TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @EricLDaugh
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw shocking footage of Hillary Clinton erupting in rage at Rep. Nancy Mace during Epstein testimony, shouting “I’m gonna ANSWER your question!” and slamming the table. Mace replies she’s a survivor and will yell back, saying she’s looking out for survivors.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jaw-dropping footage released of Hillary Clinton GOING BERSERK, yelling in a fit of rage at Rep. Nancy Mace during her Epstein testimony "I'm gonna ANSWER your question! *Slams table* I was TAKING CARE OF THE PEOPLE who lost 3,000 lives!" Mace can be heard talking about how she is also a survivor MACE: "You wanna yell at me, I'll YELL RIGHT BACK! I'm looking out for survivors, I'm doing the job you WOULD NOT DO." @RepNancyMace Yikes. She's crazy!
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that behind closed doors Bill Clinton cleared Trump of wrongdoing regarding Epstein, while Hillary attacked him. Clinton supposedly said Trump wasn’t involved and that they had a falling out over a business/land deal. Republicans say this disrupts the Dems’ narrative on Oversight, letting the air out of the balloon. Imagine that!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. It just came out that behind closed doors, Bill Clinton was CLEARING President Trump of wrongdoing regarding Epstein — but Hillary Clinton was being a vicious witch, ATTACKING him "Bill Clinton let the AIR OUT of the balloon!" She has the PUREST FORM of TDS, and will never shake it! REP. FALLON: "Hillary was BITTER, RIPPING Trump, encouraging us to investigate him! But Bill came in and said, I don't think he had ANYTHING to do with Epstein!" REP. LANGWORTHY: "Bill Clinton said he had a conversation with Donald Trump in 2002-2003 that he said he doesn't believe he was involved in anything to do with Epstein, that they had had a falling out over a business deal, a land deal, and he didn't believe he was involved in any of that." "I think that's why this was such a bad day for Robert Garcia and the Democrats on the Oversight Committee!" "Why they were very quiet, because he let the air out of the balloon on this whole fiasco, on how they have tried to make this an albatross on Trump!" "Because here you have Bill Clinton himself, Democratic ROYALTY, who basically said, I don't think Trump's got anything to do with this!" 🔥🔥 IMAGINE THAT!
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting BREAKING: Trump exposed Schumer with a 1996 clip showing support for ID to prevent fraud. Now he calls the SAVE America Act “Jim Crow 2.0,” says he’s caught. Pass the SAVE America Act!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just EXPOSED Chuck Schumer, posting a 1996 video where he SUPPORTED ID to prevent fraud "Everywhere people go, they're asked for Social Security or driver's license! This is anti-fraud!" Now, he calls the SAVE America Act "Jim Crow 2.0" He got CAUGHT. Pass the SAVE America Act!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that everywhere people go, they’re asked for a Social Security card, and that proving you’re a bonafide person who can have a job involves asking for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is described as an anti-fraud amendment. The speaker notes that people ask why we can’t stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here, and to constituents, the number one answer given is that when they come here, they can get jobs and benefits against the law because of fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's admit the truth. Everywhere people go, they're asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you're a bonafide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver's license and a Social Security card. This is an anti fraud amendment. All the over where we go, people say, well, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here?
And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JAW-DROPPING betrayal that deserves prison time. Minnesota Legislative Auditor found Tim Walz employees fabricated records to cover up fraud, they did 0 site visits to locations that received hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars per year PRISON. https://t.co/wYBAaKmO8S
reSee.it AI Summary
I see it’s official: leftist protestors are making job listings paying up to $4.2K a month. ActBlue has funneled billions to groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, coordinating resistance on ICE in Minneapolis. Indivisible allegedly paid protesters and has received over $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. It’s all astroturfed.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: The leftist protestors have been caught making JOB LISTINGS for up to $4.2K per month https://t.co/THQkkqntTH “ActBlue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis." "Indivisible has been caught paying protesters, and they've received over $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros." — @NateFriedman97 IT'S ALL ASTROTURFED!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on allegations that Naftali Aaron Kranz is a paid protester and that a group called GetFree recruits and deploys paid demonstrators. A journalist questions whether there is someone they can speak to, and the conversation suggests the person of interest is on the other side of a park. The speaker asserts that Naftali Aaron Kranz is “a paid protester through and through,” and that he posts on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for GetFree, a company advertising itself as a grassroots organization while paying people to protest.
GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four-plus years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, and civil disobedience (which is described as experience getting arrested). Compensation is reportedly 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours per week. The speaker claims GetFree’s stated mission is to undo white supremacy, despite the assertion that Kranz and others are paid to protest.
The narrative highlights Kranz’s participation in protests, including celebrating vandalism, with an example cited of “Crown Heights stay winning” after an egg was thrown at a stranger’s cyber truck and dog feces placed on it. The speaker places Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he is not leading the protest but blending in with recruits, enabling a later photo op. The claim is that this recruitment tactic blends various leftist causes to inflate the appearance of each individual cause. The speaker also states Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and was encountered at a DSA Tax the Rich rally.
LinkedIn activity is cited again, with Kranz posting about paid protester roles and recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore to expand turnout at events. When clicking a linked job posting, the contract is described as nine weeks, part-time, paying about 3,400 dollars in stipends issued biweekly, with responsibilities including recruiting and training people to drive turnout. The speaker identifies Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement and attributes a belief that George Floyd protests were a factor in Biden’s 2020 victory.
The transcript connects protest NGOs to political goals, claiming donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the Department of Justice is investigating for foreign contributions. It also asserts ActBlue funds activists like Indivisible Twin Cities, which allegedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been paid protesters, receiving over 7.6 million dollars from Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal note to stay away, and the journalist states they have to go.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a journalist, and I'm wondering if there's someone I can speak to. I mean, any any Is there someone that I can speak to?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think they might be, like, on the other side
Speaker 0: of the park, actually. No. Yeah. So said you would be here.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. But other side of park's actually
Speaker 0: Why are you so upset? Why are you so angry? I was angry right here. What? You seem don't angry right seem like really jittery, like upset.
You're just annoying. That's all. Oh, why am I annoying?
Speaker 1: Meet Naftali Aaron Kranz. He's a paid protester through and through. Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for the company he works for called GetFree. Listen to this. GetFree is hiring for part time mobilization support contractor.
That just means paid protester. We're seeking out people with four plus years of experience in leading direct action and large scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience, which just means experience getting arrested. Compensation is 3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of twenty hours a week. Get Free on their website calls themselves a grassroots organization when Naftali and others are literally being paid to protest. Get Free wants to quote undo white supremacy.
Naftali thinks one of the best ways to do that is to celebrate vandalism, saying Crown Heights stay winning after someone threw an egg at a stranger's cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. Here's Naftali at an abolish the police rally. You can see he's not leading the protest, just blending in amongst the other recruits. He can get his photo op later because the way this works is combining all the leftist causes together to make the individual causes look bigger than they are. And, of course, he works with the DSA, which is why I ran into him at this DSA Tax the Rich rally.
On LinkedIn, you can see Naftali frequently doing his paid protester posts saying, come work with and help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country. And Naftali is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, The Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly, and they're looking for someone excited about experimentation and will recruit people and train them to drive turnout to events. We see Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement.
She says that George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the twenty twenty election. Now we can see that these protest NGO groups are about one thing, getting Democrats elected. So it's only fitting that donations to get free are funneled through ActBlue, who is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. Act Blue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters and they've received over $7,600,000 from the Open Society Foundation funded by George Soros.
I gotta stay away. Alright.
Speaker 0: Well, I have to go for a stand here.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: A citizen journalist has EXPOSED countless anti-ICE protestors boarding BUSES after they clocked out of the day's protest "Look, watch this. See? All these people are not from Massachusetts!" It's COMMUNIST DOLLARS. Audit the funds! https://t.co/lM87xgaf5Y
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting breaking news: California faces mass demands for a sweeping audit after alleged fraud—LA County accounts for 18% of U.S. home health, more hospice agencies than 36 states combined. One doctor billed taxpayers $120M. A cluster of 287 hospice providers in a 2-mile radius—strip malls, unmarked buildings, even a wrecking yard and a vacant lot—it's all paperwork. Gavin Newsom is not only allowing it but complicit.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: California is facing mass demands for a sweeping audit after MAJOR FRAUD was exposed — 18% of the entire United States' home health comes from just LA county The single county has more hospice agencies than 36 states combined! https://t.co/yl3MSk4cA5 ONE doctor was caught billing taxpayers $120M fraudulently "A cluster of 287 hospice providers, in a 2-mile radius, some in strip malls, unmarked buildings, even a wrecking yard and vacant lot. All of it is just paperwork. I could fill that out in Kazakhstan if I want and get a hospice license waiting for me!" 🤯 Gavin Newsom is not only allowing it but is COMPLICIT.
Video Transcript AI Summary
- A doctor billed the government $120,000,000 in a single year, claiming to oversee 1,900 patients.
- With almost 2,000 hospice agencies, Los Angeles County has more than 36 states combined, and 30 times more than either Florida or New York.
- 18% of the whole country’s home health care billing is coming out of Los Angeles County.
- A map shows a cluster of 287 hospice providers in a two-mile radius, some in strip malls, unmarked buildings, even a wrecking yard and vacant lot; all of it is just paperwork.
- I could fill that out in Kazakhstan if I want.
- I can get a hospice license waiting for me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor billed the government $120,000,000 in a single year, claiming to oversee 1,900 patients. With almost 2,000 hospice agencies, LA County has more than 36 states combined, and 30 times more than either Florida or New York.
Speaker 1: 18% of the whole country's home health care billing is coming out of Los Angeles County. How is that possible?
Speaker 0: And take a look at this map. A cluster of two eighty seven hospice providers in a two mile radius. Some in strip malls, unmarked buildings, even a wrecking yard and vacant lot. All of it is just paperwork. I could fill that out in Kazakhstan if I want.
I can get a hospice license waiting for me.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: The leftist agitators are paid and got CAUGHT packing up all their equipment after clocking out of their designated protest time David Khait got the entire thing on video and they’re furious It’s COMMUNIST DOLLARS! https://t.co/6KxW9I9bBv
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes how on-the-spot protests unfold, arguing that protests that appear to erupt immediately after events, and often seem spontaneous, are in fact not organic or unplanned. According to the speaker, such demonstrations can be initiated without the traditional apparatus of organizers, music, bullhorns, or large gatherings that are typically associated with coordinated protests. Instead, the speaker notes that trucks are being loaded to depart after the protest, suggesting a premeditated or at least organized behind-the-scenes workflow that enables these protests to occur with apparent immediacy.
The speaker then identifies the groups involved in the protest activity behind them. The groups named are the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and a few looser organizations described as Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker asserts that these groups, together, are responsible for the protests and the organizing of the demonstrations.
A central claim of the speaker is that none of the protests seen are organic contributions arising spontaneously from local populations. Instead, the protests are characterized as well organized, implying a level of planning and coordination beyond what the public perceives. The assertion extends to the source of this organization, suggesting that the readiness and capability to mobilize protests come from structured planning and networks rather than spontaneous public sentiment alone.
Building on the claim of organization, the speaker posits that the effective mobilization of these protests is supported by funding. The funding is described as coming through various campaigns, with two described pathways: foreign influence campaigns and domestic political campaigns, specifically mentioning Democrat campaigns as potential sources of financial support. The speaker implies that such funding enables the rapid deployment and execution of protest activities.
In summary, the speaker contends that the protests observed after events are not spontaneously generated but are the result of deliberate organization by specific political groups, with notable involvement from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, and Revolutionary Communists for America. The speaker emphasizes that these protests are well funded through campaigns, including foreign influence efforts or Democratic campaigns, which facilitates their ability to mobilize quickly and appear as if they are happening organically.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you've ever wondered how protests happen on the spot, this is exactly how. Without organizers, without the music, without the bullhorns, without all of these people coming together. Right now, what they're doing is they're loading their trucks to leave out of here after they finish with the protest. None None of the protests that you see that happen immediately after something happens, which is all the time now, wouldn't be possible. What's behind me is a combination of party for socialism and liberation.
We have Democrat Socialists of America here as well, and a couple very loose communist organizations like Revolutionary Communists for America. None of the protests that you see are organic. They're well organized. And because they're well organized, that means they're well funded through various campaigns, whether it's foreign influence campaigns or it could be even Democrat campaigns. So this is how it all happens.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that Minnesota fraud could be up to nearly $80 billion, with hundreds of financial investigators on it. A distraction is keeping people from talking about the fraud. We have hundreds of accountants reviewing everything, and we’re finding fraud on top of fraud. They think it’s $19 billion, but triple or quadruple that isn’t out of the question. If we catch this, there will be accountability.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump confirms Minnesota fraud could be up to nearly $80 BILLION dollars, he has HUNDREDS of financial investigators looking into it right now "A lot of what's going on with Minneapolis is so people DON'T TALK ABOUT THE FRAUD! It's a DISTRACTION." "What you don't see is that we have hundreds of accountants and from all of the different people. We have hundreds of accountants going over everything that's happening." "And we're finding fraud on top of fraud on top of fraud. And I think that they don't want that to happen. You're talking about $19 billion. Probably that's a minimal number." "If they think it's $19 billion, triple it or quadruple it. And if we catch a lot of this fraud, and I felt it for a long time, but now we know what's happening." "And the answer is, yeah, there will be accountability!" @RapidResponse47
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that James O'Keefe exposes taxpayer-funded NGOs and nonprofits propping up violence in Minneapolis, with rioters sending death threats and chasing them until they retreated. He calls the whole thing a criminal conspiracy, naming a network of NGOs, unions, and groups—SEIU, Make the Road New York, Independent Socialist Group—behind the chaos. They were accused of being feds, chased, teargassed, hit, forced to retreat, and received death threats by text and being followed.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 WOW. James O'Keefe just exposed that taxpayer-funded NGOs and nonprofits are propping up VIOLENCE in Minneapolis — with rioters sending them DEATH THREATS and chasing them until they retreated. This entire conspiracy is CRIMINAL. https://t.co/PnriH3uNUR "An entire network of NGOs, unions, and activist groups including “SEIU”, “Make the Road New York”, and the “Independent Socialist Group” are all behind this chaos." "We were accused of being “feds,” chased, teargassed, hit, and forced to retreat when our team was being attacked and threatened. We received death threats via text messages and were followed to each location we were at."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript follows James O’Keefe’s Okefe Media team in downtown Minneapolis as they document protests, counter-mobilization, and personal risk around a period of political tension. The team’s undercover reporters describe being inside a mob that shouts, curses, and attempts to block or attack vehicles. They recount that “they threw something at me, which hit the back of my bulletproof vest,” and a frozen ice brick was hurled at the SUV. They note the mob’s perception of vehicles like SUVs as “feds,” and emphasize the danger of driving through protests, holding up windows, and the need to roll up windows to avoid escalation. An independent journalist, Cam Higbee, is cited as reporting that trucks and SUVs are “an absolute no go” and that license plates can be tracked.
As the day proceeds, the undercover reporters observe and film chants such as “ice out” and “fuck ICE,” with some participants identified as teachers, nurses, and union organizers who express appreciation for the reporters’ presence. The team mentions Peggy Wang, based in Boston and active in the Massachusetts Teachers Association, who works at the Massachusetts College of Art and Design and participates in pro-Palestinian protests; her job is reportedly threatened for engaging in these activities. Peggy Wang’s list of issues includes immigration rights, abolishing ICE, stopping raids and deportations, justice for victims, and getting ICE out of cities like Minneapolis. The footage also references Make the Road New York, described by a protester as an organization with a $30,000,000 budget, connected to an April Veretti, president of the SEIU (Service Employees International Union).
The team’s analysis of funding shows Make the Road New York as a registered 501(c)(3) with Form 990s and substantial grant income, including “they received $16,000,000 in grants.” Agitators and protesters are shown on top of cars, breaking parts of vehicles, and a tense dynamic emerges with claims that there are no “blood” or “MAGA” people present. The cold weather hampers equipment, with cameras freezing and water turning into a weapon within seconds, and tear gas affecting the undercover reporters when they approach a nearby apartment complex lobby where agitators are wiping tear gas from their faces.
A key moment comes on January 24, when a shooting occurs a few miles away, and the mayor’s demand to choose sides intensifies tensions: “Our streets. Our streets. No justice. No peace.” The reporters describe mob behavior that seems to outpace law enforcement, noting that Minneapolis police stood down and implying that accountability is lacking in the absence of constant oversight. They document being followed and harassed, with the agitators showing disdain for press that is not aligned with their beliefs, and the discovery that identifying as press can lead to hostility or threats.
In a post-event segment, the team travels to another hotel to avoid spotters, reports of being tailed persist, and a burner-number threat claims: “you have one hour to leave or you’re dead.” The closing reflections address broader themes: self-preservation versus accountability, the need for consequences to ensure justice, and the claim that “justice only happens when they are being watched.” The piece ends with James O’Keefe pivoting to a promotional segment for gold investment, touting rising gold and silver prices and offering a free gold bar with purchases, branding it as a call to protect freedom and retirement, ending with financial advisory caution.
Key individuals mentioned by name: Peggy Wang; April Veretti; Make the Road New York; SEIU; Cam Higbee (indirectly cited as corroborating signal chats).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we're in Downtown Minneapolis. What we found NGOs and nonprofits funded by the government featuring true believers. Is this a door lock. Not the door. Why are you giving us the middle finger?
Speaker 1: Oh, it just snapped
Speaker 2: the shit out of that rear.
Speaker 0: Our undercover people were inside the mob.
Speaker 3: With our national organization. You can look up make the road New York.
Speaker 4: Are there chats and stuff? I'm trying
Speaker 2: to get linked up. Watch out. Here we go. Here we go.
Speaker 0: They threw something at me, which hit the back of my bulletproof vest. They're everywhere. Shut the fucking doors.
Speaker 2: Shut the door. Oh, woah. Woah.
Speaker 0: They threw a a frozen ice brick at the car. Downtown Minneapolis, the day before the shooting of Alex Preti, they were still protesting Renee Goode. The O'Keefe team rolled into town in an SUV with tinted windows. They could not see inside. And what's remarkable is they start cursing at your car merely because it is an SUV, which they all perceive to be feds.
Is the door locked? Lock the door. Why are you giving us the middle finger?
Speaker 2: Right here, buddy. Get the fuck out of here.
Speaker 0: Here comes a guy, don't loan, do not. Yeah. I don't know what he's doing. No. Don't.
Don't. Don't. See? Just don't hit anybody. Okay?
Usually, I'm pretty confrontational, but we soon realize the only way to deal with these types of white walkers or zombies as we call them is to just not engage. Roll up your window. Roll up your window now. Anything else would lead to escalation and violence. You are alone.
You are It's safe to say that I've never seen anything like this in my life. Just driving down a street will have people scream to you and curse at you and threaten violence. In fact, independent journalist, Cam Higbee, was nearby and texted me at this time telling me that trucks, Tahoes, Suburbans, SUVs are an absolute no go. He advised us to get a Subaru or other mom car or Honda, as he said. He mentioned they would bank our license plate.
Our undercover people arrived at the tail end of the protest that evening, including myself.
Speaker 5: Watchdog, how you doing? What's going on? It's Jay O'Connell, watchdog. What's going My fiance is a teacher.
Speaker 2: Is she? Where's what's she teach? Oh.
Speaker 0: What's she teach?
Speaker 5: Special needs. We're
Speaker 2: a we're gonna be a ICE agent. Don't you have a a thing to call your face? Like this. We
Speaker 0: heard chants of ice out and fuck ice. Ice out.
Speaker 2: Ice out. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Ice.
Ice.
Speaker 0: Hopefully, the audience will forgive this reporter for participating in these chants in order to fit in. We found teachers, nurses, and union organizers all telling us, we appreciate you, neighbor.
Speaker 2: I do appreciate you, neighbor. Appreciate neighbor. I appreciate you, neighbor.
Speaker 6: A guy came by before and
Speaker 2: he stopped here. It was a bunch of young kids, and they handed out weed to everybody. It was so cool. I gave all right away. All all but a little bit because I wanted to at least try it.
You got anything better than weed? Love? Are you a paid agitator? I'm just kidding.
Speaker 0: While many, probably many of you, might think this is all due to some specific centralized funding source, what we found is a hodgepodge of various NGOs and nonprofits loosely tied together through ideology funded in part by the government featuring five zero one c threes with nonprofit tax returns, a variety of funding sources. But most of these people we found were actually true believers there to live and die by their cause. This woman featured on a hidden camera is Peggy Wang based in Boston. She works at Massachusetts College of Art and Design, active in the Massachusetts Teachers Association. She participates in pro Palestinian protests, and her job is currently being threatened for doing so.
While this footage is hard to hear, Peggy Wang lists the issues that her organization gets involved in, immigration rights, abolishing ICE, stopping raids and deportations, justice for victims, and getting ICE out of cities like Minneapolis. This other protester we secretly recorded talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently, they have a budget of $30,000,000. They talk about one of the speakers that spoke earlier that day, April Veretti. April is the president of the SEIU Labor Union.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you're interested in in on the
Speaker 3: immigrant rights organization, you can look up Make the Road New York.
Speaker 2: Make the Road New
Speaker 3: York. Make the
Speaker 2: Road New But who are you with? I'm just with the
Speaker 3: I'm with the union.
Speaker 2: Oh. Yeah. Yeah. S e I u, Service Employees International. We
Speaker 0: looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501C3 that file a nine ninety, and they received $16,000,000 in grants. Guys, out.
Speaker 2: Guys. Guys. We love our neighbors.
Speaker 0: As cars drove by, the agitators would ride on top of the cars. One man's spoiler was broken off his car as one agitator tried to climb on board the car.
Speaker 2: What happened? It was out. I just accidentally broke his wing on his car. Oh, shit.
Speaker 1: Oh, they snapped the shit out
Speaker 2: of that way right there.
Speaker 0: One of the comments they made was, there's no blood here, and you know there's no Trump people. There's no MAGA people. Because if there was, there's there'd be blood.
Speaker 2: We have one very oh, I have to have a clue. I got any what are the sashes trying to read through it? Nope. Not yet.
Speaker 0: One of the advantages of it being so cold is we were able to cover every single part of our skin, but these conditions were truly dangerous. Many of our DSLR cameras actually froze. Our hidden cameras malfunctioned in minutes because it was so cold.
Speaker 2: You make this this PSA?
Speaker 6: I made
Speaker 2: it for the Powderhorn Festival because I wanna melt ice to get them the fuck out of here. No. Not melting. Earth is so good. Oh, you know why?
Because it's so cold out. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: We watched water freeze in seconds. A bottle of water quickly be turned into a weapon. Negative 17 degree weather. Let's see what happens to water. Let's see how fast that freezes.
One, two, three. It's already frozen. On our second day, January 24, something happened that we never anticipated. Oh, shit. What the fuck?
There was a second shooting. We were only a few miles away when that happened. There was just a shooting. Any updates that you sit while you were sitting there, you guys were reading the news?
Speaker 2: The biggest updates that we have is that the mayor just announced the mayor just announced that you need to decide what side you're on, either you're on the side of Minneapolis or you're on the side of the federal government. Our streets. Our streets. Our streets. Our streets.
Streets. No justice. No peace. No justice. No peace.
Speaker 0: Around noon local time, when people started to descend walking down the street, mobs of people appeared out of nowhere, all walking in the direction of the shooting. We wondered where did these people come from and how did they know so quickly to mobilize? Our undercover people were inside the mob.
Speaker 2: I can't believe this happened again. I drove down from Colorado to come yesterday. We were gonna leave today, and then all that just happened. Like Okay. How's it more than we gonna Yeah.
Yeah. Course. I mean, we're
Speaker 7: gonna a good time. I mean, like, I'm glad you guys are here because, yeah, I
Speaker 2: don't know what the fuck is going on. Yeah.
Speaker 7: Like, I don't know how they're gonna keep getting away with this. Yeah. And I
Speaker 4: are there are there, like, group are there are there chats and stuff?
Speaker 2: I'm trying to get linked up and stuff and I don't
Speaker 7: just because you're out of town or
Speaker 0: I don't know
Speaker 7: if I feel comfortable like putting you in chats and shit just because there's like so many fucking ops.
Speaker 2: Oh, I see. You know what I'm Yeah.
Speaker 0: The agitator confirms the reporting done by citizen journalist Cam Higbee, who posted a video on X of all the signal chats. The agitator talks about the signal chats. Just seconds later after having that conversation, our undercover reporter was tear gassed.
Speaker 2: Oh, okay.
Speaker 7: I'm not I'm not like I'm not I don't feel comfortable, like
Speaker 0: Oh, no.
Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
You're fine. Yeah. I just drove down here, me and my brother. No. I'm And he's a film editor, so he's filming it.
Uh-oh. Watch out. Watch out. Here we go.
Speaker 0: Our undercover reporter was invited into the lobby of a nearby apartment complex where the agitators were wiping tear gas off their face. Fuck guys. Fuck. Tear gas. Yep.
I'll say I live here if anybody needs it in for
Speaker 2: a second. I got you. It stays like on your clothes
Speaker 0: and burns. You'll it on your clothes. And they'll keep burning? That's great. Don't go downstairs and fight.
Speaker 2: Right. Can I just sit right here, dude? I'll just
Speaker 5: I stand Shame
Speaker 0: Shame on
Speaker 5: Shame on you. Shame. Shame. Shame.
Speaker 0: When that happened, I decided to arrive. We rolled up about 10 blocks from the scene of the tear gas. What struck me was this was not a bad neighborhood. The neighborhood looked like many of the neighborhoods that you live in. And immediately, as we got out of the car, four to five women asked us who we were with.
Speaker 2: I'd love to see some sort of media.
Speaker 8: Period. Like, would love to see just, like, your work.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Stop taking pictures
Speaker 3: of me, bro.
Speaker 8: Stop taking pictures.
Speaker 2: Pleasure to distract you. No. You're not. These guys are not pressed. No.
We we are pressed. Press. See them. Yeah.
Speaker 0: We got this press on. Eventually, I decided to identify myself as a member of the press, specifically a member of Okay Media, as in O'Keeffe Media. Bizarrely, the agitator claimed that Okay Media was Portuguese.
Speaker 8: I looked up your fucking website. It's all Portuguese. And none of their work is political at all.
Speaker 0: What's fascinating about this interaction is the statement from the agitator, quote, they're not political at all. What dawned upon me in that moment was it wasn't a good thing we weren't political. It was actually a liability. If you're not a member of their team, if you don't believe exactly what they believe, you are their enemy. Even if you're neutral, you must be destroyed or killed.
Speaker 3: Stop taking pictures of people.
Speaker 2: I'm not taking pictures. I'm taking pictures of him.
Speaker 8: Stop. Why? What the fuck is
Speaker 2: the point? Because we're press. Not are press. These guys are not press. We're press.
Then
Speaker 0: they were able to ID me. A woman pulled up my Wikipedia page, which labeled me as a far right activist, and it went all downhill from there.
Speaker 2: Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame.
Speaker 0: They threw something at me, which hit the back of my Kevlar plate.
Speaker 2: Shocking, shame. You don't have to go. Shame. Shame. Shame.
Speaker 0: My security determined this was an unsafe situation, so we retreated back to the SUV. So the key is when we get to the car, we gotta get in and get out right now. Okay? But they continued to follow us.
Speaker 2: Those guys are fed. Don't let them take your pictures. Those guys are fed. Don't let them take pictures.
Speaker 0: All you can do is merely disengage and try your best to get out. But they follow you, and they don't stop following you. It felt like a horror movie. This agitator attempted to organize an army recruiting members of the mob to follow us.
Speaker 2: Those guys are reds. Reds? Yeah. The reds? Reds.
Reds. Reds are reds. Reds.
Speaker 0: Our cameraman actually pulled his mask down to try to show them that we are actually pressed.
Speaker 2: If I was a fed, I wouldn't take off my mask.
Speaker 0: We got into the vehicle and they started throwing projectiles at us, frozen water bottles at us.
Speaker 2: You support the First Amendment? Yes. I'm against fucking ICE. It's a desert. Yelling the throne thing.
We're not doing nothing. You assaulted us. We're prepped. We
Speaker 0: are. We're trying. Alright. No problem, bro. I got you.
Hey, just everywhere.
Speaker 2: Look, turn around. Turn around. They're everywhere. Shut the fucking doors.
Speaker 0: Shut the door. Shut the fucking doors. They threw a frozen ice ice brick at the car.
Speaker 2: Take off your vest again quickly. Yes. I'm gonna fucking bring a lot of damage.
Speaker 0: Here. Just throw
Speaker 2: it in the back.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't know.
Speaker 5: It's this is
Speaker 0: you could get killed, man. I you could get killed. There's no first amendment anymore in this country.
Speaker 2: No. There's not.
Speaker 0: It's it's over. Game over. Now there's there's a cop. What is that? It's an ambulance.
Okay. Yeah. Let me get let me get out of Dodge and and regroup, but Yeah. This is not safe. This is not safe for you and I.
Okay? So we we were one became 20 became a 100. They just started assaulting us. They started attacking us, and I I mean, I think my realization is that we are ahead towards the civil war in this country. There is there is no way that's going to be avoided.
There's total lawlessness. They don't care
Speaker 2: that we're
Speaker 0: press. Anybody who is not on their side will be destroyed, killed. Everyone's afraid. No one wants to expose anything. It's all about greed and money and power.
People need to wake up because, you know, that's what the future looks like. That's the future. I felt like we're in a movie, perhaps children of men would be the would be the closest metaphor I could see. Zombies attacking the car, attacking you. Cartel guys, you should put in the line of the sand.
Cartel was running away from me when I pulled up with a press vest in in in in California. But here, they run they run toward they they throw bricks at the police. They don't give a fuck. They're just gonna come for all everyone. Oh, I'm just gonna protect my portfolio and make sure my kids are safe behind my picket fence.
Okay. For another few years, that'll work. Eventually, they'll come for you. We went back to our hotel. My undercover reporter found spotters from their groups spying on us, following us, and reporting back to their signal chats.
I I we we have to get out of the hotel. James, go pack. Okay. I need him, didn't he? Yeah.
Let's go. We we we This is George. We we have to get out of the hotel. They got spotters in the hotel, so now we gotta get just out of Minneapolis. Come on.
We soon realized we had to change hotels and moved to another location thirty minutes away. They took three pictures of us, and
Speaker 2: then now they're changing lanes and trying to act like I didn't see him.
Speaker 0: You wanna slow down so we can figure out what's going on? Yeah. Okay. He's slowing down too? Yep.
Dude, that's wild. Yep. People were following us on the freeway. Reporter Cam Higbee also reported that people were following him.
Speaker 2: Let them turn with us. Yep. Will they come?
Speaker 9: White Chevy Silverado with the newly changed plates with the coexist sticker on the back. We're on Irving And Lake Street. We seem to be the only commuters following. Just wanted to give an update on our location.
Speaker 2: We aren't ice. We are not ice. We're not ice. You said you're fucking ice. We're not ice.
I'm chilling my face. I'm not ice. We're we've questioned. We're not ice.
Speaker 8: Yeah. They've been following us for an over an hour. We're just letting them know in that and they
Speaker 5: Not ice. Not in an ice vehicle. Right? No. Right.
Right. Get in your truck and get the fuck out. Why? Because you need to go. Confirmed ICE.
Speaker 2: Get the fuck
Speaker 8: Confirmed ICE through who? We're American citizens. We're we're not ICE.
Speaker 5: To the people that you abducted. Get out.
Speaker 0: It was incredible to see how people act when they're stopped. It was impossible to convince them that you are not ICE. If you are not them, you are automatically ICE. If you don't hear your name called, they most likely think you're a Fed. That's actually better than them thinking that you're James O'Keefe.
It's better that you're a Fed than James O'Keefe according to our source. But again, if you're thinking about don't try this at home, but if you do, come here to Minneapolis, get on the freeway, exchange the SUV or the pickup truck for a Subaru. You wanna you wanna look like your mom. You wanna look like you're a teacher. You wanna look like you got that union union sticker on the back of your car.
You get that union sticker put on your car. You do not want to have an SUV like us. Lesson learned. Let's let's get inside the hotel. Yeah.
Upon getting to our hotel, my security detail showed me a text message that he had received from what appeared to be a burner number threatening to kill us if we do not vacate the city of Minneapolis within the next hour. We just got this message, and it says, we know that you're in Minneapolis. You're with O'Keefe and his crew of Nazis. You're in a white Ford license plate. They actually wrote the license plate down from Florida.
You have one hour to leave or you're dead. You have one hour to leave or you're dead. We're gonna contact law enforcement, DHS, and the FBI, and we're gonna try to get out of here safely so we can bring the news to you. As I left Minneapolis, I was very shaken by what I witnessed, and all I could do was write down my thoughts as I awaited my production team to go through the hidden camera footage and identify some of the folks we spoke with. And what I realized is that self preservation is the enemy of the American people.
In the Peloponnesian War, Euclides says the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must. There is absolutely no accountability in our country for those who are actually engaged in wrongdoing, and everything collapses when power disparities grow. Justice as you want it can only exist when there are consequences. But why be just if injustice pays better? The Minneapolis police stood down.
They probably stood down because there was no incentive for them to stand up. People are only just if they're being watched. And you might say that this report and investigative journalism doesn't matter if there are no consequences. But remember that justice only happens when they are being watched. Remove oversight in the journalistic sense, and those incentives that define human behavior will take over.
Profits of corruption are immediate. Accountability or prison for bad actors takes forever, and there aren't enough prosecutors who can't be bribed or threatened. Get back. One of the most haunting things I know is that people tend to love money more than justice. They love power more than truth and safety more than doing the right thing.
But perhaps the only thing that these people fear is exposure itself, and that's very good news because at this point, it may be our only recourse. This is James O'Keefe. You know me for exposing the truth and holding the corrupt elite accountable. But today, I wanna talk to you about protecting your own freedom, your retirement. Now gold is soaring above 4,200 an ounce right now and climbing towards $5,000.
That's up over 45% this year alone, with silver closing in on $60 an ounce. Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and major banks are now forecasting gold between 5,000 and $6,000 within the next six to twelve months. And that's why with American Independence Gold, a veteran owned company where proceeds from every sale help support the Tumble to Towers Foundation. And right now, my followers get a free gold bar with every purchase of $10,000 or more. Go to okeefmediagold.com.
That's okeefmediagold.com, or call (833) 324-4653. That's 833324 gold. This is James O'Keefe, where freedom isn't given, it's secured. This is not financial advice. Consult a professional before making investment decisions.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Kash Patel's FBI is now ACTIVELY INVESTIGATING paid protest, riot and ICE-hunting campaigns in Minnesota They have a database and are deploying their foot-soldiers to IMPEDE federal agents. YES! Dismantle the networks! 🔥 https://t.co/F5JxCxTzDt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes ongoing activity in Minneapolis involving collecting information on ICE whereabouts and telegraphing it to protesters, urging people to come and back them up, including outside a donut shop. The second screen is shown with details: an incident outside Glam Doll Donuts at the Black Forest Inn parking lot on Nicolette Avenue where Alex Preti attempted to film the Border Patrol arrest that was taking place and ended up dead. He notes a call for black backup at the Black Forest Inn parking lot. Observers urgently requested a Glam Doll Donuts, the location where the “Pretty incident” occurred. An observer had been shot by ICE, with unknown condition, and EMTs were present. The speaker emphasizes that people are being urged to actively get out there, and warns that if someone protests or interferes with an ongoing law enforcement operation, there can be horrible consequences.
Speaker 1 responds by saying that there should always be decrying of the loss of human life and that they do not want situations like the ones seen in Minneapolis. He asserts that all the blame is being directed at federal law enforcement officers carrying out their legal duties, while part of the responsibility lies with groups that are conspiring to obstruct federal law enforcement, which he characterizes as a crime. He contends they are contributing to the rise in violence in Minneapolis, and asserts that the obstruction of federal law enforcement is illegal. He argues that the Trump administration should not pull back and should not allow a message to be sent that such conspiring, use of funds, and obstruction of federal law enforcement can succeed, because that would undermine federal law enforcement throughout the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Minneapolis actively collecting information on ICE whereabouts, telegraphing it to protesters, asking people to come and back them up, including outside the donut shop. Let's put up the second screen here. Including outside of the donut shop where Alex Preti, got involved in trying to film or take video of the, Border Patrol arrest that was going down and and ended up dead. I mean, can see black backup needed at Black Forest Inn parking lot on Nicolette Avenue. Urgent.
Observers urgently requested a Glam Doll Donuts. That's where the Pretty incident went down. Observer has been shot by ICE, unknown condition. EMT's present. Please be safe.
I mean, they're they're calling for people to actively get out there. And and if you in in protest or in trying to interfere or take video or whatever, law enforcement operation as it's ongoing, knowing how chaotic they can be, you try to get in the middle of that. Sometimes there are horrible consequences.
Speaker 1: We should always decry the loss of human life. We don't want there to be situations like the ones we saw in Minneapolis. But all the blame is going right now to federal law enforcement officers who are carrying out their legal duties. And part of the responsibility lies with these groups, which are conspiring, I think, to obstruct federal law enforcement. That is a crime.
They are contributing to, I think, unfortunately, the rise in violence you're seeing in Minneapolis, and it's illegal. It can't I I don't think that what the Trump administration should do is pull back and let the message be sent out that this kind of conspiring, that this kind of use of funds, this kind of obstruction of federal law enforcement is going to succeed because it then undermines federal law throughout the whole country.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Leftists are going INSANE at the Minneapolis hotel they believe GREG BOVINO is staying at Some degenerate tried to hunt and track him down. This is a well-funded group and its organizers MUST be arrested! Bovino is a patriot! https://t.co/AHztSN4VrB
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m stunned by the claim: Democrats’ betrayal with over $5B in payment errors and over $50B in rental aid in 2024 alone. Money went to 30,000 dead people, government-backed mortgages to non-citizens, and public housing to illegal aliens. “That is ludicrous. It’s ridiculous to even think or talk in such a way!” It’s a violation of our sacred trust to American taxpayers, and it has to end, and it will!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Trump's HUD Sec. Scott Turner unveiled a JAW-DROPPING betrayal by the Democrats: - Over $5 BILLION in "payment errors," over $50 billion in total rental assistance in 2024 ALONE - Money went to 30,000 DEAD PEOPLE - Government-backed mortgages went to NON-CITIZENS - Public housing went to illegal aliens "That is ludicrous. It's ridiculous to even think or talk in such a way!" "It's a violation of our sacred trust to American taxpayers, and it has to end, and it will!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines several policy and oversight actions within HUD and related agencies. First, they assert that non-permanent residents are no longer eligible for FHA insured mortgages, and that public housing authorities are being audited to ensure taxpayer dollars do not support illegal aliens, insisting that “American dollars should benefit American citizens and American citizens only.”
Despite these emphasis on restricting benefits, the speaker notes that HUD previously provided a pathway for home ownership and supported housing affordability for more than 1,000,000 Americans through FHA and Ginnie Mae, highlighting the agency’s impact in expanding access to housing and affordability.
On stewardship and accountability, the speaker emphasizes a strong focus on cracking down on waste and fraud and abuse. They cite findings from the office of the chief financial officer (CFO) regarding potential financial issues: more than $5,000,000,000 in potential payment errors and over $50,000,000,000 in total rental assistance for fiscal year 2024. They also point to a specific problem within that broader amount: money that went to nearly 30,000 dead people.
The speaker characterizes these financial findings as ludicrous and unacceptable, stating that such issues are a violation of the sacred trust with American taxpayers. They assert that the problem “has to end, and it will,” signaling a firm commitment to ending waste, fraud, and abuse and to restoring confidence in the management of housing programs and related federal dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We eliminated non permanent residents eligibility for FHA insured mortgages, and we are audited in public housing authorities to ensure taxpayer dollars don't support illegal aliens, American dollars should benefit American citizens and American citizens only. By focusing on our core mission, HUD provided a pathway for home ownership and supported housing affordability for more than 1,000,000 Americans through FHA and Ginnie Mae. We also take stewardship very seriously, so we're cracking down on waste and fraud and abuse. Our office of the chief financial officer uncovered more than $5,000,000,000 in potential payment errors over 50,000,000,000 in total rental assistance for the fiscal year 2024 and that includes money that went to nearly 30,000 dead people. That is ludicrous.
It's ridiculous to even think or talk in such a way. It's a violation of our sacred trust to American taxpayers, and it has to end, and it will.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Minnesota Judge Patrick Schiltz is a donor/volunteer for the pro-illegal-immigrant Immigrant Law Center, the same judge who shielded Don Lemon after storming the church, and who threatens ICE Director Todd Lyons with contempt per Bill Melugin. The judicial cartel is real and must be purged.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Minnesota federal Judge Patrick Schiltz is a DONOR and VOLUNTEER for the pro-illegal alien Immigrant Law Center... ...and is the same judge who shielded DON LEMON from accountability after storming the church, AND is threatening to hold ICE Director Todd Lyons in contempt, per @BillMelugin_ The judicial cartel IS REAL. It needs to be purged. How can we have a republic when the judiciary is tainted like this?
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting that Ilhan Omar’s supposed winery allegedly jumped to $5 million in a year with no physical winery, no wine, a barely functioning site—scared, prosecute! And @bennyjohnson has them terrified.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP. Ilhan Omar’s “winery” suspiciously surged in value from practically zero to $5 MILLION DOLLARS in a year — despite NO physical winery, phone line, social media, barely functioning website and *NO WINE* This is why she’s scared. PROSECUTE! https://t.co/JEatM5UK6x
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
@bennyjohnson has them TERRIFIED!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Kristi Noem confirms Mayor Frey and Tim Walz RELEASED 490 m*rderers, r*pists and drug traffickers onto the streets INSTEAD of handing them over to ICE in the jails WTF?! That is TREASON! There is no other way to put it. https://t.co/1ci4FTiFRZ
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 WOW. Sen. Josh Hawley just confirmed the Democrats secretly sent MILLIONS of dollars to the Islamist organization Council on American Islamic Relations - CAIR - in blue states... ...and the funds were used to import Muslim terrorist migrants. TREASON.https://t.co/GqvCPuZNcr
reSee.it AI Summary
I see leftists arming in Minneapolis to counter conservatives backing ICE and opposing radical Islam. Walz and Frey invited this, seeking violence and chaos, ordering police to stand down, hoping a conservative gets hurt or killed. It will worsen unless Minnesota Democrats intervene.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Leftists are now showing up ARMED in Minneapolis to counter conservatives supporting ICE and opposing radical Islam TIM WALZ and MAYOR FREY asked precisely for this. They want violence and chaos. They ordered police to stand down. They want a conservative to get hurt or even KlLLED. It will only get worse unless Minnesota Democrats call this off. 📸 @VenturaReport
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Citizen journalist David Khait found a CONFIRMED 2,079 people registered to vote in Fulton County GA at - Abandoned homeless shelter - UPS Store - Church with a taxpayer-funded political advocacy group Voter fraud is real. The left LIES.https://t.co/tsw7rDai69
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers tour sites in Atlanta that they say show problems with voter registration and housing. They point to 477 P Street Northeast, where they state that, according to Georgia registration rolls updated less than two weeks ago, over 70 people are actively registered to vote from that location, even though the Peachtree Pine homeless shelter behind them was closed in 2017. They question why those former residents remain on the rolls and propose that there should be automatic purges when a shelter closes. They note the property is private, boarded up, with danger and no trespassing signs, and they attempt to enter entrances but are blocked.
They compare the 70-some registrations at that site to the expectation that USPS would drop off mail or voter information for residents, and they express skepticism about how such registrations could occur. They also highlight a UPS store at 2625 Piedmont Road Northeast, where they say 96 people are still registered to vote from that address, again asserting this is a violation of Georgia law because a UPS store, PO box, or virtual mailbox cannot be a place of residence. They say the law specifies that where you vote from is where you live and rest, and they emphasize that this is a clear violation.
The discussion shifts to the idea that, in addition to homelessness and voting, welfare fraud could be connected to these registrations. They claim that some churches act with advocacy groups to sign up homeless people for benefits and that this could involve checks sent to addresses used for registration. They allege that an outreach program at services and mail lines at a neighboring center, the central outreach and advocacy center, handles housing needs and mail for thousands of people. They report that the organization took in almost $700,000, with a government grant of $25,000 for homeless activities and a private contractor paid $50,000 to write grant proposals to the government, implying that the county maintains a surplus in election budgets and disperses funds to such groups.
The speakers assert that the county is not cleaning voter rolls, thereby inflating the number of registered voters. They speculate that if there were many such sites—perhaps hundreds—with around 100 voters each, it would be easy to influence elections, noting that Georgia uses voter ID while contrasting with states like California. They also reference the 2020 election, suggesting that in Georgia, the state was won by a narrow margin and that widespread irregularities in Fulton County could have impacted the result. They discuss potential political leanings, claiming that donations and grants to these groups likely go to Democrats, and that the same organizations could be targeting homeless people to register them to vote and to receive government assistance.
The presenters visit another church area at 201 Washington Street Southwest, identifying two lines: one for services and one for mail, implying that the church’s outreach program is involved in registering people for voting and distributing mail to many individuals. They reiterate their belief that the operation is funded by state and federal grants and private donations, and they reiterate that the aggregate registrations at two churches total over a thousand. They propose a broader pattern of “targeting” vulnerable populations for political and financial gain, suggesting potential corruption and kickbacks linked to government funds and political support. They conclude with a strong assertion that the described situation constitutes corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Apparently, this is where 70 people are still registered to vote. If we were to trust the voter rolls, that means that 96 people are supposed to be sleeping in there, using the bathroom, showering, cooking.
Speaker 1: As our main residents,
Speaker 2: first of all, right across, if we can pan the camera over, that is a capital right there.
Speaker 3: This is how close this place is.
Speaker 2: Right behind me in this beautiful building, it's actually the Peachtree Pine homeless shelter that was closed almost ten years ago in 2017, but there's still some weird stuff happening here.
Speaker 0: The weird thing that's happening here is that, again, according to Georgia registration rules, people are still registered to vote from this exact same location. Over 70 people are actively still registered to vote according to the most recent Georgia registration rolls that we received, which was just updated less than two weeks ago. The fact that this place was shut down more than ten years ago and they still haven't cleaned the people up off the rolls is crazy to me.
Speaker 2: What are they doing? Like, let me literally, what are they doing? This place, no one is living in it. The everything's boarded up. It says private property.
There's gates. There's, there's a fence over the gates. The window's broken. We we took a peep inside from this vantage point, and there was no one in there. I mean, I would love just to even maybe we can walk around and see where would someone actually even drop off ballots here.
Speaker 0: That's a good question. Why don't we actually go do that? Yeah. Let's walk around and see what's going on. So this is 477 P Street Street Northeast.
And according to the voter rolls, there are 70 people actively registered to vote here. That means that at some point during any election season, somebody from the mail from USPS is supposed to come by and drop
Speaker 2: off Drop off some somebody.
Speaker 0: Something. Some kind of voter information. So we're gonna go find out where they do this. So we're gonna try the first entrance, but it says danger. Do not enter.
Speaker 2: Definitely can't get into there. I don't think you would want to anyway.
Speaker 0: Now, Fabian, how funny is this right here? Amber Higgins Connor, Amber for Atlanta City Council, citywide. The first thing that I'll be focusing on is why in the heck is this still a problem?
Speaker 2: Number one, she doesn't even know what this place is. It doesn't care. No. Because it's not it it doesn't get her votes. And second, is she does know it's here and they're doing it to get her votes.
Speaker 0: Well, we have another entrance, so I don't think we're gonna get in here. Nope. It's closed. Now, Fabian, the thing is is that I don't doubt that once upon a time, this was actually a legit shelter where homeless people were being registered to vote from for whatever reason, for health benefits. We don't care.
But the problem is is that, obviously, this place has closed. It's been closed since 2017. That means that no longer people are laying their head inside of there and claiming this place is the place of residence. That means that they should be automatically purged from the voter rolls, but they're not.
Speaker 2: And you know what's interesting is if you have a 100 sites like this or, you know, who knows how many, but
Speaker 0: let's
Speaker 2: just say a 100, and they each have around a 100 people voting there that don't live there that there's there's no building. You do that all over the place, and you can disperse the the the burden of proof since, well, we don't have enough people to go to all thousand locations
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 2: Compared to if it was in one or two. They can they can claim, oh, we don't have the manpower, the resources. We need more money to go and send people all over these places, but it's really this easy. Yep. Here's an address.
It's not open. We take the voters off. That's it.
Speaker 0: That simple. And you know what's interesting to me is that perhaps they're doing this on purpose to win big federal elections because Georgia in 2020, president Trump lost it only by 11,000 votes. So if there's a 100 of these just in one county Exactly. With about a 100 voters or so That'd be extremely easy to do. Exactly.
Let's keep going and seeing what's up. I mean, maybe eventually we'll find a door or or 70 something people who are sleeping here.
Speaker 2: Maybe 70 people walk out of here.
Speaker 0: Well, good thing to know that this is private property and no trespassing. So maybe this is where
Speaker 2: And you can't even pull that.
Speaker 0: You can't even pull that.
Speaker 2: It's completely covered. I shouldn't have touched that. Don't know what that is. I think that's the end of it though.
Speaker 0: That's the end of it. Yeah. We go see what's up with neighbors maybe? This is the neighbors.
Speaker 2: Oh, it's definitely not in here.
Speaker 0: I don't think we're No. Posted. Well, apparently this is where so many people are still registered to vote as of today, and I think that's what really pisses off most people is that
Speaker 2: It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 0: It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 2: It it just doesn't make logical sense unless you do it on purpose.
Speaker 0: And democrats biggest narrative always is that you guys are trying to suppress people's votes, take away homeless people's votes. We're literally at a place where people are actively registered and I don't see even homeless people squatting in.
Speaker 2: There's no one here. There's literally no one here.
Speaker 0: There is a still sign right there that says open studio.
Speaker 2: What we've done is we've now walked across the entire building and this is the last part of the building. And as you can see, it's completely boarded off. So for anyone saying, well, they might still be doing something there. In addition to the broken windows, the danger no trespassing, now we have this. So this is the entire building we've walked around now.
Speaker 0: And the thing that I keep thinking about while we went through this the the entire building is there's no way that Fulton County can hold legitimate elections. And if I was a Republican candidate, that's what I would be focusing on nonstop right now. So if I'm running anywhere where there's a county like this that touches Atlanta, I would say, I'd be focusing on what the heck is going on. I don't know if people are actually voting, but they are on the voter registration list. And are they committing other fraud?
Is some entity in here collecting these ballots, collecting welfare fraud? I don't know, but it's so simple. Right? That's what pisses us off. It's just simple to come here and do what we did, take an hour or two out of the day, and see these in just one place, 70 irregularities.
Yeah. Yeah. And and that's
Speaker 2: not including the churches, that's not including the people who are voter who are registered to vote at places that are even open. This place has been closed for almost ten years. That's almost ten years. That's a decade, and no one's cleaned them. What if I
Speaker 0: told you the guy that's in charge of elections in Georgia, the secretary of state, says that we have the cleanest voter rolls in all of The US.
Speaker 2: Well, mister secretary of state, what's up with this?
Speaker 0: And what if I told you that he's now trying to run for governor as well? Governor of Georgia. So, hey, secretary of state Rafflesberger, why don't you just come down here to 477 Peachtree Street Northwest, see a homeless shelter like what? Close to ten years ago now?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And and That's crazy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and you
Speaker 2: can tell the voters, how is it possible that you claim that you have the cleanest voter rolls, and we're literally standing in front of a place that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 0: Maybe in walking around Fulton County and seeing places like this, I have to tell you that back during the twenty twenty election, I didn't really believe in any of the conspiracy theories or, you know, there's voter fraud, systemic voter fraud. But coming out here and seeing this for myself, whether it's abandoned homes, empty lots, places like this, I have to say that this is this is a problem. And I'm I'm starting to believe the 2020 narrative regarding what president Trump was saying, especially about Fulton County because we lost he he lost the state only by 11,000 or so votes. And if we just walked around Fulton County and already found about 10,000 irregularities just in one county
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, imagine how much this is happening in other places, not just here.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: Right? California, Minneapolis, like any blue state, I assume they've replicated this exact same model in all of those places.
Speaker 0: And we see that map always that Kamala Harris won every state where there's no voter ID. Georgia thankfully has voter ID, so I think that there is a check on stuff like this. But what about in states like California, where, obviously, there isn't a check on this? Imagine how dirty the voter rolls are there.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh. 44,000,000 people live in that state. Imagine how dirty those voter
Speaker 0: rolls are. Jeez. Wow. This is epic. Well, we're at a UPS store located at 2625 Piedmont Road Northeast in Atlanta, Fulton County, where apparently 96 people are right now actively registered to vote.
And the reason we're laughing is because this is such a clear violation of law in Georgia. It's very specific. You cannot use a UPS store, a PO box, a virtual mailbox, whatever you wanna call it, as a place of residence. The law is clear. Where you vote from, where you say you vote from, is the play or where you live is the place that you actually rest and sleep at.
So clear violation of law. What do you think, Fabian?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I don't think anyone's sleeping in there. And if there's over you said there's 70 something?
Speaker 0: There is according to the latest registration rolls that the Georgia Secretary of State Office provided us, there's 96 people registered to vote from here.
Speaker 2: That's interesting. And I bet they all vote Democrat. I bet. Here is a similarity between the health care fraud in Minnesota and the voter fraud here in Georgia. We were just laughing about it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's funny because if we were to trust the voter rolls, that means that 96 people are supposed to be sleeping in there, using the bathroom, showering, cooking.
Speaker 1: As their main residents.
Speaker 0: As their main residents. The same way how they're supposed to be a certain amount of kids at a daycare when they go and visit these daycares in Minnesota owned by Somalis. It's the exact same thing. And a key thing that people don't understand is that all of the welfare fraud starts with voter fraud. If you end up on a voter registration list, you can suddenly start to claim benefits because, oh my god, now you have a residential address.
Speaker 2: Yep. Exactly. So now they know where to send the checks to.
Speaker 0: And we have a feeling that that's exactly what is systematically happening at the churches. Yeah. The churches are using advocacy groups to sign up homeless people, maybe not to vote, but to definitely collect benefits. Now are the homeless people there to collect the benefits?
Speaker 2: That's what we don't know.
Speaker 0: We don't know.
Speaker 2: The checks are going there. So what what's going on with the checks? Is it just a massive amount of mail that's uncollected that just sits there with checks in it, or someone helping the homeless people by opening them.
Speaker 0: And here's the other caveat. These advocacy groups that go and sign up the people, the homeless people, to get the the benefits from the church and stuff, they get money from the federal government.
Speaker 2: To do that.
Speaker 0: From the from the state government, from the federal government. It's interesting. Let's go see what what else we have here. We're outside 201 Washington Street Southwest back to the church where I discovered thousands of people are registered from the same exact place. And Fabian, we started to search this place and look into it a little bit more.
What did we uncover here?
Speaker 2: So first of all, right across, if you can pan the camera over, that is a capital right there.
Speaker 3: This is how close this place is.
Speaker 2: This is the central outreach and advocacy center. This is basically a homeless shelter, and it was really interesting. We saw that they have two lines here. One is for services and one is a mail line. So if you're looking to get your mail, I guess you have thousands of people come here like a UPS store at the church and get the mail.
Speaker 0: So what we kind of also discovered is that this exact same outreach program takes money from the state government, right, through grants. It also has private donations, of course. But what we're starting to put together here is that this seems to be like a massive operation to register as many people as possible that kind of lean a certain political affiliation. You
Speaker 2: would think. You would think. Right? Yeah. So they actually took in almost $700,000.
I I looked at the taxes. Now you can't see the individual donations where the money is coming from, but they did get a grant from the government for $25,000 just a few years ago for homeless activities. And then they just paid a company $50,000 to write grant proposals to the government. So they're paying a company $50 to go write grants to get them, they hope, hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to do more of what they're already doing.
Speaker 0: And what we're starting to also realize here is that we now know that if there's a surplus from the election budget for the county, the county actually maintains that surplus to disperse it to various other places like that advocacy group here who may have received it from that funding, the $25,000 and the $50,000. So if we put everything together, the county is purposely maintaining the voter list unchecked and, not cleaning them up so they have as many people as possible on the voter kind of bloating up the voter list. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And then I would be curious, and we're gonna do this later on, get the board of directors for this place and find out who they they contributed money to politically. Because I guarantee you, it's gonna be like the other places we saw. 100% of the political donations are going to democrat.
Speaker 0: Between the two churches here, over a thousand people are registered to vote. The crazy part for me is, right, we talked about the advocacy group kind of seeing homeless people, bringing them in, getting them and whatnot. The reason I say that they target them is because this is where all of them usually are. We're in the colder part of the year now, so I think they're in a little different location. They kinda settle where the sun hits them pretty hard during the day, which is right there on the corner.
We have various shelters all around here. The idea that I'm trying to draw to everybody and to you is that this is a heavy homeless area. And to have churches have an advocacy groups inside the churches going out and registering them literally out here in the streets using taxpayers' money is a scheme in my opinion. The people Well,
Speaker 2: they they know exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And here's the thing. No. I'm not gonna say all homeless people, but we know homeless people can be mentally unwell. So you're registering mentally unwell people from the church to get a ballot to the church.
Yep. And what are they gonna do with that church? Are are the homeless people gonna actually go and and vote?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I don't really think homeless people are having discussions on who to vote for for your city council in Georgia. Pretty sure that's not something that typically comes up in conversation.
Speaker 0: And let's say they are not voting. Okay. You're still registering people from here who are socioeconomically in a disadvantage, and we know we have a bunch of programs that you can get federal or state funding from.
Speaker 2: A lot of.
Speaker 0: So potentially, we are also witnessing welfare fraud happening right here.
Speaker 2: Oh, I'm sure you can find a lot of interesting things here. That's for sure. These are all voters right here.
Speaker 0: These are all voters. Usually, the only difference is that, again, during the warmer time of the year, there's hundreds of them here. I'm not even kidding.
Speaker 2: I've seen them here before when we've been. Yeah.
Speaker 0: During the protest. It's covered. And all around us again are shelters. So homeless people are coming here because of a shelter. Suddenly, from the church comes out and says, hey.
Are you registered? Not even registered
Speaker 2: to vote.
Speaker 0: Right? Hey.
Speaker 2: Do you want some government assistance?
Speaker 0: Do you want some government government assistance? Assistance?
Speaker 2: Don't worry. No address. We can put you here. By the way, hey. We're gonna register you to vote.
Right?
Speaker 0: There you go.
Speaker 2: Right? You want everything else? Sure.
Speaker 0: I sure do.
Speaker 2: So think about how easy this is. I work in the government. I have a friend, and there's a organization right across the street that's hiring. I get them a job. They pay a $100,000 for that position.
Now they can thank me for that job. And all I ask in return is, hey. They're my friend. Why don't they contribute to me getting reelected? And on top of that, as a cherry, I'll make sure that they get some grants.
They get a few of their employees inside and say, oh, hey. Let's all donate to Vademi because he's giving us these massive grants, and that's how you stay in power. That's how you make money. That's how you get kickbacks.
Speaker 0: Now the irony about all of this is that what you explained to me is pure corruption.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 Somalis in Minnesota run 90% of more than 1,000 "emergency transportation" companies and they collect MILLIONS in taxpayer dollars And NONE of the vans have moved an inch. Addresses are fake. They rake in millions for nothing. MORE ARRESTS ARE NEEDED!https://t.co/QhI9S3MQnk
Video Transcript AI Summary
A report from Minnesota describes nonemergency medical transportation (NEMT) businesses that operate vans seen sitting in the snow and reportedly never moved. Neighbors say these vans haven’t moved in months, with snow built up around them. The segment states that Minnesota has over 1,020 NEMT companies, and 90% of them are Somali-owned. It claims that each of these businesses collects over $1,000,000 a year in taxpayer dollars by moving people with medical needs, according to the report. Neighbors say the vans “never leave” and that the situation amounts to “massive fraud,” while the reporter asks for viewers’ thoughts on the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here in Minnesota, there's businesses just like the one behind me. These are called nonemergency medical transportation businesses where they have vans like this sitting out in the snow that have never even been moved. Neighbors say these vans haven't moved in months. Yet, the state of Minnesota has over 1,020 companies like this, and 90% of them are Somalian owned. Each one of these businesses collecting over $1,000,000 a year.
And what are they doing? They're saying that they're moving people around that have some type of medical emergency, but the neighbors say, these vans never leave. And if you can look right there, there's snow built up around all those vans. Those vans haven't moved for a long time. But in the state of Minnesota, they're literally paying companies just like this millions of dollars a year.
Like I said, they're called nonemergency medical transportation companies, and there's over 90% of them in Minnesota that are owned by Somalians collecting millions of taxpayer dollars a year, and the vans just sit like that all year long. This is going on in Minnesota, massive fraud. Let me know your thoughts on this one.
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: A massive line of Albertans formed to sign a petition to secede from Canada, potentially becoming the 51st state after independence. Alberta is seen as conservative, and a secession election could be held. 51st state? I'd welcome it. H/t @BehizyTweets
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: MASSIVE amounts of Albertans just formed a huge line to sign a petition to SECEDE from Canada - and potentially become the 51st state after gaining independence Alberta is the most conservative Canadian Province, and an election could be held soon for secession 51ST STATE? I'd welcome it! 🇺🇸🇺🇸 H/t @BehizyTweets
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on Capitol Hill: Hawley asks, “Can men get pregnant?” Verma dodges, noting many identities; Hawley keeps pressing; Verma says science should guide medicine and that yes-no questions are political tools; I see this exchange as a clash over biological reality and politics.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP. This actually just happened on Capitol Hill. SEN. JOSH HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" LIBERAL DR. VERMA: "I'm not sure what the goal of the question is." HAWLEY: "The goal is to establish a biological reality. Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "I take care of people with many identities." HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "Again, as I'm saying-" HAWLEY: "You said science and evidence should control. Can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, I think." VERMA: "Science and evidence should guide medicine." HAWLEY: "Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant?" VERMA: "I think yes-no questions like this are a political tool." WOW. 🤯🤯🤯 @HawleyMO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator and Dr. Verma engage in a contentious exchange about biology, pregnancy, and how science should guide medicine. The Senator presses: “Can men get pregnant?” He frames the question as a straightforward biological reality and argues that science and evidence should control, not politics. He emphasizes that there are biological men and biological women, and that women get pregnant. He notes that the abortion drug has safety concerns, stating that it “causes adverse health events in eleven percent of cases” and that this is “twenty two times greater than the FDA label,” asserting that this basic reality has not been acknowledged.
Dr. Verma responds by describing his clinical practice, saying he cares for patients with different identities and for many women, including people who do not identify as women. He pauses when asked the binary question, explaining that he is unsure of the goal of the question and emphasizing the complexity of identity and medicine. He reframes the issue by saying that science and evidence should guide medicine, but he avoids giving a yes-or-no answer to the question of whether “biological men” can get pregnant. He characterizes such yes/no questions as political tools and stresses the need to address the experiences of patients rather than polarize the discussion.
The Senator insists on a direct yes/no response, reiterating that the question is about biology and the truth, and that men are not pregnant. He argues that failing to acknowledge this undermines trust in science and could have constitutional implications for protections of women. Dr. Verma maintains that he is a physician who follows science and aims to represent the complex experiences of patients, and he again cautions against polarized framing. He expresses willingness to have a conversation that avoids polarization and politics.
The exchange moves from the specific biology question to broader themes: the role of science in medicine, the intersection of gender identity with medical care, and the communication of medical facts in a political context. The Senator closes by emphasizing the distinction between biological reality and political narratives, reiterating that women get pregnant and highlighting safety concerns about abortion drugs. He thanks the witnesses and the chairman for the hearing, noting a focus on protecting women and following science, while indicating disappointment at the level of debate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Since you bring it up, why don't we start there? Doctor. Verma, I wasn't sure I understood your answer to Senator Moody a moment ago.
Do you think that men can get pregnant?
Speaker 1: I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation was going or what the goal was. I mean, I do take care of patients with different identities. I take care of many women. I take care of people with different identities. And so that's where I paused.
Think yeah, I wasn't sure where you were going with that.
Speaker 0: Well, goal is just the truth. So can men get pregnant?
Speaker 1: Again, the reason I paused there is I'm not really sure what the goal of the
Speaker 0: question The goal is just to establish a biological reality. You just said a moment ago that science and evidence should control, not politics. Absolutely. So let's just test that proposition. Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 1: I take care of people with many identities, but
Speaker 0: Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 1: Many women that can get pregnant. I do take care of people that don't identify as women. Doctor.
Speaker 0: Can men get
Speaker 1: pregnant? As I'm saying
Speaker 0: Let me just remind you, you testified too a moment ago. Science and evidence should control, not politics. So can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, think.
Speaker 1: Doctor. Think science and evidence should guide medicine.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant? Biological men, can they get pregnant?
Speaker 1: I also think yesno questions like this are a political tool
Speaker 0: and No. Yesno questions are about the truth, doctor. Let's not make a mockery of this proceeding. This is about science and evidence. And I'm asking you, you know, the United States Supreme Court just heard arguments yesterday at great length on this question.
This is not a hypothetical question. This is not theoretical. It affects real people in their real lives. And you're here as an expert called by the other side as an expert. And you've been telling us that you follow right, you're a doctor.
And you follow the science and the evidence. So I just want to know, based on the science, can men get pregnant? That's a yes or no question. It really is, I think.
Speaker 1: I think you're trying to reduce the complexity of a lot of
Speaker 0: I'm not. I'm trying to get it's not complex. No, I'm not conflating male and female. They're two different things. There's biological men and there's biological women.
And I want to know, can men get pregnant?
Speaker 1: What you were talking about is biological
Speaker 0: You're not going to answer my question.
Speaker 1: Biological males.
Speaker 0: Doctor. This isn't hard, Doctor. Can men get pregnant? Yes or no?
Speaker 1: Doctor. I would be more than happy to have a conversation with you that is not coming from a place of trying to be polarized and pushing I'm
Speaker 0: not trying to be polarizing. I'm trying to ask I think it is extraordinary that we are here and hearing about science and about women. And for the record, it's women who get pregnant, not men. We are here about the safety of women and science that shows that this abortion drug causes adverse health events in eleven percent of cases. That's twenty two times greater than the FDA label, another fact you haven't acknowledged.
And yet you won't even acknowledge the basic reality that biological men don't get pregnant. There's a difference between biological men and biological women. I don't know how we can take you seriously and your claims to be a person of science if you won't level with this on this basic issue. I thought we were past all of this, frankly. I can't believe we're still here talking about this.
Speaker 1: I am a person of science, and I'm also someone here who's here to represent the complex experiences of my patients. And I don't think polarized language or questions serve that goal. I don't think they serve the American people.
Speaker 0: It is not polarizing say that there is a scientific difference between men and women. And I want this to be clear and for the record. It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such. That is not polarizing. That is truth.
It is also, by the way, the United States Constitution, which offers unique protections to women in a variety of circumstances as women. And your refusal to recognize women as women and men as men is deeply corrosive to science, to public trust, and, yes, to constitutional protections for women as women. And I just I I I think it's extraordinary that you would sit here and advance a political agenda that has been thoroughly discredited and rejected by the American people in this forum. And I'm glad we had this exchange because it is exceptionally clarifying. It is also in many ways quite depressing.
I see that my time has nearly expired. I just wanna thank the other witnesses for being here. Thank you for protecting women and children. Thank you for your valiant efforts. Thank you for following the science.
And thank you, mister chairman, for this hearing. Senator also
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve learned that Renee Good’s Minnesota ICE WATCH allegedly trains members to assault ICE and federal Border agents, plus harass their vehicles. Labeled “micro‑intifada” and “break their grip”—this must be shut down. H/t @MattWhitlock @StrackHaley
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. It's confirmed that anti-ICE vehicle rammer Renee Good's organization "Minnesota ICE WATCH" explicitly trains their members to ASSAULT ICE and federal Border agents, on top of harassing and targeting their vehicles "Micro-intifada" 🤯 "Break their grip" (assault) THIS MUST BE SHUT DOWN! H/t @MattWhitlock @StrackHaley
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 dismisses a medical-related claim, noting they don’t change their plates every morning and that the plate will stay the same when they return for a later conversation. They taunt the other person by saying, “US citizen, former fucking country. You wanna come at us? You wanna come at us? I said go get yourself some lunch, big boy.”
Speaker 1 orders, “Get out of the car. Get out of the fucking car.”
Speaker 0 attempts to respond, exclaiming, “I can’t get my car. Woah.”
Speaker 1 escalates, calling Speaker 0 a “fucking bitch.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not medical. That's okay. We don't change our plates every morning, just so you know. It'll be the same plate when you come talk to us later. That's fine.
US citizen, former fucking country. You wanna come at us? You wanna come at us? I said go get yourself some lunch, big boy. Go ahead.
Speaker 1: Get out of the car. Get out of the fucking car.
Speaker 0: Get out of the car. I can't get my car. Woah.
Speaker 1: Fucking bitch.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: It’s confirmed Minneapolis police received a STAND DOWN ORDER on making arrests that would enrage the leftist rioters, 911 told Nick Sortor “YOU’RE ON YOUR OWN” after multiple death threats and intimidation SEND IN THE GUARD! MN is CORRUPT!https://t.co/57TevlC2RM
Video Transcript AI Summary
A tense street confrontation unfolds with loud exchanges, accusations, and threats centered on an alleged Nazi presence and a planned conversation that escalates into threats and harassment. The participants describe a scene where neighbors are distressed and some individuals demand to know who is filming and where their car is, while others respond with hostility and accusations of Nazism.
Key points:
- A group argues that someone is blocking an ice vehicle and demands to see a car and its plate, calling the driver a coward. The demand to identify car owners and vehicles recurs, along with insults and aggressive language.
- The group states they came out for a discussion and security, not for a fight, while others label their presence as Nazi or agitator activity. One person says, “We’re Nazis for… walking down the road,” and others insist they are there to talk, not to provoke a confrontation.
- There is immediate hostility: objects are thrown, including ice blocks, and there is intermittent back-and-forth about whether the group is there for a fight or a conversation. The phrase “You’re a fucking coward” and “Get the fuck out” surfaces repeatedly.
- A livestream is mentioned, with one participant asking another to be honest and accusing the other side of fascist behavior. The accused are called “Nazis” multiple times, and the livestream is referenced as part of the confrontation.
- The participants claim they have been there only minutes, with remarks like “I’ve been here for maybe three minutes at the most,” and another asserts they are walking the block without saying much.
- The group attempts to de-escalate by calling for police help, asking for a 911 address, and reporting that the group is being followed and that rocks or ice blocks are being thrown. They specify the location as Park Avenue and 33rd Street (moving toward 34th and Portland at times), Minneapolis.
- They describe the police response as insufficient or unavailable: a dispatcher explains that officers are not able to reach the location, suggesting the group move to a different location where police can access them. There is frustration at the lack of immediate police support.
- The participants report being chased, a vehicle turning onto a one-way street, and the sense of danger increases as they try to remain safe while continuing to seek police assistance.
- Throughout, the speakers alternate between insisting they want a conversation and berating the other side, with repeated demands that the other group “get the fuck out.” The dialogue includes interruptions, taunts, and interruptions about who started the confrontation.
- Towards the end, the participants confirm the location as 33rd Street near Park Avenue and Portland, note that police can’t reach that location, and mention a white Toyota Corolla following them. They consider moving to a different location to facilitate police assistance, and the traffic dynamics continue as they attempt to navigate the area on foot while seeking protection.
In sum, the transcript details a heated, harassment-laden encounter marked by accusations of Nazism, a contested intention of dialogue versus confrontation, objects thrown, a livestream presence, and a troubling lack of timely police intervention, with the scene centered around Park Avenue and 33rd/34th Streets in Minneapolis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get the fuck out of here right now. See,
Speaker 1: that's what I'm saying. It's a bunch of
Speaker 0: They killed my fucking neighbor.
Speaker 2: What the fuck is
Speaker 0: wrong with you? Somebody's dying.
Speaker 2: So is it Go to your fucking car so we can take a picture of your fucking plate. Where's your fucking car, you coward? You couldn't even fucking stop?
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not moving.
Speaker 2: You fucking walk the block. You're a fucking coward. Get the fuck out. You think we're fucking playing? You can't you got nothing.
Alright.
Speaker 1: So we are we are Nazis for
Speaker 2: fuck up. Asking What? Who?
Speaker 1: For walking down the road asking you know, you're wondering why I was so adamant on having security before we actually came out here, and this is exactly why.
Speaker 2: Hey. This is fucking Nazi. Get the fuck out
Speaker 1: of here. The the the question that was posed was why are they blocking ice vehicles in the street? And and this is the this is the reaction.
Speaker 2: Try and send help. I guess how
Speaker 0: you doing. What the fuck is this?
Speaker 1: I mean, I've I've been here for
Speaker 2: Weirdo. What you fucking Nazi?
Speaker 1: I've been here for maybe three minutes at the most.
Speaker 2: What's going on? What's going on? Look at you and look at us. What the fuck? The sales, man.
No. That's not how you think. Fuck you. What are you what are Look at you, you headset. Look at you, motherfucker.
I'm That's a
Speaker 1: hell of a hell of a comment right there. Yep.
Speaker 2: Oh, actually, think that's a comment. Fucking Nazis. The fuck do
Speaker 0: you Hey. This motherfucker with the livestream.
Speaker 2: You proud of what you fucking did? Get the fuck out of here.
Speaker 3: Be live on this motherfucker with the livestream.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, sir. Fucking leave.
Speaker 1: And this
Speaker 2: is it. You get you can go see it now. Back either. You lasted for thirty fucking seconds of fucking hours.
Speaker 1: I'd say barely any words out there. Barely anything at all.
Speaker 2: An agitator calling for us an agitator is wild.
Speaker 1: But I'm I'm I'm literally just walking down the road.
Speaker 2: We haven't we didn't say a word.
Speaker 0: Fuck you.
Speaker 2: Where's your fucking car? Show us. We're not here for a fight, man.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's that's the difference. I'm not here to fight with anybody.
Speaker 2: I'm just walking. We came for a conversation. Oh, shut the fuck up and get the fuck out. But I can't Oh, they're too scared to show who the car's at. I thought you were saying you didn't give a shit.
You were proud of yourself. Show us your fucking car. What? Let's go. Why are you so mad at us?
We didn't Why are we so mad? You're fucking Nazis. What did we do there? We You're fucking Nazis. Get the fuck out.
Help me not be a Nazi.
Speaker 4: Just be
Speaker 2: honest. Oh. Don't be here. That's it. Leave.
You wanna finish that thought? I got you. Okay. Hold on, guys. We'll just keep throwing.
Oh, he's throwing snow. It's a stump.
Speaker 1: Uh-oh. Look
Speaker 2: at this fucking tower. Trapeze are scared of snow. Get the fuck out. Snowball. Uh-uh.
Okay.
Speaker 1: So what so happens what if I call 911? Let's do that. Good. Can can can you give me an address, please? Wait.
What are they? Said they're on?
Speaker 2: What is the address of the emergency?
Speaker 1: I We're on foot. We're, yeah, we're on foot.
Speaker 2: Okay. And how big is the group of people?
Speaker 1: It's 20 at least.
Speaker 2: Hey. Cops, get here. Yeah. Do it.
Speaker 1: I I I the throwing objects are following
Speaker 2: us down the road. Guys, there's a
Speaker 1: Yeah. We right here when you get here.
Speaker 2: Hey, cops. We're waiting for you. Come on. You're a fucking coward.
Speaker 0: You're scared,
Speaker 2: though. No. I'll be right here. You know what the word Cogent means? Get the fuck out.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. We're at I guess Park Park Avenue in 33rd now.
Speaker 2: And then you're on East. How's 33rd exactly? Yes. Affirmative. East on 33rd Street.
Wicked you. Fuck. Get the fuck out of here. I won't be associated with you anymore. Yeah.
Yeah. I went down to grade. They got slipped. You got something to say?
Speaker 1: White Friday or black people.
Speaker 2: Murdering people and fucks. Hey. Let's cross the street this way. They love how you speak. They're not supposed to be in
Speaker 5: the past.
Speaker 2: You got nothing to fucking say. Exactly why they're here. You said you're here to talk? Stace and shit. Exactly why they're here.
Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah. So we're we're we're crossing we're crossing Park Avenue on the thirty third.
Speaker 2: No. We're crossing Park Avenue. Come protect us.
Speaker 1: We're we're we're crossing Park Avenue on the thirty third.
Speaker 2: You walk like fucking idiots. Look at you. Celebrating. I hate murdering people. Y'all in the gate analysis.
Look at you.
Speaker 1: They're throwing ice blocks at us now.
Speaker 2: This is a bad fucking idea. What what do we do we
Speaker 1: have an ETA?
Speaker 5: We don't
Speaker 1: have an ETA?
Speaker 2: We have an ETA. We came in the city. Are are
Speaker 1: are you guys actually gonna respond to this area, or are we just out here buyers, like, out here fending for ourselves?
Speaker 2: We do have an office. So that's really fine. They didn't acknowledge the college. They to drive there. Look at you.
Tiny little fucking coward. Look at you. What you got tattooed on your neck? What is that? I'll put in case before we get there.
Okay?
Speaker 1: Oh, you
Speaker 2: can't What happened? Talk now, Oh, you don't want any problems with one of
Speaker 1: I highly doubt it's gonna change. So unless it gets worse, it might get worse.
Speaker 2: Hey. If you didn't want to try Oh, the city is so fucking scary.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. 91911 hung up on me.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Because you're a fucking coward. Where are you from? Who's gonna see your place? That's it.
We just wanna talk right by your car. I bet it's something. Hello? It's got good light now. Let's take a photo of it.
Yes. It is. Take a photo of his tattoo. So we're heading south.
Speaker 1: Guys understand?
Speaker 2: Hang a minute. Go back this way. About 2530
Speaker 1: 33rd.
Speaker 2: We're at 33rd heading towards Park Place.
Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah. We're heading toward heading back toward Park.
Speaker 2: I didn't came from this place. I you were going to your car. I sent you directions.
Speaker 1: Wait. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Say that again.
Speaker 2: Who is this again? People that think you're fucking morons as they are.
Speaker 1: So are we get are we getting an officer out here, or is that not happening?
Speaker 2: No. You got friends from your cell phone. You're from the start shit. Okay.
Speaker 5: We need you to try and get to your vehicle or some receipt.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's that's a little
Speaker 2: Tell him to know what's the name?
Speaker 1: It's a little not possible right now. In water. In water. Leave. We can't just get a unit here?
Let's go. Mean in
Speaker 2: your fucking
Speaker 1: we're we're we're not far from Downtown Minneapolis, and we can't get we can't get anybody to come out here.
Speaker 2: Fuck her. Right by where you just killed somebody, you pieces of shit.
Speaker 1: I I mean, we're we're we're hovering in the area of 33rd And Park.
Speaker 5: Are you a robot? No.
Speaker 1: I don't have any ability to do that by myself.
Speaker 2: Fucking car and go. We're wasting police
Speaker 1: resources. Got I've got I've got two people here with me. I just need I I I I need some sort of police. It's been ten minutes now. I I would love to, but I I can't I don't I don't feel safe doing so.
On that
Speaker 2: motherfuckers do your shit. It's a jazz between your oh, it's a street. What the
Speaker 1: fuck is in front of
Speaker 2: a vehicle. Are you kidding me? The fucking
Speaker 1: And see and see, and this fucker is gonna try
Speaker 2: to turn
Speaker 1: onto a one way street.
Speaker 2: Fucked house.
Speaker 1: Alright, guys. You got a you got you got a guy driving the wrong way down a a a one way coming after me now, and we have no police here.
Speaker 2: This is unbelievable. Driving the wrong way down the mountain, and they're be in fucking simple. Get the fuck out.
Speaker 1: I I I don't think that matters until we get a cop here. Are
Speaker 2: you serious? We're on 33rd.
Speaker 1: That's what I need. I need somebody on on on 33rd near Park Avenue in between Park Avenue and Portland. That's it. In my Black peacoat on. I see I see no
Speaker 2: Move. Move. Yeah, man. I didn't mean to stop you, you know, what you're doing, but we had no backup real quick without cops.
Speaker 4: I said officers aren't able to get to your current location. If you'd like to speak with them, you'll have to move to a different location.
Speaker 1: Oh, so they're the police can't get to 33rd and Portland 34th and Portland.
Speaker 4: Okay. Would you like to move to another location?
Speaker 1: I I mean, I'm just asking, is that the case? Is that This
Speaker 2: is a good
Speaker 4: You said what?
Speaker 1: They can't get to 34th and I'm just making sure. Like, I guess if that's what gotta do, then that's that's what I gotta do. Although, you know, being chased down the street.
Speaker 2: Let's talk to the cops.
Speaker 4: Okay. Yeah. And I'm telling you that if you would like to speak with officers, you'll have to move to a different location that they can access so they can assist you.
Speaker 1: Okay. So they're not coming to this location. Correct? I have to go and find
Speaker 4: them myself. If you're not gonna answer my question, are you going to go to a different location?
Speaker 1: I mean, being chased down the road. What do you want from me? I have to go what location
Speaker 2: do I need to go to?
Speaker 4: To a different location if you'd like to be okay. I'm gonna disconnect.
Speaker 1: What what location do I have to go to?
Speaker 2: That's unfucking believable. Minneapolis police will
Speaker 1: You guys did nothing. Nothing at all. Thank you very much for that. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 2: We're It's
Speaker 1: a great look.
Speaker 4: Police officers out there.
Speaker 2: They're not here. They're not.
Speaker 1: Wait. What'd you say?
Speaker 2: We're getting followed by a Toyota We're getting followed by a Toyota Corolla. White Toyota Corolla.
Speaker 1: Are you a 100%?
Speaker 2: I turned my signal on late to test her, and she did the same. So we'll do a cleaning maneuver. So take a right, right, a right.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2: There they are. Alright. So you probably have to get on an over
Speaker 1: there. Yeah. Go for it.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. The man who was in Nick Shirley’s video has gone to 50 Somali “day cares” on his own and NOT ONE has children “They average about $2.5 million a year!” “I go there in the morning, afternoon and night — no kids there EVER.” RAID THEM ALL!https://t.co/6vYSi2pbz6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Massive fraud is going on here in the state of Minnesota, especially in Minneapolis. Explain to me what's going on with the day cares.
Speaker 1: One of the things I've noticed is there’s an exceptional number of childcare centers set up mostly in Minneapolis, but also in Saint Paul. I wondered how many kids are there in the Twin Cities. I visited facilities near my office and saw there aren’t any kids there. I’d go to another one and there aren’t any kids there either. I spoke with someone outside who said, “We’re all full,” yet when I looked inside the door was open and there was a couch and a table with a couple chairs and no kids. I asked if the kids were outside playing or what kind of place this was, and the staffer said, “You go,” and followed me down the street to my car. That made me think something was going on, and this was maybe five years ago.
Speaker 1: This fraud is so massive. When the dust settles on this, it’s going to be found to be the largest fraud in the history of the country and probably the world. The ones I’ve gotten data on average about $2,500,000 a year, and a lot of them will say they have anywhere from 80 to 120 children.
Speaker 1: I’ve been to literally 40 or 50 of these childcare centers, and there never has been a single child at any one of them ever. Morning, afternoon, evening. Some say they’re open till 10:00 at night. I go there in the morning, I go there in the afternoon, I go there at 9:00 at night. Nobody. There are no kids there ever.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Massive fraud is going on here in the state of Minnesota, especially in Minneapolis. Explain to me what's going on with the day cares.
Speaker 1: So one of the things that I've noticed is there's an exceptional number of childcare centers that are set up mostly in Minneapolis, but also in Saint Paul. And I said, wow, this I mean, how many kids are there in the Twin Cities? Some of them are by my office. And I would watch, I said, well, there aren't any kids there. And I go to another one.
There aren't any kids there. And I'd see just some guys some Somali guys outside smoking cigarettes. So I stopped at one of them, and I said, hey. I'm just wondering. I've got a a grandson who's looking for child care, and I wonder if this might be a good facility.
They said, no. We're all full. We're all full. They had the door open, I looked, and there were no kids. There was, like, a couch and a table with a couple chairs.
I said, well, are the kids out back playing, or what kind of place is this? The guy said, you go. You go. And he almost pushed me out the door, and then he followed me down the street to my car. And that's when I said, wait a minute.
There's something going on here, and that's gotta be maybe five years ago. This fraud is so massive. When the dust settles on this, it's gonna be found to be the largest fraud in the history of the country and probably the world. It's that big. The ones that I've that I've gotten data on, they average about $2,500,000 a year, and a lot of them will say they have anywhere from 80 to a 120 children.
I've been to literally 40 or 50 of these childcare, and there never has been a single child at any one of them ever. Morning, afternoon, evening. Some say they're open till 10:00 at night. I go there in the morning. I go there in the afternoon.
I go there at 09:00 at night. Nobody. There are no kids there ever.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: Milwaukee leftist Judge Hannah Dugan found GUILTY on FELONY OBSTRUCTION after she tried to help a criminal illegal alien evade ICE agents. Up to 5 YEARS in prison. FAFO! LOCK THIS JUDGE UP! 🔥🔥 https://t.co/9e5cgLjFRw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes an incident on April 18 in which Judge Hannah Dugan was seen outside her Milwaukee courtroom wearing her black robes and confronting several federal agents who were there to arrest Eduardo Flores Ruiz, a Milwaukee man and Mexican national charged locally with three counts of domestic battery. Milwaukee County released video of the events through an open records request, and the footage is part of the evidence in the case against Dugan, who is charged with obstructing a federal investigation by concealing Flores Ruiz and allowing him to leave her courtroom through a different door after sending the agents to speak to the chief judge.
Flores Ruiz, dressed in black with his attorney, is shown in multiple videos leaving by that other door, which prosecutors say was used by jurors and not open to the public. As he exits, he is followed by another agent. When Flores Ruiz gets into the elevator to leave, the agent slips into the elevator as well. According to the criminal complaint against Dugan, the agent followed them down; another video shows the agent following them out of the building downstairs, and once backup arrived, they tried to arrest Flores Ruiz. He reportedly ran north in front of the courthouse for nearly a block before agents caught up with him and arrested him. Federal agents arrested Dugan herself a week later.
Eduardo Flores Ruiz’s domestic violence case is moving through Milwaukee County Court, though he is in federal custody on an immigration arrest. The FBI arrested Judge Dugan at the county courthouse one week later on April 25. She pleaded not guilty in federal court last week. In response, Dugan’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it unconstitutional and arguing that she is entitled to judicial immunity. A judge set a tentative trial date for July 21.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the first time, we're seeing judge Hannah Dugan outside her courtroom April 18 wearing her black robes, appearing to confront several federal agents there to arrest Eduardo Flores Ruiz, a Milwaukee man and Mexican national charged locally with three counts of domestic battery. This video released by Milwaukee County through an open records request is part of the evidence in the case against judge Dugan, who's charged with obstructing a federal investigation concealing Flores Ruiz, allowing him to leave her courtroom by a different door after sending the agents to speak to the chief judge. Flores Ruiz, dressed in black with his attorney, is seen in several of the videos leaving by that other door, one prosecutors say was used by jurors and not open to the public. As he leaves, though, he is seen in the hallway followed by another agent. As Flores Ruiz gets into the elevator to leave, the agent slips in as well.
According to the criminal complaint against Dugan, that agent followed them down. The agent seen here following out of the building downstairs, and once backup arrived, they tried to arrest Flores Ruiz, who another video shows ran north in front of the courthouse for nearly a block before agents caught up with him and arrested him. Federal agents arrested Dugan herself a week later.
Speaker 1: Eduardo Flores Ruiz, domestic violence case is moving through the Milwaukee County Court. He is, however, in federal custody on his immigration arrest. The FBI arrested Judge Dugan at the county courthouse one week later on April 25. She pleaded not guilty in federal court last week. Judge Dugan, your response.
That's Dugan exiting the federal courthouse after an arraignment last week. Her legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it unconstitutional and saying that she is entitled to judicial immunity. A judge set a tentative trial date for July 21.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that SNAP fraud in Massachusetts is exposed, with Antonio Bonheur and Saul Alisme accused of running fake stores to turn SNAP benefits into cash, totaling about $7 million. The U.S. attorney says Jesula Variety (≈150 sq ft) and Saul Mache Mixe (≈500 sq ft) redeemed $100k–$500k monthly, far above legitimate sales; a nearby supermarket redeems about $82k. We’re overrun by scammers—enough is enough.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! MAJOR SNAP fraud exposed in Massachusetts, committed by Haitian migrants Antonio Bonheur and Saul Alisme to the tune of $7 million The US attorney says they ran fake stores to turn SNAP benefits into cash, earning up to $480K per MONTH "Jesula Variety Store measured about 150 square feet and Saul Mache Mixe Store about 500 square feet—their SNAP redemptions ranged from $100,000 to $500,000 per month, far exceeding what legitimate food sales could support, federal prosecutors alleged." "By comparison, a full-service supermarket in the same area redeems about $82,000 per month." We are OVERRUN by 3rd world scammers. Enough is enough!
reSee.it AI Summary
I wasn't a fan of Rob Reiner at all. He was a deranged person, as far as I'm concerned. He knew the Russia hoax was false—that I was friends with Russia, controlled by Russia—and helped it. He hurt himself career-wise. He became deranged—Trump Derangement Syndrome. I thought he was very bad for our country.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump responds to people criticizing his post about Rob Reiner's death, where Trump mentions Reiner's "TDS" "I wasn't a fan of his at all. He was a DERANGED person, as far as Trump is concerned." "He knew it was false - that I was a friend of Russia, controlled by Russia. The Russia hoax - he was one of the people behind it. He hurt himself career-wise." "He became deranged - Trump Derangement Syndrome. I was not a fan of Rob Reiner. At all. In any way, shape, or form. I thought he was very bad for our country."
Video Transcript AI Summary
In response to questions about Republicans denouncing his True Social post after Rob Reiner’s murder, Speaker 1 said: "I wasn't a fan of his at all. He was a a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned." He asserted, "He said, he liked he knew it was false. In fact, it's the exact opposite that I was, a friend of Russia controlled by Russia. You know, it was the Russia hoax." He claimed Reiner "was one of the people behind it" and that Reiner "hurt himself in, career wise." He described Reiner as "a deranged person, Trump derangement syndrome," and stated, "I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all in any way, shape, or form." The exchange closed with Speaker 0 saying, "Loose lips, mister president."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, a number of Republicans have denounced your statement on True Social after the murder of Rob Reiner. Do you stand by that post?
Speaker 1: Well, I wasn't a fan of his at all. He was a a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned. He said, he liked he knew it was false. In fact, it's the exact opposite that I was, a friend of Russia controlled by Russia. You know, it was the Russia hoax.
He was one of the people behind it. I think he hurt himself in, career wise. He became like a deranged person, Trump derangement syndrome. So I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all in any way, shape, or form. I thought he was very bad for our country.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: Loose lips, mister president.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says Rob Reiner and his wife sadly died because of the “anger” Reiner caused in others through Trump Derangement Syndrome “…reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS.” “He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before.” “May Rob and Michele rest in peace!”
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: Authorities say this camera angle is the best video they have of the Brown University mass shooter. There’s a manhunt underway. They say there weren’t many cameras in the engineering building because it’s old. Brown has 800 cameras and an $8B endowment. This is the best footage they have.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: Authorities ADMIT this camera angle is the BEST video they have of the Brown University mass shooter. Manhunt underway. "There was not a lot of cameras in the engineering building because it's old." BROWN HAS 800 CAMERAS! An $8 BILLION endowment. This is the best footage they have!🤦♂️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The person of interest that had been detained and publicized is not the person in the widely circulated video showing someone leaving the scene of Saturday’s shooting. The Attorney General said that while there was some evidence that justified detaining this person, recent evidence and lab testing from the scene are pointing investigators in a different direction.
Providence’s mayor, Brett Smiley, said that even though the murderer is still at large, they are not reinstating a shelter-in-place order that was lifted just before 6 AM yesterday; instead, they are increasing police presence.
The chief of police in Providence announced that a tip led them to the now-released person of interest, reportedly a 24-year-old man from Wisconsin. The FBI helped locate him at a hotel 20 miles south of Brown University in Coventry, Rhode Island, where he was detained on Sunday morning. Investigators also stated that this video of the person of interest is the best video they have of the potential gunman, though they do not have video showing the gunman’s face. The Attorney General noted there were not many cameras inside the engineering building where the shooting took place because it is an old building.
In the meantime, the community is holding a vigil for the two students killed and nine others wounded in Saturday’s shooting. The unfolding details reflect that the initially detained person of interest is no longer considered the person of interest, and ongoing investigations continue to focus on identifying the actual gunman. The FBI’s involvement and the lab analysis are contributing to re-evaluating the person of interest, while authorities balance public safety with communications about the absence of credible or specific threats since the initial call.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That the person of interest that they have now released is not the person in this video. The video that's been seen all around the world showing, a person leaving the scene of the shooting on Saturday afternoon. The AG said while there was some evidence that justified detaining this person, recent evidence and lab testing from the scene is pointing them in a different direction. Providence's mayor, Brett Smiley, says even though the murderer is still on the loose, they are not reinstating a shelter in place order that was lifted just before 6AM yesterday and are now instead increasing the police presence.
Speaker 1: We will be releasing the person of interest who had been detained earlier today. We know that this is likely to cause fresh anxiety for our community, and we wanna reiterate what we said earlier, which remains true, which is ever since the initial call, now a day and a half ago, we have not received any credible or specific threats to the Providence community.
Speaker 0: Now the chief of police here in Providence says a tip led them to the now released person of interest, reportedly a 24 year old man from Wisconsin. The FBI helped locate him at a hotel 20 miles south of Brown University in Coventry, Rhode Island where he was detained on Sunday morning. Investigators also admit this video of the person of interest is the best video they have of the potential gunman. They don't have video of the gunman's face. The AG says there was not a lot of cameras inside the engineering building where the shooting took place because it's an old building.
Meanwhile, the community here holding a vigil for the two students killed and nine others wounded in Saturday's shooting.
reSee.it AI Summary
I BREAKING: Liberals outraged as a woman who helps ambush and dox federal immigration agents is CAUGHT—spotted hyperventilating, begging to be let go. "I’m just a MOM! I’m SHAKING!" She camps out to spy on agents, then tells criminals. SHE’S FAFOING! Arrest anyone who impedes!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: Liberals are outraged after a woman who helps ambush and dox federal immigration agents finally got CAUGHT — spotted literally hyperventilating and begging they let her go. https://t.co/Vow8xQgz0Y “I’m just a MOM! I’m SHAKING!” She reportedly camps out to spy on federal agents, then tells criminals. SHE’S FAFOING! Arrest anyone who impedes! 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
A tense roadside encounter unfolds as a fast Mustang rams into the scene, coming on the officers quickly. The driver of the Mustang runs a red light, and the pursuing officer notes the car is right behind another vehicle. The directive is given to slow down, and one officer asks to let him handle the situation, guiding the driver to come down and fly over to a safer spot.
The officers instruct the driver to turn on the lights and to switch on the vehicle’s lights. One officer warns the driver that she is “empty with the federal investigation” and that they have surveillance and their own camera in vehicles, indicating that her case will be referred to Homeland Security Investigations for prosecution and that she will be arrested. This is stated as a last warning. The officers request the driver to provide her license.
The driver responds, insisting she is alone and asking for leniency, while the officers press to secure the situation. The officer identifies himself as the deputy field office director and notes that there are four people in the Mustang. The officers arrange to run the name and mention that they are going to refer the case for enforcement action, pressing the driver to stop impeding traffic and to exit the area.
The driver pleads, repeating that she is alone and requesting permission to leave. The officer urges the driver to turn around and get out, stating that she is surrounded by federal agents. The driver agrees to comply, repeatedly asking for space and offering to step away, while the officer tries to reassure her.
As the tension escalates, the officer tells the driver to slow down, take a deep breath, and pull over to the location, suggesting she go home. The driver, visibly shaken, asks for permission to leave and is told she may. The officer declares that he will stop traffic for her and directs her to go. The driver indicates she is shaking, and the officer continues to guide her toward leaving the scene. Finally, the officer allows her to exit, telling her to go home and take a deep breath.
In summary, the interaction centers on stopping a fast, red-light-running Mustang, asserting a federal investigation and potential prosecution by Homeland Security Investigations, and guiding the driver to safely disengage from the scene, return home, and calm down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Send it to Christie. Fuck you.
Speaker 1: That Mustang is coming on you pretty fast. She just ran a red light.
Speaker 0: She went up with you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's a fast little car. She's right behind you now. Alright. Just slow down.
Let let me let me do this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Come down here. Come down here. Fly over.
Speaker 1: Okay. Turn on the lights. On lights. Turn on the lights. Turn on the lights.
Turn lights. The Hey. Wait.
Speaker 0: Turn on the lights.
Speaker 1: Ma'am, you're empty with the federal investigation. We have your own camera. We actually
Speaker 0: have news reported with us in vehicles.
Speaker 1: Your case will be referred over to Homeland Security Investigations for prosecution. You will you will be arrested. This is your last and final warning. Hold on a second, guys. Give me
Speaker 0: a warning. I
Speaker 1: have kids. Give me your license, please.
Speaker 0: I will once again tell you, do you
Speaker 1: have cases in danger?
Speaker 0: I'm I'm just Put
Speaker 1: your vehicle in park and shut it off, please. I'm just a I understand. But you are impeding look where you are at. You are almost causing an accident. You are surrounded by federal ladens.
Speaker 0: I
Speaker 1: am the deputy
Speaker 0: field office director here, ma'am. We're no I have four here at the Mustang.
Speaker 1: Please. Standby. We're running the name. We were gonna refer this case to her for enforcement action.
Speaker 0: Please don't. I'm just I'm just alone, please. You got it? Please. Please.
Please. I'm just alone. Please. I'm just alone. Yes, please.
I'm just alone.
Speaker 1: Just you turn around and get out of here.
Speaker 0: I'm getting of here.
Speaker 1: Getting I'm I'm getting here.
Speaker 0: Slow down. Yes. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: Take a deep breath. Take a deep breath. Okay? I need you right now. Take a deep breath.
I want you to pull over right here and go home. Okay? Take a deep breath.
Speaker 0: Can I just I'm shaking?
Speaker 1: You may leave. Please turn around. I'm gonna stop traffic for you. Go. Okay?
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m flagging claims that a Soros-linked nonprofit foments sedition in the military, timed with a “script” urging rebellion against Trump. There are links to Antifa. On Nov 11, the National Lawyers Guild urged service members to refuse “illegal” orders—the same talking point in the video. Win Without War, tied to a Soros-backed group formerly New Security Action, ran a NC billboard and reportedly partners with the NLG, a supporter of Antifa. Sen. Gallego said a “script” was sent to him, coordinated externally.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: It's been revealed that a nonprofit linked to George Soros is fomenting sedition within the military around the same time a "script" went out to Democrat members of Congress urging rebellion within the ranks against President Trump. There are also links to ANTIFA. On November 11th - just days before the video - the National Lawyers Guild published a page urging service members to refuse "illegal" orders. The same talking point in the video. Win Without War has put up a billboard in NC urging chaos and dissent within the ranks, a group linked to a 501(c)(4) backed by Soros' Open Society. The group was previously named New Security Action. As per @DataRepublican, Win Without War is partnered with the National Lawyers Guild. National Lawyers Guild is a supporter of antifa. And to wrap it all together? Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) said on national TV a "script" was sent to him. He ended up not participating, but admitted it was coordinated from an external party. There it is. Rope them ALL IN to this investigation. THIS RUNS DEEP. H/t @info_blurbs, @ErikaC47
reSee.it AI Summary
I say Kristi Noem found 50% of Minnesota visas are fraudulent, implying Gov. Walz is an idiot or did it on purpose—probably both. I vow to remove fraudulent visa applications from government programs and get our money back.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sec. Kristi Noem just discovered that 50% of visas in Tim Walz's MINNESOTA are FRAUDULENT 🤯 "I looked into Minnesota and their visa fraud. 50% of them are fraudulent, which means that whacko Gov. Walz either is an IDIOT or did it on PURPOSE! I think HE'S BOTH." 💯 "Fraudulent visa applications signed up for government programs took hundreds of billions of dollars from the taxpayers and we're going to remove them and we're going to get our money BACK!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses Minnesota of fraud on visas and their programs, asserting that 50% of them are fraudulent. They claim that Governor Walls is either an idiot or acted on purpose, describing him as bold for allegedly bringing people into the state illegally, who allegedly never should have been in this country, and who were said to be somebody they are not. The speaker contends that these individuals claimed to be married to someone who was really their brother or some other relation, and that fraudulent visa applications were signed up for government programs.
They further assert that these actions resulted in hundreds of billions of dollars being taken from taxpayers. The speaker declares they will remove these individuals and recover the money, and that in the next year they will ensure that only people in leadership positions in the country who love this country are placed in those roles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Into Minnesota and their fraud on visas and their programs. 50% of them are fraudulent, which means that that wacko governor Walls either is an idiot or he did it on purpose. And I think he's bold, sir. He brought people in there illegally that never should have been in this country, said they were somebody that they're not. They said they were married to somebody who was their brother or somebody else.
Fraudulent visa applications signed up for government programs, took hundreds of billions of dollars from the taxpayers, and we're gonna remove them, and we're gonna get our money back. And we're gonna this next year, sure that we only put people in leadership positions in this country that love this country.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that World Relief, a Soros-linked NGO, funded Rahmanullah Lakanwal's settlement in Washington from Afghanistan using US taxpayer dollars via USAID. They’ve worked with pro-migration groups backed by Soros. Every. Freaking. Time.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: The Soros-linked NGO "World Relief" FUNDED the settlement of National Guard shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal in Washington State, from Afghanistan. World Relief has received US TAXPAYER DOLLARS through USAID. This same NGO has worked with pro-migration and open borders groups in recent years that are heavily backed by George Soros. Every. Freaking. Time.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: A retired sergeant in Texas has exposed that Muslims have set up a COMMAND CENTER with weapons, armored vehicles and a training facility - on top of Muslim-only communities and Sharia courts. SAVE YOURSELF, TEXAS! We can't let this spread! https://t.co/IWca7sSiDQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes repeated interactions with Epic representatives while serving as training sergeant for the Plano Police Department. He contends there is a general misunderstanding that the community plan aims to build an Islamic Sharia friendly area, asserting that the Epic neighborhood already exists in Plano for nearly twelve years. He states it comprises 74 residential properties, a massive mosque, schools, a medical clinic, and multiple businesses, and includes an office of an Islamic financing institution called the UIF Corporation.
He claims the UIF Corporation is not a bank, describing it as a Michigan based corporation whose publicly stated purpose is to “engage in financial transactions that are Sharia compliant.” He asserts that local government officials south of Plano have known for years that only Muslims can purchase homes inside that neighborhood, and that one must be a member of their mosque to live there.
The speaker describes the first house built in the neighborhood as being located right next to the Plano Police Academy, noting it as a huge structure with two separate front doors. He describes the rear of the property as being just a few feet from a large outdoor warning siren, and the house as having a large second story platform overlooking the restricted access parking lot where the police department stores specialized vehicles such as bomb trucks, bomb disposal equipment, and the SWAT team’s armored vehicle.
As a court recognized expert in SWAT team tactics and procedures, he states that the house has “all the hallmarks of a fortress and a command post.” He elaborates that the rear of the house resembles an observation post and a shooting platform. He questions why someone would build a house so close to a giant warning siren and a police training site and why there would be a huge platform overlooking those specialized police emergency vehicles.
He identifies the first owner of that house as a leader in the EPIC neighborhood and also as the co founder of the Yaquin Institute for Islamic Research, urging listeners to visit their website and read what it says about instituting Sharia law.
The speaker claims this is not a matter of radicals hiding in plain sight, stating they are not hiding and have been open about their beliefs and their intent. He asserts that local government decision makers have failed to ask hard questions for fear of negative publicity and being labeled as bigots. He says he is not here to spread innuendo or to make unfounded accusations, but is asking everyone to look at the evidence and the confirmed facts that are already in existence. He closes by thanking the judge and mister Deenan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the Plano Police Department after twenty six years of full time law enforcement service, and I've dealt with representatives of Epic many times when I was the sergeant for the Plano Police Department excuse me, the training sergeant for the Plano PD. There seems to be a general misunderstanding that we're talking about a plan to build an Islamic Sharia friendly community. The epic neighborhood already exists in Plano. It's been there for nearly twelve years with 74 residential properties, a massive mosque, schools, a medical clinic, and multiple businesses. It also has an office of an Islamic financing institution called the UIF Corporation.
The UIF Corporation is not a bank. It's a Michigan based corporation whose publicly stated purpose is to, quote, engage in financial transactions that are Sharia compliant, end quote, which are their words, not mine. Local government officials south of here have known for years that only Muslims can purchase homes inside that neighborhood. You have to be a member of their mosque to live there. First house built in that neighborhood was built right next to the Plano Police Academy.
It's a huge structure with two separate front doors. The rear of the property is just a few feet from a large outdoor warning siren. The house has a large second story platform overlooking the restricted access parking lot where the police department stored specialized vehicles such as bomb trucks, bomb disposal equipment, and the SWAT team's armored vehicle. I am a court recognized expert in SWAT team tactics and procedures. That house has all the hallmarks of a fortress and a command post.
The rear of the house looks a lot like an observation post and a shooting platform. Why would somebody choose to build a house so close to a giant warning siren and a police training site? Why would someone build a huge platform overlooking all those specialized police emergency vehicles? The first owner of that house is a leader in the EPIC neighborhood, and he is also the co founder of the Yaquin Institute for Islamic Research. And I urge everyone to visit their website and read what it has to say about instituting Sharia law.
This is not a matter of radicals hiding in plain sight. They're not hiding. They've been open about their beliefs and their intent. Local government decision makers have failed to ask hard questions for fear of negative publicity and being labeled as bigots. I'm not here to spread innuendo or to make unfounded accusations.
I'm asking everyone to simply look at the evidence and the confirmed facts that are already in existence. Thank you for your time, judge. Thank you, mister Deenan.
reSee.it AI Summary
Schumer expressed anger on the Senate floor after Trump alleged Democrats seek violent rebellion from the military and CIA, calling such language an outright, deadly serious threat and suggesting Trump’s rhetoric could influence supporters. In reply, PowerHousez06 notes Noem is using polygraphs to identify and fire leakers in her department, reporting that some leakers have been found and fired.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 NOW: Sen. Chuck Schumer is LIVID on the Senate floor after President Trump accused Democrats of demanding violent rebellion against him from the military and CIA "The president of the United States is calling for the execution of elected officials! This is an outright threat and it's deadly serious." "When Donald Trump uses the language of execution and treason, some of his supporters may very well listen!"
@PowerHousez06 - PoweraHouse_06
@EricLDaugh Sec. Noem says she is using polygraphs and other tools to find out who is leaking information in her department “I have found some leakers ... They will be fired.” https://t.co/cUAkY7CGo4
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Cam Higby just CALLED OUT the mayor of Muslim-dominated Dearborn Michigan at the council meeting and had the entire room STUNNED Antifa ambushed Higby and Dearborn police let the criminal run free. Dearborn has been conquered. https://t.co/n9VipbHmea
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: Sen. Rand Paul officially moves to BLOCK Sen. John Kennedy’s measure to withhold Congressional members’ pay during the shutdown Rand Paul says he doesn’t want to pay “less people” in a shutdown — “I want to pay more.” https://t.co/ewOq2JtE2u
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines his first bill, the no shutdown paychecks to politicians act, which would say members of Congress can’t be paid and won’t receive back pay after a shutdown ends. He asks unanimous consent for immediate consideration, reading, and passage of the bill, with the motion to reconsider laid on the table.
Speaker 1 asks if there is objection.
Speaker 2 argues for an approach that would begin paying those who are working during a shutdown—soldiers, air traffic controllers, and all workers—stating this should become a permanent feature of government. He says paying workers is better than isolating or punishing groups and asks that the Senate modify the request to consider, read, and pass Senator Paul’s alternative. He references Senator Johnson’s shutdown no shutdown act as an alternative and asks to replace the current bill with that.
Speaker 0 responds, explaining he will not substitute Senator Paul’s bill for his own. He says he understands Senator Paul’s point as wanting to pay everyone, but explains his bill has a chance to pass the House and be signed by the president, whereas Senator Paul’s bill would not pass the House or be signed by President Trump. He states this is why he cannot substitute Paul’s bill. He then asks for a parliamentary clarification: did Senator Paul object to his bill, and would Paul’s modification substitute his bill? The chair confirms that Paul’s modification would substitute his bill for the original.
Speaker 1 asks if there is an objection to the original request.
Speaker 2 (from Kentucky) reserves the right to object and argues it is not clear that the president wouldn’t sign a bill to continue paying federal workers. He says it’s confusing that Democrats object to paying traffic controllers and suggests letting Democrats explain why they don’t want to pay workers. He asserts there is a debate over spending levels, but that workers who have contracts should be paid. He mentions his own fiscal conservatism, stating he would not hire new people and would allow government shrink through attrition, but asserts that those who work for the government should be paid. He contends that Democrats' subsidies to higher earners are inconsistent with helping the working class or the poor and argues that the president would sign a bill to pay workers.
Speaker 0 disputes, arguing the bill to keep Congress from being paid during a shutdown is different from Paul’s.
Speaker 1 clarifies that Senator Paul objected to the bill and that the objection to the unanimous consent request stands.
Speaker 0 introduces a second bill, the withhold member pay during shutdowns act, which would withhold lawmakers’ pay during a shutdown but escrow it to be paid after the shutdown ends. He notes there is precedent from Obama in 2013. He seeks unanimous consent for Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs to be discharged from further consideration of S. 3057, and asks that the Senate proceed to immediate consideration, with reading, passage, and a tabled motion to reconsider.
Speaker 2 objects with the objection noted. Speaker 1 acknowledges the objection from the Kentucky senator.
Speaker 0 attempts clarification on the bill to withhold member pay, and Speaker 1 confirms the objection to the unanimous consent request. The scene ends with the discussion in progress on the second bill.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the members' consideration. So starting with my first bill, which would say members of congress can't be paid, and don't get back pay even after we end the shutdown. That's called the no shutdown paychecks to politicians act. I ask a unanimous consent that the senate proceed to the immediate consideration of my of my bill, that bill, which I just described, is at the desk. Desk.
I further ask that the bill be considered read a third time and passed, and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid on upon the table. Is
Speaker 1: there objection?
Speaker 2: Legislation that instead of closing government down further begins to pay those who are working. Pays our soldiers, pays our air traffic controllers, pays everyone who's showing up for work. I think this should become a permanent feature of our government. I think it's disruptive. I think it's unfair.
And I think it's wrong that we don't pay the workers that are showing up. But a better way than isolating out different groups and punishing different groups is to actually pay those who are working. And I think we should do this if we're past this legislation. This would never be a problem again. We're going to run into disagreements in the future.
We're going to have times when the government shuts down, but there's no reason that we shouldn't be paying our government workers. So I ask the senator modify his request so that instead of the senate proceeding to the immediate consideration of calendar item one ninety one, that s three zero one two, that the bill be considered, read a third time and passed and the motion to consider be considered made and laid upon the table.
Speaker 0: Mister president?
Speaker 1: Would would the senator modify his request?
Speaker 0: I will not, mister president, and I'd like to explain why. I understand senator Paul is making a good point. What he's saying is rather than than saying as I am that nobody else is being paid so members of congress shouldn't be paid. I think what senator Paul is saying, let's pay everybody. That's what I understand him to be saying.
And he wants me to agree to that instead of my bill. What senator Paul is proposing is senator Ron Johnson's shutdown no shutdown act that we voted on several times. And and I'm for it. I voted for it several times. Here's the problem I have with senator Paul's proposal of pulling down my bill and going with senator Johnson's bill.
Several reasons. Number one, I'm interested passing something. I'm not interested in just putting on a show. My bill will pass the House of Representatives, and my bill will be signed by the president. Senator Paul's bill, I can assure you, will not pass the House of Representatives, and president Trump will not sign it.
I'm not saying someone's right or somebody's wrong. Trump does not consider to be senator senator Paul to be be part of his MAGA agenda, and he will veto it. And then we're right back to square one. So for that reason, I can't substitute his for mine because his is gonna gonna gonna be as dead as fried chicken here in a few days, and mine has a chance to pass. Now I need some clarification, mister president.
Parliamentary inquiry, if you will. Do I understand that senator Paul has objected ed to to my my bill? Bill? Correctly. The senator from Kentucky asked if would modify your request.
Speaker 1: The senator from Kentucky asked if you would modify your request.
Speaker 0: And his his modification, if I might ask, is to substitute his bill for mine. That is what?
Speaker 1: That is the sub That is the understanding of the chair.
Speaker 0: Okay. I have said I will not substitute his bill for mine. Objection to the modification is heard.
Speaker 1: Objection to the modification is heard.
Speaker 0: Is there an objection to the
Speaker 1: original request?
Speaker 2: Reserving the right Mister president.
Speaker 1: Consentor from Kentucky.
Speaker 2: Reserving the right to object, I think it's actually not clear at all that the president wouldn't sign a bill to continue paying federal workers. I think it's actually a universal sentiment among both parties, among American people, particularly among the soldiers that we ought to continue to pay the soldiers, continue to pay the workers. I'm perhaps the most conservative member of the senate. I vote to cut spending on everything. I think we pay when I think we spend way too much, but I'm not for cutting the salaries of people who have a contract and who are doing their work.
Now I probably would not hire new people, and I would probably let the federal government shrink gradually through attrition because I think we need to be smaller. But if you work for government, you're doing your job, and you have a contract, I think you ought to be paid. So I don't think it's not clear that the president wouldn't support this. I think it's actually quite confusing that this is being objected by the Democrats. And I think actually it'd be nice to let the Democrats, you know, have a round at this and explain to us why they don't wanna pay their traffic controllers.
Look. We can have a dispute over spending. I think the Republican proposal spends too much. I think the Democrat proposal spends too much. But I think we ought to pay the workers while we're working out the debate over what the spending level ought to be.
I think it's actually an untenable position of Democrats to come before this body and say, oh, we wanna give subsidies to people who make $225,000 a year. That's what they're arguing for. The Obamacare subsidies are not the basic subsidies. These are add on subsidies that started two years ago. If you make a $100,000 a year, the Democrats wanna give you 13,000.
Meanwhile, people who make 20,000 and are on food stamps are not gonna get food stamps, but somebody making a 100,000 is going to get fifth $13,000. That doesn't sound like the Democrats are for the working class or for the poor. Sounds like the Democrats are for people making $200,000 a year to get a subsidy. Subsidy. But I think in the midst of all this, with pressure, I think the Democrats could be made to understand and support paying the government workers.
I mean, I I just think it is something eminently reasonable. I think it is something very passable, and I don't see the president objecting to this. I think the president would sign this in a heartbeat. So I object.
Speaker 1: Objection is heard. Mister president senator from Louisiana.
Speaker 0: Clarification. I have offered in a bill a bill to say that congress does not get paid like everyone else is not being paid during their shutdown. There's been a little bit back and forth. As I as I understand it, senator Paula's objected to that bill. Is that correct?
The senator from Kentucky objected to your unanimous consent request.
Speaker 1: The senator from Kentucky objected to your unanimous consent request.
Speaker 0: To my bill to keep to say congress isn't played during a shut down. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: To the
Speaker 0: bill you ask unanimous
Speaker 1: consent to pass the objection to the unanimous consent.
Speaker 0: I wanna bring up my second bill. It's called the with hold member pay during shutdowns act. Remember my first bill that senator Paul objected to would have said members of congress staffs don't get paid, just like air traffic controllers don't get paid, just like the military doesn't get paid. We don't get paid until the shutdown is lifted, and we don't get our money in arrears. In other words, we don't recoup our money once the shutdown is lifted.
Perhaps senator Paul will find my second bill to be more palatable to him and his pocketbook. The withhold member pay during shutdowns act would say, while member while we're in a shutdown and everyone else is not being paid, Congress would not be paid. But members of Congress, including senator Paul, including me, including all members of Congress, would have the right to get the money back to be paid after they're out of the shutdown. In other words, the money would be escrowed, and they would get it once we came out of the shutdown. Again, there is there is precedent for that.
I talked about what senator Obama did back in 2013. And for that reason, mister I'm gonna ask unanimous consent on that one. I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs be discharged from further consideration of s three zero five seven. Is that the right bill number? Okay.
S is that the right bill madam Clerk? You don't know? Yes. Okay.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: S three zero five seven in the senate proceed to its immediate consideration. I further ask that the bill be considered read a third time and passed passed and and that that the the motion to reconsidered to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
Speaker 2: Is objection? Mister president?
Speaker 1: Chair recognizes senator from Kentucky.
Speaker 2: Reserving
Speaker 0: the
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that I get death threats every day, and my wife faces them too, along with extensive doxxing campaigns. The Democrat Party has become dangerously radicalized. Across the country, across government and law enforcement, people fighting for safety deal with radical left threats. We confront a party that treats opponents as mortal enemies, dehumanizes them, and justifies violence against federal officers and ICE. They praised the MS-13 ‘Maryland dad’ as a hero. This is a dangerous party and movement.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: STEPHEN MILLER drops a TRUTH NUKE on the entire Democrat Party "I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns!" "The Democrat Party has become dangerously, violently RADICALIZED." "But the truth is, people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement, who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity, are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long." "We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and Border Patrol, that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS-13 gang bangers." "Look at how they venerated and WORSHIPPED and PRAISED the MS-13 child smuggler that they dubbed the 'Maryland dad,' somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children, and was a member of a terrorist organization - and they held them up as their HERO." "This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement!" @StephenM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The Democrat party has become dangerously, violently radicalized. And you're right, Sean. I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've obviously had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns. But the truth is, Sean, that people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long. And President Trump, of course, came within inches sorry, centimeters of A millimeter. Assassinated one millimeter. On during the middle of his rally on live television by a wicked evil assassin and then only weeks later, a second assassin, if not for a secret service agent spotting the burial of that gun, would have taken president Trump's life, saved by the by the hand of God himself. We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and border patrol that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS 13 gang bangers. Look at how they look at how they venerated and worshipped and praised the MS 13 child smuggler that they dubbed the Maryland dad, somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children and was a member of a terrorist organization and they held him up as their hero. This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement. And when you're singing New York City with Mamdani, that is the future. A party that believes in no bail, a party believes in no jail, a party that believes in no borders, but here's one group they do wanna put in jail, their political enemies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Democrat party has become dangerously, violently radicalized. And you're right, Sean. I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've obviously had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns.
But the truth is, Sean, that people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long. And President Trump, of course, came within inches sorry, centimeters of A millimeter. Assassinated one millimeter. On during the middle of his rally on live television by a wicked evil assassin and then only weeks later, a second assassin, if not for a secret service agent spotting the burial of that gun, would have taken president Trump's life, saved by the by the hand of God himself. We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and border patrol that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS 13 gang bangers.
Look at how they look at how they venerated and worshipped and praised the MS 13 child smuggler that they dubbed the Maryland dad, somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children and was a member of a terrorist organization and they held him up as their hero. This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement. And when you're singing New York City with Mamdani, that is the future. A party that believes in no bail, a party believes in no jail, a party that believes in no borders, but here's one group they do wanna put in jail, their political enemies.
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: I report Harjinder Singh, labeled Indian illegal alien semitruck driver, failed his CDL 10 times in 60 days in 2023 and failed air brakes twice, per Fox. CALIFORNIA must be banned from issuing CDLs until this is figured out. Another illegal Singh semitruck driver caused a deadly wreck in CA.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: In an infuriating development, Indian illegal alien semitruck driver Harjinder Singh - who killed 3 in Florida - FAILED his CDL license test a whopping 10 TIMES across 60 days in 2023. Singh additionally FAILED the air breaks knowledge test TWICE, per Fox's @BillMelugin_. CALIFORNIA must be IMMEDIATELY banned from issuing CDLs until we can figure out what the h*ll is going on! Another illegal alien "Singh" semitruck driver caused a deadly wreck in California this week.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that two men, Jashanpreet Singh (CA) and Harjinder Singh (FL), described as Indian illegal aliens, caused multiple deaths driving semis, crashes weeks apart. Both resided in California, both needed CDLs to drive, and the piece questions how states hand out CDL licenses to illegals named “Singh” who don’t know how to drive. H/t @BillMelugin_
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 ALL of America should be FURIOUS right now. TOP: Indian illegal alien Jashanpreet Singh causes multiple deaths while driving a semitruck in CA BOTTOM: Indian illegal alien Harjinder Singh causes multiple deaths while driving semitruck in FL Both resided in Newsom's California. The crashes happened just weeks apart. Both require a CDL to drive the vehicle they were driving. Something is SERIOUSLY wrong with how states are handing out CDL licenses like candy to illegals named "Singh" who don't know how to drive. H/t @BillMelugin_
reSee.it AI Summary
I read BREAKING: Democrats are about to launch a “master ICE TRACKER” on an official gov site to track agents. “We will be tracking EVERY SINGLE instance we can verify. The community will send us information.” FLOOD IT WITH FAKE INFO! Do not let them get away with targeting federal agents. This is vile.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: In a disgusting move, Democrats are about to create a "master ICE TRACKER" on an official government website to track the movements and activities of agents. "We will be tracking EVERY SINGLE instance we can verify. The community will send us information." FLOOD IT WITH FAKE INFO! Do not let them get away with targeting federal agents. This is vile.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker said they shared with the mayor that over the next couple of weeks the oversight committee will launch on their website a master ICE tracker to track every single instance that can be verified from information the community can send to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I shared this with the mayor. Over the course of the next couple of weeks, the oversight committee will be launching on their website a master ice tracker where we can we're we're gonna be essentially tracking every single instance that we can verify that the community will send able to send us information on.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that CNN had Hakeem Jeffries react to a video of Harry Sisson being dumped on by a fighter jet pilot under President Trump. Jeffries fumed: the video is deeply unserious, unpresidential, and un-American—an erratic, extreme display Americans have seen from this president. CNN looped it.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: In a hilarious moment, CNN just made Hakeem Jeffries watch Harry Sisson be DUMPED on by fighter jet pilot President Trump and asked for his live reaction Hakeem fumed: "That VIDEO is DEEPLY unserious!! DEEPLY unpresidential, and deeply UNAMERICAN. It's the type of erratic, extreme behavior the American people have continued to see from this president!!" I can't believe CNN just played this video on LOOP on national television. We truly live in the best timeline 😭
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Mike Johnson discusses a video featuring a crown flying in a plane, bombing, and No Kings protesters with piles of waste, noting that it is described as “a family program.” He says that the video is “satire,” and that satire is the word he used to make a point about the clip and its context.
The response to the video is presented as follows: one viewpoint characterizes the video as “deeply unsirious, deeply unpresidential, and deeply un American.” This characterization is described as reflecting erratic, extreme behavior purportedly shown by the president and the administration from the very beginning.
Additionally, the excerpt asserts that it is “no surprise” to the speakers that House Republicans behave as “nothing more than reckless rubber stamps for Donald Trump’s extreme agenda,” which is said to be hurting the American people. It also claims that Republicans support “his extreme behavior that they continue to whitewash.” The overall framing suggests a contrast between the described satirical video and the alleged behavior and attitudes of the president and the House Republican majority, portraying the latter as enabling or shielding Trump’s actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Which showed him with a crown flying in a plane, bombing, the No Kings protesters with piles of waste. It's a family program. I'll use that word. House speaker Mike Johnson says that it's just Trump using social media and satire. Satire is the word that he used to make a point.
How do you see it? Well, that video is deeply unsirious, deeply unpresidential, and deeply un American. But, unfortunately, it's the type of erratic, extreme behavior that the American people have continued to see from this president and from this administration from the very beginning. And, of course, it's no surprise to us that house Republicans continue to behave as nothing more than reckless rubber stamps for Donald Trump's extreme agenda that's hurting the American people and, of course, for his extreme behavior that they continue to whitewash. Speaker Johnson
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm reporting that US Attorney Jeanine Pirro announces new charges against criminals who assaulted Edward Coristine after a judge let them run free. Powell, 19, and Taylor, 18, are now charged with assault. They were involved in other crimes before the attack. Ten suspects approached him; multiple attackers pinned him, demanded the car. Lock them up; DC must stop going easy on youths.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: US Attorney Jeanine Pirro announces NEW CHARGES against criminals who brutally assaulted DOGE's "Big Balls" Edward Coristine after a liberal judge let them run free. One assaulter was a KNOWN criminal, released multiple times by leftist judges. "Today, we are announcing that Lawrence Cotton Powell, 19, along with Anthony Taylor, 18, are now charged with assault." These thugs were involved in OTHER crimes before the attack on Coristine. "The group then [walked] into the direction of another crime within minutes [on] Edward Coristine..." "10 suspects approached him...he was then attacked by MULTIPLE suspects...they got him on the ground and demanded the car." LFG! Lock them UP and DC must stop going easy on "youths" and teens! 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today we announce charges against Lawrence Cotton Powell, 19, and Anthony Taylor, 18, for assaulting Ethan Levine and for related crimes involving Edward Corristine.
Lawrence Cotton Powell is charged with first-degree robbery (fifteen years), assault with intent to commit robbery (fifteen years), and robbery (fifteen years) for the attack on Edward Corristine, along with assault with intent to commit robbery (fifteen years) and attempted carjacking (five years). The incidents described show Powell stomping on Levine’s head; Levine rose briefly but was chased, downed again, and the group continued the assault while Levine was on the ground, then robbed him of his sneakers and watch. Minutes later, the group attacked Edward Corristine while he was escorting a young woman to her car; Corristine was punched repeatedly and brought to the ground. The suspects demanded the car from the woman inside the locked car, banging on the door and urging her to surrender the keys; a Metropolitan Police Department officer on patrol witnessed the assault as the suspects attacked Corristine. The juveniles fled, and two 15-year-olds were later arrested and taken into the family court by the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.
Powell’s history is highlighted as significant. On April 3, Powell was sentenced for felony attempted robbery. The office sought jail time, but Judge McClain, a Superior Court criminal-part judge with no criminal background, granted probation despite the felony conviction. Within 31 days, Powell reoffended and was rearrested on charges of simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon. On May 4, the office sought probation revocation. On May 16, Judge McClain released Powell again, telling him to be a good boy. On July 24, Powell was sentenced for one of the two misdemeanors he faced, with the office again requesting jail time after victimizing another person. On July 25, another judge suspended Powell’s sentence and placed him on probation. After a felony attempted robbery conviction, a violation of probation, another crime, another conviction, and noncompliance with conditions of supervision, the judges allegedly told him to do better and released him. Ten days later, Powell committed acts against Levine and Corristine.
Anthony Taylor, Powell’s co-defendant, is charged with the same offenses as Powell: robbery, assault with intent to commit robbery, and related counts. Taylor is from Maryland and is 18 years old; there is no additional history provided about him in this briefing.
The speaker extends thanks to the Metropolitan Police Department for their hard work and dedication in pursuing these cases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Them. Today, we are announcing that Lawrence Cotton Powell, who is 19 years of age, along with Anthony Taylor, who is 18 years of age, are now charged with assaulting Levine. Cotton Powell was stomping on Levine's head. As you can see in this poster to my left, Levine was able to get up momentarily, but the crowd chased him and got him down again. They continued to attack Levine while he was on the ground, and then proceeded to rob him of his sneakers and, his watch.
The group then, after the robbery and assault of Ethan Levine, they walked in the direction of where another crime occurred within minutes. You have heard of this crime. Edward Corristine, a 19 year old Doge person who was working in the administration, was walking a young woman to her car when he was approached in the 1400 Block Of Swan Street Northwest. Approximately 10 suspects approached him, and as they did, he pushed the young woman into the car that and he was protecting her from the group before he was then attacked by multiple suspects who then punched him repeatedly causing significant injuries to him. They got him on the ground.
And as they were doing so, they demanded the car from the woman who was inside the car and had already locked the car. They were banging on the car. They were pulling the car door, trying to get the car open, and were telling the woman in the car to hand over the keys. And the woman was, as I said, able to lock the car door, so they were unable to gain entry. And it was fortuitous that someone from the Metropolitan Police Department was on patrol.
He happened to pull onto the block, and he witnessed the suspects actually assaulting Coracine who was on the ground lying next to the car. The juveniles fled, but within a short period of time, two 15 year olds were arrested, and they were taken into the family court by the attorney general's office. That is the local attorney general's office. Now I think what's significant about this case is a history of Lawrence Cotton Powell. I want you to I want you to follow me on this.
Lawrence Cotton Powell is 19 years of age. He's now charged with robbery, first degree robbery, for which he faces fifteen years in prison. He also faces a charge of assault with intent to commit robbery in another fifteen years and robbery for Edward Corstein, fifteen years, assault with intent to commit robbery, another fifteen years, and attempted carjacking, five years. Now let me tell you his background. On April 3, Lawrence Cotton Powell was sentenced for a felony attempted robbery.
My office asked for jail time. Judge McClain, a judge sitting in the criminal part in Superior Court with no criminal background, made a decision to give Cotton Powell probation in spite of his conviction on a felony attempted robbery. Within thirty one days, by May 4, Powell reoffends. He's rearrested while he's on probation from the felony, and he's charged with simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon b. On May 4, my office asked that probation be revoked.
But on May 16, that same judge McClain comes back and releases Cotton Powell and tells him, basically, be a good boy. On July 24, he is sentenced to one of the two misdemeanors that he's charged with. Again, my office asked for jail time after he victimized yet another person. And on July 25, another judge suspends his sentence and decides that he should be on probation. So after a felony of attempted robbery conviction, after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with c Sosa, the judges say do better, and they let him go.
And guess what? Within ten days, he's at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Corstein. Now the codefendant in this case is is an individual by the name of Anthony Taylor. He charged also with the same arrest. He is from with the same crimes.
He is from Maryland. He is 18 years old. We are unaware of any any history as it relates to him. I wanna thank the Metropolitan Police Department. I wanna thank the fact that this department went above and beyond and worked incredibly hard.
reSee.it AI Summary
The black man claimed the young white male is the real threat to America. I agreed: they’ll be the majority with guns, and if you keep telling them they’re criminals and must pay for others’ bad decisions, you don’t want to see their anger. They’ve never been angrier; I’m listening to it. They’re getting their ass kicked.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 NEW: A black man told Steven Crowder that the young white man is the top threat to America - and Crowder dropped a TRUTH NUKE in response MAN: "The young white male is the REAL THREAT to America!" STEVEN CROWDER: "You know what? You're right. I agree...because young white males are gonna be the majority with guns. And if you keep telling them they're F-ing criminals and should pay for people's bad decisions? You don't want to see them angry." "They've never been angry. I'm looking at young men, and they're way, way more angry than I ever was. And I LISTEN to it...They're getting their a*s kicked."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: There's no cameras over young white male when the young white male is the real threat to America. And it just hangs.
Speaker 1: You know what? You're right. I agree. I agree. You're right about that. Because young white males are gonna be the majority with guns, and if you keep telling them that they're criminals and they should pay for people's bad decisions, you don't wanna see them angry. Tell them that they've never been angry. And I'm telling you, I'm looking at young men, and they're way way more angry than I ever was. Well, they're getting their ass kicked. If they're that angry, why they're only killing each other in their communities? When's the last time you I mean, how many let's look at recently.
Speaker 0: That's good question. Why are not killing black people?
Speaker 1: No. You know what? What's the point? Because they're they're they're able to understand that the ones that are not the problem. They're not listen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no cameras over young white male when the young white male is the real threat to America. And it just hangs.
Speaker 1: You know what? You're right. I agree. I agree. You're right about that.
Because young white males are gonna be the majority with guns, and if you keep telling them that they're criminals and they should pay for people's bad decisions, you don't wanna see them angry. Tell them that they've never been angry. And I'm telling you, I'm looking at young men, and they're way way more angry than I ever was. Well, they're getting
Speaker 0: their ass kicked. If they're that angry, why they're only killing each other in their communities? When's the last time you I mean, how many let's look at recently.
Speaker 1: That's good question. Why are not killing black people?
Speaker 0: No. You know what? What's the point? Because they're they're they're able to understand that the ones that are not the problem. They're not listen.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that cartels are allegedly teaming with left-wing terror groups in the US, offering thousands for assassinating top border officials, including Border Commander Greg Bovino. Bovino says protests involve ramming vehicles and bringing guns; lethality is rising. @TriciaOhio says Sec. Noem hardened ICE facilities and a coordinated, organized war on law enforcement in Chicago, with foreign networks using tiered bounties. Democrats must call off their foot-soldiers.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 BREAKING: Cartels are working with left-wing terror groups in the US offering thousands of dollars for the assassination of top border officials, including Border Commander GREG BOVINO BOVINO: "We have criminals ramming vehicles, bringing guns to protests! This is NOT regular street crime in Chicago!" "The lethality of these assaults is increasing!" @TriciaOhio: "[Sec. Noem] has been HARDENING our ICE facilities...we are seeing a coordinated, highly organized waging of WAR on our law enforcement in Chicago...these foreign terrorist networks are using a tiered system of BOUNTIES to go after them." Democrats MUST call off their foot-soldiers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss explicit reward figures tied to harming federal law enforcement personnel and describe a rising level of danger for officers in Chicago. They begin by listing bounties: $5 to $10 for kidnapping of ICE agents or Customs and Border Patrol agents, non-lethal assaults, and $50,000 for the assassination of high-ranking officials. Greg Movino, who works in Chicago, says he has personally experienced a bounty placed on his head, illustrating the immediacy of the threat.
The panel emphasizes that there are now “$50,000 bounties on the heads of federal law enforcement officers” and that criminals are involved in ramming vehicles and bringing guns to protests. They insist this is not ordinary street crime, but attacks against federal law enforcement, including assaults on border patrol agents, ICE officers, and allied agencies, occurring daily and often multiple times per day. They warn that the lethality of these assaults is increasing, highlighting the growing danger faced by officers enforcing the rule of law.
In response to these threats, the speakers discuss measures and leadership strategies. They note that “there's power in numbers” and “safety in numbers,” suggesting collective protection as part of the response. They reference actions at the national level: Secretary Noem reportedly hardening ICE facilities since the terror attack in Dallas, and President Trump having called in the National Guard, viewing these steps as indicative of strong leadership during the crisis. The speakers describe the situation as a coordinated, highly organized “war on our law enforcement on the streets of Chicago,” implying a systematic campaign by adversaries.
A key point is the claim that foreign terrorist networks are targeting law enforcement, using a tiered system of bounties to pursue officers. The threats are described as extending beyond direct attacks to include doxxing family members, kidnapping, and even murder. The language frames these actions as deliberate tactics by hostile groups to destabilize and intimidate those enforcing the law, underscoring the perceived severity and organization behind the threats as testified by the speakers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 5 to $10 for kidnapping of ICE agents or, customs and border patrol agents, non lethal assault, $50,000 for the assassination of high ranking officials. Here's Greg Movino. He works in Chicago. Says he had a bounty on his head. Watch.
Speaker 1: We've got $50,000 bounties on the heads of federal law enforcement officers. We have criminals ramming vehicles, criminals bringing guns to protests. This is not regular street crime here in Chicago. We have assaults on border patrol agents, ICE officers, and our allied law enforcement agencies every day, often multiple times per day. And, again, these assaults the lethality of these assaults is increasing.
Speaker 0: How can your officers respond to that effectively?
Speaker 2: Well, there's, you know, power in numbers. There's safety in numbers. Secretary Noem, ever since that terror attack we saw in Dallas, she's been hardening our ICE facilities. President Trump has called in the National Guard a very prescient and and great strong leadership we've seen from the president of The United States. But, I mean, we are seeing a coordinated, highly organized waging of war on our law enforcement on the streets of Chicago.
These men and women are simply enforcing the rule of law in doing their job, and yet there's these foreign terrorist networks who are going after them. They're using a tier tiered system of bounties to go after them, whether it be doxing their family members, kidnapping, even murdering these brave men and women.
reSee.it AI Summary
I don’t think anything will get me into heaven; maybe I’m in heaven now as we fly on Air Force One. I’m not sure I’ll reach heaven, but I’ve made life better for a lot of people.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN - PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I don't think there's anything that's gonna get me in heaven. I really don't. I think I'm not, maybe, heaven-bound." "I may be in heaven right now as we fly in Air Force One. I'm not sure I'm gonna be able to make heaven. But I've made life better for a lot of people." 🙏
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 muses about heaven, saying, "I don't think there's anything gonna get me in heaven. Okay? I really don't. I think I think I'm not maybe heaven bound." They add, "I may be in heaven right now as we fly an Air Force One. I'm not sure I I'm gonna be able to make heaven." They claim they have "made life a lot better for a lot of people." They illustrate with: "as an example, had the had the election of twenty twenty not been rigged, you would have millions of people living just in Russia, Ukraine alone. That would have never happened, and it didn't happen for four years."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A little cute. I don't think there's anything gonna get me in heaven. Okay? I really don't. I think I think I'm not maybe heaven bound.
I may be in heaven right now as we fly an Air Force one. I'm not sure I I'm gonna be able to make heaven. But I've made life a lot better for a lot of people and, you know, as an example, had the had the election of twenty twenty not been rigged, you would have millions of people living just in Russia, Ukraine alone. That would have never happened, and it didn't happen for four years.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Trump thanks Putin after Putin says the Nobel Peace Prize has lost credibility. Putin argues the prize has honored people who did nothing for the world, questions the US president’s worth, but says he admires efforts to resolve long crises and Ukraine.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump THANKS Vladimir Putin after he said the Nobel Peace Prize has "lost credibility" Putin: "There were cases when this committee discussed the Nobel Peace Prize for people who have done NOTHING for the world." "Is the current president of the USA worthy or unworthy? I don’t know. He really does a lot to solve such complex problems, crises that last for years or even decades. He sincerely aspires for this crisis in Ukraine to be resolved.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Я не считаю это моим делом решать, кому присуждать Нобелевскую премию. Бывали случаи, когда комитет награждал людей, которые для мира ничего не сделали, и это подрывало авторитет премии. Человек мог казаться хорошим, а через месяц–два награда появлялась — за что? В итоге авторитет премии утрачен. Бог с ним, не мне судить, но достоин ли действующий президент США Нобелевской премии, я не знаю. Но он реально много делает, чтобы решить долговременные кризисы, включая кризис на Украине. Что-то удаётся, что-то нет. Возможно, ещё многое удастся достичь на основе договорённостей и обсуждений в Анкоридже; он точно старается и работает над достижением мира и разрешением сложных международных ситуаций.
I don’t consider it my business to decide who should be awarded the Nobel Prize. There have been cases when the committee awarded the Peace Prize to people who did nothing for the world, and this undermined the prize’s authority. A person could seem good, but within a month or two the award appeared — for what? Ultimately, the prize’s authority is eroded. God bless it, not for me to judge, but whether the sitting U.S. president deserves the Nobel Prize, I don’t know. But he really does a lot to resolve long-standing crises, including the Ukraine crisis. Some things succeed, some don’t. Perhaps much more can be achieved through agreements and discussions in Anchorage; he definitely tries and works toward achieving peace and resolving complex international situations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Это не мне решать, кому присуждать Нобелевскую премию. Во-первых, мне кажется, и вряд ли кто-нибудь из вас или из ваших зрителей и слушателей будет возражать, Вряд ли. Сейчас скажу, что я имею в виду. Были случаи, когда комитет присуждал Нобелевскую премию мира людям, которые для мира ничего не сделали. И, на мой взгляд, этими решениями они нанесли огромный ущерб авторитету этой премии.
Человек пришёл хороший, плохой, ему сразу через месяц, через два бум! За что? Да вообще ничего не сделал. Как раз так работают, это же заслуги какие-то нужно. И поэтому авторитет, мне кажется, он в значительной степени утрачен.
Бог с ним, не мне судить, но достоин или не достоин действующий президент США Нобелевской премии, я не знаю. Но он реально много делает для того, чтобы разрешить такие сложные десятилетиями длящиеся годами, а то и десятилетиями длящиеся кризиса. Я уже говорил точно, я знаю по отношению кризиса на Украине, он искренне стремится к этому. Чего-то там удалось, чего то не удалось. Может быть, ещё нам многое удастся сделать на основе договоренностей и обсуждений в Анкоридже, но он точно старается, точно работает над этими вопросами достижения мира и разрешения сложных международных ситуаций.
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched a clip of a legal immigrant arguing with Don Lemon: crossing the border illegally is a crime, laws are being broken, and people aren’t held accountable. She says Mexico uses force in deportations, the U.S. doesn’t, and that mass deportations are needed—she believes she’s right.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! This legal immigrant from Latin America STUNNED Don Lemon, going off on his supporting of illegal aliens https://t.co/l8qlMEM1vW WOMAN: "[Mass deportations] is how you handle the country...myself as an immigrant. It's about doing things the RIGHT WAY...a lot of them say, 'No human is illegal.' But once you enter the wrong way, you break the law." LEMON: "It's not a crime, you're NOT breaking the law - I mean, you ARE breaking the law, but it's not a criminal act..." WOMAN: "Laws are being broken right and people are not being accountable! It starts growing until it gets to a place you can't live or be safe!" "In Mexico they are doing mass deportations using FORCE. NOTHING like here. They aren't pulling you over, 'Let me see if you're legal.' No, they beat you up and question you later!" LEMON: "We're there! That's happening!" WOMAN: "Not even CLOSE...crossing the border illegally is a CRIME. You don't see it that way, but I do." Fascinating. She is right 100%.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says Mexico is conducting mass deportations of people who stayed illegally to 'manage a country,' insisting this is not about hating people but enforcing laws. They note signs saying 'no human is illegal,' but insist 'once you enter the wrong way, you're breaking the law.' They compare Mexico to the US, claiming Mexico 'start beating you up and then they question you later,' and 'In Mexico, they are doing mass deportations and are using force. Nothing like you see here in The US.' They state, 'Crossing the border illegally, that's a crime,' while adding, 'you don't see it that way, but I do.' They add a Japan analogy: 'Go to Japan and try to do it illegally and guarantee you, you're gonna You don't live in Japan. That's not a crime. You're not breaking the law. I mean, you are breaking the law, but it's not a criminal act.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mexico right now is doing mass deportations on all the people that stayed illegally. Right. Because that's how you manage a country. It is not about hating people, myself as an immigrant. It's just about doing, things that lightweight.
So a lot of them have signs that said, no human is illegal. Yeah. But once you enter the wrong way, you're breaking the law. Go to Japan and try to do it illegally and guarantee you, you're gonna You don't live in Japan. That's not a crime.
You're not breaking the law. I mean, you are breaking the law, but it's not a criminal act. Laws are being broken left and right, and people are not being accountable, and it gets to the point where little by little starts growing and growing till it gets to a place where you can no longer live and be safe. In Mexico, they are doing mass deportations and are using force. Nothing like you see here in The US.
They're not pulling you over and checking out. Let me see if you're legal to to be here. No. They start beating you up and then they question you later. That's we're we're the we're there.
That's happening. Not even close. Crossing the border illegally, that's a crime. You don't see it that way, but I do.
reSee.it AI Summary
I faced intense questioning during a debate about my endorsement of Jay Jones after controversial comments he made. When pressed for a clear answer, I emphasized that I learned of the comments only when they were made public and condemned them immediately. I reiterated that voters now have the information to make their own choices. Despite the pressure, I maintained that each candidate is running their own race, and it’s ultimately up to the voters to decide. The exchange was heated, but I focused on my commitment to serving Virginia.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! BRUTAL exchange as Virginia governor candidate Abigail Spanberger is grilled on if she STILL endorses Jay Jones for attorney general, after he called for the death of Republicans and their children. This is BAD. MODERATOR: "I didn't hear an answer on [whether you still endorse] Jay Jones." SPANBERGER: "In fact, it appears that it was the, uh, those who released the text messages and held them for years so the public was unaware who had knowledge of these text messages." SEARS: "When did you KNOW, and what did you DO about it?!" SPANBERGER: "I learned of these text messages the day that they came out and I denounced them as soon as I learned of them." SEARS: "Oh, she denounces M*RDER!" SPANBERGER: "And importantly, um, at this point as we move forward, the voters now have this information, information that was withheld for them, presumably for political reasons." "But the voters now have the information and it is up to voter to make an individual choice based on this information." MODERATOR: "Do you still continue to endorse Jay Jones? 15 seconds, yes or no." SPANBERGER: "We are all running our individual races. I believe my opponent has said that about her lieutenant governor nominee." SEARS: "Third time's a charm, Abigail!" SPANBERGER: "It's up to every person to make their own decision. I am running my race to serve Virginia, and that is what I intend to do." MODERATOR: "We just want to clarify, what you're saying is that as of now, you still endorse Jay Jones as attorney general?" SPANBERGER: "I'm saying as of now, it's up to every voter to make their own individual decision." SEARS: "She STILL endorses him!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Question: Will you continue to endorse Jay Jones to be the next attorney general of Virginia? And were you aware of these text messages before they released?
Speaker 1: "I learned of these text messages the day that they came out, and I denounced them as soon as I learned of them." The voters now have this information, information that was withheld for them, and it is up to voters to make an individual choice based on this information.
Speaker 0: Do you still endorse Jay Jones? Fifteen seconds. Yes or no?
Speaker 1: "We are all running our individual races. I believe my opponent has said that about her lieutenant governor nominee. Miss Earl Fairs. If there's every person to make their own decision." "I am running my race to serve Virginia and that is what I intend to do."
Speaker 0: As of now, it's up to every voter to make their own individual decision.
Speaker 1: "I am running for governor. I am accountable for the words that I say endorse this. For the acts that I take for the policies that I have put out." "I am responsible for the policies I put out and the work I will endeavor to do tirelessly for the people's governor, Virginia."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, miss Spamberger. I just I didn't hear an answer there on the endorsement issue, so I want to just make sure. Will you continue to endorse Jay Jones to be the next attorney general of Virginia? And were you aware of these text messages before they released? You have thirty seconds.
Speaker 1: In fact, it appears that it was the, those who released the text messages and held them for years. So the public was unaware who had knowledge of these text messages or many else. You do a
Speaker 0: mess. I learned
Speaker 1: of these text messages the day that they came out, and I denounced them as soon as I learned of them. She denounces murders. And importantly, at this point, as we move forward, the voters now have this information, information that was withheld for them You're running for the police. For political reasons. But the voters now have the information, and it is up to voters to make an individual choice based on this information.
Speaker 0: Miss Member, I understand what you're saying about the voters, but for you yourself, do you still continue to endorse Jay Jones? Fifteen seconds. Yes or no?
Speaker 1: I, we are all running our individual races. I believe my opponent has said that about her lieutenant governor nominee. Miss Earl Fairs. If there's every person to make their own decision. I am running my race to serve Virginia and that is what I intend to do.
Speaker 0: Thank you, miss Spamburger. We just wanna clarify, you know, what you're saying is that as of now, you still endorse Jay Jones as attorney general.
Speaker 1: I'm saying as of now, it's up to every voter to make their own individual decision. I am running for governor. I am accountable for the words that I say endorse this. For the acts that I take for the policies that I have put out.
Speaker 0: Thank
Speaker 1: you. I am responsible for the policies I put out and the work I will endeavor to do tirelessly for the people's governor, Virginia.
Speaker 0: Thank you, miss Spamberger.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 NOW: AG Pam Bondi STUNNED Senator Amy Klobuchar (D) "My agents are working, on the street working WITHOUT A PAYCHECK because your party voted to SHUT DOWN the federal government!" https://t.co/LIwWodA3Ye
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker addresses Senator Klobuchar, saying they won't discuss personnel decisions, but highlighting a personnel issue. The speaker states that all of their agents and all of their lawyers are working. They claim that their agents are on the street working without a paycheck, attributing this to the shutdown caused by the other party. The speaker asserts, "My agents are on the street working without a paycheck because your party voted to shut down the federal government." This emphasizes perceived consequences of the government shutdown on federal operations and compensation. The message conveys frustration that personnel are continuing to work without pay due to political actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Klobuchar, I'm not going to discuss personnel decisions, but the personnel issue that I'm having right now is that all of my agents, all of my lawyers are working. My agents are on the street working without a paycheck because your party voted to shut down the federal government.