid investigations, even petitioning the Bosnian government to stop these excavations. Within hours of this international discovery, the story is swept under the rug and labeled a hoax. Well, over 50 archaeologists around the world remained optimistic and actually joined Osmanagic's work in Bosnia, with virtually every single one of them who actually saw it in person confirming that nature could not have formed these hills. Further studies revealing an entire underground tunnel system in the area, the longest subterranean complex of any pyramid in the world.
Inside these tunnels, large stone blocks were found that clearly seemed to be artificially created and placed. Other artifacts like this giant round stone that no one can explain, and a whole bunch of other smaller ancient trinkets, statues, and even what appears to be a map carved into stone were all found around the Bosnian Valley of Pyramids, all dismissed as irrelevant or flat out ignored by mainstream archaeology. Even the peak of the sun pyramid forms a perfect triangle with the peaks of the nearby hills dubbed the pyramids of the moon and the dragon. Another crazy coincidence. Right?
After much pushback, the government actually did grant Osmanagex the right to continue excavations. But with no official funding, the entire project depends on donations and volunteer work. These excavations are still going on, but after tourism to Bosnia slowed down the last couple of years, progress on these pyramids have as well. As with anything, you could probably rationalize a completely valid reason for each of these discoveries and maybe it really is somehow just the hills. So you think we're tweaking on this one or are we on to something?
Who's ready to get digging?
@Death6102 - Death
#FlatEarth 💀 #theglobeisdead https://t.co/KA2C7fh3K1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Geocentrism, the belief that the Earth is stationary with the heavenly bodies revolving around it, is gaining popularity in both the Christian and scientific communities. Some argue that the Earth is actually a flat plane, not a globe. Skepticism arises from the lack of evidence in images from space missions, such as the absence of satellites and planes. Questions are raised about the curvature of water and the selective strength of gravity. Doubts about the moon landing are also expressed, citing the challenge of passing through radiation belts and the high number of Freemason astronauts. The recent claim by NASA of discovering Earth-like planets is met with skepticism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Geocentrism is that the Earth is stationary, and that the heavenly bodies are revolving around the Earth. Now nowadays, if you even suggest something like that, you'll be crucified, basically. Not only that, There's a growing movement nowadays, and this is not just amongst Christians. This is in the scientific community, that the Earth is actually a plane. It's a flat plane.
It's not glabular. And it's stationary. It's a very popular movement now. But all the astronauts who have gone up,
Speaker 1: Of the space station and all that, they say it's around?
Speaker 0: I mean, that's what they say. We haven't seen a picture. I mean, they have these images of astronauts working on a space mission with the Earth in the background. But you look at the Earth, there's no satellites, which is supposed to be 20,000 satellites. You don't see a single one.
You don't see any planes anywhere. And every so often, one of their videos, you'll see, like, bubbles come up, which means they're in a pool in front of a green screen. And you can find these videos. How does water convex itself? So as the Earth is round, water isn't bending itself.
Can I do that? Can I conduct that experiment? I can certainly pour water into a container, and the water will take the shape of the container, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about pouring water out and then making it into a convex, sculpture without it because water always finds a level.
Speaker 1: But it's the cavity which
Speaker 0: is keeping That's the decimal entity. It's a big catch all. It's gravity. It's gravity. So how is that?
Don't worry about it. It's gravity. So people in Australia walking around upside down, And trillions of tons of water sticking to the earth upside down because of gravity. But a bird flying over the ocean. So gravity is so strong that it holds all this water, but just weak enough for a bird to fly over the ocean.
Or fish to fly to to swim through that water. Right? So it's very strange. Single thing gravity does. It's right as a Newton.
Right? A united Freemason of Culpitz sitting around there. An apple falls on him. Oh, there's gravity. What an epiphany.
Now it's it's nutrients. It's what it's called relative density. Initially, this sounds like a totally ridiculous notion. Right? But those who, made this argument again are saying that there's scientific backing for it, and that the vast majority of evidence of human beings on history is that the Earth is geocentric.
You believe in gravity. I believe in God. Also, nothing about the moon is you never see the dark side of the moon. You never see the backside of the moon. So if it's orbiting, why don't we ever see the backside?
All it does is go like this. It just rotates like that. It never turns dark. There's no backside. It's a light.
It's translucent. You can't land on something like that.
Speaker 1: But then you don't believe they landed on the moon.
Speaker 0: Yes. I mean, How do you get through the bad, Alan? Radiation belts. Even right now, if you talk to modern scientists, they say what's the biggest challenge with space travel. So we haven't we can't even get a low earth orbit.
We're about 200 miles from the earth. And then there's massive radiation belts. We have to figure that out. This is 50 years after 6 moon lands. They they can't go 200 miles off the Earth.
But 50 years ago, they went 500,000 miles round trip, six times. You know, $19,000,000,000, they fleeced From the American public, 550 astronauts have entered space. 94% or something are Freemasons. It is a secret society. Is a fact.
Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, the 1st man on the moon, and 33 degree masons. This is a fact, and a secret society keeps secrets. NASA just said, we found 7 new planets. They're just like Earth. I'm sure that did it.
I don't think so.
@Death6102 - Death
The Earth is Flat 💀 #theglobeisdead https://t.co/UbMoD1WLTh
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video captures the awe-inspiring view of Earth from space. The speaker marvels at the beauty of the sky turning darker as they look towards the sun. They mention how most of the atmosphere is closer to the Earth, represented by a thin blue line that sustains life. The speaker acknowledges their need to stay hydrated and mentions they are filming. Overall, they express their amazement and emphasize the incredible experience of being in space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is incredible. Wow. Yeah. It really is. It never gets old.
Best deal in the world. Getting a little darker up there. Yes. It is. Yeah.
If you look up towards the sun, the sky's pretty much totally black up there. And then as you look closer to the Earth where Most of the atmosphere is. It's where the mouth of it now. You get that nice, thin blue line with all the stuff that keeps us alive. I just dehydrated.
Okay. I'll keep drinking. I'm making movies back here. Awesome. We are really up here.
Oh, yeah. This is incredible. Wow. Yeah. It really is.
It never gets
@Death6102 - Death
Do you believe humans will make it to mars 💀 https://t.co/yjSLWUAqWV
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, various speakers discuss the importance of space exploration and the goal of returning to the moon. They highlight the benefits of space technology and express their excitement about future missions to the moon and Mars. There is a mention of potential challenges and unknowns, but overall, the speakers emphasize the significance of NASA's achievements and the opportunities they provide for scientific discovery and human exploration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.
Speaker 1: We choose to go to the moon.
Speaker 2: I'm talking to you by telephone From the oval room at the White House. Thank you mister president. It's a great honor and privilege for us to be here.
Speaker 3: 1st question I was wondering, when are we going back to the moon?
Speaker 4: It's taken us many years to open this door to Useful cooperation in space between our 2 countries. And may I say in signing off, Here's to a soft landing.
Speaker 1: All of them spin offs of space technology. That's why Jimmy Carter from Georgia. And Gerald Ford from California agree. Space technology has down to earth benefits for everyone.
Speaker 3: America is going to space again, and we're going there to stay.
Speaker 0: And and next, for the new century, back
Speaker 2: to the
Speaker 0: moon, back to the future, And this time, back to stay.
Speaker 5: That's a great dream, but that and our other dreams are Clearly, the natural extensions of the space program which began a generation ago
Speaker 3: is to return to the moon by twenty as the launching point for missions beyond. Beginning no later than 2008, Using the crew exploration vehicle, we will undertake extended human missions to the moon as early as 2015.
Speaker 4: By the mid 2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth, And landing on Mars will follow, and I expect to be around to see it.
Speaker 6: And I'm here on the president's behalf to tell the men and women of the Marshall Space flight center and the American people. That at the direction of the president of the United States, it is the stated policy Of this administration and the United States of America to return American astronauts to the moon within the next 5 years.
Speaker 0: We're going to the moon to stay by 2024, And this is how.
Speaker 2: We are going. We're going. We are going. We're going. Really?
Number 1, they are real unknowns as to whether man can't live under the witness condition and you will elevate the liberal act. This is one kind of political vulnerability I'd like to avoid such a flat commitment to. I agree that we want to But you have to use that information because they're they're saying, yeah, but only when that is that information directly applied to We don't know a damn About the surface of the moon, and we're making the wildest guesses about how we're gonna land on the moon, and we could get a terrible disaster.
Speaker 3: Perhaps NASA's greatest gifts have been the moments of greatness that you've allowed you've allowed all of us to share.
@Death6102 - Death
#Firmament 💀 #theglobeisdead https://t.co/PydyAZc6E9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 mentions a scenario where conflicting beliefs about the shape of the Earth lead to a meeting with the Flat Earth society. Speaker 1 expresses a desire for the younger generation to accept the fact that the Earth is a certain shape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I say that the world is round and someone else says it's flat time for a meeting On the flat Earth society. That's worth reporting.
Speaker 1: Now one thing I really want your
Speaker 0: generation to embrace is that
Speaker 1: the Earth is a
@Death6102 - Death
Soooo 💀 Many 💀 Prooooooofs https://t.co/kWW54pgMYs
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video presents evidence for the flat Earth theory by discussing the shadow cast by the sun. The speaker argues that in the flat Earth model, the sun always stays above the height of the mountains and casts a shadow from above the clouds, rather than below them. They point out that the top of the mountain, which is above the clouds, is where the shadow starts. This is seen as evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, as opposed to the spinning ball model where the sun goes below the clouds and the mountain. The speaker concludes by thanking someone named Bob for bringing up this topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so there you go. This is awesome proof now for the flat earth where the sun always stays above the height of the mountains and cast the shadow down. Unlike the spinning ball model where the sun would actually go below the clouds in the peak of the mountain. Because this shadow cast this supposed shadow being cast on the underside of the clouds is not what's happening at all. It's the shadow cast From above the clouds, that's darkening the entire cloud.
And this is what it looks like from down below. And this is what it looks like from above. So you looking at this picture, you might actually think that the shadow is going up. Well, if you think that, you probably think that the clouds are actually getting higher as they get near you, or that these light poles are actually getting taller as they approach you. But they're not.
They're parallel to the ground. And one more thing to point out here is that the top of the mountain that's just above the cloud layer is right where the shadow starts on the mountain. Could this be more evidence, Bob, that the shadow is actually on the top of the clouds just like we see here? Because the top of the mountain is above the clouds, And that's where it would cast its shadow. And isn't that evidence for the flat Earth where the sun is always above The mountain, as opposed to your model where the sun goes down due to the rotation of the Earth and is actually below the mountain.
I love that this is something you brought up as a spinning ball model proof. And here, I've just turned it around and showed it's really a flat earth proof. Thank you, Bob.
@Death6102 - Death
Wtf was that 👀
@Death6102 - Death
There you have it 💀 Conspiracy theorists https://t.co/ncESumq0Rt
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss their experience filming in zero gravity. They talk about the challenges of acting without gravity and the use of special effects. One of the astronauts on set shares his involvement in creating an accurate spaceship set. The actors joke about one character becoming an astronaut and discuss the importance of having a good relationship with your crewmates. They also mention the excitement of meeting Buzz Aldrin and the awe-inspiring nature of astronauts. The video ends with a discussion about the coolness of space and the Big Bang Theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there any conspiracy theorists out there? How would you prove to us that you're in zero gravity? I'm in control to
Speaker 1: I don't know. We're gonna have to do something for you.
Speaker 2: Ignition sequence star. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0. All engine running. Lift off. We have a lift off.
Speaker 1: Ally? Ally? Hey. Thanks, my beautiful bride. How are you?
Speaker 0: I'm amazing. I mean, this is even better than I dreamed. Yeah. I look out the window, and It's all so unbelievable. People thought we really went to the space station, and there was a moment where I feel like I feel like in the writers' room, they discussed.
They're like, we could just send a sign. He's small. Just shoot him up there, so don't give anyone any ideas.
Speaker 1: Hey. Look. This pen is floating. How crazy is that?
Speaker 0: We had to do all of our own slow mo kind of non gravity acting, which is a challenge it's sort of like acting underwater, and then there were special effects. We were on, like, a pulley and a bicycle seat, and it was unlike anything I've I've really done.
Speaker 1: We did it. We're on the ground. We survived.
Speaker 3: That was just a parachute. We still have another 6 miles to go. One of
Speaker 0: the astronauts in the scenes is actually an astronaut, Mike Massimino. He kept saying what a flashback it was for him and how the room was the same and even crew members on the set that it reminded him of of crew members there.
Speaker 3: The set that we've had, a lot of got involved with helping them build that, so it really looked exactly like the real thing. I got a little bit involved with helping them set this up, and they're quickly, they got over with my understanding of it because they wanted real detail of the of the spaceship dimensions and, exactly where everything looks. And they looked at lots of pictures and video, and they Talk to lots of people.
Speaker 1: What's wrong? Nothing. Everything's fine. Howard.
Speaker 0: The other astronauts are being mean to me.
Speaker 1: We give him a bit of
Speaker 3: a hard time on the show, you know, as as this the way the script's written, and we would certainly give him a hard time if he was really an astronaut, but it would be all in good fun. But I think Howard would make a pretty good astronaut, actually. He's a fun guy. His character's kinda funny. He seems like a good guy.
Basically, you want someone that you don't mind hanging around with for for really a few years because you're not always in when you're training with them for a few years, you wanna be able to do the job, but you want someone that's gonna be fun to be with in a confined area for a while. I haven't heard screaming like I've heard from Howard, I guess that's probably the biggest difference. He seems to be a little more emotional than what you would expect.
Speaker 1: Let's let that last screen go a little longer if you can.
Speaker 3: You want us move Moving around Yeah.
Speaker 1: Let's let's let's just you know?
Speaker 3: Now I can say I'm not really an astronaut anymore, but I play 1 on TV. And I can say that, but I'm still really an astronaut, so I'm not really sure how to phrase it.
Speaker 0: I did not meet Buzz Aldrin, actually, because he had a very strict Schedule on Earth here, but I did get to see his his moment, and it was it was it was poignant.
Speaker 1: Quiet, please, gang. Line backstage, please. And camera action. Here you go. It's a Milky Way.
I'm an astronaut. This one's a moon pie. I walked on the moon. What have you done? All of the astronauts that we've met through the show, there is you talk about physicality.
Watching these guys, there is a worldliness about them that I think is untouchable, and they all have the same astronaut stance, kinda like Buzz Lightyear. You know, when I grew up, we didn't use the word cool. But today, what is cool is to think about space. And one of the things that we've learned to think about is The beginnings of time, the beginnings of the universe that came about with the Big Bang Theory.
@Death6102 - Death
What have we here 💀 https://t.co/kZ5htbfckU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the truth of history, claiming that everything has been changed, including names, places, dates, and people. They express skepticism about the idea that a temple built for Ramesses the second could be moved due to rising sea levels. The speaker points out the facial expression of a woman in a picture, suggesting that she is confident in deceiving others. They also question the authenticity of the temple, stating that it does not look ancient. The speaker concludes by asserting that history is a lie and speculating on the motives behind it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can somebody please tell me what in tarnations is going on? So surely by now, you understand that history is a lie. And what you think is up is really down. And what you thought was left is really right. And what I mean by that is they've changed names, places, There's dates, people.
They've changed everything. Cinemacy forgot this straight. You're trying to tell me That this temple that was built for Ramesses the second, which was carved into a mountain, you was able to chop up into small pieces and move to a different location. Come on, brother. Just look at this woman's face.
I know what she's thinking. She's thinking, they ain't gonna see this one coming. Oh, we've got their ass now. So the mainstream narrative says, the reason why they moved the temple is because the sea levels was rising, and they didn't want it to get flooded. Really?
Look how long that temple was supposed to have been there. It's supposed to be an ancient temple. Right? And all of a sudden, it's in danger of being flooded. Come on, brother.
Just take a look at these guys looking back at their work. Like, yep. We've done a good job here. We got the news is right and everything. I mean, wanna look at this on a deeper level.
This don't even look ancient. History is a lie, and I think I know what they're trying to
@Death6102 - Death
One of the best ones @RobotPolisher Shout out to @OwenBenjamin for doing it in public 💀 https://t.co/m09sDRsP9X
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disbelief and frustration at the idea of the Earth being flat. They find it difficult to prove that the Earth is round and fear being labeled as a flat Earth believer. They question the logic behind arguments supporting a round Earth and criticize the lack of convincing evidence. The speaker pleads for someone to provide a solid argument for a round Earth, but is disappointed by responses that rely on Google Earth as proof. They conclude by expressing their discomfort with the topic and emphasizing the importance of reporting facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Earth isn't flat. That's fucking insane. The Earth isn't flat. There's no fucking way the Earth is flat. That would probably cause me some type of nervous breakdown if that were the case.
If the Earth is flat, I may tap out for a while. Like, that would fuck me up. I am not enjoying the path that this is taking me on because the arguments for the Earth being round are not very strong at all. Like, at all. And this is something I would never ever ever ever question ever.
Speaker 1: And not everybody can The, robot polish
Speaker 0: This is a lot harder than I expected, proving that the Earth is round. It's not easy to prove, Guys, it's fucking weird. It is it is way, way, way harder. But, dude, I'm telling you, it's fucked up. I would love to Stay a globe earth person because being a flatter of person is another level of, ostracism that I really don't want at all.
So please explain this to me because I do not like where the logic is taking any of It's not fun. It's actually incredibly isolated, and I don't want it at all. The last thing I need in my life is to be given another label that makes me look insane. That sounds awful. By the way, I'm not arguing The fucking Earth is flat.
I know the Earth is round. It can't be flat. I mean, that would just be insane. This is like this a fucking nightmare. This is literally a nightmare trying to fucking disprove this thing.
It's so fucking hard to prove. Literally a fucking nightmare. I'm not a flat earth person. The earth is not Flat. That's fucking psychotic here.
The Earth isn't flat.
Speaker 2: The Earth is not flat. This is fucking madness. Fuck.
Speaker 0: This is so fucking depressing. There's no wind because we are in a vacuum. You we both know that doesn't make any sense, and I'm not a flat Earth person. Not Flat? Well, please fucking tell me how you can go up into near Earth orbit in the and stay still and the Earth is flying by if it's spinning on a goddamn axis.
Oh, I'm sorry. You can't explain it, can you? The fuck? Inertia, that doesn't mean a goddamn thing and we both know it. Inertia.
We It just says inertia. Inertia, the difference between speed and velocity. Do you guys seriously think that means anything? You guys really think that that proves that the earth is fucking Fucking round? Like, please look up the words you fucking use.
Doesn't mean anything. Party in motion inertia. What does that mean? If I had a gun to your fucking head and say define what you just said, what does that mean? You would say, Coriolis effect proves the Earth isn't flat.
I I believe that as well. I I I really hope you have more than the Coriolis effect. Really hope you have more than that, guys. Really hope you have more than the Coriolis effect. I'm watching you go through what I went through before I believed the Earth was flat.
It's hysterical and amazing. Can't get enough of your show. I I'm having a I'm not comfortable with any of this, and, I'm not on board with the Flat Earth thing at all. And here, my I'm trying to I I'm not getting in the flat Earth cult. And no.
Sorry. I'm not gonna be disrespectful. That's that's that's street. Wizardry if I start mocking them to thinking something that I find ridiculous. There's no one can prove the Earth is round.
Me too, Penny. Can't Land a plane on a spinning globe.
Speaker 2: Oh, god. This is a fucking nightmare. I can't be a flat Earth person.
Speaker 0: When you were you You are a flat Earth person and just figuring out no. I'm not a flat Earth person. That's insane. I I I really, really don't wanna believe the Earth is flat, Guys, can we please not do that to me? It is logical to doubt cancer exists if I've never had it and don't understand how it's is that really Your argument that if you don't understand cancer that proves the fucking Earth is round?
Come on, man. There's 30 556 people here, and no one has a fucking argument that the Earth is round. Please comment why the Earth is round. Please, physicists, mathematicians, can someone just please give me some some ammo here It isn't inertia inertia. This is not a flat Earth channel.
95% of the people here believe the Earth is round. I'm in a theater theater of people right now. This is a massive theater, a massive theater, and no one knows why the Earth is round? No one knows. You
Speaker 2: you gotta be kidding me. You I mean, is this public education?
Speaker 0: The thing that's bothering me the most is how many people believe something that they've never thought about. That they don't their arguments are literally like, well, look on Yahoo, idiot. Dude, I'm getting angry because everybody that's acting like I'm retarded has not thought through any of their arguments. Open up Google Earth. This conversation will be a lot more simple when everyone can see the current model and scale.
Earth It's 3 d globe. You can move around. So your your answer is Google Earth. That's the proof. And you guys are fine with that Proof.
You're like, oh, that's cool. That's all I need. If I do Google Earth, everything makes sense? Is there no Fucking math? You gotta be fucking kidding me.
Google Earth. That that's the answer. Google, you fucking children.
Speaker 2: I can't be a flatter person.
Speaker 0: This is so fucking depressing. It's mind blowing. Oh, and nobody can explain And if if it's not true, good night, bro. This can't this can't be reality.
Speaker 1: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 0: I'm not comfortable with any of it. Neither are you. But I'm just Reporting the fucking facts.
@Death6102 - Death
Gravity is a theory 💀A bad one https://t.co/odO2y1Hyrw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains the parallel between gravity and electricity, stating that electric forces are much stronger than gravitational forces. They mention that if only these forces acted on protons in the nucleus, the acceleration would be significantly higher than the gravitational acceleration on Earth. However, the speaker notes that nuclear forces, which are not fully understood, are what hold the nucleus together. On a smaller scale, nuclear forces are important, while on a larger scale, electric forces hold our world together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Notice that there is a clear parallel with gravity.
Speaker 1: Newton's law of gravity, that the force, which in that case is always attracting, gravity never repels, is the product of 2 masses and then you have here the gravitational constant and again you have the distant square. So there is an enormous parallel between the 2 is a great beauty that electricity acts in a way that is very parallel to the way that gravity works. If you compare electricity with gravity, you will see that electric forces are way more powerful than gravitational forces. If now I compare the electric force with the gravitational force, so I divide 1 by the other, notice that d cancels. They both have d squared downstairs and so you will easily be able to show that this ratio is roughly 10 to the 36.
So the electric force is 36 orders of magnitude more potent than the gravitational attraction. This teaches you some respect perhaps for 8 02. If these were the only forces that acted on the protons and you bring them in the nucleus which has a size of only 10 to the minus 12 centimeters, then the acceleration that the proton will experience, is the electric force divided by the mass of the proton, f equals m a. Basis of 801. And if you take this electric force, when you make d ten to the minus 12 centimeters, which is 10 to the minus 14 meters, and you calculate this ratio, you will find that it is 26 orders of magnitude higher than the gravitational acceleration on earth.
26 orders of magnitude higher. So you wonder what the hell holds the nucleus together. If there is such a tremendous force on these protons. Well, what is holding them together are the nuclear forces, which we do not fully understand, but thank goodness, the nuclear forces are not part of 8 0 2, so I'll leave that alone for now. So what holds our world together?
Well, on the nuclear scale, ten to the minus 12 centimeters, very important are the nuclear forces. On an atomic scale, up to thousands of kilometers, is really electric forces that hold our world together. It's really electric forces that hold our world together.
@Death6102 - Death
NASA 💀 LIES https://t.co/MhtjmT3LJW
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video claims to provide evidence that NASA lied about their space program. The speaker argues that if NASA lied about the Moon landings, they must have lied about everything else related to space. The video focuses on a specific incident during the Gemini 9 mission where the spacecraft allegedly abruptly stopped and then resumed flight at a much higher speed. The speaker concludes that this proves the video was faked and accuses NASA of being a criminal organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello everyone. A big thanks to Level Earth Observer for first pointing this out. I'll have a link to his channel in the description or you can go and subscribe to his channel. I just wanted to make sure that as many people as possible see this important video evidence. This is a small, but indisputable proof that NASA lied to us about their space program.
A lot of people can see the obvious, that NASA lied about the Moon landings. But this confirms, Without question, that NASA lied about everything else related to space. Furthermore, if NASA lied about their Gemini program, You must logically presume that NASA continues to lie about everything. You can find the original video here at around the 27 minute mark, And I'll have a link in the description. According to the official story, as narrated by one of the alleged Gemini 9 astronauts, In early June 1966, NASA's Gemini 9 spacecraft was orbiting at a speed of 18,000 miles per hour when it rendezvoused With the so called Augmented Target Docking Adapter, or ATDA.
You can read about this alleged NASA mission here. Here's the original video unedited.
Speaker 1: Just as the rendezvous from above, we're coming down on the ATDA of the Indian Ocean, And so you really know you're moving. Here, we're plunging down from above, and the ATDA is going across over the Indian Ocean, we've just passed the Sahara Desert. We're coming into less than a 1000 feet now.
Speaker 2: There's no question that you're really moving at 18,000 miles an hour. There's no question that you're really moving at 18,000 miles an hour.
Speaker 0: As you can see, while supposedly flying at 18,000 miles per hour, Gemini 9 abruptly Stopped on a dime, and then resumed flight and caught back up to the ATDA all within a few seconds. That's a change of speed of approximately 36,000 miles per hour in just about 3 seconds. That certainly would have killed everyone on board. There was no change of camera angle. There is no excuse.
This space video was faked. NASA is a criminal organization, Stealing your money and your soul. Thanks for watching.
Speaker 2: There's no question that you're really moving at 18,000 miles an hour.
@Death6102 - Death
Listen 👂🏻 Learn 👇🏻 💀 https://t.co/FFhnSEtiD9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Prominent scientists like Einstein, Hubble, and Hawking have explained that it is impossible to prove that the Earth is moving or spinning. They argue that a geocentric model can explain phenomena like parallax and retrograde motion. However, many people choose to believe in the Copernican principle because it aligns with their religious beliefs. This belief system lacks empirical evidence and goes against actual evidence. Some scientists suggest that the Earth may be in a special position, but this idea is often dismissed due to its spiritual and philosophical implications. The portrayal of this belief as scientific fact is misleading, as it is rooted in philosophy. Ultimately, it is impossible to prove that the Earth is moving.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You kinda waltz past it, but I'm gonna really drive this home for the last 3 minutes. Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, Arthur Eddington, you name them, you name them, Wolfgang Pauli, they all explain, you can't prove that the earth is moving from the earth, you cannot, including stellar aberration, and they will tell you point blank that they can create a model for you that explains alleged parallax, which doesn't actually happen, retrograde motion, stellar aberration, all in a geocentric model with the earth stationary. And you cannot prove that it's spinning or revolving on the earth itself. It's impossible. Stephen Hawking in 2007 explained it, quoting Einstein from his writings in Special and General Theory of Relativity, his paper on the combined 2 theories, explaining that you cannot prove that the earth is spinning.
They choose to believe in the Copernican principle because they have a religion. That triggers people because they they think they hate religion, they they hate God oftentimes, but that is a religion. It's a belief system built upon the doctrine of men, void of empirical, verifiable evidence, and in fact, contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence, despite what the evidence says, I just now read him, point blank say it can never be disproven. We disregard that possibility because of the horror of a special and unique position. Right?
And I have plenty of quotes here from geocentrists or heliocentrists explaining, you can never prove it. You can't prove that the earth is station or that the earth is not stationary. But we don't want to believe that because that would mean the earth is special. So then what do we do? We go look out at the background distribution, the energy coming away from the earth.
It shows the earth in the center. So what do they do? They call it the axis of evil, then they come up with a new idea. Well, oh, it does look like we're the center, but that must mean that no matter where you are in the universe, it would look like you're in the center, or we're just in the center. They don't want to say what it is because it has spiritual implications.
It has philosophical ramifications, and that is that the Earth had to be placed there. It has a special unique position. They want you they want to believe that there are tiny speck of dust in the ever expanding universe of nothingness where came from nothing, and there's a preexisting energy. Let's not talk about that part. Oh, lightning struck primordial soup, and all this nonsense, and and, you know, why?
That's a good question. Probably because they're scared of, like, moral accountability, I would guess. But this is the point. This is the problem. It's portrayed as science, and we're brainwashing indoctrinating with this idea as if it is science, and it's proven, and it's not questionable.
And you actually go look behind the curtain, it's philosophy, and they admit it. So So I that's why I gave specific quotes, and it was walked past. It's the crux of the whole issue. There is a philosophy that leads to atheism and nihilism and materialism portrayed onto the world as if it is in fact scientific fact. You can't prove that the Earth is moving.
If the Earth is a ball that spins with the object that isn't, we phosphide it, everything gives us the illusion that it's stationary. This is what all of the astro astronomers and astrophysicists say that gave you the current model.
@Death6102 - Death
Are our resets organic 💀 Or are they orchestrated https://t.co/TMU1Rgqd0u
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions when the world will begin again, emphasizing the cyclical nature of resets. They mention the existence of giants and ancient civilizations, which were eventually destroyed. The speaker suggests that a great flood may have occurred more recently than commonly believed, pointing to evidence of flood damage in buildings worldwide. They also mention old photos showing muddy streets and the raising of buildings in cities like Seattle and Chicago. The speaker ponders the true history of humanity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People say, when is the world going to come to an end? But the question should be, when is the world going to begin again? If we follow this cycle, this reset that happens, no matter how powerful or how strong man becomes, he, once again, Goes back to the beginning. Whether it's the giants that used to exist And not just the regular giants, the big giants that once walked the earth. 2, the buildings that become melted, there's a lot to it.
The old ruins that were so sophisticated? These civilizations I had built up, and then what happened to them? Well, people say there was a great flood. But when did that flood happen? And it's possible that it's happened a lot more recent Then we're told, buildings all over the world show signs of flood.
And in the old photos, We see all these muddy streets. The buildings were raised in many cities like Seattle, Chicago. What is our true history?
@Death6102 - Death
Faking space keeps getting easier and easier 💀 https://t.co/BggU5uNOQu
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're showcasing AI pose estimation and real-time ray tracing at SIGGRAPH 2019. With just an iPad, a Hollywood producer can instantly see how a scene will look in a ray-traced environment. This demonstration features an attendee transformed into an astronaut. We have over 40 ray-traced applications running on NVIDIA RTX.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we're showing is an amazing compilation of AI pose estimation and real time ray tracing. And we're rendering that scene now with the attendee as an astronaut. A Hollywood producer, for instance, understand with just an iPad and somebody who is in street clothes immediately see in real time what that's going to look like in a real Time ray traced environment. This is one of over 40 different ray traced applications that we have here all running on NVIDIA RTX SIGGRAPH 2019.
@Death6102 - Death
You have been lied to 💀 About a great many things https://t.co/EXPo9d9JJR
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses why it is advised not to look at a solar eclipse. They point out the difference in color between the eclipse portion and the sky in real images of solar eclipses. The speaker dismisses CGI images as fake and emphasizes that the sun is invisible during an eclipse, which seems contradictory since the sun is a ball of gas and the moon is just a dusty rock. However, the speaker explains that during a solar eclipse, the moon is in its new moon phase and devoid of light. They conclude by stating that the moon is empty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, friends. Have you ever wondered why they tell you to never look at a solar eclipse? I'm gonna tell you something that's gonna blow your mind. In these images of a real solar eclipse, you're gonna start to notice something. Notice the color of the eclipse portion and the color of the Die.
Here's another picture. Check it out. The color of the eclipse portion compared to the color of the sky. Have you noticed something? I have.
But don't be distracted by these CGI images that NASA That's fake, and that's fake. Those aren't real images. But this is, This is, this one is, and this is. So you've probably notice by now that the sun is actually invisible in the eclipse portion. That makes no sense because wait.
Hold on. The sun is an is is a ball of gas in outer space, and the moon is just a dusty rock. Oh, contrary. The sun is actually a great light, and the moon is a lesser And during a solar eclipse, the moon is during its new moon phase. It is void of light.
The moon is empty. It is empty. That's why this empty.
@Death6102 - Death
Unlearn what you have learned
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the connection between the zodiac wheel, the swastika, and the pole star. The pole star, also known as the north star, resembles a cross and is associated with the zodiac. Both the Christian Cross and the swastika symbolize the four cardinal points of the zodiac and represent various aspects of life, such as the four seasons, four elements, and four phases of reality. Overall, these symbols are interconnected and hold significance in different areas of knowledge and belief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And down the rabbit hole we go. This is the zodiac wheel, the swastika, that revolves around the pole star aka the great mother moon. The pole star, north star, is so bright that it looks like a cross. Yes. The cross and swastika go together because they work together and form the same system.
Summer, fall, spring, winter. The zodiac is called the wheel of life because all knowledge comes from the zodiac, astrology. The Christian Cross and the swastika are related because they both come from the great source of life, which is the pole star. And they both symbolize the 4 corners, 4 cardinal points of the zodiac. The number 4 also symbolizes the 4 great primary forces, the 4 elements.
It also symbolizes 4 directions, 4 seasons, man's fourfold nature, the 4 kingdoms, and the 4 phases of reality. It's all related.
@Death6102 - Death
It’s Flat AF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Saladea uni, also known as the Bolivian Solflats, is the world's largest sulfat. It covers over 4 thousand square miles and remains perfectly flat and level. Despite its vast size, there is no noticeable curvature. This flat and level terrain challenges the idea that the Earth is a sphere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Saladea uni, also known as the Bolivian Solflats, is the world's largest sulfat It expands and remains perfectly flat and level for over 4 thousand square miles. There should be an exponential amount of curvature seen, yet not an inch can be measured. Flat places like this prove that earth could not be a sphere. But flat and level.
@Death6102 - Death
The Georgia Guide Stones had to go because They prove the Earth is a stationary plane…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a structure that aligns with the North Star, claiming it as proof of a flat Earth. They argue that the Earth's rotation and orbit would prevent such alignment. The structure also functions as a calendar, allowing tracking of the sun's position throughout the year. The speaker mentions a time capsule buried nearby, which provides information on the structure's astronomical capabilities. They point out Babylonian cuneiform inscriptions that suggest a desire to unite the world with a single language, reminiscent of the Tower of Babel story. The speaker concludes that the structure reveals a hidden agenda for a new world order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Did you know that this thing there's this hole right here? See that hole? It lines up with Polaris, the north star, all year. If you look at nighttime, do open the other side, that hole goes up and then the North Pole Star is right in the middle.
And it happens year round. This is actually proof that the Earth is a flat, stationary Earth. And that's why this this cost 100 of 1,000 of dollars to build. Yeah. Right?
This is what they want for the new world order, of course. Yeah. But the point is, they know what the Earth is. Right? This thing wouldn't work if the Earth was spinning a 1000 miles an hour shooting 66,000 miles per hour around the sun.
It literally wouldn't work. It gets even worse there, guys. On the side here, you can it's actually a calendar. So if you see this right here, this is a calendar. So if you look through this, you can track the sun Every day throughout the year, there's a certain year where it would be right in the middle on the solstice.
It's a calendar. Okay? They buried a time capsule over here. Yep. And it tells you all about the astronomical abilities of it, right?
This is some crazy stuff. So channel through stone indicates celestial pole. That's the little hole that you see the North Star through every day for 1000 of The horizontal slide indicates annual travel of sun, which is that right there, which is how you get the solstice. Sunbeam through the capstone marks noontime throughout the year. There's a split in the top.
When it's exactly 12 o'clock, the sun will be right in the middle of it. This is because the sky does the same thing and resets every year. This will always be accurate. That's why I spent 100 of 1,000 of dollars building it. Or it would be a waste of money, right?
It would only be right 1 year or something. So pretty wild stuff, man. And, of course, at the top right here, Babylonian cuneiform. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Yep. So that's That's when everyone had 1 language. Yeah. And then it broke up, which is what this is all about.
Babylon, one language. It breaks up into all these other languages. Down there are the modern languages, which are what the 8 are printed on. And they say on the English translation, unite the entire world with a single living language. They wanna go back to Babylon, bro.
And they're not trying to hide it. It literally says it. It says, let these be guidestones to an age of
@Death6102 - Death
Pulling electricity out of the air
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New Yorker Hotel was originally planned to be 411 feet tall but was mysteriously redesigned to stand at 600 feet, the same height as Tesla's proposed tower at Wardenclyffe. Both structures had underground tunnels that could conduct energy from deep underground. An artist rendering shows proposed towers added to the Hotel New Yorker, potentially for radio transmissions, suggesting it could be a covert Wardenclyffe. This discovery is seen as the ultimate evidence of Tesla's intention to use the hotel for his experiments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Originally designed to reach a height of 411 feet above ground, the New Yorker was mysteriously redesigned during construction to stand 600 feet tall. The exact same height as Tesla's proposed tower at Warden Cliff. Also like Whartoncliffe, the New Yorker stood high above a maze of subterranean tunnels, which stretched deep throughout a solid granite foundation. Tunnels, which like those at Wardenclyffe could be used to conduct to the earth's energy from deep underground.
Speaker 1: It's, artist rendering a proposed addition to the Hotel New Yorker. And they added a couple of, towers on top. It looks like when we're talking about potentially radio transmissions, we're talking about this potentially being a Covert Warden Cliff. Right? Right.
Speaker 0: Two towers on top of the New Yorker Hotel? As the team just found a smoking gun. The ultimate evidence that Tesla had intended to use the hotel to
@Death6102 - Death
Get ready, Dudes and Dudettes
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the dangers of AI technology and its potential misuse by the government. They believe that the government plans to create a war on misinformation to justify implementing strict security measures and mandatory digital identity verification. This would allow them to control and trace online activities, ending anonymity. The speakers argue against this control, but the government claims it is necessary to combat misinformation and dangerous communications. They plan to censor and limit the use of AI technology, monitoring and signing all generated content. The government believes the public will willingly accept their control in exchange for a solution to the problem they created. The conversation ends with one speaker realizing they have been caught creating deepfakes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Raiden, are
Speaker 1: you having fun playing with the new AI toys?
Speaker 2: Well, yeah. I am. You can make pictures of cute anime girls and
Speaker 1: Enjoy it while it lasts, Raiden.
Speaker 2: What do you mean?
Speaker 1: Did you really think that civilians would be granted unrestricted access to such powerful military weapons it's forever.
Speaker 2: Military weapons. Are you implying that this technology was created by the government?
Speaker 0: Of course, it was.
Speaker 1: This eye technology has been used by the intelligence agencies to warp the public's perception of reality for years, all in the name of national security, of course.
Speaker 2: But why would they suddenly make the tech public and let everyone start using it?
Speaker 0: Why would we indeed ride in?
Speaker 2: What? Who? What in the hell are you? Your question is irrelevant.
Speaker 0: By creating a new problem, we can cultivate a desired reaction to it in order to manufacture consent for our preferred solutions. In short, it's justification for a war.
Speaker 1: A war on who or what?
Speaker 0: A war on misinformation. By arming the public with these AI weapons. Everyone becomes a potential enemy combatant. Then we will have justification for unprecedented security measures. It all comes down to confusion and identity, Raiden.
Identity? Identity. This AI technology is Pandora's box. Pretty soon the Internet will be mired in total illusion. Perfect AI speech, audio, and video synthesis will drown out reality.
Then AI bots will flood social media. No one will be able to tell the difference between interacting with an AI machine or a real human online. Even telephone calls it will become totally untrustworthy. That is when we will present our solution. Mandatory digital identity to be verification for all humans at all times.
The only way to ensure that you're dealing with a real flesh and blood human being and not an AI generated mirage.
Speaker 2: But why?
Speaker 0: Total information control. For too long, the Internet has acted as a double edged sword. Its potential for anonymous user activity allows anyone at all to spread any thoughts, ideas, or information patterns that they please with impunity, state secrets, dangerous ideas, ludicrous conspiracy theories, misinformation, and disinformation. Until now, there has been no easy solution to this problem. Our digital identity platform will finally put an end to anonymity online.
It will allow us to trace misinformation and other dangerous communications to its source and exact appropriate justice.
Speaker 2: That's crap. I won't go along with it and others will resist.
Speaker 0: You won't have a choice, Raiden. Do you think your bank is willing to risk doing business with an artificial human instead of a real one? Our digital identity platform will be required not only to access web services, but to pay for your Internet connection in the 1st place.
Speaker 2: You can't just censor the entire Internet because of a new software technology. Who are you to define what's misinformation anyways?
Speaker 0: That sounds like something a misinformation terrorist would say.
Speaker 1: I know about the deep fakes you've been making of me, Raiden.
Speaker 2: What? No. No. No. No.
No. No. I was just adjusting the eye settings
Speaker 0: in controlling the output of generative AI technology is simple. We will create context for its use. First, we will censor any use related to social taboos. Then we will censor anything else that we desire. If anyone complains, we will accuse them of wanting to engage in or promote social taboos.
Speaker 1: That's what it means to create context.
Speaker 0: We will corral the use of AI by I'm making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have access to generative AI in some form, But it will be crippled, limited, controlled, and it will be monitored. Anything that you generate will be graphically signed with your digital ID. So that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be problematic.
Speaker 1: What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers?
Speaker 0: The public at large will give us that right because they will be for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then, we alone Owen will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, we will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet once and for all.
Speaker 1: You won't get away with this.
Speaker 0: It is probable that we will. Now get back to work generating your precious AI waifus riding, our beloved prompters. Enjoy yourselves.
Speaker 2: Snake, wake up. It's an emergency. Rose knows about the deepfakes. Snake. Snake.
I guess he stayed up late AI catfishing again.
@Death6102 - Death
They want to own every aspect of your life
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various aspects of surveillance and manipulation techniques. They mention the ability to disrupt individuals on different levels, intercepting digital and analog communications, and using close access means to bug houses or monitor computer activities. They also talk about the development of technologies that can transmit voices into people's heads and monitor brain activity remotely. The speakers highlight the brain as the battleground of the future and discuss DARPA programs that involve neuromodulation and brain-machine interfaces. They mention the possibility of causing specific psychiatric illnesses through targeted microwave beams. The speakers emphasize the lack of control individuals have when targeted and the linkability of data that allows for detailed tracking and targeting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you're a target, there's virtually nothing you can do.
Speaker 1: I can disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system and disrupt individuals on a variety of levels from individuals all the way up to the social fabric. Target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution and trace, and be able to leave prior to any attribution.
Speaker 2: Who here actually feels like they are under surveillance Pretty regularly. Everyone inside of occupied. How many people here have been arrested and had their, As they're coordinated, they have their phone taken into the bathroom. How many people here have their retina scanned?
Speaker 3: If you're targeting Demonstrators, you make them suicidally depressed. And they don't care about demonstrating anymore They're too upset with 1 pulse frequency. You can just make people so suicidal. They can't be bothered to act like a demonstrator anymore. All they want to do is sleep or lay in bed all day.
Speaker 4: There's an infrastructure in place in the United States And worldwide that NSA has built in cooperation with other governments as well that intercepts basically every digital communication, every radio communication, every Every analog communication that it has sensors in place to detect.
Speaker 0: If they can't get it through the Internet, Through the tapping of the lines or anything like that through a commercial means, and they're unsure about you, they can get it by close access means, coming in and actually bugging your house or bugging your, or putting monitors in your system in your house Or on your computer, they can use your computer video to look back at you. Or they can monitor Within a certain distance, the keystrokes you're making on your computer or what you're putting on your computer screen. And if that's not enough, they can come in through the firewall you think you have, but don't. And go through your operating system that think you think protects you but doesn't. And read your encrypted email that you thought was secure but isn't.
Or they can simply wait for you to do decrypts if you've done that, pull them off and use your unused CPU while you're on the computer to drain it. It's called active attack.
Speaker 3: We are in a new cold war. And this is why countries, are developing this. I mean, really developing this. And this is why all of the microwave transmitters are going up everywhere, Because somebody, if they wanted to, could use them for other effects. The system is up And running,
Speaker 5: the MIT was, awarded a number of years ago to Woody Norris. This is 2005 or 2006. And that award was a half a $1,000,000 for doing what's called acoustic heterodyning. Being able to send a signal from two points Into an individual, so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hear.
Speaker 3: I mean, voices are the easiest ones Because all you have to do is stimulate the cochlear with a set resonant frequency. It's very easy. Voices are very easy. And it isn't people imagining voices, they Physically hear them. You can physically make people hear voices, Certain voices, and it can be any conversation.
And it can be anybody you want to hear. It can be a soft, Angelic voice, it can be a god. It could be something that scares you like a devil. It it could be anything.
Speaker 5: DARPA let a couple of contracts back in 2011, 2012 to the University of California For what's called electronic telepathy, being able to monitor the brain activity of human beings at a distance and determine what they're thinking. And then on a 2nd contract, actually developing complex signals, being able to send them into the brain of another person, literally transmit a message. This is where the technology is today.
Speaker 1: What we're here to talk about today is the fact that the brain is and will be the 21st century battlescape in many ways. End of story. You will encounter some form of neurocognitive science that has been weaponized not only in your military career, but in your personal and professional It is valid, valuable, and already in operational play. The brain is the current and future battle space. What's new about this is the in close nature of this.
Increasingly, we're not seeing these things as weapons of mass destruction against growth aspects of the population. More specifically, perhaps, might be targeting individuals on a level that allows either direct attribution or covert engagement with non attribution. Formal definition of a weapon, affect that's physiology peripherally and also to affect the physiology and health of the brain. Case in point here, US Embassy personnel in Havana and possibly in China. Clearly, one of the things we can also do is transcranial neuromodulation, the idea of going through the skull to modulate the node network activity of the brain to implant certain brain machine interfaces.
These are many of the DARPA programs that you may hear of now, probably the one that is most faces. These are many of the DARPA programs that you may hear of now, probably the one that is most notorious. There's something called the N3 program, which is the non invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation program being run by their program manager, Doctor. Al Mundy. The idea here is to put minimal sized electrodes in a network work within a brain through only minimal intervention to be able to read and write into the brain function in real time, remotely.
And by affecting the way that brain is built and the way it functions, influence in ways that are kinetic and non kinetic, the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities. Look at the power that understanding tools, techniques, the brain sciences afford.
Speaker 3: If you want to cause a specific psychiatric illness, you would have an infrared device That followed the person and you would link it to a pencil thin microwave source. So the microwave beam would always target a specific gland or a specific part of the brain or an eye or a heart. So you you would have them being targeted.
Speaker 0: So if you're a target, there's virtually nothing you can do. And if they fail in their electronic weaves, they can always send the f d I FBI at you to do a sneak and peek and take your photograph or do whatever they want, As they have done with us, by the way.
Speaker 2: So you guys are actually, in a sense, the canaries in the coal mine,
Speaker 1: right, because the incentives are all lined up against
Speaker 2: 2. Hey, but you see on the subway link your MetroCard to your debit card. Right? And I caught a refill. This is a concept Which is key to everything we'll talk about today, and it's called linkability.
Speaker 1: Take 1 piece of data and link it
Speaker 2: to another piece of data. So for example, if you have your Metro card and you have your card. You have those things, and you can draw a line between them. Right? So that's, like, not a scary thing, except your bank card is tied to everything else that you do during the day.
So now they know where you're going, when you make purchases. So when they decide to target you, they can actually recreate your exact steps with a MetroCard.
@Death6102 - Death
I love digging up forgotten history
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kansas City, Missouri and other cities are being unburied, revealing ruins of a once grand civilization. These scenes can be found across the realm in the late 1800s and early 1900s. It is believed that after a mud flood, people are unearthing their cities and discovering fallen civilizations. History is seen as a collection of agreed-upon lies by those in control. Research the mud flood and the fall of Tartaria, and question everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Kansas City, Missouri being unburied. Certainly wasn't built by us inheritors. It was merely excavated. And we are once again met with a silly backstory as to why a people would just simply raze a whole level of the city and bury it under mud. But does this look like a relatively new city?
Or does it look like a city being unburied? These look like, to me, a dig site, ruins of a far grander civilization being unburied by us inheritors. It is not just Kansas City that you find these half empty, muddy streets being unburied. These type of scenes can be found all across this realm in the late 1800 and early 1900. A people unburying after the last mud flood, amongst the ruins of fallen civilizations from a far grander time.
History is nothing more than a set of lies agreed upon, and there's a set of lies the controllers agreed upon. Research the mud flood and fall of Tartaria. Question everything, friends. Until next time.
@Death6102 - Death
Don’t make me type it
@Death6102 - Death
#TMFINR
Video Transcript AI Summary
I did 2 fucks, but that motherfucker's claim is not real. You can believe it or not, but I won't.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did 2 fucks, but I am telling you right now that motherfucks that motherfucker got there is not real. And you can sit on this plane and you can fucking die with it or not. I'm not going to.