reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DrDMartinWorld

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 12:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. D. Martin shared a video of the UK Parliament testimony. @PaulHar96828113 asked if it was recorded. Dr. D. Martin confirmed that the Parliament turned off the livestream, but several people recorded it.

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

Watch and share the summary video of yesterday's UK Parliament testimony from @ABridgen @DrDMartinWorld @RWMaloneMD @PierreKory @stkirsch @drcole12 https://rumble.com/v3zkbvg-malone-mccullough-kory-cole-martin-kirsch-yeadon-dalgleish-join-bridgen-in-.html

Malone, McCullough, Kory, Cole, Martin, Kirsch, Yeadon, Dalgleish Join Bridgen In U.K. Parliament Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen writes: Tomorrow, I'm hosting a historic meeting in Parliament at which doctors and analysts will give expert testimony on the pandemic and its consequences. All MPs & Lords h rumble.com

@PaulHar96828113 - Harry H

@DrDMartinWorld @ABridgen @RWMaloneMD @PierreKory @stkirsch @drcole12 Was the presentation recorded?

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

@PaulHar96828113 @ABridgen @RWMaloneMD @PierreKory @stkirsch @drcole12 The Parliament turned off the livestream but several recorded it

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 8:38 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 10:21 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

@KenPaxtonTX Add the crimes that I shared with your office in September 2021 and pierce the EUA immunity protections... https://t.co/4HvXPMG5OU

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 8:36 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 8:48 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

September 2021, I supplied @KenPaxtonTX this information and evidence of other crimes. He chose not to prosecute then. His action then would have saved MILLIONS of lives but politics got in the way. And yes, I have all the records including the phone and text logs!

@KenPaxtonTX - Attorney General Ken Paxton

BREAKING:🚨 I am suing Pfizer for misrepresenting Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor public discourse. https://t.co/63mZ1y6FNC

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:02 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 2:23 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

A morsel of what's coming on Monday... Why would the head of MI5 be presiding over the @wellcometrust for the launch of COVID, in September 2019, when they (on @WHO GPMB) announced an "accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen" so the world would accept a vax? https://t.co/yF6nfEZIoO

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - September 28, 2023 at 3:31 PM
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 3:37 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

@AndersonAfDMdEP @DschlopesIsBack @JohnBoweActor @P_McCulloughMD @ShawnRyan762 @DowdEdward @rustyrockets

@GraveyardPirate - Graveyard Pirate

Short clip from the Dr. David Martin Interview published 9/26/23. #TLAV @TLAVagabond The evidence is, and always has been, Hiding in Plain Sight. #Wuhan #Fauci #BiologicalWarfare #WillfulIgnorance Full interview link in comments. Link It, Bookmark It, Share It! #StoptheShots 💉

Video Transcript AI Summary
For 20 years, I've seen people overlook the obvious evidence. The creation of the virus was not a secret. It was publicly announced in 2016 that the Wuhan variant was chosen for human emergence. This wasn't a random event involving bats and pangolins. The Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One model was intentionally selected as a weapon. They admitted their goal was to use fear to promote a drug. They openly discussed biohacking synthetic coronaviruses and biological warfare enabling technologies. This is not a mistake or accident, but a deliberate act of war against humanity. The evidence is clear and undeniable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I've been doing this now for 20 years. And and what one of the things I find frustrating is people pretend like there's this who done it kind of gumshoe sleuthing required to go through and find all the stuff that's the evidence. It doesn't actually take any creativity or effort. This thing was done in plain sight. It was engineered in plain sight. It was publicly announced. By 2016. We even knew that it was the Wuhan variant that was the one that they had chosen. Like, there's nothing left to the imagination. We knew that it was WIV one poised for human emergence. Right? This is not a I wonder if it could be a bat and a pangolin going into a bar in Wuhan 1 night and getting it on and boom, out comes baby COVID. No. We knew in 2016 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One model was the one that they had selected for the weapon. And so, You know, you sit back and you you say, well, how is it that in the face of such egregiously public information, We still are asking questions about motivation, about whether this was from nature or whatever it is. Listen, people. They said in their own words, this was to hype a drug to get the public to accept something that without terror, the public would have never agreed to. That's their words, not mine. Mhmm. And when you have a world in which, as you have on the screen right now. They actually stated outright biohacking synthetic coronaviruses, biological warfare enabling technologies. You know, you don't have to interpret that. That doesn't require some spin. When you say biological warfare enabling technology, you are not talking about something that is an innocent oops, who could have known, who could have seen. It is actually a declaration of war against humanity, and we have it in black and white.
DrDMartinWorld
Posted - September 17, 2023 at 9:40 AM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 3:42 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

After hundreds of requests for the slides for the EU Parliament presentation, here they are.

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - September 17, 2023 at 9:39 AM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 2:05 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

DrDMartinWorld
Posted - September 16, 2023 at 9:55 PM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 6:15 AM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

@realDonaldTrump @rustyrockets @joerogan @Jim_Jordan @RonDeSantis @RobertKennedyJr @TuckerCarlson @IngrahamAngle @simonateba @DrJBhattacharya @drdrew @GenFlynn @elonmusk We must #DestroytheWHO - humanity depends on it!

Dr. David Martin gives a speech to the EU parliament concerning the WHO This is the complete speech without the introduction to Dr. David Martin. vimeo.com
DrDMartinWorld
Posted - September 14, 2023 at 5:07 AM
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 9:36 PM

@DrDMartinWorld - Dr. David Martin

@Plandemic3Movie @RonDeSantis @realstewpeters @realDonaldTrump

@Restitutor_ - Restitutor Orbis

The most important video you will watch. Today, 13th September, A panel bravely exposed the WHO (World Health Organisation) for the criminal organisation it is, and proved that Covid is indeed a BioWeapon. This is Dr David Martin's Speech. Please Share

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the global population. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provides evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They call for the dismantling of the WHO and condemn the actions of those involved. The video concludes with a call to share the information presented.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where a group, a very small number of criminal industrial conspirators, decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity, and I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit? Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in 19 forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent, and I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand, and they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it, and in violation of 15 US Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started, so I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a 110 years later. And in violation of TFIU, or TFEU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it always was, and we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things, but the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus, cunningly, that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide, and we need to call it what it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print, and I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH, and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age, and in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was, because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection, it was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing, it was actually tale of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to kill people, and what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947 when the WHO was funded and founded. It was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement: immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution, and it's worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity. This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st Director General, none other than Doctor. Rene Essand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940, earlier in 1947, mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation, was nominated to become the 1st Director General of the Who, and within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the who in writing by then Director General Doctor. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health. This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics Office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, philanthropy, of Andrew Carnegie. People, stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers. Let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest, and it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent, charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of cheering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. Why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words because it's the best way to say it? When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization, and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. Now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes, he has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left, and it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during the moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop, why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? First, the 2nd bullet under Project 1, which by the way, was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models, but this grant was modified with this letter to say, we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line, or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end? And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation, let's be clear, and there's a big difference, I'm not alleging anything, they actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus it was going to get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14th of 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, and I quote, is poised for human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019, or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan, and look at coronavirus, and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and lo and behold, we're gonna go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done. And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of 2000s, in the latter part of 90s, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. The reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, so why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation, synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like, biological warfare enabling technologies, and the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, non competitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not because that's what they called it, and we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019, because on September 18, 2019, the co conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an to experience for the world that it was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not we'll look at other options of treatment, not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as doctor McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the criminal racketeers. Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. To deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process, and lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer, of public funds. Moderna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000, more than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it, and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next, and now you get the final slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of or liberty or anything else, as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information, and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this, that's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a, quote, emergency. The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition, so we just used them. Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion, in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not, for a moment, denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes, but I will, without doubt, say the following, until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers tiers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder, until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the Who. Destroy the Who. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you to all of our wonderful speakers this afternoon. Thank you To the audience, thank you. To the audience at home, please, share the information that you heard today
View Full Interactive Feed