TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DrJudyAMikovits

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 6:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vaccine authorities have admitted that safety trials were never conducted on vaccines, as revealed in a congressional hearing featuring Dr. Kathryn Edwards. Del Bigtree emphasizes that this acknowledgment confirms claims made by various advocates against vaccines, including himself and others. During the hearing, Dr. Edwards acknowledged her experience in clinical trials but could not provide evidence that vaccines do not cause autism. Bigtree argues that the lack of credible evidence undermines the credibility of vaccine regulations, declaring a victory for their movement.

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

“Vaccine Authorities” admit never doing safety trials on vaccines https://tinyurl.com/HighWireDrKathyrnEdwards Del Bigtree: If this was a religion if this was Christianity, this is their Jesus "Vaccines" is their Jesus. That Plotkin, Stanley Plotkin himself has finally given in and admitted that ICAN, the Informed Consent, the HighWirwe, Dell Bigtree Aaron Siri, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Sherri Tenpenny, Judy Mikovits and the rest of them were all exactly right! We never did the safety trials on any of the vaccines. We win lawsuits against government agencies. And now Aaron Siri, our lawyer appearing before congressional hearings and saying you've never done a proper safety trial and the health departments are all saying themselves, "This can't possibly be true." Watch this: Aaron Siri: According to your profile you have done most of the tradable trials relied upon to license many of the vaccines, correct? On the market? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes, sir. Aaron Siri: Okay. So you're highly experienced in conducting clinical trials? Correct. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: I'm highly experienced conducting clinical trials. Aaron Siri: And you're familiar with many of the clinical trials, relied upon to license many of the vaccines currently on the market, correct? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: I am. Aaron Siri: in your opinion, did the clinical trials relied upon to license the vaccines that Gates received, many of which are still on the market today? Were they designed to rule out that the vaccine causes autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: No, you badgered me into answering the question the way you want me to. But I think that, that that I've that's probably the answer. Aaron Siri: Is that your accurate and truthful testimony? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes. Aaron Siri: In the expert discloses for this case, it asserts that, among other things, you will testify that, "the issue of whether vaccines cause autism has been thoroughly researched and rejected." it's your testimony that MMR vaccine cannot cause autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: That's correct. Aaron Siri: It's your testimony, that HepB vaccine cannot cause autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: That's correct. Aaron Siri: It's your testimony that IPOL cannot cause autism. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes. Aaron Siri: It's your testimony that Hib vaccine cannot cause autism. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes. Aaron Siri: Your testimony that varicella vaccine cannot cause autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes Aaron Siri: It's your testimony that Prevnar vaccine cannot cause autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes. Aaron Siri: It's your testimony that DTaP vaccine cannot cause autism. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Yes. Aaron Siri: And you have a study that supports that DTaP doesn't cause autism. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: I have, I do not have a study that's that DTaP causes autism. So I don't have either. Aaron Siri: Do you have any study one way or another of whether IPOL causes autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: I know I do not. Sir. Aaron Siri: Do you have any study one way or another of whether HiB causes autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: I do not have any evidence that it causes autism or that it does not. And Aaron Siri: what about Hib Vaccine any evidence one way or another whether it causes autism? What about Prevnar vaccine? Any evidence one way or another? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: No, sir. Aaron Siri: And how about varicella vaccine? Let me just finish. Are there any studies one way or another report whether it does or doesn't cause autism? Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Part of MMR but not as varicella by itself? No, sir. No studies that say it does or no studies that say it doesn't. Aaron Siri: There have been studies that have found an association between Hepatitis B vaccine and autism Correct. Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: Not studies that I feel are credible. Aaron Siri: Okay, which study which study you are you referring to when you say that? Well, Dr. Kathyrn Edwards: why don't you show me the study and then I'll see whether I agree with it. Del Bigtree: We rest our case. If the top leading experts in the world are admitting to you they never did pre-licensure trials. They don't do pre-licensure or post-licensure trials. And then under oath when they're asked to show whatever evidence they have, and they come up with zero evidence! Zero evidence to back up what they have had every news reporter in the world saying ad nauseam: "This is the one thing we know for sure." But under oath, you have zero evidence. So let me honestly say here's where we're at in the United States of America and the world. This BOOK is not worth the paper it's written on! End of story! ICAN wins, the HighWire wins, and everybody that has been fighting for this truth. We are now the victors. But here's the reality. We need them to admit it. We need this Supreme Court to admit it. We need to wipe out every regulatory agency that ever lied and poisoned our children! 08/01/2024 - Full HighWire Episode 383 Hidden Games: https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/episode-383-hidden-games/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues, "if this was a religion, if this was Christianity, this is their Jesus. Vaccines is their Jesus." He says Stanley Plotkin "has finally given in and admitted that ... we were all exactly right" and "We never did the safety trials on any of the vaccines." "We win lawsuits against government agencies." Aaron Siri and others testified before Congress, saying, "you've never done a proper safety trial." In cross-examination, it is asserted that "the issue of whether vaccines cause autism has been thoroughly researched and rejected" and "It's your testimony that MMR vaccine cannot cause autism." He also testifies that "hep b vaccine cannot cause autism?" "That's correct." The dialogue notes "There have been studies that have found an association between hepatitis B vaccine and autism," but "Not studies that I feel are credible." The speaker concludes: "This book is not worth the paper it's written on."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ways if this was a religion, if this was Christianity, this is their Jesus. Vaccines is their Jesus. That Plotkin, Stanley Plotkin himself, has finally given in and admitted that I can, the informed consent, the high wire, Del Baitry, Aaron Siri, Robert Kennedy junior, Sherry Tenpenny, Judy Mikovits, and the rest of them were all exactly right. We never did the safety trials on any of the vaccines. We win lawsuits against government agencies. And now Aaron Siri, our lawyers, appeared before congressional hearings and saying, you've never done a proper safety trial. And the health departments are all saying themselves, this can't possibly be true. Watch this. Speaker 1: According to your profile, you have done most of the tradable trials relied upon to license many of the vaccines, correct, on the market? Speaker 2: Yes, sir. Speaker 1: K. So you're highly experienced in conducting clinical trials. Correct? Speaker 2: I'm highly experienced conducting clinical trials. Speaker 1: K. And you're familiar with many of the clinical trials that relied upon to license many of the vaccines currently on the market. Correct? Speaker 2: I am. Speaker 1: K. In your opinion, did the clinical trials relied upon to license the vaccines that Yates received, many of which are still on the market today, were they designed to rule out that the vaccine causes autism? Speaker 2: No. You've badgered me into answering the question the way you want me to, but I I think that that that I've that's probably the answer. Speaker 1: Is is it is that your accurate and truthful testimony? Yes. In the expert disclosures for this case, it asserts that among other things, you will testify that, quote, the issue of whether vaccines cause autism has been thoroughly researched and rejected, end quote. It's your testimony that MMR vaccine cannot cause autism. Speaker 2: That's correct. Speaker 1: It's your testimony that hep b vaccine cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: That's correct. Speaker 1: It's your testimony that eye poll cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: It's your testimony that hip vaccine cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: It's your testimony that varicella vaccine cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: It's your testimony that Prevnar vaccine cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: And it's your testimony that DTaP vaccine cannot cause autism? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: And do you have a study that supports that DTaP doesn't cause autism? Speaker 2: I have I do not have a study that that DTaP caused autism, so I don't have either. Speaker 1: Do you have any study one way or another of whether IPOL causes autism? Speaker 2: I no. I do not, sir. Speaker 1: Do you have any study one way or another of whether Engerix b causes autism? Speaker 2: I do not have any, evidence that it causes autism nor that it does not. Speaker 1: And what about, Hib titers vaccine? Any evidence one way or another whether it causes autism? No. And what about Prevnar vaccine? Any evidence one way or another? Speaker 2: No, sir. No, sir. Speaker 1: And how about varicella vaccine? Let me just finish. Are there any studies one way or another that's for whether it does or doesn't cause autism? Speaker 2: Part of of MMR, but but not as, varicella by itself. No, sir. No studies that say it does or no studies that say it doesn't. Alright. Speaker 1: There have been studies that have found an association between hepatitis b vaccine and autism. Correct? Speaker 2: Not studies that I feel are credible. Speaker 1: K. Which study which study you are you referring to when you say that? Speaker 2: Well, why don't you show me the study and then I'll see whether I I agree with it. Speaker 0: We rest our case. If the top leading experts in the world are admitting to you they never did pre licensure trials, they don't do pre licensure, post licensure trials. And then under oath, when they're asked to show whatever evidence they have and they come up with zero evidence. Zero evidence to back up what they have had every news reporter in the world saying ad nauseam. This is the one thing we know for sure, but under oath you have zero evidence. So let me honestly say, here's where we're at in The United States Of America and the world. This book is not worth the paper it's written on. End of story, ICANN wins. The high wire wins. And everybody that's been fighting for this truth, we are now the victors. But here's the reality. We need them to admit it. We need the supreme court to admit it. We need to wipe out every regulatory agency that ever lied and poisoned our children.
“Vaccine Authorities” admit never doing safety trials on vaccines Clip on Rumble - Bitchute - Brighteon - Odysee therealdrjudy.com
HIDDEN GAMES - The HighWire Paul Offit Fails To Explain Why Childhood Vaccine Safety Science Hasn’t Been Done; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on the Illegal Immigration Crisis and the Legacy Media’s Attempts to rewrite History, HHS Director Sets the Table for a Bird Flu ‘Emergency,’ and the controversy over the Olympics Opening Ceremony; Del does a deep dive on the origins […] thehighwire.com

@HighWireTalk - The HighWire

STANDING OUR GROUND | EP 420 Health freedom scores BIG in Idaho; @JeffereyJaxen on @SecKennedy’s autism bombshell; @iansomerhalder w/ @Delbigtree on how soil could save America. Don’t miss this! #HealthFreedom #RFKJr #Autism #IanSomerhalder #CommonGround https://t.co/qMgkeXeBSQ

Saved - October 9, 2024 at 11:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fifteen years after my groundbreaking paper on XMRV, I feel the world is finally starting to understand the implications of my findings regarding infectious retroviruses in vaccines. I faced backlash for exposing these truths, but I remain steadfast in my belief that true cures come from God, not from patents or government control. I appreciate the efforts of those like David Martin, who have bravely highlighted issues of patent fraud. Despite attempts to silence us, I believe in the power of unity and faith to overcome challenges.

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

Fifteen years later, the world is starting to get it! Fifteen years ago, on October 8, 2009, was the publication date of my paper that changed everything: Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome https://therealdrjudy.com/peer-reviewed-pubs#a644d596-2ac8-478c-af67-a6c44fa267d9… My paper demonstrated that there were animal viruses in the vaccines, causing death, as we exposed in Vaccine Court starting in 2015. So, 2009 is when “they” started to develop synthetic viruses! That’s why they ended up kicking me out because I exposed “them!” Peer Reviewed Pubs: https://therealdrjudy.com/peer-reviewed-pubs #truth #health #news #publications #science #XMRV #virus #COVID #CFS #vaccine #CrimesAgainstHumanity #medicare #Faith #GodWins

The Real Dr. Judy Dr Judy Mikovits, PhD Biochemistry & Molecular Biology VIDEO CLIPS & TRANSCRIPTS therealdrjudy.com
The Real Dr. Judy Dr Judy Mikovits, PhD Biochemistry & Molecular Biology VIDEO CLIPS & TRANSCRIPTS therealdrjudy.com

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

I was the senior author the last author will NOT bow down ! The American OWN the cures and those come from GOD alone Cannot patent Nature! Thank you David Martin Hero exposing patent fraud Plandemic indorctornation August 18 2020 Destroy small business and steal our land !!! 2chron7:14 One nation under God NOT government Sound like NC Lahaina ventura Thomas fires floods They thought they silenced we the people IMPOSSIBLE INITED WE STAND

Saved - December 9, 2023 at 2:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Eliquis, a triple therapy drug, is deemed dangerous and potentially lethal. Instead, consider Nattokin Plus, which supports your body's natural signaling pathways. Be cautious of the risks involved and prioritize your health. Learn more at https://tinyurl.com/NattoKinPlus.

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

You don't thin the blood. The triple therapy is deadly and they are killing you & they know it! Eliquis is one of the most dangerous things we ever used. It's a deadly drug. Nattokin Plus is what we use. You don't use it every day. Your own body has cascades, be mindful of your signaling pathways! https://tinyurl.com/NattoKinPlus #truth #health #news #cardio #heart #BloodVessel #fridaymorning #FridayVibes #Faith #GodWins #FridayFeeling

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the use of vaccines and the potential risks associated with amyloid fibrin microclots. They mention triple therapy using clopidogrel, povidone, and a liquid state, but state that blood thinners are not effective. They recommend using nattokinase, a fiberlytic and thrombolytic product, specifically the nutritional frontiers brand. The speaker expresses concerns about stabilizing fermented soybeans into a drug, as it can harm the microbiome. They criticize Dr. McCullough's lack of knowledge on drug development and mention the importance of purinergic modulators like Ivermectin and Brilinta for preventing clots. They recommend NanoKinn Plus and caution against using Eliquis. The speaker concludes by suggesting that the current therapies are dangerous and harmful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, a lot of the vaccine would have the amyloid fibrin microclots. What are your thoughts on triple therapy? Clopidogrel, povidone, and then the liquid state all of that. Nothing blood thinners do is doing anything. So that's where nattokinase It's not a kinase. Fiberlytic and thrombolytic cascades of cleavage. The product I like the best Is the nutritional frontiers, because it's formed together. It's with It's the fermented soybeans. But when you stabilize that, you make it a drug, and it takes out a very key Part of your microbiome that you need, you can't keep cutting up your serine protease proteins. You all your Proteins with a serine in it, so you create d dimers. I appreciate doctor McCullough, but he's not a drug developer nor does he know what he's talking about. So if he didn't know Ivermectin was a purinergic modulator and that Brilinta is one of the most important purinergic modulator For preventing clots from going on stents that you put in after, angioplasty and blue therapy, whatever you wanna call it. You know, okay, let the drug developers teach you, but if you can't get out of your ego, you can't. So NanoKinn Plus It's what we use. You don't use it every day. Your own body has cascades. You don't thin the blood. Eliquis is one of the most Dangerous things we ever used. It's a deadly drug. The triple therapy is Deadly. And they are killing you, and they know
Nattokin Plus 120 Nattokin Plus Supports: Capillary Strength Vascular Health Healthy Blood Flow The Importance of Capillaries, Veins and Blood Flow: Capillaries are tiny blood vessels between arteries and veins that distribute oxygen-rich blood to the body. Capill shop.therealdrjudy.com

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

I will join Amalya's Twitter Space after 7:45pm PST for an hour tonight. https://t.co/6dSevbz6tg #truth #health #news #MondayMotivation

Saved - November 14, 2023 at 5:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nattokinase, a nutraceutical, can be both a drug and a poison. The formulation is crucial. For the Advanced Recovery mRNA Spike Detox protocol, I recommend NattokinPlus. Find it here: [link]. #health #covid #nutrition #selfcare #FridayFeeling #VeteransDay

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

Nattokinase the nutraceutical is a drug & a poison. I was asked to explain at the Health & Freedom Summit. What matters is the formulation. I recommend NattokinPlus, as part of the Advanced Recovery mRNA Spike Detox protocol: https://shop.therealdrjudy.com/advanced-recovery-mrna-spike-detox.html #truth #health #news #covid #flu #SelfCareMatters #selfcare #nutrition #food #solutions #faith #GodWins #FridayVibes #VeteransDay #FridayFeeling #fridaymorning

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nattokinase is a fermented soybean product that acts as a serine protease, not a kinase. It kills a specific microbe in the body, affecting the microbiome and digestion. However, it is not recommended as it alters the gut biome and is considered toxic. Our bodies naturally break down microorganisms and use them as food. Nattokinase is a drug, and it is concerning that even young children are taking numerous pills without understanding why. Instead of seeking quick fixes, we should address the pollution and environmental destruction that have led to these health issues. It is time to take responsibility and work towards restoring our environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nattokinase isn't soy. It it's natto is fermented soybeans, and the the drug with the the nutraceutical theoretically, is is not a kinase that puts a phosphate group on a on a molecule. It's a it's a serine protease. So what they did was they took the natural product, which the fermented nano kills a very specific microbe. So they're like, we'll we'll kill that microbe contributing to the microbiome and the digestion or the metabolism of food in your body when you eat a fermented. That if you ever ate natto, you can only take a little bit of it. It's disgusting. But the way we do it in the fermentation chemistry is to see, we killed a very specific microbe, and then you stabilized it to kill it for eternity and never turn off. And what did you do? You changed the gut microbe of biome, your food no longer vacate food and Nattokinase is a poison. And our body makes, you know, the right microbes breakdown those, microorganisms or it uses them in our own body, as food, to to to nourish and feed our body. So again, there's a reason why it tastes disgusting because you won't eat it. You know, we lost our sense of taste and smell because they took those sensors away from us. You know, how does the stunk hurt somebody? Praise them. You know? But it hurts for a really long time mean, you never forget it. You never go anywhere near that animal. And we've heard all about that all weekend. So again, Nattokinase is a drug. So we're not gonna turn around and do the same thing all over again and just carry around. And we see our 2 year olds as, Heather just said, they're carrying around These pills. You know, just buckets of pills. Why do you choose? Why do I take this? Speaker 1: Why do I take that? Speaker 0: And I got people or patients asking me, what do Speaker 1: I do, Doctor. Judy? Speaker 0: Why do I does that. It's food. Eat it. It's water. Drink it. You're being poisoned. And the kids won't even drink that poison. The autistic kids. Because They know it's poison because they've been poisoned with it through the generations. Stop. You know? Stop looking for the quick answer and go with the tough pollution and ask how we destroy this environment, how god gave us the ability sitting in this room to get it back.
Advanced Recovery MRNA Spike Detox Default Description shop.therealdrjudy.com
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 10:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The NSA, a spy agency, oversaw Warp Speed. Originally, it began in 1980 at Ft Detrick, MD, as the Institute of Biowarfare, later renamed National Cancer Institute. Deborah Birx and Robert Redfield allegedly injected the military with HIV in the 90s. #health #truth #news #moderna #pfizer #vaccine #cancer #HIV

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

The top organization that managed Warp Speed was  the NSA, a spy agency! It’s not Warp Speed, it started in 1980 at Ft Detrick, MD, when they just changed the sign from Institute of Biowarfare to National Cancer Institute! Deborah Birx and Robert Redfield injected the military with HIV in the 90s and they know it! #health #truth #news #moderna #pfizer #vaccine #cancer #HIV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The top agencies leading Operation Warp Speed were the NSA and the Pentagon, not public health agencies like HHS, CDC, or NIH. The vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military tractors, with Pfizer and Moderna being paid to put their names on them. The speaker believes that Operation Warp Speed is not new, as it has been happening since 1980 at Fort Detrick, a bioweapons lab. They claim that the government has been involved in unethical practices, such as injecting the military with HIV in the 1990s.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The top organization that had managed Warp Speed was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency. That was the top agency, the lead agency on operation warp speed and the pandemic. And the 2nd agency was the Pentagon. As it turns out, you know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH. They're owned. The patents are owned 50% by NIH, nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military tractors. And, basically, Pfizer, Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Let's look at your thoughts on operation in warp speed there, ma'am. Speaker 1: It's not warp speed. It's been happening since June 10, 1980 when I walked in that military installation called Fort Detrick. They just turn the sign around with then president Richard Nixon, oh, we're just gonna cure cancer. No. We always just turn the sign around on the bioweapons lab. They made it a historic landmark right there at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the ants, Where we had the beautiful they put the plaque up there when we built the new lab. It's all in plague of corruption. It's not Warp Speed. All of those People are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. I don't care whether it's Deborah Birx Or or Robert Redfield. They injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and they know it. HIV PNL 43. I know the plasmid. I know the exact one. I know the people they injected it in, and that's the data we have in our
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 9:09 PM

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

#truth #news #health #COVID19 #WednesdayMotivation #StopTheShots #Pfizer #Moderna

@Restitutor_ - Restitutor Orbis

The most important video you will watch. Today, 13th September, A panel bravely exposed the WHO (World Health Organisation) for the criminal organisation it is, and proved that Covid is indeed a BioWeapon. This is Dr David Martin's Speech. Please Share

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the global population. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal entities. They provide examples of unethical practices, such as conducting deadly experiments on children and funding gain-of-function research. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and urges viewers to share this information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where a group, a very small number of criminal industrial conspirators, decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity, and I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit? Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in 19 forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent, and I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand, and they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it, and in violation of 15 US Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started, so I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a 110 years later. And in violation of TFIU, or TFEU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it always was, and we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things, but the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus, cunningly, that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide, and we need to call it what it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print, and I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH, and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age, and in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was, because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection, it was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing, it was actually tale of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to kill people, and what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947 when the WHO was funded and founded. It was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement: immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution, and it's worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity. This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st Director General, none other than Doctor. Rene Essand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940, earlier in 1947, mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation, was nominated to become the 1st Director General of the Who, and within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the who in writing by then Director General Doctor. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health. This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics Office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, philanthropy, of Andrew Carnegie. People, stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers. Let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest, and it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent, charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of cheering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. Why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words because it's the best way to say it? When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization, and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. Now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes, he has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left, and it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during the moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop, why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? First, the 2nd bullet under Project 1, which by the way, was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models, but this grant was modified with this letter to say, we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line, or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end? And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation, let's be clear, and there's a big difference, I'm not alleging anything, they actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus it was going to get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14th of 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, and I quote, is poised for human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019, or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan, and look at coronavirus, and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, and lo and behold, we're gonna go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done. And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of 2000s, in the latter part of 90s, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. The reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, so why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation, synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like, biological warfare enabling technologies, and the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, non competitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not because that's what they called it, and we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019, because on September 18, 2019, the co conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an to experience for the world that it was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not we'll look at other options of treatment, not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as doctor McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the criminal racketeers. Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. To deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process, and lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer, of public funds. Moderna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000, more than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it, and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next, and now you get the final slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of or liberty or anything else, as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information, and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this, that's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a, quote, emergency. The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition, so we just used them. Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion, in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not, for a moment, denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes, but I will, without doubt, say the following, until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers tiers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder, until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the Who. Destroy the Who. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you to all of our wonderful speakers this afternoon. Thank you To the audience, thank you. To the audience at home, please, share the information that you heard today
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 4:07 PM

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

Yes, Bryan Ardis was right about the snake venom! Why is my pen pointing to Syncitin in the Ventura County Star in 2014? #truth #news #health #cancer #infertility @jathorpmfm #pregnancy #cancer #VaccineInjuries #StoptheShots #XMRV

Saved - July 30, 2023 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists created a potent bioweapon by injecting the deadliest spike protein, disregarding decades of research showing infectious viruses aren't necessary for disease. The spike protein alone is lethal, so they cloned the 1918 Spanish flu strain, which has been in polio vaccines since 2005. This isn't about SARSCoV2. #Influenza #Health #Vaccines #COVID19

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

I never believed they would create a bioweapon & inject the deadliest spike protein of all time, when every bit of our work for 40 years said you don't need infectious virus to create disease since 1980. We knew the spike, the envelope, the surface unit alone of these viruses was the deadly component. So, they cloned the deadly part of the 1918 Spanish flu, the 1918 pandemic strain of influenza A. This was never about SARSCoV2 which had been injected in every polio vaccine since 2005. @I_am_JohnCullen @DowdEdward @Jeffereyjaxen @Delbigtree @TheHighwire @DavidMARTIN #truth #news #influenza #health #vaccines #polio #COVID19 #SaturdayMorning #SaturdayVibes #SpanishFlu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disbelief that a bioweapon was created and injected into people, causing more deaths than the Vietnam War. They argue that the spike protein alone is deadly and that the 1918 Spanish flu strain was cloned and injected instead of the SARS CoV-2 virus. They claim that the deaths were covered up and that people mistakenly believe masks stopped the flu. The speaker struggles with the idea that millions of innocent people, including their husband, were murdered and the truth denied. They emphasize the need for action to prevent such events from happening again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That it was the shot that caused the deaths we're seeing now. That had doubts reporting that everybody's reporting. They murdered more millennials than the entire 10 year Vietnam War. So I never believed they would create a bioweapon and inject the deadliest spike protein of all time, when every bit of our work for 40 years said, you don't need infectious virus to create disease. Since 1980, we knew the spike, the envelope, the surface unit alone of these viruses, was the deadly component. So they cloned the deadly part of the 1918 Spanish flu, the 1918 pandemic strain of influenza A. This was never about SARS CoV-two, which had been injected in every polio vaccine since 2005 when it was published. Hear Me. On September 25th, John Cullen told us It was all about the influenza that was injected, just as Tony Fauci promised to the American people on 60 Minutes, the Sunday before the 2016 election. It was always influenza. 4,000 deaths a week starting in January of 'twenty, and all covered up. And now doctors actually believe the lie that we or stopped influenza. Oh, we stopped the flu, thanks to the masks. And we're going back there again, and people don't understand this. So Every word was true. How did I feel? Not for a second. And to this day, I struggle with it. I could not believe they would simply murder millions of innocent people, including my husband. And and deny deny, deny, and and perpetrate a lie when we have absolute proof, as we know from Ryan Cole, everybody's work, that it was the shot that caused the deaths we're seeing now that had doubts reporting that everybody's reporting. They murdered more millennials than than the entire 10 year Vietnam War. So for me, it's still horrific. Were and it won't end until We The People stop it and make sure it never happens again.

@LondonRealTV - London Real

Dr. Judy Mikovits - Covid Was Premeditated Murder & Vaccination Is Not Immunisation, It’s Extermination https://t.co/dyKMrOJAaD

Saved - June 29, 2023 at 4:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In April 2010, a patent was filed for a PCR that detects all XMRV variants. Interestingly, the same PCR is used for COVID, supposedly caused by SARSCoV2, a monkey chimera injected in polio vaccines since 2005. We're expected to believe it was released from Wuhan in 2019. Remember the open air centrifuge at Ft Detrick, where I was told to produce a cancer-causing retrovirus in 1982. It was intended for deployment, but not on my watch. We'll continue to teach and share therapies for these bioweapons. #truth #news #health #PCR #XMRV #COVID #solutions #education #thursdayvibes #thursdaymorning

@DrJudyAMikovits - Judy A. Mikovits PhD

April 6 2010 we filed a patent for PCR that detects every variant of XMRVs. How interesting that they used one PCR for  COVID supposedly caused by SARS-CoV2 a monkey chimera, manufactured & injected in every polio vaccine since 2005. Yet we're expected to believe it was released from Wuhan in 2019? Remember that open air centrifuge at Ft Detrick; I was told to produce the cancer causing human retrovirus in 1982? Yep in an open air centrifuge...  It was intended to be deployed but not on my watch! We know the bioweapons & we will continue to teach & share therapies! #truth #news #health #PCR #XMRV #COVID #solutions #education #thursdayvibes #thursdaymorning

View Full Interactive Feed