TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DrSHankMD
@DrSHankMD - DrHankMD
@realDonaldTrump If you had acted on this eight years ago, millions would’ve been saved. Please explain why you didn’t. https://t.co/yzISBVHFiW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Key points discuss alleged vaccine safety concerns and political influence. An anecdote describes a two-year-old who “went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.” “President-elect Trump was very thoughtful on the issue. He asked the chair commission on vaccine safety.” “Vaccine safety.” The plan was to “chair and to assemble a vaccine safety committee that would look at the safety of the various vaccinations.” In March 2017, there was talk in the White House about whether “vaccines weren't a bad thing” with Robert Kennedy Jr. advising against it, to which the speaker replied, “no. That's a dead end. That would be a bad thing. Don't do that.” Finally, it is claimed Trump took “a million dollar contribution for his inaugural party from Pfizer” and appointed “Alex Azar and Scott Utley,” “Pfizer's handpicked candidates,” who “killed the vaccine safety commission.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you take this little beautiful baby and you pump I mean, it looks just like it's meant for a horse, not for a child. And we've had so many instances, people that work for me just the other day. Two years old, two and a half years old, a child, a beautiful child, went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.
Speaker 1: President-elect Trump was very thoughtful on the issue. He asked the chair commission on vaccine safety.
Speaker 2: Vaccine safety.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And scientific integrity. Over Christmas vacation, I got a call from somebody in president-elect Donald Trump's office asking me to come meet with the president-elect the January 1. I went in to meet with him at Trump Tower. This was maybe two or three weeks before the his inauguration.
And he asked me to chair and to assemble a vaccine safety committee that would look at the safety of the various vaccinations. And I said that I would be happy to do that.
Speaker 2: Also March 2017 in the White House, he asked me if vaccines weren't a bad thing because he was considering a commission to look into ill effects of vaccines. And and somebody, his name is Robert Kennedy junior, was advising him that vaccines were causing bad things. And I said, no. That's a dead end. That would be a bad thing.
Don't do that.
Speaker 1: And I don't know whether these things are connected, but the president soon after this announcement occurred took a million dollar contribution for his inaugural party from Pfizer and then chose two of Pfizer's handpicked candidates, Alex Azar and Scott Utley, from the public health agencies, and those gentlemen killed the vaccine safety commission.
@DrSHankMD - DrHankMD
So interesting and exciting that the word is getting out. Telling all my patients with cancer about this guy. https://t.co/sCxb4JrwwP
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found over 100 scientific papers showing Ivermectin's potential against cancer, primarily from preclinical studies. Researchers are puzzled by how this anti-parasitic drug, which has been effective for decades, can also treat cancer. Ivermectin is off patent, meaning there's little financial incentive for big pharma to invest in its research. Notably, Ivermectin can kill cancer stem cells, reverse chemotherapy resistance, and enhance the effectiveness of both chemotherapy and radiation. Patients combining Ivermectin with these treatments have shown remarkable results, including significant tumor reductions. After two years of research, I now treat over 1,000 cancer patients with Ivermectin and other anti-parasitic drugs. The recent mention by Mel Gibson about friends curing stage 4 cancer with these treatments highlights the growing awareness of this approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I discovered an entire body of of articles and scientific papers, over a 100 papers on the success of Ivermectin in cancer. Now these are preclinical studies, you know, a lot of studies done on mice and and, cell lines and so on. But there is a tremendous body of work showing that Ivermectin is successful against cancer. And all these, you know, researchers have been trying to figure out how is Ivermectin doing this? How is Ivermectin treating cancer?
How is it that an anti parasitic that, you know, has been a successful parasitic drug for decades, how is it treating cancer? And it's a fascinating, body of research that has really been completely abandoned and ignored by big pharma. Ivermectin, of course, is off patent. Merck had a patent on it till, I think, 1996. It's off patent.
No one's gonna make money on it. So there's your answer. It's there's no money in researching ivermectin. And yet there are over a dozen mechanisms of action for Ivermectin in cancer. Some of the more fascinating ones are that Ivermectin attacks, cancer stem cells.
Now these are cancer cells that chemo can't kill. So when your oncologist tells you we can't cure your cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, it's because they know that the chemo is not gonna be able to kill those cancer stem cells. And so, Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells. It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy. And so it's got this ability on a molecular level to reverse the resistance, it's called multidrug resistance, and make cancer cells actually susceptible to chemo.
It also makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it's a radio sensitizer. And so patients, for example, who are taking combinations of chemo and ivermectin or radiation and ivermectin are seeing dramatic results that oncologists have never seen, that radiation oncologists have never seen, you know, tumor shrinking down to almost nothing, you know, liver metastases disappearing, brain metastases disappearing. And so, you know, I've been writing about this for almost 2 years now. I've had, you know, some articles go viral internationally, you know, with millions of views on my substack.
And then, last year, last summer, I actually started treating cancer patients with Ivermectin with other anti parasitic drugs like Fenbendazole, mabendazole. And so now I have what I believe is the largest ivermectin cancer practice in the world. I have over 1,000 cancer patients who are on either a combination of ivermectin and fenbendazole or ivermectin and mebendazole. And, you know, when Mel Gibson had mentioned, you know, that he had 3 friends who had, you know, taken ivermectin and fenbendazole and had cured their stage 4 cancers, it rang a bell because, you know, one of my patients had actually said that he was a very close friend of Mel Gibson. And so, just to see this go into the mainstream is is is is really fascinating.
@DrSHankMD - DrHankMD
A very credible source in Israel talking about the fat cats in charge.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israeli defense forces were reportedly placed around the West Bank instead of Gaza due to security concerns, leaving the Gaza envelope unoccupied. The lack of IDF forces led to a reliance on news from each other rather than mainstream media. Questions arise about Israeli intelligence and the lack of response to border breaches despite advanced technology. The speaker, a former IDF member, suggests that Israel may consider a prisoner exchange deal only after a shocking event like this. They also highlight the general sense of insecurity and political instability in Israel. The surprise attack is seen as a failure to protect the people, possibly comparable to the Yom Kippur War. The speaker hints at a conspiracy involving higher powers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Apparently, Israeli defense forces that were supposed to be around Gaza were placed around the West Bank because of security concerns so that the the gaza envelope was left unoccupied with military. They say around 60 to 80% of that area was left without the IDF forces that were supposed to be there. Soldiers are being recruited for reserves as we speak from, this morning, but because of stupid reasons such as no public transport, they're waiting hours to get to the bases. Main Street Media, this is an interesting point. Apparently, admits that IDF spokesperson is for beating them to tell the complete truth about what's happening, highlighting a lack of transparency, and this is to the Israeli citizens.
I'm not even talking about overseas. I'm talking about to the people of Israel here. For hours and hours, the reports that came from the mainstream media were completely lacking and people started to rely mostly on the news from each other, from people on the ground. Only now 6 PM Israel time or actually 7 already. 12 hours after the event started, we received the first formal statement from the IDF spokesperson, and I will include an article with that statement in the notes.
A year ago, there was a military operation in Gaza to prepare for such events And, ongoingly, there are trainings for these kind of scenarios. This raises serious questions for me anyway about Israeli intelligence. What happened? 2 years ago, there were, there was a successful deployment of underground barriers with sensors to alert exactly on these kind of terrorist breaches. Israel is one of the most advanced and high-tech armies How come there was zero response to the border and fence breaching?
I cannot understand that. Personally, I served in the IDF 25 years ago in the intelligence forces. There's no way in my view that Israel did not know of what's coming. A cat moving alongside the fence is triggering all forces. So this what happened to the strongest army in the world?
How come border crossings were wide open? Something is very wrong here. Something is very strange. This chain of events is very unusual and not typical for the Israeli defense system. With the recent normalization efforts of Israel and Palestine led by Saudi Arabia.
I wonder whether a prisoner's exchange deal is something that could only be seriously considered by Israel if a shocking event like that happened? Is it a possibility that only with Israel hostages, it can be justified to release dangerous prisoner from Israeli Prizes? I don't know. Mainstream media reported that deputy Hamas leader Salam Al Aruwe suggests using Israeli prisoners for leverage in negotiations. So maybe a point about the situation in Israel in the past few years, which I wanna make, is related to, and those who follow me know that There's a general sense of insecurity in Israel.
There's political and social instability and unrest public funds are being misused on agendas such as COVID, climate, judicial reform, abolishing cash, and many more. The current government is highly corrupt in my view while the previous one was no better. I didn't care about having a popular opinion. I care about a exposing Evo forces wherever and whomever they are. So to me, this surprise attack seems like a planned operation on all fronts.
This is a failure to protect the people of Israel For sure. Perhaps the biggest failure since the Yongkipur war exactly 50 years ago, if not bigger. By the way, is it a coincidence? It's exactly 50 years ago, almost on the day. The Kippur War was on October 6th, 1973.
If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would say that this feels like the work of the deep state. It feels like the people of Israel and the people of Palestine have been sold once again to the higher powers that be At the same time, this is still very, very difficult to fathom. Have a good evening.
@DrSHankMD - DrHankMD
This needs to be circulated far and wide.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their observations and analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. They claim that the World Health Organization (WHO) has played an adverse role in both the virus's origins and the vaccine rollout. They believe that the WHO is part of a complex syndicate that includes various organizations and foundations. The speaker criticizes the WHO for not supporting early treatment protocols and claims that the vaccines have caused significant harm, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. They argue that the vaccines should be removed from the market and urge the European Medicine Agency to take action. They also suggest that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are my observations and this is my analysis. There have been 2 waves of injury to the world. The first has been the SARS CoV-two infection, which preyed upon the frail and the elderly. And then the 2nd wave of injury now has been the COVID nineteen vaccines. The role of the WHO appears to be adverse in both of these.
The role of the WHO appears to be operating within a biopharmaceutical complex, a syndicate, a complicated syndicate that has formed over time. It includes the WHO, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, GAVI, CEPI, the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation that Gates Foundation and the WAF formed largely. The Department of State in the United States, the National Institutes of Health, the CDC, the FDA, the MHRA in the UK, the TGA in Australia, SAFRA in South Africa, the EMA here in Europe. This grouping of nongovernmental organizations with governmental public health agencies is operating as a unit. They're carefully coordinated and the impact has been adverse.
At the outset of the pandemic, there was an investigation by the WHO on the origins of SARS CoV-two. That's when the beginning of the cover up began. Rear Admiral Brett Giroir in the United States nominated 3 independent scientists to go to Wuhan and figure out what was going on. We knew at that time and this has all come out in congressional hearings that Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, who was at the Wellcome Trust, who is now the Chief Scientist at the WHO, Christian Andersen at Scripps, Edwin Holmes in Sydney, Peter Deseck at the EcoHealth Alliance, they all conspired in January of 2020 to cover up what they knew that the virus was engineered in a joint U. S.-Chinese collaboration in the lab in Wuhan, China, and they deceive the world with 12 subsequent fraudulent papers in the peer reviewed literature.
These were quarterbacked by Jeremy Farrar, who is the Chief Scientist at the WHO. This is all in the series of reports in the House Select Committee in the United States by the U. S. Congress, led by, Representative Brad Wenstrup. The WHO has played an adverse role from the very beginning, deceiving the world on the origins of SARS CoV-two.
Doctors like us in clinical practice got behind on this because our governments and agencies like the WHO weren't honest with us. And instead of helping us or at least getting out of the way in terms of treating patients and saving lives, they got in the way and they impeded our ability to treat patients. They effectively created an entire environment of therapeutic nihilism. There are only 2 things that prevented hospitalization and death. One was early treatment early on and then the second was to acquire natural immunity with the 1st episode of the infection.
Nothing else worked. There are only 2 bad outcomes, hospitalization and death. To this day, the WHO does not support, embrace or promulgate early treatment protocols for patients with acute COVID nineteen. That should tell you something. That should be a wake up call.
We're going on 3 years of this 3 years of this, and still nothing to reduce human suffering from the WHO, Nothing. In fact, efforts that enhance human suffering because the 1st wave was the illness. And I've testified in the U. S. Senate multiple times.
The majority of hospitalizations and deaths were completely avoidable in the highest risk patients with early intervention starting with virocidal nasal sprays and gargles and then intravenous and oral drugs administered at home to get people through the illness. Now enter the vaccines. Since 2021, the vaccines have ravaged the population in the world. Worldwide, 2 thirds of people took a vaccine. United States COVID Community State study shows 75% of Americans took a vaccine.
Thankfully, 25% didn't. I was the only public health and public figure in the United States in writing to question the vaccines before they came out, and I did it as loudly as I could. The COVID nineteen vaccines in the United States, 94% of Americans took a messenger RNA vaccine. It is the genetic code for the potentially lethal spike protein part of the virus. It was the worst idea ever to install the genetic code by injection and allow unbridled production of a potentially lethal protein in the human body for an uncontrolled duration of time.
Everything we've learned about the vaccines since they've come out is horrifying. There's not a single study showing that the messenger RNA is broken down because it's pseudouridated. It's made synthetically. It cannot be broken down. There's not a study showing it leaves the body.
We now have papers by Kastriuta, who demonstrates the messenger RNA circulating for a month. That's as long as they've looked. We have the spike protein, the lethal protein from the vaccines found in the human body after vaccination circulating at least for 6 months, if not longer. And if people take an injection another 6 months, There's another installation in more circulating potentially lethal protein. The spike protein is proven in 3,400 peer reviewed manuscripts to cause 4 major domains of disease.
One is cardiovascular disease, heart inflammation or myocarditis. Every regulatory agency agrees the vaccines cause myocarditis. I'm a cardiologist. Before COVID, for years, we've had guidelines in cardiology. When there is myocarditis, whether it's symptomatic or not, People cannot exert themselves in athletics.
It will cause a cardiac arrest. And yet across Europe and across the United States, sports leagues We're injecting young people who had no medical necessity, no clinical indication with these vaccines and we have seen a montage of cardiac arrests in young individuals. I'm telling you as an expert cardiologist, these cardiac arrests are due to the COVID nineteen vaccine until proven otherwise. They are. Other cardiovascular diseases caused by the vaccine proven acceleration of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart attacks, cardiovascular arrest, posterior orthostatic tachycardia sinorapots or people passing out due to low blood pressure.
You have seen montages of people in the media, one after another passing out like you've never seen before. It is the vaccine until proven otherwise. Aortic dissection, atrial fibrillation, other arrhythmias, cardiac arrest in the absence of myocarditis has been described with the COVID nineteen vaccines. The cardiovascular domain of damage in the human body from the vaccine is substantial more than anything we've ever seen with cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes. The 2nd major domain is neurologic disease, stroke, both ischemic and hemorrhagic Guillain Barre syndrome ascending paralysis that can lead to death, which it has led to death with messenger RNA vaccines, agreed to by our all of our regulatory agencies, small fiber neuropathy, numbness and tingling, ringing in the ears, headaches these are common.
3rd major domain, blood clots. Blood clots like we've never seen before. The spike protein is the most thrombogenic protein we've ever seen in human medicine. It's found in the blood clots. The spike protein causes blood clots, blood clots larger and more resistant to blood thinners than we've ever experienced in human medicine.
I have patients with blood clots now going on 2 years and they are not dissolving with conventional blood thinners due to these vaccines. We can't get these out of the body. We can't get the messenger RNA or the spike protein out of the body as is continually produced. 4th and last domain, immunologic abnormalities. Vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia and multisystem inflammatory disorder Early acute syndromes, well described, published, they have their own acronyms, all agreed to by the regulatory agencies.
So all of you in the room and all of you listening online are asking, is it me? Is it my family member? Is it my loved one? Who is going to be the next person to drop after a vaccine? We've seen cardiac arrest now 2 years after these shots 2 years.
I'm the senior author on the largest autopsy study ever assembled of death after COVID nineteen vaccination worldwide. We searched the literature, 600 papers, all the clinical findings, we reviewed them with contemporary knowledge, experts in pathology in clinical medicine. Our conclusion, 73.9% of the deaths after vaccination are due to the vaccine. We are due to the vaccine. When it's suspected myocarditis in a second paper of which I'm the senior author, it's 100% of the time.
It's due to the vaccine. Not COVID, respiratory illness, the vaccine. We are seeing now a third false narrative. The 1st false narrative was that the virus is unassailable, we have to stay in lockdown and be fearful. The 2nd false narrative is take a vaccine, it's safe and effective.
The 3rd false narrative now is It's not the vaccine causing these problems, it's COVID. It's COVID that we saw back in 2020 causing all these problems in 2020 Three, don't fall for the false narrative. The medical literature at this point in time is compelling. The Bradford Hill criteria for causality have been fulfilled. The vaccines are causing this enormous wave of illness.
Now could it be you and your family member? A few important papers to finish. One is by Schmeling and colleagues from Denmark, demonstrating that about 30% of people who have taken a vaccine have zero side effects, nothing, not even a sore arm, not even a sensation that anything happened with the injection. Those people appear to be fine forever as if they didn't take a shot. And the same the data are the same in the United States in our VAER system.
The 2nd batch group is about 70% of individuals, and they have some moderate side effects, some trouble, but they don't seem to really have serious events. And then there's that small 3rd batch group, 4.2% in the Schmeling data. It's through the roof, myocarditis, cardiac arrest, blood clots, hemorrhagic stroke, disabilities, sudden death at home in bed and the data are the same in the United States. 4.2% of people in Europe right now are in trouble because they were unlucky enough to get a high risk batch. In the United States, our CDC V Safe data, which is self reported data, 10,000,000 Americans, the number is 7.7% got so sick with a shot, they had to go to the hospital and be treated or and or be hospitalized.
A Zogby survey done about a year ago, a big representative sample in the United States found 15% of those who took a vaccine have some medical problem that they're dealing with right now. So again, 4.2%, 7.7%, 15%. That's the penumbra. That is the Venn diagram that you're all going to be involved in the calculus. What's the path forward?
The path forward is clearly for no one to take another shot. No one. Now the World Council For Health, which is a multinational evidence based physician and health care provider organization on June 11, 2022, issued a pharmacovigilance report looking at 39 safety databases, including the WHO VisiSafe and the EMA databases and the U. S. Databases.
And their conclusion was to remove all the COVID nineteen vaccines off the market for excess risk of death excess risk of death, okay? On the floor of the U. S. Senate, December 7, 2022, I co moderated a session and our expert panel by Ascent in the seen should be removed from the market, all of them. No new boosters.
And then in March 23, 2023, The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a fact factual fact based, evidence based consensus driven organization just like the 2 others also concluded to remove the vaccines from the market. So I submit to you the COVID nineteen vaccines scenes and all of their progeny and future boosters are not safe for human use. I implore you as a governing body, European Medicine Agency to apply all pressure and due urgency to remove the COVID-nineteen vaccines from market. In the United States, it's going jurisdiction by jurisdiction, Probably state by state, we'll remove them off the market if the federal government doesn't do so. It's going to happen all over the world.
The WHO is standing behind these vaccines. They are far more of a problem than a help to the European Union. And it's my belief that the European Union, the United States and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO and leave the WHO to its own endeavors, not to have any jurisprudence, any dominion over what we do in health care. WHO will never have dominion over what I do as a practitioner, with patients in my practice. I'm Doctor.
Peter McCullough. Thank you so much for having