TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DowdEdward

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 8:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I hear Billy Corgan confirming how deep the manipulation runs. Covid showed me anti-establishment bands bending the knee for the poisonous juice jabs. If you want your mind blown, read Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon by David McGowan. He links the Hippie scene to an astroturfed psyop.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Billy Corgan of Smashing Pumpkins confirms how deep the manipulation goes. This for me became evident during Covid when so called anti-establishment bands bent the knee for the poisonous juice jabs. If you want your mind blown read Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon - David McGowan He connects dots suggesting the Hippie music scene and culture was an astroturfed psyop.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 NEW: Smashing Pumpkins’ Billy Corgan Says He Was Approached by the U.S. Government For ‘Off the Record Meetings’ “They somehow want to hook my influence … into whatever they're after … There are elements in popular music where people have been compromised … I know the game because I've lived it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recounts experiences where elements of the US government approached him to be involved in things that were “way above my pay grid,” noting he has never discussed them in depth publicly. He describes being in rooms with people and wondering, “why are they talking to me?” comparing the experience to something out of “eyes wide shut.” When pressed about what they said, he declines to detail, saying, “I’m not gonna tell you.” He hints at a broader pattern, referencing a prior discussion about a “shape shifter” on Howard Stern and explains that he has experienced supernatural things and times when elements of the US government reached out to leverage his influence, which he characterizes as not being “that great.” He asserts that there are insinuations and, openly, that in popular music there are people who have been compromised knowingly, describing it as a Faustian bargain: “Pick door number one, and we're gonna push you to the moon.” He explains that in music, some people are protected and receive every benefit of that protection, while others are discarded if they do not comply with demands or “press a button and throw them off the ship.” He emphasizes that he has been in rooms with some of the most famous people in the world and has been invited to the White House twice for meetings that were essentially off the record. When asked to explain why, he notes the meetings occurred “during the Bush administration” and adds, “Oh oh, wow. And and and I’m not a Republican,” which surprised him given he grew up in a blue state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At different times, I've been approached by elements of the US government to be involved in things that were just way above my pay grid. I've never talked about them in any depth publicly. But I I've had experiences where I would find myself in a room with people and think, why are they talking to me? It was something out of, like, eyes wide shut. Really? Oh, yeah. And what what did they say? Like, we'd like I'm not gonna tell you. Okay. Okay. Okay. No. Because I haven't talked about it. I can certainly talk about it in sort of like a in a sort of a kind of a I was there kind of way. Well yeah. But it's similar to when I when I talked about experiencing a shape shifter on Howard Stern. It became this thing where I was hunted in airports. Please tell me the shape shifter story. All I can say is is I've experienced supernatural things, and I've experienced things where I've had elements of the US government reach out to me because they somehow wanna hook my influence, which is not that great, into whatever they're after. So having had personal experience of this, and, of course, there's lots of other Right. Insinuations, and I certainly would say sitting here quite openly, it seems very, very obvious to me that there are elements in popular music where people have been compromised knowingly Right. Because they were offered kind of a Faustian bargain. Right. Pick door number one, and we're gonna push you to the moon. Right. Because in music, and this is certainly my my area of expertise, there are people who are protected, and they get every benefit of that protection. And I know it because I know the game because I've lived it. And there are other people where they just they decide to press a button and throw them off the ship. Right. Now it might be because they're engaging in bad behavior, and we talked a little bit about that. But in other cases, I think just because they won't do the bidding that people want them to do. You can believe me or you can't. Right. But I can say sitting here that that I've been in the room with some of the most famous people in the world. I've been, you know, invited at the White House two times to have meetings that were, you know, essentially off the record meetings. Why? So if you wanna call me crazy or wacky or talk about my Can say which presidency this was? It was during the Bush administration. Oh oh, wow. And and and I'm and I'm not a Republican. So that was even more shocking to me. I grew up in a in a blue state.
Saved - December 27, 2025 at 3:47 PM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

I am sensing the same phenomenon coming. To those interested in staying in touch should I disappear here is my personal website: https://www.eddowd.com

Home Edward Dowd is economic and investment analyst and currently a founding partner at Phinance Technologies. He has worked on Wall Street most of his career, most notably at Blackrock as a portfolio manager. Ed's book, "Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden eddowd.com

@TheMarcitect - The Architect.

The coming social media censorship has nothing to do with silencing hate and everything to do with silencing the truth.

Saved - April 30, 2025 at 3:25 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Sir James Goldsmith predicting the decline of the west due to the flight of capital in search of slave labor with Charlie Rose in 1994. The battle between capital and labor. Very prophetic interview. And here we are 31 years later. https://t.co/qTiaMab540

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that while China and India represent huge markets, moving factories from the US to these countries to re-import goods leads to domestic job losses and lower wages. This is because companies seek cheaper labor, undermining the traditional balance between capital and labor in developed nations. The speaker asserts that the purpose of an economy should be to serve society's needs, offering prosperity, stability, and contentment. However, prioritizing economic growth at the expense of these factors leads to poverty, unemployment, and societal destabilization. The speaker believes that big business favors unlimited access to cheap labor, which hurts ordinary people. The speaker claims that the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) will cause job losses in industrialized nations as companies move manufacturing to find the cheapest labor. The speaker states that the poor in rich countries will subsidize the rich in poor countries, and modern society worships economic indexes, destroying societal stability. The economy should be a tool subjected to societal well-being.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has proven despite all the warnings to be good for The United States and good for Mexico. That when you say these people in, for example, the People's Republic Of China Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And India, Four Million people Speaker 1: 4,000,000,000. Yeah. 4,000,000,000. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. The argument is also made that they, all of a sudden, not only is there a question of the price of their labor, but it is a huge buying power that they have, that China, in the year, the new millennium, will be the world's fastest growing economy. Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: And it'll be a market. That's wonderful. And those people will be buying products Speaker 1: That's wonderful. Speaker 0: From the industrialized And Speaker 1: let's benefit from that. And we can work together, but how do you benefit from that without destroying ourselves? You go and you create a corporation in China, and you build a factory in China. And what do you wanna sell? Mugs? Sell mugs in China. And you conquer part of the Chinese market by competing there fan square in China. That's life. That's adding to the activity of China. You're a corporate citizen over there. You end up working over there. But if you move a factory from The States and take that to China, not so as to conquer the Chinese market, but so as to reimport the goods into The States, so as to get cheap labor, what are you doing? What you are doing is you are saying to your employees here, you're too expensive folks. You want money. You want protection. You want unions. You want holidays. Forget it. We can employ 47 people over there who want nothing. So the so called recovery, which is a recovery of economic indices, hasn't got the feel good factor because people's salaries have done that. People are gonna go down much more. It's only beginning, and the reason is very straightforward. When you manufacture something, anything, this table Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: You have a value added. The value added is when you take the raw materials and you manufacture a product. Mhmm. The value you add is known as value added, and that is shared between capital and labor. And the whole division, the sharing of that, has been the subject of massive debates for generations. How much should go to capital? How much should go to labor? You've had strikes. You've had lockouts. You've had political debates. All of a sudden, by creating a global marketplace for labor. But what it might makes creating circumstances where people are making the same product with the same technology and the same capital, and the only variant is cost of labor. You are shattering that shattering the way you share the value added. And that means that you are destroying the basis on which we've been able to create an equilibrium and have a stable society. Speaker 0: Okay. But you let me just take this argument. This is the same thing we've heard about protectionism every time it comes up. Speaker 1: Not No. Absolutely not. I am entirely for free enterprise. I am for free markets. I I'm not I I believe that you Speaker 0: have waiting for the but. Speaker 1: Oh, I'm giving you the but. I'm not for the destruction of one's society. Can you explain what is the purpose of an economy in your view? Speaker 0: Well, I know this is a point that you feel very strongly about. It has many purposes, in fact, to play a role in a society in terms of creating jobs, in terms of playing a positive force, in term giving people an opportunity to to serve and to take care of their family, giving people an opportunity In other words, the economy participate in their society. Speaker 1: In other words, the economy is there to serve the fundamental needs of society Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Which offers prosperity Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Which are stability Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And which are contentment. Speaker 0: Do you agree with that or not? Speaker 1: That is the basis. And that's the basis of my thinking. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And what I'm saying at this stage is that if purely for an economic doctrine, you have a situation whereby the economy grows, but you create poverty, unemployment, and you destabilize the society, you're in trouble. When I was a boy, we were taught that irreversibly, we were moving towards progress. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: That material wealth, material prosperity would solve our problems, would improve our way of life, and improve our civilization. We were taught that. And we achieved the creation of material prosperity in a way which we would never have dreamt of. We made the economy grow 400% incredibly. And what have we done? We've destabilized our society. We've increased unemployment massively. We've totally destabilized our cities. We've uprooted our countryside. We've increased crime. Every single valid criterion for a stable society has become negative. Therefore, something must be wrong. And what has become wrong Yeah. Is that instead of the economy being there to serve us, we are there adoring, serving economic industries. Speaker 0: Alright. Let me what brought you to believe that you, as one very wealthy Speaker 1: And you can reimport into the states the products that you manufacture. And the result is that you will obliterate earnings and employment in the states. Speaker 2: First of all, let me point out that an important point that you miss here is The US has, by choice and for a considerable period of time, much lower trade barriers than its partners. So what is going to happen in the Uruguay round, and incidentally what happened in NAFTA, is that the foreign markets are going to become much more open relative to our market. It changes the balance of incentives, making it more attractive for American companies to stay here and produce for those foreign markets. Remember, we have low tariffs and barriers to begin with. It's the rest of the world. Why is America still are actually leveling the playing field and making it more possible for American companies Speaker 0: to Yeah. Wait. Wait. Let me let Speaker 1: me When they try, because you've got to understand what is happening. This is the establishment against the rest of society. Who what is happening in France today, for instance, 30% of the population is forget, 70% against it. But who are the 70%? They're the ordinary people. Who are the 30%? They're basically big business whose dream and I've been in big business, and I'm for business as long as it doesn't devour society, as long as it doesn't totally destroy things. So I'm for profits, for free markets, and I'm a capitalist, and I'm perfectly proud of having been successful. But let me make it clear that we have a conflict of interest, and what is happening is that big business loves the idea of total access to unlimited giveaway labor, which is what it's gonna have. And this and therefore, in a community like France where we have succeeded in getting the issue out and getting it discussed and understood, 70% are now against it. Speaker 0: But when when you strip away everything, what you were saying, I mean I've this book, what you were saying is that you're gonna see if if GAT passes, you're gonna see labor. Jobs will be create jobs will be lost in the industrialized world because of the fact that companies in the search of the cheapest labor will move their manufacturing operations. Speaker 1: And you know who's gonna make money over there? You know who's gonna make money over there? Speaker 0: Make money over there. Speaker 1: I'll tell you who's gonna make money over there. In every developing nation, you have the same pattern. You have a handful of people who control everything. Speaker 0: The oligarchy that controls it underdeveloped Everyone. I got everyone. You gotta move on. Speaker 1: What you've got let me just make it clear. The people who are gonna lose here in the developed countries are not people like me or you. They're gonna be the people who lose their jobs out there. It's the it is the it is the poor in the rich countries who are going to be subsidizing the rich in the poor countries. Is this nonsense? Everything is based in our modern society on improving an economic index. How do we get greater economic growth? How do we grow via GNP? And the result is we are destroying our the stability of our societies because we are worshiping the wrong god, economic index. Speaker 0: And the god we should worship is? Speaker 1: Is that the economy, like everything else, is a tool which should be sub submitted, should be subject to the true Speaker 0: and
Saved - August 18, 2024 at 4:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it strange that the junk food issue for young people is said to have started in 2021. That just doesn’t add up. It feels like there's a major cover-up regarding the real reasons behind this problem.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Weird…so the junk food problem started in 2021 for young? No that’s nonsense. The greatest fraudulent crime coverup continues. https://researchgate.net/publication/378869803_US_-Death_Trends_for_Neoplasms_ICD_codes_C00-D48_Ages_15-44

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@nypost - New York Post

2 foods could be fueling cancer epidemic in young people: docs https://trib.al/g3SdrNQ

SocialFlow trib.al

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

View all our work at https://www.humanityprojects.info

Humanity Projects Info Quick Reference site for The Humanity Projects - powered by Finance Technologies - analyzing the rise in excess deaths, disabilities, injuries since the Covid 19 vaccine rollout. Official data sources. Correlation or causation? We report, you decide. humanityprojects.info
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 10:24 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Almost slips up and calls it a recording…🤦‍♂️…I can’t with these freaks anymore. Put him live with the press!

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NOW - Kamala speaks to Biden over phone at campaign HQ: "It is so good to hear our President's voice. Joe, I know you're still on the reco... on the call... and we've been talking everyday..." https://t.co/i6MyVAB9M3

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am glad to hear from our President, Joe. We talk every day and he is like family to us. We all love Joe and Jill, and they love us too. Joe, we know you're still here and we're not letting you go. I'm keeping an eye on you, kid. I love you, Joe. Translation: It is nice to hear our President's voice. We talk every day and he is like family to us. We all love Joe and Jill, and they love us too. Joe, we know you're still here and we're not letting you go. I'm keeping an eye on you, kid. I love you, Joe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is so good to hear our President's voice. Joe, I know you're still on the on the call and we've been talking every day. You probably you guys heard it from Doug's voice. We love Joe and Jill. We really do. They truly are like family to us. And we do everybody here though. It's mutual. I knew you were still there. You're not going anywhere, Joe. I'm watching you, kid. I'm watching you, kid. I love you. I love you, Joe.
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 2:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maybe we should consider the 1987 act that granted vaccine manufacturers immunity, leading to an increase in vaccines. How did the autism rate go from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 36? My younger friend, born after '87, may have been exposed to more toxins through vaccines.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Just spitballing here but maybe we should look into the 1987 act that gave vaccine manufacturers immunity that then incentivized the medical establishment food chain to keep adding vaccines to the schedule. I don’t know but maybe we should start there. Again just spitballing!

@WalkerAmerica - Walker⚡️

How did we go from less than 1 in 1000 children with Autism to 1 in 36? What changed? https://t.co/ixz3j4JT4G

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

I have a 31 year old buddy and when I beat him once on the Pali trail hike I jokingly/not joking said “don’t beat yourself up you were born after 87 and you were jabbed with way more poisons than me.”

Saved - February 29, 2024 at 12:57 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Watch this phenomenal presentation by James Lindsey @ConceptualJames on the The politics of Compliance: The target is You! Presented at ICS at CPAC https://t.co/g5n1p2YFrO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the politics of compliance, drawing parallels to Mao Zedong's strategies. They explain that the goal is to divide people into three categories: those who comply, those who refuse, and those who are unsure. The speaker emphasizes that the compliant are made to feel superior and frustrated with others, while the non-compliant are dehumanized and targeted. They highlight how this dynamic is applied to various domains, such as COVID, identity politics, and global citizenship. The speaker suggests that exposing this manipulation can inoculate people against falling for it, and encourages individuals to rely on their common sense and love for the truth to navigate through these tactics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, y'all. Brief isn't my brand, so I'm gonna try to be brief, which means I'm gonna cut out the pleasantries and the jokes. I wanna quote where we've already had Stalin quoted so we're just to put the context of what's going on, I'm gonna quote a lesser known quote from another, tyrannical dictator and that's Mao Zedong. In 1957, he not so famously said, not to have correct political opinions is like not having a soul. And I think that that is kind of a, banner for the lives that we've been living for the last few years. And that's very unfortunate, but it's also very telling. My talk is titled, which I found out this morning, The Target is You. What I wanna talk to you about is actually the politics of compliance is the name I've given this and it's actually derived from a strategy that Mao Zedong used. But to make the politics of compliance work, the target is actually you and I don't just mean you with wrong political opinions who don't have souls. I mean everybody. There are generally 3 categories of people where it comes to the politics of compliance. There are the people who are complying, there are the people who are refusing and the people who aren't sure. And all 3 are targeted by the politics of compliance, roughly the same way, actually, with the same dynamic. The goal is, of course, to get the compliant to feel better than everybody else, but also frustrated with everybody else. It is to convince those who are not sure to join the program and to begin to comply, and it is to use the people who refuse to comply as the wedge around which the entire thing turns. In fact, it's to dehumanize them and motivate the other 2 groups to try to destroy them. So, Mao Zedong very, simply took over China with a very small number of conceptual concepts that I'm lumping together in what I'm calling a politics of compliance. He separated the population into 2 broad categories. I just mentioned 3. Well, he cut it into 2. So, there's an oversimplification and those 2 categories are the people and the enemies of the people, Not to put too fine a point on it. That's what he called them. The people and the enemies of the people. And what he said is, who are the people? Well, he gives this kind of historical record in 1957 of who counted as the people when and there's a consistent running theme through his his, you know, 8 or 8 or 9 maybe examples of different historical periods of the Chinese story, whether it's the Japanese war, the Sino Japanese war, the second one, whether it's, the period of building socialism after he took power in 1949, whether it's during his first, second or third 5 year plan. And the examples all have the single theme that the people are the people who agree with Mao, and the enemies of the people are the people who don't agree with Mao. And it turns out to be really that simple. The people at the period of building socialism are those who support the building of socialism and the enemies of the people are those who resist the building of socialism. He says it explicitly that clearly. And this sets up a dynamic that I think the best name for is hatecraft, And here's how it works. The goal of this split is to say that there is a correct perspective on all things, a sacred science as Robert Lifton described it. And that's called the people's perspective, at least it was in China. We could call it whatever, the critical race perspective on race. We could call it the queer perspective on sexual politics, and we can all imagine a bunch of examples under COVID. The public health perspective, I guess, would be the right name for it. We certainly aren't. I see red hats in the crowd. You're not allowed to have those. That's the deplorable side of a different perspective. But this is the general idea. There are the people who do the right thing, there are people who do the wrong thing and the goal is to bring people into the people's perspective which is also called agreeing with the tyranny. And what you do in order to achieve this idea is that you separate the population into 2 broad categories. The people and the enemies of the people. And then you say, well, what we want is unity. We want unity. But there are certain elements in the population who are preventing us from unity and moving into the future that we could be having. And it's their fault. The people wanna move forward and the enemies of the people are stopping them. The people want to open their businesses and go back about their lives, but the people who won't wear masks, or take a shot, or socially distance, or close down their lives, or whatever else in the COVID department, are stopping them. We want to open the country back up, but we can't because there's anti vaxxers. They are the problem and that is hate craft. That is teaching the compliant to hate the people who are holding them back. We did what we were supposed to do. We complied. We did not get our freedom back. We took risks with our lives. We did not get our freedom back, and it's their fault. That's the essence of the politics of compliance. Mau called this formula unity, criticism, unity. He said we'll start with a desire for unity and just parenthetically, I'll mention the best way to create a desire for unity is to create a contentious, fractious, polarized situation where there's tremendous disunity. You start with a desire for unity. He says, we then criticize and struggle. Referring to his torture sessions that are called struggle sessions. We criticize and struggle those elements of the population who have incorrect opinions so that we can arrive at a new unity on a new basis. That's direct quote. New unity on a new basis. He called it socialist discipline. We call it sustainable and inclusive future. It's the same thing. We also call it new world order. In other words, we can have unity, which everybody now wants, if and only if we all start to agree on how we're all gonna live, which just so happened to be dictated by the tyrants. And everybody who isn't going along is holding us back. The larger the proportion of people that you can get to comply, the more powerful the hate craft. Because they, like I said, put their lives on the line. They did things they probably didn't wanna do. They they willingly gave away, I should say, their freedoms. Willingly gave away their freedoms and other people didn't and those people are selfish. Those people are bourgeois. Those people are racist as opposed to anti racist. We could do this in every domain because the same exact dynamic is playing out in every domain. Covid, environmentalism, politics with your deplorable hat. Every single identity politics dimension you can imagine from race to sex to gender to sexuality to ability status to fat status to national origin. Get ready for critical immigration theory this year. If you thought 2020 CRT was bad, you've got CIT coming this year and its target is you because its actual target is national sovereignty and national citizenship to be compared against global citizenship. People with a global perspective are seeking global unity. A system of interdependence from nation to nation. And these stupid, backwards, national loving people who wanna keep their identities, their national citizenship. They care about being, say, american citizens rather than undocumented americans or new americans. Those are the words that are being used. They care more about their own citizenship and its benefits, than they do about human rights. The child on the other side of the razor wire is your neighbor too, and you have to love your neighbor as yourself. And they twist every virtue and every value into a weapon of enmity and hate. That's the politics of compliance. That's how it works, and Mao Zedong was the world leader, the most expert practitioner of it up until the present day, which I think he may have been succeeded at this point because it's happening on the global scale in 10 dimensions at once, and the target is you. So how do you deal with the politics of compliance? How do you get people to stop hating their neighbors, to stop snitching on their neighbors, to stop pressuring their neighbors? How do you get people to stop blaming their neighbors? It turns out, and I hesitate in this room to call it a vaccine, but it turns out there is something that we could like into a vaccine in its platonic ideal form. And that is that it turns out that when you expose this dynamic, it inoculates people against falling for this dynamic. When people realize that this is a manipulative play and it can be described and I just did it in 6 minutes so I know it can be done. When you can describe how this play works and give them concrete examples of how it's been applied to them in the recent past, so that they can see it for themselves, they are far less likely to fall for the next one. And if they do fall for the next one, they fall for it for a much shorter duration. In other words, the vaccine here is a lack of trust in these authorities. So here's kind of the societal situation and I'll give you something that I think maybe you already know, but I want to clarify for you in close. The situation that we're in, my my Instagram algorithm is probably powered by AI and it badly knows me, but somehow it figured out since I spend a lot of time on airplanes that I might like airplanes and it's been propagandizing me with pilot videos which are very fascinating and I watch all of them feeding the algorithm further and recently it showed me a video of a horrible situation where a commercial flight took off and within minutes, the entire instrumentation of the cockpit went down. No altimeter, no nav computer, nothing. Not even a radio. The entire instrument, apparatus in the aircraft died. So normally in society, our trusted and venerable institutions are our instrument panel, if we think of this society as a plane flying through the air. And what you have to be able to do is fly the plane, get where you're going or get somewhere and land the plane on runway. That's the basic principle of flight period, if you want it to be a safe flight. When you have your instruments, they really help. When you don't have your instruments, you're in another situation. So obviously, this plane turned around, found the runway, landed safely, even without a radio to to contact the traffic control tower, they somehow figured out how to signal and were able to to get runway clearance and and land the plane. So it's possible. The point is, when I bring this up, we as a society have our instrument panel, which is our institutions, fully captured by this ideology. We just listened to a litany of things that we think we should be able to trust that we can't trust. CDC is a bad word now in our society. I see more people who think that whatever the CDC or FDA says, you should do the opposite, than I meet people who think you should believe those things now. So what do you do to land the plane? You have to use your common sense and your senses and your figure out where the runway is, figure out how high up they are, figure out how fast they're going, and land the plane. And it can be done. So the vaccine, and I hesitate on that word, that you need is to expose the dynamic of the politics of compliance to as many people as you can so they don't fall for it. In the meantime, as many people like yourselves who are awake need to start using your senses determining reality, follow the facts. We're hearing different phrases for this and do everything in your power to fly without the instruments, these corrupt institutions, until that trust bottoms out and we can start to rebuild them into something or replace them with something that's worthy of our trust and our respect, which will take decades. In the meantime, this is the perfect audience I know to tell this to. We hear a lot about speaking the truth. We opened about speaking the truth. I want to tell you something just to change your perspective on this in a tiny way that means everything. It is not enough to tell the truth. I'm gonna wax biblical on you. You have to love the truth. You have to love the truth with all of your heart and all of your mind and all of your soul and all of your strength. And then you must love your neighbor as yourself by telling him the truth as well. Why this is important is because if you tell the truth and the pressure of hatecraft or the politics of compliance comes to you hard enough, you will buckle. But if you love the truth, you will not. You will stand for the truth. You will seek the truth. You will defend the truth when it's under attack. You will defend other people who are standing for, seeking, and speaking the truth because it's the truth that you love and you love it more than anything. And when you love the truth, speaking the truth becomes easy. You don't have to worry. You're like David Martin. You don't care if you get kicked out of CPAC. I've never been allowed to speak at CPAC, so I don't care. Take that, Matt Schlapp. I'm just kidding. I know, Matt. It's okay. I'm just joking. So I mean, I I I wanna just thank you for letting me come and tell you the politics of compliance. The dynamic is what they've used through COVID. It's what they will use for disease x or whatever. It is what they've used for the deplorable maggots. It is what they use in all of the identity politics. It's what they're using in environmentalism. It's the same play over and over and over and over again. And the target is you. To destroy you if you disagree, to bring you in under coercion if you're in doubt, and to turn you into a weapon of the state if you've already given in and complied. Learning and understanding this dynamic is crucial. Loving the truth and telling it is the truth.
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 4:43 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Which side of the trade do these health care professionals want to be on? https://t.co/JtmpbyyM8w

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 7:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The significant rise in disability among the US working population demands urgent investigation. The data reveals a concerning trend: employed individuals are being disproportionately affected. Surprisingly, the unemployed show the least increase in disability since 2020. This phenomenon calls for a closer examination of the causes and implications.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Surely everyone can agree that this statistically relevant US disability phenomenon along with BLS absence & work-time lost data warrants a full investigation no matter the cause. It’s very troubling that the working population seems to be getting disabled disproportionately to general population. I guess Covid disproportionately affects only the employed 🥴

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Disability Not in Labor Force 16 & over is up 1 million from pre 2020 high. Or 5.7%. This category is available to work and willing to work. So the unemployed have the least amount of increase in disability since 2020…very curious 🧐 🤔 https://t.co/jdh7pWGbGV

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 4:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Analysis of a peer-reviewed paper on Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in mRNA clinical trials reveals a stronger case for a causal link between disabilities and Covid-19 vaccines. The rate of estimated SAEs appears underreported compared to the rise in disabilities. The correlation between vaccine rollout and disability rate supports this. A comprehensive investigation is needed, either through new trials or forensic autopsies. Safety signals during trials should have prompted halting. Full analysis: phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProject.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

🚨🚨Our anaysis of a peer reviewed paper on Serious Adverse Events in the mRNA Clinical Trials https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036 reveals the following conclusions: ✅Our results provide a stronger case for establishing a causal relationship between disabilities and the Covid-19 vaccines.

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potentia… sciencedirect.com

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

The time series of SAEs that were computed based on the rates estimated during the mRNA clinical trials are shown to be of the same magnitude as the rate of increase in disability rates in the 16-64 Civilian Labor Force.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

The rate of estimated SAEs appears to be under-reported relative the recorded rise in disabilities (according to the BLS survey) by about 2.6 times. ✅These results were expected as we had already shown in part 3 of our study the high correlation between the rise in the

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

disability rate since 2/21 with the vaccine rollout. We realise that performing the correlation of cumulative time series is misleading & the R2 should not be taken as an indication of establishing a statistically significant relationship as both time series have autocorrelation. https://t.co/s535ATPDml

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

✅However, the coincidence of the rise in disabilities with the start of the Covid-19 vaccination rollout in conjunction with the similar magnitude of the rate of SAEs (from the clinical trials) & changes in disabilities (from the BLS data) leads to a stronger case for asserting

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

causation. ✅We believe that a comprehensive investigation needs to be performed, either in the form of new phase III clinical trials for at least a 3-year period, or a programme of forensic autopsies in a large sample of deceased individuals where the Covid-19 vaccines were not

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

suspected as a co-factor for cause of death. Our modeled estimates are low & likely due to: 1)Some disabilities reported by the individuals surveyed by the BLS may be caused by adverse events that are not deemed SAEs, due to the criteria used to define an SAE being overly

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

restrictive. 2)The population of the Civilian Labor Force as a whole may be less healthy (and somehow more vulnerable to vaccine-related disabilities) than the vaccine trial populations, either due to the selection criteria for participation in the trial, or ‘self-selection’ bias

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

3) Under-reporting of SAEs in the trial populations 4) Other factors causing excess disabilities in the Civilian Labor Force in a concurrent timeframe to the vaccine rollout.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Link to our full analysis & our modeling assumptions: phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjec…

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

🚨🚨Bottom line: There were enough safety signals to show that what we are seeing in the BLS data was known during the clinical trials even given their narrow definition of a SAE. The trials should have been halted. https://t.co/IeqkQl5bfY

Saved - September 4, 2023 at 9:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Excess deaths in the UK for ages 15-44 are rising to 20% in 2023, surpassing previous years. Similarly, children aged 1-14 are experiencing a high of 22% in excess deaths. Contrary to expectations, the pandemic's impact persists.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

🚨🚨Annualized 2023 excess death data in UK for ages 15-44 is reaccelerating to new highs of 20% from 11% in 2022 and exceeding excess deaths of 15.7% in 2021. I thought the pandemic was over?🤡 https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/yearly%20Excess%20Death%20Rate%20Analysis%20-%20UK.htm…

UK - Yearly Excess Death Rate Analysis phinancetechnologies.com

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Children 1-14 in UK hits new high of 22% in annualized 2023 excess deaths from negative excess deaths of -7% in 2021. Again I thought the pandemic was over…my bad! 🤡 https://t.co/4WQCoaLBJd

Saved - July 24, 2023 at 1:50 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Only the willingly blind are puzzled at this point.

Saved - July 14, 2023 at 4:03 AM

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

UK Disabilities (PIP) Project We analyze claims cleared by Body System then by Underlying Causes. Can Doctors & Health authorities please explain these findings? It’s a crisis of epic proportions. Total Body System findings summarized by % increase & z-score versus pre 2020 trend https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Projects.htm

Saved - March 31, 2023 at 5:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2020, a virus spreads globally, causing economic collapse and wealth inequality. Citizens obey orders to shelter in place, while big box businesses remain open. Restrictions increase, drones enforce rules, and citizens snitch on each other. Billionaires work on a vaccine and digital ID system. Mandatory vaccines are required for the economy to reopen. Skeptics head for the hills, but those who take the vaccine begin to die. The government blames the skeptics and the vaccinated hunt them down. Social media censors dissenting opinions. The movie is called Freedoms Last Stand.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

I have an idea for a dystopian movie: The background begins in 2020: a virus that mimics the flu sweeps across the globe.Some believe it’s a man made bioweapon to provide cover for global economic collapse from an unsustainable debt load & rising wealth inequality. The majority

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Believe their governments and dutifully obey orders to shelter in place while supply chains dissolve, they lose jobs or small businesses and eventually the middle class is wiped out. Inexplicably large big box businesses are allowed to operate and folks are allowed to shop there

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

But not allowed to gather together, use beaches or parks...some cities won’t allow you to run in the street or even bike. Masks become mandatory well after the virus has spread. Drones are deployed to enforce these rules. Citizens are encouraged to snitch on each other and even

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Get rewards. The social order breaks down and folks begin to get depressed & suicidal from isolation and some even starve to death. The virus inexplicably keeps re-emerging according to the global governments so more restrictions and punishments are enacted. Protests are not

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Allowed as they will spread the virus you see. In the background magnanimous billionaires are working diligently on a vaccine and a digital ID system to make sure you are a good citizen. The economy won’t be re-opened the governments say without mandatory vaccines for everyone.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

They are still those who are skeptical of all this but they are few and far between. These few refuse to take the vaccine and decide to head for the hills. Well the vaccine is administered and many begin to die. Of course the governments blame the folks hiding in the hills as the

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Cause. The folks who got just vaccinated are very tired, sick, starving and unfortunately not very bright believe this nonsense and begin to hunt down those folks in the hills and that’s where the movie begins in 2022. I have decided to name the movie Freedoms Last Stand

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

I forgot to add that while the virus spread large social media giants censored all dissenting opinions from even licensed experts that deviated from Supranational Organizational edicts that operate outside all governments.

Saved - March 29, 2023 at 8:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The estimated 2022 US vaccine damage report predicts 266 million injuries, 136 million disabilities, and 300k excess deaths, with a total economic cost of 1478 billion. Pfizer and Moderna's combined C19 vaccine revenues in the US were 115 billion, but for every dollar they made, it cost the US economy 13 dollars. The Humanity Project's economic damage estimates are only part of the picture, as knock-on effects like lost productivity and supply chain delays are not captured.

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Estimated 2022 US Vaccine Damage Report: Estimated Human Cost: 26.6 million Injuries 1.36 million Disabilities 300k excess deaths Estimated Economic Cost: Total: $147.8 Billion Injuries: $89.9 billion Disabilities: $52.2 billion Excess Deaths: $5.6 Billion

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Pfizer & Moderna in 2022 had combined C-19 vaccine revenues in US of $11.5 billion so… For every $1 dollar they made it cost the US economy $13 dollars. Quite the negative societal ROI. Largest crime scene in history. Multiply this across the globe. Numbers… Show more

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Estimated Human cost report: phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjec…

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Estimated Economic cost report: phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjec…

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Project Overview: phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjec…

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

Our economic damage estimates are what we can measure. The knock effects such as lost productivity due to a worker being present but working at say 50%-75% of capacity is missed plus burn out from those picking up slack. Also supply chain delays are not captured etc and etc.… Show more

View Full Interactive Feed