TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DefiantLs
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Furious man doesn't hold back against the school board: You had 6 kids r*ped and the first thing you thought of doing is banning free speech. https://t.co/FXIn9xu1iT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, who identifies as Ray Gallagher: Class of '97. I made it halfway through 1995, but for some reason, I was too ill behaved to even make it through Heather Ridge. I identify as Ray Gallagher, and I'm gonna go by Ray Gallagher for the rest of the speech. So you guys had six kids raped, and the first thing you thought to do was to start to ban free speech and require driver's licenses in order to stop citizens from calling you out on your bull.
Well, it's not gonna work.
Speaker 1: Mister Porter, I'm
Speaker 0: gonna stop. I'm gonna stop
Speaker 1: you right there.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. There is nothing disruptive about the content of my free speech. Do you wanna talk about Cohen versus California? Did you stop my time? You did.
Speaker 1: It is stopped.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna continue. No. It didn't stop. It's still counting. I'm looking at it.
It's two minutes.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you one more chance, and then I'm gonna ask you to sit down.
Speaker 0: For what?
Speaker 1: To abide by our new policy.
Speaker 0: You can't ban specific words. My my particular view of your policies, the fact you got all these kids raped by a transgender person and then you keep pushing transgender stuff on children, is that your policy is completely out of line with America. Now this is a transgender flag, and I would like to show you demonstrably what America and the voters think about the transgender ideology being pushed on children. So that right there is what America thinks of your transgender policy four four three. Most people don't support this garbage.
Literally support chopping off appendages of children and giving them puberty blockers that make them sterile. You're a monster, all of you, the ones that vote for it support this stuff. The board is out of line. The board's policies are out of line. You guys don't know what you're doing.
You're pissing everybody off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Class of '97. I made it halfway through 1995, but for some reason, I was too ill behaved to even make it through Heather Ridge. I know it's hard to believe. But I identify as Ray Gallagher, and I'm gonna go by Ray Gallagher for the rest of the speech. So you guys had six kids raped, and the first thing you thought to do was to start to ban free speech and require driver's licenses in order to stop citizens from calling you out on your bull.
Well, it's not gonna work.
Speaker 1: Mister Porter, I'm
Speaker 0: gonna stop. I'm gonna stop
Speaker 1: you right there.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. There is nothing disruptive about the content of my free speech. Do you wanna talk about Cohen versus California? Did you stop my time? You did.
Speaker 1: It is stopped.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna continue. No. It didn't stop. It's still counting. I'm looking at it.
It's two minutes.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you one more chance, and then I'm gonna ask you to sit down.
Speaker 0: For what?
Speaker 1: To abide by our new policy.
Speaker 0: You can't ban specific words. My my particular view of your policies, the fact you got all these kids raped by a transgender person and then you keep pushing transgender stuff on children, is that your policy is completely out of line with America. Now this is a transgender flag, and I would like to show you demonstrably what America and the voters think about the transgender ideology being pushed on children. So that right there is what America thinks of your transgender policy four four three. Most people don't support this garbage.
Literally support chopping off appendages of children and giving them puberty blockers that make them sterile. You're a monster, all of you, the ones that vote for it support this stuff. The board is out of line. The board's policies are out of line. You guys don't know what you're doing.
You're pissing everybody off.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
WEF World Economic Forum Matthew Liao: We can induce 'meat allergy' by using Lone Star Ticks to stop the consumption of meat and “help the planet” https://t.co/C2qmYq0WGb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents two examples. First, he notes that people eat too much meat, and if they reduced meat consumption, it would help the planet. He observes that people are not willing to give up meat; some will be willing, but others lack willpower. He admits personal weakness, saying, “Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way.” He then suggests a thought: we know about intolerances, such as his milk intolerance and others being intolerant to crayfish. He proposes that human engineering could make it the case that people become intolerant to certain kinds of meat, specifically bovine proteins. He points to an analogue in life—the long star tick—where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. He mentions that he can describe the mechanism. He then asserts that this is something that could be done through human engineering. In summary, he suggests that human engineering might address large global problems by altering human tolerances to certain foods, including meat, as a potential solution.
The second example is implied but not elaborated in the transcript beyond the assertion that human engineering could address big world problems by enabling intolerances to particular foods, thereby influencing behavior and environmental impact. The overall argument centers on leveraging biological or engineered intolerances to reduce meat consumption as a means of benefiting the planet, supported by the reference to naturally occurring meat allergy mechanisms such as the long star tick.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll give two examples. So one is that people eat too much meat, right? And if they were to cut down on their consumption on meat, then it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up meat. Some people will be willing to, but other people, they may be willing to, but they have a weakness of will.
They say, Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way. So here's a thought. So it turns out that we know a lot about so we have this intolerance to for example I have milk intolerance and some people are intolerant to crayfish.
So possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. I can sort of describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do through human engineering.
We can kinda possibly address really big world problems through human engineering. Another
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Fraud reported to be happening in Maine as well, using the same tactics as Minnesota, "It's the same thing that we're finding in Minnesota" https://t.co/UzNszVBTMW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elizabeth describes a pattern she’s seeing in Portland, Maine that mirrors what’s been found in Minnesota: the use of zombie offices and large clusters of home health care businesses operating from a single location to defraud Medicaid. She notes that among the businesses registered in the Portland area, of the 20-something identified, about 10 are home health care providers. She cites specific examples, including Prestige Home Care, Bright Star Home Care, Atlanta Community Support, Five Stars Home Health Care, and Prime Home Care LLC, as part of this trend.
Elizabeth emphasizes that this clustering is a tactic previously observed in Minnesota, where the Minnesota House Oversight Committee on Fraud described it as a giant red flag, pointing to large groups of health care providers located in one building as problematic. She points to a particular building in Portland as evidence: inside this building, 22 different home and community-based health care companies are registered, illustrating the concentration of providers within a single address.
Ron Nevins, the building owner, agrees to speak with Elizabeth about what’s inside. He is asked about how many health care companies occupy the space. He responds, “I think I got 10 health care companies, which is probably about half, maybe a little less than half of this building.” He repeatedly references “health care, health care, health care, home health care,” underscoring the focus of the tenants.
Elizabeth probes the legitimacy of these businesses, asking whether they are all legitimate. Ron Nevins replies partially: “Some, yes, but some I highly question.” His comment reflects uncertainty about the fidelity or legality of the operations housed in the building, aligning with the concerns raised by the Minnesota case.
In summary, the reporting highlights a pattern of many home health care providers co-located in a single Portland building, mirroring Minnesota’s findings of clustered health care entities as a potential red flag for Medicaid fraud. The account cites specific companies and notes substantial occupancy by home health care firms, while also acknowledging doubts about the legitimacy of some of these businesses according to the building’s owner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's the same thing that we're finding in Minnesota, just to be completely blunt, Elizabeth, the same tactics being used to defraud Medicaid. In this case, zombie houses, I call zombie offices, I call them, where large clusters of home health care businesses and providers in one location. We saw them in Minnesota, and we're seeing them here. And the business owners and building owners that we speak to here say enough. We're here in Portland, Maine.
We found of the businesses that are registered in here, of the 20 something businesses, 10 of them are home health care businesses. As you can see, Prestige Home Care, Bright Star Home Care, Atlanta Community Support, Five Stars Home Health Care, Prime Home Care LLC. It's a trend we saw in Minnesota, one that the Minnesota House Oversight Committee on Fraud tells News Nation is a giant red flag, large clusters of health care providers in one location. This building right behind me has 22 different home and community based health care companies registered in the building. Inside this Portland office building, owner Ron Nevins agreed to speak with us.
Speaker 1: I think I got 10 health care companies, which is probably about half, maybe a little less than half of this building.
Speaker 0: Health care, health care, health care, home health care. I didn't even know what home health care was. Do you think these businesses are actually legit businesses?
Speaker 1: Some, yes, but some I I highly question.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
RFK Jr. to Sen. Murray: "You've presided here, I think for 32 years... What have you done about the epidemic of chronic disease?" https://t.co/tIdlHUIwZl
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2021, at the beginning of President Biden's administration, he submitted his budget in May. The speaker responds to an accusation, saying, “I appreciate twenty eighth, he submitted his budget,” and notes, “we're a new administration.” With two minutes left, the speaker says he asked for a specific point and mentions presiding for thirty-two years, claiming, “You presided over the destruction of the health of the American people.” He asserts, “Our people are now the sickest people in the world seriously,” and asks, “What have you done about the epidemic of chronic disease?” He repeats the question to the secretary: “Mister secretary What have you done about the epidemic of chronic disease?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator, I wanna point out that in 2021, at the beginning of his administration, president Biden submitted his budget on May you know you know what? You've made an accusation of me. I'm gonna answer it. Okay. I appreciate twenty eighth, he submitted his budget.
So we're our budget we're a new administration. Okay. I you can go ahead. I also wanna point out just two minutes left. I wanna I asked you a specific point out something, senator.
You provide presided here, I think, for thirty two years. You presided over the destruction of the health of the American people. Well, I have Our people are now the sickest people in the world Seriously. Because you have Seriously. Not done your That that is an amazing thing.
About what have you done about the epidemic of chronic disease? Mister secretary What have you done about the epidemic of chronic disease?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
"So, the people running the Department of Energy for Biden’s administration shoveled $93 Billion.. out the door in 76 days." https://t.co/9dHq1Xn5pa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The seventy six day period is the time between when President Trump was elected and President Biden left office. Is that right?
Speaker 1: Correct. During that period, from the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000 went out the door—well over twice as much as in the previous fifteen years. There were funds that went out the door and commitments made from businesses that provided no business plan and no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project...
Speaker 0: So you’re telling me that the Department of Energy, in the seventy six day period, before their boss was going to leave office, gave our loan money to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials?
Speaker 1: Correct. I’ve come in with great concern about how this institution,
Speaker 0: this great American institution has been run and how American taxpayer money has been handled. You’re going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren’t you?
Speaker 1: We’re looking at that, and yes, my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren’t you?
Speaker 0: That’s correct. I am. It’s rare that I’m speechless, but I want to be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for President Biden’s administration shoveled $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when President Trump was elected and President Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right?
Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The seventy six day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that president Trump was elected and president Biden left office. Is that right? That is correct. During that short period of time, seventy six days, how much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy?
Speaker 1: From the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000. Well over twice as much as in the previous fifteen years. There is lots of funds that have gone out the door and commitments that were made from businesses that provided no business plan, no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project
Speaker 0: So you're telling me that the Department of Energy, in the seventy six day period, before their boss was gonna leave office gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials?
Speaker 1: Correct. That's I've I've come in with great concern about how this institution,
Speaker 0: this great American institution has been run and how American taxpayer money has been handled. You're going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren't you?
Speaker 1: We're looking at that, and and, yeah, my my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at
Speaker 0: the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren't you? That's correct. I am it's rare that I'm speechless, But I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving.
Is that right?
Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
I see why they filed for bankruptcy... https://t.co/KYf1u5vqve
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 launches a heated confrontation, telling Speaker 1 to “go suck another dirty dick” and insisting, “I’m not the one or the two.” They call Speaker 1 a “raggedy ass fucking bitch” and declare, “I’m not the one or the two.” Speaker 1 asks, “What you talking about?” and appears confused or surprised, while Speaker 0 repeats the insult, telling Speaker 1 to “Go suck a dick.” Speaker 0 asserts, “I said what I said, and I said what I said,” and adds, “Please text me like you want it.” They emphasize the challenge to Speaker 1, saying, “You tried me two times,” and conclude with, “I want you to do it a third.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go suck another dirty dick. Don't play with me. I'm not play with you. Do not play with me because I'm not the one or the two. One or the You're not the one or the two.
Speaker 1: You know what, honey?
Speaker 0: Let's go. You ain't got sister. No. Ain't gonna do nothing. Name.
I You and your raggedy ass fucking bitch.
Speaker 1: What you talking
Speaker 0: about? Fuck out of here. Go suck a
Speaker 1: dick. Like
Speaker 0: I said, I said what I said, and I said what I said. Please text me like you want it. Go suck another dirty dick. I'm not the one of the two, bitch. You tried me two times.
I want you to do it a third.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Kaitlan Collins on the Charlie Kirk assassination: “We don't have a motive yet. We don't know yet. We're waiting...” Sen. Cruz: “Of course we know. Come on.” https://t.co/pX1Yg0KqSe
Video Transcript AI Summary
The panel debates motive, with "we don't have a motive yet. We don't know yet" and "Law enforcement hasn't laid out a direct motive. They've laid out a lot of evidence here of these messages." They cite "they said that he was a left wing activist who hated Charlie Kirk." "Look. I believe anyone engaged in acts of violence should be prosecuted and go to jail." They claim "There has been an enormous amount, and CNN has been guilty of this, of both sides ism." They argue "It is the left that overwhelmingly celebrates this" and "look at Blue Sky and it is a cesspool of leftist celebrating the murder of of Charlie Kirk." The discussion touches polling: "the polls the vast majority of Democrats believe a Republican and a Trump supporter." "Senator Ted Cruz, thanks for your time tonight."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You said a lot there, and we don't have a motive yet. We don't know yet. We're waiting. Obviously, we've heard what the governor's had to say with the Of course.
Speaker 1: We know. We don't have a
Speaker 2: motive yet. We know. We don't we don't have a motive yet.
Speaker 0: What's happening with Really?
Speaker 1: That's CNN's position. Mean, he just happened to fire the gun in celebration. You you can't tell the motive.
Speaker 0: Senator, that's not what I said. And and I said law enforcement hasn't laid out a direct motive. They've laid out a lot of evidence here of these messages and
Speaker 2: what they said to said that he was
Speaker 1: a left wing activist who hated Charlie Kirk. Pardon?
Speaker 0: Senator, with all due respect, you know exactly what I'm saying. I'm not arguing with you politically. I'm saying that law enforcement has not put a specific motive. You know that there's a difference of what they're putting in a legal argument than what you're talking about. And you're not even we're not even arguing about the facts here
Speaker 1: because said is is false. Senator
Speaker 2: Caitlyn. No.
Speaker 1: Caitlyn. Facts hold on a second. Let me answer your statement because what you said is facts.
Speaker 0: Senator, with all due respect
Speaker 2: Law enforcement. Respect, you're putting a lot of statements Go ahead. That I
Speaker 0: did not say. And I wanna get back to we just laid out the
Speaker 1: facts You you just said law enforcement has not not made out a motive. That is
Speaker 0: objectively to the deputy attorney general.
Speaker 1: That is objectively false.
Speaker 0: They did not set a concrete motive exactly what it was.
Speaker 2: And they went out every be engaged
Speaker 1: in misinformation. Katelyn, answer my question. It's not information
Speaker 2: the polls the vast majority of Democrats believe
Speaker 1: this murderer is
Speaker 2: a Republican and
Speaker 1: a Trump supporter. Have you seen that poll?
Speaker 0: Let me get back to my questions though, senator, because the question here
Speaker 2: You're not gonna answer that question. Are you gonna answer that question about the
Speaker 0: allegations that you'd like to see
Speaker 1: So so you're not gonna
Speaker 0: answer asking the questions here. And the question
Speaker 1: No. We're having conversation. I understand that that that
Speaker 2: you wanna say things where their financing is coming and then you don't actually want also to be able to get it. Laid out.
Speaker 1: Okay. Give give your speech.
Speaker 0: That's not true, senator. I'm asking you a
Speaker 1: question. Go ahead. I I don't know what your question is because we have a delay because you're an influence, so I can't hear what you're saying.
Speaker 0: You said that you believe that left wing groups should be investigated. You wanna know where the financing is coming from for Do you believe that they should also be looking into right wing groups as well, or do you believe it should only be limited to that?
Speaker 1: Look. I believe anyone engaged in acts of violence should be prosecuted and go to jail. But I will say there has been an enormous amount, and CNN has been guilty of this, of of both sides ism. I was saying, gosh, both sides are violent. And understand, yes, there is some violence on both sides, but it is the left that overwhelmingly celebrates this.
It is leftist that have been celebrating. You look at Blue Sky and it is a cesspool of leftist celebrating the murder of of Charlie Kirk. You look at recent polling that shows over 50% of Democrats saying violence against Elon Musk is justified. Violence against Donald Trump is justified. You you you look at Democrats who do things like what Kamala Harris did of giving money and and urging people to give money to bail out violent rioters and Antifa riots.
It is only one side that justifies this violent violence. My view is if you commit acts of violence, you you should be prosecuted. And and and so, yes, we should follow the money. Anyone funding acts of violence, we should
Speaker 0: But go
Speaker 1: this is a left wing problem. Problem.
Speaker 0: How can you argue that it's I think the argument that people have been talking about recently is what's going on with the Charlie Kirk case. I think people have raised that because there have been other acts of political violence as well when it comes to targeting Democrats. I mean, we've seen that with a lawmaker who was killed in Minnesota this summer alongside her husband. We've seen it with the break in at Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 2: But the assassin there was a just Brett Kavanaugh. Maybe the assassin would
Speaker 1: hold on a second. If you're if you're gonna say facts, get you need to get your facts right. The assassin there was not a right wing assassin acting on a political motive. The assassin there was someone who had been an appointee of Tim Waltz, and he was a deranged lunatic. And, yes, there are deranged lunatics who attack people both right and left.
But if you look at murders carried out for political agendas, are overwhelmingly on the left. Whether it is the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the two assassination attempts of Donald Trump, the assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh, over and over and over again, whether it was the congressional suit shooter who came to Washington to the baseball game and said, I wanna find
Speaker 0: congressional base We noted of those instances.
Speaker 2: We noted all of those instances.
Speaker 0: Also noting that there have been others including the Democratic lawmakers who were targeted just a couple of months ago. So I think that is the the point that people have
Speaker 2: made here. It wasn't by Republicans for a political agenda. And by the way,
Speaker 1: that lunatic should be prosecuted and go to jail. So what I'm not doing is what leftists are doing. Leftists are celebrating that murder. I think the murder in Minnesota was horrible. It was horrible, and that and that that violent criminal should be prosecuted and going to jail.
You would have a point if I said, gosh, let's set up a bail fund for that murderer, then you'd have a point. But but it's only one side that is doing that. Do you agree that on blue sky, there are thousands of leftists celebrating and reveling in the murder of Charlie Kirk? Okay.
Speaker 0: Senator, I don't think that anyone should celebrate
Speaker 1: someone's murder
Speaker 0: regardless of what that person believed in their honor. And I don't think Blue Sky is representative of how people feel. If you celebrate it, I think that's wrong, and I think that's wrong.
Speaker 1: It's only left wingers are on it.
Speaker 0: Senator Ted Cruz, thanks for your time tonight.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
I'd say Stephen King should be ashamed of himself, but what's the point? https://t.co/fkTg1Mmxzk
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
“Christian minister here, Charlie Kirk is not a martyr for Christ” “He preached antisemitism, Islamophobia, racism, misogyny and homophobia.” https://t.co/qqStT49dkJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk is not a martyr for Christ, despite the claims on social media this week from the right. Kirk preached hatred and division as a white Christian nationalist, which contradicts Jesus' teachings. He preached anti Semitism, Islamophobia, racism, misogyny and homophobia. Jesus said that the greatest commandment was to love. Kirk preached that empathy was weakness, and that gun deaths are the cost of freedom. His death is tragic. But the media should stop betraying him as a man of peace just following Jesus when he was anything but. White Christian nationalism is a false gospel rooted in white supremacy. This week's violence was horrific and has been rightfully condemned. But that violence should not be used today to normalize, even celebrate the hatred that white Christian nationalism embodies. All of us need to commit ourselves to non violence. Anything else is incompatible with democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christian minister here. Charlie Kirk is not a martyr for Christ, despite the claims on social media this week from the right. While we condemn his murder and the gun violence that led to it, we must also reject Maga's efforts to betray him something he was not. Kirk preached hatred and division as a white Christian nationalist, which contradicts Jesus' teachings. He preached anti Semitism, Islamophobia, racism, misogyny and homophobia.
Jesus said that the greatest commandment was to love. Kirk preached that empathy was weakness, and that gun deaths are the cost of freedom. His death is tragic. And I'm thankful that the shooter has been apprehended. But the media should stop betraying him as a man of peace just following Jesus when he was anything but.
And yes, it dishonors The United States to award a white Christian nationalist the presidential medal of freedom, as Donald Trump has promised. White Christian nationalism is a false gospel rooted in white supremacy. This week's violence was horrific and has been rightfully condemned. But that violence should not be used today to normalize, even celebrate the hatred that white Christian nationalism embodies. All of us need to commit ourselves to non violence.
Anything else is incompatible with democracy. May God bless our country. May God bless all of you, and may God bless the world. Peace be with you.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
MSNBC anchor calls Charlie Kirk “divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod. What ever term you want to use” AFTER he’s been shot. She should be ashamed of herself. So disgusting. https://t.co/nqOJIS6Y4o
Video Transcript AI Summary
Coverage of the Utah Valley University shooting shows footage of people running away in aftermath. The FBI director, Kash Patel, has weighed in on this. He just tweeted the following: 'We're closely monitoring reports of the tragic shooting involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the response and the investigation.' Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod, whatever term you wanna use. Why? Speaker 1: 'Well, he's one of MAGA's most prominent voices online.' He hosts a near daily podcast and opines on almost everything. He's been closely aligned with the president since his initial run for office in 2015, 2016, and his ties to Trump really elevated his own brand. His group has brought in tons of tons of money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're showing, by the way, our affiliate in Utah and the aftermath of the shooting. You could see people running away pretty quickly as as you would imagine they would do gunshots. The FBI director, Kash Patel, has weighed in on this. He just tweeted the following.
We're closely monitoring reports of the tragic shooting involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the ongoing response and the investigation. Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod, whatever term you wanna use. Why?
Speaker 1: Well, he's one of MAGA's most prominent voices online. He hosts a near daily podcast. He opines on almost everything. He's been very closely aligned with the president since his initial run for office in 2015, 2016, and his ties to Trump really elevated his own brand. He was really quite young as an activist when the president launched his initial campaign, and he has kind of ridden along with MAGA since 2016 and built up a massive massive brand of his own.
His his group has brought in tons and tons of money.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
What do you think? https://t.co/VLQ2On3PVs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Oscar Moon from the OPP informs Daniel (Speaker 1) about his behavior at town council meetings. He says there was yelling, name-calling, and swearing on the streets, and that behavior is not appropriate. He notes 'There is a section in the criminal code called cause disturbance' for yelling and swearing in public that disturbs people. He warns Daniel that they 'may issue a trespass letter' and that he might be 'not allowed to be in the town hall' after New Year, and that 'if you went to the front town hall again, you get a trespass charge.' A hospital social worker, Kelsey, offers to chat; a 'mobile crisis worker' accompanies. Daniel says he won't confront or swear; 'I've done that a long time ago.' He agrees to stop yelling at them in the streets and acknowledges '100% understand.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, Daniel. How are you today?
Speaker 1: Good day. How are you?
Speaker 0: Good. My name is Oscar Moon with the OPP obviously.
Speaker 1: Right? Yep.
Speaker 0: Hey. So I'm just here to talk about some of your behavior at the town council meetings and town councilors.
Speaker 1: There was no behavior. It was just letters.
Speaker 0: I'm just gonna let you know. So past behaviors, what I've heard is when you see the councilors on the streets in particular, you sometimes yell at them, call the names, and swear is what I've been told? Nope. K. That's fine if you're denying.
It's all good. I just wanna let you know that that behavior is not appropriate.
Speaker 1: I know that.
Speaker 0: There is a section in the criminal code called cause disturbance, which says that when you do things like yelling and screaming in public and swearing and it it disturbs people, that's an offense. So I don't want you to do that anymore.
Speaker 1: Got it. Cool? Yep.
Speaker 0: Cool. The other thing that may happen because they're not particularly fond of your behaviors, they're a little concerned, is they may issue a trespass letter, which would say that you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to pay off. Can I stop for a minute? Sure. After the New Year in the letters, I don't know if you've read the letters at all, we're coming to you people for a fraud investigation.
Speaker 0: Okay. We'll just say that you're not allowed to be in the town hall.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: It would just be like if you went to the front town hall again, you get a trespass charge. Okay? Yep. And these individuals are just here to chat with you because maybe you got a little stress going on. I don't they do.
No. I don't.
Speaker 1: Nothing like that? Okay.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, this this this young lady here is awesome to talk to. I'm just gonna let you have a conversation with her.
Speaker 1: If she if if I don't want her to You don't you don't have
Speaker 0: play out the police
Speaker 1: I'll just introduce myself, and then you can decide if you want to or not. I'm Kelsey with the hospital. I'm a social worker. No. See you.
I ride around with these guys as the the mobile crisis worker. Good for you. So if you want to chat with me at all I know. I'm here to chat with you. I got other people to chat to.
That's perfect. Cool. Glad to have somebody.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Right. So just to be a 100% sure you understand, don't be confronting the
Speaker 1: top That's of the that's why letters were left. That's why I don't leave.
Speaker 0: You know what I'm saying? 100% understand. You're not gonna confront them and swear them and
Speaker 1: swear them. That's there's documentation. There's documentation here. Got no issues with your letters. Everywhere.
Speaker 0: I got no issues with your letters. I just want you to stop yelling at them in streets because that's not appropriate.
Speaker 1: See, see, what they're doing is just trying to cover up their fraud.
Speaker 0: Just stop yelling at yelling at them in the street.
Speaker 1: That will be brought on.
Speaker 0: You're good with that.
Speaker 1: So go back and tell them that, please.
Speaker 0: Are you agreeing to stop yelling at them
Speaker 1: in Sure. I've done that a long time ago.
Speaker 0: Cool. Awesome. Okay. Alright. Have a great day.
Speaker 1: K. Drive safe now. You too. Thank you.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Bill O'Reilly: "Schumer is lying. And I very rarely use that word… He's not looking out for you or me or anybody else. He is a rank propagandist." https://t.co/kVprxWZ8hp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Schumer of lying and being a propagandist, stating this is unusual rhetoric for them. They claim to have no respect for Schumer, alleging he doesn't love the country or look out for anyone. The speaker mentions a past decent relationship and occasional encounters in New York, but now views Schumer as a "rank propagandist."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Schumer's lying, and I very rarely use that word. I usually say he's misleading or he's a propagandist, which he is, but he's just lying. He's just head down reading something that's been written for him by one of his propaganda people. And, you know, I used to have a decent relationship with him, and I run into him from time to time in New York. I have no respect for Charles Schumer.
None. None. He doesn't love this country, in my opinion. He's not looking out for you or me or anybody else. He is a rank propagandist.
And again, I don't use this kind of rhetoric. Alright? I usually can see two sides to this story. You know that. This guy?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Scott Jennings has a message for Democrats: "If I can't trust you not to put a boy in my daughter's locker room, why would I talk to you about taxation policy? Or inflation? Or tariffs? Or anything else?" https://t.co/HPa7WGhKx5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats have dug themselves into the deepest hole in their party's history due to the Biden presidency and alleged lies about Biden's condition and the inflationary impacts of his policies. The speaker asserts that the Democratic Party is choosing to "die on" culturally radical hills, such as boys and girls sports, paying for transgender surgeries of inmates (which Kamala Harris allegedly supported), and the case of a Maryland man deported to his home country. Because of these issues, the speaker suggests the Democratic Party's approval rating will continue to decline. The speaker states that if he can't trust Democrats not to put a boy in his daughter's locker room, he won't trust them on issues like taxation, inflation, or tariffs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democrats, because of the Biden presidency, because they lied about Joe Biden's condition, because they lied to the country about the inflationary impacts of his policies, have dug themselves the deepest hole they've ever been in in the history of their party. That's number one. Number two, cultural radicalism. I mean, when when the hills you're willing to die on are boys and girls sports, paying for transgender surgeries of inmates, which Kamala Harris had in the last election. When you're willing to die on these hills, when you're willing to go and say Maryland man, unfairly deported back to his home country.
I mean, when you're willing to die on all these eighty, twenty hills, eventually, approval rating will wind up, I'm no mathematician, but around 20. Yeah. Exactly. They're getting there. And so this hole they've dug themselves in like, if I can't trust you not to put a boy in my daughter's locker room, why would I talk to you about taxation policy or inflation or tariffs or anything else?
You're trying to put a boy in my girl's locker room. That's right. Why?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Steve Scalise: “If you're disabled on Medicaid right now, you've been crowded out by able-bodied people sitting at home playing video games.” https://t.co/cEwGxZtDVN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that disabled individuals on Medicaid have been negatively impacted by able-bodied people, specifically 35-year-olds who are choosing not to work and instead play video games. The speaker claims these individuals are crowding out the truly needy from receiving Medicaid benefits. The speaker states that these able-bodied individuals will now be required to get a job. The speaker believes this change is beneficial for them, as their families likely disapprove of their current lifestyle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before. If you're disabled on Medicaid right now, you've been crowded out of those programs by people turning down work. Able-bodied people, 35 year olds sitting at home playing video games. They're gonna now have to go get a job. That's right.
And by way, that's a good thing for them. Their mom doesn't want them sitting in the basement playing video games anyway. But now it no longer will be crowding out Medicaid for the truly needy people who deserve it.
reSee.it AI Summary
Gavin Newsom criticized Donald Trump, stating he "vandalized our progress and programs" and "broke the law" during his presidency. In response, another user shared a link, presumably related to the conversation.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Gavin Newsom: "We know what happened the last time Donald Trump was president. He vandalized our progress. He vandalized our programs. He broke the law." https://t.co/vodoVbnaOW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The special session focuses on litigation preparation, not a theoretical exercise, regarding potential actions by Donald Trump, who previously vandalized programs and broke the law. The aim is to avoid being caught off guard and to prepare for January 20 with a new legislature.
The previous litigation strategy was reactive, responding to assaults. The governor hopes to avoid lawsuits but acknowledges past instances where Trump took high-speed rail money and crime grants while attempting to undo progress.
The governor believes Trump intends to repeat such actions, evidenced by his agency appointments. The focus remains on communities, but the state aims to protect its values and billions of dollars at stake in the Central Valley.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As it relates to the special session, that's a special session to focus on litigation preparation as it relates to the reality. It's not an it's not a theoretical exercise. We know what happened the last time Donald Trump was president. He vandalized our progress. He vandalized our programs.
He broke the law. Courts adjudicated that. It's not an assertion. He did certain things that were unwound at the agency level, that attacked this state, and so we are preparing for that. That's that was the whole point is the whole point of the special session.
We're not gonna be caught flat footed, and we wanna be prepared, as early as January 20, and that's why the special session is important. We also have a brand new legislature coming in. A lot of new people, and this will be an opportunity to engage and convene, talk about the previous 22 lawsuits. Again, we reacted to the assault. Wasn't a proactive litigation strategy.
It was a reactive strategy. I hope there's not one lawsuit with Trump administration. As I said, open hand, not a closed fist. No governor in California worked more closely. No governor in the country, I would argue.
Democrat worked more closely. Democratic governor with Donald Trump than I did during COVID. Same time, he took a million billion dollars your high speed rail money. Same time, he tried to take your crime grants. At the same time, he tried to vandalize most of the progress the last half century as we were getting along.
So, no one's naive. I've been there. We have the receipts. We know exactly what he intends to do. He's been very honest about that and there's nothing to suggest the last two weeks that he's not even more hell bent on doing it.
Look at the folks one less today that, he's lining up to run these agencies, and, that's why it's very important we're doing the work we're doing today, putting our head down, not focusing on Trump, focusing on you, focusing on communities like this. At the same time, we wanna protect our state and protect our values, billions and billions of dollars of your money in the Central Valley at stake if we roll over and we play naive and nice.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
14-year old carjacks family in front of their home, gets bond set at $1.7M after his parents turned him https://t.co/15DDiaI60K
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Nancy Mace: "They didn’t want due process on their way in illegally, they shouldn’t get due process on their way out." https://t.co/rUXR7qChoX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judge Brian Murphy blocked the Trump administration's deportation of eight illegal immigrants convicted of murder, pedophilia, and sexual abuse, arguing they deserve due process. The immigrants are currently in Djibouti awaiting adjudication.
One speaker argues that these individuals did not want due process when entering the country illegally, so they shouldn't get it upon deportation. They should be deported immediately, especially murderers, pedophiles, and rapists, which is what Donald Trump is doing.
The speaker believes Judge Murphy cannot override Trump's agenda to keep America safe. Trump should deport these criminals quickly to protect women and children. Some countries release violent criminals into the U.S., which is a national security problem. The U.S. has the right to stand up for its freedoms, liberty, and national security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have the judge, Brian Murphy, who has blocked the Trump administration's deportation of eight illegal immigrants, not just eight illegal immigrants, those who have been convicted of murder, pedophilia, sexual abuse, essentially saying that these folks deserve due process. Now this plane of illegal immigrants landed in Djibouti, and they are now there until this is adjudicated. What what do you make of this judge's decision, and what do you have to say to those who say that even the worst of the worst deserve due process?
Speaker 1: Well, they didn't get due process. They didn't want due process on their way in illegally. They shouldn't get due process on their way out. They need to be deported immediately, particularly the murderers, the pedophiles, the child molesters, the rapists. They gotta go first, that's what Donald Trump is doing.
But guess what? Judge Brian Murphy, he's not secretary of state. He's not the president of The United States. He's not God. He does not get to override Donald Trump and his agenda to keep America safe.
And so I I hope that Donald Trump will keep deporting those murderers and rapists and do it as quick as he can because we need to keep women and kids safe in our country. And these illegals who are here. And what I understand is some of these countries just open up their prisons and let these these violent criminals come walk right into The United States Of America. It's wrong. And we have the right to stand up for ourselves, our freedoms, our liberty, and our national security.
Speaker 0: At
Speaker 1: this point, it's a national security problem.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Is Carney coming for X? "Large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, antisemitism, islamophobia and hate in all its forms... My government will act." https://t.co/ForGCCJ5WH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Large American online platforms are full of racism, misogyny, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and hate. Criminals are using them to harm children. The government will act with a plan to fight crime, protect Canadians, and build safe, secure, and strong communities. The plan aims to make Canada secure and strong.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and hate in all its forms. And they're being used by criminals to harm our children. My government will act. And today, we're announcing our plan to fight crime, to protect Canadians, and to build communities that are safe, secure, and strong. A plan to make Canada secure, to make Canada strong.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This would be canceled today. https://t.co/Esmv9BqohZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 chants "2, 4, 6, 8. Go fun of our way," twice.
Speaker 1 says someone will fall through the floor and accuses "the no ma'am guy" of sending them. He suggests someone was supposed to jump out of a cake but ate it.
Speaker 0 claims they are activists.
Speaker 1 retorts they are not active enough.
Speaker 0 says they marched yesterday.
Speaker 1 asks if it was "the million pound march" or "Hams across America."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2, 4, 6, 8. Go fun of our way. 2, 4, 6, 8. Go make fun of our way.
Speaker 1: 1, 2, 3, 4. You're gonna fall through the floor. Okay. I get it. The no ma'am guy sent you guys over here, didn't they?
It's the birthday gag. One of you supposed to jump out of a cake, but you ate it on the way over.
Speaker 0: Bundy, we are activists.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'd say not quite active enough.
Speaker 0: It so happens we marched yesterday, shoo shmuck.
Speaker 1: What? The million pound march? What? What? Hams across America?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
JD Vance on Biden's cancer diagnosis: "We really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job... I don't think that he was in good enough health. In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him." https://t.co/4PiuMYyHGf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wishes the former president well but questions his past capability to do the job, regardless of policy disagreements. The speaker believes the former president was not in good enough health and faults his staff for not providing the American people with a better sense of his health picture. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the role, especially concerning the nuclear arsenal. The speaker suggests that if someone is not in good enough health, they shouldn't be in the job.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaking of Joe Biden, Sir, do you have any thoughts on his diagnosis? Yeah, look, I mean, first of all, of course we wish the best for the former president's health. And you know, it sounds pretty serious, but but hopefully he makes the right recovery. Like, I I I will say, whether the right time to have this conversation is now or at some point in the future, we really do need to be honest about whether the former president was capable of doing the job. And that's that's no you know, that that that you can separate the desire for him to have the right health outcome with the recognition that whether it was doctors or whether there were staffers around the former president, I don't think he was able to do a good job for the American people.
And that's not politics. That's not because I disagreed with him on policy. That's because I don't think that he was in good enough health. In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him. And why did the American people have a better sense of his health picture?
Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with? This is serious stuff. And this is a guy who carries around the nuclear football for the world's largest nuclear arsenal. This is not child's play, and we can pray for good health, but also recognize that if you're not in good enough health to do the job you shouldn't be doing the job. Okay.
Guys. Have a safe trip. See you. You too.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
"The three most dead cities in the USA everyone is fleeing." https://t.co/s4lkIaJc9i
Video Transcript AI Summary
St. Louis, Missouri, is reportedly the third fastest shrinking city in the USA, having lost over 77,000 residents in ten years. It has a violent incident rate of 87 per 100,000 people, and over 25% of homes are abandoned.
Detroit, Michigan, is second, having decreased from 1,850,000 to 620,000 residents. The city contains over 70,000 abandoned buildings, and 50% of adults struggle with basic reading.
Gary, Indiana, is reportedly number one, having fallen from 178,000 to under 66,000 residents. Over 30% of the city is abandoned, and in 2024, real estate surveys allegedly found more stray animals than children in some areas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The three most dead cities in The USA everyone is fleeing. Number three, St. Louis, Missouri. St. Louis lost over 77,000 residents in just ten years, becoming America's fastest shrinking city.
It has a violent incident rate of 87 per 100,000 people, over 15 times the national average. Over 25% of homes sit abandoned, and some neighborhoods look like entire zombie movie sets. There are parts so empty that in a 2023 survey, less than one person per acre was recorded living there. Number two, Detroit, Michigan. Detroit crashed from 1,850,000 people to just 620,000, wiping out two thirds of its population like a ghost wave.
The city has over 70,000 abandoned buildings, So many that experts say it would take forty years to tear them all down. Fifty percent of adults struggle with basic reading, and the car insurance costs here are so extreme, the average bill is higher than some monthly rents. In some areas, homes for $1 still sit untouched for years, overtaken by trees and wild animals. Number one, Gary, Indiana. Gary fell from 178,000 residents to under 66,000, losing more people than entire small countries.
Today, over 30 of the city is abandoned wasteland, with schools, malls, and even entire neighborhoods left frozen in time. In 2024, real estate surveys found more stray animals than children living in some areas. What do you think is the main cause of this issue? Let us know in the comments.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Oh my God, imagine this is your grandchild… that poor guy. I want to believe this is scripted, cause wtf did I just watch? https://t.co/E8NpcrSEHE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions Frank, age 82, a Republican voter, about his political choices and their impact. The speaker believes that voting Republican enables fascism and exploits people, particularly through the two-party system which they say ran on anti-immigration, pro-genocide, pro-gun, pro-fracking, and anti-trans campaigns in 2024.
The speaker argues that political actions have personal consequences and that continuing a relationship without changed behavior would enable harmful ideologies. They express frustration that they have had to educate Frank on issues like racism and the impact of his political views.
They highlight the exploitation inherent in capitalism, citing examples like American-Israeli bombs harming Palestinian children and corporations exploiting the Congolese. They criticize the support of a system where the 1% profits while others struggle, and express the need for change, urging Frank to reconsider his beliefs and show unconditional love through his actions. They say that his politics should reflect his love for them, and that voting against their basic human rights is not unconditional love.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, where are you gonna put this on?
Speaker 1: Just TikTok.
Speaker 0: TikTok. Don't
Speaker 1: want you to think that this is a debate in any type of way. Like, I just wanna ask you questions, and I want you to answer though.
Speaker 0: I can just say my first name, Frank.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And age.
Speaker 0: 82.
Speaker 1: What party have you historically voted for in your life?
Speaker 0: Republican.
Speaker 1: Do you know what I would label myself politically?
Speaker 0: Well, I would tend to think that you're neither because neither one is doing the right thing.
Speaker 1: Did you vote this year, 02/2024? Yeah. Who did you vote
Speaker 0: for? Trump.
Speaker 1: So now going back to that because I had a feeling that was going to be the answer. Why do you think you can vote away my basic human rights and expect a relationship with me?
Speaker 0: Well, I don't think the Democrats have the answers. I don't either. K. The big the the biggest problem that I see with the Democrats, they throw money at things to solve the problem, and they don't and they really don't want to solve the problem. The black problem, Ronald Reagan, I think.
Speaker 1: So I'm trying not to interject, but can we maybe just simplify it to that the way you vote is because you just don't agree with the Democratic party, so you're voting against the Democratic party. Can we simplify it to that? Okay. Can you see, after all of these questions and having this talk with me, if I continue to have a relationship with you without absolutely any change in your behavior, how I would be enabling fascism?
Speaker 0: Let me turn it around to you. I've been honest to what I believe. Mhmm. How do you feel if I said, well, if you can't change the way you believe to match my needs, how can I respect you? Shouldn't we both have shouldn't we both look at ourselves and change what we can?
Speaker 1: K. K. So now I have asked you all of the questions that I have. I have a summary here that, honestly, what you're asking me, I answer. So I am going to ask you not to interrupt me because I tried really hard not to interrupt you unless I needed to clarify something or anything like that.
Now that I've asked my questions and I've allowed you to speak, it's my turn to speak and read my summary, and I ask you to not interrupt. The series of questions was created to underline the interconnectedness of our personal and political lives. That's what I was trying to do. We cannot put politics to the side. The American empire was built off black and indigenous slavery and genocide.
It doesn't matter red or blue. Our two party system is built off the exploitation of the people. The ratchet will continue. Both Democrats and Republicans this election season ran off a campaign that was anti immigration, pro genocide, pro gun, pro fracking, and anti trans. Those were the campaigns that both parties ran off in 02/2024.
Our system is not here to save us. It is here to exploit us. Capitalism is a cycle of exploitation. You are either getting exploited or you are exploiting others. If I allow somebody in my life that supports these ideologies, I just enable them.
I spent years educating you. If you truly unconditionally loved me, your politics would reflect that. You wouldn't have spent the majority of your life voting my rights away. That is not unconditional love. I will always be the child in this situation, and you will always be the adult with many years on me.
Allowing a relationship with you would allow you to believe that there are no consequences for the way that you vote. Again, this is not a debate. These are my boundaries. Under Biden and and state governed by walls, you saw the system deem me disposable. I wasn't allowed any cash assistance.
I wasn't allowed disability. They didn't care about any of my mental or physical fifteen plus diagnosed disabilities. After that, I was forced to rely on mutual aid, which is an anti capitalist ideology. Mutual aid you gave me. Mutual aid I survived off of.
Now I watch the ratchet continue as immigrants and even legal American citizens are deported, kept in concentration camps, and are dehumanized. I see it every day on my phone, and it hasn't stopped. And it never started under the Trump administration. No amount of American propaganda could brainwash me into supporting either of its systems. I cannot unsee everything I have seen.
I've seen American Israeli bombs mutilate Palestinian children. I've watched corporations like Apple kill the Congolese for resources. Of course, this country is run by fascists and upheld by fascists. We, the people, have been bystanding and enabling for hundreds of years. Democrats think they can marry Republicans and vote democratic as their one revolutionary act, but it's not revolutionary.
It's enabling fascism. We have fascism in this country because we allow fascism in our homes. We allow it in our communities, not only the people we allow to, like, take political power, but the people in our own lives. Your politics have real world consequences. Your inability to see my point of view of to change, your change is necessary.
I shouldn't have had to educate you on why saying the n word is racist or how blaming black people for slavery is racist. I shouldn't have had to explain why I should have been gifted a diverse collection of dolls my entire life. I shouldn't have had to point out how you saying you failed me growing up is not changed behavior. How are you helping or protecting my younger sibling from the same abuse growing up? Are you educating her?
Are you doing anything differently that you did with me? Or are you just doing like what you did with me, and you're trying to buy her way through life? To avoid doing any of the real personal work. You cannot go to church and ask God for forgiveness. I'm the real person.
You negatively affected, and I don't forgive you. Not until your actions change, until you are really ready to hear me when I say that my politics and my political life are completely intertwined. You can't vote away my basic human rights and expect a relationship with me. You just can't, grandpa. I shouldn't have to sit here and list off all of the awful things Trump has done since he's got in office.
I shouldn't have to. It's my basic human rights that should horrify you at its core. You should care about me and how I feel and our relationship more than you should care about the fucking economy. Because, again, you know it's a made up system that we made up, and it doesn't need to be here. We don't need to exploit people.
The 1% doesn't need to keep making more money while I have none. That's not how this works, grandpa. It's just not. Not when everything we could ever need in the entire world is breaking the fucking ground while the 1% is putting prices on shit that is free from the fucking ground. I don't get it.
I don't understand your support of the system. I don't understand how you cannot see that your support of the system affects our relationship. My county has already called me and told me that my EBT and my health care under Trump are now, like, being attacked, and I have to fight for my fucking rights. Doesn't matter, grandpa, democratic or republican. We are drowning as a society.
Fucking drowning. And we don't give a shit about each other. We think we can just go vote, and that's revolutionary, and it's not. What's revolutionary is how you show up for people. You are a villager, so I don't understand why you're not getting this.
Like, you know what it is to be a community member. You know what it is. Like, you understand. We've had talks. I know you get it.
You have to change. I don't care how old you are. Like, I don't care. I seriously don't care. You could be a hundred years old, and I'd still sit down and have this conversation with you.
And I'm having this conversation with you because I care. If I didn't give a fuck about you, I could've just blocked your number and never talked to you again, honestly, just like I did mom. Like, I am asking you to do better and show that you actually unfinitionally love me like you say you do because the way you vote doesn't. And I know this is a hard pill for you to swallow. I know it is.
This is the reality that we live in. I am asking you to unwire years of propaganda that has been taught to you. And I know that's not easy, but if you loved me, you would. You'd hear me. You would really hear me when I say even Palestine in Israel, as simple as that, you would understand what I'm saying.
Because when it comes to Palestine and Israel, you can't support Israel and support Palestine in the same breath because Israel is being given resources by us, our American tax dollars, that Palestine is not being given. Israel has an iron dome. Do you know what that is? Protects you from any bombs. So any bomb Palestine's sending to Israel, it's not hitting Israel.
It's being deflected by the fucking iron dome that's being funded by us. It's not a fair fight. It's not a fair fight at all. Israel has one of the best militaries in the entire world. And because of their religion, they're colonizing, and they're ethnically cleansing people.
And I see it every day. I mutilize children, grandpa. That should mean something to you. That should horrify you at your core that no matter who's in charge, it doesn't matter. Biden it doesn't matter that children are getting fucking bombed.
Like, that should horrify you at its core, and that should be enough for you to be an anti capitalist in my opinion. It really should. Like, it really should. That's what did it for me, And it did it to me as a kid when mom looked me in the eyes and told me that she would give up her parental rights to go kill Arabs because she views Arabs as terrorists, not as human beings. And that is how she views them.
And, again, that's why I can't talk to mom because she can't look in the mirror and realize that shit she's doing is wrong, but I think you can. I really do. I think you're capable of doing better no how no matter how old you are. And I don't think it's fair that I'm alone because you all believe in these things, these hateful ideologies. I don't think it's fair.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
How does a person get to this point? https://t.co/xCRqmqM2z5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why someone didn't receive a ticket for not using a turn signal. The speaker offers to help someone talk to someone else and asks to call an ambulance. The speaker then yells "All of you stupid, fat fucking white privilege, brother," and states, "You can't take me money."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why the fuck doesn't he get a ticket? I can help you talk to somebody. Didn't use his turn signal. Can I please call you to ambulance? Can I talk with you?
All of you stupid, fat fucking white privilege, brother. Okay. You can't take me money, Okay.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Maine State Rep says her priority is Somalia: "We Somalis living outside of Somalia must always prioritize our country, Somalia" Who elected this person? https://t.co/6YGj9sKLVG
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Did she just call COVID the "Fauci virus" in front of Fauci 😭 https://t.co/7CNNfGjLnd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Anthony Fauci is a household name in the United States, with every American citizen knowing who he is and holding a clear opinion about him. His opponents are calling COVID the Fauci virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anthony Fauci, who is a household name here in The United States, every single American citizen at this point not only knows who Tony Fauci is, but has a decidedly clear opinion. So much so that his opponents are now calling COVID the Fauci virus. And Jennifer Dodd Hello darkness my old friend. I've come to talk with you again.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This is the first time I’m seeing this. Chuck is a fan. https://t.co/YpiOvlwxmj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was born in Brooklyn, the same place where Donald Trump's family comes from. The speaker says his grandfather and Trump's father were builders together in Brooklyn. The speaker knew Trump was going to go places even when Trump was younger. The speaker states that Senator Schumer and Trump are good friends. The speaker believes they both have a passion for life and that Trump cares about what he does.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was born in Brooklyn, the same place where Donald Trump's family comes from. His father and my grandfather were builders together in Brooklyn. Really? Oh. Yeah.
Even when he was much younger, you knew that he was gonna go places, so it's not Senator Schumer and and mister Trump are good friends. They both have a passion for life, and you get that immediately talking to him that he actually cares about what he does.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This is on point! https://t.co/wol8RR4oZe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions the legitimacy of government spending, implying items like hammers and toilet seats don't actually cost $20,000 and $30,000 respectively. Speaker 1 objects to this line of questioning, stating it is devastating to their case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do you get funding for something like this? You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?
Speaker 1: Your honor, I object.
Speaker 0: And why is that, mister Reed?
Speaker 1: Because it's devastating to my case.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Elon Musk: “The fraud is overwhelmingly on the left. These NGOs are almost all left wing NGOs that are being funded. They hate me because DOGE is being effective” This is why they’re so mad, no more leaching off taxpayers. https://t.co/gllFs30Fvx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge is effective at eliminating waste and fraud, which overwhelmingly originates from left-wing NGOs. These NGOs are funded and exploit loopholes, but Doge is preventing them from taking advantage.
The biggest concern is that Doge will stop fraudulent entitlement payments, including Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, disability, Small Business Administration loans, from going to illegals. This is the core reason why people are against Doge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If those was ineffective, if we were not actually getting rid of a bunch of waste and fraud and a bunch of that fraud I mean, the fraud risk we're seeing is over overwhelmingly on the the on the left. Mhmm. I mean, it's it's there's it's not zero on the right, but these NGOs are almost all left wing NGOs that are being funded, for example. Yep. So they they hate me because Doge is being effective, And Doge is getting rid of a lot of waste before that they were that people on the left were taking advantage of.
That that's that's that's where it comes out to. And and the the the single biggest thing that they're that they're worried about is that Doge is is gonna turn off fraudulent payments of entitlements. I mean, everything from Social Security, Medicare, you know, unemployment, disability, swampers, administration loans, turn them off to illegals. This is the crux of the matter. Yep.
Okay. This is this is the this is the thing that why why they really hit my guts and want me to die.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
“Powell says he won’t leave even if you ask him to.” Trump: “Oh, he’ll leave. If I ask him to, he’ll be out of there real fast.” https://t.co/tWuJsl2VMC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 stated that Jerome Powell is too late and slow, and that he is not happy with him. Speaker 1 claims he has let Powell know this. Speaker 1 believes that if he wanted Powell out, Powell would be out of his position very fast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On Jerome Powell, you said that the termination of Jerome Powell cannot come fast enough. He says he won't leave it even if you ask him to.
Speaker 1: Oh, he'll leave. If I ask him to, he'll be out of there. But Do you believe he's think he's I don't think he
Speaker 0: try to do that?
Speaker 1: I don't think he's doing the job. He's too late, always too late, a little slow, and I'm not happy with him. I let him know it. And if I want him out, he'll be out of there real fast. Believe me.
Are
Speaker 0: you trying to do that?
Speaker 1: Go ahead, please. Question.
Speaker 0: Are you trying to reach him, mister president?
Speaker 1: Do you have a question? Mister president, yesterday, judge Bozeman
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Man is arrested for using the word sh*t in the UK. The UK is so cooked. https://t.co/8Q8QFW0RWu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims they are allowed to swear as part of their dialect if it's an expressive matter, citing Lord Justice Bean and freedom of expression. They acknowledge not being allowed to swear in an abusive or threatening manner, or use language that may cause alarm, harassment, or distress. The speaker is then arrested for a public order offense. The arresting officer states they don't have to say anything but may give an inevitable. The speaker asks what public was around at that point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Because you're trapped. You're trapped in shit. Are you mate, swear again. You'll get nicked.
I'm not allowed to swear in abusive or threatening manner. I'm allowed to use swear words as part of my dialect if it's an expressive matter. Talk to lord justice Bean about it. He's already ruled about it in the high court. I know section five.
I know section four around four a. Okay. He looks great. I can swear as part of my general vernacular because it's expressive language, and it's protected under freedom of expression. I'm not allowed to swear at people.
I'm not allowed to use language that may cause alarm harassment or distress, which would be using it in a threatening or abusive manner. Even if that's towards you, but there's somebody offended. I get that. Got anything better to do than try and get into an argument? I wasn't trying to get into an argument.
You won't let me explain my point. No. Because you're chatting shit. Right. Under arrest.
Public order. Under arrest. Yeah. Yeah. You're under arrest for public order offense.
Okay? So you don't have to say anything that may harm your defense. We don't mention one question. What public what public was around at that point? You do say maybe give an inevitable.
Okay?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
This is the first time I’m seeing this. Chuck is a fan. https://t.co/YpiOvlwxmj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was born in Brooklyn, the same place where Donald Trump's family comes from. The speaker says his grandfather and Trump's father were builders together in Brooklyn. The speaker knew Trump was going to go places even when Trump was younger. The speaker states that Senator Schumer and Trump are good friends. The speaker believes they both have a passion for life and that Trump cares about what he does.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was born in Brooklyn, the same place where Donald Trump's family comes from. His father and my grandfather were builders together in Brooklyn. Really? Oh. Yeah.
Even when he was much younger, you knew that he was gonna go places, so it's not Senator Schumer and and mister Trump are good friends. They both have a passion for life, and you get that immediately talking to him that he actually cares about what he does.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Seems like people are getting tired of these things happening. https://t.co/7hfG73mN1h
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 confronts someone, accusing them of stealing and threatening to call the cops. Speaker 1 questions what Speaker 0 is going to do. Speaker 0 says that the person and their "buddies" can't steal. Both speakers state that the other can't touch them. Speaker 0 threatens to burn the other person's socks and suit. Speaker 1 tells Speaker 0 to stop and threatens to sue, claiming Speaker 0 is putting hands on them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're gonna pay for that stuff there, buddy? Call the cops. Call the cops. What
Speaker 1: are you gonna do? What are you gonna do?
Speaker 0: Relax. Can't do this. Yeah. You can't steal you and your buddies, buddy. You can't touch me, bro.
I can't I ain't touching you. I ain't touching you. You can't touch me. You've been touched. You can't touch me.
You can't touch me. I'm burning your socks on this. Suit. Stop. I'm gonna put the speaker.
Stop, bro. Yeah. You're gonna sue me? Yes, bro. You're putting hands on me, sir.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan expressed surprise at inbreeding statistics among immigrants in the UK. In response, a participant highlighted concerns about continuous inbreeding, particularly first cousins marrying. They explained that such unions increase the risk of genetic disorders due to shared DNA, with a 1.7-2.8% higher chance of congenital anomalies compared to unrelated couples. The risk varies based on family history and the prevalence of recessive traits. They noted that genetic counseling and testing can help manage these risks, which are culturally accepted in some communities but restricted in others.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Joe Rogan stunned by the inbreeding statistics among immigrants in the UK. https://t.co/RPIVB94N1d
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers claim inbreeding is a major problem, especially among Pakistani immigrants in Britain, where 70% are allegedly inbred. In Turkey, the figure is said to be 25-30%, and nearly half the Arab world is allegedly inbred.
A BBC investigation purportedly found that 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain marry first cousins. Although British Pakistanis account for 3.4% of births in Britain, they account for 30% of British children with recessive disorders and have a higher infant mortality rate. A Labour MP has allegedly called for a ban on first-cousin marriage. Medical evidence purportedly shows inbreeding doubles the risk of stillbirths.
The speakers claim symptoms of inbreeding include irrational rage. Research purportedly shows that children from cousin marriages face a 400% increased risk of having an IQ lower than 70, and that intelligence goes down 10 to 16 IQ points. The speakers suggest this information is suppressed due to fear of being labeled Islamophobic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think a part of it was inbreeding. This is your own theory. No. No. No.
Look at someone else's inbreeding. Major major problem. Never heard this before. Especially with immigrants in Britain like the Pakistanis in London, they'll have all kinds of serious inbreeding problems because that's an even smaller sample size you're dealing with.
Speaker 1: Strap yourself in for this. 70% of all Pakistanis are inbred. And in Turkey, the amount is between 25 to 30%. More stillbirths among immigrants, a rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred. A large percentage of the parents said, this is blowing my mind.
So listen to the BBC investigation in Britain Several Years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin. Holy shit. BBC's research also discovered that while British Pakistanis account for just three point four four percent of all births in Britain, they accounted for thirty percent of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality. What in the fuck? Labor party MP has called for a ban on first cousin marriage.
Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a one hundred percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. Wow. That is insane.
Speaker 0: I also read somewhere that's a lot of the symptoms of inbred people are irrational rage Put that up in attitudes. And they end up just describing ISIS.
Speaker 1: Look at what it says here that with the the IQ points. It says findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one parents or cousins if one's parents or cousins' intelligence goes down 10 to 16 IQ points, The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, criterion for being retarded in quotes. Are they using that word? Mhmm.
Increases four hundred percent among children from cousin marriages. Let me say that again. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 increases four hundred percent amongst children from cousin marriages. Jesus Christ.
Speaker 0: And why don't we know this? Because
Speaker 1: people don't like the truth. Islamophobia. Don't like being called Islamophobic by even discussing it. Like, we're gonna be called Islamophobic for even bringing this up. Information has to
Speaker 0: come out.
Speaker 1: You boom.
@tenn_rich - TennRich (Rich is a state of being, not a name)
FWIW: Here’s what Grok has to say on the subject. The real problem is continuous inbreeding. First cousins marrying and having children increases the risk of certain genetic issues due to shared DNA. Here’s a concise breakdown: Genetic Risks: First cousins share about 12.5% of their DNA, raising the chance of inheriting recessive genetic disorders if both carry the same harmful gene. Studies estimate a 1.7-2.8% higher risk of congenital anomalies or serious genetic conditions in their children compared to unrelated couples (baseline risk ~3-4%). Examples include cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs, or thalassemia, depending on family history. Specific Conditions: The risk depends on the prevalence of recessive traits in the family. If no known genetic disorders exist, the absolute risk remains low but isn’t zero. Other Factors: Repeated consanguineous marriages over generations (e.g., in isolated communities) can amplify risks by concentrating harmful genes. Environmental factors or lack of genetic screening can also influence outcomes. Mitigation: Genetic counseling and testing can identify risks before conception. Prenatal screening may detect issues early. Socially, consanguineous marriage is accepted in some cultures but restricted in others (e.g., illegal in ~30 U.S. states). Risks are manageable with modern medicine, but awareness and testing are key.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Joe Rogan stunned by the inbreeding statistics among immigrants in the UK. https://t.co/RPIVB94N1d
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers claim inbreeding is a major problem, especially among Pakistani immigrants in Britain, where 70% are allegedly inbred. In Turkey, the figure is said to be 25-30%, and nearly half the Arab world is allegedly inbred.
A BBC investigation purportedly found that 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain marry first cousins. Although British Pakistanis account for 3.4% of births in Britain, they account for 30% of British children with recessive disorders and have a higher infant mortality rate. A Labour MP has allegedly called for a ban on first-cousin marriage. Medical evidence purportedly shows inbreeding doubles the risk of stillbirths.
Symptoms of inbreeding are said to include irrational rage. Research purportedly shows that children from cousin marriages risk a 400% increased chance of having an IQ lower than 70. This information is allegedly suppressed due to fear of being called Islamophobic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think a part of it was inbreeding. This is your own theory. No. No. No.
Look at someone else's inbreeding. Major major problem. Never heard this before. Especially with immigrants in Britain like the Pakistanis in London, they'll have all kinds of serious inbreeding problems because that's an even smaller sample size you're dealing with.
Speaker 1: Strap yourself in for this. 70% of all Pakistanis are inbred. And in Turkey, the amount is between 25 to 30%. More stillbirths among immigrants, a rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred. A large percentage of the parents said, this is blowing my mind.
So listen to the BBC investigation in Britain Several Years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin. Holy shit. BBC's research also discovered that while British Pakistanis account for just three point four four percent of all births in Britain, they accounted for thirty percent of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality. What in the fuck? Labor party MP has called for a ban on first cousin marriage.
Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a one hundred percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. Wow. That is insane.
Speaker 0: I also read somewhere that's a lot of the symptoms of inbred people are irrational rage Put that up in attitudes. And they end up just describing ISIS.
Speaker 1: Look at what it says here that with the the IQ points. It says findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one parents or cousins if one's parents or cousins' intelligence goes down 10 to 16 IQ points, The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, criterion for being retarded in quotes. Are they using that word? Mhmm.
Increases four hundred percent among children from cousin marriages. Let me say that again. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 increases four hundred percent amongst children from cousin marriages. Jesus Christ.
Speaker 0: And why don't we know this? Because
Speaker 1: people don't like the truth. Islamophobia. Don't like being called Islamophobic by even discussing it. Like, we're gonna be called Islamophobic for even bringing this up. Information has to
Speaker 0: come out.
Speaker 1: You boom.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Rep. Sarah McBride says MAGA Republicans have "consistently exploited immigration to gain power, and now, they are exploiting it again to grow their power illegally." https://t.co/FLulQTqB3y
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump administration is allegedly using a 1798 law, the Alien Enemies Act, to expedite mass deportations, bypassing due process by claiming the US is currently at war. This law was originally intended to expand presidential power to deport non-citizens during wartime.
The administration is reportedly detaining and deporting individuals without regard for legal residency, and has allegedly admitted to mistakenly imprisoning at least one person, dismissing it as an "administrative error" without rectifying the situation, allegedly violating a court order and civil rights. Without due process, anyone could become such an "administrative error."
Democrats claim to have a comprehensive approach to immigration that secures the border while maintaining safety. The speaker asserts MAGA Republicans exploit immigration for political gain and that this abuse of power endangers everyone. The speaker pledges to address the broken immigration system lawfully and constitutionally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't let people tell you we have to choose between securing our borders and upholding the rule of law. Don't let anyone tell you the way we keep people safe is by dismantling due process. The Trump administration's tactic right now is to overwhelm us with information with the sole purpose of distracting, demeaning, and dividing us. This administration is invoking a two hundred and twenty seven year old law to speed up mass deportations, stripping people of due process. This law known as the Alien Enemies Act was created in 1798 with the purpose of expanding the president's power to deport noncitizens from The United States during times of war, during times of war.
They are detaining and deporting people with no due process or regard for legal residency in this country, all under the guise that we are at war right now. This is not the rule of law that MAGA Republicans claim to care so much about. This is a harmful and indiscriminate application of an old law that strips real people of their civil liberties and the opportunity to chase life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The reason due process exists is to both hold people who break the law accountable, but also to guarantee that innocent people don't get unfairly punished. The only way to protect a US citizen from being wrongly rounded up and shipped to a dangerous foreign prison is to have a process to guarantee that you aren't deporting a US citizen, a process that already exists and should be used accordingly.
This administration has already admitted that there is at least one person who has been imprisoned who they didn't intend to round up. And here's the kicker. They excused it by calling it a, quote, administrative error, and they are doing nothing to correct it, all in violation of a court order and this individual's civil rights. How many more might there be? How many more could there be if there isn't due process?
Where does this end? If they don't care about imprisoning an innocent person in this instance, then I'm not safe and you're not safe. None of us are safe. Anyone could become an administrative error that they do nothing to correct. A threat to due process anywhere is a threat to due process everywhere.
This is the MAGA playbook. They test how far they can push their authority until there is no one left to defend the rule of law and the integrity of our rights and our liberties. Democrats have been ready to address our broken immigration system with a comprehensive approach that secures our border and keeps us safe. There is a way to reform our immigration system, secure our border, and make this country safer, But the Trump administration is not doing that. MAGA Republicans have consistently exploited immigration to gain power, and now they are exploiting it to again grow their power illegally.
I simply can't stay silent on this abuse of power that puts all of us at risk, and I stand ready to actually solve our broken immigration system consistent with our laws and our constitution. Stay in touch, and I'll do the same.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Influencer arrested after filming himself going 192mph on Connecticut highways https://t.co/6umISDkeVf
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Liberal woman informs everyone that she won't be dating white men anymore. Groundbreaking information. https://t.co/2lC5Kqm0Qb
Video Transcript AI Summary
A white American woman states she will no longer date white men and is looking for men of other races.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Friendly reminder, as a white American woman, yeah, I will no longer be dating white men. I'm looking for anything other than a white man. Okay? Just a heads up.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread featuring the top 8 brutal roasts aimed at the woke culture. Each roast highlights a different perspective, from calling someone a drama queen to acknowledging the impact of nuclear wars. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for valuable news and @DOGE__news for updates on DOGE and insights into liberal perspectives. Some of the roasts made me laugh, while others felt like works of art. I can't help but appreciate the humor and creativity behind them.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
💀 Top 8 BRUTAL Roasts That Will Piss Off The Woke Cult 🧵A Thread 1. Drama queen https://t.co/TAEN5qobUj
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
If you're not following @ResisttheMS then you're missing out on a lot of valuable information. They're my go-to news source, so make sure you check them out. https://t.co/GdZBtzLSdo
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
I also recommend you follow @DOGE__news. He posts the latest updates about DOGE, Elon and exposes liberals on a daily basis. https://t.co/D8ElJDv3Do
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
I almost forgot this happened lol https://t.co/OKcMIqIb9H
Video Transcript AI Summary
In October, the speaker was on a Zoom call with New Yorker colleagues. During a break, the speaker was caught masturbating on camera. As a result, the speaker was fired from the New Yorker after 27 years and has since been on leave from CNN.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In October, you were on a Zoom call with your colleagues from the New Yorker magazine. Everyone took a break for several minutes during which time you were caught masturbating on camera. You were subsequently fired from that job after twenty seven years of working there, and you since then have been on leave from CNN. Do I have all that right? You got it all right.
Sad to say.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
She said it perfectly 👏 https://t.co/LgQJ7dzBEU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kaylee Weichbroat, a Fairfax County mother of two, is facing a difficult decision regarding her oldest child's preschool education. Fairfax County Public Schools plans to institute gender studies in elementary school, despite community focus groups indicating parents did not want this. The school board then allegedly voted 16-0 to move forward, which Weichbroat believes demonstrates that the board views parents as obstacles rather than partners. She is hesitant to entrust her child to a system that does not want to partner with her in his upbringing. Weichbroat believes early childhood education should focus on exploration, creativity, and fun, not adult debates. She feels sensitive topics should be introduced by parents according to their own values, not through a top-down ideology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Kaylee Weichbroat. I'm a mom of two in Fairfax County. This is my oldest. And my husband and I, have a difficult decision to make this fall as he is approaching preschool age, and we are faced with the decision of whether or not we are going to put our child in public school system where Fairfax County has decided to move forward with instituting gender studies in elementary school despite having done a study group, a focus group in the community to see if parents even wanted this.
And when parents said no, the board voted 16 to zero and said we're moving forward anyways. This shows clearly that they see parents not as partners, but as an obstacle for their agenda. And I I have a really hard time looking at him and going, here, I'm just gonna give you over to people who do not wanna partner with me in how you're going to be raised. School and education is a huge part of a child's life. And early childhood is supposed to be filled with exploration and creativity and fun, not debating issues that are for adults to handle.
These kinds of topics should be introduced sensitively and by parents who are raising their children with their values, not with an ideology passed down from the top.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread on the top 7 savage FAFO moments. Each moment is a mix of instant satisfaction and justice served. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for news the mainstream media misses and @DOGE__news for updates on DOGE while taking a stand against liberal narratives.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
🔥 Top 7 Savage FAFO Moments A thread 🧵 1. Instantaneous https://t.co/WdMc5On2Bu
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
If you are not already, I recommend you follow @ResisttheMS The report the news that the mainstream media won't. https://t.co/EXj2WoT1qc
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Another great follow is @DOGE__news They keep you updated on DOGE and destroy liberals daily. https://t.co/iNefgLyGuq
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Purple hair liberal: “This is not a safe space for MAGA” https://t.co/Xjvz0x4zKz
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is not a safe space for MAGA supporters. If you comment, I will attack you because you are blind and hateful.
Do not comment on my content; you suck and are the scum of the earth.
Any comments from you maggots will be automatically reported. I will flag it without reading it, even if it's an apology or something nice. So, fuck off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not a safe space for MAGA. Not at all. Not safe. If you don't want me to attack you, don't fucking make a comment. You guys are so fucking blind and so fucking hateful that it is making everyone hateful.
Fuck off. Do not comment on my shit. You suck. You are the scum of the earth. You're below the scum of the earth.
And for when any one of you maggots that do comment, I'm gonna automatically report it. Automatically. I'm on a fucking flag it. Go ahead. Give me a try.
I'm not even gonna fucking read what it says even if it's, oh, I'm sorry. You're a little upset or even something that's semi nice. I am reporting it. So fuck off. This is not a
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread featuring my top 8 savage responses that might annoy some woke individuals. I highlighted a few favorites, including a reminder that not everything is true and a playful jab at Hillary. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for news not covered by mainstream media, and @CNviolations for community notes and memes that critique the woke culture. Each response is meant to provoke thought and humor, reflecting my perspective on current discussions.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
💀 Top 8 SAVAGE responses that will piss off some woke people A thread 🧵 1. I thought they liked Teslas? https://t.co/Hx3tqstuZK
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
If you are not already, go ahead and follow @ResisttheMS They are quick to report the news that you won’t see on the MSM. Fast and accurate, what more does one need? https://t.co/Xh2mE5T3Pg
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Another great follow is @CNviolations He posts brutal community notes and memes exposing the woke cult daily. https://t.co/trgu2eqx3p
reSee.it AI Summary
I've shared a thread highlighting nine replies that challenge the "woke cult." The list includes topics like a surprising pro-gun stance from George Takei, Jimmy Kimmel, and a mention of "Orange is the New Black." I also recommend following @ResisttheMS for news the mainstream media overlooks, and @CNviolations for eye-opening community notes. The thread wraps up with reminders to ignore negativity and a nod to a username that encapsulates the sentiment.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
🔥 Top 9 SAVAGE replies that the woke cult won't like 🧵A thread 1. The password https://t.co/qfXgYj27lR
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
If you're not following @ResisttheMS then I highly recommend you rethink your life choices. These guys are incredible. Fast, reliable, and they report the news that the mainstream media won't. Give them a follow. https://t.co/wxLpwVwCmJ
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
6. Caramel latte with a double shot of espresso for me please https://t.co/swTAqFlAoz
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
While I still have your attention, go ahead and follow @CNviolations. He posts brutal community notes and violations that make woke liberals punch the air. https://t.co/8fAWeBfOwy
