TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DonaldBestCA

DonaldBestCA
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 1:14 PM
Saved - March 12, 2026 at 4:33 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Canada’s courts have ruled that Blacks are naturally more violent than other races due to the trauma of being Black. Therefore, (the courts reason) Blacks deserve reduced sentences for murdering their White girlfriends. The phrase “brings the administration of Justice into disrepute” comes to mind.

@nationalpost - National Post

Man who murdered girlfriend gets reduced sentence partly due to his race https://nationalpost.com/news/man-who-murdered-girlfriend-gets-reduced-sentence-partly-due-to-his-race https://t.co/Fbtf2UmAjc

DonaldBestCA
Posted - February 10, 2026 at 5:21 AM
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 12:21 AM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus will be sentenced for Discreditable Conduct - May 19, 2026 at 9:30am, 211 Huntmar, Kanata. Her offence? Infant Deaths Tripled – Detective Grus Asked Why Open to the Public Be there. https://grusjusticeproject.org/grus-case/ https://t.co/XnT078wTch

DonaldBestCA
Posted - December 15, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Saved - December 15, 2025 at 2:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus was dragged back to court as the prosecution seeks to dismiss 1000 pages of medical evidence supporting her findings. She was convicted of Discreditable Conduct on March 25, 2025, with a Tribunal Officer saying she should have asked for permission to probe an infant-deaths cluster due to political/societal ramifications and targeting public officials. The ruling threatens police independence and chillingly affects investigations of public figures. Public attendance: Dec 18/25 9:30 am. Full story at grusjusticeproject.org.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨Ottawa Police drag Detective Helen Grus back to court days before Christmas. Prosecution seeks to throw out 1000 pages of medical evidence showing Grus was correct. PUBLIC CAN ATTEND - Dec 18/25 930am Politics Stopped a Police Inquiry into a Cluster of Infant Deaths The Most Important Legal Case in the History of Canadian Policing Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus, a veteran investigator in the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Unit, was convicted of Discreditable Conduct under Ontario’s Police Services Act on March 25, 2025. Incredibly, the internal Tribunal Officer found that Detective Grus should have asked for permission before initiating an investigation into an unusual cluster of infant deaths – due to the “political and societal ramifications” of her inquiries, and because she was investigating “public officials”. The written decision eliminates the right and duty of Canadian police officers to conduct investigations without political interference – or to investigate public officials or politicians without prior permission from above. If allowed to stand, the Grus decision will undermine public confidence in the independence of police investigations, and cause serving police officers to look the other way when they suspect wrongdoing by ‘public officials’ or see possible crimes that have ‘political ramifications.’ The Full Story https://grusjusticeproject.org/grus-case/

Grus Case – Grus Justice Project grusjusticeproject.org
DonaldBestCA
Posted - December 4, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Saved - December 5, 2025 at 1:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting Bill C-9 as a major muzzling of free speech affecting lawmakers, reporters, and the public. I cite Ted Kuntz, Vincent Gircys, and Randy Hillier, warn that similar UK measures yield thousands of arrests, and fear overwhelmed courts will worsen. Bruce Pardy says the “fear” is ideological, not violent. Join our news conference to oppose with federally and provincially elected members. Date: Dec 8, 11:30 a.m., Queen’s Park Media Studio.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Bill C-9: The Quiet Coup Against Every Canadian’s Right to Speak, Believe, and Disagree Bill C-9 Turns Ideological Criticism into a Crime: • Ted Kuntz - President of the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) • Vincent Gircys - President of Police for Freedom • Randy Hillier - Former MPP, Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston This proposed bill in the House of Commons 2nd Reading Committee, represents a major muzzling of Free Speech affecting legislators at all levels, reporters and the public. Similar legislation in the UK is resulting in 12,000 arrests per year, and currently over 4,000 people in jail. At a time when Ontario courts are overwhelmed and failing to prosecute violent criminals these new measures will only amplify the number of violent criminals left on the street, and bring the justice system into disrepute. Bruce Pardy, Professor Of Law at Queen’s University: “The words in this provision are ‘to provoke a state of fear”. Now you and I are thinking of those words in the traditional way, that is, we’re assuming… that it means provoking a state of fear about the possibility of violence. That’s a threat, that’s an assault. That’s not what they’re getting at… If you have a group of people that are advocating for an ideology that is contrary to yours, and stands against everything you believe in, then now we are in to provoking a different kind of fear, and that’s the kind of fear I think they’re talking about. This is a type of fear that until recently has been unknown to the law.” Join our news conference to help learn why to share your opposition with your elected members federally, and provincially. EVENT DETAILS • Date: Monday, December 8 • Time: 11:30 a.m. • Location: Queen’s Park Media Studio @VGircys @randyhillier @NCICanada @PardyBruce

DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 28, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I, Frank Serpico, slam the Ottawa Police Service for covering up Detective Helen Grus’s probe into a possible link between mRNA vaccines and Sudden Infant Deaths. I say incompetence or criminality will go to any length to avoid exposure, even at the cost of innocent infant lives, and that the cover-up continues. Also noting I’m online on X.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Legendary New York Police Detective and Medal of Honor recipient Frank Serpico has slammed the Ottawa Police Service for covering up Detective Helen Grus's investigation into the potential connection between mRNA ‘vaccines’ and Sudden Infant Deaths. “Incompetence or criminality will go to any length not to be exposed even at the cost of innocent infant lives.” Detective Serpico says the cover-up is proceeding even though it puts “innocent infant lives” at risk. https://donaldbest.ca/famed-nypd-detective-frank-serpico-slams-ottawa-police-cover-up-in-grus-case/

Famed NYPD Detective Frank Serpico Slams Ottawa Police Cover-up In Grus Case | DonaldBest.CA “Incompetence or criminality will go to any length not to be exposed even at the cost of innocent infant lives.” Legendary New York Police Detective and Medal of Honor recipient Frank Serpico has slammed the Ottawa Police Service for covering up an investigation into the potential connection between mRNA ‘vaccines’ and Sudden Infant Deaths. Detective Serpico says this cover-up is donaldbest.ca

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Detective Serpico - NYPD Badge 761 - is online on X... https://t.co/Vek6cTamUy https://t.co/m8qoQzcKFR

DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 8, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 12:12 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

'Brampton' trucker Navjeet Singh blew a stop sign & slaughtered Sara Unger & daughter Alexa. He fled Canada but returned AND WAS GIVEN BAIL! Our friend @KevinKleinwpg speaks for us all - disgusted. Just once, can some bleeding heart judge get fired? https://winnipegsun.com/opinion/columnists/klein-driver-accused-in-fatal-crash-fled-canada-now-free-on-bail

KLEIN: Driver accused in fatal crash, fled Canada, now free on bail An accused truck driver who fled Canada after a fatal crash is free on bail — a decision exposing deep flaws in our justice system. Read more. winnipegsun.com

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

On November 15, 2024 semi-transport driver Navjeet Singh failed to stop and killed mother Sara Unger and her 8 year old daughter Alexa. @rcmpmb could have arrested the out of province driver while he was in the hospital - but they didn't. For all we know, the RCMP never even took a statement from him. Now CBC informs us that the RCMP are 'still searching' for a bird they had in their hand but let go. Was it RCMP incompetence? Laziness? Failure to keep proper staffing levels while charging Manitoba for the full price? There's a warrant out for Singh's arrest for two counts of dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death - and one count of obstructing a police officer. The Obstruct Police charge is very interesting. Did he falsely identify himself to police? Did he remove or destroy the truck's logs, video recordings, or black box? So many things Navjeet Singh could have done to merit the Obstruct Police charge. But if Navjeet Singh hasn't turned himself in by now - he's probably gone back to India. And that's on the RCMP officers at the scene who either failed to have an officer ride with him to the hospital or detail an officer to meet him there... or worse were at the hospital and let him go. The statement by the area RCMP commander that they didn't want to arrest Singh prematurely is pure nonsense. He was from out of province and a flight risk. He might have even been in Canada on a foreign worker visa. Two people were dead - but the RCMP officers and organization failed in their duty. But there's never any penalty for incompetence or neglect by police officers or for management that perpetuates and tolerates substandard performance. Best Bet... Navjeet Singh is gone, gone, gone.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - August 3, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 10:35 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

It’s called ‘Neglect of Duty’ - a chargeable offence for police officers who fail to diligently investigate reported crime or act if they witness a crime. Far too much of this going on by police officers. It undermines public confidence in both the police & Rule Of Law.

@CarymaRules - Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist

Not a single officer on scene made an effort to identify the masked protester who grabbed my videographer’s phone unprovoked, including the police liaison team who witnessed it. 📸 Aug 1, 2025 #Mississauga #ProtestMania https://t.co/N9CgbdQ6Ow

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person is requesting that an individual named "mister Patel" obtain the identification of a woman before she leaves. The speaker claims the woman assaulted them and expresses concern that she will disappear into the crowd, making it impossible to find her later.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you are you able to get her her identification because she assaulted me before she leaves? Miss mister Patel? Just give me one second, sir. She's gonna go into the crowd, we're not gonna we're not gonna be able to get her after, mister Patel.

@CarymaRules - Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist

WATCH: After witnessing an unprovoked assault by a masked protester, police advise heading to the nearest station to file a report— even as the suspect remains on scene and unidentified. Do you think @PeelPolice handled this appropriately? 📸 Aug 1, 2025 #Mississauga https://t.co/h0ZvH8dRO8

Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist is seeking clarity on rules of engagement after an incident. While filming, someone handed them a flyer, then a comrade told her to stop talking to them. The woman returned and allegedly grabbed at the journalist's camera and tried snapping his tampons. The journalist believes this was assault. The journalist is concerned about potential escalation if they encounter the masked woman again and wants to know her identity or have a record of the incident. They ask the police for help in identifying her. The police suggest going to 11 Division, but the journalist points out that this would require leaving the protest. The journalist feels the police should be able to at least identify the woman.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not back at this time. Speaker 1: Hi. I just want to get some clarity on the rules of engagement here, because we are journalists. We were standing in one spot filming. Someone came to give us a flyer, which is totally fine. She was explaining the purpose. That's what we're here for. A comrade of hers came and told her not to talk to us, which is also fine. She then returned and tried grabbing at his campground. Now that's not a fool. She seems to think that that's not an assault. It is. She tried snapping his tampons, and she's now sort of venting into the crowd. She was masked. We don't know who she is. And my general observation is that people who act aggressively, if we encounter them again, there's an escalation. So at the very least, we'd like to know who that person is or having some kind of record because the next time that we see her, surely we will see her again if she's here Speaker 0: police, you're more than welcome Speaker 1: to do that. Can you facilitate that for us? Speaker 0: Closest division would be to go to 11 Division. Speaker 1: So we have to leave the protest for the person who's currently standing by because you can't help and there's no other police here going home. Like I So I appreciate that the liaisons have a specific Speaker 0: information gathering rule. They all have one We have to do that. Speaker 1: Should be able Speaker 0: to facilitate at least identifying someone who Had we get all the police in one way
DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Saved - July 13, 2025 at 5:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prosecutor Jessica Barrow argues that police investigations involving politicians and government employees should require pre-approval due to their political implications. I haven't reviewed the full January recordings of the Grus Hearing yet, but I anticipate significant developments when defense lawyer Bath-Sheba van den Berg continues her arguments. Barrow's stance suggests that Detective Grus's investigation should have involved higher authority, implying that certain individuals may be shielded from scrutiny, which I firmly oppose. No one is above the law.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨Breaking🚨 Prosecutor in Detective Grus Internal Trial Argues For Special Protection From Police Investigations - for Politicians and Government Employees Prosecutor Jessica Barrow argues that police investigation of politicians and government employees is special and should be pre-approved by those in power. I'm being cautious because I have not yet reviewed the full January recordings of the Grus Hearing - but what I've read and heard makes me believe that there will be fireworks today - Friday 10th - when defense lawyer Bath-Sheba van den Berg continues her submissions. @rkraychik, @RobStocki both reported that hired-gun prosecutor Jessica Barrow of the Perley-Robertson @PRHMLaw law firm made statements that because Detective Grus's investigation had "political ramifications" - Grus should have sought permission before proceeding. I have a message for Prosecutor Jessica Barrow... Nobody is above the law, including the politicians and government employees that you believe should be shielded from investigation by individual police officers - unlike other Canadians. In my opinion, Ottawa Police Prosecutor Jessica Barrow endorsed the criminal offences of Obstruct Police and Obstruct Justice. Barrow argues that police investigation of politicians and government employees is special and should be pre-approved by those in power. In @JessicaJBarrow own words... "Her (Detective Grus's) Investigation would have massive political implications..." "...there can be absolutely no doubt that an experienced detective like Detective Grus would understand that the investigation of an allegation of widespread criminal activity by all of the public institutions that serve our community cannot be initiated without at least a conversation with the chain of command. That type of investigation would be one of massive implications and proportions, and with all due respect, would not and could not be put in the hands of one detective in one unit of one police service, and Detective Grus knows that, just like she admits in her cross examination, that if you're a patrol officer and happen upon a homicide, you're not just unilaterally conducting a homicide investigation just because you're a police officer with investigative powers and responsibilities and you happen to be there." Photo: Lawyer Jessica Barrow

DonaldBestCA
Posted - March 25, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 11:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated to hear that Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus has been found guilty for conducting unauthorized inquiries into public officials. This raises serious concerns about the integrity of the police force and the need for permission to investigate. I plan to gather my thoughts and provide a detailed analysis of this biased decision. Additionally, I’ve learned from internal sources that Chief Eric Stubbs is away, leaving Deputy Chief Steve Bell to handle the fallout from the verdict, which is concerning given his past actions during the Trucker Convoy.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus Found GUILTY "...unauthorized criminal negligence inquiries on public officials were being undertaken by a criminal investigator within SACA." So now police officers are required to obtain permission before investigating public officials? How corrupt. I'm going to have a tea and calm myself before writing my full analysis of this corrupt and biased decision by a corrupt and biased tribunal. You can download the decision from the corrupt @OttawaPolice .... https://ottawapolice.ca/en/Decision-with-Reasons,-Det.-Grus.pdf…

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

INSIDER INFORMATION: Two internal Ottawa Police sources report that Chief of Police Eric Stubbs is away until the second week in April. Sources say the decision release was timed so that Deputy Chief Steve Bell would be acting Chief. Expect to hear Bell commenting on the verdict to the legacy media. As Acting Chief during the Trucker Convoy, Steve Bell infamously said that the Ottawa Police would "follow up with financial sanctions" (ie: illegally seizing / freezing bank accounts, destroying protestors' businesses, removing their licenses)

Video Transcript AI Summary
If protesters retreat and go home, they will face repercussions. Authorities will actively look to identify individuals involved in the protest and follow up with financial sanctions and criminal charges. The investigation will continue for months and involve many different streams, including federal financial, provincial licensing, criminal code, and municipal breach of court order/injunction levels. Authorities are committed to continuing the investigation and holding people accountable for taking over the streets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gathering intelligence with those cameras. Can you elaborate, like, if the protesters at this point, you know, retreat and go home, are they gonna be getting sort of repercussions down the road? Are you gonna be sort of actively pursuing the people that you've been sort of documenting and filming who are still out there protesting? What are your plans after this after the protest is over? Speaker 1: Thank you. It's a great question. And the simple answer is yes. If you are involved in this protest, we will actively look to identify you and follow-up with financial sanctions and criminal charges. Absolutely. We this investigation will go on for months to come. It has many, many different streams, both from a federal financial level, from a provincial licensing level, from a criminal code level, from a municipal breach of court order, breach of court injunction level. It will be a complicated and time consuming investigation that will go on for a period of time. You have my commitment that that investigation will continue, and we will hold people accountable for taking our streets over. Speaker 0: And could I just
DonaldBestCA
Posted - March 11, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Saved - March 11, 2025 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canada's Public Health Agency has confirmed that mRNA COVID booster shots are linked to a significant increase in deaths among vaccinated individuals. This acknowledgment comes after months of pressure from independent researchers. Data indicates that mortality rates for boosted individuals are higher than those for the unvaccinated, a trend noted since late 2021. Despite this, the government continues to promote the vaccines, even as over 10,000 vaccine injury claims have been reported. The implications of these findings may take years to fully understand.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨Breaking🚨Canada Confirms Covid Boosters Linked to Death Surge Iron🍁Wire (formerly Iron Will Report @IronWillRpt ) just published the following video. We've posted the transcript below and the video. (As a side note - Once again @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus is proven correct in her suspicions that the COVID-19 'vaccines' were linked to injuries and deaths. My reporting on the Grus case is here: https://donaldbest.ca/detective-grus-case/ ) Check out the original IronWire video and the many other excellently-researched major articles and interviews at https://ironwiredaily.com/top-stories/canada-confirms-covid-boosters-linked-to-death-surge/ Iron🍁Wire is well worth your time. I've subscribed to their free daily newsletter. Transcript via Otter dot ai with minimal human checking: CANADA CONFIRMS COVID BOOSTERS LINKED TO DEATH SURGE The Public Health Agency of Canada finally confessed this past week what we've all known for some time, confirming that mRNA COVID booster shots triggered a significant surge in deaths among vaccinated Canadians. The agency's latest report, quietly released after months of pressure from independent researchers and parliamentary inquiries, reveals that boosted individuals experienced mortality rates markedly higher than their unvaccinated peers. According to data obtained last fall through a Freedom of Information request, this trend became evident as early as late 2021 - so Statistics Canada, updates on vaccine related deaths mysteriously ceased by mid 2022. Independent media outlets like slay news and well us, have long tracked whistleblower claims now validated that the boosters heavily promoted by Trudeau Government carried severe risks. Canada's vaccine rollout launched in December 2020 saw over 80% of adults receive at least two doses by mid 2022 - at least, according to Statistics Canada, although this figure was artificially and consciously inflated by sometimes counting the first booster as a first shot. The third and fourth boosters pushed in 2023 targeted the elderly and immunocompromised. Yet the report shows deaths spiked across all age groups as people - either coerced or fooled by the safe and effective government propaganda - continued to line up for yet more shots of a vaccine our government had already confessed did not prevent transmission or infection. Posts on social media since the announcement erupted with outrage pointing to censored doctors like Byram Bridle and many others who warned of mRNA side effects years ago. The agency offers no explanation for the delay in acknowledging these findings, nor does it address the fate of officials who dismissed early concerns as misinformation. This revelation lands as Health Canada grapples with ongoing vaccine injury claims, with over 10,000 reports logged by late last year. The data stands unrefuted. The boosters, touted by Trudeau Government as the key to ending lockdowns, have a lethal legacy - the impact of which we may not know for decades. Meanwhile, Health Canada and many provincial health agencies continue to recommend the COVID vaccines.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Public Health Agency of Canada has finally admitted that mRNA COVID boosters led to a significant increase in deaths among vaccinated Canadians. The report, released after pressure from researchers and inquiries, shows boosted individuals had higher mortality rates than the unvaccinated, starting as early as late 2021. While Statistics Canada stopped reporting vaccine-related deaths in mid-2022, data obtained through Freedom of Information requests confirmed these findings. Despite over 80% of adults receiving at least two doses by mid-2022 and the promotion of third and fourth boosters in 2023, deaths spiked across all age groups. This occurred even though the government had already acknowledged the vaccines didn't prevent transmission or infection. The revelation has sparked outrage, with many pointing to previously censored doctors who warned of mRNA side effects. The agency hasn't explained the delay in acknowledging these findings, and this comes as Health Canada deals with over 10,000 vaccine injury claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Public Health Agency of Canada finally confessed this past week what we've all known for some time, confirming that mRNA COVID booster shots triggered a significant surge in deaths among vaccinated Canadians. The agency's latest report, quietly released after months of pressure from independent researchers and parliamentary inquiries, reveals that boosted individuals experienced mortality rates markedly higher than their unvaccinated peers. According to data obtained last fall through a Freedom of Information request, this trend became evident as early as late twenty twenty one, though Statistics Canada updates on vaccine related deaths mysteriously ceased by mid twenty twenty two. Independent media outlets like Slay News and, well, Us, have long tracked whistleblower claims, now validated, that the boosters, heavily promoted by Trudeau's government, carried severe risks. Canada's vaccine rollout, launched in December 2020, saw over eighty percent of adults receive at least two doses by mid-twenty twenty two, at least according to Statistics Canada, although this figure was artificially and consciously inflated by sometimes counting the first booster as a first shot. The third and fourth boosters, pushed in 2023, targeted the elderly and immunocompromised. Yet the report shows deaths spiked across all age groups as people either coerced or fooled by the safe and effective government propaganda continued to line up for yet more shots of a vaccine. Our government had already confessed did not prevent transmission or infection. Posts on social media since the announcement erupted with outrage, pointing to censored doctors like Byram Breidl and many others who warned of mRNA side effects years ago. The agency offers no explanation for the delay in acknowledging these findings, nor does it address the fate of officials who dismissed early concerns as misinformation. This revelation lands as Health Canada grapples with ongoing vaccine injury claims, with over 10,000 reports logged by late last year. The data stands unrefuted. The boosters, touted by Trudeau's government as the key to ending lockdowns, have a lethal legacy, the impact of which we may not know for decades. Meanwhile, Health Canada and many provincial health agencies continue to recommend the COVID vaccines.
Canada Confirms Covid Boosters Linked to Death Surge – Iron Wire ironwiredaily.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've created a searchable database of the first 200 pages of Dr. Theresa Tam's FOI emails using Claude 3.7 Sonnet A.I. After testing various AI engines, only Claude could manage the detailed work required. The database is available in multiple formats on my blog, with more documents being processed daily. Over the past five days, I've been indexing and summarizing the emails, achieving high accuracy and efficiency. I plan to share my entire process soon, as I believe everyone should have access to tools that facilitate evidence processing.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨Breaking🚨 re Dr. Theresa Tam FOI emails I've used Claude 3.7 Sonnet A.I. to create a searchable database of the first 200 pages of the @Bret_Sears Tam FOI emails. After testing Grok3, ChatGPT 4o, and Claude a.i. engines, only Claude could handle the detail work required. The database / index is available in Excel, CSV, and FileMaker Pro formats on my blog - with more documents to be processed and indexed every day. https://donaldbest.ca/tam-foi/ Full process guide coming soon... I'm sharing my method and development experience freely because I believe everyone deserves access to tools that can efficiently process evidence. The truth about what was done to our loved ones, friends, and fellow citizens shouldn't be limited by technical barriers. As I wrote to a few of my friends last night... For the last five days I've been... Using Artificial Intelligence to Database and Summarize the Tam Emails After 5 days of testing and trials I am in a production mode using Claude 3.7 Sonnet to index and database .pdfs of emails. Right now it's limited to 50 page batches with a throughput of about 4 an hour - so 15 minutes per 50 pages which includes all my using Acrobat for OCRing, deleting everything except the 50 page batch, saving as a reduced size pdf, uploading my perfected instructions to Claude with the 50 page pdf. Waiting for Claude processing into a .csv file. Downloading the .csv file, importing the .csv file into the database (filemaker but could be anything) , then checking for accuracy (so far 100% acceptable thanks to the new instructions and smaller batches), then uploading the .csv into the master database that continues building. I could probably shave 1/3 off the time by mass producing the 50 page pdfs. Two people using Claude on the same project could probably index 500 to 700 pages per hour. The indexing also produces an excellent detailed summary of each page including all involved names. Say two people working a full 7 hour day indexing, summarizing, and databasing 3,000 to 4,000 pages per day. And the quality is excellent. When Claude is able to swallow 100 pages at a time - as it will in a year no doubt - two people could database, bates number, index, summarize 20,000 to 30,000 pages per 5 day week. This is unbelievable as we used to database 100,000 pages manually with 20+ employees and it could take months and months for a major civil case - continuing sometimes for over a year. Made a ton of $ back in the day handling major civil cases for Bay Street law firms - but now I could do it with a single partner / employee. The key is that the summaries are excellent. I will send samples to you tomorrow. I am also willing to share my entire process and will be publishing an article revealing everything in a few days.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - February 25, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 3:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered shocking FOI emails revealing that Canadian officials conducted RSV vaccine trials on Inuit children from 2017 to 2019 without parental consent or oversight. Despite ethical concerns raised by health workers, the government continued the trials even after the vaccine failed. This pattern of deception echoes past abuses, including unethical experiments on Indigenous children dating back to the 1930s. As more FOI documents emerge, I question whether officials, including Theresa Tam, should face accountability for their actions.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨 THREAD: Bombshell FOI Emails Expose Secret Vaccine Experiments on Inuit Children 🚨 1/ BREAKING: Newly uncovered FOI emails prove that Canadian officials used Inuit children as test subjects for an RSV vaccine 2017-2019 - without parental consent, without oversight, and without accountability. Theresa Tam knew. And she did nothing. 🧵⬇️ 🔗 Read the full story: https://donaldbest.ca/bombshell-foi-emails-will-theresa-tam-finally-face-a-reckoning/

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

2/ Dec. 16, 2019: A bombshell internal government email from Dr. Tom Wong to Theresa Tam raises serious ethical concerns. ⚠️ “Health workers raised concerns about free and informed consent from parents… the Inuit population was not involved in the decision.” Yet the government pressed forward.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

3/ The RSV vaccine experiment FAILED. Canadian officials knew it wasn’t working. Instead of stopping, they kept Indigenous children in the dark and continued the trials anyway. The pattern of deception is undeniable - going back to the 1930s...

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

4/ This wasn’t the first time. 📌 1940s-50s: Canada’s medical establishment deliberately starved Indigenous children in residential schools to “study malnutrition.” 📌 1933: TB vaccine trials on Indigenous children without parental consent—20% died. 🇨🇦 A shameful blueprint for abuse by Canada's medical establishment and successive governments.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

5/ No one gave consent. No one had a choice. “The difference between medical research’s clinical trials and human experimentation is patient consent. In these cases, consent was simply taken for granted.” — Maureen Lux, Separate Beds

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

6/ FOI emails also reveal a bigger scandal—COVID-19. @Bret_Sears has pried loose 1,818 pages of internal government emails. They shift focus from RSV to mRNA vaccines. What did Theresa Tam and officials know about vaccine harm—and when?

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

7/ Criminal Negligence? As a former Toronto Police Sergeant (Detective), I have one question: If officials KNEW the mRNA injections were causing harm and continued pushing them while concealing the truth—could this support criminal charges? My full article addresses this important issue. #BombshellFOI #TheresaTam

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

8/ This is just the beginning. More FOI pages are coming. More revelations are inevitable. 👁‍🗨 Read the full story. Share this thread. Help expose the truth. https://donaldbest.ca/bombshell-foi-emails-will-theresa-tam-finally-face-a-reckoning/ 💬 What do YOU think? Should Tam and other officials be held accountable? #Canada #InformedConsent #FOI

DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 10:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlighted serious concerns regarding the safety of COVID mRNA vaccines based on a recent Alberta government review, which calls for an immediate halt to their use, especially in healthy children. The report reveals alarming data, including 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries reported shortly after vaccination. Detective Helen Grus raised similar concerns about vaccine safety and was charged with discreditable conduct for her investigation into unexplained infant deaths. This unprecedented case raises critical questions about the influence of politics on police investigations and public health policies.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination" @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus was right - and as @TamaraUgo reports, an Alberta government review calls for the immediate halt of COVID mRNA vaccines. Neglect of Duty at the Highest Ottawa Police Ranks During December 2021 and January 2022 meetings, Detective Helen Grus warned Chief Peter Sloly, Deputy Trish Ferguson, and other senior officers that the Pfizer vaccine had never been tested on pregnant women. As a police detective, she expressed concern for the welfare of pregnant women receiving these experimental COVID vaccines. In the context of widespread vaccine mandates and public health policies, Detective Grus highlighted that adverse effects were going unreported, and that persons were not being informed of potential adverse effects – which she described as potentially criminal. As an example she told the senior officers of an Ottawa motorist who had a medical event and collision when driving home from being vaccinated. The motorist died 2 days later. This from evidence presented during the internal trial of Detective Grus – who in July 2022 was charged with one count of ‘discreditable conduct’ for allegedly initiating an ‘unauthorized’ investigation into nine unexplained infant deaths. She was exploring the possibility that the vaccination status of the mothers might be a factor in the fatalities. When the Chief Peter Sloly and senior officers deliberately ignored the evidence of infant deaths, Grus became the target of a backlash from the top down. Ottawa Police eventually charged Helen with discreditable conduct, to make an example of her AND TO DETER OTHER OFFICERS FROM CONTINUING HER INVESTIGATION. Meanwhile, Grus was suspended, her reputation dragged through the mud, and her career placed in jeopardy for simply doing the job she was sworn to do. This case is unprecedented. Never in Canadian history has a police officer been charged for conducting a professional investigation. Yet that is exactly what happened. Even Ottawa Police prosecutor Jessica Barrow acknowledged that Grus's investigation was halted and charges were brought against her for political reasons. This case will undoubtedly influence the mindset of Canada's 70,000 police officers, prompting them to consider whether certain actions are "too political." Now that Detective Grus’s tribunal has concluded, all eyes are on adjudicator Chris Renwick, who holds her fate in his hands. The decision is set for late February, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

@RebelNewsOnline - Rebel News

Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy. The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies. Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data. One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations. The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals. Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made. The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented. Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety profile. Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked? The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies. The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Alberta government's COVID-19 response review calls for an immediate halt to modified RNA vaccines, particularly for children. The report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, highlights significant data gaps regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, citing alarming statistics from Pfizer's post-authorization trial, including over 1,200 deaths and 42,000 injuries. It criticizes the abandonment of Alberta's pandemic plan and urges a return to localized approaches. Recommendations include halting vaccine use without full risk disclosure, further research, and establishing support for vaccine-injured individuals. The review raises concerns about the lack of long-term safety data and the high risk of adverse events, particularly in young, healthy populations. It emphasizes the need for transparency and informed choice in future vaccination initiatives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Alberta government has just released its official COVID nineteen response review, and it calls for an immediate halt of the novel modified RNA COVID nineteen vaccines. The Alberta government's newly but quietly released COVID-nineteen response review is scathing and part of it calls for an immediate halt to the novel modified RNA COVID-nineteen injections especially for children commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, the report highlights significant gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and effectiveness. Key findings include alarming statistics from Pfizer's post authorization trial, 1,200 23 deaths and 42,000 injuries with a disproportionate number of affected individuals being those who are healthy and young, not at all at risk of COVID 19 complications. The review first began in 2022 when clinical lead for emergency medicine in Central Alberta, Doctor. Gary Davidson, was tasked with examining the data and governance surrounding the pandemic response. This included reviewing non pharmaceutical interventions like masking and lockdowns, the modeling used to predict outcomes, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Jay Paddacharya, Byram Bridle and David Speaker contributed to the report. Doctor. Davidson criticized the abandonment of Alberta's pandemic plan in favor of a more reactive seemingly top down decision making leading to unintended consequences like a surge in accidental deaths from overdoses and suicides which he says have not returned to baseline levels. He calls for a return to a more localized Alberta specific approach In terms of pharmaceutical interventions, the task force recommends halting the use of COVID 19 vaccines without full disclosure of their potential risks, ending their use in healthy children and teenagers, conducting further research into their effectiveness, establishing support for vaccine injured individuals, and providing an opt out mechanism from federal public health policy. In addition to that, they recommend a careful assessment of risks and benefits, transparency, and individual choice in decision making for any future pandemic response vaccination initiative. The summary of the data used to authorize these injections, which fell squarely on health Canada shoulders found that there were significant gaps identified and that these were never discussed. Whether or not a risk assessment was conducted is unknown. I've been probing Health Canada for this exact risk assessment in an attempt to determine that the benefit of these novel injections outweighed the risks for those under the age of 18, since they first began authorizing them for those age groups in May of 2021. The agency responded to one concerned Ontario doctor, Mark Benoit, that they were basing their decisions on feelings, not facts. Look at this. Health Canada's review of COVID-nineteen vaccines and therapeutic products is based on qualitative risk benefit calculation. It would not be sufficiently accurate to quantitatively calculate risk based on our limited understanding of the virus and the disease. Wait. What? We have at least 16 months of quantitative data, and it shows that the flu is more risky to children than COVID 19. I literally say that in my last report with doctor Benoit. Have a listen. Influenza is exponentially more risky for children than COVID 19 has shown to be over the last year plus of of the emergency, quote unquote. That was until last week when the CDC magically changed their wording on the risk assessment of flu versus COVID for children. And even if there wasn't over a year's worth of data to start to draw from, somehow health Canada thinks that it's totally fine to develop and administer emergency use injections with no long term safety testing based on what they call limited understanding of the virus, what kind of health agency does this to children? So anyway, the email goes on to say that, quote, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, that's NACI, reviewed available evidence on the burden of illness in this population and vaccine acceptability of parents and guardians. Apparently, they used parental approval as an appropriate evaluation tool. Well that speaks to the quality of the qualitative evidence, which could basically be polling, like how do people feel about the risk? See, qualitative data is subjective and open to interpretation, while quantitative includes hard numbers and facts to prove something. The Alberta task force details Pfizer's own vaccine safety data from the 3 month post authorization trial, which they call alarming. 1,223 deaths attributed to the vaccine, 42,086 people injured within 4 days of vaccination, and 45% of these were between the ages of 18 to 50 who were at negligible risk from COVID 19 infection. The report notes that the lipid nanoparticles, which are the synthetic fat bubbles wrapping the modified RNA and spike protein to act as a barrier to ensure it's delivered directly into cells, have a well described toxicity in scientific literature after multiple injections and that pregnant women in the Pfizer randomized control trial did not fare well. It is unknown why vaccines were recommended in Alberta to pregnant women and those of childbearing age. The well documented risk for developing myocarditis and pericarditis from these injections is acknowledged stating that these heart conditions have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences. It acknowledges that it's easy to authorize novel therapies under the emergency use authorization, but very difficult to halt or discontinue them if concerns are warranted. And that it's very difficult to access relevant vaccine safety and efficacy data in Alberta's publicly funded health system. In detailing some of the gaps and information that I mentioned above, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization called NACI even said that there is only short term clinical data. So it is unknown how long the vaccines are protective for, that there wasn't sufficient data to assess whether they prevented severe infection, hospitalization, or death, that long term immunity data is unknown. They knew that medium and long term evidence on vaccine safety was limited, and that the clinical trials excluded individuals with a history of severe adverse reactions associated with the vaccine and or severe allergic reaction to any of the ingredients slash components. The report broke down the risk of COVID complications based on comorbidities in a graph on page 193, showing what they say is an outsized impact that 2 or more comorbidities had on the severity of outcomes for those admitted to hospital. Then the age stratify the risk to show absolute risk levels, which found what many have been saying for years. There should have been a risk benefit analysis performed to protect the at risk demographic will decrease or halt mitigation resources on populations with a positive risk benefit analysis. The most damning piece of evidence lies in the 6 month interim report of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine clinical trial that was finally published in September 2023. This is the trial whose original trial report I first featured in December of 2021 after discovering that the study was unblinded after a mere 2 months in despite showing an increased risk of illness and death in the vaccine arm. Overall, it was riddled with lack of oversight, inadequate follow ups, conflicts of interest and inappropriate demographics, including missing and buried data. So the way that they reported their efficacy outcomes was in relative risk reductions, which amplify or make, you know, improve they seem to make the effect bigger, but Speaker 1: the way that they reported their adverse events was in in percentages of the population. And so then it didn't seem to be as impactful. But if you actually did relative risk reduction and absolute risk change for both populations for adverse events as well as the co the the symptomatic cases, if you use the same principles and statistical methodology, what you actually notice is for treatment related adverse effects, there were about 5,241 people who actually had COVID you know, some sort of COVID like symptom or worse, and in the the vaccine arm, and only 1,311 in the placebo arm. So that's a net increase to, you know, a 300% relative increase in adverse events for the people who took the vaccine. We're seeing that the trend is going towards more severe outcomes and serious outcomes in the vaccine arm. So So I guess what we would have to conclude is I don't think that this is doing the job that we'd hoped that it was doing. In fact, it looks like it might be pointing in the other direction when we isolate the PCR test and we just look at clinical Speaker 0: symptoms. The Alberta report confirms these concerns, albeit over 3 years later when they write the mRNA LNP platform is novel, not previously phase 2, 3 tested in humans, and the toxicity of the spike protein was unknown. Taken together, a 20 week placebo controlled clinical trial is not sufficient to identify any except for the most common safety concerns. Shockingly, it further notes that out of 38 deaths reported in the 6 month interim report of adverse events, 21 of the vaccinated subjects died compared to 17 placebo. It showed delayed reporting of the subject deaths in violation of the trial protocol, which allowed the emergency use authorization to continue. The number of subject deaths was 17% of the expected number, and there was a 3.7 fold increase in cardiac events in subjects who received the vaccine versus the placebo. The report even acknowledges the issue of underreporting that only 1 to 10 percent of all adverse events were reported concerning data regarding pregnant women and Pfizer's initial trial is included in the review where only one normal birth outcome occurred out of 32 women followed. There were 270 women, but Pfizer reported no outcomes for 238 of them. This means there was an 87.5% fetal slash neonatal mortality for the 32 pregnancies they had reported an outcome for in their post authorization follow-up period. The report reads, these are devastating results. The history and safety or lack thereof of the lipid nanoparticle platform referred to as LNPs is detailed again. Things I've reported on dating back to October 2023 November 2021. The report sources back to a 2016 article interviewing Moderna's CEO, where it stated that the delivery platform of modified RNA is inherently dangerous, stating that the RNA work better if they're wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years. Indeed, the data included in this report on adverse events confirms that recognized and acknowledged risk associated with the LMP platform through multiple dosing. The more doses one gets, the higher the risk of an adverse reaction. Despite overwhelming evidence, those responsible for public health have dismissed critical concerns as misinformation. Even though the alarming data has been out in the open for years, yet only a handful of journalists in Canada like myself have been relentlessly exposing the truth and following the facts around these novel pharmaceutical products since 2021. This report demands transparency, informed choice, and proper risk assessments, underscoring the devastating consequences of a rushed and fear driven response that ignored a more reasonable evidence based approach. Will these shots finally be pulled from the market, or at the very least immediately banned for use in healthy young populations? Maybe misinformation monger Teresa Tam cares to weigh in. For Rebel news, I'm Tamara Ugolini. You can call for an end to these shots at no more shots dot CA. There, you can sign our petition, send a form email to minister of health, Mark Holland, and support this kind of investigative solution journalism at no more shots dot CA.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

@OttawaPolice https://t.co/WrQI1SYaNf

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🔥Now Premiering: Explosive Video!🔥 Ottawa Police Prosecutor admits Detective Helen Grus was charged to shield politicians and officials from police investigations. Grus is accused of probing 9 unexplained infant deaths for possible links to COVID vaccines. This shocking @DaveFreedom4 video exposes how @OttawaPolice and Prosecutor Jessica Barrow delivered a chilling on-the-record message to Canada’s 70,000 police officers: “Do NOT investigate matters with political ramifications without permission.” With the trial now over, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Hearing Officer Chris Renwick’s verdict will not just define Grus’s fate and his legacy—it will shape the future of policing in Canada. Watch now. Full video transcript in the next post.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Detective Helen Bruce, after 20 years of service, faced a life-altering investigation into the deaths of nine infants, potentially linked to their mothers' Pfizer vaccination status. A fellow officer failed to follow protocol regarding vaccine inquiries, leading to Bruce being targeted by senior officials who ignored her findings. Charged with discreditable conduct, Bruce was suspended and her career jeopardized for fulfilling her duty. Ottawa police prosecutor Jessica Barrow noted the charges were politically motivated, raising concerns among Canada's police force about political influence on investigations. As the tribunal concludes, adjudicator Kris Renwick's decision in February will be pivotal, impacting the future of policing in Canada and the principle that no one is above the law.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After 20 years of dedicated service to the city of Ottawa, police detective Helen Bruce thought she'd seen it all, but nothing could have prepared her for the battle of her life. When 9 infants tragically died, Grouss uncovered chilling evidence suggesting a possible link between the deaths and their mother's vaccination status, specifically, the Pfizer vaccines. Her investigation also revealed a troubling oversight. A fellow officer had deviated from established protocol by neglecting to inquire about the vaccine status of the mothers and babies, a standard procedure that had been in place for over 50 years. When chief Peter Slowly and senior officers deliberately ignored the evidence of infant deaths, Grews became the target of a backlash from the top down. Ottawa police eventually charged Helen with discreditable conduct to make an example of her and to deter other officers from continuing her investigation. Meanwhile, Bruce was suspended. Her reputation dragged through the mud and her career placed in jeopardy for simply doing the job she was sworn to do. This case is unprecedented. Never in Canadian history has a police officer been charged for conducting a professional investigation, yet that is exactly what happened. Even Ottawa police prosecutor, Jessica Barrow, acknowledged that Bruce's investigation was halted and charges were brought against her for political reasons. This case will undoubtedly influence the mindset of Canada's 70,000 police officers, prompting them to consider whether certain actions are too political. Now that detective Bruce's tribunal has concluded, all eyes are on adjudicator, Kris Renwick, who holds her fate in his hands. The decision is set for late February, and the stakes couldn't be higher. Speaker 1: Mister Renwick, this case will define your legacy. It is a decision that will echo far beyond the confines of this tribunal, influencing the future of policing in Canada, and how history judges your role in this critical moment. You stand at a crossroads where moral integrity and adherence to the rule of law should outweigh external pressures or political considerations. 70,000 police officers and millions of Canadians are watching, hoping that you will act with courage and fairness. Detective Helen Grewe stands accused of this credible conduct without evidence to support such a charge. Her work was driven by sworn duty to protect the public yet, she has been met with systemic retaliation instead of recognition for her diligence. This trial risk becoming a symbol of injustice unless you rise above it. History would remember you as the one who upheld the principle that no corporation, politician or senior official is above the law. Standing in stark contrast to the prosecutor's final submission that detective Bruce should have informed her supervisors about her inquiry due to its, quote, political ramifications. The audacity of such a statement cannot be overstated. It suggests that political considerations should dictate what law enforcement investigates. This trial is not just about one officer. It is about the very essence of what it means to serve and protect without fear or favor. Your ruling will set a precedent whether for justice or for capitulation to political expedience and pressure. If ever there was a moment to stand for justice, this is it. The weight of this responsibility is immense and Canada awaits your decision.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 22, 2025 at 5:39 AM
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 2:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am sharing a powerful video and transcript regarding Detective Helen Grus, who faced charges for investigating nine unexplained infant deaths potentially linked to COVID vaccines. Despite her dedication, she was targeted for conducting a professional inquiry that senior officers ignored. The case raises serious concerns about political influence on police investigations. As the tribunal's decision approaches, it holds significant implications for the future of policing in Canada. I urge the adjudicator, Chris Renwick, to prioritize justice over political pressures in his ruling.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🔥Now Premiering: Explosive Video!🔥 Ottawa Police Prosecutor admits Detective Helen Grus was charged to shield politicians and officials from police investigations. Grus is accused of probing 9 unexplained infant deaths for possible links to COVID vaccines. This shocking @DaveFreedom4 video exposes how @OttawaPolice and Prosecutor Jessica Barrow delivered a chilling on-the-record message to Canada’s 70,000 police officers: “Do NOT investigate matters with political ramifications without permission.” With the trial now over, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Hearing Officer Chris Renwick’s verdict will not just define Grus’s fate and his legacy—it will shape the future of policing in Canada. Watch now. Full video transcript in the next post.

Video Transcript AI Summary
After 20 years of service, Detective Helen Bruce faced an unprecedented challenge when investigating the deaths of 9 infants, uncovering potential links to their mothers' Pfizer vaccination status. A fellow officer's failure to follow protocol regarding vaccine inquiries compounded the issue. When Bruce's findings were ignored by senior officials, she became a target, facing charges of discreditable conduct for her investigation. This case, unprecedented in Canadian history, raises concerns about political influence on policing. As her tribunal concludes, all eyes are on adjudicator Kris Renwick, whose decision will impact the future of policing in Canada. The case symbolizes the struggle between moral integrity and political pressure, with the potential to set a significant precedent for law enforcement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After 20 years of dedicated service to the city of Ottawa, police detective Helen Bruce thought she'd seen it all, but nothing could have prepared her for the battle of her life. When 9 infants tragically died, Grouss uncovered chilling evidence suggesting a possible link between the deaths and their mother's vaccination status, specifically, the Pfizer vaccines. Her investigation also revealed a troubling oversight. A fellow officer had deviated from established protocol by neglecting to inquire about the vaccine status of the mothers and babies, a standard procedure that had been in place for over 50 years. When chief Peter Slowly and senior officers deliberately ignored the evidence of infant deaths, Grews became the target of a backlash from the top down. Ottawa police eventually charged Helen with discreditable conduct to make an example of her and to deter other officers from continuing her investigation. Meanwhile, Bruce was suspended. Her reputation dragged through the mud and her career placed in jeopardy for simply doing the job she was sworn to do. This case is unprecedented. Never in Canadian history has a police officer been charged for conducting a professional investigation, yet that is exactly what happened. Even Ottawa police prosecutor, Jessica Barrow, acknowledged that Bruce's investigation was halted and charges were brought against her for political reasons. This case will undoubtedly influence the mindset of Canada's 70,000 police officers, prompting them to consider whether certain actions are too political. Now that detective Bruce's tribunal has concluded, all eyes are on adjudicator, Kris Renwick, who holds her fate in his hands. The decision is set for late February, and the stakes couldn't be higher. Speaker 1: Mister Renwick, this case will define your legacy. It is a decision that will echo far beyond the confines of this tribunal, influencing the future of policing in Canada, and how history judges your role in this critical moment. You stand at a crossroads where moral integrity and adherence to the rule of law should outweigh external pressures or political considerations. 70,000 police officers and millions of Canadians are watching, hoping that you will act with courage and fairness. Detective Helen Grewe stands accused of this credible conduct without evidence to support such a charge. Her work was driven by sworn duty to protect the public yet, she has been met with systemic retaliation instead of recognition for her diligence. This trial risk becoming a symbol of injustice unless you rise above it. History would remember you as the one who upheld the principle that no corporation, politician or senior official is above the law. Standing in stark contrast to the prosecutor's final submission that detective Bruce should have informed her supervisors about her inquiry due to its, quote, political ramifications. The audacity of such a statement cannot be overstated. It suggests that political considerations should dictate what law enforcement investigates. This trial is not just about one officer. It is about the very essence of what it means to serve and protect without fear or favor. Your ruling will set a precedent whether for justice or for capitulation to political expedience and pressure. If ever there was a moment to stand for justice, this is it. The weight of this responsibility is immense and Canada awaits your decision.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Here is the full transcript. Feel free to copy and distribute both the video and transcript. If you wish a full resolution copy of the video - direct message either me or @DaveFreedom4 Script: Video released January 22, 2025 After 20 years of dedicated service to the city of Ottawa, Police Detective Helen Grus thought she had seen it all. But nothing could have prepared her for the battle of her life. When nine infants tragically died, Grus uncovered chilling evidence suggesting a possible link between the deaths and their mothers’ vaccination status—specifically, the Pfizer vaccines. Her investigation also revealed a troubling oversight: a fellow officer had deviated from established protocol by neglecting to inquire about the vaccine status of the mothers and babies - a standard procedure that had been in place for OVER 50 YEARS. When the Chief Peter Sloly and senior officers deliberately ignored the evidence of infant deaths, Grus became the target of a backlash from the top down. Ottawa Police eventually charged Helen with discreditable conduct, to make an example of her AND TO DETER OTHER OFFICERS FROM CONTINUING HER INVESTIGATION. Meanwhile, Grus was suspended, her reputation dragged through the mud, and her career placed in jeopardy for simply doing the job she was sworn to do. This case is UNPRECEDENTED. Never in Canadian history has a police officer been charged for conducting a professional investigation. Yet that is exactly what happened. Even Ottawa Police prosecutor Jessica Barrow acknowledged that Grus's investigation was halted and charges were brought against her for POLITICAL REASONS. This case will undoubtedly influence the mindset of Canada's 70,000 police officers, prompting them to consider whether certain actions are "too political." Now that Detective Grus’s tribunal has concluded, all eyes are on adjudicator Chris Renwick, who holds her fate in his hands. The decision is set for late February, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. Open Letter To: Chris Renwick, Superintendent (Retired) - Adjudicator in the Detective Helen Grus Internal Trial Mr. Renwick, This case will define your legacy. It is a decision that will echo far beyond the confines of this tribunal, influencing the future of policing in Canada and how history judges your role in this critical moment. You stand at a crossroads where moral integrity and adherence to the rule of law should outweigh external pressures or political considerations. Seventy thousand police officers and millions of Canadians are watching, hoping that you will act with courage and fairness. Detective Helen Grus stands accused of discreditable conduct without evidence to support such a charge. Her work was driven by a sworn duty to protect the public, yet she has been met with systemic retaliation instead of recognition for her diligence. This trial risks becoming a symbol of injustice—unless you rise above it. History would remember you as the one who upheld the principle that no corporation, politician, or senior official is above the law—standing in stark contrast to the prosecutor’s final submission that Detective Grus should have informed her supervisors about her inquiry due to its “political ramifications.” The audacity of such a statement cannot be overstated; it suggests that political considerations should dictate what law enforcement investigates. This trial is not just about one officer; it is about the very essence of what it means to serve and protect without fear or favour. Your ruling will set a precedent, whether for justice or for capitulation to POLITICAL expedience and pressure. If ever there was a moment to stand for justice, this is it. The weight of this responsibility is immense, and Canada awaits your decision. Tribunal Adjudicator Superintendent (Retired) Chris Renwick

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

https://www.givesendgo.com/helengrus

Helen Grus Legal Defense Fund In July 2022, Detective Helen Grus was charged under the Police Services Act with ‘Discreditable Conduct’ for allegedly conducting an ‘unauthorized’ investig... givesendgo.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 18, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 12:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Canadian government would go to extreme lengths against Pat King, viewing him as a political prisoner. He has endured what I see as torture in solitary confinement, with constant lights and noise preventing him from sleeping, and he hasn't received medical care for an infection. The government's intention seems to be to imprison him for another decade, aiming to intimidate anyone who opposes their authority.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

The Canadian government would murder Pat King if they could get away with it. Solitary Confinement is Torture - and that's what they did to Pat King, tortured him with the lights on 24/7, banging on the door to prevent sleep. No medical care for an infection. Pat King is Trudeau's political prisoner and now the government wants him behind bars for another 10 years to send a message to every Canadian who opposes tyranny. The Canadian government would murder Pat King if they could get away with it.

@rightblend - Right Blend

Surprise: Pat King speaks. He says he feels remorse. He did not expect it to happen. He honour and respects the court and accepts the findings of the court. He comes from long line of family who spent time in military and takes a lot of pride in the country. He takes a lot of pride in family and who he is. And his pride has been vanished, defamed, slandered, raked through the coals more than he can shake a stick at He is extremely sorry for what happened to Ottawa and apologized for his actions. Intention not to hurt citizen but speak to government and it never happened. King says it was very dark. Government didnt help, in fact hindering, and people frustrating and speak on my behalf and I was frustrated and hurt and lost friends. I own my actions. Served 6 months in OCDC and while in that jail went through harsh condition no one should have to, was mistreated, was threatened by guards and inmates, was held in isolation for 38 days with lights on. Guards would pound on the door and wake me up Was put in cell with man for double homicide for mischief and I lived with that man scared I would be killed in my sleep. I was given no opportunity to have medical care when asking and I screamed and yelled and it almost led to Staph infection It wasnt until till one guard came up and spoke and said you have this man in maximum wing for mischief he needs medical care he needs to be out of here. He brought me to infirmary and got me medical care. The treatment I went through, the solitary confinement. It was torture I did not deserve that. Constant threats. The shower not accommodating to man of my disability. If I take a shower with metal leg will slip and fell. I need chair. Didnt get it until one guard fought for me. Well in prison... I get emotional... and one of proudest moment parent gets is to see child graduate and move on to secondary. So proud of my oldest kid so smart accepted to Tokyo school for aerospace. And I was going to see his graduation and I missed out and that strained relationship with him So when you read in PSR I have strained relationship its because of this. And for that Im so ashamed of what I did to hurt my son in that way one of worst feelings in world. Now I get out of jail and in repair mode. I am under constant surveillance not only by law enforcement but my sureties. I am constantly under watch. I lived for 2 years with lack of sleep because of door knock for year and a half at 3 am... wasn't regular knock but boot the door. Would jump me out of bed. I dont sleep well. I barely get an hour or two. So when we talk about what people went through in Ottawa I can relate and understand [king is emotional and crying and sincere] ... my funds locked out... For my son to go to college he had to decline because I couldnt get funds out. My younger son going to college next year and I cant get fund... theyre geniuses and Im not just saying that... they were raised by me. ... I raised them to say I grew up with troubled past but made change and worked hard to make change and be a contributor and make an example and now my children are embarrassed... the attacks online and stalking have come down on me, my son, my fiance, we go through harassing and stalking from all aspects of Canada. ... I dont have access to travel. Dont have access to go on social media. My bank accounts are frozen. I cant make money from podcasting... the strain this has put on my family, the media propaganda, the way the CBC [ran my name through the mud]... has drug my name in a manner that is... Im afraid in public to be attacked. ... Ive lost my pride. I dont want to be in Canada. I dont want anything to do with protest... ... people dont want to hire me. See my name... Im lucky I have someone who hired me remote... Im nervous to take full time. Will take it if I dont go to jail and in that still nervous because if some employees know who I am they may not like me... ... My mother doesnt want anything to do with [media]... Im sorry I did this to my family. Im sorry I did this to my mom. When they talk about things going on to Convoy. Talk about trucks parked. Found me guilty. When doing that no injunction... guided by police... if you ask if Id do it again I wouldnt... the harassment... hope Canada doesnt go down that path If anyone knows me I laugh in uncomfortable situations. I laugh in nervous situations... when you hear me laugh it sounds cynical... ... if you give me ten years I may as well get MAID. Dont want to live in country where thats the punishment for standing up... I had to bring up remorse. I am sorry for what I did. The uncomfortable people went through. Ive been living that for years. Its [1000+] days since arrest... Ive lost friends... I wouldnt suggest anyone follow in my path. I wouldnt allow anyone to do what I did and Id scream at them at top of lungs. If your honour is worried about lesser sentence because may not send a message... I have a message. Think of the cost. Im over 250,000$ into lawyer, into funds... had to rely on begging online. I do not have access to my funds. ...Canadians saw hardship in my actions and no one wants to do what I did. You will never see me in this town again. I make a solemn promise. I will never be here again except for court. I just want to live my life. I want to be in a hole and die sometimes... Im done. I dont want anything to do with it anymore. End of Pat King's statement ----------------------------------- Now for return date. Please note my notes are not verbatim. There are sections I miss. Thank you so much for following along. Covering these trials has been one of the most difficult and important things I've ever done. It's the end of a chapter and it's fitting that King got to finally speak. 9:15 February 7th for the sentencing.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 9, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Saved - January 9, 2025 at 2:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Detective Grus is facing charges for launching an unauthorized investigation, which I find perplexing. In my 45 years in law enforcement, I've never encountered the concept of authorized versus unauthorized investigations. During my 15 years with the Toronto Police, I never sought permission to investigate; I would request assistance or resources but never permission. Officers are meant to operate independently under the law and their oath, ensuring that outside interests do not interfere with their duties. This principle is crucial for effective policing.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"Detective Grus is charged with launching an unauthorized investigation. Well, in 45 years of being in and around law enforcement, I have never before heard of an authorized or an unauthorized investigation. In my 15 years on the Toronto Police, I never once asked for permission to investigate anything. I would ask for assistance. I would ask for resources, maybe some advice. I’d even go to the Crown. But I never asked permission because law enforcement officers, sworn officers, don’t have to ask permission. We have set this system up so that officers have independence—autonomy to act as they see fit under the law and their oath of office. And we do that to prevent outside interests from interfering with police officers, individual police officers, and organizations." From my sworn testimony before @NCICanada on June 1, 2024.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I find the case of Detective Bruce intriguing from a professional perspective as a former police officer. He is charged with launching an unauthorized investigation, which is something I have never encountered in my 45 years in law enforcement. During my 15 years with the Toronto Police, I never sought permission to investigate; I would request assistance or resources, but not permission. Law enforcement officers are designed to operate independently under the law and their oath of office. This structure is in place to prevent outside influences from interfering with police work.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I was also interested in this case from a professional standpoint as a former police officer. Detective Bruce is charged with launching an unauthorized investigation. Well, in 45 years of being in and around law enforcement, I have never before heard of an authorized investigation or an unauthorized investigation rather. In my 15 years on the Toronto Police, I never once asked for permission to investigate anything. I would ask for assistance. I would ask for resources, maybe some advice. I'd even go to the Crown, but I never asked permission because law enforcement officers, sworn officers don't have to ask permission. We have set this system up so that officers have independence, autonomy to act as they see fit under the law and their oath of office. And we do that to prevent outside interests from interfering with police officers, individual police officers and organizations.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - January 8, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Saved - January 8, 2025 at 4:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question why @CBCNews and other government-funded media didn't report that family members of two deceased infants testified in support of Detective Grus at the internal trial. Many Canadians seem to understand that these outlets often align with government agendas rather than prioritizing truth.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Why didn't @CBCNews and other government-paid legacy media report that family members of two of the deceased infants testified FOR Detective Grus at the internal trial? Most Canadians are well aware of the answer - that the legacy media outlets dance to the government's tune with an agenda that has nothing to do with duty to truth or to the public.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - December 12, 2024 at 10:01 PM
Saved - December 13, 2024 at 3:37 AM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

In 1987 Ontario Family Coalition Party leader Don Pennell told me euthanasia would be the next step. "They won't drag people off like the Nazis, because after the propaganda Canadians will request death." In my wildest dreams I never thought that Don would be proven correct. #euthanasia #maid

@AmandaAchtman - Amanda Achtman

In this building, the Nazis euthanized 15,000 people from 1940-1941. That's the same number of Canadians who were euthanized in 2023. https://t.co/c6Nj8Z2sVY

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 7:36 PM
Saved - December 1, 2024 at 9:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trudeau government has unlawfully de-banked hundreds of Canadians based on their political beliefs, leading to severe consequences for businesses, pensions, and families, all without due process or the chance for appeal. I question whether opposition leaders like Pierre Poilievre took a stand against this. I also recommend listening to a discussion by Joe Rogan that sheds light on the government's actions.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

The Trudeau Regime illegally de-banked hundreds of Canadians for their political views - destroying businesses, pensions, mortgages, credit availability and even families. This without due process, court order, or any appeal mechanism. Canada's banks happily complied. Did @PierrePoilievre or any other opposition leader fight against this? Worth your time to listen to @joerogan and guest (Name?)...

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Forward this video to friends & family to understand just how evil the government has been https://t.co/XgRnikMK6J

Video Transcript AI Summary
Debanking occurs when individuals or companies are removed from the banking system, often due to political reasons. This has notably affected right-leaning individuals and businesses, while those on the left seem largely unaffected. For instance, some have been debanked for expressing conservative views or being involved in industries like legal marijuana or firearms. This trend has intensified over the last 15 years, with recent actions targeting tech and crypto entrepreneurs. The government applies pressure on banks to debank these individuals, creating a system without due process or accountability. Many affected individuals are forced to operate in cash or seek alternative means to manage their finances, often leading to significant disruptions in their lives and businesses.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New in financial services. I need Can Speaker 1: you give me an example? Speaker 0: I guess, you know, debanking. This is where a lot of the debanking comes from is the is these agencies. So debanking is when you're you as either a person or your company are literally kicked out of the banking system. Speaker 1: Like they did to Kanye. Speaker 0: Exactly. Like they did to Kanye. My my my partner Ben's father, has been debanked. Really? We had an employee who For what? We for having the wrong politics Oh. For for saying unacceptable things. Under current banking regulations under okay. Here's a great here's a great thing. Under current banking regulations, after all the reforms of the last 20 years, there's now a category called a politically exposed person, PEP. And if you are a PEP, you are required by financial regulators to kick them off of your of to kick them out of your bank. You you you're not allowed to Speaker 1: have politically on the left? Speaker 0: Well, that that's fine. No. Because they're because they're not politically exposed. Speaker 1: So no one on the left gets debanked? Speaker 0: No. I have not heard of a single instance of anyone in the left getting debanked. Can you Speaker 1: tell me what the person that you know did, what what they said that got them debanked? Speaker 0: Oh, well, I mean, David Horowitz is a right wing. You know, he's pro Trump. I mean, he said all kinds of things. You know, he's been very anti Islamic terrorism. He's been very worried about immigration, all these things. Speaker 1: And they debanked for the Yeah. Speaker 0: They de banked it. So you get kicked out you get kicked out of your bank account. You get you get kicked out of the you can't do credit card transactions. But by the way, you can't How is that legal? Well, exactly. So this is the thing. And so and then you go in this thing of, like, well, there's no this is where the government and the companies get intertwined back to your fascism point, which is, there's no there's a constitutional amendment that says the government can't restrict your speech, but there's no constitutional amendment that says the government can't de bank you. Right? And so they if they can't do the one thing, then they they do the other thing. And then they don't have to de bank you. They just have to put pressure on on the private company banks to do it. And then the private company banks do it because they're expected to. But the government gets to say we didn't do it. It was the private company that did it. And, of course, JPMorgan can decide who they wanna have as customers, of course, right, because they're a private company. And so it's this it's this sleight of hand that happens. So it's basically it's a privatized sanctions regime that lets bureaucrats do to American citizens the same thing that we do to Iran. Woah. Kick you out of the financial system. And so this has been happening to all the crypto entrepreneurs in the last 4 years. This has been happening to a lot of the Fintech entrepreneurs, anybody trying to start any kind of new banking service, because they're trying to protect the big banks. And then this has been happening, by the way, also in legal fields of economic activity that they don't like. And so a lot of this started about 15 years ago with this thing called Operation Truck Point where they decided to, as marijuana started to become legal, as prostitution started to become legal and then guns which there's always a fight about. Under the Obama administration they started to de bank legal marijuana businesses, escrow businesses and then and then and then gun shops just like your gun manufacturers and just like you're done, you're out of the banking system. And so if you're running a medical marijuana dispensary in 2012, like you guess what? You're doing your business all in cash because you literally can't get a bank account. You can't get a Visa terminal. You can't process transactions. You can't do payroll. You can't do direct deposit. You can't get insurance. Like, none of that stuff is you've been sanctioned. Right? None of that stuff is available. And then this administration extended that concept to apply it to tech founders, crypto founders, and then just generally political opponents. Yeah. Yeah. So that's that's been like super pernicious. Speaker 1: I wasn't aware of that. Speaker 0: Oh, 100%. And it's called so it's Operation Short Point 1.0 was 15 years ago against the pot and the guns. Short Point 2.0 is primarily against their political enemies and then to their disfavored tech startups. And it's hit the tech world. Like, we've hard we've had, like, 30 founders de banked in the last 4 years. Real? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's been it's been a big recurring pattern. 30. This is one of the reasons why we ended up supporting Trump. It's like we just can't we can't live in this world. We can't live in a world where somebody starts a company that's a completely legal thing, and then they literally, like, get sanctioned. Right? And embargoed by the United States government through a completely unaccountable no. By the way, no due process. None of this is written down. There's no rules. There's no court. There's no decision process. There's no appeal. Who do you appeal to? Right? Like, who do you go to to get your bank account back? Right? You know, and then and then, you know, and then there's there's this and then there's also the civil asset forfeiture side of it, which is right the other side. And that doesn't happen to us, but that happens to people in a lot of places now who get arrested and all of a sudden, you know, the state takes their money. Speaker 1: Yeah. So that happens to people if they get pulled over and they have a large amount of cash in some states. Right. Speaker 0: Or, you know, there'll be there'll be, you know, well publicized examples of, like, you know, there was, like, you know, there'll be some investigation into, like, you know, safe deposit boxes. And the next thing you know, the the the feds have seized all this all the contents of the state deposit Right. Safe deposit boxes and that that stuff never gets returned. And so it's it's this and this is when, you know, this is when Trump says the deep state, you know, I like the way we would describe it as it's it's administrative power. It's it's political power being administered, not through legislation. Right? So there's no defined law that covers this. It's not through regulation. Right? There's nothing you can you can't go sue a regulator to fix this. It's not through any kind of court judgment. It's just raw power. It's just raw administrative power. It's the government or politicians just deciding that things are going to be a certain way, and then they just apply pressure until they get it. Speaker 1: So what happens to those 30 tech people that you know that Speaker 0: To to go into a different field, like, try to do something different and try to Woah. Try to try to get, you know Speaker 1: Complete upending of your life. Speaker 0: Yeah. Complete upending of your life and try to try to, yeah, try to change your try to get out of try to get away from the eye of Sauron. Try to get out of whatever zone got you into this and keep applying for new bank accounts at different banks and hope that at some point, a bank will say, you know, oh, okay. You know, it's okay. We've checked in. It's now alright. Speaker 1: Woah. But there's no So what do they do with their money? Like, what happens? Yeah. Speaker 0: I mean, you go to cash. I mean Speaker 1: You go to cash? Speaker 0: You can't have a yeah. Do you So where do you put it? I don't I don't under your mattress. Under your mattress. Yes. Exactly. Yeah. Speaker 1: Exactly. So insane. So if someone has $30,000,000 in the bank and they get debanked. Speaker 0: Diamonds, art, you know, do you, I don't know, go overseas somewhere. Speaker 1: Holy shit. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It just, like, it just it just happens. And and, again, it's really, really important. There's no fingerprints. Like, there's no Right. Speaker 1: There's no person who There's no stick above the strings. Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Right. It just happened. And and we can trace it back as we understand exactly you know, we we know we know the we know the politicians involved, and we know how the agencies work, and we know how the pressure is applied. And we know that these banks get phone calls and so forth. And so we can loosely like we understand the flow of power as it happens. But when you're on the receiving end of this, your specific instance of it, like you can't trace it back and there's nothing you can Speaker 1: do with that. So these what are the instances? Like what is the company? What are they trying to do and how do they run a file? Well, all Speaker 0: the crypto startups in the last basically 4 years. So remember the crypto crypto thing got, like, really, you know, sort of everybody got excited and, like, NFTs and, like, all that stuff, and then it just, like, stopped. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And the reason it stopped is because basically every crypto founder, every crypto startup, they either got debanked personally and forced out of the industry, or their company got debanked and so it couldn't keep operating, or they got prosecuted, charged, or they got threatened with being charged. This is a fun this is a fun twist. It's a fun little twist. The the s so the SEC sort of has been trying to kill the crypto industry under under Biden. And this has been a big issue issue for us because we're we're the biggest crypto crypto startup investor. The SEC can they can investigate you. They can subpoena you. They can prosecute you. They can do all these things. But they don't have to do any of those things to really damage you. All they have to do is they issue what's called a Wells notice. And the Wells notice is a notification that you may be charged at some point in the future. Like you're like on notice that you might be doing something wrong and they might be coming after you at some point in the future. Speaker 2: Oh my god. Speaker 0: Okay. So terrifying. Speaker 1: That's the eye. Speaker 0: The eye of Sauron is on you. Okay. Now trying to be a company with a Wells notice doing business with anybody else. Speaker 3: Oh my god. Right? Speaker 0: Try to try to work with a big company, try to get access to a bank, try try to do anything. Speaker 1: When they support DEI initiatives and they yeah. Speaker 0: Well, then the s the SEC under Biden became a the SEC under Biden became a direct application of exactly. So DEI, they started they did a lot with that and then ESG all the ESG stuff. And ESG is a very malleable concept, and they piled all kinds of new requirements into that. So through that through this process, the SEC could basically just simply dictate what companies do with no accountability at all. Like, there's no, you know, there's no over there's no over there. There are hearings where they get yelled at, but, like, nothing changed. Nothing ever happened in a hearing that ever changed anything. It's just the raw application of power. Right. And so This is your friends. Speaker 1: This has happened to. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. For sure. Yeah. And we had like I said, we had an employee who got D Bank because he had crypto in his job title. He was he was doing crypto policy for us, and his bank booted him, because he That's it. Because they did they did they did a screen across it's what they told us is they did a screen across their their customer base. And anyone with crypto. Because because anybody with crypto became a politically exposed person. Because wow.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Apparently Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 @pmarca

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 18, 2024 at 8:12 PM
Saved - November 18, 2024 at 8:25 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

German Police raid home, seize computers, phone over a meme saying Economics Minister Robert Habeck is a "Professional Idiot". In Canada, politicians are also voting for this type of power and control over what citizens say and publish. This is coming unless Canadians FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! https://reclaimthenet.org/german-man-raided-calling-vice-chancellor-idiot

German Man is Raided By Police For Calling Pro-Censorship Vice Chancellor an "Idiot" Join Reclaim The Net. reclaimthenet.org
DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 12, 2024 at 8:31 PM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 9:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's turmoil in the Detective Grus case as Prosecutor Vanessa Stewart has been removed. OPS leadership is reportedly trying to find a way out of the situation. I'll be on The Lavigne Show with Donald Best on Thursday morning to discuss this further.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Turmoil in Detective Grus Case as Prosecutor Exits Ottawa Police Insiders: Prosecutor Vanessa Stewart dumped. OPS Leadership Split. "OPS leadership is attempting to devise an exit strategy from the Grus debacle." Article includes emails from OPS & Stewart. Lead Defense Counsel Bath-Shéba van den Berg to appear on The Lavigne Show @JasonLavigneAB on Thursday morning with Donald Best. https://donaldbest.ca/turmoil-in-detective-grus-trial-as-prosecutor-leaves-ottawa-police/

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 12, 2024 at 5:33 AM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Aretha Phillip, the City of Toronto's Chief of Protocol, disrupted Remembrance Day by prioritizing a political agenda over honoring fallen troops. I believe she should be fired immediately for this disrespect. Instead of focusing on remembrance, she chose to discuss Canada's history of colonization and slavery, which many found inappropriate for the occasion. Additionally, her annual salary of $188,476.24 raises questions about her role and responsibilities in such a significant event.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Toronto city protocol manager Aretha Phillip hijacked Remembrance Day for her own political agenda. Fire her right now. Don’t even allow her back into City Hall. If the mayor doesn’t fire her - that’s a message to all Canadians. She should have spoken about the indigenous slave economy and how Chief Joseph Brant brought Black and Indian slaves to Canada - including Black child slaves to look after his personal comfort. Fire Aretha Phillip for disrespecting Remembrance Day.

@joe_warmington - Joe Warmington

Before ⁦@cityoftoronto⁩ got to pay respect to the fallen troops on #RemembranceTO city protocol manager Aretha Phillip took the veterans and families through a history lesson of Canada’s colonization of country, racism and slavery https://t.co/iukl1lKocL

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to acknowledge the indigenous peoples of this land and emphasize our commitment to improving relationships and understanding the rich history here. Toronto recognizes the traditional territory of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, Anishinaabe, Chippewa, Haudenosaunee, and Wendat peoples, and honors the diverse First Nations, Inuit, and Métis communities that now call this place home. We also recognize all treaty peoples, including settlers and migrants, and pay tribute to those brought here involuntarily, particularly through the transatlantic slave trade. This remembrance week, we honor our ancestors of African origin and descent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to begin by acknowledging the indigenous peoples of these lands. It is important that we reaffirm our commitment and responsibility in improving relationships between nations and in learning about the rich history of this this land to better understand our role as residents, neighbors, partners, and caretakers in this place we each call home. The city of Toronto acknowledges the land we are meeting on as the traditional territory of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabe, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee, and the Wendat peoples, and is now home to many first stage diverse First Nations, Inuit, and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that other The city of Toronto acknowledges all treaty peoples, including those who came here as settlers, as migrants either in this generation or in generations past, and those of us who came here involuntarily, particularly those brought to these lands as a result of the transatlantic slave trade and slavery. We pay tribute to our ancestors of African origin and descent. In keeping with this tribute, during this remembrance week, the city

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Aretha Phillip held the position of Chief Of Protocol at the City Of Toronto in 2023 and received an annual salary of $188,476.24 as per the records provided by the Government of Ontario. Year: 2023 Salary: $188,476.24 Position: Chief Of Protocol Employer: City Of Toronto Category of Employment: Municipalities & Services Source: Ontario's Sunshine List

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 10, 2024 at 4:04 PM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 5:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
After publishing an article critiquing the Peel Police for not enforcing Section 176 of the Criminal Code during a protest at a Hindu Temple, I found myself blocked by Chief Nishan Duraiappah. My article argued that the police's inaction contributed to retaliatory violence from a Hindu mob, which I deemed illegal and un-Canadian. I had hoped the Chief, given his background, would be more proactive against sectarian violence. Being blocked has only intensified my curiosity about how the Peel Police plan to address the rising issue of Indian Sectarian Violence in Canada.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Peel Chief of Police Nishan Duraiappah blocks journalist Donald Best @ChiefNish blocked me after I published an article criticizing the Peel Police for not upholding Section 176 of the Criminal Code (Disturbing Religious Meetings). I thought my short X article (below) was balanced and fair to all. It did criticize the police in several ways including by writing... "The @PeelPolice failure to enforce the law and #RuleOfLaw during the initial 'protest' at the Hindu Temple contributed to the subsequent retaliatory actions of the Hindu mob. The retaliatory Hindu mob actions the next day were illegal, wrong, and un-Canadian - but arguably might not have happened had the Peel Police arrested those who violated CC 176 at the Hindu Temple." I can still see the Chief's X account but am unable to comment, follow, or direct message him. I had thought that Chief Duraiappah - who was born in Sri Lanka - would be more supportive of nipping sectarian violence in the bud given that his esteemed uncle Alfred Duraiappah was assassinated at a Hindu Temple by Tamil terrorists in 1975. Perhaps it is his media relations team that blocked this journalist - but in any event being blocked has only piqued my interest in how the Peel Police intend to deal with the growing trend of Indian Sectarian Violence in Canada.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

In Brampton, both the Sikh-Khalistan and Hindu mobs violated the Criminal Code of Canada Section 176 - prohibiting the Obstruction, Violence, or Disturbing of Religious Meetings. The @PeelPolice failure to enforce the law and #RuleOfLaw during the initial 'protest' at the Hindu Temple contributed to the subsequent retaliatory actions of the Hindu mob. The retaliatory Hindu mob actions the next day were illegal, wrong, and un-Canadian - but arguably might not have happened had the Peel Police arrested those who violated CC 176 at the Hindu Temple. That includes now suspended off-duty Peel Police Sergeant Harinder SOHI - who should have been arrested and charged criminally during his protest at the Hindu Temple. Protesting at a house of worship in Canada is a criminal offence... but it takes integrity, courage, and a grounding in duty for the police to act. Peel Police failed in their duty. They should have enforced CC 176 the moment the Sikh-Kalistan mob showed up at the Hindu place of worship. Even Mayor @patrickbrownont seems confused - thinking that he must enact some bylaw to prohibit protests at places of worship. What the heck is the matter with him and Chief of Police @ChiefNish ??? The Peel Police should do their duty and enforce the law - equally against the Sikh-Kalistan and Hindu mobs. And those who break the law who are not Canadian citizens must suffer severe immigration consequences. Canada cannot allow sectarian violence that has claimed millions of lives in India. When I wrote my initial reports of Sergeant Harinder SOHI betraying his police oath of office, I received threats from Sikhs. Then when I reported on the retaliatory Hindu mobs, I received threats from Hindus. Unfortunately, as we are now witnessing, these deep-seated cultural and religious conflicts are spilling onto Canadian soil - leading to violent clashes, threats to public safety, and a direct challenge to Canada’s social fabric. We must tackle rising Indian sectarian violence in Canada head-on through unbiased law enforcement, strict adherence to the Rule of Law, and effective social education - particularly for younger generations. Additionally, violent immigrants who are not yet citizens must face immediate and severe immigration consequences to uphold public safety and protect Canada’s social fabric and culture. Peel Police - DO YOUR DUTY and enforce Criminal Code Section 176 without fear or favour. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-28.html#h-118604

Criminal Code Federal laws of Canada laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 10, 2024 at 6:10 PM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 5:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Over 13 hours have passed since the Indian news media reported the arrest of Khalistani terrorist Arsh Dalla by Halton Regional Police in Canada for a shooting, yet there has been no coverage from CBC News or other Canadian legacy media. I found an insightful article from the Economic Times of India that highlights this lack of reporting, suggesting that Canadian media may be influenced by the Liberal government's stance on how to handle the story.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Over 13 hours since the Indian news media broke the story that Halton Regional Police had arrested Khalistani terrorist Arsh Dalla in Canada - for a shooting. Still nothing on the @CBCNews or any other Canuck legacy media. Here's an excellent Economic Times of India article seeing as the Canadian news media still don't know how their boss - the Liberals - want them to cover the story. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/khalistani-terrorist-hardeep-singh-nijjars-aide-arsh-dalla-nabbed-by-canadian-police-report/articleshow/115144284.cms?from=mdr

Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar's aide Arsh Dalla nabbed by Canadian Police: Report Canadian authorities have apprehended Arshdeep Singh, alias Arsh Dalla, a suspected Khalistani terrorist wanted in India for multiple crimes, including the murder of a Congress leader. Dalla's arrest follows that of another Nijjar associate, Inderjeet Gosal, highlighting growing tensions between India and Canada over the latter's handling of Khalistani extremism. economictimes.indiatimes.com

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Halton Police Arrest Khalistani Terrorist in Canada - Shooting Canadian Media not reporting the story. What's the agenda @CBCNews ??? News is breaking all over India but not in Canada. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/hardeep-singh-nijjars-aide-and-khalistani-terrorist-arsh-dala-detained-in-canada-report-101731239406153.html https://t.co/I8yp5g2P3S

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 6:17 AM
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 9:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported on an incident involving an off-duty Peel Police Sergeant, Harinder Sohi, allegedly participating in a Khalistan protest at the Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple on November 3, 2024. Videos and photos show him with a Khalistan flag, seemingly engaged with the crowd. I've reached out to Peel Police for clarification on his identity and status during the protest, as well as potential implications for community trust. I’m awaiting their response and have additional videos to share soon.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Source: Off-Duty Peel Police Sergeant part of Khalistan mob attacking Hindu Temple. A man said to be @PeelPolice Sergeant Harinder SOHI is visible in videos and photographs of the Sunday November 3, 2024 attack at Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple. (Attached) Purported Peel Police Sergeant smiles and moves his lips as the protest leader yells "Who's the terrorist?" and the crowd yells, "Indian Government". The anonymous source, X account @MaterBellato, posted a photo and video purported to be Sgt. SOHI holding a Khalistan Flag and protesting outside of Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple on Sunday, November 3, 2024. The post also notified numerous people on X including yours truly. Many news media reports indicate that the Khalistan protesters trespassed into the temple lands and also physically attacked and assaulted Hindu worshippers. As of Monday, November 4, 2024 a few minutes after midnight, Peel Regional Police Communications informed this reporter that the protest is still ongoing at the temple. I've asked to speak with the Duty Inspector - the senior officer in charge of everything in the middle of the night. Peel Police Communications took my number and told me that the D.I. is at the protest and that they will relay my message to the D.I. immediately. I told the Communications operator that I will send the videos and photo of purported Sgt. SOHI for examination. I informed that I have an urgent deadline. As of 1:15am I have not heard back from the Peel Regional Police so I am publishing this post. What say all? Is this Sgt. Sohi or not?

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

I've called and emailed Peel Police Media Relations and await their response to the following questions emailed to them... 1/ Is the man in the video actually Sgt. SOHI ? 2/ Was he off duty or on duty? 3/ If it was Sgt. SOHI, is there likely to be any internal investigation? 4/ If it was Sgt. SOHI, how can members of the Hindu community know that the officer will not be biased in his professional duties with the Hindu community? 5/ Any further comments on this situation? As well, I've received many more videos from various sources and will post them in this thread soon.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

https://t.co/YvrZi95MMK

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 6:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Peel Police have suspended Sgt. Harinder Sohi after he was seen attending a Khalistan protest and an attack at the Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple. I received confirmation from Peel Police Media Relations stating they are aware of a video circulating on social media showing the off-duty officer at the demonstration. They are conducting a thorough investigation in line with the Community Safety and Policing Act and cannot provide additional details until the investigation concludes.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING: Peel Police Suspend Sgt. Harinder SOHI for Attending Khalistan Protest and Attack at Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple🚨 I received this from Peel Police Media Relations at 11:17am Eastern time... "We are aware of a video circulating on social media which shows an off-duty Peel Police officer involved in a demonstration. This officer has since been suspended in accordance with the Community Safety and Policing Act. We are investigating the circumstances in totality depicted in the video and are unable to provide further information until such time that this investigation is complete."

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

I've called and emailed Peel Police Media Relations and await their response to the following questions emailed to them... 1/ Is the man in the video actually Sgt. SOHI ? 2/ Was he off duty or on duty? 3/ If it was Sgt. SOHI, is there likely to be any internal investigation? 4/ If it was Sgt. SOHI, how can members of the Hindu community know that the officer will not be biased in his professional duties with the Hindu community? 5/ Any further comments on this situation? As well, I've received many more videos from various sources and will post them in this thread soon.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 6:17 AM
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 10:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported on an incident involving an off-duty Peel Police Sergeant, Harinder Sohi, allegedly participating in a Khalistan protest at the Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple on November 3, 2024. Videos and photos show him with a Khalistan flag, amidst a crowd chanting anti-Indian government slogans. The protest reportedly escalated to trespassing and assaults on Hindu worshippers. I reached out to Peel Police Communications for confirmation and to share evidence, but as of 1:15 am, I had not received a response. What do you think—Is this Sgt. Sohi?

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Source: Off-Duty Peel Police Sergeant part of Khalistan mob attacking Hindu Temple. A man said to be @PeelPolice Sergeant Harinder SOHI is visible in videos and photographs of the Sunday November 3, 2024 attack at Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple. (Attached) Purported Peel Police Sergeant smiles and moves his lips as the protest leader yells "Who's the terrorist?" and the crowd yells, "Indian Government". The anonymous source, X account @MaterBellato, posted a photo and video purported to be Sgt. SOHI holding a Khalistan Flag and protesting outside of Brampton Hindu Sabha Temple on Sunday, November 3, 2024. The post also notified numerous people on X including yours truly. Many news media reports indicate that the Khalistan protesters trespassed into the temple lands and also physically attacked and assaulted Hindu worshippers. As of Monday, November 4, 2024 a few minutes after midnight, Peel Regional Police Communications informed this reporter that the protest is still ongoing at the temple. I've asked to speak with the Duty Inspector - the senior officer in charge of everything in the middle of the night. Peel Police Communications took my number and told me that the D.I. is at the protest and that they will relay my message to the D.I. immediately. I told the Communications operator that I will send the videos and photo of purported Sgt. SOHI for examination. I informed that I have an urgent deadline. As of 1:15am I have not heard back from the Peel Regional Police so I am publishing this post. What say all? Is this Sgt. Sohi or not?

DonaldBestCA
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 5:30 AM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 6:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned that Alberta is on the brink of losing 52 years of rights and freedoms due to proposed amendments to the Alberta Bill of Rights. While the government claims these changes will strengthen our rights, the term "reasonable limits" is vague and could lead to restrictions on freedoms like speech and assembly. This foundational document should not be vulnerable to subjective interpretations. It's crucial for everyone, especially Albertans, to be aware and voice their concerns to their MPPs about these potential changes. Freedom thrives on public awareness.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"The province of Alberta is on the precipice of losing 52 years of established rights and freedoms, and most have no clue." @DaveFreedom6 presents his newest video. Well worth your time... Transcript... As some of you may have heard, there is a proposal to add reasonable limits to the Alberta Bill of Rights. On the surface, it may sound innocent enough. The problem, though, is that reasonable is a very vague word. What seems reasonable to one person might be unreasonable to another. The proposed amendment itself is being referred to by many lawyers as a Trojan horse. On September 24, 2024 Premier @ABDanielleSmith said... “In a few weeks time, our UCP government will be introducing legislation to amend and strengthen the Alberta Bill of Rights, a document that has stood as a safeguard for our civil liberties and freedoms for decades.” For quick context, the Alberta Bill of Rights was created in 1972 to protect core rights that we all rely on: freedom of speech, assembly, the right to own property, etc. This document is meant to serve as a shield, ensuring the government cannot encroach on these rights and freedoms. A modified Alberta Bill of Rights could lead to limits on freedom of speech if a message is seen as unreasonable. It could also limit freedom of assembly if a peaceful protest is deemed too disruptive. Or what about public interest, national security, climate change, or the next thing they have planned for us? The truth is, once the language allows for reasonable limits, it gives the government broad discretion over when and how it applies those limits. The proposed changes are very well crafted, quite genius. Actually, on one hand, it appeals to a logical thinking Canadian with proposals like, quote, the right for an individual with capacity not to be compelled or coerced into receiving a vaccine. I mean, hey, who doesn't want that, right? However, the added fine print of reasonable limits makes the entire document worthless? As the saying goes, giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other. The Alberta Bill of Rights is a foundational document. It shouldn't be left vulnerable to subjective interpretations or shifting political interests. What makes it so special is that it shines in stark contrast to the Charter of Rights, which does include the words 'reasonable limits' bye the way. A script repeated quite often during the 2020 and 2021 lockdowns. Protester: "Why are you guys doing this? Man, seriously, you guys don't care about the charter." Police: "The charter has limitations." We want to maintain our rights. It's essential to keep them free from subjective limits that could shift based on political tides. Whether you live in Alberta or not, let's stand for an Alberta Bill of Rights that truly protects Albertans without compromise. The intention behind this video is not to attack or advocate for any individual or political party, but rather bring this topic to the front of people's minds. Public awareness is our greatest weapon, which is why this video is necessary. Freedom dies in the dark. If you live in Alberta, reach out to your MPP and express your concern over "reasonable limits".

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alberta is at risk of losing 52 years of established rights due to proposed amendments to the Alberta Bill of Rights. While the changes may seem harmless, the term "reasonable limits" is vague and could lead to restrictions on freedoms like speech and assembly. The Alberta Bill of Rights, created in 1972, protects essential rights such as freedom of speech and property ownership. The proposed modifications could give the government broad discretion to limit these rights under various pretexts, undermining the document's integrity. It's crucial to maintain a Bill of Rights that is free from subjective interpretations influenced by political changes. Public awareness is vital to protect these freedoms, as freedom thrives in transparency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The province of Alberta is on the precipice of losing 52 years of established rights and freedoms, and most have no clue. As some of you may have heard, there is a proposal to add reasonable limits to the Alberta Bill of Rights. On the surface, it may sound innocent enough. The problem though is that reasonable is a very vague word. What seems reasonable to one person might be unreasonable few weeks' time, our UCP government will be introducing legislation to amend and strengthen the Alberta Bill of Rights, A document that has stood as a safeguard for our civil liberties and freedoms for decades. For quick context, the Alberta Bill of Rights was created in 1972 to protect core rights that we all rely on. Freedom of speech, assembly, the right to own property, etcetera. This document is meant to serve as a shield ensuring the government cannot encroach on these rights and freedoms. A modified Alberta rights could lead to limits on freedom of speech if a message is seen as unreasonable. It could also limit freedom of assembly if a peaceful protest is deemed too disruptive. Or what about public interest, national security, climate change, or the next thing they have planned for us? The truth is, once the language allows for reasonable limits, it gives the government broad discretion over when and how it applies those limits. The proposed changes are very well crafted, Quite genius, actually. On one hand, it appeals to a logical thinking Canadian with proposals like, quote, the right for an individual with capacity not to be compelled or coerced into receiving a vaccine. I mean, hey. Who doesn't want that? Right? However, the added fine print of reasonable limits makes the entire document worthless. As the saying goes, give it with one hand and taketh away with the other. The Alberta Bill of Rights is a foundational document. It shouldn't be left vulnerable to subjective interpretations or shifting political interests. What makes it so special is that it shines in stark contrast to the charter of rights, which does include the words reasonable limits, by the way, a script repeated quite often during the 2020 and 2021 lockdowns. Why are you guys doing this, man? Seriously. You guys don't care about the charter? The charter has limitations. Yep. Article 52. Has limitations. If we want to maintain our rights, it's essential to keep them free from subjective limits that could shift based on political tides. Whether you live in Alberta or not, let's stand for an Alberta Bill of Rights that truly protects Albertans without compromise. The intentions behind this video is not to attack or advocate for any individual or political party, but rather bring this topic to the front of people's minds. Public awareness is our greatest weapon, which is why this video is necessary. Freedom dies in the dark.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 22, 2024 at 5:16 PM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The disciplinary hearing for Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police resumes on January 6, 2025, after her suspension for investigating a potential link between vaccinated mothers and infant deaths. Over the past three years, significant issues have arisen, including perjury by prosecution witnesses, the resignation of the head of OPS Professional Standards amid serious allegations, and interference from Public Health Agency of Canada personnel. Evidence suggests a coverup and neglect of duty by Ottawa Police. This case is pivotal for the future of police autonomy in investigations. We need to ensure the courtroom is filled to highlight the corruption and political pressure surrounding these charges.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

The disciplinary hearing against @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus resumes January 6, 2025 - 3 years after she was suspended for daring to investigate a possible connection between vaccinated mothers & the deaths of breastfeeding infants. So far spectators have seen... - Prosecution witnesses commit perjury. - The head of OPS Professional Standards resign amidst allegations of witness tampering, obstruction of justice, & criminal threats against a witness. - Interference in the police investigation by Public Health Agency of Canada personnel. - Illegal wiretapping of Detective Helen Grus & her family under the anti-terrorism / imminent harm emergency wiretap provisions. - A serious conflict of interest between prosecutor Vanessa Stewart & one of the primary witnesses - who is her sister-in-law! - Prosecutor Vanessa Stewart despicably likening Detective Grus to Serial Rapist-Murderer Russell Williams. - The Hearing Officer disallow every defence expert witness. - The Hearing Officer not allow Detective Grus to examine her own hand-written notes from January 2022 that were made on a date that the prosecution alleges she committed an act of wrongdoing. - A complete coverup by Ottawa Police concerning two officers who criminally supplied confidential police information about the Grus case to CBC reporter Shaamini Yogaretnam. - Neglect of duty by Ottawa Police officers who received the 'Criminal Negligence Causing Bodily Harm and Death' investigation file from Detective Grus - but then hid the evidence and did nothing. Part of the evidence collected by Detective Grus and handed over to Professional Standards Unit detectives was a copy of the Pfizer Documents - that prove Pfizer and some public officials knew the vaccines caused injuries and deaths including to unborn babies in the womb. So much new evidence has come to light in the past three years that vindicates Detective Grus and shows that she was and is a professional doing her job to protect the lives of innocent babies. Yet the Ottawa Police continue targeting this fine officer - who has been forced to pay for her own defence lawyer even though her actions were on duty. The Ottawa Police Association - the police union - abandoned Detective Grus just as they abandoned and betrayed all police personnel who refused to be injected with an experimental genetic treatment that has now been proven deadly. This is probably the most important case in Canadian policing in decades because the outcome decides whether law enforcement officers are free to investigate crimes according to their judgment - or whether the political class controls the daily operations and investigations of individual police officers. We must fill the courtroom every trial day in January - and let Canadians know of the corruption and political pressure involved in the charges against Detective Helen Grus.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

This is the most powerful, accurate short video to date about Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus - who will testify in her own defence on Monday, May 27, 2024. @DaveFreedom6 has done a masterful job capturing the main factors in the case in only 9 minutes. Well worth your time. The Disciplinary Hearing against Detective Grus continues May 27-31, 2024, 9am at 211 Huntmar Drive, Kanata, Ontario (suburb just West of Ottawa) Helen Grus GiveSendGo: https://www.givesendgo.com/helengrus Video is also on Dave Freedom's facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/dave.freedom.509

Video Transcript AI Summary
Detective Helen Groos of the Ottawa Police faces a discreditable conduct charge for initiating an investigation in January 2022 into a possible connection between 9 sudden infant deaths and the mothers' vaccination status. Her evidence included Pfizer documents showing 31 of 32 pregnancies followed by trial investigators resulted in spontaneous abortion. Groos was suspended and formally charged after opening the investigation. Evidence suggests police colleagues leaked confidential information to a CBC reporter, impacting the investigation. The Ottawa police then made a financial settlement with one of the parents of the deceased infants. A wiretap on Groos yielded nothing. During the tribunal, defense counsel Blair Ector reported a threatening email sent to Groos, calling it witness tampering. The adjudicator, Chris Randwick, ruled the defense must provide questions in advance and that Groos couldn't review her notes from the day of alleged misconduct. All five defense expert witnesses were denied. The prosecutor, Vanessa Stewart, was also the sister-in-law of the primary prosecution witness. Supporters claim the case is politically motivated and are asking for public support and donations to Groos's legal fund.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Detective Helen Groos of the Ottawa Police will be telling her story to the world for the first time at a police disciplinary tribunal that's been plagued with bias, corruption, perjury, witness intimidation, and abuse of process. Helen faces the bogus charge of discreditable conduct for simply doing her job as an Ottawa police detective. In January 2022, detective Grooves initiated an investigation into a possible connection between 9 sudden infant deaths and their mother's vaccination status. Missus Cruz's evidence package included Pfizer documents that showed 31 of 32 pregnancies followed by trial investigators resulted in spontaneous abortion. Only one baby of 32 pregnancies survived. Within days of opening the investigation, detective Groose was suspended for discreditable conduct for initiating an unauthorized investigation and was formally charged in July 2022. What's disturbing to learn is that in late March 2022, overwhelming evidence points to 2 police colleagues illegally providing confidential police information to CBC reporter, Shamini Yokudev, which resulted in CBC articles and broadcast about the police investigation. Of course, impacting the investigation itself. After leaking the story to CBC, Ottawa police were then faced with a 24 hour ultimatum from reporter to contact the parents of the deceased infants before the story broke. So it's just a giant coincidence that after the news broke, Ottawa police made a financial settlement with one of her parents. The news was then used as a propaganda tool to assist and swing public opinion. The timing of the settlement also couldn't have been better given that it was one day before detective Bruce's hearing in December 2023. The mainstream media has been very strategic in their reporting, just enough to cover the basics, but not too much to stir the pot. Of course, things you'll never see the mainstream media report on is the fact that the one and only parent of the 9 deceased infants detective Cruz contacted during her investigation very much appreciated her phone call or that the grandfather of another deceased infant only had positive things to say about detective Bruce at the tribunal. Members of the Ottawa police at one point got so desperate for a smidge of wrongdoing that they initiate a wiretap listening in on detective Bruce and her family. For those who don't know, under the criminal code, there are 2 ways for a wiretap to be granted. One way is somewhat tedious where grounds are established, affidavits are signed, etcetera. While the other way is via an emergency provision under section 1844 of the criminal code meant for abduction, murder, terrorism, or hostage situations where actual lives are at stake. So as you can all guess, after 36 hours of listening to detective Bruce, they came back with absolutely nothing. The decision maker at detective cruises tribunal is adjudicator Chris Randwick, retired superintendent of Ottawa Police, who by the way has zero legal training. The prosecutor is miss Vanessa Stewart. There are so many things unjust about the current proceedings that it would take hours to cover it all. But for those watching, here are some quick examples that indicate the fix is in. Just as detective Cruz was to testify in her own defense, her counsel, Blair Ector, announced to the tribunal that his client had received a threatening email earlier in the day. He said, and I quote, it's come to my attention today that inspector Hugh O'Toole sent an email to my client stating that she could not rely in any Ottawa police service documents. That is witness tampering. That is intimidation. That is obstruction. This tribunal should be outraged. I am outraged, Bector said. Other things of concern is that adjudicator Chris Renwick ruled that defense has to give all their questions for witnesses in advance. Right. Mister Renwick also ruled that detective Cruz could not review her own handwritten notes from January 30, 2020 2. The very day upon which it is alleged she engaged in misconduct by calling 1 of the parents. Although the prosecutor was on a curveball when detective Cruz's own sergeant admitted on the stand that she had every right to look into the file. I'm sure the prosecutor would love to read you that day. As far as testimonies go, all 5 defense expert witnesses were denied by adjudicator Chris Wenwig. They include doctor Eric Payne, pediatric neurology. Doctor James Thorpe, obstetrics and genealogy, doctor Gregory Chang, family medicine, Ottawa police staff, Peter Landlick, and lawyer Sean Buckley. On a different note before many of the questions could even get past the second word the prosecutor Vanessa Stewart would constantly object to the question in an effort to protect their witnesses from perjury. Missus Stewart also despicably compared detective Helen Bruce's calm demeanor to that of a serial rapist and murderer in this country. Speaking of Vanessa Stewart, adjudicator Chris Renwick denied defenses request to switch out prosecutor miss Stewart on the grounds that she is the sister-in-law of the primary prosecution witness. Yes. You heard that correctly. Evidence exists that the case against detective Helen Cruz is an engineered politically motivated setup by persons within the Ottawa Police Services. Detective Cruz has been serving her community for over 20 years as a police officer and carries an exemplary police record with glowing reviews. Missus Cruz's commitment to catching and convicting bad guys in the sexual assault and child abuse unit is second to none. This case in particular is one of the most important cases in Canadian history as it will define how police investigate crimes. The question then becomes, are we going to have police officers frightened like we do in communist countries to do their duty without thinking of the political implications? In Western police forces across Canada and the United States, police officers are encouraged to initiate any investigation they see appropriate. We allow the police to do this so the politicians can't corruptly direct police operations. Autonomy is granted in order to prevent the police from being used politically. If you're able, please come and show your support for Helen Groos at 211 Hunmar Drive, Kanata, Ontario from May 27th to 31st starting at 9:30 AM. Detective Cruz is a hero who's standing up for all police officers and citizens alike. If you wish to donate to detective Cruz's legal fund, I have provided a link in the description. If you think Speaker 1: me where my trust is without borders, she's faced for doing the right thing. We stand behind her fully and completely, Kim. Speaker 2: And we ask you to give her the strength that she needs to do, that she may move forward, Speaker 1: and that the resolve today, although it be your will, will be easy for her at the end of the day.
Helen Grus Legal Defense Fund In July 2022, Detective Helen Grus was charged under the Police Services Act with ‘Discreditable Conduct’ for allegedly conducting an ‘unauthorized’ investig... givesendgo.com
Log in or sign up to view See posts, photos and more on Facebook. facebook.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 1:34 AM
Saved - October 15, 2024 at 11:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a police officer, my role is to investigate and seek justice, especially in cases involving innocent lives, like the tragic deaths of infants. I am deeply troubled by these unexplained deaths and the lack of answers surrounding them. My current focus is on exploring the potential link between the vaccine status of breastfeeding mothers and the deaths of nine infants in the Ottawa area. It's crucial to find clarity and prevent further tragedies.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"I'm a police officer. I'm there to solve and help solve if somebody dies. Especially an innocent little baby... I don't want more babies to die. ... I'm not okay with babies dying and not getting any answers." @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus. Detective Grus is charged with investigating the possible connection between the vaccine status of breastfeeding mothers and the unexplained deaths of nine Ottawa area infants. https://donaldbest.ca/ottawa-police-inspector-hugh-otoole-resigns-amid-witness-tampering-accusations-in-detective-grus-case/

DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 14, 2024 at 3:13 PM
Saved - October 14, 2024 at 8:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believed in January 2022 that Detective Helen Grus was onto something important. Now, everything she suspected has been validated. Despite this, the Ottawa Police persist in their vendetta against her for questioning the link between mothers’ Covid vaccinations and the sudden deaths of breastfeeding infants.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Everything that @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus suspected in January 2022 has been proven true. Yet the Ottawa Police continues the vendetta against this fine officer - for daring to suspect that the mothers’ Covid vaccinations caused the sudden and unexplained deaths of a number of breastfeeding infants.

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

821,000 children studied in England. *Half of them opted out of 2nd dose. Myocarditis and pericarditis only seen in children who received the shots. *No deaths from C0VID in either group. All risk, no benefit. Profits over safety. *No child should receive these shots. https://t.co/9l3jE2JRDg

DonaldBestCA
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 4:03 PM
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 10:39 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

@DaveFreedom6 One of the most important Canadian criminal cases - and most of us have never heard of it... https://t.co/SOaLuDkzH0

DonaldBestCA
Posted - September 29, 2024 at 8:01 PM
Saved - September 30, 2024 at 12:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Minister and her government forced pregnant women to receive an experimental injection, leading to millions injured or dead globally. For Canadian Police to regain respect and trust, they must initiate criminal investigations into the vaccine injuries and deaths, and they need to act quickly.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

The Minister and her government compelled pregnant women to take an experimental injection. We know that millions of people were injured or died worldwide. If Canadian Police ever want to be respected or trusted again they had better launch Criminal Investigations into the vax injuries and deaths - and it better be soon.

@LionAdvocacy - Lion Advocacy

What bald-face cowardice. This Minister and her government compelled pregnant women to take an experimental vaccine. The alternative was that these women be left with no job and no employment insurance. There was no choice. And yes, experimental. https://covid-vaccine.canada.ca/info/pdf/comirnaty-kp2-pm-en.pdf https://t.co/0z0DMCKjDh

DonaldBestCA
Posted - July 27, 2024 at 5:56 PM
Saved - July 27, 2024 at 9:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the breaking story of US election fraud and money laundering straightforward. Canadians should take note of the techniques involved, as they remind me of Prime Minister Trudeau's campaign receiving many donations from Chinese individuals in British Columbia. @RealAndyLeeShow has covered this topic thoroughly.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

This breaking story of US election fraud and money laundering is easy to understand. Canadians should pay attention to the techniques because the scandal Is reminiscent of Prime Minister Trudeau’s personal campaign receiving numerous donations from Chinese living in British Columbia. Our friend @RealAndyLeeShow covered that issue very well.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

Honestly this ActBlue scandel is just insane. Investigators inserted fake names into ActBlue and what do you know they wound up on fundraising emails. All the grass roots support is a total lie. It’s all about foreign interference with our elections laundered through unsuspecting people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discoveries on fec.gov revealed suspicious donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Four unemployed donors made nearly $198,000 in donations through thousands of transactions. They donated to various Democrat campaigns and PACs, raising questions about the source of their funds. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with Harris campaign emails urging small donations. Fake names were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing up in official emails, suggesting a potential scam to create a facade of grassroots support while funneling larger sums.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In just 10 minutes on fec.gov, they discovered startling donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Now let's take a look at some of these numbers. 4 unemployed individuals donating a staggering $197,993.68 across you ready for this? 23,416 separate donations. That's an average of 10 donations per day every day since January 1, 2023. Does this sound like genuine grassroots support to you? So let's break it down. These suspicious donations. 1st, we have Carolyn from New Jersey living in an apartment and listed as unemployed. She somehow managed to donate 53,000 over $53,000 through 598 I'm sorry. 5,000 998 separate donations since January 1st 23. The bulk of the donations, 36,000, went directly to ActBlue across over 4,600 transactions. But it doesn't stop there. She also made donations to various Democrat campaigns and PACs including Bob Casey for Senate, Jeffries for Congress, and Nancy Pelosi for Congress. So how does an unemployed person living in an apartment have this kind of money to throw around? Next, we have Sandra from California. Also, unemployed and living in an average house. She donated $30,000 or just over 30,000 dollars. Ready for this? Across 66,000 almost 6800 donations. Again, the majority went to ActBlue. Just over $19,000 over 4,870 donations. She also contributed to Rosen for Nevada, HMP, and even Harris for president. That's right folks. Direct donations to Harris' campaign from an unemployed individual. Then there is Thomas from Wisconsin. His listed address is just a plot of land, yet this unemployed donor managed to give, you ready for this? Just shy of $70,000 through 26 100 donations. A whopping 34, almost 35,000 went to ActBlue in 1600 separate transactions. He also donated to the progressive turnout project, retired Americans pack, and once again, Harris for president. And then we also have here this is Amy. Meet Amy from Oregon, another unemployed donor who somehow scraped together $42,000 for about 8,000 donations that ActBlue received. Okay? Now they received 29,000 from her across 55100 transactions. She donated to Ameripac, moms fed up, elect democratic women. Now my friends, these patterns are not just suspicious. They are downright alarming. So how are unemployed individuals making 1,000 of small donations totaling tens of 1,000 of dollars? And why are they spreading these donations across multiple Democrat campaigns and PACs? But it gets worse. Tony Saruga, another investigator, he found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in just 30 days. Now take a look at some of the emails that were sent by the Harris campaign. They're practically begging for $1, $2, $3 donations, but there's a twist that reveals just how deep the rabbit hole goes. You ready? In this email, you can see right here, They're pushing hard for a measly $3 donation. They claim it could guarantee Joe and Kamala are reelected and prevent Donald Trump from becoming president again. Yeah. Well here's another one. This time they are down to asking for just a dollar, $1. They're using scare tactics mentioning Trump's far right billionaire donors and a supposed $50,000,000 donation to Trump's Super PAC. It's clear fear mongering 101. But this last email is where things get really interesting. If you notice the name at the top, f j b. Now you might think that's just a random set of initials, but here's the kicker. The investigators deliberately seeded these initials intact, Blue's database. That's right, America. Tony Saruga and his team inserted tens of thousands of fake donors into ActBlue lists to track their activities and lo and behold, here's one of the fake names showing up in an official email. This proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the Harris Campaign is using these ActBlue lists for their fundraising efforts. They're sending personalized emails to names that don't even exist. But why are they so desperate for these tiny donations? It's not about the money folks, it's about creating ActBlue accounts to facilitate what appears to be a massive scam. They're using these small donations to create a smokescreen of grassroots support all while potentially funneling much larger sums through these seemingly innocent transactions. This isn't just clever market.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - July 18, 2024 at 3:41 PM
Saved - July 19, 2024 at 4:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve witnessed how quickly friends, neighbors, and even family turned against us for questioning mandates and lockdowns. The most shocking was the transformation of 72,000 Canadian police officers into an occupying force, disregarding their oaths and the law. They enforced illegal orders while favoring certain groups, allowing them to break laws. Liquor stores stayed open while restaurants suffered, and police ignored politicians breaking lockdowns. When ordered to freeze accounts of opponents, they complied, destroying lives. Trust in the police has been irrevocably shattered.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

How quickly our friends, neighbours, employers, and even family turned against us for questioning the mandates, jabs, and lockdowns. But nothing was more destructive than the 72,000 Canadian police officers who transformed themselves into an occupying paramilitary force, virtually overnight. Ignoring their Oaths of Office, the Constitution, Rule of Law, Human Rights, and the law itself - Canadian police brutality enforced illegal government orders and political policies. The police also favoured certain groups and political causes - allowing them to break the laws. Chiefs of Police knelt with BLM and allowed thousands to break lockdown - even as police officers were brutally dragging away pastors in handcuffs for preaching to a small congregation. Liquor stores remained open while restaurant owners were destroyed for not enforcing illegal vax passport laws. When neighbours informed on neighbours, the Gestapo arrived to count the number attending a family birthday party. When politicians were caught breaking the lockdown - the police wouldn’t lay charges. When the government ordered police to freeze the bank accounts of political opponents, officers complied and destroyed businesses, homes, and families. When evidence showed massive frauds and criminal negligence regarding the approval, purchase, and mandating of the jabs - the police failed to do their duty as the tsunami of dead and injured broke upon Canada. Instead, the police covered up crimes and destroyed any officers who questioned the approved narrative. Millions of Canadians will never trust the police again, and with good reason.

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

Roughly 40% of the people in this country who took the Covid mRNA vaccine, did so they could go to bars, restaurants and movies. Then they bragged to the 20% who stood up to the state about how much more freedom they have. This was made me realize it's not the govt that's the real threat, but the people who happily obeyed.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 9:18 PM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 2:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There has been a significant influx of foreign workers and students in Canada, leading to concerns about the impact on local communities and job opportunities for Canadians. Many businesses, such as Tim Hortons and Walmart, are predominantly staffed by foreign workers, and some neighborhoods have seen an increase in overcrowded housing and safety concerns. Additionally, there are allegations of preferential treatment for certain religious and cultural groups, such as allowing Sikhs to carry ceremonial daggers on flights and accommodating Muslim polygamous families. These changes have been implemented without the consent or input of Canadians, raising questions about the motives of the political class.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

1.5 million foreign invaders into Canada in the last 18 months. The transformation in some smaller communities is outrageous. If this continues you will have nothing left as your personal income and assets are stripped to subsidize corporate profits and cheap labour, and to centralize control and authority in a balkanized Canada. The same plan, of course, is also at work in the United States, U.K., Ireland, and throughout Western Europe. The entry-level jobs that so many young Canadians relied upon to gain work experience and money after school and in summer are now almost exclusively given to temporary workers and 'students' from other countries. Many Tim Hortons, McDonalds, grocery stores, and other businesses provide foreign worker accommodations in homes maintained for the purpose. Quiet residential neighbourhoods are suddenly full of 'single family dwellings' where 10 or 15 foreign single men reside - and it's party city every night. Women no longer feel safe in their own residential neighbourhoods where only five years ago every bungalow housed one family. (Long time friends who have lived in an Oshawa area subdivision for 15 years are now sandwiched between two 'illegal rooming houses' - single family homes containing a total of 19 single foreign men. They are being forced to sell their home for whatever they can get because the 'authorities' refuse to act.) Within the last year the local Walmart went from a handful of Indian 'students' staff to about 80%. I personally witnessed a training class of new employees given in Hindi (I asked). There were ZERO English-first-language Canadians in that hiring - and the staff routinely communicates with each other in Hindi. Often when customers ask a question, an interpreter must be called to take over. This change is all in the past 12 months. Tim Horton's Highway 400 OnRoute Service Centre near Barrie Ontario is staffed almost exclusively by non-resident temporary workers from India. Orders are received in English and then passed on in Punjabi between the staff. (Again I confirmed the language by asking an employee.) The last time I visited this Tim's the only non-Indian was an older woman - perhaps over 65 - staffing an order window. In Barrie, Ontario public transit is now operated almost exclusively for foreign temporary workers who cannot afford vehicles or other transportation. So too the hospital and other healthcare centres are servicing great numbers of temporary foreign workers and students - again subsidizing corporate profits with your tax dollars. The local food bank is overrun with temporary foreigners who make instructional TikTok videos showing how to milk the system. Nobody voted for this economic and social destruction. Nobody voted to take in millions of single, foreign men of military age - and to insert them into communities across this country. Nobody voted to allow exceptions in Canadian laws to accommodate foreign values and customs - and to give rights that other Canadians do not have. It is illegal for Canadians to carry a knife or a sword (or any weapon) for defensive purposes - unless you are a Sikh. It is illegal for Canadians to carry concealed defensive weapons - unless you are a Sikh. It is illegal for Canadians to carry knives on commercial airline flights - unless you are a Sikh... "The World Sikh Organization is welcoming new Canadian regulations that will allow Sikhs to wear small ceremonial daggers on most flights." Transport Canada announced that, as of Nov. 27, 2017 it will update its Prohibited Items List to allow for blades of six centimetres or less on all domestic and international flights, except to the U.S." https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-tuesday-edition-1.4391247/world-sikh-organization-welcomes-canadian-decision-to-allow-small-kirpans-on-flights-1.4391256 "The kirpan is a dagger which symbolises a Sikh's duty to come to the defence of those in peril. All Sikhs should wear the kirpan on their body at all times as a defensive side-arm, just as a police officer is expected to wear a side-arm when on duty. Its use is only allowed in the act of self-defense and the protection of others. It stands for bravery and protecting the weak and innocent." (Wikipedia 'Kirpan' + other sources) It is illegal for Canadian men to marry multiple women and to have each wife and their children on social assistance - unless you are a Muslim. While the criminal provision against polygamy is still in force in Canada, the practical reality is that no Canadian Muslim has ever been charged with bigamy - although men from Christian religious sects have been convicted. Canada welcomes Muslim polygamous families. "Our flexibility is this regard is remarkable: children from marriages other than the applicant’s first, for instance, can come along as dependents to Canada, provided the other parent confirms they were not abducted." https://macleans.ca/politics/how-to-get-into-canada-if-youre-a-polygamist/ Further, Canadian municipal, provincial and federal government social assistance (welfare) benefits are regularly paid to multiple wives - according to many mainstream media articles over the years. None of this happened by accident. It did not happen with the consent of Canadians. No debate was allowed. No vote was taken. Our traitorous political class continues to engineer this economic and social destruction in furtherance of the WEF / globalist war on nationalism to further World Government and Control. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-souris-tim-hortons-evictions-housing-1.6752938

How to immigrate to Canada if you're a polygamist - Macleans.ca We don't approve, but that doesn't mean you can't get in macleans.ca
DonaldBestCA
Posted - June 6, 2024 at 3:22 AM
Saved - June 6, 2024 at 1:07 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Journalist @JayUnrau delivers excellent coverage of the latest in the disciplinary hearing of @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus. Detective Grus is charged with an 'unauthorized' investigation into the unexpected deaths of nine infants and a potential connection to the jabs. https://tnc.news/2024/06/05/probing-infant-deaths-vaccine-link-proper1/

Probing infant deaths for vaccine link was proper police work, detective maintains Lawyers for the Ottawa Police Service challenged detective Helen Grus’ story that she was acting on legitimate police business when she pursued “a mere hunch” that a spike in local sudden infant deaths could be related to the COVID vaccines. tnc.news
DonaldBestCA
Posted - May 26, 2024 at 10:22 PM
Saved - May 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A concise summary of the posts: A short video about Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus, who will testify in her own defence, captures the main factors of the case. The Disciplinary Hearing against Detective Grus will continue from May 27-31, 2024, in Kanata, Ontario. The video can be found on Dave Freedom's Facebook page.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

This is the most powerful, accurate short video to date about Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus - who will testify in her own defence on Monday, May 27, 2024. @DaveFreedom6 has done a masterful job capturing the main factors in the case in only 9 minutes. Well worth your time. The Disciplinary Hearing against Detective Grus continues May 27-31, 2024, 9am at 211 Huntmar Drive, Kanata, Ontario (suburb just West of Ottawa) Helen Grus GiveSendGo: https://www.givesendgo.com/helengrus Video is also on Dave Freedom's facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/dave.freedom.509

Video Transcript AI Summary
Detective Helen Groos faces biased disciplinary tribunal charges for investigating infant deaths related to vaccination status. Despite suspension and legal challenges, she remains steadfast. The tribunal, led by an untrained adjudicator, restricts her defense and witnesses. The prosecutor, linked to a key witness, obstructs questioning. The case appears politically motivated, aiming to silence Helen's dedication to justice. Supporters rally behind her, recognizing her bravery in upholding police integrity. Helen's fight symbolizes the importance of police autonomy in preventing political interference. Show support at the tribunal or donate to her legal fund. Stand with Helen Groos in her pursuit of truth and justice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Detective Helen Groos of the Ottawa Police will be telling her story to the world for the first time at a police disciplinary tribunal that's been plagued with bias, corruption, perjury, witness intimidation, and abuse of process. Helen faces the bogus charge of discreditable conduct for simply doing her job as an Ottawa police detective. In January 2022, detective Grooves initiated an investigation into a possible connection between 9 sudden infant deaths and their mother's vaccination status. Missus Cruz's evidence package included Pfizer documents that showed 31 of 32 pregnancies followed by trial investigators resulted in spontaneous abortion. Only one baby of 32 pregnancies survived. Within days of opening the investigation, detective Groose was suspended for discreditable conduct for initiating an unauthorized investigation and was formally charged in July 2022. What's disturbing to learn is that in late March 2022, overwhelming evidence points to 2 police colleagues illegally providing confidential police information to CBC reporter, Shamini Yokudev, which resulted in CBC articles and broadcast about the police investigation. Of course, impacting the investigation itself. After leaking the story to CBC, Ottawa police were then faced with a 24 hour ultimatum from reporter to contact the parents of the deceased infants before the story broke. So it's just a giant coincidence that after the news broke, Ottawa police made a financial settlement with one of her parents. The news was then used as a propaganda tool to assist and swing public opinion. The timing of the settlement also couldn't have been better given that it was one day before detective Bruce's hearing in December 2023. The mainstream media has been very strategic in their reporting, just enough to cover the basics, but not too much to stir the pot. Of course, things you'll never see the mainstream media report on is the fact that the one and only parent of the 9 deceased infants detective Cruz contacted during her investigation very much appreciated her phone call or that the grandfather of another deceased infant only had positive things to say about detective Bruce at the tribunal. Members of the Ottawa police at one point got so desperate for a smidge of wrongdoing that they initiate a wiretap listening in on detective Bruce and her family. For those who don't know, under the criminal code, there are 2 ways for a wiretap to be granted. One way is somewhat tedious where grounds are established, affidavits are signed, etcetera. While the other way is via an emergency provision under section 1844 of the criminal code meant for abduction, murder, terrorism, or hostage situations where actual lives are at stake. So as you can all guess, after 36 hours of listening to detective Bruce, they came back with absolutely nothing. The decision maker at detective cruises tribunal is adjudicator Chris Randwick, retired superintendent of Ottawa Police, who by the way has zero legal training. The prosecutor is miss Vanessa Stewart. There are so many things unjust about the current proceedings that it would take hours to cover it all. But for those watching, here are some quick examples that indicate the fix is in. Just as detective Cruz was to testify in her own defense, her counsel, Blair Ector, announced to the tribunal that his client had received a threatening email earlier in the day. He said, and I quote, it's come to my attention today that inspector Hugh O'Toole sent an email to my client stating that she could not rely in any Ottawa police service documents. That is witness tampering. That is intimidation. That is obstruction. This tribunal should be outraged. I am outraged, Bector said. Other things of concern is that adjudicator Chris Renwick ruled that defense has to give all their questions for witnesses in advance. Right. Mister Renwick also ruled that detective Cruz could not review her own handwritten notes from January 30, 2020 2. The very day upon which it is alleged she engaged in misconduct by calling 1 of the parents. Although the prosecutor was on a curveball when detective Cruz's own sergeant admitted on the stand that she had every right to look into the file. I'm sure the prosecutor would love to read you that day. As far as testimonies go, all 5 defense expert witnesses were denied by adjudicator Chris Wenwig. They include doctor Eric Payne, pediatric neurology. Doctor James Thorpe, obstetrics and genealogy, doctor Gregory Chang, family medicine, Ottawa police staff, Peter Landlick, and lawyer Sean Buckley. On a different note before many of the questions could even get past the second word the prosecutor Vanessa Stewart would constantly object to the question in an effort to protect their witnesses from perjury. Missus Stewart also despicably compared detective Helen Bruce's calm demeanor to that of a serial rapist and murderer in this country. Speaking of Vanessa Stewart, adjudicator Chris Renwick denied defenses request to switch out prosecutor miss Stewart on the grounds that she is the sister-in-law of the primary prosecution witness. Yes. You heard that correctly. Evidence exists that the case against detective Helen Cruz is an engineered politically motivated setup by persons within the Ottawa Police Services. Detective Cruz has been serving her community for over 20 years as a police officer and carries an exemplary police record with glowing reviews. Missus Cruz's commitment to catching and convicting bad guys in the sexual assault and child abuse unit is second to none. This case in particular is one of the most important cases in Canadian history as it will define how police investigate crimes. The question then becomes, are we going to have police officers frightened like we do in communist countries to do their duty without thinking of the political implications? In Western police forces across Canada and the United States, police officers are encouraged to initiate any investigation they see appropriate. We allow the police to do this so the politicians can't corruptly direct police operations. Autonomy is granted in order to prevent the police from being used politically. If you're able, please come and show your support for Helen Groos at 211 Hunmar Drive, Kanata, Ontario from May 27th to 31st starting at 9:30 AM. Detective Cruz is a hero who's standing up for all police officers and citizens alike. If you wish to donate to detective Cruz's legal fund, I have provided a link in the description. If you think Speaker 1: me where my trust is without borders, she's faced for doing the right thing. We stand behind her fully and completely, Kim. Speaker 2: And we ask you to give her the strength that she needs to do, that she may move forward, Speaker 1: and that the resolve today, although it be your will, will be easy for her at the end of the day.
Helen Grus Legal Defense Fund In July 2022, Detective Helen Grus was charged under the Police Services Act with ‘Discreditable Conduct’ for allegedly conducting an ‘unauthorized’ investig... givesendgo.com
Log in or sign up to view See posts, photos and more on Facebook. facebook.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - May 26, 2024 at 10:16 AM
Saved - May 26, 2024 at 11:48 AM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Thugs like this utterly destroyed so many good people’s respect and support for police. I honestly believe that for a significant proportion of Canadians, the damage is irreparable.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Canada, 2021: An unvaccinated mother is roughed up and arrested in front of her crying children for disobeying totalitarian vaccine mandates. Never forget the tyranny imposed on you by your own government in the name of "health". https://t.co/gwQkiFn8gu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Why arrest her? You didn't say why she's arrested. Trespassing? We're within our rights. Why arrest her? I've told you twice. It's not trespassing. We're within our rights. You've been asked, but I have to. A mandate is not a requirement. Translation: Why are you arresting her? You didn't say why she's under arrest. Trespassing? We are within our rights. Why arrest her? I've already told you twice. It's not trespassing. We are within our rights. You've been asked, but I have to. A mandate is not a requirement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why are you arresting her? You're gonna be the same with you? Why are you arresting her? Told you. You didn't say why she's under arrest. To the Trespass robbery act. Oh my god. I'm sorry. We are within our rights. Why did why did you arrest her? I've already told you twice. It's not trespassing. We are within our rights. You've been asked, but I have to A mandate is not a
DonaldBestCA
Posted - May 24, 2024 at 2:47 PM
Saved - May 24, 2024 at 4:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Ottawa Police have announced that there will be no internet broadcast of Detective Helen Grus' disciplinary hearing, despite previously stating that it would be publicly broadcasted. The hearing will take place in a small boardroom with only 15 seats, causing disappointment among the 100+ members of the public and journalists who were expecting a larger venue. This sudden change has led to accusations of deception and a lack of transparency. Detective Grus is facing charges of 'Discreditable Conduct' for conducting unauthorized investigations into the deaths of nine infants.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 No Public Broadcast Detective Grus Trial Public Deceived and Betrayed. Open Court Principle and Transparency Dead 100+ Public and Journalists expected to show for tiny 15-seat Kanata boardroom Today @OttawaPolice announced that there will be NO INTERNET BROADCAST of the Detective Helen Grus Disciplinary Hearing starting Monday, May 27, 2024. Ottawa Police have for the last two months deceived the public with false information that the hearing would be moved to a larger facility, and be publicly broadcast to ensure transparency of the trial. Then they cancelled the large Ottawa venue and moved the hearing back to the tiny boardroom - dangling the promise that the proceedings would be broadcast - especially as Detective Grus is expected to testify in her own defense on Monday. Now on the Friday before the Monday trial we learn the truth: 15 seats, no public broadcast, 100+ public and journalists wanting the 15 available seats in the tiny boardroom. OPS led everybody on - deceived us for two months before announcing early this morning that there would be no broadcast. No doubt Ottawa Police saved the 'no broadcast' announcement to the Friday before the trial in hopes that the public and journalists would not make plans to personally attend the hearing in Kanata. The last hearing day in March 2024 saw an overflow crowd of about 70 people. Ottawa Police will not reserve a section for journalists, so members of the public gave up their seats to allow the journalists to cover the event. Although the crowd was peaceful and respectful, Ottawa Police threatened to tow cars from the public parking spaces at the station. Further, the spectators were warned not to park at the nearby Canadian Tire Centre or they would be towed. This reporter has learned that Ottawa Police called the Canadian Tire Centre and effectively communicated to management that the police did not want members of the public to park at the centre! Thus police announced to the crowd that CTC parking was prohibited. In context, the past two months can be seen as an Ottawa Police strategy to limit public access and transparency to this most contentious case and hearing. Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus is charged with ‘Discreditable Conduct’ under the Ontario Police Services Act for conducting “unauthorized” investigations into the sudden deaths of nine infants. The next Hearing is on Monday, May 27, 2024. Grus was investigating any potential connection between the vaccination status of the mothers and the sudden deaths of breastfeeding babies. Ottawa Police shut down her investigation, ordered her to stop, and charged her with an internal disciplinary charge. My independent journalism revealed that Public Health Agency of Canada personnel sought to influence the Ottawa Police investigation of Detective Grus as early as March 2022, and even continuing after she was charged in July of 2022. Full background and all my articles can be found at my website: https://donaldbest.ca/detective-grus-case/

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨UPDATE DETECTIVE GRUS HEARING🚨 As of May 23, 2024 330pm Eastern - @OttawaPolice Media Relations still don't know if the Detective Grus hearing will be broadcast to the public. This after OPS cancelled an announced large 200 seat Ottawa venue and moved the hearing back to the tiny Kanata boardroom with only 15-20 seats available for the public and journalists. At the last hearing date in March, Ottawa Police officers threatened an overflow crowd of 60+ members of the public who attended at the Kanata boardroom. And yet - hear we go again with the Ottawa Police setting the stage to limit the public's ability to witness what many describe as an abuse of process and justice against a dedicated police detective. Detective Helen Grus will testify for the first time on Monday, May 27, 2024. My sources indicate that over 100+ members of the public and press will attend the Kanata police station whether the hearing is broadcast or not. Lawn chairs, umbrellas, and coolers would seem to be in order for what appears to be a lawn party at the Kanata police station. More to come.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - May 15, 2024 at 6:32 PM
Saved - May 15, 2024 at 7:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Journalist Jason Unrau questions the lack of coverage on the "statue defacement" incident. Legacy media, including CBC, expressed outrage when Freedom Convoy protestors placed a Canadian flag and a sign on the Terry Fox memorial. However, there seems to be no issue with Terry supporting Hamas. Follow Jason Unrau, a former Parliamentary Press Gallery reporter and ex-CBC staffer.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Where's the 'statue defacement' coverage now? asks journalist Jason Unrau. Legacy media especially @CBC pumped outrage when Freedom Convoy protestors put a Canadian flag & 'Mandate Freedom' sign on the Terry Fox memorial... No problem having Terry support Hamas though! Former Parliamentary Press Gallery reporter & ex-CBC staffer @JayUnrau is worth a follow...

@JayUnrau - Jason Unrau

Hey @brodiefenlon, where is @markgollom for more "statue defacement" coverage? Also, why no desire to look into who is financing these pro-Pally protests? I remember crack typists like @gqinott harassed grannies who donated $20 to the freedom convoy. https://t.co/9DJgLFd2ip

DonaldBestCA
Posted - May 13, 2024 at 7:25 PM
Saved - May 13, 2024 at 8:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author argues that police checkpoints and forced medical tests by armed officers in Canada are not signs of an impending police state, but rather a reflection of the existing police state. They express concern about the violation of bodily autonomy, the potential misuse of DNA samples, and the lack of laws or controls to prevent the sharing or selling of collected information. The author also raises the issue of non-medical personnel having the authority to perform invasive procedures at checkpoints. They mention the questionable quality of PPE and swabs used in these tests.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Police Checkpoints and forced medical tests by armed officers are not harbingers of an imminent Police State - they are part of the existing Canadian Police State. Even if they smile as they violate your bodily autonomy. As a police officer I can think of a dozen scenarios where I would want to have a DNA sample from specific people - including members of organized crime. This roadside stop scenario provides a method of circumventing the Charter, search warrants, or spending resources on surveillance. On the grander scale, these samples might be retained, logged, and tested for other than the purported initial purpose. There is no law, no control, no effective prevention against the use of this information for many purposes - even to share or sell the information to the private sector or foreign governments. There's also the issue of police officers - non-medical personnel - having the right under law to insert an object into your body at a checkpoint where you have not been stopped for committing an offense - just a checkpoint. And we've all seen the videos of the filthy factories where hundreds of millions of 'sterile' PPE and swabs are made. Police Checkpoints and forced medical tests by police officers are not harbingers of an imminent Police State - they are part of the existing Canadian #PoliceState. Even if they smile as they violate your bodily autonomy.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 27, 2024 at 6:07 PM
Saved - April 27, 2024 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many health professionals have been accused of using illegal and harmful procedures during mass vaccinations, crossing the criminal threshold. There is evidence of a prima facie case against healthcare professionals who injected unknown substances into patients. Some pharmacists, nurses, and doctors received payment per shot, prioritizing profits over safe medical practice and informed consent.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

As increasing numbers of health professionals speak about illegal and harmful procedures used during the mass-vaccinations - it is clear that the Criminal Threshold was crossed in many provable events. At the very least, there is a prima facie case apparent against health care professionals who injected unknown substances into patients. Those pharmacists, nurses, and doctors who participated in the mass-injections often received payment per shot - if not directly, then to the corporation paying them. It is clear that for many health professionals - safe medical practice and informed consent were secondary to profits.

@dksdata - David Dickson

🚨 COVID SHOTS WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT Pre-filled COVID shot syringes not drawn by the immunizer were used throughout Alberta in 2021. This meant neither the immunizer nor the recipient knew what they were being injected with. Statement from an Alberta Nurse in 2021 - buried by the Chief of Staff to the Alberta Justice Minister, Justice Minister, Public Safety Minister, Health Minister, Premier and their "Political Allies". “I was instructed to administer a prefilled syringe to clients with the apparent vaccine. I was told a team of Nurses and Pharmacists were doing the reconstitution of the Pfizer vaccine and it would help us with efficiency to give a preloaded syringe to save time of the immunizing Nurse not needing to mix and draw up their own vaccine” In May of 2021 the United Nurses of Alberta (UNA) union had a Zoom call where this practice of using pre-filled syringes was raised. During this call, it was confirmed that complaints had already been submitted about this illegal prectice. The Union did NOTHING and the illegal practice continued. This meant every single shot given this way was an assault. If you did not provide or obtain informed consent for this, you MUST speak up now. Alberta CMOH official policy on the use of pre-filled syringes for COVID shots in 2021 “immunizers must:” “Only administer the COVID-19 vaccine that they have drawn up and labelled themselves” "Suggested informed consent script: “Due to challenging vaccine storage and handling requirements, the best way to transport the vaccine to your home is in a prepared syringe. It is important to understand that transporting the vaccine this way has not been broadly studied and there is limited data regarding the stability of the vaccine transported in this way. Would you like to proceed with receiving an immunization from a prepared syringe for COVID 19 vaccine?” Healthcare Unions knew. Healthcare Colleges knew. Alberta Health knew. Alberta Health Services knew. Pharmacies knew. The Media knew. Ministers and MLA's (on both sides) knew. Freedom Lawyers knew. Each and every one is complicit in the obstruction of justice relating to mass assaults in Alberta. https://dksdata.com/BenefactBulletins https://dksdata.com/AlbertaDead#COMMUNICATIONS https://dksdata.com/Benefact/Prefilledsyringe.pdf https://onehealth.ca/Portals/1/2021-02-04%20Prefilled%20Syringes%20COVID-19%20Immunization%20-%20Final.pdf https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/58d31634-61d9-469d-b95f-f714719b923e/resource/3b73d911-8a68-444f-958e-87cfd54e88a9/download/prefilled-syringes-covid-19-policy.pdf https://www.ab.bluecross.ca/pdfs/Off-Site-Pre-Filled-Syringes-(PFS)-for-small-groups.pdf https://www.ab.bluecross.ca/pdfs/Off-Site-Pharmacy-Immunization-Policy-APPROVED.pdf

404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 25, 2024 at 5:07 PM
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 5:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Irish government's decision to relocate hundreds of single, foreign men to a small town has sparked controversy. Some residents feel unheard and believe that their concerns about cultural differences and women's rights are being ignored.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

The Irish government is using violence to force a small town to take in hundreds of single, military-aged, foreign men from societies that believe women are the property of men. "It would appear that we simply do not have a voice any more. The government simply do not care - for our communities, for our laws and for our people."

@EoinLenihan - Dr. Eoin Lenihan

The scenes at Newtown Mount Kennedy where the Irish government are forcing immigrant accommodation on a small, close-knit community are not the scenes of a functioning democracy. Public order police units have been bussed in during the night to accompany masked workers who are forging ahead with the controversial project. I spoke to Terry K who is on the ground there and whose account is an essential follow. He told me that demonstrators had gotten a tip on Monday from a known source who claimed that the owner of the site wanted to speak with the community next Monday with a view to winding down operations. Believing the source, demonstrators took a well-earned break and there were reduced numbers on site this morning when police and workers arrived. As word about the apparent set up and works got out, locals arrived on site throughout the day and the police have become more heavy handed with reports of local demonstrators being injured. Follow Terry for more on events as they unfold. 👇👇👇

DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 24, 2024 at 2:52 AM
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 10:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Canadian Armed Forces, after dismissing over 400 military personnel for refusing the experimental jabs, are now seeking their return. The recruitment campaign's focus on inclusivity and the perception that straight White males are unwelcome may have contributed to the need for re-enlistment. It is uncertain how many of the 400+ individuals will choose to return, but it is speculated that their refusal indicates their critical thinking and intelligence. The Military Industrial Complex's intentions in Ukraine are also mentioned.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

After firing or causing 400+ military personnel to quit over their refusal to be injected with the experimental jabs - the Canadian Armed Forces are now begging them to return. The reasons for the about face are obvious - given the absolute disaster of a recruitment campaign that features tampons, rainbows, and a core message that straight White males are not welcome. How many of the 400+ refusniks will re-enlist in the CAF? My guess: Just about none will return to the military because they are all intelligent, critical thinkers who refused to take the jab... ... and the Military Industrial Complex is hoping to throw some young Canadians into the death factory called the Ukraine. @NChartierET has the story... https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/soldiers-dismissed-over-covid-shot-refusal-get-waiver-for-re-enrolment-5635528

Soldiers Dismissed Over COVID Shot Refusal Get Waiver for Re-Enrolment theepochtimes.com
DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 9, 2024 at 4:18 PM
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 4:39 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

🚨BREAKING🚨 Canadian PM Justin Trudeau and Defense Minister Bill Blair prepare to use the Canadian Military against Canadian citizens in Canada. This from the same government that wanted to send tanks against #FreedomConvoy protesters in February 2022. Are you awake yet?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Canadian Armed Forces can assist domestic law enforcement in Canada as needed under the National Defence Act. This is part of their responsibility to support civil authority when required. Minister Blair, who has experience in both areas, can provide more information on this topic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To project future threats one of the things I noticed in the document and then there was no follow-up on so I'm hoping to find out what it's about was the Canadian Armed Forces helping domestic law enforcement in Canada? What does that involve? Speaker 1: Happy to turn to, Minister Blair for that. He's an expert in both. He's done a bit of both. First of all, the National Defence Act, one of the responsibilities of the Canadian Armed Forces in addition to all of the the the extraordinary work and challenges that we place before them is to be there when required to assist what we call civil authority. So that legislation, we need to have that capacity.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 8, 2024 at 3:51 AM
Saved - April 8, 2024 at 4:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post expresses concern over a man wearing a suicide-vest costume at a rally, calling for his identification and potential deportation if not a Canadian citizen. It questions the integrity of his path to citizenship and criticizes anyone defending him. The post also discusses the impact of immigration on Canadian values. The second post dismisses a non-Canadian defending the man, suggesting they should stay in their own country as their values don't align with Canada.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Canadians & @TorontoPolice need to identify this man wearing a suicide-vest costume to the #AlQudsDay rally. No doubt his intent was to cause fear, and he did. If he is not a Canadian citizen, he should be deported. If he is a citizen, his path to citizenship should be closely audited to ensure that the process was fully complied with. Anyone defending this man wearing this to a public gathering is an enemy of Canada. Import the 3rd World - Become the 3rd World. For the last 150+ years, so many Canadians arrived here to embrace Canadian values and cultural standards - and to leave behind the chaos and violence of their home societies. But now we have hundreds of thousands - if not more - who are here for convenience and to carry on their political and religious battles. Those people should return to their homelands. Anyone wearing this to a public rally in Canada is my enemy, and the enemy of Canada.

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

A non-Canadian tries to defend the indefensible - and of course plays the race card. Ho hum. Please... stay in your own country and don't come here. Your values and cultural perspectives don't fit with Canada.

DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 6, 2024 at 3:33 PM
Saved - April 6, 2024 at 4:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Justin Trudeau has implemented the Emergency Act to control the situation, restricting access to money, petrol, and food. The presence of troops adds to the intensity. #NeverForget #NoAmnesty

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"Justin Trudeau has declared an Emergency Act, the strongest, most repressive tool in his government to try and silence and starve these people, to stop them getting their hands on their own money, to stop them getting petrol, to stop them getting food. It's insane what Trudeau is doing just have a look at now that the troops have moved in on these people." @SkyNewsAust on February 19, 2022 #NeverForget #NoAmnesty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inPEY_PS4kU

DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 4, 2024 at 3:48 PM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 4:18 PM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

Almost three years after Ontario Premier Doug Ford introduced vaccine certificates to make it easier to discriminate against the non-compliant in employment - and even to eat at @McDonalds... @fordnation won't talk about the tsunami of excess deaths, and vax injuries / deaths.

@fordnation - Doug Ford

I know that many of you are concerned about the proof of vaccination & what it means for your civil liberties. Our government understands your concerns, but our highest concern is ensuring we don't lose our hard fought progress in our fight against COVID-19. https://t.co/PY8CJ9XjPD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ontario launched a vaccine certificate. The government hears concerns about civil liberties but prioritizes protecting progress made in fighting the pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This morning, Ontario launched its own vaccine certificate. I know that many people are concerned about this certificate and what it means for your civil liberties. I want you to know that I hear you. Our government understands your concerns, but our highest concern, what keeps me up at night is ensuring we never lose our hard fought progress.
DonaldBestCA
Posted - April 2, 2024 at 5:47 AM
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 2:39 AM

@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

"People in Scotland now do not know what is illegal to say... You can be arrested for things said in your own home." Canadians should pay close attention to the Scottish Hate Crime Law - because this is exactly what Trudeau, Singh, and all the Uniparty tyrants intend for us.

@GBNEWS - GB News

‘They have to investigate every single report… You can be arrested for things said in your own home!’ Deputy Editor of Spiked @FraserMyers on the extent of power the controversial Scottish Hate Crime Bill gives police. 🔒 Become a GB News Member: gbnews.com/support https://t.co/QPO0mUeYKc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Scottish National Party's hate crime legislation is criticized for potentially chilling free speech. The law's vague boundaries create uncertainty about what can be said, leading to concerns about authoritarianism. Third-party reporting in various locations raises fears of false complaints. Police must investigate every report, contrasting with their discretion in other crimes. The law's reach extends to private conversations, risking family members reporting each other. Critics view the legislation as an attack on the Scottish people, questioning the SNP's commitment to independence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, this has been really criticized by the U. K. Government, hasn't it? A source saying that the Scottish National Party was taking Scotland down a very dangerous path, potentially chilling effects on free speech. What do you make of that? Speaker 1: Yes. I think this absolutely will have chilling effects on free speech precisely because people in Scotland now do not know what it is illegal to say. You know, we do not know. At the Edinburgh Festival, for instance, that comes up, will you be allowed to make fun of Islam? Will you be allowed to, make jokes about transgender issues? That is yet to be tested. And that's Well, I'll tell Speaker 2: you what will not test. An owned firm game between Celtic and Rangers and the sectarian abuse that comes from either end, Are they going to go into that crowd of 60, 70000 people and make arrests on that day? I I would doubt it. Speaker 1: Well, there was already attempts to criminalize, this kind of sectarian, chanting. There was the offensive behavior of football act, which had to be, repealed because it was seen as so authoritarian. It basically, that would have sent people to prison for 5 years, for, you know, making sectarian chance. Again, the SMP just has an appalling track record of coming up with these crazily authoritarian laws. Thankfully, a lot of them end up in in the bin and we can hope that the same thing happens with this hate crime act. I think what's ironic is that the SNP talks about independence for Scotland. It says it's proud of Scotland. But actually, it's public enemy number 1 for the SNP is the Scottish people because it thinks that they're all hateful bigots, that they need to be you know, they're just one moment away from committing a hate crime. They need to be told what they can and can't say, what they can and can't eat and drink as well and things like that, how they can raise their children. So it seems to me it's also a kind of classist and elitist attack on the public as well as being authoritarian. Speaker 0: Peter Snatcher, the human rights campaigner, he's criticized the legislation for various things. But one of the things is third party reporting. Because if people aren't comfortable reporting it to the police, you can go to other sites, there's 400 of them, where you can register a complaint, including a sex shop, a mushroom farm and a caravan park. What's that all about? Speaker 1: Yes. So this is this idea that if you are part of a marginalized group, you might not have a good relationship with the police. But you know, the trouble is that if you allow for anonymous reporting, anonymous snitching, then that surely just encourages vexatious complaints further. And the police have an obligation under this law, unlike other crimes. It's interesting, you know, the Scottish police are talking about maybe they won't come to every burglary, maybe they won't come to, every mugging. But under the under the provisions of the Hate Crime Act, they have to investigate every single report. Speaker 2: It's funny how they can make something obligatory if they want to. Speaker 1: Yes. Exactly. Well, it shows the priorities of the S&P. Speaker 2: So your car is stolen. Well, we may or may not, you know, turn up and investigate. Speaker 1: But are you saying something naughty? Oh, yeah. And and potentially as well, what's also shocking about this law is that you could be arrested hatred in your own home is ridiculous. But under this, new act, you could stir up hatred in your own home is ridiculous. But under this, new act you could, you know, think about conversations over the dinner table. Children reporting their parents. Granny says something spicy over Christmas, she's in trouble. Speaker 2: Yeah.
View Full Interactive Feed