TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @EniorJimenez
@EniorJimenez - Enior
"El problema es el sionismo, no el judaísmo". Si crees eso, por favor, mira este breve video y luego hablemos. Literalmente: la religión del Anticristo. https://t.co/c51st6HWeE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a volume of the Talmud, the Steinsaltz edition, claiming it contains shocking and evil content that rabbis want to keep hidden. The passage discusses the ketubah, a marriage contract, and how its value differs for virgins and non-virgins.
The speaker highlights a section that addresses scenarios affecting a woman's virginity status, such as intercourse with a man and a girl less than three years old, or a young boy less than nine years old with a grown woman. The speaker expresses outrage, stating that according to this passage, a Jewish woman could have a relationship with his ten-year-old son. He suggests that the Talmud promotes abhorrent behavior and questions what goes on in families that uphold it as a holy book. The speaker insists that this is not a debunked conspiracy, presenting the text as proof.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I'm going to show you something so evil and so vile in this book right here, which I'll be showing you in closer detail, that's probably going to really shock you. And that is certainly something that the Talmudic rabbis do not want people to understand. They don't want people to know. What I have here is the Talmud, the the Steinsaltz edition, volume seven, tractate kitabud, part one. You can see it right there.
I did a video on these a little while ago. The whole set, we have the whole thing. Cost us over $2,000 for this. And the fruits of this are going to start paying off. Mishnah, whatever the Hebrew is there, it has already been established in a previous Mishnah above 10 b, that a woman who is presumed to be a virgin at the time of her marriage is entitled to a ketubah of 200 denarim, whereas a woman who is presumed to be a non virgin at the time of her marriage is entitled to a ketubah of 100 denirim, a minna, whatever the Mishnah we are about to consider continues in its efforts to determine which women are considered virgins for the purpose of the ketubah, and which are treated as non virgins.
If a grown up man has intercourse with a less than three years old. Are you seeing this? And they're not condemning this. Or if a young boy less than nine years old has had with a grown woman. Or if a woman has been injured by a stick and as a result her sorry about that has been ruptured.
In each of these cases, the woman is entitled to a ketubah of 200 denarum when she marries. Okay? And you can keep on reading there. You can pause it and read it, if you really want to. Now, take great issue with that.
My son, which I mentioned earlier, is 10 years old. And according to this satanism right here, a woman, a Jewish woman, could have a relationship with my 10 year old. And, if I was a Jew, hey, that three year old girl over there, she's really hot. Excuse me? And this is what these, Jews at the Torah Institute are learning.
I'm gonna go learn the Talmud. I mean, maybe they're not all learning the Talmud and things, but a lot of them do. It takes seven years to go through this garbage. I wonder what kind of horrible things go on in these families, between these families, when their holy book right here that they deny the word of God to uplift this. And this holy book says, three year old girl.
If you're a man, you're a woman, 10 year old or a nine year old. Excuse me. Nine year old boy. Oh, well, that's just conspiracy stuff. That's been debunked.
We've done we've fact checked it, and it's not true. I just showed it to you. Overhead camera. Just showed you the page and the quotes. Right here.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tuve una entrevista reciente con Tucker Carlson donde hablé sobre cómo un solo país ejerce un control total sobre el Congreso estadounidense. Desde el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, el moderno Estado de Israel ha dictado la política exterior de EE. UU. y la geopolítica global.
@EniorJimenez - Enior
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie es un congresista republicano desde 2012 representado el estado de Kentucky. Aquí su entrevista reciente con Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson sobre cómo un solo país del mundo, ejerce completo control sobre el Congreso estadounidense. El moderno Estado de Israel, desde el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, dicta la política exterior estadounidense y, con ella, la geopolítica del mundo moderno.
Video Transcript AI Summary
APAC is ostensibly a group of Americans who lobby on behalf of Israel, and they're very effective. As a candidate, they wanted me to do homework for them on Israel. When I refused, they suggested I copy Rand Paul's paper. I may be the only Republican in Congress who hasn't done homework for them.
They tried to get to me through churches, using organizations like Christians United for Israel to co-opt evangelicals. After I was elected, they ran ads against me, so I banned them from my office. This cycle, they spent $400,000 against me.
I think they're afraid of one person speaking the truth. They've called me a bigot and an anti-Semite, which is disgusting. I'm not anti-Semitic, but I don't like APAC. They should be registered with FARA, like anyone lobbying for a foreign government. Many Republicans agree with me privately but fear the backlash. Everyone has an "APAC person" they talk to, which is crazy. No other country has this kind of influence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what's APAC? APAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And they didn't start out as a pack in in the sense of a political action committee, but now they have a political action committee. Ostensibly, it's a group of Americans who lobby on behalf of Israel. They're for anything Israel.
And they're a very effective lobbying group. They get in there, they they try to get me to write a white paper as a candidate for instance for congress. They almost get On on what? On Israel. Like, and I wouldn't do it.
And they said, why? And I'm like, I don't do homework for lobbyists. Right? I'm like, I didn't learn I didn't like writing term papers at college. I'm not writing one for you.
Speaker 1: What did they say?
Speaker 0: They said, oh, well, here just copy Rand Paul's term paper and put your name on it. We'll accept that. I'm like, no. I'm still not cribbing somebody else's homework to do homework. I'm not turning in my homework for you.
And and what I hear laughing, but you know what, I bet I may be the only republican in congress who hasn't done homework for APAC. And it's just what it is, it's conditioning. They want you to do something very simple and benign and you know, for them. They don't really they don't really grade your term paper. They just wanna know that you'll do something for them.
And if you'll do something for them as a candidate, you're more likely to do something for them as as a congressman when you get in there. So this my rift started out in 2012 when I refused to turn in an Israel respond to that? Well, they kind of got in my race a little too late there in the beginning, and because it was hard to tell that I was actually going to win, and when they saw I was going to win, that's when they tried to get me to do the term paper. They didn't have a political action committee at the time. They couldn't spend hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars against me at that time.
It was just sort of like a whisper campaign to try to, hey, don't vote for him, blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: That's why?
Speaker 0: Because at that point, they sensed I wouldn't do what they wanted when I
Speaker 1: What did they whisper against you? What were they saying about you?
Speaker 0: Well, they would do it through, for instance, churches, evangelical churches. They've got an organization called Christians United for Israel. Where they sort of co opted evangelicals. People think it's a grassroots movement in Kentucky, it's actually a top down movement from APAC, so that people who aren't even Jewish will feel like they've got to support Israel, you know, no matter what. And even if it's a secular state that funds abortions, they, you know, just sort of forget that part and we've got to fund Israel.
So they have networks, so it's more than just about the money.
Speaker 1: So you get elected despite their efforts, and then what happens? Do you talk to them after that?
Speaker 0: And by the way, let me just put a little footnote here. I'm not against Israel. I've never voted to sanction Israel. I've never said anything particularly, you know, critical of Israel, you know, other than, for instance, right now, they're bombing. They've killed 1% of the civilian population in Gaza.
That's concerning to me. But so what do they do now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. You get elected 02/2012. Do you hear from them again?
Speaker 0: I vote my conscience, which they won't tolerate. So they ran with their five zero one c four before they had a super PAC. They were they were running educational advocacy ads against me saying that, you know, I'm bad on Israel. They didn't say don't vote for him, they just said he's he's a bad guy. And so I said, alright, well you're not welcome in my office anymore, because for years I I invited him into my office, let's talk this through, let me explain to you.
I'm a libertarian leaning republican, I don't vote for foreign aid for anybody, So don't be offended when I don't vote for your foreign aid. I don't vote for wars anywhere, so don't be offended if I tell you that. I'm for free speech, even if it's abhorrent. And you know, we used to talk, but now they're banned from my office. The situation went from bad to worse.
This election cycle, they spent $400,000 against me. $90,000 last fall running TV ads in my district, and Facebook ads, and whatnot, trying to equate me with the squad. And then this most recently, and in fact, as I'm speaking you to you today, even though my election is over, they're still running hundreds of thousand dollars of negative ads.
Speaker 1: It's a little weird though, because as you said, you're probably the only republican in the house who hasn't done homework for them, who isn't on their side. And but and that's okay. I mean, you can have you know, you're a libertarian oriented republican from Northern Kentucky. You're probably not gonna single handedly determine our foreign policy. So you I think you should, but you don't.
Thank
Speaker 0: you. And you're not going
Speaker 1: to. So why do they care? Why not just let Thomas Massey be Thomas Massey in Northern Kentucky? Like, why why the need to crush you?
Speaker 0: I don't know. I think it's they don't want one horse out of the barn. If one person starts speaking the truth, they're afraid it could be contagious, perhaps. Or it's like a new car. They they go to Mike Johnson, they say we want a Cadillac, you know, Escalade with pearl white paint, and here's, you know, here's the rims we want.
And Mike Johnson puts that bill on the floor, it passes with a unanimous vote except for one guy votes no, and it I think they feel like it's a scratch on their car. They wanted a brand new car and it got scratched by this guy named Massey. They were gonna drive it over to the senate and ask for unanimous consent. But now the senators are saying, wait, why this wasn't unanimous in the house, why should we do it unanimously in the senate? And it starts raising questions and I think that's why they get mad.
Speaker 1: What I find interesting is that it's not just that they disagree with your views, which they do, and I think they have an absolute right to disagree with anybody's views. We all do. But they've called you a bigot, and call you an anti semite and say you're a hater and try to destroy your character. That seems like a very different level of response to me.
Speaker 0: Right. They there's no need to do that. I'm not anti semitic. I don't have an anti semitic hair in my head. Okay?
It's I mean, I don't like APAC anymore. Like, I used to be neutral toward APAC. Right? But I I have no antagonistic feelings toward Jewish people. I I am the last thing.
I think I'm probably the least xenophobic person in congress. I mean, are the guys that my colleagues wanna sanction everybody, you know, declare them terrorist states, you know, come up with these strongly worded resolutions. I don't vote for any of that crap. Right? I'll unless somebody does harm to me, I'm not gonna call them anything.
So I get called names just for staying out of all of this political posture. That's that's disgusting though, isn't it? You know, I guess That's your character.
Speaker 1: They can they can disagree with your views
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: But but to call you, like, the worst thing you can be in America, like, that's disgusting.
Speaker 0: You know, I I have a thick skin. Apparently. And and here's the good news, Tucker. My my constituents aren't falling for it. Two weeks ago, I just had a primary and got 76% of the vote.
With APAC running hundreds of thousand dollars of ads. So it's it's not working against me. I I think it's shortsighted on their, you know, on their side to do this. They're just burning money. But they're trying to make an example of me
Speaker 1: But they're also exposing their weakness.
Speaker 0: I think they are. I think they've exposed a real weakness here. And, you know, it used to be just me voting against some of these resolutions, but recently where they tried to ban passages in the New Testament, I think we got like almost two dozen Republicans who said, wait, hold on there.
Speaker 1: Question though. There's a fundamental question. So the Biden administration has put a bunch of people in jail for violating something called FARA, the Foreign Agent Registration Act nineteen thirty six ish. It's been on the books for, you know, ninety years. And it's never been enforced ever until recently, until really the Trump era and Biden era.
So but the law requires people who lobby on behalf of foreign governments to register. It was that simple. And this is the largest lobby in the night most effective lobby in The United States on behalf of a foreign government. Are they registered with FARA?
Speaker 0: They are not, but they should be.
Speaker 1: Well, how how can that how can that be? How can they put Paul Manafort in jail, which they did, on a FARA violation and a bunch of other people in jail on FARA violations, but the largest and most effective and most feared foreign lobby working for a foreign government doesn't have to
Speaker 0: register under the law? That's insane. So this is APAC is exactly what FARA is meant for. Now they would say, and we have a first amendment right. Okay.
Well I agree. I agree with you there, but we also have election laws. And to the it's disclosure. Right? We're they're not doesn't say you can't say Thomas Massie's, you know, an ignorant hillbilly.
You're allowed to say that if you want to, but we just want to check where your money's coming from. Tell us where it's coming from, what you're spending it on, and if you are lobbying on behalf of a foreign country. So they should be, now to your point, they should be registered with FARA. This is what FARA is, is where there's gray area, where it's an American representing a foreign country. Let's let's look and see if you're getting any money from that foreign country.
Are you a dual citizen with that foreign country? Are you being directed by for instance is Netanyahu speaking to your group, advising you on your next move? Those are you getting money from the military industrial complex? Like because to understand APAC, I think it's easiest to model them as a military industrial lobby. Like, their biggest thing is they want more equipment, more military equipment from The United States going to Israel.
In fact, when they used to be allowed in my office, the thing they the argument they would make is, oh, we're just stimulating the US military industrial complex because every single penny of the 3,800,000,000.0 that they nominally get, now they're getting way more than that, but that Israel nominally gets goes to US Military Contractors. Now, didn't make me warm and fuzzy, okay? But that is their argument. And if you notice what they advocate for, I think sometimes they advocate for things that even Israelis wouldn't advocate for.
Speaker 1: I believe that.
Speaker 0: Like, they would, I think, be okay with a war with Iran. Like, a all out, you know, apocalyptic war with Iran. Whereas, there are people in Israel saying, woah, hold on a second. We'd we'd rather not have a war with Iran. But APAC does things that lead us in that direction.
Speaker 1: It's just the idea of a foreign government playing in our political campaigns openly.
Speaker 0: Openly in that they are showing you they're doing it, but opaquely in that you can't track it because they're not registered.
Speaker 1: Is is there any other Republican who has your views on this?
Speaker 0: Well, I have Republicans who come to me on the floor and say, wish I could vote with you today. Yours is the right vote, but I would just take too much flack back home. And I have Republicans who come to me and say, that's wrong what APAC is doing to you. Let me talk to my APAC person. By the way, everybody but me has an APAC person.
Speaker 1: What does that mean an APAC person?
Speaker 0: It's like your babysitter. Your APAC Babysitter who is always talking to you for APAC. They're probably a constituent in your district, but they are, you know, firmly embedded in APAC and Every member has something like this? Every I don't know how it works on the democrat side, but that's how it works on the republican side. And when they and when they come to DC, you go have lunch with them.
And they've got your cell number and you have conversations with them. So I've had like That's absolutely crazy. I've had four members of congress say, I'll talk to my APAC person and it's literally what we call them, my APAC guy. I'll talk to my APAC guy and see if I can get him to, you know, dial those ads back.
Speaker 1: Why have I never heard this before?
Speaker 0: It doesn't benefit anybody. Why would they want to tell their constituents that they've basically got a buddy system with somebody who's representing a foreign country? It it doesn't benefit the congressman for people to know that, so they're not going to tell you that.
Speaker 1: It's it's in have you seen any other country do anything like this? Like No. Russia obviously determines the outcome of our elections. We keep hearing that. Does anyone have a Putin guy that they talk to?
Speaker 0: Not only do they not have a Putin guy. Look, they don't they they don't have a Britain guy. They don't have an Australian guy. They, you know, they don't have a Germany dude. Like, it's the only country that does this.