reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DrBrianKeating

DrBrianKeating
Posted - August 26, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 4:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve spent over 20 years testing the laws of nature, and I find the belief in anti-gravity crafts to be pseudoscience. Claims about UAPs defy physics, as extreme maneuvers would be lethal to any biology or machine. Technology develops incrementally, and if such advanced tech existed, we’d see tangible evidence. The idea of miraculous inventions appearing without a trace is akin to technological creationism. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and until then, this is just fan fiction.

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

UFO true believers aren’t just wrong. They’ve built a techno-cargo cult around fake physics. As someone who’s spent 20+ years building experiments to test the actual laws of nature, here’s why “anti-gravity craft” is pseudoscience wrapped in Pentagon PowerPoints. https://t.co/elNtLniOlW

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

Claim: UAPs do 80,000 ft dives in <1 sec, stop instantly, turn at Mach 10. Reality: That’s thousands of g’s—lethal to any known biology or machine. Also? No sonic boom = no physics. You don’t break the sound barrier silently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdAB1S0NUyI

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

Tech doesn’t emerge from nowhere. Ridley + Basalla: Innovation is incremental, combinatorial, visible. If Russia or China had this, we’d see prototypes, patents, physics papers. Not ghost craft with zero supply chain. https://t.co/KeJK3pT2Sz

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

The Manhattan Project—a literal doomsday machine—was copied by the Soviets in 4 years. Why? Tech leaks. Ideas spread. No one invents warp drives in secret and hides it for decades. Physics doesn’t obey NDAs. https://t.co/lAIFOTJIU0

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

Belief in “instant wizardry” without evidence isn’t science. It’s technological creationism—the fantasy that a miracle machine appeared ex nihilo. You’ve replaced scientific method with Space Jesus. https://t.co/hchFgtW85P

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

I’ve built CMB telescopes in Antarctica. I’ve calibrated instruments down to microkelvin precision. Nothing in the data violates energy conservation or inertia. And no—grainy videos ≠ peer-reviewed evidence. https://t.co/cR5YP0vzcb

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

To the Disclosure diehards: Until you show a craft, a lab, or an equation that survives peer review— Stop pretending this is physics. It’s fan fiction in uniform. Extraordinary claims still require extraordinary evidence. https://t.co/ni92FvGbuR

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

Hi Ashton, Thanks!! First off, who exactly is “they”? If it’s the U.S. gov’t, explain why NASA convened a blue-ribbon panel led by NAS member David Spergel, with top SETI researchers like Shelley Wright. These scientists, helped in their mission by US military personnel sporting eyewitness testimony have both security clearance and Nobel-level physics expertise. So your claim boils down to: Navy pilots and Nobel-caliber scientists, with access to, and an understanding of, far more data than amateur UFO proponents or grandstanding Congressmen, are actually the clueless rubes being “psyopped by NASA”? Do I understand your argument? Now, about “gravity manipulation”: Einstein predicted gravitational waves, not a sci-fi joystick for inertia. And you know he thought detecting them was impossible, right? So even Einstein was wrong, right? But anyway, you make my point for me -- these ripples in spacetime are so weak that LIGO needed 4-km interferometers and attometer sensitivity to detect signals of order 10^{-21}. However, the binary black holes used to do the "manipulation" were 30x the mass of the Sun...each. Hardly the stuff that “leaks out” of a Manhattan Project vault unnoticed. And, sorry pal, “g-forces don’t matter” is just wrong. In GR, proper acceleration is invariant. If you’re pulling 10g, your organs still liquefy — secrecy doesn’t change the tensor calculus. That’s why fighter pilots strap on G-suits instead of waiting for the Pentagon to roll out warp bubbles. Finally, the Manhattan Project unlocked nuclear chain reactions, not antigravity. Conflating those is like claiming CRISPR edits your horoscope. If you’re going to invoke Einstein, at least convince me you can solve the field equations before turning him into Q from Star Trek. Take care, Brian

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

@DaveEvans5555 https://youtu.be/tnQtfv93agA?si=EP_uwZtIJE63d9HA

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

@KellieBorut1 Cogito ego sum

DrBrianKeating
Posted - May 20, 2024 at 11:58 PM
Saved - May 21, 2024 at 4:35 AM

@DrBrianKeating - Prof. Brian Keating

Big, if true! Can any chemists confirm? @leecronin? https://t.co/1yEhPdtTON

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a new way to organize the periodic table based on tones and frequencies. They explain how elements like hydrogen, carbon, silicone, cobalt, and rhodium are interconnected through vibrations. The speaker mentions a relationship between noble gases and a single substance. They also touch on the unique properties of elements like lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and fluorine. Additionally, they talk about how introducing certain elements can break chemical bonds, such as beryllium breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you say rebuild the periodic table, what do you mean specifically? Well, the way the periodic table is laid out, the periodic table they have now it looks like a box. Image of it. It looks like a straight box. Mhmm. But they don't show that hydrogen has the same tone as carbon. What do you mean by tone? Same tone. Same Kia v. Same Kia v. 40.5 hertz. The next one would be, like, 81 hertz. You go to silicone, it would double up and would be a 162 hertz. You'll go to cobalt and it'll be 324 hertz. It's take the angles of incidence or the tones that they create, you know, their color. Like, you can turn color back into sound based upon it's the same wavelength. It's just twice as long or much longer. So all you have to do is keep dividing light by 2. You keep dividing light by 2, and you'll ultimately get back to the audible sound of it because there was a relationship between light and color, sound and tone, matter and shape. Walter Russell's periodic table that he put together. Now you will compare that to Mendeleev's periodic table, and you'll see something completely different. It's unwinding. Woah. And you see there's a relationship that hydrogen So you you had figured this out at a young age? I had already seen this. This was all inside of that palace. I had access to it, and I knew the relationship. Saw this in dreams. I saw it as a circle. Everything was a full circle laid out, and each area was just expanding like wrapping a rag around your hand. The first wrap, you know, it's so tight. This is how I saw it more so, but as a vortex, you'll see there's a relationship between hydrogen, carbon, silicone, cobalt, rhodium. They're all bonded. They're all sit be as the middle point between 2 noble gases. So those things don't really exist. It's only one substance. Now the problem is the first thing that we're able to perceive is hydrogen. That's the first visible element because before, it is too dense for us to perceive it. You understand what I'm saying? As you reach into the next octave, the carbon octave, and they call that the a bisexual tone because the carbon has two tones to it. It has a negative side and a positive side, the part where lithium behaves. Lithium is contractive. Beryllium is contractive. Boron is contractive. But the moment you get to carbon, you balance it out, gets to a perfect balance of plus and minus 4. So it's a double tone. Nitrogen is minus 3. Oxygen is minus 2. Fluorine is minus 1. Now the balance of this, all of those are made. Fluorine and lithium naturally made. If you have lithium bonded with any other element, the moment that chlorine is introduced, it will break all bonds violently so it can bond with fluorine. Same thing with Beryllium and oxygen. That's why it's said and what they've tried to keep from us. If you have you wanna break water into its component parts of hydrogen and oxygen, all you have to do is introduce beryllium or the sound of beryllium, and oxygen will violently break away from any other thing, even hydrogen, to bond with that beryllia.
View Full Interactive Feed