TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @EndTribalism

Saved - February 10, 2026 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Ian Carroll and Tucker Carlson question Bill Gates’ global health role, urging we forget him after the Epstein Files. Carroll asks how Gates ended up directing our medical decisions, calling him someone to forget. Carlson says Gates, who steered worldwide health, allegedly tried to slip a drug into his wife’s drink after an infection from a Russian hooker, implying corrupt health professionals.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Tucker Carlson and Ian Carroll say Bill Gates should never be taken seriously again after the Epstein Files revelations. Ian Carroll: “How did we let Bill Gates be in charge of the medical decisions of our entire nation?” “When you realize who Bill Gates is and who he is exposed as being in the files… he’s a person we need to just forget about forever.” Tucker Carlson: “This is the guy who was making health decisions for the entire world, and apparently, from these emails, he’s trying to slip a drug into his wife’s drink because he infected her with a venereal disease from a Russian hooker.” Ian Carroll: “Yeah, that's apparently our health professionals and pandemic response.” @IanCarrollShow @TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions how Bill Gates ended up in charge of the medical decisions for the nation, claiming he was trying to slip antibiotics to his wife secretly because he transferred sexually transmitted diseases from hookers on Jeffrey Epstein's islands to her. He calls that insane and says, when you look back at the crime against humanity that COVID was and you realize who Bill Gates is and who he's exposed to be in these emails, that's atrocious. He adds that that's less of a question we need to ask and more of a person we need to forget about forever. Speaker 1 responds, blessing Speaker 0 for saying that and paraphrasing that Gates is the one making health decisions for the entire world, and apparently from these emails he's trying to slip a drug into his wife's drink because he infected her with a venereal disease from a Russian hooker, calling it amazing. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that this is apparently our health professionals and our pandemic response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How did we let Bill Gates be in charge of the medical decisions of our entire nation when apparently he was trying to slip antibiotics to his wife secretly because he transferred sexually transmitted diseases from hookers on Jeffrey Epstein's islands to her. That is insane. And when you look back at the absolutely, just the crime against humanity that COVID was, and you realize who Bill Gates is, and who he's exposed to be in these emails, that's atrocious. But that's less of a question we need to ask. No, no, but And that more of a person we need to just forget about forever, right? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, I just bless you for saying that, and you put it so well. This is the guy who is making health decisions for the entire world. And apparently from these emails, he's trying to slip a drug into his wife's drink because he infected her with a venereal disease from a Russian hooker. So, I mean, that's just like, that's Thank just you for saying that. It's amazing. Speaker 0: Yeah, that's apparently our health professionals, our pandemic response.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 4:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched a shocking revelation from Aaron Siri about a study conducted by Henry Ford Medical Center comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study, which showed that unvaccinated children were healthier, was buried despite being well-designed. It found significantly higher rates of asthma, autoimmune diseases, and developmental disorders among vaccinated children. The researchers admitted the findings were valid but chose not to publish them due to fear of backlash and job security. This highlights how vaccine-related science can be manipulated to fit prevailing beliefs.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. To our surprise, doctor Zervers said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant. There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero in the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, and there were none in the unvaccinated group. This study, there were around sixteen thousand kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared. These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and Lemoretta to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervos has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lamoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable. This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted, how only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms. We should and we must do both.
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 4:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaos erupted at the CDC this week with the firing of the director and resignations of officials, who were blamed by the media for destabilizing public health. However, the real issue was the ACIP's new work group, led by Retsef Levi, which aimed to confront the full data on Covid vaccines, including safety and injuries. Levi emphasized the need for transparency and inclusion of all relevant data, challenging the status quo. The resignations revealed a struggle for control over the narrative, as those leaving sought to suppress discussions on vaccine injuries. A reckoning is underway.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Chaos ERUPTED at the CDC this week. The director was fired and officials quit. Mainstream Media blamed RFK Jr. for being “anti-vaccine”. The truth is the CDC tried to block reviews of vaccine injuries. ACIP member Retsef Levi exposed it in an exclusive interview. Thread🧵 https://t.co/Vb9WwbBrie

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The resignations became headline news, with outlets portraying the CDC as “leaderless” and blaming RFK Jr. for destabilizing public health. But that storyline left out the key fact: these officials weren’t leaving because science was under attack. They were leaving because, for the first time, ACIP was preparing to confront the full data on Covid vaccines — including safety, efficacy, and injuries.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Two weeks earlier, ACIP created a new Covid vaccine work group and named Retsef Levi chair. The Terms of Reference laid out a sweeping mandate: risk-benefit analyses, identifying critical gaps in safety and efficacy, and examining adverse events. This wasn’t a rubber stamp. It was an open door to follow the data wherever it led — and that’s exactly what shook the CDC.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

In an exclusive interview with Maryanne Demasi (go subscribe to her to get the full interview), Levi explained how the clash unfolded. His mandate was clear: no exclusions, no off-limits questions, no ignored data. “We will not exclude any question that is relevant, nor any data source or knowledge source that is available,” he said. The officials who resigned wanted to narrow the scope and keep control. Levi insisted on opening it up.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The breaking point came over vaccine injuries. Levi said he was “emotionally shocked” at the CDC’s unwillingness to even discuss them. “Recognizing vaccine injuries is a foundational component of any successful vaccine program,” he explained. “We have seen a lot of gaslighting, and leaving the vaccine injured out to dry. I want that to change with this Covid immunisation workgroup and more generally as part of the ACIP work.” The media painted those who resigned as defenders of science. In reality, they were trying to bury the most vulnerable victims.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Instead of debating the science, CDC leaders tried to stop the work group with legal arguments. “They tried to use the lawyers to say it was not in the scope of ACIP to examine these issues,” Levi said. In the end, they were forced to admit Levi’s plans were in fact in scope of ACIP’s duty’s, but not before turning what should have been basic science into a legal fight.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

This was never about good governance — it was about control. The officials running for the exits shaped the vaccine narrative for years. They know what’s coming if independent scientists are allowed to follow the data. They buried evidence, silenced dissent, and dismissed the injured. Now, with RFK Jr. at HHS and people like Levi at ACIP, their cover is unraveling. A reckoning has begun, and this week was only the start.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Question about the CDC resignation and how the agency can function. "I will confirm that we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday." The CDC is an agency that is very troubled for a very long time. "Among the top 10 medical innovations greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion. This is the one of the greatest medical accomplishments because it keeps small families." "Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines." There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term to change the institutional culture and bring back pride. "I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The recent resignation with the CDC, how are you ensuring that that agency is able to do a stop effectively? I would say this that first of all, I will confirm that we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday. I'm not gonna talk about personnel issues, but you know the CDC is an agency that is very troubled for a very long time and anybody who lives through the COVID pandemic and saw all of these bizarre recommendations that were not science based, all the information understands that the CDC has on its website today. Among the top 10 medical innovations greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion. This is the one of the greatest medical accomplishments because it keeps small families. Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines. There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been. I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.
Saved - August 20, 2025 at 8:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses Dr. Anthony Fauci's controversial history as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), particularly regarding HIV-positive foster children used in drug trials from the late 1980s to the 2000s. It highlights that these vulnerable children, often without parental consent, were subjected to experimental drug cocktails, leading to severe side effects and deaths. Critics argue that Fauci's involvement in these trials reflects a troubling pattern of prioritizing research funding over ethical considerations, extending beyond his COVID-19 response.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Most people think Dr. Anthony Fauci’s story starts with mishandling Covid. But the darkest part of his career happened long before. As head of NIAID, he used HIV-positive foster kids for horrific experiments. This is a part of his record most people have never heard about:🧵 https://t.co/7Gu0JDWjET

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

From the late 1980s into the 2000s, Fauci ran the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Under his leadership, NIAID funded AIDS drug & vaccine trials on foster children. One major site: the Incarnation Children’s Center in Harlem. These were kids already living with HIV—or born to HIV-positive mothers—placed in state custody, then handed over for “research.” (Footage from Documentary Guinea Pig Kids)

Video Transcript AI Summary
This Catholic run home, the Incarnation Children's Center in Harlem, is where many HIV children end up if their parents or guardians refuse to medicate them. For years, it was the center of highly controversial and secretive drug trials on orphans and foster children as young as three months old. At the time, these assertions describe a setting and activities that have sparked significant scrutiny, with emphasis on secrecy surrounding the research and the vulnerability of the children involved. The transcript presents these points without concluding on the ethics or outcomes. Further context or details are not included in this excerpt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This Catholic run home, the Incarnation Children's Center in Harlem, is where many HIV children end up if their parents or guardians refuse to medicate them. For years, it was the center of highly controversial and secretive drug trials on orphans and foster children as young as three months old. At the time

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Why use foster kids? Because they had no parents to say no. State officials signed off, making them the easiest pool of children to enroll. Of course, any harm against children is sickening—but doing this to the poorest, sickest, most defenseless kids makes it even more haunting.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Children were dosed with experimental drug cocktails — sometimes multiple at once, often at adult levels. Side effects included organ failure, rashes, stunted growth, agonizing pain, and death. When kids resisted, doctors restrained them and inserted feeding tubes to pump the drugs in. The child in this video was one of those experimented on — living proof of how defenseless these kids were under Fauci’s NIAID-funded trials.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Documentation lists experiments carried out on HIV children at the home, describing several different procedures. It notes that one of the experiments was for treating herpes, while another involved giving children double doses of the measles vaccine. The record also describes additional trials that involved whole cocktails of drugs, with side effects admitted by the manufacturers, including severe stomach pain, muscle wastage, organ failure, and many more adverse outcomes mentioned in the documentation. These entries illustrate the range of interventions referenced in the documents and the seriousness of the side-effect profiles acknowledged by manufacturers. The description emphasizes the existence and scope of the reported experiments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found documentation listing some of the experiments carried out on HIV children at the home. One was for treating herpes, another involved giving children double doses of the measles vaccine, And yet others involved whole cocktails of drugs with side effects admitted by the manufacturers, including severe stomach pain, muscle wastage, organ failure, and many more.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

If you’re new here, bookmark this thread, follow, and subscribe ($1/month). I do my best to put out threads on up-to-date medical freedom news, along with more in-depth threads like this one when I have time.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The Vera Institute later reviewed these trials and confirmed 532 foster kids were enrolled. Eighty of those children died while in foster care. At least Twenty-five of them died while enrolled in a medication trial. Strangely, this very report has since been used to debunk what happened — making victims and whistleblowers look like “conspiracy theorists” or liars, instead of acknowledging the horror these kids endured.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

These weren’t rogue doctors in Harlem — they were NIAID-sponsored projects. That means Fauci’s institute approved, designed, and funded this research. When he was asked about it, he denied it — even though countless people spoke out. All the money flowed through him. For decades he held the power to greenlight experiments and steer billions in federal research. And when foster children were the test subjects, he looked the other way.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Fauci isn’t evil just because of how he misled Americans during Covid. The truth is far worse. He is a lifetime bureaucrat who, to protect his job and keep the money flowing, was willing to go to any length — including sacrificing children for horrific research. These families, and the foster kids who grew into adults, deserve justice. The public deserves to know that his deceptions during Covid were not the beginning but the continuation of a much older pattern.

Saved - August 8, 2025 at 1:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
RFK Jr. announced the cancellation of 22 mRNA vaccine development projects, citing risks outweighing benefits after consulting experts. This decision, which redirects $500 million towards safer vaccine strategies, has garnered support from some but faced backlash from the mRNA lobby, prompting Trump to express intentions to discuss the cancellations. Dr. Robert Malone and other MAHA officials urge public support for RFK Jr.'s decision, emphasizing the urgency to counteract the lobbying pressure in Washington.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

RFK Jr. NEEDS your help! The mRNA lobby is in full meltdown, pressuring Trump to overturn RFK’s decision to end funding for mRNA vaccines. Now MAHA insiders are calling on you to speak up. “The Secretary needs your support now, more than ever.” Short thread🧵 https://t.co/CNyCtrP450

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Bookmark and share this thread to spread the word—RFK Jr. needs our help now:🧵

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Earlier this week, RFK Jr. made a stunning move as HHS Secretary. After a full review, the agency concluded that mRNA vaccines carry more risk than reward—and canceled 22 development projects, pulling $500 million in funding. “Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them.” He said the decision came after consulting top scientists at NIH and the FDA. “After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.” The main concern? These vaccines fail to protect against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu. “Most of these shots are for flu or Covid, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don’t perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.” Instead, HHS will invest in broader, more reliable vaccine platforms that don’t fall apart when viruses mutate. “To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we’re prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms that don’t collapse when viruses mutate.” He made it clear—this isn’t an attack on vaccines, it’s a shift toward safer, more effective ones. “Let me be absolutely clear, HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them.” That’s why the department is moving on from mRNA and toward real solutions. “That’s why we’re moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as HHS secretary, explains that BARDA is canceling 22 mRNA vaccine development investments, primarily for flu and COVID. He claims mRNA vaccines don't perform well against upper respiratory viruses because they only code for a small part of viral proteins, and a single mutation can make them ineffective. This drives antigenic shift, paradoxically encouraging new mutations and prolonging pandemics. HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these viruses. The canceled contracts total just under $500 million. HHS will prioritize safer, broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. HHS supports safe, effective vaccines and is moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Here, your HHS secretary. At HHS, we have a division called the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. BARDA drives some of our most advanced scientific research. It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other tools to fight emerging diseases and national health threats. Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them. Let me explain why. Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Here's the problem. MRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen. One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective. This dynamic drives a phenomena called antigenic shift, meaning that the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective effects of the vaccine. Millions of people, maybe even you or someone you know, got the omicron variant despite being vaccinated. That's because a single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to flu. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review, BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions. Thank you.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

People were cheering RFK Jr.’s bold move—Until President Trump weighed in from the White House. He made clear the mRNA lobby is still in his ear, confirming he’ll be meeting about the cancellations Thursday. “We have meetings about it Thursday at 12:00.” He even praised Operation Warp Speed, the very program that pushed mRNA into overdrive. “Operation Warp Speed is one of the most incredible things ever done in this country… Everything about it was has been amazing.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is questioned about the Health Secretary pulling funding for mRNA vaccine research, claiming the risks outweigh the benefits, putting him at odds with the medical community. The speaker responds that Operation Warp Speed was considered incredible, regardless of political affiliation, citing its efficiency and distribution. While acknowledging that Warp Speed was "a long time ago," the speaker states that they are "on to other things" and are looking for answers to other sicknesses and diseases. They mention upcoming meetings to determine the next steps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Warp speed. These mRNA vaccines that are the gold standard. Right. Now your health secretary is pulling back all the funding for research. He's saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, which puts him at odds Speaker 1: with entire Speaker 0: medical community and with you. What is Speaker 1: going on? Research on what? Speaker 0: Into mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1: Well, we're gonna look at that. We're talking about it, and they're doing a very good job. And, you know, that is a pass. With Operation Warp Speed was, whether you're Republican or Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country. The efficiency, the, the way it was done, the distribution, everything about it was has been amazing. But, you know, that was, now a long time ago, and we're on to other things. But we are speaking about it. We have meetings about it in, tomorrow, actually, tomorrow at 12:00, and we'll determine. We're looking for other answers to other problems, to other sicknesses or diseases, and I think we're doing really well. Yes, ma'am.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Trump’s response sent shockwaves through the MAHA movement. Even insiders like ACIP member Dr. Robert Malone are sounding the alarm. The mRNA lobby is pushing hard to get Trump to reverse RFK Jr.’s decision. Now Dr. Malone is calling on all of us to act. “I really need to you use your social media channels and accounts to contact the White House and President Trump to immediately voice your support for Secretary Kennedy’s decision to eliminate federal subsidies for the development of mRNA-based respiratory virus vaccines.” “This must be done now.” “A key meeting has been called on short notice, and will be held today in the White House.”

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

It’s not just Dr. Malone raising the alarm. Top MAHA officials are seeing the pressure firsthand. Gray Delaney, Director of MAHA Implementation and External Affairs, says the mRNA lobby is in full panic mode in DC. And RFK Jr. needs our support more than ever. “From a political perspective, the mRNA lobby in Washington is huge.” “We really need our network to support this decision to amplify the message, and to have the secretary's back.” “There is an active effort to divide us, and the Secretary really needs your support now, more than ever.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the significant influence of the mRNA lobby in Washington and the need for network support to amplify the message and support the secretary. They acknowledge internal disagreements within the movement, particularly regarding vaccines, and stress the importance of unity to counter efforts to divide them. The speaker believes the secretary requires increased support following courageous decisions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will just say from a political perspective, the mRNA lobby in Washington is huge. There's something there, so that is why we really need our network to support this decision to amplify the message and to have the secretary's back. I mean, there's been a lot of, back and forth within the movement on especially on the vaccine issue. And I just I just would hope that we can stay united as a movement because I think there is an active effort to divide us. And the secretary really needs your support more than ever after some, you know, very courageous decisions and moves like you did yesterday.
Saved - June 12, 2025 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared that RFK Jr. appointed eight new members to the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, aiming to enhance independence, transparency, and public trust in vaccine science. I introduced each member, starting with Dr. Robert Malone, a critic of mRNA vaccines, and Dr. Cody Meissner, who raised concerns about their rapid introduction for children. Other members include Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, who emphasizes natural health, Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, advocating for informed consent, and Dr. Retsef Levi, who critiques vaccine data management. Dr. Martin Kulldorff is known for opposing mandates and questioning mRNA safety.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

RFK Jr. just appointed 8 new members to the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee. He says the goal is to restore independence, transparency, and public trust in vaccine science. Here’s a quick breakdown of who they are—and where they stand on vaccines. Thread🧵 https://t.co/wicVrHgHAU

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

This is a brief intro to the 8 people RFK Jr. just appointed—feel free to reply with more info on them if you have it🧵

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Robert Malone: An early contributor to mRNA vaccine research, Malone now argues the tech was misused during the pandemic. He was banned from Twitter during Covid for warning about spike protein toxicity. He’s become one of the most vocal critics of mRNA shots in both adults and children.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Cody Meissner: A pediatric infectious disease specialist from Dartmouth, Meissner served on prior FDA and CDC vaccine panels. He supported Covid vaccines for older adults but raised red flags on risk–benefit for young children. He’s expressed concerns about how fast mRNA shots were pushed into childhood schedules.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Joseph Hibbeln: A psychiatrist and former NIH nutrition scientist, Hibbeln is known for studying how diet affects brain and immune function. He hasn’t been a public voice on Covid shots, but he’s emphasized natural health over pharmaceutical intervention. No major record of him discussing mRNA vaccines specifically.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. James Pagano: An emergency medicine physician with over 40 years of clinical experience, Pagano has worked in trauma centers and community hospitals across the country. He’s served on hospital committees focused on critical care and patient safety, and brings a frontline medical perspective to the new ACIP. No public statements found on Covid or mRNA vaccines. I haven’t heard of Dr. Pagano and couldn’t find a picture I was sure was him so please reply if you have an image or more about his stance on vaccines🧵

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Vicky Pebsworth: A nurse and public health PhD who previously advised the FDA on vaccine safety. She’s advocated for better informed consent and more research into long-term effects. She’s expressed caution about mRNA vaccines, particularly regarding adverse event tracking.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Michael Ross: An OB-GYN with experience on CDC cancer prevention panels, Ross brings maternal health expertise. He hasn’t been a major public figure in the Covid vaccine debate. No known statements on mRNA vaccines, but his focus may shape pregnancy vaccine policy. https://t.co/QSzt0fMciN

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Retsef Levi: A professor at MIT Sloan, Levi analyzes health systems using risk management and data science. He’s spoken out on vaccine side effect data being mismanaged and underreported. He’s been highly critical of mRNA technology rollout without transparent long-term trials.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Martin Kulldorff: An epidemiologist formerly at Harvard, Kulldorff helped write the Great Barrington Declaration against lockdowns and mandates. He publicly opposed Covid vaccine mandates and criticized CDC policy. He’s questioned the long-term safety of mRNA platforms, especially for young people.

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a crucial video featuring RFK Jr. discussing the Biden administration's HHS budget increase of 38% and employee growth of 17%, while healthcare declined. He emphasized working with Elon to cut redundancies, redirect funds to scientists and patients, and restore gold standard science to improve health in America.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The most important video on X today! RFK Jr: “The budget of HHS during the Biden administration went up by 38%, the employees went up by 17%, yet health care went down.” “We are, with Elon's help, eliminating the redundancies.” “We're gonna get the money to the scientists and to the patients rather than to the administrators and to the bureaucrats.” “We're gonna restore gold standard science, and we're gonna Make America Healthy Again.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude for a partnership with Doge and Elon, stating that Health and Human Services (HHS) expenditures increased by 38% and employees by 17% during the Biden administration, while healthcare declined. The department has 40 communications, procurement, IT, and HR departments that do not communicate with each other. With Elon's help, the speaker aims to eliminate redundancies and streamline the department. The goal is to restore gold standard science, directing funds to scientists and patients instead of administrators and bureaucrats, and to make America healthy again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm very grateful to you and very grateful for the partnership with Doge, with the Elon. We've identified extraordinary ways in my department and HHS. The expenditures, the budget of HHS during the Biden administration went up by 38%. The employees went up by 17% and healthcare went down. We have 40 comms departments. We have 40 procurement departments. We have 40 IT departments, and we have 40 procurement HR. None of them talking to each other. We are with Elon's help eliminating the redundancies. We are streamlining our department. We're going to go back to providing gold standard science. We're going to get the money to the scientists and to the patients rather than to the administrators and to the bureaucrats. And we're gonna restore gold standard to science, and we're gonna make America healthy again. Thank you very much. It's great.
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 1:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just listened to Joe Rogan's latest podcast with Dr. Suzanne Humphries, where she challenges mainstream medical beliefs about vaccines and chronic illness. They discuss polio, highlighting that most cases are asymptomatic and that the virus can be beneficial. Dr. Humphries reveals that human actions have made polio more dangerous and questions the role of vaccines in health improvements. She emphasizes sanitation's importance and discusses the potential links between vaccines and allergies. The conversation touches on the stigma surrounding vaccine-autism debates and the struggles she faces in her career.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

🔥 Joe Rogan just dropped his most important podcast of the year — with Dr. Suzanne Humphries. She challenges decades of mainstream medical claims — from vaccines to chronic illness. This conversation changes everything. Thread 🧵 https://t.co/FlHygG3QGQ

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

They start the podcast discussing the misconceptions around polio. Rogan: “I read this crazy statistic, and I still can't believe it's real, 90%-95% of all polio is asymptomatic.” Dr. Humphries: “Poliovirus is what we call a commensal.” “So like you have staph on your skin and strep on your skin, and it actually serves a purpose. It keeps other microbes in check as long as you don't get a cut and have a good immune system to deal from the inside out.” “Most viruses in nature don't become more problematic as they go through the human system. They become less problematic.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, 95-99% of polio cases are asymptomatic because poliovirus is a commensal organism. Studies by the Indian Health Service of the Javonte Indians in South America found that 98-99% of those tested had immunity to all three strains of polio, yet the tribe had no instances of crippled children, short legs, or deaths from respiratory failure. The speaker claims that most viruses become less problematic as they spread through the human system. They cite COVID-19 as an example, where the initial strain was highly virulent but less contagious, while later variants like Omicron were more contagious but less pathological. The speaker suggests that significant problems with microbes typically arise when they are reverse attenuated, made more lethal in a lab, and then introduced into the population.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I read this crazy statistic, and I still can't believe it's real, that ninety five to ninety nine percent of all polio is asymptomatic. Speaker 1: That's exactly right. So poliovirus is what we call a commensal. Just like you have staph on your skin and strep on your skin, and it actually serves a purpose. It keeps other microbes in check as long as you don't get a cut, and have not a good immune system to deal from the inside out. So polio and the reason I can say that polio is a commensal is because, again, there are medical studies that showed that people who dared to get on the edge of some of these wild native tribes down in South America elsewhere, but in particular I'm talking about South American tribe called the Javonte Indians. So the Indian Health Service got to the edge of it and bargained that they would get some stool and some blood from the tribes so that they could test it for polio. And what they found was ninety eight to ninety nine percent of every person they tested and it was hundreds of people had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio. And they said to them, Well where are your crippled children? Where's your short legs? Where are the people that died of respiratory failure? And they were like, we don't have we don't have any of that problem. So it was well known Speaker 0: possibly be that whatever you're calling polio evolved and became less powerful over time and more contagious? Does that does happen with some some viruses. Right? Speaker 1: Most viruses in nature don't become more problematic as they go through the human the human system. They become less problematic. Remember remember the the whole COVID thing. Like, the beginning, people were getting super, super sick. It was it wasn't as contagious, but it was more virulent. And as it attenuated into the human bodies, it sort of felt it kinda fizzled out a bit. And then we got the omicron, which was, you know, less. It was more spreadable, but it was much less pathological. And that's the natural process that happens. So when you're gonna have problem real problems with microbes, they're usually going to be reverse attenuated, meaning made more lethal in a lab, and then they're introduced into the population. And look, I'm not making this up either.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Then Dr. Humphries Dropped the bombshell. “There was a Rockefeller lab that their specific stated goal was to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” “Polio was only made more lethal by the stupid things that humans did around it.” https://t.co/DqMlKqXFVy

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1916, a Rockefeller lab in Manhattan aimed to create the most pathological polio strain by injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys. An accidental release led to the worst polio epidemic on record, with a 25% mortality rate. The epicenter fanned out, and the virus attenuated as it moved through the body, eventually disappearing. Lethal viruses typically die out with their hosts, but polio was made more lethal by human actions that increased its invasiveness. Poliovirus used to be a normal human commensal until oral vaccines replaced it with vaccine strains. The wild strains are normal human commensals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Making this up either 1916 Upper East Side Manhattan, there was a Rockefeller lab that their specific stated goal was to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible. They did that by taking monkey brains and human spinal serum and injecting it into monkeys and there was a big problem with that which was released into the public by accident. The world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record, twenty five percent mortality, that's unheard of. Really freaked the public out but as it and you can see the epicenter as it fanned out and as it fanned out and as time went on, never heard of it again. It it attenuates as it moves through the body because it's a normal human commensal that goes back to its normal state when it's in a human. And that's generally what happens. If you have a highly lethal virus and it kills a lot of people, those people are dead. They can't spread anything. So that's kind of a different story if you wanna talk about hantavirus or something like that. But as far as polio goes, no. Polio was only made more lethal by the stupid things that humans did around it to make it more invasive into the body just like you can go do stupid things and end end up with herpes outbreaks and, you know, staph outbreaks. Poliovirus is a normal commence commensal. It used to be until we obliterated it with oral vaccines and replaced it with vaccine strain, but the wild strains are normal human commensals. So there's

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Humphries points out that diseases without vaccines declined at the same time vaccine-targeted diseases did — raising serious questions about what actually caused the drop. “The diseases that there were never any vaccines for, we see the death rate come down at the same exact avalanche as the diseases that we did vaccinate for.” “The point of my book was just interpreting the data that's existed for a really long time, vital statistics throughout the world such as the decline in death rate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims death rates for diseases without vaccines declined at the same rate as those with vaccines. They state that vaccine introduction sometimes correlated with a temporary increase in deaths before a decline. The speaker says the book focuses on interpreting existing vital statistics on death rate decline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of death rates over disease rates, as parental concern centered on infant mortality. They suggest diseases vary in severity, solutions, and treatment options to avoid hospitalization. They claim that medicine of the time consisted mainly of mercurials, arsenicals, and some homeopathics. The speaker alleges that high doses of aspirin, up to ten grams daily, may have worsened the 1918 flu pandemic due to potential pulmonary edema.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the the diseases that there were never any vaccines for, we see the death rate come down at the same exact avalanche as the diseases that we did vaccinate for. And in some cases, there's a little blip when the vaccine comes up, and things get worse for a bit and then come back down. So again the point of the book was just interpreting the data that's existed for a really long time, vital statistics throughout the world as to the decline in death rate. In some cases the disease rate went down too but the most important thing was the death rate because that's what people your baby could die, you have to have a vaccine, right? It's not your baby could have a rash. Right. You know so different diseases have different severities and different solutions and different ways to treat them so that they never have to present to a hospital. But like you said, back in those days, the pharmacies basically had your mercurials, arsenicals, you were lucky, some homeopathics. That was pretty much medicine back then until aspirin was invented, was probably one of the reasons why the nineteen eighteen flu looked as bad as it did because they were giving people up to ten grams of aspirin a day, which can cause pulmonary edema in a healthy person.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Rogan also brought up how sanitation in general is a huge factor in people being healthier. “What's fascinating also is that most people aren't aware of the just the general public health conditions during the time of the smallpox outbreak.” “Streets were filled with outhouses. There was animal s*** in the streets. There was no sanitation. There was no running water. It was a disaster.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the smallpox outbreak, general public health conditions involved a way of life that is almost unimaginable today. Streets were filled with human and animal waste due to a lack of sanitation and running water. Malnutrition was common, and people were exposed to numerous pathogens. Fecal matter was likely unavoidable and present everywhere, including in drinking water, which was obtained by skimming the top of water sources. Co-infections worsened primary infections, leading to complications like pneumonias. This environment was considered normal at the time, similar to what is depicted in the film "Gangs of New York." Slums were prevalent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's fascinating also is that most people aren't aware of the just the general public health conditions during the time of the smallpox outbreak. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: And the just the way the way people lived is almost unheard of. You you you wouldn't you wouldn't be able to imagine just the smell of human feces everywhere. Like, streets were filled without houses. There was animal shit in the streets. It was no sanitation. There's no running water. It's a disaster. It's a disaster, and there's no good food. So you got malnutrition. You you're exposed to numerous pathogens and just waste. You probably have fecal matter on everything. It's probably unavoidable. It tracks in your house. It's everywhere you go. Speaker 1: It's your drinking water. Yeah. Yeah. Drinking water was the you would skim the top off for your drinking water back then. And we know that co infections make make any primary infection worse. You know, if you have measles and you get a co infection makes it worse. COVID with a co anything makes it worse. You get end up with, you know, pneumonias and pus pockets in your lungs. So, yeah, thank you for that description. I don't think I could have done it much better myself. Speaker 0: But that's that's the That was normal. It's go watch gangs of New York. Like, that's that's obviously a a drama, and, you know, it's probably not completely accurate, but it's probably I bet it's pretty close. Yeah. Bet it's pretty close to how people lived back then. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the slums, like, you

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

If you’ve made it this far in the thread make sure to give @DrSuzanneH7 a follow. She’s dedicated her life to this work and make sure to check out her book, “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History.” https://t.co/xVBm9OQcX3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they were able to open an account and get a blue check mark after having to rebuild from losing an account with over 95,000 followers. The speaker believes "they" enjoy letting people build themselves up only to tear them down and make them rebuild. The speaker's account is "doctor Suzanne h seven" (drsuzanneh7). The speaker posts about vaccines and tries to stay in that lane, rather than posting opinions or pictures of pets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I did finally get a get an account. I was able to open an account and get a blue check mark, but I've only got like, I don't have that many followers. I mean, I went from having over 95,000 to having nothing and now rebuild. And that's they love that. They love to let us build ourselves up and chop us down and make us rebuild and scabbath. Your account will help you out? It's d r it's doctor Suzanne h seven, d r s u z a n n e h seven. Yeah. And I only look. I don't post my opinions about different things in the world or dog and cat pictures. Like, I post stuff about vaccines. You know? I like I stay in lane as as best as I can.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Humphries hammers home just how little she believes vaccines have improved humans life spans. “It's about 3.5%, that the contribution from medicine goes into our extended lifespan.” “3.5% based on antibiotics, vaccines, etc.” “The rest of it was all about the health revolution which is the clean water, the shelter, the electricity, the child labor laws.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lifespan improvement is attributed to medical interventions, but medicine only contributes about 3.5% through antibiotics, vaccines, etc. The rest stems from the health revolution: clean water, shelter, electricity, and child labor laws ending. The "magic of medicine" is overstated. The medical field has value in surgery and certain drugs, especially for organ failure. The speaker's Hippocratic Oath involves consulting any helpful consultant and prioritizing the patient's well-being, including using the most benign therapies first. Therapies that align with the body's blueprint and the theory of health, rather than just fighting disease, yield better results, assuming there's time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is one of the big arguments that we really ought to touch on is that they say that our lifespan has improved as a result of medical interventions. When what we show in here what other scientists have shown is that it's about 3.5% of the contribution from medicine goes into our extended lifespan. 3.5% based on antibiotics, vaccines, etcetera. The rest of it was all about the revolution, the health revolution, the clean water, the shelter, the electricity, the child labor laws ending. So the magic of medicine is not what people think and it really traps a lot of people. I think there's a value to the medical field in terms of surgery and certain drugs and if you have an organ failure like absolutely. But why not? Like my Hippocratic Oath said that I should consult any consultant that will help my patient and keep the well-being of my patient stable. Well to me that includes using every therapy that is the most benign therapies possible first. The ones that work along with the blueprint of the human body, that go along with the theory of health rather than pounding down disease. You're always gonna get a better result that way, assuming you've got time and, you know, you haven't waited till the last minute. Well, you certainly will get a better

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Joe Rogan admits he himself was brainwashed with vaccine propaganda. “I would not have guessed in a million years that I would be even questioning other vaccines.” “I would have told you that vaccines are one of the most important inventions in human history.” “Then I read Robert F. Kennedy's book.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker admits they once believed vaccines were one of humanity's most important inventions, citing polio and smallpox eradication. However, after reading Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book and "Turtles All the Way Down," their views shifted. The speaker notes the existence of another book with the same title and nearly identical cover that promotes vaccines, which they see as a deliberate attempt to confuse people. They initially dismissed RFK Jr. as an "anti-vaccine kook" based on a casual narrative, but now regrets that judgment after reading his book and speaking with him. They admit to succumbing to the common perception of RFK Jr. as someone with a weird voice who is ruining the world's immunity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Asked in a million years that, I would be even questioning other vaccines. I would have never guessed that. I would have told you that vaccines are one of the most important inventions in human history, and it's, like, saved us from polio. It saved us from smallpox. I would have been that guy ranting off all those all those statistics. I would have told you that. But then I read then I read your book. I've read Sorry. Sorry. I read Robert f Kennedy's book. I read your book, and I started reading Turtles All the Way Down, which also which is really interesting because they wrote another book called Turtles All the Way Down and someone else published it Oh. That has almost the identical cover, and that book is a pro vaccine book. Nice. Like, they literally hijack they're like, what do we do? Oh, this is what we do. Fucking confuse the shit out of people. Make one with the exact same cover. Mhmm. Exact same cover. Exact same name. Wow. And they made it a pro vaccine book. It's Yeah. Kinda wild. I mean, it's really kind of ingenious. Like, what a great way to, like, flood the market with bullshit. Mhmm. And the RFK junior book was bananas. I mean, I people had told me to read it and my initial thought book? Yes. Yeah. My initial thought was, that's that guy that's like that anti vaccine kook. Mhmm. That's what I thought. Mhmm. And I've apologized to him for that. When when I talked to him on the podcast, I I said to him, I said, I I I succumbed like everybody else did to that the casual narrative. What's the casual narrative? Oh, that RFK guy's a kook. Talks weird. Got a weird voice. He's ruining the world's immunity. Yeah. Well, I had the same thing. Like, you know, when I was first waking up, I had a friend who had unvaccinated

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Another interesting point that Dr. Humphries discusses is how Vaccines have led to an increase in allergies. “Absolutely there’s a connection.” “It’s very well known that the vaccines that have aluminum in them skew the immune system.” https://t.co/VSsJeu5wkb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aluminum in vaccines can trigger food allergies. Brett Weinstein believes there's a connection between aluminum in shots and the development of food allergies. According to dissolving illusions, vaccines with aluminum skew the immune system. The immune system has two arms: Th1 and Th2. Th1 includes T cells and lymphocytes, which eliminate garbage. Th2 deals with parasites and is mostly an antibody arm. Vaccinologists prioritize making sure there are enough antibodies. Vaccines with aluminum trigger the Th2 response, which is the allergic response and can set up the body for autoimmunity. DTaP and killed vaccines contain aluminum. Live attenuated vaccines do not contain aluminum.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All pox. I wanna talk about this because he just brought it up. One of the things that Brett Weinstein has explained to me is that aluminum is when that the concept is that giving someone a shot with aluminum in it and triggering an immune immune response, if they're eating certain foods during that time, they can then develop an allergy to those foods. Like, certain people with peanuts and and various things like that that are used to be very common for people to eat, but then a bunch of people developed, like, pretty severe food allergies. And he makes this connection that he believes he is it's reasonably it's a reasonable connection to say that there's something. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Oh, a %. And and it's it's not just something he's dreamed up. Again, provable medical literature in the book, dissolving illusions. The physiology, the pathology is known. It's very well known that the vaccines that have aluminum in them skew the immune system. So the immune system kind of just if you want to break it down really simply, you have your Th1 arm and your Th2 arm. Your Th1 arm is your really important one. Those are your T cells, your lymphocytes, the cells that chew up any garbage that's going around. That's the part you want activated in any infection you have, whether it's COVID or measles or smallpox or whatever. Then you have your Th2 arm which is there mostly to deal with parasites and things like that and it's mostly an antibody arm of immunity. That's the one that vaccinologists are obsessed with making sure there's enough antibody. So the vaccines that have aluminum in them as opposed to the live attenuated vaccines which don't have aluminum, all the other ones do. So your DTaP is going have aluminum in them. All your killed vaccines are going have aluminum in them. That is very well known to trigger that Th2 response which is the allergic response which can set up your body for autoimmunity. Part of the purpose Speaker 0: of

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Humphries then discussed the insanity that doctors are giving 6 month old babies the Covid vaccine. “They're giving Covid vaccines to six month old children now.” “We know how bad it is.” https://t.co/0ddVOyWS0F

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the media isn't reporting negative effects of COVID vaccines. COVID vaccines are now given to six-month-old children, and they supposedly ruin stem cells in pregnant women, impacting placentas and stem cell harvesting for research and cosmetics. Kevin McKernan and others allegedly found SV40, a staphylococcal endotoxin gene, and two snake genes in the vaccines, indicating gain of function. Despite this, the speaker alleges the vaccine is being added to the baby vaccine schedule to eliminate any doubts about vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were some good things about it. So the the look. Even if you look at what happened with COVID, let's just look at that. Like, how did how did they pass this off? Look at the media today. You know that they're giving COVID vaccines to six month old children now. We know how bad it is. We know that it ruins stem cells in pregnant women. They don't give stem cells to their babies. The industry is upset because the placentas no longer have stem cells. They used to use those stem cells in research and cosmetics, etcetera. They're not getting them anymore because of what the COVID shots did to the placentas and those infants. That's not being talked about in the media. Nothing bad about the shots being talked about when we have Kevin McKernan and all these people looking at it going, there's s v 40 in it. There was a staphylococcal endotoxin gene. There were two snake genes in there. You know, it's a definite gain of function. Nope. We gotta put it on the vaccine, the baby vaccine schedule, because any doubts whether or not well funded about the vaccination must not be allowed to exist. That's why. That sounds like a

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Dr. Humphries made clear the life she’s chosen hasn’t been easy. “I never expected to be here. I just wanted to be a healer. I just wanted to be a doctor. I wanted to be a nephrologist and teach medical students and make the world a better place for people.” “That's all I ever wanted. This is a nightmare for me.” “I have no regrets and I would do it all again, but no doctor wants to be put in a position where their integrity is doubted and their sanity is doubted.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they never expected to be in their current position, as their initial aspiration was to be a healer, specifically a nephrologist, teach medical students, and improve the world. While they've met incredible people and have no regrets, they describe their current situation as a nightmare. They emphasize that no doctor desires to have their integrity or sanity questioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just been look. Again, I never expected to be here. I just wanted to be a healer. I just wanted to be a doctor. I wanted to be a nephrologist and teach medical students and make the world a better place for people. That's all I ever wanted. This is a nightmare for me actually to while I've met some incredible people and I've had a really good life and I have no regrets and I would do it all again, no doctor wants to be put in a position where their integrity is doubted, their sanity is doubted. And if you want to pull up a page

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

They finished by discussing the demonization of people who think vaccines could cause autism. Dr. Humphries: “Everyone that's tried to lobby and get to the truth with autism will tell you that the brick walls and the plexiglass and the lead walls that went down were intense and still are intense.” “The lying studies that they use to uphold vaccines don't cause autism are so easy to dismantle.” Rogan: “I think for a lot of people, it's too horrible to believe, especially if they have an autistic child, that this was caused by a vaccine.” “I know a guy who told me that he believes the vaccine had an impact on his child having autism and then later was shaming people for not taking the Covid vaccine.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers claim that well-funded entities suppressed the truth about autism. They state that parents of autistic children who have tried to investigate the causes of autism have encountered intense resistance. They allege that studies used to support the claim that vaccines don't cause autism are easily disproven, but the media's ownership allows the lie to spread faster than the truth. One speaker believes that many find it too difficult to accept that vaccines could cause autism. They mention someone who suspects a vaccine caused their child's autism but still shamed others for not taking the COVID vaccine, illustrating the power of propaganda. People are afraid of social ostracization and are hesitant to speak their minds, often only whispering their true feelings to close friends. The speakers reference montages showing the horrible things people said about unvaccinated individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To be outright denied. I mean, look at autism. Hello. Like, do we how many I don't even know to start with that. But that was another thing where there was no doubt whether or not Well Funded allowed to exist what came to autism. And every autistic parent parent of an autistic child will tell you this. Everyone that's tried to lobby and get to the truth with autism will tell you that the brick walls and the plexiglass and the lead walls that went down were intense and still are intense. And the lying studies that they use to uphold vaccines don't cause autism are so easy to dismantle. But you know, Joe, you know, the lie gets around the earth three times before the truth has a chance to get out of bed. That's pretty much what happens when the media is owned. You're like one of the cracks in the matrix here, quite frankly. Speaker 1: I think for a lot of people, it's too horrible to believe, especially if they have an autistic child, that this was caused by a vaccine. I know a guy who told me that he believes the vaccine had an impact on his child having autism and then later was shaming people for not taking the COVID vaccine. That's how strong Yeah. The impulse is, and that's how good the propaganda was. And that's how cowardly a lot of people are when it comes to fighting against a narrative. They get very scared of being socially ostracized and they they just they can't speak their mind. They can't tell the truth and they'll whisper it to maybe this one guy that they're friends with like, hey, you know, I don't don't wanna take it, man, but I have to for work. Like, yeah, I don't want don't trust them either. But, you know, shh, don't tell anybody I said that. You know, you don't want anybody thinking you're on the bad side. And we all saw the propaganda on television. There's some amazing montages that people put together lately of people saying horrible things about the vaccinated people, unvaccinated people, horrible thing.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 2:02 AM

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Throwback to last year’s RFK Jr. presidential campaign Super Bowl ad that broke the internet. Crazy how much can change in just one year! https://t.co/phEgWM0ycu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy. Do you want a president who's experienced and energetic? It's your decision. It's entirely up to you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kennedy. Kennedy. Kennedy. Kennedy. Kennedy. Kennedy. Kennedy. Do you want a man for president who sees him through and through? A man who's old enough to know and young enough to do? Well, it's up to you. It's up to you. It's strictly up to you. Speaker 1: American Value twenty twenty four is responsible for the content of this advertisement.
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 4:35 PM

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

RFK Jr: “I'm going to remain on the ballot in Wisconsin and Michigan.” “They want me on the ballot to trick people into voting for me instead of voting for President Trump.” “Do not fall for that. I don't want your vote. I want you to vote for Donald Trump.” https://t.co/6nL8KQgklN

Video Transcript AI Summary
I lost a case in the Supreme Court today regarding my ballot status in 10 states. After I switched to Donald Trump, the Democratic Party changed their lawsuits to keep me on the ballot. The Supreme Court ruled that I will remain on the ballot in Wisconsin and Michigan, with dissent from the conservative justices. The Democrats want me on the ballot to interfere with the election, tricking voters into choosing me over Trump. I urge you not to fall for this. I don’t want your vote; I want you to vote for Donald Trump. Everyone needs to vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I lost the case in the United States Supreme Court. As I said before, the Democratic Party was suing me in 10 states to keep me off the ballot, including here. And as soon as I switched to Donald Trump, they changed their lawsuits to keep me on the ballot. And that lawsuit in Michigan and Wisconsin just went to the Supreme Court. And today, in a split decision, the Supreme Court said no, that I'm gonna remain on the ballot in Wisconsin and Michigan. And there were the conservatives on the court led by Neil Gorsuch all dissented. But because of that case, I because the Democratic party wants me on the ballot. Now why do they want me on the ballot? They know I'm not running for president. They want me on the ballot because they wanna do election interference. They're all talking about the integrity of the election. They want me on the ballot to trick people into voting for me instead of voting for president Trump. And what I'm saying to you is do not fall for that boy. I want I don't want your vote. I want you to vote for Donald Trump. Everybody's gotta vote.
View Full Interactive Feed