reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @DsJ0URNEY
@DsJ0URNEY - Doug's Journey ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
Such incestuous creatures, corrupt politicians always have an angle. These 2 "married" for Fraudulent purposes, criminals are always thinking of ways to undermine/subvert the law. https://t.co/cPv0g6sagm
@DsJ0URNEY - D. Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
🤔The more I learn about J.D. Vance the more I understand why 45/47 picked him for VP. Listen to him destroy the mockingbird media's attempt to frame a false narrative... Again! https://t.co/GXCUG7AMuC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker defends former President Trump's comments on illegal immigrants and fentanyl overdoses, criticizing the press for focusing on his language rather than the drug epidemic. They argue that Trump's remarks were not targeting immigrants like Adolf Hitler did with Jews, but rather highlighting the issue of Americans being affected by drug poisoning. The speaker accuses the journalist of trying to limit the immigration debate and divert attention from the real problem caused by Joe Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so there's do you have to say to, the former president's comments over the in the back of ignorance and saying that they're poisoning the blood in their condition? Well, look. I've been asked this question a number of times, and here's here here's my view on these comments. First of all, he didn't say immigrants were poisoning the blood of of this country. He said illegal immigrants were poisoning the blood of the country, which is objectively and obviously true to anybody who looks at the statistics about fentanyl overdoses.
And I I think just one one observation about the press as an organization, you guys seem far more upset about the guy who criticized the problem than you did about Joe Biden who's causing this problem. Let me just go back to his comments, though, when sort of using language that we heard, you know, during World War 2. I'm sure you're a student of history. You're well aware of what that kind of language represents in in historical context. What organization do you represent?
I work at the Associated Press. The idea that I am well aware, you just framed your question implicitly assuming that Donald Trump is talking about Adolf Hitler. It's absurd. It is absurd. Why do you think that Donald Trump's language is targeted at the blood of the immigrants and not at the blood of the American citizens who are being poisoned by the fentanyl problem.
You think he was referring to spending ridiculous. If you watch the speech in context and you look at what's going on, it is obvious that he was talking about the the very clear fact that the blood of Americans is being poisoned by a drug epidemic. The the to to see to take that comment and then to immediately assume that he's talking about immigrants as Adolf Hitler talked about Jews is preposterous. You guys need to wake up and actually do some journalism. Language then?
Because that is language that's Here's here's the problem with that question and that framing. You are allegedly a journalist. You're supposed to hold speak truth to power, and yet you're trying to circumscribe and narrow the limits of debate on immigration in this country. What you're doing is not speaking truth to power. You're trying to police the guy who's criticizing the problem so that Americans don't pay attention to the guy who caused the problem.
It's an absurd question. It's an absurd
@DsJ0URNEY - D. Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
They've always known & all these years not one from either "party" had the balls to say or do anything about it, to the point of allowing this Crooked Perv to be installed in the most powerful position on earth. Phucking Pathetic. https://t.co/lYSCFtdKFv
@DsJ0URNEY - D. Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
To Every "Protester" Chanting: "We Are Hamas" & "Free, Free Palestine" I sincerely pray these images haunt your every waking hour & visits every dream you have.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
It's so Easy to Hack Voting Machines Even Democrats Can Do it!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the vulnerabilities of a specific voting machine, the ES&S Model 650, and the potential for hacking and manipulation of election results. The machine lacks security measures and can be easily accessed through a serial console on the back, providing full root access. With physical access, someone could rewrite the machine's code to manipulate vote counts. The machine's operating system has never received security patches and can be compromised by simply plugging in a zip disk. The video highlights the lack of security in these machines and the potential for widespread hacking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a Phoenix BIOS A 46 6 version 1.0. What was the version? 1.03.
Speaker 1: I'm Rich DeMello. I'm a professor of computer science at Georgia Tech. 6. Let's head up towards the, the scanners.
Speaker 0: Simple case, legendary. This right?
Speaker 1: 6. Looks like he has a USB connection into the scanner.
Speaker 0: The the serial console on the back gives us a root shell. That
Speaker 1: means you have control of the of the machine once you
Speaker 0: full control of that, and then we can changed the results of what it's scanning.
Speaker 1: This is the way that you get data in and out of the, in and out of the operating system that runs on this machine.
Speaker 0: My computer is connected to the machine. This is a serial cable, and it's connected to the back of the machine. Take off the back of the machine, and there's a serial port, and that gives us sis. Full root access with no password again.
Speaker 1: There's no security subsystem on this one?
Speaker 2: Nope. There's no password on it.
Speaker 0: With this kind of access, you could rewrite the code that's running on there and get it to count votes in whatever way you want it. You would do this in advance of election night and then wait for the results to come in. You could control the selection results. Either way, as long as I had physical access to either plug something in or take off the back and plug something in there. But you just need that access Briefly?
Once.
Speaker 2: Yes. Very briefly.
Speaker 0: About how long? If you had this all prepped and ready to go a minute.
Speaker 3: This is easily possible for, six. Somebody to get into these machines, because they're unsecured for such long periods of time. I'm Marilyn Marks, the executive director of Coalition For Good Governance. 6. I have done research on and personally watched 150 elections, at least, in the context of our lawsuit against Georgia To get rid of the DRE machines, 2 of our experts and I went to the closing of the polls in one of the recent elections.
At the end of the closing of the polls, something. The poll workers left us there with about 6 voting machines by ourselves. I was with 2 guys who could have gotten into those machines in a matter of seconds Input in malware.
Speaker 2: My name is Joseph Canirey, and I am the CEO and chief scientist of Free and Fair. The machine we're in front of is a central count scanner. It's the ES and S Model 650. It's, to our knowledge, the most widely deployed central count scanner 3 voting or provisional voting. Or anytime you're in a state where they do central tabulation of all the ballots, so bring them to one place this is the kind of high speed scanner they would use to count balance C.
Historically, these machines were examined, and they determined and there was a number of serious problems with them by virtue of messing with the Zip disk. Just turn it on for 3 minutes s stick a disc in, wait 1 minute, and then walk away. You're able to change the behavior of the machine any way you want, including changing the results
Speaker 0: election.
Speaker 2: This is an ancient operating system. It's never seen any security patches ever
Speaker 0: since. It's probably easier to do all of this by just plugging it in.
Speaker 1: So this probably came from a server side of those?
Speaker 2: I have I have no
Speaker 0: idea where where they're getting their programs.
Speaker 2: We downloaded c a image of the operating system, the software that runs on this machine from a Russian server.
Speaker 1: All of the security breaches throughout history, the famous ones, have to do with 6. Misusing the procedures that people have carefully set up. So these are exactly the environments that the election officials should be studying. They be criticizing
Speaker 2: it.
Speaker 0: How many people might have access to stick in a zip disk like that.
Speaker 2: It would be everyone from elections officials to people who run the storage facilities, volunteers in the election, section, security guards, you name it. There's gonna be tens of thousands of people who have access to the machine in that fashion. And our adversaries definitely have this machine in Russia, seven. Period.
Speaker 3: There are so many possible hacks and so many possible vectors for entry. It's hard to believe that 6. Someone's not taking advantage of it.
Speaker 0: We're bored now, and trying to find more fun things to do.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
I have a feeling we're going to be hearing a lot more about 2020's "Most Secure in American History" election in the near future. 🤔81 million🤣 https://t.co/5bbgKaZvKg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 1.5 million fraudulent votes were counted in Pennsylvania, including dead voters, early received ballots, and electronic spikes from voting machines. Georgia had 66,248 underage voters, 10,315 dead voters, and 2,500 convicted felons casting votes. Additionally, nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently added in Georgia, and 4,500 votes came from unregistered voters. Democrats are accused of trying to cover up this election fraud, with governors and secretaries of state removing accessible information and preventing conservatives from auditing the results. Independent research suggests that millions of votes were fraudulently altered or deleted nationwide in favor of Joe Biden. Arizona had 36,400 noncitizens voting and experienced phantom spikes benefiting Biden. This information was publicly available before being removed or shared on election night.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Had over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently, what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for.
66,248 Underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters.
These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to January 20, 2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the Beverup.
Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 noncitizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed, or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
This Coven should be Banned from TV The daily lies, hypocrisy, race baiting, propaganda & all the hateful Bullshit is plenty of reason. Ass Kissing 2003 twenty yrs. later Spewing Venom. https://t.co/dtjYZ0oD0Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump defends the authenticity of his hair, despite widespread skepticism. He dismisses criticism and claims that his hair is real, although not particularly attractive. Trump accuses his interviewer of being more critical than others and asserts that his hair is truly his own. He also mentions his close relationship with someone, possibly a woman, who he finds attractive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump. Joy said the guy wears a tube. He says that it's his own hair. So I believe him because I believe Donald. He's an upstanding American.
Yeah. But America doesn't believe him. We've gotten, you know, a letter poured in yesterday. I think it's Nate. Is that really?
His hair. Oh my god. Him. Okay. You got it.
Come on. Just check it out a little bit. No. It's it. True.
It's it's real. It's not very pretty, but it's real. How did it feel like when they really attack you? They do a hair job. Really?
Your dog it. Was he? Excuse me. You attack my hair all the time. I'm getting used to you were worse than they were.
I stopped You were worse than they were. And you know what? It's you know what? Us. It's real.
It's really mine. You know? Him. We have we've gone through a few things together over the years. She is very sexy.
I wouldn't tell you. He knows how to get
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
San Antonio, Illegal Human Trafficking Center - Gets more overwhelmed with illegal invaders at night, like all things sinister, they come out in the cover of darkness. credit: @hernandoarce https://t.co/mNrTUYrEss
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, filmed in San Antonio, Texas, the speaker shows a line forming outside an overwhelmed illegal immigration human trafficking center. Despite the usual slowdown in November, illegal immigration is increasing. Once processed, the individuals are moved to another warehouse behind the airport and then flown to various locations in the interior. The speaker encounters a confrontational individual who will soon become someone's new neighbor. The footage also shows people coming from Eagle Pass and Laredo. The video ends with the speaker mentioning going up to the sidewalk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you are watching This transmission, you are the resistance. We are here in San Antonio, Texas, November 19 2023. The time, 10 PM. The illegal immigration human trafficking center is busting by the seams tonight. We've got a line forming outside the perimeter into a tent, And that's believe that's where they're processing them, stamping their papers so the NGOs can get paid by your tax dollars.
Unbelievable. This is November. Usually in November, The illegal immigration slows down because of the weather, but it's picking up. It's not slowing down. Look at this.
Look at this. They're everywhere. Overwhelmed. So what happens here is once they're processed, they'll be moving out in 2, 3 hours to the Other warehouse behind the airport, a mile 2 miles away, which I have footage of. In order to remove these people to the other warehouse, and then from there, they have their tickets airline tickets that go into the interior through the airports.
That that way, the space is open for the new illegals to come in tomorrow afternoon in the evening. That's it gets busy after 4 p after 4 PM here. This guy's got a problem with me It's illegal right there. Alright. He's giving me the finger.
This this guy is gonna be someone's new neighbor somewhere in the interior. Now he's telling me to fuck you. So you see the film, the footage over at Eagle Pass In Laredo, these are these are the people that are coming from Eagle Pass in Laredo. Unfucking believable. Okay.
I'm gonna go up to the sidewalk.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
Wakey, wakey kids!! 🇺🇸👏👏👏 https://t.co/ZjH1QB07kf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The crowd chants "We want Trump" repeatedly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We want Trump. We want Trump. We want Trump. We want Trump. We want Trump.
We want Trump.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
Security Forces & Russian National Guard has stormed the Makhachkala International Airport in Dagestan, Russia arresting the trash seeking Jews to attack. Is this 2023 or 1939 Nazi Germany?? https://t.co/LFpqddp1bN
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
This Navy SEAL does a great job pointing out just how deep the political bias & corruption in the FBI/Alphabet agencies is & how badly they need to be gutted or dismantled.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes someone for not taking a serious question seriously and suggests that it reveals their allegiances. They compare the Trump family's foreign business dealings to the Biden family's, highlighting that the Trumps actually own businesses. They argue that if the damning evidence of money laundering were against Eric and Don Jr., they would be in jail. The speaker mentions whistleblowers who have had enough and asks the other person's opinion on them. The other person expresses support for whistleblower protection and the FBI's work. The speaker questions if they feel torn like the whistleblowers, but the person denies feeling torn. The speaker finds this sad and suggests it shows their allegiances. They mention their own service and express pride in those who prioritize their oath to the country over their organization. They hope for change within the FBI to better protect the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You a serious question. Not the slightest. Well, that's that's pretty sad, ma'am. That really is. And it really shows who your allegiances are to.
It really does. And as somebody who served this country myself, I want to make a comment about something that one of my colleagues who just left the room said. You know, he made a reference to the former president of the United States and his family and their known business dealings in China and other places. You know, I found it interesting because one of the biggest Differences between the Trump family and their foreign business dealings and the Biden family and their Foreign business dealings is that the Trump family actually owns businesses. They actually own hotels and resorts, okay?
Pretty stark difference from what we're learning, what many of us knew and now we're actually learning as the oversight and judiciary committee actually get to bring in witnesses. The sad thing is for everybody in this room, everybody in this room, everybody in this town, everybody in this country knows that if the FBI and our doj have the type of damning information hard evidence, bank records, etcetera, on the money laundering that this president, his family have been up to the last couple years. And their names were Eric and Don Junior, we wouldn't even be having this hearing. You know why? They'd be in jail.
And this is exactly the type of thing I was talking about, miss Murphy. And this is exactly why so many of your colleagues have had enough And they've become whistleblowers. Miss Murphy, what do you think about that? So many of your colleagues have had enough. What do you think about the whistleblowers that just said I can't do it anymore?
I can't cover for the organization, the institution That I work for because I didn't swear an oath to them. I actually swore an oath to the United States and the constitution. What do you think about that, ma'am? Is it, do you feel like they betrayed the institution? Are you glad that they're up here?
Speaker 1: Sir, I appreciate the question. I'm proud and I'm happy that we live in a country Where there's whistleblower protection acts and that people can come forward when they think things have done been done incorrectly. Yeah, like I support the FBI. I think the FBI does amazing work.
Speaker 0: Ma'am, I think they do do some amazing work too. But I think we both know that its reputation is massively tarnished. And I think we're both glad that we have whistleblower provisions in this country. But I think if we weren't, you weren't under oath and we weren't wearing these clothes And in this room right now, and we are having a private conversation, I sure hope there's part of you that is embarrassed And disgusted with what the FBI has been up to. And I know the American people are.
I mean, look at the movies growing up. You guys are in like every movie as the hero. When you were a little girl and you were watching movies growing up, Did you notice that? Those cool blue jackets with the bright yellow lettering, the BI on it. Was that pretty cool watching those movies growing up and those TV shows and now getting to work for this organization?
Speaker 1: It's amazing to work for this organization. Yes, sir. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Is there a part of you though, is there a part of you though that feels torn ma'am? Like, Like the whistle blowers that are coming up here now in droves that just say I can't I can't do it anymore. I didn't swear an oath to the FBI. Is there a part of you that feels torn or not at all? Ma'am, I'm asking you a serious question.
Speaker 1: Sir, I'm very proud to work for the FBI. I think I stated that.
Speaker 0: I know you are. That's not what I asked you, ma'am. I asked you if you feel torn.
Speaker 1: Not at the least.
Speaker 0: Not the slightest. Mhmm. Well, that's that's pretty sad, ma'am. That really is. And it really shows who your allegiances are to.
It really does. And as somebody who served this country myself and comes I come from a very proud unit, the SEAL teams, I know that my allegiances are not to NSW naval special warfare. They're not to a SEAL team. And I am glad. I am so proud that we have men and women who see their oath to this country and they said I can't do it anymore I'm going to go try and straighten this out so that the organization that I love Can maybe, just maybe be turned around, quit being a partisan tool and actually protect the American people, which it clearly is not doing right now.
@DValory1 - David Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ
#WednesdayMotivation REMINDER: The 2020 Presidential Election was "The Most Secure in American History"
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video highlights instances of ballot irregularities in the 2020 election. It shows examples where ballots were not filled out correctly, yet still counted for Joe Biden. It also mentions a ballot that was thrown out, which had votes for Donald Trump and other Republican candidates. According to Just the News, many adjudicated ballots had marks removed next to Trump's name, allowing for additional marks next to Biden's name. In total, 1,341 marks were removed, which accounts for over 11% of the votes in a race decided by 11,779 votes. The video suggests that this is just one type of fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1,820 of which Just the News was able to review. Just take a look at how they were accounted for. Now this solid right here, the circle next to president Trump's name is filled in, albeit outside of the lines. Well, there is a simple check mark next to Joe Biden. But guess who that ballot went to?
You guessed it. Joe Biden. Even though right above that very language, it says on the ballot, completely fill in the empty oval to the left of the candidate name or choice in all races you wish to vote. And under the warnings, the warning says do not use check marks or x to mark ballot. But when this voter did check, Biden gets another vote.
And here's another. Just take a look at this. Both the circle next to president Trump's and Biden's names are filled in. But who did the vote go to? Why Joe Biden?
And here's another. The voter selects Biden and libertarian Joe Jorgensen. Who does the vote go to? Biden. Oh, but wait.
Here's another so called spoiled ballot. Spoiled because the voter chose president Trump and Trump alone. But guess who the vote went to. Wait a second. No one.
The ballot was actually thrown out. And the voters votes for Donald Trump for president and David Perdue and Doug Collins for senate were thrown out. And that ballot doesn't even look spoiled, does it? Or was it spoiled because it spoiled the Democrats' plans to rig and cheat and steal a presidential election. And according to Just the News, it wasn't just 1 ballot here or 1 ballot there.
No scores of adjudicated ballots ultimately were resolved with the notation removed mark next to Trump's name. In most cases, allowing a second mark next to Biden's named account. Of course, they go on to say, but at times, it happened in reverse too or to the detriment of third party candidates. But the fact is, in total, 1,341 marks were removed. And these are only the adjudicated ballots we know of.
In a race decided by 11,779 votes, that's over 11%. And, again, that's just one type of fraud.