@Dialectiks - Moist Hegel
Link https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf
@Dialectiks - Dark Hegel™️
The hero we needed, but not the one we deserved https://t.co/OAGO8LXbZ4
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
Tim Walz Signed a Bill Redefining the Term "Sexual Orientation" to INCLUDE PEDOPHILES. 🧵A Thread 🧵 1/x On 02/13/2023, Leigh Finke, a trans identified male, Introduced H. F. No. 1655, which redefined "Sexual Orientation." Link to the amendment: https://revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1655&version=0&session=ls93&session_year=2023&session_number=0&format=pdf… In this amendment, Finke CROSSED OUT the section that expressly precluded pedophiles from falling under the definition of "Sexual orientation." In the old bill, the definition "Sexual orientation" delineated which people were were protected under the Minnesota Human Rights Statute, making it a violation to discriminate against those falling under that definition. This old definition EXPLICITLY EXCLUDED pedophiles through the addition of this phrase to the definition: "Sexual orientation" does not include a physical 1.20 or sexual attachment to children by an adult. The bill then passed the committee was adopted. Link to Minutes: https://house.mn.gov/Committees/minutes/93015/90275 Link to the video stream of the hearing: https://house.mn.gov/hjvid/93/896506 The amendment to 2022 c 52 art 19 s 44, (yes, this includes the section crossing out the pedophile exclusion), is characterized by Finke in the committee hearing as "modernizing" the terminology to reflect more contemporary understandings of sexual orientation and gender. They think including pedophiles under the umbrella of "Sexual orientation" reflects a "modern understanding of sexuality and gender."
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
2/x The most disturbing part of this bill, is that it went through MULTIPLE revisions, and in EVERY. SINGLE. REVISION., they kept the pedophile exclusion crossed out. Link to the final changes to the bill: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2023/0/52/#laws.19.46.0 Here is the final version of the bill that is LAW with the language TAKEN OUT: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/363A.03#stat.363A.03.44
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
3/x These amendments were signed into law by Tim Walz, by virtue of their inclusion in the "Take Pride Act," which was an act included in the Judiciary and Public Safety bill. As such, Tim Walz signed a bill into law that included an amendment that REMOVED the clause that excluded pedophiles from 2022 c 52 art 19 s 44. Link to the Minnesota Department Human Rights announcement and list of things the bill included: https://mn.gov/mdhr/news-community/newsroom/civilrightsupdates.jsp?id=1061-579395 This bill included the Take Pride Act, which is where Finke's amendment, HF1655, the amendment that modified 2022 c 52 art 19 s 44 to exclude the section that excepted pedophiles from civil rights protections under the Minnesota human rights code. To reiterate, Tim Walz signed a bill into law through which, removed the pedophile exclusion that excepted pedophiles from the civil rights protections that are afforded to those protected identities or classifications that fall under the definition "Sexual orientation." This opens the door for the law to protect pedophilia as a "sexual orientation" under the Minnesota human rights legislation, especially when there is language in the bill expressly saying the provisions are to be construed "liberally."
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
4/x For further clarification about this amendment, the "Sexual orientation" definition change was included in the HF 1655 amendment, which amended 2023 c 52 art 19 s 46-48, and passed into law by Tim Walz. Here is the link that shows JUST the definitions, of which apply to 2023 c 52 art 19 Chapter 363A, and were passed in the 2023 legislative session, with the corresponding legislative history version highlighted for which the new "Sexual Orientation" definition corresponds: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2023/cite/363A.03/subd/363A.03.44#stat.363A.03.44 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2023/0/52/#laws.19.46.0 Here is the link to the full text of the bill, which IS current law and includes the subsection 44 "Sexual orientation" definition amendment that was included in HF 1655. As a reminder, HF 1655 was part of the "Take Pride Act," which was signed into law by Tim Walz on May 30, 2023 per its inclusion in the Judiciary and Public Safety bill: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/363A/full#stat.363A.03.44
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
5/x Here is how the "Take Pride Act" and HF 1655 relate to Judiciary and Public Safety bill signed into law by Tim Walz. The Judiciary and Public Safety bill is also named SF 2909. Navigation Note: these screenshots were taken after clicking the "chronological" tab which is under the "Actions" subtitle. The below photo, which can be found on the same webpage as the above (also under the "chronological" tab) includes the record of Tim Walz having signed it the bill into law. Here is a link to page where you can see the list of actions: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/bill.php?view=chrono&f=SF2909&y=2023&ssn=0&b=senate#actions As referred to above, SF 2909 (a.k.a. the Judiciary and Public Safety bill), includes the HF 1655 amendment, which is apart of the "Take Pride Act" introduced by Finke. The below photo shows the page where you can access the entire text of the bill, which includes annotations whenever the legislators added or removed components of the bill. You can see the below bill name (SF 2909) matches the above bill name, also SF 2909, which is also known as SF 2909. If you "control+F" on the above page using the term "subdivision 44," you will see the below revised text which is the revised definition of "Sexual orientation" that Leigh Finke proposed in his HF 1655 amendment. Here is a link to the full annotated version of the bill: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=SF2909&session_year=2023&session_number=0&version=latest
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
6/x This post is continuing from the last webpage mentioned (the full text annotated SF 2909 bill), as discussed above in 5/x, and is for those who still happen to be confused about how the amendment, the act, and the bill relate to each other. I will use dates here to make it more obvious that the HF 1655 amendment included in the "Take Pride Act" introduced by Finke, is contained in the SF 2909 bill, a.k.a the Judiciary and Public Safety bill, which was signed by Tim Walz into law. As shown below, the annotated full text of the SF 2909 bill, as mentioned and shown in 5/x, was published to the Office of the Revisor of Statutes' website on 05/31/2023 08:51am. As previously mentioned in post 3/x, the announcement of the signing of the SF 2909 bill, aka the Judiciary and Public Safety bill (which was signed by Tim Walz on 05/19/2023), was announced on the Minnesota Dept. of Human Rights' website on 05/30/2023. I will link to this website again for convenience: https://mn.gov/mdhr/news-community/newsroom/civilrightsupdates.jsp?id=1061-579395 So here we have demonstrated that the dates all match up.
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
7/x It get's better y'all. They had around half a dozen organizations endorse the "Take Pride Act," which REMOVED the pedophile exclusion!!! - The Girl Scouts - The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits - National Council of Jewish Women - The Minnesota Catholic Conference
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
8/x Since people are now accusing me of being “dishonest” and “intentionally misleading” for accidentally mixing up a single organization’s “nay” with another’s “yay” in post 7/x, let me clarify: Thanks to your very *gracious* notification and your very *honest* characterizations of my supposed “maliciously intended deception,” I now humbly realize that I mistakenly included the Catholic organization’s “nay” by confusing it with another nonprofit’s “yay.” The other three organizations are correctly identified as “yays,” so despite your suspicions, those characterizations are accurate. I spent several hours sorting through 10,000 pages of PDFs and annotated code only to be accused of “intentional dishonesty” for accidentally mixing up one document out of thousands. So, please accept my 1,000 prostrations and the sacrifice of my firstborn child as penance for this utterly unforgivable error.
@xxclusionary - Dark Hegel™️
9/x Here is a video of Leigh Finke on ABC News yesterday discussing how integral and involved Tim Walz was in LGBTQ+ legislation, the “Trans Refuge Bill,” and through his collaboration with the “queer caucus.” Also that last line is a lot creepier when you interpret it in lieu of the above developments: “[Tim Walz] wants Minnesota to be the best place to raise a family, and he knows that means all families.”
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
A thread: This thread is one of the MOST IMPORTANT things you can read if you want to understand how gender ideology is spreading through corporations and educational institutions. This will focus on how ESG is responsible for the virulent spread of GI. PLEASE SHARE 1/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
I will first focus on how significant hedge funds like Vanguard and Blackrock are using YOUR retirement funds to strong-arm companies into adopting ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives. I will first outline how proxy voting plays a role in this. 2/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Proxy voting is when shareholders exercise their right to vote without attending the company's annual general meeting (AGM) or other shareholder meetings in person. Instead, they authorize a proxy, an individual, or an institution, to vote on their behalf. 3/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Hedge funds invest in various companies by buying shares on their clients' behalves, including retirement funds. They then have the right to vote on corporate matters like electing directors, approving mergers and acquisitions, and deciding on executive compensation. 4/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
These hedge funds are voting on behalf of the people who have been authorized to invest their funds. If you have a pension or retirement fund, your money is being used to further the ESG initiatives these hedge funds want to implement. 5/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Hedge funds often have their own voting policies and guidelines, which dictate how they decide how to vote on various proposals. These policies include corporate governance, ESG issues, and financial performance. 6/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
The extra voting power they gain from voting on behalf of their clients, even if the clients would never agree to the direction the fund is strong-arming a company into going, allows these funds to have a massive amount of power in dictating corporate policy. 7/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
So what exactly are ESG and ESG scores? ESG is a set of policies that outlay specific parameters that ultimately enable an ESG score to be calculated. ESG scores are numerical ratings assigned to companies based on their performance in various ESG criteria. 8/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
These scores are typically calculated by specialized ESG rating agencies using black box methodologies. ESG scores consider a series of conditions such as: 1. Anti-discrimination policies and hiring, promotion, and compensation decisions. 9/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
2. "Inclusive Healthcare Benefits," including transgender-related care, such as hormone therapy, mental health services, and gender-affirming surgeries. 3. guidelines for preferred names, pronouns, and gender identity.
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
4. gender-neutral language and guidance on maintaining an inclusive workforce. 5. Providing restrooms and changing facilities so employees can access spaces that "align with their gender identity." 6. Offering regular diversity and inclusion training for employees 10/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
7. Employee Resource Groups (ERGs): "Encourage the formation of ERGs to support transgender and gender diverse employees." 8. Supplier Diversity: the diversity of suppliers and partners, including those owned or led by transgender and gender-diverse individuals. 11/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
You get the picture. So what do ESG scores mean? ESGs are meant to be a "guide" for (activist) investors to decide which companies align with their social goals so they can invest in them; in reality, they can be used by the government in a much more pernicious way. 12/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
For example, the U.S. government is a significant purchaser of goods and services. Its procurement policies can influence ESG practices by setting requirements for suppliers, such as environmental sustainability, fair labor practices, or diversity and inclusion. 13/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Additionally, the gov. operates pension funds for its employees, such as the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) for federal employees and military personnel. These pension funds incorporate ESG factors into their investment strategies like other institutional investors. 14/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
This functionally means that the government can use ESG to financially strongarm companies into adopting these ESG "initiatives" by refusing to invest in them via pensions or contract with them because they aren't "socially conscious enough." 15/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
How does ESG affect universities and colleges? Like the above-mentioned pension plans, many universities have sizable endowments and investment portfolios to support their operations and financial sustainability. /16
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Universities invest their endowments using ESG scores, much like the above pension plans. Meaning the government is using public taxpayer money to strong-arm these initiatives that are potentially diametrically opposed to the interests of the average taxpayer. 17/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
NOT ONLY THIS, but many university ranking systems have started to include ESG-related criteria as part of their evaluation processes. Rankings like the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings and the UI GreenMetric World University Rankings specifically focus on 18/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
measuring universities' performance in sustainability, social impact, and "responsible governance." A university's "ESG performance" is now DIRECTLY affecting how that university is ranked, meaning actual performance and employment rate are not as pivotal. 19/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
The US government is extorting universities by tying grant funding, NIH grants (amounting to tens of millions of dollars), and other research funding. Agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the 20/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
National Institutes of Health (NIH), PRIORITIZE research areas aligned with ESG principles. Grant applications may require universities to demonstrate their commitment to ESG principles. "Universities with strong ESG track records may have a competitive advantage." 21/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
These scores include measuring whether a university has integrated ESG topics into its curricula and teaching students about "sustainability, ethical business practices, and social responsibility." 22/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
This includes providing scholarships and financial aid to" underrepresented students, hiring diverse faculty and staff, and fostering a supportive campus culture." So this means ESG factors influence a university's ranking and hugely impact grant funding. 23/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
ESG is being used by both huge institutional backers and the government to strongarm companies and universities into implementing their desired social policies, and they're using YOUR money to do it. They don't want you to know. PLEASE SHARE! MOST PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE! 24/
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
To add Biden JUST vetoed a proposal yesterday that would have prevented hedge funds from using pensions and retirements funds to implement company ESG priorities via proxy voting. The government is totally complicit and they want to keep you ignorant. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/03/21/biden-veto-401k-rule-esg-investment-funds.html
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Watch. The. Entire. Thing. Transitioning children is one of the most egregious crimes in American medical history.