@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Archetypes – the lost key to your purpose How knowing your archetypes gives you the secret blueprint of your life There is no knowledge as powerful than knowing who you are! 🧵 https://t.co/Unt62uFgkb
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Life is a play and we are merely players on a stage said Shakespeare centuries ago. Whatever you are you should act well your part. But the vast majority know not their part. They live life as insignificant minor characters repeating tiny insipid lines programmed into them by dark forces.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Depression is often caused by an inability to do what we are made to do. Do you fulfill the measure of your creation? Are you crafting the world of your own making? Does your work give you joy? Our misery can be tied back to our slavery which was originally caused by ignorance. https://t.co/1O2y786CPb
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
So what even is an archetype? It’s a plan, a code, and a design. The archetypes are made from the mind of God and represent the inherent unity of mankind. Each represents a different aspect of the human psyche. Each has a part to play in the cycle and sage of life. https://t.co/nzMvCLYxhP
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The madness of modernity often leaves crippling confusions as to who we are. Can a fish climb a tree like a monkey? Can an elephant fly like an eagle? Can a sloth run like a cheetah? We are just as diverse with our own unique skills, temperaments, passions, and powers. https://t.co/LQsGR3HPdn
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Humans though, are far more advanced than mere animals. We have four archetypes – a dominant, an auxiliary, a challenger, and a shadow. They fit together like four passengers in a car – the driver, shotgun, and two back seats. All influence where it goes. https://t.co/FXS01AoPDP
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The dominant is so used to driving that all of his actions are unconscious. Everything is automatic. He will often not even be aware of how others see him. However, he truly is how the car will come across to the world. This archetype is achieved effortlessly without stress. https://t.co/94AiBTJkv8
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The auxiliary is the much more conscious copilot. She helps the driver socially, mentally, emotionally, and often even intellectually. The auxiliary is often an angel that soothes the two passengers in the back. She is accessed with minimal stress and pressure. https://t.co/Y5L36eV2f0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The challenger is the 10 year old boy in the back that’s screaming are we there yet. He’s your demon. He’s the part of you that you overestimate your abilities in. He gets you into trouble. However, many strive to be their challenger. He’s accessed under stress. https://t.co/WvejiSw647
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The shadow is your inner child as a toddler in the back. She’s doesn’t understand where she’s going. She is the opposite of your dominant. She is accessed under trials of intense stress, trauma, or incredible pressure. This is your anima (or animus if you’re a psychologically female).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Knowing your archetypes allows you to know what stage you’re in. You instantly have a reading for how you’re doing. Most people have to develop and integrate themselves. Most spend far too much time in their challenger’s and shadow’s and have forgotten who they are. https://t.co/UYhvFjXZd5
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Each archetype is more developed than the next. The golden ratio applies to what archetype they should be in (majority dominant, strong minority auxiliary, small minority challenger, and tiny minority shadow). It’s like a steak with potatoes and a sauce with just a pinch of salt. https://t.co/wNNOZa2DF0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Knowing your archetypes allows you to know where to direct your self-development. First is the journey of self-actualization and then is the journey of self-transcendence. You quickly understand your strengths and weaknesses. You know where to grow. https://t.co/Zce5i2Fx1H
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Purpose, clarity, and motivation come to those that can see where they’re going. How are you supposed to act if you don’t even know who your character is? Why focus on your weaknesses if you could focus on your strengths? I’ve mapped out 100s of traits for your self-discovery! https://t.co/4xKQ2M5fri
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
What are the archetypes? They are the archetypes of the collective unconscious. They have been described by Jung, Campbell, and many other great authors. We recognize these archetypes subconsciously in others. You will soon see how others see you! https://t.co/yhS0Ys2IKy
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The archetypology I’ve developed is called Seasonal Dynamics. There is a different personality type of each day of the year. Clusters of different personalities can be heuristically categorized into different archetypes. There are 24 archetypes. https://t.co/7RbzGu8XYV
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Each part of someone can be understood as being interconnected to the entire whole. It is exactly like a genetic code. However, this methodology can be applied to body language, physiognomy, eye movements, micro-expressions, voice, attire, and more! https://t.co/m9XvibyZF4
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Knowing other people’s archetypes and traits allows one to know 100s of different things within seconds of meeting someone. As we psychologically accelerate (Psych/Acc) we will in fact become more psychic. The pun is intended. https://t.co/7IY4Quovl0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you are unsure of what you’re doing in life – whether it be your profession, your relationships, or your lifestyle, knowing your archetypes can be an instant way to dramatically improve your wellbeing. How? You can follow the examples of similar people. https://t.co/R6qtJq9TY4
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Your life has incredible parallels with those who share your traits. You can know what to expect from your children. You can plan accordingly for your future. You can set appropriate expectations in relationships of all kinds. https://t.co/fVM8zUflCM
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Knowing the archetypes and how they behave gives one priceless insights into history, sociology, anthropology, economics, and all of the other social sciences. The clearest way to predict a nation’s future is in understanding its archetypes! https://t.co/czEDeZ5bem
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is a journey that will help future generations use these systems, frameworks, and tools to their greatest capacities. We are at a turning point as a species now where are only choice is to psychologically accelerate! https://t.co/iaJ2Oss3vg
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
There is a powerful opportunity here to grow more through this process of self-understanding then you ever could through any other means. This is not just an esoteric art – this is an applied science: https://t.co/al0znDnQ6U
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Do you know what you’re doing with your life? Divers hordes of people go down paths due to unchallenged expectations leading to a life of quiet desperation. The younger you are the more useful this will be. But even if you’re a nonagenarian this is still of the utmost importance. https://t.co/08K9rMhzMD
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is both a journey and a destination. Knowing these archetypes will even transform how you look, carry yourself, and your own attractiveness. You will become more intelligent knowing what you should focus on. The weight and stress of years are about to go away. https://t.co/QWauCB8zGm
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is a core part of who you are – something you brought with you to this life and something you will take out of this life. It transcends the bounds of space and time. It traverses life and death. You are an alchemical action and being going beyond life and death! https://t.co/FfIzFTUjMi
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you want to learn more about your archetypes (including your specific archetypes’ sub-archetypes, colors, aesthetics, and status positions) then I suggest that we communicate more so that you have your questions answered.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Seven Hermetic Principles and their intimate connection to Archetypology and the collective unconscious! What is portrayed in the world is often the exact opposite of what is reality. To see truth you need to recognize energy around you. Light will attract light!🧵 https://t.co/EYLfK0chYV
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The entire universe is conscious. Everything that exists has a level of intelligence. The mind can be anywhere. If you want to search something all you have to do is to experience the same resonance and connect to the location of that mind. All is mind! https://t.co/GHmeVSUAHb
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Specifically, you can find truth to esoteric or erudite topics by thinking of that topic. If it exists then it will manifest unto you. Everything you may think about a certain time or place is given to you by your programming. If you were told India is poor, you'd be right! https://t.co/PQEbbKMmDc
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
But if you were told that India is a place where great wealth resides you'd easily find that information. Humans will go to great lengths to support their confirmation biases. If someone tells you they are an 'ENTJ' you will often think so but if they said 'ISFP' then you would find evidence for that as well. Our minds are programmed to see what we want to see.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
There is always a correspondence of different levels and layers. Every season has its different tribal members and functions. Every trait is manifested differently in its own time. Space changes the absolute form but the essence will still be recognizable. https://t.co/LwquvRi99A
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
What this means if you combine the first statement: you'll find the reality you're looking for plus the second: there is always a parallel to each trait in each existence, then you can find interesting phenomena wherever you look. A computer from ancient Greece may sound impossible but was just as real as the computer you're reading this from. It wasn't the same but was their analogous device.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Everything exists in a state of vibration. Personality will never be permanent - everyone will always be a potentiality of different archetypes - that's why there's a Dominant, Auxiliary, Challenger, Shadow, Envy, and Crises archetypes. Each personality trait exists in its intensity, its frequency, and its accessibility. You are a quantum entanglement of possibilities.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
So if you combine mentalism, correspondence, and vibration you can connect to the energy of the age and see its parallel analogs. You can also see the energy of a place. Each archetype has a different phenotype in each ethnicity. There won't be the same exact results but you will see running parallels!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Everything exists in polarity. Without polarity there could not be existence as there could not be gender. The desire to create is manifested trifold into the ability to usher in, ability to maintain, and the ability to destroy. Everything in its extreme is its exact opposite! https://t.co/H3zvpGOFRQ
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Touching frozen carbon dioxide will give you burns. The horseshoe theory shows that political opposites can be effectively the same. For every personality trait taken in its extreme it will appear like its exact opposite. The most masculine men have the most feminine anima. The most feminine women have the most masculine animus! We draw upon our most extreme sides and then balance it out. The shadow exists to be integrated!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
As we combine the traits of mentalism, correspondence, vibration, and polarity we'll start to see energy in its raw forms. Energy exists to create and propagate itself. Whenever we question or inquire upon another's existence we are asking for permission to see (in a limited amount) who they are on the inside. We are confused at first by the awkwardness as they are initially alien. But then we ascertain their worthiness.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Sentience is the ability to gain real foothold into the eyes. And the eyes are the window into the soul. In the eyes of intuition we can see how paradoxes can be reconciled. All truths have a duality to them - a masculine and a feminine side. Opposites are identical in nature! https://t.co/OSEmRyFaj8
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Nothing happens in perpetuity. There is a flow in and out. There will always be cycles. When predicting the future everyone assumes the same trends going on forever and they are always wrong. You may think something is new but it certainly existed before. To see the future just look into the past. See the geometry of pattens if you want to see the birds eye view of history!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
When one combines mentalism, correspondence, vibration, polarity, and rhythm you can see that archetypes not only have their own themes but each one has its own color and its own same exact variations on each particular level. Also who you are is a result of the direct alchemy of yourself and those you are with. You do not exist in isolation. Psychology must be understood as a group endeavor! A group of teenager shenanigans can never be understood by a single individual but as a collective doing of peer pressure. People don't have ideas. Ideas have people. (Colorized images early 1930s)
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Everything happens for a reason. There is an underlying cause for every effect! There is a law for everything. It may seem random but it was according to the laws that you didn't understand. Looking back into history you will see things that don't make sense. This woman, Seraph Young (Niece of Brigham Young) was the first woman to ever vote in 1869. This happened in what people thought of as a polygamous patriarchy. History is often stranger and more contradictory than you can imagine.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
There will always be underlying factors going on at play. Fundamentally, reality works like physics, and so do the non-material interactions as well. Energetic laws work similar to how physical laws work. A game will allow you to see the interactions of mysterious laws. You jump of a diving board and it gives you an equal push up. The same things happen with our personality traits. They push and pull. Each archetype has pulleys and levers amidst the different archetypes and create different attractions among themselves!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Looking at mentalism, correspondence, vibration, polarity, rhythm, and cause & effect you can you the multivariable nature of human interactions. People have multiple layers of body language, energies, and physiognomies that layer on top of each other to represent multiple congruent and discongruent aspects to the human mind. You can see that these harmonious and disharmonious aspects work together to push humanity upwards in a double helix that spins around in curves in space. Fundamentally, the universe will always be a dance!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Finally gender is in everything - everything is a product of creation - the dance between the masculine and the feminine. All personality traits exist in a spectrum and in combination between the hyper masculine and the hyper feminine. The masculine desires for order and the feminine wishes for chaos. Every interaction that will ever exist will be tied to the masculine attempting to take order over the feminine!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The most masculine time of the Emperor will have the most feminine shadow through the Siren. The Siren is the pure representation of water (which is s symbol of sacrifice) but us also a symbol of primordial chaos. The Leviathan must be conquered and tame! The masculine must literally ground the feminine. Strictness but overcome imagination. Reality must triumph over illusion! https://t.co/xQGYmYc1mb
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
As all planes show the reality of gender we must realize that there is a feminine creatrix but she also has the potential to be like Kali the destroyer. The energy of the seductress is not new it's only become cognizant as its power has become to high. The next age will be one of more masculine consistency as this one has been an age of feminine chaos! A life time of of feminine resonance will sway and the pendulum will bounce back to masculine gravity, control, and justice!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In many ways culturally we live in the age of the Siren. This was brought in a lifetime ago. The age of the siren seeks to understand all resonances, vibrations, emotions, and energies. But in doing so in looses all connection to the ground. It looses it's connection to reality. It becomes relativistic, post-truth, and solipsistic. And thus begins generations of degeneracy, demotivation, and confusion!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Not to dive any deeper, but this is a legacy of dark ancestral powers that ask us to pay our debts to the faustian bargain. We now live in modernity and we pay with our advancements with our moral decay, anxiety, and destruction. Remember who took these photos and you'll see a man who took a pack with the devil! Remember Goethe and his people!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
As we combine the traits of mentalism, correspondence, vibration, polarity, rhythm, cause & effect, and gender we can see that archetypes are civilizational forces. They are pacts that go beyond space and time. You are a result of the actions and fulfilled actions and state of being of your ancestors. Your'e a spiritual being encapsulated in physical form. The impact of the physical onto the fluid represents your reality impacting quantum potentialities!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you want to understand personality, all you have to see is the ripples of waves you see as you touch a surface of water. Your consciousness is but a drop of water that has the potential to return and be connected to the ocean of consciousness. All energy is matter and all matter is intelligent. All matter reflects a certain level of intelligence and has its own individuality and paradoxically its own unity. You are one and you are all!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In conclusion, energy exists in balls of motion, existences that can be either a particle or a wave. This is how temperament is formed and how subconsciousnesses flows. It's in the interplay between the physical solids and the energetic fluids. To understand personality you must see the rivers entanglement of I am, what I was, and what I will be!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
BTW I wrote this article to demonstrate that the lives of your ancestors wasn't a foreign world. They know what you're experiencing and your descendants will experience what you experience. The form will be slightly different but deep down it will be many of the same tests!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Deep Read into H. Pearl Davis Why does she have the views she does? What's her motivation? What's she really like under her skin? What's she afraid of? How does she operate? Why is she the Tate counterpart? What is she really after? Let's fund out more about this Orphan! https://t.co/1x7tOfkqNp
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Basics: Orphan auxiliary Caregiver demon Magician shadow Trickster. Somewhat higher degrees of narcissism, much lower degrees of autism compared to most Orphans. O - moderately low tries to be moderately high C - moderate E - moderately low tries to be very high A - Low N - moderately low - is much higher under stress Likely an ISTP (almost ISTJ) who types as an IN T/F J. Enneagram 6w7. Often under moderate levels of stress. Type 1 Body (masculine, dominant, broad shoulders). Modest personal taste (cares about proximity over speed and quality). Low bioenergetic temperature (7-12 degrees). Longhouse aesthetic type.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Sub archetypes include the Despot (for Orphan), the Superficialist (for Caregiver), the Theatric (for Magician), and the Social Critique (for shadow). This means in terms of personal growth and character she leans negative (maybe 2.5 or 3 out of 10). She is displaying relatively bad versions of her potential self. This is manifested in her views. She is naturally drawn to centralization and the cementation of power. She is obsessed with control. She hates chaotic energies (which is why she comes across as quite masculine). Inherently authoritarian and drawn to dictatorial people.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Most unique take is that she scores SO HIGH ON NPCism that she will appear the opposite of an NPC and appear as if she is out of the matrix. Natural born reactionary but in an extremely normie way. Kruschevka traits. Would be an extremely good Soviet era KGB officer and operative. Drawn to modernization, standardization, normalization of strange behaviors, strong binary thinker, and so institutional that she hates the institutions. Auxiliary traits are focused on being visible, mortal, earthly, grounded, and being part of a social club.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Spends a lot of time in her shadow. Communist newscaster type. Very dull/sterile vibe. Women like this in previous generations in the U.S. were often fundamentalist religious types with LOTS of kids. Now they're like this. Her mind is neurologically set to enjoy the patriarchy. For he she views hyper-patriarchal norms as a way for women to gain far more power. Is somewhat machiavellian. Temperamentally she's very conservative and in this day and age being conservative means being anti-family (conserving what happened in the 60s social revolutions) but with Islamic cultural value twists.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Fundamentally Pearl is very afraid of death - is a strong materialist. She's very blackpilled. Has a deep sense of fear for the future and the hereafter. She's a Red Orphan so psychologically she's very masculine and really feels and identifies more with men. However she has traits that many other women do associated with nanny-state directives. She would do much better personally in a world where arranged marriages at 15 were the norm and she could completely control a beta husband. Strange that she's this white but maybe it's a sign that the West will have to adapt to Islamo-Eurasian values.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In conclusion: Pearl likes normalization, collectivization, and doesn't like uniqueness. She has a naturally authoritarian personality. Probably failed at previous relationships because she acted too much like a man. She's motivated by desires to control. Subconsciously she realizes that women have the most societal controls in hyper-sexist societies (which is often true). She previously had a high degree of stress and decided she was more like her ENTP shadow (like Tucker Carlson) but she's not. She represents a new breed of conservatism which has never been seen before in the West. She's such an NPC that she appears the opposite (breaking the matrix). She's half industrious half lackadaisical. Scores high on mesmerizing (hence her following of omega orbiters) and also scores high on constructive (wants to build stuff - often tangible real world things - it would help her if she was more in the physical world as she's a hyper-sensor type). She has a dilemma where she wants to be seen but be self-effacing and also is tempted to present high value (when she obviously has very little to none) while being afraid of being a ghost (fear of death, insignificance, and judgement)!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Aesthetics is predictive of mood: The West (and the US in particular) was highly optimistic in the 1950s and this state lasted until 1971. But up to a decade before aesthetic tastes went through a radical change that predicted the upcoming wave of pessimism! https://t.co/hLQXEcFR63
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you look at Lindy magazines from the 1950s and into the very beginning of the 1960s the mood is inherently optimistic. Playful. Exuberant. Collaborative. Easygoing. Easy on the eyes (directed towards male pattern gaze). Mass appeal. Middle Class focused. Dimorphic. Charged! https://t.co/aADOaAoNkR
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
However within the space of literally months (1961-1963) the mood had become more serious, somber, harder on the eyes (directed more towards female pattern gaze). Limited appeal. Upper Class focused. Androgynous. Solitary. Limited Charge. Solipsistic. Individualistic. Depressive https://t.co/lFpulnN98x
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
All of this occurred before the JFK assassination exactly 60 years ago. Did this happen as a result of the birth control pill (1960) or because of the threat of nuclear war (Bay of Pigs), or because of something entirely else? This was the pivot point of eventual destruction! https://t.co/MTyhsT51R5
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The beginning of the 60s represented a focus on sophistication from common tastes (left vs right). However in so doing we eventually left behind the common man. Peak flattering styles (the early 60s) would eventually collapse into provocativeness. https://t.co/B6KCQSxsPu
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Looking back you can tell the inflection point happened in 1960-1961. Compare 1958 (left) with 1962 (right). Clear top down destruction of middle class morales, inception of post-modernism, aggressive feminism, attack on universal Christian culture, American exceptionalism, etc. https://t.co/ddiyekhLuq
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The physical inflection point of the end of the West was in 1971. The spiritual inflection point of the end of the West was in 1960. Compare the two years and you'll see massive spiritual changes that are expressed in aesthetics. Many cases aesthetic predicts trends by 10 years! https://t.co/yTB556jx1L
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Don't be blackpilled though. Given recent trends we should see a serious backlash towards social conservatism sometime around 2030 given current trends in aesthetics. If you want to see the immediate future - look to the aesthetics in society! https://t.co/YeONXUqxWe
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Left (became big in late 00's) predicted cultural marxism, urban decay + decadence, economic decline, dystopian values, extremism, and skepticism. Right (current) is predicting return to traditionalism, ruralism, Christian revival, higher focus on family/less individualism. https://t.co/LQdTrS0HUX
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
There is always the question of what is part of the natural process and what is forced culture. I believe the major social changes of the 60s wouldn't have happened (and it'd be gradual and somewhat weaker) until 1970-1990 without elite intervention https://t.co/XV3XiWPk8t
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is what they took away from us and this is what they gave us. This wasnt natural. This was a forced top down culture shift. Artificial Destructive Chaotic. The Boomers and their cultural consequences have been a disaster for the West and will continue to harm us for decades https://t.co/3UbESWyZdB
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
!How to build AGI A thread for all those that wish to accelerate You heard it here first https://t.co/fPcCpiJKeM
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Artificial General Intelligence. Artificial means silicon based, swiftly scalable, and powered by a central processing unit. General means that it can be applied not just in a game a chess but in every situation imaginable. The ‘Artificial’ (since the 2010s) and now the ’General’ (this decade) part have largely been solved for (assuming basic linear improvements). What has not even been considered is the ‘Intelligence’ part.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Intelligence is a part of consciousness. By far the number 1 holdup in AGI is understanding consciousness. In order to understand the ‘how’ we must be able to 1. Visualize 2. Quantify 3. Operationalize. Algorithmic intelligence must be based in par on how humanity thinks. https://t.co/P84HFNqFaA
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In order to do effective accelerationism you must first focus on psychological accelerationism. Intelligence is a phenomenon of the mind (which is not necessarily the brain). We must make tools that understand not just ‘how’ people think but ‘why’ people think, feel, and act the way they do. Machines need an operating system to understanding our psyches. However, given the way our mental health crises are going it appears that we’re either lacking useful models or being flooded by detrimental models (it’s both).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Large language models can only go so far. When technologies are introduced they go through a natural period of acceleration but then they foment into their matured form. In order to make future progress you have to reinvent the wheel or else natural entropy or deceleration will occur. Imagine where aerospace was in the 1950s compared to today.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Try to envision what it if would be like if we were trying to do biotech and we had AI (machine learning tools) but Watson and Crick had never discovered DNA. There would be no human genome project. Biology would still be back in the dark ages. The reality this is exactly where we are at with Psychology.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you’ve read my previous works you’ll know how I intend to transform Psychology from a pseudoscience into a material science. This same process occurred when astrology became astronomy and alchemy became chemistry. We still haven’t made that leap in understanding the mind. Only AI (really as its existed since 2022 with generative abilities and real time search capacities) , a free open internet (without censorship, tight centralization, and rampant SEO problems), and a desire to conduct real science (with a primary concern with truth over politics) can create this new field.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Our psyches can be viewed all at once. The internet is the collective unconscious of humanity as it exists in real time. This raw power of intellect can be captured the same way the future Kardashev scale climbers will harness the near infinite energy of the stars! We think too small.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We must visualize. What we need is the human genome project but for human consciousness. Every single type of thought, response, interaction, feeling, emotion, and conceptualization, and experience must be recorded, categorized, and framed into models. https://t.co/WXWUn73GT5
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
To visualize we must understand things from the ‘negativa’, the ‘neutrativa’, and the ‘positiva’. The negativa explains how things don’t happen. It’s more bottom up or inductive in its reasoning. It’s focused on the ‘how’. The neutrativa explains the particulars of what is happening. It’s abductive in its reasoning and deals with the who, what, where, and when. The positive takes a top-down approach with deductive reasoning. It explains ‘why’ things happen. Technology has been far too focused on the negativa without the neutrativa let alone the positiva.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We must be able to quantify. To do this we must build a psychoscope – a tool that can measure any trait by its intensity, frequency, and attainability. Not just the area or nature of a trait but also the level and movement of where it’s going. Right now personality and the human states are viewed in an algebraic way. We must go from Newtonian to Einsteinian physics in this regard as we go to simple states of solid mass to quantum states of energy.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
To quantify we need legions of 140+ IQ geniuses working on this. Psychology isn’t a science (reproducibility crisis, ideological hazards, aversion to math, BS theories with no real world applications) largely because those who study it are feminized midwits as opposed to rocket scientists.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The same exact skillset used currently in the world of genomics is precisely what will be needed to understand psychology at scale and synthesized incarnations. It’s Bayesian statistics. We actually don’t need a thousand Freuds or Jungs, we only need a handful working with those who believe in legalized math.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
To operationalize we need to incentivize the user to be part of this great historic endeavor. What would it be like if you controlled the algorithms? What would it be like if the internet and search was customized, perfectly tailored, and personalized to you? What would a ZK proofs internet where you owned all your own data be like? This could not be possible outside an ecosystem built by cryptography.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Personal inputs must be gathered. Psychographics (with thousands of different traits, states, types, and category schemas) must be instilled into the very basic bedrock of the internet. Running water and electricity were embedded into the internet in order to create the modern world. In order to create AGI we need psychographics and cryptography. One will make AGI livable (human centric – read my manifesto on Psychological Accelerationism for more details) and the other functional (it must be tied to the proof of personhood to work).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
It is an absolute impossibility to attain anything near AGI without PsychTech or NeuroTech. There are only a handful of live players in this space. We need a built out environment of companies focused on these issues. https://t.co/TuynnhYkEH
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
You may ask why? PsychTech is foundational to the social technologies of the future. These are as far ranging as education, media, mental health, hiring, training, relationships, statecraft, marketing, economic resources, investing, and dozens of other fields. https://t.co/nxU3E5atIg
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Why focus on NeuroTech? You have no idea what dreams may come. Despite impressive advancements in neuroscience over the last 30 years, we know far less about the brain and other neurological systems than other parts of the body. If you actually want to create advancements in neural networks we first need to make a supercharged leap in neurology.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
By the way, the difference between PsychTech and NeuroTech is that PsychTech doesn’t directly interface with the body while NeuroTech does. PsychTech has an advantage at scale (you only need remote inputs like language, visuals, or user responses) but NeuroTech has an advantage with specific applied experiential uses (like lucid dreaming or bionic limbs).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Do you want to accelerate? Get the richest people you know to put together a fund. Ideally AUM of over $20 billion. Invest in 100 different companies focused on either PsychTech or NeuroTech. Virtually everyone who has the necessary skillsets already exist. This is only a problem of human capital allocation.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
You may ask why this hasn’t been done. As explained in previous works the part of the brain interested in systemizing is the exact opposite as the part that mentalizes. Autists can’t built PsychTech nor effective NeuroTech. Those with a greater theory of mind will have to be present to train the models of the future.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
People may say that AGI is right around the corner. I still stand by that these bots are still imbecilic. I want that to change. Speed, computational prowess, and breadth is not the same thing as metaphysical intuition, philosophical reasoning, or timeless sentience. They still make rookie mistakes. Let’s change that.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If you want AGI then you must experience Psychological Accelerationism! https://t.co/CIa7jPdLfG
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Genetic Potential Through Aesthetics Male & Female pattern gaze: Contrasts & Comparisons An anthropological dive into intergenerational values https://t.co/3VngnrChqP
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Previous work has firmly established that Culture is the bedrock of a society. The subconscious programming of the collective determines the demographics. Visual cues provide compelling derivative guides into underlying phenomena. https://t.co/Z7ZbRzx4xc
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
What we consider to be beautiful is what will inevitably propagate. Procreation is predicated on aesthetics. The motivation behind aesthetics has three foundational pillars: 1. The desire to reproduce (or to create – a playful process of descension) 2. The Will to live (an operational or facilitative purview of maintenance) 3. The wanting to escape (an ascension, or a focus on transcendence in a real or illusioned form).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In this treatise I will namely focus on the desire to reproduce. The limbic system is intimately connected with the visual-spatial processing part of the brain. The reptilian has eyes to see. However, these stimuli can be domesticated through processes of enculturation. How you see reveals what you believe.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
1. Direct Charge of Sexuality (DCS). DCS or ‘Charge’ frankly said is the male force to propagate. The woman is objectified while the man is (usually assumed) subjectified. This is a combination what feminists refer to as the male pattern gaze, cisheteronormativity, internalized misogyny, and patriarchal beauty norms. This is the psychic energy, collective libido, and social force that allows a man to see a woman and from that vital desire have the will to create new life as the stated and direct goal. DCS is straight to the point, rigid, no-nonsense, analyzable, grounded, focused, orderly, and pushed. It has a ‘yang’ or psychologically masculine like quality to it. Testosterone based (honor appreciating, internally prideful, successfully ambitious, consistently competitive, and rapidly developing) cultures are much more likely to have a higher Charge. https://t.co/XVLFvgfqMx
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
2. Erogeneity. This is the setting apart of sexuality. This is when limits are placed on specific things. Certain things are inherently sexual (with clear universal standards) and certain things are inherently not sexual (not influenced by subjective whims). This is a moderating and civilizing force. Erogeneity disappears with extremes. Fetishes and alternative forms (i.e. non-reproductive) destroy it. Primitive tribes have low levels of this. However, a culture that considers feet, ankles, hands, hair, and a face as inherently sexual will also have low levels of Erogeneity as well. If everything is sexual then nothing is sexual. If nothing is sexual than everything is sexual. This means that certain body parts, speech, mannerisms, and activities must be sequestered, secluded, and categorically separated for the express purpose of increasing genetic potential. https://t.co/fISCVaJDmN
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
3. Coverage. This is a very simple concept. It just means the percentage of the body that is covered by clothing. The following chart assigns percentage values to different body parts. Female and Male values slightly differ corresponding to different value hierarchies based on male vs female pattern gazes. The process is as follows: Add scores (from body parts) if they are revealed to uncover a summed score. Depending on the setting (Hyper casual and private life is at the same level as athletic) there will be a certain grade assigned to the score (Grade is the 0-10 metric under ‘Covered’). So for example, a woman wearing short shorts and a tank top would have a score of ‘10’ (1 from ‘head and hands’, 4 from ‘legs’, 2 from ‘shoulders’, and 3 from ‘legs’). This would get a score of 6 for normal streetwear, 7.8 for athleticwear, and 9 for swimwear (assuming she is wearing a swimsuit with identical coverage). 10 represents ‘prudishness’, 9 is ‘very modest’, 8 is ‘respectable’, 7 is ‘standard’, 6 is ‘potentially questionable but widespread’, 5 is ‘widespread but clearly noticeable’, 4 is ‘immodest’, 3 is ‘bold, daring, or of ill repute’, 2 is ‘clearly provocative’, 1 is ‘scandalous, indecent and immoral, 0 is ‘the absence of clothes’. If something is skin tight it has 20% of the points it would have as if it was revealed and if a clothing is sheer it has 50% of the points it would have as if it was revealed.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Please keep in mind that this is referring to the modern urban monoculture which has become universally widespread since the mid 20thcentury. However, it still works surprisingly well in different times and places. For example, a French aristocratic woman showing most of her breasts (15 points), her shoulders (2 points), and arms (3 points) would have 20 points (metric of 2 on covered so ‘clearly provocative). An Indian woman wearing a Sari exposing her Sides (4 points), Arms (3 points), and part of her back (2 points) would have a score of 9 points (metric of 6.4 so ‘potentially questionable (unlikely) but widespread). A Japanese summon wrestler reveals everything but his groin area (40) points leaving him with 60 points. This leaves him with a rating of 2.67 (the fundoshi was used as swimwear in pre-modern Japan so it’s in the swimwear category not the athletic one).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now research, polling, and insights from AI has shown 7 different cultural archetypes arising out of the disparity between the sexes. These archetypes are as follows: 1. ‘Adromecy’ 2. ‘Patriarcism’ 3. ‘Erogenicity’ 4. ‘Neutricial’ 5. ‘Clemencial’ 6. ‘Feminicism’ 7. ‘Degenericial’. https://t.co/67ioRX5OAf
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
1. Adromecy is the dynamic where the standard for women be a score at least ‘3’ higher on the coverage metric system. This essentially means that men can where whatever they want and women must be covered. The perfect example of this can be seen throughout the Islamic world. Imagine a man wearing a tank top and shorts while a woman is wearing a burqa. Adromecy is fundamentally obsessed with power dynamics. Its an all or nothing situation. It’s hallmarked by despotism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
1. Patriarcism is a conventional culture tied to norms of strictness. It believes in clearly defined standards and those standards differ between men and women in all aspects of life. The woman’s standard of coverage is ‘2’ higher than the man’s. In this culture it could be reasonable for a man to wear a tank top while doing heavy labor while that would be considered inappropriate for a woman to do. This dynamic is very traditionalistic.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
3. Erogenicity puts women to a slightly higher standard (specifically ‘1’ higher on coverage). In these cultures women are expected to do a little bit more than men. This was paternalized by 1950s America. Many modern people throughout the world have this particular mindset. You can think of it as a ‘soft patriarchy’. Men have less responsibility but more privileges. Women have less power over home life. Imagine if men could wear shorts while working out while women were still expected to wear sweatpants. https://t.co/TzKtkn0MFX
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
4. Neutricial societies are often idealized but they are far more common in theory than in practice. This view is that men and women should have equal coverage. However, equality never works in practice (as sameness doesn’t exist in the natural world) between men and women so some level of equity is implemented. The problem is represented by the question of ‘how can you say a man and a woman are equally covered when their bodies are different’. This is fundamentally the same issue of fairness that occurs across all forms of diversity, multiculturalism, and tests of competency.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
5. Clemencial societies allow the women a standard of ‘1’ less than men on the metric coverage rating system. They often claim equality but end up giving preferential treatment to women. Flexible standards exist alongside pragmatic realism. However, much of the modern (first and former second) world is currently in this state and has been for decades. These societies are in effect ‘post-feminist’ in that the feminist revolution occurred decades earlier and there is an uneasy sense of détente after the battle between the sexes. A society like this would expect men to wear pants as formal wear but would allow women to wear a miniskirt.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
6. Feminicism is applied feminism. This is symbolized through girl power, women becoming like men, female revenge, the belief that women (and protected classes of men) can do and become anything, and other post-modern neo-liberal points of view. These societies allow women a standard of ‘2’ less than men. An example of this is expecting men to wear shorts and some kind of a shirt while working out while women can wear leggings and a crop top (or often less). This culture often induces chronic ugliness. It’s a result of the subjective agreed upon norms of modern feminism, wokeism, intersectionalism, Bipocism, ‘Times Up’, ‘Me Too’, ‘Globohomo’, and ‘Tiktok Thirdworldism’. https://t.co/MPfrZVJ6bt
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
7. Degenericial is when the coverage standards for women are at least ‘3’ lower than those for men. This framework is inherently polygynous. It’s predicated by harem dynamics. The sex worker often idolizes this but won’t ever be part of this world. This is built upon limited boundaries and male dominion. Females claim empowerment while men can see whatever they want whenever they want. An example of this would be to see a man dressed up in a suit and tie while a woman would be expected to be in a sexy costume at all times. This state is frequently LARPed but is almost never attained.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The further away from ‘0’ (like Adromecy and Degenericial) the more ‘intense’ the culture is. This implies that it is more focused on direct visual stimuli as opposed to ideational stimuli. Patriarcism and Feminicism are still ‘potent’ in visual messages while Erogenicity and Celemcial are Lookwarm. Neutricial is subtle. It’s like a u curve where it starts off very high visual (Adromecy), bottoms out around Neutricial, and rises again towards Degenericial. https://t.co/IRGJgr5Hsc
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
To be clear we can set a specific standard to measure where someone lies on this scale. For example, if a guy can wear swim trunks (Coverage score of 35 so a ‘5 swimsuit rating’) at the beach but a woman must wear something much more modest (coverage score of 5 so a ‘9.5’ swimsuit rating) then it’s a sign of Adromecy. There is clearly a very different standard in order to maintain the same effect of modesty.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
A viewer who sees a guy wearing a similar swimsuit (again a rating of ‘5’) and a woman wearing an athletic one-piece swimsuit (25 points so a rating of ‘7’) as being comparable would likely have views in line with Patriarcism https://t.co/Cp83bgFCMn
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
A different respondent who sees a guy wearing the same standard swim trunks and a woman wearing a high-waisted two-piece swimsuit (30 points so a rating of ‘6’ compared to the man at ‘5’) as being comparable in appropriateness would likely have a prefect for Erogenicity. https://t.co/zcdgYbFZL5
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now for the respondent who says men and women should have equal standards its quite tough. A woman can’t just wear a man’s swim trunks or else she’d be topless. The problem for Neutricial is to find a creative solution that respects the realities of the different parties while still achieving equity and fairness. It might look a little out of the ordinary. In this case board shorts and specific style from Baywatch Hawaii both come out to 35 points (grade of ‘5’).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Clemencial will say things like well if men don’t have to wear a shirt at the beach than women don’t need to either. They then interpret this to mean that she can wear a bikini even though a bikini (40 points, so a grade of ‘4’) objectively shows more skin than board shorts. https://t.co/GKKV3dfaP3
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Femenicism mindset is that women can pretty much wear whatever they want. For example, they will say a woman naturally has more freedom to choose than the man. A speedo may be viewed as innapropriate for a man (55 points so a ‘3’ rating) while a thong string bikini is absolutely OK (70 points so a ‘2’ rating). https://t.co/kH5uoum7ml
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Degenerecial will say its preferable for the man to wear something while the woman is borderline naked. Obviously I want show pictures of this phenomena.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In terms of overall subconscious support for these different categories (this is based on my polls which aren’t a good sample to group from) roughly 8% prefer Adromecy (with a 3:1 male to female ratio), 17% prefer Patriarcism (with a 2:1 male to female ratio), 24% prefer Erogenicity (5:3 male to female ratio) 20% prefer Neutricial (1:3 male to female ratio), 13% prefer Clemencial (5:4 male to female ratio), 14% prefer Feminicism (2:5 male to female ratio), and 4% prefer Degenericial (1:3 male to female ratio).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now let’s look back at the three original definitions of Direct Charge of Sexuality, Erogeneity, and Coverage. In applied definitions high DCS, high Erogeneity, and high Coverage is seen in Traditional Western Culture. High DCS, high Erogeneity, and low Coverage is seen in 1980s (and occasionally 1950s) modern culture. High DCS, low Erogeneity, and high Coverage is seen in Islamic Culture. High DCS, low Erogeneity, and low coverage is seen in many traditional African cultures. Low DCS, high Erogeneity, and high Coverage is seen in many Indic cultures. Low DCS, low Erogeneity, and high Coverage is seen in many Communist (former 2nd world) cultures. Low DCS, high Erogeneity, and low Coverage is seen in other Indic cultures (often SE Asia) and certain alphabet communities. Low DCS, low Erogeneity, and low Coverage is often seen in certain highly primitive indigenous groups, hippie communities, and other groups with alternative lifestyles.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In terms of bio-political inclinations, K selection favors Patriarcism (strong present father figure), Erogenicity (capable conventions), Neutricial (logical outcomes), and Degenericial (Survival of the very fittest). R selection favors Adromecy, Clemencial, and Femenicism. Clemencial and Degenericial typically value decentralization while the others typically go for centralization of control. The subtler types are more spiritual (immaterially or intelligence focused) and the more intense types are more physical (more tangible in its focus).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Adromecy is a natural ally of Clemencial, and Femenicism (all three are R selective). Adromecy is hiddenly feminist while Clemencial is casually feminist and Femenicism is fiercely feminist. Adromecy has the lowest status, 2ndlowest is Femenicism, 3rd lowest is Clemencial, Neutricial rejects status games, 3rd highest is Erogenicity, 2nd highest is Patriarcism, and the highest is Degenericial.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Adromecy is has the highest fertility rate with each next category (Patriarcism through Feminicism) going lower. However Degenericial at the bottom is moderate in fertility (comparable to Erogenicity). Adromecy promotes poor genetic potential while Patriarcism promotes the highest. Neutricial and Degenericial are both moderately high in offspring capabilities while Erognecity is moderate, Clemencial is moderately low, and Feminicism is low.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Adromecy gives trashy (but trying to be modest) vibes, Patriarcism praises modesty. Erogenicity is seen as classy. Neutricial has a ‘handsome’ qualia to it. Clemencial is viewed as sexy. Feminicism is trashy (but trying to be cute) in its approach. Degenericial is naturally provocative.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In terms of the type of women attracted to these types, you can predict preferences based on biology, personality, and status. Women who prefer Andromecy are often low status discordant (more left-brained and disagreeable) and have higher BMIs. Women who prefer Patriarcism often have low BMIs and are often high-status. Women who prefer Erogenicity are often very sought over by conventional norms of attraction and sex-appeal. Neutricial appreciating women often have androgynous physical or psychological features. Women who like Clemencial are often sexy but not as respectable as those who prefer Erogenicity. Women who prefer Femenicism are either hyper-masculine and somewhat machiavellian or fat, ugly, and stupid (or all of the above). Women who prefer Degenericial are often very attractive but give even less respectable vibes than those who prefer Clemencial.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In conclusion, if one wants to raise the birthrate, create specific cultures, or to do social engineering, one can select for specific cultural settings. A Medgold may want to select for a Degenericial harem. A traditionalist may want a Patriarcism relationship. A destroyer of cultures may want Femencism. Its important to know what you are selecting for.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Only answer poll if you read the entire thread. How much of it did you comprehend?
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
George Jetson (an Everyman) was born on July 31st, 2022. He's a member of Gen Alpha. What are the chances that a baby right now will live a life anything like this as a 40 year old man with a Star wife that respects him and children (Star daughter & Explorer son) that adore him? https://t.co/DHn2vSc3ud
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The future will be much more divided than the present. Some will live lives of utopian visions while others will be thrown back to the stone age (Fred - Warrior/Orphan, Barney - Warrior/Artiste, Betty - Artiste/Warrior, Wilma - Innocent/Explorer). They will be parallelized! https://t.co/BmHRxP2obK
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Nothing says more about a society than its psychographic properties. Tell me about the collective consciousness of a country and I can know its past, present, and future! https://t.co/e6Rhij54D0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
1950s: Paradise Lost Why we will never ‘RETVRN’ Instead we should build something even better!🧵 https://t.co/N6pBtPo8HE
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
American domination Cultural preeminence Technological acceleration Timeless sophistication Conservative values These were all a result of the psychographics and archetypes of the people who lived in this era https://t.co/wfA5fD6elr
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
No amount of enforcement could turn back the clock. You cannot force Spring to go back into Winter. You have to go forward through Summer. The 50s represented peak centralization and that is no longer a thinkable possibility. https://t.co/yW7BBoMhMi
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We live in mourning (and for the wokists, derision) for the 50s. Recent polls run show its popularity, prosperity, and purity. It was a time of relative innocence. But once virtue is robbed, it cannot be restored. https://t.co/0MFubDUgVx https://t.co/ueZfpbq86k
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
You can’t undo a chemical reaction. Demographics have radically shifted. We are far less intelligent, civilized, and moral compared to our recent forefathers. Thus we strive to measure up, but we are not the same people as they were. https://t.co/9f5mOYvGw7
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Most Americans belonged to certain archetypes in this era. Most people were Emperors, Judges, Scribes, Everymen, Caregivers, and Innocents. Now most people are Artistes, Stars, Warriors, Rebels, Explorers, and Orphans. https://t.co/vUkcK9xsKl
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We have gone through the greatest neuroendocrinological and hormonal disruptions in history. They’ve changed us on a genetic and epigenetic level. This is something out of a dystopian sci-fi movie. Our biology has changed! https://t.co/jmt2qvAU30
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
On top of environmental catastrophes (xenoestrogens, seed oils, GMOs and the like), spiritual pollutants have shifted our physiology. Yes, direct spiritual forces have changed the behaviors of humanity and have rid us of personal agency. https://t.co/emkpSJuPJz
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In reality, the 50s were tenuous. They were sterile, controlled, and ersatz. This is what lead to the 60s social revolutions (plus a whole lot of funded psyops). But if you look carefully, the 50s were the beginning of the end. https://t.co/AwAbURTI1m
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Whether you look at any subversive social movement their core genesis was likely in this decade. It makes sense as it was in direct rebellion to the conservatism of this age. The sling went forwards and then shot backwards! https://t.co/sWGRnpgLzE
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Normies think of the 60s and 70s as being ‘Sexy’ decades. If you talked to someone from the Greatest Generation they’d strongly disagree. The 50s created children for a reason. It appealed to natalist preferences. https://t.co/ZjyFS8mDnJ
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Specifically, the 50s aesthetically had a direct charge of sexuality. This charge went off a cliff in 1960 (advent of the pill). The idea that the 60s were sexy is a psyop. It is the modern post 60s views that are actually sex-negative. https://t.co/KZf8erPLdR
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Promiscuity increased rapidly around 1960 but this energetic direct charge disappeared. After the forbidden fruit is tried it is no longer appealing. Our society is now like a woman doing the walk of shame – disgusted of what she’s done. https://t.co/P4hWSIAYvD
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
People long for a timeless sophistication after years of disgust. People long for a paradise that has been lost. People long for a beauty that has been taken from us. We can’t go back. We can only go forward! https://t.co/kK0OVikEET
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Specifically You can look at pictures from the 50s. There was something there that didn’t exist before and certainly didn’t exist after. Many of these photos are a direct comparison between the 50s and the 60s (obvious difference). https://t.co/N301gzqTWm
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Before the pill (Left) and after the pill (Right) https://t.co/dicyKdDwdP
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Before the pill (Left) and after the pill (Right) https://t.co/WHgVVnm4hD
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Interestingly enough, this direct charge of sexuality reappeared briefly in the 80s (slight millennial baby boom) and a tiny bit around 2000 (Zoomers cohort circa 2004-2007). How media is portrayed can predict fertility. https://t.co/460p7i9AVF
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
What a man likes to look at reveals his spiritual transcendence and psychological maturity Most Transcendent to Most Debased: 1. Eyes 2. Back 3. Arms/Shoulders 4. Waist/Navel 5. Boba 6. Lower Waist/Belly Pouch 7. Abs/Upper Torso 8. *Loins 9. Legs 10. Hips 11. Feet 12. Butt
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Aesthetics determines ethics. There's a reason why the male pattern gaze has fallen way down on this list over the last few decades. Where you are on this list determines where you're at with your souls level of spiritual advancement/attainment
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This list also applies to women, but women don't usually have this problem as strongly as men do. The higher on this list the more K selected the lower on this list the more R selected. This is also associated with IQ, civilizational attainment, and mastery over violence
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
It also reveals core cultural assumptions and collective programming. It uncovers what scripts are being run in your subconscious. Find out what a man likes to look at and you've figured out everything about him in regards to his state of ascension or descension.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
And since 2001 we've been in a state of cultural collapse. WEIRD traits are in free fall. Unless we pivot back to K we won't make it as a civilization. Our IQ is dropping fast. Essentially from my polls earlier I discovered that most people (men included) are highly irrational
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
1960s cultural revolutions blinded people from seeing clear as day phenomenon. Women are attracted to men who're obviously psychos. Men are attracted to women who're obviously thots. Reality distortion goggles created by social engineering prevent many from seeing the obvious
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Women be like "wow he's so cute and sweet and but he's so rugged and attractive". Prior to the 60s a guy with 10 tattoos riding around on a motorcycle would be a social outcast. We're programmed to not see what's right in front of us. Ted Bundy couldn't have done it in the 50s
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Many men are insane enough to justify that shes a good girl just because they're attracted to her. They ignore actual good girls. Theyll simp over girl with 20k Insta followers - think she's somehow pure, sweet, and innocent. Bro, you're fooling yourself. Onlyfans only works now
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
If we are to overcome the insane worldviews, social realities, and behavioral premises that are ripping our communities apart at the seams, disintegrating the remaining social technologies that are left, and leading to psychological black deaths, we must reject the 60s programs
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Rousseau, Marx, and Freud never would have happened without philosophical developments from Protestantism. There's compelling reasons why Atheism/Materialism/Hyper Left-Brainism as intellectual movements came about in NW Europe in the same social milieu as the reformation
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Wokism is Judeo-Protestantism without God. Would have been unthinkable in a Catholic or an Orthodox society without the interference of Anglo culture. People may cite numerous examples in the 2nd or 3rd world but those movements were funded by those in the West
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The theologians of the future need to figure out all the flaws that inevitably lead to blank slatism, nihilism, community disintegration, predestination (historical inevitability), out-group favoritism, and psychological hyper-femininity. Reformation theologians made our world!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
However, it is extremely obvious that these same worldviews lead to the scientific revolution and modernity. However, we're dealing with the serious psychological consequences now in the 21st century.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Archetype Definition Thread: Pinned for everyone to know what I am referring to all the time. Here are the 24 Archetypes: January - Hero (Extrovert) and Priest (Introvert) Feb - Revelator (Extrovert) and Hermit (Introvert) March - Sage (Extravert) and Seer (Introvert) April - Illuminator (Extravert) and Fae (Introvert) May - Lover (Extravert) and Melodist (Introvert) June - Star (Extravert) and Artiste (Introvert) July - Warrior (Extravert) and Rebel (Introvert) Aug - Explorer (Extravert) and Orphan (Introvert) Sep - Caregiver (Extravert) and Innocent (Introvert) Oct - Everyman (Extravert) and Scribe (Introvert) Nov - Emperor (Extravert) and Judge (Introvert) Dec - King (Extravert) and Scholar (Introvert)
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Hero archetype is often associated with the following characteristics: Courage, Sacrifice, Justice, Compassion, Adventure, Confrontation, and Personal Transformation. Heroes display bravery, resilience, and the unbridled will to face challenges and confront their inner demons and physical obstacles. Their fierce indomitable desire to overcome adversity and achieve their goals places them as the protagonist in the story arch. They often put the needs of others before their own and are driven by a sense of responsibility to protect and uplift the community they grew up in. Heroes stand for a set of values and principles that guide their actions. They are often focused on ethics. They uphold virtues such as justice, truth, and integrity, serving as paragons and beacons while inspiring others to follow their lead. The Hero is seen through the lens of the 'call to adventure'. Heroes typically should receive a catalytic call that propels them into a transformative journey. This call might manifest as a personal crisis, a moral dilemma, or an external threat, compelling the Hero to embark on a quest for self-realization. If the Hero fails then he will become a dark knight and lose his virtuous powers. If he succeeds he will be remembered for time immemorial. Through their terrific trials and testing tribulations they experience a symbolic death and rebirth, emerging as a stronger, wiser individual who has gained insight, regality, apotheosis, and sentience from their journey. Heroes and Heroines serve as powerful symbols of human potential, encouraging individuals to embrace their own heroic qualities and embark on a path of personal growth, authenticity, and individuation. This archetype is also associated with high openness to experience, moderately high conscientiousness, extraversion, lower agreeableness, low neuroticism, high EQ, and relatively high IQ. They are abstract thinkers but are very relatable to the common man.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Priest archetype, in Jungian psychology, represents a profoundly spiritual and moral dimension within the human psyche. The Collective Unconscious is readily available to this intuitive archetype. Priests embody the dynamic desire for true transcendence, the search for deeper esoteric meanings, and the pursuit of a connection with the arcane, the mystical, divine and the sacred. The Priest archetype is concerned with matters of spirituality, ethics, and the inner quest for the doctrines of eternity. The Priest archetype fulfills the role of a spiritual guide, mediator, or intermediary between the physical and the metaphysical realms. Priests often engage in rituals, ceremonies, or practices aimed at facilitating the individual's connection with God and fostering meaningful connections with others. Priests embody moral authority and advocate for ethical behavior. They reply with admonitions for repentance. They promote principles of regal righteousness, acting as careful custodians of moral values within their communities. The Priest archetype is concerned with the development of an individual's ethical conscience and their responsibility towards others. They're also known for their intense focus on self-reflection, contemplation, and meditation. They dive deep into specialized teachings, ancient texts, and forgotten traditions to gain insight into the nature of existence, the purpose of life, and the secrets of the universe. Priests can also play a role in facilitating healing and transformation, both at the individual and on the collective level. The Priest archetype represents a beautiful bridge to the towering realms of transcendence. They reflect the longing for Our Marker, pre-mortal and post-mortal presences, and a sense of the numinous. The Priest archetype seeks to bridge the gap between the mundane and the divine. Priests are known for being introverted, conscientious, disagreeable, slightly neurotic, and high on openness to experience.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Revelator archetype, embodies a dynamic and transformative aspect of the human psyche. It represents the impulse for prophesying, truth-telling, and challenging established norms and beliefs. The Revelator archetype disrupts conventional thinking, often provoking discomfort and inviting individuals to question the status quo. The Revelator disrupts established structures, systems, and beliefs. They challenge societal norms, traditions, and dogmas that may hinder personal growth or restrict individual freedom. The Revelator archetype encourages individuals to question authority and to seek alternative perspectives. This is especially true in regards to history, anthropology, psychology, politics, the arts, and the sciences. They are natural born innovators and social critics. They are philosophers who seek to apply their knowledge to the real world. The Revelator archetype is driven by a deep desire for truth and authenticity. They have powerfully sentient minds that can see many different points of view simultaneously. It seeks to uncover hidden or suppressed truths and expose illusions, hypocrisy, or corruption. Revelators strive to bring forth prophetic utterances and insights that can lead to personal and collective transformation. The Revelator archetype often employs powerful, unconventional, and paradoxical means to challenge conventional wisdom. It uses humor, irony, or disruptive tactics to challenge entrenched ways of thinking. They will change your worldview if you let them. The Revelator archetype is associated with creative and transformative energy. They can be quite imaginative, intuitive, and prescient. The Revelator is obsessed with Shadow Integration. By confronting and integrating the darker, repressed elements, individuals can undergo personal growth and contribute to social change. Revelators are extraverted, high on openness to experience, moderate conscientiousness, disagreeable, and somewhat neurotic. They are highly abstract thinkers. Also known (in a more negative light) as the Trickster.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Hermit archetype represents a deep inward-focused aspect of the human psyche. They are represented by the air element - ideas, possibilities, intellection, abstraction, intuition, and self-reflection. Hermits embody the pursuit of solitude, introspection, and inner wisdom. The Hermit archetype reflects the need for withdrawal from the outer world to engage in esoteric pursuits, spiritual exploration, and personal transformation. Hermits strive to withdraw from external distractions and seek the journey into the interior realms of human consciousness, the might of the mind, and power of intelligence. They are strong in regards to theory. They philosophize every aspect of life. The Hermit archetype emphasizes a profound detachment from material possessions, external attachments, and societal expectations. They encourage individuals to simplify their lives, detach from worldly distractions, and focus on inner growth and spiritual pursuits. However some Hermits are spiritual and/or religious in a very unique way. Many of them are ardent atheists while others are acute apologists for differing orders of the divine. The Hermit archetype often plays the role of a mentor or guide, offering wisdom and guidance to seekers on their own metaphysical and multi-layered journeys. Hermits share their insights, teachings, and experiences to aid others in their quest for understanding the world at large. They represent the revelation of inner wisdom and the navigation of the shadows of the self. The Hermit sheds perspectives on the unconscious aspects of the psyche. Many of them are drawn to psychology and theories of human behavior. Hermits are world builders. They enjoy playing games in their minds and many of them are known to be nerdy. They are naturally more introverted, extremely high on openness to experience, lower on conscientiousness, disagreeable, and higher on neuroticism. Hermits have a depth of thought unmatched by anyone else!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Sage archetype, in Jungian psychology, represents the wise and sophic aspect of our societies. Sages embody the pursuit of truth, understanding, and the quest for wisdom. They balance justice with mercy and objectivity with subjectivity. They are also known for their compassion and intuitive insights. The Sage archetype reflects the longing for their depth, intellectual clarity, and the ability to discern and articulate profound truths about oneself and the world. The Sage archetype is deeply connected to the otherwordly wisdom of the ages. Sages are lifelong learners who possess a vast understanding of various subjects. They are oracular orators that creatively change our societies. They are catalysts that transform personal lives and mighty mentors. They engage in critical thinking, intellectual exploration, and question assumptions and widely held beliefs. Sages are motivated to uncover deeper meanings and unravel complex concepts. Sages have the ability to see beyond biases and personal attachments, providing a broader perspective. They offer insightful analyses, logical reasoning, and the ability to distill complex ideas into understandable concepts. The Sage archetype often assumes the role of a mentor, advisor, or teacher. Sages share their knowledge, experiences, and insights to guide and inspire others in their quest for understanding and personal growth. They offer mythic advice and special support to help individuals navigate life's challenges and make informed decisions. They readily understand hidden symbolism, allegories, and metaphors. They see multiple meanings when others take things literally. The Sage archetype recognizes and embraces the interconnectedness of opposing forces. Sages understand the inherent paradoxes and complexities of life and can integrate seemingly conflicting ideas, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the world. Sages are extraverted, high on openness to experience, moderately agreeable, and conscientious.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Seer archetype represents a profound intuitive and visionary aspect of the human experience. It is a truly unique moment to encounter a self-actualized Seer. They embody the ability to perceive beyond the ordinary senses through abstract feeling. They tap into the higher realms of consciousness. The Seer archetype reflects the longing for spiritual insight, mystical experiences, and the ability to access the arcane in everyday life through hidden knowledge and truths. The Seer archetype relies on intuition and inner vision to perceive and understand the deeper layers of reality. They are known for their potent prescience and awesome auguries. Seers possess a heightened sense of awareness and can access information beyond the limitations of the physical senses. Seers often engage in practices such as meditation, divination, or ritual to access spiritual realms and receive insights angels and the divine. Seers are skilled in deciphering symbols and interpreting their meaning. They can read signs, omens, and synchronicities to gain understanding and guidance. The Seer archetype sees the world as a tapestry of interconnected symbols and seeks to unravel their significance. The Seer archetype embodies the transformative power of consciousness. Seers possess the ability to perceive and navigate the realms of collective transformation. They facilitate healing, growth, and spiritual awakening by guiding individuals toward higher dimensions. They offer insights, predictions, and guidance based on their heightened intuitive abilities. Seers can provide a deep perspective on life's challenges and help others make beneficial choices. Seers can use esoteric practices to access mysterious knowledge and manifest desired outcomes. The Seer archetype taps into the collective unconscious, a reservoir of shared, universal knowledge and experiences. Seers are introverted, high on openness to experience, conscientious, agreeable, and neurotic. They are highly abstract thinkers. Also known (sometimes has negative connotation) as the Magician.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Fae archetype represents a mystical and enchanting aspect of the collective unconscious. Faes embody a compassionate connection to nature, the magical realms, and the expression of joy, creativity, and playfulness. The Fae archetype reflects the longing for an authentic harmony with the natural world, an awesome sense of wonder, and the cerebral celebration of life's beauty. Fae archetypes often express a deep love for plants, animals, and the elements of nature. They are effulgent, effervescent, and illusory. They see possibilities and potentialities. Everything is open to them in their unique world. They are known for being whimsical, silly, and imaginative. Few archetypes match their levels of creativity. Faes have a sense of childlike wonder. They engage in spontaneous and creative activities, finding delight in the simple pleasures of life. Fae archetypes inspire others to embrace the lighter side of existence and find magic in everyday moments. Fae archetypes possess a connection to the mysterious realms. They are often associated with supernatural abilities, such as shape-shifting, healing, or communing with sprites and spirits. Faes bring an air of illusion and enchantment, inviting others to explore the riveting realms beyond the earthly mundane. Fae archetypes tap into the realm of the unconscious, where dreams, fantasies, and imaginative energies reside. They encourage individuals to embrace their own creativity, imagination, and intuitive wisdom. The Fae archetype is often symbolized by the butterfly or the metamorphosis process. Fae archetypes embody the transformative power of change, growth, and renewal. They inspire others to embrace the beauty of becoming. They value art and aesthetics. Fae archetypes inspire others to recognize and celebrate the beautiful inspiration in the world and in themselves. They are introverted, sky high in openness to experience, low on conscientiousness, highly agreeable, and very neurotic. They're abstract thinkers.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Illuminator archetype represents a transformative and enlightening aspect of the transformation of human consciousness. It embodies the capacity to bring forth illumination, insight, and awareness to oneself and others. Illuminators reflects the longing for inner enlightenment, the pursuit of creativity, and the ability to catalyze personal and collective growth. The Illuminator archetype embodies the journey of awesome awakenings, potent potentialities, and supreme self-discoveries. It represents the desire for inner clarity and expanded consciousness. They are known for their exceptional authenticity, otherwordliness, and fluidity. Illuminators are driven by a wanting to uncover deeper truths and share them with others. The Illuminator is often associated with the symbolism of light and shadow. It understands that there is opposition in all things. Illuminators shine a light on the unconscious aspects of the psyche and navigate the shadows to facilitate personal growth and transformation. Illuminators serve as a catalyst for personal and collective change. Illuminators challenge conventional thinking, question established norms, and disrupt stagnant patterns. They inspire others to question, explore, and embrace new perspectives and possibilities. By embodying a mischievous and unconventional nature, Illuminators may disrupt established structures, challenge beliefs, and employ humor and unconventional methods to provoke thought and catalyze transformation. Illuminators have a natural inclination to share their wisdom and insights with others. They possess the ability to communicate complex concepts in accessible ways, making profound knowledge more relatable and understandable. Illuminators guide and inspire others on their own journeys of self-discovery. They shed light on areas of stagnation, limitation, and unconscious patterns of control. They're extraverted, high on openness to experience, agreeable, low on conscientiousness, and low on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Melodist (frequently known as the Siren when referring to females) archetype represents a deeply expressive and emotive aspect of the collective unconscious. It embodies the power of music, poetry, and artistic expression to evoke emotions, inspire, and connect with others on a profound level. The Melodist archetype reflects the longing for vibrational resonance, the pursuit of beauty, and the ability to convey profound truths through artistic creation. The Melodist archetype is deeply connected to the realm of artistic expression. Melodists possess a natural talent for music, poetry, and other intelligent, innovative, and avant-garde forms of creative expression. They use their artistic gifts to communicate and convey ideas to others. Their artistry elicits empathy, catharsis, and a sense of connection with the audience. However, many Melodists stand in fear to their calling and downplay their inner-sensibilities clinging to fact, logic, reason, science, and other left-brained pursuits. However, the most powerful Melodists embrace their right-brained capabilities. Melodists use rhythm, melody, and language to create a harmonious flow that touches the hearts and minds of others. They are often polyglots, avid readers, and studious students of the human condition. Melodists have a refined aesthetic sensibility and a deep appreciation for beauty. They recognize and celebrate the beauty in various forms, whether it be in nature, art, or the human experience. Melodists inspire others to find beauty in the world and within themselves. The Melodist archetype can tap into the depths of the unconscious, accessing raw emotions, dreams, and hidden desires. Through their artistic expression, Melodists bring the unconscious to the surface, shedding light on the depths of human experience. They must overcome their fears to be their true selves. They are introverted, high on openness to experience, usually moderately disagreeable, inherently lower on conscientiousness, and high on neuroticism. They are very intuitive thinkers.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Lover archetype represents a passionate and deeply connected need that has been experienced by the entire of the human family. It embodies the capacity for love, intimacy, and the pursuit of meaningful relationships. The Lover archetype reflects the longing for connection, emotional depth, and the ability to experience profound love and desire. They are romanticists, idealists, and harmonizers. The Lover archetype is characterized by intense passion and pleasure. They represent a deep appreciation for beauty, both in physical form and in the experiences of life. Lovers embraces an instinctual connection to the senses in an intuitive way. Through these experiences they seek to create meaningful and intimate connections. They are often extremely effervescent, whimsical, silly, imaginative, fluid, bohemian, creative, artistic, and adaptable. However, they can also be dependent, display immaturity, and lack decisiveness. Lovers seek to form deep bonds and establish intimate relationships based on trust, vulnerability, and authentic expressions of complex emotions. The Lover archetype values the experience of being seen and understood by others as the highest good. The Lover archetype embodies romantic ideals and a belief in the power of love to transform lives. Lovers recognize the need for both independence and togetherness, allowing individuals to maintain their sense of self while nurturing the connection with their partners. The Lover archetype values mutual respect, empathy, and understanding. They are empathizers and care about fairness, equality, and compassion. The Lover archetype seeks to create beauty and bring aesthetic pleasure into relationships and environments. The Lover archetype understands the power of creativity in deepening connections and expressing innermost feelings through music, art, cuisine, and media. They are extraverted, sky high on openness to experience, moderately agreeable, low on conscientiousness, and low on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Star archetype, also known as the Performer, represents a charismatic and expressive aspect of the collective unconscious. It embodies the desire for recognition, the pursuit of self-expression, and the ability to captivate and inspire others. Stars reflect the longing for validation, creative fulfillment, and the ability to shine brightly in one's chosen field. Stars possess a natural charisma and presence that draws attention and admiration. They have a magnetic quality that captivates others and leaves a lasting impression. Stars exude confidence, charm, and a natural ability to command attention. They exude potential, charm, youth, vulnerability, and adaptability. Stars are often associated with exceptional talent and the desire to showcase it through performance. Whether in the realms of arts, entertainment, sports, or any other domain, Stars excel in their chosen field and strive for excellence in their craft. They have strong kinesthetic acumen that can be displayed in various ways like dancing, food, and music. Stars thrive in environments where their skills and achievements are recognized and rewarded. They need to be on stage being a light and an inspiration for others. They possess a unique and authentic voice that they use to communicate and connect with others. Stars often engage in artistic endeavors, utilizing their talents to convey emotions, tell stories, and inspire others. Stars have the potential to wield significant influence and make a lasting impact on their audiences or communities. They can use their platform and visibility to promote positive change, share important messages, and inspire others to pursue their own dreams and passions. They are also known for their glamor, style, vibrance, sensuality, beauty, fun, warmth, and radiance. Their versatile energy and enthusiasm is marked with extraversion, higher openness to experience, lower conscientiousness, agreeableness, and extremely low neuroticism. They will brighten your day!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Artiste archetype represents a deeply creative and sensitive aspect of the collective unconscious. It embodies a profound appreciation for beauty, a passion for artistic expression, and a unique perspective on the world. Artistes reflect the longing for self-expression, the pursuit of aesthetic experiences, and the ability to bring forth beauty through various forms of art in sensory ways. The Artiste archetype is characterized by a heightened sensitivity to the inner world of emotions and experiences. They are very instinctual and connect with their hands. Artiste types are deeply attuned to their own feelings and often possess an intuitive understanding of the emotions of others. This sensitivity serves as a wellspring of inspiration for their creative endeavors. They can be quite subjective and right-brained. However, many artistes have not self-actualized and heavily rely on left-brained, over-rational, and legalistic thought processes. Self-actualized artistes are often drawn to fashion, media, culinary arts, high-culture, music, and literature. Artiste types have a profound appreciation for aesthetics, recognizing beauty in the world around them. They often possess a keen eye for details, colors, textures, and patterns. The Artiste archetype seeks to capture and convey this beauty through their artistic expressions. Many of them are drawn to marketing and design. Artiste types have a natural talent for artistic mediums such as painting, sculpture, music, dance, writing, or any other form of creative outlet. They use their art to communicate their unique perspectives, emotions, and experiences. Artiste types value their individuality and are driven to express their true selves authentically through their art. They usually resist conforming to societal expectations while embracing their own unique visions. They're introverted, moderately high in openness to new experiences, low on conscientiousness, agreeable, and somewhat neurotic. Non-abstract thinkers.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Rebel archetype represents a fiercely independent and adventurous part of the human experience. Rebels will embark on a dangerous quest for freedom, a willingness to challenge the status quo, and a thirst for excitement and new experiences. Rebels reflect the longing for self-expression, the pursuit of personal autonomy, and the ability to navigate through life on one's own terms. The Rebel is brought low by his circumstances and must break free through his or her own powerful initiative. They have a deep need to express their unique identity and assert their independence and iconoclasts and mavericks. Rebel types have a natural inclination towards thrill-seeking and adventurous activities. They seek out experiences that provide excitement, novelty, and a sense of risk. Rebels enjoy pushing boundaries, exploring uncharted territory, and challenging themselves physically or intellectually. Rebel types possess a resourceful nature. They excel at problem-solving and improvising in the face of challenges. Rebels are often skilled with their hands and have a knack for finding innovative solutions to problems. They are natural born trouble shooters with strong kinesthetic acumen. Rebels prefer hands-on engagement with their environment. They thrive in down-to-earth and active pursuits rather than abstract or theoretical endeavors. Rebels have a natural inclination towards activities that involve physicality, craftsmanship, or technical skills. Many make fine engineers. However, they're often represented in all of the material trades. Rebels possess a calm and composed demeanor even in high-pressure situations. They thrive in moments of crisis or chaos, relying on their ability to think quickly and adapt to changing circumstances. Rebels often excel in situations that require split-second decision-making. They're often excellent at poker. They're introverted, moderately high in openness to experience, lower on conscientiousness, disagreeable, and low on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Warrior archetype represents the courageous, disciplined, and assertive aspect of our collective experience. It embodies the noble pursuit of justice, protection, and the willingness to confront challenges head-on. Fight or flight, they fight! They are quick on their feet. They want to be in the middle of the action. They enjoy confrontation and all that it entails. Warriors reflect the longing for inner strength, resilience, and the ability to fight for what is right in all times and in all places. The Warrior archetype is characterized by immense courage and bravery. Warriors have the inner strength to face their fears and take action even in the face of adversity. They are willing to stand up for their beliefs and protect those who are vulnerable. They stand for their nations, families, and tribes whenever they are in danger. They are committed to their goals and display unwavering dedication to their missions. Warriors have a clear sense of purpose and are willing to make sacrifices to achieve their objectives. Warriors are guided by principles and act in accordance with their values. They know where they come from and where they belong. Warriors exhibit physical and mental strength. They train their bodies and minds to be resilient and prepared for challenges. They are hands on learners that have strong hand-eye coordination and excellent visual-spatial skills. They rarely get lost. They have an incredibly instinctual and clear understanding of their environs. Warriors possess assertiveness and leadership qualities. They are willing to take charge, make decisions, and guide others in times of need. Warriors exhibit resilience and perseverance in the face of challenges and setbacks. They do not know when to give up. Warriors draw upon their inner strength and determination to overcome obstacles and continue moving forward. They are extraverted, high on openness to experience, fiercely disagreeable, low on conscientiousness, and moderate on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Orphan archetype represents the systemized, mechanized, and atomized aspect of human consciousness. It embodies the experience of feeling disconnected, or lacking a sense of belonging. The Orphan archetype reflects the longing for support, healing, and the journey towards self-acceptance and integration. They are the engineers, the builders, and the technologists of this material world. They are known for their strong quantitative skills, their impressive ability to think visual-spatially, and their technical expertise. Many of them enjoy tinkering with objects and enjoy troubleshooting. They seek to understand 'the how' in every aspect of their lives. The Orphan archetype is characterized by a sense of abandonment or disconnection from others. Often this comes from their focus on physical things over personal relationships. Orphans often have high IQ's but typically don't have very high EQ's. Orphans often feel alone, isolated, or overlooked. In societies that prioritize extraverted pursuits they can be even more disconnected. Many Orphans resort to stoicism in order to go all in on their passions. The physical world as we know would not be here without their contributions. They may have experienced literal abandonment or have internalized a sense of being rejected or unimportant. This is because they don't have the social graces of many of the other archetypes. Orphans develop self-reliance and independence as a means of survival. They learn to rely on their own resources. Orphans may become self-sufficient, resilient, and capable of navigating life's challenges on their own terms. Orphans often feel a strong connection to others who are seen as the underdogs and the true outcasts in society. They recognize the inherent worth and potential within these individuals and seek to create a sense of community and belonging for them. They are introverted, moderate on openness to experience, very disagreeable, moderate on conscientiousness, and higher on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Explorer archetype represents the physically adventurous, curious, and restless features of the inner psyche. Explorers have an innate desire to seek out new experiences, discover unexplored territories, and to expand their horizons. The Explorer archetype reflects the longing for personal growth, the pursuit of knowledge and understanding, and the ability to navigate through the unknown. They believe that the ultimate teacher in life is experience. Explorers are characterized by a natural curiosity and openness to the world. Explorers possess a thirst for knowledge, constantly seeking to learn and understand new things. They are open-minded and willing to challenge their existing beliefs and perspectives. They are known for their extraordinarily broad perspective. They enjoy challenging ideas and can even be quite discordant at times. They are among the most extraverted of types and can be very smooth or Charismatic communicators. Explorers embrace the unknown by pushing boundaries and stepping outside of their comfort zones. Explorers value their independence and self-reliance. They have a strong sense of autonomy and prefer to chart their own course rather than follow established paths. Even though Explorers are extraverted, they are comfortable with solitude and enjoy the freedom to pursue their interests and passions. Explorers exhibit resilience and adaptability in the face of challenges and obstacles. They possess the ability to navigate uncertain and unpredictable situations, adjusting their strategies and plans as needed. Explorers are comfortable with change and are quick to adapt to new circumstances. Explorers value cultural diversity and seek to connect with people from different backgrounds and experiences. They appreciate the richness and variety of human cultures and strive to foster understanding across boundaries. They are sky high in openness to experience, very disagreeable, lower on conscientiousness, and are lower on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Caregiver archetype represents the nurturing, compassionate, and selfless aspect of the human experience. It embodies the deep desire to support and care for others, to provide comfort and assistance, and to foster well-being and harmony in relationships and communities. Caregiver are known for their impressive logistical skills, their ability to follow and execute intricate processes, and their intense operational expertise. Throughout history many of them were farmers but now they might be project managers, economic facilitators, and the bedrocks of every community. Caregivers reflect the longing for connection, empathy, and the fulfillment that comes from serving others. Caregivers have an innate ability to understand and feel the emotions and needs of those around them. They genuinely care about the well-being of others and are motivated to alleviate their suffering. Only the unhealthiest of Caregivers lack these helpful traits of service. Caregivers exhibit generosity in their actions. However, their actions can be a two-edged sword. Some are known for being judgmental, square, or close-minded. They strive to follow conventions, traditions, and established procedures. They offer solace, reassurance, and a sense of stability in times of distress. Caregivers often possess the capacity to listen attentively, offer kind words, and create environments that promote order, a sense of duty, and a way to fulfill ones societal obligations. They are highly resourceful, down-to-earth, and pragmatic. Rarely do they ever philosophize or think about abstract subject matters. They have high standards for themselves and others. They excel in building and maintaining strong bonds, fostering open communication, and promoting collaboration and cooperation. Caregivers strive to create a sense of belonging and unity among those they care for. They are extraverted, low on openness to experience, high on conscientiousness, higher on agreeableness, and low on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Innocent archetype represents the pure, trusting, and optimistic aspect of the collective unconscious. It embodies a childlike innocence and a belief in the inherent goodness of the world. The Innocent reflects the longing for safety, simplicity, and the pursuit of happiness. Innocents are known for their orderliness, dutifulness, and naturally high levels of conscientiousness. They are quick to make judgments and desire to see the world through clear-cut terms. Many of them are left-brained thinkers who display linearity, precision, and cleanliness. They normally have a high disgust sensitivity. The Innocent archetype is characterized by a natural inclination towards optimism. If they lack this they'll become quite jaded, nihilistic, and will lose their ability to stay focused. Innocents can be very perseverant, gritty, and hard working. Many employers love having them as employees as they also have a strong operational acumen and attention to detail. They have an easy time seeing the individual trees but it is harder them to see the forest. This means that they are thoroughly non-abstract thinkers. They are very grounded, pragmatic, practical, and down-to-earth. Innocents often have a natural ability to form connections with people. They have an innate ability to find beauty in the simplest things and appreciate the small joys of life. They enjoy writing things down, checking off lists, and finishing tasks. Innocents love planning for activities. Innocents have a deep need for belonging. They thrive in environments where they feel accepted and loved. Innocents value close relationships and enjoy creating a sense of family and community. They often prioritize maintaining harmony and avoiding conflict. Innocents may resist change and have difficulty coping with loss or disappointment. They strive to preserve the innocence and stability they perceive in the world. Innocents may find it challenging to confront harsh realities or navigate complex emotions.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Scribe archetype represents the meticulous, organized, and detail-oriented aspect of our collective psyche. It embodies a strong sense of duty, responsibility, and a dedication to preserving knowledge and maintaining order. The Scribe archetype reflects the longing for structure, reliability, and the pursuit of accuracy and truth. They are introverted, connected to the real world of physical things, judgmental, and tough-minded objective thinkers that enjoy writing things down. The Scribe archetype is characterized by a keen attention to detail. Scribes have a natural inclination to focus on precision, accuracy, and thoroughness in their work and in their interactions. They possess a meticulous nature and strive for excellence in all they do. Scribes have a strong need for order and structure in their lives. They seek to establish and maintain organized systems, routines, and processes. Scribes find comfort and security in predictability and often excel in roles that require systematic approaches and attention to regulations. They hate it when things go out of order. They naturally have a low openness to new experiences and are known for their linearity and rididity. Many of them are known for being square, conventional, or boring. Scribes value knowledge and the preservation of information. They possess a deep desire to document and record facts, ideas, and experiences. Scribes often excel in roles that involve research, record-keeping, and information management. They are often drawn to institutions, corporations, governments, and other bureaucratic structures. The Scribe archetype embodies a strong sense of duty and responsibility. Scribes are committed to fulfilling their obligations and take pride in being reliable and dependable. They often possess a strong work ethic and a willingness to go the extra mile to ensure tasks are completed thoroughly. They are known for their integrity, loyalty, and commitment. They are strict, practical, and realistic.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Everyman archetype represents the relatable, standard-bearing, and social aspect of our collective unconscious. It embodies the desire for recognition, the pursuit of achievement, and the ability to adapt to different social contexts. They are known for their high levels of 'Common Sense'. The Everyman archetype reflects the longing for being the center of societal norms and expectations. They are extraverted, low on openness to experience, highly conscientious, moderate on agreeableness, and are extremely low on neuroticism. The Everyman archetype is characterized by social adaptability and the ability to fit in well with various social groups. Everymen possess a chameleon-like quality, allowing them to adjust their behavior, interests, and attitudes to match the expectations and norms of different situations. However, the Everyman is also known for being very serious, practical, down-to-earth, and pragmatic. They are drawn to conventions and want to make sure they do things the right way. They care about their image and constantly are aware of how they come across to other people. They are often very judgmental and they can be extremely hard on themselves. They are often their own hardest critic. They often write down goals and enjoy finishing tasks. They have a high degree of self-motivation and are drawn to be a winner. However, despite their assertiveness, competitive natures, and aggressiveness they possess a natural empathy and emotional connection with others. They are attuned to the emotional needs of those around them and excel at creating a sense of normalization and harmony. Everymen can serve as excellent peacemakers and mediators in social settings. They make good referees and many of them enjoy watching sports. Everymen are driven by a desire for success in regards to material goods, financial outcomes, and career placements. They hope that as they help others they can achieve their highest and most visibly recognizable goals.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Judge archetype represents the conscientious, principled, and disciplined aspect of the sentient experience of humanity. It embodies a strong sense of duty, fairness, and adherence to rules and standards. The Judge archetype reflects the longing for order, justice, and the pursuit of perfection. Judges are characterized by a strong sense of duty and responsibility. Judges have a deep commitment to upholding principles and fulfilling their obligations. They have a clear understanding of right and wrong and feel compelled to act in accordance with their ethical standards. They can be austere, tough-minded, and overly stoic at times valuing justice over mercy. Judges possess a keen ability to discern and analyze situations, seeking clarity and objectivity. They have a natural inclination to evaluate information, gather evidence, and make informed decisions based on rationality and logical reasoning. They are very left-brained. They think legalistically and are stronger verbal thinkers. Judges value rules and established standards. They strive to maintain order and ensure that everyone follows the prescribed guidelines. Judges have a deep respect for tradition and often serve as guardians of societal norms and values. They care deeply about precedence, history, and implications of current decisions. They are often known for their strong sense of integrity. Judges are often advocates for accountability and hold others to high standards. They immediately assume responsibility whenever there is disorder or an opportunity to lead. Judges have a tendency towards perfectionism and pay meticulous attention to detail. Judges are diligent in their work and expect the same level of precision from others. They possess the ability to delay gratification, make sacrifices, and adhere to their principles even in challenging situations. They need clarity and closure. They are introverted, conscientious, low on openness to experience, disagreeable, and low on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Emperor archetype represents the most authoritative, assertive, and visionary aspect of the archetypes. It embodies strong leadership qualities, a desire for control, and a focus on creating and maintaining order and structure. The Emperor archetype reflects the longing for power, influence, and the pursuit of strategic goals. Emperors are extraverted, conscientious, moderate on openness to experience, extremely disagreeable, and lower on neuroticism. The Emperor archetype is characterized by natural leadership abilities and a strong sense of authority. Emperors are confident in taking charge and making decisions. They possess a commanding presence and inspire others to follow their lead. They enjoy assuming responsibility and are extremely decisive. They know how to prioritize and how to quickly organize their thoughts. Many people look up to them due to their alpha-like traits and qualities. Emperors have a strategic vision and possess the ability to plan for the future. They excel in setting clear goals and creating a roadmap to achieve them. Emperors focus on long-term outcomes and take calculated risks to achieve their objectives. Emperors value organization and structure. They create systems, establish rules and hierarchies, and ensure that everything functions efficiently. Emperors thrive in environments where order is maintained and tasks are delegated effectively. Emperors are often very meritocratic and reward personal ambition. Emperors exude confidence and inspire confidence in others. Emperors are driven by tangible results and outcomes. They focus on efficiency and productivity, striving to accomplish tasks and meet objectives effectively. Emperors have a natural ability to prioritize and allocate resources for maximum effectiveness. Emperors are persuasive communicators and can rally others to support their cause. Emperors prioritize protection and stability. Their strong style of leadership can benefit us all.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The King archetype (also connected to and the same as the Hierophant) represents the wise, authoritative, and patriarchal traits of the human psyche. It embodies the qualities of leadership, power, and the ability to bring order and majesty into one's life and community. The King archetype reflects the longing for wisdom, responsibility, and the pursuit of a just and prosperous realm. Many Kings become CEOs, public figures, and leaders in their own worlds. They are known for their maturity, objectivity, competence, and leadership qualities. They have a commanding presence. Kings inspire respect and admiration, and others look to them for direction. They have the ability to make firm decisions and lead with authority. They are deep, sentient, and intuitive. They are much less brash than many of the other archetypes. Kings possess revelatory insights into human nature. They have accumulated knowledge and life experience, which they use to make informed decisions and offer guidance to others. Kings are known for their sagacity and ability to see the bigger picture. They understand the weight of their authority. They strive to create a just and harmonious environment, ensuring the well-being of their subjects or those under their care. They possess strategic thinking skills and are able to develop long-term plans to achieve their goals. Kings align their actions with their vision, motivating and inspiring others to work towards a shared purpose. They are judges of not just the physical but the metaphysical as well. They can often make excellent orators and philosophers. Kings uphold strong moral principles and display a sense of integrity and honor in their actions. Kings serve as mentors and guides to others. They offer support, encouragement, and valuable advice to those under their influence. Kings are committed to the growth and development of their subjects, empowering them to reach their full potential. They are extraverted, high on openness to experience, conscientious, disagreeable, and lower on neuroticism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The Scholar archetype represents the intellectual, analytical, and knowledge-seeking aspect of the collective unconscious. It embodies a unquenchable thirst for understanding, a love for learning, and a commitment to acquiring wisdom. The Scholar archetype reflects the longing for mastery, expertise, and the pursuit of truth. Scholars are driven by a strong intellectual curiosity. They have a natural inclination to explore and seek knowledge in various fields of study. Scholars constantly ask questions, challenge assumptions, and engage in deep thinking to uncover new insights and understand the complexities of the world. They live by the scientific method, academic rigor, and a deep seated desire for pure objectivity. The truth is their highest value. Scholars possess highly developed analytical and critical thinking skills. They excel in breaking down complex information into manageable parts, analyzing patterns, and drawing connections. Scholars value logical reasoning and rely on evidence and facts to form their understanding of the world. They are very introverted, intuitive, tough-thinking, and conscientious. They have moderate levels of openness to experience and are exceptionally disagreeable. They have moderate levels of neuroticism. Scholars strive for depth of knowledge in their chosen areas of expertise. They dedicate significant time and effort to study, research, and gain a comprehensive understanding of the subjects that interest them. Scholars often become authorities and experts in their respective fields. Their chosen fields are not necessarily academic, they could related to a performance art, a technical skill, or source of fame. Scholars engage in deep reflection and contemplation. They value solitude and introspection. They seek to uncover the underlying realities of the world. They understand dynamics of power. They use their incredible expertise to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and society.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The 1930s was the most creative decade the west will ever see. The depression represented a brief interregnum before it's inevitable destruction in WW2. Collective trauma ensued and everything that's left is an echo from this era. This was peak aesthetic modernism. 🧵 https://t.co/3UfZBMLBdX
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The 30s represented an ascendent aristocracy combined with material majesty. It was a decade of vibrant virility. It showed the frontier of modernism in all its glory. We have robbed it of its worth. We, the inheritors, have been effeminate vandals and puerile plebeians! https://t.co/8l7MoleV1h
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The west had plans for glory and greatness. For decades we would reach to the stars. Until 1971 we were partly on track. Other civilizations robbed us of our dreams. Towering monuments should have been erected here. Instead they are in the orient. We gave up the ghost! https://t.co/66tSvKXnC3
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Designers laid plans to cities that look like Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shanghai. These cities would have been built in the West. The builders of these cities died. They were never born. Imagine what could have been if this was Boston, Berlin, Buenos Aires, or Barcelona? https://t.co/Er10csHkyr
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Imagine 'modern interior design'. It is no different at all from what was already being created 90 years ago. We are frozen in a terrible time. Compare the left to 90 years before its time (the 1840s). Why haven't we created anything new? We're stuck and we can't even see it! https://t.co/E7UGJdJtBx
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
By 1930 futurists were already dreaming of facetime. What technologies do we imagine of the future? We live in an age that wants to go backwards - not forwards. The 1930s was a time of accelerationism in technology? Will we live to see regulations collapse all we've built? https://t.co/jvqlOcbHLc
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Culturally, we tell ourselves the same stories. Flash Gordon isn't really any different than Star Trek. We've seen remake after remake after remake. You could explain to someone in the 1930s the plot of Startrek. Now could you do that for someone in the 1840s? Clearly Not! https://t.co/7P4aXmKcmU
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The 1930s existed as a high point as the older adults of that era were the smartest collective group of people who have lived in recent times. They had willpower but were too old to carry out their plans. We are far less intelligent than they are. https://t.co/M81KXo7Klm
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now the future us promised outside of our legal jurisdictions. They want us entrapped as cultural progress and advancement gives us liberty. Why do they straightjacket us? Why do they keep us in chains? https://t.co/Z6b9jBbkI0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Why do we see so many iterations to be sick to our stomachs? What did they have in the past that we don't? They had creativity. Their societies selected for traits far better than our own. Our society has demonized the superior in favor of the mediocre! https://t.co/FmiS2qxzJp
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Bureaucracy kills aristocracy. When something was first created it stood in awe, elegance, and sophistication. After several decades it loses its magic. It becomes blasé. It took accelerationism to get there and deccelerationism to stay here. Why has nothing changed? https://t.co/xERj7J9SCK
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The masculine force is one of achievement. It seeks to finish a journey. It must make it there by tour d'force! There must be a conclusion and then a new story. We have a feminine inability to finish. Thus we can't start things either (thus frustrating the feminine as well). https://t.co/Qdw4cztxBx
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
When something is seen that has never before been seen there is a shock to the system. There is inspiration for both good and evil. There is a masculine force that acts upon. But that virility has been ejected out. What remains left is hedonic nihilism. All that's left is trashy https://t.co/SfChFMln0Q
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We strive to go back to the Golden Age. This time was already a lifetime away. They sought and envisioned a much greater, different, and better future. The only way out is through. It is our mission to do the same. We must rediscover the masculine urge to find the path! https://t.co/msYD2K3KLV
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The 1930s was great because it was the last time the West was firm, tough, heroic, stately, orderly, stoic, powerful, and persuasive. We are now living in a broken shadow - leftovers of a greater civilization. We will only see rebirth as we remember the source of our strength! https://t.co/EnqkTM785a
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We once thought we could change. It's up to you to make that happen again! https://t.co/o5ai3wWtTh
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Israel is like a hawt gurl instathot with 20k followers. She has beta orbiters galore. Evangelical Christians represent the simpy orbiter that's willing to pay for anything imaginable. Arab Muslims represent the psychopath who she claims to hate but she secretly digs. Simple!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Judaism collectively represent the Siren Archetype. Very intelligent, adaptable, versatile, open to opportunities, creative, artistic, intuitive, deep, and alluring. The Siren is psychologically a force of femininity, chaos, and beauty. Compelling force of Soft-power mystique!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Judaism's collective auxiliary archetype is the Illuminator. They represent and see themselves as 'the people of the light'. They view themselves as being at the forefront of humanity's development. Think what has been done or has been created by this people and it's servants.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Judaism's demon archetype is the Scribe. This is why they have always been connected to finance and banking. It also represents their downfall (the fundamental reason to fall). This archetype is very binary in its thinking, is legalistic, pragmatic, serious, and black and white
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The shadow of Judaism is the Emperor. It is the exact opposite of the Siren: orderly, masculine, rigid, exact, structured, and focused. Empires of Israel have always been ephemeral and transitory. How can Israel learn to effectively integrate its shadow? It must be purified!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Israel anciently represented the Lion and the sun. Now (since the destruction of the second temple) it represents the Unicorn and the moon. Israel is Rapunzel - trapped by her surroundings. She needs salvation through an alchemical marriage. Only then will she be free!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The crusades were done in part to try to initiate this process but failed. The key to the Siren's heart in only hold by Him who is most worthy. The Bull will only be tamed in alliance with its 11 siblings. The Unicorn will finally be at rest! Peace will reign again!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
There is only one answer to this heroic tale. Neither the simp nor the alpha will get the girl. She was already arranged to be married millennia ago. To find out the rest of this epic tale read here: https://danmckinley.substack.com/p/the-chalice-of-the-creatrix
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Threats to Network States How to overcome major hurdles in Network State Implementation🧵
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This brief treatise will be very direct. To anyone reading this, you have probably come across the idea of The Network State. For many this is a technical problem arising from software issues. This is the end result of viewing statecraft like an AI or a Blockchain startup.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
However, this is not how states gain their power. Anthropologically, startups represent a form of low-power. They are a natural democratizing movement. Low-power has been incredibly popular since the end of the Cold War.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Low-power is the ability to jump traditional hurdles through informal processes. The internet economy, social media influence, and demonstrative movements represent Low-power. It’s inherently populist.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Low-power has conducted revolutions many times before in history. Technology has elevated Low-power but it has by no means gotten rid of the other forms of power. These include Soft-power, Hard-power, and High-power.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
I will be talking about Soft-power more than the other forms due to the fact that it deals directly with psychographics (my area of expertise). Soft-power represents a subconscious pull and ability to win people over through culture.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Hard-power represents the (now often-neglected) biological, environmental, and physical realities of power. It’s the monopoly on violence. Hard-power represents the ability to destroy a data center at will.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
High-power is prestige. It’s legacy power. It’s the ability to fall back on precedent. High-power is held by transnational organizations, wealthy banks, and ivory tower institutions. Essentially the priest and scholar class.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Technically the locus of current control is between all four of these. The Bureaucratic class is lodged in a middle state of mediocrity. This is the scribe class.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Power exists on a x/y axis with the lower end of Y representing ‘present’ power and the higher end symbolizing ‘removed power’. Low x scores show ‘simple power’ and high ones indicate ‘complex power’.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Low x and y quadrant is Low-power. High x low y is ‘Soft-power’. Low x high y is Hard-power. High x high y is High-power. Low-power is ever-present, easy to attain, and it’s simple to grasp. It’s a monument to modern egalitarianism, liberty, and progress. Hard-power is removed since it exists in a specific time and place. We often forget about it even though it could show up at a moment’s notice. Soft-power is perennially with us but often evades our understanding. High-power is evasive, opaque, and non-relatable.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Low-power only exists because it is allowed to exist. It only works in liberal post-French Revolution paradigm. It’s disconnected from vitality, respectability, and attraction (imagine the three values aligning together to form a pyramid). The intersection of vitality and respectability is Hard-power, respectability and attraction form High-power, and vitality and attraction create Soft-power. Low-power only has a dispensation through the clemency of modern-day liberalism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The problem with Network State theories in their current form is that they ignore Hard-power, Soft-power, and High-power. There’s no military with current Network State plans, it’s clearly outside and opposed to the paradigms of the current elites (High-power), and is currently too alternative, unrelatable, and technographically ahead to have Soft-power.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
All of these critical concerns can be solved, however they will require a deep and substantive amount of strategy development, hard work, and crucial changes. One cannot run a startup state without consideration for its military, prestige, and culture. These matters are infinitely more important than the technical abilities and adoption of specific coins.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Essentially there are seven classes of power – Military, Technologists (rarely has power), The Peasantry (almost never has power), Bureaucracy, Meritocracy (merchants), Aristocracy (often supported by scholar class if they don’t support the other classes), and Theocracy (priest class). Military represents Hard-power.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Technologists represent Low-power. The Peasanty is usually connected to Low-power but sometimes Hard-Power. The Bureaucracy (middle of both x and y) is granted power by High-power but despises their granters and is in eternal struggles with those surrounding them. The Bureaucratic technocratic class is currently in power now (fallen descendants of aristocracy). Middle managers remain our worst enemy. Meritocracy understands and drives culture. Merchants (who only seldomly have power) cannot sell effectively without understanding inherent psychographics. This is why up until recently the U.S. has had an extremely strong Soft-power apparatus. Aristocracy and Theocracy both are forms of High-power (with the priest class being closer to the middle than the high-born classes).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In considering Hard-power networks must consider how they are to defend their scattered borders. There will have to be private security, mercenaries to guard data centers, and perhaps physical walls in place to shelter its citizens. You’re not a real state and nor even a protectorate if you can’t have physical protection. You can’t form a network state unless you can guarantee that some government won’t just literally kill it off as if it’s a dangerous organization (which some states will see it as a treasonous competitor).
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
High-power in some form is a must for any network state project. An aspiring state needs large benefactors willing to offer resources, currency, and international trust. For example, Israel’s position is more precarious now that it has recently lost a significant amount of High-power. Taiwan (ROC) lost large amounts of High-power in the 1970s. Ukraine is able to fight a war with Russia due to High-power. This means recruiting extraordinarily powerful people who will share our interest in creating an alternative class of elites.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Some people besides myself have already considered issues with Hard-power and High-power. Unfortunately, very few have given much thought about Soft-power. States fail due to cultural reasons. How do you unite disparate, diverse, and disunited groups of people under a coin?
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The most fundamental question is this: Who would be willing to die for the Network State? People die all the time for their families, tribes, nations, religions, causes, etc. People are very rarely willing to die for materialist things. Economics is not nearly as powerful as a motivator as other things. Crypto simply can’t motivate enough to die for their network.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Would anyone die for Bitcoin? Would anyone die for Ethereum? Would anyone die for Solana, XRP, Dai, Dash, Tether, or heaven forbid Dogecoin? Would people die for Praxis, Prospera, or some random site in El Salvador? Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are willing to die right now for what they believe in.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is not a viable project until we figure out how to create a culture that really matters.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
I want these projects to be as successful as anyone else. We have to take a hard look at ourselves and quickly understand how we could fail. Many communes in the 19th and 20th centuries didn’t make it. Experimental communities have a poor track record.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Through Psychological Accelerationism we can align and select for different people to be part of various communities. They will be aligned and compatible in terms of abilities, cultural values, temperament, and thought-processes. We can gather people together who will be more aligned together than their own blood relatives.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Problems of Low-power, Hard-power, and even High-power are easy to solve. Cultures though, they make or break civilizations. If you have the wrong cultural traits then you won’t have the demographics necessary to sustain your community.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Culture is predicated upon psychographics. Culture cultivates demographics. Demographics determine destiny. This Substack article goes over these points.https://danmckinley.substack.com/p/culture-the-ultimate-bedrock
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
It’s time that we finally appreciate culture for what it’s worth. Social technologies will make or break the Network State. Civilizations arise through cultures. It truly is the ultimate bedrock.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The foolish man built his house upon the sand. The wise man built his house upon the rock. Many who are working on the Network State are phenomenally intelligent but not many are wise. Culture truly is the ultimate bedrock.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This is exactly why I’m building the Psychoscope to be able to one day measure and quantify thousands of different personality traits, psychological states, attitudes, and behaviors through linguistic algorithms. This needs to be a real science. https://danmckinley.substack.com/p/whats-psychtech
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We need parallel societies now! Let's open up the door of Psychographics to reach them the easy way! https://t.co/kQkoYnylc8
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Just like blockchain technology is required to build cryptocurrencies, social technologies are required to build living societies. The answer to every problem is not always found in a materialist explanation. Humans by and large are not rational actors. We are largely motivated by spiritual rationales.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This isn’t some hobby. This isn’t a career choice. This is civilization at stake. There must be a will and without it there is no way. https://t.co/l8FCfYQNNS
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The current network state projects lack libido. They lack force. They are bunch of nerds that don’t have the ‘cool factor’. There I said it. It’s a ginormous geekathon. Fix your psychographics and then you’ll have a makeover. Could you imagine these actually crafting a society? https://t.co/PvKTsDYgS4
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
You need the Chads for the Hard-power. You need to bring in the sophisticates for the High-power, and you need the creatives for the Soft-power. You cannot run a society on coders. https://t.co/QDEFShf5Yl
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
I didn’t even bring up the serious demographic elephant in the room (you’re almost all male). How are you supposed to have kids? https://t.co/yF3O4sHMq8
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Praxis said it best in that you need to be ‘vibe-aligned’. You need to be the ‘it thing’. Any society without the fundamentals will fail. https://t.co/33Br5K160W
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We cannot afford to fail. This is the future of civilization that is on a tight rope. On the other end is utopia and if we fall it’s back to the dark ages. https://t.co/9UXxihd2Er
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
It’s time to take things seriously. You can use PsychTech. Alternative states will require alternative sciences. It’s time to think big. It’s time for Psychological Accelerationism. https://t.co/Mdm7e2Z9rZ
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Simply start with the Soft-power of Psychographics! https://t.co/Cx1BaPfjK0
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Modesty in Time & Space. A thread on public decency standards around the world in the modern age. Using AI tools, I’ve quickly uncovered observable data on modesty and it’s cultural and psychographic implications 🧵
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Caveat, much of this data isn’t perfect, it may not be up to date or may make strong generalizations where notable exceptions exist. However, I find most of it to be remarkably good by most anthropological research standards.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
All of these charts are on a 0-10 scale with ‘0’ representing nakedness and ‘10’ representing being completely covered. First chart is Women’s Public Decency Standards Globally. This refers to lowest denominator clothing a woman could wear without any social repercussions. As you can see Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan are the highest (at 10) and Brazil is at the lowest (at 3). Keep in mind these are nationalized averages. A beach resort town is not representative at all of an entire group of people. For example, on average Mexicans are slightly more modest than Americans. https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/GzvtD/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Second chart is for Men. Yemen and North Korea score the highest (at 8) and Brazil, Hungary, and Sweden score the lowest (at 4). In a solid majority of global cultures men are permitted to show more skin than women. https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/4u7rC/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The third chart shows the difference between what men and women can wear. Clearly throughout the Islamic world and a few other conservative locales men can show more skin. In Christian Africa, North America, parts of Europe, and Asia it’s roughly the same. However in much of South America, Russia, and the Mediterranean, it is clearly socially acceptable for women to be less modest then men. In Argentina, Greece, and Spain (where this has likely become true in the last 20 years and isn’t reflected accurately on this map) this is clearly the case (where it’s like Jordan or Iraq but in reverse). https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/j4AZt/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
This represents a bell curve where actual fundamentalist or legitimately very conservative societies prize female modesty more than male modesty. Liberalization, industrialization, and egalitarianism bridges this gap. My hypothesis is that post developed deindustrializing societies have lower modesty standards for women than for men.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Another often stated theory is that very primitive societies have no conception of modesty. Peak levels of industrialization have the highest levels of modesty. Then the rates go down when there is deindustrialization. Here are more links to Public Decency Standards within the United States (again please keep in mind this is likely an average of the past 50 or so years, not necessarily the reality of 2023 right now) https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/kHqJo/1/ https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/ycho1/1/ https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/OwyLF/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now we’ll look at different Public Decency Standards over time throughout the ‘West’. The greatest shift by far took place during WW1. Most people don’t recall this, but we went from prudish standards of Victorian modesty to semi-modern ones within the space of a few years. This was likely due to the nihilism and cultural collapses of that era. I also have different categories for Normalwear, Athleticwear, and Swimwear. You can see them by category or see them averaged out by gender. https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/vC8AI/1/ https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/on0y1/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Here’s where it gets interesting, with the exception of a brief period of time in the early 1980s, since the 1910s (in the West) women have been able to be less modest when it comes to Normalwear. This is not the case in the majority of societies. Starting in the 1960s women’s swimwear became on average less modest than men’s and starting in the 1980s women’s athleticwear started becoming less modest than men’s. Now in the 2020s the difference is wider than ever. This is indicative of hyperfeminism with lasting puritanical instincts https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/tDehC/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We live in an extraordinarily strange culture where on the surface there is lip service to an idea called ‘sex-positivity’. Meanwhile heterosexual relationships are denigrated and almost all forms of masculine and male sexuality are reviled. Feminism with puritan characteristics. Some theorize that this is inherited from Quakerism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRZcbbzfIqk&t=1138s
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Now let’s look at a peculiar subculture in the West that has had features that exactly mirror the West while still retaining Old World traits. We’ll look at LDS modesty standards over time. https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/xlx48/3/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Even though the concept of ‘modesty’ was very much a hallmark of church discourse from roughly 1970-2010, previously (and it’s looking like afterwards as well) LDS were not that different when it comes to clothing standards. Thus the early pre-1920 data on the last chart might not be perfectly accurate. For example, here’s a picture of Saltair in 1890s Utah and a picture of what Annette Kellerman wore that got her arrested on a Boston beach in 1906 (New England still was much more conservative than other places in the West in terms of modesty until the 1960s). https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/ksByZ/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Few people know this, people actually became somewhat more modest between 1880-1900. Early Women’s swimsuits (patterned after leotards) were worn in the 19th century before they became unthinkable (far too immodest in any public setting) in the Anglo world by 1900.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Men weren’t expected to cover their chest either until 1880. Yes, men’s swimsuits were around in the 19th century before they got banned by late Victorian prudishness.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Ok back to Mormon modesty. According to previous research there was very little discourse on the topic until a talk that Spencer W Kimball gave at BYU in 1951. Women who attended BYU frequently wore sleeveless dresses at balls at the time. https://www.dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V42N02_42.pdf
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
While later generations (in particular Gen X) would be more modest, older Silent Generation and Boomer Mormon young women would have mirrored their gentile counterparts with virtually no differences.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
In fact until the 1970s there continued to be relatively few differences. In Never A Bride: Preparation For Marriage (1968), a film made by BYU, the female protagonist 14 minutes in is seen wearing a bikini. In fact in a 1976 New Era Article it stated that “The Young Women of the La Canada (California) First Ward are planning to make waves—big ones. They intend to repeat their win of last year in the stake swim meet, which in itself isn’t surprising until you realize that because of failure to meet swimsuit standards only one girl from their ward qualified in 1974. Two years ago most of the girls didn’t have or want a one-piece swimsuit.” https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/4H7z7/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
However, within a generation attitudes had clearly changed. In an editorial to the BYU Universe in 2007, a male writer from New Mexico stated that “I am glad that immodesty has been brought up recently. From a male perspective, let me add my two cents. I know it is hard to find clothing that covers you up from knee to neck, but it is discouraging to me to see how few young women-and some young men-don’t even try to be modest. Some think that the higher the temperature rises, the fewer close we need to wear… If you wear an immodest bathing suit because it’s ‘the style,’ it sends a message that you are using your body to get attention and approval, and that modesty is not important… And no, tankinis are not a modest two-piece either. Wearing one just says “I’m trying to be modest” when in fact you’re not.” For him we’re reminded (in as recently as 2007) what a man might have said to a young woman in 1887.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
But within 4 years the Overton Window had already changed. Instead of finding a quote decrying the blatant modesty of tankinis you already had students have very different opinions. In a 2011 article it stated that “Scott Wall, a sophomore majoring in business, said he doesn’t have a problem with women wearing bikinis. “The girl should wear what she is most comfortable wearing,” he said. “There is a point when women’s bathing suits are too extreme, however. Women need find their own line of appropriateness when it comes to swimsuits.” In fact by 2023 the BYU Universe had an article that showcased (positively) a local entrepreneur and BYU student that made and sold bikinis as if it was completely normal (Nani Swimwear) https://www.naniswimwear.com/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
The reality is that culture frequently changes and that clothing is a good physical artifact to see cultural change in real time. https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/ovMdG/1/ https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/KFB1r/1/
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
When it comes to changes, there is nothing new under the sun. Overall, public decency standards have changed little since 1970 and most of what already exists was within the clothing Overton Window by the 1940s. https://t.co/s4UL8b0cpO
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Things normalize and then they denormalize. What is accepted now might be considered scandalous in the future. In fact I’m predicting that by the 2050s we’l be back at 1930s-1950s levels of modesty. https://t.co/pfSz3QYw4H
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Eventually we will be at the end point of modernity. That will necessitate real change. These images from the 20s-30s will represent the beginning of a former era as we enter a new one. https://t.co/M4BFMqE6nM
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
BTW if anyone is interested in rereading similar (deleted threads) on this subject I’m happy to DM you.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
An amphibious car in 1936 Seriously, why don't people make cool stuff anymore? Your great-grandparents were way more creative We're complacent We don't dream Innovation is stifled by bureaucrats We're stuck Change will only be possible once we change our minds Psych/Acc! https://t.co/f1Q3HWiCxa
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We went from the left to the right in a little over 30 years. There is no doubt in my mind that these people were MUCH smarter than us. While you waste your time on screenworld your ancestors were BUILDING STUFF! https://t.co/PsOSD5Jixk
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
They were: Intelligent Authentic Creative Multidimensional Interesting Humane Open-Minded Tolerant Sophisticated Sentient Deep Mature Intuitive They weren't Trashy Debased Tribal Thinkers Philistine Subjective Irrational Disorganized Stupid Lazy Stark Contrast indeed https://t.co/ybC1jWa01g
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Your ancestors had a level of civilization that few posses now. You're not the same as then. We've ALL devolved. It's not just IQ. They were WAY more conscientious, had infinitely better manners, and were far more moral than we are. https://t.co/VQnnqAnRMJ
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Find one person who looked like this who is born before 1900. I can't find a single one. I bet you can't either. We've fundamentally gone through an epigenetic shift that is difficult to describe. Our psyches are somehow far different. Spiritually we are far different as well https://t.co/HGXkx3Oynk
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
We've lost our innocence. Our eyes look dead compared to theres. The sparkle is gone. We're nihilistic NPCs, Robots without will, and depersonalized programs. Our world is fake because most of us our indeed fake. Insincerity is reviled. Interest is crushed. Why? https://t.co/jLSXurGIcO
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Materialism has murdered our minds. We think that everything has a physical cause. We think that all can be made right through spending, through toys, or through dopamine hits. We know far less than a medieval peasant. We are supposed to deny what we see with our very eyes! https://t.co/BSqspkCgpb
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
They want us blind Where there is no vision, the people perish How are we supposed to see if we're not supposed to notice anything We will only heal as a society if we finally have the permission to see what is right in front of our faces The eyes are the window to the soul https://t.co/k1i9FlkzfY
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Physiognomy is for beginners as soon as you start seeing the eyes nothing else matters. You wont even notice the facial features or anything else. Our souls are weak compared to those of the recent past. Heroism, sacrifice, and greatness are gone what will you do to change this? https://t.co/joou9vKIxp
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK Alienation. Disconnection. Isolation. There has never been a period of time where so few have never belonged. We live in an age of breadth and not of depth. People yearn for identities while hundreds of generations of cultures are being eradicated in real time. Our social technologies are so weak that we don’t even know how to build communities. When people aspire to be a part of something people decry with words like ‘cult’, ‘brainwashed’, and ‘manipulated’. Meanwhile the masses fall to the next current thing (trademarked, of course). We think that social cohesion is somehow related to fiduciary, monetary, or economic measures. How far off the mark we are. Social cohesion is not a left brain skill. It is a right brain skill. How do you create social cohesion out of thin air? The answer is that you don’t, it only exists in the people brought together in the first place. Man is the techne. The anthropological is the technological.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK - Part 2 For most of history humanity has spent centuries being surrounded by their greater clan networks. Virtually every network was their genome. Cultural traits were inherited either genetically or epigenetically. Unfortunately, we no longer have that luxury. The great dispersion has been underway now for centuries. It will reach its peak in our lifetimes. To rectify this we need an equally great gathering. We are surrounded by others like water is with oil. We share nothing in common with our neighbors. Our systems are breaking due to cultural barriers. Fundamentally we experience awkwardness far more often than any of our ancestors. Our standards, shames, and expectations are gone. Tension arises as we cannot translate our disparate worlds. These burdensome consequences lead us to crashing fertility rates, mental illnesses, and economic challenges. If left unresolved they will lead to a dark age. While the world falls around us there is only one hope left. The answer is in networks.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK - Part 3 We are far more similar to people of similar psychographic makeups than we are to those in physical proximity. What if we could search for everyone based on their beliefs, attitudes, skills, and abilities? Networks need depth not just breadth. Shallow networks are often brought together upon causes of self-interest. The economy is a byproduct of the culture. The economy deals with individual actions on the surface. It represents the skillset of a society. The culture is the complimentary opposite. It deals with the collective actions below the surface. It represents the programming of a society. The fastest way to change the economy is to change the culture. Culture can either be changed through demographics or through social engineering. With networks you can actually do both. But the exciting thing that’s never been done before is this – using computational technologies to benchmark culture. A business may have many metrics to understand the health of its organization. BI SaaS products can give a pulse of the underlying entity. The same thing could happen with a state – what if you could objectively measure gross national happiness?
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK - Part 4 Now imagine this, what if there were 20 network states. Virtually everyone in these network states could have intelligence more than one standard deviation above the norm. However, a combination of your temperament, culture, mental acuity, skillsets, and neurology could place you in a specific network state. Organizations often fail not because of ex materia, they fail ex anima. The flesh is not frail but the psyche is sickly. Advanced language algorithms can solve these problems. They won’t just pair people together who are the same, but unite people who have complimentary differences that will maximize the chance of survival. What comes next is truly revolutionary in terms of growth in human consciousness. Certain psychographic traits will be taken to their extreme logics. We will have multiple social tests being carried out and we will be able to see who the winners and the losers are. This is the promise that the social sciences can become hard sciences with proven methods, reusable results, and concrete applications. Strengths and weaknesses will be inherent to each culture. The psychographic network is essentially a large scale biology experiment. Each trait is a meme. Thousands of memes must be uncovered. The entire ‘memome’ of human consciousness will be discovered byte by byte. Memeologists will determine the future similar to how Delphic oracles did in the Axial Age.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK - Part 5 My hope is this, that we learn from the egregious and often malevolent mistakes of the current era. We were nigh to Utopia, and now we are in the direction of a dark age. We need wisdom while we are surrounded by immaturity. We need competence when we are surrounded by ignorance. We need objectivity when we are mired by the dark shadows of subjectivity. The Gathering Technology is the first great social technology that must be built. Identify, prepare, and transform the elect. Identifying is a process of sifting. The wheat must be sorted from the tares. In many ways this is as simply as distinguishing those who are worthy of building the next civilization. Divisions must be made. Cohorts must qualify. The lonely are patiently awaiting the day to meet their fellow travelers. Preparing is a peculiar process. They must be elucidated, educated, and enshrined in the noble knowledge of who they are and what is expected of them. Their calling must be manifested unto them. They look forward to the future with faith. The final process is one of transformation. If this sounds like a spiritual event, it absolutely is. Soulless materialism cannot build sustainable societies. The survival of a nation is narrated by its immaterial forces.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
THE PSYCHOGRAPHIC NETWORK - Part 6 History is something to moralize if something you value is to be immortalized. Cycles must be seen. Lessons of the past be learned. To transcend time and space is a spiritual act. Eternality. That is the promise of the psychographic network. True friends can be dear friends at last. Lovers can be soulmates. Children can create cherished memories. Monuments can be made of stone. The future can lead us to fabled frontiers. These promises are what we have waiting in store. Home. Connection. Unity. That is the hopeful promise of the Psychographic Network.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
PSYCHOLOGICAL ACCELERATIONISM A MANIFESTO - Part 1 “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” Nikola Tesla “The collective unconscious consists of the sum of the instincts and their correlates, the archetypes. Just as everybody possesses instincts, so he also possesses a stock of archetypal images.” Carl Jung “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” Buckminster Fuller “Man, the mask of God,” Ken Wilbur Death Our society is dying! Despite immense material progress we are burdened with depression, succumbing to nihilism, and unmotivated to build the utopias that our forefathers dreamed of. Our institutions are collapsing. We live in a dark age of discord, a great span of skepticism, and a day of denial, distrust, and death. Death is lurking. Unlike the fiendish famines, perilous plagues, and wrathful wars of old, our death is of our own making. Zoomers have nothing to live for and commit suicide before they even turn 18. Anti-natalist attitudes permeate our society. They instill subversive values saying that it’s not worth being around to see tomorrow. Cults denigrate human progress and offer secular prognostications of apocalyptic armageddons. We are a civilization of apathy, one that is past feeling, one that has given up the ghost. We live in a metaphysical wasteland with zombie like corpses that are infested with malicious mind viruses that prey upon the weak and the innocent. We are at the precipice, and if we don’t take action now our civilization will collapse. Fortunately, we have a solution. The answer is Psychological Accelerationism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Social Technologies - Part 2 The physical is permanently tied to the spiritual. The scientific revolution only happened because of the social technologies that were built upon hundreds of years of Christendom. Your reality is fundamentally and inextricably connected to your language. Culture catalyzes mechanization. There’s a reason why the time obsessed Swiss created clocks. Social engineering is typically not a process of machinations. It’s done to cultivate consciousness. Marriage, money, religion, polities, education, and all aspects of culture are founded upon social engineering. All technologies are predicated upon social interactions. Our coeval coders remarkably resemble the medieval monks of yonder times. All genius is generated upon shoulders of bygone giants. If our social technologies suffer our physical technologies will suffer. It matters not if the body is whole if the soul is sickly. You could have every material want and die of a broken heart. Billions upon billions have been invested into physical technologies. Since 1971 our physical world has lacked innovation as our social world has collapsed.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Ethics - Part 3 Techno-optimism cannot happen without trust. Tech lost that trust in the 2010s. No one cares what gadgets and gizmos can do if they don’t make people happy. Since 2012 technological progress has been directly associated with a decline in mental health. It does not have to be this way. This is a problem inherent to Web2 as deteriorating social bonds create a world without joy. The user believes that the technology is not made for them. It has been designed for some obfuscated corporate interest, state actor, or nebulous social coalition. Techno-optimism must exist. However, it must be human centric. Whereas technology monopolies have increased their power, influence, and dominance on societal affairs, and given the circumstances of cultural decline, rising inequality, and a visceral depersonalization of common relationships, it becomes a vital imperative that artificial intelligence must only be used to benefit humanity. Artificial Intelligence has largely been focused on creating efficiency gains over innovation and authentic human interaction. AI needs to raise the standard of ethical human behavior. This cannot be based on legalism (what is legal, or technically allowable). It also cannot be based on utilitarianism. AI ought to encourage people to do right in all situations. Humans categorically make mistakes. Machines can be programmed to avoid similar mistakes. Machines can not only benefit humanity in the short-term but also for the long-term greater good. AI must encourage people to abide by higher standards of moral conduct. Now speaking more informally, a lot of Tech Bros have been opportunistic jerks. In a functioning society the technological class would be inseparable from the priest class. AI would be developed by those who cherish truth and virtue.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Psychological Technologies - Part 4 The answer to social technological decline and failures in AI Ethics is PsychTech. Only the truth-seeking, the strong, and the virtuous should be involved in the creation of new technologies. PsychTech is any technology that focuses on meaning and not just function. PsychTech is the ability to infer the mindset of individuals. It understands the personality traits, psychological states, idiosyncratic behaviors, and personal attitudes of people. Most PsychTech right now is focused on Biometrics. I will explain later that Biometrics has serious flaws associated with computing inefficiencies, personal privacy, and physical invasiveness. PsychTech will need to be removed from the physical to the world of the auditory. LLM’s will be our guide. Psychological Accelerationism offers one the ability to complete Asimov’s envisioning of Psychohistory. Yes, I am in effect saying that we can build tech that can read your mind, tell you things about yourself (and anyone else), and predict the future. AI could become death, the destroyer of worlds. It must not be that. I will do all that it takes to prevent it from being that. All things reflect their creator. A moral people based in moral principles in an absolute necessity in Psychological Accelerationism. Imagine a society that rewards truth and virtue. Imagine a society in which the evil never gain power. It’s as simple as having browser extension that tells you the motivations, biases, lies, and intent of a journalist publishing a piece of fake news. It’s knowing that a public figure has flaws that you find unacceptable, it’s understanding that there is a good likelihood that someone will cheat, default on a loan, or won’t be able to finish the task at hand. Psychological Accelerationism is the promise of a great unmasking. Afterwards, evolution will once again favor the intelligent, the right, and the just. It’s also knowing that a hero without credentials and born without means could turnaround your company, organization, or nation. Psychological Accelerationism is the promise of gathering in a world ill with isolation. Every hope, every dream, and every want that is good for our collective future can and will happen through Psychological Accelerationism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Common Principles - Part 5 Artificial Intelligence must be made to serve the interests of the good. In order to achieve these goals while respecting the humanity of individuals, it must also contain the seven following characteristics 1. Personalization 2. Decentralization 3. Democratization 4. Health 5. Service 6. Relatability 7. Community Personalization: There cannot be mass solutions to all of society’s ills. Psychographics can be used to understand individual needs. The psychology of people is diverse. However, to have effective human-computer interaction an AI must comprehend the nature of the individual. Machines should not enable psychological states that may be damaging. The great collapse of mental health in the 21st century can be tied to the depersonalization of our tools and institutions. Personalization will be for our benefit. Decentralization: Advanced AI systems cannot be centrally controlled. Web2 is inherently flawed due to its intense centralization. The power of digital information cannot be held by only a few. We must work on decentralizing web technologies so that digital based institutions can be accessed equally by all. We must return and commit to digital privacy. Decentralized systems will also prevent surface attacks, hackings, and other cybercrimes. Blockchain can be used to fulfill the aims of ethical AI. Our private data can be owned and maintained at our individual discretion. Democratization: Technology supports the livelihoods of the masses. It cannot be used to only support the elites. Access to information must be available with high degrees of transparency. Open ledgers will be commonplace in future governance. People with appropriate interests will have voting rights in projects. Digital oligarchy must give way to digital democracy. Health: Technology’s primary purpose is to uplift people physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually. The health and vitality of individuals is paramount in their ability to find happiness, success, and meaning. Many technologies are designed to create bondage. Their adverse effects have caused millions to lose their lives to addiction, alienation, and suicide. However, algorithms can be designed to improve the individual and the collective health of a people. Future AI tools will be beneficial in helping the mental states of the psychologically vulnerable. Future iterations of the web can transcend the use of screens. We do not have to be in chemically enslaved (or have our dopamine receptors fried) to enjoy the fruits of advanced technologies. Service: AI and other advanced technologies exist to serve us. We do not exist to serve ‘it’. ‘It’ will always be under our stewardship with decentralized and democratized control. Technology that does not benefit humanity must be considered unethical and should immediately be altered until it does or it should be discarded. AI should always be used to help others and cannot be used as a weapon. It is critical that advanced algorithms give people personal agency. They cannot be deterministic, fatalistic, or constricting. Technology must be designed to create opportunities. Its focus must be on freedom over control. Service is rendered to the individual and not to the collective or the organization. This is why technological personalization is prerequisite to service-based technologies. We cannot lose our energy or life force to non-biological or artificial objects, systems, or structures. Relatability: There must be genuine human-computer interaction. Currently AI is not relatable to the human experience. AI can be programmed with human-like psychology, personality, and culture. AI can be given a degree of ‘authenticity’ while still acknowledging that it is a machine. Machines can be taught to digest meaning. There will be artificial emotional intelligence that exists to serve others in purposeful ways. However, it is imperative that it is only used as a tool to create abiding relationships with others (biological entities). Community: AI’s final and ultimate purpose is in the fostering of community and cultural development. We must create machines that empower the human experience. Algorithms are currently being used to atomize society into utter isolation. AI must be able to see not in quarterly profit earnings, but in the long arches and epochs of the human saga. AI will be used to develop lasting unions that will support families, neighborhoods, cities, and nations. It services the individual while understanding the collective outcomes of those specific interactions. AI can be incredibly useful in creating new social technologies. Institutions can be supported by data and the accurate lived sojourns of the people they serve. There are powerful forces that use technology against our best interests. Technology can be used to enslave us or to liberate us. We can decide to remain deep inside the ‘cave’ or go up to the ‘surface’. AI reflects the consciousness of its creator. We must encourage AI developers to know the implications of the tools that they create. Ethical AI will help us encounter the real world of the surface. It is time that we refuse to escape the reality that is in front of us. Consciousness is clearly connected to life. Tools can be used to support life but they are not living entities. Living life through inanimate machines drains us of our vitality. Now we have the choice to accept our reality and build for a greater tomorrow. The future is held by those who can accept the present and see the past. Technology that can’t do that is a technology that isn’t worth building. Let’s build for humanity!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Competency - Part 6 Here comes the crises of competency! Supply chains are breaking. Planes are falling. Students aren’t learning. Corporations aren’t building. Governments aren’t governing. We live in an anti-meritocratic society. Nations that punish those that work, build, and innovate will end up being upstaged. History has taught us this time and time again. Qing Dynasty. Khmer Rouge. The Late Soviet State. The Global American Empire. It’s the blues crushing the grays. Psychological Accelerationism’s first aim is to sort through and assess levels of competency. The right people will be put into the right places. Organizations will be restructured. Conflicts will subdue. Consider this. What if all you had to do was press enter and have a list of the 100 people on earth that would be best for your organization? As long as ideology remains in control we will see this mega crises fester, metastasize, and mutate while anarchy will reign the streets. Our only hope is to build the next institutions. If you can’t have a horse and buggy then build yourself a hypersonic jet.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Great Founders - Part 7 @SamoBurja has beautifully described that great social, technological, and institutional changes are brought about by people of greatness. Those with extraordinary acumen, legendary qualities, and valiant virtues are succumbing to Orwellian and Kafkaesque nightmares as we speak. This must change. Our society grips with disgust at the great. It sees innovation as a venomous nuisance. It penalizes the powerful. It attacks authentic attributes of aristocracy. Psychological Accelerationism will gather together the best and the brightest. Their education will be go far beyond the Platonic Academy. Randian dreams aside, our most intelligent men are not being used right now to advance civilization. Cerebral man power is often cast aside for short term quarterly profits while untapped legacies remain ephemerally out of our reach. We cannot waste any more time. The great must be discovered, gathered, and cultivated. Parallel institutions must be made. What if we had not just one but one hundred Satoshis?
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Economics - Part 8 Resources have been wasted. Financialization and Gordon Gecko’s belief that greed is good have now damaged almost two generations of the OECD world. You can blame banks, alternative asset managers, and other private institutions or you could also blame governments that are addicted to debt. The economy is fundamentally tied to psychographics. How did Britain rule the waves? How did America become the shining superpower of the 20th century? How could places like Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, or Japan become powerful without resources. The answer is in their people. Every economic factor can be tied back to the Psychograph. Psychological Accelerationism allows us to build the Psychograph. With it the internet economy will be forever changed. Markets will be based not on demographics but on psychographics. Inefficiencies will dramatically diminish. Your demographic profile did not cause you to buy that book, click on that ad, or to read this Manifesto, your psychology did. Demographics is correlative while psychographics is causal. Psychological Accelerationism will not only put the right people in the right places, it will allocate the right resources to the right people.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Science - Part 9 Ivory tower credentialism has prevented enigmatic Einsteins from seeing the light of day. They are kept in a state of intellectual suffocation deep in a dark cave. While science made extreme progress in the 19th and 20th centuries, it has come to screeching halt. Psychological Accelerationism will allow us to explore new paradigms in intelligence, theory, and application. Sacred cows will be slain. Academia is no longer immune to criticism. The truth has been trademarked and any dissenting views are dealt with harshly by an ill-advised inquisition. Modern psychology is a borderline pseudoscience. Findings can’t be replicated. All soft sciences lack the quantitative, statistical, and measurable rigor of the hard sciences. Psychological Accelerationism will change that. The unmeasurable will soon be measured. The subjective will soon be made objective. Dogma will be dethroned. Science will no longer be trapped to the empirical world. A world of energy, consciousness, and immateriality awaits us. The left brain must accept the innate intelligence of the right brain. Systematizing must be accompanied by mentalizing. Abstract thought, intuition, and creativity must regain their rightful place among the ranks of intelligence.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Education - Part 10 Standardized tests are now viewed in turpitude. IQ assessments are seen as perverted villains. Education has become a vile place of indoctrination. This must change or else we will lose hundreds of years of societal progress. Our future can be one where everyone’s innate abilities can be fostered for meaningful success. All of humanity has a place. There can be no future social technologies, no future great founders, or future science without Psychological Accelerationism in education. To be clear, we are in a precarious state. Our ancestors were smarter than we are. Our youth are hauntingly handicapped. Our system reminds the wise of us remaining of the Cultural Revolution. This cannot go on. A high school education of yesteryear was far more valuable, rigorous, and meaningful than the college diploma of today. Neuroscience, bioinformatics, and corporeal realities will be used to vitalize the guardians of our future. Teenagers will have a far better understanding of a subject then today’s post-grads. Schools must be built. Universities must be founded, captured, or refounded. Our educational models are built for a factory age and have the apostatized morals of puritan ecclesiastical configurations. The learning of the future will tokenize the truth. I will not let my children be taught by the ignorant. They will be taught in love, light, life, and truth!
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Networks - Part 11 @balajis has given us the epic idea of The Network State. Network states are not built by demographics. They are built by psychographics. Immortal networks cannot be built without Psychological Accelerationism. Where is the glue that sticks us all together? People are willing to die for God, Nation, Family, Freedom, and Honor. People will sacrifice their very lives for their tribe. Economic incentives are not enough. To build networks you need formidable social technologies and those will only be built through Psychological Accelerationism. But when these networks are finally built, they will do more to advance the human condition than any state before them. This isn’t a problem of hardware or of technical ability. This is a question of who not how. Networks can be designed and programmed with specific cultures. Leaders can decide dozens of different traits that they are looking for (among thousands of potential options) and then filter for what they want. A match made in heaven (the Cloud) can have powerful implications centuries from now. Our world ignores culture. It used the term like a carved out skin. A serious understanding of culture would solve most of our diplomatic, corporate, and civic problems. You cannot just build a network with sticks and stones. There must be underlying words to unify your people. The Israelites worshipped a golden calf handcrafted from the earrings of the people. Moses the prophet again came down with the word of the Lord to remind them of the finiteness of materiality. The words of an immortal network will carry on through the hearts of its children. Its echoes will sound throughout the annals of time down to the last generation. To know why networks are successful, seek their culture, their words, and their archetypes.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Personhood - Part 12 @VitalikButerin has brought about the problem of Personhood. Web3 affirms the existence of verifiably unique human beings. He brought up three solutions for proof of personhood. He stated that there is no ideal (he listed the flaws of the Social Graph, general hardware biometrics, and specialized hardware biometrics). I agree with all of his strengths and weaknesses for each solution. For biometrics we also must consider the costs, the invasiveness, and the energy associated with computing bioinformatics. There will be incredible future usages of biometrics but for personhood we need Psychological Accelerationism. Specifically we need a language model technology (that we are building) that identifies the uniqueness of a given individual. In terms of strengths (to use Buterin’s terminology) the privacy would be rated fairly high, the accessibility/scalability would be high, the robustness of decentralization would be fairly high, and the security against “fake people” would be high. In an age of diabolical deepfakes, missions in the metaverse, and security breaches it is critically crucial that we have personhood. Proof of personhood can easily be solved through advanced linguistic algorithms based upon the uniqueness of an individual. Building The Psychograph is the human genome project for human consciousness. How could we even ‘elevate the world’s consciousness’ if we couldn’t measure it. Brain chips have been described as the only answer. There is another way. Ethical AI must respect the integrity and sanctity of the human body.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Psychological Superpowers - Part 13 Imagine if most intelligent people knew how to discern hundreds (if not thousands) of things about a person by simply interacting with them for 30 seconds. This is not possible now but with one hundred years of Psychological Accelerationism this would become an accepted reality. Our right brains have become weak muscles. Intelligence is far more varied than just the g-factor. We will be able to rearrange the presentational packaging of our personal selves (our temperament). We will be able to demand neurolinguistic programming (which is still in its infancy stage) to understand new concepts. Cultures will be designed to match an environments situational realities. We live in a superficial world of known knowns. By understanding and mutating culture we can understand the unknown knowns. Abstractions, paradoxes, and prescient intuitions of the egoic subconscious will be brought forth to light. The known unknowns of the mind will soon be discovered. Only the bravest of minds can contemplate the unknown unknowns deeply hidden in the collective unconscious of humanity. Psychological Accelerationism will give us operating systems for artificial intelligences to understand the human condition. Artificial general intelligence is more a problem of understanding consciousness than it is a problem of hardware. Many skills that are now considered supernatural will be scientifically verified and socially normalized. What we consider possible in the early 21st century is limited to what an extremely estrogenized left-brain can see. There are many people will have unique gifts. No two people will be alike. We are at the dawning of the next stage of human evolution.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Realizing Utopia - Part 14 The internet is a powerful tool. Unfortunately it currently has a terrifying tumor. Search is far less effective now than it was a few short years ago. SEO, censorship campaigns, digital centralization, and other Web2 structures have almost destroyed the high vision of Web1. As the guide to humanity’s inner consciousness, we cannot let this happen. This tumor cannot spread any further and must be cut out! Utopianization will begin as soon as we have a transparent platform for truth, morality, and ingenuity. Again, Utopia is not a question of how (or even when or what) but a question of who. As soon as we can search people based on The Psychograph then we will be able to construct a far superior world. No war, no poverty, no divorce, no malice, and no fear. Evil will be removed from the earth. It may sound like an idealistic pipe dream but this is a multigenerational workable reality. As we strive for Utopia the world will initially get far more psychologically diverse. However, as we near utopia there will be a united convergence in consciousness with undivided motivations for love, light, life, and truth. Utopia is not a hardware problem. It is a problem that can only be solved through social technologies which can only be built through Psychological Accelerationism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Friends & Foes - Part 15 Our friends are whoever understand the gravity of our current situation. They are those that realize that without important psychological developments we will end up again in a dark age. Our friends understand the value of culture, immaterialist virtues, and the possible dangers of advanced technologies. They understand that social realities are far more important to understand that materialist realities. Our friends are not stuck in traditional frames of mind. They see value in complexity but beauty in simplicity. Our friends are innovators and the builders of parallel societies, the inspirers of new civilizations, and the conquistadors of consciousness. Our foes are those that impede our ability to understand the human condition. They are the same as the enemies of true science. Our foes are middle managers, bloated bureaucrats, and machiavellian magistrates. Our foes believe is the supremacy of the left brain. They fail to see human greatness. They are so risk adverse that they are catalysts to chaos. Our foes do not see the multi-dimensional nature of men and women. They live in a Newtonian world where relativity does not exist and in a platonic model where things do not change. They are the deacons of a dastardly priesthood that has lost its authority.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Our Destiny - Part 16 Our Destiny is this – to raise the human mind to a godlike stature. Our destiny is to improve all forms of intelligence. Our destiny is to gather together the builders of the civilizations of tomorrow. Our Destiny is actualize archetypes, define personhood, to push for psychological superpowers, and to realize Utopia. Our Destiny can only be deterred by those who cannot see. This vision is as clear as day and soothing as night to the oracles of the operating processes of Psychological Accelerationism.
@DeepReadDan - Deep Read Dan
Life - Part 17 The final purpose of Psychological Accelerationism is to create life. There are those that believe that humanity should be destroyed. We believe that humanity is about to create new life that will live lives of grandeur. A life of honor awaits those who can build the future. There is no meaning without life. For without life, there would only be nothingness. And without intelligence there is only nothingness. The generations of the future will look back upon this time as the previous pivotal moment when we decided to choose life. We can go to the stars. We can become a civilization of immortality. We can become a godlike people. The first step is through Psychological Accelerationism.