TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DrDobberstein
reSee.it AI Summary
The Royal Family's brand would be damaged if they associated with Harry and Meghan. The RF represents class system, colonialism, corruption, boredom, jealousy, brutality, moral decay. In contrast, the Sussexes stand for equality, diversity, empowerment, representation, openness, and Gen Y & Z values.
@DrDobberstein - Prof. Dr. Monika Dobberstein
@richardaeden @DailyMailUK Nonsense! It would damage their brand. The RF represents the class system, colonialism, corruption, boredom, jealousy, brutality, moral decay, while the Sussexes stand for equality, diversity, empowerment, representation, openness, and the values of Gen Y & Z. #HarryandMeghan https://t.co/1WXANMiaVl
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe the monarchy should be abolished because it's unfair that wealthy people are suffering while the royal family lives in luxury. They have numerous palaces and can't be held accountable for discrimination. It's outdated and time to get rid of it. King Charles is only becoming king because of his birthright, not merit. They have never truly apologized for their ties to the empire. We pay millions of pounds to support their lifestyle, which perpetuates the class system. The monarchy is used to maintain unity and prevent people from questioning the status quo. However, with so many people struggling, it's unacceptable to spend £100 million on this archaic institution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have to say that I, in terms of what the gentleman said earlier on, I think the they should be abolished. I think it's it's shameful that £1,800,000,000 fortune people are suffering in this country. People having to choose between fuel and whether they can feed their children, and the idea of having a monarch, a person who's Receiving coronation, not on the basis of merit, just simply because he was born into it, the right to rule. This is a family that has 20 palaces, one of which has a 1,000 rooms in it. We have you cannot they can't they have a rule and a clause on the people that they employ within their policies.
They can't even be done. They can't even prosecuted on race or sexual discrimination. It's backwards. It's archaic. It's time to get rid of it.
And we should never forget King Charles, country. King Charles being coronation. We were told, remember, about Queen Camilla would be the King's consort. This is a man country, who would never get there on merit if he was a boss, a chief executive. He's getting there simply because he was born.
They're tied to a bloody empire that they've never ever really apologized for. And the idea that somehow they do it for us, we do it for them. We pay our taxes. Country. Millions and millions and millions of pounds are paid out from our pockets to keep them in the lifestyle they're accustomed.
And the idea that they are the pinnacle of the class system, that somehow that's acceptable. Country. We don't accept Ethan Toffs. We don't accept those, all those people that are running the country, the bankers and the billionaires who differentiate themselves. But somehow, we use the King, which as the Queen did before to show this is a loyalty to the nations, and it's to stop conflict.
And that's what it's about, is to stop people asking questions saying, oh, well, we have the King, You know, that's uniting the nation. There is no unity in this nation at this moment because millions of people, as I said earlier on, are suffering a gate deal, and the last thing they want country. See, it's a £100,000,000 spent on some archaic institution that resembles something from 4, 500 years ago.