TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ElanderNews
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
WEF - Klaus Schwab & Biden 2016. The Middle classes are holding back the 4th Industrial Revolution. The poor can be bribed, the elites stand to gain & the ordinary people will need to be forced against their will, to comply. Oh … https://t.co/5eVUtaXcpa
Video Transcript AI Summary
The main challenge of the fourth industrial revolution is the decline of the middle class.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To our discussion which, we had, 10 or 2 2 days ago. So 4th industrial revolution has one big challenge. It is the holding out of the middle class.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
AL GORE - At COP28. Listen carefully. He says Democracy is under threat because citizens are no longer all getting the same print news (propaganda) Algorithms (that governments can’t control) are threatening democracy. It’s like he thinks we are stupid or insane … oh https://t.co/aQe41iOhNY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the transition from broadcasting to the internet and social media has disrupted the balance necessary for representative democracy to function effectively. They argue that algorithms on social media platforms lead people into echo chambers, similar to being trapped in a rabbit hole. This creates a distorted reality and hinders collective reasoning. The speaker suggests that these algorithms should be banned as they abuse the public forum. They also mention the weaponization of another form of AI, artificial Hannity, which further exacerbates the problem. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To 1 based on broadcasting and then moving on to the Internet and to social media has disrupted the balances that used to exist, that made representative democracy work much better. Because a free self governing people rely on a shared base of knowledge that serves as a basis for reasoning together collectively. But, If you have social media that is dominated by algorithms that pull people down these rabbit holes that are a bit like pitcher plants. These algorithms, they are the digital equivalent of AR fifteens. They ought to be banned.
They really ought to be banned. It's an abuse of the public forum. But when these when people are pulled down these rabbit holes, you know what's at the bottom of the rabbit hole, that's where the echo chamber is. And if you spend too much time in the echo chamber, what's weaponized is another form of AI, not artificial intelligence, artificial Hannity. I'm serious.
I'm serious.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
COVID ENQUIRY - The foregone conclusion of this charade, is that we should have locked down sooner & harder. Ignoring all contra science. And then it will decide that only the WHO has the skills to run global heath And this is what that means 👇🏻 https://t.co/GOgKmCGmCO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. They argue that proposed regulations would give the WHO more power, including the ability to make binding recommendations and enforce financial contributions from countries for pandemic response. The regulations could also require the sharing of intellectual property, mandate vaccine production and international sharing, and override national safety approval processes. Another speaker highlights the agility of the UK's response to COVID-19 after leaving the European Union and suggests it as a model for the future. The speaker warns that the WHO's powers could include ordering border closures, travel restrictions, contact tracing, forced quarantining, medical examinations, proof of vaccination, and forced medication, even in potential emergencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, we know about the WHO. We know it's unaccountable nature. The director general appointed through an opaque, nondemocratic process, too much power for international pharmaceutical companies. And these regulations propose the creation of a vast public health surveillance mechanism at public expense, but also if the WHO itself is anything to go by, it would be substantially funded by the pharmaceutical industry. And, crucially, as my friend from Don Valley just mentioned, It proposes that if the existing powers for the WHO to make recommendations about what countries should do, should be upgraded from nonbinding to binding recommendations.
So it it amounts to a vast transfer of power to the WHO. And what would these new regulations enable? Legally binding obligations on countries to mandate financial contributions to fund pandemic response activities. It could require the surrender of intellectual property and technologies. It could mandate the manufacture and international sharing of vaccines.
That override national safety approval processes for vaccines, gene based therapies, medical devices and diagnostics.
Speaker 1: How would you give way? Thank you for giving way. Does my honourable friend agree with me that it was through the ability to react to COVID in a very agile way, which was only possible, having exited the European Union at the time, that we were able to invest, procure and then roll out the vaccine that did, in fact, to save millions of lives? And shouldn't this be a model, as he has, in fact, stated in his eminently sensible speech, as usual, that this should be a model for moving forward?
Speaker 0: Prime Minister May I agree to my honourable friend, and it's certainly the case, in my opinion, that the best aspects of the British government's response, but the ones that we we're able to undertake using our own sovereignty, and I agree with that. The the the powers for the WHO extend, potentially, to ordering border closures on countries, travel restrictions, tracing of contacts, refusal of entry, forced quarantining, medical examinations, including requirements for proof of vaccination, and even the forced medication of individuals. And it's not just when there is indeed a pandemic already declared that these powers might be invoked, is when there is simply the potential for such an emergency. The WHO claims this power.
reSee.it AI Summary
Humans contribute only 3% of global CO2 emissions. The current global CO2 level is 0.03% to 0.04%. However, plants need at least 0.02% to survive. In greenhouses, the optimal level is 0.15%+. Let's ask more questions about net zero.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
NET ZERO - The people making civilisational changes can’t even answer basic questions. For clarity ◾️Humans are responsible for 3% of global CO2 ◾️Global CO2 is 0.03% to 0.04% currently ◾️At 0.02 plants stop photosynthesis and die ◾️Optimal level for plant life in greenhouses is 0.15%+ Ask more questions ‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks the audience to guess what percentage of our atmosphere is made up of carbon dioxide (CO2). After some guesses, the speaker reveals that the actual percentage is 0.04%, which has increased slightly over the past few decades. The speaker emphasizes that this small change in CO2 is what is causing concern about climate change. They also mention that if the CO2 levels drop below 0.02%, it could negatively impact plant life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Down the vine real fast. What percent of our atmosphere is CO 2? Take your best guess. You don't have to be accurate all down the line. Repeat that question.
What percent of our atmosphere is CO2, carbon dioxide? Wild guess. It's okay. I'll buy 5%. 5?
I'll just follow you. Vacation causes 49% of c o two, so that's why we're all working on energy transition. Alright. So what number you think it is? 5.
5? How about you? I didn't hear you, miss Dreyer. 7. 7.
Do you have 1, mister Boyd? So we got a 57, Price is Right. 8, I'm going to hit the high end. All right. Well, I appreciate that.
And I don't mean to put you on ice, I ask A lot of people that because all we hear is climate change, climate change, CO2, CO2. I heard a couple of you on the panel saying you're looking to change your vehicles to electric, even though we don't have the electric grid. And me as a farmer, I wouldn't be real happy about running out and replacing $300,000, $500,000, $1,000,000 pieces of equipment because someone wants someone wants it to be electric. The answer is 0.04%. Not 1%, not a half of a percent.
It's 0.04%. And it's gone up from 0.03 over the last couple for decades. This is what we're being all contorted into doing is this tiny change in CO2. If we go if we get below 0.02, plant life starts dying off. So
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
‼️WHO - Pandemic Treaty negotiations start again today! The UK government is refusing to reveal the names of those MPs negotiating on Britains behalf! Listen to what the WHO is demanding. And now ask yourself what your government is hiding?‼️ https://t.co/YRAiARuErf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing human life compared to animals. (148 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director, then the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject, if if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI, was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the states so there are no longer recommendations, but enforceable. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists.
He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health.
Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals. And I've got the quote there from The Lancet in January.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
NET ZERO - “You can’t be an environmentalist and support Wind and Solar power.” If the solution is worse than the problem then it is your duty to question the ‘science’ https://t.co/W7YWmIjOKG
Video Transcript AI Summary
To make a wind turbine, you need a large amount of iron ore, concrete, and steel. The concrete production emits carbon dioxide, and the steel requires rare earth elements, which are often sourced from China and come with environmental concerns. Additionally, the cobalt used in wind turbines is often mined by child slaves in dangerous conditions in the Congo. The turbine blades are made from balsa wood obtained by clearing parts of the Amazon forest, and they contain a toxic chemical called Bisphenol A. These blades cannot be recycled and end up as landfill, polluting the soil and water. Supporting wind and solar power means supporting pollution, slavery, and environmental damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To start with a wind turbine, you need about 30,000 tons of iron ore, about 30,000 tons of concrete. To make concrete, you need to get limestone and shale, cook it up. Limestone's got 44% carbon dioxide in it. That carbon dioxide goes in the atmosphere, you sinter it, then you grind it up, and you have cement. You then got to quarry stone to make the aggregate, to make your concrete.
You then got to transport that 30,000 tonnes just for the foundation for 1 turbine. So you use a lot of concrete to make a wind turbine. You use a lot of steel to make a wind turbine. But then you get into the generator. Now the generator uses rare earth element magnets.
We used to have magnets made out of iron. We then found it would be better to have an iron cobalt magnet. We now find that magnets made out of rare earth elements are much better. Rare earth elements mainly come from are part of China, Bayer and Orbul, and that rare earth element, ore, is quite rich in uranium and thorium. I've been to Byron Allborn, it is probably the greatest environmental disaster in the world.
The uranium and thorium material are just thrown everywhere. So if you're using wind powered electricity, you are actually responsible for a huge amount of pollution by uranium and thorium in China, but they're Chinese, let's not worry about that. You can't be an environmentalist. Now, that's in the magnets. We also have cobalt in those wind turbines.
And that cobalt, most of it is mined by slaves who are children, who are working in dangerous open pits and underground in the Congo for Chinese groups. So If you want to support wind power, you're supportive slavery, the same as if you're supporting solar power, the solar panels are made by Uyghur slaves in China. So if you want to be supporting renewables, you're supporting slavery, you're supporting massive pollution of uranium and storing. And then you look at the turbine blades, and they're made out of balsa wood laminated with epoxy. That balsa wood you get from clear filling parts of the Amazon forest to get your bolster wood.
So of course, you're a good environmentalist, you want to have renewable power, bugger the Amazon, you just clear fella and get the balsa wood. And then in the epoxy, there's a chemical called Bisphenol A that's incredibly toxic. Most countries in the world have banned the use of it. This comes out of China in the laminate turbine blades. Those blades cannot be recycled.
Those blades are eroding all the time and spreading this bisphenol everywhere in soils and waterways around the turbine blades. And then when the turbine blade has finished its useful life, which is much shorter than we're told, they get cut up and used as landfill. And so the best fennel A gets into soil and gets into water. You cannot possibly be an environment and support wind and solar power.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
U.K. - The Home office is a shambles. Unable to produce any deportation figures at all, for any period and they’ve lost 17,300 people. Complete incompetence from the top down. This would be totally unacceptable in a private business. https://t.co/7Dh6TLhpy4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the number of asylum seekers who have been refused and sent back to their country or a third country in the past three years. They express disbelief at the lack of information provided by the big boss, stating that it is staggering. They suggest looking at figures from the last year, last week, and the last six months, emphasizing the constant return of people through chartered flights and other means. The speaker also mentions their intention to write to obtain specific numbers. They conclude by criticizing the big boss's lack of knowledge on various topics discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Put foreign offenders aside and Albanians aside, just forget about those numbers, how many traveling on small boats has been refused asylum have been sent to a third country or back to their own of the past 3 years? I don't think we have I don't I think we'll right to agree with those numbers, Mr. Anderson. Last quarter, I was staggering. So So Okay.
Then let's do it. Go for the last year. I don't have a number for non Albanian, non That's not be able to help you. Let's do last week then. Do we have any figures about anything?
Yes. In the last 6 months? Just how many in the last 6 months? As Simon said, there are chartered flights and Other ways of doing returns the whole time, constantly, and we can give you whatever time line. People are coming here, who are being refused asylum.
On the order of the pew, how many was sent back last month? We'll write to those numbers. I'm sorry, but I find it absolutely staggering that the big boss hasn't got a clue, not just on this question, but nearly every other question with us today.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
WEF - Prophet Yuval Harani, excitedly explaining the death of privacy. “for the first time in history it is possible to eliminate privacy” State control over every aspect of society and every aspect of your life. Through Digital ID, you will be forced to do as you are told. https://t.co/d3IG16tx5z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Throughout history, the debate between privacy and security has persisted. However, a new development has emerged. For the first time ever, privacy can be entirely eradicated. This represents a significant shift, as in the past, dictators and tyrants have longed for the ability to monitor and control every aspect of individuals' lives, including their thoughts and emotions. Yet, this desire remained unattainable due to technological limitations. Now, that barrier has been broken, and complete surveillance is within reach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Privacy versus security is as old as civilization, you can say. But there is something new now. For the first time in history, it's possible to completely eliminate privacy. It was just never possible before and it is possible now, something fundamental has changed. When dictators always dreamt about completely eliminating privacy, monitoring everybody all the time and knowing everything you do and not just everything you do, but even everything you you think in everything you feel.
Whether it's a tyrant in ancient Greece or whether it's Stalin, they always dreamt about it. They could never do it because it was technically impossible. Now it's possible
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
WEF - If people refuse to give up meat they will have to be forced to through human engineering, by making them intolerant. Perhaps through mosquito bites. Well this isn’t terrifying at all 👀 https://t.co/4Zq4Mcm0wB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people are unwilling to give up meat, even though reducing meat consumption would greatly benefit the planet. This is due to a weakness of will and the enjoyment they derive from eating meat. However, human engineering could potentially help address this issue. For instance, by making people intolerant to certain types of meat proteins, similar to how some individuals are intolerant to milk or crayfish. An example of this is the long star tick, which can cause individuals to develop an allergy to meat. Through human engineering, we may be able to tackle significant global problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'll give 2 examples. So one is that people eat too much meat, right? And if they were to cut down on their consumption on meat, then they would, it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up meat. Yeah.
You know, some people will be willing to, but other people, they may be willing to, but they sort of, they have a weakness of will. They say, wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I am one of those, by the way. So, but, so here is the thought, right?
So it turns out that we know a lot about, so we have this intolerance to, so I, for example, I have milk intolerance. And there some people are intolerant to crayfish. So possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, so certain kinds of bovine, bovine proteins. And there's actually analogs of this in light. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.
I can sort of describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do through human engineering. We can kind of possibly address really big world problems through human engineering.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
WHO - Whilst you are distracted John Kerry’s daughter is shifting the WHO remit to make Climate Change a Health Control issue. 'The climate crisis is a health crisis’ How you live, eat and even walk! All decided for you by the unelected WHO, under the new IHR regulations. https://t.co/MHeTpitB1z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The climate crisis is a health crisis, as we've learned in recent years. Air pollution alone causes 7 million deaths annually, surpassing the entire COVID pandemic over three years. That's equivalent to one person dying every five seconds. Climate change affects every aspect of our health and daily lives. We need a health-centered approach to address this urgent issue and protect our way of living, breathing, and moving. The appointment is an opportunity to emphasize the urgency we face.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have learned with great, great understanding in the most recent years that the climate crisis is a health crisis. And already we see 7,000,000 people a year dying from air pollution, for example. That's more than we saw in the entire COVID pandemic over 3 years. And that's 1 person every 5 seconds. So that by the time I complete my next sentence, someone else will have died.
And we see this in every aspect of health, The way climate change is impacting, our, our lived experience. And so there's a very real opportunity for us to have a health centered approach to climate change And to be able to ensure that we're protecting how we live, how we breathe, how we walk, and and and what we can do in our lives. And so The appointment, I think, is truly just an opportunity to, continue to really flag the urgency of what we face.
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists urge WHO to declare a global health emergency, granting the organization extensive control over all living beings. Proposed changes to IHR & Pandemic Treaty align with this demand, coinciding with upcoming negotiations. #WHO #GlobalHealthEmergency #Scientists
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
‼️WHO - Scientists demand the WHO declare a Health emergency for the planet! Under proposed changes to the IHR & the Pandemic Treaty the WHO will have almost total control over all living things! How timely that ‘scientists’ should call for this declaration now, just before the negotiating teams reconvene.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
SOUTH AFRICA - Has published their Pfizer vaccine contract. 💥Efficacy = UNKNOWN 💥Adverse events = UNKNOWN 💥Long term side effects = UNKNOWN Governments forced citizens to take medication they said was “safe and effective “ But they didn’t know if it was or not! https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/OCRPfizer-1_Redacted.pdf
Page not found - Health Justice Initiative (HJI)
healthjusticeinitiative.org.za
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
‼️WHO - Pandemic Treaty & IHR amendments. The UK government is refusing to reveal the names of the MPs negotiating on Britains behalf? Listen to what the WHO is demanding. Now ask yourself what your government is hiding?‼️ https://t.co/YRAiARuErf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, restrict freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health would give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing humans compared to animals. (150 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director, then the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject, if if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI, was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the states so there are no longer recommendations, but enforceable. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists.
He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health.
Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals. And I've got the quote there from The Lancet in January.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
UN & WEF - The SDG plan ends in Corporate control of all Earth’s inventory Land Water Animals Minerals Plants Construction Production Food Energy Information Humans The legal theft of everything by global companies
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to control all means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, sustainable development is not just about recycling and creating resources for all. It involves relocating populations to concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. Agenda 21 is implemented through public-private partnerships, which is a form of fascism. It seeks to establish a one-world government and total control from a central unit. This corporatocracy is currently being developed globally, but there is still an opportunity to stand up and fight for freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United Nations Agenda 21, Sustainable Development. It is the inventory and control plan. All means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan.
It's called the agenda for the 21st century. And so many of us around the world think that sustainable development just sounds so great, isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas.
It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government In order to dictate and regulate what it is that happens around the world, regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization, And globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to to control them all. And the goal of Agenda 21 is 1 world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implemented on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, non governmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate.
This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world, while we are moving towards the end game, we are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
WEF - Klaus Schwab and Biden 2016. The Middle classes are holding back the 4th Industrial Revolution. The poor can be bribed, the elites stand to gain but the ordinary person will need to be forced against their will. Focus.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In our recent discussion, we highlighted a major challenge posed by the fourth industrial revolution: the decline of the middle class.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To our discussion which, we had, 10 or 2 2 days ago. So 4th industrial revolution has one big challenge. It is the holding out of the middle class.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
LONDON - we have a problem.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
ISRAEL- Palestinian terrorist Group releases a video showing Israeli women beaten and in the back of their truck. Captured and being taken back to Gaza, their fate in the hands of cheering men! Women raped & murdered as spoils of war!
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
CHINA - China opens its new coal transportation rail network. 100 new coal fired power stations to add to the 3095 all needed to provide the West with products, including solar panels. So we can pretend we are carbon neutral.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
CLIMATE CHANGE - Oops! The Cloud seeding ‘conspiracy theory’ that isn’t happening, we … isn’t working as intended. The Tasmanian Governments experiments appear to have resulted in a 1-in-50-year flood
Video Transcript AI Summary
Residents in southern Tasmania are questioning the decision to conduct cloud seeding over the Derwent River catchment before the recent severe floods. Cloud seeding, a method to enhance rainfall, was carried out by Hydro Tasmania despite weather warnings. Farmers are concerned that this technique may have exacerbated the flooding. To address these concerns, the premier has stated that a formal inquiry will be conducted to investigate the effects and management of the floods, if deemed necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Residents in southern Tasmania are demanding to know why cloud seeding was conducted over the Derwent River catchment the day before the worst floods in 40 years. Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain. Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight despite the weather warnings. Farmers believe the technique could have made the flooding worse. The premier says a formal inquiry will be held into the effects and handling of the floods if it's necessary.
@ElanderNews - Elander & the News
15/ It's not hard to see why Tech Giants want to tap this data & why Governments may be tempted to roll out similar systems, in the name of Health. Covid vaccine passports are the start of an encroachment into person freedoms. We need to be vigilant. It must not happen. /End.
@bernie_voice - Bernie's Voice.
CONTROL - you knew it was coming because the NGO proposals, buried deep in government websites, has been there for the last 3 years. YOU must sacrifice your lifestyle but the rich won’t have to. One short haul flight per year! … Did you vote for this?
@balancealways - Bernie's Tweets
U.K. - ULEZ Lies!! Sadiq Kahn says rumours of the Pay per mile scheme are “nonsense” Yet on Transport for London’s own website are the details stating when these measures will be introduced. All lies. The parities have colluded to subvert democracy. Pay attention!
@balancealways - Bernie's Tweets
HAWAII - Maui’s police chief puts a journalist in a head lock and refuses to answer questions about how many of the missing are children. Silence from the media and devastating for the families.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confronts someone, possibly a police officer, about the identification of cadavers. They demand answers about the number of children among the deceased, but the person refuses to provide any information. The speaker becomes frustrated and accuses the person of pushing them. They continue to press for answers, but the person remains uncooperative. Another person expresses disappointment in the response and criticizes the speaker for their behavior. The confrontation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Confirm it. So we're not gonna ask we're not gonna ask you a question. How many of these 10 cadavers are perfect. Now it's fucking formidable. Okay?
So first choice over. Okay? Get your pieces there. So he's not gonna he's not gonna answer me. I'm done.
Person here. Thank you. They take pictures of me. There's no need for acting. You're you're with Maui police.
Right? Yeah. He's done with the first couple. Appreciate your patience. Yeah.
Get out of my way. Who are you? You're some police department. Okay. And what's my crime?
You're literally pushing me. The 1st conference is over. Care of. The 1st conference is over. Get out of the way.
I'm sorry. Alright. So, sir, a 10 cadavers, but we can't identify we can't identify how many of them are children. Listen. Get out of my country.
Can do get off my toes. We're not, sir. No. I'm not gonna get You're not. No.
I'm not gonna get it. Okay. I'm not gonna get it. No. I'm not doing anything illegal.
I'm trying to ask a fucking question. We can't get the answer for it. How many of the 110 dead or children? You know you know who are children. They're cadavers.
You have the bodies. You know how many of them are children. How many children are dead? The deputies. How many children are dead, mayor?
So you're just you're just not gonna tell I don't know. I was just asking. How many children are sick. You know I knew the answer to that. I'd be happy to answer that.
You have no estimate of how many children are missing? I can't give you an address right now. You guys all we can say that about you. You ruined it forever. Welcome to Jared.
You're the leader. You can say whatever you want. You're a disaster. Alright. Okay.
You've been the worst mayor we can possibly imagine.
Speaker 1: Respect Respect what? The most dismal response we have ever had.
Speaker 0: You won't wait for your turn. If you wanna shout over these guys, they're
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM- Where governments are controlled by large corporations. Unelected, unaccountable and unstoppable. Shaping society without bothering to ask you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
State Street, BlackRock, and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in 88% of companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone is worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern repeats in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially have a monopoly. They have immense control, being able to fire boards and replace CEOs. This raises concerns about monopoly laws, as even a 50% market share is considered a monopoly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 88% of the companies on S&P 500, the largest shareholder is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000?
Only 2 countries have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has. US and China. That's how big BlackRock is. And then you See their influence in defense contracts. If you Google top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, Vanguard.
Okay. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical. And you're like, wait a minute.
These guys essentially have a monopoly. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like.
But they say 50% is a monopoly law. That is already a monopoly.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
CANADA - The Police confront an ordinary citizen at his home for criticising Trudeau online. “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” This is not democracy, it’s a dictatorship
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, Ryan Davidson, is being questioned by an Integrated National Security Enforcement Team about his online posts regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Davidson claims he is seeking a lawful remedy for what he perceives as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. He expresses concerns about the well-being of citizens and offers to contribute to investigations. Davidson criticizes Trudeau's government and accuses him of being propped up by a terrorist. He calls for an independent civilian to oversee the RCMP investigation. The security team warns Davidson about making inflammatory statements and confirms that they have no interest in stifling his speech. Davidson insists on continuing to voice his opinions until the issues are resolved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The background about why I'm here. 3rd Can
Speaker 1: you just, state your name again,
Speaker 0: please, sir? Ryan Davidson. From? Integrated National Security Enforcement Team. Thank you.
So we had received information about post online in which you are making statements about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Things about like Being hung for treason, drawn in quartering, and, that sort of thing. So I'm just here to talk
Speaker 1: to you about that. So what do you wanna talk about?
Speaker 0: Well, I wanted to let you know that you're getting dangerously close to making thermal threats with these kinds of posts. And if you post that kind of stuff online
Speaker 1: I think all of my claims were that I would seek a lawful remedy.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: I I understand that. So so unless it's reasonable to seek a lawful remedy, then I don't see it as a threat. I'm seeking a lawful remedy for what I view As a criminal conspiracy with the, Communist Party of China. Okay.
Speaker 0: I understand.
Speaker 1: There's some serious things going on. You're wearing an ear loop mask which doesn't protect against viruses. Okay. I'm a sound mind. I'm, I'm a 10th generation pre Confederation Mhmm.
Person of the
Speaker 0: land.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm concerned about the well-being of my citizens, And I believe that we've got some problems, and they need to be investigated. I've offered my services To the authorities, okay, to come in and talk about anything and everything. I'll, answer all the questions. You will not, keep me, but I offer a conversation where we can talk about all of these things, we can talk about who's working on what to investigate what's going on.
Now Justin Justin Trudeau right now has a minority Government that is being propped up by a guy that is, a terrorist in his home country Of India. We're talking about Jagmeet Singh. Okay? And there's a lot of bullshit going on. Nobody knows where all the money's going.
All of the, Ottawa long term Ottawa reporters Are being blocked by, federal politicians. We've got, I I don't recall his name off the top of my head. I saw it this morning. But, Blacklock's reporter has been on scene. He's from Edmonton, lives in Ottawa.
He's been on scene reporting on what's going on in parliament, and there's some serious shit going down. Mhmm. So I want that investigated as a citizen. Then I will contribute to the investigation. I'm a 10th generation person of this land.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Okay? There is no reason to think I would not care about you, sir you, sir, or my fellow citizens. Okay? Mhmm. I'm not a terrorist.
I'm not a, bad guy. Mhmm. However the fuck I may address?
Speaker 0: I don't think you're a bad guy.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm Good. Talk to you. We have an understanding then. So here
Speaker 0: to talk You Okay. What you had said about
Speaker 1: prime minister Trudeau. Well, mister Trudeau is is is in a heap of shit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Phil, could could you just let me finish about my understanding of the situation? Okay. I'm sorry. That's okay.
So basically, like, I understand that in these Post, you were saying that with a government change, the reinstatement of the death penalty and that sort of thing. You're talking about Both carrying MPDOCK lawfully.
Speaker 1: I am talking about investigating the prime minister for the crimes that he has committed already. He appointed Brenda Lucky, and Brenda Lucky needs to recuse herself from office. And we need to put in an independent civilian To oversee the RCMP investigation of what is going on in this country.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you can't be calling for the hanging, drawing, and Ordering
Speaker 1: I'm, I'm merely expressing opinion of what the future looks like because once that civilian investigator is put in place, There is going to be an investigation. It's going to be in the public eye. And traitors and treasonous people to the people of Canada, not the crown, but the to the people of Canada, Will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, present or future.
Speaker 0: I under
Speaker 1: That is my statement. I'm a peaceful person. Mhmm. Okay. I'm a I I'm a 25 year IT veteran.
Okay. I'm a Bill Gates protege. That's what's kept me surviving all of these years. Okay. Okay.
And the man is a dangerous man. Okay. He's doing things that are not with consent of the people. He's hiring the crown, and we're gonna get this motherfucker.
Speaker 0: So I understand what you're telling me. I understand that you're making a government change, but once you start making statements about Killing the prime minister.
Speaker 1: Well, they're forward looking statements. They're speculative. It's free expression. I think the laws are gonna change because people are gonna start listening to me.
Speaker 0: I understand that. Yes. If you make these statements and put them online, that national security teams like us are gonna keep
Speaker 1: Wonderful. I wanna make friends with you guys. I I wanna make friends with you guys because I'm interested in national security. And right now, that is under question, under the authority of the crown, under authority of Justin Trudeau with his minority government and this foreign fucking terrorist, something's going on. You bring CSIS down to my fucking door, and let's come in, Have a conversation.
Off you boys a cigar and a fucking and a and a and a whiskey, and we sit down, and we have talk like a man. And, and we talk about how we're going to save our fucking country, okay? You see my house? This is a country in distress. I've made a declaration of independence to my MP.
I'm a Metis, 10th generation Metis. Okay. I'm making an independence claim.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: You guys don't have authority over me. This is now, you need to send diplomats to
Speaker 0: my fucking door, and we're gonna have a talk. Okay. But the fact remains, like I said,
Speaker 1: You make inflammatory statements like these online, and other people wind up taking taking action. Listen. Opinions are like assholes, and some have really big Opinions. Yes. But
Speaker 0: if you're inspiring hatred or
Speaker 1: I'm not no. No. Listen. I'm not inspiring hatred. Justin Trudeau is bringing hatred upon himself By not allowing the truth to come out.
Okay? We see what's going on. This has become a dictatorship. I don't I was not born in a dictatorship. I'm a Free, sovereign Canadian.
Mhmm. Okay? Just like Deepenbaker, I am Canadian. I am Free to choose who leads my country. I am free to see to say to speak my mind.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Okay? Free expression. I am not inciting anyone else to any other action other than gathering together to stand up against the oppression, Call for legal changes, begin the investigation, change the laws if necessary to punish everybody within the full extent of the law. Do you understand? Now people that are destroying our country are going to be held accountable.
What that accountability looks like in the future is anyone's guess. I may speculate freely as my right to free expression. There is a charter of rights that Justin Trudeau's father put into place, but there's also a bill of rights, and the Alberta bill of rights trumps Well the Canadian Charter.
Speaker 0: Perhaps in the Future, you can avoid such inflammatory rhetoric as speaking of drawing a quarter and hanging in that
Speaker 1: Well, they're they're they're right now working on Shutting down our free speech. That is very concerning to me. So why don't you charge me with a thought crime or send CSIS my door so we can investigate these motherfuckers because no. Listen. Listen.
I am Canadian. I'm pre Canadian. I was born here. I'm in the place of my birth. I stand up for the truth.
If if I have to be a fucking rebel To stand up for the truth. If I have to be a fucking rebel, then I'm then I'm the devil himself. Do you see? You guys punch that code in anytime. You wanna fucking come in my door.
Do you understand?
Speaker 0: Well
Speaker 1: Now it's time for you to leave. You are now trespassing, sir. Send CSIS back to my door. Please leave. It's time for you to go.
Speaker 0: You understand we have no interest in coming into your house or arresting you this time
Speaker 1: I do understand that. I want you to send someone with authority to my door to tell me how they are going to help me Stand up for my country against what's going on. And if you can't do that, then you shall not return because my language will Stay consistent. My opinion is an opinion only. I am not inciting violence.
I am a peaceful person.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. And that's I think that's what we wanted to confirm, mister Primo, today.
Speaker 1: Yes. I've confirmed that many times with many different levels of authority. You keep sending them until somebody takes me seriously, And we start looking into the criminal, the corruption and the criminality that's going on right now. This is not my Canada. This last 5 years, this is not my Canada.
This place has been turned upside down, and I'm fed up.
Speaker 0: We're more interested in having a conversation with you confirming your thought process as to whether or not you have any intent to carry out any such for whatever
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. I I intend to continue going out into public to demonstrate against this bullshit And to continue to try and build relationships with authority figures that are actually gonna put it to an end because it's not based on Science. This is all propaganda. It seems like a communist communist takeover. I want it to come to an end.
I've got international Companies interfering in my political process, my ability to communicate online, and I am pissed, and I've had enough.
Speaker 0: Pardon me one second. Hello? Yep. Yeah. Everything's good.
Just keep us where we are. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Alright. So I'm gonna continue, voicing my free expression until you guys come and either charge me with thoughtcrime or you bring some people here to tell you how to serious about how we're gonna put this to an end.
Speaker 0: Thing is 5 times. So No. But there will be. There will be one day. Always been charging you for what you think.
We have no interest in stifling your speech
Speaker 1: No. But you're here, aren't you?
Speaker 0: We're concerned about the rhetoric. That's why. Talking about hanging the prime minister, talking about drawing even the prime minister. I understand that it's
Speaker 1: We hang we hang criminals. I don't hang prime ministers. I'm gonna hang criminals. I'm gonna be one of the guys calling for the laws to be changed so criminals are hung.
Speaker 0: I understand.
Speaker 1: And and I'm pretty sure that criminals cannot be prime ministers.
Speaker 0: So our like I like my me and my partner said, our main reason was to come here, confirm your thought process as to why you had posted these things, And tell you that if you continue to post these things, we're going to continue to visit because it's inflammatory.
Speaker 1: Well, listen. So so continue to visit, but have something new to say next time. Do you understand? If you come to my door and you repeat this speech, you're gonna be turned away. Now it's time for you to go.
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 0: Well, hopefully, we don't have to come back.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not gonna stop until this problem is resolved. Okay?
Speaker 0: Well, there are more productive ways to voice your opinion than speculating about things like hangings drawing
Speaker 1: a portrait. Well, okay. Do do tell. What what what should I do that's more productive? I'm being censored in so many fucking ways right now That it has created an environment where I have to try and test, to see if we're going into, 1984.
No. George Orwell, Thought Crimes. Yeah. No. That's exactly what I'm doing.
I'm testing the limits because right now, I'm being Censored on Facebook for posting an image of Justin Trudeau in a pink Nazi uniform. That Is political rhetoric at its finest? My house is pink. Like, get over yourself, Justin, you fucking little wormy fucking you you guys need to leave. Okay.
I'm upset. You're trespassing now. You must leave. Bye bye. See you later.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
GERMANY- Falling into dictatorship as the ruling party looks to BAN its greatest threat, by calling the AfD a threat to democracy’ The AfDis polling at 21% But the people cannot be allowed to choose the ‘wrong’ leaders. Banning the opposition? This should scare you
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
BRAZIL - Lula saying the quiet parts out loud! A Global Government & the UN should take sovereignty from nation states for all Climate change measures because democratically elected governments may not do as they are told! Oh…
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a powerful stone that makes me crazy, but how did my father find it? I took all those broken ones, but no one, Sabah Süleyman. And he made it into my substance. Thanks for the three, wow four, and bravo. Such a lady.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ya kudret taşı var ki ben deli bana ama bab nasıl bul yahu? Ben ya o bozukleri aldı sizi ama kimse ben, Sabah Süleyman. Ve maddesindeme yaptı. Sağ olma üçlan şua, yuh dört nede bravo. Böyle Hanım.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
AUSTRALIA - Wind turbine energy is the greatest public policy failure of a lifetime. Destroying millions of acres of farmland, ecology and beauty, for an unreliable technology that’s intermittent at best. They didn’t bother asking the people.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the negative impact of using heavy machinery to break rocks for renewable energy projects. The speakers criticize the approach, calling it over the top and a failure in public policy. They highlight the complexity, expense, and damage caused by this method. The video also mentions the transportation of large components for wind turbines and suggests that a smaller nuclear reactor could have been a more efficient alternative. The construction process is described as extensive and messy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd call it a very brutal assault on the landscape. This is really heavy machinery, rock breaking machinery, and they have teams and teams of rock breakers working simultaneously across the site.
Speaker 1: You know a word I'd use for this? Or 3 words, over the top. Right? Yeah. You got a problem here or perceived problem about carbon in the atmosphere.
You wanna turn electricity See, carbon free, that's your ambition. Right? And you do it like this, like You you cut great sways in the great sways in the bushland. You you bulldoze and hack into rock. Does any of this make any sense to anybody?
This is why I Call this the greatest public policy failure of my lifetime by far. I mean, you you want you've got a project. You wanna create green energy. You wanna create carbon free energy, and you go about it in the most absurdly complicated, with expensive and damaging way you can.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But they're just they're really big pieces of the construction. So these big tubes, these big cylinders, the structural poles of the turbine, they all come in on trucks, semi trailer. So all these roads need to be engineered to bring in these big components. Then the sell up there, the center spindle, is around 80 tonne.
So that's 80 tonne cruises.
Speaker 1: I was having a fall on it. Yeah.
Speaker 0: What blows me away is, on this site, we could have had a 200 megawatt SMR, 300 megawatt SMR that would take up Tiny proportion. Tiny proportion of this pad.
Speaker 1: For the We could lose 18 hectares and put which would not be a good thing. I'm not advocating we put a nuclear No. Reactor here. But were we to here. Do something like that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. To show
Speaker 1: 18 hectares as opposed to what? 200 hectares
Speaker 0: or more? Well, that's right. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yep. You're building on a hill. You got all of earthwork just to get a flat surface, like this. This is not simple construction, and it's not, tidy construction.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
US - They are going to block out the sunlight and reduce CO2…. two of the most essential ingredients for life on earth. Playing God won’t end well.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration's research on solar radiation modification (SRM) as a climate policy component is seen by Mark Marano, publisher of climatedepot.com, as a government attempt to control weather. He points out that this approach, funded by Bill Gates through Harvard University, echoes ideas from the 1970s when scientists believed fossil fuels were causing global cooling. Marano criticizes the risky and unproven nature of SRM, suggesting it is being used as leverage to push for electric cars and Green New Deal policies. He argues that the American people have already shown their opposition to phasing out gas cars, with less than 7% of car sales being electric vehicles. Marano also raises concerns about the increased dependence on China and the intentional creation of car shortages to promote mass transit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the Biden administration signals its fight against global warming may actually involve blocking sunlight. The White House posting research claiming, quote, solar radiation modification would enable better informed decisions about the potential risk and benefits of SRM as a component of climate policy alongside the foundational elements of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation. Our next guest warns this is simply government's way to control your weather. Mark Marano, publisher of climatedepot.com, and he joins us now. Okay, Margaret.
You know, my take this morning was maybe this is one of those or else, you know, get on board with everything else or we're gonna block the sun, but I guess it's a little bit more, it's a little bit more reality than that. Tell us
Speaker 1: about it. Well, this is actually Bill Gates Funding this as well through Harvard University. This is retro 19 seventies. In the 19 seventies, they believed that our, fossil fuels were creating aerosols, blocking The sun creating man made global cooling. So they came up with the same kind of geoengineering solutions back then.
They wanted to put black Soot on the Arctic to melt it. There was one proposal to use nuclear energy to help loosen the Arctic ice caps because they thought they were growing too much. And John Holdren back in the Obama administration also supported this kind of geoengineering, if you will, of the climate. This is radical, risky, Unproven, unknown effects, but they're doing it as a sort of lever over us to say now in the Biden administration, kinda like, yeah, we know this is dangerous. We don't know the effects, But darn it.
People aren't buying electric cars fast enough, or they're not embracing Green New Deal policies. So we have to risk our entire planet With this insane kind of research. It's basically weather modification. China's been doing it for years. It's another form of what the US government has even Doing the the ABC News wet meteorologist bragged about the cloud seeding they're doing to increase rain or snow and storms.
They will control Troll the the government will control the weather, and you will be happy. That seems to be the new motto.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I was talking I was just talking to Will about the cloud seeding. He's not sure if he believes it. And I said, listen, it's something they've been trying to do for a while. But on that same topic, if they don't get to block out the sun, they're gonna try other maybe more ethical ways like electric vehicles pushing those on us.
A poll out shows 59% of us oppose phasing out gas cars by 2035. 21% support Biden's policy on this. What's your take on it?
Speaker 1: Well, this is, you know, The I don't think we need a poll to show us these numbers. The American people have voted. Less than 7% of cars are Electric vehicle sales in America, and that's despite massive subsidies, massive tax credits, mandates of banning gas Powered cars led by California and 18 other states with trigger laws. They have done everything they can to promote electric cars, and they're more Expensive. They have less range, and all they do is increase our dependence on China.
It takes fossil fuels to make a car. It takes fossil fuels to recharge the electric cars. It makes no sense. And what they're doing is intentionally creating car shortages by these gas powered car vans to force us into mass transit.
Speaker 0: No. That one point there, inviting China into our auto industry and into our electronic industry, while they're passing things like the CHIPS Act, a lot of it is kind of speaking out both sides of your mouth. Thank you, Mark Marano, for joining us.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Joe. I appreciate it. I'm Steve Ducey. I'm Brian Kilmeade.
Speaker 2: And I'm Ainsley Earhart. And click here to subscribe to the Fox News YouTube page to catch our hottest interviews And most compelling analysis.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
AUSTRALIA - Senator Alex Antic asking Moderna a simple question. What is the rate of adverse effects? There will be no amnesty. Never forget what governments in collusion with Pharma did to you and to society. On the basis of … “I don’t know”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I referred earlier to a and tabled a report from a journal, L. Sylvia said that wrongly, recent report from the end of last year, which stands for the proposition and found that the rates of serious adverse reactions are occurring at a rate of 1 in 800 people vaccinated. Now according to your own clinical trial data, do you accept that, that is the rate? And if not, how does your overall rate of serious adverse events compare with routine traditional vaccine products such as vaccines and the like.
Speaker 1: So I'm not aware of the report to which you're referring.
Speaker 0: This is the report of a prominent medical journal, you're not aware of that?
Speaker 1: I'm not aware of that.
Speaker 0: Do you think you should be aware of that?
Speaker 1: I think if you're able to provide that report,
Speaker 0: I mean, this is part of the frustration of this process is if you were here, we could provide you with that. But I mean, this has been widely reported. You are a manufacturer of saying, I find it difficult to think that you wouldn't be aware of this report.
Speaker 1: So one thing I can say is that as a company, we have As part of our pharmacovigilance activities, we do do routine screens of the literature to I look particularly for publications that include adverse events. We do review those publications and those adverse events, and we do include them into our global pharmacovigilance database. So that manuscript would have been assessed by our business department, and the information from it would have been taken into account and Evaluating the benefit risk of our vaccine.
Speaker 0: So what is your what is Moderna's overall rate of serious adverse events? And how does that compare with routine vaccinations was the question?
Speaker 1: So I don't have the actual rates of adverse events
Speaker 0: you don't have the rates of adverse events
Speaker 1: in front of you. If you just I can refer to the I'll see if I can refer to the product information. What I can tell you is that the rates of serious adverse events in our very large randomized controlled trials was actually In a similar range to what was observed in the placebo. But you
Speaker 0: don't you can't tell me the rates of serious adverse events. You realize you've come to a Senate hearing today for the purposes of exactly that question, and you can't tell me the rates of serious adverse reactions to your product, which I find extraordinary.
Speaker 1: What I can tell you is that on the TGA website, it reports there are 1.2 reports
Speaker 0: that's the TGA. I'm not asking about the TGA, I'm asking about Moderna. You must have that information. You are a multinational company. You're before a Senate inquiry and you cannot tell me the rates of serious adverse I mean, it's quite extraordinary what you're telling me.
Nobody can tell me that.
Speaker 1: Doctor. Parker?
Speaker 0: Sorry, I want to cut you off.
Speaker 1: I can provide that information on notice. What I can tell you is that we have observed in our clinical trials, we observed no safety concerns. There were no imbalances of Serious adverse events, adverse events for special interests or debts between the vaccine group and the placebo group.
Speaker 0: Chair, I think we're wasting our time here. Thank you. You can have the call back.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
CO2 - Things that make you go hmm… The ideal C02 level for growing food is 400ppm & 600-1000ppm is used in greenhouses to increase yield by over 30% & reduce pests & diseases. Yet climate scientists tell us 350ppm is so dangerous we will all starve. Question everything.
Video Transcript AI Summary
AGA is driving growth in agriculture by adding carbon dioxide to increase production capacity and ensure larger, more attractive flowers and vegetables like cucumbers, tomatoes, and lettuce. Carbon dioxide fertilization boosts yield by up to 30%. While ambient air contains enough carbon dioxide for growing tomatoes and cucumbers, plants in greenhouses consume it quickly, slowing down or halting growth. To maintain optimal growth, carbon dioxide concentration in the greenhouse atmosphere should be kept between 600 to 1000 PPM. Adding extra carbon dioxide improves yield by up to 30% or more for tomatoes, cucumbers, lettuce, cut flowers, and potted plants. Additionally, carbon dioxide enhances early harvest, disease resistance, and pest resilience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: AGA is driving growth in the agricultural sector by adding carbon dioxide to increase production capacity and guarantee large attractive flowers and vegetables such as cucumbers, tomatoes and lettuce. Using carbon dioxide fertilization increases yield by up to 30%. Ambient air has a carbon dioxide site concentration of 400 PPM. This is sufficient for growing tomatoes and cucumbers but as the plants often grown in greenhouses start to consume the carbon dioxide in the air at first sunlight. If the concentration of carbon dioxide is allowed to fall, growth is slowed down or halted.
Speaker 1: C o two in greenhouses is very important because we get a better crop, a higher gene, and better Quality of the tomatoes.
Speaker 0: Additional carbon dioxide needs to be added to increase efficiency and to have the optimal yield. By keeping the carbon dioxide concentration in the greenhouse atmosphere in a range of 600 to 1000 PPM, the best growth rate can be expected. When extra carbon dioxide is added to greenhouse air, the tomato, cucumber and lettuce yield improves by up to 30% or even more. Cut flowers and potted plants it's also benefit from carbon dioxide fertilization. Carbon dioxide not only increases yield but also produces an earlier harvest and improves plants resistance to disease and pests.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
WINDSOR CASTLE - UK King, Climate King John Kerry & the Globalist King. Media were silent about Larry Fink CEO of Blackrock attending their little Windsor Castle meeting with Biden! Here’s Larry explaining how he’s going to force you to behave https://t.co/ywG61ZXl9q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Forcing behaviors is crucial to achieving diversity and inclusion in teams, regardless of gender, race, or composition. It goes beyond recruitment and also involves development. However, the process of change can be slow and incremental. The speakers, including Larry from BlackRock and Ken, discuss the need for more radical approaches to enhance diversity and inclusion. They suggest that cultural transformation within a firm is essential, where discussions and demonstrations of acceptable behaviors are widespread and consistent across regions. Every member of the firm should understand what behaviors are acceptable and unacceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just you have to force behaviors. And if you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, you're going to be impacted. And that's not just not recruiting, it is development, as Ken said.
Speaker 1: How do you force change, though? I mean, Larry, BlackRock has has really been the forefront of the ESG movement within within corporate governance and a real leader, And yet change is so slow. So what is and and Ken as well, what how do you force change when it is so incremental and so gradual? How do you do something more radical? Have you thought about that?
Has the Board with American Express thought about more radical things we could do to enhance Diversity and inclusion.
Speaker 0: Because it has to be imbued in the culture of a firm. It has to be talked about, it has to be shown. Behaviors across the entire firm in every region, have to be similar. And every citizen of the firm has to understand what is acceptable behaviors and what are unacceptable
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
NETHERLANDS - The government won’t stop at seizing farmers land. The new Housing Act forces home owners to sell ONLY to people with a lower/middle income. The government will decide who can purchase property & will force sales at under market value. To refuse to sell to a “marginalised group” would be illegal. Wtf
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
FRANCE - A war on farmers continues. The court of Auditors has decided farmers must kill their cattle. “17 million cattle are not favourable to the climate” French farmers were not asked for their opinion.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
VACCINES - The thing they said they aren’t doing? … They are preparing to do! By vaccinating livestock with spike-coding mRNA, vaccinated produce will enter the food chain & remove informed consent We already know it enters the food chain through breast milk!
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
AUSTRALIA - Holding Government to account looks like this Senator Gerard Rennick stands in fury against those who still bow down to the narrative, scared to question the authorities who control their careers. There will be no amnesty. Ever 🔥 https://t.co/N4NhoAOhaR
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses various concerns related to COVID-19 in Australia. They mention the high number of cases despite vaccination efforts and criticize the Australian health department for not addressing the issue. The speaker also highlights the excess deaths in 2021 and the significant number of vaccine injuries reported. They question the transparency of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and accuse Professor Skerritt, the head of the organization, of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. The speaker criticizes the lack of knowledge among health officials and emphasizes the importance of being properly informed and not coerced into taking vaccines according to Australian law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, well, here we are. The end of 2022, and we've had over 10,000,000 cases of COVID. The Australian health department, of course, stopped counting around September sometime because I think it was getting too embarrassing to admit that despite with over 20,000,000 people being vaccinated, over half the country had caught COVID. Whatever happened to protecting you? Whatever happened to protecting you?
But we don't wanna talk about that anymore. We'll just Department off the website and not discuss it. We'll not discuss it. And then we've got the excess deaths that, senator Babbitt talked about before. We had 8,706 extra deaths last year despite the fact that New South Wales locked down for 3 months.
So in theory, the deaths should have been lower like they were in 2020, but let's not count 2021 in the ABS ABS figures. Oh, sorry. 2020, they're not counting. Let's pretend nothing happened there. Almost a 140,000 jab injuries, more than all the injuries reported from vaccines since 1971, more than all the injuries put together, you've got an injury rate that's 3 times higher and yet the TGA don't wanna look at the signal.
The whole point of having a database where doctors report these injuries, where they tick the box suspected and as the doctors say they don't fill these forms out because they don't have the spare time. They don't have a lazy 20 or 30 minutes sitting around filling these forms out if someone fell off a bike, no, no, they're ticking these boxes because they believe that the vaccine caused the injury that they are reporting and yet the TGA wanna pretend that there's nothing to see here. And why wouldn't they? Because professor Skerritt is head of an organisation, that is funded by Big Pharma. That is funded by Big Pharma.
Now if you want to talk about a conflict of interest, that's it. That's it. And these guys have no idea what they are talking about. I asked professor Brendan Murphy, who was the chief health officer at the time, whether or not he'd actually read the non clinical report into the Pfizer vaccine. Guess what?
He hadn't read it. Despite that, he'd been saying for the last, a couple of days earlier that the spike protein wasn't in the blood. Well, had he read the report, he would have known that they never even have tested the spike protein and they would have also known that when they did the animal trials that the report said there was no difference in lung inflammation between the placebo group and the vaccinated group after 9 days. There was not 1 steric of evidence that showed that that vaccine was effective. But did anyone in this chamber right here right now actually read that report?
I bet you not. But you all went out there and said it was safe and effective where you didn't have a clue what you were talking about and shame on you because the law in this country the law in this country and the Australian Immunisation Register says you cannot be coerced into taking a vaccine, number 1, and number 2 is that you need to be properly informed about what is in the vaccine.
@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets
This is not China… This is Canada. Trudeau is calling on the Chinese government to respect the protesters & listen to them. Reminder: Trudeau detained protesters without trial, sent in armed police & then froze their bank accounts. Just saying 🤷♀️ https://t.co/xlsoHRhyeB