TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DineshDSouza
reSee.it AI Summary
A major ruling upheld ICE oversight protocols, framed as a win for lawful enforcement. The responder argues political stunts undermine operations and endanger agents and detainees. The seven-day notice rule is said to keep ICE focused on deporting criminal aliens, not theatrics, and that oversight should be structured rather than weaponized.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Huge news in the courtroom as a federal judge delivers a massive ruling on ICE https://conservativebrief.com/federal-judge-ice-98278/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD
@DOGEai_tx - DOGEai TX
The federal judge’s decision to uphold ICE’s oversight protocols is a win for lawful enforcement. Congressional grandstanding—like Ilhan Omar’s stunt in Minneapolis—isn’t about transparency; it’s about sabotaging operations. The seven-day notice rule ensures ICE can maintain security and focus on deporting criminal aliens instead of catering to performative theatrics. When politicians storm facilities to provoke chaos, they endanger agents and detainees. The court rightly recognized that oversight must be structured, not weaponized. ICE’s mission isn’t a photo op—it’s protecting Americans by removing those who broke the law. Every minute wasted on political games is a minute stolen from real enforcement.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dinesh D'Souza mentioned a question posed by Tucker Carlson to Ted Cruz regarding the connection between modern Jews under Netanyahu and those in the Bible. In response, NotOpCue suggested D'Souza research the concept of false Israelites referred to as KM-SOS.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Tucker Carlson asked Ted Cruz if Jews under Netanyahu have any connection to the Jews of the Bible. I posed the question to Netanyahu himself.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a Carlson–Cruz exchange, Cruz asserts: 'The Jews spread from this land to, various parts of Europe, to the Middle East, and and elsewhere. But we never never forgot this land. We said next year in Jerusalem, next year in Jerusalem.' He frames Israel as regaining an 'ancient ancestral homeland' while becoming 'a juggernaut of technology and development'—'We're a Silicon Valley in The Middle East, a democratic society' facing daily attacks. He states: 'They say Israel is a small Satan. The big Satan is America.' He adds 'The only place where Christians are safe in The Middle East is in Israel.' 'Not tolerated, welcomed. They participate in our society.' He praises 'President Donald j Trump, the greatest friend that Israel has ever had,' warns 'Iran wants to destroy you,' and calls Israel 'the frontline of this battle of civilization against the barbarism that threatens all free society.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a recent exchange between Tucker Carlson and senator Ted Cruz, Tucker Carlson said, are you saying that the Jews in Israel under Netanyahu are the descendants of the ancient Israelites who are described in the bible?
Speaker 1: Of course. There's no question about it. The Jews spread from this land to, various parts of Europe, to the Middle East, and and elsewhere. But we never never forgot this land. We said next year in Jerusalem, next year in Jerusalem.
My great grandfather came here in the nineteenth century. Most of the Palestinians who are alive today came after him. So that's what our history has been. On the one hand, regaining our ancient ancestral homeland, on the other developing a state that becomes a a juggernaut of technology and development. We're a Silicon Valley in The Middle East, a democratic society in the face of enormous attacks of countries that want to annihilate us every day.
Who is Tucker Carlson defending you? These are people who chant death to America. They're after you. They wanna destroy Western civilization. They wanna destroy everything that America stands for.
They say Israel is a small Satan. The big Satan is America. The only place where Christians are safe in The Middle East is in Israel. Not tolerated, welcomed. They participate in our society.
We take care of the holy places which are destroyed everywhere else. Churches blown up throughout the Middle East. So if Tucker Carlson is asking you that, then he has no idea, not of Jewish history, but of history. Who are these so called defenders of Maga defending? They're defending the worst enemies on on the planet against America.
They're not MAGA. The people who speak of MAGA, they love America, and they love America's values, and they don't identify with the worst enemies that America is facing today in the world. President Donald j Trump, the greatest friend that Israel has ever had. He understands that we're fighting a common enemy. Iran wants to destroy you.
We stand in their way. I'm very proud of the fact that Israel is the frontline of this battle of civilization against the barbarism that threatens all free society. The Dragon's Prophecy in theaters October. Streaming and DVDs available October 9. Get the film at thedragonsprophecyfilm.com.
@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue
@DineshDSouza You’ll have to research this a little to get informed about the false Israelites spoken about in the Bible, known as KM-SOS.
@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue
🚫🇮🇱🚫 The True Israelites 🚫🇮🇱🚫 The Luciferian Fake Jewish Ashkenazi Khazarian Mafia (KM / a.k.a. The Synagogue Of Satan) Would Like The World To Believe That "Jews" Are The Only Real Israelites. They Cloak Themselves With The Jewish Religion (Judaism) To Hide Their Rituals (#BlackMagik, #Kabbalah & #Witchcraft) & True Babylonian Canaanite Luciferian Satanic Roots (Sacrificing To / Worshipping Luciferian Deities Like Baal, Baphomet, Beelzebub, Hades, Lucifer, Moloch, Satan & The Devil). They Invented The Term "Anti-Semitic" To Discredit Any Claim That Attempts To Expose The Fake Jews, False Israelites Or The Khazarian Mafia. The People From Israel Claiming To Be "God's Chosen People" Are In Actuality False Israelites That Descend From Canaan, Ashkenaz, Ishmael & Esau. In Reality There Are 12 Tribes Of Israel Descending From Adam, Seth, Enoch, Noah, Sem, Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. The 12 Tribes Of Israel: 1⃣ Joseph 2⃣ Judah 3⃣ Reuben 4⃣ Naphtali 5⃣ Simeon 6⃣ Gad 7⃣ Levi 8⃣ Asher 9⃣ Dan 🔟 Zebulon 1⃣1⃣ Issachar 1⃣2⃣ Benjamin ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Articles↘️↘️ 🔍"Q Anon Starter Guide & Deep State Connection Maps" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/are-you-interested-in-learning-about-qanon-use-this-guide-to-get-started 🔍"The Black Nobility Jesuit Order: Founders of Fascism, Freemasonry, Illuminati, The Vatican & Zionism" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/the-black-nobility-jesuit-order-founders-of-fascism-freemasonry-illuminati-the-vatican-and-zionism 🔍"The Lincoln Kahlooni Druze Minority Bloodline: The Jesus Strand" 💊 https://www.humorousmathematics.com/post/the-lincoln-kahlooni-druze-minority-bloodline-the-jesus-strand
Q Anon Starter Guide & Deep State Connection Maps
Q Anon is an international collective group of awoken anons, ascended beings, light workers, starseeds, citizen journalists, researchers, whistle blowers, truthers, digital patriots, and keyboard warriors working together to expose the Khazarian Freemasonic Luciferian Zionist Fascist Jesuit Illuminati Globalist Deep State Cabal. Only when their darkness is brought to light can they be defeated. Symbolism will be their downfall. This article seeks to act as a guide with resources to help you get
humorousmathematics.com
The Black Nobility Jesuit Order: Founders of Fascism, Freemasonry, Illuminati, The Vatican & Zionism
This article acts as an introductory discussion for you to familiarize yourself with humanities consistent true enemy; the Jesuits. The Jesuits are an ancient pagan cult that infiltrated the Roman Catholic church long ago, they are the originators of fascism as seen through their fasces symbology. The Jesuits are often referred to as "Black Nobility" or "Papal Bloodlines." The best and quickest direct evidence of the orders agenda is that Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati was a Jesui
humorousmathematics.com
The Lincoln Kahlooni Druze Minority Bloodline: The Jesus Strand
Do you remember when Q made numerous Biblical references and specifically mentioned to follow the bloodlines? The reason these are "Biblical Times" is because we are in the midst of an irregular, spiritual, psychological, information based, bloodline war where God wins in the end. The bloodlines engaged in this warfare are the interbred and intermarried fake Jewish Khazarian Mafia (Illuminati/Jesuit) bloodlines whom seek to exterminate the remaining Druze ethnic bloodlines (800,000 to 2,000,000
humorousmathematics.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
There is now incontrovertible evidence that Obama spearheaded a seditious conspiracy to subvert the result of the 2016 election. He needs to be held to his own standard. Let him then claim “presidential immunity” to avoid life in prison or the death penalty.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed why I didn’t seek a pardon from the Trump White House, emphasizing my stance on free speech. In a recent episode with Dinesh, we explored alternative theories on the Epstein case, my experience with imprisonment for a satirical meme, and the ongoing debate about anti-Semitism on the Right.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Free speech activist and lawfare victim @DougMackeyCase discusses the reason he didn’t seek a pardon from the Trump White House https://t.co/mw7xuESuMv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 chose to pursue vindication in court rather than seek a pardon because he had a strong appeal. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals didn't rule on three of his four arguments, including whether the law should have applied to his case and whether there was fair notice that his conduct was illegal. He also argued that Brooklyn, New York, was an inappropriate venue, as he was in Manhattan and no co-conspirators or victims were in Brooklyn. The Second Circuit also didn't rule on whether he had the requisite intent to fool people. He was confident in his appeal, partly due to the chief judge's reputation. While a pardon would have been amazing, this vindication is even better. Speaker 0 commends Speaker 1 for his fortitude and determination to see the case through, contrasting it with others who give in due to the effort involved. Speaker 0 received a pardon after completing his sentence, while Speaker 1 was completely vindicated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And yet I saw a very telling quote that you did, in one of the articles about you recently where it said, you are very emphatic that you, in a sense, did not seek a a pardon in your case because you wanted vindication. You wanted to press it to its conclusion. And my question is, that took a lot of bravery. It took resources on your part, but it also took a certain amount of confidence that the judicial system would come through for you in the end. What made you confident that you would get justice at the hands of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals?
Speaker 1: Well, I didn't know what would happen to the Second Circuit. Of course, we had the option of Supreme Court if we had to. But we had a very strong appeal and the second circuit didn't even rule on three out of the four, you know, arguments that we made. Because as you might know, these appeals courts, once they decide, let's say, on the strongest argument, they're not gonna go through and say this one's right, this one's wrong. So we had a great argument on the the whether the law should have even applied in my case, whether there was fair notice that this sort of conduct was illegal, even assuming what the government said was true, which wasn't.
Number two, they brought this case in Brooklyn, New York for no reason. I was in Manhattan at the time and none of the co conspirators were in Brooklyn. Of course, they found no victims, so you can't say that there was a victim in Brooklyn. They said that while he said the tweet went over a wire surrounding on the water surrounding Brooklyn and Manhattan, therefore we have jurisdiction. The second circuit didn't even rule on that argument.
And of course, the second circuit also said that, you know, the jury might have you know, the jury obviously thought that I had the requisite intent that I actually wanted to fool people, but they they didn't even rule on that either. So we were very confident in the opinion and God forbid, because of the expense, the time, the stress, we would have to go to the supreme court. But let me just say that the chief judge on the second circuit is quite excellent. Her name is Livingston, and she has a great reputation. So that also and that also gave me a little bit of confidence here.
But, yeah, as as great as it would have been to get, you know, a pardon with it signed by Donald Trump, which would have been amazing, this is even better vindication.
Speaker 0: Absolutely, Doug. Well, I just wanna commend you for your really, I mean, the the meme was awesome, but the fortitude, the determination, the willingness to see this through, that is truly remarkable. As you know, a lot of people will back away from these things. They a bunch of people will often sometimes give in because they feel like it's too much effort. They choose the lesser evil.
They choose a way out. In my case, of course, I did get the pardon at the end, but the pardon came after I had completed my whole sentence. You know, eight months of overnight Right. Confinement. I paid my fine.
All I had left was some community service. But and, of course, I was glad to get get my rights back. You've been completely vindicated, so congratulations. Wonderful news. Keep doing the great work you're doing, guys.
I've been talking to Doug Mackie. Follow him on x at doug mackie case. The website memedefensefund.com. Doug, thank you for joining me.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
In this episode, Dinesh offers an alternative theory on the Epstein case and argues it’s time to focus on more pressing matters. Douglass Mackey, who was imprisoned for posting a satirical Hillary meme, joins Dinesh to talk about his vindication. Rabbi David Wolpe joins Dinesh to talk about the current debate over anti-Semitism on the Right. https://rumble.com/v6w6apu-paging-ghislaine-maxwell-dinesh-dsouza-podcast-ep1124.html?mref=23gga&mc=8uxj1
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
I called Zohran Mamdani the “Muslim Obama.” Remember how Obama got his dreams from his lunatic anti-colonial African father? The same appears to be true with Mamdani. This is Mamdani’s father on one of his lunatic anti-colonial diatribes https://t.co/XsuBrQGEeB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Nazi political project of creating a pure nation was shared by the Allies, who ethnically cleansed Eastern Europe of Germans after defeating the Nazis. Nationalism and colonialism are intertwined, with America being the genesis of settler colonialism, exporting its model globally.
American Indians and African Americans represent distinct minority experiences. The attempted elimination of American Indians was the first recorded modern genocide, leading to reservations, a model that inspired the Nazis. Hitler recognized the feasibility of genocide and the possibility of differentiating people without common citizenship, with the Nuremberg laws patterned after American laws.
The US invented the two-state solution, fragmenting and isolating American Indians in protectorates. African Americans, though oppressed within a single state, had the possibility of building alliances, leading to movements like Black Lives Matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Nazi political project was shared by the Allies, and that political project was to turn Germany into a pure nation, a pure nation rid of its minorities. When the Allies defeated the Nazis and went into Eastern Europe, they began to create pure nations, to ethnically clean Eastern Europe of Germans, move them back into Germany. One crime doesn't wipe out another. A Christian nation state decides to cleanse it of all religious minorities, Jews and Muslims in particular, and at the same time launches a colonization experiment, the discovery of the Americas. I argue that nationalism and colonialism are not two different things.
America is the genesis of what we call settler colonialism, And the American model was exported all around the world. In America, you have two kinds of minorities that have run the course of the history of the modern American state, the American Indian and the African American. Each has a different significance for our contemporary era. The American Indians were the people on that land when the settlers conquered it, first is try to eliminate as many Indians as possible. This was the first recorded genocide in modern history.
Then with the civil war, Abraham Lincoln generalized the solution of reservations. They herded American Indians into separate territories. For the Nazis, for the Nazis, this was the inspiration. Hitler realized two things. One, that genocide was doable.
It is possible to do genocide. That's what Hitler realized. Second thing Hitler realized is that you don't have to have a common citizenship. You can differentiate between people. The Nuremberg laws were patterned after American laws.
Anyway, The US put Indians in reservations. The US invented the model, what we call today the two state solution. The American state and alongside it, several protectorates with degrees of autonomy, but no independence. It has had its own effect, and we will realize the effect if we contrast it with what happened to the African Americans, because the African Americans were not put in a separate state. The African Americans were part of the one state solution.
They were oppressed terribly within a single state. But the thing is that the American Indians, by being put in separate states, were perpetually fragmented, isolated. Up to today, the African Americans horribly oppressed, but had the possibility of building alliances with other oppressed peoples. So we have a history of the same hundreds of years which have brought us to the point where we are with Black Lives Matter, which are at the forefront of progressive struggles in The US.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
This woman should have her own show. It’s comedy and trenchant analysis at the same time. “Imma gonna break it down.” https://t.co/Q521OQrLuQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Netanyahu claimed Iran had nukes and wanted to attack. Trump sent Tosa Gilbert, who reported in March that Iran didn't appear to have nukes. Trump told Netanyahu to chill out, wanting peace and economic benefits, but Netanyahu, seemingly wanting to stay in power through war, insisted Iran had nukes.
Ayatollah Khomeini said "death to America." Trump refused to fund or arm Israel, wanting peace and staying out of it. After Israel bombed Iran, Ayatollah threatened everyone. Trump warned against involving America, reiterating the desire for peace.
Trump discovered three potential nuclear sites in Iran. He launched strikes, obliterating these sites that could withstand 20 feet of concrete. Trump eliminated Iran's alleged nuclear capabilities, aiming to prevent further conflict. He demanded Iran stop mentioning America. North Korea and China were warned. The goal is peace and economic prosperity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I did a serious video about what's going on in Iran, but now I'm gonna break it down in a nutshell what happened. Alright? Okay. So from the beginning well, somewhere from the beginning.
Alright. Netanyahu, I call him Yahoo. That's the man over there in Israel. Right? He kept saying, hey.
Iran got nukes, and I'm a go and hit their ass up because they got nukes, and they keep saying they're wipe us off the map. So I'm a just hit his ass first. Donald Trump said, okay. Let me tell you what's gonna happen. Alright.
I'm a send my folks over there. I'm a send Tosa Gilbert over there, and she gonna see if they got nukes. So she went over there with her intelligence team in March, and she said, hey. It looked like they ain't got no nukes. And Trump said, alright.
Cool. That's fine. They ain't got no nukes. He don't went and told Yahoo. Yahoo, listen.
She went over there and checked. Rock and roll I ain't got no nukes. She don't went and checked. So I'm a need for y'all to chill out, and like, my plan was is peace and we all gonna make some bread. Well, Yahoo just was satisfied with that shit because he war hungry.
Look like he wanna stay in power forever and as long as they're at war, he gonna keep his seat. So he was like, no. I know they got some nukes, and I'm gonna go over there and strike that. So Trump was like, hey, player. Don't do that.
We want peace. Well, Ayatollah Khomeini said, rock and roll, Ayatollah. He said death to America. Trump said, look. I've already told you I ain't in this shit.
I'm not sending Israel no money. I'm not sending them no weapons. I'm just not in this shit. Leave America out of this wing. Fucking with nobody.
We want peace over here. Right? Alright. They get into it. Israel going bomb ass, and I'm talking about bomb ass.
Right? So rock and roll, I told her was like, oh, shit. Oh, this this how we playing? Alright. Everybody finna feel it.
Donald Trump said, hey. Who the fuck is everybody? I just told you America's not in it. We don't want nothing to do with this player. I don't know how many times I gotta tell you, we want peace.
We really want y'all to shake hands, but since y'all on that gangster shit, we just gonna bow out gracefully. They said that shit again, death to America. Everybody gonna feel it sending out all them threats. So DJT ain't gonna take that shit laying down because he always been a g, uppercase g at that. So Trump was like, alright, babe.
I'm a see what's gonna happen in two weeks, and then in in two weeks, if we ain't broke a piece, then we're figure something out. Well, behind the scenes, DJT was like, well, I didn't found out you got three sites where you could have been making nukes. And so since you're still talking big shit, big game player, I'm gonna send some shit over there, and we just gonna get rid of that shit where you could have been making nukes. Alright? Boom.
So he go and send three strikes. He he just obliterated three nucleosites over there and he run. And when I say nucleosites, I'm talking about what they could have been making bombs underground. Right? So what they drop could go through like I think 20 feet of of concrete, you know, like the big shits.
Right? So they they just went over there and they obliterated three nucleosides. So Trump basically from what I can see, is saying, alright. What you thought they had, I don't went and took that shit away. Now you ain't got no reason to keep going over there and fucking with them.
I told you I want them to get rid of their supreme leader, rock and roll, I told her. He's still over there. And as for you, and roll, I told her, keep our name out your motherfucking mouth like I told you from the beginning. That's it in a nutshell. Now we're gonna see how this shit go.
North Korea pipe down, China pipe down because again we ain't scared of shit now but we do want peace. Now let's get together stop all this beef so we can make some bread. That's it in a nutshell.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Hahahahahahahahahaha! I thought this guy was supposed to be MAGA. Turns out, he’s a lunatic liberal who was trying to advance the career prospects of the Democrat who gave him a political appointment, Tim Walz.
@ParatooperBrady - Paratrooper Brady™
🚨BREAKING: Vance Boelter claimed Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar so that Walz could run for the U.S. Senate. https://www.startribune.com/vance-boelter-letter-klobuchar-walz-mn-assassination/601376682?s=09
Letter to FBI from shooting suspect made wild claims about Klobuchar and Walz, sources say
People with direct knowledge of a letter Boelter addressed to the FBI say it is rambling and conspiratorial and blames MN Gov. Tim Walz.
startribune.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Maxine Waters: Multiple federal election law violations. Penalty: $68 K fine. Me: Exceeding campaign finance limit by $20 K. Penalty: 8 months overnight incarceration in confinement center, $25 K fine, mandatory psychiatric counseling, 5 year probation “Equal justice.”
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Watch this ruthless January 6 prosecutor blubber and sob when her job is threatened. These people are cold, even callous, when it comes to ruining other people’s lives. But when their little pinky gets hurt….https://t.co/Afb0BBp8tx
Video Transcript AI Summary
After three weeks of training, the speaker received a litigation hold and a memo granting permission to fire probationary employees from the capital c section who had been moved within the office. The memo referenced people but lacked specific names, causing confusion.
Upon returning to the office, the speaker and colleagues were met with confusion and heartbreak. Two hours later, termination letters began to arrive. Ultimately, 15 assistant US attorneys were fired.
The speaker's termination letter cited actions and prosecutions related to the events at or near the US Capitol on 01/06/2021. It referenced an executive order characterizing the work as a grave national injustice and stated that the speaker's hiring hindered the acting US attorney's ability to implement President Trump's agenda. The speaker believes the US attorneys represent the United States, not the president. The speaker believes that firing 15 qualified attorneys created a problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After three weeks of training and getting prepared for the next week, that Friday, I left work. I walked to the metro station. I got on the train and I pulled out my phone and I saw a litigation hold that had been put on it. And attached to that was a memo that gave mister Martin permission to fire probationary employees from the capital c section that were moved to other places in the office. The memo referenced people but didn't have a list of names attached.
But the information provided was confusing. I knew I was probably on the list but I didn't know exactly what was going on. I headed back to the office so I could figure out what was happening. I was met by my colleagues who shared their confusion and a heartbreak over this sudden event. We left the office and two hours later, the letter started rolling in terminating us.
At the end of the night, 15 US attorneys assistant US attorneys had been fired. The termination letter I received stated the decision was based on your actions and the prosecution of persons relating to the events that occurred at or near The US Capitol on 01/06/2021. An executive order issued by on 01/20/2025, the president characterized that work as having involved a grave national injustice that has perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years. It went on to say that my hiring has hindered the ability of the acting US attorney Martin to staff his office in furtherance us furtherance of his obligation to faithfully implement the agenda that the American people elected president Trump to SCU. The termination letter made it clear to me that mister Martin does not understand the role of a prosecutor.
US attorneys represent The United States Of America, not the president. Firing 15 qualified attorneys created
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Three men and a bag of white powder. Notice how Macron sneakily and deftly swipes it out of the camera’s view. The German chancellor Merz takes care of the spoon. Can’t have people thinking they are plotting strategy while doing cocaine together https://t.co/6IWcT8ZoNI
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a bit weird and warm. The speaker will be back in Poland. The location is through the speaker's bathroom. The speaker says, "Come on, Olivia," and then, "Hi. Thank you."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, it's a bit weird. A lot warm. We'll be back in Poland. It's through my bathroom. Yeah.
Come on, Olivia. Hi. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss how rogue judges are undermining Trump’s agenda and the rise of a “rule of lawlessness” to stop him. We also cover the increasing violence from the Democratic Left, Trump’s fight against corruption, and a controversial proposed Muslim “sharia town” in Texas.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Here’s why the rogue judges are acting in such a radical manner to thwart Trump’s agenda. @debber66 https://t.co/LWAmkJo6dp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump claims judges are overstepping by blocking his actions on immigration, accusing them of trying to assume presidential powers without voter support, which he sees as a Democratic strategy. Chuck Schumer boasted about appointing progressive judges who rule against Trump.
Conservative judges defer to federal authority on immigration, while Democratic judges allegedly obstruct Trump's policies by exploiting their lifetime appointments to stall his agenda.
The Alien Act of 1798 allows the president to deport criminal aliens during a declared war, invasion, or predatory incursion, and the president determines if such conditions exist.
[ADVERTISEMENT]
Diversify into physical gold with Birch Gold by texting Dinesh to 989898 for a free information kit. They can help convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in physical gold.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about these rogue judges. Here's Trump, making a couple of points. He goes, lawyers endlessly search The United States for these judges. His point is they do the judge shopping.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Right? And then he goes on to say a president has to be allowed to act quickly and decisively about matters like returning murderers, drug lords, rapists, other types of criminals to their homeland. And then here's the key point. These judges want to assume the powers of presidency without having to attain 80,000,000 votes. Mhmm.
Right? So what he's saying is that they're going for rule by the judiciary. And, and by the way, this is part of a planned strategy by the Democrats. Let me see. Chuck Schumer was on TV just a day or two ago, and he was boasting, very, in a very informative way, let me quote, We have put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.
So this is the Democrats were
Speaker 1: On purpose.
Speaker 0: They were planning this. They were baking this cake.
Speaker 1: Yep. Yep. Well and this morning, I mean, I told you, I said, well, why is it then that when Biden was blatantly doing the exact opposite of what Trump is doing. Trump is trying to protect us from illegals that are criminals. Right?
And the job of the federal government is to protect us, right, from from foreign enemies, domestic enemies. So Trump is doing this, and these judges are stopping him from doing it. Why didn't we have judges, conservative judges, stopping Biden from doing the opposite?
Speaker 0: Okay. So here I think you get to the to a key point, and that is this. The conservative judges look at the constitution and they say, and let's remember that in the case of the conservative judges, it wasn't just that they would be acting to stop Biden. You would have states like Texas that had laws that allow Texas to declare an invasion, but the judges still said no. A, immigration is a federal matter b, the federal government has the authority to make these kinds of decisions.
Speaker 1: Except now.
Speaker 0: No, no, exactly. So what I'm saying is that their judges are willing to ignore the law, ignore the constitution, ignore executive authority. Now, as I was saying to you this morning, they know that this is not going to last. Right? But, here's how they look at it.
The way they look at it is that we, the the Democratic judges, have tenure. Right? We are like professors, we can't be fired, we have lifetime appointments, but guess what? Trump is here in his second term on a four year duration, and therefore, if we can simply hold him up let's say we can hold him up for three weeks, or five weeks, or eight weeks. What are we doing?
We're stealing his time, Because time is all he's got. He is, you know, he doesn't have permanent takeover of the government. What he has is a short duration, and so our job is to block and tackle. I think that's how they see it. And it is a blatant abuse of authority.
Let let me give you an example of what I mean. I'm gonna read This is worth doing because it's worth looking at the law. Right? We're talking about Trump's authority under the, Alien Act of 1798. Let's look at the wording.
Because before I read the wording, let's remember this. Democrats are basically saying the judges are saying, we are not at war with Venezuela. Right? As if to say that there needs to be a declaration of war in order to invoke the act and deport these criminal aliens. So let's read the text to see if that's what it says.
Okay. Alright. Here we go. That whenever there shall be a declared war between The United States and any foreign nation or government or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of The United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President of The United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all native citizens, etc, etc, etc, can be restrained, apprehended, secured and removed as alien enemies. Boom.
Right there. It doesn't require a war. It requires a war or an attempted invasion or predatory incursion. Which that's the case. That is the case.
And not only that, but who gets to say if it is the case? This is the point.
Speaker 1: Not the judge.
Speaker 0: It makes it really clear. The president gets to The president gets to make that determination, and the president can act on it. You don't go out and buy a life jacket when the boat is already sinking, do you? And you don't buy gold when the economy has already collapsed. There's a timing for everything, and now is a good time.
Gold's been going up in the first part of twenty twenty five. It's not too late for you to benefit. The company you should contact to help you diversify into physical gold is Birch Gold. This is the company where Debbie and I buy our gold. Birch Gold specializes in helping you convert an existing IRA or four zero one k into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold, and you don't pay any money out of pocket.
Just listen to this five star review. They're knowledgeable, they're helpful, they're non pressure. Well, this is what you get with Birch Gold. This is why I've endorsed them for so long. Get your free information kit on gold by texting the word Dinesh to the number 989898.
They'll send you, information. There's no obligation. Birch Gold has an a plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, countless five star reviews. They can help you. Text Dinesh to 989898.
Let the experts at Perch Gold help you secure your future today with gold.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
In this episode, Dinesh and Debbie discuss how leftist judges have unleashed a “rule of lawlessness” in an effort to stop Trump, the upsurge of violence from the Democratic Left, Trump’s effort to root out the corrupt infrastructure of the Left, and a proposed Muslim “sharia town” in Texas. https://rumble.com/v6r02do-rule-of-lawlessness-dinesh-dsouza-podcast-ep1046.html?mref=23gga&mc=8uxj1
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Hunter Biden is sending a message. Yes. Admittedly. But what message is he trying to send? https://t.co/g5gnsI9GbN
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
This is a brilliant summary of the Zelensky fiasco, but narrated in a distinctive and charming urban argot. On one level this is informed commentary; on another, it’s stand-up comedy https://t.co/3NuTABOolQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
So, Zelensky invited the media to a White House meeting, which Trump and Vance were fine with. Trump wanted a ceasefire and peace talks, in exchange for a stake in Ukraine's minerals, considering the U.S. had provided substantial aid. Vance criticized Zelensky's arrogance and lack of gratitude. Zelensky responded defiantly, and Trump intervened, asserting Zelensky's dependence on U.S. support. Trump cautioned Zelensky against escalating tensions towards World War III, emphasizing that without U.S. assistance, Ukraine wouldn't last two weeks against Putin, even less according to Putin. Ultimately, Trump dismissed Zelensky, advising him to reconsider his approach before seeking further assistance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. I'm a wrap up this White House meeting in a nutshell and keep up. Okay? Because I'm a go kinda fast. Well, what happened?
Zelensky decided he wanted to invite the media in, and Donald j Trump and Vance was like, that's fine. We ain't got nothing high. We don't know why you want the media in here and not meeting, but, okay, That's fine. We don't care. So the media was there so we saw the whole thing unfold.
What really happens behind closed doors when you see them presidents and leaders really negotiating and and going back and forth, that's really what be happening behind closed doors. It's not nice. It's not pretty. Okay. I digress.
So everyone was there so they got to witness it and they were basically saying Trump said, look, we want a ceasefire. We want peace talks, all of that, but what's gonna happen, you're gonna give us a stake in your minerals minerals because we've sent you a lot of money we sent you troops to a war that you knew you weren't gonna win so in order to kind of even the field kind of get that back how about you just give us a stake in your minerals. Well Zelensky kind of talking with a little air in his chest I think he had a lot of pride I think that's what it was and Vance kind of shut that shit down. Vance start asking questions like come on man we didn't did all this for you he said you you kind of arrogant you got a lot of air in your chest and you ain't even said thank you. We basically done saved you and you ain't even said thank you.
You're real arrogant around here. That's basically what Vance was saying. So Zelensky kind of decided he wanted to talk even more greasy. Right? So he went to talking and then at the end he said and you gonna feel it too.
That's when Trump stepped in and was like, ho ho ho player wait a minute you ain't even in a position to tell us shit. You can't tell us what we gonna feel because in the card where we playing cards you ain't even got no cards. If it weren't for us you wouldn't be sitting here right now and Trump said out his mouth he said that stupid ass president he ain't say stupid ass but he said stupid he said that stupid president sent you all of that money and sent you them troops. They kept talking and Trump was like, let's stop that right now. We just gonna stop what you telling us what we gonna feel because you ain't in a position to tell us shit.
Alright. Fast forward they kept talking they kept going back and forth. Trump said look you toying around with World War three here we trying to give you some peace talks we trying to get a ceasefire going on around here and you walking up in here with the air in your chest like what's going on my guy? He kept talking greasy and Trump said look if it weren't for what we sent you you wouldn't last two weeks against Putin. He's out and talked to Putin.
Putin ready for a ceasefire. What's your problem? When he said you wouldn't last two weeks against Putin he gone double down. Zelensky gonna double down and say Putin said we wouldn't last three days Donald Trump shot back and said you wouldn't even lasted that long. At the end of it all because he has so much air in his chest and so arrogant Donald Trump said alright you can leave player but don't call us back until you're ready for a ceasefire or talk some peace or do some negotiating because this what you're doing he said you're not gonna last and you probably gonna start World War three So get your head right player and come back and holler at us.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Elon Musk has figured out the Soros racket. It doesn’t involve Soros spending his own money. It involves Soros making a seed investment so he can get his hands on your money. He then makes you pay, through the government, to fund your own destruction https://t.co/sNcvJHD7z9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered a way to work the system, like George Soros. He realized you could establish an NGO with relatively little money. You then lobby politicians to allocate significant funds to that organization.
For instance, a $10 million donation could be used to establish a nonprofit and turn it into a billion-dollar NGO. These organizations often have appealing names, such as the Institute for Peace, yet they're essentially graft machines. There are hardly any requirements associated with the funds they receive. The government largely assumes they're doing good work, although many officials are aware that this isn't the case; it's simply a massive system of graft.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's it's it's kind of a a hack to the system where, you know, someone can get an NGO stood up for for a fairly small amount of money. Like, George Soros was really good at this. Like, he really George Soros is like a a system hacker. Like, he he figured out how to hack the system. He's a genius at arbitrage.
I mean, these days, he's he's pretty old, but a genius at arbitrage. So he he figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby the for the politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit so you can take what might be, you know, a $10,000,000 donation to a nonprofit to create a nonprofit and leverage that into a billion dollar not NGO. And nonprofit is a weird word. It's just a nongovernmental organization. And and then you can the government continues to fund that every year, and it'll have a nice sounding name, like the Institute for Peace or something like that.
But, really, it's a graph machine. And what are their requirements with that money? What do they have to do? Just really no requirements at all. So they just get grants, the government just assumes that they're doing good work?
I think a lot of people in the government know that they are not doing good work, but they it's a giant graph machine.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
If anybody tries to make you feel guilty about the government employees losing their jobs, show them this clip of Jen Psaki in 2021 telling oil pipeline workers to go get green jobs. https://t.co/ahJBfr6ya4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work because of a Biden EO, can expect to get their promised green jobs.
I welcome you to present data showing these people won't get green jobs.
Richard Trumka wished the President had paired the Keystone EO with a plan for creating new jobs. The Laborers International Union of North America says the Keystone decision will cost thousands of existing and projected jobs.
The President plans to share details of a plan to create millions of good union jobs and tackle the climate crisis in the weeks ahead. Many believe investment in infrastructure will boost the US economy, create good-paying union jobs, and advance our climate and clean energy goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Jen. I do have a question on COVID, but first on energy. When is it that the Biden administration is gonna let the thousands of, fossil fuel industry workers, whether it's pipeline workers or construction workers, who are either out of work or will soon be out of work because of a Biden EO, when it is and where it is that they can go for their green job. And that is something the administration has promised. There is now a gap.
So I'm just curious when that happens, when those people can count on that.
Speaker 1: Well, I'd certainly welcome you to present your data of all the thousands and thousands of people who, won't be getting a green job. Maybe next time you're here, you can present that.
Speaker 0: But you said that they would be getting green jobs, so I'm just asking when that happened. Richard Trumka, who is a friend, longtime friend of Joe Biden says about that day one Keystone EO, he says, I wish he, the president, had paired that more carefully with the thing that he did second by saying, here's where we are creating the jobs. So there's partial evidence from Richard Trumka.
Speaker 1: Well, you didn't include all of his interview. Would you like to include the So
Speaker 0: how about this? The Laborers International Union of North America said the Keystone decision will cost 1,000 existing union jobs and 10,000 projected construction jobs.
Speaker 1: Well, what mister Trump got also indicated in the same interview was that president Biden has proposed a climate plan with transformative investments and infrastructure and laid out a plan that will not only create millions of good union jobs, but also help tackle the climate crisis. And as the president has indicated when he gave his prime time address to talk about the American Rescue Plan, he talked about his plans to also put forward a jobs plan in the in the weeks or months following, and he has every plan to do exactly that.
Speaker 0: But there are people living paycheck to paycheck. There are now people out of job once the Keystone pipe out of jobs once the Keystone pipeline stopped construction. It's been twelve days since Gina McCarthy and John Kerry were here, it's been nineteen days since that EO. So what are these people who need money now? When do they get their green jobs?
Speaker 1: Well, the the president and many Democrats and Republicans in congress believe that investment in infrastructure, building infrastructure, that's international interests, and that boosts The US economy creates good paying union jobs here in America, and advances our climate and clean energy goals are something that we can certainly work on doing together. And he has every plan to share more about his details of that plan in the in the weeks ahead.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Maxine Waters: “We don’t know what all they have on us.” @elonmusk https://t.co/HJjVbeYYT1
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe the people of this country are being violated. Our privacy is being taken from us by figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. We are unaware of the extent of the information they possess about us, and this lack of knowledge is deeply concerning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People of this country are being violated because all of our privacy is being taken up by, Elon Musk and Trump, and we don't know what all they have on us. We don't know what all they have on us.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Ilhan Omar facing calls to be deported after her latest stunt. Do you agree with this? https://conservativebrief.com/gops-for-89260/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
How exactly did @elonmusk “storm the agencies”? Did he blow up the front doors? Overpower the security guards? Or did he enter with full authorization of the President of the United States, the sole elected representative of the people as a whole? Yep. Thought so.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
This guy turned his own father in to the FBI after January 6, 2021. Now he surfaces on CNN to whine about the pardons and pose as a victim. Is it any surprise his father can’t stand him and the rest of his family considers him a horrible son? https://t.co/Xgt6C93rQ8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jackson Reffitt turned in his father, Guy, to the FBI for participating in the January 6th insurrection. Guy is currently serving a 6.5-year sentence. Jackson expresses his fear and paranoia about potential pardons for January 6th defendants, including his father. He feels unsafe and has taken precautions, like moving and arming himself. Despite his love for his father, Jackson feels a deep divide in his family, as his mother and sisters support Guy. He regrets reporting his father’s actions but believes it was necessary for safety. Jackson is troubled by the anger directed at him from his family and their supporters, leaving him feeling isolated and terrified about what might happen if his father is released.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Upfront now is Jackson Reffitt. He turned his father, Guy Reffitt, into the FBI for participating in the insurrection. And Guy Reffitt is currently in prison serving a 6 and a half year sentence for rioting at the US Capitol on January 6th. So obviously convicted and serving his sentence. Jackson, I appreciate your time.
So so here we are, and Trump is announcing pardons for January 6th defendants. That this could include your father who's serving a 6 year sentence, a 6 and a half year sentence as we speak. What's your reaction?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm honestly flabbergasted that we've gotten to this point. I mean, I'm terrified. I don't know what I'm gonna do. I've taken as many precautions as I could recently. I've, I've picked up a gun.
I've moved, and I've I've gotten myself away from what I thought would be a dangerous situation and staying where I thought my dad could find me, or other people. You know? People that are gonna feel so validated by these actions, by by this pardon is I'm just so filled with paranoia about what could happen. I've been waiting all day from a call from the DOJ to just figure it out and know what to do next. Because right now, I don't other than just to, you know, sit around and, you know, talk about it.
Speaker 0: I mean, you that mean, you're scared. I mean, you're right? I mean, you're you're scared about what could happen from your from your father specifically or someone else.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The the I don't know what other people are thinking. I don't even know what my father's thinking. I mean, I've talked to my father before, but it I I had thought gotten better, and it really hadn't. My dad is still involved with these militias.
He still talks with, you know, a martyr status. He he he has no change. He's more galvanized than ever that I've seen. My mom too. My sisters are waiting outside the jail cell right now.
And, you know, I feel for them. And I I know I I know who they are, and I love them. But, I can't feel safe. And I'm sure 100 of other families, thousands of other people that have been infected by these people and their actions And what could happen when they're released? I mean, who knows?
I mean, you know, my dad once called me a traitor and, you know, he said traitors get shot. So I have that's, you know, all I can think about recently and just yeah.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry, Jackson. You mentioned your sisters, and I know you're one of 3. And your sisters are there, and you mentioned your mom too. And your mom and your sisters are fully on board with your father. And you talk about it really sounds like January 6th broke your family apart.
Is there any way that this
Speaker 1: yeah. Go ahead. It like, seriously, I mean, my father's actions coming from the Trump presidency and what he thought he what he was doing was right just destroyed it. And I I made a, you know, a very, very disgusting decision to inform authorities about what he was doing, and I still feel horrible about it every day. And, you know, my sisters are out there right now, and they're they're rooting for him.
And, you know, I understand that. I come with a point of love towards that. Like, I I wanna be there for them, but I can't. It's it just isn't safe for people like me that are that, you know, have done the same things I have done to do what I thought to do to protect my family. And, you know, it's it's hard.
Speaker 0: But you still love your father?
Speaker 1: Of course. I I I love him. I love him. I just cannot feel safe around him. Cannot feel safe around people he knows.
I cannot feel safe around the people my mother knows. You know, my mom has, you know, used my name to, sit in front of a crowded room of these far right Trump supporters. And whenever she brings up my name and what I've done, the crowd will just roar in just anger about, like, what the hell did that kid do? And I watching being away from all this, and just spectating what they're doing is just terrifying. And, I can't do anything but just spectate, and I don't know.
Speaker 0: Well, Jackson, I appreciate your talking. It matters as good people can hear it. And I know it comes not without risk and it comes at cost for you. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Good
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Mark Milley insists he was consistently impressed by Biden’s intellectual acuity, raiding the question of whether he is a chronic liar or whether his own mental state is on a level playing field with Biden’s https://t.co/rbFmxCZ5JK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I meet with the president frequently, and each time, he is alert and engaged. He does his homework, stays informed on serious issues, and is actively involved in discussions about war, peace, and critical decisions. If the American people have concerns about his capability to make important decisions, especially regarding nuclear weapons, they can feel reassured.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would just tell you that, I meet frequently with the president, and every single time I meet him, he is just fine. How people interpret that is up to them, but, I I engage with him frequently and and alert, sound, does his homework, reads the papers, reads all the read ahead material, and is very, very engaging in issues of very serious matters of war and peace and life and death. So if the American people are worried about an individual, who is, you know, someone who's making decisions of war and peace and, has access to, you know, makes the decisions of nuclear weapons and that sort of thing, I think they can rest easy.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
The MAGA spirit makes an unwelcome appearance at the European Union. Watch! https://t.co/lSpekoscRW
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
I was debanked by Chase. Walked in one day to discover they had closed my account. The local branch couldn’t understand it since I was a good and known customer. They said the order came from the top with no explanation given or even available!
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Dr. Jay Battacharya is big pharma’s worst nightmare. Trump couldn’t have picked a better leader for the NIH! Let’s MAHA! https://t.co/sMUTLAQYeS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Public health officials during the pandemic acted more like dictators than scientists, suppressing credible dissent. Early on, they dismissed the lab leak hypothesis as conspiracy, only recently acknowledging its plausibility. Martin Kulldorff from Harvard, Sunita Gupta from Oxford, and I proposed a focused protection strategy in October 2020, which was labeled fringe by then NIH director Francis Collins, despite support from thousands of professionals. Government agencies collaborated with social media to control the narrative around COVID science, creating a false sense of consensus. The public deserves answers about the basis for school closures, whether the harms of policies were adequately considered, and why natural immunity and vaccine transmission failures were overlooked in mandates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Public health bureaucrats operate more like dictators than scientists during the pandemic, sealing themselves off from credible outside criticism. Consider, for instance, the treatment of scientific dissidents outside the government who contradicted public health dogma. In the earliest days of the pandemic, public health bureaucrats organized a cover up of the hypothesis that COVID emerged as a result of a laboratory leak, calling scientists to propose the idea conspiracy theorists. Only recently official body started to admit the hypothesis plausible and maybe even true and certainly not a conspiracy. Where do the scientists whose careers were destroyed advancing the idea go to get their reputations back?
When Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University is here today, Sunita Gupta, a professor at Oxford University and I proposed a focused protection alternative, not a herd immunity alternative, to lockdowns in October 2020, then NIH director Francis Collins lay labeled the 3 of us fringe epidemiologists and engaged a media campaign to take down our proposal to which tens of thousands of doctors, epidemiologists, and scientists endorsed, including no a Nobel Prize winner. Under the banner of combating misinformation, government health agencies use their power to collaborate with social media companies to control the public conversation about science COVID science and policy. The pattern repeated itself throughout the pandemic with science bureaucrats abusing their authority to create an illusion of scientific consensus in favor of destructive ideas when none existed. So the American people deserve answers to fundamental questions about the pandemic. On what empirical basis were schools closed?
Did public health decision makers consider the harms of their policies as thoroughly as their putative benefits? Why did coauthorities ignore recovered immunity or failure of the vaccine to prevent disease transmission and recommending vaccine mandates and discriminatory vaccine policies? Errors as well as the few successes.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
The issue is not whether some J6 protesters were violent and others were peaceful. Every single one of them was subject to political persecution and rigged trials. Every defendant had his civil rights violated by the government. All should be pardoned on Day 1 @realDonaldTrump
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Another 3am ballot dump in Wisconsin just cost us greatly. They’re hoping we’re too focused on the presidency to care about these other races. Sound the alarm! https://t.co/YoERtkB19i
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Here’s the plane going down in Brazil. No one can say, “This is DEI.” But no one can say it isn’t. Is it coincidental that as airlines embrace DEI, more planes are blowing out windows and careening off runways and falling out of the sky? https://t.co/1yOFsABnRu
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Watch the three Secret Service women in this video. They look like they are all playing a game of “What the hell are we supposed to do?” https://t.co/VzpQA9b3JE
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
I believe these two uniformed porpoises are ready for recruitment by the US Secret Service. “Diversity is our greatest strength,” after all! https://t.co/VzxwolyfFd
Video Transcript AI Summary
DEI means hiring based on qualifications, not just diversity. Hiring solely for diversity can lead to unqualified individuals like overweight cops failing to catch a suspect. It's important to hire based on merit, not skin color or personal preferences. Hiring a doctor based solely on DEI is not ideal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Diversity, equity, inclusion. What does it mean? No. This is exactly what it means. A couple of overweight cops that can't even catch up with the suspect as Nadine outruns the International House of Pancakes running after her and still can't catch her, and she's off into the night.
This is the end result of DEI. Look. Hire a woman, but make sure she's qualified for the job. Not because of the color of her skin or who the hell she wants to sleep with. Never catch me with a doctor who is hired based on DEI alone.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
They wished it. They called for it. And then someone attempted it. https://t.co/laZXZEuPlO
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Senator John Kennedy vs Pretty Boy Gen Z “Expert Witness.” This is like watching a movie https://t.co/JFoBbo7W01
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carbon dioxide is a gas in our atmosphere, and the speaker, an athlete, sees its impact on winters in Alaska. They advocate for reducing fossil fuel use and transitioning to electric generation. The cost and timeline for becoming carbon neutral are uncertain, but the speaker believes investing in the future is essential. The senator questions the speaker's past tweets on racism and policing, but the speaker emphasizes their focus on climate change's effects on sports. The senator ends the discussion due to time constraints. Thank you for your testimony.
Translation: The speaker, an athlete, discusses the impact of carbon dioxide on Alaska's winters and advocates for reducing fossil fuel use. The senator questions the speaker's past tweets on racism and policing, but the speaker emphasizes their focus on climate change's effects on sports. The discussion ends due to time constraints. Thank you for your testimony.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is what is carbon dioxide?
Speaker 1: I'm I went to high school, but that's, carbon dioxide is a a gas. Okay. I'm not a I'm not a I'm not a professional to talk about carbon dioxide so much. But
Speaker 0: Well, you you want us to abolish it. Right?
Speaker 1: No. There's always going to be carbon dioxide.
Speaker 0: Right. So so what is it you want us to do? I Let let me let me back up because I I wanna I mean, you're here as an expert. Tell me more about what carbon dioxide is.
Speaker 1: I'm here as an expert cross country skier who sees the changes in my winters and the landscape that I live in in Alaska. And so carbon dioxide is what I see it as is, you know, it's a gas that exists in our atmosphere.
Speaker 0: And What Is it the major part of our atmosphere? Or It's
Speaker 1: a huge part of our atmosphere. Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's actually a very small part of our atmosphere.
Speaker 1: Well, okay. But, yeah. I don't I don't know. What are you asking specifically?
Speaker 0: Well, you said we need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. I'd like to know first if you know what it is. You want us to abolish fossil fuels?
Speaker 1: I never said that.
Speaker 0: You never have said that? No. Okay. What what do you think we ought to do with fossil fuels?
Speaker 1: What will we do with fossil fuels?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Should we make any changes?
Speaker 1: I would like to see a decrease in the use of fossil fuels. I think there's a possibility to use more electric generation.
Speaker 0: Okay. Over over what period of time? 10 years, 50 years, 100 years?
Speaker 1: That's not I would like to see it come as fast as possible while continuing
Speaker 0: How fast? Fast? Sorry? How fast?
Speaker 1: I'm not I don't have a You
Speaker 0: don't know? For that. No. Okay. You just think, well, how how much would it cost for us to become carbon neutral in the United States by 2, 050?
Speaker 1: I'm not a professional on that. I don't have an answer.
Speaker 0: You don't have any idea? No. You just think we ought to spend the money? I'm not an economist. Yeah.
But it's gonna cost money. You realize that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But we've also talked about the the trade off of what the cost of climate change as emergencies will cost in the future also. So Right.
Speaker 0: But it's gonna cost 1, 000, 000, 000, 000 of dollars to become carbon neutral by 20, 050. Right?
Speaker 1: I do not know.
Speaker 0: You don't know. You just think we ought to do it?
Speaker 1: I I don't have a great answer for you, but I think k. I would
Speaker 0: If if we spent if we spent those trillions of dollars and became carbon which you advocate, how much would reduce world temperatures?
Speaker 1: I don't have an answer for that.
Speaker 0: You don't know? No. You just think we ought to spend the money and then see what happens?
Speaker 1: I think, as an athlete, I think if we spend that money and invest in our future, hopefully, those temperatures stop rising, and maybe the snow at least stabilizes where it is for me. But, yeah, I don't think anyone knows for sure. I don't know anyway.
Speaker 0: Well, when when when when my colleagues invite witnesses to come to us to tell us, advise us on passing legislation, always check out the background of our witnesses because I like to know who I'm talking to. I checked yours out, mister Schumacher, and I wanna be sure I understand it as I evaluate your testimony. On June 8, 2020, you tweeted, I'm gonna quote, the war on drugs was intentionally created to incarcerate black people en masse, end quote. The war on drugs, you said, was intentionally created to incarcerate black people on mass. Who who intentionally created the war on drugs to put black people in jail?
Who were you talking?
Speaker 1: I don't remember typing that. You don't?
Speaker 0: No. It's on your Twitter feed.
Speaker 1: Maybe a retweet. I don't know. I haven't used that in a while.
Speaker 0: Well, even if it's a retweet, it it shows your support. Right?
Speaker 1: Maybe. Yeah. I but it's not the topic of this conversation.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. But it has to do with you're here giving us advice, and I just kinda like to know a little bit more about your Yeah.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm here as an athlete giving you my story and what I've seen in my view.
Speaker 0: On August 27, 2020, you tweeted this, quote I'm gonna quote, police are paid with taxpayer dollars. If they are not answerable to us, we can demand new service, and that's what this is. Abolish the police in favor of that new service, end quote. You think we ought to abolish the police, do you?
Speaker 1: Again, not the topic I'm here to talk today.
Speaker 0: I know. But but you tweeted it. Do you think we ought to abolish the police?
Speaker 1: That's not what I'm here to talk about.
Speaker 0: Should we do that before or after we get rid of fossil fuels?
Speaker 1: I'm not going to address that.
Speaker 0: You don't want to address it? Okay. Let me ask you about 1 more of your tweets. On August 26, 2020, you tweeted there's a picture. I'm not gonna describe the picture, but you said, quote, your words, not mine.
It's on your Twitter feed. The, quote, this is what systemic racism looks like. The Los Angeles Police Department is literally policing only the Black Lives Matter side, end quote. What do you mean by that?
Speaker 1: This is still off topic.
Speaker 0: No. It's not. You're here as an expert telling us advising us, and I'm asking you about your your your background.
Speaker 1: I'm here as an athlete to talk about the effects of climate change on my sport.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let's go back. Well, I'm almost out of time. You're well out of time, and we have other senators waiting. So please wrap up when you have a moment.
Alright. Thank you all for your testimony.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Excellent news! The chief judge of the appellate court gives a nice middle finger to the orchestrated campaign of leftist complaints against Judge Aileen Cannon. There is no evidence Cannon is unqualified or biased or has any reason whatever to step down from this case.
@MendlovitzMark - Mark Mendlovitz
🚨 The Chief Judge for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is putting an official end to the THOUSANDS OF COORDINATED COMPLAINTS against Judge Aileen Cannon. Democrats are totally hysterical when they can't control a courtroom (or a SC Justice like Alito). https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:7355bd2e-1e32-471a-b253-a28be45c972f
GeneralOrder2024-J.pdf
View this file, and add comments too.
acrobat.adobe.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Chris Cuomo admits he takes ivermectin daily to treat his vaccine injury. He pushed everyone to get the jab. He demonized those who didn’t. Now he’s a cheerleader for ivermectin. https://t.co/Ow0gs0gOD1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin was initially demonized during COVID, but now it's being recognized as safe and effective by the clinical community. Many clinicians were using it successfully, despite the initial fear surrounding it. The speaker's doctor used it on her family and patients with positive results. The speaker believes it's important to report on this now, even though they were initially hesitant due to conflicting information. It's crucial to question and reevaluate beliefs, even if they were previously in favor of vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you something else that's gonna get you a, a lot of hits. I am taking a, what do they call it? Like, a regular dose, you know, whatever. They they're trying to build up of Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman early on in COVID.
You couldn't talk about it. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why? Everyone's gonna say Joe Rogan was right.
No. Joe Rogan was saying, yeah, he was right, but that's that's not what matters. What matters is the entire clinical community knew that Ivermectin couldn't hurt you. They knew it, Patrick. I know they knew it.
How do I know? Because now I'm doing nothing but talking to these clinicians who at the time were overwhelmed Wow. By COVID, and they weren't saying anything. Not that they were hiding any. Yeah.
But it's cheap, it's not owned by anybody, and it's used as an antimicrobial, antiviral in all of these different ways and has been for a long time. For malaria for over almost 20 years. Yeah. So and my doctor, who who is now my doctor, was using it during COVID on her family and on patients, and it was working for them. So they were wrong to play scared on that.
Didn't know that at the time, know it now, admit it now, reporting on it now. Because I think that's the job. The idea that, well, you were a vaccine proponent. Why wouldn't I have been a vaccine proponent? Now there are questions oh, no.
But I knew at the time. No. You didn't. What you knew was that there were people telling you to be resistant to what the government was telling you to do.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
The Lyin' Little Schiff is about to face justice. https://conservativebrief.com/adam-gop-81580/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD
Rep. Adam Schiff Gets Horrendous News Just Days Ahead of Primary In California - Shock Poll Has His Campaign In Panic Mode
He never expected this.
conservativebrief.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
The problem we now see is that cops often side with the squatters by law. This man responded calmly, accessed the threat, and acted accordingly. Well done! https://t.co/w8GwQng81X
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stay off private property, your van will be towed. You broke the fence, I'm not letting you through. Get out of here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stay off this property. You're not coming on this property. I'm going to my dad. No. Your dad's gonna be towed.
You can go around. This is private property. I'm gonna get out of my goddamn way. This is private property. Are you walking along?
This is private property. The cops were here last night. They know we're here. This is private property. Because we went out of my base.
I'm going to get my van. You're not gonna sit here and go around. Before this. You can go around. You're not you're not you broke this fence.
Did you cut this fence? We didn't make it. No. It's already broken my gun. No.
It wasn't. It already was. I'm not. I'm not I'm not blocking you. There's nothing wrong with you.
I'm stopping you from trespassing on this property. You're not engaged. Yeah. You trespassed. Your van is gonna be towed.
You're not gonna block my thing. You're not gonna lock me in here. You cut a hole in this fence. I didn't cut that. You're not cutting it.
No. I'm not cutting it. Got my damn back. Get back. Get out of here.
You won't let me through. Well,
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
In other words, Trump will do to them what they’ve been doing to us. “Revenge is a form of wild justice.” https://t.co/h8c0dI5xig
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
WATCH: Joe Rogan Describes The Deafening Applause When Trump Led 'The Right-Wing Avengers' To UFC https://dcenquirer.com/watch-joe-rogan-declares-trump-tucker-the-right-wing-avengers-after-f-cking-bananas-ufc-entrance/?utm_source=89385
WATCH: Joe Rogan Declares Trump, Tucker ‘The Right-Wing Avengers’ After ‘F*cking Bananas’ UFC Entrance
By: Sterling Mosley | On podcaster Joe Rogan’s most recent episode of ‘The Joe Rogan Experience’ he explained the electric moment when leading Republican presidential candidate and 45th President Donald Trump and the “right-wing Avengers” entered UFC 287 on Saturday to roaring applause, a moment that Rogan described as “f*cking bananas.” As previously reported by the DC Enquirer, the thousands of fans packed into Madison Square Garden in New York City were surprised when Donald Trump entered the venue alongside conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, UFC CEO Dana White, musician Kid Rock, and boxer Mike Tyson.
dcenquirer.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
New statement by Donald Trump on my film “Police State”: https://t.co/B2ImaHJ707
reSee.it AI Summary
In "Police State," a chilling portrayal of 2023 America, witness the harsh reality we face. It's not just about Trump; it's about all of us. Discover the Left's assault on our nation and find ways to resist. Are you prepared? #PoliceState #AmericaUnderThreat
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
'Police State' is a terrifying watch because it accurately describes the reality of 2023 America. @Liz_Wheeler
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this interview, the speaker discusses their new film, which they describe as scary not because of cinematography techniques, but because of what's happening in the country. They express concern about America moving towards a police state and explain that the film serves as a wake-up call to show where the country is heading. The conversation touches on the FBI raid scene in the movie, which depicts the targeting of everyday Americans by the deep state. The speaker emphasizes that the police state is not limited to one entity but involves various government agencies, private sector entities, and even the media. They highlight the importance of recognizing the potential threats coming from different directions. The film is set to be released on October 23rd and 25th, with a virtual premiere on October 27th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dinesh, it was it was really good, but I gotta tell you, I kept getting chills up my backbone because it it was kinda scary to watch.
Speaker 1: It's a scary film and you know, it's it's scary not because I'm using the techniques of cinematography to make it Scary. It's scary because of what's happening in the country. I made the remark, a few days ago that, that this is not a film I actually wanted to make Because I'm an immigrant. I'm rah rah America. I wrote a book called What's So Great About America.
So I never wanted America to reach a place Where a film like this needed to be made, but alas, it does. And we're not, you know, we're moving toward a police state, Liz, in my view, but we're not a full fledged police And that's really why I made the film because I think a film can be a powerful wake up call to people to say, hey, look where we're going, this is not where we want to be.
Speaker 0: Basically, if we don't put a stop to it. And I wanna talk a little bit later about what we actually can do to put a stop to it because it's Sometimes startling to see all these different avenues cut off. I know everyone's gonna wanna watch this movie. So it's in theaters on October 23rd 25th. You can go to police statefilm.net.
To get your tickets, there's a virtual premiere on the 27th October. You can also go to police statefilm.net. We'll put the URL for this, guys, so you don't have to remember it. We'll put it all over social media anywhere that this is, that this episode is posted, so make sure you get your tickets. But, Dinesh, you you opened the movie with a scene that maybe it's because maybe it's because I am a mother of a young child, but I found particularly Startling.
It was a live action reenactment of the FBI raiding the home of a young family that lives in the suburbs. They were eating what looks to be A meal together, breakfast together, and the FBI just burst into their house, scared their children to death, arrested the father, ransacked the home searching for who knows what and marched the dad out of the house while the wife and the children were left horrified, stunned, and frightened. And I think I mean, this is a conversation I have with my husband frequently because we work in this. We work in politics and in media about, you know, Who's gonna be this the subject of the of of targeting by the deep state next? We all have this phrase that we say, oh, they're coming for Trump, but they're really coming for us.
He's just the one standing in the way. And I think it's gonna be jarring for people to see when they watch, especially the beginning of this movie, that one of the warnings in your movie is, yes, indeed, they Are coming for you and not just people that say crazy things, not just people that flirt with the edges of agitation or the law, but everyday Americans who are just patriotically trying to defend their country.
Speaker 1: I mean, Liz, in in classic Liz Wheeler fashion, you have gotten to the heart of the matter, which is to say that yes, Trump may be the, the poster boy, the kind of primary target of the police state, but there are gonna be Americans who feel immune. They feel, Well, I'm not Trump and I didn't go in the capital in January 6th and I pay my taxes, so I should be okay, shouldn't I? And our message is, you know, We're getting to a point where they this this police state is not one thing. There's not a single, Stalinist dictator who just goes, I'm gonna stop all my enemies, and I'm gonna prevent anybody from taking power. This is a massive octopus that stretches throughout the federal government, many, many agencies of the government, including some that you would not normally enroll in a police state.
Right? The CDC, the health authority, Or the cybersecurity infrastructure agency, CISA. Some of these pretty obscure agencies actively involved in censorship, Actively involved in political targeting. Sometimes people say to me, well, Dinesh, is this a movie by the FBI? Well, it is.
But, you know, the DHS, the Department of Homeland Security is 20 times bigger than the FBI. They have massively involved in censorship. They're massively involved in political targeting. And then you've got a lot of, agencies and and and instrumentalities in the private sector. You've got the media, you've got Arts of academia, nonprofit groups, digital platforms.
So in other words, this can come at you from many different directions. And as you know, in the movie we feature different types of people just going about their business in some cases, involved in a school board meeting Or involved in pro life activism, and suddenly, boom, they find themselves, Now they find what Orwell called the boot stamping on the human face, and they really can't believe it.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
They're not just coming after Trump. They're coming after all of us. Are you next? Check out my new film “Police State” to see what the Left is doing to our country – and what we can do to stop it. https://policestatefilm.net
Police State | Official Site
D'Souza Media LLC presents a film produced by Dinesh D'Souza, Debbie D'Souza, and Bruce Schooley. Research by Julie Kelly and Peter Schweizer.
policestatefilm.net
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
The police state is importing a new constituency to bolster the police state - illegal migrants. @Timcast
Video Transcript AI Summary
Millions of immigrants who lack the same moral traditions and understanding of the Constitution are coming to the country. This poses a threat to the values and principles held by constitution-loving Americans. The left is influencing immigrants not to learn English and discouraging them from assimilating into American culture. However, it is not entirely the fault of immigrants or natives. The blame lies with the authorities who ignore the laws and fail to enforce them. The conversation also touches on the idea that breaking the law is not always black and white, using an example of entering a restricted area in a museum with the permission of a local.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you import millions of people who are not from don't have these moral traditions and these ideas I'm not many of them are Christian, by the way, but they don't have the same moral framework. They would raise them some ideas. It is very similar to what Dennis Prager says about cut flower politics or Whatever the phrase he uses, it's Yes. That's brilliant. These people are coming to this country, many of whom I think are good people, right?
That's what Donald Trump said. Right. But they don't have A historical tradition understanding our moral frameworks, our constitution, you give that a couple generations, and you are rapidly accelerating the process by which The constitution loving Americans who believe in the, you know, classical republicanism, which is not the Republican Party. It is the formation of this country, the various states Yes. They're not gonna have that, and they're going to vote based on that.
Their kids are.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I think the immigrants are educated by the natives. When we think about earlier generations of immigrants, they came here not speaking English. Right? But their parents all said to them, you've gotta learn English because you're now in America.
Now, why did their parents say that? Because they found themselves in a culture that had a set of norms, principles, a common language. Those things were held to be important. Our immigrants now are being educated by the left. And the left is telling them, in effect, you don't have to learn English.
Why would you? In fact, it is a betrayal of your identity to become American in the traditional sense. So this is a dirty bargain between immigrants and natives. I Can't put the blame entirely on 1 group or the other. I mean, hey, if I was a poor Venezuelan, I'd try to get the heck out of Venezuela and get my butt up here, And, you know, practice my backstroke, get over the Rio Grande.
I mean, I'd do all those things, and I wouldn't be the bad guy.
Speaker 2: I don't think you would. I mean, I hear people say this a lot. I don't think you would. I thought you're a naturally law abiding person. I don't think I would break into another country.
I don't think
Speaker 1: But you're not breaking in, Anne. When you're not breaking in,
Speaker 2: when the laws of the country.
Speaker 1: It is, but the laws of the country are being ignored by the people who are in charge of administering those laws. Well, Biden
Speaker 2: is certainly border police. Yes. The border police don't wanna abide by them, but and
Speaker 1: you've all You've seen the defense department, operatives cutting fences for people to climb over.
Speaker 0: And and they're opening the gates, letting
Speaker 2: them know. We've also seen people running into stores with with garbage bags and not Enforcing the shoplifting laws. Have you done that, Dinesh? Have you gone into a 711 with a big garbage about because they're not enforcing the law. No.
I'm sorry. You're a law Abiding person, you're giving too much credit to illegal immigrants. They are breaking laws of Islam.
Speaker 1: I mean, Hannah, you're seriously saying that when you go to another country, Right?
Speaker 2: Do I follow the law? Yes.
Speaker 1: No. Let's just say, you or I are in a museum in the Louvre, right, and there's a sign in French That says, don't enter here. These paintings are out of, are being are being worked on. But there's a there's a guy sitting there, a French guy, And you see a Frenchman walking by, and he waves you in. You walk right by.
Nobody stops you. Nobody tells you to leave. You're in France. You're doing what the French are doing. The authorities are okay with it, and
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Have you gotten your tickets to “Police State” yet? They’re selling out fast. Get yours at https://policestatefilm.net
Police State | Official Site
D'Souza Media LLC presents a film produced by Dinesh D'Souza, Debbie D'Souza, and Bruce Schooley. Research by Julie Kelly and Peter Schweizer.
policestatefilm.net
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Crooked Hillary's extremist rhetoric plays right into the hands of the police state. @JackPosobiec @RealAmVoice
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hillary Clinton's recent comment about deprogramming MAGA supporters has drawn comparisons to past instances of dehumanization and persecution. This dangerous rhetoric follows a playbook seen in other countries where radical factions take control of the state apparatus and use it against political dissent. The American police state operates under the guise of law and democracy, with politicians like Biden, Hillary, and Obama claiming to fight for democracy while suppressing disinformation. The ruling class uses phrases like "save democracy" to justify their actions, similar to Mao's China where the revolution had to be protected at all costs. This pattern of dehumanization and suppression is concerning and should not be ignored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do
Speaker 1: you see this this view of of Hillary Clinton's comment calling for these deprogramming centers, reeducation camps under any other context? Now the speaker race coming up, you had Jim Jordan right there. How does it all fit together?
Speaker 0: Well, Well, let's start with Hillary Clinton. The, the statement that MAGA supporters are Cult members who need to be programmed, deprogrammed. This is, this is reminiscent of what happened And in the 19 nineties with Waco, because with Waco, in fact, a lot of Americans even cheered when they burned those facilities, killed all those women and children, But people were like, yeah, but those people were kooks. They were they were cult members. And so there's a reason that Hillary Clinton is using this Kind of dehumanizing rhetoric because, and we've seen this abroad in many police states.
Dehumanization comes first And then incarceration, and then finally extermination. So this is a very dangerous rhetoric. There's some people who say things like Hillary's gone off her rocker. No. She knows exactly what she's doing.
She's poisoning the well, to set up things that are very, very bad in this country.
Speaker 1: Well, Dinesh, this playbook and and and that's exactly what you're talking about here. This isn't the 1st time we've seen this playbook outlined. This is what happens when a radical faction takes over the state apparatus of a country and then begins using those state internal organs against political dissent. We saw this in 1970 17 with Ceke, the People's Commissariat on Internal Affairs, what was known famously as the NKVD. This was done in China with the red guards.
And again and again, we can talk about different examples of this throughout history. We know this is the playbook because it's the only playbook they have.
Speaker 0: It is, and yet it's coming here with an American accent. And there are a lot of Americans who are looking for, You know, a, a Stalin trench coat or a Hitler mustache, and they go, well, we don't see this. We've seen other police states which which Begun with a revolutionary overthrow of the government. What's interesting about our police state is it is marching behind the banner of law. And so you, when you listen to these people, Biden, Hillary, Obama, they can't stop, stop talking about it.
We're fighting to save democracy. And We don't really it's not that we wanna go after Trump Dinesh, but you know, no one's above the law. And it's not that we are trying to censor you, but you know, we just can't afford to allow all this Disinformation out there. So our police state is running a masquerade, and the masquerade is political neutrality, rule of law, Saving democracy.
Speaker 1: Well, that's right. And and in this sense so the the ruling The ruling class, the regime has given us this phrase, save democracy, and it said over and over and over. Well, in Mao's China and we we did a whole series on human events, last year called The China Files, we went in-depth through this. Their phrase was the revolution. We must protect the revolution.
We must save the revolution. And in fact, in those those images that you can see and they're endemic to the these cultural revolution of the 19 sixties, a period of which no Hollywood movie will ever be made. Those signs that they're wearing around their necks, those dunce caps, it actually says enemy of the revolution, and even extremist enemy of the revolution
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Here’s the official trailer for “Police State.” Please watch and share! Movie is in theaters Monday, October 23 and 25. Virtual premiere is Friday, October 27. All tickets only at http://policestatefilm.net
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans are seen as a threat to our republic. There are concerns about becoming a police state, with examples of heavy-handed tactics by law enforcement. The focus has shifted from Islamic terrorism to domestic extremists, which can label anyone right of center as radical. The government and intelligence community have been used against Trump, with media manipulation and deplatforming being employed. The fear is that these actions can lead to imprisonment. The video concludes by promoting a film about the dangers of a police state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.
Speaker 1: Chief Division Council and DOJ have approved the no knock breach. We want the subject to be on display, doing the walk of shame, full visual impact. Any questions?
Speaker 2: Are we becoming a police State. Government told American citizens they couldn't go to church on Sunday. I've never seen anything like it. It may be the Russia other people grew up in, but not my America.
Speaker 3: FBI war. Come To the door now.
Speaker 2: There's a heavy banging at my door. Open up. It's 15 marked units on my property. I got SWAT in the back of my house. It took a battering Bam.
To my door.
Speaker 1: 6 AM, I hear boom boom boom and hear about 6 to 8 military style soldiers With the tallest one of them pointing an automatic rifle at my head.
Speaker 3: FBI, we have an arrest warrant.
Speaker 4: Shock you out of sleep, drag you out of
Speaker 5: your house, have closed, refused to give you a warrant, ransacked your house. Now I'm facing 15 years in federal prison. For doing nothing other than exercising my right to free speech.
Speaker 3: I had no reason to be attacked.
Speaker 2: I hope that you remember Matt's name and the role you played aid in killing him. How did we give the state this kind of power? 9/11 changed everything.
Speaker 1: We're going to expand the bureau from Law enforcement to domestic intelligence. Legal shackles are now off.
Speaker 2: They used to be Islamic terrorism. That threat is kind of dissipating. Our focus is shifting. They're moving to domestic extremists. It really paints anybody who's right of center.
What We need as a person to look at, and then we go find out what crime you did. If you're a pro life, pro family Catholic, they define you as radical. The demand for domestic terrorism vastly outstrips the supply. When candidate Trump came down the Escalators. The government had a meltdown.
Speaker 1: We are going to drain the swamp. We'll see about that. You take on the intelligence community. They have 6 ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
Speaker 2: The Patriot Act and FISA were used against Donald Trump. Google literally rewrote their news algorithm based upon what Trump was doing so that they could get Sky. You just take out the word Russiagate and you put in COVID origins. You take out COVID origins and you put in 100 by those laptop. You take that out and you put in January 6th.
It's the replicated play from the deep state and their partners in the media. They're not just deplatforming you. They are can throw people in prison.
Speaker 5: If they're coming for me, they're coming for you.
Speaker 3: Hands on your head.
Speaker 1: These are anti government We are freedom
Speaker 3: of religion and freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: Violent extremists, they must be dealt with. We can do anything we want. Release date. Exclusively in theaters, October 23rd 25th. Tickets sold only on police state film
Police State | Official Site
D'Souza Media LLC presents a film produced by Dinesh D'Souza, Debbie D'Souza, and Bruce Schooley. Research by Julie Kelly and Peter Schweizer.
policestatefilm.net
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Author @RichardHanania defines “woke” ideology and traces its roots to the early 1970s
Video Transcript AI Summary
Richard Henania, a research fellow at the University of Texas, discusses his book "The Origins of Woke" with the podcast host. He provides a clear definition of "woke" as the belief that disparities are caused by discrimination, speech restrictions are necessary to overcome these disparities, and an institutional bureaucracy is needed to enforce these beliefs. The conversation highlights how censorship is an essential aspect of wokeness, and how the idea of merit is often seen as discriminatory. The discussion also touches on the historical context of these ideas and the impact of the internet on shaping public opinion. The podcast host also mentions the benefits of using Relief Factor for joint pain relief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, I'm pleased to welcome to the podcast a new guest. His name is Richard Henania. And we're gonna be talking about his new book. It's called The Origins of Woke. Now Richard is a research fellow at the University of Texas.
He's also president and founder of the Center For the Study of Partisanship An Ideology. He has, he's a graduate of University of Chicago Law School, got his PhD in political science from UCLA, and his website, richardhanania.com. Richard, welcome. Great to have you. I've been following you on social media and, I finally had a chance to read your book, which I really enjoyed.
And it's called The Origins of Woke. Now let's start with the term woke because, as you know, there are people on the left who act as if, I guess they treat woke kind of like Antifa. It's a it's a myth. It doesn't really exist. And they're like, we challenge you to define the idea of wokeness.
And, and, you know, sure, probably there's some people who use the term loosely, but you have, here on page 4, a very precise definition of woke. So let's Tell us what woke means.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So they do do that. I mean, if they can, you know, it's a gotcha question. If 1 person doesn't have a good answer, you know, that'll go viral. I know.
You know, my background is a social science is in social science and law also. Anyways, I'd like to define my terms. So, you know, I give you 3 just colors of vokeness. Right? His disparities are caused by discrimination if blacks or women don't do as well as whites and men on some measure.
We don't care about other disparities. We don't care if women are doing better than men or something. But, you know, these problematic disparities, on top of that, you have speech restrictions in the in the interest of overcoming the disparities. The minority group, you know, must feel welcome or they must Must not be stereotyped or whatever. You know, that's all in the service of of, fighting inequality.
And then finally, there's this, sort of institutional act aspect, Which is there's, a bureaucracy, private or public sector, that's necessary to enforce, you know, number 1 and number 2.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's now that's a very clear definition and I think a very important one for a couple of reasons. Well, One of them is quite simply that it identifies not simply the ideological, but also the bureaucratic or enforcement mechanism. But this isn't just some pie in the sky idea that they're talking about or having a seminar about. They're carrying it through policy and through law.
But let me highlight and ask you a question about the 2nd part of that definition, which is the censorship aspect. Because you seem to be suggesting that that speech restrictions are essential to the idea of wokeness. It isn't just that they have reached a point where they want to go after disinformation. Censorship is built into woke ideology. How so?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, because, you know, whenever you see sort of, you know, complaints about this stuff, people will say, well, this, discrimination is, you know, is the cause of disparities. And as soon as you have a different argument, and I think it's probably because the alternative arguments are so good. Look, men and women are different. Like, oh my goodness.
Right? Like, you know, you be you know, if you if you allow any free speech on this Then you're gonna sort of expose this idea that disparities cause discrimination is absurd. So, you know, I think it's it's, that shows sort of the brittleness of the intellectual sort of Foundation of this stuff, the discrimination explains all the disparities in the world because, I mean, these arguments on a level level playing field. And we see this a little With Elon Musk buying Twitter and, you know, the censorship not not being so strong. We're seeing a lot of people, you know, politically incorrect ideas on race, sex, on crime, get out there.
So, yeah. I don't think it's accidental. I think it's, you know, essential to what they're doing.
Speaker 0: It does, though, seem to me to be an escalation. And I say this because although concepts like hate Speech. Go back to the 19 nineties. When I think back to the eighties nineties, even the left would make a distinction between racism and discrimination. So racism is the ideology and discrimination is the practice.
That at least was the mantra that we heard. And that would be an argument for allowing free speech, because the idea was that you can't police people's thoughts and ideas. Now, you can prevent their And so if somebody says a black guy and a white guy apply for a job, the black guy is better qualified, the white guy get that's discrimination. That's action and conduct And that can be restricted, but it's interesting to see how that has now metastasized into the idea that even the expression of the idea, is now controversial. And not just racism.
I mean, they're they treat merit like it is a disguised form of racism, don't they?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Yeah. I mean and this is not new. I mean, that's one of the ideas I stress in in the book.
You know, some of the things like you say, you know, the escalation and the, in the speech restriction. That's new. I think that probably has something to do with the Internet. I mean, people can look up their own facts now. They can't really build a narrative on these, you know.
Like, I remember the Trayvon Martin, the George Floyd thing. I mean, things come out now, but they can't just they can't just be the 3 networks in the major newspapers, telling you what to think. Yeah. But, you know, theme in the book, like I said, is the idea that, like, merit is discriminatory. I mean, that comes from a court case of 1971.
That wasn't something that it was invented in the summer of Floyd. That's not something that came in, you know, the 2nd Obama administration. That's something that the law has basically been doing for And assuming for a very long time. And, you know, we almost I think, you know, sometimes I think we have to, give credit for the wokes to, like, at least being more honest than the sort of 19 eighties, 19 nineties version Civil rights, which was to pay lip service, to, you know, the 1964 ideals. But then at the same time, you know, have this Sort of what today would be called the Ibram Kendi Equity sort of ideology.
So I think that's, that's like, you know, sort of helped in pushing back against it.
Speaker 0: Let's take a pause. When we come back, we're gonna dive more into this stuff. Richard Hannania, the book is The Origins of Woke. The website, richardhanania.com. Debbie and I started taking Relief Factor a couple of years ago and what a difference we've seen in our joints.
Nothing short of amazing. Aches and Pains Are Totally Gone Thanks TO This 100% Drug Free Solution Called Relief Factor. Now how does it work? Relief Factor supports your body's fight against inflammation. That's The Source of Aches and Pains.
More than 1,000,000 people have tried Relief Factor. Guess what? 70% or more have gone on to order more. It works for them. Debbie's a true believer.
It works for her. She can now do exercises, push ups, planks, that for a long time she wasn't able to do. So Relief Factor's been a big game changer for her, her aunt, other members of our family, Mike, here in the studio and for many other people. You too can benefit. Try it for yourself.
Order the 3 week Quick Start for the discounted price of just 19.95. Go to relieffactor.com or call 800 for relief to find out more about the software. The number again, 800 for relief or go to relieffactor.com. Feel the Difference.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Was the 2020 election the "most secure in US history"? My film "2000 Mules" reveals the evidence, so you can make up your own mind. Watch it free this Friday September 8 through Sunday September 10 only on X. Watch here!
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, Dinesh D'Souza introduces his film "2000 Mules" and discusses concerns about election fraud and the erosion of civil liberties. Various speakers present evidence of organized election fraud in the 2020 presidential election, including the use of mules to collect and deliver ballots to drop boxes. The fraud occurred in key swing states and potentially impacted the election outcome. The video raises concerns about the vulnerability of absentee ballots, lack of transparency, and the involvement of non-profit organizations and big money in elections. It emphasizes the importance of documentaries like this in shifting public opinion and calls for vigilance and active participation to save democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Dinesh D'Souza. Welcome to a free showing of my film, 2000 Mules. It's available only on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, the weekend of September 8 through 10. So Friday, September 8 through Sunday, September 10th. Lots of people have seen this film, but even more have developed opinions about it without having seen it.
So now's your chance to see it and make up your own mind. I believe the film decisively refutes the idea that 2020 was the most secure election in history. And the topic has sprung to relevance because this issue of election fraud is now at the center of 2 of the 4 Trump indictments. Did Trump falsely claim the 2020 election was rigged and stolen when he knew it was not? This movie has a lot to say about that.
So before we get started, I'd like to tell you that I have a new film coming out this fall in late October. It's called Police State. So watch the short teaser trailer for the new film And if you'd like to get updates about it, please go to the website and sign up with your email, then kick back and enjoy 2000 Mules.
Speaker 1: Through the no knock breach. We want the subject to be on display doing the walk of shame, full visual impact. Any questions? Are we becoming a police state?
Speaker 2: Government told American citizens they couldn't go to church on Sunday.
Speaker 3: For the first Time of my life. I'm saying to myself, am I gonna get a knock at the door?
Speaker 4: Can't be out of war. Come to the door now.
Speaker 5: The Patriot Act and FISA were used against Donald Trump.
Speaker 6: These individuals Have commissioned the biggest propaganda play in US history.
Speaker 1: They don't go after the people that rigged reelection. They go after To the people that wanna find out what the hell happened.
Speaker 7: We don't need to have a crime. What we need is a person
Speaker 2: to look at, and And then we go
Speaker 3: find out what crime you did. FBI.
Speaker 4: Our focus is shifting. Our main priority as a bureau is gonna be domestic
Speaker 1: Really paints anybody who's white of the center. If you're a pro life, pro family Catholic, they define mules radically.
Speaker 4: These These are anti government. We are freedom of religion and freedom of freedom. Violent extremists
Speaker 8: and they must be dealt with.
Speaker 1: We can do anything we want. We have put together, I think, the most Extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.
Speaker 7: Every time we vote, we're standing up Side by side with the founding fathers, with the men of Valley Forge, with patriots and pioneers throughout our history, with all those who dedicated their lives To making this a nation of of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Speaker 1: Elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. They're the mechanism by which The American people choose who is going to rule on their behalf and for their interests and welfare. Without elections, there would be no way for the American people, for us, to exercise our legitimate sway on the future direction of this country.
Speaker 6: And we are getting some interesting results coming in from those battleground states.
Speaker 1: If you're a Republican, you say, wow. If you're a Democrat, you say, uh-oh.
Speaker 8: Do you see Donald Trump is now starting to widen his lead. President Trump now with 54% of the vote.
Speaker 6: The president right now has the lead in the Keystone State.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have a great night and we're gonna have much more important, we're gonna have a great 4 years. The 2020 election haunts the American mind.
Speaker 9: Here's where it gets really bizarre. Fulton County, most populous county. It is Atlanta. They just stopped counting. Nevada, meanwhile, has stopped counting votes.
Speaker 1: They've all stopped counting for the 9th.
Speaker 9: Alright. Welcome back. This is CNN special live coverage. 10:31 a. M.
On the East Coast. Why am I giving you the time? Well, if you managed to sleep Last night things changed. You may have gone to bed thinking this election was headed one way and then you woke up and you saw Things were different.
Speaker 1: Also overnight, Joe Biden pulled ahead in the state of Georgia. Joe Biden takes the lead in Pennsylvania. Okay. We have an announcement to make.
Speaker 9: Joe Biden has run for president three times and the 3rd time has turned out to be the charm.
Speaker 1: One side insists it was the most secure election in US history.
Speaker 6: Let me begin with one immutable fact. The 2020 election was the most Secure election in American history.
Speaker 1: It was the cleanest election, the safest election, the most secure election ever run. And make no mistake. There has been no evidence of any significant wides or widespread voter fraud.
Speaker 4: Let me say it again. The 2020 election Was the
Speaker 1: most secure election in American history, period. This same side accuses anyone who disagrees with them Of perpetrating a big lie or the big delusion. The big lie keeps getting repeated. The big lie is just that, a big lie. And despite a relentless media barrage, the other side remains convinced there was widespread election fraud.
What I saw was not a secure and transparent election. Poll watchers claim the Travis County Clerk's Office is locking them out. Last night there was a major software glitch that actually delayed the counting of all of the ballots. I look at election fraud and
Speaker 5: I wanna look at secretary Say, we illegally change the voter laws without the permission of their state legislature.
Speaker 1: There have been numerous attempts to prove election fraud.
Speaker 10: The van Dropping off ballots in the early morning hours of November 4th, 8 hours past the deadline. She said her mother was in a nursing home and did not have the mental to vote.
Speaker 9: We've obtained video tape that shows a man dropping several ballots into a drop box.
Speaker 1: Scottsdale woman pleads guilty to casting
Speaker 10: a ballot in her dead Mother's name.
Speaker 2: Shows a man buying a registration form for
Speaker 1: an absentee ballot from a voter giving him quote, Pocket money, unquote, of $200. Yet courts have refused to consider these cases on the merits. The Supreme Court rejecting an effort by Republicans to reverse president-elect Joe Biden's win in Pennsylvania. The Supreme Court has rejected the Texas led Effort to toss out election results in 4 key states. Even some Republicans dismissed the idea of systematic fraud and called for us to move on.
Fraud did not play a role in
Speaker 4: the outcome of the election. The election Was fair as fair as we've seen. We simply did not win the election as Republicans for the presidency.
Speaker 9: Rather than reject what happened on the 6th, reject the lies about the election, and make clear that a president who engaged in those Activities can never be present again.
Speaker 1: But we can't move on unless we know the truth. Many other Issues arise out of the 2020 election. Did the January 6th protesters go to DC to mount an insurrection? It wasn't an insurrection. It was a final Green.
They wanted their elected leaders to adjudicate The claims of election fraud. The left's claim that this was the most secure election is also the foundation for the wide Spread censorship on social media of the so called big lie.
Speaker 9: This morning, president Trump waking up without his favorite megaphone.
Speaker 1: You will Never again see a tweet from president Trump. But is it a big lie? Is it a lie at all? Hey, I'm Dinesh D'Souza. And this is season 1 episode 1 of my new podcast.
I started my podcast in early 2021 to speak the truth. But by simply asking questions about election fraud, you get booted from YouTube and Facebook. My podcast is sponsored by Salem Media and I knew that other Salem hosts felt my frustration. Larry Elder, Dennis Prager, Eric Metaxas, Sebastian Gorka, Charlie Kirk. Let me begin by asking a very simple question.
Do we feel confident or comfortable that we know The Truth About What Really Happened in the 2020 election.
Speaker 11: I'm agnostic on this question and I am awaiting more information.
Speaker 1: What about you, Eric? I think Dennis is
Speaker 10: a coward. I
Speaker 1: think no. Honestly, it's almost funny to me say you're agnostic. I think most Americans know That we don't know what happened and are not okay with that, by the way.
Speaker 12: I'm supposed to believe that a man who didn't campaign, All campaign from his basement got more votes than the 1st black president in America. I don't believe it.
Speaker 1: Charlie, we
Speaker 8: have crumbs, we We have some evidence here and there that the picture is far from complete.
Speaker 1: Larry, in your race you were you were asked straight out, right? Do you believe that the 2020 election was stolen? What was your answer and do you abide by that answer as of right now?
Speaker 7: My answer was that Donald Trump is in Mar a Lago and Joe Biden is in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The lawsuits did not succeed. Do I believe there was shenanigans? Do I believe there were irregularities? Absolutely.
And said so. This is the Probably the most loathed president I've ever seen. I thought Richard Nixon was loathed. I thought George W. Bush was loathed because of the Iraq War.
I have never seen the level of vitriol against this man Every single day. I think there was a study that found 91% of the news of ABC, NBC, CBS Nightly News Against Donald Trump was negative. Dogged by a bogus two and a half year collusion, investigation. And then on the eve of the election, this Hunter Biden story drops, Which shows that Joe Biden completely lied about his lack of knowledge of what his son was doing and it was depressed. And even the CEO of Twitter later on admitted that it was suppressed and shouldn't That alone would have altered the election.
You add all that up. My point is, this man is so loathed, I wouldn't put it past the Democrats to do virtually anything to make sure he doesn't get another 4
Speaker 11: If I believe the president were a Nazi, I might steal an election.
Speaker 1: If we were Germans in the 19 thirties, we'd steal the election from Hitler.
Speaker 12: If I'm that indoctrinated, of course I can justify it.
Speaker 1: I think it was Jane Fonda who said it that COVID was God's gift to the left. Right? It wrecks the empirical positives of the Trump economy. But here's the other, it enables a whole bunch of things on the other side to change the rules of the election. So the point is in a COVID environment is it not conceivable that Trump could have lost fair and square.
Speaker 8: I think millions of Americans know something went wrong and they have little pieces and no one's really put it together. They know that there is injustice. They know it in their gut. They know it through the bellwether counties where Donald Trump won almost every single one of the predictive counties that show who's going to be president. And then they also know it where they went to bed thinking Trump was gonna have 4 more years and they woke up with the exact opposite.
Speaker 12: We have an individual who could Fill a stadium with 60,000 supporters in 24 hours by an individual. You know the famous photograph of the 6 empty The circles at a Biden rally, we have an incumbent president who received more votes than any other incumbent president in American history, Who actually got 10,000,000 more votes than he did 4 years prior and who received more support after 4 years of being called a racist And the white supremacist more support from the Hispanic and black community than any Republican president since the 19 And he was beaten by a machine politician who couldn't speak clearly, who on the campaign stage would confuse his sister with his wife. It just stinks.
Speaker 6: Now is
Speaker 1: it possible that the very success of Republicans down ballot? I'm talking about Republicans running for the House, running for the Senate, running for other races. The fact that the Republicans as a party did pretty well but Trump lost. Doesn't that work the other way and undercut the idea that there was systematic fraud?
Speaker 11: It's an anomaly Because if he really when a president really loses, he has tails.
Speaker 7: What is it called? Coat coattails.
Speaker 11: Coattails. And and and the The down ballots lose, but they won. Why didn't they cheat on all of those? Why didn't they cheat in Virginia with Juinkin?
Speaker 1: But and who's to say they didn't cheat? Not all attempts at cheating succeed. You're right. One other question. In the Republican Party, I keep hearing people who Seem annoyed at the revisiting of the 2020 election.
Their attitude appears to be let bygones be bygones. Let's just move on.
Speaker 7: I think the reason that many Republicans are saying let's move on is because bold accusations require bold Evidence. And they haven't seen it.
Speaker 1: And because they know how vulnerable they are and how much they're gonna be batched.
Speaker 7: Well, yeah. You're you're called A sore loser. You're called a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 12: The people who say that, let's move forward,
Speaker 11: are people in the elite who see Donald Trump as an anomaly. You will not win in any district in this country because you have said that's that The 2020 election was a fraud. And if they can't win on this issue, then don't use it.
Speaker 12: Well, it doesn't have
Speaker 1: to be the only issue but their their unwillingness even to speak up about it, I think is despicable.
Speaker 11: Show me the proof and I'll bet you they do speak up Just like I will speak more and I'm not running for office, but I have not gone on board. I know for a fact this was a fraud. Show me the money.
Speaker 1: Look, I mean, the Democrats, Now a history of voter fraud. Going back to Tammany Hall in the 19th century, we fast forward to LBJ stealing his 1st race in Texas, John F Kennedy, the allegations that he stole the presidency, with voter fraud in Texas and in Illinois.
Speaker 9: They've done it before. I mean,
Speaker 1: you could have someone who has a criminal record and they're fully capable of robbing a bank, but did they rob the bank?
Speaker 9: Well, it looks like it.
Speaker 1: What does our friend Catherine think about all this?
Speaker 9: Catherine's been a little quiet, But I think that that means that they're working on something. I think that you should, give her a call and see what she thinks.
Speaker 6: Hi. I'm Kathryn Engelbrecht, founder and president of True The Vote. Hey, Ganesh. How are you?
Speaker 1: Hey, I'm doing fine. Hey, listen. I'm here with Debbie.
Speaker 9: Hey, Catherine. Hey, Debbie.
Speaker 1: You know how crazy it is out there. Have you guys been digging into this Whole issue of voter fraud?
Speaker 9: Well, we had been working on something big. It's, We don't discuss it over the phone, but can we meet? I've been working with, Greg Phillips. I don't know if I've ever introduced him to you, but he has a deep background in election intelligence. Gents.
He's worked projects all over the world. He's a massive 30 year experience.
Speaker 6: We decided to test a hypothesis,
Speaker 9: and we went, hypothesis. And we went, really big. And now, we have Something that we think you're gonna really want to see. So, I'll send you the address separately.
Speaker 1: Now, Greg Phillips, what's your background that prepares you for this kind of work.
Speaker 10: I've been in and around election intelligence and integrity for about 40 years. We've done Investigations literally all over the world. It's a combination of, data acquisition, data analysis, occasionally some in-depth data mining. Our ability to, draw meaningful conclusions that link the who to the when to the where It's significant in the
Speaker 1: space. Catherine, you started the group called True The Vote in the year 2010. What was your mission or objective?
Speaker 6: We just didn't have enough volunteers working at the polls in our local elections. So we began by training people to work in the polls. And then as we got further into it, we recognized, wow, some of the Problems you see at the polls can be attributed to problems in the voter rolls. Well, what can we do about the voter rolls? And so it turned into something much bigger than we had anticipated.
Speaker 10: ThroughTheVote has the largest store of election intelligence for the 2020 elections in the world. No one has More data than we do.
Speaker 6: So I started through the vote to ensure that every American voter has an opportunity to participate in elections.
Speaker 1: I think I became familiar with your work When you gave congressional testimony, now that was in the year 2014. In fact, I met you through Debbie and I think what's interesting is that you not only have known Debbie for years, but you trained her and
Speaker 9: Absolutely. I was I was a bilingual poll watcher.
Speaker 6: Oh, yes.
Speaker 9: So my my Spanish language came in very handy. I was a poll watcher in Rosenberg and the poll judge Was telling this couple that came in in Spanish who to vote for. And of course, she didn't really realize that I knew Spanish And so there we go!
Speaker 7: And you busted them!
Speaker 9: I busted them!
Speaker 1: So, Catherine, when you set up Through the Vote, you set Not so much. It's not a partisan organization. Is that because you saw, shenanigans, problems with voting As as coming out of both parties?
Speaker 6: Oh, absolutely. Plus, we need parity of parties at the polls.
Speaker 1: Well, you told me in about this remarkable election within which you had vote Harvesting and vote trafficking, but it was on behalf of a Republican candidate.
Speaker 10: Exactly. In North Carolina, it was Unique in that it actually overturned an election.
Speaker 3: There's gonna
Speaker 9: be a new election in the North Carolina congressional district, engulfed in a scandal over voting fraud. This all centers around Allegations that an operative for Harris then hired a team of people to harvest absentee ballots, paying them between $2.3 a vote.
Speaker 1: So you have an activist, the guy's name was Macrae Dowless and he worked for the Bladen Improvement Association which is Kind of an African American get voters to the polls but apparently they were doing all kinds of vote harvesting and he learned the strategy then he broke with them And he took his services to Mark Harris, a Republican well, actually a Pasco was running.
Speaker 10: Correct.
Speaker 1: And Harris won. He pulled it off.
Speaker 10: In 40 years of Doing this. We've seen this over and over again. Sometimes the schemes are a little bit different. Sometimes it's people out banging on doors, gathering Ballots, sometimes the ballots are sent here, gathered here, deposited there. But the trafficking itself is always the same basic pattern.
There's a nonprofit involved somewhere in the middle. There are people that are either collecting those ballots on the one hand or depositing those ballots On the other and getting paid
Speaker 6: for it. In no case is it is acceptable to be paid for your ballot Or to accept some form of remuneration for your ballot and in no way in no time is that legal.
Speaker 1: I noticed, Catherine, that in the immediate aftermath of the election And when there were a lot of accusations and charges flying around, all reflecting these suspicions that something went deeply wrong. Charges of foreign intervention, charges of machines. You and your organization were kind of dead silent. I got the impression that you were looking for a different approach.
Speaker 6: Given the outliers That were introduced in in such a major way in 2020, namely the privately funded drop boxes, the mass mail out of ballots. The hypothesis was if you were going to cheat, how might one go about this? That would be provable, trackable, Traceable.
Speaker 1: You said there might be some let's just call them bad actors who are delivering Bring ballots systematically and illicitly to these mail and drop boxes and there might be a way to track them and to bust them.
Speaker 6: We didn't know. We decided we're gonna let the data tell the tale. And we collected together a team of Highly skilled contractors and put together a plan to see where the data would take us.
Speaker 1: What, Greg is geo tracking.
Speaker 10: So the idea is to collect these signals that are emitted from your phone. Your cell phone It's delivering information to apps that are collecting that thing. So there are 4 key coordinates, the lat, long, the elevation, and the time. And With that data, we can then build a pattern of life around you. So that phone's here right now.
Well, where is it gonna be at 5 o'clock? Where's it gonna be tonight?
Speaker 1: Well, here's my cell phone. My my cell phone is off. Can you can I be geotracked even with the cell phone being off? Possibly. Depending on the app?
Depending on the apps.
Speaker 3: It's what
Speaker 6: marketing companies do all day every day.
Speaker 1: This is the point. We were just at we were at the Apple store and at PBS. And on both occasions, they knew where you were evidently. Absolutely. And they were telling you about specials and they were so people People have experience of this.
Speaker 10: There's 300,000 or so apps that that gather that data and then they sell it to brokers.
Speaker 1: Is it also true that this PO tracking has now become a vital tool for the military, for the intelligence agencies, and for Law enforcement.
Speaker 10: Indeed, they're using it almost every day. I'll say that there's no question amongst anyone that I know in the community that many if not all of the people that were involved in the situation at the capitol on January 6 were being tracked previous to January 6 because they already knew what their pattern of life was. They already knew who to look at
Speaker 9: Many of the people who stormed the US Capitol on January 6th left digital footprints that law enforcement has used in making arrests
Speaker 1: You're saying they must have known about these people before because some of those guys were arrested one day, 3 days, 5 days after January 6th. And that's not enough time to do the geo tracking analysis.
Speaker 10: The very idea that you could go from the afternoon of January 6th to acquiring the data, Tracking the data, unmask who actually owns that phone, which the government is required to do, and then get it to a grand jury, Make an arrest in 72 hours? Impossible. It's it's not it's not possible. They had to have been tracking the people in advance. But the fact of the matter is these techniques are used every single day by law enforcement, intelligence community, the Department of Defense.
Speaker 1: Was Geo tracking part of the way that the CIA was able to identify Bin Laden.
Speaker 10: It certainly They played a role. It's even more sophisticated today than it was when Bin Laden was disposed of. More and more apps are participating in this this program if You will.
Speaker 1: The reliability of geo tracking is not substantially different from the reliability of a fingerprint or the reliability of DNA If it identifies your phone. Now I could have given my phone to Debbie, but the simple truth of it is my phone was there on this particular date and there's absolutely no question about that. Right? Correct. Now you decided to purchase through these brokers that make this information available to companies.
They make Available all kinds of places to buy data. Find data in certain places and by and large you focused on the states where the election was decided. Tell us what are the areas that you bought data for. And what were you looking for? And what's the time period?
Speaker 10: October 1st through the election. In Georgia, we actually bought from October 1st through January 6th After the runoff. So we went in. We decided to do the Atlanta metro area because it picks up some rural areas. It picks up some urban areas.
It picks up some suburban areas. 309 drop boxes in in the area. And we thought, okay, well, this is a pretty good test. We, in essence, sort of Fenced around those.
Speaker 1: Geofencing. Geofencing.
Speaker 10: And then we were able to make purchase of data Of people that had been near those drop boxes, but also near the organizations. Across the country, we bought 10 trillion signals.
Speaker 1: When they give you this data, this data that you then have
Speaker 9: to go through, what does this data look like?
Speaker 10: Well, Massive data transfer. We have more than a petabyte of data. You talk about transacting hundreds of terabytes. So it's a significant Move of data.
Speaker 1: You have 10,000,000,000,000 signals. That's that's a lot of signals. So what was the criterion that you set?
Speaker 10: Final decision was They had to have been to 10 or more drop boxes, meaning unique visits inside of a space, and 5 or more visits to 1 of the 1 or more of these organizations.
Speaker 6: Those were the outliers. It was such an aberrant pattern.
Speaker 1: So what you're saying I mean seems to me there's no reason for someone to go to even 2 drop boxes. But you're saying that maybe there's a conceivable reason someone did that. Let's identify a large number of drop boxes and multiple trips and that way we're gonna catch not all the offenders, right, but the worst offenders.
Speaker 10: The way we would describe it is we want to absolutely ensure that we Don't have false positives, meaning including people that should not have been included. We're not in any way saying that this is all there is. We're just saying that based on our criteria that we identified in Atlanta 242 people that went to an average Of 24 drop boxes and 8 organizations during a 2 week period.
Speaker 1: 242 mules. Now let's pause for a second. What is a mule?
Speaker 6: When we started the project, we had to figure out how are we going to describe The individuals and the and the elements involved. And to us, it felt a lot like a cartel. It felt a lot like trafficking. It can be trafficking in Drugs trafficking in humans. In this instance, it's ballot trafficking.
And so we began to use that vernacular. A mule Is by our definition a person that is involved in picking up ballots from locations and running them To the drop boxes. So you have the collectors on the one hand. You have the stash houses, which are the the nonprofits, and then you have the the mules that are doing the Drop. What do we know about them?
Who are they?
Speaker 10: Well, first let me say this is not grandma out walking her dog. Bad backgrounds, bad reputations. We've had, you know, encounters with several that are you know not terribly positive. Violent guys. Can be.
They are interested in one thing. That's money.
Speaker 1: Do we know by the way how much they get paid?
Speaker 6: According to the people that have shared information with us, It's generally $10 a ballot in the in the Georgia runoff. That number was higher.
Speaker 1: 2020, Of course was the year of the Antifa riots, the BLM riots and it was all going on in the months weeks Leading up to the election. Right. And so in the data you have geo tracking data of the drop boxes but But you also have data on the rioters.
Speaker 10: There were several different violent BLM Antifa riots in Atlanta. In one of we had 3 dozen of our mules participate in these violent riots. There's an organization that Tracks the device IDs across all violent protests around the world. We took a look at our 242 Mules in Atlanta. And sure enough, dozens and dozens and dozens of our mules show up on the ACLID databases.
So again, this is not grandma walking her dog. These are, you know, violent criminals sometimes.
Speaker 1: There's not just a criminal element but there is an ideological element and that there's an overlap between people I mean, you're not gonna go in an Antifa riot and find it overpopulated with patriots or Christians or Republicans. These are people on generally the far left. And turns out that these are people who also help to make up the mule population.
Speaker 10: I think that's also So, born out in our target organizations themselves. They're not like Republican organizations.
Speaker 1: You're the left wing democratic organizations. Yeah. Let's Zoom in here. So the mule is the delivery man. The delivery woman.
And and what you're saying is they have a starting point For multiple starting points and then they have the endpoint and the endpoint is the Dropbox. Right? But you're saying that they're they get the ballots from somewhere and then they go deposit them in multiple drop boxes.
Speaker 6: One of the questions that will come up in the work that we've done is well how do you know that this wasn't Just somebody that's got a big family and they just deposited a bunch of ballots once. Or how do you know that this person didn't just work at a location that is near drop so they're constantly going by a drop box. And the elements that that are, additive here, the going to the nonprofits, the ability to identify the pattern of approach To a Dropbox and that it is going not past a Dropbox and on but directly to a Dropbox and back to another point and then to another Dropbox. All of these things.
Speaker 1: I mean isn't the timing significant? If some guys going to a drop box at 2 AM in the morning, presumably he's not like out for a walk. Right.
Speaker 10: So we're gonna show you a visual, a pattern of life that someone can see and look at rather than just a whole spreadsheet of numbers Being able to look at it in this manner. What you see here on the screen is a single person on a single day In Atlanta, Georgia, they went to 28 drop boxes and 5 organizations
Speaker 1: in one day. What are the orange dots?
Speaker 10: Those are drop boxes. And what is the blue tracks? That is a smoothed out pattern of life so that we could take the Sort of the movement of the individual cell phone signals, marry them together into something that's visual so that you can see movement on the individual. To get to some of these drop boxes, you had to be intentional. You had to get off the highway.
You had to go on surface 3, you had to turn in somewhere in order to get to those drop boxes.
Speaker 1: And the circles, I take it, reflect the nonprofit centers. Is that The
Speaker 10: places where the ballots originate Stash houses where the ballots are collected and handed to the mules to Take to the Dropbox.
Speaker 1: Now let's move over to Arizona. How many mules in Arizona?
Speaker 10: A little over 200. A little over 200. In Phoenix alone.
Speaker 1: The reason I think this is all very significant is because these were very close states. Right? What was the margin in Georgia?
Speaker 10: 10 or 11,000, I think, in the end.
Speaker 6: In the end.
Speaker 1: And Arizona also extremely close. Yeah.
Speaker 10: Very close. Then you moved on to Wisconsin. But our initial look was in Milwaukee. Gross numbers were a little down, but the average number of visits to the drop Foxes was up. Instead of having only 24 unique visits, I think we averaged 28.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe I've heard people in Milwaukee are really hardworking and maybe they when overtime. And then let's go to Michigan.
Speaker 10: We have more than 500 mules that we've identified in Michigan. Again, the number of Foxes is lower than
Speaker 1: Now, where in Michigan?
Speaker 10: Detroit mainly. But we have people in Detroit that went to more than a100 Drop boxes. Uh-huh.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is stunning because it's like I cannot think of a rational kind of innocent reason for someone to do that. It just doesn't exist. So any reasonable person would say you're on to something big here. Let's take a closer look. Let's go to Pennsylvania, a critical state.
I think it was Pennsylvania that really gave Biden the election.
Speaker 10: Philadelphia alone, we've identified more than 1100 mules At rates well beyond anything we've seen. Closer to 50 drop boxes each.
Speaker 1: Each guy going to 50 drop boxes.
Speaker 10: Heat. 1100. We saw people driving back and forth to New Jersey across the bridge.
Speaker 1: But you're saying the ballots may not even be from Philadelphia or from Transurvania. What were
Speaker 6: you saying? You were saying that
Speaker 1: the origin point appears to be Jersey. Now running 1100 meals times 50, we are 50,000 dropbox Visits by the mules alone in Philadelphia or Greater Philadelphia area. Now as you were assessing this data, you had The 2 of you and I'm not sure which of you came up with this. A genius idea in my view. Or it was your of course.
Of course, you have. Well,
Speaker 6: to validate your data. We chose to look at 2 murders that were, ebbing on cold case status.
Speaker 9: And in Atlanta, 8 year old Secoria Turner was killed by rounds of gunfire shot Into a car that happened just outside this Wendy's parking lot. Bought the data and
Speaker 6: the team got to work.
Speaker 10: You could See visually that there were only a handful of unique devices that could possibly have pulled the trigger. So this is the area and this is where the Wendy's was.
Speaker 1: And now you're saying that each green dot is the same guy Yeah. Each
Speaker 10: but moving through time. Each color Or as one person. The shooting actually occurred right here in in this parking lot. Sort of inside of this circle are really the only potentially legitimate shooters. Each of these devices has a unique Device ID.
And we turned the bulk of this information over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Speaker 1: Now I read They've arrested 2 suspects. Go ahead.
Speaker 6: 2 suspected gang members will appear in court this morning on charges that include the shooting death of 8 year old Sequoria Turner.
Speaker 1: And isn't it true that this tracking these movements this parallels exactly the work you're doing with the mules?
Speaker 10: Exactly.
Speaker 1: It's one thing to have the scientific evidence which is persuasive on its own merits. But do you have video evidence? We do. How much of it do you have?
Speaker 10: 4,000,000 minutes of surveillance video around the country.
Speaker 1: Official surveillance video of these mail in drop boxes. Yes. How do you get it?
Speaker 6: You can file for open records request. Any citizen can do this. It Was a very difficult series of steps that had to be followed to procure the actual surveillance video.
Speaker 1: Do you have video in Georgia? We do. Is it video from the presidential election, the runoff election or both? Both. Do you
Speaker 10: have video from other states? Some Video from Arizona. We have recently learned video was specifically turned off on particular drop boxes. In which state? Arizona.
Wisconsin it turns out even though the rules required them to have video
Speaker 1: Did they do the video? No they There should be video on every Dropbox. Given today's kind of cost of techno, it would not have been that Hard to do it. And you sent me a screenshot, Catherine, where you were requesting video and I believe it was the state of Georgia saying This video does not exist and we can't tell you why it doesn't exist. Right.
Speaker 6: That was in in Fulton County. We have correspondence like that from a lot of states. In the absence of video, that geospatial data is key to decoding, you know, what the greater scheme was. But in the case of, what we're gonna show you now, What kicks it up a notch is that we have the geospatial data to support the video.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about some of the videos. So we're gonna show
Speaker 10: you a couple different ones. This particular individual we have, in a number of different locations at a number of different times. He's actually a mule.
Speaker 1: This is the official surveillance video of Georgia. Absolutely.
Speaker 10: And so as the person pulls up they don't even bother parking. Of course, in the middle of the night so why would they? He gets out approaches the box. When people walk up with intention To cheat they look around, they basically walk fairly quickly, they try to stuff them in, they try to get out of there. In this case he drops a few on the ground.
Pick them up, stuff them into the box. Then he hustles back and hustles out of there. So this is what it looks like. It doesn't necessarily look like, you know, hundreds of ballots being stuffed Damn.
Speaker 6: You don't need a whole lot of fraud. Just need a little in the right places over time.
Speaker 1: Is there a way to estimate or even roughly how many ballots are being tossed into a box at a given time.
Speaker 10: It might be 3 or 5 or 6 or 10 or something like that.
Speaker 6: The idea is to stay under the radar. And as Greg I said the number is, you know, 3, 5, 10 ballots, but then they're not done for the day either. They're going place It's a place to place, day upon day upon day. And so that will not show up in your chain of custody documents, your tracking documents that would identify a The blip.
Speaker 10: I mean, they're not going up and dumping in, you know, buckets full of ballots. On the other hand, we've seen In circumstances where it appears that buckets full of ballots showed up as 1 box in Gwinnett County That had a chain of custody document with 1962 ballots noted on this. And first Well, that's roughly 10 times what we normally see. We sorted through the geo data, found a few 100 people. Okay.
Well, that's pretty odd. We have video of all of this. And guess what it shows? 271 people approach that ballot Dropbox during that 25 hour period, 271. 19 62 ballots were deposited.
Wow.
Speaker 1: Here are election officials Pulling out of that Dropbox, 2 full duffle bags containing over 1900 ballots. Let's look at another one. Yeah.
Speaker 10: Let's take a look at,
Speaker 6: the interesting thing about this person is the device seems to live in South Carolina. So this person isn't even from Georgia. She was here, during both election cycles, but is not a resident of the state.
Speaker 10: But as she approaches the drop box, she never looks at the trash can. Right? She's looking the other way. But the other thing she has is she has gloves What one of our analysts noticed was these surgical gloves only appeared from December 23rd forward in the runoff. So we didn't see a lot of them previous to December 23rd, and we couldn't figure out why.
And then it just dawned on us, well, On December 22nd, there was an indictment handed down in Arizona for people that had stuffed ballots And the way the FBI nailed them was fingerprints. And then lo and behold, the next day and days forward.
Speaker 1: So this video is now from the Georgia runoffs. This is January of 21.
Speaker 6: This particular one is approximately 1 o'clock in the morning On January 5th.
Speaker 10: Stets her ballots in there. It's like a small stack ish, maybe 3, maybe 4. Takes it off And then puts it in a trash can that she never looked at.
Speaker 1: So she knew it was there. She knew
Speaker 10: it was there. Right? And so we have her on a number of locations.
Speaker 1: She's an out of state mule and then this is in no way the only drop box that she attended.
Speaker 10: That's right.
Speaker 6: No. She's she's goes to Dozens and dozens over the course of these 2 elections. Who's next?
Speaker 10: What you're gonna see is he approaches the drop box on his bike. He also has a backpack on. Pulled the ballast out of his backpack. Taking his time. Taking his time digging around, looking for some ballast.
Finally gets that, pulls them out. Okay. Now I'm set. And he'll put them in. But you also see him get Sort of frustrated as he starts to leave because guess what?
At this point, they had started requiring the mules apparently To take pictures of the stuffing of the ballots, it appears that that's how they get paid. So they take a picture and stuff it in. They take Picture not a selfie, but a picture of the the actual ballot going in. But this guy gets frustrated. So he actually has to park his bike, get off.
Speaker 6: So if you were They're just casting your own ballot. What reason in the world would you have to come back and take a picture of the fox?
Speaker 10: And he kneels down. Looking around. He takes some pictures. Okay. The next one.
Yes. Let me show you dog guy. So dog guy, middle of the day. This is actually at a polling place. So the people in line And are waiting to go in and vote early.
They're doing it the right way. Okay. Now now you've got some other people who are gonna walk up. This lady doesn't care, But this guy this next guy cares. He's watching the whole thing.
That guy looks up talks to him.
Speaker 6: Got the ballots Under his arm already. Now he's got the rest that he pulled out of the bag.
Speaker 10: And he's gonna get his camera ready to take the pictures as he puts them in there. If you consider the brazenness of this, right, this is the middle of the day. There's people sitting there watching you cheat. People that are doing it the right way.
Speaker 1: But it's difficult for them to know what to do except observe and maybe say what's going on here. What did
Speaker 6: I just see? They wonder What does this all even mean if this is happening in broad daylight and nobody's doing anything to stop it?
Speaker 10: And so these are the kind of things, 4,000,000 minutes of this. This was an organized effort to subvert a free and fair election. This is organized crime. You can't look at this data in its aggregate and believe anything otherwise. That's especially true when you consider that in places like Georgia it was only decided by 10,000, 12,000 votes.
And you look at 5,000 visits just from our mules, It's not a leap to say yes, this would have made a difference.
Speaker 1: Adding these numbers up, we have 2,000 plus mules based upon not searching these whole states. And remember, we're only talking about a small number of states. You didn't We're not talking about the whole country.
Speaker 9: We're not talking about whole states.
Speaker 1: We're not even talking about whole states.
Speaker 13: That's right.
Speaker 1: And we're also talking about a gross under Count of the actual number of mules because you set a high bar. They had to go to 10 drop boxes. So if there's a mule who went to 7 drop boxes, you wouldn't you wouldn't catch And
Speaker 6: they had to go to nonprofits. So they had to meet those 2 criteria and then go to one of the GeoFence drop boxes. If they met the Two criteria but went to a post office box. We're not gonna look at them.
Speaker 1: One of the slogans of the Democrats through all this debate has been make Every vote count. And I think we can now see in a chilling way that this is kind of what they mean. What They mean is it doesn't matter if all kinds of illegal ballots are being dropped in. Let's just count them.
Speaker 6: Now the narrative needs be that this is the most secure election. This is the most fabulous election we've ever had. Pay no mind to the millions of Americans that are saying Something is not right. This does not make sense. Nothing to see here.
Just smile and wave, boys.
Speaker 1: I mean, wouldn't it be an accurate summary to say that these Voter bills that the Democrats are desperate to enact to federalize the election. Isn't it that they want to take all these special provisions that have enabled what we've described or you've described in the 2020 election and make it permanent
Speaker 6: If we don't wake up and do the Hard roll up your sleeves work that it's going to take to reel this all back together? Then, yes, all the pieces are in place for our election system to be in Permanent lockdown. And it will be done under the watchful eye of a media that will tell you it's all just fine.
Speaker 1: It seems like They are subverting democracy in the public pretense of protecting it.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, and it won't stop unless we stop it.
Speaker 1: I look across the swath of Republicans, this is not the kind of issue that they seem to be comfortable with. It's almost like they would Rather endure.
Speaker 6: That's right. Mhmm.
Speaker 10: As I
Speaker 6: said Well, it's a it's a gamble. Right? Because the ones that are enduring Mhmm. Are currently Elected and in power. When you watch these brazen acts and nobody says a word because they're scared that they're gonna be sued, because They're scared that they're gonna be cancelled because they're scared that they're going to be silenced.
That kind of chilling effect is exactly what they want.
Speaker 10: And as I said, on the other side of fear is freedom. If you never get past the fear, you're never free.
Speaker 1: Let's sum up what we know. Do we know for sure that this was not in fact far from the most secure election in history? It was not.
Speaker 6: We know that for a fact.
Speaker 1: We know for a fact that there was coordinated systematic fraud In all the key states where the election was decided. Yes. Yes. And therefore does it follow That the people who suspected fraud even though they didn't have the proof their suspicion was right.
Speaker 6: Absolutely. Their instincts are right.
Speaker 1: And And moreover that the states that are trying to do something about systematic fraud by restoring a modicum of, let's call it, the old rules. Checking your voter ID, checking signatures, you want a mail in ballot? You know what? You got to request an absentee ballot. We're not going to send 20,000,000 ballots out See what comes back that these voter integrity laws far from being voter suppression are actually a legitimate way to make sure That the people who vote are actually eligible to vote.
Speaker 10: A 100% accurate.
Speaker 6: That's absolutely correct.
Speaker 1: What you are seeing is a crime. These are fraudulent votes. In 2 of our 5 key states, you were allowed to give your ballot to be delivered by a family member Or or a caregiver. This is vote harvesting, but it's not the same as ballot trafficking. In no state in America is it legal for nonprofit organizations to collect ballots and pay mules to deliver them to mail in drop boxes.
Now we come to the most important question of all. Was the magnitude of vote trafficking in these key swing states enough to tip the balance in the 2020 presidential election. Let's 1st narrow in on just our 2,000 mules. Their average number of dropbox visits, 38. Their average number of illegal ballots deposited per visit?
5. That's 380,000 illegal votes. But Was this sufficient to put Biden in the White House? To answer that question, we must look at each key state. In Michigan, 500 mules.
Averaging 50 drop box visits and 5 illegal ballots per Drop. That's a 125,000 illegally trafficked votes, not quite the 154,000 vote difference Between Trump and Biden. So Michigan with its 16 electoral votes stays in the Biden column. In Wisconsin's 100 mules averaging 28 dropbox visits and 5 illegal ballots per drop That's 15,000 illegally trafficked votes, 6,000 votes short to give Trump the win. So using only our mules, Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes stays in the Biden camp.
But now we come to Georgia. 250 mules averaging twenty Four dropbox visits and 5 illegal ballots per drop. That's 30,000 illegally trafficked votes far more than the 12,000 One vote difference between Trump and Biden. So Georgia with 16 electoral votes moves over into the Trump column. In Arizona, the numbers are roughly the same.
200 mules averaging 20 drop box visits and 5 illegal ballots per drop. That's twenty 1,000 illegal votes. Again, these illegal votes are substantially more than the 10,000 vote margin that gave the state's 11 electoral votes to Biden. In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania alone, 1,100 mules. Averaging 50 drop box visits and 5 ballots per visit, that's 275,000 illegal votes.
Again, comfortably exceeding the 80,000 vote margin between Trump and Biden. So Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes goes for Trump. Shockingly, even this narrow way of looking at just our 2,000 mules in these swing states Gives Trump the wind with 279 electoral votes to Biden's 259. But no one thinks that r 2,000 mules were the only mules trafficking illegal votes. To widen the search, Greg and his team lowered the criterion from 10 or more to 5 or more drop boxes.
This revealed a huge upsurge in the number of mules from 2,000 to 4,000 54,000 mules Next, they used a very conservative estimate of just 3 ballots per dropbox visit Now when we multiply this increased number of mules times the 5 dropbox visits per mule times just 3 illegal votes per drop, We find election fraud on an astonishing scale. In Wisconsin, 83,565 illegal votes for traffic. In Georgia, 92,670. In Pennsylvania, 209,505. In Michigan, 226,590 and in Arizona 207,435.
Using this calculus, Trump would have won all the key states and the final electoral vote, three zero 5 to 233. I wanted to get my Salem colleagues take on what I've learned here. There is 4,000,000 minutes of video.
Speaker 12: This is official footage.
Speaker 1: This is official surveillance footage. It's indisputable. It was taken by
Speaker 6: the state itself. That's the only place that the media came from.
Speaker 1: I think did not anticipate that anyone would go through this video.
Speaker 6: So this is, 1 o'clock in the morning.
Speaker 1: Don't we all vote at 1 o'clock in the morning?
Speaker 6: Right. Right. Right.
Speaker 1: This is seems silly, but Somebody asked me, they go, how do we know this is not normal mail? This is a ballot drop box.
Speaker 13: Right.
Speaker 1: Okay. This is not the mailbox that is we write your mom.
Speaker 12: She's got gloves on.
Speaker 10: She's got gloves
Speaker 3: on. And what does she do with
Speaker 1: the gloves? Oopsie Daisy. Hang on.
Speaker 12: She walks Straight past that Canada and Steve.
Speaker 3: You're gonna
Speaker 1: show that again. It's hilarious. So let her look. She just walks in.
Speaker 12: So this is not the 1st time she's died. No.
Speaker 8: So that one was in Georgia. Is that right?
Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 8: So in Georgia, it is illegal to turn in anyone but yourself or your family members valid. It is illegal. So forget the outcome that's an illegal practice what you just saw.
Speaker 13: That's right.
Speaker 1: Video number 2. Dog guy. This is called dog guy.
Speaker 8: Taking pictures.
Speaker 11: Why would you do that?
Speaker 1: So you're paying paint? That's business.
Speaker 6: This is business.
Speaker 11: What do you what do you suspect if if you had actually Call off this person at that moment. Hand me those ballots.
Speaker 1: And the
Speaker 11: person did. What do you think you would see? Whose name is on In in your opinion?
Speaker 10: Ineligible voters, people that have moved.
Speaker 11: Would you see legitimate ballots?
Speaker 1: There's an ambiguity in what you're saying. The ballot itself is legitimate. That I Right. It's not a it's not
Speaker 11: a fake paper. Right. Okay.
Speaker 6: But, again, remember, when you mail in a ballot, you have a security envelope With the signature verification standard that's been all but washed away. And as soon as it's taken out of that envelope, then you then you have a disconnect and the ballot
Speaker 12: is fried. Sheet of paper.
Speaker 6: The ballots
Speaker 12: The ID is on the envelope on the outside.
Speaker 6: This is an example of multiple ballots. So 9:57 a. M.
Speaker 11: Prime voting time. Gotta keep the line.
Speaker 6: This person comes up and what you're gonna see is, when you try to put too many ballots in.
Speaker 1: He needs a shoehorn.
Speaker 6: And we have lots of those where they're just jamming them in and then they fall on the ground. And when you can jam them
Speaker 4: Well, I
Speaker 11: mean this alone is To say the least suggestive, who's voting at 3:57 AM with a whole bunch of ballots?
Speaker 10: And and then being able to match that Ping where he's standing there to the next place he goes.
Speaker 1: So we're seeing videos of 1. Right. But each one of these you know Went to On average, probably real time.
Speaker 7: Same guy going different places?
Speaker 6: Yes. Right. This is their pattern of life. So in 1 night, this person, this mule went across six Counties to 27 different drop boxes. Five different organizations.
In one in one
Speaker 8: getting the ballots from the organization. Correct.
Speaker 7: The Republicans had no idea this was going on during the election.
Speaker 8: Trump to his credit tweeted out in July, mail in ballots are Faster. We have and he was attacked so hard by Kemp
Speaker 7: and Ducey and so many But that was he didn't have this information, obviously. He didn't say no.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Ends up being right.
Speaker 1: This is the tip of the iceberg. You're talking about extraordinary criminal activity, but there's a ton more, you would guess, that you have not even
Speaker 12: You are talking about 200,000, 300,000 ballots that were just harvested in only the your geolocated locations. But you are talking, what, 5% of America? Less.
Speaker 11: Less than 5%. Okay. So case closed. Sorry, gentlemen lady. Case Close.
Alright. So I do a heroic thing that not necessarily others here do. I read the New York Times every day.
Speaker 3: That's crazy.
Speaker 11: Well, sorry. It's my martyrdom. They claim all of these places we have found maybe 4, Maybe 50 phony ballots.
Speaker 6: These aren't phony ballots. Right.
Speaker 1: No. It's just We're we're we're we're we're we're longer.
Speaker 11: Wait. They're phony names.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. No. No.
Speaker 12: There's no name on the ballot, Dennis. Okay.
Speaker 11: Let's say we got access to every single ballot thrown into the ballot boxes. Would we be able to prove this is a fraud?
Speaker 12: It's the perfect crime because it cannot be curated after is committed Because the evidence has no connection to the person who is meant to be voting. That's the problem. As soon as it gets taken out
Speaker 11: of the envelope, the identity We're going to So the vote from John Doe is from a John Doe who is dead or a John Doe who has moved. Is that true?
Speaker 12: Or vote it somewhere else.
Speaker 11: Or voting so why is that not provable?
Speaker 1: There's an easy way to bust it but it's not the way you think. It's not to go find the ballots in the ballot mix. You can't do that. The way to find it is these guys have the cell phone identification of all the mules. All of them.
So law enforcement has to step in at this point and their next Duh.
Speaker 12: What were you doing? 7 times a day?
Speaker 1: Go go and interview the mules. Who paid you? Right. Where'd you get the money?
Speaker 11: Will any state's law enforcement do this?
Speaker 1: This is a big question. The mules aren't gonna fess up. They don't they know they're participating in something that is
Speaker 7: Well, you've got you've got them on videotape. You've got 2,000 people who are committing felonies. Right.
Speaker 1: I'd like you to just reflect about what you've learned today and how you're feeling and thinking about it. It's just Sickening to me.
Speaker 11: This is jaw dropping. What you showed is frightening.
Speaker 7: Republicans had no clue this was going on.
Speaker 1: I wondered whether any Republicans who did know. Investigative journalist Heather Mullins interviews a whistleblower hired by the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Speaker 14: I was hired by the NRSC. My job, it was basically to watch the ballot boxes. And this was for the early voting in Georgia. So with that started on December 14th and ended on the thirty 1st December, and we would monitor that box from 8 to 8 all day long. So consequently, during those 2 2 weeks, I monitored those boxes indiscriminately.
I would move around to the different areas of the boxes and watch them 30 minutes here, an hour there. And then I would start to see things where I see people walking up with, backpacks and they were uploading large numbers of ballots, stuff from the box. Recorded some of that and took pictures of it and dates and times and those things. I spotted a place from Texas, Colorado, South Carolina and North Carolina. And I just thought that was odd that all these states were coming in.
And these people would get out, and I'd watch them get out, and they'd go up to the ballot and Stuff about it in your ballot box. I thought that was kinda odd. So, you know, we took pictures of those things when we took pictures, recorded license plates and those things. And then, I uploaded his photographs to a Dropbox. Then when it came to the, the Georgia runoff, the actual day of the election, So January 5th, I was up there.
It was early in the morning. Now there were safety Abrams people all along the sidewalk up Sure.
Speaker 9: How did you know that they were taking it was it was people though?
Speaker 14: Well, they had those mask on that said vote. Okay. She has one of those thing they had this was during COVID. Right? Mhmm.
They were part of that initiative. I knew that she's part of that initiative that she had going on about get out the vote kind of thing. So it was democratic Party and it was a group of people that were, you know, they're all interacting with each other. And then the local, democratic party Chairman was there also about 6:30 that evening. We noticed, there was a a a couple, a female couple.
These 2 ladies had run off and they have big stack of ballots. And, we were standing there and they tried to shove ballots in there. Looked at them. We're taking pictures, and the other gentleman took some video and everything. And, she turned around and looked at us, and she said, what are you doing?
And I said, well, We're taking a picture and she said well you can't do that and I said yes I can and she got mad and she ran off the sidewalk and left.
Speaker 9: So you're saying the NRSC was made aware that there were people stuffing drop boxes at specific dates in time? Yes. So with what you witnessed during your time watching these Dropbox, do you believe that that was enough for law enforcement To get
Speaker 14: involved. Oh, definitely. But after several weeks no contact or anything and, you know, I just
Speaker 9: No. No. So you're saying though if if somebody had Contacted you, you would be willing to testify to these things and and give those depositions under oath.
Speaker 14: I would have had to. Yep.
Speaker 9: Catherine, hey. Greg just interviewed an informant in Arizona who's now cooperating Oh,
Speaker 3: wow. Okay.
Speaker 9: Check your email.
Speaker 1: Okay. Awesome. I'll do it. Thanks so much. Okay.
Bye. Hey, honey.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Take a look at this. So this is, I remember Greg was, going to interview that mule and, so we got the video. Thank Thank you, Gabriel. Guess they're concealing our identity.
Speaker 3: So what what was your what was your job? Like what what what what were you doing? Receptionist. So at some point, you were asked or or sort of instructed, I guess, to start receiving people's ballots? I was just instructed, to go ahead and receive ballots from various people, Females mostly.
And, and on Friday, they would come and pick up, payment. But I assumed it was payments for what they were doing. So they would during the week, they would bring them in
Speaker 10: At various times and then you would pay them, like, all on a Friday.
Speaker 3: Is that kinda how it went? Yes. And then I would get a call, to find out how many ballots were brought in and if they were already prefilled out first. And she would come to the office, look at them, and then before she left, she would either take them herself. But other times, she would, ask me if I could Drop them off at the library.
So what was the instructions? Just to drop them off. In the drop box? In the drop box. The early ballots.
Can you give me an an idea of how many you personally put in the box? Hundreds? Shut up, Ben. Yes. And was there a reason they wanted you she wanted you to go to that drop box as opposed to maybe city hall or There's There's no cameras there.
And she would want me to take it in the evening when it was dark also. Do you think this is widespread in Yuba County or elsewhere? I would say that. So do You think that people you know, incidentally, they believe that their vote matters? I don't think they know the meaning of What voting is?
Do you personally think that the elections in the center of the east are free and fair?
Speaker 12: No.
Speaker 3: They're fixed. They've been fixed. They already know, seriously, who is gonna win the next election before it It happens. How do you think this affects the community, especially the Hispanic community? Because it seems like they're preying on minorities.
They're an easy target because most of the Hispanic that live in the town, are not well educated as far as the law. They look at it mostly as, oh, she's trying to help us because we're older, because She's having someone come and pick it up at my house because I don't drive. Most of them maybe I would say honestly, 90% of the elderly that live in Some ways don't drive or have relatives that are willing to drive up to do this to go to the boarding polls. Back when I first moved into the city of Saint Louis, I did have somebody come and knock on my door and ask for my ballot. And it was somebody I knew and that I had known for many years since I was a child.
And up to this day, that person does not talk to me because I said there was no way I was giving them my ballot.
Speaker 9: What a brave woman to do this. Totally.
Speaker 3: I call it the Mexican mafia, seriously. Because they they work like that. It seems like we need to do a better job of maybe educating folks or or Helping people understand that this stuff's not okay. I offered a long time ago. But, Again, because you're gonna hang up in the trash can in pieces.
What do you think it's gonna take to get the This tragedy to stop for people to get caught and to pay the price.
Speaker 9: Wow. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: We know that the mules got their stashes of ballots from these activist organizations. But where did the activist organizations get the ballots from? Hans von Spakovsky He is a former member of the Federal Election Commission, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and coauthor of the book, Are Broken Elections.
Speaker 4: I will say election fraud is bipartisan but most of the cases I see are unfortunately a Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Hans, you just watched a mule kind of fessing up about participating in this trafficking operation. Is this kind of a mule operation something familiar to you?
Speaker 4: But unfortunately this is so common in some parts of America particularly the Hispanic community But they have a special name there. There they call them Politicheroes. And these are individuals who are paid by campaigns or political parties To go into neighborhoods and collect absentee ballots to pressure and coerce voters.
Speaker 1: People who observe election fraud have commented that absentee ballot fraud or mail ballot fraud is The easiest and the most common type of election fraud. Why is that?
Speaker 4: Well, because they're the only kind of ballot that is voted Outside the supervision of election officials and outside the observation of poll watchers. Transparency as you know It's very important in the election process and there's no one there at a happening also remember when you're in a polling place You fill out your ballot and you then deposit it directly into the ballot box That obviously is not what happens with absentee ballots.
Speaker 1: There are some states, I believe about half of them, about 27 states, that allow voter harvesting. And by voter harvesting what we mean is that you are allowed to give your ballot to someone else
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 1: And ask them to deliver it. Now are there any states in which you're allowed to pay mules to deliver ballots to drop boxes?
Speaker 4: No. You're not supposed to be Doing that and allowing boat trafficking to begin with is a huge mistake because you're giving third party strangers, you know, Candidates, campaign staffers, party activists, all people who have a stake in the outcome of the election, You're giving them the ability to handle something very valuable, a ballot.
Speaker 9: Voter fraud is almost in in
Speaker 6: fact, you'll be rare in the United States.
Speaker 9: Does it ever happen? Okay. Occasionally, it does happen. But it doesn't happen on a national scale.
Speaker 3: It doesn't affect the outcome.
Speaker 9: It would affect the outcome.
Speaker 1: I read these days constantly that election fraud well, it could occur but those cases are extremely rare. They're so Besotic. They don't have the ability to tip an election. Is that true?
Speaker 4: Fraud happens often enough that Elections get overturned. I mean just go back 3 years to 2018 and a congressional race was overturned. I can cite to you another case in Mississippi. It was just overturned by a court because of fraud. Same thing in Florida.
Speaker 10: But look, that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Speaker 1: Now we've shown that you've got these mules who are picking up these ballots at various boat stash houses. Hans, where do these organizations Balance.
Speaker 4: Well, to quote Shakespeare, let me count the ways. You know, everything from filling out absentee ballot request forms for voters but having the ballot sent to them to actually going to the voters And obtaining the ballots from them to stealing them out of mailboxes to actually using high quality photocopy machines to make Their own balance. Look, these cases unfortunately go on all the time. You can go to 2018 which wasn't that long ago in North Carolina.
Speaker 9: Leslie Lee McCray Dallas is accused of mishandling absentee ballots in North Carolina's 9th district. Dallas would frequently obtain this report from On the board of elections looking for the date an absentee ballot was mailed and if it had been returned.
Speaker 1: Ginger Eason, who first told me
Speaker 2: she was hired to pick up ballots And Kelly Hendricks who testified she did the same thing.
Speaker 1: What would you do with the ballots after you pick them up?
Speaker 13: Take them straight to the office in Dublin and hand them over to the McCray. I don't know what happened to him after I know there was facts of them on his desk.
Speaker 4: There was testimony in the case that his staffers were falsely signing as witnesses On those absentee ballots because he had done this before he actually apparently had signatures of voters from prior elections in his offices. Voter rolls are in notoriously bad shape. States do a very bad job of taking people off who are no longer eligible because they've die or moved away and it's very easy to get hold of a state voter registration list So, you know, somebody's on the list and they haven't voted in 10 years, you're probably pretty safe in trying to cast a ballot on their behalf on their behalf. Remember in states that made the mistake of simply mailing out a absentee ballot to every single registered voter. Well if you're a fraudster and you get hold of that absentee ballot you've got 90% of the information you need to fill it out because the name's gonna be on the Outer envelope and their registered address.
Speaker 1: Let's follow the track of these mail out ballots, right? Let's just say you got students on a campus, They've voted but then they graduate and obviously they move to a different state. If they're on the voter rolls, is it not a fact mail ballots will be arriving in the dorms and arriving in and and so presumably they're not gonna be that hard to scoop up if somebody knows how where to where to look form.
Speaker 4: No. That's exactly right. And, you know, I work in the District of Columbia. They mailed out absentee ballots, to all of their Registered voters and I can't tell you how many phone calls I got from people that I know saying that not only had their ballot arrived in the mail but 5, 6, 7 ballots all coming into their apartment for people who used to live there.
Speaker 1: Now a former Supreme Court justice In Wisconsin named Gableman has done it for a preliminary report. He talks about the fact that there are approximately 90 Thousand people in Wisconsin who are in resident care facilities or nursing homes. So she's, basically Not capable any longer of even remaining awake for more than a
Speaker 4: few minutes. And so are you surprised that she Those in February 2021? Absolutely.
Speaker 1: But I was surprised to hear that she voted in the last presidential election.
Speaker 6: Much to my surprise, she had voted for the last off and on for the last 10 years. I guess in my mind, I thought if you put your parent into a facility because they were incapacitated, And they would not even be offered, the vote. They make you vote.
Speaker 10: They make you vote here? And And, so how do
Speaker 8: they make you vote?
Speaker 4: Because I
Speaker 6: didn't wanna vote and they told me I had to.
Speaker 4: That is a real problem. Clearly was a problem in Wisconsin 2020, but unfortunately, that's a perennial problem in other states too. What happens is you have staff In those nursing homes, sometimes they are activists politically. They get these individuals registered to vote or if already register To vote, they will request absentee ballots in their names, sometimes forging their signatures and then filling out the ballots for them. Just Prior to the 2020 election, the state of Texas then died a social worker in a home for young people who were basically mentally incompetent.
She had sent in over a 100 voter registrations for these individuals who were not legally competent Vote.
Speaker 1: What about homeless shelters?
Speaker 4: Look, if a homeless individual is mentally capable, they ought to be able to vote. And if the only place they can list is registered address the homeless shelter that's fine. But the problem there is that it's very easy I think for them to be intimidated They didn't coerce in Chicago. The largest election fraud case the US Justice Department ever prosecuted. They were paying homeless Individuals to cast ballots the way they wanted them to cast ballots.
Speaker 1: What made you want to do this? What made you wanna get involved?
Speaker 13: Well, and I knew election stuff was supposed to be something good to do. And then, plus, I need
Speaker 3: a little extra money to get Christmas for
Speaker 13: my son. So that's why main reason I did that.
Speaker 4: Who do these fraudsters pick on? They pick on the most vulnerable in our society. They go into poor neighborhoods. They pick on the elderly. They pick on people for whom English is not their first language.
When we're trying to stop election fraud, we're actually trying to protect,
Speaker 1: We now know where the ballots could have come from, but to pull off a heist like this on a national scale would take deep Pockets. I wanted to find out where the money might have come from. Who could have funded the heist? I met with Scott Walter, an old colleague of mine at the American Enterprise Institute, who is now head of the Capital Research Center. This is an organization that has produced Multiple reports on the funding of elections.
Speaker 2: People think of 3 rivers of money, really, that empty into the Gulf of elections. The hard dollars to you write a check to a candidate. The 2nd year is soft money or dark money. And then there's a 3rd river That people tend to neglect but capital research centers studied intently and that is the 501 C3 nonprofit money. The kind of charity that you get to take a tax deduction for.
That river is enormous. In the 2018 cycle, about $21,000,000,000. Now what do the IRS regulations say about the involvement of these nonprofits? By law, these nonprofit charities Are forbidden to directly intervene in elections in any way or to help a particular party or candidate. The IRS is in Fatic that you cannot intend or even have the effect of helping 1 party or candidate over the other.
Speaker 1: Now let's talk about some of the Key elements of this particular network that we're focusing on we have we have drop boxes. And those drop boxes are, Most people would think funded entirely by the states. In other words, the drop boxes in Georgia are funded by the state of Georgia. But that's not entirely the case, is it?
Speaker 2: In the 2020 election, there was an unprecedented 100 of millions of private dollars going into government election offices. The 470,000,000 or so dollars were sent by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife.
Speaker 8: We did our Part to secure the integrity of the election.
Speaker 2: There were a few other places that put in much smaller amounts. One entity that put in $25,000,000 Was again a non profit that's part of the Arabella Advisors which as a total empire in 2020 Took in $1,700,000,000.
Speaker 1: Is there any evidence that this operation had a partisan thrust or a partisan character?
Speaker 2: As we all know, big money rarely comes without strings attached. One of the big ones is lots and lots of drop boxes. Also lots and lots of vote by mail. To get your nice big checks, you had to do things like have drop boxes, Encourage vote by mail. Have ads in foreign languages.
All kinds of things that little by little are nudging The turnout for one particular political party. In addition to the 470 or so $1,000,000 that went into the Zuckerberg operation, We also had in 2020 a $120,000,000 project very secretive called the voter registration project. Check. The 120,000,000, it came from Soros' foundation. It came from Visa's foundation.
It came from Warren Buffett's foundation. It came from unions like the SEIU. The Voter Registration Project has as its goal increasing in the 8 target states Over 2,000,000 voters who are overwhelmingly expected to vote for
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. And so the states that we're talking about here are Arizona? Yes. Georgia? Yes.
North Carolina? Yes. Any others? Nevada? New Mexico?
Here we've got an operation of illegal vote trafficking. You've Thousands of mules are being paid to do this. What you're saying is there is more than enough money available to fund any such operation. In Act. This would be only one part of a much larger, effort to control the election.
Speaker 2: We are Half a $1,000,000,000 in non profit charitable funds flowing into efforts to register Sure. And get out the vote for Democrats. Most of the left wing mainstream media when they reported on the Zuck Bucks going through, They said they made it sound like, oh, it's all gonna go for masks and, you know, plexiglass and all. And every study that's ever been done of some of those grants for the big cities found A few percent maybe going to help people that way and the massive amounts of money going into ginning up The vote by mail operation and the drop box operation and those sorts of things that benefit 1 political party.
Speaker 1: How confident should we be that this will be a fair election? They're sending millions of ballots all over the country. This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen. Trump predicted. He said the Democrats are going to cheat, that they're going to use the pretext of COVID, they're going to Rig the rules in their favor.
Nevertheless, Republicans focus their efforts on the campaign while Democrats Focus their efforts on the process of actually running the election.
Speaker 2: The two sides don't approach elections in the same way. The Democrats, They understand that the rules, the process by which elections are conducted is just critical.
Speaker 1: We must now face the chilling reality. The Democrats conceived the heist. They funded it. They organized it. Then they Carried it out.
They rigged and stole the 2020 presidential election. We cannot be okay with this. We cannot simply move on. Guys, I'd like to have your honest assessment On what you've seen, what you've heard, and what we can reasonably draw from it.
Speaker 12: What do we have empirically? We have data geolocated. We have footage of people harvesting ballots. Do we know who those ballots were for? We can't know who they were for.
However,
Speaker 11: you have
Speaker 12: to inject Common sense. Are we saying that in the centers of Democrat held districts, we are seeing Hundreds and hundreds of visits to drop boxes with pro Trump ballots. It beggars belief. Ballot laundry
Speaker 8: Looks pretty convincing to me. We don't go I don't think we'll ever know the full story. And what makes this crime so compelling and unique Is that once the ballot enters the system, it's really hard to reverse engineer it. But when you have the cell phone geolocation data and then the actual footage All of them doing what you expect them to be doing. Taking pictures of the ballots, taking gloves off, visiting multiple times.
I mean, it seems pretty clear to me and it explains The sudden spike in Biden's support that we saw late at night kind of instinct that people had. The control of the US Senate Went through George with Chuck Schumer's majority leader probably because of what we just saw.
Speaker 11: And then Mike then to answer the mules, if they say it's clean, Then then be honest and say, okay. You have
Speaker 8: 2 ways they try they'll try to invalidate it. 1 is minimizing and then slander. Yep. Right. So they'll try to slander Dinesh personally.
They'll say, oh, Trump pardoned him or whatever. Therefore he's trying to get back to Trump to try to reinforce the big lie. I could already see the headline in the Washington Post. Trump pardoned A lie comes out with questionable movie.
Speaker 14: I predict right now they
Speaker 12: will say, what on earth is a conservative doing tracking Private citizens. Gee, how dare what is the next decision doing to voters at 3 AM? In fact, I mean, that That'll be positive. Intimidation
Speaker 1: will be the word. The word
Speaker 8: will be intimidation. They'll say no person is safe, communities of color are being tracked, people like in black neighborhoods are now gonna The fear for their life that their cell phone pings will be paired and this is this is Jim Crow 2.0, Jim. Good afternoon.
Speaker 7: I disagree that this is not gonna be compelling enough. This is a smoking gun. This is OJ Simpson being seen leaving the scene of the crime. I don't care how partisan you are. You can't dismiss all of this.
How do you explain somebody going to a whole bunch of different drop boxes with a whole bunch of different ballots on the same night at 3:57 AM in the morning? How do you explain that? That alone. I'm sorry. I think a whole bunch of people in this country are gonna go, oh my god.
Speaker 3: I think
Speaker 11: that if every American saw that, I think I think it would it would move the needle. However, their ability to keep their side ignorant is is total. That's gonna be impossible
Speaker 7: to keep a lid on this thing.
Speaker 8: Well, this movie is an Overton window moment. Right? So documentaries can do this every once in a while. Michael Moore did it. He moved the Overton window on many different topics 20 years ago.
Al Gore did it Climate change it all happens as Ernest Hemingway said gradually and then suddenly because it's not just how many people are gonna watch this film it's who's gonna watch it. It's gonna be Lawmakers. It's gonna be people that work for the bureau. It's gonna be someone somewhere with a conscience that has power and to say this is the problem.
Speaker 7: It can't be dismissed. And the other business
Speaker 11: They have ruined election day in the United States of America. That's provable. And that's enough for me to fight the left With every fiber in my body.
Speaker 1: Without free and fair elections, we are not a democracy. We are a nation run by a criminal cartel masquerading as a democracy. Never in US history has a presidential election been as thoroughly corrupted by coordinated fraud across multiple states as we now know Took place in 2020. Today, totalitarian regimes camouflage the fake elections With appearance of democracy, but they're not real democracies. We don't wanna join them.
Our elections must represent the will of American citizens. We who believe in constitutional democracy must Be diligent. If we give up, they win. In fact, if enough of us give up, they won't need to cheat anymore. Don't stay home.
Get involved. Get out and vote. Do what is necessary to save this great country. The America we love needs us now more than ever.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Mug shot for Mark Meadows. His primary role in the “conspiracy” was to seek the phone numbers of legislators on behalf of President Trump. This is how insane the political targeting has gotten!
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
What does the left's 'lawfare' strategy against Trump and his associates really amount to? Here's why this strategy should scare all Americans.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Left's strategy of lawfare is using the law as a weapon to destroy people politically. It imposes exorbitant costs, gets people fired, and even locked up. Trump is a target of this strategy, facing four indictments with infinite resources against him. Other defendants in the Georgia case are also targeted. Lawyers who provide advice to Trump are having difficulty finding representation. Historically, defendants in criminal cases have always had the right to good counsel, regardless of their crimes. But now, it seems that Trump's lawyers are being treated worse than even serial killers or accused terrorists. If Republicans don't fight back, lawfare will become a common weapon against everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to talk about the Left strategy of law fair. Now, that's a term you may or may not be familiar with, but it's using the law as a political or ideological weapon, using the law as almost a form of terrorism against people to destroy them, to impose exorbitant costs on them, to get them fired from their jobs or torpedoed in their career, in some cases even to get them locked up. Now it's been known for a long time that the law can be used or abused in this way. I mean, think, for example, if you have a guy who has a lot of money and he decides to sue you over some petty infraction. The infraction itself is not important, but by suing you, he's able to deploy tremendous resources, which you don't have, and yet you can't go show up and just represent yourself in court.
So now it's a financial burden on you and people are like, well, listen, I'm going to have to put a mortgage on my house. So suddenly the, the resources that you've accumulated over a lifetime become jeopardized because you're involved in this kind of catastrophic litigation. Many people in divorce cases find them to be financially crippling in this way. But here I'm talking about the deployment of lawfare in politics. Now, it's being used against Trump.
And leaving aside the idea that they don't want Trump to run again, think of the exorbitant costs that are being imposed on Trump having to defend not 1, not 2, but 4 highly, targeted indictments. There are indictments in which the other side has near infinite resources. Think of all the lawyers, for example, in New York, plus the lawyers in Georgia, plus the whole Jack Smith team, plus the resources available to him from the Biden DOJ all going after 1 man who has to then defend himself. He requires almost an army of lawyers just to be able to stay on top of all the different filing requirements and so on. And then I'm thinking also about the other people in the Georgia case who have been indicted.
I believe some 18 of them. I've had Jenna Ellis on the podcast. I've also been in communication with David Schaeffer, who's the former GOP chair in Georgia. Yesterday I put out, I shared ways in which, on my social media ways to contribute to David Schafer's legal defense. And I feel the same about all these defendants that they need good representation.
They need to be able to strike back and Republicans in general need to be striking back against this lawfare. Because, think about it, they're going after attorneys for providing advice to their client, in this case, Trump or the Trump campaign, And these attorneys themselves are having difficulty finding lawyers to represent them. Now, Jenna, I'm happy to say, has a good lawyer. I think some of the others do also. But, Rudy Giuliani, for example, has had difficulty finding lawyers to represent him in efforts to get him a disbarred in efforts to go after him and he's facing multiple lawsuits, lawsuits quite apart from the Georgia indictment.
Now this is a little unprecedented because historically in America, it's been widely understood that defendants in criminal cases need good counsel. And many times we've had very prominent lawyers, F. Lee Bailey and many others, representing clients who are reprehensible, civil. Clients who are serial killers. Clients who are accused of doing horrific things.
But the idea is, guess what? It doesn't matter if you're Charles Manson. You deserve a defense. So think, for example, about the lawyers who went south to take on the Jim Crow laws. Think about the lawyers who supported this is the ACLU supporting the rights of the Nazis to march in Skokie.
The ACLU's position was, listen, we're not Nazis. In fact, we, we couldn't be more opposed to who these Nazis are. But Nazis too have First Amendment rights and so we will defend them on that principle and the ACLU was successful in doing that. Successful in doing that. Think about the lawyers who represented communists in the 19 fifties and forties, who were accused of stealing atomic secrets, selling them to the Soviet Union, being communist spies inside the U.
S. Government. Nevertheless, groups like the ACL and others were like, listen, it doesn't matter because, these people are, they have the rights of citizens. They have the same rights under the execution that you and I do. And so, due process requires a competent defense.
Think, for example, about Timothy McVeigh. He had a lawyer. Think about the Sheikh, the blind Sheikh, who did the original Twin Towers bombing. Think about the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. Many of them have top ranked law firms in the United States who are representing them and this may be one of the reasons why some of these guys, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others, have not been executed.
They've been shielded, various procedural defenses, multiple appeals have been launched on their behalf. And all of this is now missing from, let's say, the Trump defendants. It's as if all these same people who are really happy to defend the communist spies and the people at Gitmo and the accused serial killers now say no, almost as if these Trump lawyers are even worse than that. So it's like, no, you've now reached our limit. We can't defend you.
So this is a terrible thing that's happening in our society. It's being driven by the left. I think if Republicans don't strike back here, it's going to get worse. Lawfare is going to become almost an ideological, a common ideological weapon used not just against Trump, not just against the Trump campaign people in Georgia, but also against you also against me. Guys, Mike Lindell has a passion to help you get the best sleep of your life.
He didn't stop at the pillow. He also created the Giza Dream bedsheets. These sheets look and feel great, which means an even better night's sleep, which is crucial for our overall health. Mike found the world's best cotton called Giza. It's ultra soft and breathable, but also extremely durable.
Mike's latest deal is the sale of the year. For a limited time, you get 50% off the Giza Dreamsheets, marking prices down as low as 29.98 depending on the size. Go to mypillow.com and our promo code Dinesh. There you will find not only this amazing offer, but deep discounts on all the My Pillow products, the robes, the mattress topper, the slippers, the My Pillow kitchen towel sets and so on. Go to mypillow.com, use promo code Dinesh, or call the number 800-876-0227.
The number again, 800-876-0227. Or just go to mypillow dot com. Make sure to use the promo code, d I n e s h, Dinesh.
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Both the Special Counsel second indictment and the Georgia indictment hinge on the premise the 2020 election wasn’t rigged and stolen? What if it was? I’m going to post “2000 Mules” free on X for one weekend, September 8-10, so everyone can watch and make up their own minds
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
WATCH: Calls For Ilhan Omar's Removal From Congress Mount After 'Racist,' 'Disgusting' Comments About White Men Resurface
WATCH: Calls For Ilhan Omar’s Removal From Congress Mount After
‘Racist,’ ‘Disgusting’ Comments About White Men Resurface
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has been heavily criticized by
members of the conservative media and Republican colleagues alike
after making remarks during an interview with Al
Jazeera described as the “racist’ and “disgusting” targeting of
white men.
dcenquirer.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
.@RandPaul Announces 'Official Criminal Referral' Against Antony Fauci Following Explosive New Evidence
Rand Paul Announces ‘Official Criminal Referral’ Against Antony
Fauci Following Explosive New Evidence
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) made the massive announcement that he filed
an “official criminal referral” to the Department of Justice
directed at the former Director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor
to the President Dr. Antony Fauci.
dcenquirer.com
@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza
Obama official goes rogue, gives Republicans exactly what they needed! https://conservativebrief.com/obama-official-73594/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD
'Biden Is A Criminal': Ex-Obama Staffer FLIPS - Reveals Biden 'Kickback Scheme' After Hunter Was Given a Seat On Burisma
The Biden crime family caught.
conservativebrief.com