reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @EMichaelJones1
@EMichaelJones1 - E. Michael Jones
Syria on the brink. IDF forces have now reached the outskirts of Damascus. What happens when they make contact with Julani and the HTS? If there is open conflict, as the HTS has promised, this means Hezbollah, Turkey, and Iran will be drawn into the fighting
@EMichaelJones1 - E. Michael Jones
The real story of what happened to the German people during World War II continues to be erased. In Dresden, a memorial inscription about the bombing of the city by the American and British Air Forces in February 1945 was removed. The firebombing of Dresden was the real holocaust. Hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians were "burnt whole." Read #TheHolocaustNarrative for the full story of how the Jews stole the narrative from the Catholics.
@EMichaelJones1 - E. Michael Jones
On Monday, October 30, CNN and Fox ran reports of grieving family members from Lewiston, Maine, who had lost relatives in “the most lethal act of firearms violence in the state’s history.” Three days earlier, the perpetrator had been found dead inside a cargo trailer parked on the lot of a recycling plant where he once worked. Every death diminishes me, as John Donne once said, but no matter how much we mourn for the dead, we need to put a stop to the pernicious undercurrent beneath the mourning which claims that the people who died in Lewiston, Maine were somehow innocent victims. No one on either Fox or CNN was willing to state the obvious. These people deserved to die. Let me list three reasons why. First of all, every single victim was white. As Noel Ignatiev, the late Harvard professor once put it, decent people need to unite to “Abolish the white race – by any means necessary.” Robert R. Card, the lone deranged gunman in this case, was only carrying what Ignatiev advocated to its logical conclusion, a conclusion shared by virtually every proponent of Critical Race Theory in the United States. The second reason all of these people deserved to die is that all of the so-called victims were engaged in bowling when they were killed. Bowling, those of us who are old enough to remember its halcyon days know, was an exclusively white activity in a country which still had laws upholding segregation in many southern states at the time. Finally—and here I come to the main reason why all of these people deserved to die—Lewiston voted for Donald Trump. Unmentioned in any of the reporting on the Lewiston Bowling alley shooting was the fact that Donald Trump carried Maine’s second congressional district, which encompasses Lewiston and virtually the entire geographical area of the state of Maine in 2016 and 2020. Maine’s second congressional district is, as you probably suspected, 90.9 percent white. I know that this conclusion will shock many people, but I am not alone in holding these views, nor should these views be considered hate speech. If they were they would have been banned from YouTube, but even though Alain Soral faces jail time for calling a journalist a “fat lesbian,” Ben Shapiro can advocate Palestinian genocide in Gaza with impunity on YouTube. YouTube also regularly features Jews angered over the current war in Gaza calling for the extermination of Palestinians with impunity. So, it can’t be hate speech, at least as YouTube defines the term. More importantly, however, I base my claim that there were no innocent victims in the Lewiston bowling alley shootings on the writings of that distinguished moral theologian, Rabbi Dov Fischer, who opined in an article entitled “What Israel Needs to do Now” in the American Spectator that all of the residents of Dresden including all non-combatants, refugees, women and children deserved to die because “the German citizens of Dresden freely voted to make Hitler their democratically elected leader.” If that is the case, then the bowlers in Lewiston deserved to die for voting for Donald Trump. Given Rabbi Fischer’s premises, no other conclusion is possible. According to Rabbi Fischer’s Talmudic moral theology, that means that “it is imperative” to “exterminate Hamas” even if this means killing innocent civilians, i.e. babies, in Gaza because “Hamas controls Gaza” in 2023 every bit as much as the Nazis controlled Dresden in 1945. If everyone in Gaza, including women and children, deserves to die “because the population of Gaza have voted for them [Hamas] repeatedly,” as Rabbi Fischer puts it, then I see no reason why the citizens of Lewiston shouldn’t be gunned down for voting for Donald Trump. As Rabbi Fischer would put it, the white people who were gunned down while bowling in Lewiston “are no more innocent than German voters in Dresden who elected Hitler” or the Palestinian babies who are dying under the rubble created by Israeli bombing runs in Gaza. I know many of my readers may find this conclusion unpalatable and morally repugnant, but it flows logically from the Talmudic thinking that determines our current foreign policy. More importantly it comes from distinguished Jewish rabbis, who can say with Secretary of State Blinken that they have relatives who died in the Holocaust. As I have pointed out in my recent book #TheHolocaustNarrative, the Holocaust has been used to justify crimes against humanity ever since the founding of the state of Israel. So, it must be true in some sense that that the goyische kop may not understand but should follow, nonetheless.
@EMichaelJones1 - E. Michael Jones
Great article. https://mouqawamahmusic.net/red-china-is-jew-china-the-disturbing-origins-of-chinese-communism-and-the-deepening-chinese-israeli-ties-of-today/ The conclusion is inescapable: In conclusion–and a damn clear conclusion at that–there’d be no communism in China without the contributions of these Jews and many others still to be discovered and documented. From the subversive efforts of Gayn and Kuczynski, to the state-building efforts of Epstein, Chandler and Shapiro, to the primordial efforts of Stern and the godfather of them all, Voitinsky. Also, China would not have become the world power it is today if Henry Kissinger hadn’t opened up the doors to trade. Moving further forward, as discussed at the start, we see China becoming disturbingly more ingratiated with the ‘Israeli’ entity in the fields of military, intelligence and technology cooperation as time goes on–no doubt an extension of Jewish-Chinese familiarity going back almost a century.
