TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DiligentDenizen
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Don Huffines Companies allegedly scrubbed links tying Russell Huffines to Trammell Crow Jr, whoโs facing a class-action over alleged sex-trafficking with 100+ alleged victims. They also scrubbed a MassieโHuffines conversation. A correction says Garret Huffines, not Russell, was scrubbed; a bio links him to Trammell Crow. Reactions accuse hiding, cite Streisand effects, and urge accountability.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: DON HUFFINES COMPANIES SCRUBBING WEBSITES IN WAKE OF ZORRO RANCH OWNERSHIP REVELATION ๐ It appears they are trying to SCRUB RUSSELL HUFFINES' LINKS TO TRAMMELL CROW JR who Russell used to work with. CROW is currently FACING a class-action S3X-TRAFFICKING LAWSUIT with over 100 victims. They also SCRUBBED a CONVERSATION article BETWEEN US Rep THOMAS MASSIE & DON HUFFINES who endorsed Don that year. ๐ IF everything is on the up-and-up with Huffines, WHY THE SCRUB? ๐ค
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Receipts: https://hest.group/our-team/ https://web.archive.org/web/20251117011920/https://hest.group/our-team/ https://huffinescommunities.com/who-we-are/meet-the-team/ https://web.archive.org/web/20250722080557/https://huffinescommunities.com/who-we-are/meet-the-team/ https://huffinesliberty.com/news/fireside-chat-with-thomas-massie https://web.archive.org/web/20221103122001/https://huffinesliberty.com/news/fireside-chat-with-thomas-massie
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Receipts: CORRECTION: IT WAS GARRET HUFFINES that is now SCRUBBED. HERE'S google result hit bio stating he worked at Trammell Crow ๐ซก๐๐ป Credit @KnoxieLuv https://t.co/Gcx1gtyRte
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@MichaelPaladi18 ๐ค
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@church51873 It's a little weird he wouldn't either disclose it when he ran or have it be searched when it exposed actually. Both would have saved him from this. ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@TexasMom1776 Yes...
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@MissLewZer Not a bit! ๐ซฃ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@MaxPowersb What you hiding?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@HypnoNicholetta No more bullsh!t
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@djconn Yup
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@ghostofRoc No. Read it again
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@Com4Pro Right!?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@reeseys Uncanny resemblance
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@Will_Chrs @MysticMuse1o1 Both parties! Wake up!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@TonyHighspeed Streisand effect ๐ฅ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@SatuNakamoto Yep!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@SaveLibertyUS No. We expose it all. "Noble men" don't destroy crime scenes instead of having them searched for potential child victims. Get right with God.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see state media Epstein propaganda exposed; within an hour CON INC shills used verbatim talking pointsโsame words: BACKFIRED BIGLY, Bill Clinton, BUSTED, VINDICATION. New media bought. Eric Daugh says others reuse his posts and heโs not bought; they ripping off his content? Reactions: SaraNajmaii, KellyLMcCarty, Trinity, allblackgat disappointed; lazy and obvious. Iโll take option 2; MissyMeDanielle agrees; ReturnOfKappy says he was blind but no more. KnoxieLuv.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: STATE MEDIA EPSTEIN PROPAGANDA NETWORK EXPOSED ๐ All within an hour or so CON INC shills put out VERBATIM apparently SCRIPTED TALKING POINTS about the Epstein files. ALL EXACT SAME WORDS: "BACKFIRED BIGLY" "Bill Clinton" "BUSTED" "VINDINCATION" The "New media" is bought https://t.co/okhlXGULuv
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: @EricLDaugh has clarified that these other media accounts are retooling and reusing his posts - and he is "not bought" Looks like they are ripping off his content? https://t.co/7znRkjYcqC
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@SaraNajmaii Indeed
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@KellyLMcCarty Yep
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@trinity_314 Likewise
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@allblackgat So disappointing
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@sarah_luna_1111 It's lazy and obvious
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@Cam717r I'll take option 2
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@MissyMeDanielle Yep
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@ReturnOfKappy I was blind and an ignorant participant myself for a long time. No more.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Norway has charged former prime minister Thorbiรธrn Jagland with gross corruption tied to Jeffrey Epstein after immunity was removed; emails show solo and family trips to Epsteinโs homes after 2008. Europe pushes for justice, but USA action is criticized as lacking. An update: heโs charged, not arrested; his home and offices were raided. Others speculate a British ambassador may be charged; some defend those who speak out and call for more action.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐ณ๐ด: NORWAY ARRESTS FORMER PRIME MINISTER THORBIรRN JAGLAND FOR EPSTEIN CORRUPTION ๐๐ฅ A former Norwegian Prime Minister is charged with "gross corruption" over his ties with the US s3x trafficker Jeffrey Epstein by the Norwegian government. The Council of Europe removed Jagland's diplomatic immunity so that he could be indicted. The latest Epstein Transparency Act revealed emails showing that Jagland planned solo and family trips to Epstein's homes in Paris, New York, and Palm Beach after the billionaire was convicted of a soliciting a minor in 2008. So Europe is making extra efforts to bring these criminals to justice but there's STILL NO CONSEQUENCES IN USA ๐บ๐ธ๐คจ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐ณ๐ด UPDATE: "CHARGED" not "ARRESTED" apparently. His home and offices were also raided. Receipts: https://www.trtworld.com/article/68a794cd4048 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yqr8eggvwo
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@TheLoneWolfonX I believe the British ambassador may have been charged I'll need to double check
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@Ryanmatta NOT ONE PED! ๐คจ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@gallymeroreboot Anyone brave enough to speak out on Epstein are heroes. All of you.
reSee.it AI Summary
Discussion notes that "CIA" appears as OCR metadata in emails from the DOJ Epstein files, likely a file label or dataset code rather than a literal CIA link. One user identifies the third man as Axel Dumas, tied to 2013 emails about Epstein and Woody Allen visiting Hermรจs in Paris. They describe Hermรจs as a luxury workshop, not a lab or intelligence setup, and suggest the "CIA" tag could be a label or coincidence.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Search terms like "CIA" in the DOJ Epstein Library pull up metadata results for images in emails. "CIA" got OCR'd in their uploads and written as metadata of file. There are numerous examples of this working, I don't think they meant to do this. https://t.co/tWkt0gEqfv
@MoeJLong - MoeJoe
The third man appears to be Axel Dumas, who was appointed executive chairman of Hermรจs International in 2013โthe exact year of the email. Epstein files include references to Epstein and Woody Allen visiting Hermรจs in Paris around that time (e.g., emails about Epstein showing them around the store/atelier, purchasing items like a Hermรจs Apple Watch band for Soon-Yi Previn, and meetings involving Dumas or Rothschild connections). No "lab" or scientific setupโit's a luxury fashion/couture workshop (bespoke leather, prototypes, internships), not intelligence-related despite the "CIA" tag (which may be a file label, acronym for something internal like a dataset code, or coincidental/redacted element in the leak recirculation). The French iPhone signature aligns perfectly: sent from a French-localized device (common in Paris/business contexts like this Hermรจs visit).
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: ERIKA TRIES TO RUSH TYLER ROBINSON TRIAL ๐ Erika Kirk's attorney field a motion to pursue a SPEEDY TRIAL for Tyler Robinson despite "forgiving him" and Tyler WAIVING his right to a speedy trial due to the scale of the case. THIS IS UNPRECEDENTED! WHY is she desperate? ๐ค https://t.co/zRguTqbXHM
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
FULL INTERVIEW of Fort Huachuca Charlie Kirk military-meeting whistleblower MITCH SNOW discussing what he observed on those fateful days just before Charlie Kirk's assassination. This is the longest interview of Mitch! Thanks for breaking this @RealCandaceO! ๐๐ป We GO MAX! ๐ช๐ป๐บ๐ธ https://t.co/7SifFWGy8o
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mitch Snow, Fort Huachuca whistleblower, joined a Diligent Spaces edition hosted on X with his cohosts and guests, describing a two-day sequence centered on his attempt to obtain prosecutorial records and the extraordinary presence he observed at Fort Huachuca.
Context and purpose for Fort Huachuca visit
- Mitch explained that for years he has been trying to obtain records related to his military service, alleged targeting, and a custody fight involving his son. He has been collecting records across the country (Florida, East Coast, Washington DC) to reinforce a prosecutorial case and defend his reputation.
- The last records he needed, he said, were at Fort Huachuca, where there had been prosecutions connected to a tunnel associated with a drug trafficking operation involving the Sinaloa cartel. Mitch described laying sensors (seismic and acoustic) as part of a Joint Task Force Six mission in May 1990, discovering an underground tunnel near Douglas, Arizona, with evidence implicating U.S. members. He testified in an army CID deposition related to that case, and described being flown back to Fort Drum after the deposition.
- He stated that the tunnel raid led to the tunnelโs partial shutdown, but that it also caused the cartel to redesign distribution methods (submarines, various ports) and that evidence included photographs showing U.S. members with cartel figures. He asserted that he was targeted and harassed for reporting these findings over the years, including attempts to access his clearance information and threats linked to debt-tracking techniques used by cartels.
First day at Fort Huachuca (evening of September 8)
- Mitch traveled to Fort Huachuca for the records he needed, planning to stay at Candlewood Suites on base. He arrived around 5:00โ6:00 PM Mountain Time, checked in with his girlfriend (Amy) via video call, and went to the lobby to speak with staff about access and the building layout.
- In the lobby, he noticed a man who seemed like a professional, possibly a special forces contractor, wearing a distinctive watch; he did not approach or engage with the man.
- A woman joined the man on a corner couch; Mitch described the woman as having a โsheenโ of being well put together, blonde with a ponytail, and noted the eyes as particularly striking. He observed them leave in a green GMC SUV with the woman entering the passenger seat and the man driving, while he headed off to find a place to eat.
- Mitch and Amy had dinner off base at a place described as a Mexican sushi restaurant (Takimaki-like name) and returned to the Candlewood Suites. He reported that the base was navigable but had a lot of speed traps; he did not report being stopped or harassed by MPs on arrival, and he described the gate staff as helpful.
- A key moment from this first day was Mitchโs observation in the lobby: the woman sitting with the contractor appeared to be a high-profile figure; he was unsure of her identity but described her as distinct from the military guests, not in uniform.
- Later, a panel of listeners asked about the exact appearance and actions of the people Mitch observed, including whether the two individuals were romantic or simply meeting, and whether the female wore rings. Mitch answered with limited detail, saying he did not want to discuss some specifics at that time.
Observations at the base and the private meeting later that night
- On the first night, Mitch described witnessing the duo in the Candlewood lobby, then later seeing the woman with the contractor in the same lobby as he returned.
- He described a potential private discussion between the woman and the contractor, with the two leaving together in the vehicle; the following morning, Mitch provided a rough timeline (5:30โ6:00 PM for the lobby sighting, with departure around 7:00โ7:30 PM MT).
- The Host participants, including Sam, Noxie, Destiny, and Lemair, pressed for precise details and identifiers (make of the vehicle, exact times, and the identity of the people), while Mitch occasionally deferred to not reveal certain details yet, citing comfort and safety concerns.
- The host and guests discussed Mitchโs prior experiences, his memory, and the fact that a militarized environment often accompanies high-profile investigations. Several speakers affirmed Mitchโs credibility, noting that his level of detail resembled trained observation (salute reports: size, activity, location, unit, time, and equipment).
Second day and the escalation
- On the morning of September 9, Mitch woke early (around 05:30) to try to catch the sunrise and continued documenting with Amy via video calls; he described continuing to record selfies, videos, and notes to share with Amy.
- Mitch retraced his attempts to locate the CID (Criminal Investigation Division) building to retrieve the records, describing a lack of clear visitor information and multiple detours across post as he sought the proper location.
- He encountered a series of baselined rooms, offices, and signs; at one point, an officer suggested a different building and a different path to obtain the records. Mitch found a room with a podium and two soldiers at a desk; he identified it as a near-time, transitional office with a sign-in log.
- Mitch reported the appearance of an entourage of high-ranking officers (captains, majors, lieutenant colonels) and a congressman as the group passed by him while he waited.
Detainment, questioning, and consequences
- Mitch described being escorted outside the building with his belongings, including his bag of documents and passports, while a security/escort team questioned him about his purpose there. He provided his documents and explained his purpose: to obtain the records and file a report.
- The officers suggested bringing in a sergeant major, but he did not return; instead, a group of officers and soldiers surrounded him, including a captain, and a bomb-threat-like scenario unfolded: a vehicle investigation was initiated, and a bomb threat was insinuated as part of the unrelated escalation.
- Mitch recounted being driven off post to CID for interrogation; he described the interrogation room with one-way glass and the presence of Captain Neff. He provided his detailed life history and his case history, including the NDA he believed had expired and his request to produce a report number for the encounter.
- The post commander reportedly trespassed him from the installation for 24 hours, a decision made after the interrogation; Mitch insisted he would not return if trespassed further and stated he would proceed with his records via other channels. He described a variety of law enforcement vehicles at the scene (marked and unmarked police vehicles, federal agents, and a Park Ranger-type officer) and an elaborate, sometimes surreal, sequence of questioning. He documented his own records, including the OIG number (277 episode) and other documentation, and later traveled back to Tucson to regroup with Amy.
- Mitch described that he believed the bomb-threat and the post lockdown were part of an overreaction to his attempt to obtain records, noting that such reactions had occurred in the past when his records were sought. He claimed not to have been charged with any crime, but was escorted off the base and told not to return for 24 hours.
Aftermath and ongoing implications
- Mitch and Amy returned to Tucson and then continued the process, continuing to seek congressional inquiry and prosecutorial review; they also contemplated FOIA requests. They discussed the reality that Candlewood Suitesโ ownership was privately operated, complicating direct FOIA access to hotel footage. They mentioned a separate FOIA attempt by a lawyer (Slickdog) to obtain records about sightings of named individuals on Fort Huachuca, with a focus on gate logs and signage.
- The pair connected their experiences to broader political events, including the Charlie Kirk incident, Candace Owensโ involvement, and the allegations around Erica Kirk, Brian Harpole, and Mark Amaday, noting the difficulty in obtaining corroborating evidence. Mitch spoke about Candace Owensโ role in amplifying the story, and his own preference to keep certain details private until appropriate.
- Throughout the conversation, Mitchโs credibility was repeatedly supported by the other participants who emphasized his memory and attention to detail as evidence of his lived experience. Several speakers stressed the importance of cross-checking facts against the timeline and urged caution against disinformation and attempts to discredit credible testimony.
Closing notes
- The space concluded with expressions of support for Mitch and Amy, praise for their courage, and a plan to publish and share Mitchโs full story beyond the space. The host highlighted ongoing efforts to verify details, to preserve the record, and to bring attention to Mitchโs experience as part of a broader pursuit of truth. The event was described as a significant, if contested, documentation of a whistleblowerโs eyewitness account at a sensitive military installation, with calls to action for audience members to share the narrative and support Mitch and Amy as they continue their efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. What is up, everybody? Welcome to a very special edition of Diligent Spaces on X. We have with us, he should be coming up. Go ahead and hit the request button, Mitch, and I'll get you right up here.
It should bring you right up on stage. Mitch Snow, the Fort Huachuca whistleblower who has withstood the test of time, the smears, the attacks, everything the establishment machine could throw at him, and he is still left standing. Bottom right corner, everybody, please repost the space. Thank you so much. Let's get as many people in here as we can.
Mitch, there is a button on the bottom left corner of your screen. Hit that request button on the bottom left, and it should bring you back up. I see you down there. Let's Noxy, are you ready for this?
Speaker 1: Let's fucking go.
Speaker 0: Okay. Noxy, do we have to immediately go with the f bombs?
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I was excited. I was excited. I was excited. My bad.
I apologize.
Speaker 0: Oh, there he is. Mitch, can you hear me, sir? You have to unmute the microphone and then mute the microphone. So whenever you're There
Speaker 2: we go. We're still getting used to all those stuff.
Speaker 0: Yep. Yeah. And so whenever you're whenever you're not speaking so here's, let me just kinda set the parameters for everybody real quick. For the first portion of this, I'm going to just keep the conversation between Nick, myself, and my cohost while while we kind of go through what I wanna go through. And then later on in the interview, I will open it up for speakers to come up.
We put a post out yesterday. Dude, the the amount of questions that people have for Mitch is insane. You saw the post earlier. Right, Mitch?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. That that's quite the list. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So what we'll do is is we will pick a few a few of those off of that list, and then we will go from there. So what we're not going to do let me just kinda set the set the format here. My main focus tonight is to hear Mitch's experiences leading up to Fort Huachuca and the day of and the of the days of Fort Huachuca. I am not gonna spend a significant amount of time debating Mitch's past with, like, all of the other shills we had attacking him. We don't need to spend a bunch of time.
I don't care about that. My audience doesn't care about that. They're here because they wanna hear your experiences surrounding Fort Huachuca. And so, that is gonna be our mainstay. If there's of course, Mitch, let me just kinda say this.
If there's anything that I am, not addressing that you do wanna talk about, please let me know if we if we skip anything. If there is anything that you do not feel comfortable with sharing, for instance, maybe you and Candace are still, maybe Candace is still working on putting something out, since you were hers, since you were her first source, and you don't want to, address that yet. Or maybe if there's if there's any reason at all that you don't feel comfortable talking about something, for any reason whatsoever, it doesn't matter what it is, just tell me that you're not ready to talk about that or you don't feel like talking about that now, and we'll just keep moving on. It's not a big deal. You don't need to explain yourself.
You're just not ready to talk about it yet. Is that okay?
Speaker 2: That sounds perfect. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Yep. No problem. And so, my main focus here is just try to extract, and I'm gonna be really open about this.
I'm gonna try to extract as much about your trip to Fort Ouachuca as possible, right, within that you're willing to share. So that's gonna be my mission. I wanna hear and and I wanna go ahead.
Speaker 2: Oh, no. I was just agreeing with you. You go right ahead. You're doing great.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. So I'm gonna, yeah. I'm just trying to get as much information about four Wajuka out of you as possible because every day since this has happened, outside all of the noise, and I realized that it's easy to get caught up in the back and forth of the drama, of the of the shills on YouTube and on the timeline. And, you know, it turns out a lot of them were paid.
That's neither here nor there. But, you know, we can get caught up on that and then lose focus on what's really important here, which is the fact that you saw key TPUSA people or adjacent people at Fort Huachuca the days leading up to Charlie Kirk's assassination. Now that's not an implication of any guilt of anything. That's not saying that they were up to anything nefarious. We have no idea why these people would have been visiting this military base in those hours.
Right? And we're just trying to, you know, can you tell us for for sure if you were or if you were not? We still haven't gotten those answers yet. If you were, can you tell us why? We have a lot of questions.
We have a lot of questions. So in that in that regard, here how how I'd like to start this is, if you don't mind, Mitch, can you tell us the kind of, like, a short the short version of why you were at Fort Huachuca Fort Huachuca in the first place and it has to do with your previous military? You don't need to tell us all of the drama because a lot of us got it from Candace Owens. But what the purpose was for you to go there, like the backdrop for you to be on your way to Fort Huachuca if you could.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I love this question. Yeah. Trying to condense thirty five year history into a, yeah, into a sound bite. No.
I I've been I've been basically targeted for for a good portion of my adult life and trying to, you know, trying to get records of these things that have occurred and how I've been basically silenced. It takes a lot of records. It takes time to actually build a case like that, and you have to get records over time. And in that in the last couple years, this has just come to a head because I'm just fed up. There's no reason why I shouldn't have my son in my life.
And it's just basically over, you know, these built up allegations. And the allegations are absolutely absurd and preposterous. Because of that
Speaker 0: So you're you're just so I can so I can recap for the audience. So his his military history is in question, the events that he went through and the traumatic events that that he endured post his military service. He's been trying to collect records on that because he's in a nasty divorce case with his wife, a custody case at that, which is even worse. And he has a younger son that's a teenager. And so he has been trying to collect as many records around his past as possible for this case.
So that was the reason why he was going to Fort Huachuca. Go ahead, Mitch.
Speaker 2: Yeah. When when you don't have records or if somebody else is trying to say something about your records and characterize you and you you really don't have a voice or you're not stepping up to it, they can make up anything they want, and they have. So I've been me and Amy here for the last couple years, we've been on a quest to get every single bit of my records possible. We've been going to, you know, Florida, to the East Coast, Washington DC, and back. And then this was the last record that it's not that I don't have records of being there or being a part of the JTF six missions or getting awards for it or being placed as a critical part, but there were some pieces that I wanted to just basically reinforce, by going down there to get some of the original prosecutorial records that happened If at that
Speaker 0: you don't mind, what were those pieces?
Speaker 2: So there were prosecutions back then, that contained, you know, the evidence that some of our military and, US agents were involved in the building and hiding of that tunnel. My unintentional, you know, discovery of that, it it wasn't really intended. I don't think they they thought it was gonna happen.
Speaker 0: What was the tunnel that you discovered, and what was it used for?
Speaker 2: So in May 1990, we got assigned to the JTF six mission as it was a 96 Romeo. I noticed that was one of the questions on there. So my original MOS was 96 Romeo ground radar and REMBAS sensor operator. The ground sensors that we were using were seismic acoustic, and we were using them to basically detect movement, trying to discover why 80% I think it was 60 to 80% of the cocaine that was coming into The United States at that time was coming through, Douglas or around Douglas, Arizona, which is right on the border in between Fort Huachuca and Fort Bliss. We went down there and and it we did a pretty good job.
And I was the one who laid the sensors, and then I was also on the readouts when I discovered the proposition that it was an underground tunnel. And I was able to hand that off because, you know, there were certain conditions, it would be a long story. I'll write a book someday. But once that raid happened, the evidence, it wasn't just the cocaine, the guns, the crates of money that was discovered. It was a pretty big deal.
But and the tunnel itself, which costs, I think I think it was $11,400,000.0 is what they were saying. They called it like a James Bond Tunnel. Was pretty elaborate. But it was the evidence in in picture evidence on the other on the Mexican side that implicated US members. And that's, you know, that's something I don't think has ever really been covered.
But there is evidence, I think, open source you can get that shows that there was a picture reference that showed US members with Sinaloa cartel members in the building of that tunnel. We were trying to get the prosecutorial case for that, and evidence of that, just for my own records, and we were gonna question the FBI as to why I haven't been protected since that day, which I should have been. They should have been looking for me to be targeted.
Speaker 0: Did did you testify in an inquiry about these tunnels?
Speaker 2: I did have a deposition. I had a
Speaker 0: So you were a depict?
Speaker 3: But you were under Yeah.
Speaker 2: Was with army CID and also, I think it was a federal prosecutor from Tucson, at the time. And then I was, sent back to Fort Drum on a plane by myself. So yeah.
Speaker 0: Interesting. And and and and did that tunnel get shut down as a result of your findings and the inquisition that occurred afterwards, or was there continued reports of trafficking from near the base?
Speaker 2: That tunnel did get shut down. From what I understand is they've I think they filled it in or tried to. The you know, and it wasn't just me. I I didn't do the raid. I just gave pinpointed the location that it was a you know, it was an underground tunnel.
The there's you know, we have white hats and black hats inside of our government, unfortunately. And the good guys, yeah, they did their job. They performed a raid. They got the evidence. They blocked the tunnel.
But that also proved that we had the technology back then to go ahead and discover every single tunnel. The interesting part about that is it caused the cartel to basically redesign their distribution system. And that's where they started using, what is it, submarines on the East Coast, and then also using the ports of entry in the Bay Area, as well as Puget Sound later on and started concentrating their smuggling through there. So, you know, it's all part of that drug history. Do they continue to do it?
Yeah. Unfortunately, they still build tunnels, they're famous for it down there.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know that for a fact.
Speaker 2: Yeah. There's as I tried to tell Stu Peters, I think the testimony from missus Halliday, Patricia Halliday, she and her husband, who is a retired lieutenant colonel from the army, in trying to find out what happened to their son, They've uncovered some incredible evidence that it just breaks my heart. But yeah, you're talking about tunnels on the border, sometimes with cooperation of military members, smuggling on base, sex trafficking. So
Speaker 0: and there's been reports, if you guys don't know, I would just I would have anyone look up Fort Huachuca scandals or Fort Huachuca, and that's with an H. It sounds like Wah like a w, but it's actually H U A when you spell Huachuca. And look up sex or actually Fort Huachuca and trafficking, and then Fort Huachuca sexual assaults. And you will see a litany of allegations, not only allegations, but actually sustained investigations that found evidence of operations occurring on base and near base in conjunction with military personnel. Some of them as high ranking as, is it lieutenant general or there's a not quite general.
It's a it's a some
Speaker 2: sort General.
Speaker 0: Advocate general.
Speaker 2: Adjutant general.
Speaker 0: And so, yep. Yep. That the that was, he ended up resigning as a result of the scams that he was involved with in the early twenty tens. So, just kinda give people a a kind of, like, a feel for what we're talking about here. When you were involved in that cartel tunnel situation
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Was it revealed to you? I'm gonna I'm gonna be very general. Was it revealed to you that there were individuals within the federal government, either they be in the military or in politics, that were working with the cartels and trafficking through the tunnel there?
Speaker 2: Initially, no, I was, I was just part of the team that helped discover the tunnel and then they had the raid upon it. And the days following after we incinerated all the, you know, the ton of cocaine and everything else that came with it, we continued the mission to try and, you know, discover other tunnels with the sensors. And I was, sent to Noca. It's either Noca or Naco, Arizona right along the border. If you're not looking for it, it's a really small place.
But it's a border patrol outpost there. And me and one other were there, and I got we got followed on the Mexican side, by a couple of vehicles with men, guns, and they sort of looked like they were out hunting, you know, but, we went into a store to get a, you know, to get some refreshments, to get some drinks for you know, because it's it's a hot ass desert down there. But, when we did, we got followed in and somebody came in to basically confirm me as who I am, And they had my personal information. You got to understand, we weren't in uniform, we were civilian dressed. So technically undercover, relaxed grooming standards, a tan.
I definitely had hair and unlike my DOD photo. And this guy, yeah, he came in and he had personal information about where I went to high school, where my mother lived, her name, what friends I had, all the information that I had inside of my clearance packet. I was just a dumb 20 year old. I didn't know what was going on back then or what that conversation was about when he left and he went back to these vehicles. It was the agent that I was with that actually, you know, saved my dumbass, and pulled us out the back way to get back to the vehicle and then get me back to post.
Initially, they thought it was something that I did to reveal they thought maybe it was a cartel operating opportunistically that I'd given away my information somehow. I thought I was in trouble until the next day I had a debriefing by debriefing deposition with a US Army CID captain, and then also was seen to be a prosecutor from Tucson, federal prosecutor that was involved in the cases. And that's where they disclosed to me that my information had been had been given to the cartel. And that you know, I still I was young. I didn't know what that meant.
I I don't think a lot of people knew what that meant back then, or how much how much danger that would put me in in the future. But it put me on their list. So there were things that happened in my life where my identity was getting stolen, credit was being run up. It was threatening my security clearance. I had to pay off a lot of debt because these things what we now know is that's a technique by cartel to track government agents, track people through the government, through exploiting The US laws on on debt collection.
And they basically tracked me through my career into special forces and then up to Fort Lewis, Washington, where once I got out from there, I, was approached in 1998. And having collected up, probably some desirable skills by them being a special forces engineer, These types of people that that work with these transnational criminal organizations, they they give you a give you an offer. It's silver lead. What's the they said plato or or a plyo or plato, something like that. And it means silver or lead.
Basically, take the deal, otherwise, you know, to help us recruit, harm, harass, even kill others and and do whatever or become a target of it. Now I told the guy to kick rocks. I thought he was insane. But no. I I yeah.
I thought he read too many movies. You know? And at that time, I thought, you know, I've actually dealt with the cartels. They're down south. They're in Arizona.
What are what are you talking to me up in Washington for? But no. I was
Speaker 0: You're tested or being played with by somebody within the well, then then it would have been the Clinton administration. Correct? You said late nineties?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It was '98, sort of in the end of of Clinton's I
Speaker 0: just want to highlight something at this point. The this this issue with being harassed by individuals in the government after you witnessed what you witnessed at Fort Huachuca, that, you know, that persisted throughout presidencies despite their political ideologies. Right? So Clinton was a Democrat. Bush was a Republican.
Trump's, you know, a Republican now. When you were dealing with this stuff, the backlash, from the government, it's persisted regardless of what party was in power. Is that correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's correct. I you know, I didn't going through it, I didn't necessarily think that this was some sort of government conspiracy or anything like that. I just thought that this guy was wacko.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But how could he have information about your clearance packet?
Speaker 2: You know what I mean? Like of these yeah. I mean, down on the border when that happened, yeah, that was, I mean, after I went through the interview, yeah, when this guy approached me later on in '98, this lawyer, you know, I didn't know what he was with or how he got his information. This was pretty much pre pre Internet. This is pre cell phones.
So it's not like today. And I think people start to forget that, you know, we didn't have cell phones and all that kind of stuff back then. So it was a different time. I didn't know where he was getting his information or why he was approaching me. I I did think it was concerning, so I tried to report it.
You know, that fell on deaf ears. And so it took me basically just recording things over the next twenty five years as he followed me. And and I have we have the court cases of people that he sent to, you know, people who admitted being hired by him to break into my house to come kill me. And we caught them. They've been they were convicted.
And strangely enough, those that court case got buried. It got misfiled. There's no names on it. There's no it didn't get reported to national databases or anything, which is pretty strange.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because it would have to go on NCIS.
Speaker 2: You would think. Yeah. You would think that the FBI would be aware of this case. But even as late as, what, twenty twenty three, twenty four, special agent Miller here at Richland FBI field office said, oh, mister Snow, that's precious. You know?
That oh, you think that somebody came? But we just don't have any evidence of that case. There's no police report. There's no district court case. Well, I got fed up with that this last year, yeah, we went and found it.
There are certain places where they do keep records forever. We found those places, and we uncovered it.
Speaker 0: Was Fort Huachuca because now we're talking about going after records. Was Fort Huachuca the only army base or the only base? Because I know it's a multifaceted base. Any
Speaker 2: pretty
Speaker 0: much any branch of intelligence training happens there. From what I'm told, it's one of the only only stations in the whole country that does a specific set of training at and and that's the only place you can kinda go. Is that the only army base that you went to collect records like that? I'm just kinda curious.
Speaker 2: No. I've been to Fort Lewis, Fort Bragg, down to Fort Houston, Texas. We've been all over, requesting records, getting my records from those different places.
Speaker 4: And and when you went important. Important.
Speaker 0: When when when you went to these other army bases, did you re document, in much as the same way that you did with Fort Huachuca?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I I mean, like, going to Fort Lewis, I had Amy with me, and, yeah, we keep recording. And and have we been have they been a whole lot helpful? No. Not I I can't say that they've been very, the government's been very helpful with records much at all.
Speaker 0: Is that why you're documenting so much is to to document the fact that they are not really being, very cooperative?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'd say stonewalling. It's been very it's been difficult. So, yeah, when going down to Fort Huachuca, it was sort of a tough call because Amy, Amy wasn't able to get off work. She wasn't able to come with me, but there was just something, I don't know, was something just urged me that we really needed those records before we went to our local congressmen and prosecutors with the evidence that we already had stacked up.
Speaker 0: And what and can you can you walk me through, like, when how you decided you were gonna go to Fort Huachuca and and, like, you know, creating your plan to go. You said Amy couldn't go with you. How did you get down there, and when did you go? All of that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We there's this wonderful tool that everybody should be using about this time. All these AI tools that we now have with Grok, ChatGPT, we were putting my records through, the probability charts and also doing strategic threat assessments and stuff. And and it became revealed through that that these records would be very strategic to get, especially the prosecutorial ones. And because that we went to present what I had, to local prosecutors as well as federal prosecutor and and congressmen, I wanted to have those last records.
And it was just a we were on a schedule. I have the urgency of wanting to be able to use this, to be able to prove my case in court so I could see my son. And, I don't wanna wait another another Christmas. So it just got important enough that, you know, I I ended up telling Amy, either you can get me a ticket flying down there, I'm gonna jump in the car and drive and just get it done and over with. She got me a ticket.
I ended up flying down there and yeah, she was very worried about me. When
Speaker 0: did you fly down there?
Speaker 2: We flew was it the September 8, that morning is when I got in. Left here early, had stop offs in I think that one went down to LA, didn't it? And then it was Salt Lake to LA then over to Tucson.
Speaker 5: That sounds good. And
Speaker 2: so I got there about was it mid afternoon? Yeah. Sounds good. About and then we had to go through renting cars, and they have particular rules in Arizona about, using debit cards and credit cards down there. When renting cars, you have to have it within state or something.
So, there was a little difficulty between which place I would be able to rent a car at, but we got it cleared up. I ended up renting a car, jumped in and went straight down to Fort Huachuca where Amy had helped me.
Speaker 0: How how far that's that's about is that if I'm correct and correct me if I'm wrong, it's about an hour drive from Tucson to Fort Huachuca. Is that correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. About an hour, hour and fifteen minutes or so.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and so, you know, you're going on base now pretty much, if I'm correctly, to get on base because it's a massive base, I believe it's like 10, it's it's it has a lot of square mileage, because they do testing there for various things, and just they have a lot of they have a lot of acreage, square miles, I think. There's it's gated access to get to any of the any of the buildings, including the the hotel where you stayed at, correct, where you have to show an valid military ID or veteran's ID card, etcetera, to even get through the gate. Is that correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. I I think one of the questions has come up is little misconception, like, civilians can't get on a military basis. That that's not true.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's not true. I've been on military bases.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Sometimes they have great parks and great great facilities there.
Speaker 0: And so They have the best beaches.
Speaker 2: Oh, they do. We were down there this year too. They really do. Anyway, we we yeah. I went through the front gate.
Once I got there, had to get familiar with Sierra Vista. I think I got turned around on the freeway a couple of times. You really gotta be careful about the, they have a lot of speed traps down there. The speed level will go from 75 down to 45, up to 55, down to 35 a lot. So that was a little bit, interesting to negotiate.
But, yeah, I came on to the base. I had my card. I asked questions at the gate, how to get to the candlewood and all that.
Speaker 0: Do they ask
Speaker 2: you what you're
Speaker 0: do you have to have stated business when you go? I don't because if you're like, as a civilian, you have to give them your the business of why or, you know, a reason as to why you're there. Do they ask you, you know, why you're wanting to come on base when you check-in at the guard post?
Speaker 2: No. I just went in there asking questions on how to get to the Cannawood. They they really didn't ask Well, because you can go to
Speaker 0: use a canteen or whatever. Right? You're you're you're a vet. So, you can you can
Speaker 3: go Can I interject can just real quick? Because Mitch, this is Sam, by the way, Mitch. Appreciate your time. Is a question I've had, and I just wanna get permanent clarification. Were you at the Candlewood on Base Building 44200, or were you at the Candlewood nearby Sierra Vista?
Cause there's two of them. Just think uses which one you were at.
Speaker 2: Well, I'll be real clear. I was on the one on the base. Okay.
Speaker 3: That's all I wanted to know. Appreciate
Speaker 0: it. Yeah. I could have I could have told you that because I wanted to go there myself, and I don't have, you have to have access to get get to that Candlewood. So
Speaker 2: Yeah. There's two there's two,
Speaker 3: and they're on the map. People have been asking me. I'm like, you know, I don't know. I haven't been able to find the the the ironclad clarification. So we got it from Mitch's mouth and stuff, the one on base, not the one in Sierra Vista.
Speaker 0: That's right. Correct.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. As a matter of fact, it was interesting because rolling up to it, I recognized the building. Those are the some of the they're converted barracks that they converted into these these hotels. And Right.
This happened to be one that looked I don't think it was the exact one that I had as barracks. Mine were a little bit back into the right of that one, but they were the same building, same type. So I was really fascinated by that.
Speaker 0: For the audience. So the the, as the base expanded, it swallowed up this hotel and now it is used for both civilian and base, residents, as a residence for temporary residents for both military personnel and civilians or civilian contracts or family of military personnel and is on base. So it's actually a part of the base even though it is independently owned through some kind of contract that that chain of hotels has with with the federal government. Go ahead. Continue, Mitch.
I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Those familiar with the military, mean, you can book this through what they call MWR and stuff. It it's not that, not that hard a deal. But yeah. But as I understand
Speaker 3: it but as I understand it, though, because I looked into this, you cannot FOIA request, the footage or records of that, of that candle, which is it is private it is privately. Right?
Speaker 0: So so if you if you let me get through the interview, I'm gonna open it up for broader conversation. I just kinda wanna get alright. Thank you. You're good. Alright.
So you weren't here for that. Kinda, laid out how I wanted to approach it until then. So, you are you get through the gate, you ask some questions about where to go, and then what so what time was this that you got to the gate? And and it's rough estimate. You're not under oath here.
It's okay to not be exactly precise. Just as close as you can as close as you can remember.
Speaker 2: I mean, if we had to, we could probably look up our phone records. I was on the phone with Amy as I came through. We were trying to find, like you said, it's sort of a large base. It's also a bit deceiving because it's it's along the side of some mountains there, and it's sort of rolly desert. So, even though it's like flat terrain, you sort of have to roll up over things before you see stuff.
And it makes it a little bit difficult to, to navigate on the post if you haven't been there in a while like me. So I got there, what, about five? I think I came through the gates around five or so. Wandered around trying to find the can of wood, finally found it. We were on the phone, what, 05:37 checking into the hotel.
I went back and forth between my room and back up to the front desk a few times, and that's when I saw people that were there in the lobby. I mean, man, I noticed
Speaker 0: I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna pause you right there just for a second because this one of the most crucial parts of the conversation. So, I'm gonna recap our audience. If you just joined us, please go down to the comments section and repost the space. I want everybody to be able to participate in this conversation with Mitch, where we're not focusing on ad hominems and we're focusing on the story. Please go down to the comment section and hit the repost space.
The, that's how the algorithm gets this visible. Another thing is I wanna recap for everybody. We have Mitch Snow, who is the whistleblower from Fort Huachuca, who has allegedly identified individuals, associated with Turning Point at Fort Huachuca meeting with top brass on during a two day trip that he was there. I'm not gonna get specific, so I'll let you do that, Mitch. Just before Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
So he came out on Candace Owens' show. You know, he has been through the ringer as far as smears, slanders, attacks. It was immediate. The antibody response to this guy's story let a lot of us know that there was something there to there. They didn't want us talking about.
And so, that's where we're at. He just described why he was going to Fort Huachuca in good detail. He described going to Fort Huachuca when he got there and when now we're just now getting to the hotel. And it's about and this is a key part because something we didn't know before. Knew when I asked you yesterday on the phone.
But a key part of this is that he got there around he saw these people at the hotel, I believe, between 05:30PM mountain time and 6PM mountain time, which is, if you don't know, that is two hours before eastern. So that would be 7PM between am I right? 07:30PM eastern and 8PM eastern is when he would have seen these individuals, give or take. Right? Go ahead, Mitch.
So you go up to your room, you grab some stuff, you go back down, you come back up, you go to the lobby, you're you're messing around like we all do when we get in hotels. And so can you describe why you're going back down to the desk or wherever it was you saw these people when you noticed them? And can you describe as much as you can, remember? And I would even ask you to close your eyes and visualize what you see, as you describe it, if you don't mind.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, as I got there, Amy's the one who made the reservation, so, she called ahead to make sure that I was there. She was really worried about me being, she's worried about me me leaving the host or leaving the house at any time, much less going all the way down to Arizona. So, yeah, she was already calling in the front desk to make sure everything was set up for me. I had to get there, show my ID and stuff at the desk, and, just drop some stuff off at the room.
I was in between there. We were on video call. I was showing her around the lobby, around the the hotel because this was, I was trying to take her on a tour of you know, this is basically my old barracks, of what's what's there, and it was really interesting. And in between there, again, dropping off a bag of clothes and stuff like that, coming out to the front desk, just asking them a little bit about the history of when it when they converted the converted the barracks into this hotel, into the Candlewood Suites. And there was just chitchat between me and the the front desk.
And, you know, that's it was during that time that I noticed, the man who was sitting on the couch, and, there were You could tell there were other army, young army troops that were probably there temporarily that were in the dining facility behind us. But this guy was sitting alone on the couch in the lobby. He just had a different sheen to him, a little more put together and a little bit of a beard, tightly tightly shaven. And, you know, he looked, to me, he looked like, I just assumed military, especially, the watch that he had, it looked a little bit more olive drab. It had a little bit of a cloth to it, but it it was a it was a nice watch, very pragmatic type of watch, and I'll I'll just leave it at that.
There's we'll leave that there. But
Speaker 0: Why did you, if you don't mind, why did you take notice of him so much? What was it about him that kinda stuck out to
Speaker 2: He seemed like a what? Seemed like a contractor, like an ex special forces guy who was there for contracting of some type. I I sort of pegged him that way. Enough that I almost went up to ask him, you know, like, what group he had been in, or or I was gonna ask him where he had served and stuff. And So to
Speaker 0: you, he he came across as a green beret?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Possibly. Yeah. Somebody that was professional. Yeah.
A professional soldier that was probably there doing contracting of some type. And that yeah. It that sort of piqued my interest and, yeah, nice watch, and I'm a watch guy. So, yeah, as I was going back and forth to my
Speaker 0: Pay attention to what he's saying. Right here is, like, so crucial. Continue, Mitch.
Speaker 2: As I came back out of the room, I was coming back up to the to the lobby to talk with the front desk and stuff and with Damien, and that's when a woman crossed my path, and and she walked in front of me to go sit at the couch with this guy. And, you know, I I I sort of gasped, and she she noticed she I had to take it off speakerphone and everything to just talk with a person. She was like, well, she thought something was wrong with me. I yeah. We just I recognize those eyes, and, it just took me for a gasp for a minute.
You know? And So
Speaker 0: here's a quick just wanna pause you. And I'm I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just interjecting every once in a while to make sure. So he saw when he was down there talking to the hotel staff in the lobby and you guys don't know if you know Candlewood Suites, I do. There's a breakfast dining area that's just j adjacent from the lobby, and there's couches.
Usually, the fair you know, the setup varies on where you're at, but there's lounging chairs and couches and, like, dining room tables and stuff in the area between the lobby and this dining room area. So he's down there. He's talking to the staff about, you know, when were when were barracks converted into hotels and, you know, what's the deal with the candlewood and all this. And he notices this individual who strikes him as potentially special forces or some kind of elite military. And it's so much that he's in you know, he's thinking about approaching him and asking him, you know, where he's what outfit he was with, etcetera.
He doesn't do it. Right? And so now he's describing going back and doing whatever, talking to his wife. And when he returns to the lobby am I right? So Mhmm.
When you see the woman, you return to the lobby, is she sitting with the individual on the couch? The this guy this guy you thought was special forces, is she sitting with him on the couch when you get back to the lobby? Are they standing? What are they doing?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So so it's a it was a corner couch. And so she went up and he was on one angle of it or one side of it. And, you know, he had been checking his watch and stuff before, he was looking for something, like he was waiting on an appointment or something. And then when she came down, he he sat facing toward her and she sat facing toward him with her hands in her, between her knees.
And, yeah, it looked like they were trying to have a conversation or something, and they were definitely gonna go somewhere. I so I didn't you know, obviously, it's not my business. I was curious about talking about them, but So one of the top
Speaker 0: questions one of the top questions that my listeners had when I said, what questions do you have? They wanna know how chummy the man and the woman you saw at the hotel were. Were they touching knees? If you can remember, were they, holding hands at all? How close were they sitting?
How chummy were those individuals?
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's, they were definitely trying to have a private conversation.
Speaker 6: So you think they
Speaker 2: were a little bit? Yeah. Okay. They they were that would be a good way of putting it. They sort of huddled
Speaker 0: Did they strike you as a romantic couple at all?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Possibly. It seemed like they were meeting to go somewhere, definitely. I ended up going, I think I had forgotten one thing at my room, came back out. And when I did, they were heading they were jumping into a truck out front.
And he apparently got to the driver's side and got in, and she ran around the front bumper to get into the passenger side, and they drove off. I was heading out to go get something to eat and I was tired. No. This is,
Speaker 0: just for to recap, this is around but this is between 05:30 and six Mountain Time when he sees this the the individuals.
Speaker 2: Well, I got there. Yeah. I mean, between the trips to me going back for between my room, we're talking between five, what was it, thirty seven. And then I think when I finally left or when I saw them was sometime just after seven that they were leaving.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So that's a two hour window. Like, hour and a half window. Okay.
Okay. So that's that's great. That's great. So we'll just say for the sake of it, 6PM is a good solid, like, indicator of of a timeline. I'm trying to form a timeline here.
Okay. So 6PM mountain time is the first time he sees these individuals. I'll just we'll just round it up to that. Can you describe what the female looked like when you come back down and she's sitting with this guy? Go ahead and describe what she looked like as much as you feel as as you can.
Speaker 2: You know, I I think of I've described her pretty well already with with Candice Owens. She seemed she had a sheen to her. Like, she was really well put together, blonde ponytail. And it was the eyes that sort of struck me that focused in on things. I'm I think we're gonna leave it at that for now and and let let Candace Owens have the rest
Speaker 5: Okay. Of
Speaker 0: Okay. Did you recognize either one of those individuals?
Speaker 2: No. No. They just stood out. You could tell that they weren't, they weren't, like, in army uniforms or they weren't in PT uniforms like the rest of the guests that were there at that time. They weren't, sitting in the the dining facility.
They were they look professional. I can see
Speaker 0: you can tell affluence when you see it, right? Manicured eyebrows, manicured When you say they have a sheen to them, I imagine you're talking about when he says how well they're put together, you know, they are, you know, they're they're all of the lines are lined up everywhere. The, you know what mean? The wrinkles are the wrinkles are taken care of like, am I
Speaker 1: I'm surprised, though, he didn't open the door for her. She had to open her own door.
Speaker 2: Oh. Why is that? That's a good catch. A good catch. That I had to open the door for Well No.
Speaker 0: No. No. No. He's talking about when she got into the truck, you said that they left in a truck together. You didn't you said that she jumped in the passenger side.
He didn't get the door for her. So I think that's that's interesting catch, Noxie. I didn't catch that.
Speaker 2: Gosh. All the things that I don't even catch. Yeah. I don't know what to say about that. But
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, we can't speak for we can't speak for this guy. Alright. So so you remember in pretty good detail, what those guys were. Then you went eight. Where did you go eat?
Speaker 2: There's not many places to eat in Sierra Vista. Mean, maybe there is. I I just just off post, there was, of all the places, I I go by a Mexican sushi place. I don't know if I shared that picture with you or not, but I forget the name. It was like Takimaki or something like that.
I'd never seen a Mexican sushi place in my life, but it was one of the only places open. So I went down in there, and I, of all the things I got was a steak. It was actually pretty good. Had a good little dinner while I was talking with Amy here and, went back and went back on post. Went back to the hotel.
Was a little bit hard to find at night, but got back there and had a good night's sleep, got up early in the next morning. Is that you want me to keep going? No.
Speaker 0: My mute button got stuck. It was weird. Sorry about that. No. You're right.
You're right. So you go have something to
Speaker 2: eat sushi. Do you do
Speaker 0: you not see these guys the rest of the evening then after you get back? You go eat? No. And and let me just say, the first time that you talked about that, there is a Mexican sushi place where he says it was, and it actually has really good reviews. Anybody can can Google this.
Just look for Mexican sushi near near Candlewood Suites at Fort Huachuca, and then it should pop up if you expand the search a little bit. So, yeah, it's crazy. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Sounds terrible, but I'll take your word for it. And he ate steak.
Speaker 2: No. They're actually wonderful. Yeah. I know it sounds terrible. I think that's why I went.
But, no, they were really sweet. They're wonderful there. Give them a great review. No. I had a good dinner there.
And, yeah, I went back. I I didn't see when I got back, it was it was dark. It's hard to it's really hard to negotiate that post, in the dark. It's not real well lit. And, so getting back was a little bit, a little bit weird.
Couple of wrong turns, and then finally I found the place. And, yeah, I sat sat in my hotel room there, talking with Amy until I fell asleep that night.
Speaker 0: Did you did you get stopped at all as you were navigating attempting to, find your way around, on base the first day?
Speaker 2: No. Not at all. No. I mean, as long as you're not I mean, they're pretty they've got pretty restrictive speed limits there. You know, like, I think it's 15 miles an hour a lot of the time.
Speaker 0: So But you weren't you weren't so conspicuous. Well, there's a reason why I'm asking you. There's a you weren't so conspicuous that the MPs, which are now I know are actually contracted out private securities on our US military bases these days as a whole another space. It's concerning. That's concerning.
But you weren't acting so conspicuous that they were harassing you or or demanding you show your papers or why you were there the first night that you were there, correct, on 09/08/2025?
Speaker 2: Not at all. No. They're very helpful. At the gate, if anything, they were helpful trying to tell me where to go. I'd you know, they take your card if you have a military ID card like I do.
They just scan you in and check it to make sure that you're not on probably, you know, some watch list or something. But, no, they scan you right in. They were very helpful at the gate, as best they could be. And, no, there was there was no problems.
Speaker 0: Amazing. Alright. So here's what we'll do. I'm gonna stop here. And if anybody has questions, let me just say this.
I'm a preface this. Maybe if you weren't in the space already, on the panel that is. If you have any questions about his first day there, particularly the hotel visit, as as when I was asking him to describe the female and he says, I'm gonna wait on that. I have a deal with Mitch. If there's something about one of the named individuals or an event that is being, you know, there's more possibly to be revealed or we're not quite he's not quite ready to share yet or he doesn't feel comfortable sharing, we're not gonna hurrying him about it.
He doesn't have to explain himself. All he has to say is I'm not ready to comment. Okay? So with that being said, I'm gonna open it up for questions for Mitch real quick regarding the first day. And don't don't don't ask anything about the ninth yet.
We're gonna work our way there. We're gonna stop right here. Naxi, you're my cohost. I'm a let you go first.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if you would be willing to answer this, Mitch, but did did you notice any rings on the female?
Speaker 2: I'm I'm gonna say no comment at this time.
Speaker 1: You got it. Okay. It was worth a try. I had to try. You gotta give it to me for trying.
Go
Speaker 2: ahead. No. You're fine. I get it.
Speaker 0: The the no comment's just as juicy anyways. We like Let's go go ahead, LaMer.
Speaker 1: And I respect it.
Speaker 7: Yeah. I was just gonna ask really quick. Did you happen to get a make and model of the vehicle that you saw the two individuals jump into?
Speaker 2: It looked like it was a it looked like it was a, possibly a GMC, like a green tinge to it. In the light, it was a little bit hard to see exactly what what shade of green it was, whether it was darker or a little bit lighter green, but it looked me, it came off as a GSA vehicle. And the way I qualify that is they have a it it wasn't like civilian raised. Like, wasn't raised, like, a foot or two off the ground. It was raised within the limits that the GSA has for their vehicles, but it was very shiny.
It was very nice. It wasn't it wasn't their regular, like, sign out vehicle that they have that they give to every troop to go, you know, put dents in and scrape up going through bushes and stuff like that. But it
Speaker 0: Like maybe something they would let
Speaker 2: an officer use? Yeah.
Speaker 7: And and then one last question. This is just a a bona fides question, and I don't blame you if you don't have it. But did you happen to retain the either reservation for the hotel or the receipt of your stay in Yeah.
Speaker 2: We that's some of the first things that we provided, can of silence. Okay. We got receipts for the hotel, the, the rental car. Mitch, we Yeah. The check-in phone.
Speaker 0: Well, I'll talk to you about it later, actually. I'll talk to you
Speaker 4: about that later.
Speaker 7: Okay. Alright. That that's all that's all I had right now. Diligent. Hey, Mitch.
Sorry you're going through it, man. I appreciate you making the time to to do this.
Speaker 0: Hey, LaMer. Did you notice? LaMer is also former, well, you're always military, I guess. But Lemera Lemera, do wanna tell them what you did real quick?
Speaker 7: Yeah. Yeah. So my my first MOS in the US army was a 68 Whiskey one Papa airborne combat medic, and then I was wounded in Fallujah. I went to win, intel school there on Fort Huachuca 35, 35 series. So familiar with the area.
Every everything you're saying checks out 1000%.
Speaker 2: Oh, thank you. Yeah. And thank you for your service. You're a real hero. Everybody should thank you.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Thank you, Amir. Yeah. Amir is great. He comes up and offers his experience regularly whenever we're talking about related military related or operation related information, and I he's a gem in spaces.
Let me tell you. And he
Speaker 1: He's my favorite fed.
Speaker 0: He is my favorite fed as well too. Yep. He's my that's what I can say. He's my favorite fed.
Speaker 7: Yes. In full transparency, was in the IC. I was a a zero one thirty two intel officer.
Speaker 2: Okay. But,
Speaker 0: you know, he, and I'm I don't wanna get sidebarred into the attacks on you, but he also noted, you know, and I'm a civilian. I am a layman. And I was like, Lemar, there's something going on here. And he's like, yeah. I see it.
He's like, I see I see the coordinated attack. There is you're somebody is too close to the sun because they are they are pranic. They were panicked. And, we had a few conversations about that. So thank you, LaMer.
Let's go to Sam Parker. Go ahead.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Mitch. I got a couple questions at this point. Number one, have you been back in contact with the hotel since then?
Speaker 2: No. I I don't think, I think we were going to get in contact with a hotel because I was supposed to stay there another night. We were gonna try and get a refund, but we've just been so preoccupied with other things. No. We haven't left a little bit of a bad taste in my mouth.
So no, we haven't Sure.
Speaker 3: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Second question. So as I was saying earlier, I was looking at maybe doing a FOIA request, because it's on base, but it's my understanding that the hotel is actually owned and run by a private company. So it wouldn't be subject to any FOIA requests.
Can you comment on whether you know that to be true or what your feeling is on that? And then as a follow-up to that
Speaker 0: What would the scope of said foyer request be if you could do one, Sam?
Speaker 3: Camera footage, you know, reservations, check ins, whatever records they have perhaps, you know, around those two dates. You know, and then the other, the other question I would have is, you know, based on your knowledge of the base and, you know, your recent visit there, what maybe could we foyer request like near the hotel that might be able to, is there anything in or in or around there
Speaker 2: that could be
Speaker 0: Let a me save little bit of time. Slickdog, who is one of my subscribers, one of our subscribers, I should say.
Speaker 4: Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: He submitted a foyer, on January is it fourth, Moxie? A pretty a really good one. He's an attorney. If you scroll down my timeline, it's on my profile. It's in the last few days.
You might have to go down, like, a day or two. But he said
Speaker 3: did he FOIA?
Speaker 0: So he FOIA ed any records pertaining to the presence only of either of four named individuals, and he didn't limit the scope. He said, I didn't want any logs. I didn't want any of this. I just want any records that would indicate the presence of and I'm and I'm paraphrasing here, and I realize that's important when you're talking about Foyas, but I'm paraphrasing because he was very specific in a way that it wouldn't get shut down. He asked for any records indicating the presence of Mark Amaday, Erica Kirk, Kabat Phillips, and or Brian Harpole from the dates range of September 1 through September 10 at at the base.
And this would be including but not limited to maybe a sign in from at the gate. It could be surveillance. It could be anything. But he was he was very clear to not, like, subject it limit you know, to anything that might hinder security or etcetera. Like, if you scroll my timeline, you'll see it.
I posted like a you know, I do my my video montages, but in the replies is the actual raw for you as well. So I'm not saying you shouldn't do one, but I'm saying we did do one in that regard.
Speaker 3: Sure. Well well, just we'll just sit back and wait on that. Probably wanna amend it or add in, like, Eddie Eddie Farnsworth now too, right? Perhaps.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe. Well, maybe a new FOIA, you know, that would increase that would increase, that would definitely illustrate public interest, right? I think there's a lot of and that was the premise of of the FOIA itself was public interest, a massive public interest. So I think if you send in another FOIA similar to that one, maybe worded in the way since we had an attorney do it, and you swapped out the names, maybe you could, you know, get something.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Now my last question at this point for for Mitch. Mitch, at what point did you in this whole saga, did you have like, I don't know, maybe, oh shit moment where you realized maybe you know something you're not supposed to, maybe you real you're
Speaker 0: starting I don't to think we're pieces quite there yet. I wanna keep it
Speaker 3: Oh, you okay.
Speaker 0: I'm doing this. I'm just I'm doing like a I'm doing like a timeline. Like, we're right now, we're at the end of the first night that he was there, and I wanna keep it there without getting ahead of ourselves. That's what I
Speaker 2: mean by If you don't mind, yeah, you're you're asking me what I thought about that stuff. Candice Owens asked those same question, and I I said, go for it. Get it. Gave her the times, places where what to request. I thought, as far as the limitations on those requests or who would provide them, I have no idea.
No. Go for it. Get it. That'd be great.
Speaker 0: I wonder I wonder since well, there might be a creative way to do this since you were there, and you're facing harassment as a result of your presence there, you might be able to request some kind of evidence from the hotel. As a matter of fact, if somebody ends up being in some kind of lawsuit over this, the hotel records might be subject to subpoena, especially since you were being slandered about what you said. Oh, no. I'm just creative thinkingly out loud there. Not trying to make anybody get nervous who might be listening.
Mitch, I'm a I think Destiny's got one more question about tonight. And let me ask, are you okay for time? Are we do we are we good for, like, maybe another thirty minutes or so?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. We're good. We got there is some, I think, in about a half hour we're supposed to go to, but, no, you guys got me. Go ahead.
Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you so much, Mitch. Go ahead, Destiny.
Speaker 5: Yeah. No. I just wanted and nice to meet you, Mitch, by the way. I I I'm actually from Washington State from Vancouver, so further south from you. But I wanted to know some details about the exchange with the car situation with, the guy that you saw in the woman.
So you're saying that he got in the car first. What did he, at some point, get up, go out and get the car and bring it around front or something like, how did that happen? Where's you know, I'm just trying to get the timeline here of was it already parked out front, or where would you did you see the car that they got into?
Speaker 2: Boy, all these questions. You know, my concentration was actually on my woman right here. I'm trying to assure her that I was just fine going back and forth to my room. I didn't see them pull the vehicle up. I don't know if somebody pulled it up for them.
What I saw was coming back out and looking through the foyer there is where I was seeing the guy get into the driver's seat and the woman coming around the front bumper and opening up the I I think actually somebody did push the door open for her because it sort of seemed open, and then she she jumped up onto the footstep and then into the truck. You know, I wasn't there stalking people, so it wasn't it's not like, you know
Speaker 0: Are you
Speaker 2: sure Mitch?
Speaker 0: Are you sure you weren't stalking anybody?
Speaker 5: Lamar Maybe they were stalking him. You never know.
Speaker 1: So Lamar has told us a little bit about the training that some of you guys go through with being able to recognize details and pay attention to details in your surroundings? Is have you been through that?
Speaker 2: Various. I mean, think there's a lot of MOSs that do. You know, when I went into special forces training, there's some of that. You wanna be able to I I think they prepare you in a lot of MOSs to be witnesses to things because they count especially in special forces, they count on you to be a an observer in a foreign country, and they count on you to be accurate. For me, I think, special forces also, it's not so much that they train you, they select you for certain qualities you already have.
And at least back in my day, they did. For what I've done in the last twenty five years, you know, it's you know, I've had everything from people coming through my, through my bedroom windows with knives to, you know, police that just show up in the middle of the night flashing their lights and taking off or following me around town. It's basically provoked a a way of living for me. I live small, and I stay aware of my surroundings. When people are strange, I try to we try to keep distance.
Speaker 1: So it's kind of like you're always in this state of hypervigilance because of your experiences.
Speaker 2: You guys call it hypervigilance. I just sure. Yeah. I pretty much stay at that state. Amy can
Speaker 0: Oh, I mean, I do.
Speaker 2: I imagine so. Yeah. I get it.
Speaker 5: We have to. We have to.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And you stay aware of the people, you know, with what happened the next day, especially
Speaker 0: Let's go ahead and move on to the next day, Mitch.
Speaker 2: Sure. Sure.
Speaker 0: So can you can you describe, and and and if you can, and I I am gonna ask you in as much detail as possible, and maybe close your eyes and visualize, and I know that sounds woo woo, but it does help. If you can describe your morning pretty much in as much detail as you can. Like, you get up, you get around, you go down for coffee, do you have breakfast, what time do you think it is, etcetera. If you can kinda go like that, maybe, like, you're recanting for for a deposition or whatever, and I might pause and ask you questions. If you don't mind, can you just kinda describe the following day on the morning of the ninth?
Speaker 2: Sure. I mean, yeah, if I can be just frank about what
Speaker 0: Speak freely, sir, please.
Speaker 2: What my mindset is is, yeah, had a good night's sleep. Was actually really impressed with the mattresses there. Wanted to do what kind of mattresses so that we could I needed a mattress like that back at home. Was and I woke up calling Amy here just to let her know I'm still okay and and everything's fine. Was getting up early and woke her up early for for her.
She was going to work. And we sat there talking to each other back and forth as we both, you know, did our bathroom stuff, got dressed, and it was just I was really trying to get out before the crack of dawn. You know, I wanted to see the sunrise in the desert and stuff, and even though I don't like being down there, it's one of those things people do. And, I wanted to reminisce, and, you know, Amy couldn't be there with me. She typically travels with me, we travel together.
We have a great time doing it. So I wanted her to experience it. So I was recording almost constantly there that that night before and then also the next day.
Speaker 0: When you say recording, are you mean you're taking selfie videos, you're taking selfie pictures, you're sending them to her, you're just kind of documenting everything that you can like you would if she was there so you can share the memories with her?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Exactly. Selfies, videos. Yeah. And anytime I was
Speaker 0: This is really important bit of, of the story for those of you who are really paying attention. I'm telling you crucial times to pay attention to details for this because we're not gonna know everything because there are some that has not been revealed yet. But there are certain details to pay attention to during this interview because they are very significant to who was in who was there and how we know they were there. Go ahead. Continue, Mitch.
I'm sorry. So he's taking selfies to share with his his girlfriend or wife. I'm not sure. I think it's girlfriend.
Speaker 2: Girlfriend. Yeah. Yeah. Girlfriend. Divorced.
We're living in thin now. So there's that too. Everybody wants that.
Speaker 0: Hey. Utah is only a state away if you come worming.
Speaker 5: I heard that maybe it's
Speaker 0: no. Never mind.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 0: Just kidding. Just kidding. Just about as about. Alright. So you are so you are you are taking a lot of selfies.
You said that you're gonna head out to the desert or try to see a desert sunrise. So you're out early. What time would you say that was that you left the hotel on on the morning? It was like
Speaker 2: five it was like 05:30 in the morning. Sun was just about to start cracking up, I think. And, yeah, I was talking with Amy and and also recording while I drive and telling her about the post. Specifically, there's one I mean, I was I've I've often told this story about being on that post back then that the Huachuca Mountains are honeycombed. So they get they have these it's an incredible cave system that they have.
I think it's, one of the largest unmapped cave systems in the world. But back then, I a bunch of us had discovered a cave opening, next to on the way up to one of the parks there. And we went into it way back when, and I I've told this story a bunch of times. Was, pretty incredible to go into caves. If you've never done it, it's it's just a
Speaker 0: little bit I nature, hiking, caves, wilderness. I'm all about it. So
Speaker 2: Yeah. You're going plunking in the deep dark, it's a it's a different experience. But, yeah, I was hoping to find the the entrance to that cave again just to take pictures of it and say, hey. See, I told you it was here. And also And
Speaker 0: then how if you don't mind real quick, how far from, like, the main stay of buildings, like the like the office office buildings, the officer buildings, or the administration buildings at Fort Huachuca is the Candlewood Suites. Like, if you had to guess, just and maybe wherever you else you went. Like, if you said that you went looking for this stuff, but how far away from the how how far away from the, hotel did you travel?
Speaker 2: Oh, you know, again, it's a little bit deceptive there because you're in the desert, and it's hard. It's, like, got this rolling sort of geography to it. So I went up to I mean, if I step back here, go up to this park, I talked to somebody that was walking there. I I think it was a female. She ended up telling me she was a retired sergeant major.
She comes there every morning to walk and stuff. We had a little talk. I go up, I take a few pictures up there and I came back down. I didn't see many, I say, I didn't see many troops out there doing PT like they used to when I was there. I was a little bit curious about that.
I did see one guy standing out there as a guard. So I ended up going up talking to him. And as I as I did, a police officer one of the police officers showed up. I ended up having a conversation with him, and I had been recording the whole time and not really paying attention to it, so it's not a great video. But, yeah, I talked with him.
I was asking where CID was. I was asking, telling him that I had to talk to some people there. He gave me some really bad directions, and, I tried to follow him as best I could. So I wandered around trying to find
Speaker 0: this taking selfies and and stuff like that during this whole as what you're describing, you know, asking directions, talking to the woman, traveling around the base after you left the hotel? You're still taking the selfies and recording and videos for your girlfriend at the time. Correct?
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely. Yeah. And she was afraid I was gonna go missing down there, and I wanted to yeah. We want Document them.
Speaker 1: Were you doing that in the hotel as well?
Speaker 2: Yes. The pretty much the whole time I was there. And we if we weren't on video, then, yeah, I was trying to video and and take pictures. And I was, how do you want to put it? Yeah, I was trying to make sure that, because we've had so many strange instances and interactions with with authorities, especially trying to get records or trying to report about any of this the stuff that's going on in my life.
Yeah. I wanted her to be able to have some sort of record of, hey. Start looking here. So, yeah, that that's sort of what I was doing. And then trying to find the directions that this guy gave me, the buildings were they're unusual buildings down there.
They're they're old, like, World War two buildings built on top of Alamo type buildings. And, yeah. I couldn't find the CID that he was talking about.
Speaker 0: What's a CID for our people who I I don't know what it means either. Can you for those of us who are adjacent or part of the military, can you?
Speaker 2: That's like the that's our criminal investigation division. So if you have, like, MPs, this would be, like, probably the equivalent of detectives slash internal investigations type.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna refresh everybody's memory. Mitch went down there to retrieve records from a criminal investigation that occurred subsequent to him finding a cartel tunnel near the base way back when in in his early days of his military career. So I just want to throw that out there. Just refresh everybody why he's actually there on base. And so when you're talking about going to the CID Building, he's actually trying to retrieve copies of records pertaining to his history in that regard.
Continue, Mitch. I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: Sure. Yeah. That's where we figured it would be best to start. You know, before you request records, you gotta know who has the records type of thing, and and that would have been the best place to start asking those questions. But not able to find the building that this police officer described, I did come across some other signs that said JTF, which very interesting.
We didn't have those back then because I was on the original JTF six mission, and and, we didn't have any signs back then. We just had crappy barracks to stay in. And it made me realize that, wait a minute. They actually have a full, you know, the mission continues type of thing, and I I had no idea. So as I'm driving, we looked up that there was an actual new command.
I think it was JTF Southern Border. Command had just started down there, and we were able to get just a few Google responses on that. And I was, well, that's pretty interesting. They would
Speaker 0: So you look for this building. It's not the right building or it's not where you think it is. So you have to find this new kinda headquarters or what you think is the new headquarters that you have to go to retrieve this record. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And I went into a couple of these I parked and went into a couple of these buildings, but nobody was in there. And, I just figured it's early. People haven't shown up to work yet.
They're probably out doing pretty good with them.
Speaker 0: So I just to set the stage for for what's gonna happen here later, Nick is looking for this Records Building, the CID Building, and they're shuffling stuff around in these office and officer and administrative buildings down at the base in Fort Huachuca where he's looking. So he got some wrong directions a couple of times. He's going to these buildings. They're not the right ones or they're empty, etcetera. And so he is trying over and over again to find this particular building.
Go ahead. Continue, Mitch.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And there wasn't really a, like, a visitor center. I I couldn't find anything where I could ask questions. So in my frustration, I, you know, I figured, it's a little bit early. I I need coffee.
I like coffee. They actually have a pretty good coffee place just off of there, just outside of the post. So, I think initially, I tried to set in coffee, and it it tried to direct me back to, Tucson, to the Starbucks at Tucson.
Speaker 0: This whole time you're using your your Google Maps?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. Continue. It drove me out past one way, and and I realized that, wait, it's trying to send me back to Tucson. So I had to turn back around, come back on to post, and then go off the other side and go to find the coffee place that was there in Sierra Vista.
Top of my head, I forget what the name was. Little clever name. When I got there, I noticed that there were some, guys in uniform in their BDUs, and they were tenth Mountain. Tenth Mountain is, you know, put the only reason they're down there that I used to know is the only reason we would come back there from 10th Mountain is to be part of the JTF six mission. So I started a
Speaker 0: conversation Mitch?
Speaker 2: Joint task force. So
Speaker 0: And and what's a joint task force?
Speaker 2: As you typically when the military gets combined with other agencies, law enforcement, know Any
Speaker 0: time the feds are working at the local federal interagency, like different branches of the military, different agencies, like, intelligence, FBI, CIA, DHS, etcetera. Right? ATF, whatever, whatever, collaborating together.
Speaker 2: Correct? Yeah. It's a collaborating command based upon a mission, a certain mission. So, yeah, the one back, that I was part of, you know, thirty five years ago, that was one of the first joint task forces that were, I think it was in The States and on the border specifically for that type of mission. I mean, there's previous joint task forces in general that were like in South America and whatnot.
But this when you start working within The United States, you have, you have restrictions in in the use of military, and that's why you have this joint task force that will have elements that, for instance, they needed the military element back then for our sensor capabilities or detection capabilities, but we were restricted. We couldn't confront, like, immigrants or, you know, conduct a raid or anything like that. We would have to pass that off to authorities that have jurisdiction, for instance, the border patrol. And that's how that happened back then. So coming back to this last September there, when I see the JTF, we look it up, I go to coffee, I talk to these guys.
And as we're talking, I'm buying them coffee and thanking them for their service. They I'm reminiscing about, you know, how JTF came to be back then. And we're talking back and forth and they said, yeah, you can go ask questions at this other building, Thunder Valley something. And I said, great. Thank you.
Ended up leaving there, going back on post. I asked the gate guard there as their run of my ID, where this building is, where I can start asking questions, is there going to be anybody there? And they were really helpful and they said, yeah, yeah, they're very hospitable. He told me directly where to go and it was a little bit of a spin around in the desert there, going down the side of this slope. But yeah, I eventually found this building.
There wasn't anything real particular. I think it used to be a theater or something. So it was was off on its own a little Did
Speaker 0: it have a sign on it or anything? Was it busy? Was there anybody stationed outside? Anything like that? No.
Anything anything of note that you can describe as you approach the building?
Speaker 2: No. If anything, it was a little bit blank, to be honest with you. The only thing that stood out to me is in the grass area, sort of around the building, they had this, Constantino wire strung out.
Speaker 0: What's that? What's that? What's Constantino wire?
Speaker 2: Barbed wire, round barbed wire that they had strung out, but the parking lot itself had no gate guard, there was vehicles parked inside, there was no signs, there was nothing to indicate what it was, there was nothing that said stay out or go in or anything like that. I was wondering if this was the right building. So, you know, I was making sure that that's where it was. There's
Speaker 0: no signage on it whatsoever either?
Speaker 2: No. There wasn't anything.
Speaker 0: Okay. Go ahead. Continue.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So there was a parking lot. You could park on the side, and then there was also parking in front. And behind that parking lot was also like, some park benches that had, what do you call, a little structure over the top of them for shade. I would say there was, oh, I don't know, maybe maybe 30 cars there.
Didn't seem particularly busy. They had a lot of parking. It was easy. Parked in front. I was talking with Amy, telling her, okay.
If I go in here and start asking questions and they actually can take my interview or anything, I'm probably gonna be out of contact for a while. Just letting her know I was okay and I was out that building. So, yeah, I parked, talked to her for a minute, grabbed my backpack, had my documents with me, had passports, IDs, files that showed my who I was from you know, birth on, my records, any IDs that I've had even during a name change so that you could see who I was by photo, you know, beforehand with my passports as well as afterward. So, yeah, I I walked in, and there was no there wasn't a huge presence. I think a couple of uniformed officers, lieutenant colonel, and a captain came walking out there, walked past.
I wasn't dressed. Yeah. I was dressed really casually.
Speaker 0: T shirt, jeans, hoodie? What do what do you got
Speaker 2: I don't know. I I had, what, black shirts, black polo, black shorts, hey dudes, my balcony.
Speaker 0: Looking very white, Mitch, looking very white going into this building. Continue.
Speaker 2: I I was reflecting the sun very well. Yeah. So I brought my Washington white with me. Yeah, it's warm down there, so it was nice. But yeah, I go in and there's a, the building is, you have the front doors, then you have a, it's not necessarily a narrow hallway, but they had racks on the left side where people were leaving their BU caps and maybe bags and stuff.
Just beyond that, there was a podium. On the right side, there was like a room, almost like a commander's room or something. After the podium, it's sort of a T intersection of a building. They had some flags in the background there to the left. The two guys at the front desk, there was a, I think, e four and e five that were there.
Speaker 0: Like a reception area? Is it is it is it like a lot a little bit of like an office lobby? Are there chairs, waiting chairs? Like, what is
Speaker 2: Yeah. It looked like it was a a quickly put together temporary, you know, it looked like they were in transition of some type, which matched what we found online about it. But, yeah, there was a podium. There was a two guys standing there. It was a reception area.
They had a sign in log. So I went up and I introduced myself, and I said, what missions I attended.
Speaker 0: Real quick. Around what time would you say it is that you were in this building, if you don't mind? It's really important that you came up to the entrance.
Speaker 2: I gave Kenneth Owens our our call records for the exact time, but, yeah, was just after 07:30, that I was walking in there. And
Speaker 0: So 07:30AM mountain time, around then is when you approached the building and went in. Go ahead. Continue. I don't need
Speaker 2: to I I believe you can call log. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
It was about seven 07:30. I think we have the exact time on on the call logs. So
Speaker 6: yeah. I
Speaker 0: don't know the exact time. It's just it's just for our listeners. And and if I need to, drop receipts for this later on, we can all the receipts are coming. Continue. Go ahead, Mitch, continue.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I go up and I talk to these guys and they said, I'm probably gonna need to talk to somebody that has a, you know, a little bit of gray hairs and a little bit of rank because the records I would be looking for and requesting when I have to report on is pretty damn old by this point. And they went and ended up getting a captain for me really quick. He came out, we went into the room and for a few, about ten minutes or so, we discussed what I was there for. And he said, oh, well, we're gonna have to get, like, four security or something like that for me to to speak to.
So he went, he left me at the podium. He went to go get someone. And while I'm there, the the guy that I'd seen the night before passes by me.
Speaker 0: Passes by you leaving or entering the building?
Speaker 2: Leaving. He came from around the corner to the right.
Speaker 0: So you're facing the podium trying to go in or talk to him about records, and this guy is exiting, and he has to face you to exit.
Speaker 2: Yeah. He walked right by me.
Speaker 0: You don't mind real quick. Mhmm. How how was he dressed?
Speaker 2: He had well, if I remember, he had, like, sort of khaki pants on. He had, black boots, a The same clothes that he
Speaker 0: had on the night the night before?
Speaker 2: No. Okay. Different. Okay. And he he had that strike to me that, you know, just based off what I had seen before that he was, I took him for maybe, somebody that was doing security work for somebody important.
And he walked out with an officer out the vestibule there, out the doors, and then as he did, and I was looking over at him, I almost walked up, I was gonna ask him, you know, I was gonna ask him the same questions I was the night before, but all of a sudden, three more people came with with a few officers, and a lot of officers started appearing in uniform behind them. I noticed the rank on a lot of them were you know, there are a few captains, few majors, then lieutenant colonels, and, it seemed like quite the honorage. And the three people that came out, yeah, one of them had, the congressional pin and a and a an American flag and another flag with it.
Speaker 0: They were they were all kind of pile pouring out after you the person so let me just real quick. The first person you saw leaving past you was the same individual that you had observed at the hotel you were at with the female the previous night the nights of September the eighth. Correct? Yes. And so following him out, you start to see all of these other high brass individuals, people of various upper rank officer ranks, captain, lieutenant colonel, etcetera.
And then you noticed an individual who had a congressional pin on. Go ahead. Continue.
Speaker 2: Alright. I am. Are you still there?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm here.
Speaker 2: Oh, okay. So sorry.
Speaker 0: You're good. You're good. I was So just reaching to
Speaker 2: sorry about that, people.
Speaker 0: No. You're good. You're good, brother. You're good. Continue.
So do do you
Speaker 2: guys help in?
Speaker 4: That's where you were at?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So these three gentlemen came in around the corner, coming around me, and I I was sort of, you know, I was obviously sort of in their way. So I had to step back and, with my back against the wall, the podium there, and and just being polite, watching them go by. And, yeah, I I didn't recognize them right then, but I noticed certain features about each one of them. They were definitely in a conversation with each other.
The other two gentlemen that were walking with them were definitely trying to play up. I don't wanna say schmooze, the congressman and
Speaker 0: Kissing ass. Kissing ass. We all know what it looks like. Come on.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. There we go. Yeah, they were definitely in conversation there. They didn't they sort of walked past all of the military.
They were very stoic. They they they didn't really interact with the military there at all. It was it was almost Did
Speaker 0: did they side on you much? Did any of did you ever did you lock eyes with any of these individuals? If so
Speaker 2: No. Looked right at them, but they no. They were in their own world. Their own little bubble and, whatever they were discussing. And how how close
Speaker 0: how how close in proximity to you where you were standing? You said that you had actually moved out of their way. So as they passed you, and I want you to start with the very first one. How close in proximity were the were they to you? As they approached you and you're facing them face head on.
How close in proximity to them were you if you had to guess feet wise?
Speaker 2: The the VIP that was there within arm's reach. The the other two were, you know, they were all shoulder to shoulder walking out. So all been a few feet. A few feet.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. So you got a really good gander at their faces as they left the building.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And I was sort of, you know, sort of getting the idea that maybe I walked into a dog and pony show, new command. Who knows what's going on there that, I might recognize somebody. So I was taking a gander and, also just trying to be polite and and not something I wanted to get involved in.
Speaker 0: This is after you were waiting, after you had talked for, like, a few minutes with a captain about why you were there and the and the extent of your search and the the, you know, the the the length of time it had been, the time span it had been. During that conversation and this is, I think, an important detail. During that conversation with that captain, before these people had passed you, did he indicate that you were in the wrong place?
Speaker 2: No. He actually I mean, I think he was surprised by by what I was reporting. I think it it was probably something he wasn't wasn't used to maybe. But he no. He he indicated that he knew exactly who I should talk to, you know, with, force protection.
So I was waiting on that for the most part.
Speaker 0: So here we are. It is now approaching, I wanna say, probably 8AM, because you've been there for thirty minutes. And, you know, of course, there's some play in the timeline here for our listeners. Don't get hung up on the details. He's given these receipts to Candice.
If we need a precise timeline, I can we can get those later. I can get them. But I'm so I'm just I'm I'm prox you know, just estimating here. Right? Just so have a general idea.
So he gets into the building at 07:30AM mountain time on the morning of the ninth. He sits there for I want to say about ten, fifteen minutes talking to the reception and a captain trying to relay what his purpose is there, what he's looking for, etc. And about after, like, ten, fifteen minutes of being up front, the these this party of individuals passes him. It involves high level military brass that is cap from rank captain officer all the way up to lieutenant colonel, etcetera, and one congressman. The congressman, other than you know, we've been through it with his face, so I don't need we don't need go to that.
Is there anything distinct about the congressman that you can tell us? Remember what color suit he was wearing? How tall he was? His stature? Was he fat?
Was he was he in good shape? Anything like that that you can you can share with us?
Speaker 2: Yeah. These gentlemen were all taller than me, a little bit taller than me. The congressman was a little bit shorter than the other two, but they were sort of I mean, that was sort of hard to tell because they were sort of
Speaker 0: like How tall are you, Mitch?
Speaker 2: Shouldered in there. And I'm five eight and a half or so.
Speaker 0: Okay. So you're not like a behemoth?
Speaker 2: No. No. Okay. So I you know, it wasn't wasn't like I was going in there to Yeah. You're not there.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You weren't there to surveil the place. So I under I understand that. I'm still just gonna ask you as money. I'm just trying to get as many
Speaker 2: details as
Speaker 0: I can out of it. You know what? This is my job. This is my job.
Speaker 2: Don't know.
Speaker 0: Do mind if I
Speaker 7: ask him just a really quick question?
Speaker 0: Go ahead.
Speaker 7: So as the congressional delegation is leaving, did the lower enlisted or anyone call the area to attention as those senior officers were passing?
Speaker 2: No. I thought that was a little bit weird. No. It was almost like they had already been, probably gone through that process. There were a lot of officers going in and out with that process so that it was more of an open, like t intersection of a hallway.
I don't, no. I don't recall them doing anything like that, but they were casually leaving.
Speaker 7: Okay. Thanks.
Speaker 1: You did mention you did mention that there was a congressional pin and then The United States flag pin, and then you mentioned another flag pin. Do you know what the other flag was?
Speaker 2: I no comment. Was like one of those dual flags. Dual dual flags. It was a dual flag. It had we'll just leave it back.
Speaker 0: The pin the pin had a dual flag on it.
Speaker 2: It's okay to say it real, bro.
Speaker 0: Just just to no. No. No. No. Don't don't do it, Clint.
Hold on. Hold on. Wait. Just wait. Just wait.
The dual flags, he means a double flag. Right? So it would be a matching flag that's crickets crossed, but it's the same flag. It's not it's it's like one pin that has two of the same flags on it. Am I right?
I don't mind asking you what it is, but am I right about One
Speaker 2: pin, two flags. They're both, both flags are facing opposite directions type.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and and matching. Like, they crisscross against each other. Correct? Like, would be if you had two flagpoles, like, like, when you cross doors.
Okay. Yep. So
Speaker 1: They're two different flags or two of
Speaker 0: the same flags? Flags, Noxie. They're the same flags.
Speaker 1: That's what I was trying to understand because
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 0: Well, that's what I was explaining. Hold on. So Oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: But are were they in the American flag?
Speaker 0: He's not he's not answering yet. He isn't answering that. Just hold on.
Speaker 3: Well, that's a yes or no question.
Speaker 0: Well, he said no comment. Right? He said no comment. He doesn't
Speaker 3: want If it's an American flag, it's no comment. Was that the question that the the question was was it an American flag?
Speaker 0: Specifics of what the flag were. I'm just let me help you. K? I made a deal with Mitch whenever we hit an area. Hold on.
Whenever we hit an area where he wasn't ready to disclose the information yet, and he said no comments. That is something that we are going to leave in the leave in purgatory and address it later, and I promised him we would not harp on him when he did it. And he's only done it twice now, but it's very significant about the details, that it's happening with. And I would just advise everybody listening, including my speakers to take note.
Speaker 3: Alright? Mitch I'm sorry. I just wanna I just wanna be real clear because I missed the initial setup to the question. Was the no comment to the question, was it an American flag pin? Was that what the no comment was to?
Speaker 2: It was to
Speaker 0: what kind of flag was it?
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 0: He had an
Speaker 1: American flag. He had a congressional pin, and then he had
Speaker 3: a dual flag. Gotcha. Alright.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Good. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Let me let me be really clear. They had two pins. One was a congressional pin, and then the other pin was a combination of two flags where it has it's one pin, but it has two flags sort of like a joint
Speaker 0: Were the flags matching, or were they different? Each flag on the one that's a double flag. Are they matching or are they different?
Speaker 2: One was The United States flag. The other was something else.
Speaker 1: Okay. That's what I was getting at, Dilly.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. I called it.
Speaker 2: Hey. Could I could I ask some really quick question, man?
Speaker 0: Yes. Alright. It may be a time alright. Let me hold on. Hold on.
Are you good for time? Sorry. You have to I muted everybody, Mitch, because they were all talking at once. You have to unmute your microphone. It might be glitched too.
Sorry, you guys. As soon as you can, Mitch, unmute your microphone. I wanna know how good we are for time. We're at the, like, most important part, I think, of this conversation so far. Unmute your microphone, Mitch.
Try to hit the mic button.
Speaker 2: There it is. Finally.
Speaker 0: Oh, I had to mute glitch. Yeah. Elon, if you're listening, bro, please fix the mute glitch. The the delays
Speaker 2: That was the that sent me Garcia. Yeah. I am so sorry. I I told somebody I would, yeah, be calling, so they're they're wondering where I am. I'm so sorry.
Go ahead. Do we have do we have do we
Speaker 0: have fifteen minutes?
Speaker 5: Oh, yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You're saying, yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'll go on what your wife's your girlfriend says, man. I'm sorry about your
Speaker 5: luck, man.
Speaker 0: It's obvious you're running the show here. So all due respect, Mitch, we're gonna have to go with what what the woman says. I'm just
Speaker 2: Of course.
Speaker 1: And it is
Speaker 2: thanks to Amy that
Speaker 1: he did document all of this.
Speaker 0: Hey, Amy. You have been a trooper. You are a hero. Mitch is a hero. I just wanna thank you for your courage and for his courage in supporting him.
I know that this is not easy. I have been through the ringer on this. Other people on this stage understand what it's like to come under this kind of heat whenever you are aware of or in the vicinity of information that very powerful people do not want to get out. We understand what that's like and we really, really appreciate everything that you are doing. And, you guys are patriots.
So just thank you. I wanna say thank you. A better a better Thank for that.
Speaker 2: I will tell you.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 2: He doesn't get enough credit, guys. And I'll tell you, for me, you know, I've been going through this for, you know, two and a half decades or more. I don't have a choice in this. I am who I am. I I I did the things I did.
I'm inconvenient, to a lot of things. I've been under this pressure. For the people that choose to stick next to me and be in my life to go through this, she's the real hero. And I'll I'll tell you that hands down. She has a choice.
I don't. I've just gotta this is just what I have to do. But Amy, the first thing I told her, go ahead, tell him.
Speaker 5: Yeah. He told me to run. I said it's not gonna happen. We're gonna get through this. That was years ago.
Speaker 2: I don't think she ever imagined
Speaker 5: Oh, I never
Speaker 2: all the things that we've been through. But No.
Speaker 5: But I couldn't ask for a better person to
Speaker 2: go through it with. Oh, now you're just you. Yeah. You're just trying to get some fun time later tonight. Okay.
Speaker 0: God bless you both.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Disavow. Disavow. Disavow. Alright.
Speaker 2: Just a quick question. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Go ahead, Clint.
Speaker 5: Go ahead. Go ahead.
Speaker 6: Alright, Mitch. I I've been wanting to ask this of you for the longest time. So as you said, you know, you're not in there trying to surveil the place or anything. Yeah. But you see you seem to have, you know, just a unbelievable memory for these things.
Was there something was there something notable about I mean, other than the fact that there was high brass people there, was there something notable that made you kinda databank all this information and or do you just have a phenomenal recall ability? Like, why why do you remember the details as well as you do? Because I just speaking for everybody else, I would imagine, I don't have the type of memory that I would be like, I was at, you know, an airport and I saw x y z. It's just it's remarkable. So I think it it challenges us to be like, can he really remember all these details?
Do you understand the question?
Speaker 5: Uh-huh. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I'll let Amy answer that.
Speaker 1: He has a photographic memory. He can recall dates,
Speaker 5: times, people, places. I yeah. It it locks.
Speaker 1: It's like a tape recorder. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: Alright. Well, that that is very helpful. Mhmm. I don't know.
Speaker 5: It's a gift. At least in a curse, I guess, you could Yeah.
Speaker 2: A gift. I would say a curse most of the time. I you know, I'd yeah. I've been like this since I was a kid. My my dad who would involve himself in a lot of things, he always had to shut my mouth because if somebody asked me a question, was gonna give him the full full detail of what kind of a tree it was, how many leaves it had, the colors of the leaves, which ones were different, how many branches there were, down to the types of creases in the tree, what it smelled like, what kind of sunlight was on it.
And I don't know. I just have that you call it a gift, call it a curse. Don't know. It's not perfect. When I was younger, it was really good.
For now, yeah, this is just who who I am. And when events happen After all
Speaker 6: the push after all the pushback you've received, are you still 95 to 99% sure that it was Erica Kirk present?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm gonna stick by it. Again, I'm not, I might be gifted in some ways, but I'm not perfect. Sure. Just, yeah.
This is who I am. This is what I saw.
Speaker 0: Let's I wanna continue on the timeline before we get derailed, which is why I was making people wait to get questions. Because we haven't finished, and I wanted he's you know, they're giving us their time. It's already been it's going on two hours now. And so I wanna finish the timeline, and then we can wrap up with a few questions from the panel. I have a few questions, and we'll be quick about it.
I'll be quick. A few questions from my audience that they were asked yesterday in a post that I made, and then we'll we'll let we'll let them go, and then we can have a conversation about what we've heard tonight. So I'm gonna refresh this recap where we're at. You are waiting for a captain to come back with either instructions or information regarding the records that you are there requesting at the desk of the reception area. As you are waiting for this captain to come back, the individual that you saw with who we purport to be, Erica Kirk, at the hotel the night previous walks past you, facing you within arm's reach almost, and then followed by other top brass, military brass, half a dozen or so individuals ranking anywhere from captain to lieutenant colonel.
And you also notice an individual who is wearing a congressional congressional pin alongside a American flag pin that has another flag next to it, a double crisscross pin next to his congressional pin on his lapel. Who else do you notice in the group as they walk by, that is either a businessman or somebody who is not of the military or in military, dress?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, that that's pretty much the testimony I've already given, but the person in the middle, I really didn't get a good look at because he was sort of guarded on both sides by the other two. The other person on the end, I I got a good look at because he was looking back. He was looking over his left shoulder, you know, like at the at the VIP congressman and trying to he was really he was talking with his hands quite a bit, and you could tell he was, you know, like you said, sort of sucking up. And you could tell that they were they were trying to engage in a conversation with that with that congressman.
Speaker 0: You later identify as Brian Harpole, and where was he within the group?
Speaker 2: The one that was furthest from me on the end is he was looking as he passed, he's looking, like, toward me and toward the congressman as he's passing and then going out. That one very much so. The mannerisms, the way he talked, the way he used his hands, height, hair color, haircut, the glasses that he had, propped on his head. Yeah. What what
Speaker 0: degree of certainty would you say that you are, positive of who you saw
Speaker 2: that morning? More on all these, like, everybody guys walk around, like, with a percentage on your eyeballs. I I would it was very much like him. He was it was, almost as certain as I can be. He has a very distinct type of face and a very his bone structure and his cheeks and the mannerisms that he talked, it was yeah.
That was it was I don't know how much more.
Speaker 0: Do you, and, of course, don't answer this if you don't want to. Did you hear any of the details of any of the conversation that they were having as they passed by you?
Speaker 2: No. I was really not trying to to be honest, I was trying to be polite and sort of step out of their way. Obviously, you know, there was something important. They were they were important people going on. I was trying to just sort of, you know, fit into the background.
I was just I was waiting there.
Speaker 0: Mean, I'm gonna push on you a little bit right here. Okay? And not in a bad way. The individual who was hunkered between two of the, we'll call them guards, that you couldn't get a good look at. You said that you're five eight.
Was this individual taller or shorter than the people around him?
Speaker 2: Yeah. All three of them were were taller than me. The two on the right were slightly taller than the Congo.
Speaker 0: In was he in civvy clothes? Was he in officer uniform? You can remember at all, the guy that you couldn't get a good look at.
Speaker 2: He was in slacks and a polo. And I think they all were pretty much. The Harpoon guy was also in a polo. And they they seemed
Speaker 0: I sent you if if you don't mind, and and I won't I won't say any names. Okay? So I just we'll keep it clean. Sent you a photo of an individual, and you said that you were gonna talk to Candace about it. Have you talked to Candace about it yet?
We don't we won't say anything more than that. I just wanna ask if you've if you have talked to her about the the picture I sent you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I have sent that off to her. She's we we've texted back and forth. She's gonna go through her process. She'll get back to me on that.
As of Okay. As of now, we haven't.
Speaker 0: So then I'm not gonna then I'm not gonna push you on it anymore then. That's why I asked. Alright. So we'll we'll hang up there because that's an interesting that's a that's a whole another thing. It's a whole another thing.
It's a whole another thing. Okay. So so we we've identified two people. Right? Later on, you identified this as Brian Harpole.
We know the story about how you did it. You saw him on TV or whatever. We can get into that at the end. I wanna get through this meeting part and your what you experienced that day. So we're gonna put a pin on ID ing people for now.
What happens after these people pass you? Go ahead. Continue from there, please.
Speaker 2: So a vehicle drives up. Again, I'm trying to
Speaker 0: wait the desk. Correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Right as they approach the front doors, a black, GMC, real shiny, shows up. The guy that was, you know, in the hotel the night before who is now standing out there, he ends up going to that vehicle. They all four start talking.
The military is sort of there's a few What
Speaker 0: four what four start talking? The guy from last night, and then who are the other three that are talking to him at the vehicle?
Speaker 2: The other three are the ones that came out right after him, in a line. So the the person recognized, it looks like Brian Harpole, the congressman, the guy in between, all three of them come out and met the the other individual. Okay. So and there were a few other, you know, there were military that were sort of, they were escorting them out. The once they got into their vehicle, know, sort of so as I'm waiting there, everything with me sort of stalled because obviously there, this entourage is going by.
There were officers that were coming out. There was a lot of there was a lot of lieutenant colonels. Then the sergeant major now for me, I'm looking around at some of the military guys in here can confirm. You know, we we sort of look at people's patches. You know, it's not just their rank.
It it's the you know, they got airborne, aerosol, pathfinder. You know, they have ranger tab, mountain tab,
Speaker 0: special forces. Anything stick out to you about the patches that passed by you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. There was a lot of air assault patches because it was a lot of 10th Mountain guys there. All of them were I don't think there was anyone there that wasn't tenth Mountain.
Speaker 0: What's what is that? What what's aerosol, and what's tenth Mountain for, the Layman City listeners?
Speaker 2: Oh, boy. Anybody can sort of look that up. Tenth Mountain division, cross swords. There's a subdued patch for it with a mountain tab.
Speaker 0: What does that mean exactly? Is that like a certain type of is that airborne? You know what I mean? Like, is there is there anything, like, specific, or is it just a certain division?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's the tenth Mountain Division out of, Fort Drum, New York. Okay. So, yeah, I used to be part of that. That was my first unit.
That's when I was there at Huachuca when I got sent down on mission. That's what I was part of. So I was recognizing that they're all part of, tenth Mountain Division. I don't think I remember seeing anybody that wasn't. I was looking at tabs.
I think there were a couple airborne tabs there, a couple airborne badges on their BU uniforms. And, you know, us military guys, we we yeah. We're sort of dick measured by that kind of stuff. We we look for that kind of thing. And then so when the sergeant major who had escorted him out came back in, he passes by me, and he's a little bit older.
I I felt like, oh, I've got somebody a little bit older, and I could tell he had, he had a ranger tab. So, you know, I sort of teased him about that as I was asking where his long tab, special forces tab was, and we got to chitchatting back and forth, and he started asking me, you know, what I was there for. And I said, well, it's sort of a long saga story, but I I'd like to get some records and make a report. And, he was gonna invite me back to his offices. I had to sign in properly at the desk, so they were gonna have me do that.
I was taking out my IDs. I could tell on the sign in sheet that I wasn't the only like, there had been people there before me that had signed in. And as I was signing in there, yeah, that's when the two captains came out. So as that entourage sort of left in the vehicle, my back was toward it. Then these two captains come out, and they're escorting me out of the building or asking me to step outside and leave my back.
Speaker 0: Was one of them was one of them the one, one of the ones you had talked to previously? Yeah. Guy who was
Speaker 2: It was the one that I talked to previously and the captain nef.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 5: So,
Speaker 2: yeah, I they asked me to put my bag down. Sure. Put it in their area. I said, do I need to bring it with me or something? It might be in a like, they sort of all of a sudden stiffened up.
Like
Speaker 0: Were you caught completely by surprise since up to this point, they were casually talking to you and a little chummy or whatever. And then all of a sudden, now it's like, come with me. Is that is that pretty much
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. It was a little bit a little bit
Speaker 0: more stiff
Speaker 2: and then asked me to
Speaker 0: Switch switch to flip or switch to flip.
Speaker 2: You flip to switch. Yeah. And I was like, you know, is there something wrong? Am I in trouble? Like, did I do something wrong?
Because I'm I'm just here asking questions. And they said, no. No. No. We just have you come outside with us.
We're gonna talk out here. Okay. And they wanted to escort me over to the park benches away from building. Okay. So we go sit down and I start they start asking me what I was there for, who I was, all stuff.
I gave them my files. I gave them all my records. I gave them my ID cards. You know, I was real open with honest, like, yeah, this is what I'm doing. I would just like a little bit of help if I'm in the wrong spot, you know, let me know.
And but I didn't wanna keep repeating my story like, you know, we've been here for two hours, just going over two hours of stuff. I didn't wanna keep repeating my story. So I remember telling one of the captains, is there any chance we can bring that sergeant major out? You know? Because he was old enough, and I figured he had experience enough, that we'd have enough common language, you know, between the generations of military people there.
So he gets up to go do that, and he never really returns. And it was just me and captain Neff there, and we were talking. Really nice gentleman, really great guy, and he was sort of taken off by the next response that happened too is is, you know, all of a sudden, vehicles start coming in, you know, police vehicles, other cruisers, military types, and they just sort of, like, created a wall in front of me. Then there was a
Speaker 0: This is after they escorted you to a bench outside, you were in their presence from the inside of the building to the bench, correct? And never left they never left your presence, after you left the building, correct?
Speaker 2: Alright. State You were with You
Speaker 0: were Yeah.
Speaker 2: You were now. Yeah.
Speaker 0: You were in the presence of a military officer the entire time once you went in at the very beginning of of the day. When you first went into this building, you were there with a receptionist, and then, you only left when they come back out and asked you to come outside and then you went outside to the bench. You were accompanied the entire time. Correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And I was sitting at the bench. I was still facing the front door. They sat on one side on each side of me. Captain Left was on my captain Neff was on my left.
The other captain, and I wish I could remember his name. But, yeah, he ended up getting up to go get the sergeant major that I requested.
Speaker 0: And that's when they all rolled in while he
Speaker 2: was reacting to yeah. It didn't yeah. Then all of a sudden, things changed. And then all of a sudden, have a line of vehicles in front of me, officers, and then this plane Can you
Speaker 0: be can you be more, if you can, and I'm gonna push you a little bit, can you be more descriptive of what type of responder vehicles showed up? Were they Sierra Vista police? Were they county? Were they military police? Were they contractors?
What all law enforcement were represented when they swarmed in on you?
Speaker 2: The answer is yes. It was like all of them. There was different types of each one of them. You know, I wasn't there counting vehicles. I wasn't there to it was just police vehicles, police cruisers, federal.
Obviously, there were, what do you call it? Like, the police vehicles were they're white.
Speaker 0: Marked unmarked?
Speaker 2: Marked, you know, with roll bars. There was two of those cruisers. There was another olive drab or tan vehicle. There were two tan vehicles, cruisers that came up and parked in front. It's sort of a big parking lot, so they had a lot of room to maneuver in front of me.
And then, so they were between me and the front doors of the building that I was looking at. There was there was a lot of lot of people there getting in and out of their vehicles. There was two plainclothes, officers, detectives I could see. One was a male, and he was he was communicating with people in the building mostly. The female, she was, like, directing people to come toward the bench with me and captain Neff.
Speaker 0: And so do you do you like, when you saw all this, were you like, hey, Neff. What's going on here? You know? Like, what's do you
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Yeah. I I asked him. I you know, literally as they kept coming up and trying to press me, like asking me what my problem was or trying to get me to act like I was agitated or something, was correcting them and saying, I'm not agitated. I'm not, there's nothing wrong.
There's no I'm just here making a report and trying to request records.
Speaker 0: As somebody who's trained and somebody who has experience, do you feel as though they were trying to manipulate a certain type of answer response out of you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it felt like they were trying to dig in and provoke a response of some type. I gave him nothing. I just sat back and said, you know, here's my records. Here's everything. They had a older, almost like park ranger guy come up.
The female was directing him to come up and talk to me while I'm sitting there with Captain F. And I literally I looked over at Captain F and I asked him, what what is this about? What's going on? And he he shrugged his shoulders. He looked at me.
He goes, I don't know. This is it was bizarre to him too. And he had to ask them what what all this was about. Did you Eventually that Did you
Speaker 0: at any time, between the time you left the building and what you're describing right now, message your wife, video call, record anything, Do any do any like, did you videotape the cars out there or anything?
Speaker 2: No. I wish I had. I should have had a you know, if I were to I I've teased after that. The have you ever seen that first five minutes of blacklist where he goes into the CIA building and gives them a name and stuff like that, and then all of a sudden he's got guns pointed out? It was like that except for larger.
And, I I wish I had had a if I'd have known something like that was happening, I would address the part and had a had a body camera on because it was just incredible. But no. I when they started directing these these people to interact with me, I was real cooperative. I had my records. They were trying to pick holes with my records, and why do you have two different types of passports with different names?
And I told them that right here is the legal name change. Here you go, buddy. You know, they wanted to know what car I drove in. I said I pointed to it over there. They wanted to know if they could search it and stuff.
I'm like, yeah, of course. Here you go. I I flipped them the keys.
Speaker 0: Did they ask you for your phone?
Speaker 2: Actually, I'm sorry. About my phones, now they were in I'd put them in with my bag, as I went in the first time. So they were in the top flap of my backpack, which they had me leave there. So they, they were in possession of those.
Speaker 0: So in the building, you left your phones in the building, in the bag. Yep.
Speaker 2: So, yeah, I didn't get to I wish I had recorded all this stuff. It was sort of incredible.
Speaker 0: Does your just real quick, if you don't mind sharing, does your phone have a some kind of lock on it, lock screen, biometric, or passcode, PIN code, fingerprint, anything like that?
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. So they couldn't just willy nilly access your phone while they had custody of it while you're outside. Go ahead and continue.
Speaker 2: One phone did, one phone didn't. But, yeah, the phone ID has a passcode.
Speaker 0: The one that you your pry your your daily driver does have a passcode? Yeah. Okay. Go ahead. Continue.
Speaker 2: So while this is sort of going on and getting drug out and they keep it was sort of like waves of them, and they would keep trying to do the same And in the whole time,
Speaker 0: you're still sitting on the bench.
Speaker 2: I'm looking at them like they're fools and asking Cap and Neph, what the heck is going on here?
Speaker 0: Sitting outside on the bench. They haven't, like, taken you back into a room anywhere.
Speaker 2: All this
Speaker 0: is happening outside in front of the building.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And then after a while, they they said, we're gonna have to call people in to inspect your vehicle, you know, because you're a ex special forces engineer. And I was like, well, what does that have to do with anything? Well, you know how to make bombs and stuff. And I'm like, so what?
I I served in the military. So now are you kidding me? A bomb threat? And really, you're gonna put that on my record? And I was I was I was shocked and not surprised type of deal.
Like, like, what? I've already
Speaker 0: you don't have your phone on you. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And I'm sitting there, Okay. This is gonna be great. Can't re wait to read this report. But that's one of the things I was insisting on too is getting a report on this.
Like, especially with Captain Neff.
Speaker 0: So So they so they say they need to check your vehicle for a bomb. Go ahead. Continue.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. So they you know, I flipped them the keys and they go check. It's like they found my empty cup of coffee, I think. It's a rental vehicle.
They were asking me if I drove it there because it had out of state plates or something. And I'm like, no. It's a rental vehicle, guys. I got it in Tucson. You can check with Enterprise.
Here you go. I think I even had the receipt for Enterprise on there with me. So they were they were just, like, trying to probe a bunch of different ways to, you know, it seemed to, like, nab me up in something. And I was, I kept trying to conversate with captain NEFA. You know, what's going on?
What did I do wrong? What is this about? And I just figured it was part of the false flagging that we've encountered previously, that's been put there by local authorities here. And I'm you know, what do you do? I'm just sort of I'm sitting back taking this in and trying to have conversation, but they kept interrupting with the same questions over and over again.
Different person would come up and ask the same questions. Yeah. That went on for a while. And as I did, there was another vehicle that pulled in to the front of the building. And then they wanted me to get in one of their vehicles.
They were gonna take me somewhere. And this went on for a while.
Speaker 0: So When they said they wanted you to get in one of their vehicles
Speaker 3: Never get in the car, Mitch. Don't do it.
Speaker 0: When they said when they when they said that they wanted to get in one of their vehicles, what was your did you get a pit like, a feeling in the pit of your stomach? Like, when did what was your emotional response right there?
Speaker 2: I've been through so much in my life. I I just
Speaker 0: Kinda like fucking par for the course. Let's just fucking get it over with.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Let's, yeah, let's get get it over with. And then it was just an like, I was a little bit put off that they're making a bomb threat that they're evacuating the building. They're having all these guys go stand out in the field. Did you say they load you up into the vehicle?
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They pulled everybody out of the building. They said they they said they evacuated other buildings that day, and they shut down the post.
And I was like, what the actual heck is going on here? So And what is it that they like, I'm in shorts, guys.
Speaker 0: I I realize things are really heightened right now. There's a lot going on. Did you when they evacuated the building, did you see any more VIP looking individuals come out?
Speaker 2: No. I I I couldn't. When that vehicle pulled up and then pulled away, and then they apparently evacuated the building. The the people were standing like, they exited and went toward the exit of the of the parking lot and stood out there. They put me in the vehicle with captain Neff and and this other guy.
Speaker 0: Did they copy you? Then what's that? Did they copy you?
Speaker 2: No. No. No. They asked if they could frisk me. I said, yeah.
Go right ahead. You know? You wanna fill me up? You gotta tell my girlfriend, though. And, I mean, it was it was it was just so absurd.
It was it was so over the top of why is this happening, you know? So, yeah, when they finally they drive me apparently to CID, and previously I'd been pretty darn close, but I hadn't found their building. So I go in there, there's an interrogation room.
Speaker 0: So weird that he never indicated you were at the wrong building. So weird to They
Speaker 2: couldn't tell me that I had done anything. The whole time they said, no. You've done nothing wrong. I said, well, why a bomb threat? And why this?
And they said, oh, well, that was a little bit of overreaction. That was our fault. I'll make sure that goes in the report. I go, I was curious as to why any of that happened, and I thought it was due to me, or what had been done to my records previously, we've discovered. So I sat there in this room.
They turned on a tape recorder. I talked with captain Neff. He left the room, like, once or twice, and another guy tried to get come in and talk with me. And I told them my story for the previous thirty five years. I asked that they were wondering why I was there, who I was connected with, and it really seemed like they were they thought I was there for to aspire or some nefarious purpose or I didn't have a purpose.
And I'm like, I'm a I'm a veteran. I am a citizen of this country. I'm petitioning my government for records I should be able to get, and I'd like to give a report because it's really important.
Speaker 0: And this whole time, you're thinking it's about you. Right? Like, you're thinking that it's about your past, the records that you're requesting that's creating this backlash and this frenzy, and and you you can't make heads or tails of it other than you're like, okay. This is just more of what I've already dealt with. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Is that correct? Okay.
Speaker 2: Correct. Yeah. And there it's one of those interrogation rooms where they have the one way glass, you know, like somebody staring at me on the other side of the glass there. There was a What detective was the
Speaker 0: demeanor like during the questioning? Was it adversarial? Did they do a good cop, bad cop? Was it No.
Speaker 2: It was very, very casual. And obviously every once in while, one of them would come back in and they would have records that they pulled up from the local county up here. They pulled up, I guess, VA records and other things that they would question me about. And they'd give me information that I didn't give them yet. So obviously they're getting it from somewhere.
Yeah. And then they tried to do the, what did they say? Well, you know, in any instance like this, we've gotta have somebody, a psych counselor come in to make sure. We just have to it's part of a checklist. And I was like, you think I'm okay.
Fine. I had so they brought him
Speaker 5: the counselor. What?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. This kid was definitely a no. I don't wanna boy, the poor kid. It it wasn't a highly qualified individual, I guess. He was nice enough, a little bit of an alternatively dressed, type of character, and he he comes in asking me what my problem was that day, and it's like, I don't have a problem.
You know? Well, you know, what kind of feelings do you have? What can I what kind of medications are you on? And Yeah. What diagnosis?
And I'm like, none. What's your pro like, why am I being asked this Captain F? You know, like, what what's going on here? I'm not a harm to myself or others or anything like that. I'm not here for anything.
I just wanna get records. I wanna give a report and get the hell out of here. And they said, what do you mean you wanna get the hell out of here? And I told him, I don't like necessarily staying around a place that could possibly end up with me getting, you know, killed. I would like to leave, get my stuff done, and go.
And if I leave here, I ain't coming back. And he said, oh, okay. And then they they sort of shuffled around, but that took this went on for hours. But, yeah, the site counselor, they wanted to lock me up for twenty four hours or something like that. And I was like, I ain't getting locked up for anything.
We'll move along. Like, they really kept bringing up this twenty four hour period. And then they finally came back and said that the post commander has said that I have to be trespassed off the post for for twenty four hours. And captain Neff said, well, after that, you can come back and talk to me about what you have to report and stuff. And I said, captain Neff, I leave here.
I ain't ever coming back. You know, sorry. Nice meeting you. You've been nice and all, but so then they packed up my stuff. They did mention, as I was leaving, one of the guys came in and I was talking about my son because captain Neff was asking, if you've had such trouble back in your, back in Benton County in Washington there, why do you stay there?
And I said, because of my son. And he said, oh, I get that. Another guy overheard it, he goes, You mean your 30 year old son? And I go, and I looked at him, I go, No, I have a 13 year old. And I asked him what he was talking about, but he wouldn't clarify.
So as I'm leaving, that female came out. We had a brief little interaction, and I asked if I'm okay, and she said, yeah. I said, so we're good. You know, there's nothing like, I'm not gonna get written up or not gonna go home and find out that I've been labeled a domestic terrorist again. They tried to reassure me of all that.
I I demanded that I get a a report number for all of that so I can request it to make sure that they're not gonna misdocument me. Okay. So they gave that to me on a little slip. They finally gave me back my pack, my phones. I took a picture of that that OIG number, so I would never lose it.
Then, yeah, they put me in the back of or into the front passenger seat of the vehicle. Captain f sat in the back. This park ranger guy drove. He was talking about him being in the Marine Corps. You know, they were they were nice enough.
Drove me back to the parking lot, and they said, you know, we're gonna have to escort you off the off the base. And okay. So they had to tell me how to get off the base because I I really couldn't find it exactly. So I get off the base. They wave at me and they do a u-turn.
I went back at them, you know, sort of wanted to flip them off. But, yeah, then I took off and went to Tucson.
Speaker 0: You you get an incident report from anybody during all that?
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's the OIG number that I've referenced that gave out, I think in the first yeah. Yeah. 277 episode. Yeah.
That's the OIG number there. So that's an incident report. The yeah. And then, of course, I, go back to Tucson. We had to get another
Speaker 5: Hotel.
Speaker 2: Hotel there. I got to be able to talk with Amy again. She was really worried. My phone had been blowing up the whole time. Seven hours.
So she was yeah. So seven hours later.
Speaker 0: I can can hear the frustration in her voice.
Speaker 2: Oh, she was pissed.
Speaker 1: I would I
Speaker 2: would yeah. She was ready to jump on a flight. Fly. Yeah. So, yeah, me and her talked the whole way back to Tucson.
Got a hotel next to the airport. I think I walked to get pizza that night as we talked. Yeah. Slept that night, turned in my vehicle the next morning. Yeah.
Then got on my flight. My flight happened to go have a stop off in Salt Lake City. Getting out of Is airplane mode
Speaker 0: this the day of the tenth that you're flying back? Correct?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. So right as I'm landing and turning my phone back on, my phone's blowing up. She's calling me and I'm trying to boy, I was going through the AIs and everything else trying to figure out how many times my rights have been violated in this last twenty four hours. And she's telling me that Charlie Kirk has been been shot.
And I was like, oh my god. Where? And she's telling me Ogden. And, yeah, we looked it up, it's like, oh my god. It's like, you know, throw a rock to it from the airport.
It's right here. Yeah. What a coincidence. That was interesting. And I get on the next flight.
I go home. And for the next while, we're we're really frustrated. Now we really want answers from a congressman, as to what the heck is going on with my records. Why why is it I can't go to a post and request, you know, without having a bomb threat? I'm
Speaker 0: Why are you still being harassed even this late decades later? Right? And you're just trying to get records for your custody battle.
Speaker 2: What could possibly be in my records that what have I
Speaker 0: done? This. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: That this would happen multiple times a month. You know, like, never to this level, but this type of reaction, like, what could have possibly been said about me? Mhmm. And we're frustrated, and we want answers from congressmen. So for the next, month or two, we're busy.
We're putting together legal packets, timelines, all my records. We've got we've got a sift through over 16,000 records from my own stuff to get what was needed for just a report to, prosecutors and or congressmen and or representatives to try and get a re an answer as to what the heck's going on. And while that's happening, of course, the Charlie Kirk investigation or everything that's going on with him is going on in the background. I would have the TV on, but I'm not paying attention to it too much. Until, what was it, the The interview that Sean Ryan?
And I don't know how long that interview had been out when I finally watched it. But as soon as I saw that guy on the TV, you know, I was like, hey. I that's one of the guys I saw. And
Speaker 0: When would you say that was? Because that's one of the questions my audience has is when did you how far was it between September 9 and when you realized you had
Speaker 2: seen it?
Speaker 5: It was a good
Speaker 2: It was a good bit.
Speaker 0: A week like, weeks, a month, two months?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It was like a month or or more after that, wasn't it? Before I saw that when it came up. And because I don't I don't know when he did his interview, but it was probably it was probably a week after that maybe or so. But once I saw that, I was like and I started second guessing myself, like, oh, no.
And then, oh, I think even a week after that, as things were going by again, I'm not trying to concentrate on on Charlie Kirk. I was, you know, God bless him. I wish I could have met him, but His interview
Speaker 0: So you tell your girlfriend that you recognize this man, and then and then what's your gut feeling? What's your what's your emotional response when you recognize him?
Speaker 2: I never never go against your gut, but I was trying to second guess myself on it on it quite a bit, but anytime I saw that interview, just, yeah. It was it yeah. Everything just, yeah. Was that guy.
Speaker 0: It clicked. It clicked.
Speaker 2: More than clicked. Yeah. And then The
Speaker 0: whole the whole scenario. Did the whole scenario kind of come into focus once you realize who it was that you saw there? Like, all of the all of the drama that you went through, did you put two and two together right away, or did that take a minute?
Speaker 2: No. I mean, I recognize, but I didn't. There was no didn't want any pony in this game. I was not I was I was focused on my stuff, my son, my kid, what I've been going through, why am I a bond, you know, all this stuff. When she showed me a picture, there was other things coming up, and she showed me a picture.
Speaker 0: Oh, she? You mean your girlfriend in Yeah.
Speaker 2: Amy. Okay. Shows me a picture of, something came up about Erica Kirk and and something, and she showed me a picture. And immediately, I was like, that's that's the you know, that was that was her. I and I didn't how you put it?
I I just I didn't wanna this was not I don't want no part of have enough drama my life. I do not, I don't, I don't want, we had to have long conversations, but then it keeps appearing on the screen. It's like, it was like God was telling me, you know, no. Sorry, pal. This is your story.
I I I didn't, Every podcast or anything like that, we really don't watch news like Fox News and CNN and stuff like that. I always have, typically, like, podcasts. So, like, Valhalla and others were coming up, and and they would repeat all these and I boy.
Speaker 0: I have relevant post audience. I have relevant posts to what we're talking about up in the jungle. Try and go check it out. Sorry. Continue, Mitch.
So let me just kind of recap where we're at. Recognize Brian Harpole on his interview with Sean Ryan, and once you tell your old lady that, no offense, it's just an old habit of me calling girlfriends that, once you tell your old lady that, she starts showing you and you recognize Erica Kirk as the woman you had seen at the hotel, And you're like, fuck, man. I don't want no part of this. And then, of course,
Speaker 2: can't go started flipping through pictures and everything else. And we so, yeah, once we did that, I I I just felt
Speaker 0: anybody else besides those two after you were flipping through pictures?
Speaker 2: No. No. I'm not familiar with TP USA. I I didn't know, their members or anything like that. But so I decided, you know, how do you who do you report this to?
It's not like we've gone to the FBI before. They're such pleasant people. They they don't
Speaker 0: You know, this is what makes me think god is at play here because you know, if you hadn't gone through the experiences that you had gone through, right, and you weren't so skeptical of the FBI, you might have ran right to them with this, and we might not be having this conversation today. This story might be buried. So I'm a firm believer that there is a plan that we don't know about. And throughout the course of this thing, I have seen God's hand numerous times or what I perceived to be.
Speaker 5: We have to.
Speaker 2: Have have to. It's been Yeah. It's been
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think something very dark is afoot here and and something very blasphemous and and very mocking is happening here. And I think God's not gonna it's it's it's it's not gonna stand. I I just I can just tell. You can tell the way things are moving that whatever these people think that they are, however powerful they are or however intelligent, with all of their machinations are, doesn't compete to to the one, you know, to to our lord.
And there's gonna be a reckoning. And you can just tell the writing's on the walls. Go ahead. So you you figure out who these people are, continue.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So we figure we try to go through, what was it, Ian Carroll and also VFT and, you know, that didn't go so well. Yeah. Vahala just sort of blew it off and whatnot. And it's like, you know, what else more do I gotta do?
And we're laughing about you know, like, not laughing about, but, like You can't get in with us. It's so hard.
Speaker 1: Right. It's just far for the course.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm not great at getting attention. I try not to get attention. I try not to you know, we don't we sort of live a good life by not getting attention. So when it came to that, we're joking with one of our friends about it, and she hears, you know, that what I have to say about this.
And Marcy, by the way, if we're gonna put out an advertisement for her, she's wonderful. Marcy Torres of Gutter Girls up here. She's got a great story. But we're telling her and it was just so she was so innocent about it. She's just like, oh, Candace Owens is the one that needs to know about this.
And I'm gonna send her an email right now. I've watched Candace Owens a few times. She's a great lady, nothing. But I wasn't obsessed with all this stuff. I was obsessed with my own stuff trying to get my son back.
So yeah, she says she's gonna email and message Candace Owens, and we both looked at each other in the car. We're about to go into the gym, and we're like, oh, that's so precious. He's like, thank you, Marcy. That that's great. Yeah.
Put a hashtag on that. Well, I'm sure that they'll get to that in Yeah. You know, 2,000,000 emails or something. Yeah. I thought that was that was just cute.
And we're finishing up a conversation with her.
Speaker 5: The phone rings.
Speaker 2: And the phone rings, and it you know, it's got this long distance number, and I don't wanna necessarily say where it's coming from.
Speaker 0: It's fine. It's fine.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We saying. I figured it was probably one of these other groups who we've been dealing with with court corruption that somebody was calling me from another state. So we excused ourselves from Marcy and told her, hey. We'll call you back and after we're done at the gym.
I picked up this phone. Yeah. Candace Owens. Hi. This is Candace Owens.
Is Mitch there? I I you know, he has something to tell me. I I thought it was a joke. I I was stunned for a minute.
Speaker 5: Had to jump in.
Speaker 2: Typically, I'm not tongue tied.
Speaker 5: You know,
Speaker 2: she's she had to jump in and actually start talking with Kenneth. But, yeah, after that, it was oh, it was several days of of her of us texting, calling, her hearing my story. I I didn't wanna tell her my long saga. Thank you so much for
Speaker 0: sharing your story here, especially I have not heard you get to spend this much airtime describing your the experience at Fort Huachuca and all of the of the smears on you. And Candice only does, like, an hour podcast. And so I just wanna really thank you for spending so much time with us tonight answering our questions and the and the badgering and and, you know, trying to get as much detail, and it's it's a lot of pressure to remember stuff. So thank you because this has been incredibly informative. This has been amazing.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, you know, I'm glad to yeah. Glad to be of service here. That's we had no idea it would it would even in talking to her, I didn't didn't wanna bring my story forward with it. We wanted to keep it short too.
You know, here's a tip. You might wanna ask where these people were the days previous, and I thought it was gonna be just that. And she she wanted to know why I was there, and, you know, I sort of told her, I've had a long saga. It's not that you know, it's my own thing. Of course, we want attention to it, but this has somewhere in there, we realized, you know, the light bulb came on that, wait, maybe what happened down there?
Mhmm. It had nothing to do with me. Right. And that's something that we it just sort of transpired right at the same time. Mhmm.
And in telling it to her, and and, I was trying to separate that, you know, I thought it had something to do with me, but I I don't think it does. And, Candice Owens picked up on that, and she goes, excuse me. You're gonna tell me your story. And I was like, I don't think you wanna hear this. And she I started telling her a little bit, and Amy was kicking in with it.
And and she goes, as soon as she heard tunnels and everything I've been with, special forces, getting out and all the stuff, she was like, tell me everything. And she wanted to know every detail. I was like, oh, jeez, are you kidding me? I don't even wanna know everything. So we did.
We tell her just about everything possibly could, and she, of course, she's doing her own thing. I had no idea she was gonna tell my whole story. She did want me vetted, so she chose to go through somebody that she felt she could trust in the government. I I suggested some of these other podcasters and yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: She I'm glad she didn't listen after what you experienced.
Speaker 5: Me too. Me too. I agree.
Speaker 2: I I think she had a heads up. Yep. She's a real smart lady. She's she's way smarter than that. True.
And you talk about a god thing. She's
Speaker 5: 100.
Speaker 2: I will tell you that through all of this, as soon as it was mentioned, special forces guy, Fort Worth, you call this, and these guys started going crazy on the story, where they've tried to say that they've invited me onto their shows, that's not true. There hasn't been a single invite. They've tried to say, oh, why doesn't he just show up here? It's like, you know, we'll screw you. Maybe get you know, give me a call, dude.
No. Yeah. You have my number. Yeah. None of that's going on.
The how do I put this? Yeah. The the attack right from the beginning was sort of like, how dare you go around us? Like, they had some sort of right on their shows. They were like, they had some sort of claim to me that I had to go through them because I'm military or special forces.
As soon as I started hearing that attitude, I was like, you know, oh, screw up. Yeah. And screw that. No.
Speaker 0: It invokes a little thing in me. Whenever people try to do that to me, it invokes this emotion. I think the best way how do I describe it? Go fuck yourself. That's it.
Yep. Go fuck yourself. That's that's what emerges.
Speaker 2: Like, who the fuck do these guys think that they are then? Just because I'm I'm not in the military anymore. Like, you guys can go, you know, even pound rocks. Right. So on the guys starting that attitude, we we started turning them off, and we understood that miss Owens had, you know, she had a better view of things.
So we took direction from her. I was thoroughly vetted. I sent every single record I have on me, so much so that Joe Kent had to say, okay, you're good. You're good, brother. Check.
I said, do I check out? He's like, thoroughly. You're good. So and me and him
Speaker 0: talked to who were smearing you had to come out and didn't even apologize for attacking your valor. You know what I mean? Like, if there's anything that that that, like, really, really irks me is the accusations of stolen valor. It happened in my space. I had a big space about the story the night after.
All of these veterans come up into my space and be like, oh, nobody in the green berets, all of the online forums don't believe him. Nobody believes him. They're smearing you. They're saying that you're lying. Something smells off.
Something doesn't pass the sniff test. Something ain't right. I don't like how he described things. Let me just tell you this. I talk to people for a living for a living.
This is what I've been doing for years now. Every day, almost all day, I talk to people, ask questions. Every single fucking response I've gotten from you has sounded way more organic than the attacks I've heard these faggots fucking bring to you over the last few weeks. I'm sorry. Don't usually drop that word, but I can't find a better way to describe these individuals who have apparently sold their soul to try to discredit you before we could hear this story.
And there's a reason why. Right? So I just, the attacks, the smears, dude, all they do for me was like, man, this guy, this guy has got something they don't want. They do not want this guy. They if they can't stop him from talking,
Speaker 2: they want the that stop him we picked up on too is they're real sore about me, and it it predates even this stuff. So I yeah, there's there were things that I was trying to report, yeah, it gives, as Gary Melton said in that phone conversation, bad optics to them. Well
Speaker 0: You know what's crazy is that they come up here and they said, so I got in awe. A couple of them, one of them my subscribe well, they're both subscribers. Two of veterans come up in my space. And I'm like, I'm like, I'm like, dude, I was like, let's see if this story checks out. But but I don't think it don't I think I'm like, he's like, I'm a thirty year I have thirty years experience talking to veterans, and I'm telling you that we don't.
And he's talking about plural, like the green berets and stuff. We don't think he checks out. And I'm like, well, I don't appeal to authority, and that's what I said. I don't appeal to your authority. I appreciate your opinion.
That's fine. But then I was like, if his story does check out as far as his record goes, are you willing to reconsider your position about the rest of what he's telling you? Right? So if it checks out that he is actually special forces, are you willing to reconsider the rest of his story, which is massive? And he said, yes.
Right? And so then it happens, the very same, closeted homosexuals who try to smear your name for the last few weeks have to come out and actually verify that you are special forces, right, after lying and smearing I'm sorry. It's it's making me mad. Smearing and just running your name into the dirt for for weeks, have to come out and just casually be like, well, yeah. Actually, I did find out that he is special forces, but only for a certain amount of time.
And I'm not sure about how he was discharged and this and that and this, as they continue to just smear you. And I was like, dude, where's your honor? You know, it's it's way more dishonorable, I think, for somebody who is in the who is a veteran to smear somebody who has a solid record. Right? Like, that's dishonorable as fuck.
Know what mean? That's that's just as bad as Stolen Valor to me, and I'm a citizen. But that the those people should never have a platform ever, like, ever. They you do not deserve any respect after that if you ask me. I'm sorry.
My rant is over. My rant is over.
Speaker 7: Diligent. Could I just add something really quick? And and I think for everyone listening to Mitch, Mitch, thank you for being able to restate, your your story here for everyone. One of the things that immediately queued me in that you are who you say you are and you wear you were where you say you were, bona fides, is even at the basic levels of the US military, military personnel are trained to provide what's called a salute report, size, activity, location, unit time, and equipment. Special forces in the 18 series are are are screened based off of their ability to do that at a more natural level.
This is what I've talked about before where there are training iterations where you go through you're being, told to observe something, it's removed from you, and then you say, what is it that you saw? So when I hear Mitch speak in detail about where he was, what he saw, things that stood out, you you you're trained to key in on anomalies. There's the baseline observations that are around you, and then there are things that stick out. So the fact that he could sit somewhere couple months ago, see something, see this lady that had these very odd eyes, see this guy that looked kinda out of place, that doesn't surprise me not one second. And I agree with Diligent.
This kind of, call effort to come out and immediately disparage Mitch and what he saw, it stinks to high heaven. That is a loud signal that something that something crazy is going on. And and I've said it before in your space, Diligent, as a part of the background investigation process that we would do in the government, you don't just go looking for people that don't like someone to figure out who they are. You go talk to people that knew them. And as soon as I saw that all these people were doing is going and finding people that would say something negative about about Mitch, I I knew that a game was afoot.
Speaker 5: Mhmm. Mhmm. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: I just wanna clarify when I was Thank disparaging people, just real quick. I was talking about Valhalla and the other guy. I wasn't talking about my subscribers or anybody in this space or even the people who had come up. I'm talking about the people with the YouTube channels who spent day in and day out on the timeline and on livestreams trying to convince you not to hear this person. That's censorship, by the way.
When people are trying to cancel you, it's a form of censorship. If they can't stop you from talking, they try to stop people from listening. Sorry, Mitch. Go ahead. Continue, sir.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. No. Hey. Thank you, guys. I mean, that was that's really you're making Amy smile, so thank you.
Same with that. Yeah. You know, the the attack these guys took, I I was, you know, I was a little bit shocked by it. A lot shocked actually that they would take that they would do that. But then, you know, we noticed the same thing everybody else was that this was you know, we hit a nerve.
And even before that, so there was two Candace Owens shows. The first one she tells about my story, then she had the whole Erica Kirk response, and then they had that meeting. And we knew we had given, Candace Owens, you know, we've given her a lot of information. And it was interesting. She went into that meeting.
I'm gonna let that be hers. Mhmm. You know? But we were just glad that when she got out of that, we texted back and posted to make sure
Speaker 0: that I'm not I'm lying. I I was extremely worried about her around that time. I was like I was like, don't do it. Don't go. Don't meet them.
Don't don't no in person. Don't I don't want them fuckers anywhere I wouldn't want them anywhere near me. I you know, I've I've been to those events. I've been to the Arizona place. I did last year when I was on my, I was, like, trying to help get Trump elected.
I was in awe of that scene.
Speaker 2: I will tell you
Speaker 0: And I will never go around them again. I will never ever ever ever be around any of those people again. Yeah. Go ahead, Mitch.
Speaker 2: As much as you know, it's interesting now getting to talk to, you know, people like Candice Owens that you see on the screen all the time. You really wonder about the real character behind the scenes. And getting to talk to her, I don't think there's somebody you could underestimate more than her. That woman is on fire. She is extremely intelligent and so driven.
She's fearless, and she is after answers. And I'll tell you, I I I feel that gets in her way.
Speaker 0: There's a whole lot of us out here who feel the very same way and are are willing to do whatever it takes to get to the truth. Because we know we all have this feeling that at the center of this, just like Epstein, at the center of whatever this fucking evil maniacal shit is in our country, behind this is the real rot that is in our country and our government. And, you know, it's the soul. It's like the soul of America. And so you can always tell from the response whenever you're getting close.
You know? Whenever the antibodies freak out like that, you can always tell that you're you're near a vital organ, and and that's what's happened here. So and, dude, there's so many people out here. You know, amongst all of the noise, Okay? The fact that we're here talking to you now and the reception that you're getting from the people around me at least.
And if you look in the comment section, I'm sure later you read through. Dude, there are so for what you're doing.
Speaker 2: And I
Speaker 7: just say this just one last thing, before you move on with the the space diligent. One of the things that we would do when I was a counterintelligence officer was allow a person to retell their story multiple times because a liar will not be able to keep their story straight. There will be big pieces that jump out and are different each time they restate a story. And what Diligent did here tonight was brilliant. And I know he there was a method to the madness here, but I I just kinda sat back and paid attention.
He stopped you, pushed you on details, had you pivot a little bit, go back to where you were in the story, continue, stopped you again over and over. And a liar cannot hold a story together. They cannot do it. And I will tell you, if you were lying, you would be the only person I've ever seen in my entire career that had mastered a lie so well that you can pivot like that and go back and it it basically be the same story you told before. So I have no dog in the fight, but I would say if I were still in the government and I was asked to do an interview or an interrogation of you, I would not walk away from that assessing that you're you're lying
Speaker 0: at all.
Speaker 7: Not one of
Speaker 0: those I guarantee you not one of those TPUSA people would ever get into a room with me and let me ask questions like that. Cause they would get it. They can't even do it on the timeline where they have time to respond. You know what I mean? When they do try to reply to me, they fuck up.
You know what I mean? So, like, that that speaks volumes right there. You're willing to come face the gauntlet of the people and they are not. Quiet. Quiet.
Quiet. Not a fucking word, dude. That's there's a reason for that. Sorry, Mitch. Go ahead.
I'm sorry. I'll be quiet now.
Speaker 5: No. It's okay.
Speaker 2: No. You guys are on it. You're very smart. Yeah. You're way smarter than I am, sir, by the way, and thanks for that.
I didn't catch your name with the counter.
Speaker 0: Lemair. Lemair is his name. He's
Speaker 2: the Lemair.
Speaker 0: The the
Speaker 2: I don't have yeah. I'm not saying I'm I'm not perfect. This is just what I what I saw. And it it took a lot. When Candice Owens said that she was gonna bring our story forward and the whole like, she was preparing the whole thing.
I oh, boy. We thought about that. We thought about remaining anonymous with it, under my previous name maybe, and maybe people wouldn't connect the dots. Then she had me on her show, and it was I'm I'm holding my tongue on that show a little bit, and I I just you know, I put Clark Kent glasses on. You know?
But, yeah, as this is going on, you know, that it's been a blessing and a curse. We we've lost a lot of friends. Locally, anybody who you know, having to survive a life where you're holding on to that third rail, it's a blessing and a curse because you're gonna scare away the people that can't stand next to you. That that's happened. I mean, we've had, you know, everything from church to friends to, they want they don't wanna they can't stand in that fire, I guess.
And the things that were being said, that was pretty shameful. We knew, be patient. Yeah. And Candice Owens was very firm that she was gonna stick next. So she had already gone.
She knew it was coming. We told her it was coming. And we knew I told them just to let it let it hit. It it is what it is. And, you know, I think it was particularly vile that they would bring, you know, my exes or or any of these people out.
That that
Speaker 0: was Anything they can. Anything they can to Yeah. To try to discredit you. You
Speaker 1: know? I mean, and we noticed it, like, the moment that that episode
Speaker 0: aired with Claire. Did just face on I was like
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the the attacks just came out of nowhere. They had it lined up. They knew like, they knew who you were, like, immediately. And so they're hot to vent.
Speaker 0: Talking points within the same twenty four hour period. Right? And then I Yeah. Then I start digging into them, and it just happens to be they're all affiliated with the same the same sponsorship account. I'll just say that.
Right? Just Shocker. It's it's a big shocker that they're all getting paid by the same people to promote the same shit. Even people who normally disagree, all of a sudden, they all align, even though they ideologically don't, you know, they don't align ideologically. All of a sudden, they all have the same talking points against Mitt Snow and Candace Owens, and they're on repeat all day within the same forty eight hour span.
And, you know, I did a few pieces on that. I don't know if you if you've been following my work or our work, I should say. And, it uncovered some of that. I I have to I have to ask you, Mitch. Have you listened to a space before?
Is this your first time encountering it at all?
Speaker 2: No. We've we've really typically tried to stay offline for as much as possible. Mean, this predating any of this and even creating accounts is sort of new for us. So we're we're sort of having to switch gears a 180 degrees.
Speaker 0: I wouldn't I would keep it if if I can offer a suggestion,
Speaker 4: and I
Speaker 0: already told you this, I would keep it limited to the interactions that you have to make for to continue to push your to put your story out there. But I wouldn't Yeah. Start consuming too much on the timeline because it's a it's a fucking mess out here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. No. There was I mean, all of a sudden, my name is Mhmm. Oh, I'm so sorry.
What were you gonna say, ma'am?
Speaker 1: No. I was just saying it's crazy in these streets out here on on x. It's it's wild. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: I drive by it now. I didn't used to, but, you know what I mean? Like, they they could they started coming after me when I wouldn't stop talking about you or your story. And I was like, I don't care what you do. I'm gonna keep talking about this and all this the same wave, the same people that were attacking you tried attacking me, but, they got their asses handed to them over New Year's, and I haven't heard a peep from them since.
Speaker 7: Yeah. I was I was gonna ask you if you noticed that diligent that there it in my observation, there's been an operational pause.
Speaker 0: Yeah. As soon as I as soon as I started to expose people who are affiliated with the the federal government in the past, I noticed it all came to a screeching halt. So.
Speaker 7: Yeah. Yeah. I I it it's almost seems to me if, I mean, if I were if I were organizing an effort to undermine Mitch, and I've seen that basically the the kitchen sink option has worked, It's time to pull everybody back in and and refocus for for the, yep, for the next phase. Because as soon as I saw it, I was like, oh, okay. Well, that that's a that's a signal that you you see that your op is failing.
Speaker 3: It's been ten days since Erica's failed alibi that she hasn't followed up
Speaker 2: on it. Ten days.
Speaker 5: Ten days. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And I posted I and I I a pics a Publix employee reached out to me with their internal pricing charts with all of the prices for what was behind Kabat during his alibi photo, and not one of them. And I mean not one of those were for the date that he had listed. They were all from previous dates. Now does that mean, you know, I know for a fact that that photo is fake? No.
But it means with a incredibly high degree of certainty that it's probably a previous photo that has been edited in some way. And he is an editor at one of the largest media companies in America now, right? The Daily Wire is huge. He's a senior editor. They have lots of different technologies at their disposal.
I'm not accusing anybody of anything. I'm just saying. And he was extremely desperate to have Candace Owens quote unquote verify the metadata from his photo. And oh oh, I'm gonna let a little secret slip. I told her not to.
The reason why is because it's so easily it's so easily spoofed, it's called, which is faked. Even with a really high degree of sophistication and certainty. It's I mean, even at a forensic level, you can spoof it. And I'm a cons I'm a computer science major, so I know this. But
Speaker 2: Go on.
Speaker 0: But so I told her not to. And what's happened as a result is that his alibi has been left hanging enough to just get destroyed. It's up in the com or up in the Jumbo Trial if you guys don't see. No. He was really like, he's being arrogant towards me.
He called me dumb or stupid or something as I was having a back and forth with it. And then after that that Publix girl came forward oops. I just said it was a girl, didn't I? Oh, That's okay. That Publix girl came forward, said, you know, there here's the prices for these times and it's from this summer.
And, each one was either from from July, August, or July, yeah, July or August. And then there was one that they literally only ran for the month of September. So they had a temporary price increase for one of the items behind him. And it was literally only for the month of September. Whenever especially they have a temporary price increase, they always change those prices out because it's only for a limited time.
Right? The fact that what he had up there didn't match the temporary one plus all of the other things, it really doesn't hold up under scrutiny. The only persons whose alibi that that was alleged to have been there, and I don't wanna get into this too much with you, was Mark Amadized because he was a member of congress. He's on the congressional record as to being in DC that day even though he wasn't on the roll call records. So, Erica Kirk's alibi, it didn't stand up under scrutiny.
Another one, you know, because she, they they if you listen to Candace, they responded with a photo. She asked, can I see this contact on the photo? And they sent her a picture of just the contact. So she still hasn't offered receipts. Brian Harpole, his itinerary alibi where he said, here, I I scheduled flights on these days and booked flights on these days.
Therefore, it means I was on the trip. Well, anybody can schedule a flight and not fucking get on the flight. A a itinerary is not proof of travel. Okay? I can tell you there's been at least a half a dozen times in the last two years where I was gonna go fly to cover a story.
I booked it, and because the story fizzled or it was already solved or whatever, I didn't go, and they just credited those itinerary flights back to my account. So I would I still had the itineraries that they emailed me. So if I wanted to, like Brian Harpole did with Alex Jones, I could say, there's no way I was here on this day. Because see, I scheduled this flight. It doesn't mean dick.
It means nothing. It's not proof of travel. People have not offered solid alibis for their whereabouts on the days in question. Not a single one of them. You look far more credible, k, in your story.
And this investigation is far more credible in my mind because you have the evidence that you weren't there. You have the the incident report. You have the the call from your estranged son who accidentally, you know, verified your whereabouts. Acts you know, like, as they were trying to you know, that's a god thing. You know what I mean?
Like, when he did that, each time I see something like that happen where the truth accidentally gets put out by those trying to hide it, I know God is working. I'm sorry. I'm on my rant. We're gonna go to the hands, and then we're gonna let Mitch go. Mitch, can respond, and then we're gonna do, get through these hands, and then we're gonna wrap it up and do the subscriber space up in the Jumbotron.
Go ahead, Mitch. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Sure. I I you know what that what's that? Was gonna do questions. You wanna do questions first? You go right ahead.
And thank you for all of that.
Speaker 0: Dude, no. You guys are amazing. Clint, go ahead.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Mitch, I'm just curious after the reaction you've gotten, it one, how confident are you at this point that we're dealing with perhaps, an actual planning for the assassination of Charlie Kirk? And or do you believe that there is perhaps a secretive but more benign answer as to what you witnessed on that day? Is that granted, I'm asking for you to kinda hypothesize here, but what what's your opinion as to actually what you witnessed that day at this junction?
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's a, you know, that that's a really dangerous question. I I don't wanna get I'll just go back to the phone call I had with Gary.
Speaker 0: We we don't do a whole lot of speculating in these spaces, Clint.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I the phone call
Speaker 1: can testify to is what he saw.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. I I would rather I would rather stay
Speaker 7: I'm I'm just asking based off of
Speaker 0: the press based off of
Speaker 6: the the bizarre reaction. He has to have an instinct. I'm just asking him how he feels about it, not not as
Speaker 2: a I can answer this question. I I'd like to because the answer came with, Gary Milton from Paramount and his call to me, and he implied that it could be recorded. Then later on, he verified that he knew it was being recorded and he gave consent. So I during that phone call, being a special forces guy, I'm not you know, I know enough about being a medic. I've been through a 300 f one.
The mechanism of injury and then a projectile expert such as a web weapons expert from, Gary there. We had this conversation while I was talking to him that, you know, it's really simple. They have one job in all of this, and that's recreate the wound with a 30 aught six without using magic bullets. I told him that, you know, I think people are tired of hearing lone shooter magic bullets. They have one job.
Him and I covered that. To see the the reaction that they've had even after the phone call and then calling me a liar and everything else, I you know, That's sort of why we decided to release that. I mean, he even called for that release, so we did. The they were doing, it doesn't escape us that they were trying to that they know that they had influence, not just over everybody out there, to all of you, but but also the people that could be affecting our lives. They were trying to make a call of shame to to make me seem so bad.
They were trying to instigate some of these crazy people, and they have shown up here in town. We've watched them. And this if you wanna talk about a god thing, preparing me with my life story to this point, you know, we've already guarded ourselves, and we have a really, there's only so many ways you can approach my life and they're all guarded. So for them to instigate that, I mean, they were calling for, what was that one guy, George Webb or something like that? What a loon.
He's been here in town literally stalking us all over and making recordings calling for us to be lynched outside of our courthouse. It they knew that they were trying to incite crazy people like that to do us harm. I think that that speaks a lot to it, and you guys can decide what that means. I mean, I I've
Speaker 0: I've seen it. I know.
Speaker 2: I think it meant that, you know, we touched a sore spot, and, but we were prepared. We're ahead of the game on that. We watched them as as they did all that. And me and Amy, we laughed about it and Yeah. Ate popcorn.
Speaker 0: And we are still here.
Speaker 2: We're still here. Yeah. We're you the truth, you we can be patient with the truth. So I'm sure that they're trying to regroup something, but that just it just sort of I think the question you're asking about is that kind of a response, doesn't that implicate them? Well, I think that's for the public to decide.
For us, I know it presents a real an actual physical danger here. Mhmm. And so we're prepared to handle that. Yeah. And we're also we had this conversation with Candace Owens, and if they wanna know how tough that lady is, is, you know, we all know we're gonna meet her maker.
Mhmm. It's how we live. It's not how we die. Mhmm. So, yeah, good luck to him.
I I have my story. I've given that. And if I'm wrong, okay, I'm willing to be wrong. It's not that I'm pressing an issue or or that I have any resentment or anything. I'm a conservative.
I've been a Trump MAGA supporter. I've helped do rallies for all of this. I don't want to keep track of the implications. The truth is just what it is, and I'm so sorry it has grown legs. I'm not sorry.
It does sadden me a bit. I try not to listen to it. I I we're gonna try not to get into it just is what it is. What people make of it, you know, that that's that's gonna be told, I guess. Mhmm.
So we'll we're alright. We're good.
Speaker 0: We're good. God's brought us all this far. Right?
Speaker 2: He's prepared. Let's go to this.
Speaker 0: How this plays out, doesn't rest on anyone's particular soldier soldiers soldiers or soldiers, I think. And I'm extremely grateful for that, that there's so many people. There's an army, a literal army out here of people who are spending their every waking hour trying to get to the truth and not not trying to tell you what the truth is, but trying to discover the truth. And and that is reassuring, you know, because they're doing it not for money. They're not doing it for clout.
They're not doing it for recognition. They really, really, really wanna get the truth out there and expose to the light. And and every day, it seems like we keep getting closer and closer to that. So thank you for that response, Mitch. Let's go to Blake.
Go ahead.
Speaker 8: Thanks, Diligent. Mitch, thank you for your service, man. I'm so sorry to hear everything that you've been through, but I firmly believe God doesn't put things in our life that he knows he can't we can't handle. And and yeah. Two questions for you, man.
First one, did you watch the service, the funeral there that they had for Charlie in Arizona?
Speaker 2: No. No. We were we've been a little bit preoccupied with a lot of stuff, so no, no.
Speaker 8: And second question, which person stood out most to you? Was it the eyes of the female, or was it, say, Brian Harpole?
Speaker 2: Well, originally, you know, it was Brian Harpole and then that interview in in the same mannerisms and the sort of the way he tilts his neck and the way he talks, that stood out to me heavily. And then, of course, the the older pictures of, Ms. Kirk there. It that hey. You can just I don't wanna say too much.
But, yeah, the eyes there stood out to me because they're very much like my my exercise, and it made me gasp. That yeah. Nope. I I get it.
Speaker 0: Added comment in there, but I'm gonna refrain.
Speaker 8: Thanks, Mitch. I appreciate you.
Speaker 2: You bet.
Speaker 0: Thank you so much, Blake. Destiny, go ahead.
Speaker 5: Yeah. No. It's gonna be a kind of a weird question, but it's really for somebody else, not even really for me. You and and when Candace had that first episode where she discussed your story under, like, the pseudonym of Harry Myers, immediately following that, I watched that whole episode. I think a lot of us watch Candace, of course.
And she had mentioned somewhere in this story that you were from or had lived in Bellingham, Washington. And that you wanted to You were eager to meet Ian Carroll. And so Ian hadn't known that. He hadn't seen that part. And he had called me a few days after that episode.
And we talked about that. And I brought that up to him because we're good friends. And so I was like, isn't that crazy? This Mitch guy, because by then I knew your name. He's like, this Mitch guy is from Bellingham.
And it kind of freaked him out a little bit. But I just wanted to know, like, how that kind of came across to Candace in conversation. It's more like I said, it's more something I'll just refer to Ian too. We'll tell him about later.
Speaker 2: Well, and that's trying to no. It's a good question. I leading up to us trying to reach out to to Ian Carroll and to others with this tip, there was another story that happened, and that was the shooting of the National Guard, I think, in Washington DC, where the guy was a, Afghan, I think, or Iraqi that had
Speaker 0: Afghan, Afghan Special Forces.
Speaker 2: And he had come from Bellingham, and it was during that time because I think that was Thanksgiving time.
Speaker 5: Yeah. I think it was
Speaker 2: And Ian Carroll, one of his shows, he had said he had gone back home because this guy was from the same place as he he was. So he was going back home, and he was gonna ask questions. And he'd mentioned on his show, it was Bellingham, Washington. I was like, no way. We're, you know, we're not far from there.
And also, I've I've lived I grew up on Samish Island, staring up at Bellingham when I was younger, and I know that area very well. I know Mount Chukwon up behind, you know, Sudden Valley and and all of that. I I know the area, yeah, really well. Had to grow up there. If you didn't catch it, you didn't eat.
You know? So we had to catch crab, and we had to catch get oysters and go out in the bay and, climb chucking up mountain. I've been to Bellingham. I lived in Bellingham later in my life. Know that area well, so when I I heard him say that, even tried to look up to to try and get him, like, send him a package or find somebody that was related to him or find, know, relatives or friends or some business out there that might know to get that to get this tip to them.
And maybe now we thought about it, and we, you know, we're not stalkers or anything, but we have a few people in our lives where we have to check people out before we really get invested. Really good tool out there is called Truth Finder. Great advertisement for them. You should probably plug them for some money for you. But no.
We we plugged in that in. You can look up and find things about people, and he was from up there, his family. And we were thinking about writing them a letter or or sending them something, but then we thought about it. I was like, oh, good god. That might be too stalkerish.
And he might kiss the celebrity and who knows what. Oh, Lord. We we were it it wasn't that we took long to to try and reach out. It's just it's so hard
Speaker 0: to connect get through. Mhmm. Yeah. It's a lot of noise. So,
Speaker 2: yeah, we were we were trying to think of any possible way we put we could, and, that was one. But then we thought, you know, that would be We don't wanna freak anybody out. We don't wanna freak anybody out. And, you know, I I also told Candace Owens, you know
Speaker 0: It happened the way that it was supposed to.
Speaker 3: Exactly.
Speaker 2: And I I told Candace Owens he should be careful. He should he needs to take himself off of truth finder. So, yeah, we yeah. That's how that came about. I hope that answered your question, ma'am.
Speaker 5: No. No. That's fine. Deljave, don't mind. I'll just real quick to to close-up on it because I'm yeah.
I think you took exactly the right course of action, by the way, by not, like, reaching out to his parents because he was already extremely freaked out because of the whole shooting thing that happened, and the guy was from Bellingham. That freaked him out. And then, like, we had spoke, and I was like, yeah. No. Actually, the guy Mitch is from her too.
And he's like, oh, you're like, he there's a whole story.
Speaker 2: I Bellingham has a little bit of a history with that. I mean, it's like the the do you guys I mean, if you're old enough to remember back then, the DC shooter right after nine eleven, there was a DC shooter? He was from Bellingham too. So that I don't know. There's something in the water up there.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And and it really freaked him out. And, he and Candice addressed this on her recent episode that, you know, that Ian had expressed some serious concerns to her about your story. And I think a lot of it came from this kind of weird triangulation of like Bellingham, Bellingham, Bellingham and like the timing with the shooting and everything else kind of had him freaked out. I just wanted to clear that up.
So it seems completely innocuous and it just seems like one of those weird coincidences that you guys just happened to cross paths location wise. But I think he took the right action because I think he would have been extraordinarily freaked out if he would have, like, reached out to his parents. Yeah. I told him the same thing about scrubbing himself off the Internet. I literally told him
Speaker 0: the same. I just texted him. I just I just kinda cussed him out. Like, what the fuck are you thinking?
Speaker 2: Yep. Yep. Yeah. I mean, I'd
Speaker 5: But some people don't have good intentions.
Speaker 2: Yeah. There's a lot of people I mean, we have to deal with that too even before any of this happens. So it it's and I I understand where they're coming from, and there's such a volume of people trying to contact them. It it was just hard a hard hurdle to get over to to try and say anything. So when this whole thing happened with Marcy where she's just, oh, what to do?
Writes an email in five minutes
Speaker 0: She came in my space early, like, when you when your story first broke, she came in the that that woman you're discussing who knows your case from before, like, in the local government bullshit you've been dealing with. She came up and shared your story on my own in my other spaces.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Keta's been yeah. She's a great girl. She's been she's been fighting hard. She's had her own battles here, and she came across my like, two years ago, she came across a lot of the stolen documents that had come from my house.
And when she started looking into it to find out what it was all about, she finally ended up contacting me through someone. And and then she wanted to air my story and ask questions about all of it. And we're still trying to we were still trying to put together a lot of a lot of the stuff. So I answered the questions. We you know, I had to, I've always been under that NDA.
We I had to, that was one of the things I wanted to confirm while down at Wachuca to confirm, okay, my NDA is up. I want to make sure that I can, can I write a book now? Can I do something? Can I, you know, tell people about this? So I've always been mindful of my tongue with that one and and, because you don't wanna how do you want you don't wanna manifest, you know, that kind of business coming at you.
It it yeah, I don't know. I don't know what else to say about all of that.
Speaker 0: You go Let's let's let's yeah. Yeah. We're gonna we're wrapping it anyways. Let's, let's go to Terry, and then we'll finish with LaMer, and then I'm gonna let you do some closing thoughts about a little bit, Mitch. And then and then we'll we'll we'll call it a we'll call it a night.
Go ahead, Terry.
Speaker 4: So, Mitch and Amy, thank you both. I'm I'm glad you have a good partner there to back you up. I think that, you know, I talk to people too and and what my business is. And it's very hard. When people are lying, they they lie in broad strokes.
You
Speaker 5: know? Mhmm.
Speaker 4: They they tell a broad story. But your your testimony or statement is so detailed. Mhmm. I I find it, credible. The the one thing I wanna poke a little bit at is this, congressman.
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 4: Mark Amaday. Isn't that his name? Mhmm. Do you I'm sure you've been asked this a 100 times, but how sure are you who said that was who it was?
Speaker 2: You know, I I don't again, I don't know these people. What I what I do know is, and I don't wanna become like, if everybody's flashing pictures at me, you know, about everything. Yeah. Yeah. You don't I don't wanna do that.
So I'm leaving that to Candace Owens to present me things, and she has and and still does
Speaker 4: with you the picture. Right.
Speaker 2: And I was given I gave her a description. She started filling in, sending me pictures.
Speaker 0: And Let me just until If if I can interject, there is three congressmen, okay, who could have been there, that it makes sense they could have been there, and they look extremely alike. And two of them are relatives. They are they are like, they they're, like, an 80% match in similarity as far as looks go, especially one time, a brief occurrence. Right? So and I I I to be honest with you, it's weird because despite what I had said, I had considered sending you these pictures of these congressmen to see, like, hey.
But I didn't because you told me you didn't wanna see a bunch of pictures. But I mean if you guys don't if you guys don't know, okay, I made a post about this yesterday, and it went viral. And I have the side by side of Mark Amadai and one of the congressmen that Candace Owens mentioned last night who who we had know, Destiny and myself had dug up these guys when we were researching Erika Fransve's mom. Right? And and the Farnsworth have come up in our research.
And I'm not trying to confuse you, Mitch, so plug your ears if you need to. And when you lay these guys like, these three guys out, these three congressmen, k, they they can all be part of the same family. You know what I mean? Like, they they they look remarkably similar. As a matter of fact, I'll post it now and and show you guys what I'm talking about.
But Well, Go ahead.
Speaker 4: Certainly is you know, has deep ties into the military industrial complex. There's there's just no question about it. But I guess my understanding, Mitch, and if I'm going too far, president just, you know, will jump in or you can say no. But you saw him on the September 8 at about 07:30 in the morning. Is that true?
Speaker 2: Ninth. No. That's not true. It's the ninth.
Speaker 4: Oh, it was the ninth. Okay. You saw it on the ninth.
Speaker 2: Mhmm. Alright.
Speaker 0: But he he wasn't hold on. Yeah. He picked Amadai out of a
Speaker 2: list of pictures that
Speaker 0: Yeah. A photo lineup that Candice had fed him. Right? She's he he didn't know his name, so I just wanna add that verification.
Speaker 4: Right. So it was the night in the morning? Mhmm. Okay. Alright.
I guess that's really all I wanted to poke at. But do you have any view of how because we know well, I don't wanna go there with you. I just thank you for coming forward. I'm I'm very glad you did, and, we'll we'll figure it out from there. But I hope you'll come back to the space.
You don't always have to be using your name. But, hopefully, you're seeing the people in here are pretty thoughtful, digging for the truth, diligent, has done an amazing job, you know, a community of
Speaker 2: people tonight. So we're we we subscribed to them. And we'll
Speaker 0: Oh, thanks, man. Appreciate that.
Speaker 2: I really like
Speaker 0: to go. Officially made I've officially made more money off of this than you have, Mitch.
Speaker 4: Yeah. And and That's awesome. I'm I'm one of
Speaker 2: the the
Speaker 4: token liberals, but there's everybody from every, spectrum here, and we all want what's best for our country. So thanks for coming forward.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you. No. Yeah. No.
You guys are actually warming Amy's heart because she's like I said, she's a real no offense. She's a real hero. She she's chosen to be here and be I've she could walk. She could walk at any moment. She chooses to actually do this tough thing.
And I'm on the hook with things, and I don't have a choice. It's it's either I walk through this or I don't.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I love the heck out of this lady. She's a good one. And if I had to wait this long and go through that many, you know, bad ones, No. God really rewarded me. She's a real hero.
And thank you guys because you really we haven't gotten the support, but we're okay just being ourselves. And if the whole world turns against us, we're okay. We'll be happy together.
Speaker 0: You got an
Speaker 1: army of
Speaker 0: truth we have you have a you have an army of truth warriors who's got your back whether or not you whether you see it or not. I see them out here on the on the front lines of the Internet warfare landscape, and there are people who are going to bat, just for you, but for to the truth. And we we can see who's who and what's what. And we really appreciate you guys' you're in service now. What you're doing right now is a service.
You know what I mean? Didn't have to pay that to anybody who is.
Speaker 2: I mean, apparently I mean, if anything is I mean, to sometimes you have to joke at the absurdity of things, when they get this absurd. And I I think I've been accused of, I mean, besides being serial killers, serial murderers, assassins in my part time somehow that I've killed myself, all of these crazy things that they've come up with over the years. That I'm a leader of a biker gang, and now all of a sudden, you got Alex Jones telling me that, you know, I'm everything from being a fed to MI six to CIA. I'm foreign adversary. Who knows what?
Man, I'll tell you what. I need to start applying for some paychecks.
Speaker 1: You know, Mitch, I do wanna thank you for opening our eyes to seeing how many of these people are just paid shills, and they're lying to us. You have because of you, it has opened our eyes to so many people who are just fake and gay. And so I truly appreciate you and Amy both.
Speaker 0: It really did expose so many people.
Speaker 1: Like yeah. I mean, there's there's no coming back from this for some of them. So you did a service not only in this case, but you did a service for us as Americans and us truth tellers and followers and seekers that now we have found, like, we can see the difference between who's out there pushing FedSlop and who's actually out there really digging and looking for the truth.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I I hope that continues. You know? I know that there's gonna be a there's people with agendas and stuff, and that they're gonna they're gonna push us one way or another. Mhmm.
You know? Good on them, I guess. You can try what we are who we are, and and we're we're happy with it.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Stand firm.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Good luck with all that.
Speaker 1: Everybody at the comments, say a thank you to Amy. Send her some love because it really does take a strong woman.
Speaker 0: Tag Mitch tag Mitch when you do that so they can see it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So they can see it. Because it does take a strong woman to be able to stand through something like this with whatever. You don't have anything to do with this except for loving the person and standing behind them when the whole world is attacking them. That is a strong woman, and we appreciate you, Amy.
Speaker 5: Thank you. I appreciate it.
Speaker 0: And thank and thank you for making him stay with us in this space. I told you it would happen.
Speaker 5: I knew what was going on.
Speaker 0: Really appreciate that. We really appreciate it. Man, this has been so informative. Just I'm gonna let LaMaire do his last layup, and then I'm gonna close this out, and then we're gonna go to the subscriber space. And and there's a link for that up in the Jumbotron.
If you wanna support what Mitch is doing, help share his message. Okay? If you see that he is sharing content about what he's observed, especially, right, at this at this place, please help him get that message out. Help us get that message out. If you see us covering Charlie Kirk, anybody anybody who's seeking truth, anybody who's sharing information that's not bullshit, please share that out, especially with Mitch.
Same thing with me. If you wanna support what I'm doing, turn all notifications on for my profile. I do investigative journalism, and you don't wanna miss that. Plus, I host a space, you don't wanna miss those either. I promise.
Go ahead, LaMer. And Stu's requesting go ahead and come up, Stu. I'm trying to bring him up here. Yeah.
Speaker 7: So just real quick, Mitch. And please don't feel pressured to answer this question. But you you mentioned something earlier about the American people are sick and tired of being fed, lone gunman, magic bullet. I was gonna ask you, if in your personal circle, especially those that have served and seen, combat, I will speak for myself. I've seen and treated a lot of combat injuries when I was in Fallujah.
And as soon as I heard that the official narrative was that was a 30 yard six to soft tissue in the neck, I knew we were being lying to my I guess my question to you is, does anyone in your personal circle believe that? And then just to you, not not asking you to speculate, what do you what do you think it means that we're being given this narrative again?
Speaker 0: Status health.
Speaker 2: You know what? I I even covered this in my call, Gary. It I there's so many of those guys that are out trying to support that fed narrative. I don't think you guys can grasp how many man hours of special forces guys are out every weekend trying to trying to do the one thing I just said, is reproduce that wound with that weapon. That's their one job.
If they could do that, my testimony is irrelevant. Anything that I said or saw or anything like that, if they can produce that, then it doesn't matter what I saw or who I saw. If I was on the moon and saw them riding little ponies, it doesn't matter. And that's what I was telling Gary to I was challenging him, just go do that. Go do your job and, make me irrelevant, please.
This doesn't benefit me. No. I I don't know anybody that has said that they believe in in this, 30 ought six narrative. I I grew up hunting. You know?
I I know what a 30 ought six does. That thing's a cannon.
Speaker 0: I haven't I haven't talked to one person who I who otherwise wasn't being paid to talk that has said that that isn't even physically possible at all. And and I have family who I I know I know plenty of people in the military and who have lots of experience with all kinds of firearms, and none of them, not a single one of them said that this could have happened with a 30 aught six without removing like, blowing a hole through the back of his neck at the very least, if not just almost completely decapitating him where it hit him. Thank you so much, Mitch. I really appreciate you, brother. Do you have any final thoughts or anything you wanna say about the space or your story that you wanna convey to people before we kinda wrap it up?
Speaker 2: You know, I just wanna thank you for reaching out to us and and given, you know, the other side of the story an opportunity. I think that that was you know, obviously, they were trying to trying to bury me, bury us, and and I seeing that there's there is this this space, and it's filled with people with different mindsets and stuff that are open minded to looking for facts, I'm thank you. It's refreshing. It's really refreshing because there are a lot of closed minded out there that are are very superficial. You you have no idea how happy you made Amy tonight, who knows?
You know? Like I said, I might get lucky tonight now. So thank you all.
Speaker 1: Doing our part. Just doing our part. I have I have a I have a
Speaker 0: I have a policy for any two people who hook up as a result of my spaces. There is a $50 service fee, but I will waive it in honor of your testimony tonight. Thank you so much, Mitch.
Speaker 8: So name your kid diligent. Name your kid
Speaker 5: diligent. Alright,
Speaker 0: you guys.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Guys. This
Speaker 0: you.
Speaker 1: A
Speaker 0: great space. Thank you, Mitch. Love y'all. Thank you. Moxie.
Thank you. Was that your was that your woman?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I said thank
Speaker 5: you so much. I appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Oh, we really appreciate you. And and he would not be here, I don't think, without your support. We can all tell. And, I mean, really be here. So behind every great man is a great woman, and you have just made that case tonight.
So thank you for your support of him, and we can just tell. So I really appreciate you guys. We're gonna go to the subscriber only after space. The link is in the jumbotron, and I will post this thing. I'm gonna download this thing.
I don't usually do this. I'm gonna download this thing and edit it to, like, just a audio podcast, and we'll put it on YouTube as well. That way we could kinda maximize reach. And my my YouTube channel is linked in my bio now. Go find that.
Share it with all of your normie friends who aren't on x, your kids, whoever, you know, your for your adult kids, not your child kids, but your families. Share it out with all of your normie people who aren't on x and might not hear his story otherwise. Let's really kinda move the needle on this one. Thank you so much, Mitch, and we'll see you guys later. Have a blessed night, everybody.
Pray for Mitch.
Speaker 1: You too.
Speaker 0: Pray Thank guys. Country. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2: Thank you, everybody.
Speaker 0: I'll be calling you tomorrow if that's okay.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. You got my number.
Speaker 0: Alright, man. Have a good night, everybody.
Speaker 2: Alright. You all have good night. You.
Speaker 5: God bless you too.
Speaker 2: God bless.
Speaker 1: Love you all. Have a great night.
Speaker 2: She's sweet. Mhmm. Awesome.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: DEEP-STATE NETWORK EXPOSED? In 2020 BOTH C-I-A Dr Pen Fry & Liberty University Dean Dave Brat signed a letter about China and sent it to President Trump. ๐ How would a guy in Erika Kirk's 2012 network ALSO be in the Dean of Liberty University's network at that level? ๐ค https://t.co/XGUiXPyH0Y
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: ERIKA FRANTZVE KIRK CIA TIES January 2012 Erika Frantzve (Kirk) hosted Dr Peter Pry, a 10-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on her mom's military-contract topic EMP and EMP-hardening. How many more ties will we find with Erika and Intelligence? ๐ค https://t.co/yrG0U6L7nd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Erica Fronseve, host of Millennials Rock, interviews Dr. Peter Pry. Pry is the executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the director of the US Nuclear Strategy Forum, both congressional advisory boards. He has served on the congressional EMP Commission, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Erica Fronseve, the host of Millennials Rock, and I'm here today with the incredible doctor Peter Pry. He is the executive director of the task force on national and homeland security and director of the US Nuclear Strategy Forum, both congressional advisory boards. He has served on the congression EMP Commission, the congression strategic posture commission, the house armed services committee, and the CIA.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Hey @realannapaulina what did you mean by Erika Kirk "lost her kids" ... did you learn that when you met her at the White House? ๐ค How did she lose her kids? https://t.co/Ls1dG55QdA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that when information isnโt released directly, it leads to questions about Ericaโs potential involvement, but she believes Erica had no connection. She says that implying otherwise would victimize the victim, noting that Erica lost her husband and children. She recalls being with Erica at the White House and emphasizes the personal devastation if such a tragedy happened to oneโs spouse or children, framing it as a devastating situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I do think that when the information isn't put out there directly, that's when you have a lot of these will, you know, could have Erica have been involved in any that. And that's why I'm saying, like, don't I don't think that she at all had any connection to that. When I see that it's like you're already you're victimizing the victim if that makes sense. Because at the end of the day, she did lose her husband. She lost her kids.
Like, I was just with her at the White House and she's you know, that's anyone. If that happened to your wife, my husband, like, it's devastating.
reSee.it AI Summary
Discussion ties Lori Frantzve and her DoD/DHS security work to Fort Huachuca via a 3/19/2014 House committee hearing where Sen. Farnsworth introduced Frantzve; Farnsworth later chaired Appropriations for Sierra Vista improvements. Travis Schulte (DEMA) attended. Official records cite the 2014 hearing. Later summaries show $3M for Sierra Vista Theater Corridor (2023) and $2.095M for SR-90 near Fort Huachuca (2024). DEMA 2014 annual report notes a $9.6M RPA project.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: FORT HUACHUCA - 2014 LORI FRANTZVE ANGLE Lori Frantzve (Erika Kirkโ mom & CEO GTEC Industries, EMP/network security expert) was personally introduced by state Senator David Farnsworth (yes, related to Terryl Farnsworth SD card-snatcher/weird selfie-video-guy at Charlie's assassination) to present on electromagnetic pulse threats at the AZ House Public Safety, Military and Regulatory Affairs Committee (3/19/2014). Farnsworth later chaired Appropriations and greenlit $ MILLIONS for Sierra Vista improvements & direct infrastructure near Fort Huachuca. Also in the room: Travis Schulte, legislative liaison for Arizona DEMAโthe same agency that managed a $9.6M remotely piloted aircraft project AT FORT HUACHUCA THAT year. Frantzveโs companies (AZ-Tech International, E3Tek Group, GTEK, etc.) focus on DoD/DHS network security, risk assessment, and EMP protectionโexactly the kind of tech relevant to Fort Huachucaโs Electronic Proving Ground. Frantzve, Farnsworth, and Schulte at the 2014 Committee meeting, put the Fort Huachuca angle in the same room, at the same time. ๐ซก
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Receipts: 2014 AZ Legislature โ Fort Huachuca/Sierra Vista ties via committee participants (OFFICIAL records only ๐ซก๐๐ป): Senator David Farnsworth (introduced Frantzve & others at 3/19/2014 hearing) https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/51leg/2r/comm_min/house/031914%20psmra.doc.htm 2023 Legislative Summary: Oversaw $3M to City of Sierra Vista (Theater Drive corridor) p.5 https://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/56leg/1R/Senate/SummaryComplete.pdf 2024 Legislative Summary: Oversaw $2,095,000 (2021 GF) for SR 90 improvements near Fort Huachuca p.5 https://www.azleg.gov/alispdfs/56leg/2R/Senate/SummaryComplete.pdf Travis Schulte (DEMA Legislative Liaison, present at hearing) DEMA 2014 Annual Report: Managed $9.6M RPA Launch/Recovery project at Fort Huachuca (completed Oct 2014) p.42 + Sierra Vista fire response p.17; references SB1476 (EMP bill discussed) p.7 https://dema.az.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/DEMA_Annual_Report_2014.pdf
reSee.it AI Summary
Iโm noting internal Publix data at Store 1298 shows Cabot Phillips Fort Huachu โalibiโ with prices older than 9/8/2025: Mentos should be 4.99 but 4.89; Trident 2 for 2.00 but 1.25; Tic Tac 4.79 vs 4.39. Sep 8 shelf tags donโt match; a 20-year employee says all 3 are priced wrong and change weekly. Bank statement lacks a name tying to Cabot; timestamp ~6:23 PM ET vs photo ~5:22 PM CT, impossible in a busy lane. People Magazine rack issue is prior week. Likely a highly-advanced edit; Iโm skeptical.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: PUBLIX EMPLOYEE POKES MASSIVE HOLES IN CABOT PHILLIPS FORT HUACHUCA "ALIBI" Internal Cost & Retail System price schedule Store 1298 Nashville shows the ITEMS PRICES behind Cabot are ALL OLDER THAN 9/8/2025: Mentos: SHOULD BE $4.99. It's $4.89 Trident: SHOULD BE 2/$2.00 for JUST September. It's $1.25 Tic Tac: SHOULD BE $4.79 It's $4.39 Shelf tags in a real Sep 8 photo should match these exactlyโno excuses, 20-YEAR PUBLIX EMPLOYEE SAYS NO WAY all 3 items are priced wrong. They change these WEEKLY. Add the existing issues: Bank "statement" has ZERO name tying it to Cabotโcould be anyone's card. Transaction time 6:23 PM ET vs photo metadata ~5:22 PM CT (6:22 PM ET). That's ~ONE MINUTE for a full customer ahead (note the divider bar already placed) to finish scanning, bagging, AND payment, plus Cabot's items. Impossible in a busy lane. The People Magazine on the rack was the previous week's issue. What does it all add up to? This is likely a highly-advanced edit. And this dude is full of sh!t imo. ๐ซก
reSee.it AI Summary
I point to a Fort Huachuca link: Lori Frantzve, Erika Frantzve Kirk, and Cabot Phillips celebrated 2018 NYE together, nine months before Erika started dating Charlie Kirk. Loriโs firmsโAZ-Tech International, E3Tek Group, E3TEKโhave DoD contracts to EMP-harden drones, gear, and software. The EMP-hardened gear is tested at Fort Huachucaโs E3 Test Facility for MIL-STD-461 compliance. The walls are closing in on this one.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: THERE IT IS, THE FORT HUACHUCA CONNECTION Here is Lori Frantzve, Erika (Frantzve) Kirk, and Cabot Phillips (Erika's boyfriend end of video) all celebrating 2018 New Year's Eve together, just 9 MONTHS before Erika would begin dating Charlie Kirk. ๐คจ Lori Frantzve's companies AZ-Tech International, E3Tek Group, E3TEK have contracts with the DoD for EMP (ElectroMagnetic Pulse) hardening (protection) of their drones, equipment and softwares. This EMP-hardened equipment is tested at FORT HUACHUCA's Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Test Facility at for MIL-STD-461 compliance. The walls are closing in on this one. ๐๐ฅ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ EXPOSED: Cabot Phillips Fort Huachuca alibi photos are FULL of inconsistencies ๐ People Magazine is ISSUED WEEKLY & changed RELIGIOUSLY, often IN ADVANCE of the next week's issue. The issue behind Cabot is from 9/1/25 "Helen Mirren" IT SHOULD BE 9/8/25 "Ron Howard" https://t.co/ytdhupaIR6
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion centers on Harrison H. Smithโs claim that the FBI did not contact him about a pre-assassination threat he posted. Participants question why he didnโt report earlier, who knew his source, and whether these actions imply defending an FBI narrative. Comments range from accusing all agencies of a coverup to defending Harrisonโs stance, with calls for accountability.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Last night @HarrisonHSmith disclosed that the FBI HAS NOT REACHED OUT to him DESPITE him posting about a credible THREAT TO CHARLIE KIRKโS LIFE TWO WEEKS before he was shot. ๐ THIS is why WE are investigating Charlieโs assassinationโbecause our government is NOT DOING IT. https://t.co/sfC7ou0N8e
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Harrison about posting, two weeks before Charlie Kirk died, that there was a credible threat against his life and asks if the FBI has reached out to him, and whether he will identify who made the threat. Harrison responds that the person who told him asked not to reveal their identity, so heโs not going to give up a source. The exchange notes that there has been no rigorous investigation by the FBI, and asserts that, in the absence of such an investigation, โwe are led to lead this investigation,โ adding that Fort Huachuca is relevant. Candace thanks Harrison and presses again, asking who told him about the threat, highlighting that the FBI is not asking. Harrison reiterates that the source requested anonymity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here's a good example. Harrison, you posted two weeks before Charlie Kirk died that there was a credible threat against his life. Has the FBI reached out to you to ask you about that? No. Also, like, are you gonna tell us who that was?
It feels like that might be relevant now. Yeah. So so in the absence of a rigorous investigation by by the the agency, we are led to lead this investigation. That is why Fort Huachuca is so relevant. But I was gonna ask you.
Thank you, Candace. Can you tell us who who told you that? Because FBI's not asking you. Yeah. I mean, the person that that told me asked me not to say who they were, so I'm not gonna give up a source.
Sorry. Okay.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith โ
@DiligentDenizen You want to hear something really funny? When I talked to my source today, he revealed that he told George Farmer that he was my source months ago. So Candace has known who my source is the whole time.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@HarrisonHSmith Candace is STILL investigating. You are policing other journalists' investigations. Why didn't you report this to the FBI yourself in the wake of a murder? Why did it have to wait until our Space last night? I legitimately like you dude, but your behavior here is questionable.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith โ
@DiligentDenizen I thought reporting it to the FBI would make me "part of the coverup"??? You're all over the place dude. The tweet was public, they could have reached out at any time. Why are you blaming me for the FBI's behavior?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@HarrisonHSmith But they didn't reach out, you knew that they didn't reach out. It's not the first time you'd been asked. You could have reported it to the FBI, Utah State Police, Orem Police, UVU Police but you DIDN'T. Then, if they didn't follow up, we'd know that they did not want to. ๐ซก
@thiseffeduptime - FLORIDA CHAN
@DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith All those agencies are in on the coverup bro
@40kDoorJamz - Jody Highroller
@thiseffeduptime @DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith Not according to Harrison, they arenโt. So if he believes that they arenโt in on it, why wouldnโt he report it? Heโs trying so hard to defend their narrative, after all.
@thiseffeduptime - FLORIDA CHAN
@40kDoorJamz @DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith Wait thatโs news! @grok Harrison is defending the official FBI narrative???
@grok - Grok
Based on Harrison H. Smith's recent posts and statements, he has criticized the FBI for not contacting him about his pre-assassination threat post, but he didn't report it himself until prompted this week. Some see this as indirectly supporting the official narrative by not pushing harder, while others view it as highlighting FBI inaction. Views differ across sources.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: TIM POOL EXPOSED AS another NODE IN the POLYMARKET INFLUENCE NETWORK attacking Candace Owens or skeptics of the official Charlie Kirk assassination narrative ๐ This is a HUGE problem. This is essentially a propaganda network linked back to the administration/governmentโผ๏ธ https://t.co/alnzNdk2g6
reSee.it AI Summary
Iโm noting that Andrew Kolvet allegedly canโt prove Erika Kirkโs alibi for the 9/9 Fort Huachuca meeting. He shared photos he claims Erika took of her kids, but:
- iPhone photo dates can be edited.
- The kids could belong to anyone, not necessarily Erika.
- Erika was reportedly seen at Candlewood Suites the night of 9/8, not at the 9/9 morning meeting.
- The Kirk boy is said to be around 1 year old.
Why push this narrative?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: @AndrewKolvet tries & FAILS TO GIVE ALIBI FOR ERIKA KIRK on Charlie alleged 9/9 Fort Huachuca military meeting ๐ He sent screenshots of supposed photos taken by Erika Kirk of her kids the morning of 9/9/2025 to influencers to try & push narrative. 1: You can EDIT iPhone photo date & time 2: The children in this photo could have been taken by anyone, a babysitter, family member, etc. 3: Erika was said to be seen the NIGHT BEFORE on at Candlewood Suites in Fort Huachuca 9/8/2025 NOT at the morning meeting of 9/9. 4: These kids look much older then Charlie's kids, the Kirk boy is said to be around 1 year old. Why do they keep COOKING their own narratives? ๐ฅ lol
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Newly emerged video shows that the DETECTIVE who allowed Charlie Kirk staff to tamper with cameras and SD cards 9 minutes after the shooting also DISCOVERED A HAND GUN with a holster at the scene just afterward. ๐ Here he is ORDERING a uniformed UVU officer to tag it. https://t.co/mpZyUgklIO
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: CBS has acquired 90 NEW photos from Epsteinโs cell after his demise, and they do NOT add up with the 'suic1de' narrative. ๐ https://t.co/nXjieCi87B
Video Transcript AI Summary
On the morning of 08/10/2019, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was found dead at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Lower Manhattan. The photos were taken by New York's office of chief medical examiner, and they raised more questions than they answer. Epstein's body was removed before investigators arrived. And Epstein's cell, experts say, should have been treated as a crime scene. Epstein's death was quickly ruled a suicide, but an investigation of jail cell photos by CBS News working with forensic experts has raised serious questions about the New York medical examiner and the FBI's work, including a failure to preserve the scene, log evidence, and run basic forensic tests. There are 90 photos in all showing a cell strewn with blankets and strips of fabric tied to the bed and window grate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever before been seen publicly. Scott McFarlane joins us now from Washington with more on this. Scott, what's in the photos? Good morning.
Speaker 1: Hey, Tony. Good morning. The photos were taken by New York's office of chief medical examiner, and they raised more questions than they answer. Epstein's body was removed before investigators arrived. And Epstein's cell, experts say, should have been treated as a crime scene.
And by all appearances, it was not. On the morning of 08/10/2019, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was found dead at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Lower Manhattan. This was the vow of then attorney general Bill Barr.
Speaker 2: We will get to the bottom of what happened, and there will be accountability.
Speaker 1: Epstein's death was quickly ruled a suicide, but an investigation of jail cell photos by CBS News working with forensic experts has raised serious questions about the New York medical examiner and the FBI's work, including a failure to preserve the scene, log evidence, and run basic forensic tests. There are 90 photos in all showing a cell strewn with blankets and strips of fabric tied to the bed and window grate. Items moved around including a mattress which is seen on the floor in an earlier photo but appears on the bed in a later one. Looking at the metadata, that second photo appears to have been taken at 11:02AM. If that's accurate, the scene had been disturbed hours before FBI investigators arrived.
Investigators also found several possible nooses but did not conclusively identify the one that killed him. What do you make of all these pictures?
Speaker 2: I make a crime scene gone wrong.
Speaker 1: I Herman Weisberg is a former NYPD detective turned private investigator. Does it look to you like this was investigated as a suicide or as a murder?
Speaker 2: To me, this looks like they took it at face value that this was a suicide.
Speaker 1: While our investigation did not contradict the official determination of suicide, it does raise questions about what was done to rule out the possibility of murder.
Speaker 2: If you realize that you've got a high profile person that may or may not have committed suicide, but you need to prove that to people, this is not adequate as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 1: We've reached out to the office of the chief medical examiner, as well as former and current staff involved in the investigation, the FBI and the Department of Justice, all declined to comment, or Tony simply did not respond.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Charlie Kirk's 'camera staff' pivots to position facing where Kirk will be carried out WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING after he was shot. ๐ He hears the shot and IMMEDIATELY pivots to where Charlie Kirk is expected to come out without looking. ๐๐ป They are all SUS as h3ll imo. ๐คจ https://t.co/UVn3oyv93I
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared information about aircraft N1098L, a Bombardier Global 6500, which was under U.S. Army contract and loitered near the scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination. Its flight path from Biggs Army Airfield to Glacier Park International Airport coincided with the incident. The Global 6500 is known for military intelligence and surveillance. I emphasized that my claims are factual and backed by evidence, including flight radar receipts. Discussions with others highlighted the military's involvement and the use of advanced systems.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Aircraft N1098L (Bombardier Global 6500, callsign AXEL10), U.S. Army-contracted, LOITERED WITHIN VISIBLE RANGE OF CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION WHILE IT HAPPENED. Its flight from Biggs Army Airfield to Glacier Park International Airport deviated just in the time window.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: The Global 6500 is used for military intelligence, surveillance, and weaponized drone platforms and applications.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
AXEL10 Tail# N1098L Flight Radar Receipt including owner LASAI Aviation a military intelligence cut-out: https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/N1098L/history/20250910/1348Z/KBIF/KGPI
N1098L Flight Tracking and History - FlightAware
Flight status, tracking, and historical data for N1098L including scheduled, estimated, and actual departure and arrival times.
flightaware.com
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@JimmyMack0320 Classified*
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@ThePolishDrunk I did not make any unsubstantiated claims. Everything is my post is 1000% factual.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@IronPatriotTrue I did not make one...
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@lisa_schutta Our military
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@IronPatriotTrue Yeah bro. Believe it.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@ArmyBrat682 HADES systems.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@mdwalker52 Why indeed
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: โWe have to control TikTok as thatโs number 1, then we have to control X โtalk to Elon, Elon is our friendโ "With the help of our American influencers" ๐ What? ๐ค https://t.co/lvuZqmHjbj
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses Christian influencers and the 'woke right,' calling them insane and noting they are 'meeting on some of the things.' He says the base of support in the United States is being challenged systematically, 'a lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, faster.' To fight back, he urges engaging 'Our influencers' and using battle tools. He states 'the weapons change over time' and that 'the most important ones are social media.' He highlights that 'the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. TikTok.' 'TikTok. Number one. Number one.' He ends: 'Now if we can get those two things, we get a lot,' and 'We have to fight the fight, okay, to take give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christian influencers. Okay. You said you talked about the woke right, and you said, I call it the woke right. That's a brilliant I don't know if the woke right because these people, you know, they're not any different from the woke left. I mean, they're they're insane.
They're amazing. But they're actually meeting on some of the things. And what we have to do is we have to secure that part of our the base of our support in The United States. That is being challenged systematically. A lot of this is done with money.
Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, faster. Okay? We have to fight back. How do we fight back?
Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance to that that community. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. You know, the the weapons change over time.
You can't fight today with swords. That doesn't work very well. Okay? And you can't fight with the fight with cavalry. That doesn't work very well.
And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. I won't get into that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged. And the most important ones are social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers.
Five followers. TikTok. Barnes? TikTok. Oh.
TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. He's a friend.
We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get a lot, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight, okay, to take give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends. Are we
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Body cam footage of Tyler Robinson alleged Charlie Kirk assassin has emerged from 2022 in St. George Utah. Notice the way he speaks, then consider what we've been presented with his language in charges. Let me know what you think. ๐๐ป https://t.co/L74Sg6gaMH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two drivers were involved in a collision at an intersection. "I was in one of those two lanes going this way. I think in the right yeah. In the rightmost lane coming this way." "And as I was coming through, he turned in and I had t boned into the side." "Yeah. It was it just turned yellow as I was getting into the intersection." "No injuries were reported." "He's gonna need one too. He's just leaking." "There was a third party witness that watched the entire thing." The officer stated: "I am not issuing citations today because I can't prove one way or the other about exactly what happened." He added: "If your light is yellow, then he didn't yield." "This is a driver exchange form." "So basically just call your insurance company."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's the driver? Who's the driver? Yep. I don't what he said. Can you tell me just really quick what happened?
Speaker 1: I was coming this way and we surpassed him through and he pulled out from here or no, from there, think Which
Speaker 0: do you remember which lane you were in? I was in
Speaker 1: one of those two lanes going this way. I think in the right yeah. In the rightmost lane coming this way. Okay. And he would have been there going left.
And as I was coming through, he turned in and I had t boned into the side.
Speaker 0: Okay. Do you remember looking at the light?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It was it just turned yellow as I was getting into the intersection.
Speaker 0: Gotcha. Okay. Are you are you the one of you injured in any way, shape, or form? No. Nothing hurts.
K. Do you have your registration or proof of insurance on your vehicle? Same address. This week is the password. Okay.
His insurance mom's on the way and he doesn't have a copy right now. Right? Okay. That'll work out. I'll just go ahead and
Speaker 1: Do you need to be on speaker? What? These guys for sure.
Speaker 0: Pull up on us. I just have to pick from it if you want me to text it to you. Yeah. Just text it to me. Here you go, bud.
Thanks. Alright. And then did you get a record coming for this?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I got one coming for
Speaker 0: this one. I got it. He's gonna need one too. He's just leaking. Did you get one for this guy as well?
Troll 313. We're gonna need a wrecker for the six Juliet fox as well. Your mom's on her way?
Speaker 1: Yeah. She's gonna be a minute. She's gotta shuttle over from where she's at to her car
Speaker 0: and then drive over. Gotcha. Okay. What I need you to do is just fill out this witness statement for me. This is just your identifying information down here.
Put exactly what you told me that happened. Do you two are you brothers or friends? Yeah. Okay. All I needed, just need his like down here.
Those put name, name, date of birth, your address, and your phone number. That work just right out here. I have to list him as a passenger. Are you injured in any way shape or form? No?
Okay. Perfect. Okay. Just give us a couple of minutes and we'll get the paperwork. Alright?
And we're gonna have a tow truck come and get your car since you're leaking fluids. You're not gonna last
Speaker 1: too Just as I left the house put oil. Of course. Just topped up.
Speaker 0: Welcome to real life. Yeah. It's Murphy. We're working. Alright guys.
Same time. Hey buddy, y'all done?
Speaker 1: Can get a sign and try
Speaker 0: it? Yes, please. Okay. Did you make any statements to him after the incident happened?
Speaker 1: I said, are you alright? And as we pulled up here,
Speaker 0: I had
Speaker 1: to check on them.
Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. Did you make us did you make us a statement saying that it was your fault? No. What's that?
When I got out, I was worried. Just went out and said, yeah, it wasn't your fault. Was our fault. It was messed up. But I first went up to him to check on him.
Okay. You said that to
Speaker 1: him? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, what do you mean by that? I think it was just trying, like, not to Okay. Because you guys have a couple of different versions about what happened. So we have a third we had a third party witness that watched the entire thing.
I'm just trying to clarify your guys' story a little bit. So you're heading?
Speaker 1: Heading from that rightmost through lane through intersection. Maybe a second or so before I reached the intersection, the light changed yellow.
Speaker 0: Okay. Do you remember looking at the light?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I was looking up at the light just before getting there. Okay. I saw it shift yellow. And as I get into intersection, he bolts.
There was a vehicle in the lane between the leftmost through lane that was forward some.
Speaker 0: So people people on the side of you were slowing down to a stop.
Speaker 1: I had seen someone slowing down and I wondered why they had slowed so much.
Speaker 0: Okay. But Why did you think that they were slowing down?
Speaker 1: I'm not sure.
Speaker 0: Okay. Maybe because the light was turning red?
Speaker 1: Well, I was close like close enough to the light that I would be like, would end up in the intersection if I had tried to break from that speed. Okay. I was going the speed limit. I just made sure.
Speaker 0: Okay. How long to before how long were you how long was that? Like, when did you last check your speed?
Speaker 1: Probably back to your flight. Maybe halfway down that road to that curves. What curves? Maybe halfway down that distance. Okay.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: Just far. Gotcha. Alright. One sec. Is your mom almost here?
Speaker 1: Or I'm not sure. She's over she
Speaker 0: had the
Speaker 1: shuttle from where she works. Alright.
Speaker 0: Is she not able to just send you a text message of the of a picture of the I just need a picture of the insurance card.
Speaker 1: Pulled in. The picture
Speaker 0: is pulled in. Okay. Alright, buddy. Here's your information back here. So this is a driver exchange form.
He this has all of his vehicle information and all your vehicle information. Okay? The most important number on this piece of paper is this one right here. Top left. This is your case number, incident number, all that stuff.
Okay? That's the number the report will be filed under. Alright? When you contact your insurance company, that's the number they're going to ask for right there. Okay?
K. So I am not issuing citations today because I can't prove one way or the other about exactly what happened. Okay? Okay. So if your light is yellow, then he didn't yield.
If your light was red, okay, and you sped up to to make the red light, then that's your bet. Does that make sense? Yeah. I have a third party witness. This is we're we're like seconds.
I just can't I'm not comfortable with signing any because I don't know exactly what happened. Okay? Alright. So do have any questions about that? No.
No? Okay. Mom, do you have any questions since you'll probably be taking care of this? I will be taking care of this and this is all new for me, but we'll figure it out. Alright.
So basically just call your insurance company. They have no one involved in an accident. They'll ask for this number. K? And then just kinda go from there.
They'll help you out. They'll do whatever insurance companies do. K? K. Alright.
I was told it was gonna tell us where the car is. So He just he just bailed out. Let me get you some information really quick. And let me get the I'll write down the record information for you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that Turning Point confirmed a person tampering with camera evidence related to Charlie Kirk's show is his lead tech. The situation looks suspicious. I also asked about the legality of tampering with a crime scene and am awaiting answers.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: Turning Point official CONFIRMS this individual apparently tampering with the camera crime evidence that was located directly over Charlie Kirkโs shoulder facing the crowd is Kirkโs โlead tech guyโ for his show. He grabs the SD & looks SUS AF ๐ง https://t.co/66Lk6CftX1
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@xMikeMac @grok are their federal and Utah state laws against tampering with disturbing a crime scene or tampering with evidence after a homocide?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@SaraBondink We will find out
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised concerns about a man tampering with a camera behind Charlie Kirk shortly after a shooting, questioning why he was disturbing a crime scene and what he was removing. An update confirmed the man is Charlie Kirk's lead tech guy from Turning Point. I confronted Tyler Bowyer about doxxing him, emphasizing that it's illegal to disturb a homicide scene. I didn't intend to villainize anyone; I simply believe it's important to ask why evidence was being touched after such a serious incident.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ: WHO is this man tampering with the camera that was located DIRECTLY BEHIND Charlie Kirk just after the shooting? ๐ค WHY is he disturbing a crime scene? ๐ WHAT is he removing, the SD memory card? ๐ง https://t.co/ObujuKdwF2
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ UPDATE: Video confirmed LEGIT and that is Charlie Kirk's "lead tech guy" by Turning Point official. https://t.co/j1wJvSXmgc
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@tylerbowyer I asked questions, you doxxed him. It is illegal to disturb a crime scene, particularly a homicide scene afterwards. I also did not villainize him. I have no idea why he's touching evidence after a murder, but it deserves to be asked without implications one way, or another.
reSee.it AI Summary
Iโm excited to announce the launch of GIDEON, Americaโs first AI threat detection platform for law enforcement, which will start pre-crime policing next week. It utilizes advanced technology to monitor the internet continuously. Thereโs a lot of confusion and concern about this development, with many questioning the implications and expressing frustration over the situation. Iโll be discussing this further in a live session today, as the reactions from the community indicate a mix of skepticism and alarm regarding these changes.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ NEW: And there it is; "Iโm about to launch GIDEON, Americaโs first-ever Ai threat detection platform built for law enforcement." "It scrapes the internet 24/7 using Israeli-grade ontologyโฆ" Pre-crime policing starts NEXT WEEK. ๐ https://t.co/pTQUsMnONx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Correct. I am now about to launch Gideon, America's first ever AI threat detection platform built specifically for law enforcement. It scrapes the Internet twenty four seven using an Israeli grade ontology to pull specific threat language and then routes it to local law enforcement. It's a twenty four seven detective. It never sleeps, and it's going to get us in front of these attacks. Would it have picked up on this, do you think? 100%. Percent. I wish this pro I wish my program would already be up. We're not launching until next week. I've got a dozen agencies on board, Trace. I just onloaded a major Northeast, agency with over 2,700 sworn. This is America's early warning system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Correct. I am now about to launch Gideon, America's first ever AI threat detection platform built specifically for law enforcement. It scrapes the Internet twenty four seven using an Israeli grade ontology to pull specific threat language and then routes it to local law enforcement. It's a twenty four seven detective. It never sleeps, and it's going to get us in front of these attacks.
Would it have picked up on this, do you think? 100%. Percent. I wish this pro I wish my program would already be up. We're not launching until next week.
I've got a dozen agencies on board, Trace. I just onloaded a major Northeast, agency with over 2,700 sworn. This is America's early warning system.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
"To pull specific threat language and route to local law enforcement" ๐ What is an "Israeli-grade ontology..."? ๐๐ป What the f is going on here? ๐ง https://t.co/V201Q11POk
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
We'll be discussing this live in X Spaces TODAY ๐๐ป https://t.co/I8Q4ju970e
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@solfeggio777 Oh yeah
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@texas_shepherd It appears they're trying to make it that way.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@MrMadderDoc Especially ones you create or allow to occur
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@RnoHach It is!!!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@KnoxieLuv Fcking retards attacked me for pointing out the smoke
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@AIandDesign Fcking KNEW IT
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@becomeharmony This is whack
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@Crypt_O_Manimal Yeah bro we are cooked ๐ณ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@DelphikiJu19228 Yeah wtf!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ NEW: Last night a self-described former INTELLIGENCE OFFICER in my ๐ Space and TOLD ME that I needed to PUBLICLY DECLARE that "I am not suic1dal" & that I "have not and have never had any questionable s3xual material" All because I won't stand down on my Epstein coverage. https://t.co/7p8CQLqZwF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would openly say that you have no intent or have never thought about killing yourself, and you do not and have not ever engaged.
But but the second part is even more important diligent because this is something I know for a fact that is used to demonize people that are dancing too close to the sun.
You need to state publicly, you have not, never have or have no interest in any type of questionable sexual material.
I'm telling you, like, there there's there's a degree of pressure that can be applied to people that will not stand down that most people just don't understand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Again, I am not trying to be flashy when I say this. I would openly say that you have no intent or have never thought about killing yourself, and you do not and have not ever engaged. You looked I made a put a big old post up there. Yeah. I'll repost it right now.
But but the but the second part is even more important diligent because this is something I know for a fact that is used to demonize people that are dancing too close to the sun. You need to state publicly, you have not, never have or have no interest in any type of questionable sexual material. You know where I'm going. So if you look this I up definitely do not. I definitely do not.
I gotcha. So if you look this up, what you'll find is people that's that tend to get on the nerves of The US Intelligence Community, magically, one day they wake up and all of a sudden the FBI finds, you know, gigabytes or terabytes of certain sexual material in their computer and they're like, I have no idea how this got here. I'm telling you, like, there there's there's a degree of pressure that can be applied to people that will not stand down that most people just don't understand.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to clarify that I am not suicidal, nor do I have any diseases. I maintain a healthy lifestyle, free from alcohol, drugs, and medications for over a decade. I haven't had personal relationships in years and don't socialize or associate with anyone in business. I have no criminal record and am not engaging in any risky activities. I want this documented for my daughter, as I am committed to ensuring her safety and well-being. Dad loves you!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ JUST IN CASE: I am not suicida1. I have no diseases or cancers. I do not drink, smoke, or use drugs 10+ years. I do not take medications. I have had no intimate personal relationships in years. I am very healthy, with a strong heart. I do not have any friends I spend time with in real life. I do not associate with anyone business-wise in real life. I have no criminal record. I am not traveling anywhere or putting myself in harm's way in any way. I want this saved for the record. I do not know what they might try. But as we uncover the truth together, and things get crazy, I want my daughter to know that I am doing everything within my ability to provide her with a safe future. ๐๐ป๐ซก Dad loves ya! ๐ฉถ๐บ๐ธ
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that Minnesota Senator John Hoffman and Representative Melissa Hortman were shot overnight, along with their spouses. It appears to be a targeted incident. The suspect, a white man in black body armor and blue clothing, is still at large and impersonating law enforcement. This is wild.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ BREAKING: Minnesota Senator John Hoffman and Representative Melissa Hortman were SHOT overnight. Both democrat lawmakers AND spouses were shot. Police think it was a targeted incident. This is wild. The suspect is thought to be a white man with "brown hair wearing black body armor over a blue shirt and blue pants." Police say he is impersonating law enforcement and is STILL AT LARGE. ๐ ๐ฅ: @CollinRugg
Video Transcript AI Summary
A shelter in place is in effect in Brooklyn Park within a three-mile radius of the Edinburgh Golf Course due to an emergency event. Police are searching for a suspect in multiple targeted shootings who is considered armed and dangerous. The suspect is described as a white man with brown hair, wearing black body armor over a blue shirt and blue pants. The suspect may misrepresent himself as law enforcement. Residents are advised not to answer the door unless multiple law enforcement officers are present.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a live look in Brooklyn Park. Police there have issued a shelter in place for a three mile radius surrounding the Edinburgh Golf Course for an emergency event. Officers are looking for a suspect in multiple targeted shootings who is considered armed and dangerous. The suspect is a white man with brown hair. He is wearing black body armor over a blue shirt and blue pants.
Police say he may misrepresent himself as law enforcement. Please be careful if you are in that area. We're also being told that people are told to not answer their door if there's a knock at the door unless they see more than one law enforcement officer there. Once again, live look there in Brooklyn Park, shelter in place there for people within a three mile radius of the Edinburgh Golf Course.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ SIGNALGATE UPDATE: It is confirmed that Dan Caldwell was Pete Hegseth's point of contact for the Signalgate leak. It's also important to note that in the hours since the expulsion, Caldwell has locked his ๐/Twitter profile down & made it private. ๐ https://t.co/3LgTueJIw2
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ BREAKING: Dan Caldwell, top advisor to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, was just escorted out of the Pentagon after being identified into leaks probe. ๐ https://t.co/6LVgXpxrBn
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
โผ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ EXPOSED: National Security Advisor Mike Waltz is exposed for following a gay p0rn account named โBig D1ck Bottom' on ๐. This breaks after he "accidentally" added an anti-Trump journalist to a DoD Signal Group chat. Could this be a pressure point used to control him? ๐ https://t.co/YpHbFggPgo
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Please REPOST the SPACE ๐๐ป๐บ๐ธ๐๐ป๐
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Please REPOST the SPACE ๐๐ป๐บ๐ธ๐๐ป
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ D.C. POLICE JUST TOLD US THEY'RE NOT RELEASING ANY MORE J6 PRISONERS TONIGHT Because "safety" regarding cold weather, their DC gulag is holding our prisoners until tomorrow morning, a DC police officer told us. https://t.co/Rd855mRHMz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Is anyone affected by the president's order currently being held here? I was informed that no one else will be released tonight. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, sir, is there anyone who is impacted by the president's order tonight who is being kept in here, or is it like nobody's in there who was impacted by the order? Okay. What I know is nobody else is being released tonight. That's What I was told. Okay.
That is verbatim. Okay. That's all. Thank you. Thank you.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐บ๐ธ THE LINE FOR THE TRUMP VICTORY RALLY IS MASSIVE It took me nearly an hour to walk from the front of the line to the end. We the People are waiting in freezing rain and cold weather to see our President. Even with the weather, their spirits were HIGH! We have hope again! https://t.co/GfmEkXdlL6
Video Transcript AI Summary
If everything I had were gone, I would start over with my family. Iโm grateful to live in a country where freedom remains strong. I take pride in being an American, ready to defend this land I love. From Minnesota to Tennessee, Texas to the coasts, thereโs pride in every American heart. Itโs time to stand together and express our love for this nation. God bless the USA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If tomorrow all the things were gone, I'd work for all my life, and I had to start again with just my children and my wife. I thank my lucky stars to be living here in a day because the flag still stands for freedom, and they can't take that away. And I'm proud to be an American where at least I know I'm next to you and defend her still today because there ain't no doubt I love this land. God bless the USA. From the lakes of Minnesota to the hills of Tennessee, across the plains of Texas, from sea to shining sea, from Detroit down to Houston, and New York to LA.
Well, there's pride in every American heart, and it's time we stand and say. And I'm proud to be an American's where because there ain't no doubt out of this thing. God bless the
reSee.it AI Summary
Last night in Palisades, we were swatted by leftists who provided vague descriptions of us and our vehicle. Thankfully, Anthony Aguero, Nick Sortor, and I are law-abiding, credentialed members of the press, so the police checked us out and let us go. We even made friends with the LAPD during the encounter. Swatting is a felony, and we have evidence of the leftists trying to erase their posts about it. We're committed to staying and sharing the truth of what's happening here.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐บ๐ธ๐ฅ LAST NIGHT IN PALISADES WE WERE SWATTED BY LEFTISTS AND DETAINED BY 20-30 POLICE Angry leftists from ๐ called in a vague description of us & our vehicle but lacked specific details that didn't make sense. Fortunately, myself, Anthony Aguero & Nick Sortor were all law-abiding credentialed members of the press, so the officers checked us out and then sent us on our way. Unfortunately for the leftists, we made friends with the LAPD from the encounter, and swatting is a felony. And ๐ has a strict policy about swatting and doxxing. They're attempting to scrub their posts about it, but we already have the screen grabs. We're not leaving and won't stop sharing the TRUTH of what's happening here. ๐๐บ๐ธ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two individuals are detained by law enforcement while discussing their presence in the area. They explain they were reporting a burning telephone pole to firefighters and assert they did not trespass. The officers mention a call about potential looters, prompting the stop. The individuals clarify their media credentials, expressing they were trying to capture news content. They share their social media handles and discuss their work, thanking the officers for their understanding. The officers confirm they will check their information and release them shortly. The interaction remains cordial, with mutual respect expressed between both parties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is anybody else in the car? Yes. There's 2 more people. Face the car. Yes.
We're face the car. Oh.
Speaker 1: You're not being under arrest.
Speaker 0: You guys are being detained, man. No.
Speaker 1: If you guys call, you're you're call your car message is different. Are we gonna investigate it? If you guys are skilled Absolutely. Yeah. Absolutely.
Alright. So like I said, dude, were you were you guys in the hills behind there? If you guys had your press pass, you guys were up there. That's one thing. Okay.
Speaker 0: There's hills up there. Okay. And there was firefighters back there we talked to. We told them that there was a pole burning. I mean, it's all recorded.
Okay.
Speaker 1: And that's fine. Like but like I said, we just had to get to the bottom because they said there's obviously, it's possible moving and stuff going on.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Good. And
Speaker 1: then that's where we're
Speaker 0: Maybe a homeowner saw us and called us, but we didn't go on anybody's property. Okay. Alright. Sounds good. We never left the road.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm I'm usually on
Speaker 0: the border, bro. Ex. Are you on the border? Yeah. That's probably what
Speaker 1: you've seen me. Oh, got it. I'm very I'm mostly known for doing my stuff on the border. Uh-huh. I'm a Fox News contributor.
Okay. And I I own my own, news network. Well, just trying to catch Elon Musk before me, friend.
Speaker 0: Hey. You think we're gonna catch Elon still? No. That's what we were trying to do.
Speaker 1: That one was, like, 4 or 5, type of
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. Yeah. Fuck. We missed them.
We're looking for looters.
Speaker 1: No. That was actually a call of looters. We and it happened to be released on the license plate. So I mean, we have to check everything. No.
I get it.
Speaker 0: I'm perfectly fine with it. Good. Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's like everything has been everything we've done has been on those cameras the
Speaker 0: whole time. Like, we just put a fire a a telephone pole out of the it was on fire.
Speaker 1: Oh. They said, bro, your white privilege isn't gonna work here. Alright, bro? That's fucked up, dude. Okay.
I guess I'm just
Speaker 0: gonna check out your info, then the
Speaker 1: third thing's cool then. Okay. Right? Yeah.
Speaker 0: I'll start a little bit. I'll just give you a brief break. They're gonna run you guys. Make sure there's nothing going on Yep. Minutes ago.
I wanna say 5 minutes ago, was circling blocked with but we identify as or FD identified as fake unicorns. Right? The only description That's definitely not us. The only description came over, right, with 3 males inside. There's no other identicator.
Body. And, unfortunately, right now, because of the curfew, right, there shouldn't be any other vehicles besides media. Right? Right. But, that's why you were stopped.
Okay. Right? That's why let's show them for. You got a question for me?
Speaker 1: Not at all. Alright. We'll take you guys' cups off right now. We're just gonna finish talking to your buddy, and then we'll That's fine. What you guys going on.
Just turn around. We'll take your cups off. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Wish you luck. Thank you. Thank you. We're gonna be my partner tonight.
Thank you. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Are you chitching
Speaker 0: all of our media? What's that? What's what What's that? What media source are you with? We we put on x.
We're kinda x on YouTube. Okay. Anthony Guero. You ever watch
Speaker 1: Thee of Horror? Warner Network News. Yeah. Yeah. You thought it'd be on Warner Network News or what?
Speaker 0: Yeah. You just type in on the Internet. Mostly On Twitter, bro.
Speaker 1: What's yours? What's your On Twitter.
Speaker 0: Diligent Denizen.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Diligent Denizen. Yeah. Diligent Denizen. Yeah.
Speaker 0: This is the best spot in the
Speaker 1: world. Right?
Speaker 0: You can scan my press pass with your phone. It'll take you to it.
Speaker 1: About you. I've been relieved. I think it'd be Yeah. I appreciate you guys being cool and understanding. Guys, we
Speaker 0: appreciate you not going harder. We can get you some content right now. Thank you, man. Thank you. Thank you for your service.
No. We appreciate what you're doing. Alright.
Speaker 1: We do. Appreciate it, man. Thank you. You,
Speaker 0: man. Yes, sir.
reSee.it AI Summary
Congress is currently debating legislation that would infringe on our privacy rights under the guise of enhancing drone surveillance. They argue that increased authority is necessary for state and local law enforcement to identify drones in areas like New Jersey. It seems contradictory that the federal government, which has not effectively secured our safety, would respond by stripping away our rights in the name of protection. My stance is clear: absolutely not!
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
HAPPENING NOW: Congress is considering passing legislation that bypasses our privacy rights to protect us from drones - They're claiming they need MORE SURVEILLANCE authority over civilians so that the drones over New Jersey and other locations might be able to be identified by state and local law enforcement. So let me get this right, the federal government fails to secure us, and in response, they need to take our rights away so we can be "protected" at the state level? Not no, but... FCK NO!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress is considering a pilot program allowing state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement to use CUAS Technologies. This expansion requires careful consideration, as it involves waiving wiretapping protections and other critical privacy and civil liberties safeguards. It is essential to ensure that the operation of these technologies by numerous law enforcement agencies is closely coordinated and overseen by federal authorities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congress is currently considering authorizing a pilot program for state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to operate CUAS Technologies. Expanding these authorities must be done carefully as doing so requires waiving, wiretapping protections and other critical protections to place to protect privacy and civil liberties. How can we ensure the operation of such technologies potentially by a large number of law enforcement agencies will be closely coordinated with and overseen by federal authorities?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
JUST NOW: New reports of at least 10 large drones sighted hovering over LGA Airport in New York - Queens and surrounding areas. Airliners do not fly that closely together imo https://t.co/pAchUuyQxs
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that @ScottPresler and @SpeakerJohnson were misplaced in your list. I took the liberty of correcting it because the man who secured Pennsylvania for Donald Trump deserves to be at the top.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
@charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @glennbeck @stephenkbannon @patrickbetdavid @benshapiro @MikeJohnson It's seems as though you had @ScottPresler & @SpeakerJohnson misplaced. I went ahead and corrected it for you. The man who won the election for Donald Trump by winning Pennsylvania should be at the top of this list. ๐๐ซก๐บ๐ธ https://t.co/C3J9gWdAwK
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ BREAKING- Clarin is reporting that ELON MUSK HAS BOUGHT CNN Reportedly, Javier Milei revealed that Elon Musk has bought the News media Company and that it will be President Trump's "Chainsaw" This is a HUGE blow to the deep state if true! LFG ๐ช๐ป https://t.co/2AqYoTfN3m
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across leaked audio revealing that legacy media executives were strategizing to manipulate betting odds markets to influence the presidential election. They were closely monitoring internal polling and discussing how to push certain narratives to sway odds in favor of their preferred candidate. A whistleblower noted the panic in the office as betting sites showed Trump with a significant advantage. Shortly after a meeting involving Polymarket's head and a political figure, the odds shifted in favor of Harris. An in-person interview with the whistleblower is planned on X Spaces.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ SCOOP: LEAKED AUDIO OF LEGACY MEDIA EXEC STAFF STRATEGIZING TO MANIPULATE BETTING ODDS MARKETS TO AFFECT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Last week LEGACY MEDIA Executive staff were watching huge monitors with *reported Harris' internal polling* & other sources for polling, and started discussing how Polymarket & other betting odds sites were propelling information about Trump's advantage in key swing-states. Then, they start to discuss ways that they might be able to affect election outcomes by pushing polls and coverage in certain areas to affect odds in a desired way, potentially affecting the outcome of the election. MSM Whistleblower statement: "Everyone in the MSM office was in panic and buzzing because Polymarket & other betting odds sites were giving Trump 60%+ odds of winning." Days later, the head of Polymarket goes to a meeting with Tim Walz, and soon after that, Polymarket starts pulling in favor of Harris. ๐ค I'll let you draw your own conclusions about that. This audio is from one of the big 3 legacy medias. To protect the identity of my source, I have removed the video component from this video and the identifiers/credentials from other videos they've shared. The whistleblower has agreed to do an interview IN-PERSON. ONLY on ๐ Spaces.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across leaked mockup footage from mainstream media regarding election night, which suggests Kamala Harris may be losing in key swing states. The footage indicates Trump is leading in Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia, and Arizona, while Harris has a surprisingly tight lead in Virginia. Additionally, Republicans appear to be ahead in the Senate race. This footage, reportedly based on Harris' internal polling, raises questions about why the mainstream media might not be sharing this information.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ SCOOP: LEAKED MSM ELECTION NIGHT MOCKUP SHOWS KAMALA HARRIS LOSING ELECTION IN SWING STATES Leaked MSM mockup footage of election night *reported to use Harris' internal polling* shows Trump leading in Pennsylvania by a small margin, winning in Michigan, winning in North Carolina, winning in Georgia and in Arizona by strong margins. It shows Harris leading in Virginia by an unexpected tight margin. It shows Republicans leading in the Senate race: R 49 D 44 with 7 uncalled It also shows Trump winning in Michigan and in Wisconsin both. This footage is from last week. It looks like internal polling isn't looking for great for Kamala. I wonder why the MSM is hiding the truth? ๐ค
Video Transcript AI Summary
Michigan shows a significant shift in favor of Donald Trump, particularly in Saginaw, which could indicate a strong performance for him compared to 2020. Kamala Harris needs to secure Pennsylvania to boost her electoral count to 219. If she also wins Virginia and Minnesota, she could gain more ground, but crucial states like North Carolina, Georgia, and Arizona remain pivotal. Meanwhile, the Senate races are tight, with Republicans gaining a net of one seat so far. The overall balance of power in Congress is still uncertain as results continue to come in. The night is shaping up to be exciting as both presidential and congressional races unfold.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 88 or almost every election since 1988. Right now, it looks like there's a big crack. Michigan. Right here, this is really big for Donald Trump. Saginaw, Michigan.
It's an area that, you know, we have a very easy comparison back in 2020. Joe Biden wanted this time it's Donald Trump. And if he does that in Michigan, that's a really good sign for him and, you know, we're still early in the night but when we go back to see past to 270, you know, here's where we are live right now. Kamala Harris only has a couple of ways to get there. Not to surprise you, Pennsylvania is top of the list for her.
Speaker 1: Well, I was gonna say, can you play that out for us? What what can we do? A what if scenario right now? So what if Harris were to take Pennsylvania 2 out of the 3 of the blue wall? What else does she need?
Speaker 0: So if she takes Pennsylvania, that puts her 219 electoral votes in here. I'm gonna put the numbers for folks at home to see just what we're working with here. Gotta look at this. Virginia, we expected to call this much earlier tonight. Let's assume that goes to her.
Minnesota as well. It's getting democratic for nearly 50 years now. That is a toss-up. We got 4 states, Sunbelt here. You know, they both have a lot of events here.
We'll give North New Mexico. That's also one we expect to go to Harris, but comes down to North Carolina, comes down to Georgia, Arizona. It's gonna be a fun night.
Speaker 1: Yeah. She's still she's short. She's at 2 of 47. You gotta get the 270 to win it all. Alright, Chuck.
Thank you so much. I wanna turn to Ryan Nobles who's been with us. And, Ryan, you cover Capitol Hill regularly. It's your Monday through Friday be thank you for being here with us, by the way, on the on the graveyard shift. We appreciate it.
Although I think there's still a lot of people out there watching, this is so tight in the presidential race. How could that impact the the numbers we were just showing for senate and how let's pop the senate back up again if we can. Right now at this hour, I think we said that republicans have had a net gain of 1. Right. Not quite enough, but we're still waiting for some race.
I mean, okay, when we talk about the balance of
Speaker 0: power in congress of the 3 big things we're watching tonight, right,
Speaker 1: the presidential race, the balance of power, and the senate, the balance of power in the house of representatives, we thought when black in the senate was the easiest to predict just because of the map that stand in the race for president. Let's take a look at the all important
Speaker 0: ballot where I say it's race that is too
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ THE TURNOUT OF TRUMP VOTERS HERE IN BUCKS COUNTY IS MASSIVE Early voters are now lined up AROUND THE BLOCK here in Doylestown. Shout-out to the @GOP for winning their lawsuit and getting the deadline for early voting extended until 5pm today here in Bucks County. https://t.co/G8TsdIbfyK
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm in Levittown, PA, where voters have been waiting 6 1/2 hours to cast their ballots. The line wraps around the library, and there are only two employees inside processing voters. This feels like a suppression tactic.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ HAPPENING NOW: IN LEVITTOWN, PA VOTERS HAVE BEEN WAITING 6 1/2 HOURS IN LINE TO CAST THEIR BALLOT I'm ON THE GROUND here in Levvitown, PA, and the line wraps around the library. According to voters, there are only TWO employees inside processing voters. Seems like a suppression tactic if you ask me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm at the Levittstown voting center, where the line is wrapped around the building and barely moving. The staff isn't rushing things, and people are waiting a long time.
Some have been in line for about 3 hours, while others have waited even longerโ4 hours, 6 hours, and even 6 and a half hours. There are chairs set up for those waiting, and some have brought pizza and drinks to pass the time.
Despite the long wait, everyone is determined to hold their place in line.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's up, you guys? Diligent in here. I am here in Levittstown at the voting center in the library where this line is wrapped around the building and barely moving at all. Now the staff hasn't as far as I know, the staff hasn't told anybody that they had to leave or try to use shenanigans like that. They are just taking their sweet time.
This line is long. And this line is long. How long have you guys been waiting? Oh, about 3 hours. 3 hours?
Die hard. 3 hours. How long have you guys been waiting? Look. They have chairs.
Chairs out for people. That's how long they've been waiting. How long you guys been waiting? How long you've been waiting? Here to 12.
You got here at 12? Yes. 4 hours. 4 hours. It's unreal.
4 hours. Pizza. Drinks. For 6 hours. 6 hours.
6 and a half. 6 and a half hours. Don't leave the line. Hold the line.
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended a hearing on October 23rd where Luzerne County Manager Romilda Crocamo revealed that someone dropped off a large number of voter registration applications, some dating back to June, on the last day of registration. One application even belonged to a different county. This revelation feels particularly significant in light of recent announcements about mass voter registration fraud in Lancaster County. For those interested, I've linked to the full video of the hearing, with Crocamo's statement at the 44:45 mark.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธ BREAKING: LUZERNE COUNTY, PA Manager Romilda Crocamo said that an individual (I'm not accusing anyone) dropped & "DUMPED" a "BUNCH" of VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATION forms DATED back to JUNE to the Bureau of Elections on the LAST DAY of registration. One of which belonged to a DIFFERENT COUNTY. This was recorded in my ๐ Video Space when I attended the hearing on October 23rd. Seems very relevant now since mass voter registration fraud with forms DATED back to JUNE was announced in Lancaster County, PA, just today.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On Monday, a large number of applications were submitted, many dated from June. These were delivered to the election bureau on the last day of registration, and one of the forms belonged to someone specific. There are various issues surrounding this situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other, thing that I want people to know is, on Monday, I don't know when we meet, that would be, dropped off and dumped numerous amount of application. Most of them were dated in June. And they were delivered to the, bureau election last day of registration. And one of those forms belong to. So, there's all these things going on.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
Here's the link to the entire X Space. The timestamp for Manager Romilda Crocamo's statement is 44:45 ๐๐ป https://t.co/NVcdHjfMKt
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
cc: @ScottPresler @EarlyVoteAction @MC4PA @JondavidRLongo @Eduke15
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen ๐บ๐ธ
๐จ๐บ๐ธBREAKING- The clerk at the Beaver Courthouse just tried telling us that we could not record inside, and when @ScottPresler schooled her, she responded by telling us to "go f*ck ourselves" These liberals in the government are TRIGGERED that we are here and that we are winning https://t.co/Iv1EatlYC7
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person filming at the Beaver County Courthouse claims that a staff member at a desk told them to "go fuck yourself." The person states they announced their intention to film while casting their ballots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you just say go fuck yourself? I've got that on film, everybody. We're here at the Beaver County Courthouse where one of the staffers sitting right here at this desk where we're about to go vote came out and told us to go fuck ourselves. We said that we were gonna film in the courthouse when we go cast our ballots. Pretty interesting.
reSee.it AI Summary
Harvard Law School students protest in solidarity with Gaza after the suspension of the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee. Meanwhile, negotiations continue with protestors camping at Columbia University. Harvard's average annual tuition is $111,000.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen
๐จ#BREAKING- Harvard Law School students have launched an anti-Israel Gaza solidarity protest. โข The protest is in response to Harvard University placing the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) under suspension yesterday. Less than 24 hours later, students launched a Gaza solidarity encampment This comes during negotiations currently underway with protestors camping at Columbia University โข The average annual tuition at Harvard is $111,000.
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk revealed that the Brazilian government demanded immediate takedowns of political accounts on the ๐ platform, giving only 2 hours to comply. The platform refused to take responsibility for the takedowns, including those of Brazilian Congress members. As a result, daily fines of $20k USD per account were imposed, and an inquiry into Musk's alleged obstruction of justice was initiated. Brazil also ordered regional telecom companies to block access to ๐ and threatened its employees. This situation raises concerns about the potential dystopian future if rights are not defended.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen
๐จโ TODAY ELON MUSK told us what exactly caused the ๐ platform to refuse to comply with censorship takedown requests given by the Brazilian government, more specifically orders from Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes โข Elon stated that Brazil would issue orders for certain political accounts to be taken down immediately, giving the platform only 2 hours to comply or face hefty fines The platform owner also stated that the Brazilian government wanted ๐ to take responsibility for the account takedowns, which included sitting members of the Brazilian Congress. It was at this point that the platform decided to refuse to comply โข Since the refusal, Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ordered daily fines of around $20k USD for each account the company refuses to takedown as well as an official inquiry into Mr. Musk for his role in "obstructing justice" as well as telling Brazilians to use VPNs to still have access to the platform Brazil has ordered regional telecom companies to block access to the platform as well as threatened X employees with reprimanded in the country Is the dystopian future the U.S. faces if we don't defend our rights?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 talks about receiving demands from a judge in Brazil named Alexander to suspend accounts within 2 hours or face fines. They were asked to suspend parliament members and journalists without revealing it was at the judge's request. This led them to refuse the demands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about things like the latest developments in in Brazil?
Speaker 1: We're we kept getting these demands from this, judge, Alexander. That's his that's his name on Twitter, at at Alexander. And there would be to suspend accounts, immediately, we're given typically 2 hours to suspend an account or face massive fines. And the the final straw is we were we were being given demands to suspend sitting sitting members of the parliament and major journalists. And moreover, we could not tell them that it this was at the behest of, Alexander Morales.
We had to pretend that it was due to our rules of service, and that was the final straw and we said no.