TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @FrankDeScushin

Saved - November 12, 2024 at 5:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that a FEMA official was fired for not aiding homes with Trump signs, claiming she was following a policy of "avoidance" for communities perceived as hostile. This practice seems to be widespread, suggesting that more homes with Trump signs might have been overlooked. I raised a question about whether we should also identify other communities that exhibit hostility and consider denying them government benefits as well.

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

The FEMA official fired for not providing aid to homes with Trump signs says she just followed FEMA policy of "avoidance" for groups who show a "community trend" of hostility toward FEMA workers, and that practice is widespread. So it's possible even more homes with Trump signs were avoided. Since the federal government is allegedly denying aid to groups which show a "community trend" toward hostility, should we notice which other communities trend toward hostility and also deny them government benefits?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was informed of my termination verbally after my demobilization, but I never received written confirmation. They claimed my actions were for personal political gain, yet there is a clear pattern of political hostility linked to my teams, which displayed Trump campaign signage. FEMA emphasizes avoidance and de-escalation, but this issue is widespread, not just in Florida but also in the Carolinas. Senior leadership may deny awareness, but field crews can provide insight into the situation. It's essential to demand FEMA's incident reports, as they will confirm the challenges we face in the field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was notified after I demobed. The next morning, they told me verbally I was fired, but they never provided me anything in writing stating that I was fired. They all alleged that these actions were made on my own recognizance and that it was for my own political advances. However, if you look at the record, there is what we call a community trend. And, unfortunately, it just so happened that the political hostility that was encountered, by my team, and I was on 2 different teams during this deployment, they just so happened to have the Trump campaign signage. FEMA always preaches avoidance first and then de escalation. So this is not isolated. This is a colossal event of avoidance, not just in the state of Florida, but you will find avoidance in the Carolinas. Senior leadership will lie to you and tell you that they do not know. But if you ask the DSA crew leads and specialists what they are experiencing in the field, they will tell you. Demand for FEMA to give you those incident reports. They will substantiate what is happening to us in the field.
Saved - January 28, 2024 at 8:53 PM

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

Before there was Donald Trump, former mayor of Philadelphia, Frank Rizzo, was the best politician at dealing with the media because Franks aren't to be fucked with. https://t.co/noEoZCs2qI

Video Transcript AI Summary
A news reporter from Channel 3 approaches the speaker, who insults him and challenges him to a fight. The speaker calls the reporter a coward and a crumb, and accuses him of being a drunk. The reporter denies the accusations and tries to defuse the situation, stating that they are there to ask questions, not fight. The speaker continues to insult the reporter, calling him a lush and promising that it will make for a great story. The speaker demands that the entire exchange be recorded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a Stan Borman from Channel 3 News. Can we, How are you? Fine, sir. How are you? Speaker 1: Get away from me, you crumb. That's a challenge except I'll put my dog away, and I'll come back. And you got 1, 2, free, and I'll do it along with you. Isn't that back of that fence? Just the 3 of us, 4 of us, me and you. Show you what kind of a man you are. You're less than a man. Okay? You're a crumb creep, and I wouldn't take that off for no buying. There's 3 of you, and I'm by myself. And when it's over, there'll be nothing to it, win or lose. Okay? But you don't have the courage. You're a real crumbum. Put that on camera. You're a crumb on the 3 of yous, and I challenge you. You're a coward. You're a yellow sneak. And if you wanna now what I say, let's forget all the rules of this great country we live in. I will go back to that wall with the 3 of Just me. There is a word here. Crumb creep coward. You can't take you don't you won't stand up to him. Speaker 0: I'm I'm standing up. We're not here to fight. We're here to get some answers to some question. That's Speaker 1: all. I wanna fight you. Why is that? Because you're a crumb creep, lush coward. Speaker 0: You don't even know me, mayor. Speaker 1: You are a lush. I can tell by looking at you. I was a cop all my life, and I know a lush when I see 1. And you're a lush. You're gonna have the hell of a story on that one. Play every word of it, crumb.
Saved - January 1, 2024 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media's hesitation to cover Pakistani-Muslims grooming and raping English girls is concerning. A reporter admits being more worried about helping political opponents than protecting girls from rape. This mindset is prevalent in today's media. Additionally, the UK's Child Protection System commissioned a video to warn girls about grooming gangs, but it was never shown due to the ethnicity of the lead groomer. A new video was ordered, this time featuring a white rapist.

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

In this clip a reporter notes he hesitated to cover Pakistani-Muslims grooming & raping English girls because "it's the dream story for the far-Right". He worried more about potentially helping political opponents than helping girls avoid rape. That mindset pervades media today. https://t.co/EcyMPlmcKx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Teenage girls are being groomed for underage sex by Asian men, while the victims are white. Investigative reporter Andrew Norfolk initially hesitated to cover the story due to concerns about its potential use by the far right. However, as more cases emerged across the North and Midlands, he noticed a recurring pattern: Pakistani men were predominantly involved. In 2010, Norfolk alerted his newspaper and began investigating further. The first story on this hidden crime pattern was published in January 2011. Norfolk faced accusations of racism, which he found strange and deeply unpleasant, as it was the first time he had been accused of such.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Revealed, the teenage girl's being groomed for underage sex. The accused men are Asian, the girls are white. Speaker 1: The suggestion that men are seeking out schoolgirls for sex would be controversial in any community, but the claims about what's happening here in Keithley are Speaker 2: Andrew Norfolk is now the chief investigative reporter for The Times. When he first heard about this story, his liberal angst kicked in immediately. Speaker 3: My reaction was how honest do you cover this story? Because it's the dream story for the far right. I, as a journalist, wrote a simple story, a single story, And moved on and hoped it wasn't true. More shame on me because as the years passed, I then began to see as stories came in from across the North The Midlands, little by little, drip, drip court cases with 2 or 3 or 4 men up for sex offenses against Children in that very same pattern kept repeating it and repeating itself. And I couldn't help noticing that invariably, the men, they were from the Pakistani Community in the vast majority of cases. Eventually, it got to such a point that in 2010, I said, you know, to to the newspaper, I think there's something really disturbing going on here, and nobody's recognized it. And you need to give me some time to look look into it. We run our 1st story about this hidden crime pattern, in January 2011. I like to steal myself for the the inevitable accusations that that that would come. Speaker 2: Did you think people were saying This bloke Norfolk, he's a bit of a racist. Speaker 3: They were. I, you know, I I read I read articles. I read comments in various social media networks. It was quite strange and deeply unpleasant to to get to the age of 45 and for the very first time in your life be accused of being racist.

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

It wasn't just media protecting brown rapists over white victims. The UK's Child Protection System commissioned a video to warn girls of grooming gangs, but the video was never shown because the lead groomer was Pakistani-Muslim. A new video was ordered, now with a white rapist. https://t.co/zpuUw0bmQa

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2008, a film called "My Dangerous Lover Boy" was commissioned to warn young girls about the dangers they face. The film accurately portrayed how teenage girls can be lured into a world that they are not prepared for. However, the film was never shown to its intended audience. The main reason for this was that the antagonist in the film was an Asian man, which was deemed unacceptable due to cultural and ethnic sensitivities. Another film was circulated instead, featuring a white teenager as the antagonist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2008, Child Protection Chiefs commissioned this film to warn young girls of the dangers they faced. Speaker 1: My Dangerous Lover Boy very accurately Identified the process by which a young teenage girl can get lured into a world in which they find themselves Horrifically out of their depth. It had, a young girl maybe. What what age would you guess from seeing her? 14 years old maybe? 15? Full of adolescent frustration at At at the the limits in her life and wanting wanting to break downs, a good looking boy, a few a good few years older, but still a young man. Maybe, what, early twenties, we say Wanna Speaker 0: come for a ride? Speaker 1: Turning up in an attractive car, music pounding, that initial attraction, The flirting, the excitement, the ride is all so accurate in terms of the way Young teenage girls get take the 1st steps into the this world that in the worst cases, you know, can lead to To utter degradation. It's alright. It's okay. Speaker 0: But however accurate the film was, There was one problem. It was never shown to its target audience. Speaker 1: What I was being told by the people on the ground Who had been involved in making that film was that the single most important reason why that film has not been changed in schools is because the main Grima and Abiza was an Asian man and that was unacceptable. There was a terror of treading into what was seen as a Cultural, ethnic, minefield. Speaker 0: A 2nd film was circulated, however. Speaker 1: By men. Alright. Speaker 0: Look closely. It's not that hard to see the difference. Speaker 1: I'm Lauren. Oh, come in there. Nice to meet you. Speaker 0: He's a white teenager as opposed to a 20 something
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 7:10 PM

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

A Florida high school student is slammed headfirst onto concrete. America's schools have always had fights, but students knew not to potentially kill each other during them. I wonder what changed and I wonder how much schools' anti-white narratives play into scenes like this. https://t.co/4D7ZPWzbTU

Saved - November 30, 2023 at 1:18 PM

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

Transcribed below is Richard Nixon's words to Henry Kissinger made in a 1973 phone call about the possibility of American Jewish groups disrupting an upcoming US-Soviet summit: https://t.co/PmoWH3qY6U

Saved - November 28, 2023 at 4:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1987, Tawana Brawley, a young black woman, falsely accused white men of holding her captive and raping her. Al Sharpton supported her, even after her hoax was exposed. This didn't harm Sharpton's career; it actually helped him become a prominent civil rights leader and a trusted advocate on race for President Obama. Sharpton's success, despite never apologizing, highlights the double standard of black privilege. White people are chastised for false accusations, while Sharpton was rewarded.

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

A case study in black privilege. On November 28, 1987, the Tawana Brawley hoax began. Brawley, a young black woman, was found with racial slurs scrawled on her. She claimed she'd been held captive and raped by white men. Al Sharpton became her most ardent backer. Even when Brawley's obvious hoax unraveled and one of the accused men won a libel suit against Sharpton, @TheRevAl still wouldn't admit he was wrong. Yet that didn't matter because falsely accusing white men of racist violence didn't hurt Sharpton's career, it helped it. Sharpton soon surpassed Jesse Jackson as black America's civil rights leader because black Americans wanted to believe lies about whites. Sharpton became a prominent Democratic Party figure. He eventually ascended to President Obama's trusted advocate on race despite being untrustworthy on the issue. And Sharpton became a liberal media staple, eventually getting his own show on MSNBC. White people are chastised if they falsely accuse black people of any offense and they're made to endlessly apologize for sins of the past. Yet Al Sharpton was rewarded for falsely accusing whites and never apologizing for it. That's black privilege.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tijuana Brawley, a 15-year-old, claimed she was raped by 6 white men in law enforcement in 1987. Al Sharpton supported her, but there was no forensic evidence of the attack and evidence suggested she made up the story. The case was dismissed, and Sharpton had to pay $65,000 to those he accused. Despite apologizing and seeking forgiveness for other mistakes, Sharpton has never expressed regret for Brawley. When questioned about it, he said he doesn't believe they treated the case properly and doesn't think they falsely accused anyone. However, it is clear that they did not commit the crime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Tijuana Brawley. Alright. I'm not a liar, and I'm not crazy. Speaker 1: It was 1987. Tijuana Brawley was a 15 year old who claimed she was raped by 6 white men in law enforcement. And Al Sharpton took up her cause, but there was no forensic evidence of any sexual attack, and there was evidence Tijuana made up the whole story. The case labeled a hoax was dismissed, and Sharpton was forced to pay $65,000 to those he had named. But in all this time, he has never voiced any regret. You have have gone back and looked at things with such a clear eye. You've apologized. You've asked for forgiveness except on Joanna Brawley. I don't get it. Speaker 2: I I'll be honest with you. I have thought about that a 1000000 times. I just don't believe they treated that case Speaker 1: If I knew that I had in any way contributed to falsely accusing someone, I think I would feel an obligation to say I'm sorry. Speaker 2: I think you're right. I think the operative word is if you knew that. I don't know that. Speaker 1: If they didn't do it Speaker 2: if. What's your job? Speaker 1: You're taking the supposed Speaker 2: they did. Speaker 1: But they didn't. They didn't.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 12:56 AM

@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin

The Las Vegas teens running over a cyclist is why I've always ignored the unwritten rule to run with traffic, and I've run against it. I want the option to see what may hit me so I can theoretically avoid it. You can't avoid what you can't see. Run against traffic.

View Full Interactive Feed