reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @FactMissionOrg
@YAmzallagh - Yehuda Amzallagh
@YAmzallagh - Yehuda Amzallagh
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion on the importance of COVID-19 vaccination was met with claims about the Hepatitis B vaccine and its alleged connection to AIDS. The person making the claims offered a reward for evidence supporting their argument. They mentioned studies, batch issues, and the withholding of key evidence. The conversation ended with a challenge to provide the evidence and claim the reward.
@IanCopeland5 - Ian Copeland, PhD
Yet more data showing the importance of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in 2023. Not that the antivaxers care....or can read.... https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7225a4.htm
Effectiveness of Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination in ...
This report describes COVID-19 bivalent vaccine effectiveness among nursing home residents.
cdc.gov
@factbid - factbid.org
I will repeat the offer I made in your space to give $1,000 to whoever addresses the issue. I brought FACTS: FACT: The 1974-78 the Hep B vaccine was developed through tests on the gay community. Those included pumping fresh chimp blood into the men, and using the blood to make a vaccine. FACT: The Merck/CDC studies show the AIDS community was AIDS-free before the experiments and 70% of trial participants became HIV+. Yes, the CDC claimed that was just a coincidence and they didn't find HIV in the batches they tested, BUT, as admitted by Merck's vax expert, Paul Offit (who is probably the most cited pro-vax expert and who you called a clown in your space btw), there were batches made that did not follow Hilleman's inactivation process and which Hilleman (the vax inventor) feared contained live virus. We don't know what happened to them, but we do know the FDA helped Bayer liquidate in poor countries HIV-tainted products that WERE giving people AIDS, all to avoid Bayer having to write them off. FACT: Merck couldn't sell the vaccine in the US and dumped it in Sub-Saharan Africa which per their own studies had a <1% AIDS rates with a 95% CI FACT: 2 years later 6% were positive, and 4 years later up to 1/3. The lion's share had no sexual relations for at least 1 year, and studies concluded AIDS was not principally being transmitted sexually but likely through injections. Unverified: In Cold Case Hammarskjold several ex-members of South Africa's Apartheid-era private military contractor SAIMR admitted they setup free clinics in black parts of South Africa with the goal of eradicating the block population, and one came forward and confessed they gave the black community a vaccine they knew would accelerate the spread of AIDS. That cannot be verified. But, IF it's true, then the the reason so many died is because for 12+ years, all the scientific community did what you just did the space and dismissed the idea as ridiculous and refused to even entertain it. They didn't even bother testing or investigating. I laid out the facts, and while there is no peer-reviewed study saying AIDS came from the vaccine, there are many that suggest as much, and, the most important part, is Merck and the CDC are withholding the key evidence that would prove it one way or another. The test results from the 1,495 kangwane samples in 1983, and the pre-1978 New York samples. There's no reason to withhold them unless.... That's why I offered $1,000 to the first person who can find those results. If, like you say, I'm just making this stuff up and haven't done my homework, send the results and claim the $1,000. @debunk_the_funk can confirm I paid him, and I do pay up when I make these bets. No need for insults, just send the link, and claim the $1,000 and we'll be done with it. https://factbid.org/transcript/17
Unearthed FDA Document Rewrites the Narrative on AIDS, Gays, Africans, and Vaccines?!
Watch now (24 mins) | $1,000 reward to fact-check and debunk. FDA doc proves: Inventors of Merck's vax tested on gay men WERE injecting humans with chimp blood, and there was no AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa when the jabs be
factbid.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m urging Dr. Paul Offit to address concerns about the origins of AIDS and the role of vaccines, particularly the B-Vax made from chimpanzee plasma. There are claims that Hilleman, who developed the vaccine, had knowledge of its testing on gay men and resisted using certain vaccines due to safety concerns. Despite my attempts to engage Offit, he has remained silent, even deleting his account when first approached. I believe it's crucial to uncover the truth about these vaccines and their implications on public health.
@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org
Please pressure @DrPaulOffit to respond. He knows about AIDS origin, having written the biography defending Merck vaccine head Hilleman who, in this leaked recording, laughed he "imported AIDS" with vaccines made from HIV+ chimpanzee blood tested on America's gay community. 🧵 https://t.co/9dKxfFax2G
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that vaccines contained 40 different viruses that were being inactivated. The yellow fever vaccine contained leukemia virus due to the crude science of the time. The speaker says they were not reporting AIDS virus at the time, but they had a disease virus. The speaker says it was good science at the time because they didn't worry about these viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are 40 different viruses in these vaccines, anyway, that we were inactivating. And, But you weren't activating the That's correct. No. That's right. But yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it and, you know, this is in the days of very crude science.
I didn't know we were reporting AIDS virus at the time. And it was you. We had a disease virus. I know we got. It came with a story.
Convertible due to Novavax. It was good science at the time because that was what you did. You didn't worry about these wildfires.
@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org
@DrPaulOffit Yes. We NEED your accurate information, lest misinformation fill the void. Please tell us: Who participated in the trials of B-Vax made from "Dane particle rich" chimpanzee plasma, that you wrote about? Your silence on #ChimpVax is deafening. https://t.co/DjxKXTwoAB https://t.co/SbrWudMnhm
@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org
The CDC first coined "AIDS" in a 9/2/1982 bulletin assuring health professionals that, unlike the "lots used in early studies" on gay men when AIDS first appeared in 1978, Hilleman's LICENSED vaccine used solely human plasma and went through strict inactivation.
@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org
Hilleman is also the one who pushed back against Alfred Prince's call to use NYBC B-Vax in the public taxpayer-funded trials on gay men, worried about the residual chimpanzee-viral material in B-Vax. So, if Hilleman told anybody who B-Vax was tested on, it'd be @DrPaulOffit.
@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org
When I first asked @DrPaulOffit for comment on X, he deleted his account immediately. He's since restored it, but won't comment. That's why he's in this video. Please don't accept "no comment" when asked if #ChimpVax killed tens of millions. https://t.co/IFMMC7kTpV
@factbid - factmission.org
CDC FOIA 24-00408 will settle the biggest conspiracy theory, proving if their “inject gay men with chimp blood” experiment caused AIDS, and if the WHO was an apartheid tool for racial purging. If they defy the law, we must mobilize politicians and media for enforcement ! https://t.co/fjPboYjVnI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker filed a freedom of information request for the CDC to disclose a pivotal number that could prove their knowledge about pandemics is wrong. They discuss an experimental hepatitis vaccine trial on gay men in the 1970s, where chimpanzee blood was used. The trial resulted in a surge of HIV infections, and the speaker wants the CDC to release the full placebo rate to settle the matter. They believe that the CDC and WHO may have been involved in racial purging using vaccines. The speaker also shares their personal experience with vaccine injuries and calls for whistleblowers to expose the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just filed this freedom of information request for the CDC to disclose 1 pivotal number that legally is public record. If they violate disclosure laws, the only explanation is that the value fell below 30, as that would prove mathematically and conclusively that nearly everything they thought they knew about pandemics is wrong, that the CDC is really the center for disease creation. And the WHO doctors and philanthropists, those now demanding vaccine passports have been clueless pawns exploited by white supremacists using their vaccines for racial purging.
Speaker 1: How can one number prove something so unfathomable?
Speaker 0: Well, this spans decades, beginning when early AIDS victims in America's gay community maintained they were infected not through the virus's sexual spread from Africa, but through a separate introduction during an infamous CDC experimental hepatitis vaccine trial on gay men. See, prior to the experiment, hepatitis vaccines were made from the blood of, volunteers intentionally infected with the virus.
Speaker 1: Let's be honest. Volunteers describes Mentally disabled children forced to drink chocolate milk laced with hepatitis infected excrement.
Speaker 2: And now great moments and unintended consequences. The year 1970 6. The problem? It's challenging to find volunteers willing to drink shit so their blood can become a vaccine's active ingredient. The solution?
Infect chimpanzees instead and test it by injecting their blood into high risk gay men. Sounds like a great idea. With best of intentions. What could possibly go wrong?
Speaker 1: Tragically, chimpanzees carry the AIDS virus.
Speaker 3: This page walks through the public documents referenced in these boxes proving lot 751 was made from chimpanzee blood and that these were the number of men vaccinated with it each year. This paper lists the CDC's figures for new HIV infections each year. The CDC concedes that before the experiment began in 1977, there was no HIV in the gay community, And the 20,000 men prescreened were all negative. They estimate that within a year of vaccinating the first 200 volunteers in 1977, The first 3 became HIV positive. Infection rates surged exponentially during the primary vaccination period, Halving while vaccinating half the placebo group and plummeted to rates typical of sexual spread the moment the trial concluded.
Speaker 1: Permit me to hazard a guess. They waived it off as a fluke that the men became infected with a chimpanzee virus at the precise moment they were injecting them with chimpanzee blood.
Speaker 0: Naturally
Speaker 1: We can definitively settle this mathematically. This was a gold standard randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial. One merely compares the 42% overall incidence in participants against the unvaccinated placebo group to compute the universally accepted probability of Transmission.
Speaker 0: Thus, my FOIA seeks the full placebo rate that the CDC has been withholding for 40 years. Although Somebody snuck the rate for half the placebo group into this seemingly unrelated CDC study. In these figures inexplicably perched atop this chart that at first appears irrelevant.
Speaker 1: Those figures reveal HIV infection was precisely dose dependent. A mere 9% of the placebo group was infected. Scientists must accept these figures as proof of vaccine transmission as the same figures, but in reverse, would be touted as irrefutable proof of vaccine protection.
Speaker 0: Exactly. 1,000,000 suffered COVID vaccine injuries from their turning a blind eye to vaccine trial results that clearly demonstrated harms. I emailed these authors. Their responses were identical to my critics on x, dismissing the 9% value as partial, yet fuming over my FOIA to get the rest. Despite these figures representing nearly half the placebo group, scientists cling to the hope that with the other half, the total will reach at least 30 where it starts to become a gray area.
Speaker 1: I recognize scientists must be loath to accept the humiliation of acknowledging everything they thought they knew about viruses was wrong And concede squandering billions hunting pandemic origins, oblivious to the fact that they themselves are the origin. Still, are you not overly harsh judging an unintentional mishap?
Speaker 0: Sadly, no. Because after these events, The WHO initiated a campaign to vaccinate Africa against hepatitis, but South Africa's apartheid regime insisted on lot 751 for black communities.
Speaker 1: Outrageous. Lot 751 was never an approved vaccine. Why were they administering an approved version to the general population while injecting black communities with an experimental concoction made of chimpanzee blood?
Speaker 0: I don't know. Their public documents commend the, quote, highly motivated apartheid regime for some unspecified, quote, enthusiastic support in administering this to black Africans. WHO financial statements ambiguously mentioned private jets in South Africa 2 months after US officials had announced AIDS emerged during the lot 751 trials, and all infected had received vaccine, not placebo. 4 months later, the remaining Lot 751 inventory was diverted to apartheid scientists to begin vaccinating the Swazi who had been AIDS free until that time but suffered a 40% infection rate post. The WHO then added the vaccine to their program, and it seems lot 751 may have been used exclusively in black communities until the 1990s, after which new infection rates plummeted.
1st, however, we need the CDC to release the full placebo rate, so it's settled if lot 751 transmitted HIV.
Speaker 1: Their call for authority over pandemics is doomed if proven that they ignited the pandemic they purported to combat.
Speaker 0: It's infuriating that scientists could simply release the placebo rate to definitively settle this. Instead, they dismiss it as a conspiracy theory despite the maker admitting the vaccine was made from blood heavily contaminated with HIV. HIV was was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven Clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. But doctor Offit is lying as the CDC only claimed to test the updated inactivation process of the commercial version, while lot 751 was made before HIV's discovery and only added a chemical the CDC conceded does not kill HIV even at 10 times the concentration. Therefore, this silently acknowledged that lot 751 should have transmitted HIV, which would explain why infection rates precisely correlated with doses received.
Yet officials dismissed this as a conspiracy theory by spreading the demonstrable lie that they had found HIV in blood samples collected prior to the 1st vaccination. And throughout its administration in Africa, doctors reported the majority of AIDS transmissions were by injection, and babies born negative were contracting the virus despite no medical intervention other than vaccination. Today, officials demand cult like blind faith in their assurances, even though it's a matter of record, the same health officials were caught red handed helping 4 other pharma companies liquidate HIV contaminated products in overseas markets. So just release the damn placebo rate and settle this once and for all.
Speaker 1: Should this require a whistleblower to incur personal sacrifices, would you contribute to their cost to do the right thing?
Speaker 0: Look. The CDC's lies about COVID vaccine led to the mandate forcing me to get jabbed right after recovering from COVID. A few hours later, the hyper inflammatory response had damaged my heart and crushed my inner ear, tormenting me with a permanent ring. And I suspect expect it compromised my immune system since, like millions of others, I got shingles a couple months later. And the numbness in my hands and feet never fully subsided.
I had to pay 1,000 out of pocket as my health insurance does not cover vaccine injuries. And the nation's top vaccine lawyer warned that trying to seek reimbursement from government programs was futile. So I'm not rich, but it'd be worth a grand to avoid a repeat as exposing them might stop their labs from cooking up another pandemic for profit, this time with digital ID and vaccine passports to make more clot shots inescapable. We can post pledges with these hashtags for potential whistleblowers to track at factbid.org.
@factbid - factmission.org
CDC & Merck 40 year old secret revealed AIDS Infection Rate during CDC Heptavax trial Vaccine: 42% vs Placebo: 9% https://t.co/0LLhA3dII3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows that 42% of trial participants were infected with HIV by the end of the trial. The speaker also mentions the use of chimpanzee blood in the vaccine's production and the subsequent spread of HIV through contaminated blood-based injectables. They propose setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to investigate the facts surrounding this issue. The speaker asks for support and donations to fund the foundation's research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Wilson asserts that this CDC report settles the matter of Merck's blood derived Heptavax being among the many injectables that contained infectious HIV in the 1980s. I agree. Here is the CDC's own data behind their report. Now, everyone knows at the start of the CDC trial, 0% of participants had HIV, and at the end, 42%. So here's Merck's explanation.
Speaker 1: He was dealing with perception more than reality, and the perception was that that HIV was was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to.
Speaker 0: In 1983, when doctors refused heptavax over AIDS fears, officials confirmed 2 trial participants had contracted this yet unidentified disease, and both had received vaccine, not placebo. But they said, 2 cases out of 1,000 didn't justify hesitating to take the vaccine. But months later, A test for the virus was available, revealing almost half the trial participants were infected. But the rate among SIBO recipients became a closely guarded secret. Identifying it took months of digging through physical archives, asking Chachapiti to dissect tens of thousands of pages of scientific papers and following breadcrumbs to calculate it from clues.
For the first time, we know the HIV infection rate among the CDC trial participants who received placebo was 9%. Instead of revealing the placebo rate, the CDC compared trial participants against those excluded due to their prior STDs. But even among that group labeled higher risk, the rate was 23% when the trial ended. The CDC compared the 1984 numbers after the higher risk group had caught up. They falsely claimed to compare those excluded against vaccine recipients.
They actually compare it against all trial participants, including placebo. Since the placebo rate was 9%, the rate among vaccine recipients must be higher? Before diving into where Merck sold heptavax, after seeing these numbers, a quick recap of how it was made. In the 19 sixties, scientists harvested antigens by feeding infected feces to disabled children who they labeled, quote, human informed but not in social potential. When RFK's dad made it illegal, scientists confirmed chimpanzee and human blood were compatible by letting Blood cross circulate through IV tubes.
Humans survived being filled with raw, unprocessed chimp blood. Around 100,000 primates were imported each year to test these viruses. Here's a list of some other viruses they were found to carry. At the time, nobody knew 20% of chimps carried a virus that was harmless to them but caused AIDS in humans. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and NIAID plus pharma infected chimps with human hepatitis to a mass plasma pools with antigens used in numerous experimental vaccines.
Some used only heat to kill whatever unknown viruses lurked. In 1978, the patent was issued for heptavax made from the blood of chimpanzees. When Merck decided to test on New York's gay community, 13,000 blood samples were collected. Upon retesting, Not one had HIV. After Merck's experiments, New York had more HIV cases than all other cities combined in the US or Europe.
When an HIV test became available, health officials realized many blood based injectables from various pharma companies were contaminated. US health officials hid this from the public and Congress, letting companies dump contaminated inventory in poor countries while introducing safe versions in affluent markets. This led to a landmark settlement. Doctor Offitze claimed that Merck was the 1 pharma company that, quote, abandoned this inventory is demonstrably false. The same year Merck's competitors sold their HIV contaminated products overseas, The Swazi in Congo in South Africa began their heptivax campaign using lot 751, the same lot trialed on the gay community almost a decade prior.
This survey found no infection among the Swazi pre vaccination post 40% of the general population was infected. Now such a high infection rate might be plausible among young urban gays, But how does this happen among rural, conservative, Christian families in sparsely populated farming villages with a capital of 1,000 inhabitants? Why were babies infected but not their mothers? Now true, most Swazi new mothers were infected, but pregnant women were also vaccinated. Why were their husbands uninfected?
These regions where women, but not adult men, Got heptavax? Were the only regions where AIDS primarily infected women. Right next to the Swazi is Venda, which shares the same demographic. Yet, while the Swazi had the highest rate, next door Venda had been spared with the lowest rate for nearly 10 years. Then in the 19 nineties, Venda became the last state to get what was still left of Merck's 20 year old heptavax inventory, after which vendor's rates caught up.
Here is the HIV infection rate in Congo, Central Africa, the epicenter since the 19 fifties. Now here it is to the north and here to the south where Merck continued selling heptavax a decade after seeing the CDC trial results. South Africa's 1st HIV positive case was a gay man infected in the US. For 5 years, it exclusively affected South Africa's gay community, but then it exploded among black heterosexuals at a rate not seen since the CDC trials while curiously sparing whites under apartheid. 1990 scientists eviscerated institutions for ignoring the evidence that the majority of the tens of millions of new infections could only be explained by injection, not sex.
I'm setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to get the facts. Swiss charitable foundations are the most trusted as they are tightly regulated and dissolved if they mismanage funds, lack transparency, or deviate from the founding charter. Fact Mission's charter will require a diverse board of advisers and strict Swiss style neutrality to counterbalance my personal bias. Every FACT mission must strictly hire independent, conflict free researchers to follow the protocol negotiated between all interested parties, including pharma companies that accept the invitation to participate. To prevent internal conflicts as well as external, the charter will prohibit taking sides stating opinions, hypotheses, or conclusions.
It must exclusively fund neutral research to test external hypotheses and stop at publishing raw data. Uniquely, the Charter will obligate protecting sources. 100 must have known this but never came forward. When conservative Swiss regulators confirm it's appropriate, the foundation will fund asylum and relocation costs for those facing credible threats. Again, the charter requires neutrality, prohibiting commenting it only covers costs to protect the source.
For this mission, I propose beginning with digitizing medical records from early AIDS cases, test any remaining blood samples, collect eyewitness testimony, and identify differences in the medical interventions given to blacks and whites under apartheid. The only financial benefit I might indirectly receive relates to my COVID vaccine injury a few hours after I was Forced to get the jab despite having just recovered from severe COVID, I had a very severe inflammatory response. My health insurance refused to cover, claiming vaccine injuries must be reimbursed by government programs. However, those also refused because health agencies cannot identify a causal link. Perhaps researching heptavax will demonstrate they don't always reliably report vaccine harms, thus clearing our biggest hurdle.
Jurors might accept doctor Offit's expert opinion that COVID vaccines are less safe than Merck's heptavax, which he concluded was
Speaker 1: the safest vaccine we've ever used.
Speaker 0: I respectfully ask for your support by sending an email to this address indicating how much you would be able to donate to the First Fact Mission. If there are enough pledges, I will, at my expense, register the foundation. Then I will send pledgers an email with instructions to donate and verify the foundation's charter legal status, and that funds will be managed by independent auditors required to disclose all transparently and vacs, exclusively fund the fact finding mission. Interested partners? Please reach out.
Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion on the importance of COVID-19 vaccination was met with claims about the Hepatitis B vaccine and its alleged connection to AIDS. The person making the claims offered a reward for evidence supporting their argument. They mentioned studies, batch issues, and the withholding of key evidence. The conversation ended with a challenge to provide the evidence and claim the reward.
@IanCopeland5 - Ian Copeland, PhD
Yet more data showing the importance of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in 2023. Not that the antivaxers care....or can read.... https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7225a4.htm
Effectiveness of Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination in ...
This report describes COVID-19 bivalent vaccine effectiveness among nursing home residents.
cdc.gov
@factbid - factbid.org
I will repeat the offer I made in your space to give $1,000 to whoever addresses the issue. I brought FACTS: FACT: The 1974-78 the Hep B vaccine was developed through tests on the gay community. Those included pumping fresh chimp blood into the men, and using the blood to make a vaccine. FACT: The Merck/CDC studies show the AIDS community was AIDS-free before the experiments and 70% of trial participants became HIV+. Yes, the CDC claimed that was just a coincidence and they didn't find HIV in the batches they tested, BUT, as admitted by Merck's vax expert, Paul Offit (who is probably the most cited pro-vax expert and who you called a clown in your space btw), there were batches made that did not follow Hilleman's inactivation process and which Hilleman (the vax inventor) feared contained live virus. We don't know what happened to them, but we do know the FDA helped Bayer liquidate in poor countries HIV-tainted products that WERE giving people AIDS, all to avoid Bayer having to write them off. FACT: Merck couldn't sell the vaccine in the US and dumped it in Sub-Saharan Africa which per their own studies had a <1% AIDS rates with a 95% CI FACT: 2 years later 6% were positive, and 4 years later up to 1/3. The lion's share had no sexual relations for at least 1 year, and studies concluded AIDS was not principally being transmitted sexually but likely through injections. Unverified: In Cold Case Hammarskjold several ex-members of South Africa's Apartheid-era private military contractor SAIMR admitted they setup free clinics in black parts of South Africa with the goal of eradicating the block population, and one came forward and confessed they gave the black community a vaccine they knew would accelerate the spread of AIDS. That cannot be verified. But, IF it's true, then the the reason so many died is because for 12+ years, all the scientific community did what you just did the space and dismissed the idea as ridiculous and refused to even entertain it. They didn't even bother testing or investigating. I laid out the facts, and while there is no peer-reviewed study saying AIDS came from the vaccine, there are many that suggest as much, and, the most important part, is Merck and the CDC are withholding the key evidence that would prove it one way or another. The test results from the 1,495 kangwane samples in 1983, and the pre-1978 New York samples. There's no reason to withhold them unless.... That's why I offered $1,000 to the first person who can find those results. If, like you say, I'm just making this stuff up and haven't done my homework, send the results and claim the $1,000. @debunk_the_funk can confirm I paid him, and I do pay up when I make these bets. No need for insults, just send the link, and claim the $1,000 and we'll be done with it. https://factbid.org/transcript/17
Unearthed FDA Document Rewrites the Narrative on AIDS, Gays, Africans, and Vaccines?!
Watch now (24 mins) | $1,000 reward to fact-check and debunk. FDA doc proves: Inventors of Merck's vax tested on gay men WERE injecting humans with chimp blood, and there was no AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa when the jabs be
factbid.substack.com
@factbid - factbid.org
Unearthed FDA Document Rewrites the Narrative on AIDS, Gays, Africans, and Vaccines?! $1,000 reward to fact-check and debunk. Inventors of Merck's vax tested on gay men WERE injecting humans with chimp blood, and there was no AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa when the jabs began
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a document they found that challenges the narrative surrounding vaccines, AIDS, and the origins of the disease. They question the connection between vaccines made from chimpanzee blood and the spread of AIDS in Africa and China. They suggest that the vaccine trials conducted by Merck may have introduced the virus to these regions. The speaker calls for the release of trial data to determine the truth. They also express concerns about the WHO pandemic treaty and the potential loss of individual freedoms. They offer a monetary reward to anyone who can provide evidence supporting their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I couldn't sleep because yesterday, I stumbled upon this seemingly unreferenced orphan FDA document that utterly annihilates everything we've been told about vaccines, AIDS, the gay community, Africa and Asia's opium triangle, overshadowing any scandal RFK ever mentioned. Its implications are so profound that to incentivize fact checkers to verify I haven't lost my mind, I'll give $1,000 to whoever flags my oversight. Check my track record. I'm a man of my word and always admit my errors and pay up. If you confirm I'm not making this up, Please join me in pledging to support a whistleblower because this document suggests that if the pending WHO pandemic treaty we're about to sign had existed in the 19 eighties, it could have destroyed our society.
So begin by verifying the list of significant yet inexplicable outbreaks of AIDS, the disease caused by the most infamous chimpanzee virus. This chat GPT list is uncontroversial. But now search the NIH website for trials of vaccines the maker described as being made from chimpanzee blood or tissue like this one. Aside from the Congo vaccine whose maker originally said,
Speaker 1: it was the virus was cultivated on kidney cells, the chimpanzee kidney cells.
Speaker 0: Every other trial relates to Merck's original hepatitis b vaccine, which was made from blood and which trials always began by first permanently archiving blood samples from a broad population in that area, which samples were later re examined when a test for the AIDS virus was developed. America's gay meccas were AIDS free when the trials began, yet 70% of participants became infected. Scientists tell us AIDS was spreading sexually across Africa for decades. So how is it possible that according to that FDA bombshell, after 22 years, AIDS apparently had barely spread outside of its origin in Kinshasa, Congo. Did Africans really have more sex in the months following vaccination than in the 22 years that preceded it?
If AIDS had been spreading sexually across Africa for decades, according to FCPT's map.
Speaker 2: There's only a 1 in 38,000 possibility that it could have evaded detection in these pre vaccination samples had a mere 1% carried the virus.
Speaker 0: Doesn't this make it highly probable that the day the white saviors arrived in Sub Saharan Africa in BRCA in 1981 to begin vaccine trials, the region was largely AIDS free outside of Kinshasa where the virus was first found, Oh, yeah. 1 year after allegedly being inoculated with minced up chimpanzee kidneys. Yet, just a few years after Merck's vaccinations began, 18% were infected with the AIDS virus, many children whose mothers were uninfected. When the governments began testing all pregnant women, at first, they were negative until those vaccinated babies reached childbearing age. When it was discovered, up to 1 third carried the AIDS virus.
But the strange coincidences don't stop there since a similar scenario unfolded in China where Merck trialed that same vaccine here in 1982. A few years later, children in that region also began mysteriously dying of AIDS and nearby villages saw 10% of their population infected. Now China's use of Merck's vaccine was short lived, quickly shifting to a domestic version, leaving only Sub Saharan Africa to continue administering the version made from blood well into the 19 nineties when half the population was already dead because of course, the cause was anything but the vaccine. China's outbreak was blamed on drug users in the opium triangle on the angle on the opposite side of that enormous country hypothesized to have donated contaminated blood. However, there's no explanation why children who never had blood transfusions, but did get the Merck vaccine, contracted AIDS.
In Sub Saharan Africa, the blame was put on negligent nurses who, for some reason, were reusing single use disposable needles during vaccination. The assumption was the AIDS virus was on the dirty needle's exterior with zero consideration for the possibility the virus lurked on the inside. In the U. S, the blame was squarely placed on gay men who are all just a bunch of sluts. Verify by comparing AIDS cases in global gay meccas, which saw infection rates rarely get above single digits in the gay community to these 3 gay cities where infection rates reached 70%.
Am I correct? The only thing different about those 3 cities is that they trialed this vaccine. Which vaccine is also the only thing those 3 cities have in common with the outbreaks in Sub Saharan Africa and eastern China, which vaccine happens to be the only one the maker ever admitted did contained the AIDS virus and the only vaccine heterosexual Americans rejected for fear it caused AIDS.
Speaker 3: So far, 75% of cases are homosexuals, but 5% are nondrug using heterosexuals with no other risk factors. What about the new hepatitis b vaccine? It's made from the blood of gay men. Its safety is now being questioned.
Speaker 1: My understanding is that it's, Coming from gay men who have been victims of hepatitis B, which is the same community where the AIDS is most rampant now. Since we don't know just what the infectious particle Is, I know there is some hesitancy now in, the various departments, particularly on infectious disease here at the hospital, so who should be receiving the vaccine.
Speaker 0: And the only vaccine whose inventor said, right after a test for the AIDS virus was developed
Speaker 1: I didn't know we recorded the case in March of the 20 Novavax.
Speaker 0: And the only vaccine about which the discoverer of the AIDS virus said
Speaker 4: If you told me you're giving me a vaccine from human blood at that time obtained from high risk patients, I'd say, maybe I can do it on my hepatitis B vaccine from
Speaker 5: my good old friend, Maurice.
Speaker 0: And so ironically, the only vaccine whose biggest defender said
Speaker 5: And thus, we had the so called plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine, a vaccine that was made from no doubt the most dangerous starting material that we ever used That I would argue created the safest vaccine we've ever used.
Speaker 0: I was emotional last night because I've always promised to take my daughter to Africa to experience what I did as a young man and world traveler, where the happiest children I've ever met rushed over to greet me when I was all alone wandering around their town. Innocent youngsters anxious to let me take their picture, inviting me into their humble home, generously sharing whatever food they had, refusing to let me chip in because all they wanted was to practice their English And as I sat cuddling their babies, enjoying their hospitality and home cooking, in the back of my mind, I kept thinking, If only Africans weren't so promiscuous. But now I can't stop thinking that half of those children who warmly invited me, this complete stranger into their home may be dead and lamenting, if only Africans weren't so trusting. Scientists. The least we can do is get to the bottom of this.
The 1957 Congo polio vaccine was covered in episode 7, which I naively thought was the big scandal. So let's dig into the Merck vaccine.
Speaker 6: Gallo and others identified HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, as the cause of AIDS. And Hilleman quickly showed that it was incapable of surviving his inactivation process. The vaccine was safe.
Speaker 0: In doctor Offit's book, the definitive debunking of the conspiracy theory that Merck's vaccine caused the AIDS pandemic, he noted development started when doctor Prince quote, took blood from people before and after they received transfusions. Oh, but he forgot one key detail hiding in plain sight on the NIH website. The transfusions involved, quote, cross circulation between the human patient's circulatory system and that of a healthy chimpanzee. He references this paper by the Vaccines Inventor. But curiously, he forgot to include the opening paragraph, which described the development and evaluation in chimpanzees of a vaccine against hepatitis B.
The patent application states the number one method of vaccination is injecting humans with blood plasma of a carrier chimpanzee previously inoculated with human hepatitis. Now, would any scientist patent something they never tested? His book concedes Merck's vaccine did contain the AIDS virus. But while Turing as Merck was not responsible for introducing that chimpanzee virus to the American gay community, he fails to acknowledge anywhere the development involved injecting Americans with at times raw and unprocessed chimpanzee blood prior to which the gay community with AIDS free. Doctor.
Offutt omits a quote from his colleague declaring it for the greater good to conduct early experiments on those, quote, human in form, but not in social potential, including orphans, the mentally disabled, Africans under apartheid and colonial rule. And it would seem in Doctor. Offit's own words, quote, the gay community at the New York Blood Center where, quote, they recruited a 1,000 homosexual men with these flyers in New York's gay bars and bathhouses. The same year the patent for injecting humans with chimp blood was granted, Merck and the CDC began formal national trials in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles, assuring participants the vaccine's safety and efficacy had already been proven in previous trials. Now, I found references to those previous trials starting around 1973.
And it seems they always started by archiving population of white blood samples to measure hepatitis prevalence. In 1974, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Uncle legislated the mandatory archiving of all pharmaceutical experiment materials and data in response to the Tuskegee scandal. Now, I assume this archive must contain specifics who Merck injected, when, where, what species blood was used and what purification process, if any, was employed.
If for whatever reason, Merck hasn't already done so, then testing those pre 1978 blood samples they collected before, during, and after the experiments, samples which Kennedy's uncle forced them to preserve would prove whether or not Merck introduced AIDS to America. Yet, I only find mention of the trials, but not the trial data. It's inconceivable that Polof, at a top level Merck insider, authoring the definitive defense of Merck, would not have asked for the pre 1978 trial data that would definitively prove or disprove Merck's innocence. Unless, Silly me. I forgot.
Doctor Offit proves that won't be necessary because the CDC already identified patient 0 who brought AIDS to America. See, it's trolley, doggy, Gaten Dougas, whose sexual escapades were legendary. Seriously, Offit, did you not do any fact checking? No. The CDC never called in patient 0.
He arrived to the US in the middle of the AIDS pandemic, not at the beginning. He's on the list of quote, times in history that a scapegoat was blamed and people fell for it.
Speaker 5: Doctor Offit holds a 1,500,000 Dollar research chair at Children's Hospital funded by Merck, and future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182,000,000 cash.
Speaker 4: So you don't think you have any conflict of interest here as a guy who created a vaccine as someone who would be seen as not wanting to speak out against this particular vaccine.
Speaker 5: Of course not. What motivated me to do that and the reward from doing that was was was, of course, not financial. My interest is in trying to represent the science of vaccine safety so that parents under can understand it, so they won't make bad decisions that put their children at risk.
Speaker 0: Somehow, off its definitive defense of Merck just sweeps under the rug the entire AIDS pandemic that killed 10 times more people than the Holocaust. And like that, the world's health agencies, scientists and pharma industry, wipe their hands, relieved some dead flight attendant, unable to defend himself, was to blame for the death of 40,000,000 people. No need to dig deeper. Case closed. Merck's innocent.
Sorry. I do follow the science And that means I need to see the data. So unless somebody claims that $1,000 by proving I just had a brain fart, Hand over the receipts, bitch. Since Merck hasn't complied with Kennedy's law requiring their release, here's my offer to give $1,000 to whoever comes forward with the data on the trials. Now, if the data is already out there and proves AIDS was not Merck's greatest gift to America, don't send me insults.
Just send me the data link and your payment instructions. I swear, I'll honor my word and apologize for this false alarm. But if it is being withheld, well, what do we suppose that means? Well, one thing it definitely means is only a high ranking Merck whistleblower could produce it. And the last time Merck's scientists blew the whistle over falsified MMR trial data, it led to a decade long legal battle with Merck seeking their imprisonment for disclosing confidential records.
Now, considering Merck's aggressive stance against whistleblowers who didn't even reveal any harm, Imagine if one comes forward with proof Merck's vaccine killed more people than the world wars. If that's the case, my $1,000 pledge, it's not even a drop in the bucket. Now if I were rich, I just put $50,000,000 in escrow for whoever comes forward, but I'm not. I've spent my whole life developing free software in the public domain, So all I can do is donate Factbit and plead with all of you. Please, let's get a 1000000 people to pledge a small amount like $50.
It can't hurt. Worst case, we sent a post and nothing happens. But if we get enough posts, it, so our combined bounty sufficiently compensates someone for coming forward, will change history and maybe take down the globalist organizations. Potential whistleblowers can track our pledges on factbid.org, then come forward when it's adequate and post their donation instructions so we can have their back if satisfied and cover their legal costs and help them start a new life in exile. I will repost claims, so followers won't miss the chance to honor pledges.
Every time I make this plea. The porters privately tell me I'm crazy for sticking my neck out like this. But there's strength in numbers. The CIA can't take out a 1000000 people posting on X. Aren't there others who are not willing to just roll over and let those empowered do whatever the hell they want with no accountability.
I cannot be the only one willing to stand up. If there's another way of doing this or anybody else trying, let me know and I'll join their cause. And if you doubt there was a massive cover up, explain why Google shows that bombshell FDA report that rewrites the origin of AIDS has only been referenced one time here, which doesn't even mention Merck or vaccines or that the test results showed Africa was AIDS free when Merck arrived in 1981. The bombshell that contradicts everything the authors are claiming is reference number 107. But nothing in their paper even mentions 107.
Okay. Now for the WHO pandemic treaty, please consider.
Speaker 5: He was dealing with perception more than reality. And the perception was that HIV was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survived the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. So ultimately, he had to abandon it.
Speaker 2: It was a tough period. I'm sure it was tough on the company because they invested in making that vaccine. It was tough on Maurice himself.
Speaker 0: Poor Merck. Let's not shed too many tears for Merck's struggle getting Americans to reject anti vaxx misinformation and obey demands to get the jab, we've already seen American Finnish trials in more compliant markets, in eastern sub Saharan Africa and eastern China, where good, obedient citizens submitted to mandates without defying their leaders like those rebellious Americans. But if viable AIDS virus was in the vaccine, I think that means in 1980s, Had Americans been subservient like the Chinese and Africans and just obeyed, then all American children would have received that same vaccine teen given in Sub Saharan Africa and perhaps suffered the same fate with 1 third of us dying. Life expectancy plummeting to 34 years and the U. S, like those African countries, becoming a failed state.
And if today's misinformation, censorship apparatus existed back then, just like Africans, Americans who would believe we brought this calamity upon ourselves by our decadent sexual revolution. If it was the vaccine, I guess what saved America was that back then, our rebellious libertarian roots hadn't yet withered away. We demanded our free speech right to propagate anti vax misinformation and conspiracy theories.
Speaker 3: What about the new hepatitis B vaccine?
Speaker 0: Brazenly fine mandates from the CDC, WHO, and health leaders all ordering us to roll up our sleeves.
Speaker 5: I have no problem with mandates. I'm all for them.
Speaker 7: Often, if you don't take these products, you can't go to school. You can't become a nurse. You can't become a doctor. You can't go work in a hospital. So these are, you know, these are these are serious and if the pharma industry and health authorities quote unquote health authorities have their way, you won't be able to do anything in American society without taking these
Speaker 0: us. In contrast to today's laws, where we become silenced and doctors lose their licenses for strain from the WHO and CDC vaccine safety narrative, back then, doctors faced no repercussions for fearlessly refusing to comply.
Speaker 1: Here at the hospital said he should be receiving the vaccine.
Speaker 0: And doctor Offit confirms, that is what forced Merck to develop a newer, more expensive, blood free version for the U. S. Market while continuing to sell the cheap blood derived version in other markets. Remember, other pharma companies were far more reckless than Merck because even after AIDS was well understood, companies like Bayer, continue to source cheap blood from prisons rather than pay more for expensive screened blood. When authorities learned FDA approved products did contain live AIDS virus and were infecting 1,000, We know for a fact, US officials not only helped pharma hide this from the public, they let American Pharma continue selling the cheaper contaminated versions in poor countries, fully aware they were infecting people with AIDS just to boost the profits of the pharma companies those officials later went to work for.
We dodged a bullet as the only reason this didn't cause a pandemic was because those products were limited to ailing adults rather than vaccines injected in healthy babies. The central point of my video is that if you agree it might have been the vaccine, that means if the pending WHO pandemic treaty with its mandates, vaccine passports, and misinformation censorship rules existed back then, we all might have been forced to take The safest vaccine. Possibly for many years after suspicions arose since nobody would have dared speak up and risk their social credit score or having their CBDC wallets and digital ID frozen, Merck would not have
Speaker 5: He had to abandon it.
Speaker 0: The massacre would be America's Tiananmen Square that nobody knows even happened.
Speaker 8: Digital platforms are being misused to subvert science and spread disinformation. This clear and present global threat demands clear and coordinated global action. It proposed its proposals are aimed at creating guardrails To help governments come together around guidelines that promote facts while exposing conspiracies and lies.
Speaker 0: Many are warning about surrendering our liberty to the globalist organizations, but I don't see one other proposal for something we can do right now to stop them. Whining about it and going to courts and congressional hearings is getting us nowhere. But if we come together and incentivize a whistleblower to come forward with something of that magnitude, hopefully, finally, lambs will take note of the wolves in sheep's clothing and demand their treaty be repurposed. Let's follow the science. But to do that, we need to incentivize someone to hand over the data.
So please, fact check me and then post your pledge.