TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DiedSuddenly_

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 7:21 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

"These COVID shots have caused greater side effects than any other medical treatment in history. The toxic spike protein ends up in literally every part of your body." -Dr Charles Hoffe https://t.co/krgpsne8Ds

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I was fired after thirty one years as an emergency room physician with not one single patient complaint against me in those thirty one years. I was fired for saying that somebody who had natural immunity didn't need to be vaccinated against the disease to which they were already immune. Fortunately, I still had my medical license even though I lost a significant part, at least 50% of my income and I couldn't work as an emergency room doctor anymore, I still had my private practice. So when I discovered from the the biodistribution studies that Pfizer had hidden, that we knew that these vaccines go around your entire body, they do not just stay in your arm. Pfizer's biodistribution studies on the lipid nanoparticles show that they literally take those messenger RNA strands into every part of your body that go into your brain and your lungs and your heart and your liver and your reproductive organs and your bone marrow and everywhere, which is, by the way, why these COVID shots have caused a a greater array of side effects than any other medical treatment in history because this toxic spike protein ends up in literally every every
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was fired after thirty one years as an emergency room physician with not one single patient complaint against me in those thirty one years. I was fired for saying that somebody who had natural immunity didn't need to be vaccinated against the disease to which they were already immune. Fortunately, I still had my medical license even though I lost a significant part, at least 50% of my income and I couldn't work as an emergency room doctor anymore, I still had my private practice. So when I discovered from the the biodistribution studies that Pfizer had hidden, that we knew that these vaccines go around your entire body, they do not just stay in your arm. Pfizer's biodistribution studies on the lipid nanoparticles show that they literally take those messenger RNA strands into every part of your body that go into your brain and your lungs and your heart and your liver and your reproductive organs and your bone marrow and everywhere, which is, by the way, why these COVID shots have caused a a greater array of side effects than any other medical treatment in history because this toxic spike protein ends up in literally every every
Saved - February 6, 2026 at 3:50 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Doctor threatens to call CPS on mother if she doesn’t put her kids on adderall… https://t.co/UNcAbZ8boe

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this exchange, Speaker 0 challenges a doctor’s stance on treating a child for ADHD. The doctor states, “this is what’s recommended for your kid. You have to put your kid on these meds,” saying, “I’m trying to do you a favor. Not even do you a favor. Do what’s best for your child,” and adds, “if you don’t follow these instructions, ma’am, I will be forced to call CPS.” The parent presses back, asking, “You’re forcing me? You’re saying either I put my kid on medication that they don’t need I will be forced to call CPS,” and asserts that the doctor is jeopardizing the child’s future. The parent clarifies that the child has “not shown any symptoms of ADHD” and requests a second opinion. The doctor replies, “I am your second opinion. I’m the doctor,” and when the parent insists, “No. You’re not,” the doctor insists that they are the authority: “I’m your doctor. If you don’t trust your doctor, then you shouldn’t be coming here.” The parent questions trust, suggesting that if they trusted the doctor, they wouldn’t feel threatened by CPS, to which the doctor responds that it’s not a threat, but an effort to do what’s best for both the parent and child. The doctor reiterates, “If you love your kid enough, then you will listen to my…” as the conversation ends, with the implication that the doctor believes compliance is essential for the child’s welfare. The exchange centers on a clash between parental autonomy and medical recommendations, with CPS being invoked as a potential consequence for not adhering to the prescribed ADHD medication plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're gonna force me to put my kid on ADHD medicine or else you're going to call CPS on me? Be real. I never said anything about forcing you. I'm saying this is what's recommended for your kid. You have to put your kid on these meds. Like, it's best for your kid. I'm trying to do you a favor. Not even do you a favor. Do what's best for your child. And if you don't follow these instructions, ma'am, I will be forced to call CPS. So you are forcing me? You're saying either I put my kid on medication that they don't need I will be forced to call CPS. You what you're doing right now is jeopardizing your kid, jeopardizing your kid's future. I'm not trying to sit here and argue with you. I'm not debating with you. I'm the doctor, so I'm telling you what's best for you and your kid. But I don't understand because my child has not did not shown any symptoms of ADHD, and I'm asking if I can get a second opinion. And you're telling me, no. Either put my child on medication or you're calling CPS. That's forcing me. You you asked about a second opinion. I am your second opinion. I'm the doctor. No. You're not. You are the person with me. Okay. Alright. Well, first and second. Why? I'm your doctor. If you don't trust your doctor, then you shouldn't be, you know, coming here, which is crazy for you to think that you wouldn't wanna If I trusted my doctor, my doctor wouldn't be threatening me with calling CPS. That would be me trusting my doctor. Like I said, it's not a threat. It's not a threat. I'm trying to do what's best for you and your kid. If you love your kid enough, then you will listen to my
Saved - January 16, 2026 at 10:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report the first 2026 episode, starting with Trump investing $44M in direct energy weapons. The hour covers a weird virus discussion, an ICE agent incident, a George Floyd comparison, new footage of a hit, taunting an officer before the shooting, social-justice school influence, anti-Christian poetry, Christian views on consequences, Trump on 6G skin, implantable tech memo, a cognitive electromagnetic warfare budget, and the dad jokes segment. Includes paid partnerships.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

First Episode of 2026! Trump Invests $44M in Direct Energy Weapons (02:13) Weird Virus Discussion (02:43) ICE Agent Incident (03:10) George Floyd Comparison (04:06) New Footage Reveals Hit (05:35) Taunting Officer Before Shooting (06:25) Social Justice School Influence (10:43) Anti-Christian Poetry Reading (14:51) Christian View on Consequences (20:37) Trump on 6G Skin View (22:25) Implantable Tech Memo Details (24:22) Cognitive Electromagnetic Warfare Budget (33:28) Dad Jokes Segment Begins Includes paid partnerships

Video Transcript AI Summary
The episode opens with broad, meta talk about “the agenda,” then shifts to a discussion of immigration and an ICE incident in Minneapolis. The hosts claim the incident involved an ICE agent being struck by a vehicle during an attempt to detain a woman they identify as Renee Goode (also named Gabriela Shyzen Panskiewicz in later rundown), who allegedly blocked the road and resisted law enforcement with a left-wing protest milieu. They describe footage showing the officer being hit by the car and argue the car was used as a weapon; they say the officer was attacked after, and that he fired because he was assaulted, with the driver’s alleged actions described as intentional and deadly. They assert the left encouraged street fighting of federal officers and reference Minnesota’s “Ice Watch” and a social-justice charter school tied to the couple. They contend the woman taunted the officer and that her partner urged her to drive, highlighting differences between left-wing rhetoric and the reality of federal enforcement. The discussion includes allegations about the couple’s finances and welfare status, mockery of the woman’s poetry, and claims about her alleged writings including a piece titled “Dissecting Fetal Pigs.” They suggest the couple was not typical “soccer moms” and mock media misidentification of a photo, noting the real name of the person involved and accusing Democrats of exploiting the incident to push an anti-ICE narrative. The segment includes claims about the wife’s treatment of children and custody, and a discussion of religious perspectives, portraying the woman as “demonically possessed.” The hosts claim the national immigration crisis is being addressed via stronger deportations, and they praise President Trump’s use of federal authority to deport. The show then transitions to tech and security topics. They discuss the fourth industrial revolution and the “beast system,” questioning Trump’s familiarity with tech oligarchs after a reported dinner with Elon Musk. They mention Trump signing a memorandum to accelerate six G deployment and raise concerns about implantable technologies, citing a White House memorandum stating that six G will be foundational to national security and that it will aid emerging technologies like AI, robotics, and implantable technologies. They speculate about implantables, including the possibility of brain chips, and discuss the potential for these technologies to be used for surveillance or control. A reported budget item is highlighted: the Department of War’s budget includes 44,000,000 for “cognitive electromagnetic warfare,” to be run by the Air Force’s RDT&E. They reference a NATO attachment defining cognitive warfare as exploiting cognition to influence decision making through advances in technology. The hosts entertain the possibility of manipulating minds, including a hypothetical situation involving pedophiles, and discuss the idea of testing technologies on subjects like targeted individuals (TIs)—people who claim to be microchipped or targeted by electronic signals. They present Dominic, a TI who produced a trailer about Havana syndrome, directed energy weapons, and mind-control technologies. The trailer features testimonies about microwave-like harassment, voices in the head, and visions, with speakers asserting that directed energy weapons cause terror and mental manipulation. The hosts connect these claims to broader fears of a coming “transhuman” or “Beast system,” and they suggest the TI community is turning to faith for relief. Throughout, they promote sponsors and investments in precious metals (Goldco) and discuss silver’s price movement, asserting that silver rose to around $80 per ounce over the break and endorsing Goldco’s New Year offers, including up to 10% back in free silver or gold on qualified purchases and a free 2026 gold and silver kit. The program signs off with a light segment on dad jokes and a tease for future coverage, promising more discussion on transhumanism, implantables, Havana syndrome, and related technology topics, with the hosts planning live events and future segments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the agenda. Speaker 1: Today on the agenda, we explore whether ICE deported a witch to hell. Speaker 2: What's the agenda today? Speaker 3: What agenda? Twenty thirty agenda. Speaker 4: What's the ultimate agenda? Speaker 0: Is there Speaker 4: an agenda? Global agenda? Speaker 5: It's run by people with agendas. Speaker 1: It's crunch time in this whole agenda. Speaker 0: Everybody has an agenda. Speaker 2: With all the current issues on our agenda. Speaker 6: It's my agenda for you. Speaker 4: Courtesy of those people and their agenda. Speaker 2: What really sets the agenda? There's no more on their agenda. Speaker 4: So what's on the agenda for today? Speaker 2: The next subject on the agenda. Speaker 1: Well, welcome back to the agenda. This is the first episode of 2026. I'm here with my cohost, Lauren Witzke. Ta da. Speaker 7: I'm back. Speaker 1: Man, do you do you feel older? Speaker 7: I do. I do feel No. I had I how was your how was your holidays? Busy. Yeah. I traveled. Speaker 1: That's true. We we say every year, hey, we're gonna take a little bit of a vacation. Nah. No. Speaker 7: I know you work straight through vacation. Yep. And I traveled way too much. I'm not doing that again. I need a vacation for my vacation. And I feel like, you know, like vacations are supposed to be relaxing and whatever. We live in Florida. Like, I live on a vacation. I don't need to go to Illinois in the snow and all that. It was just awful. Speaker 1: I agree with you. Speaker 7: Glad to be back. Speaker 1: I agree with that. It is a little bit of a thing in Florida that we do live in this vacation spot, but we work ourselves to death here. Speaker 7: Yeah. Exactly. Speaker 1: Because it's pretty expensive to live here. But but, no, you're right. We need to start spending the Christmases here. But as you know, the issue is our families. For some reason, they wanna live in the snow. Okay? So I I visited my my in laws. I've got a knee niece and a nephew now up there, and we brought the little Pomeranian too, so that was fun. Speaker 2: The little rat dog. Speaker 1: The yellow rat dog. It was good. And then you went up you went up north too. Speaker 7: Yep. Yep. Went up to see family all across, from Delaware to Illinois to Speaker 1: You gonna see your brother? Speaker 7: No. I didn't make it out to Iowa. I was gonna go out to Iowa. I just Speaker 1: Idaho, you mean. Speaker 7: You're right. Yeah. Idaho. Yeah. Idaho. So and we ended in Illinois, we were just like, let's just go home. We were so tired. So anyway, it's good to be back. Speaker 1: I got sick too during the break. I think a lot of people watching this prior Speaker 7: to a weird virus going around. I'm seeing that this is unlike anything. It's probably something else that leaked from Fort Detrick because it's weird. Speaker 1: Or produced by the Vaxxed, You know? They they predicted that that that would be these superbugs that come out of all these these triple vaxxed incubators, essentially. They're so weak that they just, like, are incubation chambers. Speaker 7: And they have all these weird mutations and stuff like that. Like I a sore throat but no fever. Then I nausea but, yeah, was weird. Speaker 1: There's been a little bit of a fever this week and it's around an incident that happened in Speaker 7: Oh, Minneapolis. Okay. Speaker 1: Alright. And, well, that fever, well, that ended very quickly. They they were trying to turn an incident involving an ICE agent and a a woman about our age. They're trying to turn that into a new George Floyd, you know, situation. They wanted people Speaker 7: They're calling her George Floyd, like, as an ephemoid. Get it? Speaker 1: It's pretty good. It's true. She is a little bit of ephemoid, and we've been looking into this. Of course, we just wanna explain it to people because I I've been asking a lot of folks, Lauren, and and it's funny. A lot of people, they don't know what to think about this. And and you can already can tell the talking points are effective. People get shamed into believing that this was a murder in cold blood or, you know, this was a this was a certain Well, Speaker 7: the Democrats are responsible. They told their constituents, oh, you go out in the streets and you fight ICE. You push back. You know, we you know, they they encouraged these left wing nuts to get out there and fight federal officers. And it's not a reality. Like, you can't fight federal law enforcement. It's like taking on the military and expecting you're gonna win. And, you know, it was there was different angles of the footage too. Of course, the leftists were showing the one angle that hid the guy, and you only see him when he's on the side of the car. And then new footage I know came out today. Speaker 1: Yes. And and that new footage, as you're seeing here on screen, look, this is this is the cell phone cam of the officer who's a Christian, by the way. He is, you see as soon as the vehicle moves, shake. Alright? That means the car hit him and hit him hard. Speaker 7: Oh, no. You can hear it. Play the whole footage. Speaker 1: There you go, folks. This this is open and shut. If if you got hit by this car, I think you also would want to shoot this woman. And you're not even a federal agent, by the way. This man had a job to do and he was doing the job. By the way, he'd also been accosted in this manner only about a month ago. He'd been dragged by an illegal when he was trying to do his job again. The the short of this is this Speaker 7: By vehicle? So he was By vehicle. Speaker 1: This right here. Yeah. Okay. This this local report, look at this. That's him getting dragged by a Speaker 2: vehicle. Speaker 7: So when they said when Christine Numa, know she's came out and said that he was afraid for his life, I truly believe it. I mean, he was hit. He got hit. And peep the left is trying to say, oh, she was trying to get away. Her wheels were turning over that point. She was dead, so she wasn't turning the wheels at all. Like, as soon as she hit him, he shot her or or right before he hit him, he had shot her. So Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 7: The turning away, that wasn't her. She was going dead for him. Speaker 1: One, she was not inferior for life. That's pretty obvious. You see now from the video that's come out today. Look at her, she's sneering. Yeah. She's taunting the officer. Her and her butch lover are doing everything but throwing rocks at the police. Okay? And they're doing this, by the way, because they've been trained to do this. Yeah. They're part of an organization that's called Minnesota Ice Watch. They'd attended some meetings because one of her kids goes to what's called a social justice charter school. Speaker 7: Oh, good. Speaker 1: Have you heard of these? So so what it is, it's where liberal white women get tricked into paying $40,000 a year to to send their children to a school that teaches them that they don't have a gender, that they must, become reverse slaves to black people, and that their parents should go out and fight cops. Speaker 7: $40,000 a year. So where was she at in that kind of money? Speaker 1: I think that she and her butch lover, they the funny thing about lesbians, gays have this thing too, where they end up saving a lot of money Oh. Because they, you know, they really they they have every program under the sun that's given them money Speaker 7: That's true. I'm sure. Speaker 1: They also misspent their, you know, I I suspect, I'll say, I suspect they misspent their college loan money, so there's a whole bunch of that sitting there that wasn't end up using for housing. And lastly, I'm sure that they were on a form of welfare. Right? Speaker 7: Oh, that's true. Speaker 1: So they they had some money and, of course, this this charter school led led them into to become social justice warriors, which led them to the streets of Minnesota. The other part to this too, the footage is pretty obvious that, you know, the the ICE agent is hit. Okay? There was this narrative that they weren't hit. It is obvious as day that not only was the ICE agent hit, but Renee Renee Goode wanted to hurt this man. Before this too, Lauren, that, you know, you just mentioned, did she try to well, they she was trying to flee. Lauren, she was there for about a minute before. There's also video from about, twenty minutes before that she's blocking the road. It's intentionally there to stop and impede the ICE agents from taking care of a violent criminal. Speaker 2: Yeah. No. Speaker 7: They do not fear they do not fear ICE at all. They do not fear federal agents. They don't respect them. And that needs to change because people are gonna end up getting hurt or killed like what happened. You cannot take on federal officers. You just can't. Speaker 1: Well, and a vehicle's a weapon. Oh, yeah. We need stop acting like she was driving some kind of minivan. Speaker 7: Just people aren't Speaker 1: on soccer mom. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay? Now she she was trying to murder that ICE agent. Yep. K? And she got she got killed. Speaker 7: Yep. That's exactly what happened. She thought nothing would happen. Oh, he's not gonna do anything because, you know, Minneapolis police have been so neutered. They don't do anything. So she was mistakenly thinking, oh, I can just like barrel over this guy and nothing's gonna happen to me because I'm protected because I'm a leftist and that's just what you think. It's a different administration. Trump is restoring law and order. You know what? I've been very critical of Trump and I'm still very critical of his Operation Warp Speed. However, with that being said, this America overwhelmingly voted for mass deportations. He said he was gonna do it and he's actually doing it. I respect that. I respect sending ICE out. I respect him making an example of him and everybody that gets in his way, they need to be dealt with with force. Speaker 1: Yes. A 100%. President Trump is using federal authority effectively. And of course, we're now seeing some of these, these harpy vultures that have been hiding in the shadows. By the way, this couple wasn't as hiding in the shower shadows. They were hiding in Canada after the election. After the election in '24, they fled. They they went to Canada. They decided to only come back because they wanted to be part of the solution. Right? Oh, gosh. The solution that, of course, led to her death. Speaker 7: Aka Canada wasn't giving them the adequate welfare checks that they wanted. Oh, that's true. That's true. Speaker 1: That's true. It's and and this, you know, of course, Minnesota is has got its own issues with the Somalians and, you know, Tim Waltz, he is a funny guy. He tried to use this, this incident as, as grounds try to deter attention away from the the massive fraud that's taken place with the Somalis in in his state. And it's just Oh, no. It's not working. Speaker 7: Democrats were thrilled to see this woman die. Like, I've never seen them so giddy. Like, they were so quick to hop on the news, hop on the news and put out social media posts. This is exactly what they were wanting to happen. That's why they were telling their constituents, get out in the street and fight ICE. Go out there and fight them. Stand up and fight back. Blah blah blah. They knew this was gonna happen and you just see democrats running on it now. Speaker 1: Oh, they they said she was an artist. She was a poet. Right. Speaker 7: She A soccer mom and a yeah. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Soccer mom. Soccer mom who lost custody of her kids, by the way. Speaker 7: Oh, the way, I heard that lesbian wife of her not wife. I don't wanna say that. Partner. Butch partner. Is that what you called him? Her it gosh. I don't even know anymore. She got arrested for putting cigarettes out on children, like, as punishment. Like psychopaths. Speaker 1: It's it's possible. I looked into There was that rumor that was swirling. And also, when you look up a poetry, of course, they were quick to try to Speaker 7: Renee's poetry? Speaker 1: Yeah. Renee's poetry. It's just anti Christian garbage. I mean, so I've got I've got one of the poems right here I can show you. It is it's pretty obvious what kind of poetry this this young woman was into. Not not the kind of stuff I Speaker 2: think Speaker 7: Sick normal and twisted people and demonic on Speaker 1: learning to dissect fetal pigs was the title of of one of her little sonnets. She said in here, I've donated Bibles to thrift stores, mashed them in plastic trash bags with an acidic Himalayan salt lamp, the post baptism Bibles, the ones plucked from street corners from the meaty hands of zealots, the dumbed down easy to read parasitic kind. This is from her poem. She went on to to say some kind of weird gobbledygook about reproduction. She said life is merely to ovum and sperm and where those two meet and how often and how well and what dies there. So obviously this woman, demonically possessed, reprobate, you know, moron is is what she is. Speaker 7: So she made her living as a poet. Speaker 1: She made her living as a poet. I guess anyone could be a poet these days. I mean, I I was reading some poems online after this. Speaker 7: I'm gonna be a daycare provider. What are Speaker 4: you talking about? Speaker 1: Yeah. Hey. That's a that's hey. According to a couple people, even that the the Capitol Police officer, That is a that is Speaker 7: Michael good Beard, the guy who killed Ashley Babbitt. That's a good million dollars in day care scam for his wife, his wife and him. Speaker 1: It's it's funny what lower class people do with wealth. Right? So if this is true, this guy had a $150,000,000, this guy is living like a slumlord still. He's living like a little rap king. Right? If it's true, I mean Speaker 7: He's got that bling, though. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. He does. He he put it he put a gold tooth in. Yeah. You Speaker 7: know? Okay. Sorry. We're getting off track. Okay. Renee. Speaker 1: But but on Speaker 7: on track, her she's got demonic poetry. And it's and it's called what is the title of it again? Speaker 1: It is called dissecting fetal pigs. Speaker 7: What on earth? Speaker 1: Is she Baby pigs. Speaker 7: Or or or is it, like, talking is is she directly talking about fetal pigs, or is she is it, like, a metaphor for, you know, Christians because she automatically goes into writing a bible on abortion? Or Speaker 1: I think it could be. I think it Speaker 7: could be a metaphor. Speaker 1: Could it could just be that she was insane. Speaker 7: Okay. Speaker 1: You know? But certainly Speaker 7: her eyes. She's nuts. Speaker 1: She's nuts. Oh, by the way too Speaker 7: And demonically proud. Speaker 1: They misnamed her, which is funny. Right? When when the right does this, it's the the left goes on Otizi, and there's there's every left wing NGO trying to sue people for misnaming. The left put the wrong photo out of of this young woman. Speaker 7: Wrong person. Speaker 2: They they tried make her Speaker 7: look like a wholesome soccer mom. Speaker 1: Yeah. And it's actually it was a Speaker 7: international support. Speaker 1: Eastern European, probably Catholic, probably pretty conservative individual that they put up. Her name is actually Gabriela Shyzen Panskiewicz, not Renee Goode. Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 1: Alright? But but the other part to this too, I I totally the poetry thing, it did seem to inspire. It inspired people. You know? Others, they they pulled out their their their writing prowess, and they produced some interesting sonnets, maybe better than hers. Speaker 7: Oh, in response to Speaker 8: her pearl? Speaker 1: In response to hers. So so one of them, I I saw, there once was a gal named Renee who wouldn't get out of the way. She stopped taking her meds and went after the feds, which effectively ended her day. What a shame. What a shame. She only has herself to blame. Speaker 7: It is true. Yeah. That was pretty good. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's pretty good. Speaker 2: We we Speaker 7: should That was put that Yeah. Speaker 1: That to one of our AI things. Speaker 7: Yeah. No. No. That was pretty good. And you know, it's like it's like I'm torn as a Christian because loss of human life is sad. She is burning in hell. That is sad. And, you know, she but she made her choices. That's the thing. You made your choice. If you choose to live your life partnered with the devil, obviously, writing poetry, fighting against your own nation borders and disrespecting authority. The bible literally says that you have to honor the authority of the government that's given to you because it's established there by God no matter who it is. You cannot do what you were doing and not expect to reap the consequences of that. Also, her wife was the one who told her, I don't even acknowledge her as a wife, her partner told her, drive baby, drive. You hear her tell her to run into that that guy. I mean it's it was consequences, you reap what you sow. Speaker 1: It's a 100% true. And she she admitted in that statement also the the partner, the Butch partner. She admitted that she had pressured, you know, this this other woman to come to this. What it comes down to, people don't live in reality. And of course, the the situation we're currently in as a nation is we are finally addressing the immigration crisis. There were people that were willing to kill over this. Alright? We're not talking about gang members either. There are left wing militias that have been training for years, and some of these people have come out of the woodwork recently to commit heinous acts of violence. So when you look at the Charlie Kirk situation, These people are unhinged. I mean, remember the the Covenant Christian School in in Nashville and Tennessee? These people will come out and they will hurt people. Speaker 7: Yeah. They buried that with the transgender that killed all those little Christian kids. No. They're they're literally demonically possessed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 7: And no, that is what we are fighting. We're fighting demons and a demon, you know, she was demonically possessed obviously and it it ended up costing her her life. So, you know, choose today who you will serve because Satan hates you. That's the thing left like they serve Satan and they think that he loves them back. No. He comes to steal, kill, and destroy from you. He hates you just as much as he hates me. And that's the reality of it. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's it's sad. And as you noted, if you die and you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and savior, you lost the race. Speaker 7: Yep. Speaker 1: And Satan won. Speaker 7: I know that the her son, who's allegedly six years old, I believe, his grandfather is trying to get custody of him, and I pray for him that he gets it so he is not left in the arms and care of that butch, irresponsible, demonically possessed, cigarette smoking, putting out on children person. And I hope the grandfather gets it. So I pray for the kid. I pray for the child, the six year old boy, her son. Speaker 1: That's a good prayer. Alright. So we're gonna be producing these segments a lot more. So hopefully, you'll see more of us. But, of course, we're able to do this because of our sponsors, one of them being Golco. So the other thing that happened over the break, Lauren, is that silver went through the freaking roof. Do you see this? It went up to almost $80 an Speaker 7: ounce. Really? Yeah. Silver I bought silver from Golco over over the Christmas, and it came in. That's funny. So it went up in value. Yeah. Yeah. My dad just bought $50,000 in silver too because he said, Lauren, silver's going up. You need to buy more silver. You need to buy more silver. That's smart. Speaker 1: That's smart. Speaker 7: So that's funny because my order came in from Goldco, and I got really cool coins and some really awesome stuff. Make So sure you go to stolenliberties.com. I know, Ed, didn't you record don't we have something, a special offer for them now? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. So here is the New Year offer for Goldco. Check it out. Are you ready to start the New Year right? Unfortunately, political chaos could mean a turbulent 2026, and that's why tens of thousands of hardworking Americans are helping safeguard their retirement savings with precious metals like gold and silver, and they're turning to the top rated precious metals company, Goldco, to do so. Plus, when you buy from Goldco, you can get up to 10% back in free silver or gold on qualified purchases. That's right. 10% just for getting started. This bonus has no limits, but it won't last forever. So if you're looking to help protect your savings, this is for you. And right now, Goldco is offering a free 2026 gold and silver kit to help you learn more about how gold and silver can help you retire on your terms. Plus, you could get that amazing bonus gold or silver offer. Don't wait until it's too late. Visit stolenliberties.com to learn more. That's stolenliberties.com. Okay. Speaker 7: So silver went up to $80? I'm shocked to hear this, actually. I should really probably keep a closer eye on it because, like, you know, my own assets, but Wow. That's great. Speaker 1: Well, then what did they say? The best investments are the ones you don't have to monitor twenty four seven. So That's true. You know, it's good. And if you had invested, if you'd listened and you're watching us, two, three years ago, CrossTalk News, you're seeing us out there, we were telling you that the times are tumultuous, and silver and gold were going to be awesome investments. Speaker 7: Bought silver and gold back in 2021 when we told you to, you'd be a very wealthy person now. I'm telling you now is the time again. Stolenliberties.com. Speaker 0: The agenda. Okay. Speaker 1: Alright. So I prepared another segment. I know you're not you're not as excited about this stuff, but I think you'll find it interesting. So there's been some weird stuff happening in the last two months with the fourth industrial revolution with the beast system that could be forming. While we're a huge fan of what president Trump's doing with immigration, I I don't think that Papa Trump knows much about the tech overlords that have come into the garden. Speaker 7: Oh, well, that's J. D. Vance's vote. Speaker 1: J. D. Loves the tech overlords. Yep. Especially the tech He met Speaker 7: with too. Trump did. He had dinner That's true. With Elon. Speaker 1: They had dinner and maybe they talked about the coming robot armies. But I'll tell you, there was some stuff I caught. And then I'm gonna keep this short, but I'm gonna tell you, the first thing is, president Trump said something really, really weird. And he was talking about how you know, about five g. You know, it's it's the new telecommunications infrastructure. We're supposed to make the movies download in, five seconds. Right? Well, six g is supposed to be more widespread and specifically uses Elon Musk's satellites, the low Earth orbiting satellites, what was your Starlink and other stuff like that. So it's way faster and more connected. Well, president Trump said it it does more than that. It also helps look under your skin. This is kinda weird. Check this out. This was at the the White House here in December. Speaker 2: So we're into six g now. I I just finished five g. I was I was a leader on five g getting that done. And now they're up to six. Let's do it again. What does that do? Give you a a a little bit deeper view into somebody's skin? See how perfect that is. Speaker 1: Alright. So you heard him say six g provides a deeper look into Somos skin. This could just be president Trump kinda just he doesn't under really understand the technology and he's just making a joke. Right? Speaker 7: Pretty sure he told people to inject bleach during Speaker 2: COVID when I was here. Speaker 1: Hey. You know, it's Speaker 7: But you know what? Oh, we didn't mention this real quick. They did Trump bravo changed the childhood schedule RFK and him did it from 72 vaccines to 11. So carry on. I'm gonna take the benefit of the doubt that he wants this. He's a big innovator. He's an imperialist. He wants to go to Mars, he wants to be the leader of AI and technology and maybe it's a medical technology, maybe he's going a little too far and he probably goes into dangerous territory, but maybe he just doesn't know. Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's we'll give the benefit of the doubt. We'll just talk about it. Like, another thing Speaker 7: that dreams caught my mind big. Speaker 1: He dreams big and is he wants a golden age. Now the other thing that caught my attention was president Trump just signed a memorandum, and this memorandum was to accelerate six g deployment. Well, inside of this, it said something really, really weird. It said the goal is to operate implantable technologies. Speaker 7: Implantable as in Speaker 1: Implantable technologies. Now what it specifically said, this is the memorandum for the whitehouse.gov you're seeing here on screen. It says that section one purpose, the next generation of mobile communication networks, six g, will be foundational to the national security, foreign policy, and economic prosperity of The United States. This technology will play a vital role in the development and adoption of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, and implantable technologies. Alright? So, again, maybe what they're saying to president Trump because we, you know, we use dinner with Elon Musk. We know Elon Musk is a fan of implantable brain chips. Right? Maybe they're telling him that there's no danger to these things. They they just you can operate your cell phone instead of it being in your hand. You can think a tweet. Right? I can I can kinda understand why he might not think this is something that we should be concerned Speaker 7: about? I think we should chip, like, pedophiles and stuff. And I I, you know, and I thought about it, you know, in this modern day and age, I may you know, I wouldn't mind putting a microchip in my kids so I can keep know where they are. You know? It's crazy. People steal kids and Speaker 1: You chip you chip for me. Speaker 7: I I would. Speaker 2: Oh my gosh. Speaker 7: Chip her. I know. It's crazy. I just you know? And I could know her location at all times. Speaker 1: You know? Speaker 7: You're looking up I mean, it's a crazy world out there, but no. I know that this is, like, leading up to the beast system. I I know that this even though the intentions are good, later I know the end result because the Bible tells me what the end result is. It's it's probably gonna be used as the mark of the beast. Speaker 1: Look. And look. All these things, we'll see how they develop. There's one other thing I caught. Alright. So for the Department of War's budget, they have to announce, line items, things they're gonna spend money on, things which they'd like to see as a priority. They have announced that they are going to be engaging in cognitive electromagnetic warfare. Alright. This is a budget item. Speaker 7: Like Havana syndrome? Speaker 1: Could be. Could be Havana syndrome. Could be like MK Ultra. Could be something like Oh. It says electromagnetic warfare. Cognitive electromagnetic warfare. Now I looked into this a little further. So in the budget item, it lists this. They're gonna spend $44,267,000. You see here on screen, this is from the budget. 44,000,000 for this, and it's gonna be run by the Department of Air Force's, research and development team, RDT and E, the research development and test and evaluations. They're be doing some weird stuff with this. Now I I also looked there was an attachment in this that was, given to NATO. Was a NATO report on this. And it said that cognitive warfare is about exploiting cognition to influence or modify decision making through any means and technological advances. So, okay, this sounds like they're trying to develop some kind of technology this year that's gonna be able to mess with your brain. Speaker 7: Change people's decision making. So maybe you don't like the decisions Vladimir Putin's making. You can send warfare, this electromagnetic warfare to their brain to change their behavior. Fascinating. I mean, I guess that's it's kinda genius. I mean, it's terrifying, but, I mean, it's it's how you win if you're, you know, about to launch World War three or something. But wow. Speaker 1: We we could take it into a realm because you talked about shipping your daughter. I think, obviously Speaker 7: For safety purposes. Speaker 1: For safety natural security. Speaker 7: Control her brain. Speaker 1: For for Witzky security, but there's something here. Okay. So if if we can manipulate minds Speaker 7: That's interesting. So they're studying they've dedicated forty hundred and forty million Speaker 4: $40.4000000. Speaker 7: 44,000,000 Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 7: To electromagnetically change behaviors. Speaker 1: Yeah. And and look, what if, as you said, the pedophile example, we would probably agree to Speaker 7: do that. Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Like, if you could change Fry Speaker 7: fry that bird. Speaker 1: They they made that Speaker 7: pedophile I wanna give them a second chance. Speaker 1: Want this to happen. They they've talked about doing this kind of, like, the electro electronic, you know, therapy, you know, Speaker 7: shocking things. Even still if you can get them like, they probably can't change the desire, but they can change Yeah. Hey. I'm not gonna go molest and steal that kid. That's interesting. I bet they I hope they test on pedophiles first. Speaker 1: Oh, sure. Speaker 2: That that would be an effector. Speaker 7: Don't stop doing it beetles. Speaker 1: Stop doing it on beetles. Well and and look, so I was looking into this, and as it turns out Interesting. We've been working with some interesting folks over the last six months. And one of the groups that we've become pretty close with is a group called the targeted individuals, TIs. Alright. They're people that claim that they've been microchipped or they're being messed with remotely through electronic signals. Now I didn't know what to think of this at first, to be fair. I mean and, you know, you and I have talked to us a little bit. I mean, people think this is crazy. I've met some of them, and a few of them, of course, they they come off everything but crazy. They they come off very coherent. And there's an individual that we've been working with. His name is Dominic. Now, today, when I was researching this topic, like, do I make of this? They're they're might be doing MK Ultra in the military. What the heck is all this stuff? They're doing implantable microchip research in in through the White House. Okay. I found a video, and it actually it turned out it was from Dominic. Dominic had produced this. He just finished this movie, and this is a trailer from, what Dominic's been looking at when it comes to targeted individuals. There's something called Havana syndrome, Lauren, where there were government officials. The government has somewhat admitted this is a real thing. Enemy powers like Russia, China, or maybe even our own CIA have been sending electronic waves through walls. You know, as president Trump said, you know, six g goes through walls, can look through maybe skin. Someone's been doing this as a weapon and they've been hurting people. They hurt people in the US embassy in Havana, Cuba. Mhmm. They hurt people in China too. There were state department officials that now are under treatment. Speaker 7: Australia used it against protesters right. Protesters. Speaker 1: So so this isn't that crazy, but it is crazy when you think about it in this respect to, like, Black Mirror and, like, the dystopian world. Well, what Dominic did, I want to show you this video. Dominic put this together in such a succinct way. It I I'm a believer. I think this is real. Speaker 9: These are very covert weapons, aren't they? Speaker 6: This weapon is designed to bathe a target's living quarters in microwaves. They're designed to make the target feel like they're crazy. Speaker 4: Volusional, fantastical, crazy, crazy talk. It was the lyrics of the song being said out loud in a robotic voice. I froze. Speaker 8: I started to hear family members and friends' voices in my head. Speaker 10: If you're a religious person, they might try pretend to be an angel or a demon or something. Speaker 8: There were visuals being sent to me while I was driving. There was a car accident. The vehicle that I was in rolled over. Speaker 4: Somebody is touching you and doing sexual acts, but there's nobody there. They wanted me to know. They it was like I could feel this vibrating. Voices in their heads telling her, we are not raping you. We're just stimulating you. Speaker 11: We have confirmed that these kids are in fact receiving directed energy weapons and and voice to skulls. Speaker 4: Somebody do something. Someone. Freaking someone do something. It was like a red hot poker going into each year. I thought I was gonna die. Speaker 10: This is wickedness and this is evil and it has to stop. Speaker 4: My life went from normal and even boring to really terrifying overnight. Speaker 5: If they put you on this program, there's no getting away from it. Speaker 12: It forced me into suicide twice. Speaker 4: Electronic harassment perpetrated through the use of directed energy weapons. Speaker 12: ABC News has learned that shooter Aaron Alexis was kicked out of navy housing just weeks before his rampage because he was raving about voices in his head. Speaker 3: The most horrific weapon ever made is being used on human beings. Our thoughts are not private. I will be launching the first counterattack against mind control in human history. Speaker 4: 39 year old Steven Marlowe is in custody. The suspect is accused of shooting and killing four people. Speaker 5: Father, I ask that you forgive me of my sins, all my past sins, all my present sins, and all my future sins. Speaker 9: What causes a seemingly well liked guy to plan a mass murder? Is it mental illness or as many suggests, being a victim of gang stalking? Speaker 4: This isn't okay. I'm a veteran. This isn't the country that we fought for. When does this program end? Who's going to step in? Who's going to do something about this? Speaker 8: There's only so many people you can dismiss as delusional and crazy. Speaker 1: That's interesting. Speaker 7: Right? No. That's very interesting and this real pro it's real programs. That's interesting. You know, and I used to get calls when I was a booker before from this woman. I remember this woman specifically. And it's crazy because they they make them like, they literally say it made me feel like I'm crazy and I thought this woman was crazy. And she's like, no. Like, I worked with the government, I went through all this and they're messing with me. They're messing with my brain. I I they're they're using directed energy weapons and I was like, yeah, okay, lady. But that's crazy. Now I'm starting to feel bad like maybe she was right and, you know, it's they're torturing them, especially the little kid. Oh my goodness. Speaker 1: One and that's I really think the Lord is using us and our platform, know, through the Died Suddenly platform to help this community. I think there's something there. It could be spiritual, you know, because Dominic has recently become a Christian too. A lot of people in this TI, the targeted individuals community, are turning to Jesus because that's the only thing that stops the voices, stops the attacks. And and I think the the biggest thing in there is that you see that there were people that later became mass shooters, went out in some kind of rampage. Speaker 7: And it's voiced to skull. So they don't have a chip implanted or they do or they're Some Speaker 1: claimed of to have them. By the way, I'll give a little bit of a preview. We may be videotaping the removal of one of these alleged chips from someone's cheek. So if that happens, I can't explain why a chip would be in someone's face. No. Right? So, what we're gonna be looking at this and have been looking into it, and of course, you're gonna probably see a little bit of Dominic's work, over over the course of the next couple months through, the agenda. But, hey, president Trump is looking into this kind of technology. Speaker 7: And, no, they're investing a lot of money in that technology. Speaker 1: A lot of money Speaker 7: is studying, and somebody's getting studied. Speaker 1: And now we we see Speaker 7: that our under the radar. It's so funny you dug that up. That was good work, Ed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Glad to do it. Okay. So it is that time of the episode. It is Oh, dear Speaker 7: lord. Speaker 1: So you you have to eventually come up Speaker 7: with The some dad joke. Speaker 1: Gotta come Speaker 7: up with some I'm a kind of sad. I can't Speaker 2: tell you. Speaker 1: Come up with, like, the Lauren joke. So maybe it's the Lauren, beauty, you know, suggestion, advice segment or something. Okay. Okay. Alright. So Speaker 7: I shower once a week. I recommend that. No. I'm Speaker 1: just kidding. Did I did I do the Chinese Maybe. Before? Did I do the Chinese jokes before? Speaker 7: Yes. Speaker 1: I did. Mhmm. Speaker 7: They were good ones. Speaker 1: Okay. I will do this one. This is a it's a computer joke. Okay? What's the difference between an American and a computer? Speaker 7: I wanna make an Indian reference, a joke, but I I can't come off at the top of my head. So go. Speaker 1: Americans don't have troubleshooting. Speaker 7: Oh. Oh, that's a left target. Speaker 2: Is it a left target? Speaker 1: A Oh, no. Speaker 2: Well, I Speaker 7: guess not. I mean, it could be American. I I don't know. Speaker 2: Alright. It was Speaker 4: a good one. Speaker 1: Do a joke then. Okay? What do hillbillies do on Thanksgiving? Speaker 7: They Speaker 1: Pumpkin. Speaker 7: Oh, gosh. Speaker 1: A good Alrighty. Speaker 7: That was a good one. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. Hopefully, we didn't insult anybody. Hey, everybody. Thank you for tuning in to Speaker 7: Pumpkin the Thanksgiving. Speaker 1: Hey. You got you got it. You gotta laugh. Speaker 7: Comment below Speaker 2: so we can block you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Comment hate in the comment section if you hate the dad. Speaker 7: Follow unfollow. Speaker 1: Unfollow and and comment hate. Okay. Well, that's it for today's agenda, tonight's agenda. Interesting. Speaker 7: Let's go into more of the transhuman and stuff. Alright. Before Ed and I talked this we were playing this segment and I was like, oh, transhumanism stuff. Like, yeah, not really. Now, I'm like intrigued because it's real. It's real real. We'll cover it next Speaker 2: week. Speaker 1: Yeah. We'll keep them we'll keep them to the point. But I'm telling you, anytime we bring it up, like most of the topics we talk about, I think you're gonna find Speaker 7: And I know you guys have been recording and doing this microchip, like those people that really have microchips in them. They're testing positive. Alex Jones tested positive. He's a targeted individual. And it might not be where they're making them feel crazy, it's just changing their behaviors and their decision making, like making And that's interesting and he tested positive. Know Masterpiece dot Health, One Speaker 2: of our Speaker 7: other sponsors is doing this study. So if you wanna support them and their heavy metal detox removal, masterpiece.health is their website. And you can spell masterpiece either way. Speaker 1: Yeah. They just they just did a study actually, that showed 80% reduction in aluminum inside of people who've been taking Speaker 7: With their detox? Speaker 1: Yeah. It works. Speaker 7: They're the real deal. Speaker 1: But they they are investing in studies, and we're actually gonna be in England, here in about a week and a half to, see the second phase of that study. Awesome. A live we're gonna do a livestream from there, a panel discussion on implantables and and Havana syndrome. It's gonna be pretty cool, so we'll we'll share it Speaker 7: that time. Interesting. Speaker 1: Well, it is Friday, and we have loved ones that should see us. So thank you so much, for joining us tonight on the agenda. On behalf of Lauren Witzke, I'm Embrance God bless you. Thank Speaker 0: you for being part of the agenda.
Saved - January 7, 2026 at 4:22 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Rockefeller’s money decided what doctors were allowed to learn, and how they treated patients… https://t.co/Ki6XqScwh4

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

“John D. Rockefeller bought out all the major universities... and basically created his own curriculum for medicine….” And the only way that you could get grants is by using their curriculum for medicine His unlimited funding was used to debunk any sort of natural remedies… https://t.co/SE92G1gkFF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends that the medical industry operates on a foundational lie. They claim that John D. Rockefeller bought all the major universities and major media companies early on, using his money to create his own curriculum for medicine. According to this view, the only way to obtain grants was to use that curriculum for medicine, and that curriculum was based on pharmacology. The assertion continues that pharmacology was rooted in the extraction of substances from oil, and that these medicines extracted from oil were discovered to be cancer-causing. It is claimed that those in power used their influence and media reach to debunk all forms of natural therapy. The statement then alleges that any doctor who dared speak up against them was completely discredited, had their lives destroyed, and some were assassinated and killed. The speaker adds a broader maxim: whatever you need in life will control you, and if you think you need your pills, you’ll be controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and the people who control them. The message concludes with an emotional reaction, “Anyway, fucking hell. Just calm down.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, the fucking medical industry is based on a complete lie. John D. Rockefeller bought all the major universities, all the major media companies early, early, early with all of his money and basically created his own curriculum for medicine, and the only way that you could get grants is by using their curriculum for medicine. And their curriculum for medicine was based on what? Pharmacology. And what was pharmacology rooted in? The extraction of substances from oil. But then they started to realize, holy shit, these medicines that we're extracting from oil are actually creating cancer. And they use all of their power, they use all of their media influence to debunk all forms of natural therapy, and any doctor that dared speak up against them, do know what happened to them? They were completely discredited, and their lives were destroyed, and some of them were assassinated and killed. Again, whatever you need in life will control you. And if you think you need your pills, you'll be controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and the people that control them. Anyway, fucking hell. Just calm down.
Saved - November 19, 2025 at 5:25 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

MY MIGA: Susie Wiles Exposed 1:29 - Affordability Crisis Admission 1:41 - Trump Polling Lows 3:34 - Zionist MAGA Takeover 4:38 - Adelson Attacks Critics 9:06 - Trump Epstein Ties 10:00 - Epstein Death Theories 11:30 - Susie Wiles Gatekeeping

Saved - November 12, 2025 at 3:34 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨 BREAKING: World Economic Forum advisor Yuval Noah Harari admits that "science is not really about truth, it's about power." https://t.co/8Oak8IJdRQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
To collaborate on a large scale, you need to convince everybody to believe in the same story. The engine of history is stories, and they don't even need to be true; some of the most powerful stories in history were fictions. You need to get everybody, or at least a significant part of the population, to believe in the same story, otherwise it doesn’t work. Science, as a historian notes, is not really about truth. It’s about power. The real aim of science as a project and as an institution is power, even if particular individuals within science may be very interested in the truth personally. Those who own the data really own the future. We are reaching a point in human history where we have enough biological knowledge and enough computing power. All you need in order to systematically hack millions of people is just the data. To hack people means to know people better than they know themselves. Somebody in San Francisco, in Beijing, can know you more than you know about yourself—your medical condition, your mental weaknesses, things you did five years ago, twenty years ago you completely forgot about. They know it. This is something we never faced before; not even the KGB could do it. And we are already beginning to see the emergence of such total surveillance regimes in places like Xinjiang, in places like in Israel, which has a big laboratory of surveillance called the occupied territories. There you have 2,500,000 guinea pigs of how to completely survey and control a population with very few soldiers. When you look at the numbers, it’s amazing how few soldiers you need to control millions of people if you have the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To collaborate on a large scale, you need to convince everybody to believe in the same story. What's really the the the engine of history is stories. And they don't even need to be true. Some of the most powerful stories in history were fictions. Right. But you need to get everybody, or at least a significant part of the population, to believe in the same story. Otherwise, it doesn't work. Speaker 1: Science is not really at least this is why I view as a historian, science is not really about truth. It's about power. The real aim of science as a project, as an establishment, is not truth, it's power. Particular individuals, particular scientists may be very interested in the truth personally. But as an institution, the real aim of science is power. Speaker 0: Those who own the data really own the future. Mhmm. We are reaching a point in human history that we have enough biological knowledge and we have enough computing power. And all you need in order to systematically hack millions of people is just the data. Mhmm. That to hack people means to know people better than they know themselves. To to somebody in San Francisco, in Beijing knows you Yeah. Knows more about you than you know about yourself. Mhmm. About your medical condition, about your mental weaknesses, things that you did five years ago, twenty years ago, you completely forgot about them, they know it. Right. This is something we never faced before. Not even the KGB could do it. Right. And we are already beginning to see the emergence of such total surveillance regimes in places like Xinjiang, in places like in my own home country in Israel, we have this big laboratory of surveillance called the occupied territories. Where you have 2,500,000 guinea pigs of how to completely survey and control a population Yeah. With very few soldiers. I mean, when you look at the numbers, it's amazing how few soldiers you need Yeah. To control millions of people if you have the data.
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 11:14 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

This is completely shocking… "One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people." "Within a year, 36 of them were dead." "And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that." https://t.co/pqCMSdEEY9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they were on board at the beginning, but based on their data and experience, excess deaths are occurring. They reference “one vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people,” and state that “within a year, thirty six of them were dead,” adding that this is “one point eight trillion to one against.” They assert, “That should never happen. The odds.” The speaker notes there are “hundreds and hundreds of instances like that,” across New Zealand. They claim this is “what got the church. One of them.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you noticed the ninety one what was it? The Yeah. I was all on board at the beginning, and that's something that they cannot dispute. But I saw something in the data based on my experience that shouldn't be happening, and that was the excess deaths which you're referring to. One vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead, and that is one point eight trillion to one against. That should never happen. The odds. And there are yeah. And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that. All over New Zealand. That's what got the church. One of them.
Saved - October 16, 2025 at 2:57 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨🚨🚨 https://t.co/ODUOjVSRHX

Video Transcript AI Summary
They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 2:30 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨The CDC covertly held meetings about the rise of autism: "They looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine ... They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days and there was a 10,000% increase." https://t.co/JXE9rfJcoO

Video Transcript AI Summary
1989 saw a surge in autoimmune and related diseases: juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, Crohn's disease, allergic and neurological diseases, and obesity appeared. "There's a number of things that could be blamed for it." The CDC considered the vaccine schedule and studied the hepatitis B vaccine, comparing children who got it in the first thirty days with those who did not. Among the first‑thirty‑day group, there was a "ten thousand percent increased risk" for a later autism diagnosis; "Oh, I know it was eleven point three five." "So it's eleven hundred and thirty five percent increased risk." They noted "a relative risk of eleven point three five." "If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed." "The link between cigarettes smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for twenty years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of ten. This was eleven point three shit." An emergency meeting was held at Simpson Wood with leaders from vaccine industry, pharmaceutical industry, universities, NIH, CDC, FDA, WHO, and EMA for two days to discuss the study. Day 1: "bulletproof... real science." Day 2: "how to hide it from the American public." The speaker published excerpts and faced heat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, there's a number of things that happened in 1989. But it's those diseases, all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared. I never knew anybody with juvenile diabetes. When I was a kid, a typical pediatrician would see one case of juvenile diabetes in his career. Today, one out of every three kids who walks through his office door has something happened. Why isn't anybody talking about this? Rheumatoid arthritis suddenly exploded, lupus, all these autoimmune diseases, you know, Crohn's disease, these exotic diseases, nobody ever heard of when I was a kid. Now they're everywhere. And so you have allergic diseases, you have neurological disease and autoimmune diseases, and obesity suddenly appear around 1989. And so there's a number of things that could be blamed for it. Well, the CDC thought it it may be the vaccine schedule. Let's check. So they looked at the they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis b vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first thirty days, and then they looked at kids who had not gotten it in thirty days. In other words, kids who got it later or didn't get it at all. And they compared these two groups. And among the kids who got it in the first thirty days, there was a I think it was a ten thousand percent increased risk for a later subsequent autism diagnosis if you got in the first thirty days. Wow. So they immediately knew what was causing it. Oh, I know it was eleven point three five. So it's eleven hundred and thirty five percent increased risk. And so they knew immediately. It's called a relative risk of eleven point three five. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed. This was eleven point three five. The link between cigarettes smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for twenty years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of ten. This was eleven point three shit. So they knew what it was. And then they they had an emergency meeting that they called. They didn't wanna do it on CDC campus because they thought it would be susceptible to freedom of information requests. So they they did it in a a very in this remote retreat center called Simpson Wood, which is a Methodist retreat center on the on the wooded banks of the Chattahoochee River in a remote part of Georgia. And they had all of the big pangerems from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry, from the universities who are the ones who test the vaccines, from NIH, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization, the European Medical Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study. The first day, they're all and somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me. And I published excerpts from it. But the first day, they're they're all talking about, oh my god. You know, the the the lawyers are gonna come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof. You know, there's no way to argue with this. This is real science. We can't you know, what are we gonna do? The second day, they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public. And I published these things. Oh, then, you know, I took a lot of heat at that point. But I, you know,
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 11:04 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨WORLD PREMIERE🚨 DS2: Nano Sapiens (2025) | Fundraising Trailer What is bigger than Snowden, larger than Wikileaks, scarier than Epstein? Have we become the machine? Take a stand for humanity, join us at http://DS2nano.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Way back in 1778, the Continental Congress unanimously passed America's first whistle blower law. It recognized the duty to give the earliest information to Congress of any misconduct, frauds, misdemeanors committed by anyone working for government. Two hundred forty six years later, whistleblowers have an incredible record of changing the course of history. In 2019, I was approached by leadership. The vendor was BiomeTech. Government is going to grant themselves powers unilaterally to create greater control over American society and global society. COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize. Total biometric surveillance. We need not just to monitor people. We need to monitor what's happening under their skin. Microchips and tracking devices are embedded in the vaccine. Is this accurate? All of your biometric data, your location, your privacy, it's gone. If you took the vaccine, you are the routers. You are a communication device now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Way back in 1778, the Continental Congress unanimously passed America's first whistle blower law. Speaker 1: I did this clearly at my own company. Speaker 0: It recognized the duty to give the earliest information to Congress of any misconduct, frauds, misdemeanors committed by anyone working for government. Speaker 2: The information I'm presenting is made as a protected communication under Title 10 USC ten thirty four as a whistleblower. Three, I, I, everybody. Speaker 0: Two hundred forty six years later, whistleblowers have an incredible record of changing the course of history. Speaker 1: In 2019, I was approached by leadership. There were five clients and there was a vendor in the room. The vendor was BiomeTech. These are the notes that I took during the conversation of the meeting with the stakeholders for the contact tracing application. Took the fabric of my reality and just rubbed me. I mean, it just made me question everything. Speaker 3: Government is going to grant themselves powers unilaterally to create greater control over American society and global society. COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize Speaker 2: Upload complete. Speaker 3: Total biometric surveillance. It's always the data. It's the crack cocaine of Silicon Valley. We are already living inside the architecture of totalitarianism. We need not just to monitor people. We need to monitor what's happening under their skin. I know my husband is not vaccinating people and putting a microchip in her arm because that technology doesn't even exist and he's never uttered the words out of his mouth, so. Speaker 0: Microchips and tracking devices are embedded in the vaccine. Is this accurate? Speaker 1: We have six MAC addresses that are pulsing Bluetooth signals and all we are is surrounded by tombstones. Speaker 3: So can someone explain to me why we're getting EMF emissions off a grave inside of a Faraday cage, please? So we've seen the reports of individuals having unlicensed MAC addresses post vaccination. I've seen evidence of that myself. Speaker 1: One of the requirements that just changed the entire course of the conversation and frankly my life, that's when lipid nano came into the conversation. Speaker 4: These are not vaccines. These are not biological. As you go through the patent in section two nineteen, it explains how they are self assembled nanoparticles and they're fully programmable. Speaker 1: From a technical perspective, if I can retrieve data, I can send data. Speaker 0: DARPA calls it transhumanism. Speaker 1: Can you hear what I just said and not wanna just step away? Speaker 4: Blood samples aren't supposed to have blinking lights, but there they are. They're little dots. They move across the slide, and they're blinking. This was, brain tissue that had been sitting in a jar of formalin for six months. Even if Speaker 0: the body dies, they continue? Speaker 4: Yes, apparently. Speaker 1: All of your biometric data, your location, your privacy, it's gone. If you took the vaccine, you are the routers. You are a communication device now.
DS2 - Nano Sapiens Bigger than Snowden. Larger than WikiLeaks. Scarier than Epstein ds2nano.com
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 2:17 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

The COVID vaccine is undeniably deadly https://t.co/2xbjm4xjGA

Saved - July 2, 2025 at 6:16 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

RFK Jr: "Wiping out the small farmers and giving control of food production to corporations is not in the interest of humanity." https://t.co/ITwN30IZHg

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a shift towards corporate carbon capture and geoengineering solutions, which the speaker opposes, especially since those pushing geoengineering often have IP rights and patents, creating a self-serving appearance. The speaker sided with Dutch farmers protesting environmental rules on nitrate fertilizers, viewing it as a corporate and government collusion that forced farmers into chemical and GMO-dependent farming. After farmers switched to hydrocarbon-based fertilizers and monocultures, they were told these practices were bad and would be shut down. The speaker views this as a bait and switch to destroy small farmers. They believe that broad land ownership by yeoman farmers is necessary for democracy. Wiping out small farmers and giving control of food production to corporations is not in the interest of humanity. Farmers need help transitioning off the addiction imposed upon them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What you're seeing is a shift away from those concerns and more towards corporate carbon capture, which, you know, is a is a it can be monetized by the corporations and exploited without seeing any real benefit on the ground. And also geoengineering solutions, which I oppose. And if you look at the kind of geoengineering solutions that are being pushed, they it tends to be the people who are pushing them also have IP rights, in other words, patent rights, in a lot of those technologies. And and there is definitely an optic of self interest and self serving commitment. Speaker 1: We had one example here in Europe recently, which were the farmers' protests taking place in The Netherlands, because there were environmental rules that came into place about using nitrate fertilizers and so on that were very severe and were appeared to for the kind of populist, frankly the kind of voters who might be interested in you, they were very angry about it and they took to the streets, and there was this sense that the environmental policy wasn't actually paying attention to ordinary people's economic reality. Did you observe that and do where would you I I Speaker 0: my you know, I I fell on the side of the farmers in that debate because I saw happened over the years, which I've been fighting, which is that the the the the the the power of corporations and this combination of corporate and and, government power, which colluded to get those farmers to switch over to heavily nitrate fertilizer dependent for, farming and chemical dependent farming. And that was a deliberate systematic and GMO farming. And that was deliberate, it was purposeful, and systematic. And so once you get all of those farmers to switch to hydrocarbon based fertilizers and to monocultures, then you say, okay. Those things are bad, and now we're gonna shut you all down. So that is what happened. And, you know, I had a a long conversation on my podcast about this issue with Vandana Shiva who felt the same way, took the same position I did. That this is a bait and switch. This is a way of destroying the small farmers. And if we wanna have democracy, we need a broad ownership of our land by, you know, by a wide variety of of yeoman farmers each with a stake of our system. As what Thomas Jefferson said, in wiping out the small farmers and giving control of food production to corporation is not in the interest of humanity. You know, we need to help those farmers transition off the addiction that we imposed upon them in the first place.
Saved - July 2, 2025 at 4:58 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

https://t.co/axMJdepxls

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the largest autopsy series to date, the speaker is the senior author. After reviewing deaths and using an adjudication committee to determine cause, it was found that in 73.9% of cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, the vaccine was determined to be the cause of death. The first author of the study is Holsher and colleagues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And do you have any science to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First author is Holsher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.
Saved - July 2, 2025 at 3:47 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

When will they start paying the hospital bills, funeral expenses and compensation to the millions affected by FDA/CDC for fast tracking this Bio-Weapon

@US_FDA - U.S. FDA

Today, FDA provided important updates on the risk of myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, noting the risk is higher in young men. https://t.co/mo5LCRmuzE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA approved an updated safety label for all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on 06/25/2025, harmonizing the age range and adding data about myocarditis. The update is based on the unadjusted crude incident rate from the 2023-2024 formulation and concerning cardiac MR findings. The rate of myo- and pericarditis is eight per million in all persons, and twenty-seven per million in young men aged 12-24. A 2024 FDA-funded study showed a high proportion of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 induced myocarditis had initial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MR, with 60% continuing to have LGE at five months follow-up. LGE is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality. The updated safety label states the unadjusted incidence of myocarditis/pericarditis was approximately 27 per million in males 12-24 years of age for the 2023-2024 formulation, and persistence of abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings was common at a median follow-up of approximately five months post vaccination. Early reports of myocarditis after mRNA vaccines came from Israel in February 2021. By April 2021, the CDC was aware of fourteen cases of post-vaccine myocarditis reported by the Department of Defense, yet stated they had not seen a signal. The FDA will perform a new benefit-risk assessment, requiring randomized controlled trials before extending additional BLAs and SBLAs to healthy Americans under 65. Providers should consider recent COVID-19 infection, the absolute risk of severe COVID-19, and recent safety label changes when pursuing COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in young men.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you all for coming. I'm gonna be discussing the safety label update for myocarditis associated with mRNA COVID vaccines, which we just put forward. This came out on 06/25/2025. The FDA approved a required updated warning, which is a class warning for all mRNA COVID nineteen vaccines in conjunction with the manufacturers. I'm gonna walk you through the the updated warning and the basis for the warning. First of all, I'd like to thank David Caslow and the vaccine team and Richard Forshey and the pharmacovigilance team for writing, coordinating, and deploying this safety label change. Also, like to note this SLC was initiated prior to my joining the agency. And note, I'm not using the FDA branch abbreviations in the hopes that this presentation will be more accessible to the general public. The updated safety label. The updated safety label for the mRNA COVID vaccines harmonizes the age range across products and adds additional data about the adverse event of myocarditis and what we know. It's based on two factors. It's based first on the unadjusted crude incident rate from the 2023 to 2024 formulation, and it's also based on persistent and concerning cardiac MR findings. So this is a slide that we put together. This is the FDA analysis of the BEST system, which is an observational data system that calcul that captures myocarditis and pericarditis following immediately afterwards the first seven days COVID nineteen mRNA vaccination. And what you see here is that even in 2023, 2024, the last year for which we have data, you see a rate of myo and pericarditis of eight out of a million in all persons in this age range, and in the highest risk demographic group, young men between the ages of 12 and 24, it's about twenty seven per million. Notably the best dataset does not allow us to disambiguate the risk by product and as such this is a class mRNA safety label. The second piece of evidence that is captured in the new safety label update is some concerning findings we've noted with late gadolinium enhancement. Now late gadolinium enhancement is a radiographic abnormality seen on cardiac resonance imaging, and this is how it's been described prior to in the literature in the context of myocarditis. Mild sorry, patchy myocardial and focal subepicardial enhancement as an expression of potentially irreversible injury is how it's been described. The FDA notably funded a study led by Jane and colleagues in 2024, which showed a among hospitalized patients with COVID nineteen induced myocarditis, a high proportion, the majority had initial late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MR. But most concerningly, at five months of follow-up, sixty percent of these patients continued to have LGE. And our results for late gadolinium enhancement are consistent with many, many others as I'll show you here. This was a study from Australia that followed post six months for post COVID nineteen vaccine induced myocarditis. Over half of the patients were still reporting symptoms, sixty seven percent had abnormal follow-up cardiac MRs, and thirty five percent showed what was listed as evidence of fibrosis. I did a quick systematic review pulling all available publications documenting late gadolinium enhancement, and these are some takeaway summaries. Ninety two percent is occurring in men. Ninety percent have LGE at presentation, but most concerning seventy two percent have persistent LGE even months thereafter, very consistent with the FDA sponsored study. Late gadolinium enhancement is not a benign clinical finding. Multiple studies document that LGE is a poor prognostic factor. That's in many cardiac settings, including for patients with myocarditis. LGE has been associated with increased future cardiovascular events and even increased mortality. We do not know the precise implications for LGE from vaccine induced myocarditis, in part because the follow-up is necessarily so limited. For this reason, the US FDA and the sponsors have issued an SLC with the following two main points. One, the updated unadjusted incidence of myocarditis and or pericarditis was approximately twenty seven per million or one in thirty seven thousand in males twelve to twenty four years of age for the 2023 to twenty twenty four formulation. And two, at a median follow-up of approximately five months post vaccination, persistence of abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings that are a marker for myocardial injury was common. So that's our class safety warning, and I think it's an important warning that was issued with the hard work of the team here. And I wanna take a minute to talk a little bit about the history of COVID nineteen vaccine induced myocarditis, the background and history. So the first reports of this phenomenon were actually came to us by way of Israel. As many of you know, Israel aggressively partnered with Pfizer to have a large wide scale distribution of the mRNA vaccines, and the first reports were reported in the Jerusalem Post in February of twenty twenty one that a young man had been admitted to the intensive care unit with myocarditis after the vaccine. In February 2021, myocarditis safety signals were triggered in the VAERS dataset, and this is a nice timeline put together by a reporter of COVID nineteen vaccines and myocarditis. By April 2021, there were at least two deaths and sixty cases reported from Israel, and these and reports said that these details had been sent to the US FDA and the CDC. And yet by 04/27/2021, then Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director said regarding this phenomenon, quote, we have not seen a signal and we've actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200,000,000 doses we've given. Yet at this time, the CDC was aware of fourteen cases of post vaccine myocarditis reported by the Department of Defense. The Department of Defense would be one of the first to publish this phenomenon, myocarditis following immunization with mRNA COVID vaccines among military members, and these early reports documented rather consistently an elevation in myocarditis risk, particularly to men, particularly for dose two. The CDC initially in the first half of twenty twenty one had planned a health alert network action, which ultimately was not released. And this occurred through the following series of events, which was obtained through FOIA obtained emails. A May 2021 vaccine safety meeting, which included FDA and CDC officials, includes the following draft notes, quote, is VAERS signaling for myocarditis now? And the answer for the age group 16 to 17 and 18 to 24, yes. On 05/25/2021, one day following the meeting where the FDA and CDC official acknowledged a safety concern, the Biden White House distributed talking points to top health officials downplaying the risk of myocarditis. On 05/26/2021, two days after that meeting, then acting FDA commissioner and CDC director notes, quote, the FDA does not concur with the issuance of the Health Alert Network, and instead, it was published as a less formal clinical consideration on the website. The rates of post vaccine myocarditis in men between the ages of 13 and 24 from 2021 have been documented in a number of publications and public documents. In August of twenty twenty one in an FDA regulatory action, we document that based on the health insurance claims Optum dataset, the rate of post vaccination myocarditis from the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was approaching two hundred cases per million or approximately one in five thousand. Prospective study in Hong Kong published in 2021 showed post vaccination myocarditis was approximately one in three thousand for the second Pfizer dose in thirteen to eighteen year old men. And using the VSD, vaccine safety data link data, Scharf and colleagues showed approximately one in two thousand risk of postsecond mRNA dose in eighteen to twenty four year old men. There's an elegant analysis put together by the team led by Tracey Beth Hug and others of post vaccine myocarditis rates reported in 2021, and basically you see across different demographic categories with the far right being men between the ages of 12 and 17, an elevated risk that in some publications exceeded three hundred per million. Active surveillance from Hong Kong confirmed a broadly similar risk in men between the ages of 13 and 18. A one in two thousand seven hundred had experienced myocarditis and were hospitalized following dose two of the Pfizer product. And the vaccine safety data link in a very interesting analysis by Sharf and colleagues was found to have initially missed sixty four percent of myo and pericarditis cases. The authors note, quote, an incomplete list of ICD 10 codes and delays in hospital claims data were responsible for the difference between the VSD reported estimate and a careful chart review estimate. Stratification by demographic factors is key to unpacking the myocarditis risk from COVID nineteen. In an analysis led by Benjamin Knudson and myself prior to joining the FDA, we analyzed publications that examined the risk of vaccines and myocarditis that had zero stratifiers, in other words, looking at all the doses given in the entire population, all the way to four stratifiers, which include looking only at men in certain age range and only certain products and certain doses. And as you can see, there is an association between looking in the right subpopulation where this is a known safety concern and the actual rate with which you'll find the safety signal. VSD chart review for my own pericarditis for the first Pfizer booster documented a rate slightly lower than I think the initial estimates, but one in sixty eight hundred in another analysis led by Sharf and colleagues from Kaiser Permanente. Some analysts based on these emerging safety signal have argued for years that there was some concern about mandatory or coercive boosting, particularly of young men, particularly those who may have also recently had COVID nineteen. And you can see among the authors of one such analysis, there are many names that may be familiar to you. The United States in general, I think, exhibited some potentially missed opportunities for engaging in mitigation on this important safety risk. Notably, spacing the doses of the first two doses further apart was a strategy deployed in Europe approximately one year before the CDC allowed providers to consider it. Another strategy was specific products were restricted for use group in multiple European countries that action was never taken in The United States. Severity and long term sequelae. The CDC data published from a few years ago in 2022 documented clinical outcomes ninety days after post vaccination myocarditis in twelve to twenty nine year olds. Notably, at presentation, this is from VAERS submissions, so there is a reporting element to this. At at at presentation, twenty five percent of these patients were initially admitted to the intensive care unit. One patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ECMO. At ninety days after diagnosis, over twenty five percent continued to be prescribed cardiac medications. Over thirty percent remained on activity restrictions to avoid strenuous exercise. Over half of these patients had more than one persistent abnormality on cardiac MR. Only sixty six percent of these patients were known to have fully recovered, and seventeen percent had not fully recovered by three months. There have also been reports of deaths due to foment myocarditis. This is one report in the New England Journal of Medicine. There are several other reports. As is the case with all idiosyncratic adverse events, these are likely to exist on a spectrum. There's undoubtedly some people who have mild or subclinical myocarditis, and undoubtedly, also, some deaths may be implicated. And we, in our own sponsored data, find that two percent of hospitalized patients required inotropes. Myocarditis from vaccines is a distinct clinical entity likely immunologically mediated. Many analysts have compared this vaccine induced myocarditis against myocarditis following COVID nineteen infection. Yet many of these studies failed to disambiguate myocarditis after COVID nineteen infection versus troponin elevations seen in the setting of severe illness. Furthermore, patients, many, can still get COVID nineteen at some distance after vaccination, accepting the risks of both the vaccine product and the illness, though very likely the illness, the former, is mitigated, though also plausibly there may be a ceiling to that mitigation with additional doses. Hospitalizations from COVID often fail to disambiguate, COVID nineteen being the cause of hospitalization versus COVID nineteen being a bystander diagnosed at hospitalization. The rates of COVID nineteen severe outcomes are declining with widespread vaccine and natural immunity and the evolving nature of the virus, And as such, the FDA will perform a new benefit risk assessment in this target group to continue to reassess the benefit risk balance. Take home points. The FDA concludes that the twenty twenty three to twenty twenty four mRNA vaccines have an unadjusted crude risk of myocarditis of twenty seven per million in young men. This risk has persisted across all of the doses of the product that we've examined. Vaccine induced myocarditis when leading to hospitalization is associated with baseline and persistent late gadolinium enhancement in the majority of patients in our funded study. LGE is a known poor prognostic marker generally, though the full implication of it is unknown in this specific setting. Because of these factors, an SLC was issued. FDA's SLC was initiated by career FDA staff. It represents the latest action by FDA to accurately convey the safety of these products. This may not be the final action, which is contingent on further data. The USFD will not negotiate on safety. Because of these factors, the commissioner and I outlined a COVID nineteen vaccine framework in the New England Journal of Medicine, which broadly will require randomized controlled trials before before extending additional BLAs and SBLAs to healthy Americans under the age of 65. At the same time, our framework will continue to provide additional doses to vulnerable populations based on immunogenicity. Providers should consider recent COVID nineteen infection, the absolute risk of severe COVID nineteen, and recent safety label changes when pursuing COVID nineteen vaccination, particularly in young men. Public trust. Public trust is delicate. In order to regain it, FDA will pursue safety signals with the best available scientific methods and ensure that our marketing authorizations are made only to populations where we have substantial confidence that benefits outweigh the risks. Our recent SLC action is a step towards rebuilding public trust. So I will thank you all for your time and attention. Gonna stop the recording, and then we're gonna turn it over to doctor Butler for some operational matters. Thank you.
Saved - June 16, 2025 at 5:23 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

https://t.co/1EVu8gY3o5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress investigated ACIP over two decades ago, finding conflicts of interest. In 2002/2003, four of five people who added the rotavirus vaccine had direct financial interest; one voted the rotavirus vaccine onto the schedule and sold his rotavirus vaccine for $186 million. Congress found that 97% of ACIP members had undisclosed conflicts. According to the speaker, a critical issue is adding new vaccines without pre-licensing safety studies. In 1986, there were 11 vaccines on the schedule; now, children must take 69 to 92 vaccines to stay in school in some states, none of which have been safety tested in pre-licensing placebo-controlled trials. The speaker states that the people in charge are now gone, and new, credentialed scientists and physicians will be brought onto the ACIP panel to do evidence-based medicine and make objective public health determinations based on science.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of changes to ASIP, this has been a long time coming. More than two decades ago, congress investigated ASIP. A government oversight, committee found that, for example, that year, which was 02/2003, they gave one example that four out of the five people who added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule had direct financial interest in that vaccine. One of those individuals voted the rotavirus onto the vaccine and sold his rotavirus vaccine that he had in development for a $186,000,000. He said he won the lottery. That year, congress said that ninety seven percent of the people on AASIP had undisclosed conflicts. People have known about this for years. You know, probably the worst example of malevolent malpractice has been adding all of these new products to the schedule without doing pre licensing safety studies. Oh, in 1986, there were 11 vaccines on the schedule. Today a compliant child must take between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines to stay in school in some states. And not one of them has been safety tested in a pre licensing placebo controlled trial. And that is just malpractice. So the people who were in charge of that are now gone. And we're gonna be bringing people onto the ACIP panel, not any vaxxers. We're bringing people on who are credentialed scientists, who are highly credentialed physicians, who are gonna do evidence based medicine, who are gonna be objective, and who are gonna follow the science and make critical public health determinations for our children based upon the best science.
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 4:25 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨Woody Harrelson: What if RFK Jr. was right about the "rushed COVID vaccines?" https://t.co/3E7WS4HkPr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identifying as a left-leaning hippie Texan, questions the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines. The speaker wonders if Kennedy was right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a left leaning hippie Texan, maybe it is in my nature to be somewhat rebellious, but, I can't help but wonder, in spite of all of the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. Received for encouraging us to be somewhat skeptical about these rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?

@kova2066 - Kova

@DiedSuddenly_ They put a spell on us🪄 https://t.co/L1XpYn9PoO

Saved - May 27, 2025 at 4:14 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨Woody Harrelson: What if RFK Jr. was right about the "rushed COVID vaccines?" https://t.co/3E7WS4HkPr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identifying as a left-leaning hippie Texan, questions the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines. The speaker wonders if Kennedy was right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a left leaning hippie Texan, maybe it is in my nature to be somewhat rebellious, but, I can't help but wonder, in spite of all of the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. Received for encouraging us to be somewhat skeptical about these rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 4:10 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨Woody Harrelson: What if RFK Jr. was right about the "rushed COVID vaccines?" https://t.co/3E7WS4HkPr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identifying as a left-leaning hippie Texan, questions the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines. The speaker wonders if Kennedy was right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a left leaning hippie Texan, maybe it is in my nature to be somewhat rebellious, but, I can't help but wonder, in spite of all of the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. Received for encouraging us to be somewhat skeptical about these rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?

@JohnWillia90228 - John Williams

@DiedSuddenly_ Check this out https://t.co/jSdw2g4Cqa

@JeckovKanani - Jeckov Kanani

AstraZeneca, can you explain this? 🤔 The people deserve to know the truth @AstraZeneca https://t.co/R3FlO8PCDA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges viewers to use Google Translate, setting the language from Latin to English. When "Astra Zenica" is entered, the translation reads "the road to death." The speaker then states that AstraZeneca is a vaccine and concludes by wishing good luck to those who received it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good day. Tonight, I learned something that keeps with my brain, and I wanna share it with you. Watch this. I want you to go to Google and Google translate Latin to English and I want you to write here a Astra Zenica Do you see? AstraZeneca, the road to death. If you don't know what AstraZeneca is, here is it. For all the people who took the AstraZeneca vaccine, good luck, happy week. Peace.
Saved - May 11, 2025 at 5:14 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

https://t.co/8x2gF4cvqt

Saved - May 2, 2025 at 4:56 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

According to data from Australia, COVID-related deaths increased WITH the rate of vaccination. https://t.co/moc4lRU61t

Saved - May 2, 2025 at 3:19 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

https://t.co/Aha7bvmdXw

Video Transcript AI Summary
A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot. Over 50% of these deaths had a cardiovascular cause. According to the speaker, these findings contradict the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. The speaker claims this research represents the largest series of autopsies indicating patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We arrived at 44 papers, three twenty five autopsies. Then we took each one of the autopsy results out and we put it as a single line item, with all the clinical description. And then we submitted that to adjudication, a blind adjudication. And we found that seventy three point nine percent of all the cases, it was either the vaccine as the direct cause of death or it significantly contributed to the death. The deaths occurred within a week or two after taking the last shot. And far more than fifty percent, the single cause was a cardiovascular cause of death. Speaker 1: Why do you say that this blows the existing narrative out of the water? What is the true significance of what you found here? Speaker 0: The CDC and the FDA at this point in time, the official narrative is they still don't see any evidence that deaths are linked to the vaccine. And they have begrudgingly acknowledged a few cases after the Janssen vaccine, for instance. So the government narrative is still that people do not die after COVID-nineteen vaccination. And now we have the largest series of autopsies and the autopsies really are incontrovertible. The patients are, you know, did die of the vaccine. So it does blow the government narrative out of the water. They're gonna have to wrestle with this. It's garnered tremendous attention certainly on the internet, social media and the editorial platforms.

@Beautiful51438 - Michelle Snider

@DiedSuddenly_ @agent_mock @LtinLala tell me more about this post?

Saved - May 2, 2025 at 4:56 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

https://t.co/Aha7bvmdXw

Video Transcript AI Summary
A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot, and in over 50% of cases, the single cause of death was cardiovascular. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. According to the speaker, these autopsy results are incontrovertible evidence that patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's stance. The findings have gained significant attention online and on social media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We arrived at 44 papers, three twenty five autopsies. Then we took each one of the autopsy results out and we put it as a single line item, with all the clinical description. And then we submitted that to adjudication, a blind adjudication. And we found that seventy three point nine percent of all the cases, it was either the vaccine as the direct cause of death or it significantly contributed to the death. The deaths occurred within a week or two after taking the last shot. And far more than fifty percent, the single cause was a cardiovascular cause of death. Speaker 1: Why do you say that this blows the existing narrative out of the water? What is the true significance of what you found here? Speaker 0: The CDC and the FDA at this point in time, the official narrative is they still don't see any evidence that deaths are linked to the vaccine. And they have begrudgingly acknowledged a few cases after the Janssen vaccine, for instance. So the government narrative is still that people do not die after COVID-nineteen vaccination. And now we have the largest series of autopsies and the autopsies really are incontrovertible. The patients are, you know, did die of the vaccine. So it does blow the government narrative out of the water. They're gonna have to wrestle with this. It's garnered tremendous attention certainly on the internet, social media and the editorial platforms.
Saved - April 23, 2025 at 10:34 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

In 2008, CNN aired a segment about a Hannah Poling, a girl who contracted autism as a toddler due to vaccines. Her father, a neurologist, claimed that the HHS ADMITTED her autism came from vaccines 👇 https://t.co/KEPjVjdkiE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. John Polling, a neurologist and father of an autistic child, claims the government conceded that vaccines contributed to his daughter Hannah's autism, encephalopathy, and seizures. He says he wouldn't have believed it until he witnessed his daughter's regression after vaccination. While experts maintain vaccines don't cause autism, Polling believes Hannah had a predisposition that vaccines triggered. He clarifies that mitochondrial dysfunction, often cited as a rare underlying cause, is not necessarily rare or underlying. Polling stresses he is pro-vaccine and advocates for safe vaccination schedules tailored to individual patients, urging pediatricians to prioritize individual patient care. He acknowledges multiple potential triggers for autism but believes vaccines were the clear trigger in his daughter's case. He is scheduled to appear on Larry King tonight to discuss the issue further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some parents of autistic children blame childhood vaccines. You may remember nine year old Hannah Polling. Recently, the government's so called vaccine court conceded her family's claim that vaccines may have helped trigger Hannah's autism. Our chief medical correspondent Doctor. Sanjay Gupta is back with more on that debate on this Autism Awareness Day. Speaker 1: Sanjay? Don, thank you. We are here with Doctor. John Polling. He is, first of all, he's a neurologist. He's also the father of Hana Polling, as you just mentioned. Her her case of autism diagnosis was conceded by the federal government as having been contributed to by vaccines. That was a pretty startling thing, I think, for a lot of people to hear. We talked to a lot of experts about this. They say, look, vaccines in no way cause autism. You're a neurologist. You're also the father of Hannah. What do you say? Speaker 2: Well, think you bring up a really important point is that the government, actually the Department of Health and Human Services, conceded that my daughter's medical problems, which are autism, encephalopathy, seizures were brought on by vaccination. Know, Speaker 1: it's That's startling, I think, for a lot of people to hear that. Because we've been taught for so long. You're a doctor. I'm a doctor. We go to medical school, we hear this vaccines, obviously. There's so many good things about vaccines. They prevent, you know, life threatening illnesses that we've heard about. But in but in your daughter's case, turned out to be to be a problem. Speaker 2: I wouldn't have believed it till it happened to me. To be honest with you as a doctor, until it happened to me, until I saw the regression, until I saw a normal 18 old toddler descend into autism, I wouldn't have believed it was possible. Speaker 1: The experts that I've talked to, including the head of the, director of the CDC, Doctor. Julie Gerberding says that was a rare case. That is not likely to be the norm or even that's likely to be an exception. What do you say to that? Speaker 2: Well, I think a lot of the media outlets have put out a statement that says rare underlying genetic mitochondrial disease. Now that's five words. Four of those are not accurate in the sense that we know now, we didn't know back in 02/2001, that mitochondrial dysfunction is rare, you know, actually not rare. Two, we don't know if it was underlying or if it was something developed later, although certainly there's some genetic underpinnings to it. And the only word correct is mitochondrial and the difference between disease and dysfunction which we talked about. Speaker 1: Right. So what you believe is that Hannah have some sort of predisposition and then the vaccines tipped her over the edge into developing autism. What is your belief now? Speaker 2: Well, I don't think that vaccines are the only way that you can tip over a child like Hannah to regress and have an encephalopathy and have a regress into autism. There are probably multiple triggers. In my daughter, clearly it was the vaccinations. That was our experience. As far as other families' experiences, it may be different. The other cases that were at Johns Hopkins, there were only a few like Hannah and then others regressed for other reasons. It's not really a known entity. Speaker 1: You know, think the thing that a lot of parents, and I have to tell you, as a doctor, now as a parent too, as you know, have two daughters, so I have a two and a half year old and a 13 old. What does that mean for me, John? I mean, because, you know, I think they're perfectly normal. I mean, seem to me to be in there delightful. And I plan on getting them vaccinated. I got my two and a half year old vaccinated on time. What what advice would you have now having gone through what you've you've gone through? Speaker 2: Well, first and foremost, I am pro vaccine. I'm in favor of safe vaccination. I I'm the last person that wants to see measles or polio come back. I had one of the only cases last year of West Nile induced polio here in Georgia, and it's devastating. I think what a parent needs to do now is, talk with their pediatrician and pediatricians need to actually have a grassroots movement amongst the pediatricians and the AAP to develop safe vaccine schedules for each individual patient. I mean, you and I are physicians and we took an oath to our individual patient. We didn't take an oath for the public health or the greater good. So each pediatrician has to focus on that. Speaker 1: All right. Well, Doctor. John Polin, you're going be joining us a lot throughout the day today. I appreciate this. This is an issue we're going to keep on as you know. And Don and Brianna, you know we're investigating this all day long obviously. Toss it back to you now. We'll keep talking. Thanks. Speaker 0: Yeah, and I'm hearing he's going be on Larry King tonight Sanjay. Speaker 1: That's right. You're going be on Larry King and and with a few other guests as well. Speaker 2: So Yes. Yes. Speaker 1: I look forward to that. Speaker 2: I should point out to Hannah's godfather. He's a pediatrician, and and I trust these folks are going to look at this issue and develop a a safe protocol for us. Speaker 1: Well, lot of parents paying attention to what you're saying right now, so thanks again for joining us. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 0: All right. Thank you very much for that, Doctor. Poling, and also our chief medical correspondent, Doctor. Sanjay Gupta. Laurie King, of course, airs tonight 9PM Eastern here on CNN. With all the conflicting data out there, how can you tell whether your child may be autistic? Our medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen joins us next hour with a test for parents. And you can read more about autism online at CNN.com and share your personal stories with iReport. You can learn more about this mysterious illness. And we have a virtual resource center for those with autism. Just log on to CNN.com/autism.
Saved - April 21, 2025 at 1:43 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

6 vaccines in 1?! Nightmare fuel. Except...it's reality. https://t.co/qw8W64iycD

Video Transcript AI Summary
A product called Vaxelis, a six-in-one vaccine for children six weeks to four years old, is being discussed. It contains vaccines for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilus b, and hepatitis b. The package insert states epinephrine and other equipment must be available during vaccination. The Institute of Medicine found a causal relationship between tetanus toxoid and brachial neuritis and Guillain Barre syndrome. Apnea has been observed in some infants after vaccination. There were no randomized controlled studies with an inert placebo; it was only tested against other vaccines. Ingredients include 319 micrograms of aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, and the antibiotics neomycin, streptomycin, and polymyxin b. Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Thursday, April 17. I wanna share with you a product that's on the market, a vaccine called Vaxilis. I pulled the package insert, and here it is. This is insane. This vaccine has six vaccines in one. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilus b, and hepatitis b. Six in one. Let's take a look at the package insert. First of all, they tell us that epinephrine and other appropriate agents and equipment must be available for immediate use if you're going to be giving this vaccination. Okay. You got my attention. This vaccine is indicated for six weeks old through four years old. It goes on to say, a review by the Institute of Medicine found evidence for a causal, not correlation, causal relationship between tetanus toxoid, one of the components, and both brachial neuritis and Guillain Barre syndrome. Look that up. Guillain Barre. It's a type of paralysis. It looks a lot like polio. It also says apnea, that's difficulty breathing, you kinda stop breathing, following intramuscular vaccination has been observed in some infants. Oh, but it gets better. First of all, studies that brought this product to market, there is not a single randomized controlled study with an inert placebo. It's only tested against other vaccinations. Ingredients. You're gonna love this. Three hundred nineteen micrograms of aluminum is used as an adjuvant. That is it stimulates the immune system to wake up to the antigens that are in this vaccine. Other ingredients, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin. That's albumin or protein that comes from cows. Then they put some antibiotics in here, neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin b. What could possibly go wrong? And, of course, my favorite part, section 13.1. It's right here. I'm not making this up. Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 2:43 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨JUST IN: RFK Jr. announces new plan to share vaccine injury data globally, says we currently know less than 1% of vaccine injuries "CDC did a study on its own vaccine system … It captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries. That's the CDC's own study!” https://t.co/9vdCwS9Hvk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the current vaccine injury surveillance system, VAERS, captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries, according to a 2010 CDC study. They state that the CDC had a machine counting system to roll out to HMOs but shelved it. The speaker intends to improve surveillance, gather data sets, and create data-sharing agreements with scientists worldwide. They aim to investigate the contribution of vaccines, mold, EMF, food, and other exposures that began in the late 1980s to health issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's outrageous that we don't have a surveillance system that functions. CDC did a study on its own vaccine. The only surveillance system it has is VAERS, really. And the CDC did a study on it in 2010 and fewer than one. It captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. So, that's CDC's own study and they had on the they had at that time a machine counting system that they were going to roll out to all the HMOs and they put it on a shelf and we are going to roll that out exactly the system that you're talking about. We're going to do. We're going to improve the surveillance. We're going to get the data sets from everybody we can. We're going to make do data sharing agreements with scientists all over the world with the best scientists and we're going to find out what contribution vaccines and everything else. Mold, EMF, food, all of these other exposures began in the late 1980s. Which one of those are the culprits II suspect
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I prayed to God that if this is my last day, please protect me and my children. From jail, I addressed concerns about my situation, including the false claims of kidnapping used to justify the police response. Our family doctor reported us to DCF after I expressed my religious and medical objections to vaccinating my children, which I believe can cause autism. The police arrived with guns drawn, ironically creating the danger they were sent to prevent. This is cruel and unwarranted punishment. Please continue to support my family.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

NEW: “I prayed to God that if this is my last day, please protect me and my children” Israel Rivera, the man who has been jailed in Massachusetts for refusing to let his children be vaccinated, has given an exclusive interview from jail. He addresses a lot of the comments and questions our audience raised, including the alleged kidnapping, which he says is just a lie the state fabricated to justify pulling 20 guns on he and his family. Israel says their family doctor reported them to DCF after he told the doctor he didn’t want his children to get their K12 vaccine schedule, due to religious and medical objections. Israel said he specifically didn’t want to vaccinate his kids because “they cause autism.” 👀 He shared that when the police showed up with guan drawn, he prayed to God that they weren’t there to murder he and his family. Ironically the police were sent because of the suspicion that the kids were being put in danger, which then literally happened by the police being sent with guns drawn. “This is cruel and unwarranted punishment” Please keep the pressure up folks! Pray and support the family 🙏

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man states that a doctor threatened to report him for neglect if he didn't administer the K12 vaccine, which he refused due to religious beliefs and concerns about autism. He says the family was switching hospitals due to constant pressure to vaccinate, despite their repeated refusals. After he informed the doctor of the change, the doctor allegedly threatened to file a report unless he provided the child's medical history or agreed to vaccination. The man refused and the doctor eventually relented after a superior intervened. He claims that DCF then began harassing them, demanding a home visit, which he refused, stating he didn't consent to their services. He says that authorities later surrounded their house and that he and his family were later confronted with 15-20 guns pointed at them. He questions why an Amber Alert wasn't issued if his children were truly in danger and expresses shock at being separated from his family.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're recording us. I can record too, so it's fine. Open. If you could just repeat what happened with the doctor, please, because this is critical. Speaker 1: Okay. So, basically, the doctor just said he was gonna report us for neglect if we didn't take the the k twelve vaccine, which I said no. I looked into it. Not only is it against my religious beliefs, but I don't vaccinate my children. We're holistic, and they're all healthy and strong. And that vaccine specifically gives kids autism. I don't wanna take it. And, also, we're switching hospitals because every single time that we call in here, it's always requested that we take it. We've already said it multiple times that we will not take this vaccine and that we don't vaccinate our children, so please give us the paper to sign. But and they said, oh oh, it's okay. But then anytime we went there, they would pressure us. Basically, when we were in that room, pressure us. And that's why the last appointment, my wife didn't even wanna go there. She said, you can you go there? Because I don't even wanna handle it because they're gonna just pressure this vaccine on us again. So I went to them. And then the last time I went to them, I said, listen, I don't need to show you proof of where they've been because we're switching them, and I don't have to show you proof. My child's healthy. I brought him here myself to be seen. And then he said, well and and then as soon as I said, we're changing doctors and we're not taking that vaccine, then his his whole just the way his demeanor, the way he was talking changed. He said, oh, where has he been seen? Because we don't have a record. I said, well, I'm changing them. I'll give that information to the new doctor because I'm not gonna keep going through this abuse of you keep of you trying to force me to take this vaccine from my son, which I told you many times that it's not gonna happen. He said, okay. Well, I'm gonna have to file a report as a mandated reporter unless you give me history of your son or unless you, you know, took this vaccine. And I said, what? Absolutely not. And I stood my ground, and I told him, call the police right now. Call whoever you need to call right now or check my son out. I'm leaving. And then he just he got the superior in there. I forget what her name was. She came in there, and she tried to calm the situation down between me and the the doctor. And I guess explained his side of things, and I said, no. I will not vaccinate my child. And then they said, okay. We'll we'll check him. We'll give you the bill of health, and and and then they did that. They checked him. They gave the bill of health, and then they let us go. Speaker 0: The irony of this story is that you said that the doctor checked out that the baby was otherwise fine. So that that's what's really key here. Speaker 1: And then, basically, I don't know, a couple days or weeks from the from then, the harassment started with DCF. Speaker 0: At that point, you said to DCF, no. Thank you. We don't need your services. You leave us alone. Speaker 1: Told them specifically, I don't consent nor do I want a contract with your agency. Please leave me alone. I said, I mean, I must have said that. I don't know how many times. Repeatedly, repeatedly saying, I don't want a contract. I don't consent. Speaker 0: So they said they needed to lay eyes on the children. That's an old trick of theirs. Speaker 1: Yeah. They use one child to to all of them. Speaker 0: We need a home visit. Is that the word they used? Home visit? Yes. Okay. Were Speaker 1: cleaning up. Speaker 0: And and you said what? Speaker 1: I said my children are a % healthy. I don't consent, and I don't contract with you, and I don't want to in the future. Please leave me alone. Speaker 0: Okay. And so then they started surrounding the house and harassing you, and you all felt frightened because, you know, police coming. Said they texted you, and you said leave it in the mailbox. I know what it's about. What did you think it was about? Speaker 1: Oh, I thought it was a home visit because they kept doing that for for weeks. I thought it was just them just continuing what they were doing. Speaker 0: Well, that makes it even worse. You were never properly served. You were getting away from the heat because you were sick and tired of the harassment, didn't even know about it. I mean, you have a right to travel anywhere in the country with your children. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Get an ex parte judgment that says that the state can take care and protection. Maybe in imminent danger, maybe if a child's been harmed, maybe if a child is very, very sick, but in this situation, where the doctor confirmed the baby was fine and you know all the other children were fine too, outrageous. Speaker 1: When we brought our son to the emergency room, which is literally the exact opposite of neglect, it's like, hey. I don't like the way his breathing sounds. Let me take him to the emergency room. My wife stayed with him overnight there. That doctor is also mandated reporter, checked him, made sure he was okay, sent him home the next day. Why didn't that doctor report it? Because he's not neglected. Another thing too that that that I just I just it's beyond me. It's just if if my kids were truly neglected and, I mean, they literally persecuted me to a different state, you know, across the this country. And it at no point did they issue a a Amber Alert. And I really feel like they did that to protect their own themselves. Because if my child really was neglected or my children were in imminent danger, why didn't they issue an Amber Alert? Why were 15 to 20 pistols pointed at my children and me? I mean, I I I literally walked out of I literally walked out of the place we were staying praying to God, like, God, this is my last like, this is my last day. Like, please protect my children. Oh my god. Just 20 guns pointed at me and my family. Didn't we didn't know that was my last day or not. Like Speaker 0: I'm I'm astonished that you've been torn apart from your family for this length of time, and I'm shocked at the judge's position of the high bail, but there are a lot of people saying they want to contribute to help you out, so this is just cruel and unusual punishment, unwarranted punishment.
Saved - April 13, 2025 at 1:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a claim that no childhood vaccine has undergone a proper placebo-controlled clinical trial to ensure safety before being administered to children in America. In response, one participant referenced the book "Turtles All The Way Down," arguing that vaccines are tested against other vaccines rather than true placebos. Another participant mentioned the HPV vaccine, noting that the initial 4-valent version was tested against a saline placebo, questioning the rationale behind testing newer versions against earlier ones. A third participant discussed the autoimmune disease rates in different vaccine trial groups, highlighting discrepancies in results.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

“Not a SINGLE childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo-controlled clinical trial, with sufficient duration and power, to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America.” https://t.co/j5dWFxxtFe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They claim that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 asserts this is not an opinion, but can be verified by anyone reviewing package inserts and clinical trial documents on the FDA website.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It am I to pull from this that none of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, has not been properly tested? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Not a single childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo controlled clinical trial, sufficient duration and power to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 0: All right. Speaker 1: I can say that categorically not because it's my opinion, but because anybody who goes to the FDA website could see that from themselves by looking at the package insert and the underlying clinical trial documents that are Speaker 0: available Speaker 1: on the FDA website.

@BruceKing_actor - Bruce King

@DiedSuddenly_ The book Turtles All The Way Down (never refuted) shows that no childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule has ever been tested against a real placebo, they are tested against other vaccines. Calling a vaccine a placebo is like saying rubbing alcohol is like water.

@PVingaard - Peter Vingaard

@BruceKing_actor @DiedSuddenly_ Not really. Take the HPV vaccine. The first 4-valent (or was it 5?) was tested against saline placebo. Why don't you think it makes sense to test the newer 9-valent against the first? Then the placebo group is at least protected against 4 (or 5) HPV strains.

@6fores1 - 6fores

@PVingaard @BruceKing_actor @DiedSuddenly_ The first hover vaccine had 3 participant groups 2 larger vaccine & aluminum adjuvant solution groups & one smaller saline group. The vax & aluminum adjuvant solution group had 2% autoimmune disease diagnosis & the saline had 0% autoimmune. This was dismissed b/c saline group was

Saved - April 13, 2025 at 11:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user claimed that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial with adequate duration and power to ensure safety before being administered to millions of children in America. Another user responded by providing evidence to support this claim.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

“Not a SINGLE childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo-controlled clinical trial, with sufficient duration and power, to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America.” https://t.co/j5dWFxxtFe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It am I to pull from this that none of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, has not been properly tested? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Not a single childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo controlled clinical trial, sufficient duration and power to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 0: All right. Speaker 1: I can say that categorically not because it's my opinion, but because anybody who goes to the FDA website could see that from themselves by looking at the package insert and the underlying clinical trial documents that are Speaker 0: available Speaker 1: on the FDA website.

@apiscina77 - Andrew Piscina

@DiedSuddenly_ Correct - here is the evidence: https://t.co/TsK9Nb5Pvc

Saved - April 12, 2025 at 10:01 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

“Not a SINGLE childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo-controlled clinical trial, with sufficient duration and power, to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America.” https://t.co/j5dWFxxtFe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It am I to pull from this that none of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, has not been properly tested? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Not a single childhood vaccine, I could tell you, has gone through a placebo controlled clinical trial, sufficient duration and power to assess that it was safe before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 0: All right. Speaker 1: I can say that categorically not because it's my opinion, but because anybody who goes to the FDA website could see that from themselves by looking at the package insert and the underlying clinical trial documents that are Speaker 0: available Speaker 1: on the FDA website.
Saved - April 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🚨🚨🚨 It is CRUCIAL for people to understand that just because you didn't drop dead immediately after taking the COVID vaccine, it doesn't mean that it is not still wreaking havoc on your body.

@infowars - INFOWARS

Tumor biopsies are now confirming what we've known all along: After covid vaccination, your body becomes a spike protein FACTORY. @HarrisonHSmith https://t.co/PIboZjm3Gm

Video Transcript AI Summary
A colon biopsy from a Pfizer-vaccinated individual who died a month after tumor emergence revealed SV40 in the origin of replication from the Pfizer vaccine. Preliminary sequencing suggests the presence of Pfizer's vaccine. The vaccine DNA copy number was greater than the human genome, indicating replication. PCR signals suggest the vaccine concentration is similar to or higher than the original vial, despite dilution in the body. This indicates the mammalian origin of replication in Pfizer's vaccine is active in human tumors. This finding may explain shedding, which is not supposed to occur because the COVID vaccine is not intended to alter DNA. However, evidence suggests that the vaccine may be altering DNA, making it a VGBT (genome altering) product. This could mean that spike proteins are continually created, and shedding is real.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We got a a colon biopsy from a group in Germany that we've been working with, and we were quite shocked by the results. This is a person who was vaccinated four times by Pfizer, one year since vaccination, tumors emerged, person was dead within a month. We got three biopsies out of them, one postmortem. All of them have s v forty in the origin of replication from the from the Pfizer vaccine. We performed some sequencing, which we're going deeper on right now, but even that preliminary sequencing shows this is in fact Pfizer's vaccine. We have enough sequence. There's sequences in there from spike in other places. Now what is shocking in this work is we were never expecting to find the DNA at the copy number at a copy number greater than the human genome. Like if you get an insertional mutagenesis event and that is a driver mutation, that means that tumor starts taking off. The insertional mutation should be at the same copy number as another human gene. What we're expecting to find is something where maybe ten or twenty percent of the tumor actually was mutated, and therefore, it would come out later in in on PCR than our human gene. We're seeing the opposite here. This is expanded inside the patient. And that if we were if we're getting signals in PCR that are so hot that it looks like we actually amplified the vaccine directly from the vial and that's impossible. That means after you inject someone with 300, this person got four, so 1.2 mls. You should have a 64,000 fold dilution into their body. So we should see a six CT shift in where this PCR signal comes out from dilution alone. We don't see that. We see something where it's coming in at the same concentration as the original vial or higher. That tells us the DNA is replicating. That tells us that the origin the mammalian origin of replication that's in Pfizer's vaccine is active in human tumors. So this needs to be filed up. It's not peer reviewed. We're doing deeper sequencing now, but this may explain shed Speaker 1: This may may explain shedding. Because remember, shedding isn't supposed to be possible because the COVID vaccine is not supposed to mutate your DNA. It's not the spike proteins that it creates are not supposed to continually be created forever. It's supposed to it's actually supposed to be, like, a matter of minutes. You're supposed to, like, you know, get the injection, and in the injection spot, you know, those cells create the spike proteins for a little while, then and then it's supposed to stop then, like, a day or so. But what they're finding is that people that they're testing are still producing spike proteins from this injection, meaning that it's, you know, altering the fundamental, you know, instruction manual of your DNA. It's it's altering your DNA. It's altering how your cells actually function in a permanent or semi permanent fashion. So, again, this is this is one of the things that like, it's it's it's very complicated. There's something called, like I think it's called v actually, I know it's called because it's it's the same as LGBT, but it's a v v g b t, and it's basically genomic alterations. It's medicine that messes with your DNA. And it taught and you and, like, shedding is a big issue for that, and there are, you know, FDA papers talking about shedding with these types of products. But if you ask ChatGBT or you, like, try to, categorize the mRNA vaccines as one of these VGBT products, they'll say, no, no, it's not because the spike protein doesn't continually replicate. It doesn't change your DNA. But I think a more accurate thing to say would be that it does they don't intend they didn't intend for it to change your DNA. It wasn't designed with the intent of changing DNA and being a a genome altering product, but it apparently is. It apparently is one. And so, you know, if you search and I know this because I had a friend ask me about shedding, and, you know, it's like a skeptical friend that is not gonna believe sources that aren't, like, very legitimate. So I spent a long time, like, going into the shedding phenomenon and trying to find, you know, evidence about the vaccine shedding. And the problem that you run into is everybody says, no, no, shedding's not real because these products aren't the VGBT products. The the mRNA isn't a genome altering DNA affecting VGBT product. But it appears though it is. But it looks like, actually, what we're finding is that, at least in some cases, maybe it's different people have different responses, maybe it's different vaccines have different levels of certain ingredients that cause this. Whatever it is, certainly, at least some of the vaccines do serve as DNA altering injections, which means that shedding would be very real. And this is, again, the problem with having a society where you can't trust the official story at all. Folks, the clip you just watched is from the American Journal streaming at Infowars on x each and every weekday morning 8AM to 11AM, and you can support us by going to the alexjonesstore.com.
Saved - March 22, 2025 at 12:49 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Over 490,000 Indian children were Paralyzed with an oral Polio vaccine. It was all funded by a man who claims he is saving the world: @BillGates https://t.co/XQ4RbSCzyo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript alleges that in 2009, thousands of tribal girls in India were administered an untested HPV vaccine, purportedly incentivized by the Gates Foundation, without proper consent, and were told it would cure cancer. Some girls developed seizures or cancer, and seven died, with no assistance provided. An Indian Parliament task force investigated, resulting in a scathing report and the expulsion of the Gates Foundation. The report claims the government officials stated they shouldn't have authorized the vaccine and wouldn't allow it again, but now they are back doing the same tricks. It is claimed that leaders unanimously want a vaccine, and pharmaceutical companies may exploit India's large population for profit, potentially harming people. A 2018 study allegedly found that nearly 500,000 children in India developed paralysis from a Gates-supported oral polio vaccine between 2000 and 2017.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. Was several Indian tribal girls used as guinea pigs? The report alleges that two American farmer giants' untested vaccine was administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork. Speaker 1: India was among the hardest hit after Bollywood celebrities were incentivized by the Gates Foundation to urge the public to submit to mass vaccinations. In 02/2009, tribal children were administered the HPV vaccine. Over 24,000 girls were told they were being given wellness shots, in many cases, without the informed consent of a parent or a guardian. Speaker 2: The people that were administering these vaccines lied to the guardians of these girls and told the girls, oh, this is going to cure cancer. You're never going to have cancer. And these girls became severely injured. Some of them developed seizures. Some of them developed cancer. And seven girls died. And there was no insurance. There was no assistance for them. And the Gates Foundation denied that it had been clinical trials. And it was so bad that the parliament in India created a task force. They studied it and they kicked out the Gates Foundation. Speaker 3: But India is a barbaric country. Things happen here in a very barbaric way. But I was surprised to find an American organization operating in broad daylight, doing things in a very, very, let's say, Indian fashion. And so the route I took was that I want the whole procedure to be investigated. The Indian parliament formed a committee, and it was to be a rather surprising move because you generally don't often have such a high level inquiry into matters affecting poor people. And that was such an extraordinary report. I don't think the Indian Parliament has ever come out with such a scathing report. And the government officials came up and said, we shouldn't have authorized this. We're sorry. We're not going to allow them again. And now they are back doing their same old tricks again. Speaker 4: The good news is that human clinical trials can start as early as July 2020 for India's First COVID Nineteen indigenous vaccine that's been developed by Bharat Biotech. Speaker 3: So you can imagine how the manipulation of the media by the media, the manipulation of public opinion by leaders from all political parties unanimously say, we want a vaccine. And the worst thing is they are taken as philanthropists, whereas what this actually is, is the acquisition of political and financial power. And I think the second most populous country with 1,300,000,000 people is going to be a good base for pharmaceutical companies to make a killing and also kill a lot of people in the process. Yes, I just find it a pity that we haven't been able to get any benefit for the girls who suffered, you know. It's so terrifying as to what they're actually doing with the world. Speaker 5: We're taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms, we're injecting them in little kids' arms. We just shoot them right into the vein. Speaker 1: A 2018 scientific study released in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluded that over four hundred and ninety thousand children in India developed paralysis as a result of the gate supported oral polio vaccine that was administered between the years of February and 02/2017. Using all the usual sleight of hand, US based media and fact checkers rushed to bury the story, But thanks to the meticulous work of a team of Indian researchers and doctors, the inconvenient truth lives on the nih.gov website.
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 1:08 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Pfizer KNEW the vaccines affected fertility. Dr. Kimberly Biss exposed the truth: “The miscarriage rate was 80 percent in the Pfizer trials. They knew that.” Remember, depopulation is their goal. https://t.co/EZHQVhU8PN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Now that people are seeing the trial documents, we're finding out about bad outcomes, like the eighty percent miscarriage rate in the Pfizer trials. They were aware of this. I'm Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN. After the COVID vaccines rolled out in 2021, I saw disturbing trends in my patients. My miscarriage rate had doubled from the previous year. I tracked my data in real time and published my findings on Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack in 2022. A lot of medical schools get a large portion of their funding from big pharma. I'm Yaniv Kelek, and this is American Thought Leaders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now that people are getting the documents from the trials, there were bad outcomes and the miscarriage rate was eighty percent in the Pfizer trials. They knew that. Speaker 1: Doctor. Kimberly Biss is a board certified obstetrician and gynecologist. She's grown her Florida private practice to a five provider group that delivers roughly three hundred babies a year. Once the COVID nineteen genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021, she observed some disturbing trends in her patients. Speaker 0: I noticed that my miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by a hundred percent. Speaker 1: She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and made waves when she published her findings on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022. Speaker 0: A lot of medical schools, 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma. Speaker 1: This is American Thought Leaders, and I'm Yaniv Kelek.
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 9:56 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Why hasn't the government investigated what went on in hospitals during COVID?? It seems they were rife with malpractice. Americans deserve answers, especially those who lost loved ones during that time. https://t.co/jF8nZPbvdX

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 3:01 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Wake up, America. It was never "sudden adult death syndrome," it was always the vaccine. https://t.co/LE52cpTZU6

Saved - February 27, 2025 at 6:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On Wednesday, a Yale University team announced the discovery of a condition called 'post-vaccination syndrome' linked to mRNA vaccines. This syndrome includes symptoms like brain fog, dizziness, tinnitus, and extreme fatigue, along with changes to the immune system. Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, the lead researcher, acknowledged the potential controversy of these findings but emphasized the team's commitment to ongoing research for better transparency and safer vaccines. She reassured patients experiencing this syndrome that their concerns are heard and that further studies will aim to improve medical care.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

On Wednesday, a team from Yale University known for their rigorous work revealed the mRNA shots can cause a previously unknown condition known as 'post-vaccination syndrome.' The syndrome appears to cause brain fog, dizziness, tinnitus, extreme fatigue and biological changes to patients' immune systems. Dr Akiko Iwasaki, the lead researcher behind the paper, told the Daily Mail he understands her findings could be seen as controversial. But she wants patients to know her team will keep studying to bring them 'better transparency and safer vaccines.'   Dr Iwasaki told this website: 'For patients who are suffering from post-vaccination syndrome, we want them to know that we see you, we listen, and we will keep on doing more research in this area so that this condition can be recognized, and better medical care can be provided.'

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a call for the media to apologize for slandering unvaccinated Americans, suggesting distrust in their reporting. In response, another participant claims the situation is about a global genocide rather than vaccination, warning of future deaths.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

NEVER forget the media's slandering of unvaccinated Americans. They owe us all an apology. Until then, these networks should never be trusted again. https://t.co/4GV1zkJJui

Video Transcript AI Summary
The unvaccinated are the problem, period. They are the only ones to blame, and this isn't shaming, it's the truth. It's time to blame the unvaccinated, because we can't trust them. They are the threat. Vaccinated people will start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated, punishing the vaccinated for the sins of the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are not behaving honorably, acting as if they can do whatever they want. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated include children and people acting like children, and the rest of us are starting to get angry. This isn't about freedom or personal choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated, you are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame. The only people you can blame. This isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed, are the unvaccinated. It's time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Anyone you came into contact with will blame you, as will the rest of us who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. Is not about freedom or personal choice.

@DaveServed - Dave Sempire

@DiedSuddenly_ YOU ALL MISS THE MAIN POINT!!! This was NOT a call to get Vaccinated! This was a CALL for GLOBAL GENOCIDE!!! and about HALF of YOU PLAYED THEIR GAME!!! MOST of YOU RIP in the next few years Just like the 30+ Million already dead...

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 1:38 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

NEVER forget the media's slandering of unvaccinated Americans. They owe us all an apology. Until then, these networks should never be trusted again. https://t.co/4GV1zkJJui

Video Transcript AI Summary
The unvaccinated are the problem, period. They are the only ones to blame. This isn't shaming, it's the truth. It's time to blame the unvaccinated, not the regular folks. Anyone you come into contact with will blame you, as will the rest of us who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated because we can't trust the unvaccinated. All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. You're punishing the vaccinated for the sins of the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are basically saying, it's open season for me. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The rest of us are starting to get upset. It's not about freedom or personal choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated, you are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame. The only people you can blame. This isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed, are the unvaccinated. It's time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Anyone you came into contact with will blame you, as will the rest of us who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. Is not about freedom or personal choice.
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 2:08 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🏥ALEXIS UPDATE🚨 After 5 1/2 months in hospital, Alexis Lorenze is free! Vaccine injury could have killed her, if it were not for massive community response and prayer warriors in the trenches. https://t.co/ifq3h6i5gP

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm finally out of the hospital after five long months! Dr. Halili has been working hard to restore my health, and I'm so excited to be walking and standing again. After dealing with my vaccine injury, I'm committed to getting Alexis back on track. It's an honor to have her complete a regenerative program with us. My only goal is to see her health fully restored, and I'm dedicated to fixing everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. I'm here with doctor Halili. I'm finally out of the hospital. He's been doing some stuff to get my health back up, and I'm very excited. I'm walking. We're standing. Speaker 1: Let's go. Alexis is finally out of UCI from her hellhole five months dealing with that hospital from her vaccine injury. We're gonna get her back on track. She's gonna complete a program with us. It's an absolute honor to do this for you. I wanted to do this out of the goodness of my heart, and I want nothing back in return other than to see her health get back on track. So we're gonna fix everything. Speaker 0: Hi. I'm here with doctor Halili. I'm finally out of the hospital. He's been doing some stuff to get my health back up and I'm very excited. I'm walking, we're standing. Speaker 1: Let's go. Alexis is finally out of UCI from her hellhole five months dealing with that hospital from her vaccine injury. We're gonna get her back on track. She's gonna complete a regenerative program with us. It's an absolute honor to do this for you. I wanted to do this out of the goodness of my heart, and I want nothing back in return other than to see her health get back on track. So we're gonna fix everything.
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 3:07 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

This documentary was way too important to put behind a pay wall, so the makers are giving FREE access to the world! Uncovering the decades-long agenda to keep America sick, addicted, and infertle, ‘Unpack The Lies We’ve Been Fed’ is the most important film you will see this year.

@TTAVOfficial - The Truth About Vaccines

🔥🚨 WORLD PREMIERE LIVE NOW 🚨🔥 "Unpacking the Lies We've Been Fed" 🎥🍿WATCH NOW ➡️ http://UnpackTheLies.com Big Pharma has spent over 5 BILLION dollars to buy off and lobby members of Congress. As we saw with Senators like Bernie Sanders during the RFK Jr @RobertKennedyJr hearings, these congressmen are doing the bidding of companies like Pfizer and vaccine manufacturers, no matter how many Americans die or are injured or killed as a result. How much was your congressman bought off for? Brought to you by the Makers of 'The Truth About Vaccines' and 'The Truth About Cancer' Ty & Charlene Bollinger DIRECTOR of DIED SUDDENLY, @SkowMatthew and Producer @LaurenWitzkeDE Watch the FULL Documentary HERE: 'http://UnpackTheLIes.com'

Video Transcript AI Summary
We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will reverse the chronic disease epidemic and put the nation back on the road to good health. Thank you. Speaker 1: The very people who are now telling us how we should produce food, and manage our health are actually the people who have created the crisis in the first Speaker 0: place. All the people here who are defending this current system and defending these pharmaceutical industry profits, many of whom are taking huge amounts of money. Speaker 2: You said that president Trump asked you to, quote, clean up corruption and conflict. Sounds great. Speaker 3: If confirmed, you would be the cabinet secretary over the CDC. Do you agree that the CDC's work is critical to Georgia, critical for our country, and the health of the entire world? You made almost $5,000,000 Speaker 4: from book deals, Speaker 3: mostly promoting junk science. If you want to move from advocacy, Americans are gonna need to hear a clear and trustworthy recantation of what you have said on vaccinations. Speaker 4: How can folks who need to have confidence in federal vaccine programs trust you to be independent and science based when you stand to gain significant funding if lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers are successful is because it just isn't believable. That when you become secretary, you are all of a sudden going to be consistent with science. Speaker 2: If president Trump tells you to do something, you're going to do it. Will you support the development and distribution of vaccines for the avian? Yes or no. Speaker 4: If the evidence is there. The evidence is there. The COVID vaccine saved millions of lives, Speaker 0: and you're casting doubt. Are you aware of Speaker 5: the vaccine safety data link? Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. I'm very aware of that. Speaker 5: Are you aware of the vaccine adverse event reporting system? Speaker 0: I'm aware of the vaccine safety data link that CDC keeps under lockbox and will not let independent scientists look Speaker 5: at it. Aware of the clinical immunization safety assessment project? Speaker 0: As I said. Speaker 5: Are you aware of v safe? Speaker 0: I I'm aware that they're broken.
Unpacking The Lies We've Been Fed New Documentary Airing Feb 17, 2025 unpackthelies.com
Unpacking The Lies We've Been Fed New Documentary Airing Feb 17, 2025 unpackthelies.com
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 1:44 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

These are the ingredients in the vaccines we are told to force on our children. If parents were aware that they are aluminum and formaldehyde cocktails, perhaps they would rethink the doctor's visit https://t.co/5Y214d6GXr

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 1:08 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

"Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75% occurred within 7 days" WAKE UP, AMERICA! Babies aren't just spontaneously dying, they are dying because vaccines are killing them https://t.co/LLGmQDKkdK

Saved - February 5, 2025 at 4:13 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Flashback to when celebrities openly spoke about the dangers of vaccines on mainstream media: JIM CARREY: "I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health, any longer, have our best interests at heart all the time." https://t.co/33hXHszhM5

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1990, the number of vaccines increased significantly, raising questions about their necessity. The U.S. administers more vaccines than many Western countries, prompting concerns about profit motives behind vaccine recommendations. Parents are encouraged to educate themselves and make informed decisions about vaccinations, questioning the need for certain shots like chickenpox and hepatitis B at birth. There’s a call to space out and delay vaccinations, as well as to remove toxins from them. The influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical schools and public health organizations is highlighted, suggesting that financial interests may overshadow children's health. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and prioritizing children's well-being over corporate profits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines. Speaker 1: What happened after 1989? The vaccine said no. Born to 26 more vaccines. Speaker 0: Agreed. Speaker 1: Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? What what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that? Yes. I think we have to choose which products know which one. Sir. Speaker 0: You should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life? Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Parents have to take to have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information. Speaker 0: Space out the vaccines. Delay them till after one. Clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't need that many. Speaker 1: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't understand. I The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 They Speaker 0: control medical schools. Speaker 1: What we're asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 3:55 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

NEW: Air traffic controllers warned the US Army helicopter it was on a collision course with the passenger jet before the crash, but the crew did not change direction. https://t.co/EtWlNgF04h

Video Transcript AI Summary
S two five is in flight, focusing on separation service. The aircraft is currently at 3,000 feet, and a call out for 1:30 from the left side is noted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Copy. S two five, CRJ in flight. S two five, f on CRJ. S two five is a aircraft in flight versus separation. Service. 472 the magnet sorry. 1 30, call out from left hand 2 positive, Clement, 8, 3,000.
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 12:34 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

How it felt standing up to the pro-vaccine mob at the height of the fake pandemic https://t.co/MU8NOMbnHc

Saved - January 27, 2025 at 7:43 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Atlanta rapper Dj Unk has died suddenly from a heart attack in his sleep. He was only 43 years old. https://t.co/U0ys7xRhA8

Saved - January 27, 2025 at 6:04 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

They don’t want you to know how many people are living with vaccine injuries https://t.co/qvVEz3lNmp

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a vaccine injury. Many of us do. We come from various backgrounds: gymnasts, authors, accountants, equestrians, geoscientists, teachers, coaches, and more. We are mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, friends, and professionals in diverse fields. Despite our different lives, we share this common experience of vaccine injury. It affects us all, but it does not define us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. You have vaccine as well. I have vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I'm a gymnast. I'm an author. I'm an accountant. I'm an equestrian. I am a geoscientist. I get Yushtanam Bransadbhaya. I am a teacher. Yeah. Football. It's a mom. I'm a wife, a mother, a friend, and a sister. Well, I'm a coach. I am a climber. I am a former gentleman. I am a mother of 4. I'm a dog mommy. I'm a yoga teacher. I'm a sister. A medical scientist. But most of all, I'm a zoleyperhuman. I'm an orthopedic surgeon. I am a husband. I'm a lawyer. I'm a father. I am a son. I am a brother. I'm just like you. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I have a vaccine injury. I'm a vaccine injury. I have vaccine injury. I have vaccine injury, but my vaccine injury does not have
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 5:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Alberta Task Force has recommended halting all mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations due to concerns over their effectiveness and undisclosed risks. The report cites 9,612 deaths and over 309,000 injuries linked to the vaccine in the province. It calls for an end to vaccinations in healthy children and teenagers, further research, support for vaccine-injured individuals, and an opt-out option from federal health policies. The task force was established by Premier Danielle Smith, who previously oversaw strict lockdowns and has since lifted many public health measures.

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

🇨🇦 ALBERTA TASK FORCE SET TO HALT COVID VACCINE DUE TO DEADLY RISKS The official pandemic task force, commissioned by the government of Alberta, has issued a report which recommends an end to all mRNA vaccination because of a lack of effectiveness and disclosure of side effects. “The Task Force recommends halting the use of COVID-19 vaccines without full disclosure of their potential risks, ending their use in healthy children and teenagers, conducting further research into their effectiveness, establishing support for vaccine-injured individuals, and providing an opt-out mechanism from federal public health policy." The task force found that the COVID vaccine killed 9,612 Canadians in the province, and injured 309,403, and also that 17,640 of the 42,000 Albertans who saw immediate adverse reactions were actually at no risk of covid infection. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith launched the task force in 2022 with an approximate $2M budget. She recently visited the U.S. for trade negotiations, and watched the Trump inauguration from the Canadian embassy in DC. Alberta followed strict lockdowns for about 18 months then abandoned those measures, as well as vaccine passports, mandated quarantines, mask mandates, and school closures. A tragic example of the real impact of these shots is the death of Alberta baby Jesse Marvin Roos on December 23rd, 2024, who died suddenly after getting the COVID vaxx at hospital. His mother was an NDP activist and viciously attacked vaccine safety advocate Dr. William Makis for warning of the risk of pediatric deaths from the shots.

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 3:34 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

The government's fake COVID narrative began to fail when citizen's started waking up... There was nothing more encouraging than watching this DC resident absolutely SCHOOL Dr. Fauci and his puppet Mayor Muriel Bowser, on the truth about COVID in the midst of the vaccine campaign https://t.co/jmxgAmHigB

Video Transcript AI Summary
People in America are skeptical about the information surrounding vaccinations, especially given the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. It traditionally takes years to create vaccines, and many feel that nine months isn't sufficient for safety. The conversation highlights the concern that unvaccinated individuals could allow the virus to spread further. While some compare COVID-19 to the flu, the death toll from COVID-19 significantly surpasses that of the flu in recent years. There are suspicions about the motives behind incentivizing vaccinations, suggesting that fear tactics are being used to encourage compliance. Ultimately, the pandemic is perceived by some as driven by fear rather than genuine health concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People in America are not settled with the information that's been given to us right now. So I'm not gonna be lining up taking a shot on a vaccination for something that wasn't clear in the first place, and then you all create a shot in miraculous time. It takes years to create Speaker 1: But factored factored Well, Speaker 2: it it used to take years. Speaker 0: Okay. It used to Speaker 2: You know how you know how many years we're invested in this in this approach? About 20 years of science to get us to be able to do it. Speaker 0: Enough. And 9 months is definitely not Speaker 2: enough Speaker 0: for nobody to be taking no vaccination that you all came up with. Speaker 1: The only reason I'm talking to you right now, as close as we are, is that I've been vaccinated. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: But if it allowed thousands of people like you don't get vaccinated, you're gonna let this virus continue to percolate in this country and in this world. Speaker 0: Like the common flu then. Right? Speaker 1: And that's not like Speaker 2: more serious than the flu. Speaker 0: Well, the flu kills a lot of people angry too. Speaker 2: You know how many people died of the flu the last year? I mean, not this year. Virtually none. But the previous year, about 20 to 30000. You know, how many people have died from COVID 19 in the United States? 600,000 Americans. Speaker 0: Well, you well, that well, the the number that you all are giving that died, that's that's once again, that's you all's number. Speaker 1: You gonna pay us. Speaker 0: Yeah. Definitely. I mean because when you start talking about paying people to get vaccinated, when when you start talking about incentivizing things to get people vaccinated, there's something else going on with that. Something else something else going on Speaker 1: with that. Something going on with that. Speaker 0: Something going on Speaker 1: with that. But I'm glad millions of people like me and most everybody here didn't get in a state. You know what their incentive was? Protecting their health and protecting the city. Because that's Speaker 0: why I Speaker 1: won't give you anymore. Speaker 0: It's okay. Because my my my my intent y'all campaign is about fear. It's about inciting fear in people. You all attack people with fear. That's what this pandemic is. It's a fear. It's fear, this pandemic. That's all it is.
Saved - January 24, 2025 at 5:21 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

Don’t let them rewrite history to cover-up the tragic stories of families who were ripped apart by COVID lockdowns. NEVER forget what Fauci, the CDC, and deep-state controlled tyrannical governors did to us. https://t.co/QijE4QMtBS

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 4:15 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

This is who the DHS labelled as terrorists. This is an actual memo written and released by them. The Department of Homeland Security must be stripped down, gutted, and rebuilt. https://t.co/Sg1J9gljJk

View Full Interactive Feed