TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @FrankRoccoG
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
I am fucking pissed. Dom and I became friends in the D.C. jail, playing cards and helping him out with his case, and he's already been incarcerated for an entire year since I was released from there. On the 21st, the past Tuesday, I filed Dominic's texted statements to me from the D.C. jail's app regarding his current situation with his "judge", holding him hostage, into the United States District Court onto my own docket. I was already putting in a filing of mine as a case review to the TRUMP administration from the record itself - specifically focusing on the collusion of the so-called "judges" - which turned out to be perfect timing for the subject matter of Dominic's texts. It's now Friday, and my filing still hasn't been published onto record. What I have to vent about, is this. I can't even tell you how much I HATE @USMarshalsHQ. Their job is to uphold the federal judiciary. Instead, they work as kidnappers for the criminal impersonators in our federal courts. They arrested me after submitting to them more than enough information from my case to prove that there were fatal flaws going unanswered by James Emanuel BOASBERG. Instead of arresting him, if anyone, they would come to arrest me on a sealed bench warrant that they didn't even SIGN or DATE, alongside an affidavit in the wrong name. These men in uniform with badges and guns are NOT working in our best interests - and what's happening to Dom and the other J6'ers post-pardon proves what I've been trying to say about just how far these fake judges with counterfeit oaths of office are willing to go to defy you. This is ALL about the oaths. Their LACK of contractual duty and decorum. The true fraud perpetuated on the American people. Fuck that.
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
But seriously, where the fuck is @POTUS, @VP, @elonmusk, @PamBondi and @EagleEdMartin on this. I'm so tired of these optics.
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
The FBI have been making false arrests of J6'ers using warrants ordered by "Magistrate Judges" who have not signed proper oaths of office as bonds. Without a bond, a federal "officer" holds no authority. 👇 --- No Proper Oaths of Office (or Article III Courts) on January 6th Cases As evident from my January 6th case's material signed onto court record under penalty of perjury, @TheJusticeDept "U.S. Attorney" prosecutors and federal "judges" have not signed and executed the proper legally required oaths of office as contractual bonds to their appointed positions - including the District of Columbia's leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" Matthew M. GRAVES and the United States District Court's respective former and current "Chief Judges," Beryl Alaine HOWELL & James Emanuel BOASBERG. Witness for yourself: Matthew GRAVES' "Assistant U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Douglas G. COLLYER admits to public defender Evan Flinn SUGAR (court-appointed to January 6'er Frank Rocco) that COLLYER himself did not sign nor file any oath of office that is required for his January 6th prosecution. The public defender further misled client Frank Rocco in legally advising that there were no signed documented oaths of office in existence for federal prosecutors and judges, anywhere - at all. The "no signed document" comment in regard to an oath of office as legally advised by Frank Rocco's public defender was in direct conflict with Title 5 U.S.C. § 3332 - the statute clearly stating that an affidavit shall be filed alongside an oath of office as required under law: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=5+U.S.+Code+%EF%BF%BD+3332&f=treesort&fq=true&num=2&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title5-section3332 The concealed signed documented oaths were eventually provided to Frank Rocco by the Justice Department themselves through FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Request, but not in accordance with U.S. Code under law and the Constitution - made out to be fraudulent. USDC D.C. January 6th "Chief Judges" HOWELL & BOASBERG were discovered to have signed illegally changed judicial oaths of office. January 6'er Frank Rocco estopped the "Chief Judges" of D.C. for fraud by refusing for cause their improper judicial oaths of office on case #23-cr-16-JEB, then to be deliberately ignored and jailed by "JEB" BOASBERG without proper Article III jurisdiction - despite BOASBERG as the "Court" granting leave for filing of this proof of fraud on himself: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ Compare Title 28 U.S.C. § 453 "So help me God" in proper form as prescribed by Congress under the Constitution to the improper corporative CAPITONYM form, "SO HELP ME GOD." Oaths of office for justices and judges cannot be changed without legislation by Congress. See the statute and its amendment: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:28%20section:453%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section453)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true Leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Matthew M. GRAVES (@USAO_DC) and his "Assistant U.S. Attorneys" have redacted their signatures from their filed oaths of office, with fraudulent former "Chief Judge" Beryl Alaine HOWELL signed to GRAVES as his witness - making his oath improperly executed. Declared unconstitutional "Special Counsel" Jack SMITH did not have a properly executed oath of office due to a missing witnessing signature. The Justice Department acknowledged this "error" as important only after SMITH had already indicted TRUMP twice without the procedurally compliant oath of office for SMITH's illegal appointment: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-10/10.06.23.%20-%20Special%20Counsel%20Oath%20Jack%20Smith.pdf D.C. "Judge" Tanya S. CHUTKAN's sworn decorum to her judicial oath of office was put in question by TRUMP's lawyers with its statute cited in a MOTION for RECUSAL. One month earlier, Frank Rocco submitted evidence of CHUTKAN's fraudulent judicial oath of office alongside the same exact statute directly to TRUMP's lawyers and Jack SMITH's Justice Department prosecutors via email: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/50/united-states-v-trump/ Federal "Judges" and "U.S. Attorneys" acting without valid civil and/or judicial oaths of office can be subjected to criminal impersonation charges under Title 18 U.S.C. § 912: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section912&num=0&edition=prelim Federal and state enforcement Offices (@FBI, @USMarshalsHQ, State of Florida's @GovRonDeSantis) have ignored evidence of documented oath fraud on the DOJ and USDC of D.C. that was submitted by Frank Rocco before his illegally executed arrest by federal and local enforcement officers using a SEALED bench warrant ORDERED by BOASBERG. This secretive SEALED bench warrant went unsigned and undated by any arresting enforcement officer for the remainder of Frank Rocco's illegal 3-month incarceration to follow. Federal and state enforcement did not protect the federal judiciary or Frank Rocco against proven impersonators of federal officers having no proper oaths as bonds - aiding and abetting criminals by arresting Frank Rocco, a lawful American, instead. In addition to federal and state law enforcement, #SeditionHunters are also aiding and abetting impersonators of federal officers within the Justice Department and United States District Courts in their nationwide persecution of January 6th, 2021 protestors as fellow Americans. Justice Neil GORSUCH has described "administrative law judges" as being different from "real judges" (aka judicial officers with proper oaths) in an August 2024 interview discussing his book: (See time stamp 47:56) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaW1-dBkjKo&t=2882s My 'Interlocutory Allocution' on USA v. GIUSTINO detailing these above oath issues: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ 'Refusal for Cause' on USA v. KELSO: courtlistener.com/docket/6672884… My Video Interview (by @realtinapeters): rumble.com/v4q9ssh-the-tr… My Article (by @gatewaypundit): thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/j6-pol… My Support Page (by @GiveSendGo): givesendgo.com/frankrocco
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
Anyone with a shared interest in the January 6th political persecutions and COVID mandates, read below; (@DecentBackup - Since we're making this serious matter a contest, allow to me possibly "one-up" you on that, here. 😉) #SeditionHunters have been directly addressed in a court filing on January 6th case USA v. KELSO this past week as discussed. It's sparked quite the discussion across X about the liability that the Sedition Hunters legally have in supporting the FBI and DOJ's illegal actions - but there's more to it than that. Also within that court filing - now published on J6 court record - I had provided Christina KELSO with the signed oath of office of @CDCgov "Senior Advisor" Rochelle WALENSKY, to then publish alongside January 6th related material involving jurisdictional issues that will eventually also need to be addressed, similar to Jack SMITH's jurisdictional issues with @realDonaldTrump. So, why did we do this? Because WALENSKY is legally beholden to that signed documented oath as a contractual bond between herself and 'We the People' under the Constitution, within the administrative process - just as the alleged "U.S. attorneys" and federal "judges" are to their own signed oaths for January 6th cases. Alongside WALENSKY's oath in this filing, several articles were filed of WALENSKY and the BIDEN administration spreading very obvious lies about the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine, even displaying clear discriminatory bias through their language against Americans who have decided not to take it. Christina and I did not know each other until recently this year when I decided to provide assistance with this court filing, but we both attended J6, 2021 for the same reasons, being that we wanted to also protest the medical tyranny that we all experienced throughout the entirety of 2020. We were fed up with it all - all the way up to the January 6th, 2021 protest itself, and beyond. The CDC has - in a way, persecuted the unvaccinated, just like BIDEN's @TheJusticeDept has persecuted the J6'ers. It's a shared issue, especially being that BIDEN had clearly supported the CDC's lies and threatened us directly. Further mentioned in Christina's January 6th court filing, is the 2022 New York Supreme Court ruling that resulted in hundreds of jobs being reinstated, due to it being decided that the COVID vaccine mandates did not prevent the spread of COVID-19 "infection" (were there ever any to being with...) It's made clear within the USA v. KELSO filing that the BIDEN administration has shown contempt for both the unvaccinated and J6'ers all the same, with WALENSKY having violated her oath for supporting such unethical medical practice and discrimination for Americans not supporting it. Soon after that New York Supreme Court ruling, a group comprised of 'We the People' called the @NewYork_dejure brought the legal paperwork to Eric ADAMS directly in the same Court, being that ADAMS had violated his own oath of office in applying the unlawful and illegal COVID mandates, well outside ADAMS' intended duties. Once I caught wind of this, I put reference to the de jure's own court filing, also involving oaths of office - onto the federal record of USA v. GIUSTINO, 9/26/23. On 9/26/24... one exact year later just in time for the feds to prosecute by a deadline... Eric ADAMS would then be suddenly federally indicted. As I always say: "No coincidences." In summary, we now have the CDC's lies about the COVID mandates and vaccines on federal record, within the biggest political persecution in the history of our country, no less - January 6th case, USA v. KELSO. The CDC "Senior Advisor" must now be held accountable on a Court of Record to her signed oath of office as contract for any unlawful and illegal activity or misleading advice that she's been involved with.👇 See pages 84 - 94 for what's just been discussed: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68535392/26/united-states-v-kelso/ @RepMattGaetz @DonaldJTrumpJr @hodgetwins
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
SPOILERS: These two posts will be responsible for more death penalties, life sentences, lost medical/pharmaceutical licenses & corporate dissolutions than just about any two posts on this platform. I’m not saying it’s a contest or anything, but it’s not NOT a contest either.🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/OBNoMqYDFQ
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
"How" can our government do this to its people? Because they are not legally bound by a proper oath. Just like Jack SMITH, the "judges" and prosecutors are mere actors. They are not federal officers. 👇 --- No Proper Oaths of Office On January 6th Cases As evident from my January 6th case's material signed onto court record under penalty of perjury, @TheJusticeDept "U.S. Attorney" prosecutors and federal "judges" have not signed and executed the proper legally required oaths of office as contractual bonds to their appointed positions - including the District of Columbia's leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" Matthew M. GRAVES and the United States District Court's respective former and current "Chief Judges," Beryl Alaine HOWELL & James Emanuel BOASBERG. Witness for yourself: Matthew GRAVES' "Assistant U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Douglas G. COLLYER admits to public defender Evan Flinn SUGAR (court-appointed to January 6'er Frank Rocco) that COLLYER himself did not sign nor file any oath of office that is required for his January 6th prosecution. The public defender further misled client Frank Rocco in legally advising that there were no signed documented oaths of office in existence for federal prosecutors and judges, anywhere - at all. The "no signed document" comment in regard to an oath of office as legally advised by Frank Rocco's public defender was in direct conflict with Title 5 U.S.C. § 3332 - the statute clearly stating that an affidavit shall be filed alongside an oath of office as required under law: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=5+U.S.+Code+%EF%BF%BD+3332&f=treesort&fq=true&num=2&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title5-section3332 The concealed signed documented oaths were eventually provided to Frank Rocco by the Justice Department themselves through FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Request, but not in accordance with U.S. Code under law and the Constitution - made out to be fraudulent. USDC D.C. January 6th "Chief Judges" HOWELL & BOASBERG were discovered to have signed illegally changed judicial oaths of office. January 6'er Frank Rocco estopped the "Chief Judges" of D.C. for fraud by refusing for cause their improper judicial oaths of office on case #23-cr-16-JEB, then to be deliberately ignored and jailed by "JEB" BOASBERG without proper Article III jurisdiction - despite BOASBERG as the "Court" granting leave for filing of this proof of fraud on himself: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ Compare Title 28 U.S.C. § 453 "So help me God" in proper form as prescribed by Congress under the Constitution to the improper corporative CAPITONYM form, "SO HELP ME GOD." Oaths of office for justices and judges cannot be changed without legislation by Congress. See the statute and its amendment: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:28%20section:453%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section453)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true Leading January 6th "U.S. Attorney" prosecutor Matthew M. GRAVES (@USAO_DC) and his "Assistant U.S. Attorneys" have redacted their signatures from their filed oaths of office, with fraudulent former "Chief Judge" Beryl Alaine HOWELL signed to GRAVES as his witness - making his oath improperly executed. Declared unconstitutional "Special Counsel" Jack SMITH did not have a properly executed oath of office due to a missing witnessing signature. The Justice Department acknowledged this "error" as important only after SMITH had already indicted TRUMP twice without the procedurally compliant oath of office for SMITH's illegal appointment: https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-10/10.06.23.%20-%20Special%20Counsel%20Oath%20Jack%20Smith.pdf D.C. "Judge" Tanya S. CHUTKAN's decorum sworn to her judicial oath of office put in question on the record with its statute cited by TRUMP's lawyers in a MOTION for RECUSAL. One month earlier, Frank Rocco submitted evidence of CHUTKAN's fraudulent judicial oath of office alongside the same exact statute directly to TRUMP's lawyers and Jack SMITH's Justice Department prosecutors via email: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/50/united-states-v-trump/ Federal "Judges" and "U.S. Attorneys" acting without valid civil and/or judicial oaths of office can be subjected to criminal impersonation charges under Title 18 U.S.C. § 912: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section912&num=0&edition=prelim Federal and state law enforcement Offices (@FBI, @USMarshalsHQ, State of Florida's @GovRonDeSantis) have ignored evidence of documented oath fraud on the DOJ and USDC of D.C. that was submitted by Frank Rocco before his illegally executed arrest by federal and local law enforcement officers using a SEALED bench warrant ORDERED by BOASBERG. This secretive SEALED bench warrant went unsigned and undated by any arresting law enforcement officer for the remainder of Frank Rocco's illegal 3-month incarceration to follow. Federal and state law enforcement did not protect the federal judiciary or Frank Rocco against proven impersonators of federal officers having no proper oaths as bonds - aiding and abetting criminals by arresting Frank Rocco, an innocent American, instead. In addition to federal and state law enforcement, #SeditionHunters are also aiding and abetting impersonators of federal officers within the Justice Department and United States District Courts in their nationwide persecution of January 6th, 2021 protestors as fellow Americans. Frank Rocco's 'Interlocutory Allocution' on court record detailing these above oath issues (Doc 59): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/ Video Interview: https://rumble.com/v4q9ssh-the-truth-matters-with-tina-peters.html TGP Article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/j6-political-prisoner-frank-rocco-giustino-spends-3/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=j6-political-prisoner-frank-rocco-giustino-spends-3 Support Page: https://www.givesendgo.com/frankrocco
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
Somebody asked me, what is the purpose for a "judge" signing an illegally changed judicial Oath of Office, as not in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. Section 453? Here's the short-explanation: 👇 By changing the judicial Oath of Office so subtly, and then signing it, it absolves any judicial responsibility of the signing pretender as "judge" towards the documented judicial Oath of Office as a contractual trust bond. That's the legal reason. The judicial Oath of Office can NOT be changed unless it's through legislation by Congress, in accordance to the prescribed form under U.S. Code, Title 28 U.S.C. Section 453. If you are not actually a judge, you have no lawful contractual obligation to treat We the People that you are presiding over as living men in an Article III judicial court. It's their game of consent. Those same living men being prosecuted and ignorant to the fraudulent judicial Oath are under the scrutiny of an administrative Article I court that they think is an Article III Court. They've been pulled into statutory, commercial legalities through their attorneys ("attorn" means to transfer property) as not living men, but commodities. A "judge" without a judicial Oath still has their Article I jurisdiction "hat", and therefore can transact People as money/property as a bank teller, but not as a judicial officer. These different "hats" that judges are supposed to have are derived from the Saving to Suitors' Clause under Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. Improper judicial officers as "judges" do not have their Article III "hat", so they must have your consent to acknowledge them as such. This is where requesting their documented Oath of Office come into play as a means of holding them up to it for it is what is accepted as an Oath, or in my case, estopped by the fraud of changing it from the prescribed proper form. Corporatizing "So help me God" to "SO HELP ME GOD" also has another reason, as these pretend officers are servants of the U.S. Corporation under a "GOD" that is not our Creator - as they won't sign "So help me God" being the proper judicial Oath through Congress because it would mean that they would be bound by that Oath as contract to uphold the Constitution to We the People, under our God as Creator. Many of these "judges" are likely not true God-loving Jews or Christians, so they pretend to be - which is why many of these actors are trying to hide behind the accusation of antisemitism, criminalizing any possible dissent were it to catch on. They are hiding behind actual believers and supporters of "God", when they are likely not themselves, hence all of the crimes against humanity that they are promoting and committing through wrathful, GOD-like punishment and rulings. The U.S. Corporation is their "GOD" that they've signed an Oath to, changing the very meaning of "God" through capitalized corporate legal language of status. We and us as the American People are being denied our Constitutional rights because they never signed the proper judicial Oath to the Constitution to We the People under our Creator of all that is as "God" (spelled lawfully in plain English.) The judicial Oath of Office was unlawfully and illegally changed as a documented bonded contract, and that's a fact - with or without religion involved. It's a "judicial" system/scam based on social conditioning, guilt, trickery and consent. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice not only ignored all of this, but defied it entirely, which would make their crime against me within my January 6th case - some would say - of 'biblical' proportions. My court filing, here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/
@FrankRoccoG - Frank Rocco Giustino
@TheRubberDuck79 Frank from that video here. Nobody in Congress approved the change of the capitalization of "So help me God" to "SO HELP ME GOD.", specifically for judges and justices. Look at the statute here, being Title 28 U.S.C. Section 453 as prescribed by Congress under the Constitution: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:28%20section:453%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section453)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true It reads: Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: "I, ______ XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ______ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God." Now, scroll down to the most recent amendment of the statute at the very bottom, last changed by Congress in 1990: Amendments 1990-Pub. L. 101–650 substituted "under the Constitution" for "according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution". See how it was amended with new wording? This shows that conformity matters, otherwise Congress wouldn't have needed an amendment to specifically say a judicial Oath must match it, as nobody else but Congress can change it without legislation. Now, compare the attached judicial Oaths of Office for Chief Justice REHNQUIST and Justice KANAVAUGH as proper oaths, one pre-1990 amendment and the latter post-1990. "So help me God." Then compare those to pre-1990 HOGAN and post-1990 BOASBERG, both having "Combined Oaths" of both civil and judicial, showing the 1990 amendment... but still capitalizing "So help me God" to "SO HELP ME GOD" without Congress. Remember, CAPITONYM holds legal significance as a corporation. Being that @IvanRaiklin is a Constitutional lawyer, he should be able to see this as a defect in agreeance. More reasons Congress gives as to why the Oath of Office cannot be changed without amendments, explained in my filing, here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66728847/59/united-states-v-giustino/
