TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DrJBhattacharya

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - October 23, 2024 at 3:02 PM
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 11:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2020, NPR reported on Tony Fauci's stance against handshakes, but the article has since disappeared. By 2021, How Stuff Works questioned if COVID had ended the handshake, which had become a symbol for the anti-lockdown movement, yet that piece was also removed. Ultimately, the handshake and hug survived because people reject treating others as mere biohazards. I appreciate Time for keeping its article intact. Additionally, HelloGiggles provided a solid warning against disinfecting groceries in April 2020, though the headline could have been clearer.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In 2020, NPR breathlessly reported Tony Fauci's opposition to handshakes. Someone should ask npr why it scrubbed the story from its site. Spoiler: covid is airborne. Avoiding handshakes was as scientific as spraying groceries with lysol. 1/3 https://web.archive.org/web/20200423235340/https://nprillinois.org/post/dr-fauci-says-no-more-handshakes-some-never-liked-them-begin#stream/0…

Dr. Fauci Says No More Handshakes. Some Never Liked Them To Begin With Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org. ARI SHAPIRO, HOST: The handshake is dead. AILSA CHANG, HOST: Well, that's according web.archive.org

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In 2021, How Stuff Works wondered whether covid had killed the handshake. Spoiler: by then, the handshake had become the secret handshake of the anti-lockdown movement. They also removed the piece from their site. 2/3 https://web.archive.org/web/20230105092113/https://people.howstuffworks.com/covid-killed-handshake-news.htm

Has COVID-19 Killed the Handshake? Dr. Anthony Fauci has famously said he hopes the handshake never comes back. If it doesn't, is the elbow bump the most logical greeting to replace it? web.archive.org

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Ultimately, covid did not kill the handshake and the hug because people know it's wrong to treat our neighbors as mere biohazards. Kudos to Time for not scrubbing its contribution to the genre. 3/3 https://time.com/5842469/coronavirus-handshake-social-touch/

The Coronavirus Killed the Handshake and the Hug. What Will Replace Them? If social touch disappears, there’s no consensus on what will replace it. But one thing is little disputed: Social interactions are about to start feeling really weird. time.com

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Bonus post: HelloGiggles, which is an actual website, did a good story warning against the spraying your groceries with lysol thing in April 2020. It would have earned more points if the headline had made the point clear. https://hellogiggles.com/how-to-disinfect-groceries-coronavirus/ https://t.co/DEzqdOxcJF

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - July 11, 2024 at 6:06 PM
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 8:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently debated @JosephFraiman on my Illusion of Consensus podcast regarding his HOPE Accord, which aims to restore ethics in public health and reconsider the authorization of the COVID mRNA vaccine. Initially hesitant to sign, I was concerned about potential benefits for certain patient groups. Joe's arguments highlighted the need for solid clinical trial evidence to identify these groups, leading me to realize that maintaining authorization might hinder future research. Ultimately, I decided to support the Accord and appreciate Joe's insights on these complex issues.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

New on my Illusion of Consensus podcast, I debate with @JosephFraiman on his HOPE Accord, a public petition to restore ethics to public health and to pull regulatory authorization for the marketing of the covid mRNA vaccine. I hesitated to sign because I was concerned that some patient groups may still benefit from it. Joe, very reasonably, asked me how we could know who falls into those categories. The answer, of course, would come from randomized clinical trial evidence with solid clinical endpoints like prevention of long covid, hospitalization, or death. By the end of the debate, Joe had convinced me that not pulling the authorization makes it more likely that we will never get good clinical trial evidence testing to check whether such groups still exist in a setting of widespread recovered immunity. Thanks to the debate, I now intend to sign the Accord. I appreciate Joe's willingness to help me think through the regulatory and policy matters. You can listen to the whole debate here: https://youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=2LlfSLKKy-k…

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Here are the timestamps to the conversation. Timestamps 0:20 Introduction to Dr Joe Fraiman 2:38 Calling for the suspension of the COVID-19 vaccine 10:25 Weighing the risks and benefits 12:20 Is there a group that benefits from the vaccine? 15:55 We can no longer trust regulatory bodies 17:30 The cautionary tale of Thalidomide 26:56 Acting on blind belief 34:23 Vaccine manufacturers are not liable for injuries 37:00 Government propaganda & gaslighting the injured 43:10 Coercion in education and immigration 53:10 Randomized trials, bias & accurate data 58:15 Drug companies vs the hit-list of critics 01:03:42 The need to return to ethical regulation

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

@JosephFraiman Here is a link to the text of the HOPE Accord. https://thehopeaccord.org/

Home Page Restore Medical Ethics: Click to Sign The Hope Accord Today thehopeaccord.org
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 9:10 PM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 9:34 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

This is false. The Biden-Harris censored online speech that contradicts their policy priorities in the name of misinformation control. Their administration even argued in front of the Supreme Court for the right to censor Americans.

@Jemsinger - James Singer

WATCH >> Harrison Ford lays it out “The truth is this, Kamala Harris will protect your right to disagree with her about policies or ideas, and then, as we have done for centuries, we’ll debate them. We’ll work on them together, and we’ll move forward.” https://t.co/8jsWg3Z655

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been voting for 64 years and usually keep it to myself. However, many former Trump administration members are warning against repeating past mistakes, and we should listen. These are influential figures who are now considering voting for someone without an "R" next to their name because they recognize the importance of this moment. Kamala Harris respects differing opinions and encourages debate on policies. In contrast, the other candidate demands loyalty and seeks revenge. I’m Harrison Ford, and I have one vote like everyone else. I choose to vote for Kamala Harris to help us move forward.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, I've been voting for 64 years. Never really wanted to talk about it very much. But when dozens of former members of the Trump administration are sounding alarms saying, for God's sake, don't do this again. You have to pay attention. They're telling us something important. These aren't soft people. They're governors, generals standing up against the leader of the party they spent their lives advocating for. For many of them this will be the first time they've ever voted for someone who doesn't have an r next to their name because they know this really matters. The truth is this, Kamala Harris will protect your right to disagree with her about policies or ideas. And then as we have done for centuries, we'll debate them. We'll work on them together, and we'll move forward. The other guy, he demands unquestioning loyalty, says he wants revenge. I'm Harrison Ford. I've got one vote, same as anyone else, and I'm gonna use it to move forward. I'm gonna vote for Kamala Harris.
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - October 25, 2024 at 6:45 AM
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 10:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The House report on HHS's COVID propaganda reveals significant issues, including nearly a billion dollars spent to promote misleading information about vaccines, masks, and social distancing. The PR firm Fors Marsh Group exaggerated risks and downplayed evidence against vaccine efficacy, leading to a collapse in public trust. Key figures, like CDC director Walensky, made controversial decisions that prioritized fear over science. The report recommends redefining CDC's mission and ensuring transparency to rebuild trust in public health.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The House report on HHS covid propaganda is devastating. The Biden admin spent almost a billion dollars to push falsehoods about covid vaccines, boosters, and masks on the American people. If a pharma company had run the campaign, it would have been fined out of existence. 1/23 https://t.co/JneY7PYJ83

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

HHS engaged a PR firm, the Fors Marsh Group (FMG), for the propaganda campaign. The main goal was to increase covid vax uptake. The strategy: 1. Exaggerate covid mortality risk 2. Downplay the fact that there was no good evidence that the covid vax stops transmission. 2/23 https://t.co/tqOAq7Z0XK

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The propaganda campaign extended beyond vax uptake and included exaggerating mask efficacy and pushing for social distancing & school closures. Ultimately, since the messaging did not match reality, the campaign collapsed public trust in public health. 3/23 https://t.co/TQWVQr0nQY

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The PR firm (FMG) drew most of its faulty science from @CDCgov's "guidance," which ignored @US_FDA findings on the vaccine's limitations, as well as scientific findings from other countries that contradicted CDC groupthink. 4/23 https://t.co/kdF7314o3G

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The report details the CDC's mask flip-flopping through the years. It's especially infuriating to recall the CDC's weird, anti-scientific, anti-human focus on masking toddlers with cloth masks into 2022. 5/23 https://t.co/jDRHxl9Y6g

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

President Biden's covid advisor, @ashishkjha, waited until Dec. 2022 (right after leaving government service) to tell the country that "[t]here is no study in the world that shows that masks work that well." What took him so long? 6/23 https://t.co/p2xBSc7CZh

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In 2021, former @cdcgov director, Rochelle Walensky rewrote CDC guidance on social distancing at the behest of national teachers' union, guaranteeing that schools would remain closed to in-person learning for many months. 7/23 https://t.co/W2UZrukFMK

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

During this period, the PR firm FMG put out ads telling parents that schools would close unless kids masked up, stayed away from friends, and got covid vaccinated. 8/23 https://t.co/Y3pm4aDYLd

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In March 2021, even as the CDC told the American people that the vaxxed did not need to mask, the PR firm ran ads saying that masks were still needed, even for the vaxxed. "It's not time to ease up" we were told, in the absence of evidence any of that did any good. 9/23 https://t.co/XA5rFFMdQq

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In 2021, to support the Biden/Harris Admin push for vax mandates, the PR firm pushed the false idea that the vax stopped covid transmission. When people started getting "breakthrough" infections, public trust in pubic health collapsed. 10/23 https://t.co/sljGLRsxGh

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Later, when the FDA approved the vax for 12 to 15-year-old kids, the PR firm told parents that schools could open in fall 2021 only if they got their kids vaccinated. These ads never mentioned side effects like myocarditis due to the vax. 11/23 https://t.co/si272TP9jM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

.@HHSGov has scrubbed the propaganda ads from this era from its webpages. It's easy to see why. They are embarrassing. They tell kids, in effect, that they should treat other kids like biohazards unless they are vaccinated. 12/23 https://t.co/U1QyIdOT4D

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

When the delta variant arrived, the PR firm doubled down on fear-mongering, masking, and social distancing. 13/23 https://t.co/gRlyACIr1l

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In Sept. 2021, CDC director Walensky overruled the agency's external experts to recommend the booster to all adults rather than just the elderly. The director's action was "highly unusual" and went beyond the FDA's approval of the booster for only the elderly. 14/23 https://t.co/E8A1S8b7E7

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The PR campaign and the CDC persistently overestimated the mortality risk of covid infection in kids to scare parents into vaccinating their children with the covid vax. 15/23 https://t.co/KTQogABPok

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In Aug. 2021, the military imposed its covid vax mandate, leading to 8,300 servicemen being discharged. Since 2023, the DOD has been trying to get the discharged servicemen to reenlist. What harm has been done to American national security by the vax mandate? 16/23 https://t.co/HTQWmqbed7

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The Biden/Harris admin imposed the OSHA, CMS, and military vax mandates, even though the CDC knew that the delta variant evaded vaccine immunity. The PR campaign studiously avoided informing Americans about waning vaccine efficacy in the face of variants. 17/23 https://t.co/ydJg2dp7Us

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The propaganda campaign hired celebrities and influencers to "persuade" children to get the covid vax. I think if a celebrity is paid to advertise a faulty product, that celebrity should be partially liable if the product harms some people. 18/23 https://t.co/boZ3XbmINE

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In the absence of evidence, the propaganda campaign ran ads telling parents that the vaccine would prevent their kids from getting long covid. 19/23 https://t.co/FA7kXFkAVP

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

With the collapse in public trust in the @CDCgov, parents have begun to question all CDC advice. Predictably, the HHS propaganda campaign has led to a decline in the uptake of routine childhood vaccines. 20/23 https://t.co/EhZQj8iQVZ

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The report makes several recommendations, including formally defining CDC's core mission to focus on its core mission of disease prevention, forcing HHS propaganda to abide by FDA's product labelling rules, and revamp the process of evaluating vaccine safety. 21/23 https://t.co/m1yorVxami

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Probably the most important recommendation: HHS should never again adopt a policy of silencing dissenting scientists in an attempt to create an illusion of consensus in favor of CDC group think. 22/23

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

You can find a copy of the full House report here. HHS must take its findings seriously if there is any hope for public health to regain public trust. 23/23 https://d1dth6e84htgma.cloudfront.net/We_Can_Do_This_NIH_PR_Campaign_Report_PUBLIC_82616d81eb.pdf

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - October 10, 2024 at 5:39 AM
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 2:48 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Bill Gates spread misinformation about the covid vaccine stopping people from getting and spreading covid which has undermined public confidence in vaccines. He wants to curtail the 1st amendment because he knows his speech will never be censored due to his money and power.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Bill Gates on the spread of "misinformation": "We should have free speech, but... if you're causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries?" "Even the US should have rules. And then if you have rules... is there some AI that encodes those rules, because... if you catch it a day later, the harm is done."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Free speech should exist, but boundaries are needed when speech incites violence or discourages vaccinations. The question is where the US should draw those lines and what rules should be in place. With billions of online activities, AI could potentially encode and enforce these rules. A delayed response to harmful content means the harm is already done.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should have free speech, but if you're inciting violence, if you're causing people not to take vaccines, you know, where are those boundaries that even the US, should, you know, have rules? And then if you have rules, you know, what is it? Is there some AI that encodes those rules because you have billions of activity and, you know, if you catch it a day later, the harm is is done.
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 12:52 PM
Saved - August 23, 2024 at 11:57 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Twitter 1.0 was a de facto wholly owned subsidiary of the US federal government, which it used for propaganda purposes against the American people.

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

1) Twitter Files: Democrats & media claimed Twitter 1.0 was a “private company” that made its own decisions, despite Biden Administration pressure to censor. But new emails show Twitter hired a lobby shop staffed w/ Biden loyalists & then coordinated w/ Biden State Dept. https://t.co/bcqyNXnvHr

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 2:08 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 2:24 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The mRNA platform hijacks human cells to make proteins from "code." But is there accurate control over the dose, distribution, & fidelity of those proteins? What if there isn't? New Illusion of Consensus podcast with my friend, scientist @MartinZ_uncut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGlT4hT2ZBk

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - July 22, 2024 at 1:50 PM
Saved - July 22, 2024 at 2:49 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

That time when Jacinda Ardern, former PM of New Zealand, banned Lord of the Rings (the books, not the movies) because of covid. The depths of The Science(tm) can never be fully understood. On the plus side, I'm sure the MSNBC folks approve.

@taipan168 - taipan168

Today I was reminded that New Zealand banned the sale of fiction (but not non-fiction) books because they were deemed "non-essential". And this included online delivery. What a ridiculous decision. https://t.co/Nbx3S8qzHc

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - July 12, 2024 at 12:10 AM
Saved - July 12, 2024 at 11:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
New report by @mtaibbi exposes the government-university alliance fueling censorship in the US. Gov't funds university to research disinformation, which then directs platforms like @x and FB to censor accounts. Clemson's involvement raises questions. Full report at Matt's Racket News.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

New @mtaibbi report on the government-university axis underlying the US govt's censorship engine. 1. The gov't funds a university to "research" disinformation 2. The university reaches out to @x or FB to direct them to censor or block accounts. It's censorship laundering. https://t.co/TDxh7rLqu2

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

@mtaibbi @X Here's a link to the full report at Matt's Racket News. Why is Clemson willing to serve as a patsy for government censorship activities? https://www.racket.news/p/foia-files-clemson-university https://t.co/UcF4UmWJBM

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - June 29, 2024 at 6:46 PM
Saved - June 29, 2024 at 8:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Germany and the United States, pandemic leaders who enforced lockdowns and school closures in 2020 are now trying to change the narrative. Despite opposing expert advice, they want to portray themselves as having lost the policy battle.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In Germany, as in the United States, the pandemic leaders who got their way in lockdowns and school closures in 2020 now want to rewrite history. They demolished the experts who advised against them with devastating takedowns, but now want people to think they lost the policy fight in 2020 and beyond.

@Quo_vadis_BRD - stefanie

1/ Nein, @c_drosten. So läuft das nicht - dass Sie nun von Redaktion zu Redaktion ziehen und glauben, dass Sie damit erfolgreich Ihre Rolle in der Geschichte der #Pandemie umschreiben werden. Auch Sie werden sich früher oder später Ihrer Mitverantwortung stellen müssen. 🧵 https://t.co/ezPFWngqlD

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 2:55 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

FDA whistle-blowers in Congress yesterday: The @US_FDA cut corners in its approval of the covid vax booster and full licensing of the covid vax in 2021 so that the government could force through covid vax mandates.

@Hale_Storm - Sarah Smith

So, it wasn't just that FDA's Gruber & Krause decided to retire because they were offended by the WH booster push. They were essentially demoted & put out to pasture by Marks & Woodcock b/c they wanted to be sure they had the data to approve the vaccine. From Krause's testimony: https://t.co/SCcWL7S09b

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - June 26, 2024 at 2:38 PM
Saved - June 26, 2024 at 2:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Murthy v. Missouri case allows the Biden Administration to coerce social media companies to censor and shadowban content. Congress needs to take action to uphold the Constitution. This issue will also impact the upcoming election, as it raises questions about the candidates' stance on social media censorship. The court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, which means that the Administration can censor ideas without facing legal challenges. This ruling has implications for free speech in America.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The Supreme Court just ruled in the Murthy v. Missouri case that the Biden Administration can coerce social media companies to censor and shadowban people and posts it doesn't like. Congress will now need to act to enforce the Constitution since the Sup. Ct. won't.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

This now also becomes a key issue in the upcoming election. Where do the presidential candidates stand on social media censorship? We know where Biden stands since his lawyers argue that he has near monarchical power over social media speech.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The court ruled that the plaintiffs (Missouri and Louisiana, as well as me and other blacklisted individuals) lacked standing to sue. This means that the Administration can censor ideas & no person will have standing to enforce the 1st Amendment. Free speech in America, for the moment, is dead.

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - May 16, 2024 at 7:06 PM
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 8:46 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

This testimony is amazing. The @nih has done everything it can to suppress public transparency about its activities via foia redactions. Finally the NIH director agrees that Morens conspired to violate foia altogether. It's time for the NIH coverup of its misdeeds to end.

@mentju4 - Mentju

David Morens' email to @PeterDaszak: "I learned from our @NIH FOIA lady how to make emails disappear after I am FOIA'd but before the search starts so I think we are all safe. Plus, I deleted most of those earlier emails..." https://t.co/lncVsHYdEp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Moran, a senior advisor to Fauci, discussed deleting emails to avoid transparency, which goes against NIH policies. He also shared internal discussions with doctor Daszak and helped craft responses to FOIA releases, which is not in line with NIH guidelines. Doctor Tabak expressed concern over these actions. Moran is currently employed by NIH.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shifting to some questions regarding NIH's document retention policies. Doctor. David Moran, a senior advisor to Fauci for decades, wrote in an email to doctor Daszak, quote, I learned from our FOIA lady here how to make emails disappear after I am FOIAed but before the search starts. So I think we are all safe. Plus, I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to Gmail, end quote. Is that consistent with NIH document retention policies? It is not. Does the NIH FOIA office teach employees how to avoid transparency? I certainly hope. He also later wrote doctor Daszak, and I quote, we are all smart enough to know to never have smoking guns. And if we did, we wouldn't put them in emails. And if we found them, we would delete them, end quote. Is that consistent with NIH document retention policies? It is not. Finally, emails show that doctor Morans would share internal discussions regarding upcoming FOIA releases with doctor Daszak. He would then help doctor Daszak craft responses to documents being released in these FOIAs. Are those actions consistent with NIH policies? If those actions occurred, they would not be consistent. So do these actions concern you, doctor Tabak? It it does indeed. What is doctor Moran's current employment status? He is an employee of NIH. Well, I think you see where my lines of questioning were
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - May 16, 2024 at 2:09 PM
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 2:27 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Nothing says "The Science (tm)" more than Biden lawyers preventing former NIH boss and gain of function proponent Francis Collins from answering questions under oath about a lab leak that likely launched the covid era.

@Bryce_Nickels - Bryce Nickels

from Francis Collins transcript @COVIDSelect Q: were any of the conversations regarding compliance on EcoHealth? LAWYER: Dr Collins I am going to step in here and ask you not to answer that question. Q: On what grounds? LAWYER: Executive branch confidentiality interest

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - May 10, 2024 at 4:57 PM
Saved - May 10, 2024 at 5:06 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Gov't affiliated censors, probably: "Oh no, we're not violating your free speech rights. We're only making it so if you write something we don't like, no one will see it, publishers that print it will lose advertising, and a social media troll mob will ostracize you."

@freddiesayers - Freddie Sayers

Ok so the latest excrescence from the ‘anti-disinformation’ bureaucracy is so political it’s almost funny… https://t.co/azOnPQeJfi

Video Transcript AI Summary
A new entity, the American Sunlight Project, has been created by Nina Jankovic to combat disinformation. She believes anti-disinformation organizations need a rapid response unit. Jankovic previously worked on anti-Russian disinformation in Eastern Europe, funded by Soros' foundations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is how meta and sort of baroque this battle is becoming. I read in a glowing profile in the New York Times last week that a new entity has been created by someone called Nina Jankovic who was, for a very feasting moment, head of president Biden's disinformation governance board for the 3 weeks that existed before he shut it down because it was considered too Orwellian and like a ministry of truth. She is now created something called the American Sunlight Project, which is to fight anti anti disinformation. We're getting very hard to follow here, but she she believes that organizations and I'm afraid she would probably include all all 3 of us on this that are attacking the disinformation movement now need their own sort of rapid response unit which Xi has been good enough to provide to come after them. So there's this sort of union of anti disinformation entities that now has a new spokesman in miss Jangobits. Do you have any thoughts on this? What I'm, you know things are getting out of hand. Speaker 1: Well, I might be, one of the only people in the world who's read miss Jankovic's book. So to bring this full circle, what you learn from her book, which focuses on her experiences in Eastern Europe, is that that was the laboratory. So what what Michael was describing a moment ago Speaker 0: She worked for president Zelensky. Speaker 1: Prior to that even, she had been focused on the anti Russian disinformation fight in Eastern Europe and who, along with the US government, was the primary funder of the anti disinformation efforts in Eastern Europe before 2016, Mr. Soros' foundations.
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 30, 2024 at 4:25 AM
Saved - April 30, 2024 at 10:15 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Drug companies dream to reach audiences with such advertisements. They pay vast sums of money for ads that end with long lists of side effects. How much did they pay for this propaganda from state aligned 'comedians' with no side effect information?

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

In a sane society, this would have ended his career. https://t.co/NI49HUhRkB

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 21, 2024 at 8:32 PM
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 9:12 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

I gave a speech a couple of weeks ago @mit at the invitation of the MIT Free Speech Alliance. I spoke on how the US government censors dissident scientists to suppress criticism of its own disinformation. The full talk is now available on youtube, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF5G46kSKR4

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 18, 2024 at 9:53 PM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 10:06 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

This is an interesting response to my post from a media insider, @KeithOlbermann. I take his point that @uberliner broke some sort of contract omerta (about which I know nothing) by blowing the whistle on NPR's culture. The question is, why does NPR impose such omerta on its reporters?

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM
Saved - April 17, 2024 at 4:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The head of NPR, formerly from Wikimedia, believes that telling the truth is not Wikipedia's main focus. This has led to the platform being used for propaganda against truth tellers. A donation to Wikipedia was regretted due to their defamation and support of public health misinformation. The CEO of Wikipedia admits to actively engaging in disinformation and coordinating censorship with the government. This raises concerns about NPR's new leadership.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The current head of @NPR was formerly the head of Wikimedia. In her TED clip here, she tells us that a commitment to tell the truth is not the central occupation of wikipedia. No wonder it has become a propaganda workshop to smear truth tellers.

@ben_kew - Ben Kew

NPR’s far-left CEO Katherine Maher: "Our reverence for the truth might be a distraction that’s getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done." https://t.co/yuFCKBjzjT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how Wikipedia's model works well for contentious topics like politics and religion because it focuses on the best knowledge available rather than absolute truth. They suggest that seeking common ground and understanding different perspectives may be more productive than trying to convince others of a single truth. Each person's truth is influenced by their background, upbringing, and perception by others, leading to multiple truths coexisting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The hard things, the places where we are prone to disagreement, say politics and religion. Well, as it turns out, not only does Wikipedia's model work there, it actually works really well because in our normal lives, these contentious conversations tend to erupt over disagreement about what the truth actually is. But the people who write these articles, they're not focused on the truth. They're focused on something else, which is the best of what we can know right now. And after 7 years of working with these brilliant folks, I've come to believe that they are onto something. That perhaps for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth Might not be the right place to start. In fact our reference for the truth. Might be a distraction that's getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. Now, that is not to say that the truth doesn't exist nor is it to say that the truth is an important Clearly the search for the truth has led us to do great things to learn great things. But I think if I were to really ask you to think about this. One of the things that we could all acknowledge is that part of the reason we have such glorious chronicles to the human experience in all forms of culture is because we acknowledge there are many different truths. And so in the spirit of that I'm certain that the truth exists for you and probably for the person sitting next to you. But this may not be the same truth. This is because the truth of the matter is very often for many people what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world. So we all have different truths. They're based on things like where we come from, how we were raised, and how other people perceive us.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

I once gave a small donation to Wikipedia. So foolish. Never again.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Wikipedia is still defaming me and the @gbdeclaration. Their support and parroting of public health misinformation is in part responsible for the crisis in education, economic instability, and many deaths caused by the lockdowns. https://t.co/1vyvB2I3pD

@realchrisrufo - Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

EXCLUSIVE: Katherine Maher says that, as CEO of Wikipedia, she "took a very active approach to disinformation," coordinated censorship "through conversations with government," and suppressed content related to the pandemic and the 2020 election. NPR's new censor-in-chief. https://t.co/BoKZlrJuLE

Video Transcript AI Summary
We actively addressed disinformation and misinformation during the pandemic and the US election by collaborating with the editing community. This model will be used in future elections globally. We aim to identify threats early by working with governments and other platforms to understand the landscape.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We took a very active approach to disinformation and misinformation coming into a lot not just the last election, but also looking at how we supported our editing community in an unprecedented moment where we were not only dealing with the global pandemic, we were dealing with a novel virus, which by definition means we knew nothing about it in real time. And we're trying to figure it out as the pandemic went along. And so we really set up in in response to both the pandemic, but also in response to both the pandemic, but also in response to the upcoming US election and as a model for future elections outside of the US, including a number that are happening in this year. What we just obviously went through yet another Israeli, election. The model was around how do we create sort of a clearing house of information that brings the institution of the Wikimedia Foundation with the editing community in order to be able to identify threats early on through conversations with, with government, of course, as well as other platform operators to understand sort of what the what the landscape looks like.
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 16, 2024 at 2:19 PM
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 5:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
NPR's response to criticism by firing an insider is seen as shameful and raises questions about the organization's adherence to orthodoxy. An interview with the excommunicated insider, Berliner, by David Folkenflik is viewed as transgressive. Berliner spoke without permission, stating that being fired for talking to an NPR journalist would be extraordinary. A correction is made regarding the use of the word "fired" in the original post, clarifying that the insider was actually suspended.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

What a shameful way for NPR to deal with thoughtful criticism by a long time insider. A news organization that responds to criticism by firing the heretic should wonder whether the orthodoxy it worships has led it to dark places. https://www.npr.org/2024/04/16/1244962042/npr-editor-uri-berliner-suspended-essay

NPR suspends veteran editor as it grapples with his public criticism NPR has suspended Senior Editor Uri Berliner after he wrote an essay accusing the public radio network of becoming too progressive in its news coverage and losing the public's trust. npr.org

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

This interview of @uberliner by @davidfolkenflik is incredible. There is a sense that the insider, Folkenflik, is transgressing by talking to the newly excommunicated Berliner. A sample: "Berliner says he did not get permission from NPR to speak with me for this story but that he was not worried about the consequences: "Talking to an NPR journalist and being fired for that would be extraordinary, I think.""

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Update / correction: I should have written 'suspended' rather than 'fired' in my original post above. Sorry for causing confusion about this. I was trying to convey a sense of final excommunication, but picked the wrong word to do it.

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 8, 2024 at 6:48 PM
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found an excellent article by Lionel Shriver on social manias, including the lockdown mania of 2020. Shriver predicts a future where there will be a great forgetting and few apologies for the damage caused. Here's the link to the article.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Astonishingly good @unherd article by Lionel Shriver on social manias, with a special appearance of the lockdown mania of 2020. There will be a great forgetting, she predicts, but few open apologies for the catastrophic damage wrought.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Here's a link to the article. https://unherd.com/2024/04/how-to-spot-the-next-mania/

How to spot the next mania unherd.com
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - April 7, 2024 at 5:11 AM
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 11:49 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Pfizer executives violated UK codes by pushing their covid vax efficacy online without mentioning side effects. They did the same in the US. Will the @US_FDA hold them accountable like a UK court just did?

@UsforThemUK - UsForThemUK 🌟

🚨🚨 BREAKING from the UK: in a ruling under the UK’s code of conduct Pfizer has been found GUILTY of ‘bringing discredit to the pharmaceutical industry’ in the UK, the most serious breach there is under the UK Code of Practice rules. A ruling by the UK’s @PMCPAUK found @pfizer had breached the UK’s regulatory code of conduct FIVE times including misleading the public about the safety and efficacy of its Covid vaccine AND unlawfully promoting an unlicensed medicine. This comes after Pfizer was found GUILTY in November 2022 of misleading UK parents over the safety of the Covid vaccine for kids. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/06/pfizer-breached-regulatory-code-five-times-watchdog-finds/

Pfizer accused of ‘bringing discredit’ on pharmaceutical industry after Covid social media posts Watchdog rules company breached regulatory code five times including promoting unlicensed medicines telegraph.co.uk
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - March 25, 2024 at 1:08 AM
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 1:42 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Eric Clapton paid a heavy price for telling the truth about his covid vaccine injury. The entertainment media should be ashamed of itself. Since when did it become a tool of pharma and big government?

@ryangerritsen - Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

The media attacked Eric Clapton for discussing the vaccine injury he suffered after his second dose. Thats how messed up the world is, they would rather protect pharma over people. Such a great eye opening story on how little informed consent there was. It woke Eric up. https://t.co/pUoF5B6QuH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker experienced adverse reactions to the vaccine, including temporary loss of hand function. They were not informed of potential risks beforehand. Concerned about the impact on their children's fertility, they spoke out despite facing backlash. The speaker believes excessive media consumption contributes to illness and struggles with expressing their views to family. Despite potential criticism, they continue to share their concerns about the vaccine's effects on future generations. Translation: The speaker had negative vaccine side effects, was unaware of risks, and worries about the vaccine's impact on their children's fertility. They speak out despite backlash and believe media consumption affects health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the vaccine took my immune system and just shook it around again. And that's still going on. So and that's Then I read, you know, a lot of the evidence that I've been reading about with people that were having adverse reaction. That was on the list was, you know, damage to the immune system. Do you feel like you were made aware of those risks beforehand? Oh, god. No. I lost the use of my hands, for about 3 weeks, so I thought I was, in real trouble. And that's about that point, I just, I was invited by Robin Monocci to talk about it because and it was easy, to say yes because I I I realized that that I may I'm definitely by then, I realized I wasn't the only one that was suffering. And that, you know, that that's my experience from having had the second jab, and but now, I've stopped watching TV. One of the cartoons was a little drawing of a guy interviewing 2 Quakers and saying, how come none of your community has got COVID? And they said, well, we don't watch TV. It it's so true, man. There's so much of the sickness is is in in our heads now. And I I I I experience it. You get caught in the trap. Well, can you believe what your heart tells you is right? Or is it go is it going against the the narrative? Can I talk about how I feel to my family? And it's, doesn't get riskier than that. When I made that little statement, I was pleased to see that it went around without too much flack. I did get some flack from the people I least wanted to get flack from that. My fear my fear about vaccination is what will it do to my children. Part of the reason, maybe the biggest part of the reason why I'm talking here here today with you and and, you know, for it to to to talk to my daughters about they may not be able to have kids, then I probably care. You know, at that point in time in your life, it's not an issue. Yeah. That's one of the risks I take by doing this is that, you know, they're gonna they're gonna look at me like, why don't you just keep your but the vaccine
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - March 20, 2024 at 8:34 PM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 9:54 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

There is literally no way that the public will regain trust in science with Holden Thorp as the editor of Science. In his position, he embraced lockdowns and dangerous virological research and publicly denigrated scientists who opposed them.

@statnews - STAT

As editor-in-chief of the Science family of journals, Holden Thorp has an eye toward increasing public trust in the scientific enterprise. Meet one of the selections to the 2024 #STATUSList: https://trib.al/8U6LJCK

SocialFlow trib.al
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - November 7, 2023 at 1:51 PM
Saved - November 7, 2023 at 2:31 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In a recent faculty senate meeting. @stanford president Richard Saller claimed that the activities of the Stanford Internet Observatory are simply "research." These documents prove otherwise. It is an integral part of the US federal government's censorship enterprise.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

BOMBSHELL REPORT ON THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HUNDREDS of secret reports show how @DHSgov’s @CISAgov, The GEC (@StateDept), @Stanford and others worked together to censor AMERICANS before the 2020 election, including true information, jokes, and opinions. 🧵 THREAD:

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - September 2, 2023 at 2:53 PM
Saved - September 3, 2023 at 2:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA faced criticism for downplaying the medical advice in their tweets about ivermectin. A federal court ruled against the FDA, stating they should not practice medicine. This decision is seen as a victory for doctors who challenged the FDA's authority during the pandemic. For more details, check the link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vbZQnddcaGcGNu55ypNTUa13NPBrQ/view?pli=1. #FDA #Ivermectin #MedicalAdvice #FederalCourt

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Remember when the FDA tweeted to tell people to stop taking ivermectin because "you are not a horse"? The FDA implausibly told a federal district court that those tweets did not contain medical advice. The court just told the FDA to stop practicing medicine. 1/2

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Here's a link to the whole decision. Well-written and worth a read. A big victory for Drs. @MdBreathe, Paul Marik, and Robert Apter. A big loss for the @US_FDA, which overstepped its authority and competence during the pandemic. 2/2 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vbZ_QnddcaG_cGNu55-ypNTUa13NPBrQ/view?pli=1

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

@MdBreathe @US_FDA US federal court: "FDA is not a physician" https://t.co/2sV8HL0PrB

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 1:58 AM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 11:39 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Did governments and public health know that the vax doesn't stop covid transmission? If so, why did they push mandates and vax discrimination anyway? Can we trust these institutions again? Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) has answers!

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - June 20, 2023 at 2:17 AM
Saved - June 20, 2023 at 7:08 AM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Stunning FOIA revelation! Three quick items: 1. @CDCgov director Walensky knew about vax "breakthrough" infections in January 2021. So did Tony Fauci. 2. They continued to push vax mandates anyway. 3. CDC is abusing its FOIA redaction privilege. This is not a classified email. https://t.co/PhFFCKhRh0

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Turns out this was a big fat lie. Walensky was privately discussing breakthrough infections right at the start of the "vaccine" rollout in January 2021. (notice also that Covid origin fraudsters Collins and Fauci were entangled in this and then lied about it) h/t @ZackStieber https://t.co/8M4RzO1MRp

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky tells Congress COVID vaccines “initially” stopped infection and transmission, so what she said in 2021 wasn’t a lie. Somehow, even after losing her job, she still manages to embarrass her whole profession. https://t.co/UnUNfQtmLO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the vaccine did not completely stop the spread or infection, but clarifies that initially it did for the Wuhan strain and the alpha strain. Early data and literature published in the New England Journal showed that those who were vaccinated and didn't get infected were not transmitting the virus to others. The vaccine had a high efficacy of up to 96% early on and this efficacy did not change over time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine did not stop spread or infection. I'm not saying it was completely bad, but it did not stop the spread or infection. I think actually, if I could actually, just Correct that point. And that is initially it did. For the Wuhan strain and for the alpha strain, all of the early data and the literature published in the New England Journal Demonstrated that for those who worked, if you didn't get infected, that you were not transmitting it to other people. And it had very high efficacy early on up to 96%. So it didn't change over time.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

@CDCgov Here's the paper referenced in the email. Thx @ctrlopenbracket! https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776039

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - March 24, 2023 at 5:07 AM
Saved - March 29, 2023 at 5:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In March 2020, UK scientists advised the government on 14 ways to encourage adherence to social distancing measures. These included emotional messaging, weaponized empathy, and coercive legislation. They briefly considered options for focused protection of vulnerable people. However, they did not rule out options to mislead, coerce, or shame the public. US scientists were no better.

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

In March 2020, the UK scientific body advising the government came up with 25 ways to make the public treat others like biohazards. Among the tactics considered included: -- Making people think they are at more risk than they actually were 1/5 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882722/25-options-for-increasing-adherence-to-social-distancing-measures-22032020.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882722/25-options-for-increasing-adherence-to-social-distancing-measures-22032020.pdf

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

-- "Emotional messaging" -- Weaponized empathy ("Responsibility to others") -- Confident assertions that NPIs will protect hospitals ("Positive messaging around actions") -- Coercive legislation -- Shaming ("social disapproval") 2/5

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Here's the matrix of "options" they considered. 3/5

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

They even briefly considered options for focused protection of vulnerable people. Here was their plan for that. 4/5

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

If scientists advising the UK government respected fellow citizens, they would have categorically ruled out options to mislead, coerce, & shame. They would have put more effort into options to protect vulnerable people. But they did not. Most US scientists were no better. 5/5

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Correction: 14 options. I was looking at the title of the document which says 25 when writing the first tweet in this thread. Doesn't change anything substantive.

View Full Interactive Feed