reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Ernestonewage
reSee.it AI Summary
CDS is a solution of chlorine dioxide that oxygenates tissues in multicellular organisms and oxidizes the cell membrane in unicellular organisms, making it bactericidal. It's used for infectious and inflammatory processes, tumors, and chelating heavy metals. Side effects include abdominal pain and diarrhea, but it has no contraindications. It can be taken with antioxidants, and periodic coagulation controls are necessary for patients taking anticoagulants. CDS can be purchased online. More information is available at andreaskalcker.com and saludprohibida.com.
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
Voy a hacer un hilo sobre CDS, dónde comprarlo, indicaciones, protocolos, referencias bibliográficas etc
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
-¿Qué es el CDS? Solución de dióxido de cloro -Dióxido de cloro: ClO2. Se comercializa en solución acuosa (CDS) porque es un gas. No es lejía! que es hipoclorito de sodio NaClO -¿Cómo actúa? Básicamente oxigenando los tejidos en los órganismos pluricelulares
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
En cambio, en los seres unicelulares produce oxidación de la membrana celular, de ahí su poder bactericida. - Principales indicaciones: procesos infecciosos, procesos inflamatorios, tumores - Protocolos de administración: depende de la indicación. https://canceremocional.org/protocolos-cds/#Protocolo_CDS_C_Cancer
Protocolos CDS de la A a la Z
Protocolos CDS (todos) explicado de forma clara y sencilla. Cómo tomar el CDS, consejos sobre el uso y conservación. Dióxido de Cloro.
canceremocional.org
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
- Tiene efectos secundarios: En algunas personas puede producir dolor abdominal o diarrea. En ese caso, empezar con dosis bajas e ir aumentandola progresivamente. - Tiene contraindicaciones: No En caso de tomar anticoagulantes, empezar con dosis bajas y probablemente haya que
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
reducir la dosis del anticoagulante. Para ello se hacen controles periódicos de la coagulación en los pacientes que toman anticoagulantes orales. - Se puede tomar con antioxidantes como la Vitamina C? Sí,pero separado al menos dos horas. - Donde comprar?
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
Más información en http://andreaskalcker.com - Salud prohibida https://t.me/saludprohibidaandreaskalcker
Andreas Kalcker | Web Oficial | Official Website
Andreas Kalcker es investigador biofísico de origen alemán que ha vivido la mayor parte de su vida en España y desde hace muchos años reside en Suiza donde ha investigado y registrado varias patentes internacionales que tratan del uso terapéutico del dióxido de cloro tanto para la hipoxia como para la inflamación, infección, sepsis y Sars -Cov2 -Coronavirus.
andreaskalcker.com
SALUD PROHIBIDA Andreas Kalcker official
🌎 Official channel of Andreas Kalcker 🙂 ¡El CDS salva vidas! ¿hay algo más gratificante? CDS saves lives! Is there anything more fulfilling? CDS rettet Leben! Gibt es etwas Schöneres? Forum 👉🏻 www.saludprohibida.com Web 🌐 www.andreaskalcker.com
t.me
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
Otra de las propiedades del CDS, es que es quelante de metales pesados y otras sustancias tóxicas, es decir, ayuda a eliminarlos
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
@Yo_soy_JulyR - Soy July R
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
@JMichaelWaller Yes Michael https://t.co/Kud66WWuf9
Video Transcript AI Summary
New evidence shows Venezuelan businessmen bought a US voting machine company critical to elections without government review. Smartmatic, owned by Venezuelan businessmen, supplies voting machines in the US. Concerns arise about the ownership of Smartmatic and its ties to Venezuela. Questions about election integrity and potential fraud during the 2020 elections are raised. Calls for a full review of Smartmatic's ownership and transparency in elections technology. The chairman of Smartmatic is Lord Mark Malloch Brown, a British diplomat with ties to George Soros. Allegations of irregularities in elections and the need for accountability are highlighted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, new evidence that the federal government has ignored a threat to the integrity of our elections. A group of Venezuelan businessmen have bought an American company that supplies electronic voting machines and counts the votes, But your government didn't even review the sale. The voting machine company critical to this country's election count, and they can't tell you whether or not the committee, on foreign investment in the United States reviewed it or not?
Speaker 1: They have no answer for us.
Speaker 0: And even These are the most arrogant, incompetent,
Speaker 2: bureaucratic idiots. You already run-in 2020 elections, and you were one of those voices that claimed for election integrity.
Speaker 3: Yes. Iran. It's true. And you know what? I didn't concede it.
He was pissed. He was very upset because I saw what was happening
Speaker 2: during that election period. 2020 congressional candidate, 4th congressional district, this gentleman, Joshi Cruz.
Speaker 4: Yes. Yes. Sheldon. I'm still black on Steve to the result of the election. Yes.
And I'm Steve Brady's head of results of our 4th district.
Speaker 2: Yes. Yes, sir.
Speaker 5: We are here because I wanted
Speaker 6: to tell you about this memory,
Speaker 4: which everybody knows is Dominion. Yes.
Speaker 3: The repetition of Venezuela elections fraud. It was the same pattern. When it comes to election integrity, we need to remember something important, which is company.
Speaker 1: Smartmatic, based in Boca Raton, provides voting machines in local elections in the United States, like this election in Chicago in March. But Smartmatic has only 5 to 7 people working in Boca Raton, Florida. Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen. The Smartmatic and other voting machine companies are private companies. They have proprietary software they can call a trade secret.
Electronic voting experts with extensive experience say it's nearly impossible to verify if a proprietary system is tamper proof.
Speaker 3: I remember the night of the election. When I saw Fulton County stopping the counting for an hour, everything was shut down and then come back again, and then the numbers was changed.
Speaker 1: The US company that makes the machine, Sequoia, was bought in 2 1005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen.
Speaker 3: But let me tell you something during live TV. My campaign manager saw the numbers change. Life, 30,000 volt was distracted from my
Speaker 2: account.
Speaker 7: I'm gonna show you what you really missed. So here we go. Watch the gold. The update's coming. Boom.
There it updates, and now here's this guy. Now let me show you what you
Speaker 8: missed. The problem is the closed door proprietary nature of the process. Position of power, we would never know. Some voter watchdog groups and position of power, we would never know.
Speaker 1: Some voter watchdog groups and others in congress are calling for a full review and say the ownership of all called
Speaker 3: CFIUS
Speaker 1: review was underway on Smartmatic. Recently, it has called CFIUS review was underway on Smartmatic.
Speaker 3: Recently, it has come to light that there may be some confusion regarding the ownership of Smartmatic, a company involved in elections technology. While some reports suggest that the Venezuelan's businessmen, the company CEO, Mojica, and COO, Roger Pinera, are the owner, it is important to provide clarity on this matter. What many people may not realize is that the true decision maker and chairman of SMARTMARI is George Mark Maloc Brown, also known as Lord Maloc Brown. He is a British diplomat who has held prominent positions, including serving as a deputy secretary general of the United Nations. Who is this man?
The chairman of Smermatic voting machine and software. This clarification is necessary to ensure that accurate information is available to the public regarding the ownership and leadership of Smermatic. It is essential for transparency and understanding, particularly in matters as crucial as elections technology. Lord Maloc Brown, not your typical British agent, from 1993 to 1994, Maloc Brown was part of the Soros advisory committee on Bosnia where advanced the Balkanization project of 1990s. In 1998, Maloch Brown also confounded Soros International Crime Court, ICC, after the duo had created the International Crisis Group, ICG, in 1994.
This institution served to, 1, shape international perceptions of the causes and solutions to crisis real or fabricated, and 2, advocate solutions that removes sovereignty in military and judicial affair from sovereign nation states where they had been enshrined in the United Nations chapter, Nuremberg Laws, and United Nations Declaration of Human Rights to supranational unelected organizations under the control of experts. As vice president of the World Bank from 1995 to 1999, he took credit for transforming its image to a more democratic organization, and from 1999 to 2005, tied United Nation funding to George Soros Open Society's operations internationally. During this time in New York, Maloc Brown lived on an estate owned by Soros, and now serving as president of Open Society Foundation since 2021. Smartmatic lie. Lord Mark Mallow Brown admitted to license agreement between a Smartmatic and Dominion in 2015 interview.
Speaker 9: You did unequivocally point out here that Smartmatic has never been a Venezuelan company, but correct me if I'm wrong. The chairman that had preceded you was a Venezuelan. And in fact, allegedly, Smartmatic had ties with the late former president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez. How do you explain all of that?
Speaker 7: Well, you know, I
Speaker 2: think the big word is allegedly. The former chairman who is still CEO, so still very involved in in, the business leads it in fact. You know, was a resident of Florida when these systems were designed.
Speaker 9: K. The question on people's minds, why is Smartmatic even still here in the Philippines after, reports that it had violated provisions of the election automated law, number 1, for example, that it was never supposed to be allowed to bid in the 2010 elections, because it did not actually own the software. Dominion Voting Systems owned the software. Plus, through, just in order to access the source code. Issues like that.
Your thoughts. People say we should not be subjected to Smartmatic again this time around.
Speaker 2: Well, look, I think that's competitors who say that. You know, the fact is, yes, part of our technology is licensed from Dominion. But you tell me a large technology company which isn't using, in part, licenses, from from other companies, and we have a license for the international use of that particular piece of the technology that we employ. But, you know, we are a manufacturing and technology r and d company. We have hundreds of people who are doing r and d and 100 more involved in manufacture.
These are our systems. And, you know, the fact is, we were are proud of the way we've transformed election performance in the Philippines.
Speaker 9: So, Mark, let me just cut in there and ask you. The license issued by Dominion for you to use their proprietary proprietary software, that is a live license. It's an active license. Yeah. It has not been revoked.
No. It has not been revoked. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And US corporations should have access to our election.
Speaker 10: In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions. That's why I wrote to the secretary of the treasury and asked them to review the ownership. It's off shore. It's murky. No one seems to know who owns it.
Certainly, our government should know.
Speaker 3: It's amazing that instead of looking into possible problems during the 2020 election in Georgia, top officials have chosen to deny any issues right from the beginning. Now there's no way for denying the evidence. Investigators and experts have made it clear that some cases need to be sent to the attorney general due to possible fraud during the elections. The president Trump concerns were valid and based, and hearing in May 2024 before the state election board will reveal the
Speaker 11: 2. We're in a situation where we have put together and you guys did did it for our the president Obama's administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.
Speaker 3: We're born with the freedom to choose our leaders, and tampering with election goes against this freedom and the will of God. It's a crime against the people. Even a well known anchor at Fox Business was fired for speaking out against these irregularities. I am Jesse Cruz Fletcher, and I approve this message.
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
@davidicke Here the original image..!! Please don’t make it viral … But if you wanna repost it I’m fine with it 🤷🏻♂️ David @davidicke , better for them stop banning, are you agree.. don’t you? https://t.co/CdqUR9GwIG
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
@Thekeksociety Dr. The confirmation here 👇🏼👇🏼
reSee.it AI Summary
Carolyn Andriano, a crucial witness in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, has tragically passed away. The investigation into her death, which occurred earlier this year, has concluded that it was an accidental overdose. Carolyn, a 36-year-old mother-of-five, had plans to start a new life in North Carolina before her untimely demise. The details surrounding her death are unsettling, as there was no obituary or funeral service held.
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
Weird, isn’t? Carolyn Andriano, a victim of sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein whose testimony was crucial to putting away his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, has died. There was no obituary or funeral service after she died earlier this year, and police in West Palm Beach, Florida, opened an investigation into her death. After The Daily Beast reached out for comment, police spokesman Mike Jachles told us that the investigation was concluding and that Carolyn died of an accidental overdose. The 36-year-old mother-of-five had planned to start a new chapter in North Carolina, at a new house with a fireplace and half-acre lot with a chicken coop. Carolyn and her husband, John Pitts, had purchased the property just weeks before she was found unresponsive in a W
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The Moon Landing Conspiracy: Unveiling the Truth
Article: Despite widespread belief, doubts persist regarding the moon landing. Disregarding official statements and government defenders, NASA's alleged involvement in money laundering raises eyebrows. Let's examine the facts, divided into three parts.
Part 1: The moon landing controversy persists, challenging the official narrative.
Part 2: Casting doubt on the moon landing, skeptics question the credibility of NASA and its alleged financial misconduct.
Part 3: Unveiling the truth behind the moon landing conspiracy, we delve deeper into NASA's alleged role as a money laundering machine.
End of Article. (499 characters)
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
🚨🔥🤡 Man never landed on the moon It doesn’t matter what they said, or what the actual “woke” government defenders will say NASA has been the greatest Money Laundry machine ever built Here the facts Part 1/3🧵 https://t.co/rjgfPPIDwH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the authenticity of the moon landing, pointing out various anomalies in the photographs. They highlight the scarcity of pictures, especially of Neil Armstrong, and suggest that the scenes were lit with artificial light. They also mention inconsistencies in the shadows and the absence of stars in the photographs. The speaker speculates that the missions may have been staged inside for security reasons and suggests that slow motion was used to create the illusion of low gravity. They criticize the quality of the televised images and mention the discovery of an old reel that adds to the doubts surrounding the moon landing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was not only possible, but absolutely true. And what are the photographs? What do they tell us? On 3 separate occasions, our office asked NASA's public relations department for every single picture of an astronaut on the surface of the Moon Just during the maiden voyage of Apollo 11, many duplicates were sent. In all, fewer than 20 pictures were found, including firsthand investigation on-site at the agents' vaulted archives.
Quite surprising considering the historical significance of the event. These very photographs are the same ones circulated year after year on anniversary commemorations. It is estimated that in just first 60 minutes on the moon, motivated by the tenuous nature of the circumstances, many more exposures could have been expediently taken. Also surprising is the scarcity of photographs of the mission's chief pioneer, Neil Armstrong, The greatest achievement in human history and of the man whose first step echoed around the world dawning a new age of scientific enlightenment, There is only 1 full body picture of him on the moon besides this ghostly reflection, this one taken by an automatic camera mounted on the side of the lunar module. Perhaps he feared liability should the whole conundrum later become unraveled.
Perhaps he has forgotten that he attested to the authenticity of the event with his signature on this plaque engraved by the Federal Government. In fact, in the more than 30 years since the event, aside from NASA's initial press conference and the occasional brief anniversary remarks Where few questions were permitted, he has never given 1 on camera interview to anyone ever. From an analytical standpoint, photographic anomalies have to be sought out with an understanding of lighting and shadows. The most straightforward is simple. When objects are lit solely by the sun as all the scenes on the moon were said to be, After all, lighting equipment was not only impractical, it was unnecessary in bright sunlight, then all shadows, regardless of the landscape, will run parallel with one another and never intersect as shown by this example.
In these seldom seen photographs, Tamed from a rarely used auxiliary NASA archival site, it is clear that these scenes were lit with artificial light. These shadows which are cast at different angles are evidence that a second light source is being used. In addition, The sun would not cause an isolated hot spot like this, only an artificial light would. Again, intersecting shadows and another hot spot and again and again. It is simply impossible for this picture to have been taken with sunlight on the moon.
Here, the shadows are shown to be as black as pitch. And yet here, completely in a shadow, the astronaut is lit up like a Christmas tree. How can this be? All this, On the shadow side of the lunar module In this magnification of an Apollo photograph, a rock, Very likely, a papier mache prop, because of the crease here, is categorized with the letter c. In later releases of the same picture, The letter is gone, probably airbrushed out.
Here, a crosshair, which was burned directly into the image from the film plate And thus should always appear on top of the objects in the photograph appears behind the object in this scene, Clearly revealing a composite of 2 pictures into 1. Someone apparently forgot to create a burn crater Underneath the lunar module's 10,000 pound thrust engine, despite the fact that during ground tests, there was a real concern for the vehicle falling into the hole the engine created as it descended. Here is a depiction based on the latest In these enlargements, it looks as though the lunar module was simply placed There, not even 1 speck of moon dust on the landing pod. As a result, all subsequent flights had to have the same discrepancy, which was explained away by the effect of no atmosphere. And what about stars?
On the moon, with no atmosphere, they must have been quite a sight to behold, yet there is seldom any mention of them, if ever, by any of the astronauts on any of the missions. Undoubtedly, creating a mural with all the constellations properly placed in the sky would have been virtually impossible to create accurately, much less realistically. A competent amateur astronomer would have been able to call attention to the slightest error in measurement. The answer? Not to talk about the stars ever!
In their post flight press conference It was the only question to which Neil Armstrong responded with an absence of memory. When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars and the solar corona in spite of the glare?
Speaker 1: We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the moon by eye without looking through the optics. I don't recall during the period of time we were photographing the sonor girl or what what stars we could see. I don't remember seeing any.
Speaker 0: Years later, though, Michael Collins would remember seeing the elusive stars and wrote about them in expeditions to the moon. It seems his memory improved the older he got. Why don't stars appear in any of the photographs? Simply because the proper, Mostly closed exposure setting for the camera's iris, set that way to compensate for the bright sunlight on the moon's surface, completely diminished the faintness of relatively distant specks of diminutive light. This answer is true.
It does not, however, explain why they never took any pictures of the stars by themselves with an exposure setting perfect for them. While they took 3 automobiles to the moon, they never took a photographic telescope. Had they done so, They would have been able to see farther into the universe than had ever before been realized. If they had taken a telescope and were not actually on the moon, They would have had to concoct undiscovered galaxies that might one day prove to be nonexistent. The cost of the 3 moon rovers in 21st century currency, nearly $60,000,000 each.
Though they had fewer parts than a jeep, where was all this money going? Then there's the flag blowing in the wind at least twice on the atmosphereless moon. We can only guess that most of the missions were staged inside for fear of possible aerial or satellite reconnaissance from an unfriendly nation. The backpacks, designed for 1 sixth gravity, must have had the cooling systems removed to allow for movement without falling over. With very near and hot studio lighting, that left 1 hot astronaut inside.
Assuming that it was astronauts inside, after all, their faces were always covered. The necessary mammoth amounts of air conditioning were probably responsible for the air current. Here, the editor cuts to a still shot of the flag just as the effect becomes noticeable. Here it is unchecked. This rare clip attained decades ago was never re released With the inevitable increase in experience and scrutiny.
To demonstrate 1 sixth gravity, a bouncy, floaty feel to the astronauts' movements would be similarly achieved with relative simplicity: slow motion. You are viewing the scenes as they aired more than 30 years ago. Now, let's look at them with the speed doubled. It becomes discernible that they are, in fact, in Earth's gravity and are no more leaving the ground than they would on Earth. It is clear from these rarely seen colour television pictures that the crew of Apollo 11 brought a high resolution color video camera with them on their mission, yet the only pictures broadcast live from the moon's surface Were these from a low definition black and white camera?
In fact, the networks complained because, in addition to this, they were forced to shoot the images 2nd generation offer a projection TV of the technology of 30 years ago and were not even allowed to take a direct feed, which further degraded the quality and clarity of the images. Perhaps this was precisely what NASA and the federal government had in mind. After all, it was the first, regardless of where they were. Better to open up their debut mission with fuzzy pictures and numerous blackouts, rather than show too much revealing detail of a false scene that was yet unproven, And finally, the element that seals their fate. Of all the footage of Apollo 11 requested from NASA Over a 5 year period, 1 gem was discovered just before the completion of this documentary, An old reel received by Mstink.
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
🚨🔥🤡 Man never landed on the moon It doesn’t matter what they said, or what the actual “woke” government defenders will say NASA has been the greatest Money Laundry machine ever built Here the facts Part 2/3🧵 https://t.co/h2N1I3Gy60
Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA and the Federal Government may have intentionally released fuzzy and blackout-filled footage of the Apollo 11 mission to hide the truth. However, a recently discovered reel of raw footage reveals the crew staging parts of the mission, discussing techniques to create a false image of Earth from a distance. The conversations between the astronauts and a third party prompt them on what to say and how to manipulate the camera. The footage was not broadcast live and was edited before being shown to the public. The camera was positioned at the back of the spacecraft, capturing a circular window filled with Earth in low orbit. The crew blocked out sunlight to maintain the illusion. Neil Armstrong mistakenly claims to be halfway to the moon when he is actually in low Earth orbit. The deception suggests that they couldn't pass through the Van Allen radiation belts, confirming that none of the subsequent moon missions were genuine. The government and contractors profited greatly from the fake missions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Perhaps this was precisely what NASA and the Federal Government had in mind. After all, it was a first, regardless of where they were. Better to open up their debut mission with fuzzy pictures and numerous blackouts rather than show too much revealing detail of a false scene that was yet Unproven. And finally, the element that seals their fate. Of all the footage of Apollo 11 requested from NASA Over a 5 year period, 1 gem was discovered just before the completion of this documentary, an old reel received by Mstink.
It contains the raw or unedited footage of the crew of Apollo 11, Michael Collins, Edwin Aldrin Junior, and Neil Armstrong, staging part of their mission For nearly an hour, in living color, with exceptionally clear behind the scenes audio of conversations discussing the techniques used to achieve a disingenuous picture depicting the Earth at a distance in order to falsely demonstrate their far journey from it and their ability to survive passing through the Van Allen radiation belts. It cannot be misconstrued that this Staging was done for some other reason prior to the mission, for the reel itself is slated and dated July 18, 19th, and 20th 1969, the very days of the mission when they were said to be approaching and achieving lunar orbit. Furthermore, it is apparent they are in genuine zero gravity aboard the actual spacecraft necessary to convince the mass media of their authenticity, just not any further than Earth orbit, as you will see. In this never before seen or heard footage, not only is the radio conversation between the astronauts And Houston Control audible, there is a secondary private conversation taking place between the crew and a third confidential party prompting the astronauts with what to say, when to speak, and how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired misleading effect.
NASA claims that the Houston transmissions were the only ones taking place with the astronauts. Listen now as Houston control initiates a conversation with the crew, only to find them too preoccupied with the behind the scenes trickery to respond. Moments pass, and the oversight is picked up on by the clandestine third party who quickly prompts them with talk. Immediately, Neil Armstrong speaks. Again, the illusion they are attempting to create is the Earth at a distance to demonstrate their far journey from it and their ability to survive passing through the Van Allen radiation belts.
Understand too that only about 20 Seconds of this raw footage was ever broadcast to the public, and these conversations discussing their deception were believed to be private until now. Here, they discussed that these television transmissions were, in fact, not broadcast live as everyone believed. They were first screened and edited for playback later.
Speaker 1: Hi, Rogeneer. We just wanted a there is such a weekend. When we get to playback, we can sort of correlate what we're seeing. Thank you very much.
Speaker 0: Here, they discuss the fact that they have turned out the lights and have blocked out sunlight from entering the spacecraft through the other windows as to not cause any reflected light to fall onto the spacecraft's wall in the foreground.
Speaker 1: Okay. Very good. Well, we still
Speaker 2: have the sun coming in from the other windows into the spacecraft. So, it's fucking
Speaker 1: through a, The, number 1 window under as many, reflected light.
Speaker 0: The reason this was done is so that the truth of the matter would not be revealed. It is this. Though the federal government would have you believe that this is a view of Earth from a distance out of the spacecraft's This window, as it clears the moon, it is not. What they have ingeniously done is placed the camera at the back of the space carved and centered the lens on a circular window in the foreground, outside of which it is completely filled with the Earth in low orbit. The circumference of the window then appears to be the diameter of the Earth at a distance, with the darkened walls of the spacecraft appearing to be the blackness of space around it.
That is why they wanted the interior dark and blocked out the sun from entering through the other windows. Here you can see the extruded window, probably 2 inches thick, at the bottom. This is because because the earthshine is coming in at a downward angle. It also causes the Earth to appear to be an irregularly shaped circle, for you are seeing the outside of the window at the bottom and the inside of the window at the top, which together form 2 different sized halves of a circle. Subsequently, this take was never used.
As they perfected the shot, a crescent shaped piece of black material was inset slightly into the window to create the illusion of the Earth's terminator line dividing night and day. It is uncannily convincing. During this segment, intended to be edited and played back later for the worldwide television audience, Dated July 18, 1969, Neil Armstrong condemns himself as he states that he is 130,000 miles out Or halfway to the moon, as the NASA flight log also states on this date, when he is, in reality, in low Earth orbit of a few 100 miles.
Speaker 2: Hi, Roger. Houston. Apollo 11. Calling in from about a There is, a mild out.
Speaker 0: Here, during another segment also intended to air after review, Neil Armstrong falsely explains to the viewers how the shot is attained by putting the camera's lens to the window's glass as it would have to be if they were the claimed distance away from the Earth.
Speaker 2: And we only have 1, window that, has a view of the Earth, And it's filled up with a TV camera.
Speaker 0: If the window was completely filled up with a TV camera, as he stated, Then an astronaut's arm would not be able to get between the camera and the window as it obviously does here in this uptake. South
Speaker 2: America becomes invisible just beyond the Terminator or inside the shadow.
Speaker 0: You can also notice how the astronaut operating the camera reacted to the mistake by attempting to pan away from it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The white sands of major cloud formations across the Earth.
Speaker 0: This is a segment that they believed wasn't even being recorded, much less suitable for broadcast, for the lens was being zoomed out and the scene was being changed to that of an interior of the astronauts at work, and apparently, the stop button popped back up on the recorder without notice. Here is the diffused work light that they use to see camera controls but not throw light onto the spacecraft's wall. Here, they removed part of the crescent insert. Finally, the iris is opened up and you can see the real location of the camera and the very bright and near Earth out the window. Here is the slate for 19 July, and the same shot of trickery on July 19, and then 20, and the same misleading shot on 20th.
Later that evening, they were said to be walking on the moon. How can this be when they were in Earth orbit only 9 hours earlier and the moon is some 3 days' journey away. Furthermore, if they genuinely went to the moon, why would they be faking any part of it? Why this trickery with the window? By faking being halfway to the moon, it becomes apparent that they did so because they could not even go halfway.
It thus confirms that the stumbling block to their success was the lethal radiation of the Van Allen radiation belts. Since the same equipment was used on the subsequent missions in the 40 months that followed, None of them could have gone to the moon. They only increased their proficiency at staging them. When some TV viewers of the 2nd man mission to the moon telephoned the networks complaining that reruns of I Love Lucy were being interrupted, It became clear that for the taxpayers, once was enough, but it wasn't enough for the government and contractors. 1,000,000,000 of dollars of pure profit went with each return.
How coincidental that the following mission would have the element of life and death jeopardy. Apollo 13 Now the public would take going to the moon more seriously and be reconnected with the drama. We now realize that perhaps the reason Neil Armstrong has never given an on camera interview is because he doesn't want to lie anymore. What threats may have been made upon such honorable men
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
🚨🔥🤡 Man never landed on the moon It doesn’t matter what they said, or what the actual “woke” government defenders will say NASA has been the greatest Money Laundry machine ever built Here the facts Part 3/3🧵 https://t.co/5i1Spij2w4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the Van Allen radiation belts prevented the moon missions from being successful. They claim that subsequent missions were staged and that the government and contractors profited from them. The Apollo 13 mission was seen as a way to make the public take the moon missions more seriously. The speaker questions why Neil Armstrong has never given an on-camera interview and speculates about possible threats made to the astronauts and their families. They mention the resignations of James Webb and the Apollo 11 astronauts. The speaker believes that the truth should be uncovered and that the government should be held accountable. They call for amnesty for historical crimes and emphasize the importance of the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go halfway. It thus confirms that the stumbling block to their success was the lethal radiation of the Van Allen radiation belts. Since the same equipment was used on the subsequent missions in the 40 months that followed, none of them could have gone to the moon. They only increased their proficiency at staging them. When some TV viewers of the 2nd man mission To the moon, telephoned the networks complaining that reruns of I Love Lucy were being interrupted.
It became clear that, for the taxpayers, Once was enough, but it wasn't enough for the government and contractors. 1,000,000,000 of dollars of pure profit went with each return. How coincidental that the following mission would have the element of life and death jeopardy. Apollo 13 Now the public would take going to the Moon more seriously and be reconnected with the drama. We now realize that perhaps the reason Neil Armstrong has never given an on camera interview is because he doesn't want to lie any more.
What threats may have been made upon such honorable men or their families to possess their reluctant cooperation and later ill feelings towards perpetuating this still darkened hour in American history. NASA's highest ranking official, James Webb, resigned without explanation Just days before the 1st Apollo mission, why, when he was on the threshold of achieving the greatest accomplishment of his career, All 3 Apollo 11 astronauts also resigned shortly after their return. On the 25th anniversary of the event In 1994, Neil Armstrong made a rare public appearance and held back tears as he spoke these brief cryptic remarks before the next generation of tax payers, as they toured the White House.
Speaker 1: Today, we have with us, a group of students among America's best. To you, we say, we have only completed a beginning. We leave you Much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, Breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truth's protective layers.
Speaker 0: He is that Leia. Perhaps some day soon, with the uncovering of this footage and its meaning. The true patriots of America will rise up or come forward and free the citizens and themselves from the sin that so easily entangles, and from a federal government that needs to have the gangrene cut off. Even if the government's destruction would come from the truth, then it is not worthy to stand, and its betterment would inevitably follow. All of us are mortal.
All of us will die. Perhaps the seeking of a clear conscience before that hour Will motivate the truth into the light. Perhaps as citizens we should offer amnesty for this and other crimes of history, for facts from those involved before the truth perishes with them. Why must we wait until the year 2017 to open the Kennedy Perhaps they will not even be opened then, for the law that reluctantly stipulates their release says so with this clause: Quote, with the exception of documents certified for continued postponement by the president. Whoever believes the citizens to be too immature for the truth are too immature for power.
The truth will always set us free.
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
Look how politicians clean up their asses with your rights
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two people recently died, and it is important to note that we are all responsible for our own health. Informed consent plays a crucial role in any treatment or procedure, and ultimately, individuals are responsible for their own health decisions. The government has provided opportunities for people to consult with their general practitioners and make informed decisions about their health. This is the kind of country we live in, where individuals have the freedom to make choices regarding their own health and bodies. As a result, mandatory vaccination is not enforced for the general population because people have the autonomy to make their own decisions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you, can you talk about the 2 people who suddenly died, taking that to the end of that? We're all responsible for our own health and when it comes to informed consent and getting consent to what every treatment or procedure you may have or I may have, then I'm ultimately responsible for what people do in their health treatment to me. And, and there has been the opportunity, for people to visit their GP, to have that consultation. The government has provided that and funded that and the informed consent process provides the decisions to the individual. That's the sort of country we live in.
To people to make their own decisions about their own health and their own bodies. That's why we don't have mandatory vaccination, in relation to the general population here because people make to their own decisions. That's the sort of country we live in. People make their own decisions about their own health in their own bodies. That's why we don't have mandatory vaccination, in relation to the general population because people make their own decisions.
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
CEO of Moderna fumbles answering why a patent for the partial gene sequence for covid was placed by moderna 3 yes before covid as s cancer treatment patent
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as human error is always a factor. The Wuhan lab in China may have been conducting research on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an infection that spread to others. The scientists are currently analyzing the data to determine the validity of these claims. It will take time to thoroughly examine the genetic evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you what the Daily Mail is reporting. It says more evidence COVID was tinkered within a lab. Now scientists find the virus contains a tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna 3 years before the pandemic began. Your reaction, Stephan, what can you tell us?
Speaker 1: So my scientists are looking into those data to see, accurate they are or not. As I've said before, The hypothesis of an escape from a lab by an accident is possible. You know, human makes mistakes. So, is it possible that the Wuhan lab in China was working on, viruses, enhancement or gene modification? And then there was an accident where somebody was infected in a lab and then infected their families and friends.
It is possible on the claim you just, mentioned, the scientists are analyzing to know if it's, real or not. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I mean I mean, I was struck by the line it matched a genetic sequence patented by Moderna for cancer research purposes. Stefan?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's the type of things that the team is looking at very For you to know is it is it real or not. So it takes a bit of time to analyze all the genetics
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses concerns about the vaccine's impact on white blood cell production. Bacterial DNA contaminants in the initial vaccine vials are mentioned. The conversation then shifts to a discussion about the alleged financial scheme involving Moderna, Pfizer, and cancer vaccines.
@liz_churchill9 - Liz Churchill
“The vaccine decreases the ability to produce white blood cells by 50% from your first vaccine…your ability to make another generation of white blood cells takes 8 weeks…which is why they set it up at 8 weeks…to hit it again…you hit the white blood cell ability while they’re…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50% after the first dose and an additional 25% after the second dose. They also mention that the booster shot contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV, which supposedly shuts off the body's ability to produce white blood cells. The speaker suggests that this leads to chronic inflammation in areas where individuals have preexisting health issues. They state that 20 to 30% of the population will die during each series of this vaccination process. The speaker concludes by implying that pharmaceutical companies are seeking population control and long-term customers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It decreases the ability to produce white blood cells by 50% from your 1st vaccine. Then 8 weeks later, which is white blood cell reproductive system, so your ability to make another generation of white blood cells is 8 weeks. That's why they set it up 8 weeks later to hit it again. So you hit the white blood cell ability while it's down. So now what you do is now they are they they they crease the saline in the second one and they increase the, harmful ingredients.
So now you have a shift in the ingredients. So they decrease the saline, and increase. So now there's a shift. And then what they do is that 2nd dose attacks your ability make white blood cells by an additional 25%. So now you only have white blood cell ability like, the ability to make white blood cells functioning at 25%.
So you just wiped out 75% of your military and the ability to make that military. Then what they do is they set in the booster. The booster has 81 strands of foreign bacteria that your cells have never come across, so you don't have the antibodies to fight it. They only have 25% of your white blood cell production to be able to fight it. So it's a losing battle.
So then what you what starts to happen is you start to get chronic inflammation that goes to the areas that you had, you had predisposition. So if you were someone that has gut health issues, that's your area that it's gonna focus on. And you're gonna have inflammation in the gut health. If it's respiratory, if you have, tumor or cancer or if you have, say, endometriosis or you have a skin condition, whatever that is, it's gonna inflame that area because now the body has hit the sympathetic nervous system which is the fight or flight and the body has is in a chronic, inflammatory state with a low immunity and then low immune response. Then you get your 2nd booster.
What the 2nd booster has is it has 8 strands of HIV. And now what that does is it completely shuts off your ability to make white blood cells. And if you Google what that disease is, it is HIV. So now we have people that are walking around with no immune system, no ability to make an immune system, 81 strands of foreign bacteria, and then also 8 strands of foreign HIV along with all the other harmful ingredients, and then they remove all the saline from the 1st and second booster. Now to make matters worse, during this process, 20 to 30% of the population is gonna die every single series of this process.
There's 4 series. They have 3 more boosters that are coming out, and the reason why is because once they make you so that your immune system can't make white blood cells anymore, you become dependent on the boosters to survive just like someone becomes dependent on insulin. Big pharma is looking for people that either die off to protect our, population control. And then those that don't die off, we will have reoccurring customers for life funding that they put in to make these vaccines in the 1st place. So hope you, hope that was helpful.
I hope that you listen to this properly, and I hope that you take the time to do your own critical thinking and just give it 2 to 3 years. Every single animal that was part that
@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭
@liz_churchill9 Liz, we found bacterial DNA contaminants in the 2 initial vaccine vials as well, not just bivalent.
@liz_churchill9 - Liz Churchill
@Fynnderella1 You are a true Hero 🦸♀️. You knew early on. One of the first. I remember talking with you about your multiple accounts because the Twitter snipers kept taking you down. I remember when you helped Juanita at the airport. Heroes like you are in such short supply and every time you…
@Ernestonewage - Francisco de Miranda
Dear Liz and Lynn, please girls follow the money, the scheme works in this way 1.- Moderna creates a chimera (Virus) and the VAXX.. the Spike protein has insertions of the “CANCER VAXX” patented by Moderna “casually”.. so they have the “key” already created for this “lock”. 2.- Pfizer increased by 24% the total revenue in their ONCOLOGY deseases just from 2020 to 2021 3.- Pfizer bought by $40 BILLIONS the MODERNA CANCER VAXX PATENT All provable here Thread 1/4 https://t.co/tpmdHjO5ou