reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DissidentMedia
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Jermaine Ruan installed Epstein’s fiber optic and a self-contained island network, shown in the Little Saint James handbook as “technology.” He was IT Manager of Southern Trust, linked to Epstein’s DNA mining funded by the Rothschilds, and he aided massive underground complexes. He inherited $1M from Epstein. Now with the USVI Bureau of Corrections, and he reportedly sent test emails to Epstein’s account as recently as Feb 2026.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Jermaine Ruan installed fiber optic at Epstein’s Zorro ranch and also built a self contained communication network on Epstein’s island. He has never been summoned to testify. He shows up on page 25 of the Little Saint James handbook as “technology.” https://t.co/Z65DDYOVWl
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Ruan was listed as the IT Manager of the Southern Trust Company, Epstein’s DNA mining operation which received tens of millions in funding from the Rothschilds. https://t.co/pspGysrOqi
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Ruan appears to be a trusted partner of Epstein’s, involved in helping to build massive underground complexes and complex tech. Ruan inherited $1m from Epstein’s estate on his “death.” This is someone Congress could call for answers right now. So why haven’t they? https://t.co/wVFh8uHip0
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
@RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY Ruan currently works for the US Virgin Islands Bureau of corrections. https://t.co/rtNLNjekLM
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
@RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY Ruan was sending test emails to Epstein’s account as recently as this month, February 2026, this seems to imply he still has access to the account. https://t.co/hBfzQsWBif
@mort_wyeth73761 - Mort Wyeth
@Rugception @vxunderground Nah, I was one of the first in and there was nothing there except this email from Jermaine Ruan on 6/20/2019 that said "Test". Here's a pic, the replies to this weren't me, those were the first person who opened it up. But the og email is real and nothing else was found. https://t.co/fGdI9SC1so
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Michael Jackson’s last phone call should make a lot more sense now. https://t.co/cLVyMi1y3Q
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Thomas Massie’s America First A short film by patriots.
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a long session, the speaker claims "lies at the CDC, shortcuts at the FDA, unconstitutional gun bans at the ATF, over prosecution of January sixers at the DOJ, targeting common citizens at the FBI, spying by the NSA, illegal mandates for livestock by the USDA, targeting transgenic plant vaccine at the NSF, and censorship, the censorship industrial complex of which the NSF is part of." He says "This is political theater" and "Groundhog Day." He asserts "the constitution requires a quorum" and that "the truth, if you're willing to report it, is they don't want a recorded vote." He calls the bill "a debt bomb ticking" and argues for auditing the Federal Reserve, warning about "dilution" from printing money. On guns, he asks "Is this receiver legal or not?" and notes "We've knocked out bump stocks." He presses Epstein files: "This transcends all other issues. And right now, anybody who wants to subvert or keep the Epstein files secret, they're on the wrong side." He cites vaccines, "Operation Warp Speed was considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country," and exemption concerns, and ends with "Dissidentmedia.com."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have sat through now almost two years of hearings in this congress where we've exposed lies at the CDC, shortcuts at the FDA, unconstitutional gun bans at the ATF, over prosecution of January sixers at the DOJ, targeting common citizens at the FBI, spying by the NSA, illegal mandates for livestock by the USDA, targeting transgenic plant vaccine at the NSF, and censorship, the censorship industrial complex of which the NSF is part of. Most Democrats are just fine with this kind of totalitarian state that the bureaucrats are pushing on us. But republicans at least pretend to be against these things. But what are we gonna do this September? We're gonna fund every freaking one of those things that we have exposed.
It sets up a fake fight that we all know here is fake. Somebody come down here and tell me it's not fake. You all know it's fake. The compromise has already been reached in a smoke filled back room here. But that's what it is, is political theater, folks.
We all know where it ends up. We've seen it. I've been here twelve years. I've seen it 12 times. I refuse to be a thespian in this failure theater.
Can we be honest with the American people about what's going on here? This is political theater. I'm sort of in a, I would say, a different category. Presidents, consultants have spent $1,800,000 against And and Trump called me three times on the floor of the house. I'm coming at
Speaker 1: you like you've never seen. Never in your life before have you seen the way in which I will come at you. I'm more popular than you in Kentucky, and you know it, and you're gonna lose.
Speaker 0: It's all posturing. It's fake fighting. We all know where it ends up. This is Groundhog Day. I don't care if the Democrat is the speaker or Republican is the speaker.
It's good theater. We've got great writers. I wish they'd just come up with a new plot. I got in my car, and I drove eight hours. And they're like, shit.
Massey's gonna do it. They went to the parliamentarian, and they're like, is there any way around this? And he's like, nope. Massey's right. The constitution requires a quorum.
Mister speaker, I came here to make sure our republic doesn't die by unanimous consent in an empty chamber, and I request a recorded vote. The truth, if you're willing to report it, is they don't want a recorded vote. They don't wanna be on record of making the biggest mistake in history.
Speaker 1: This is the second time you've done something like this. And they took me out of it before, but
Speaker 0: not this time. And then I had he said he thought it was the second time. I'd done that, like, eight times since he was the president. He just started realizing it's the same guy.
Speaker 2: Mister speaker, I have an amendment at the desk to change the title
Speaker 0: of the bill to a bill to kick
Speaker 2: the can down the road and for other purposes.
Speaker 3: This bill is just the first step, a down payment.
Speaker 0: Why do we always spend at least as much as we did last year, and why do we never cut spending? This bill is a debt bomb ticking. We're not rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic tonight. We're putting coal in the boiler and setting a course for the iceberg. If something is beautiful, you don't do it after midnight.
I think the Federal Reserve absolutely needs to be audited. They've really exceeded any kind of constitutional authority that they should be given. It is poison. When you print money, it is poison to our economy. The principle is called dilution.
And when you print $5,000,000,000,000 and you put it into the economy, you have diluted the value of the money. The the principle is so simple that a child can understand. His third tweet was, he's terrible on guns. Was like, what? Where did that come from?
Have you seen my Christmas card picture? Right.
Speaker 3: Take the firearms first and then go to court. I like taking the guns early.
Speaker 0: My question is, is this receiver legal or not? Because your bill is ambiguous. The people who own guns, which is the majority of Americans, are starting to see through this.
Speaker 3: We're knocking out bump stocks. I've told the NRA. I've told them, bump stocks are gone.
Speaker 0: What he's showing us here is not a bump stock. Would the Democrats be amenable if and when they find out that that's not a bump stock? Like, if they could use Wikipedia or a picture, would anybody over there be amenable if they found out? And you will eventually. The Internet's gonna help you here in about five minutes.
K. I'll bring it down. Alright, folks. Have you been working in school? I've got a bill to repeal I've been working in the I
Speaker 3: would like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on The United States Capitol. Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness, and mayhem.
Speaker 4: We are going to the Capitol in that direction. We are going to the Capitol. That's where our problem We are going to the Capitol where our problems problems are. Are. It's It's that that direction.
Direction. We We are are going going to to the the Capitol. Capital. Capital is in that direction. Let people know.
Spread the word.
Speaker 0: How many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January
Speaker 3: have defiled the seat of American democracy.
Speaker 0: You're sending grandmas to prison. You're putting people away for twenty years for mill merely filming. Some people weren't even there yet. You've got the guy on video who's saying go into the capital. He's directing people to the capital before the speech ends.
He's at the site of the first breach, and it's an indictment for a misdemeanor. The American public isn't buying it. Isn't it true you have a science degree from Yale?
Speaker 3: Well, it's liberal arts education and degree. It's a bachelor. Okay.
Speaker 0: So it's not really science. So I think it's somewhat appropriate that somebody with a pseudoscience degree is here pushing pseudoscience.
Speaker 3: Today, our nation has achieved a medical miracle. I am thrilled to report that the FDA has authorized the Pfizer vaccine.
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, it's none of your business, but I'm gonna tell you, I'm not vaccinated. And until there's some science by the way, I have a master's of science degree from MIT. I'm not a virologist, but I can read data.
Speaker 3: Operation Warp Speed was considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country.
Speaker 0: Can you tell me if anybody's been granted a religious exemption? I I don't know. So I believe that it's fraud. In fact, fraud to tell people that you're gonna preserve their constitutional religious accommodations by telling they can apply for an exemption and then not allowing any of those exemptions. And I would hope that we've learned something from the COVID experience.
Some of our science projects aren't the best ideas.
Speaker 3: I recommend take the vaccines. I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines. I got my booster shot as soon as they were available.
And just the other day, former president Trump announced he had gotten his booster shot. Maybe one of the few things he and I agree on.
Speaker 0: This truth was toxic to to the narrative that Pfizer was spreading, that Joe Biden wanted out there so that he could force the vaccine on everybody, whether you had natural immunity or not. I don't think the press gets special privileges on the First Amendment. I think I don't think Congress does. I think every American, by virtue of being an American, has the right to free speech enshrined in the constitution. They are at the same time denying that censorship is occurring, but suggesting that there's more material that needs to be censored.
So when I go to DC and they threaten me or try to bribe me, it's like, I know once Friday comes, I'm gonna be back on my farm, and I don't need them. Pride in America is is looked down upon right now. It's out of fashion. But pride in Israel is something we have to vote on two or three times a week now in congress. APAC is very persuasive.
For instance, the Israeli lobby in congress, if you if you look at my colleagues' feeds now, there's they all look the same. Everybody but me has an APAC person. What does that mean, an APAC person? It's like your babysitter, your APAC babysitter. And when they come to DC, you go have lunch with them.
I don't wanna condone what Israel's doing. 1% of the civilian population of Gaza is no longer breathing air, no longer on this planet. If 1% of The US civilian population were eliminated, that would be a thousand September, and I don't think we should be a party to that.
Speaker 3: Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.
Speaker 0: Iran, the reality is they don't have a missile that can reach The United States. They're not near to getting a missile that can reach The United States. If we're gonna lead, we should lead, and we should have good relations with every country. And we should conduct ourselves in a manner that sends a signal to the rest of the world that we're not tyrants.
Speaker 3: I want everybody to stop dying.
Speaker 0: I think I represent part of the coalition that elected president Trump. We were tired of endless wars in The Middle East and tired of wars in Eastern Europe, and we were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies, and our infrastructure first. I don't need the job. We're self sustaining. I help my neighbors and my neighbors help me.
And that's what enables me to go to Washington, DC and say, You don't have anything over on me. Like, you could literally take everything I've got and I can create it again. You can pull all my fingernails out. You can shove bamboo up in them. You can start cutting off my I am not voting for Mike Johnson tomorrow, and you can take that to the bank.
I don't know why it should be politically painful to be transparent.
Speaker 3: Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 0: This is not going away. Congress, a coequal branch with the president, should demand the release of everything that they have regarding the Epstein files. I mean, people have wanted these files for years, and now we're being told it's a hoax.
Speaker 3: Look. The whole thing is a hoax. It's put out by the Democrats.
Speaker 0: If it's a hoax, president's own children fell for the hoax, vice president fell for the hoax, Kash Patel fell for
Speaker 3: the hoax. I don't think it's a hoax. I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein.
Speaker 0: This transcends all other issues. And right now, anybody who wants to subvert or keep the Epstein files secret, they're on the wrong side. The American people deserve this regardless of what the political ramifications are for the speaker. Politicians do not like conflict. They'd like to tell both sides that they're on their side.
Democrats wanna grow the welfare state, and Republicans wanna grow the military industrial complex. People are becoming despondent, apathetic. Why would they go vote if they gave us the house, the senate, and the white house and the transparency and justice they were promised doesn't happen? Like, it's immoral, but even if you're okay with the the amorality or immorality of it, it's shortsighted because eventually it'll catch up with us. So do any of the dumbos you work with understand that?
What he promised us was we would put America first. No.
Speaker 3: I don't think Thomas Massey understands government. I think he's a grandstander, frankly. If you ask him a couple of questions, he never gives you an answer. He just says, I'm a no.
Speaker 0: Did did it change your views at all? No. This has been a dissident media production. Dissidentmedia.com.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed a trend where some individuals are beginning to understand the real consequences of their beliefs. It's essential to pay attention to those who celebrate death, as they often lack true experience or understanding of it. There's also a call to identify a potential shooter, hinting at future courtroom relevance. I believe leftism is a harmful ideology that corrupts societies, and even young proponents should face strong criticism. Lastly, I came across a TikTok profile with numerous videos that may not fully align with the claims being made.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Another liberal discovers consequences. https://t.co/GUJ7xGO388
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says they had to block all their friends because of different political beliefs, though they believed these were the people they would live with after college and stay in touch—the people who saved their life on multiple occasions. They dropped out of school for them and started homeschooling because of them; in a small school, they don’t know how to face them, and these people are their life. They don’t know how to avoid them and feel they might be to blame for blowing up the relationships; everything they hear makes them feel like such a shit person, and they can’t have that in their life anymore. They used to not respect themselves to cut people out for this, but now they do; they respect themselves enough to not want to feel like this. God, I'm probably gonna delete this because this is so fucking embarrassing crying on camera.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few moments later. I just had to block all of my friends because they just have such different political beliefs for me. And I thought that we were the type of friends who would live together someday after college and, like, stay in touch no matter what. And I thought these were the people that I would spend my life with and grow old next to. These were the people who saved my life on multiple different occasions and I just don't know if I can continue being friends with them because of this.
I just don't know if I mean, I dropped out of school for these people. I started homeschooling because of these people. And I don't know what I'm gonna do because we go to such a small school together. I don't know how I'm gonna be able to face them. These people are my whole life.
I don't know how I'm gonna be able to avoid them. Yeah. I don't care if you think that this is my own fault for being the person to blow up these relationships because everything that they say makes me feel like such a shit person. And I can't have that in my life. Not anymore.
Okay? I used to not respect myself to cut people out of my life for things like this, but now I do. Now I I respect myself enough to not want to feel like this. God, I'm probably gonna delete this because this is so fucking embarrassing crying on camera. But God.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Don’t forget to give these people some attention, too.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Name and shame thread. 🧵 The only people who celebrate death are those who have never experienced it or do not understand It. https://t.co/Rtuw7tRGAT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great. The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great. The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great. The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The best part of this whole goddamn thing is that he is not martyr material, so his death will mean nothing. It will activate no one. It will impact few. It's just great.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
10 social credit points to the person who identifies who this aspiring shooter is.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
No clue who this person is, but we have a feeling this might be important in a courtroom someday. https://t.co/2QmaccCgWQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I'll be the one to do it. If you guys enough that you guys follow me, I'll take one for the team. I'll do it. I'll do it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll be the one to do it. If you guys enough that you guys follow me, I'll take one for the team. I'll do it. I'll do it.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
@Imbackthanks Leftism is a disease which corrupts societies and destroys billions of lives. Even an utterance of it should be met with so much scorn and derision that no one ever dares share their views in public again. She might be a kid, but her ideology is a weapon.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
@glorioushurt_ It’s an actual tt profile with hundreds of videos. Some of what you are describing certainly goes on, just not likely in this particular instance.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
@LocklearAndy Fivehead
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
In the wake of her interview with @TuckerCarlson, Mother Agapia Stephanopoulous has been smeared as a Marxist, depicted as Satan, and cut down mercilessly for her appearance. The purveyors of these putrid statements are demons, and they simply hate her for telling the truth. https://t.co/SRvvSD4jUt
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
A incredible story about a Good Samaritan, and a corrupt local government trying to steal property from the elderly. https://t.co/uuxy623RY3
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual mowed an 80-year-old widow's lawn for free because she couldn't afford the city's $300 fee after receiving a warning. While mowing, two police cruisers arrived, and an officer stated the individual was trespassing and under investigation for unauthorized property maintenance due to municipal code regarding pending fines.
Despite the woman's pleas that she had given permission, the individual was handcuffed in front of her. The local department offers a paid lawn service, and free help interferes with city business. The individual was released with a warning of a citation for disruption of municipal process if it happens again. The individual plans to finish the job this week, even if it means arrest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Upside because if you get in my way, there's gonna be problems. You understand? I didn't break any laws. I just wanted to help someone who couldn't afford help. Today, I went to mow the lawn for an 80 year old widow.
She lives alone on a fixed income, and her front yard had grown wild after weeks of heat and rain. She told me the city had already warned her. Clean it up or get fined. Thing is, she can't afford to pay the $300 the city charges to cut it, so I offered to do it for free. I'd barely gotten halfway through when two police cruisers pulled up, lights on, doors swinging open.
One officer steps out and says, you need to shut that mower off now. I was confused, thought maybe they were checking in. But then he told me I was trespassing and under investigation for unauthorized property maintenance. I pointed at the lady standing on her porch waving frantically. She asked me to help, I said.
She gave me permission. They ignored her. One of them told me the yard fell under a municipal code that made it restricted property because of pending fines. The woman kept pleading, trying to explain, but they wouldn't listen. One officer handcuffed me right there in front of her.
Turns out the local department offers a paid lawn service. And if neighbors or charities step in for free, they interfere with city business. I sat in the back of the cruiser watching that poor woman cry on her porch. I wasn't charged. They let me go later with a warning, but they told me next time it would be a citation for disruption of municipal process.
I'm going back this week to finish the job before they find her, even if it means getting arrested again. If you wanna hear what happens next, just type stand up in the comments.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Do it. https://t.co/mJgW847Byx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable.
Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly.
The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speeds, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust steel construction and concludes that the destruction was caused by more than just the planes themselves. The speaker believes the event has fundamentally changed the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a seven sixty seven or seven forty seven or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a, like a can of soup.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into, Building Number 2 and when you see that, approach the the far side and then all of a sudden, within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right.
Speaker 0: I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building.
I mean, these buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing it's an amazing thing. It's this country is different today, and and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.
reSee.it AI Summary
A user encouraged action, prompting another to share videos supporting the claim that the collapse of Building 7 and the Twin Towers were controlled demolitions. The responder asserted that the events of the day were a significant deception, reiterating their stance multiple times weekly.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Do it. https://t.co/mJgW847Byx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable.
Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly.
The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speed, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust construction with heavy-caliber steel, asserting the destruction was caused by more than just the planes. The speaker concludes that the country has fundamentally changed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a seven sixty seven or seven forty seven or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a, like a can of soup.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into, Building Number 2 and when you see that, approach the the far side and then all of a sudden, within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right.
Speaker 0: I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building.
I mean, these buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing it's an amazing thing. It's this country is different today, and and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.
@BeerCan45 - The Vigilant 🟢🙏4🇺🇸🦅
@DissidentMedia I’ll leave these 4 vids like I do 10-20 times a week. Building 7 and WTC 1&2 were controlled demolition. The whole day’s events were one big lie. https://t.co/qywr3gF52m
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls receiving a call from the fire department commander who was unsure if they could contain the fire. The speaker suggested that, given the significant loss of life, it might be best to pull back. The decision was made to pull back, and they subsequently witnessed the building collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 witnessed what appeared to be a skyscraper explosion resembling a demolition. The building collapsed completely on itself. Speaker 1 noted that it looked like a building being deliberately destroyed by dynamite, similar to images seen on television. Speaker 0 described the collapse as if it were a planned implosion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I turned in time to see, what looked like a a skyscraper explosion. Looked like it had been done by a demolition crew. The whole thing just collapsing down on itself.
Speaker 1: For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately store destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.
Speaker 0: It was almost as if it were a planned implosion.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments, not deter conflict, and that the US will invade countries. An officer from the joint staff informed him the US was going to attack Iraq, but didn't know why, and that Saddam wasn't tied to 9/11. Later, the same officer showed the speaker a memo from the Secretary of Defense's office stating the US would attack and destroy the governments of seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. The speaker claims the country was taken over by people like Wolfowitz, Cheney, and Rumsfeld from the Project for a New American Century, who wanted to destabilize the Middle East and make it under US control. Their document, written before 9/11, acknowledged transformation would be a long process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To to to to start wars and change governments, it's not to sort of deter conflict. We're gonna invade countries and I I I you know, my mind was spinning. They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down. Now did anybody ever tell you that? Was there a national dialogue on this?
Did senators and congressmen stand up and denounce this plan? Was there a full fledged American debate on it? Absolutely not. And there still isn't. I was leaving the Pentagon and an officer from the joint staff called me into his office and said, I I want you to know, he said, sir, we're gonna attack Iraq.
And I said, why? He said, we don't know. He said I said, well, did they tie Saddam to nine eleven? He said, no. And then I came back to the Pentagon about six weeks later.
Saw the same officer. I said, why why haven't we attacked Iraq? We're still gonna attack Iraq? He said, oh, sir. He says, it's worse than that.
He said he pulled up a piece of paper off his desk. He said, I just got this memo from the secretary of defense's office. It says we're gonna attack and destroy the governments in in seven countries in five years. We're gonna start with Iraq, and then we're gonna move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. It was a pretty stunning thing.
You mean, the purpose of the military is to to to to start wars and change governments. It's not to sort of deter conflict. We're gonna invade countries and I I I, you know, my mind was spinning. And I put that aside. It was like a nugget that you hold on to.
This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup. Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld, and you could name a half dozen other collaborators from the project for a new American century. They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control.
Speaker 1: In their defining document written in February, a full year before nine eleven, they acknowledged that the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one. Absent in their
Speaker 0: own