reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DisrespectedThe

Saved - March 29, 2026 at 6:36 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This was an attack on the lower and the middle class. Treason! https://t.co/kz8bOGpojt

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2009, the government destroyed the used car market through the program known as cash for clunkers, which offered drivers up to $4,500 to trade in older vehicles for new, more fuel-efficient ones. It was sold as good for the economy and good for the environment. The program led to a dramatic increase in showroom traffic at local car dealers. What it actually did was carry out a government-mandated destruction of some of the most reliable, easy-to-repair vehicles Americans still had on the road. If a car qualified, the dealership couldn't resell it. The engine had to be intentionally destroyed, so mechanics were made to fill their engines with sodium silicate, liquid glass, and run them until they seized for good. Nearly 700,000 vehicles were wiped out, and a lot of them weren't junk. They were older cars and trucks that could last for decades, be fixed in a driveway, and kept running without software, screens, sensors, or thousand-dollar repair bills. Then they were replaced by newer vehicles that cost more, brake more easily, and push ordinary people back to the dealer for repair bills. Cash for Clunkers was sold as progress, but to a lot of Americans, it looked more like the deliberate destruction of cheap, dependable transportation. The cars they killed were simple, durable, and paid off, which may be exactly why they had to go.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the 2009, the government destroyed the used car market. In the program known as cash for clunkers, the government offered drivers up to $4,500 to trade in older vehicles for new, more fuel efficient ones. It was sold as good for the economy and good for the environment. We're already seeing a dramatic increase in showroom traffic at local car dealers. What it actually did was carry out a government mandated destruction of some of the most reliable, easy to repair vehicles Americans still had on the road. If a car qualified, the dealership couldn't resell it. The engine had to be intentionally destroyed. So mechanics were made to fill their engines with sodium silicate, liquid glass, and run them until they seized for good. Nearly 700,000 vehicles were wiped out, and a lot of them weren't junk. They were older cars and trucks that could last for decades, be fixed in a driveway, and kept running without software, screens, sensors, or thousand dollar repair bills. Then they were replaced by newer vehicles that cost more, brake more easily, and push ordinary people back to the dealer for repair bills. Cash for clunkers was sold as progress, but to a lot of Americans, it looked more like the deliberate destruction of cheap, depend able transportation. The cars they killed were simple, durable, and paid off, which may be exactly why they had to go.
Saved - March 21, 2026 at 8:38 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This TikTok account was banned after posting this. https://t.co/EViXsLkDbD

Video Transcript AI Summary
frazzled drip is a video that was on Anthony Weiner's laptop in a folder on his desktop titled "insurance." The laptop was taken during an investigation into Anthony Weiner, and the video in question was in that folder. The video depicts a woman who is the same height, build, haircut, facial features, and attire as Hillary Clinton. There is a second woman who fits the same description to Huma Aberdeen, which was Anthony Weiner's wife. In the video, which appears to be the basement of Comet Pizza in Washington DC, both of the females are shown laying different children on top of ping pong tables in the basement, molesting those children, frightening those children with weapons, and then drinking something, which would line up with the theory that it is the blood of those children for purposes of extracting adrenocryl.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you, report on an episode, called frazzled drip? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And, is frazzled drip, something about cutting off the faces of children under a pizza parlor, or what is it? Can you tell me what frazzle drip is, Phil? Speaker 1: Yeah. Drazil drip is a video that was on Anthony Weiner's laptop in a folder on his desktop titled insurance. And the laptop in question was taken during a investigation into Anthony Weiner. And the video in question, frazzledrip, was in that folder. And video depicts a woman who is the same height, build, haircut, facial features, and attire as Hillary Clinton. And there is a second woman who fits the same description to Huma Aberdeen, which was Anthony Weiner's wife. And in the video, which looks like the basement of Comet Pizza in Washington DC, it shows both of the females in the video laying different children on top of ping pong tables, which are in the basement, molesting those children, frightening those children with weapons, and then drinking something, which would line up with the theory that it is the blood of those children for purposes of extracting adrenocryl. Thus.
Saved - November 25, 2025 at 7:55 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Is anything real anymore? https://t.co/Hia2253pFo

Video Transcript AI Summary
A breakthrough in lab-grown meat is showcased by an Israeli tech company, where a piece of meat has been printed in three dimensions. The process begins with stem cells taken from a cow, which are then cultured in a laboratory setting. These cells are fed a specialized nutrient solution that supports rapid multiplication. Once there are enough cells, they are ready to be three-dimensionally printed. A computer oversees the entire operation, determining not only the shape of the meat but also the distribution of fat and muscle. The engineers have already produced a steak through this method. Although not yet ready to eat, the meat is described as alive in a sense: under a microscope, tiny muscle fibers can be observed moving. The timeline suggests that in about a month, this lab-grown steak could be prepared, cooked, and served on a dinner table. In comparison to traditional methods, Wagyu beef, which can require years to produce, is implied to be vastly slower and more expensive. The three-dimensional printing technology could reduce the production time dramatically, stating that the process now takes only a few minutes. When fully prepared and served, the expectation is that the synthetic product could be indistinguishable from real meat, with no noticeable difference in taste or texture mentioned beyond the assertion that it would appear the same as conventional meat. However, the current reality is that this technology remains extremely expensive, so it is not something that consumers will encounter in stores in the immediate future. The message ends with a direct question to the audience: what about you—would you try it?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you believe it? This piece of meat was actually printed in three d. It looks, feels, and even tastes like real beef. An Israeli tech company made this amazing discovery, and the process is as fascinating as the result. They start start by taking stem cells from a cow and growing them in a lab. These cells are fed a special nutrient solution, which helps them multiply quickly. Once there are enough cells, they're ready to be three d printed. The cool part? A computer controls everything, even the shape of the meat and how much fat and muscle it has. The engineers have already printed a steak. While it's not ready to eat yet, it's alive in a way. Under a microscope, you can see tiny muscle fibers moving. In just about a month, this lab grown steak could be cooked and served on your dinner table. Normally, it takes years to produce expensive and rare Wagyu beef. But with this three d printing technology, the process only takes a few minutes. When it's fully prepared and served, you wouldn't even notice the difference between this synthetic and the real meat. However, at the moment, this technology is still extremely expensive, so it's not something you'll see in stores anytime soon. But what about you? Would you try it?
Saved - July 30, 2025 at 8:28 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

I've never even heard of this stuff. What in the world? https://t.co/FV3P88fjsF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker warns parents about a disturbing incident. While stopping for gas, a young boy, around 14, asked the speaker to buy him "Feel Free." When the speaker refused, the boy tried to steal their wallet. Inside the gas station, the cashier identified "Feel Free" as a highly addictive drink that customers buy multiple times daily, leading to behaviors resembling crack or heroin addiction. The speaker researched the drink and found people going to rehab for it, despite it being legally sold in gas stations. The speaker is concerned about the easy access to such addictive substances and the lost look on the young boy's face.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. No joking in this video. This is a warning, specifically for parents, but I guess really for anybody. Something truly disturbing just happened to me. I just stopped for gas on my way home. And while I was there, I wanted a beverage. So I went to go inside. So as I'm walking in, I am approached by a child. I mean, this kid, he was maybe 14 years old. And he comes up to me and he says, Hey, can you buy me some feel free? I didn't understand what he was talking about. But I said, do you need food or something? And he said, no, need feel free. And I was like, I'm sorry, no. And this young kid lunged at me and tried to take my wallet out of my hand. I grabbed it really fast and I just went inside. So I go inside, I grab my drink, I go up to the cashier and I was like, hey, just so you know, there's like some kid out there. He was asking me to buy something for him and he like try to grab my wallet and she was just like, oh my gosh, it's this. And she pointed to this little blue bottle on the counter that I've never seen before. Looks like that. And I was like, oh, what's that? Like a five hour energy? And she was like, no. This stuff is so sad. I have people coming in here five, six times a day to get this. It's so addictive. And people lose their minds. People act like like actual crackheads or like they have heroin addictions over this little drink. So I get home and I look into this. People are literally going to rehab over this drink that is legal in most states in the in The US that is sold at gas stations. I mean, it's called feel free, but traps you in addiction. That feels very nefarious. But I don't think that we talk enough about things that are legal, but sold next to gum and energy drinks. And, yeah, this kid was so young, and, like, his face is, like, like, just burned into my memory about how lost he looked. So please be careful.
Saved - July 21, 2025 at 5:28 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

That's one heck of a way to load a horse into a trailer. https://t.co/sQA0yQleIV

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 9:22 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

The transformation of America has been happening right before our eyes. https://t.co/dFlp2is7r7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Private equity firms like Blackstone, Apollo, and Carlyle Group have been buying up mobile home parks across the country. Mobile homes are often not mobile, and residents typically own the home but not the land. Corporations are buying the land beneath the homes, viewing the parks as "cash machines." Once corporations move in, rent increases, maintenance is neglected, and residents are trapped because moving the home is too expensive. Residents face the choice of paying the increased rent or losing everything. This is presented as the way affordable housing is dying in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you think trailer parks are the last affordable option in America, well, Wall Street thought so too. That's why they bought them. Private equity firms and investment giants like Blackstone, Apollo, and Carlyle Crew have been quietly buying up mobile home parks across the country for the past decade. Why? Because they saw what others missed. These aren't just plots for homes. They're cash machines. See, most mobile homes aren't actually mobile. And while the home might be owned by the resident, the land beneath that's not owned by a corporation. And once the corporations move in, rent goes up, maintenance gets ignored, and tenants are trapped because moving their home often costs more than what it's worth. In many cases, residents are left with two options, pay the new rent or lose everything. This is how affordable housing dies in America, not with bulldozers, but with a spreadsheet and a shareholder meeting, and when people have nowhere else to go but the streets.
Saved - July 9, 2025 at 10:46 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Speaking from the grave. https://t.co/wMvF3o9GGa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking, claims Epstein is alive and bragging about faking his death, which she calls "the greatest vanishing act of the century." She alleges the body in the cell was not Epstein, but Hillary Clinton's brother, Tony Rodham. Virginia states that Epstein's blackmail operation was an Israeli intelligence operation, and tapes of prominent figures were sent to Israeli handlers. She claims US officials are being blackmailed or threatened into obedience, with warnings to "obey or end up like JFK." Virginia says she has sent tapes to journalists and urges them to continue pursuing the truth, asserting that those involved are not untouchable if people stand up against them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeffrey's not even hiding it anymore. He brags about it. To the sick freaks who still worship him, says he pulled off the greatest vanishing act of the century, says they'll never catch him now. And you know what? He might be right unless people wake the hell up. My name is Virginia What matters is that I was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. You know who I mean, the billionaire creep who killed himself in that prison, except he didn't. That was all a lie. He's still alive. He's laughing. He's bragging. He's out there doing it again. So how do I know? Because I was in the system. I was trafficked by him for years to the kind of men who appear on magazine covers and look important and shake hands at summits. Here's what actually happened. Jeffrey didn't die in that cell. The body they wheeled out, that wasn't him. That was Hillary Clinton's brother. His name was Tony Rodham. And, yeah, he looked close enough to pass for Jeffrey if you squinted and didn't ask questions. When those tapes drop and they will, people are gonna lose their minds. She knows it. That's why she's doing everything in her power to stop it. She cannot let the truth come out. There's too much at stake, too many reputations, too much power to lose. That's why the feds played along. And the DOJ's top brass, they made the call. Epstein didn't die. He walked out. Right through a service exit, climbed into the back of a government SUV like it was Uber black, driven straight to a private airfield in Jersey. And where did he go? Israel. Why? Because he was working for them the whole damn time. His blackmail operation, his whole setup, it wasn't just about money or perversion. It was intelligence, strategic. And those tapes, they weren't just for his. They were sent straight to Israeli handlers. And now they've got everything, every name, every act, every crime. That's why so many US officials suddenly flip their scripts. It's not ideology. It's fear. They're being blackmailed, or worse, they're being threatened. I've heard the warnings passed around. Obey or end up like JFK. And don't think that's an empty threat. These people have no limits. Kill or be killed, they say. And this is one of several tapes I've sent to trusted journalists. People who still care about truth, who still dare to stand up to power. If you're one of them, thank you. Please don't stop. If you're hearing this, it means the truth is still alive. Keep going. Don't stop. They're not untouchable. Not if we all stand up.
Saved - May 10, 2025 at 3:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Her name is Susan Rosenberg. Bill Clinton pardoned her on his last day in office, and she later became the vice chair for Thousand Currents, which donated to Black Lives Matter. Remember, the truth shall set you free. Have a great day!

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Her name is Susan Rosenberg. She was pardoned by Bill Clinton on his last day in office. She went on to be the vice chair for thousand currents. Thousand currents were responsible for donation money for none other than Black Lives Matter. Have a great day. https://t.co/APbrKVyJRm

Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 7, 1983, a bomb exploded at the US Capitol Building, causing significant damage. Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, identified as radical leftists from the May 19th Communist Organization and The Family (an offshoot of the Black Liberation Army), were convicted. The Black Liberation Army's leader was Mutulu Shakur, stepfather of Tupac Shakur. These groups were responsible for multiple bombings and violent acts, including a Brink's armored truck robbery where a guard and two policemen were killed. Mutulu Shakur was allegedly the mastermind and a shooter, while Rosenberg was a getaway driver. In 1984, Evans and Rosenberg were arrested; Rosenberg was allegedly planning to bomb the US Naval Academy. Evans received a 40-year sentence, and Rosenberg received a 58-year sentence, but both were pardoned by Bill Clinton on his last day in office, January 20, 2001. Rosenberg later worked at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and is now on the board of directors at Thousand Currents, a nonprofit organization, where she does fundraising and administrative work for Black Lives Matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 11/07/1983, a thunderous explosion tore through the Second Story of The US Capitol Building after a bomb went off that was hidden under a bench right outside the chamber. Amazingly, nobody was injured, but the blast did do lots of damage. It was estimated around a million dollars. Speaker 1: The FBI searches for the terrorists who planted a bomb on Capitol Hill. Speaker 2: Look at that. They plant a bomb on Capitol Hill, but no one seems to bring this up. Speaker 1: West senate was in session tonight as the FBI continued its search for the bombers who detonated a powerful explosion just outside the senate chambers in the capital last night. Speaker 0: The two people convicted of the terrorist attack were both women, Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, a pair of radical left commies who bombed The US Capitol in an attempt to assassinate Republican senators. Speaker 2: So when Democrats always told them about their high ground and their their moral high ground and not the side of hate, we don't believe in violence, then what do you call this? Democrats have always been on the side of violence and hate. You got both sides are not innocent, but when I was younger, I really believed that the Democrat party was the side of reason, the side of love and unity, and it's the Republican side. And then when I got old, I realized I was lied to. Speaker 0: These two women, both far left revolutionaries, were part of two separate terrorist groups. One was called m nineteen, the May nineteenth communist organization, and the other was called the family. They were an offshoot of the Black Liberation Army whose leader was, get this, Matula Doc Shakur, the stepfather of hip hop legend Tupac Shakur. Together, they were responsible for a series of violent domestic terror attacks in the late seventies and early eighties that includes bombing campaign that in addition to The US capital I mean, they also targeted government buildings in Washington and New York. They bombed an FBI office, the Washington Navy Yard, and the headquarters of New York's largest police union. Speaker 2: Does that sound familiar? The new day age, they're going around destroying, setting fires on Tesla cars. Speaker 0: So these are two crazy bit with a long history of violent extremism. And when they weren't busy bombing buildings or targeting our police, our military, and our government, they were out there robbing banks and armored trucks. In fact, there was one incident in October 1981 where they killed a guard and two policemen during a Brink's armored truck robbery. These men had families and a future ahead of them, but they were gunned down by radical leftists. Tupac's stepdad, he was the mastermind of the operation. He was also one of the trigger men, and Susan Rosenberg was one of the getaway drivers. Keep in mind that these bank and armored truck robberies were not about getting rich and running away to retire somewhere on the beach. No. In their minds, this was total war. This was war against America. So whatever happened to Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, where are they now? Well, they were finally arrested in 1984. Susan Rosenberg was planning to bomb the US Naval Academy. Wow. Local police and the FBI found hundreds of pounds of explosives and a huge cache of weapons. I mean, they were prepared for an all out war. Speaker 2: Tons of explosives, weapons to destroy property and people because they didn't like what the Republicans was doing. Speaker 0: Thank god they got busted. Linda Evans was sentenced to forty years in prison, and Susan Rosenberg was convicted and sentenced to fifty eight years behind bars. But guess what? They were both pardoned by Bill Clinton. On 01/20/2001, Bill Clinton's last day in office, he set them free. And you be wondering where would a convicted terrorist look for work once they, you know, once they got out of prison. I imagine it would be pretty tough to find a job. I mean, you couldn't work at a local gas station or McDonald's with a rap sheet like that. But she can always work for our country's liberal academia. Susan Rosenberg, she ended up at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, which is a liberal arts college, of course. And to this day, both of these women are celebrated by the left. They are social justice heroes. And now Susan Rosenberg just landed a new job, a place called Thousand Currents. They are a nonprofit organization. Susan Rosenberg is on the board of directors, and she does fundraising and administrative work for Black Lives Matter. Speaker 2: So people will shame you for supporting Trump and say, you shouldn't have supported Trump because the triple k people supports Trump. So you shouldn't support Trump at all. Mm-mm. No, you shouldn't. Meanwhile, these people support terrorists.

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Ladies and gentlemen, the truth shall set you free.

Saved - April 23, 2025 at 3:18 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This should not be allowed to happen in our country. https://t.co/39dzqc20lZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that government officials are attempting to shut down TikTok due to supposed national security concerns about Chinese data collection, but the real reason is because Meta is paying them. The speaker then states that many politicians send their children to elite private schools for safety reasons. According to the speaker, Primavera private equity, which is owned by the Chinese Communist Party, acquired the largest collection of these elite private schools in the United States. The speaker alleges that the Chinese Communist Party therefore controls the curriculum being taught to the children of US politicians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do want do want me to give you a fun example of how little our government officials know about what's happening in private equity? Just a really fun example. Why do they wanna shut down TikTok? What's the excuse they've been using? We know it's because Meta is paying them but what excuse are they using? Because China it's dangerous that they're gonna own our data it's for national security. All of the politicians have kids in private school for their safety not not because they're elitist it's for their safety. They're in some of the most elite private schools in The United States, in every state in The United States. Do you know who acquired the largest collection of private school like super elite private schools in The United States? Who? It sounds Italian. Primavera private equity. Do you know who they're owned by? Who? Chinese Communist Party. Is literally in control of the most elite prep schools in The United States and the curriculum being taught to our politicians' children. Wow. I don't think anyone's ever actually let me say that, on a podcast. I've never gotten that out. So you might have a fun clip there.
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:18 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Of course, he has a Black Lives Matter shirt on. Entitled moron. https://t.co/Wsy2WAZGQi

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person in a car is stopped by an officer who says the tag design is not allowed. The person identifies as a third-year law student and demands the officer's documents. The officer requests the person's driver's license, which is refused. The person repeatedly asks for the officer's watch commander to come to the scene. The officer threatens to call the sheriff. The officer demands the driver's license and orders the person out of the car, while the person insists there is no lawful reason for the demands. The officer points a weapon and orders the person to unbuckle their seatbelt and exit the vehicle. The person states that the officer has a weapon pointed at them and asks someone to call an attorney. The officer orders the person to get out of the car and onto the ground, threatening to use a taser. The person says they cannot stand on their own and refuses to comply.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll make this real smooth movie. Speaker 1: I got a Speaker 0: gas cam going. I'm gonna give you about twenty two seconds explaining what you're gonna be on for because I have not committed any traffic violations. Speaker 1: The tag. That's a that you that's the you can't have that design? Speaker 0: You have that You can't. I'm a third year law student. This is not something you wanna do. I'm gonna see your documents, please. Okay. Let us first of all, that's not get your watch coming out here now. Speaker 1: Hills Road 2 Delta Now. Can I get a 1094? Speaker 0: Get your let me call your sheriff just so you know. Speaker 1: Don't call the sheriff. Speaker 0: I will right now. Speaker 1: Don't call the sheriff. Speaker 0: In case you can see my shirt Speaker 1: in my head. Your driver's license. Speaker 0: What's your what's your love for commander? Speaker 1: Me over here. 316605. Speaker 0: 4 snatch it. Okay. Let me get get your watch commander out of your mouth. And that body camera Speaker 1: driver's license. Speaker 0: You will not okay. Speaker 1: Let me see your driver's license. Oh, okay. 215. Can I be Get Speaker 0: your watch coming out here now? Speaker 1: Get out of the car. You will not Get your driver's license. Okay. Give me your driver's now. Okay. This is what I'm Give me your driver's license Speaker 0: now. License now. You have no law for reason to open this door. License now. The hell up now. Speaker 1: Driver's license now. Speaker 0: This is I'm gonna do before I pull it out. 104. Speaker 1: Driver's license now. Get them on the phone. Speaker 0: Get your watch commander Speaker 1: in Get Speaker 0: here Get your watch commander out now. Speaker 1: Give me your driver's license now. Will not take driver's license. Baby, I'm being stopped. Give me your driver's license. Speaker 0: I had officers trying to Speaker 1: bring my driver's license now. Okay. Give me your license. Speaker 0: Do you have he has baby, Speaker 1: he has a weapon point on Unbuckle your seat belt with your right hand now. Speaker 0: Okay. Get your watch. Come on. Speaker 1: Unbuckle your seat belt with your right hand now. Okay. Alright. Just calm down. Okay. Just calm down. Just calm down. Keep your hands there. Speaker 0: You just want the lawsuit. Speaker 1: Keep your hand. Can't hold your seat. Speaker 0: Thank you. Has a weapon pointed at me. Speaker 1: Do not move. No. Get out of the car. You will not Speaker 0: make me get out of this car. Speaker 1: Get out of this car. Get this car now. Get out of this car now. Okay. Stay right there. Do not move. Speaker 0: Get your Do not move. That body camera better be moved. Do move. You will not point that weapon at me. I have done no unlawful criminal commands. This is a civil traffic stop. You have no lawful reason to pull that weapon out on me just because we're having a horrible disagreement. You have lost your mind. I was you your badge will be removed today. You can best believe that. Speaker 1: What he said. Speaker 0: We were just sitting here arguing. I never did anything unlawful to you. Have you lost your mind? Just Speaker 1: do what he says. Speaker 0: He has a weapon pointed at my face. Baby, I need you to get I need I need you to get I need you to get the attorney on the phone now. Speaker 1: Stop. Stop fighting now. Speaker 0: Thank for doing this. Fighting. Speaker 1: Now. Fighting now. I Speaker 0: am on cane. Get out of the car. I cannot stand on my own. Get of the car. I cannot stand on Speaker 1: my Get out I own. Get the car. Out. Get out and lay down. Okay. Just call him Stop fighting. Speaker 0: Get your Speaker 1: watch now. Speaker 0: You will Speaker 1: not Stop fighting. I'm gonna tase you right now. Get out. You will Speaker 0: not. Put those tassels me. Speaker 1: You're about to be tased. You're about to be tased. Speaker 0: You're gonna be the badge tonight. You're gonna be stripped today. Speaker 1: Get down. Get down. He has Speaker 0: a weapon pointed at you, baby. Speaker 1: Get down. Speaker 0: Get my Speaker 1: attorney baby. I need you to get attorney Malik now. Now. Get on the ground now. Get on the ground. I wanna pull you down. Do you have a backpack? Then slow down. Speaker 0: My back. Speaker 1: And get down.
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 11:49 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

What's going on here? https://t.co/2hCjCH8qIW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Energy awarded a $1.4 billion contract to Strategic Storage Partners LLC to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Strategic Storage Partners was formed in Franktown, Colorado, in 2019. The company's agent is Brian Taylor, and the manager is Sarah Westfall. Sarah Westfall's LinkedIn shows reposts of storage unit construction, and Strategic Storage Partners invests in storage units. Donald Marcotte, a founding member, has a history of working for self-storage companies. The speaker claims these are the only two employees of the company that can be found online. The speaker questions why the Department of Energy is handing over control of the strategic petroleum reserves to a private company that appears to only invest in storage units from Colorado, where the Secretary of Energy is from. Sarah Westfall claims she has worked for the company since 2017, even though it was formed in 2019. The speaker suggests there is a connection between Chris Wright, Brian Taylor, and Donald Marcotte.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Join me on a trip down this rabbit hole because something very fishy is happening with the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The Department of Energy has awarded a management and operating contract for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. They're not gonna run it anymore. They've awarded this $1,400,000,000 contract to a company called Strategic Storage Partners LLC. Here's where it gets strange, other than the fact that the Department of Energy isn't gonna run it anymore. So this is the website for the company that received the $1,400,000,000 contract to manage our Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Okay. Strategic Storage Partners was formed in Franktown, Colorado in 2019. Their agent is a person named Brian Taylor, who I cannot find on this planet. This person, Sarah Westfall, is the manager of Strategic Storage Partners right there in Franktown, Colorado. And since I can't find out anything about this company, I go to what Sarah has posted on LinkedIn, all three posts, which are just reposts of the construction of storage units, which Sarah Westfall and Strategic Storage Partners invest in. This is a company that buys storage units. This is a real estate company. Here's another one where they partnered with Red Rock's Self Storage. I don't know if you know this, but strategic petroleum reserve storage is not like storage units. Okay? That that's that's not a thing. And this gentleman, Donald Marcotte, is a founding member of Strategic Storage Partners, and his entire history is working for companies that also invest in real estate, specifically storage units. Yeah. Self storage. These are the only two employees of this company that I can find anywhere on the Internet, anywhere. And everything I'm seeing is they're investing in in storage buildings. So the Department of Energy is no longer going to run our strategic reserve. They're gonna hand all management responsibilities for $1,400,000,000, by the way, to a company that appears to be in the self storage unit business. And this company is based out of Colorado, and the people that work for it are based outside of Denver, Colorado. And guess who else is from Denver, Colorado? The secretary of energy. That is that is that yeah. That is correct. Oh, and one one other thing, not that it matters. According to Sarah, she's worked for this company since 2017 even though it wasn't formed until 2019. So here are my questions. One, why is the Department of Energy handing over control of our strategic petroleum reserves to a private company that nobody can find out anything about that appears to only invest in storage units from Colorado where the energy secretary is from. Someone, some great investigative journalist needs to connect these dots for me because I've gotten as far as I can go. There is a connection between Chris Wright, Brian Taylor, the agent of the company, and this man right here, founding member. There is a connection between those people, and we need to know what that connection is. Thanks.
Saved - April 4, 2025 at 11:57 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Amen sister. https://t.co/I0hyQdka1v

Video Transcript AI Summary
The rich are punishing Trump for siding with the American working class over them. When someone has the courage to wage class warfare on behalf of the American working class, everyone worries about the stock market. The stock market looks the way it does because the rich are punishing Trump for siding with the neglected and humiliated American working class. It is deeply unfair for the middle class to bear the burden of unfair tariffs from other countries. These tariffs have already worked, with $1.2 trillion in manufacturing invested in the U.S. since January 21. People cannot believe there is a president working for them, putting them first, and telling Wall Street to go screw itself. Wall Street picked the Democrats for the last three election cycles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The rich are punishing Trump for siding with the neglected and humiliated American working class over them. And yet when somebody has the courage to show up and say to Wall Street, screw you. I am waging war I am waging class warfare on behalf of the American working class, and you elites in Wall Street, you do what you need to do because I'm not gonna stop fighting for the American working class. Suddenly, everybody is sitting around going, oh, no. The stock market. Yeah. The stock market looks like that because the rich are punishing Trump for siding with the neglected and humiliated American working class over them. We all agree that it is deeply unfair for the middle class to be bearing the burden of unfair tariffs from other countries. We have already seen these tariffs work, Pierce. We have already seen $1,200,000,000,000 in manufacturing invested in this country since January 21. So they have already worked. Now how long is Wall Street gonna keep trying to punish this president for standing the American working class? I don't know, but I can tell you that the view from the street is people cannot believe that there is a president who is working for them, who is putting them first and telling Wall Street to go screw itself. Wall Street, picked the Democrats for the last three election cycles in a row. That's what the real story is here.
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 1:54 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This is attempted murder by cop and needs to be addressed immediately!

@HistoryBoutique - Erin Derham

Swatting families is dangerous. Conservative or Liberal. These acts of domestic terrorism create a much larger footprint than one intended target, which makes the act, in and of itself, nonsensical. Please share and come out against violence. https://t.co/sXjrsSppGG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Conservative influencers are increasingly targeted by "swatters," with at least a dozen recent incidents involving false reports to draw police to their homes. Aaron Durham described armed officers at her door late at night. The targeted influencers often have a following on X, are pro-Trump, and have interacted with Elon Musk. The swatting calls involve bogus reports of shootings or hostage situations, prompting a large emergency response. Larry Taunton recounted nearly firing on someone trying to open his door, believing it was a home invasion. Many of these influencers are armed, increasing the risk of a deadly outcome. The FBI and DHS are investigating these incidents. The Secretary of Homeland Security stated they will not stand idly by while conservative new media and their families are targeted. The difficulty in investigating stems from the use of technology to spoof phone numbers and voices, sometimes using AI. There is concern about connections to attacks on Tesla dealerships and a cyberattack on X.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This morning, a growing number of conservative influence influencers are getting targeted by swatters. There have been at least a dozen incidents in recent days of bogus calls that draw police and first responders to the targets home, including the home of Aaron Durham in North Carolina. She opened the door late at night to armed officers. Speaker 1: When I walked up to Speaker 2: the door, he was pointing a gun at me, you know, and obviously like immediately stopped when he saw me, but it was a lot of confusion, Speaker 1: a lot of fear. I felt like I was gonna pass out most of the time that they were in the house. Speaker 0: This is so disturbing. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security are now investigating these incidents and CNN had asked Gold is joining me now. She is looking into them as well. What are you learning? Who is the target mainly and how does this all go down? Speaker 3: So what we've seen is over the past two weeks, at least a dozen influencers have been targeted in these swaddings and not just swaddings. They're also getting things like bogus pizza deliveries. Now what we found commonality amongst all of these influencers is almost all of them have some sort of following on X. Almost all of them are pro Trump. Many of them have interacted with actually Elon Musk, the owner of X. Some of them have millions of followers and are super well known, and some of them are some of these more smaller influencers. But again, almost all of them are pro Trump. Many of them call themselves conservatives, and many of them have interacted with Elon Musk. Now, as you noted, swatting is very dangerous and it can be deadly. This you know these callers were calling with bogus calls of people being shot of a home invasion of of holding people hostage. It causes a huge response from police and emergency services, which draws them away from other actual emergencies. But if there's confusion, something could go wrong and something could go very wrong. So I actually spoke to two of these influencers. I spoke to Aaron who just heard from and to Larry Taunton. She's in North Carolina. He's in Alabama. Both got these swatting calls right around the same time early Sunday, right around 1AM. Both got bogus calls about that. They were pretending to be the homeowners saying that they had been shot. There were other people had been shot caused a big response. Here's what Larry said he experienced. A listen. Speaker 4: There were no sirens, no lights, no announcement, nothing, and he's trying the door handle. And I am crouched inside arms and I'm thinking if that man comes through my door, I'm gonna light him up. Because you're just thinking. Somebody's here to murder me and my wife. Speaker 3: And what's really notable is a lot of these influencers are armed. They carry guns and so so many of them are saying this could have turned really bad because I thought somebody was robbing my home. Aaron Speaker 0: Breaking in. Speaker 3: Yeah, Aaron called it a cheap form of domestic terrorism. Now the FBI and the DHS say that they are investigating this. The Secretary of Homeland Security saying that under President Trump's leadership, we will not sit idly by his conservative new media and their families are being targeted by false swatting. They she also said this is an attack on our law enforcement and innocent families and will be prosecuted as such. But what what makes this hard to investigate is the technology that these people use with the swatting. They spoof their phone numbers. A lot of them even use artificial intelligence to spoof the voices, but there have been prosecutions on this and this is a very dangerous game that people are playing. Speaker 0: It is. It's really dangerous and it puts a lot of people in a bad spot. The police and the people who are being swatted. It's it's disgusting. Someone is gonna get hurt. Someone has gotten hurt. I remember this happening over video games where someone got really hurt in all of Yes, people have been killed. And people have been killed. Yeah, exactly. This is an extremely dangerous game. It'll be interesting to see from the FBI if they're ever able to find who's Speaker 3: behind And if there's any connections to the attacks we're seeing recently on Tesla dealerships on the cyber attack like that Elon Musk said happened on X because there is this connection with Elon Musk here. Speaker 0: Yeah, alright, head off goal. Great reporting.
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 1:54 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This pisses me right off. https://t.co/NG0suhc8rn

Video Transcript AI Summary
A landlord met with a prospective tenant with a $2,000 housing voucher. The tenant said she makes $5,000 a month tax-free caring for elderly/special needs people who live with her. She also mentioned she might put her kids in the basement to use the upstairs rooms for her care business. The landlord believes this woman is scamming the system by not paying taxes on her income and still receiving a voucher. The landlord claims this is a widespread problem, alleging that most of their section 8 tenants have been involved in some kind of scam. They report these tenants and believe voucher fraud should be a jailable offense because people who need the vouchers are being taken advantage of.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna know what's wrong with this country? I met with a tenant today who wants to rent one of my rental properties. The tenant, like a lot of tenants, asked me if I accept housing vouchers. If you don't know what a voucher is, it's essentially section eight. I said, yeah. No problem. I have lots of tenants that have vouchers. I have no issue with it. The voucher is for $2,000 a month. Okay? Normal rental voucher. When she gets there, she asked me how much the deposit is. I said, well, it's gonna be the $1,800 rent, first month's rent, plus an $1,800 security deposit. 3,600. And I and she says, well, I don't have to move out of my place till the May. I said, well, I'm looking to move someone in on April 1. So if you want the place, you need to start renting it April 1. I'm not waiting until June. She goes, that's no problem. I have a side hustle. I have people that I take care of. These are elderly special needs people that live with me, and but that's $10.99. It's tax free. This woman tells me she is making $5,000 a month doing elder or or special needs care, which is a very lucrative, very big business. They live with her, and she has a five bedroom housing voucher because she has so many kids. And during the conversation, she says, I'll probably put all the kids in the basement so I can use the rooms upstairs for the the people that we'll be caring for. This is what's wrong with our country. First of all, $10.99 is not tax free, dumbass. Second of all, she's making $5,000 a month not paying taxes on it and still filed for a fucking voucher because from a tax perspective, it looks like she's unemployed and doesn't make any money. She is legitimately scamming the fucking system. There is an entire culture of people doing this. This is what our take from the rich, give to the poor mindset has done to this country. People have legitimately figured out how to scam the system, and they are executing it flawlessly. I've had a dozen section 8 tenants over the last six years since I've been a landlord. I would bet you that 10 out of the 12 were doing some kind of scam and making plenty of money and still collecting a full voucher. Some of them, I found out after the fact. Some of them, I found out in the middle of their tenancy. I just report them. I don't care. I hope they take your voucher away. You're a piece of shit. There are people who actually need these vouchers, and you are scamming the system, and it's bullshit. You should go to jail for it. Voucher fraud should be a fucking jailable offense. That's my rant for today.
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 12:41 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

What the Biden regime did and continues to do to Tina Peters is criminal! https://t.co/mgnWrs4mr3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI reportedly raided the homes of Sharona Bishop, former campaign manager for Congresswoman Lauren Bohler, and Mesa County Republican Clerk Tina Peters. Bishop stated the FBI used a battering ram while her children were present. The Colorado attorney general's office stated the search was lawful. Bishop believes it was counterterrorism aimed at people questioning election results. Peters said the DOJ raided her home because she raised doubts about the election's legitimacy. She claimed agents taped over her doorbell and seized all her storage devices. Peters likened the raid to McCarthyism. She also stated that her election manager's 16-year-old daughter was made to stand outside in her underwear during the raid. Peters described finding a disheveled box of her deceased son's belongings after the raid.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The FBI raided the home of Sharona Bishop. That's the former campaign manager for congresswoman Lauren Bohler of Colorado. According to Bishop, here's what happened. Quote, while homeschooling my youngest children, the FBI decided it was necessary to bust open my front door with a battering ram and put me in handcuffs terrifying my family. Speaker 1: They were yelling that this was the FBI, opened the door. I took my two youngest children into their bedroom. Speaker 0: The Colorado attorney general's office writing this judicially authorized search was executed in a professional and lawful manner. Counterterrorism aimed at people who ask questions about the last election results. And by the way, every election of your lifetime has been contested. You can have Speaker 2: the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: This is not what we do in America. We don't silence people like this, and we certainly don't criminalize them and terrorize them. Speaker 0: Then that same day, and you didn't read this in the New York Times either, the feds hit the home of Mesa County Republican Clerk Tina Peters. What was the justification for that raid? We're breaking into a lot of houses all of a sudden of Trump voters. Why? Well, in this case, DOJ said Peters raised doubts about the legitimacy of the last election. That's not allowed anymore. Can't question the outcome. They didn't arrest her. They just tore her house apart. Speaker 3: When the FBI agent came up to my door, he actually put tape on my ring doorbell to cover it up. Speaker 0: FBI, federal search warrant, come to the door. Speaker 3: Woke me up from a deep sleep. I was very disoriented. They're yelling, FBI, FBI, come to the door, federal search warrant. They took every storage device, every thumb drive, every computer I've ever owned. I never hid what I was doing. I want them to know the truth. At any time that they wanted information from me, all they had do was come. Speaker 0: Peter called the raid evidence of, quote, a level of weaponization of the justice department we haven't seen since the McCarthy era. But, of course, even during McCarthy, no one did that. Speaker 3: When my election manager, when they raided her home that day, They made her daughter, her 16 year old daughter, stand out in her underwear on the front porch. Speaker 2: Elections is an exciting world. There's there's just so much going on and so much to it and and you when you can, bring pride and security to the process so that voters can feel safe in casting their votes and knowing that they count, that's what's important. Speaker 3: This is the same DA that had put two men in jail for sexually assaulting this child from the age of four years old. This is the same DA that knew what it would mean to this child to have her stand out on the front steps in front of her neighbors in her underwear, to go and raid somebody's home, grandmothers, people that don't have any prior history of any violence or anything they've done to break the law. I didn't even have a a speeding ticket or a parking ticket. My chief deputy, most wonderful woman, Sandy, you know, just people doing their job. And when I came back that night, when I came into the garage, I looked, and there was a box. It was a box that had the effects of my son's that I had not been able to open since his death in 2017, laying there on the floor all disheveled. It represented places that I didn't wanna go, things I didn't wanna see. You know, that box is something that, I don't know if I would have ever opened it. It made me realize that we all have boxes that we need to open. We all have things that we need to face.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:56 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Another great video of commentary. https://t.co/ngT7Tf0047

Video Transcript AI Summary
House Republicans are prioritizing Elon Musk's interests over those of everyday Americans. Their opposition to transparency is baffling, especially for a party claiming to represent the people. The argument that access is needed to combat misinformation is misleading; the individuals involved are treasury employees, not external actors manipulating the system. The Republicans' actions demonstrate a lack of concern for the American people and their tax dollars. Full transparency on government spending is necessary to prove otherwise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: House Republicans don't appear interested in working for everyday Americans. Speaker 1: Yeah. You can shut the fuck up. It baffles me that the self proclaimed party of the people would fight tooth and nail and lie to the American people in your quest to prevent transparency. But continue on. Speaker 0: They are working for Elon Musk and doing the bidding of an unelected, unaccountable, out of control billionaire Speaker 1: You're going to cry about unelected bureaucrats, but I had no problems with them running the government during the last administration because it damn sure wasn't Geriatric Joe. Speaker 0: Why does Elon Musk and his minions need access? Speaker 2: Because there's a lot of misinformation out there. First of all, when you say the Doge team, these are treasury employees. There are two treasury employees, one of whom I personally interviewed in his final round. There is no tinkering with the system. Speaker 0: They're not stopping them because they're not working in the best interest of the American people. Speaker 1: If you were legitimately working for the American people, you would provide full transparency regarding every dime of taxpayer money spent, but you don't care about that. All you're concerned about is protecting the government grift for you and your colleagues. Prove Speaker 0: me wrong.
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 10:08 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Explain this to me like I'm 2 years old! https://t.co/WQWInAlnqQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
I found something fascinating regarding Representative Ilhan Omar's net worth. Her $83 million net worth is striking, considering her annual congressional salary of $175,000. Even saving every penny over eight years would only amount to $1.2 million. I'm curious how such a significant increase in wealth occurred. While I don't know the details of her personal finances, it raises questions that warrant further investigation. It seems worth exploring how a congresswoman accumulates such substantial wealth during her time in office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I read something today that I thought was super interesting. And I think you might think this is interesting too, especially with all what we're learning about Doge and the US Treasury and USAID and on and on. Right? Did you know that representative Elon Omar, you know, part of the squad? Do you know that her net worth is $83,000,000? And that is on a house of representatives salary of $175,000 a year. So if she saved every single one of those pennies, of that $175,000 that United States taxpayers pay her to be in Congress, that would be $1,200,000. I I wanna know how you turn $175,000 a year or $1,200,000 over the course of eight years into 83,000,000. I wanna know how to do that. I I I now I don't know what her other three husbands did for a living and maybe that contributed to some of her income, but that's a little sus. You think that's a little sus that a congresswoman makes or is her net worth is $83,000,000 after being in office for eight years? I think it's worth looking into.
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 5:22 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

We may have different skin pigmentation, but we're the same. The establishment government and mainstream media don't want us to believe that. https://t.co/bbSjjmHiMm

Video Transcript AI Summary
I see many black women criticizing black men who voted for Trump, but I want to express my gratitude to those men. Your vote was for secure borders, a strong economy, and the protection of our children from indoctrination in schools. You voted for our rights, including the right to privacy in public restrooms and against unnecessary wars that benefit only a few. You also supported freedom of speech, even when it's used against you. As a black woman, I appreciate your choice and pray for your continued protection and success. I encourage you to lead your families and communities. For those who judge me, know that I am already chosen. Let’s look forward to 2024 together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'm scrolling, and I see a lot of black women making videos talking down to black men who voted for Trump. And I just have to say, if you voted for Trump and you're a black man, thank you. And I thank you because I know exactly why you voted for Trump. You voted for secure borders so that us women and children can be safe. You voted for a strong economy so that us women and children can be provided for. You voted for our children to not be indoctrinated in this failed public school system. You voted for my right to not have to use the bathroom with a biological man. You also voted for our children not to be, drafted into another endless, senseless war that only benefits the military industrial complex. And also, you voted for the protection of our freedom of speech, The same freedom of speech that these evil, nasty, disgusting women are using to wish death upon you. So as a black woman, I just wanna say thank you for voting for Trump. I truly appreciate you, and I'm gonna speak life into you. I pray that God continues to protect you and guide you. I pray that he gives you the success that you deserve. I pray that he gives you the strength to lead your family and your communities. And for anyone who wants to say in the comments that I'm a pick me, baby, I'm already chosen. So what about you? This trunk 20 24. You already know.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 11:42 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

These feral human beings need to be put down like a rabid dog. https://t.co/Vxb38oolKo

Saved - January 2, 2025 at 4:42 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This guy gets it. https://t.co/DJev9ndze2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump invited the Mississippi Valley State Marching Band to perform at his second inauguration, a significant opportunity for these students who have worked hard for such exposure. Despite this, some individuals criticize them as sellouts for accepting the invitation, labeling Trump as a racist. However, it’s important to recognize that he supported sustainable funding for schools during his first term, something previous presidents did not do. The backlash against the band reflects a troubling mindset where personal biases overshadow the potential benefits for these young performers. If any band members are listening, embrace this opportunity and ignore the negativity. You should be proud and take advantage of this moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me get this straight. Djtaka Donald Jaquies Trump invites the Mississippi Valley State Marching Band to come and perform at one of the most important moments in American history, his second inauguration. And these kids back here who have been working their entire life for a moment like this, who have been praying for a moment like this, this level of exposure to be in the I'm okay. This is easily gonna be the most attended and most watched inauguration ever. And these kids are gonna have the opportunity to perform for the world, to show their gifting to the world, and they're being told by people who look just like them that they are sellouts for doing so and that they should scrap the entire idea. Like, imagine the audacity of somebody telling you that you should not be performing at one of the biggest events ever that may very well change your entire life because they were told not to like this guy. Matter of fact, they were told that this man right here is a racist. Mind you, this is the same racist who, created sustainable funding for schools like your own in his first term when no other president, including the president who might have looked just like you, had an opportunity to do the exact same thing. That's the the racist we're talking about. The one who was only racist after 2016. Right? Decades before that, he was beloved within the black community, but as soon as he became a potential president, all of a sudden, the media told you that he's a racist now. Yeah. That that's that's how we're entering into 2025. Now this is the exact reason I stopped listening to a lot of folks because a lot of y'all have lost your damn minds. You have let yourself become so damn occupied with your own racism, with your own bigotry that you cannot see this as a blessing for these kids. You are the problem if you believe that these kids should not perform at that event. You are the problem. And if that pisses you off, I'm glad because you need a little bit of introspection. Alright? You need to check yourself. Imagine if one of them kids was one of your kids and they had an opportunity of a lifetime and you had the audacity because you are so bitter and resentful because your candidate who you only chose, mind you, a few months ago because you were told to choose them, through $2,000,000,000 of of campaign money, that your child is going to be a disgrace and a sellout for taking advantage of such an opportunity. If any of the kids from from Mississippi Valley State hear me, please hear me clearly. Don't listen to these damn loonies, these cuckoos. Do your damn thing. I'm proud of you. Salute. Make America March again, damn it.
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 7:36 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Crickets. Chirp Chirp. https://t.co/p8f0glzLBz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Do you consider yourself a feminist? Yes. Should women be drafted in a war? No, I don’t have a strong opinion on it. If it happens, it happens. I don’t think drafting women would significantly impact the war effort. Isn’t that a sexist view? It’s about physical capability. If a woman wants to fight, she should be able to, but I don’t support forced enlistment. For those who identify as feminists, do you see a contradiction in wanting equality while being okay with men being sent to fight? How do you reconcile that? Some seem to want equality only when it benefits women.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you consider yourself a feminist? As a nice easy answer, yes. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: I think so. Yes. Yeah. Speaker 1: Do you guys think that women, if we were to get into a war, should be enlisted in the draft? Speaker 0: No. No. I don't have, like, an opinion on it. Like, I feel like if it happens, it happens. If it doesn't, it's if it doesn't, it doesn't. I don't think women should be drafted because at the end of the day, it wouldn't really help the war in any much way. Like you said, the Well, that's a really sexist statement of you today. Because, like, I'm making frontline physical you know what I mean? Yeah. Whereas, if you're saying, oh, should they have a place in the war? Yeah. I feel like if a woman wants, we would be in the war. We're talking Speaker 1: about force though. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. No force. So Speaker 1: so then for those of you that said you were feminists, do you see any inconsistency between saying that you want equality, but you're cool with sending men to run into machine guns to protect your society? Does anyone wrestle with that? Speaker 0: How do you reconcile that? Yeah. I didn't say I was a feminist. Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 0: You only want the equality that benefits women. No.
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 11:45 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

I'm just here for the comments. https://t.co/1BR268b5uo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Have I broken a law? Yes, get on the ground. Can you articulate a law I’ve broken? Because I’m telling you to. I’m legally carrying a weapon. Are you here to hurt anyone? No, I’m not a terrorist. You have an AR-15; why? Articulate the law I’ve broken, and I will comply. No crime is being committed here. In Texas, it’s legal to carry a firearm. You’re holding a veteran at gunpoint who has committed no crime. You’re the only one threatening people. I will not get on the ground or disarm myself for not committing a crime. If you harm me, you could face serious consequences. What crime are we committing? You’re interfering with my rights. Have I committed a crime?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once again, have I broken a law? Speaker 1: Hey, John. On the ground. Do you Speaker 0: have a firearm out? Yes. I do. Okay. Speaker 1: Stuff in the land? Get on the ground, man. Speaker 0: Have I broken a law? Speaker 1: Get on the ground. Speaker 0: Can you articulate a law I have broken? Speaker 1: Yes. Because I'm telling you to. Speaker 0: That's not a Get Speaker 1: on the ground. Speaker 0: Okay. Can you tell me why I need to get on the ground? Because just because you tell me to, I'm you get on the ground. Weapon. So you have a weapon. Speaker 1: Get on the ground. Speaker 0: You're legally carrying a weapon. I'm legally carrying a weapon. Speaker 1: Are you not here to hurt anyone? No. I'm not. Are you a terrorist? Speaker 0: I am not a terrorist. Speaker 1: I don't wanna kill anybody. Negative. Get on the ground still. Speaker 0: So your idea is I told you I'm not a terrorist. I'm not here to hurt anyone. I'm not committing a crime, but I still need to get on the ground. That's your reasoning. How do I know you're not a terrorist? Have I broken a law? Is the carrier of a firearm illegal in the state of Texas? Speaker 1: Why you got an AR 15 now? Get away from them. Speaker 0: Articulate the law I've broken, and I will get down. Speaker 1: Okay. Are you here to hurt anybody? Speaker 0: Negative. Do Speaker 1: you have a gun as well? Of course, I do. Okay. Get away then. Now Speaker 0: articulate the law. I have broken, and I will get down. Speaker 1: What crime is being committed here? 3. So you got an AR 15 in hand because the man is lawfully carrying. This guy over here You Speaker 0: might wanna walk away, sir. Speaker 1: Because he's lawfully carrying. How you doing? Oh, these cops are, hopefully got a Van Wobbly, Jay, and a firearm. How you doing, dude? We told you guys you were gonna learn. Today's your education. Today's your education, corporal. At some point, you're gonna realize no crime is being committed. Speaker 0: In the state of Texas, only only This Speaker 1: guy's got an AR 15 in his hand right now. Speaker 0: Can the House and Senate pass any law that pertains to the penal code? Yeah. I'm gonna Which means under 1 dash 8, no subdivision of the law can pass any criminal law, which means any law that you may have enacted in a in your city is unenforceable. 46 dash 2 does not make it illegal to carry a firearm nor a loaded firearm. So what you're doing right now is holding gunpoint to a US army veteran who deployed twice to Iraq, who has never committed a crime in his life, who is doing nothing illegal, and you have 3 officers holding me at gunpoint because I have not committed a crime. Speaker 1: No. This is almost parked outside of San Diego. Speaker 0: Are you starting to feel dumb yet? Speaker 1: Are you in a? Are you the chief? Are you the chief? Chief? No. This guy back here. Are you the chief? Sir. Speaker 0: Yeah. There's a man with a gun right there and right there and right there. Speaker 1: Doesn't have to aim on it anyway. You're the only one threatening people, officer. You're the only one. Speaker 0: You already asked if I was gonna be violent. I am not. I am not gonna shoot anyone. I am not a terrorist. Speaker 1: Are you the police chief? I Speaker 0: am an American citizen. I will not get on the ground or disarm myself for not committing a crime. Speaker 1: Are you the police chief? I am. Get on the ground. No. We're not on the ground. Get on the ground. Speaker 0: I have committed a crime. Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you one more time to to get on the ground. I'm not gonna tell you again. If you have a license to carry a handgun You have the needle in the car. Speaker 0: If you harm me, we're not committing a crime. You can go to jail for up to 10 years. Speaker 1: What crime are we committing? You're interfering with the duty Speaker 0: Have I committed a crime? Speaker 1: And you have no duty to disarm the law. Speaker 0: Have I committed a crime?
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 6:01 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

When everyone knows the truth, you're all gonna be sick!! https://t.co/m1ZEdeRonY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Beyoncé couldn't conceive naturally, and when she appeared on stage with a fake baby bump, it coincided with the timeline of Kathy White's second trimester. The timing of Blue Ivy's birth aligns with when Kathy would have delivered. It's widely believed that Blue Ivy was born via surrogate, with reports of extreme security measures at the hospital, including shutting it down for privacy. Families were denied access to their newborns for 24 hours. Allegedly, Beyoncé and Jay-Z paid $1.3 million for exclusive rights to the hospital, ensuring complete secrecy. The surrogate remained silent throughout the process, raising questions about her well-being. Cameras were turned off to prevent any photos from being taken.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Beyonce couldn't get pregnant. Not naturally. Not normally. What I do know is is this. When Beyonce got on that stage with that fake baby bump Oh, yeah. It was lined up with the same timing of where Kathy White would have been in her 2nd trimester. And when we all watched her get on TV with that fake pregnancy belly that folded over. Yep. She sat down. The timeline of when she delivered Blue Ivy lines up almost perfect with the timeline of when Kathy White would have delivered. Wow. We all know that Blue Ivy came from a surrogate. They shut that hospital down like a president had just been, And parents who had just had children their selves weren't even allowed to see their own kids for 24 hours. Speaker 1: They bounced my family off the 6th floor and from the waiting room and made them go downstairs and getters. There's a lot of us that are coming together to deal with this issue. This is not, by any means, just us. Speaker 0: Because of the security that was locking that whole thing down. Speaker 1: $1,300,000, is alleged that that Beyonce and Jay z, the Carters, paid this hospital to have the right to have their baby there in complete secrecy and privacy. So Speaker 0: The surrogate was carried out. No one heard her speak a word. Do we we know if the surrogate was alive? Speaker 1: They took a lead turn turned some of the cameras off so that there was no pictures that were being taken. Now you're getting into
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 6:46 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Do you think there's any truth in this? https://t.co/362JgHoODT

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a lot of discussion about the UnitedHealthcare CEO being shot, with media outlets claiming there was no motive. However, it's noteworthy that he was scheduled to testify against Nancy Pelosi regarding insider trading just days later. The media is not highlighting this connection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone's talking about the CEO, UnitedHealthcare CEO, getting shot down, and all the media and news outlets are saying there was no motive. We don't know why. Did y'all know that in less than a week, that CEO was supposed to testify against Nancy Pelosi for for insider trading. And they're covering it. The media, of course, the media machine to the left is covering it like they always do.
Saved - December 3, 2024 at 10:46 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

There's no arguing this man's point. https://t.co/ElyFbAING1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democratic Party often aligns with narcissistic traits, and it's concerning how they project their behaviors onto others. Many voters are uneducated about the implications of their choices, particularly regarding Kamala Harris's demographics, which reveal patterns of overindulgence and superficial praise in childhood. This contributes to a broader issue of narcissism in society. Additionally, some voters, particularly black men, may feel coerced into voting a certain way due to pressures at home. Understanding these dynamics can empower individuals to take control of their lives. It's crucial to recognize how certain political ideologies may treat children as property rather than individuals deserving of care and respect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm fine. Since nobody else is saying it, and I'm the only one that freaking says it, and nobody else wants to acknowledge it because they're absolutely terrified of these people. But I'm not terrified of these people because I'm not made out of freaking 40%, bitch. The Democratic Party and their platform, it is most geared towards narcissists. It is most geared towards people with heavy narcissistic traits. Don't you think it's a little bit weird how they keep accusing people of doing what they're doing to people? Hey. I hope you get what you voted for. You voted against your own best interest. Kamala lost because of sexism and misogyny. You guys are all uneducated. I hope you get what you voted for. We're gonna start a 4 b movement and swear off men. Ladies, divorce your husbands, and get ready to poison them. Guys, we haven't been arguing left versus right. We have been arguing empaths versus narcissists. That doesn't mean that every single Democrat has NPD. No. But narcissistic traits, we all have them in varying degrees, begin in childhood through a combination of factors like overindulgence, excessive praise for superficial qualities. I really want you to pay attention to Kamala's voter demographics. I really want you to pay attention to Kamala's voter demographics. I don't think I need to say it a third time for you to understand that that's the gigantic context clue that you need to be looking at to understand why we have a narcissist problem in this country. A lack of emotional validation or experiencing trauma, which can lead a child to develop an inflated sense of self importance and a need for constant admiration to feel valued. Again, look look at Kamala's demographics. Look at her demographics. You tell me, which one of these demographics are given to overindulgence at an early age and being excessively praised for superficial qualities? Now when it comes to her black vote, no, that wasn't just narcissism, even though the black men were coerced. Let's be real about it. Black men, you know that if you voted any other way, your home life would have exploded. You were facing narcissism in your home life. There you go. I just gave you the answers to the test. You're gonna reject it. Of course, you're gonna reject it because, well, me being right means a lot of horrible things in your personal life, and that's just too scary for you to cope with right now. And that's perfectly fine. Reject it, actually. Well, I I'm just trying to put power into your hands. I'm trying to give you more knowledge and control over what's been going on in your life. If you don't wanna take it, I'm more than happy to take advantage of this knowledge and let you run around blind. I'll just consume you like the rest of them. Okay. Fine. I couldn't leave well enough alone. Do you guys ever listen to somebody with NPD or psychopathy talk about children? They always refer to children as, like, property or pets. Which side of the aisle treats children like property or pets?
Saved - December 3, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

2025 is gonna be lit. https://t.co/TK7vNTqdrr

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the Brunson case is upheld, it could nullify Joe Biden's presidency, suggesting that all his actions, including mandates, were illegal. This would imply that Donald Trump was the last legitimate president. The situation is unfolding as we approach 2024, raising questions about the future. It's a dramatic time, and there's a sense of anticipation for what lies ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Brunson case. If the Brunson case is upheld, then that means that the entire presidency of Joe Biden will be null and void, which also could mean that the pardon me, lord. What the fuck is going on in 2024? If the Brunson case is upheld, that means that everything that Biden did was illegal. All the mandates, everything, which would mean that Trump was the last president of the United States. Holy shit. This is crazy. Stay tuned. It's only gonna get better or worse. It's 2024. Who knows? Don't mind me. I'm just looking for my popcorn.
Saved - November 28, 2024 at 6:10 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This is great! https://t.co/mqmQW2SULo

Video Transcript AI Summary
She approached me and said that Donald Trump's wall is meant to keep out women. I asked what he was keeping them out of, and she pointed to how he talks about and treats women, including his wife. She mentioned the inauguration, where he walked ahead and left her behind, showing a lack of care. She expressed that he has disdain for women, citing his infamous comment about grabbing women. I suggested he might have been referring to women who tolerate such behavior, but she had no response to that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just walked up to me and she said Speaker 1: I said that is Donald Trump's wall to keep out women. Speaker 0: What is he keeping women out of? Speaker 1: The way he talks about women, the way he downgrades women. Speaker 0: What's an example of that? Speaker 1: When he just the way he treats his wife, the way he treats other women. Speaker 0: How does he treat his wife? Speaker 1: Watched the video of the inauguration. And What did he do? He walked away from her. He could care less about her. Speaker 0: Oh my god. We need to impeach him now. Speaker 1: Yes. We do. Speaker 0: Yeah. Like, yesterday, he walked away from her at the inauguration? Speaker 1: Well, yeah. He I mean, as soon as he the car pulled up, he stomped ahead and left her to fend for herself. Speaker 0: Oh my god. Speaker 1: And then, I mean, it's just if you watched him with the queen, he's marching right ahead of her. I mean, it's just that he has disdain for women. How about the fact that he's that he was on record saying that, he had he can walk right up to a woman and grab her pussy? I mean, that that's pretty bad. Speaker 0: Well, I think what he was talking about is the type of woman who will allow a rich and powerful man to do anything that he wants, and that type of woman does exist. Speaker 1: I have no answer to that kind of comment that you just made. Speaker 0: They're called star fuckers. Speaker 1: Whatever.
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 5:41 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

This is spot on. https://t.co/5of30oZUuS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The results show that a Republican has won the national popular vote for the first time since 2004, indicating a mandate to address key issues like the economy, immigration, and crime. This election reflects the frustrations of working-class Americans who feel overlooked and insulted. They are not extremists; they are everyday people striving for a better life for their families. The narrative leading up to the election was misleading, focusing on gimmicks rather than the real concerns of inflation and economic struggles. Both parties need to analyze the results to understand what worked and what didn’t. It's crucial for those who discuss elections to engage with the half of the country that expressed their dissatisfaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's won the national popular vote, for the first time since for a Republican for the first time since 2004. This is a big deal. This isn't backing into the office. This is a mandate to do what you said you were gonna do, get the economy working again for regular working class Americans, fix immigration, try to get crime under control, try to reduce the chaos in the world. This this is a mandate from the American people to do that. I think I'm interpreting the results tonight as the revenge of just the regular old working class American, the anonymous American who has been crushed, insulted, condescended to. They're not garbage. They're not Nazis. They're just regular people who get up and go to work every day and are trying to make a better life for their kids, and they feel like they have been told to just shut up when they have complained about the things that are hurting them in their own lives. I also feel like this election, as we sit here and pour over this tonight, is something of an indictment of the political information complex. I mean, we've been sitting around here for the last couple of weeks, and the story that was portrayed was not true. I mean, we were told Puerto Rico was gonna change the election. Liz Cheney, Nikki Haley voters, women lying to their husbands. Before that, it was Tim Walz and the camo hats. Night after night after night, we were told all these things and gimmicks were gonna somehow push Harris over the line, and we were just ignoring the fundamentals. Inflation, people feeling like that they were barely able to tread water at best. That was the fundamentals of the election. And so I think that both parties should always look at the results of an election and figure out what went right and what went wrong. But I think for all of us who cover elections and talk about elections and do this on a day to day basis, we have figure out how to understand, talk to, and listen to the half of the country that rose up tonight and said, we've had enough.
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 10:17 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

I hope Monica is happy! What a shtty person. Seriously! https://t.co/V0kDtknDU0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Peanut the squirrel, a beloved social media figure, and Fred the raccoon were euthanized after a complaint from Monica Kessler, a Texas photographer and conservationist. She reported them, leading to their removal from their home, despite Peanut being raised by a family since infancy. Following the backlash over the wrongful euthanasia, Kessler deleted her social media accounts. Peanut and Fred were significant to their family and helped fund other rescue animals, making their loss particularly devastating. The community is outraged by Kessler's actions and the impact on many lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they cut his head off to check to see if he had rabies. So they found the woman that was responsible for reporting Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon, which resulted in them being taken from their home, and then euthanized. Her name is Monica Kessler, and she's from Texas, and she bragged about reporting Peanut and Fred. And since then, she has deleted her accounts. She deleted all of her social media accounts, because everybody's extremely upset about this wrongful euthanasia. And for those of you that don't know, Peanut the squirrel was a beloved squirrel on social media with millions of followers, who was taken from his home on Wednesday. He was raised by this family as a baby, and then taken from his home because of a complaint by this woman. Both Peanut and Fred the raccoon were euthanized. But the thing that's crazy about it is she's a photographer that's a conservationist. A lot of what she does is film nature, but had no problem ruining the squirrel and raccoon's life, and the life of many other rescue animals. Because Peanut and Fred were bringing in a lot of money that was helping a lot of rescue animals. This is part of the reason why everybody is upset. And now all that is gone because of one person. I feel terrible for their family, but what do you guys think?
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 10:08 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

These people are completely brainwashed and delusional. https://t.co/N5yCN4k6ue

Video Transcript AI Summary
How are you doing? You can just leave. Jumping to name-calling already? That was the slowest sprint ever. Trump is 70; he doesn’t need to be chased. We need to chase out bad people. You probably couldn’t catch a tortoise. Trump reminds me of my family members with dementia. What about Biden? Biden reminds me of myself; he’s not demented. You think Biden can speak well? Yeah, he stutters but can form sentences. What about him falling on the stairs? I’ve fallen on stairs too. If I’m too drunk, I shouldn’t be president. I’m not running for president. Neither should Trump; he’s showing signs of dementia. What if he decides to nuke China? I don’t have the nuclear codes. That could lead to World War 3. No one on the Democrat side is threatening that; it’s Trump who does.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How are you doing, sir? Speaker 1: You can fuck right off. Speaker 0: You wanna jump right to that name calling or what? Speaker 1: Put, no. No. Speaker 0: That was the slowest sprint I've ever seen in my life. Trump's, like, 70. Sir, you don't need to chase him deserve Speaker 1: to be chased around. Speaker 0: You don't need to chase him around like the Speaker 1: We do. We need to chase assholes out of our country. Speaker 0: You probably couldn't catch a tortoise, though, the way you're running. I'm not gonna lie. Speaker 1: I've had two members of my family with dementia. Trump reminds me of both of them. Speaker 0: What does Biden remind you of then? Speaker 1: Biden reminds me of me. He's not demented. Trump can't do full sentences. Speaker 0: Oh, you think Biden can though? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Really? Speaker 1: Yeah. He's gotta stutter, but he can do that. Speaker 0: Really? What did you think of him falling on the stairs and shit though? You don't think that's concerning a little bit? Biden. Speaker 1: I've fallen on stairs in my lifetime. Speaker 0: Have you really? Speaker 1: Yeah. I suppose you guys never have. Speaker 0: No. I definitely have. If I get a little too, you know, hammered with the boys. Speaker 1: That's why you shouldn't be president. Speaker 0: I'm not running for president, though. Speaker 1: No. No. Neither should Trump because he's fallen into dementia. Speaker 0: What if she decides to nuke China, though, if she has a mood swing? Speaker 1: Oh, if you Speaker 0: have a mood swing I mean, I don't have my hand on the nuclear code, so it doesn't really matter. You know? Wing or something. Speaker 1: 60 years old. This is hilarious. Speaker 0: That shit'll send us into World War 3. Speaker 1: No one's sending us on the Democrat side, say it's World War 3. Trump always is threatening nuclear war. He can't help it because that's who he is.
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 10:22 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

We seriously has been taken over by Communists https://t.co/GYOTcqIBBM

Video Transcript AI Summary
I felt like I was in another country. After Hurricane Helene, I joined Charlie from Aerial Recovery to assess the destruction in North Carolina. We met a young man who provided us with a ground-to-air radio and helped us find a helicopter ride. At a checkpoint, police recognized our vehicle and assisted us. Despite wanting to help, local law enforcement was limited to standing by. We found a woman in distress and ensured she was safe. Supplies were abundant in Asheville, but small towns lacked resources. Our first rescue mission involved a premature baby, which we successfully transported to a hospital. We also responded to a call for a woman on oxygen, locating her through SOS signs. Many people were cut off from communication, so we flew low, searching for signs of distress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I felt like I was in another country. Speaker 1: We we asked we asked the the law enforcement folks in Lake Lure, what resources are you getting from the state? And they said, we're being told every town going on. Speaker 0: Hey. I'm Jonathan Howard. I was the Air Force, combat controller. Did that for about 12 years. Speaker 1: I'm Charlie Kebaugh, the, chief development officer at, aerial recovery. Speaker 0: Hurricane Helene, I was with the state guard. Charlie is with aerial recovery. We were working together side by side out there. Charlie was like, hey. Do you wanna come in North Carolina? Because that's when we were kinda hearing, like, what was going on. So once I saw the level of destruction, what was going on, Charlie was like, hey. You wanna get in your plane and go up there tomorrow? And I was like, yes. So we we landed and this random kinda, like, young dude, I'd probably say at mid twenties, he just came up to us. He was like, hey. Do you guys need, like, a ground to air radio? And I was kinda like, yeah. I'm a controller. I could definitely use that radio. He's like, yeah. Here's the radio. I was just kinda like, she's just kinda weird. Speaker 1: Who gets the radio away? Speaker 0: It's like a worn on radio. He's just like, here's the radio. Mhmm. I don't need it. I was just like, okay. We started talking to him, like, tell him who we were. We needed a helicopter ride. Right. And he was like, oh, let me see if I can find you guys a helicopter ride. So Zed come up to us, and he was like, heard you guys need a helicopter ride. We're like, yeah. He's like, okay. I'll be back an hour and a half. I gotta fly these guys. I'll come back, and that's literally how that connection was made. Speaker 1: Everything was great. Everything was, positive. Jeremy actually had a call with Robert f Kennedy, his wife and RFK himself with the mayor of of, of those towns. And then they came and picked John and I up at the airport at the, at the airfield, and we drove out to Little Rock or, to Chimney Rock in Lake Lure and got stopped by a cop at the checkpoint. Speaker 0: This is where it gets crazy. Go ahead. Speaker 1: And we're in a truck. We're in a a white Chevy with big aerial recovery and track house logos all over the side of it. And so we meet the get get the first checkpoint, and the cops sees the vehicle and says, oh, aerial recovery. Hold on. I've been told to watch out for you guys. And so we sit there, and then the police captain comes up and says the same thing. So I take my phone out, turn my video camera on. They quickly let us by. That that that police captain actually drove us to the next next checkpoint. Why'd you pull your camera out? Because I knew what they were doing. I knew they were saying that. By this time, I kinda heard a little bit of a turf war going on. Our team that was already in place had a little bit of a rift with the Michigan task force. So I even I started talking to Speaker 0: the deputies because they were like my age. They were cool guys. Yeah. I was like, what are the heavy guys doing? Are you guys doing, like, search and recovery, knocking on doors, making sure people are okay? And he's like, man, we want to. The only thing we can do is stand right here at this checkpoint. And there was 8 of them at that one checkpoint on a single lane road. And I was like, what do you mean you're just standing here? He's like, that's all we can do is stand here on this one lane road. This is in Lake Moore. This is, like, kinda like ground 0 for all the destruction. There were so much for these guys, and they wanted to go work. They were like, we want to, but we can't. Speaker 1: And, you know, we we we didn't get we didn't get anything done that day because because when the sun goes down at 7 PM, they want everybody out of town. The little bit of work that we did get done there on the ground on that day was to go search a neighborhood that they had already searched the day before And find a woman in her house, you know, very, very poor condition mentally, not gonna make it. I don't know if they went and did door to door searches or not, but, like, she clearly would have no place still be in there. Speaker 0: She was smoking a cigarette that wasn't light lit. Yeah. She and she thought it was lit. She was literally, like, smoking a cigarette and it was being lit. Like, she was just so delusionally Yeah. Speaker 1: We didn't I mean, we didn't leave her. Speaker 0: No. We we wouldn't saw her out. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. As soon as one of our guys made contact with her, he would not leave. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So it was very apparent. Speaker 0: Asheville had all the supplies you could think of. But when you go to these small towns, they had nothing, like, nothing. There was even a place we went to on day 6. We were the first people to make contact with them on day 6. I I could not believe it. I was like, no one else has been out here? They're like, no. Speaker 1: Well, the roads are gone. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: The roads are gone. You can only get to places by air. Speaker 0: Her very first rescue mission was actually, a a premature baby. Speaker 1: Save Our Allies, shared a lead, a request with us, and had a phone number attached to it. So I called the phone number. It was the grandmother that answered the phone, Lisa, and gave us the whole scenario of what was going on. You know, 11 day old baby was born premature, only 4 days out of the hospital. Mom's not doing well either. Baby's, you know, somewhat unresponsive. Speaker 0: This is the first mission we're ever doing with this civilian helicopter. So I'm talking to the pilot, getting to know his background. Hey. Are you a military like, former military helicopter pilot? He's like, I fly Gulfstreams around the world. I mean, he's helicopter's license, but he's landing at, like, nice airfields. And he's like, I've never landed in the field, like, an open field like this. So I'm, like, talking to him, like, well, we got power lines here on this side of the road. We got power lines on this side of the road. It's not a flat terrain. Like, I'm trying to talk him in into this, and he's like, alright. We're just gonna kinda figure it out. We land out there in the field. A bunch of my, SMU guys, the special mission unit guys that were out there, our paramedic Paul and Byron, they come running out with the baby in a little car seat holder. And they had the mom and grandma, and we get them loaded into the helicopter. We take off from there. I should say this, when Paul got to the baby, the baby was actually blue. Like, the skin was blue because it just wasn't breathing very good. From the field, we flew out to Mission Hospital in Asheville. Charlie was coordinating with the hospital getting them on the phone because our frequencies weren't working with the helicopter. Kinda same scenario. We're flying up to this hell this hospital. It's, it's very windy. There's a little bit of rain. And the pilot there's a helicopter laying in the pad on top of the roof of the helicopter. And I'm like, well, Mark, that's where you gotta land. And he's like, well, find me something on the ground. And I see 2 more h l z's on the ground, but there's 2 helicopters on. So I was like, the only place you can go is on that roof. And he's like, I've never landed on a roof. And he's kinda nervous about it. I'm just like, alright, Mark. Like, it's gotta get that thing down. And I'm looking at the windsock on top of the hospital, and it was a direct 9 degree crosswind on the pad. So as we were coming in, like, the wind was just kinda picking us. It was moving us, and it was probably about 3 feet before we hit the ground. I was calling out, like, 3 feet, 2 feet. I thought he was actually gonna, like, abort the landing and take off because the wind was, like, pushing us kinda toward the flight. Like, we're gonna go over the pad and fall off the building. Shit. And then he kinda, like, backed it up, and then he just kinda, like, just dropped it on top of the helipad. And I was like, me and him jumped out. We rushed that baby inside, and there was, like, I think, 2 doctors, 3 nurses. Mhmm. And, they were there to that baby, and, man, it was, like, the biggest relief I've ever felt in my life. Like, it was just, like, the emotions were just, like, starting to hit me. And it was just it was wild. I'm not really a big emotional guy, but, like, I I I I wanted to cry when that happened. Like, I just He's gonna cry. The whole Yeah. The whole week. So we just did doctor Phil on, Tuesday, and they wanted to talk about the baby rescue specifically. And we didn't know it, but they brought their grandma all out. Like, surprised us, and he almost got me crying. Like, I was I was my eyes were watering up pretty good. The baby couldn't come because it was still premature, but the the intent was for the baby and the mom to go there. But, yeah. So that was that was actually really, cool that they reached that they did that for us. We got to find out. But I think maybe a week later, the grandma did reach out to Charlie and, like, sent some photos of the baby, and we're just like, I can't believe it. Like, it's it's all good to go. Wow. Speaker 1: There was a, a gentleman that knew his parents were trapped. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So Sean hiked, I don't know, 5 miles or so over the mountain to get to his parents' house. His mom's on oxygen. And, when he gets there, they realize that, you know, she's got about less than a day's left of fuel to power the generator. The generator powers the oxygen machine. So they got a request out for help. All we had was the, a grid coordinate. We didn't have a home address, so we we flew to a grid coordinate. Didn't really see much there. We found the river with a road next to it. So we kinda flew the river, and then John spotted an SOS sign painted on the road. Speaker 0: I didn't even see it the first time we actually flew over. There was a bridge right in front of it that was just completely demolished. And then I saw the white letter at the side of my eye, and I was just like, oh, wait. SOS? And then I looked a little bit further away, and then it was carved in the mud and said SOS as well. You wouldn't think it's America. Yeah. But that's from that mission, that's what we started flying. We would start flying looking for SOS or, like, people just waving at us because what we kinda discovered was a lot of the emissions we would get from, like, centers or, like, from Facebook. A lot of these people have no way even transmit. They need help. There's no cell phone signal. There's no WiFi. So, like, you literally have to just go fly these rivers and roads looking for SLS.
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 5:42 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/llQG41hWkR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president insults millions of hardworking Americans—parents, veterans, small business owners, and farmers—by calling Trump supporters garbage. This comes from a leader who has faced criticism for his actions and policies, including issues with the economy and border security. There's a double standard in media outrage, as past comments have drawn significant backlash. The administration shows open contempt for those who hold different views, labeling them as deplorables and irredeemable. However, those who think independently and advocate for responsible government and true borders represent the heart of America. If that makes them garbage, so be it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me see if I have this correctly. The decrepit old man who showered with his daughter and enables his cracked out son supports dismembering babies in the womb as he labels himself a Catholic and who has completely tanked this country's economy and border security is calling Trump supporters garbage? I can't help but laugh. A sitting president, once again, insulting millions of Americans. We're talking hardworking Americans, by the way. Parents, veterans, small business owners, farmers, people who love this country, who pay their taxes, who believe in the constitution, and who just want a government that works for them, not against them. But I'm sure we'll see the same outrage from the mainstream media in the same way that we did when a comedian made a joke. Yeah. So sure. I guess this is Biden's last gift to America, though, the so called decency he was supposed to bring to the White House. I'm surprised he's not more sensitive around the word garbage when he himself was basically thrown out like trash. But this is what they do. It's open contempt for anyone who doesn't tow their line, anyone daring to have a different vision for America. But let's just go down the list. They've called us deplorables, irredeemable, Nazis, garbage. But realistically, we're the heart of America. And if daring to think independently, wanting a nation with real borders, a government that spends responsibly, and leaders who stand up for our freedoms makes me garbage, well, then so be it.
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 12:26 AM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

He just lit them up 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/Ff2Wi1iNlj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala is a poor candidate who has had four years without being elected. The Democratic party may win by undermining democracy, especially after the threats against Trump. Real political violence stems from labeling opponents as threats. Identity politics have radicalized many Democrats, focusing too much on race, gender, and sexuality. An earlier conversation highlighted assumptions about identity; the speaker, a mixed individual who identifies as bisexual, emphasizes that others often project their views onto him without knowing his true background.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think Kamala's honestly just a shit candidate and she's gonna the country up. She's already had 4 years. No one's elected her. And I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the Democratic party wins only because of the way they have strategically undermined democracy because Trump was almost assassinated. When you're comp when you're constantly calling somebody a Nazi and a threat to democracy, that's what happens. Real political violence. And they are the ones who enable that. Identity politics too. She has radicalized millions of Democrats by telling them your entire identity revolves around your race, your gender, your sexuality. To the blonde dude over there when I was speaking earlier, you're talking about you can't believe my standpoint on transgenderism because I'm a black gay man. You know nothing about me actually. You assumed my sexuality. You assumed my race. I'm a mixed individual. I'm half Hispanic, half black, viva la rasa, all that, And I'm actually bisexual. I can pull bad bitches when I want to. So you know nothing about me. It's projection because you're a black gay man and you can't pull bitches.
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 3:36 AM

@DisrespectedThe - 🇺🇸The Disrespected Trucker🇨🇦

Please listen to this man. This is directed at everyone in the world. We don't have much time left. #LiberalsAreInPanic https://t.co/ZQnqhyGU1Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the historical site called Head Smashed In Buffalo Joe in Southern Alberta, where the Blackfoot nation used stealth to push buffalo herds over cliffs for easier hunting. They emphasize the importance of planning and stealth, using visual deterrents to distract the buffalo while slowly pushing them towards the cliffs. The speaker draws a parallel to the World Economic Forum, suggesting that they use similar tactics to manipulate and lead people towards negative outcomes. They urge listeners to resist being pushed towards a metaphorical cliff and instead stand strong and prepared. The speaker encourages unity and resistance against impending challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, howdy. How many of you out there have heard of the historical site in Southern Alberta called Head Smashed In Buffalo Joe? Well, that's a sight where the Blackfoot nation, back in their day, used to, by way of stealth, Push herds of buffalo over the cliffs and breaks in the ground where the buffalo would fall to their demise or be smashed up badly enough that They could be more easily killed with a bow or a lance. Now those folks didn't set out to running out into the Prairie hooting and hollering and wagging their arms and chasing buffalo in every direction. No. They used a lot of planning and a lot of stealth. They set out long before the buffalo came and put visual deterrents up along the horizon to keep the buffalo distracted and headed in their direction. And then when the buffalo came, They covered themselves in the hides of other animals and slowly drifted out into the herd, slowly, We slowly started to encroach on those animals, pushing them towards those cliffs. The visual deterrents out in front kept them mildly distracted while the folks in hides and disguise kept pushing on them, Foot by foot, buffalo slowly moving along. Now they'd also been thinking ahead, and they put what out in front of the herd called front runners. And those were covered in buffalo hides, bent over, making like they were grazing along, slowly working towards that cliff, leading them along. This is starting to sound familiar because we've got a group called the World Economic Forum, And for decades, they've been settin' out visual deterrents, sendin' folks into amongst us, covered in hides, disguises, slowly pushing us along, using those visual deterrents to keep us mildly distracted, while the front runners, covered in hour rides, or called politicians, They're out there with a smile on their face leading us towards those cliffs because they know when the folks at the back suddenly stand up and Spook the herd and used fear and distraction, running them towards the cliff. They're gonna run too, but just at the last minute, they're gonna turn off and hide behind the rocks and watch the unknowing Pile over the cliff to their demise. We have a choice at this point in time, people. We can be a herd distracted and slowly pushed towards the cliff where we're suddenly spooked over by fear and destruction. Or we can do what a big old buffalo does when he sees an adversary coming, And that's to stand solid, get himself prepared, put his fucking head down, and smash it into the ground. I'm not going over any cliff, and I'm certainly not being pushed any further. Live each and every one of you. I hope a lot of you start to turn around with me and face what's coming. Because can you imagine what all of us with our heads down can do? Stay the course, and get really fucking ready to resist.
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 3:36 PM

@DisrespectedThe - 🇺🇸The Disrespected Trucker🇨🇦

You stand for that fuckin flag! https://t.co/NbRGMoBf4L

View Full Interactive Feed