TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @FreyjaTarte
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's crazy that this was 53 years ago and it was actually aired. https://t.co/burg2sLeXD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christmas isn't what it used to be, and things were cheaper in the past, like getting five cigarettes for Tuttons. People seem to be smoking more since the cancer scare, which replaced TB as a worry.
The speaker's Uncle Wilf believed the government was responsible for diseases and put things in our food. He thought the government only needed people during wartime and considered the rest an embarrassment. He claimed they spray our food and put things in the water to keep us down, like they do to rabbits. Uncle Wilf grew his own food in a window box.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christmas ain't what it used to be. Nothing is, unless it's me getting older. Things was cheaper, though. Not cheaper. You could get five cigarettes for Tuttons then.
They don't make them in fives anymore, do they? Well, you never see them. People smoke more, I suppose. Yes. People do seem to be smoking more since the cancer scare.
Worry, I suppose. There were none of that then either. What? Cancer was all TB then. They can cure that now, couldn't they?
Yeah. I suppose as soon as they can cure cancer, I'll think of something else to worry us with. My uncle wolf used to say he reckoned it was the government. Did what? Used to give us all these diseases.
It's a bit tough, mum. They put them in our food. That's what he used to say. Well, you can taste it in the water sometimes. It's chloride.
Oh, there you are. They put that in to improve the water. It don't improve the taste. My uncle Wilf used to say, the only time they've got any use for us, the only time the government's got any use for us is in a war. Rest of the time, he used to say, we're an embarrassment to him.
Yeah. He used to say that they only need so many of us to do the things that need doing, and the rest they'd rather be without. So they spray our food, put things in the water to keep us down. Well, they do it to rabbits. He used to grow all his own food.
Everything? Well, all he could. He only had a window box.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is so powerful and true. The infighting is so destructive and right now it's more of an issue than ever. Bookmark for later if needed. Credit: @MikkiWillis https://t.co/KAQK0WELzb
Video Transcript AI Summary
A human rights activist and documentary filmmaker says that infighting is a critical mistake that causes people-powered movements to fail. Rumors and labels, such as "controlled opposition," are branded on those making the most progress, which degrades their reputation and contribution. Social media facilitates venting suspicions without evidence, creating doubt and division. Propaganda voices run false stories, retract them, knowing the lie will spread further than the correction.
The planting of divisive rumors is a common tactic in psychological warfare, with citizens unwittingly spreading disinformation. Forces are at work who understand the functionalities of your mind far better than you do, and their goal is total control through divide and conquer.
Unity will save our communities. Despite divisions, freedom is a birthright, and people must let go of what keeps them divided. While some deserve to be called out, there is a human life being affected by our words. People have been conditioned to believe they are powerless and have become careless with their power. The only thing that can stop progress is internal division. Real change begins with symbiosis, a mutually beneficial relationship between different groups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been a human rights activist for almost twenty years. As a documentary filmmaker, I've been on the front lines of many of our nation's biggest scandals and protests. From that perspective, I've been an eyewitness to the rise and fall of numerous people powered movement. Nearly every organized resistance I've been a part of has ended just inches from victory for the same critical mistake, infighting. When members of the same group turned against each other.
It often begins with whispers about the most prominent spokespeople of the cause. These rumors typically sound like, I hear John is controlled opposition, or, Some people are saying Jane is compromised. While the use of infiltrators and agitators is a very real thing, I've yet to experience one scenario where such a label was accurately applied. And suspiciously, these labels are always branded on the people who are making the most progress. With the degradation of their reputation goes their contribution to your life.
Prior to social media, people actually sat down to dialogue through their differences. Today, without solid evidence or sufficient inquiry, we go directly to our keyboards to vent our suspicions. Even after the rumor is proven false or simply fades away, some level of doubt and division always remains. This is all by design.
Speaker 1: Part of what allowed so many people to walk away from Assange was some of the me too allegations Mhmm. That had surfaced and that were ultimately discredited, stuck in people's minds.
Speaker 0: The voices of propaganda are masterful at this game. They knowingly run a false story, then retract it, knowing the lie will reach millions, but very few will see the correction.
Speaker 2: Amy Coney Barrett's religious faith is being called into question again. She belongs to this People of Praise group, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled them a hate group. When I stated that People of Praise had been deemed a hate group, I just got them mixed up with another group. I conflated them. Ah, okay.
That happens. You know, it's easy to do.
Speaker 0: In the words of former CIA director William Casey, we'll know that our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. The planting of divisive rumors is one of the most common tactics used in psychological warfare. As the lies bloom, like worker bees, well intended citizens pollinate the masses with poisonous disinformation. What the gossiping bees fail to realize is that they themselves are doing the work of controlled opposition. They are literally, unwittingly, working on behalf of the very forces they believe they are resisting.
Again, all of this is by design. While we've all been distracted by the latest trends and tragedies, everything that has influence on our behavior has been infiltrated by an agenda to control our thoughts. Whether their goal is to make us purchase a product, vote for a political party, or submit, There are forces at work who understand the functionalities of your mind far better than you do. Their goal is total control. But because they are the few and we are the many, they can only achieve total control through the age old tactic of divide and conquer.
Speaker 1: You're either with them or with us.
Speaker 0: Never before have we been so divided. Divided by politics, religion, nation, state, race, class, gender, and now, vaccine status. To better understand how we got here, consider these three quotes from The Art of War by Sun Tzu. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Victorious warriors win first and then go to war.
The secret lies in confusing the enemy so that he cannot fathom our real intent. Though Sun Tzu lived over twenty five hundred years ago, his work remains at the heart of RCIA as well as the Chinese Communist Party's strategy today. It's no coincidence that around the same era as Sun Tzu, the words united we stand, divided we fall were first recorded. It is unity that will save our communities.
Speaker 3: As you see in the audience, Muslims, Christians, the Jewish community, Democrats, Republicans, white, black, everyone all in between, this is the example of what you get when you choose to attack all members of the human family.
Speaker 0: Our greatest power is our numbers. Hence, the relentless effort to shatter us into broken fragments. As their agendas are being exposed, the dividers will stop at nothing to cover their crimes against humanity. They have bunkers. All we have is each other.
The good news is, that's all we need. Though we are intrinsically interconnected, our minds are being wired to obsess on our differences. Contrary to social indoctrination, we do not have to be ideologically aligned to stand together. We don't even have to like each other. There is only one thing that we must agree on, that freedom is our birthright.
Now is the time to let go of whatever it is you're holding onto that keeps you divided from your friends, family, and fellow humans. Rise above all the micro dramas and distractions to see that a much bigger story is unfolding. Swallow your pride, humble yourself, let it go. I'm not suggesting that we look the other way when someone is clearly thwarting our forward momentum. There are people who deserve to be called out by name, especially those who are undermining our trust in each other.
But even then, we should remember that there is a human life being affected by our words. We've been so conditioned to believe we are powerless that we've become careless with our power. Like toddlers with loaded guns. How many times do we need to shoot our own foot till we realize that the power is in our hands? The only thing that can stop us at this point is us.
We've all been lied to, scammed, fooled, tricked, conned, and coerced. Yes, it sucks. But here we are, wiser and stronger than we were just three years ago. This is the moment for us to activate our innate ability to create solutions that can only happen through the awareness of symbiosis, defined as a mutually beneficial relationship between different groups. All of life depends on relationships.
Every living thing is in communication. From the stars to the planets, the earth, the plants, the elements, the insects, the animals, the humans, and every cell within us. Real change out there begins with real change inside. The question is, how bad does it have to get before we're willing to change?
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
After hearing this conversation I don't think we even need the JFK files to understand what happened. https://t.co/qymAwasApB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that he and Linda have had disagreements over Lyndon ordering Mike Wallace to assassinate the president. Speaker 1 says Lyndon should not have issued that order, but refers to Lyndon's embarrassment caused by Kennedy in Texas. Speaker 0 says Lyndon could have helped him, but Speaker 1 claims Lyndon only cares about himself. Speaker 0 says he was blackmailed to keep quiet about the Henry Marshall killing, and that 17 people were killed mysteriously. Speaker 0 says he has lost money and it has hurt his family. He is disgusted with Lyndon, but also feels sorry for him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's good to see you. How's life treating you today?
Speaker 1: Well, Sal, it's been pretty touch and go situation. Linda and I have had quite a few unpleasant worms here lately over the deal with when he hired Mike Wallace to assassinate the president. It's been hectic in every way, but we've
Speaker 0: lived through this far.
Speaker 1: And I guess we'll continue to do so. Linden should have never issued that order to Mike, but we've had our differences in.
Speaker 0: I'm a true blue to Linden as I've always been and tried
Speaker 1: to carry out every order that he's ever given me. But this is one I'll probably never be able to forget. And the times that we've had in in Texas and the embarrassment that Linden had got from Kennedy. I guess there wasn't anything else to do with what he did.
Speaker 0: Well, know, Lyndon could have really helped me if he would.
Speaker 1: Well, Lyndon's kind of a person that doesn't wanna help anyone. He's, you know, he's all for Lyndon and that's the
Speaker 0: way he's pretty much always been. Well, had me backed up on that Henry Marshall killing him. They just kinda blackmailed me to keep my mouth shut. And if I hadn't had a bunch of tapes that I played after he got killed. As you know, seventeen got killed in this situation very mysteriously.
And I've spent a lot of time and I've lost a lot of money and it's hurt my family a whole lot. And it's really got me just disgusted to relent in one way. In one way, I feel real sorry.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Bill Cooper was labeled a conspiracy theorist for his opinion on what happened to JFK. https://t.co/VWwLtGjEGK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The driver of the car in Dallas was the assassin, as shown in a film that took 16 years to find. The footage captures the motorcade on Elm Street, where Kennedy has been shot in the throat, and Jacqueline is attempting to comfort him. The driver, William Greer, a Secret Service agent, turns around and fires a pistol over his shoulder, striking the president in the head. This weapon is an electrically operated, gas-powered assassination pistol designed for the CIA. It uses a pneumatic system to fire an exploding pellet that injects a toxin into the brain, ensuring death if the initial shot fails. Additionally, documents reveal that Kennedy's brain was switched during transport between hospitals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That the assassin was the driver in the car in which he was riding in Dallas on that day, and it was plainly visible in a
Speaker 1: film with health from the public. Now you brought that film with you. Let's take a look at that if we can. Here's the film. Go ahead and narrate this far as well.
Speaker 0: Well, it took me 16 years to find this film, because it has really been withheld and what you're seeing here is the motorcade on Elm Street passing in front of the book depository building. Kennedy has been shot in the throat and Jacqueline is pulling him toward her trying to comfort him and she's in shock. At this time, you see the driver turn around with a pistol in his left hand, firing over his right shoulder and shoots the president directly in the head.
Speaker 1: Can you repeat that, but yeah.
Speaker 0: The weapon watch the driver. His name is William Greer. He was in fact a Secret Service agent. The weapon is a an electrically operated gas powered assassination pistol built built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency.
Speaker 1: You don't see any pop of smoke any from
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: Because you think is a pistol there on the right hand corner, lower right hand corner.
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: It is a that.
Speaker 0: Well, it's an it's an air operated pistol. It's pneumatic. And it actually fired an exploding pellet, which injected shellfish toxin into the president's brain so that if the actual explosion of the pellet itself did not kill him, the toxin would.
Speaker 1: Now did you read all of this Yes. In in the documents?
Speaker 0: Yes. And that's why, his brain was switched for another brain in transit between Parkland, Hospital in Dallas and Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington, DC.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is happening. https://t.co/x67VCYXt32
Video Transcript AI Summary
Human vaccines can be integrated into foods like lettuce and tomatoes, as demonstrated by research from the University of California Riverside and UC Berkeley. There are concerns about the legality and consumer awareness regarding these products. If a food contains a vaccine, it should be labeled as a pharmaceutical to ensure proper dosage information for consumers. The discussion highlights the importance of transparency in food labeling, especially regarding potential vaccine content. The aim is to prevent issues similar to those seen in the cattle industry, where improper dosing led to resistance. Ultimately, consumers should be informed about what they are purchasing in grocery stores.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you give me an example of a food that's a vaccine?
Speaker 1: You're right, guys. Yes, sir. University of California Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now. Also tomato also tomatoes has the ability to do that also for UC Berkeley. And then, Big Tobacco, RJ Reynolds and stuff has perfected the ability to put a human vaccine into tobacco products.
Chairman Clements?
Speaker 0: And is that even legal to do in the state of Tennessee to sell those with a vaccine in them? You're right.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm not arguing that point. What I'm saying is there is no law deeming those that when you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce. The head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. All we're saying is if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dosage.
Speaker 0: You're gonna ask. Thank you. Well, my con my question is is right now, can you walk into a grocery store and there be a let head of lettuce for sale that has a vaccine in it? I don't think that's allowed under state law presently. And if it is and you have to list it as a Pharmaceutical.
Pharmaceutical, are we going to then have Walgreens pharmacists with a refrigerated section? I mean, how is this gonna play out?
Speaker 1: You're asking us
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 1: This is more of a consumer protection bill right here. It's to make sure that if you're going in to buy tomatoes and there's a polio vaccine in there, that you are aware of what you're buying has a polio vaccine, the problem you have is if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get a overdose? If you eat too less, it's like we had in the cattle industry with Eromycin, we weren't dosing our cattle properly. And the horn flies were developing an immunity to it.
If we don't have the proper dosage of a vaccine, it could lead to the efficacy of that drug that that not work anymore.
Speaker 0: Talk to me about the lettuce plate for a second.
Speaker 1: Tell me about it, buddy.
Speaker 0: Where did this came from
Speaker 1: a constituent who moved from California who was, tied to UC Berkeley out there. University of California Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now. He brought this to my attention and if at first it sounds absolutely incredible. Right? And then he produced one word for it.
Well, then well, here. But then he produced all the documentation.
Speaker 0: I saw I googled it after you've done this. Okay? First of all, it's not fully ready yet. Sure. It is.
Speaker 1: How many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get a a overdose? What this says is if if this technology continues to advance, we just want to make sure that we are having a transparency on what people are buying at a grocery store. That's all. If you eat to less, like we had in the cattle industry with Eryomycin, we weren't dosing our cattle properly and the horn flies were developing an immunity to it.
You should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce. The head of lettuce right next week could contain a vaccine in it.
Speaker 0: We got lettuce vaccine bills and you don't have those bills. Yeah. That's a little out there. Yeah. You gotta you gotta say.
Speaker 1: Eyes have it. Bill goes on to counter and rules. If you wish to be recorded as a no, please notify the clerk.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
You won't believe what you are hearing. Credit: Live Action https://t.co/s3yDL5HBex
Video Transcript AI Summary
An undercover investigation by Live Action revealed that staff at various Planned Parenthood facilities were willing to assist individuals involved in sex trafficking. Staff members discussed providing services to minors, including access to birth control and abortion without parental consent. They mentioned judicial bypass options for minors seeking abortions and emphasized confidentiality in their services. Staff also indicated that minors could receive care without needing to disclose their age accurately, as long as they did not mention being 14 or younger. Additionally, they provided information on emergency contraception and the requirement of a photo ID for abortion appointments. Overall, the investigation highlighted a concerning willingness to facilitate access to reproductive health services for minors involved in sex work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Live Action conducted an undercover investigation into Planned Parenthood, posing as a pimp and a prostitute who were looking for help running their child sex trafficking ring. 8 different staffers at 7 different facilities showed a willingness to aid and abet sex traffickers. The following is a compilation reel of this investigation.
Speaker 1: We're about the sex work. Okay. So, there's some other girls that we kinda manage that they kinda need help too. Right.
Speaker 2: We see people from, I mean, every walk
Speaker 3: of life. Oh, wow. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And, like, we for a while, we were treating, like, all the girls at Paper Moon and, like, you know, various places around town. So because it's got no judgment, no sharing of information.
Speaker 1: Some of the girls still are out now, like, 14, 15.
Speaker 2: I mean, you can get birth control testing, like, any anything without a parent. Only it requires over 18 if they're a minor is an abortion. But there's also ways that judicial bypasses, we can get around that if you guys ever need it. If someone is a minor and they don't want their parents their parents' insurance, so an abortion would show up. You fill out paperwork, and we help you kind of set it up, and then you we have a a specific confidential hotline that will call you at whatever number you give us and handle the whole thing.
So for someone who's a minor, that's a really good option. We do them probably once or twice a month here. So we're we're very good at handling if someone, you know, doesn't want someone else to know or doesn't want care. Let me give you a call. Yeah.
Oh, okay. Just I'm Kimberly.
Speaker 3: I'm Kimberly. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm Kimberly. Thank you so much. I'm here most of the time. We're about to set a court.
So we have some other grounds that we manage to work with that they're gonna be testing as well. So do you guys see them? Or
Speaker 3: Yeah. We've seen them. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1: Okay. We see people in the room.
Speaker 3: How long is the people in the room? I'm Okay. And and you guys don't have insurance. We have a family time benefit for them, and mostly everybody's on that.
Speaker 1: So you
Speaker 3: can sign off as a guardian. If you're writing their support letter, yeah, you
Speaker 1: Is it still confidential?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Okay. Alright.
Speaker 1: Where are they gonna have sex with? We have some girls that are kinda, you know, like, 14, 15 that they might need an abortion.
Speaker 3: Mhmm. And
Speaker 1: how is the best way should they go to go about that?
Speaker 3: They just show up and set up an appointment. In terms of insurance, they will probably speak to one of our entitlement people to get them set up or to some insurance. They don't have to be citizens to get the insurance. And if it is confidential
Speaker 1: We're involved in sex work. Alright? Some of them are young. They're kinda like something like 15, 14.
Speaker 3: Minors are always accepted without parental consent. Okay. The only thing that you do have to be careful is if they are a minor, we are obligated if we hear any certain information
Speaker 1: Okay. To
Speaker 3: kind of report. 14 and under, we have to report. Under. What that includes being 14? Yeah.
14. You know, once they get to 15, then there's a little bit more flavor. So as long as they just line and say, oh, use 15, 16. You know? As long as they don't say 14 and as long as it's not too much of an age gap, then we just kind of, like then we just kind of play What if
Speaker 1: they do say they're 14?
Speaker 3: You never got this from me just to make all of our lives easier. Okay. If they're 14
Speaker 2: Yeah. And under Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just send them out there if they need an abortion. Okay. Here's the thing too. If they're minors, just don't have to put down that they're students. Just Students.
Yeah. Just try to pay them all that they're students. So we wanna make it look as legit as
Speaker 1: possible. Yeah.
Speaker 3: This is actually just a minor's rights. This way, you guys have a copy. Oh, good. And you So you already kind of know before you get into any situation like, oh, alright. Okay.
No. Let's not do this way. Let's go this way. You know that Oh my god. If it comes down that they do need an abortion, how long till they can come up to it?
How soon again? Minimal chewies. Minimum chewies. Mhmm. They look chewies.
Do do you have any suggestions about what else they could do on the side?
Speaker 1: Because I mean, they still
Speaker 2: got money. You know? Yeah. Waste up.
Speaker 1: Waste up.
Speaker 2: Waste up. Okay. Or just
Speaker 3: be that extra action walking by. We'll work something out with the next girl. Thank you. Not a problem. Have a good night.
Thank you.
Speaker 1: I work at sex work. Okay. And there's some girls that I manage and someone about 40, 50. Really kinda young, but, can they how can they get help if they need, like, possibly on abortion?
Speaker 4: Okay. In the state of Virginia Yeah. From from the age of 12
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Up, for birth control, you can just come in and do that.
Speaker 1: It's coming through.
Speaker 4: You don't have to have a parent. Okay? Now for an abortion, though, you have to have a parent up to the age of 18.
Speaker 1: Don't they have anything like a pill, like, they could just take?
Speaker 4: No. We we offer, emergency contraception, unprotected sex up to 5 days.
Speaker 1: Oh, see. Right there.
Speaker 4: And that's $35. Oh. You just have to be an adult. Oh, you have to pick
Speaker 1: it up for them then. Alright. Thank you, Leslie. Once again. Thank you.
You have a good day.
Speaker 3: If you need anything else, come by.
Speaker 1: I will. I'm gonna be more into sex work.
Speaker 3: Okay. Okay? Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Now we have some girls that, they do not necessarily, have other documentation. Some of them are from out of the country.
Speaker 3: In the area.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Then we have a couple of girls that are pretty young, about 14, 15. How can they somehow still receive that even if they don't have all the legal like, is there some way they can still get protection?
Speaker 3: Look at at legal status and Okay.
Speaker 4: Like
Speaker 3: I said, abortion appointments do require photo ID.
Speaker 1: Oh, just a photo ID. Yeah. You can just get a photo ID.
Speaker 3: Scores back. It's just photo ID that Okay. That's ever gonna be required.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm involved in sex work. Right? You know? Come on.
Okay. There are some girls that I kinda manage, and I'm not sure how they would come in here to get tested.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 3: If you are tested and you're positive, your partners can come in here, and they would just need to see the clinician and you'd be given prescriptions. Okay. I'm pretty sure that's how that works.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Okay.
Speaker 3: But everything we do here is confidential. Anybody here can help you. I mean, everything here is confidential. We can't give any information.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Okay. Okay.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Listen and learn. https://t.co/RinGBGjDpY
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Swedish study from 2008 examined infants after they received their routine vaccinations, including diphtheria, pertussis, polio, and Hib. Blood samples were taken from these babies and exposed to the whooping cough toxin found in the vaccine. The results showed activation of 33 allergy-related genes, 66 asthma genes, 67 cancer genes, and 25 immunological genes after 12 hours. This indicates a genetic response triggered by the vaccines. However, it remains unclear whether these activated genes lead to diseases, as not everyone will experience these outcomes. The long-term effects depend on whether these gene activations are suppressed or not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is another study that I will show you, from 2,008. This was a Swedish study and they looked at infants after their diphtheria testis acellular pertussis vaccines, and polio Hib. So these were babies and they got their regular vaccines at 3 5 months. And then they took some of their blood out and they exposed it to, the whooping cough toxin which is basically what's in the vaccine. Okay?
And then they looked to see what happened 12 hours later in a genetic level. And what this doctor reported was 33 allergy related genes were activated. 66 asthma genes were activated. 67 cancer genes were up regulated and 25 immunological genes were up regulated. Okay?
So we're definitely seeing on a genetic level, some waking up. Now whether or not it goes through completely and causes these diseases. No, it doesn't in everybody right then and there. But do we know that unless something comes along and shuts these down, what is the result? We don't know.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Victor Davis Hanson gives a hilarious and accurate summation of the Jussie Smollet saga. I don't know how I missed this. 😂😁 https://t.co/XFTVE5KfOU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Jussie Smollett case exemplifies the extremes of identity politics. Smollett crafted an elaborate and illogical narrative, expecting America to believe it due to its biases. He presented himself as an African American, gay man who opposed Trump, adding layers to his identity. The scenario involved him walking in Chicago at night, encountering two white men wearing MAGA hats who recognized him and attacked him with bleach and a noose. This absurdity required the public to accept a highly improbable series of events, yet many did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About that as I did with a Juicy Smollett case. That was another example that sort of I mean, that was the it wasn't that kind of the ultimate trajectory of identity politics Because what you were saying what he was saying to America was, I'm going to create the most unlikely, impossible, illogical scenario in the world, and I'm gonna make America believe it because they're so deranged that I can get away with it. And so it wasn't just I'm African American, but I'm going to be African American and gay. I'm not just going to be African American gay. I'm going to be African American and I'm going to hate Trump.
Not gonna be just African American and hate Trump. I'm gonna be young and hip on empire. I'm not just gonna do all that, but I'm gonna be walking at 2 AM. And I'm not just gonna be walking 2 men. I'm gonna see 2 white guys who happen to be prowling around Liberal Chicago.
Not just 2 white guys are doing it. They're gonna have a MAGA hat on. And they're not just gonna have a MAGA hat on. 2 white guys with a MAGA hat and liberal Chicago are gonna say, we're gonna prowl around because maybe Jussie Smalls, whom we immediately recognize and yell out as the enemy of Empire because we always watch Empire. And, you know, Bob says to Fred, let's go out and look for Jesse Smollett type people tonight.
And by the way, let's take some lynch rope with us. And then Jesse and if that's not enough, let's get bleach that that freezes at 5 degrees, and we'll throw it and and defy the laws of chemistry. It won't freeze in our case. And then not only will we do all that, we'll beat him up, and we're very big. But Jesse's Juicy's very small, but he's a better fighter.
And he's gonna fight us off while he's got his sandwich in one hand and his cell phone in the other, recording the whole thing. That's what we were asked to believe, and the nation did.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Chris Salcedo retelling Rush Limbaugh's true story of Thanksgiving. https://t.co/0yWPfwT0hL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rush Limbaugh, who passed away on February 17, 2021, emphasized the true story of Thanksgiving, which is often misrepresented. The Pilgrims, fleeing persecution in England, sought freedom to worship and established a community based on biblical principles. Their initial socialist system failed due to lack of incentives, leading to hardship and discontent. Recognizing this, Governor William Bradford assigned land to families, allowing them to benefit from their labor. This shift to private property and free enterprise led to prosperity and gratitude, primarily directed toward God, not the Native Americans. George Washington's first Thanksgiving proclamation highlighted this gratitude to God for blessings. The essence of Thanksgiving is unity under God and recognizing our blessings, a tradition that should be honored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The great Rush Limbaugh passed away on February 17, 2021. Through extensive research and love of country, Rush made it a practice to remind his millions of listeners about the true story of Thanksgiving. I'm gonna do my best to recreate that. But it's my sincere hope and prayer that every conservative talk show host and commentator in these once United States will do the same. I can think of no better way to honor our nation's founding.
I can think of no better way to honor the great Rush Limbaugh who gave us this priceless history lesson. So inspired by the words of El Rushbo himself, the true story of Thanksgiving, that is today's preamble. This history lesson was inspired by Rush Limbaugh's book See, I Told You So, chapter 6 entitled Dead White Guys are what the history books never told you, the true story of Thanksgiving. It's also derived from George Washington's first Thanksgiving proclamation. For those of you who are recent products of our CRT DIE anti American government run education system, George Washington was our first and perhaps greatest president.
Speaking of Gov Ed, we have to begin with the left wing propaganda that has been spewed ever since I was in school. Everybody thinks that we screwed over the Native American Indians and gave them a whole bunch of garbage for land like the island of Manhattan. It's the other way around folks in reality. For years and especially this year after the America first win at the ballot box, America hating leftist activists and uninformed students at so called institutions of higher learning have trashed Thanksgiving because they claim it's based off the genocide of indigenous people. That's what they've been taught.
And it's 100% garbage. So let's set the record straight as to why our first president George Washington first proclaimed it, Thanksgiving. The great Russian law started off by asking, who was thanking who for what? Most of you were taught that pilgrims must have been giving thanks to the native American Indians for saving them and that's not what the pilgrims are thankful for as you will come to understand. The story of the pilgrims begins in the early part of 17th century.
The Church of England under King James was persecuting anyone and everyone who didn't recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. The first pilgrims were Christian rebels. Those who challenged King James' ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship, well they were hunted down. They were imprisoned and sometimes executed for their beliefs in the England of the 1600. And does anyone see any parallels to what's happening today around the world to anyone who opposes left wing totalitarian orthodoxy?
A group of separatist Christians who didn't want to buy into the Church of England or live under the rule of King James first fled to Holland and established a community there. After 11 years, about 40 of them having heard about this new world Christopher Columbus had discovered decided to risk everything and head out for this new land. 40 of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the new world where they knew they would face certain hardships. But the reason they did it was so they can live and worship God according to the dictates of their own beliefs. As president Ronald Reagan once said, quote, I also believe this blessed land was set apart in a very special way.
A country created by men and women who came here not in search of gold, but in search of God, end quote. On August 1, 16 20, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of a 102 passengers including 40 folks that we know today as pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract that established how they would live once they got there. The contract set forth laws for the new community irrespective of religious beliefs or political beliefs.
Where did this revolutionary, and fair ideas come from Mayflower Compact? Well, it came from the Bible. The pilgrims were a devoutly religious people, completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for inspiration. And because of the biblical precedent set forth in scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work.
They believed in God. They believed they were in God's hands. Back then, the trek across the Atlantic folks, it was no pleasure cruise. The journey to the New World and tiny by today's standards, sailing ships, it was long, it was arduous and often deadly. You had your sickness, you had your sea sickness, it was wet, it was miserable.
When the pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were there were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. There was nothing.
The sacrifice they made for freedom was just beginning. During that first winter, half the pilgrims, including Bradford's own wife died of either starvation, sickness or exposure, but they endured that first winter. And when spring finally came, they had by that time met the indigenous people, the Native American Indians. And indeed, the Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod, and skin beavers and other animals for coats. But that wasn't their prosperity.
This is key. They did not yet prosper. They were still dependent. They were still confused. They were still in a new place essentially alone.
This is incredibly important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some dumb textbooks as a holiday for which the pilgrims gave thanks for the to the Indians for saving their lives. Now don't misunderstand, that part of the story did happen. Nobody denies that, but that's not according to William Bradford's journal what they ultimately gave thanks for. Here is the part that has been omitted from agenda driven textbooks in gov ed.
To be able to afford traveling to the New World, the pilgrims had to enter into a contract with merchant sponsors They had no money of their own. Right? The merchants in London were making an investment and as such the pilgrims agreed that everything they produced would go into a bank, a common store or common account and each member of the community was entitled to one common share in this bank. Now, out of this, the merchants would be repaid until the debt was fully paid off. All of the land the pilgrims cleared, all the houses they built belonged to the community.
Everything belonged to everybody and everybody had one share in everything. They were going to distribute it equally. Now Rush Limbaugh explained that nobody owned anything. It was a it was a commune. It was the forerunner of the communes we saw in the sixties seventies out in the People's Republic of California and other parts of the country and it was complete with organic vegetables.
According to some misguided and unwise people, the pilgrims contract was considered to be the epitome of fairness, sharing the hardships and the burdens and prosperity. But under this left wing socialist system, the hardships were plenty, but the prosperity never came. After enduring months months of hardship, first in the Mayflower and then in the New World, then came the failure of the common account from which everybody got the same share. The pilgrims soon discovered there was no incentive for anybody to do anything. And it's it's human nature.
Some of the pilgrims were a bunch of lazy Democrat socialists and others, the conservatives, with a strong work ethic busted their rear ends. But it didn't matter because even the people that weren't very industrious got the same as everybody else. Bradford wrote about this socialist system and how it wasn't working. What he and the pilgrims discovered was quote, that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, end quote. Again, it's human nature in every group of people that you have out there.
You've got yourself starters, you've got your hard workers, and your industrious people, and you've got your lazy know nothings. And under this version of equity, the resentment sprang up on both sides. And Bradford wrote about this too, quote, for this community so far as it was, was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort for young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense. That meant, folks, men had to work without any payment. That was the injustice.
Why should anyone work for other people when they can't even work for themselves? What's the point? The pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without an incentive to do so. Consider this, AOC and Herb's socialist squad, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden's socialists have bought into this fantasy that the reason why socialism has never worked is that nobody's gotten it quite right. So left wingers dedicate your family's wealth, your future to an impossible endeavor trying to fix socialism, trying to refine it, perfect it, and reinvent it.
The pilgrims with more intelligence than Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and the entirety of their backward political party, the pilgrims decided to scrap socialism permanently because it brought out the worst in human nature. It emphasized laziness. It created resentment. The pilgrims found a pea that a people can't be united under a left wing collectivist system. Bradford, the new governor of the colony, recognized that socialism was costly and destructive to the success and prosperity of these early Americans, so Bradford tried something different.
Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family as their own. He got rid of the whole communist structure and assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage. And whatever they made, however much they made, it was theirs. They could sell it, they could share it, they could keep it, whatever they wanted to do. What really happened is the pilgrims turned loose the power of a free market.
The pilgrims unharnessed the power of good old fashioned free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was permitted to market their own crops and products as they saw fit. And history, the real history, not the New York Times 16/19 BS, the real history records the results. Quote, this had very good success, wrote Bradford, for it made all hands industrious in no time. The pilgrims found they had more food than they they could eat themselves.
Now, this is where it gets really good folks, if you're under the impression or misconception that so many people have and they were taught in Gov Ed. After the pilgrims were blessed with abundance, they set up trading posts and exchanged the goods with the Indians. The profits from those trading posts allowed the pilgrims to pay off their debts to the merchants in London. And the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans. This came to be known as the Great Puritan Migration.
Everybody in Europe wanted a piece of it and these early Americans, they were thankful. There was no mass slaughtering of Indians. There was no wiping out of the indigenous people in this time period. The Indians were very helpful. Puriding kids had relationships with the children of Native Americans.
There was a very cooperative atmosphere. The killings of the Indians, that came much, much later. That injustice has nothing to do with the foundation of Thanksgiving. President George Washington issued the 1st Thanksgiving Day proclamation in 17/89. It read in part, whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor.
And whereas both houses of congress have by their joint committee requested me to recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of almighty god, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness. Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, 26th day of November next, to be devoted by these people of these states to the service of that great and glorious being who is the beneficiant author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be, that we may then all unite rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks for his kind and care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation. My friends, that's the real story of Thanksgiving. The first Thanksgiving was William Bradford in the Plymouth Colony thanking God, not the Native Americans, for their blessings. There was nothing wrong with being grateful to the Indians and our ancestors shared their bounty as the Indians shared their experience and know how.
It was a shining example example of what we could all do as a people united under God. The true meaning of Thanksgiving that George Washington recognized in his first Thanksgiving proclamation was thanking God for his divine blessings on our people. Those blessings are the rewards we receive when we live up to the very American creed. We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Look at what our people can do when we are united in freedom, not under government, but under God.
And now you know why our political enemies, the enemies of man, they hate God and they're doing their best to divide us. We would all do well to remember where our blessings come from and we should continue this tradition of remembering where Thanksgiving came from. A tradition given us by a man who never forgot the noble blessings of our blessed land. Thank you, Rush Limbaugh. Miss you every day.
You know, folks, I thank God for my wonderful wife, my kids, my country, the greatest nation ever. And Americans like you who believe in the truth, the Chris Salcedo show will never stop fighting for you. The Chris Salcedo show for the news you need to know.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Here's a throwback of Pam Bondi discussing the Mar-a-Lago raid. https://t.co/hscUd28ulw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Having signed thousands of subpoenas as a prosecutor, I question why a motion to compel wasn't used when the Trump team was cooperating. The warrant's timing raises concerns; it was signed on Friday but executed on Monday, suggesting a lack of urgency. Typically, for document searches, a few agents would suffice, yet the FBI deployed an overwhelming number of agents for the Mar-a-Lago search, likely for optics to portray Trump as a criminal. This approach is part of a broader tactic to intimidate and send a message to others. Merrick Garland's statements contradict the actions taken, and the magistrate's lack of experience and potential bias raises further questions about the warrant's legitimacy. A more experienced judge might have insisted on a subpoena instead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For commentary as well as Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett. Pam, your take on all of this.
Speaker 1: Sean, having personally as a prosecutor for 18 years signed thousands of subpoenas. Thousands. Many times people don't comply. So what do you do? You either issue a new subpoena or you do a motion to compel.
Why wasn't that done in this case? The Trump people were working well with them. Why wasn't that done? That's a question for Merrick Garland. Number 2 for Merrick Garland, the warrant.
Think about the warrant. If you're going to issue a warrant, the reason has to be, I'm worried they're gonna destroy evidence. Well, what's suspect about that? We've now learned that warrant was signed on Friday, but not executed until Monday. So why get the warrant?
That doesn't even make sense. Number 3, I have personally been involved in many, many search warrants, authorizing them, the execution of the search warrants, and they came in there with guns blazing like you said. For documents, you know what you do? You get a couple agents, you go up, you show the warrant at Mar a Lago, they knew the president wasn't there, they knew it was a skeleton crew at Mar a Lago. You go in, you go to the safe, you go to the office, you get the documents you need.
Done. Yet what did they do? They brought they did an execution on land, on sea, by air. They had agents in the water, agents in the air. You may have only seen 30 to 40 there on the ground, but there were 100 of agents that had to have been weaponized to pull the assault off at Mar a Lago that day and that night.
Merrick Garland, that's where that's where tax dollars are going to that. Did you see the massive trucks out there, Sean, lined around? You know why they did that? It was the optics. They thought Donald Trump would look like a common criminal, but it backfired on them.
And the American people have seen what they've done, and they are disgusted by this. And he's got a lot more explaining to do.
Speaker 0: And and, you know, look at this. Look at the look at what they did to Peter Navarro. Look at what they did to Manafort. Look at what they did to Roger Stonehill joining us tonight, Greg. This is now their tactic.
They wanna harass, intimidate, and send a message to everyone else. Don't mess with us. We're all powerful, almighty. And the double standard, the dual system of justice couldn't be any more clear than it is now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I don't question the integrity of the DOJ and the FBI. I criticize the utter lack of integrity and rectitude of Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray. Merrick Garland today unwittingly, stupidly undermined his own argument when he said, oh, our standard practice is use the least intrusive method. That's called a subpoena.
And the FBI did that, 2 months ago. They were counting on Donald Trump challenging it so that they would then be poised for a raid. But Trump capitulated. He gave them everything they wanted. So they probably sat back at the DOJ and said, now what are we gonna do?
Well, they should have issued another subpoena if they wanted more documents. I suspect all of that is left out of, the affidavit in support of the FBI warrant to search the premises. And I think they probably snookered this magistrate who, by the way, is not a regular federal district court judge. He's appointed by the district court to do the sort of grunt work. He doesn't have the experience.
A real judge would have probably said, wait a minute.
Speaker 0: Oh, wait a minute.
Speaker 2: Searching the premises. From a case with Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 0: Why didn't he refuse himself here? Well, he should've times.
Speaker 2: His social media posts were virulently anti Trump. Under the law, he's required to recuse himself, but a good judge would have said, wait a minute. Why aren't you using a subpoena here? There are a lot of questions about this magistrate himself.
Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you, Pam Bondi. We appreciate it. Craig Jarrett, thank
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
It's so obvious that E Jean Carrol is lying. Rape victims don't act like this and everyone knows it. She admitted George Conway put her up to this. https://t.co/RySKQz6h9Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's no longer about individual interests; the focus is on reclaiming our future and rights. Plans include using funds from Trump to support women's rights. There's humor in discussing extravagant purchases, but the serious matter is the ongoing legal battles against Trump.
The cases are interconnected, with insights from one case benefiting another. For instance, evidence from Trump's depositions can influence jury decisions on punitive damages. In court, Trump is less intimidating without his usual fanfare; he can be controlled by strong judges and competent lawyers. Ultimately, he is just a person, not the larger-than-life figure portrayed in the media.
Thanks to E. Jean Carroll, Robbie Kaplan, and Sean Crowley for their efforts in these historic legal battles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it's really not about me anymore. We have moved beyond me. And as you say, the fight now is really to take back our future. This is a man who stacked the supreme court, took away women's rights over their own bodies. We would like to be a part of turning, our eyes to the future and taking back our rights.
Speaker 1: You've talked about using some of Trump's money that you're about to get, to help shore up women's rights. Do you know what that might be? What that might look like
Speaker 0: or Rachel. Yes. Tell me. I had such such great ideas for all the good I'm gonna do with this money. First thing, Rachel, you and I are gonna go shopping.
We're gonna get completely new wardrobes, new shoes, motorcycle for crawling, new fishing rod for Robbie. Rachel, what do you want? A penthouse? It's yours, Rachel. Penthouse and, France.
You want France? You wanna go fishing in France? No? Oh, alright.
Speaker 2: Alright. Okay. That's a joke.
Speaker 1: Although, if if me fishing in France could do something for women's rights, I would take the hint. You know? I would obviously take one for the team. Alright. Let me let me as if as if you need persuasion in that regard.
Let me let me finish with a final question. And, again, this is both for you, Sean, and and for you, Robbie, and you guys can divide up responsibility here. But there are multiple cases here involving Trump that are that are coming up. Obviously, most eyes are on the federal January 6th case. Having been up against Trump in the courtroom, I'm wondering if you 2 have have any advice in terms of what it's like to go up against him and his legal team in terms of the way that he approaches his defense as part of it.
But I also wanna know if this big what everybody's expecting potentially to be a very large judgment against him and his company changed anything about the way that you approached the asked to the jury, the way that you presented evidence, the way that you're planning on making sure this money is in fact extracted from Trump's wallet? I mean, how much do all of these different cases interact with each other if at all? And can various lawyers involved in various in these various cases learn from each other's experience?
Speaker 3: So the the short answer to to the cases all interact with each other is absolutely all the time. To give you just one good example, in our case, we played at the end of our case, not only the deposition that I took of Donald Trump in this case, but we played the deposition that the New York attorney general took in their case. Because in that deposition, Trump is bragging about how his his brand alone is worth more than $10,000,000,000. He has $400,000,000 cash on hand. And the reason that was so relevant is in assessing how much money to work for punitive damages, the jury is not only allowed to, but supposed to think of the wealth of the defendant.
So when we said when Sean said, give him enough give enough to Eugene to make him stop, they had to think what enough would be for Donald Trump. So the cases in in kinds of predictable ways and unpredictable ways are are kind of talking to each other all the time.
Speaker 2: On on the first question, you know, I think that one thing that I I maybe wasn't prepared for, coming into this trial is that when when Donald Trump is stripped of, you know, all of the press and not at a rally, and there's no TV cameras, and he sort of has a small group of supporters around him, he's not that scary.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And he also can be controlled. You know, I mean, his antics in the courtroom, we've talked about them. But at the end of the day, he did kind of follow the rules. Robbie Cross examined him. He was in he was in the witness chair, and he only got to answer 3 questions, I think.
And he pretty much stayed within the bounds. I think when you have a strong judge like judge Kaplan who enforces the rules of his courtroom, and you have real lawyers, you really can get him to behave, sort of. And when he is stripped of all of the rallies and the truth socials, he's just a guy. I think PG called him, the emperor with no clothes. That's not my quote, but he definitely is.
He's not the guy that you see on TV. He's just a guy, sometimes acting like a petulant toddler, but, just a guy.
Speaker 1: An American bound by the law just as every American is bound by the law. Writer E. Jean Carroll, attorney Robbie Kaplan, attorney Sean Crowley, you guys have made history a couple of times now.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And you also have meant a lot, and continue to mean a lot. You have, been lighting the way, I think, for a lot of people in terms of both moral clarity and strategic acumen. And I really, really wanna thank each of you for making the time to come talk to us, and I want I I wish you all, safety and rest. Thank you
Speaker 0: for your time. Rachel.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. Stay with us.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Julian Assange outs Mike Pompeo and the CIA. This is huge. https://t.co/JWjZ0wb5zc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Under Director Pompeo, the CIA allegedly planned to kidnap and assassinate the speaker within the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. The CIA is also accused of targeting the speaker's European colleagues with theft, hacking attacks, and disinformation.
The speaker's wife and infant son were allegedly targeted as well, with a CIA asset assigned to track the wife and instructions given to obtain DNA from the six-month-old son's nappy. These claims are based on testimony from over 30 current and former US intelligence officials and corroborated by records seized in a prosecution against CIA agents in Spain.
The speaker claims this targeting provides insight into transnational repression by powerful intelligence organizations. The speaker asserts the uniqueness of this case lies in the extensive knowledge available due to whistleblowers and judicial investigations in Spain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA director Pompeo launched a campaign of retribution. It is now a matter of public record that under Pompeo's explicit direction, the CIA drew up plans to kidnap and to assassinate me within the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and authorized going after my European colleagues subjecting us to theft, hacking attacks, and the planting of false information. My wife and my infant son were also targeted. A CIA asset was permanently assigned to track my wife and instructions were given to obtain DNA from my 6 month old son's nappy. This is the testimony of more than 30 current and former US intelligence officials speaking to the US press which has been additionally corroborated by record seized in a prosecution bought against some of the CIA agents involved.
The CIA is targeting of myself, my family, and my associates through aggressive extrajudicial and extraterritorial means provides a rare insight into how powerful intelligence organizations engage in transnational repression. Such repressions are not unique. What is unique is that we know so much about this one due to numerous whistleblowers and to judicial investigations in Spain.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
1995 former director of the Los Angeles FBI Ted Gunderson. This is a must listen. https://t.co/1lXp9dzJgG
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Wake up America! Globalists are running your country. What are you going to do about it? https://t.co/7zU971Ybyv
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is shocking. https://t.co/iHE5CGEWlg
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, the speaker attended a Communist Party USA meeting at UC Berkeley and was surprised to find older attendees discussing plans to undermine America from within, focusing on the environmental movement to dismantle the free enterprise system. This strategy aims for global solutions necessitating a global government.
The speaker referenced the book "The Naked Communist," which outlined communist goals from the 1950s, including controlling schools to promote socialism. Communists aim to transition countries to socialism before communism by gaining control and disarming the population.
The speaker claims that many countries fell to communism in the 20th century not through military invasion, but through internal disruption. Agitators stir up unrest, install a puppet leader, and then exert totalitarian control. They target traditional families by undermining the father's role and pushing mothers into the workforce to control the children, as well as brainwashing people against toxic masculinity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 1992, an older friend of my father who was from St. Louis asked me to go to this meeting that the Communist Party USA was having at the University of California Berkeley, and he had studied communism and written books about communism back in the sixties and stuff. And he was curious because if you remember back in 1989, the Berlin Wall had come down, and everyone was saying communism is dead. It's over. Then in 91 in December, the Soviet Union dissolved.
And so this is 6 months later, the summer of 92, and the Communist Party USA is having a meeting. So he asked me to go out to this meeting. He said, would you go out there and just see what they're talking about? Because we we won. This thing's over.
And so I went to that. And for 3 days, I sat there in breakout sessions and lectures and and listened to these hardcore communists. And and one thing shocking about it too, I thought it'd be college radical since it was at Berkeley, so I dress like a college radical with some radical t shirt. I walk into the autumn auditorium, there's 14 or 15, 50, 60, 70 year olds with briefcases. And I thought, woah.
This is actually serious. It's not just some radicals. And many of those exact people, as I researched them later, ended up being in Obama's cabinet in 2008. And that's what motivated me to make the movie because I realized, well, these are the people that were at this communist meeting with me back back in 1992. But at that meeting, they laid out this plan how they wanted to take America down from the inside.
They were gonna focus all their energies on that now. They've been focusing on it for a while, but they realized they could never out spend America because capitalism, free enterprise is so successful. And they kind of that woke them up. Okay. We gotta go to plan b.
They they just keep building more and more. And, of course, we had all the years of Reagan where he'd really built the military up, so they realized we're in trouble here. And so that's what they talked about to me and how they were going to do that from the inside. And I didn't think that much about it, went on with my life. But then again, 16 years later in 2008 from 92, when I remembered what they had talked about, like, one thing, that is so clear how to change.
They had said back in 92, we're gonna use the environmental movement to take down the free enterprise system in America. And in 92, that didn't make sense because that was not a big movement. It was literally people, you know, chaining themselves to trees in Oregon so they can't cut them down. I mean, it was nothing. And so I was like, how would you do that?
But in 2008, an Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore had come out. It was the biggest movement in the world and it still is, because they realized it's the ultimate vehicle for totalitarian control because it's a global problem, so it demands global solutions by
Speaker 1: a global government. That's that's the way they look
Speaker 0: at it. So they that's why that issue will never go away no matter how many facts we have and how many charts we can show them. Hey. It's not going up. And if it went up a little bit, actually would be good.
Warm warmth is the friend of life. Cold is the enemy of life. All the logical things that they don't, but from that, I wrote a letter when I was a representative on that communist meeting in 1992, and it just blew up into a huge thing. And one of the men that responded to that and said, what representative Bauer says is true, but it's nothing new. That's not from 1992.
It was all written in a book in 19 58, and I got to know the man. It was, of course, the book The Naked Communist, and it had the 45 current communist goals as of the 19 fifties in America. And I got that book for the first time in 2,008. So 50 years later, and I read through the list of goals. And as I did, I couldn't believe how specific and how purposeful and how premeditated a collapse of our country had been.
It had been people and groups for a 100 years working to take us down from within. And I just I couldn't believe as I read through these things, one of goal 17. This is from fifties America. Get control of the schools, use them as transmission belts for socialism, soften the curriculum. Well, people wonder, why do all the kids want socialism today?
Because in the fifties, they said we gotta put socialist ideas, we gotta push it. So these kids think it's good. They think it's it's wonderful. And so because they know all the hardcore communists know. You have to transition through socialism before you can go to communism.
You cannot go from a prosperous free enterprise system to communism because the problem is in the prosperous free enterprise system, you and all the people own all the stuff. Mhmm. And so they can't it's like, how do we get this? They have the wealth. They have the guns.
They have the property. They have a we gotta transition into socialism where we slowly get control of everything. And then it's easy to flip overnight, especially if you can disarm them. Then overnight, it's no more mister nice guy. You do what we say or you get a bullet in your head.
Mhmm.
Speaker 1: I
Speaker 0: mean, that's that's and that happened over and over again throughout the 20th century. So it's not like some new strategy. That's what they did to most of the countries that fell to communism, and a lot of people don't know this. During the 20th century, like, 65 or 70 countries that fell. That's how they fell.
They did not tanks didn't roll in and take them over. They stirred up their radical, stirred up the college professors to strip the young people for freedom, for for no. You these it's not a just government because it wasn't a perfect government, whatever country. It might have been like Cuba or something. No.
It wasn't a perfect government, but it was pro American. They had a lot of freedom. They were prosperous, but the people there stirred it up and said no. And so when what happens is the communists do that, then they put up their puppet as the guy that's for the people, and the people usually vote that person into power. And then once they get the levers of control, they the iron fist comes out and and, like Casper did, it started slaughtering by the 1,000.
Anyone who resisted in Cuba. They've been brainwashed that toxic masculinity because they knew that's their number one enemy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Back in the 19 thirties, even the Frankfurt School, one of the groups that my movie talks about, they talked about that. They said we're never going to be able to get these children away from the parents in the families where the father is leading the home. They go, we we gotta pull him out. We gotta get him sidetracked on other things, sports or whatever, and then we gotta create enough inflation so the mother has to work whether she wants to or not so we can raise the children. They were writing about that in the 19 thirties.
Speaker 2: And now you have them on the White House podium saying these are our children. Exactly. These are not your children. They're our children.
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: You know, you know, we're
Speaker 2: coming from the White House.
Speaker 0: That's
Speaker 2: right. Legitimately, like, 3 months ago.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. You know, one one thing that I always think back to is why, like, every now and then, you'll see one of these pictures pop up. So this is a picture of, like, a 17 year old in Vietnam. Mhmm. Right?
And, like, knowing that, like, that was that was that was the normal here. Right? Like, just this peak male. Right? Like, I mean, he's 17 year olds.
He's got muscle tone, and he's out fighting a war. You know what I'm saying? Compared to what our 17 year olds look like now. They're dressing up as fur babies and and and furries and stuff. It's like, how do we get there?
Like, and it could, like and to just, you know, for this conversation, it couldn't just be this one way that we got to this place. It's all these different facets on all these different fronts that they've been able to use to get us to exactly where we are right now. And it's not an overnight process. Right? Like, they've been planning this stuff for you.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. For it's been going on in earnest for right at about a100
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Senator Steve Daines explains how illegal aliens can circumvent the system in order to enter the United States. Listen closely and ask yourself how these people have more rights than United States citizens. And what really is the purpose of the Patriot Act? https://t.co/d4SErzUdzj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The CBP One app, used by migrants claiming asylum, is now accepted at TSA checkpoints in the Miami airport's Delta terminal as valid ID for boarding planes. The CBP One app was intended to validate non-US citizen travel documentation when a traveler lacks acceptable ID. According to the speaker, migrants can enter any information into the app, even those wanted for crimes. Photos are optional, and biographical information is not stored. The speaker questions how people from terror watch list countries can use this process. The speaker contrasts this with the Real ID requirement for Americans by May 2025 to board flights. They question how illegal immigrants can board planes with unverifiable information while Americans face stricter ID requirements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has popped up at the Delta terminal, the Miami airport. Instructions for illegals to use their CBP one app, that's the customs border patrol app at TSA checkpoints, as a valid form of ID to board a plane in the United States. For those who don't know, the CBP one app provides appointments for migrants who are claiming asylum at the border. Migrants, particularly those wanted for crimes, can fill in any basic information they want in the app and be let into the country. The goal was to and I quote, validate adult non US citizen travel documentation when the traveler does not otherwise have an acceptable form of identification.
However, it also notes that photos are optional. It says that multiple times. Says they can provide biographical information if requested, but notes that information is not stored, again, multiple times. How is this even serious? Illegals coming to the United States from country that are designated state sponsors of terror and on terror watch list can use this process.
Americans, think about this for a moment. We, as Americans, are gonna be forced to acquire a real ID by May of 2025 or you or anybody else here, myself, we barred from boarding a flight in United States. How in the world can we justify this when illegal immigrants are allowed to board planes with unverifiable information they filled out on an app?
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Anthony Fauci has tested positive again for covid. He's encouraging at risk people to wear masks again. https://t.co/MB4WumGYQQ
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
The truth bombs are flying in this one my friends. Almost 7 minutes describing Donald Trump's fight against globalism. And the exact reason that I will be voting for Trump in November. Please listen and share. #Trump2024 https://t.co/cpSoLX9R9N
Video Transcript AI Summary
Almost everyone is part of the great reset, but Trump is against it. He gave a speech at Davos rejecting alarmists and their calls for power. George Soros warned about the 2020 election's impact. The Vatican and Jeffrey Sachs criticized Trump, while Trump opposes globalism and fights against the UN. The pandemic hit after Trump declared war on globalism at the UN. The goal is to weaken the US economy for the great reset. To resist, return to normalcy, work, school, and church, and support Trump against the new world order. Stand with America or fall with the new world order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone's in on the great reset. Well, almost everyone. There's one guy who's got the power to do something to stop and he knows exactly where I'm going and they made a mistake. They tried to get Trump on their side, so they invited Donald Trump to Davos, I think a couple of times, but in January, when Donald Trump, I think, really began to see the beast that he was up against, he went to Davos, yeah, to the World Economic Forum, and he stuck a mega finger in their eye.
Speaker 1: We're committed to conserving the majesty of God's creation and the natural beauty of our world. But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse. These alarmists always demand the same thing, absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives. We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country.
Speaker 0: 2 days after Donald Trump gave that speech, the 89 year old leftist weirdo billionaire George Soros made an emergency intervention where at Davos once again warning that the US 2020 election will determine the quote fate of the whole world. Now, in the context of Davos, take a look at this one more time. This is a month after Donald Trump addressed Davos and stuck the MAGA finger in their face. Here's what Francis, the Vatican, and Jeffrey Sachs had to say in response.
Speaker 2: And it is a dangerous country right now. It will be absolutely dangerous if Trump wins reelection. Trump wins reelection. Trump wins reelection.
Speaker 0: Francis invited this guy to the to the Amazon Senate as an honored guest and advisor. He's also Bernie Sanders' advisor. What's he doing in the Vatican? Why is this guy who is a promoter for socialist, out and out socialist, Bernie Sanders, what's he doing advising the pope? Why does he have entree to the Vatican friends?
Sacks supports abortion and contraception, but that's not a problem for the Vatican. For the Vatican, for pope Francis, and for his friends at the UN, Donald Trump is the problem, obviously, friends.
Speaker 3: Clearly, I consider the Trump administration a danger to the world, but I regard it as a purely temporary phenomenon that will disappear in 2020. Do you get it?
Speaker 0: Do you see why there's so much hate for Trump? Because with all of his faults, again, he's the capitalist. He's not the globalist. He never will be one of them, which is why he pulled the United States out of the Paris Climate Agreement. Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the World Health Organization.
That's Bill Gates and company. And now he's threatening to pull the United States out of the World Trade Organization. People say, yeah. Well, Donald Trump got married twice. He's a bad guy.
Really? He's right in the face of the demons on this, friends. Nobody ever said he was a saint. He's knocking the sacred cows of the United Nations down all over the world right now.
Speaker 2: The general assembly routinely votes a 185 against the United States on almost everything right now.
Speaker 0: And you remember, speaking of the United Nations, in November of 2019, again, right before COVID landed, Trump went to the UN, the floor of the general assembly, and he declared war on globalism.
Speaker 1: Wise leaders always put the good of their own people and their own country first. The future does not belong to globalists. The future belongs to patriots.
Speaker 0: And shortly after the speech at the UN, Donald Trump delivered what do you think happened? The coronavirus was unleashed on the world and Trump's booming US economy went on life support. Do you think that was an accident? So when they tell you, when they tell all of us to stay home, wear your mask, so grandma doesn't get sick, please understand what's really going on here. They don't care about your grandmother.
They don't care about old people, these people. They don't care about babies. They want them aborted, so that they can save the common home. Abort babies, millions of them all over the world. They don't care about babies, they don't care about old people.
In fact, if you wanna save your grandma, tell the globalist to stay the hell away from her. You remember how some of them like Cuomo and characters like this were running COVID recovering patients through nursing homes. That's how much they care about grandma. And the name of the game now is to bring the United States economy to its knees, get it out of the way, so that everyone will want the great reset. Make the new normal so intolerably abnormal that even you and I maybe, you know, at some point in the near future, we'll be begging for the vaccines because we'll be driven crazy by that point, begging for whatever else is going to keep us safe according to our jailers and our handlers and our zookeepers.
You see? That's what they want. That's why they keep using this term new normal. You know, what we do to fight back? Go to work, go back to school.
If you're healthy, take off the mask. And for heaven's sake go back to church and pray that Trump wins in November. That's what the reset was on, that's what the Russia hoax was all about, that's what that's what the the, impeachment hoax was all about. Don't you see? For 4 years, I've been trying to stop this man because if he strengthens America, if he makes it great again, if he brings the economy back again, the reset won't happen.
The new world order is gonna be set way back. Who knows when they're gonna have another COVID opportunity like this one again, and they know it. Go ask yourselves why they hate this man? These folks, these men they hate God, they hate the unborn, they hate the traditional family, they hate you, and they hate Donald Trump. Whose political opponents by the way, right now are knocking statues of saints to the ground, They're beating up cops and they're burning flags.
You say you don't like Trump, I'm sorry friends but who cares? It doesn't really matter anymore. But you think of Trump's personality or his tweets, look at the big picture, the choice is simple. Friends, stand with America right now, or fall with the new world order in the not so distant future. There's no other choice.
I'm Michael Matt from Remdin TV, and we'll see you next week.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Who is this man? Anyone know? What he is saying is absolutely mind blowing. https://t.co/rV0PJwGgN8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the origins of the AIDS virus, linking it to experiments at Fort Detrick and a vaccination campaign by the World Health Organization in Africa and Brazil. They claim the virus was deliberately created and spread to target black populations. The speaker warns against trusting the government or the Democrat Party, stating that black people are seen as expendable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Military Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare Establishment at Fort Detrick and they began experimenting with the AIDS virus. I knew about the AIDS 3 years before the word ever came out in the world in the United States particularly, because of my field work in Sierra Leone. The British government used their Forten Down CAB facility. It's easier to get into the Bank of England Boston to get into Fortin Down. All the deadliest viruses in the world are being crafted there.
In pursuance of the goal of Global 2,000 to decimate the world. Shortly after this experiment that finished at Port District, the World Health Organization started a massive vaccination campaign. They said for once and for all, we're going to wipe out the scourge of smallpox. They chose Africa and Brazil, launched a massive vaccination campaign. Immediately, AIDS began to appear.
1000 and thousands of people began dying of the strange new virus, which the World Health Organization then said it come from the bite of a green monkey. They forgot to tell you the green monkey has been there for centuries and he's been biting people if he ever did for centuries but no disease of that nature had ever occurred. The World Health Organization deliberately took this virus which was crafted from a series of animal viruses including Mediobrisma, sheep, which destroys the brain, which is why you find AIDS patients get dementia probably first before any of the other AIDS related complex diseases appear. They began vaccinating innocent people on the massive scale and they began dying like flies. Why Africa and why Brazil?
Because those two countries have the biggest black population in the world. And I want to tell the black people of the United States of America, do not trust the Democrat Party. Do not trust government. Do not believe that government is your friend. To you, they to them you are dispensable.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Columbia University facilities worker speaks out after terror takeover: 'They held me hostage' The insurrection began at approximately 12:30 a.m., Tuesday when anti-Israel protesters stormed Hamilton Hall. https://www.foxnews.com/us/columbia-university-facilities-worker-speaks-terror-takeover-held-hostage
Columbia University facilities worker speaks out after terror takeover: 'They held me hostage'
A Columbia University facilities worker claims he was held hostage by anti-Israel protesters after a mob of anarchists stormed Hamilton Hall Tuesday morning.
foxnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Norfolk Southern Railway fined $70,000 for worst toxic chemical spill in US history, causing destruction in East Palestine Ohio. Contrasting this, Donald Trump fined over half a billion dollars for a fraud case with no victims.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This isn't even an April Fools joke... Norfolk Southern Railway company was fined $70,000 for being responsible for the worst toxic chemical spill in US history, destroying the entire town of East Palestine Ohio. Compare this to Donald Trump being fined over half a billion dollars for a fraud case with no victims.
reSee.it AI Summary
This series of posts covers various topics related to Joe Biden. There are mentions of his past statements, actions, and controversies. Some posts highlight his involvement in the Civil Rights movement, while others criticize his remarks about black men and drug users. There is also a post discussing his stance on school integration. Overall, the posts provide a mix of positive and negative perspectives on Biden.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is gold. It would be a shame if it got around. https://t.co/0zK388lCHV
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are concerned about avian flu, lacking vaccines and police. Debating gay marriage and flag amendment seems unnecessary. The Defense of Marriage Act already defines marriage as between a man and a woman, with no challenges. Why push for a constitutional amendment? Marriage is clear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hand basket. We are desperately concerned about the circumstance relating to avian flu. We don't have enough vaccines. We don't have enough police officers, and we're gonna debate the next 3 weeks, I'm told. Gay marriage, a flag amendment, and god only knows what else.
I can't believe the American people can't see through this. We already have a law, the Defense of Marriage Act, where we've all voted, not where I voted, and others said, look. Marriage is between a man and a woman, and states must respect that. Nobody's violated that law. There's been no challenge to that law.
Why do we need a constitutional amendment? Marriage is between a man and a woman. What's the game going on here? And
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
But wait there's more. Flashback to 2006. https://t.co/gsoUr50tEK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe abortion is always a tragedy, not a choice or right. It should be rare, safe, and efforts should focus on reducing the number of abortions. Finding common ground and consensus is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I do not view abortion as a, as a choice and a right. I think it's always a tragedy. And I think that, it should be, rare and safe. And I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions, and they ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus as to do
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this one... https://t.co/tVWVfydSsO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that a Supreme Court nominee should not have to reveal their stance on Roe v. Wade. They argue that knowing their position may not provide much insight into their future decisions. For example, a nominee could support Roe v. Wade but still vote for restrictive measures like the Webster decision. Ultimately, the speaker does not think that knowing a nominee's stance on Roe v. Wade would be very informative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should have to answer how he would rule on Roe. I do not believe he should have to do that because I think that sets a precedent that may very well come back and bite everything I believe in, even though I'd like to know how we would rule on Roe. Quite frankly, I'm not sure what it would tell us even if he told us he would sustain Roe. He might sustain Roe and vote for Webster. He might sustain Roe and say, yes.
You can't have an abortion in any facility that doesn't have hallways 14 feet wide. He might, say, sustain Roe and, you know, and so on. So I don't think it would tell us much.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this.... https://t.co/rUGdjfjNLe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Joseph Biden dropped out of the race due to plagiarism and exaggerations about his academic record, feeling angry and reluctant about his decision. This makes him the second Democratic candidate to exit the race over character and integrity concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hunter Joseph Biden dropped out of the hunt today, saying the disclosures about his plagiarism in law school and his exaggerations about his academic record made it impossible for him to continue. I do it with incredible reluctance, and it makes me angry. I'm angry with myself for having been put in the position put myself in the position of having to make this choice. The Delaware Democrat is the 2nd candidate to be forced from the race by questions of character and integrity.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Biden Thread https://t.co/xkluUQVNdI
Video Transcript AI Summary
I visited Kyiv for the 12th or 13th time to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I asked for action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't comply. I threatened to withhold the money unless the prosecutor was fired within 6 hours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kyiv, and I was supposed to announce that there's another $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from, Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't. So they said they had they're walking out the press conference. I said, no. I said, I'm not gonna we're not gonna give you the $1,000,000,000.
They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting a $1,000,000,000.
I'm gonna be leaving here. I think it was, what, 6 hours? I look at I said, I'm leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
More hypocrisy for this thread of Biden blunders. https://t.co/KPJqB737x3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden is accused of plagiarism multiple times, including using phrases without credit from Neil Kinnock and Robert Kennedy. He admitted to plagiarism in law school, calling it unintentional. Critics say he presents himself as inspiring, but using others' words is false advertising. Appropriating personal material from other politicians is seen as a bad move. The political community views his actions as dumb and immoral, questioning his suitability for the presidency. Voters will need to consider these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know I was thinking on the way over here. Now that's a little too much because as you point out what's behind the words? What's there? And a lot of people that rap on Biden has always been that it's just a surface.
Speaker 1: I should have said, to paraphrase Neil Kinnock, the only time I didn't in all the times I've ever used it.
Speaker 2: But CBS News found a tape of a second instance.
Speaker 3: It reappeared in the New York Times with a new charge that Biden had appropriated a famous litany from the late Robert Kennedy about what the gross national product cannot measure.
Speaker 4: Cannot measure the health of our children
Speaker 3: The health of our children.
Speaker 1: The quality of our education
Speaker 3: The quality of their education.
Speaker 1: The joy of their play
Speaker 3: For the joy of their play.
Speaker 1: Biden gave Kennedy no credit. He's also quoted or paraphrased John Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and British Labor Party leader, Neil Kinnock, all without credit.
Speaker 2: Joseph Biden admitted today that he committed plagiarism when he was in law school. He said it was a mistake, but that it was unintentional.
Speaker 1: He quoted 5 pages of someone else's work without proper citation.
Speaker 4: I've done some dumb things, and I'll do dumb things again. He was given an f. Ladies and gentlemen, I've been dumb.
Speaker 1: To the political community in Washington, it all seems of a piece. Plagiarism at law school, plagiarism on the stump.
Speaker 3: The great communicator. Strike that. The great imitator.
Speaker 5: You don't steal verbatim, or when you do as he did 99% of the time, you give credit.
Speaker 1: Biden's critics say he sells himself as a man whose words and visions can inspire a new generation in politics, but if the thoughts, phrases, and visions really belong to others, it's a form of false advertising.
Speaker 5: Is it a wise idea, though, to take something that personal anyway from another politician and try and appropriate it to your own campaign?
Speaker 3: I think it was a stupid thing to appropriate material that was really very personal. That was someone else's.
Speaker 6: Most people didn't know who he was. You know, Joe Biden, and now they're gonna say, oh, yeah. He's the guy who plagiarized. That's what it's first. Politically, that's devastating.
These clips are devastating. He looks like a Joe Biden wind up doll with somebody else's words coming out.
Speaker 1: If they're going to do things that are stupid as well as immoral, then they're probably too dumb to have the job of president.
Speaker 5: Voters are gonna have to
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
When Biden marched in the Civil Rights movement. 🧵 https://t.co/CDpyFAEbbo
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was involved in the civil rights movement as a high school kid, desegregating movie theaters and restaurants. I sat in black churches next to Jewish rabbis, preparing to desegregate movie theaters. Despite not actually marching, I remained engaged in civil rights causes since I was 18. Despite being reminded that I did not march, I continued to tell the story. This behavior is strange.
Translation: I participated in civil rights activities as a teenager, desegregating establishments and sitting in churches. Even though I didn't physically march, I stayed committed to civil rights causes. Despite being reminded of this, I continued to share the story, which is odd.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I
Speaker 1: marched in the civil rights movement, I did not march with a 12 point program. I marched with tens of thousands of others to change attitudes, and we changed attitudes.
Speaker 2: He lied to voters according to The New York Times, quoting aids of of Biden's about having marched in the civil rights movement.
Speaker 0: I got involved in the civil rights movement. I got involved in desegregated movie theaters. They organized voter registration drives from the time I got involved as a high school kid in the civil rights movement. But I was a kid involved in the civil rights movement, desegregating restaurants and movie theaters in my state. From the time I got involved, the kid in the civil rights movement, sit ins and desegregating restaurants.
And I got involved in civil rights movement, just as a kid, and that's why I got so deeply involved in my community with the civil rights movement. When I sat in black churches in east side of Wilmington getting ready to and by the way, next to Jewish 2 Jewish rabbis, getting ready to go out and desegregate movie theaters in Delaware. I come out of the civil rights and I start off in the black churches and we'd go from there to desegregate movie theaters. For real, I got involved in the civil rights movement. From the time I've been 18 years old, I've been involved in causes from the civil rights movement.
Got involved in the civil rights movement and desegregating restaurants, that kind of thing. Coming out of the civil rights movement and being involved with Jewish community as a kid in the civil rights movement. I got involved with civil rights movement. Get ready to go out. You said you did.
Restaurants and movie theaters. That's what got me involved in civil rights as a kid. I got very engaged, in my case, the civil rights movement.
Speaker 2: Quote, more than once, advisers had gently reminded mister Biden of the problem with this formulation. He had not actually marched during the civil rights movement. And more than once, mister Biden assured them that he understood and kept telling the story anyway. That is really, really weird.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
What do you make of this one? https://t.co/OXdo2HqH0K
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have regular phone calls with Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk, discussing Europe's reluctance to impose sanctions on Russia. Last year, I withheld a billion-dollar tranche until Ukraine fired its chief prosecutor. We are creating a roadmap for Ukraine's political steps and security guarantees from Russia. Ukraine has made progress in energy, but faces challenges like granting special status to regions. I believe they will succeed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I I am not the pen pal, but the phone pal of Poroshenko and Arseniy Yatsenyuk and now the speaker. I literally, without exaggeration, the last, 4 years, I'm on the phone 2 to 3 hours a week with with with those folks. There's an overwhelming instinct in Europe to say, hey. Before you guys became president, this was owned by Russia anyway.
They had a puppet there. What difference does it make? What the hell is the difference? Why are you making us engage in these sanctions? You remember last year, I was authorized to say we do the second tranche of a $1,000,000,000 and he didn't fire his his, chief prosecutor.
And because I have the confidence of the president, I was there. I said, I'm not signing it. Until you fire him, we're not signing, man. Get it straight. We're not doing it.
Till you form a new government and you actually bring in someone who will move on this, we're not playing. Not because we're trying to play hardball, because we know if they give an excuse to the EU, there are at least 5 countries right now that wanna say, woah, we want out. At least 5 right now. And so, what we put together, we're putting together now is a basic detailed roadmap of who goes first and who goes second. There's 2 pieces of this, folks.
1 is the security guarantees that are to flow from Russia. Into the political steps that Ukraine has to take. And some of the steps are very difficult to take. They've already done the energy piece. They've done some other things.
But my point is that when you say the dumb boss is gonna have a special status and you're gonna amend your constitution, it's like saying, okay, you know, Texas and Wyoming Texas is gonna have a special status that we don't want because we want, Mexico to have more influence in Texas. And we're gonna pass that through the United States Congress. So there's some really tough stuff they've gotta do. They're willing I'm convinced they will do it.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 1993, Joe Biden delivered a speech calling Black men “predators on our streets.” Enjoy this 🧵 and kindly retweet. https://t.co/Ue5l00hoYB
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must take action against young people who pose a threat, regardless of their upbringing. If we don't intervene now, they may become predators in the future. Society's neglect has contributed to the presence of dangerous individuals on our streets. It is crucial to address this issue to protect our families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take back the streets. It doesn't matter whether or not the person that is accosting your son or daughter or my son or daughter, my wife, your husband, my mother, your parents, It doesn't matter whether or not they were deprived as a youth. It doesn't matter or not whether or not they had no background that enabled them to have to, become, social become socialized into the fabric of society. It doesn't matter whether or not they're the victims of society. The end result is they're about to knock my mother on the head with a lead pipe, shoot my sister, beat up my wife, take on my sons.
So I don't wanna ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street. That's number 1. There's a consensus on that. Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing because they literally I yield myself 3 more minutes.
Because they literally have not been socialized. They literally have not had an opportunity. We should focus on them now. If we don't, they will or a portion of them will become the predators 15 years from now. And madam president, we have predators on our streets that society has in fact, in part because of its neglect, created.
Again, it does not mean because we created them that we somehow forgive them or do not take them out of society to protect my family and yours from
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
What is this? 2013... Enjoy this thread 👆🧵 https://t.co/gr3enG7gOF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I had 2 brain aneurysms, requiring surgery where they had to remove the top of my head. The doctor said my chances of surviving were 35-50%. I asked about potential side effects if I lived, and he mentioned speech issues due to the location of the aneurysm. I wished they had told me this before my presidential campaign to avoid complications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I, I had 2 cranioloneuroysms, and they literally had to take the top of my head off. I mean, you take a saw and they cut your head off and go in to find the artery that is one was leaking, the other that hadn't before it burst. So it's an absolutely true story. I said, what are my chances of getting off this table and being completely normal? He said, well, your chances of living are a lot better.
35 out of a 100 50 out of a 100 make it. I was I might as well be the one. I said, what's the most likely thing that will happen if I, if I live? But what he said, well, the side of the brain that the first artery the first aneurysm is on controls your ability to speak. And I thought, why the hell didn't they tell me this before the 88 campaign?
Could have saved us all a lot of trouble. You know what I mean?
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 1989 Joe Biden said we need to hold all drug users accountable, because if they are no drug users there would be no appetite for drugs and there would be no market for them. 🧵 👆 https://t.co/FrcdfLPhiG
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must hold all drug users accountable to align with the president's stance. Without drug users, there would be no demand or market for drugs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the line with what the president is calling for, we have to hold every drug user accountable. Because if there are no, no drug users, there would be no appetite for drugs. There'd be no market for them.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Tom Brokaw Exposes Joe Biden’s Corruption back in 2008 🧵 #BidenThread 👆 https://t.co/YhVITgsxkK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I worked for a company that wanted a bankruptcy bill passed, receiving campaign contributions from them. I opposed a bill Senator Obama supported. I voted against a warning on predatory lending and opposed strengthening bankruptcy protections. My son worked for the company too. It wasn't wrong for him to earn money while I protected their interests because he could've made more elsewhere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out of law school by a big company here in Delaware that is in the credit card business, MBNA. He got about $100,000 a year as I recall. You received $214,000 in campaign contributions from the company and from its employees. At the same time, you were fighting for a bankruptcy bill that, MBNA really wanted to get passed through the senate, making it much tougher for everyone to file bankruptcy. Senator Obama was opposed to the bill.
Among other things, you couldn't, in fact, claim that you had a problem because of big medical bills. You voted against an amendment that would call for a warning on predatory lending. You also called for, you opposed efforts to strengthen the protection of people in bankruptcy. This has been an issue that you've heard about before. Your son was working for the company at the same time.
In retrospect, wasn't it inappropriate for someone like you in the middle of all this to have your son collecting money from this big credit card company while you were on the floor protecting its interest?
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My son graduated from Yale Law School. The starting salary in Wall Street is a $140,000 a year if he went to lawyer. Options he had. He came home to work for a bank.
Surprise, surprise, number 1.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Joe Biden didn't want black children to go to white schools. 🧵👆 https://t.co/7tPzMzYkXC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the issue of busing is not about north versus south, but rural versus urban. They believe that applying the same standards to urban areas as in rural areas is problematic. Despite criticism, they predict that young black leaders will support their stance against busing, which they view as a bankrupt policy. They emphasize the need for federal courts to determine constitutional violations in school desegregation cases based on specific intent to segregate. The speaker references legal standards for establishing intent, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We keep talking about this thing as being north versus south. That's not the issue. It is rural versus urban, and most of the busing that's taking place to date has taken place in rural areas, whether be administratively ordered or court ordered. Now we're moving into applying the same standards to urban areas, and it is a standard that doesn't make sense. It doesn't apply.
It doesn't hold. We're moving from trying to in this in in in urban areas, we've had integrated facilities but segregated neighborhoods. And in rural areas, we've traditionally had integrated neighborhoods but segregated facilities. And they've applied the same standard and the same test. So this north south thing is not really the issue.
As professor Nathan Glaser at Harvard has indicated, as doctor Armour of the Rand Corporation, as James Coleman, as I just tell 3 days of hearing, 22 days of hearing in judiciary committee on another bill I have beyond this that deals busing. And there is uniform opinion of those who testified that it is not a north south, it's an urban rural question, the distinction. But no matter what your intent, there are going to be those who say it's a it's a segregated thing. It's a it's a question of of race, and that you have set back the movement of desegregation of schools. How would you answer that?
The way I answer that is I predict that the young black leadership of America will overwhelmingly decide with me. I predict that in 1980 80 4, my position will be totally vindicated by the sociologist and by civil rights African you know, I come from that side of the track. That's where I'm from. I was a defense lawyer. I handle civil rights cases.
I sat in on route 40. I mean, I you know, I'm not I'm not from the other side of this, and I happen to think that the one way to ensure that you set the civil rights movement in America further back is to continue to push busing because it's a bankrupt policy. And that's that's that's that's why I think I'll be vindicated. I don't I don't include myself with pro or anti busing forces. I think the only group that can determine whether or not a constitutional violation exists is the federal courts of the United States of America.
No one else has that right. Secondly, a federal court of the United States of America determining a violation of the constitution with regard to school desegregation cases must find that there is a specific intent to segregate before they can order busing. That I abide by. That I legislate by. That I hold by.
And they're they're the standards we should repair to. It's difficult to establish intent, but it's clearly possible. Factually, it can be established. The court has the Supreme Court 8 to 0, 8 to 0, ruled yesterday that they must find that, and you very well know as covering this area as long as you have that there is there are legal standards by which you bring in burdens of proof to establish whether or not there was a specific intent.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Victor Davis Hanson on why the left is terrified of Donald Trump. Worth the listen! https://t.co/zVY6totAcp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is seen as a threat by the left, fearing his intelligence and potential comeback. They are worried about potential investigations into Biden's family and their own actions. The left manipulates narratives to suit their agenda and avoid accountability. They push for loyalty to avoid consequences, creating a divide in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They look at Trump as a vampire, and they put a stake in his heart. But they're afraid that that stake could come out any time, that he's undying and they're afraid of him. They are terrified of you know why they're terrified of him because they think he's smarter this time and he has just caused to really get angry because of what they did to him. They can write all of the Atlantic monthly and they can write all the new Yorker clever little essays about Donald Trump was a threat to democracy, or they can write all their little Molly Ball Time essays, how clever and brilliant they were with their cabal and their conspiracies to get rid of them. But deep down inside, they know that if the right ever did that to Barack Obama or Joe Biden, they could have really made something out of the fact that Barack Obama had a hot mic expose where he told the president of Russia, you tell Vladimir that I will be flexible on missile defense.
That's the security of the United States of America. If he gives me space in my last election and Putin did do that, that's an impeachable offense if a phone call to Ukraine is. So they don't understand that. That the right could have done that to them and they understand now the right probably will do that to them for their own survival and they are scared. They're saying if a MAGA candidate wins and they win the house and the senate were cooked because they're gonna get special prosecutors and they're gonna go after the Biden family like they've never gone after anybody and they're gonna find stuff because we know joe is crooked And then they're going to go after Mary Garland and they're gonna go after Majorcas and they're not gonna stop.
And that's why they're scared and they're gonna do any, everybody thinks that the danger passed, they got what they wanted. No. No. No. No.
No. You're never gonna see anything like what they're gonna do in 2024. All this could have been reconciled. All they had to do was say Donald Trump should not be president if that's what they believe. And we're not gonna do any law fair.
We're not gonna try to change the voting laws. We're not gonna pack the court. We're not gonna let in 2 states. We're not gonna try to abolish the senate filibuster. We're not gonna try to change the voting ID laws.
We're just gonna play on the onto the rules that we have. We don't need $419,000,000 by Mark Zuckerberg Infuse. We don't need Sam Bankman freed, the crook giving us a 100,000,000. We're not gonna go under the radar with George. We're just going to show you the American people how we think Donald Trump should not be president, and we'll have a feral, and they can't do that.
They don't trust themselves. They think, you know what? Anybody in his right mind would close that border right now. Close the border. Anybody in his right mind would recall all of those DAs that have destroyed these major cities.
Anybody in his right mind would not beg the Saudis or the Venezuelans or the Russians or the Iranians to pump oil on the eve of a midterm, or drain the strategic petroleum when you have so much natural gas and oil and Nobody in their right mind would do that. And nobody in their right mind would ever just pull out of Afghanistan without warning just so Joe Biden can say that on the 20th anniversary of 911 or the original October, invasion of Afghan, I'm the president that got us out. Nobody would do that and nobody would print $6,000,000,000,000 when there's an pent up demand post COVID lockdown, and there's a supply chain disruption, and pull that money without any audit or examination of who got it and why and how it was spent, but to inflate the economy and ruin it. Nobody would do that. And so they know that and they know that they can't take that record to the American people.
They have deductive mind because they're ideologue. So they start with a premise that we're for social justice and for equity of result. And so we're moral morally superior and smarter than anybody else and therefore, we are entitled to do things that other people don't do. And so if under the cover of COVID and frightening people about COVID, we can change all the voting laws so that 30% instead of voting absentee and early voting shall become 70% in most states with very little audit of the level necessary to authenticate most ballots. They just do all this stuff because they start with the deductive principle.
We are better. This is the vision and therefore, the following must happen. And if things don't fit the narrative, then they go after the person. They censor it. They do that's how they work.
And if you keep that in mind, then everybody makes sense. And what I'm saying is they go on from one lie to the next. So everybody now knows that Donald Trump, we just discussed it, was impeached for things that Joe Biden got away with. Okay. Everybody knows a laptop was authentic.
Everybody knows that now. Everybody knows it would have made a big difference on that debate when Donald Trump said it was. And Joe Biden said, no. No. No.
51 authorities. Everybody knew that Dashinko and Charles or whatever his name, Dolan and Christopher Steele were frauds, and especially Clinton Simpson, and that Hillary Clinton took over an old never Trumper file, inflated it with a $1,000,000, got the FBI on it to hire Christopher Steele as a consultant informant, hid her so called legal expenses, and she was fined and cited for that violation through Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, DNC, and that that file was fraudulent. It was made up. I said that from the first time I saw it. Everything in it was false, and yet we wasted 22 months $40,000,000 to know what was obvious.
No apology. In fact, not only no apologies, they got Pulitzer prize winners, some of the reporters. Every time they give these monstrous lies, there's no apologies. They just and they and why should they? Because in their way, they're just narratives.
They're postmodern Foucauldian, Lacan, Derrida, Narrida narratives. They were useful. So that's what they looked at. Well, they were useful at the time because when we went through the Mueller investigation, when we went through the laptop, we crippled Donald Trump and therefore, we were able to stop him. We had anonymous.
Anonymous. He was burrowed deep into the homeland security. He was a minor official, but we said he was one of the major operatives in the Trump administration. We lied. And then we printed his op ed because it did what it was supposed to do.
It weakened this right wing agenda, so they think. And we got admiral McRaven. And he came in and wrote an op ed and said Trump should leave the sooner, the better. And then we got all of the 4 stars, McCaffrey, McCrystal, all of them to say that Trump was Hitler, that he was Mussolini, that he was a liar, that he was danger. We got Mark Milley to call the Chinese.
We did all of this and yes, we do not want this to be done to us. If right now a retired 4 star general says that Joe Biden is senile or he's dangerous or the Afghanistan is a disaster and he should be removed sooner or later, or his weaponization of the DOJ or the FBI is moo Mussolini like, or his hounding of individual people at school boards, or the way he conducted the Mar a Lago raid is remnant of it's Nazi like. And I'm just quoting from what they've said. You know what's gonna happen to those people? You're gonna get Mary Garland to call up the Pentagon, and they're all gonna be slapped with a code 88 uniform code of military justice and they're going to be court martialed for disparaging the commander in chief.
Trust me, they would in 2 seconds and that's not gonna happen. 1st, they're not gonna say anything because they're not equally going to apply their standards of correct Right. Behavior on the part of the and second of all, they're gonna say something with Donald Trump because they know that that the media and the Pentagon are not gonna do anything to them now. Oh man, they would they would destroy them if they ever criticize the commander in chief. They would go after him like you wouldn't believe and they know that.
And so what we're talking about I guess to sum up in this, they understand deterrents. They are saying to the American people, we are SOBs. We're capable of everything and anything. Now which side do you wanna be on? Because if you're on our side, you can do what Hunter Biden is.
There's no consequences. If you want to say that the voting machines are crooked like Jill Stein, go ahead. She did in 2016. If you wanna be Barbara Boxer and 32 Democrats and say, you know what? We're not gonna certify the Ohio count and hold up the whole election.
We're gonna try to do that. Don't worry. They got they did it in 2004. If you're Al Gore and the registrar and the attorney general says, well, the votes have been counted and they have been certified in Florida. Oh, no.
We're going to sue. We're going to sue and hold up the entire election for a month. And so you can do all of that as long as you're on our side. But if you don't do that and you wanna go on the other side, then you're gonna be in big trouble. And that's the message that that they're trying to say.
That's what we're really getting down to. Join the winning side. It's sort of like in the Soviet Union. If you're part of the nomenclature and you join the party, you're exempt. If you're not, well, you're on your own.
People say to me, oh, you're an academic and you spent your whole life. How did you deal with those 94% of all academics are left wing? And I'm just using that percentage because that's a percentage of those who give money to political campaigns. 94% go to left wing or democratic causes. And then they said, why are they so left wing?
Is it they have tenure. They're exempt from the worrying about losing their job. They have guaranteed step increases. They have a 9 month work year. Is it because they teach their 1 or 2 classes a semester?
What is it that makes them are they idealistic because they deal with words or I did I said, no. No. No. No. They understand with if you wanna be get tenure and you wanna be promoted and you wanna be like, you just pair it the majority cause.
If it paid better, they'd be fascist.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Joe Biden claims to have taken the train multiple times over the Francis Scott Key bridge. But the bridge doesn’t have any train tracks. https://t.co/gBEZTDQ9kp
Video Transcript AI Summary
A container ship hit the Francis Scott Key Bridge around 1:30. I've crossed that bridge many times commuting from Delaware by train or car.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At about 1:30, a container ship struck to Francis Scott's Key Bridge, which I've been over many, many times commuting from the state of Delaware on a train or by car.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Listen to this heartbroken mother. Hillary Clinton, you should sit this one out. Benghazi was the bloodbath and it will always matter. #Benghazi #bloodbath #Freyja https://t.co/dxNdzqifjK
Video Transcript AI Summary
My son Sean was killed in the Benghazi attack. He was a proud member of the US foreign service. Sean told me he was going to die the night before the attack. He was murdered by terrorists. I blame Hillary Clinton for his death. She lied about the attack being terrorism. I saw her lie to me and call me a liar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My son, Sean, was one of 4 brave Americans killed during the 2,012 terrorist attack at Benghazi. Sean was a wonderful son and father to my 2 amazing grandchildren, Samantha and Nathan, now 10 and 11. He was proud to serve his country with the United States foreign service The last time I talked to Sean, the night before the terrorist attack, he told me, mom, I am going to die. All security had been pulled from the embassy, he explained. And when he asked why, he never received a response.
Nobody listened. Nobody seemed to care. The very next day, he was murdered by radical Islamic terrorists. To this day, I don't even know why a computer guy like Sean was sent to Benghazi. That night, we lost sons, brothers, fathers, and husbands.
We lost 4 brave Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice for the country they chose to serve, and the American people lost the truth. For all of this loss, for all of this grief, for all of the cynicism, the tragedy and Benghazi has wrought upon America. I blame Hillary Clinton. I blame Hillary Clinton personally for the death of my son. That's personally.
In an email to her daughter shut shortly after the attack, Hillary Clinton blamed it on terrorism. But when I saw Hillary Clinton She's a liar. She sure is. She sure is. She lied to me and then called me a liar.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
New Trump ad is smoking hot! 🔥 #VoteTrump #Freyja https://t.co/om1ccjjMbU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump buys ads in East Coast newspapers to share his views on foreign policy. He criticizes American involvement in the Middle East and emphasizes the need to prioritize the country's interests. Despite rumors of running for president, he denies any intention but leaves the possibility open. Trump's strong lead in battleground states and the Republican primary indicates his nomination is secure. He vows to continue fighting for the forgotten people and promises to never disappoint them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald Trump running for president. He bought Wolf age ads in 3 East Coast Newspapers today stating his views on foreign policy, and these ads will win him a following. In the ads, he says, there's nothing wrong with American foreign policy. That little backbone won't cure. And he said, we have no business spending ourselves broke in the Middle East, protecting ships that are not ours, and oil that we don't need.
Rumblings in the Trump camp right as far as the presidency.
Speaker 1: Somebody has to help this country. And if they don't, the country the world are in big trouble. Because within a short period of time, as sure as we're sitting here, there's not gonna be a country and there's not gonna be a world. I have no intention of running for president. And if it got so bad, I would never wanna rule it out totally.
Speaker 2: Together, we will determine the course of America and the world for many, many years to come. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. That all changes starting right here and right now because this moment is your moment. It belongs to you. The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
Trump leading in 5
Speaker 1: of the 6 most important battleground states. Biden continues to trail Donald Trump. Our latest polling out of Iowa also shows former president Trump is a 30 point lead over his nearest rival. The republican primary is over. Donald Trump basically has this nomination locked up.
Speaker 2: Everyone is listening to you now. I will fight for you with every breath in my body, and I will never ever let you down. My fellow Americans, our movement is far from over. In fact, our fight has only just begun.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Have you heard this leaked audio from the Hunter Biden laptop? https://t.co/L6Xi127Xxt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Daphne Guinness will be overshadowed by my presence if my dad becomes president. I believe in using attention with intention and influencing my dad's platform positively. I have no fear or doubts about my abilities, and I see drug use as a habit I may choose to break. It has allowed me to break from the past and may lead to personal growth. I have had the epiphany and know what I need to do.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Daphne Guinness will literally be a blip in a radar on the screen as compared to my presence if my dad becomes president of the United States. Mhmm. She will be like a people on my in terms of the way in which people will beyond this, and you have no clue. I am Daphne Guinness already. Yeah.
I'm more than Daphne Guinness. No one gives a about what you think about Daphne Guinness, honey, except the Tatler. I was on the front page of every newspaper including the, I mean, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, not just the Tattler. Yeah. And so my point is is that I believe that's an opportunity to say the things and to show the things, and to reveal the things through this project that we wanna reveal.
Because it it literally gives it because you will have attention. I think that the most important thing, if you are me, is to use your attention with intention. You will not get across to everybody, and I have figured out a long time ago. If you're going to be involved in politics the way that I am, which is to to choose to engage with my father in that life because I believe in what he does Mhmm. If you're going to, then you one of your obligations is to use that platform with intent.
It's to not allow the platform to sit on top of you. Mhmm. Mhmm. I'm allowing the platform to sit on top of me right now. Well, what happens is if, you know, if your dad becomes president, for instance, or if he runs Mhmm.
It's a very, if if I don't know if it will be exposed to that degree, but if it does Wonderful. If it does, then it's a possibility for your dad to talk about drug reform and to talk about and to push He's gonna talk about drug reform and any other things I want him to. Mhmm. He'll talk about, anything that I want him to that he believes in. If I say this is important to me, then he will work a way in which to make it a part of his of his platform.
My dad respects me more than he respects anyone in the world, and I know that to be certain. So it is not gonna be about whether or my dad thinks it's going to affect his politics. It no. It won't. It's not gonna be whether or not he's gonna be embarrassed.
I mean, he never will. It's not gonna I'm all of those concerns that you have with all of the people that you know that are in the that are the children of, I have none of them. Not a single one. The only one that I have is the is the knowledge that it's a different world, not by choice. But I am understanding of that because the person that has lived that life, that has given me this life, a person I most admire in the world, and I would never change it because it's bigger than me.
Everyone else thinks it talks about how how can you be as good as your dad? I'm better than my dad. You know why I'm better than my dad? Because my dad tells me I'm better than him since I was 2 years old. So all of those fears that you think that I have of people not liking me or that I don't love myself, and first I have to go down and I'd be willing to really care about yourself and understand and put yourself out there.
Baby, have you seen me? Do I not put myself out there? Mhmm. Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, all of it Yeah. I put out there Yeah. To you or to the homeless person. I don't fear that. You know, I don't fear that.
Because the man the man I most admire in the world, that god to me thinks I'm a god. And my brother did too. And the 3 of us, it was literally I had the support to know I can do anything. What does he say about you doing crack? Just trying to He said stop.
Yeah. He's scared to death. And what do you say I mean, how does that affect you when when he says that? The same way that it would affect you if the person you love most in the world wanted you to stop. And the realization that stopping, even for the person you love most in the world, is such a hard thing because it is a it literally look.
It's not about whether or not I want to. It's about whether I really want to. No. But what's really want to and what's want to, and what is whether to make a choice or not a choice? I don't know.
This is a habit. My friend Right now, I know that I can I don't want to stop now? But you never know you never wanna stop. But that's the thing. It's like, there's you can always do it tomorrow, but tomorrow is always tomorrow.
Do it now? For real. That's when you to to things like that, I get it. But you're not an addict, and so you have no idea that that is literally like you telling me that you know the sky is blue, but you don't seem to realize it. I realize it.
I know now is now. And I know how to do it. And I'm saying to you is that I don't know if I wanna do it tomorrow. I don't wanna know if I do it now. I don't know.
Because you don't wanna stop. Because it's fear. You have fear. Because what happens if you stop? Then you have no excuses.
Oh, yeah. I have a million excuses. You know I have a million excuses. Everybody has excuses. I don't have to use drugs as an excuse.
You act as if drug addicts are the only one who come up with this idea that they're afraid because if they don't, continue to use drugs, they're not gonna have excuses. What a bunch of people know that they get in their car in the morning, and if they don't go to the gym, they're gonna end up dying of obesity, But they don't go. Why? Because they're afraid. They're afraid that they're gonna be thin, and they're gonna be healthy, and they're gonna be able to gauge in life more.
And they don't have any excuses not to do that. Well, it's a mixture of things. It's not But it's just the same. Habit as well. It's habit.
And habit is the biggest thing that's happening here. The fact of the matter is, is that I have not had the fucking reason to break the ease of the habit I'm in. And the reason is is because I don't like what? I nothing has captured my imagination until now. And this.
And that's why I have to start to do it. Because what I'm realizing now is this, is that my choice to do this, the drug, is brought me to an understanding and allowed me to break from everything in the past. Have you ever thought about this? Maybe this is the greatest thing that's ever happened to me. Maybe this is literally the continuation and the continuum of what is going to be the thing that makes me the person that my father believes I am.
Believe my father believes I am. Everybody says that that the person my father thinks I will never become. For me, it's the person I know But at what point does that happen? Like, are you always constantly looking at Well, isn't that the isn't that the word? Looking for this epiphany and No.
It's not. I've had the epiphany. Crack fire. I've had the epiphany. Yeah.
No. I've had the epiphany. I know now.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
50 insane and disturbing facts about the CIA you never knew. https://t.co/XT0ptFFsYU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses 50 disturbing facts about the CIA, including mind control experiments, assassination plots, and collaboration with former Nazis. One of the most talked-about cases is the mysterious death of Frank Olson, a scientist involved in secret mind control experiments. Olson fell from a window after being drugged with LSD, and there are suspicions that he may have been murdered to prevent him from revealing classified information. The video also highlights the CIA's involvement in unethical experiments, such as testing drugs on unsuspecting individuals and using prisoners as subjects. These revelations raise questions about the CIA's actions and their impact on individuals and society. (148 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mind melting drugs, truth serums, UFOs, and contacting former Nazis for help with unethical experiments. These are the 50 most insane and disturbing CIA facts you never knew. Number 50, the CIA assassination manual Number 49. A man introduced to this treatment fell from room 10 18 a. His name was Frank Olson and he's become one of the most talked about names in modern American history.
What happened to him and what he did for the CIA is arguably the CIA's biggest secret, so we'll talk a lot about it today. Olson was a scientist who was part of secret mind control experiments. Days before his death, he told his wife, I've made a terrible mistake. What that mistake was has been talked about for decades. What was his terrible mistake?
That night, Olson had been sharing a room with CIA agent Robert Lashbrook. After the fall, Lashbrook looked out of the broken window of his and Olsen's room, but instead of rushing down to check on Olsen, he stayed in the bathroom sitting on the toilet with his head in his hands. When the cops and Pastore entered the room and found him like that, the phone rang and Lashbrook asked, can I answer that? Lashbrook told him it was a bad connection and he put the receiver down. Later, Pastore asked the hotel phone operator if any calls had been made from that room before he and the cops got there.
These were the days when operators had to take names and put people through. She said, yes, a call had been made, which was listed as from doctor Harold Abramson calling from South Oaks Hospital on Long Island. She stayed on the line to eavesdrop. One man said, well, he's gone. The other said, well, that's too bad.
Lashbrook denied it but why would she have lied? Number 48, Frank Olson was a very clever bacteriologist who became a biological warfare scientist. His official job was in the special operations division or SOD at Fort Detrick, which was where the US biological weapons program was being developed. Olson got in deep more so than other scientists. He knew the CIA's biggest secrets and he had a conscience, which was something not really required in American intelligence.
Olson saw thousands of animals being killed by the chemicals he and his team invented. Chemicals one day to be used on humans. Olson's son, Eric, once said he'd come to work in the morning and see piles of dead monkeys. Olson had a heart. He didn't like seeing what was later reported as the deaths of 1,000 upon 1,000 of sheep, cows, goats, horses, rabbits, pigs, guinea pigs, and monkeys.
At least 2,000 rhesus monkeys. Lashbrook and Lieutenant Colonel Vincent Ruett of the Army Chemical Corps had been with him before he died. Ruett was Olson's supervisor at the SOD. A name you really shouldn't forget is that of the now infamous CIA chemist, Sydney Gottlieb. Not just a chemist, but a master spy and assassination expert.
Number 47. Olson was invited to a retreat to take place on Wednesday 18th November 1953 at a cabin on Deep Creek Lake in Maryland. Olson was one of 5 army scientists from the special operations division of the chemical corps that turned up on the day. Also at the meeting were 4 CIA scientists who were part of operation MK Ultra, which you'll understand soon. As evening approached on the 2nd day, a bottle of Cointreau was produced and Glasses were poured.
Olson drank as did the others. His drink and all but 2 other men had been spiked with lysergic acid diethylamide, LSD, an extremely potent hallucinogen that could be derived from the ergo fungi. The CIA was interested in it as a truth potion or a mind wiping, mind destroying drug. Number 46. The CIA led virtually 1000 of operations during the cold war years.
Some of them quite ridiculous sounding. One was operation scotola. Scotola is the compound found in poop. It stinks. That's why the operatives like to call it operation stinky.
The scientists were asked to create the foulest substance they could, so they started to put together a chemical concoction. This was just to make enemies smell bad. Spray a civil rights leader with scottole, and he might not go through with his speech that day. It could be useful if you could stink a place out. Evidence shows one plan was to spray it on Black Panther Newspapers to disrupt distribution.
Number 45. Many of the people who ended up working for the CIA had during the war been employed by the Office of Strategic Services or OSS. One of them was Boris Pash, who'd been a Hollywood high school teacher before the war. At the end of the war, he was part of a team charged with investigating the so called father of the atomic bomb, Robert Oppenheimer, to find out if he was a Soviet spy. He wasn't, but Pash didn't stop there.
He worked with the CIA post war on a program called PB 7. This was an operation handling what the CIA called wet affairs, which meant things such as kidnappings and assassinations. Wet because they were often bloody. Pash also worked for the creepy sounding health alteration committee, a euphemism for murder or maiming. The committee existed from 1952 to 1968.
During that time, one of their operations was to dose a high ranking politician in the Philippines with LSD. Another operation was to get a fancy handkerchief to the Iraqi leader, Abel Akareem Kassem, who came to power after the Iraqi monarchy was overthrown. The SOD had created a substance so that as soon as anyone used that handkerchief, He had a scientist collect paralytic shellfish poison as much as they could get. They worked with a herpes like virus and a botulinum toxin that could be sprayed into someone's face to cause paralysis and death. The documents show they've even worked with substances that could induce cancer through covert means.
Documents show at one point a former FBI agent named Robert Mayhew was given several capsules, each containing a deadly dose of botulism. The agent passed them on to mafia kingpin, John Handsome Johnny Rossellini. The CIA often used gangsters to do their hits for them. Sometimes the gangsters were then allowed to go on with their business, which was filling America's streets and slums with heroin. Investigation showed the CIA tested some of those products in Haiti and Guyana because as a former SOD researcher explained, there were no laws or rules pertaining to what we were doing.
He added, the people we used in these experiments were of no consequence to anyone. Families, relatives were no problem. Number 43. In Berlin, some terrible things happened. Frank Olson made trips to Germany where suspected former Nazis or real former Nazis were interrogated at safe houses.
It didn't sit well with Olson. He was there when they interrogated the so called expendables whose interviews were called terminal. They had suspected Soviet agent in a Berlin safe house and gave him an unknown substance. The now declassified documents read, examination at redacted clinic identified sickness caused partial dissolution of brain tissues. Now redacted husband redacted is developing similar symptoms.
Number 42. Olsen was never right after being spiked with LSD. He went home and told his wife, Alice, that he'd made a terrible mistake. He was going to quit his job, but his colleagues believed he was having a breakdown. His wife didn't think that though.
Were his colleagues telling the truth, or did they have ulterior motives? His boss, Ruet, said he would take Olson to see a professional who just so happened to be the LSD doctor Abramson. They took him to New York, and you know what happened there. Interestingly, the last time Frank Olson ate with his wife, he pushed the food away and said it was poisoned. You'll know why later.
Abramson suggested Olson be sent to Chestnut Lodge, an insane asylum in Maryland nicknamed the House of Horrors and Psychoville. Residents who lived nearby said they sometimes heard screaming from the hospital. Little did they know it was a CIA hospital where medical experiments happened. Olson was due to go there when he and Lashbrook and Ruitz checked into the Statler Hotel. Number 41.
The mind experiments happened under different operations, and each of these operations had sub operations. Operations. The larger ones were project Bluebird, project Artichoke, MK Naomi, and the well known one, MK Ultra. A document that the CIA didn't manage to destroy explained the material drugs could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting information, and implementing suggestions and other forms of mental control. Sometimes it was merely about disruption.
1 CIA document states that there was a plan to slip 90 milligrams of LSD into the president of the Philippines drink right before he made a speech to his country. Number 40, on January 8, 1953, a 40 2 year old professional tennis player named Harold Blauer was depressed. So depressed, he was at a psychiatric facility in New York. He checked himself in. But once there, things got much, much worse.
He became psychotic. His family had no idea what had happened. This hospital, New York's Bellevue Hospital, had signed a contract with the SOD so the latter could do a psychological investigation of potential chemical warfare agents on humans. Blauer was given LSD on 4 occasions. He hated it.
It scared him. The day before he was to be released, they injected him a 5th time with a mescaline derivative code named ea 1298. Documents show it took considerable persuasion to get him to agree to it. He'd been told these drugs would help him, not that they were chemical warfare agents. After that injection, he dropped down dead.
A woman in another ward was injected too. She later said, I've been in hell. Why did they put me in hell? Number 39. Hellish events happened in Canada too.
In Montreal, doctor Ewan Cameron was working with CIA money through one of the CIA's many front businesses. Cameron had thought for a long time that the human brain could be wiped and rewritten, that you could effectively change a person's personality, make a depressed person happy. For the CIA, the potential was making a good person a killer or rewriting the brain of an assassin. Cameron would put his psychiatric patients into an induced coma and then play tapes on a loop to them for days, weeks, or months. He called this de patterning.
When they came out of it, he sometimes gave them a powerful electroconvulsive shock. He also administered potent drugs such as amphetamines or LSD. Patients did not give their consent to this. Many of them had lifelong serious mental health issues. One of his many notes he made states, although the patient was prepared by both prolonged sensory isolation, 35 days, and by repeated de patterning, and although she received 101 days of positive driving, no favorable results were obtained.
Number 38. A Manhattan attorney that investigated the Olson case once told a newspaper, there was motive to kill him. He knew the deepest darkest secrets of the cold war. Would the American government kill an American citizen who was a scientist who was working for the CIA and the army if they thought he was a security risk? There are people who say definitely.
Documents from Operation Bluebird show the CIA wanted to find a way to make people do things they wouldn't usually do. One document written by the CIA boss, Allen Dulles, to Bluebird project leader, Sheffield Edwards, asks, can we create by post hypnotic control an action contrary to a person's basic moral principles? Could we seize a subject by post hypnotic control and have him crash an airplane, wreck a train, etcetera? This was an eyes only project, meaning very top secret. Under Bluebird, they also created what they said was a truth drug.
It seems some of these drugs weren't very safe. After one experiment, the Bluebird physician wrote, subject's respiration became labored and painful. Subject became completely irrational and disoriented, and ultimately, subject lost all ability to stand or walk and was carried in a semi conscious condition to his bedroom. Number 37, Allen Dulles was later asked, can a person under hypnosis commit an act against his religious or moral training or upbringing? Dulles replied, yes.
Anything could be done by a person under hypnosis including murder. It gets worse. Number 36. CIA contractor and narcotics bureau agent George Hunter White spiked many people with LSD. He once said about the CIA, where else could a red blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape, and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the all highest?
Under Operation Midnight Climax, he set up a safe house in San Francisco where he paid prostitutes to bring men back to a room. The room had a double mirror. The men were spiked with LSD and the CIA observed sometimes with the prostitute using various verbal cues. Number 35. When such experiments were discovered, it was all over US television.
Then for years after people sued the government, many said they'd been a patient in a hospital and had been given this drug. Some said they met a man in a bar one night and then suddenly gone mad, after which they ended up in a mental hospital for years. White was often the man they'd met that fateful night. He spiked people just for fun sometimes. After the investigations, it was stated no one knows where they, the human test subjects, are now or what effects they might have suffered.
We'll tell you some stories later about this. Number 34, White was a graduate of camp x in Ontario, Canada. Its students sometimes referred to camp x as the school of mayhem and murder. It was basically a paramilitary school where students learned covert action and assassination techniques. The camp's motto was kill or be killed.
Many shady names were under contract with the CIA. 1 was Pierre Lafitte said to be a prolific hitman who worked under project and MK Ultra. Lafitte's name pops up many times in investigations, but he is a bit of a mystery. He was thought to be the CIA's top assassin related to the Corsican mafia whose path crossed with both Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby according to investigative journalist, h p Albirelli. You'll hear more about him later.
Number 33, the CIA worked with a magician, John Mulholland. One of the things he did was teach sleight of hand so CIA agents could slip things in people's drinks. What CIA documents described as delivery mechanisms. He also worked with the CIA on UFOs. Number 32.
While UFOs might seem outlandish, documents show that doctor h Marshall Chadwell, CIA chief of scientific intelligence stated in the 19 fifties, unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major US defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles. In 1952, Chadwell warned that a fair share of the US population is mentally conditioned to the acceptance of the incredible. He said if the Soviets wanted, they could fake a UFO flying over the US and everyone would believe it. Number 31. Documents show that Gottlieb asked Mulholland to investigate the UFO sightings.
He did just that at the famous Kelly Hopkinsville encounter 1955 in which 5 adults and 7 children at a farm swore they saw aliens and fought them off with guns. Number 30. On February 19, 1954, under project Artichoke, the CIA's behavioral research specialist, Morris Allen, put his secretary into a deep trance. As she was sleeping, he hypnotized another secretary and told her if she could not wake her friend up, her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to kill. He then placed the gun, picked it up, and tried to shoot her sleeping colleague.
Success. He'd controlled them. Both women later said they remembered nothing of the ordeal. The CIA has always said it couldn't control people like that but some of the documents seem to state otherwise. Number 29, Alan Dulles once told chief of research staff Paul Gaynor that mind control experiments show promising results.
Number 28, Before he got involved with MK Ultra and Project Artichoke, Gainer had run his own operation in which he tried to find hidden homosexuals in the US government. One man, state department employee John C Montgomery died as a result of Gainer's threat to expose him. Number 27, Gainer wanted to set up a fake left wing organization. And if any illegal immigrants joined it, he would arrest them and use them for drug experiments. He also wanted to use 4,000 military personnel who were serving court martial sentences.
Number 26. At one point, Gainer debated with Allen if you could really make a person kill someone. Allen shot back that there have already been a number of successful tests with redacted that showed religious and moral inhibitions were not problematic. Allen added that in one instance, an agency employee had been forced to commit harm to fellow employees on a number of occasions. Number 25.
As we said, all this was investigated and it was a huge story at the time. In one investigation, George White's date book was used as evidence. It showed he dosed many people with LSD in 1953 and 1954 just to see what would happen. 1 woman was stroked at a dinner party and had to be hospitalized. Another woman, one of White's wife's friends, was so messed up that she was sent to a mental institution and received psychiatric care for 35 years.
An actress that lived in White's apartment block was spiked and ran up to the roof where she had to be talked down. Number 24. Documents show that doctor Loretta Bender working with doctor Abramson tested LSD on 14 schizophrenic children aged between 6 and 11 with 100 milligrams of LSD daily for 6 weeks. If you know LSD, you know how bad that is. Doctor Alfred m Friedman, also working in tandem with CIA agents, did tests on 12 autistic schizophrenic children who were attending day school.
These may have been therapeutic in nature, but they were still in violation of those children's human rights. Their parents weren't informed and the experiments were very dangerous considering their mental issues. This next one is worse. Number 23. In 1954, an MK Ultra document discusses the possibility of causing cancer in people.
It says, if this hydrocarbon can be produced in a lab by chemical transformation of normal constituents of the human organism, it is possible that the substance may arise in the body through a process of abnormal metabolism and initiate cancer. Number 22. Under the sub project called the Bullpen Project, doctor Carl C Pfeiffer wanted to make people psychotic not control them. Just make them utterly crazy, break them. He tested this at the Atlanta Penitentiary.
Later writing that hallucinations lasted for 3 days characterized by repeated waves of depersonalization. The prisoners had no idea what they were getting into, only that they'd get some extra money. Don't forget that he said 3 days. Number 21. One of them was Marvin Williams.
He later testified the tests went on for weeks. We kept getting handed a glass of what looked like water. Drink it, they said, and flam. The roof exploded. Crazy things happened.
I mean, really crazy. Like not real but happening. It was like I was in a jungle someplace with wild animals all around me. All these crazy beasts trying to kill me. Never again, man.
Never again. In court, Gottlieb later admitted that this was an ultra sensitive project involving psychotic states. He added, we learned a lot from the Atlanta experiments explaining that they knew how disturbed they could make someone. Number 20. In another prison experiment, doctor Harris Isbell worked with the CIA with mostly black prisoners.
While white prisoners did get dosed with LSD including the infamous criminal whitey Bulger, black prisoners were used more often. Bulger, by the way, did not have a history of violence before he was dosed with LSD for weeks on end which he said drove him half mad. Isabel worked at the federal narcotics prison farm where men were sent to get off drugs, mainly So they not only lost their minds, but their habits returned. One prisoner, Edward M Flowers explained, my whole reason for going into the program was to get drugs. We still haven't got to the why we think Olson was killed.
We'll come to that soon but first, let's have a deeper look at the CIA's 1952 assassination manual. Number 19. Former SOD scientist doctor Gerald Yonitz later said, the CIA was always looking for ways to kill people or to make them sick. They had various categories ranging from making someone slightly sick to terminally ill. On the lethal front, they categorized substances ranging from slow kill to quick kill and a good many in between.
He added, we had periodic meetings with the CIA to discuss the how to's of killing people. Frank Olson was there. Operation PB Success is a good example. This was to overthrow a democratically elected president, something the CIA was very good at. The president, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman of Guatemala, was one of the more cherished men in the history of Guatemalan democracy.
A supporter of the poor, which was a little too commie for the US government of the 19 fifties. His name was on what the CIA said was a disposal list. 58 Guatemalans were on the list to be murdered by what the CIA said was their k teams, meaning kill teams. The CIA supported despots and dictators all over the world. Assassination was an important part of the job.
Number 18. The CIA manual says the assassin's best bet is often killing a man with their bare hands. But the manual adds that very few are skillful enough to do it well. You can almost always get away with strangling a man and making it look like something else, said the manual, which we're not sure is still in use today. There's a whole chapter on accidents.
You already know what it said about falls. The manual states when successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated. If you're an older person watching this, you'll remember just how many people fell out of windows in the fifties sixties. When Republican Carl Mundt was asked back then who was a communist agent, he joked, we'll count them as they fall out of the windows. The manual says a killer dose of drugs is always a good option.
It adds an overdose of morphine administered as a sedative, will cause death without disturbance and is difficult to The CIA was breaking bad. As for blunt weapons, the manual says they're best used when the assassin has some anatomical knowledge. The main advantage of blunt weapons it states is their universal availability. Explains a hammer may be picked up anywhere in the world. Was it really necessary to say that to agents?
The manual explains blow should be directed to the temple, the area just below and behind the ear and the lower rear portion of the skull. If that fails, chapter 4 suggest severing the spinal cord with an edge weapon, a knife or severing both jugulars and the carotid blood vessels on both sides of the wind pipe. Number 17. One journalist who spent a long time investigating the CIA's cold war years has said one of the most formidable assassins was Lafitte. In September 1977, the New York Times called Lafitte a special employee of the narcotics bureau.
He was much more than that. It was Lafitte who helped White with those safe houses when people were tortured or recorded after being spiked with LSD by prostitutes. One safe house, a $60 a month studio at 105 West 13th Street in New York was so decked out with surveillance equipment that one former agent joked if you spilled a drink, you'd get electrocuted. Lafitte was called a Jekyll Hyde character. He could be a killer, he could work with police, and he could become a gangster rubbing shoulders with mafia bosses.
Number 16, talking about assassinations, the US Counterintelligence Corps Army CIC, a precursor to the CIA, hired the Nazi torturer Klaus Barbie when the French were looking for him. He got the name the Butcher of Leon since he did some terrifying things to French resistance fighters. He also had a lot of intel, so the US sent him through a rat line to Bolivia where he ended up torturing again for dictators that the US had helped install. But he wasn't the only Nazi helping the CIA. During Operation Bloodstone, many of Barbie's previous Nazi colleagues were also put on the CIA payroll.
These Nazis were recruited to deal with the rising influence of communism within Europe through techniques such as psychological warfare, subversion, sabotage, and miscellaneous operations such as assassination, target capture, and the rescue of allied airmen. Number 15. It's well known the agency worked with the Corsican mafia and turned a blind eye to heroin trafficking into the US in exchange for the gangsters helping the CIA keep French communists under control. The historian William McCoy said the CIA was involved with trafficking on 3 levels. 1, it allied with the traffickers.
2, it helped known traffickers to evade the law. And 3, in his own words, active engagement in the transport of opium and heroin. He added, it's ironic to say the least that America's heroin plague is of its own making. The agency is accused of helping Golden Triangle drug traffickers when the CIA was bombing the Laos, a war crime no less. The agency used its own front organization Air America to transport heroin.
It didn't handle the heroin but provided the transport. DEA agents have even said this. Some investigators have said that CIA director George h w Bush and then Arkansas governor Bill Clinton were also involved in drugs. This hasn't been proven, but a lot of people have said it. Intellectual heavyweight Christopher Hitchens went to Oxford with Clinton and later wrote in his autobiography that he Gary Webb became famous when he investigated the story of the CIA being involved with drug trafficking undertaken by the right wing rebel group it was backing in Nicaragua, the Contras.
The CIA trained and supplied the Contras as they committed heinous human rights abuses including many kidnappings and murders. Webb said he discovered that the CIA was helping the contrast to traffic cocaine to the US which led to the crack cocaine epidemic. The beginning of his first article of a series said, for the better part of a decade, a San Francisco Bay Area drug ring sold tons of cocaine to the Crips and Blood street gangs of Los Angeles and funneled millions of drug profits to a Latin American guerrilla army run by the US Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA has always denied this and other journalists have questioned its veracity. It's never been proven in a court of law.
Still, there is no doubt at all that the CIA over the decades has had a hand in drug trafficking in some way just as drugs at home were a moral panic. Gary Webb died in 2004. His death many people thought was suspicious. Number 13. In the early 19 fifties, the CIA then the CIC wanted to get a hold of the Nazi anthrax expert, doctor Walter b Schreiber.
He testified at the Nuremberg trials after being taken prisoner by the Soviets. Even though he gave evidence, he was accused of conducting gruesome medical experiments at the Auschwitz camp. He escaped the Soviets, and in 1949 ended up working for the CIC. In 1951, 3 scientists from Camp Dietrich traveled from the US to meet him and other Nazi scientists. One of the US team was Frank Olson.
Number 12. Olson also traveled to Vietnam a few times. In Saigon, the CIA station chief was William Colby. Colby helped launch what sometimes called the biggest assassination program in CIA history. That was the Phoenix program which lasted from 1967 to 1972.
It targeted not Vietnamese soldiers but regular civilians. Reports state that 81,740 people suspected of Viet Cong membership were neutralized. Many were brutally tortured. 26,369 were killed. The torture was frankly unbelievable.
It often involved doing sexual things to men and women using various objects, even eels and snakes. A former military officer who was a witness wrote that one favorite was the insertion of the 6 inch dowel into the canal of one of my detainee's ears and the tapping through the brain until dead. That's not surprising when you hear this next one. Number 11. One man they couldn't kill was the Cuban leader Fidel Castro.
Not that they didn't try. Some of the methods were the brainchild of Olson and his team at the SOD. Reports state that they produced an aerosol spray that produces energizers to make the men go insane and possibly hurt themselves. The CIA also thought about someone getting a box of cigars to Castro loaded with a killer toxin. The head of the Cuban task force, Jake Esterline, later admitted that they couldn't find anyone trustworthy enough to do the job.
The CIA, along with the SOD, considered using thallium salts on Castro, a substance women used to get rid of body hair. The CIA's plan was to make Castro's famous beard fall out and therefore, emasculate him in front of his people. The SOD worked very hard to get the concoction right with investigators saying many dogs, cats, monkeys, and sheep lost their hair in the process. Former SOD scientist, Gerald Yonitz, Slater admitted it was a pretty silly project. He said the animals not only lost their hair, but the stuff also sometimes caused paralysis, brain damage and death.
The team wrote this down as unanticipated benefits. The CIA's plan to assassinate Castro also included what it called the gambling syndicate phase which meant hiring the mafia again. Cuba had a lot of casinos and lots of mafia, but this didn't succeed. Even though Pierre Lafitte was involved again, John Maple Spirito, a Corsican mafia guy and a CIA spy were also considered. After the Bay of Pigs Fiasco when the US used Cuban exiles in an attempted land invasion of Cuba, prisoners were taken.
Castro said he'd hand some back so the CIA prepared to give him a skin diving suit in good faith. Sydney Gottlieb later admitted that the suit was heavily dusted inside with the Madura foot fungus. This fungus could produce horrible boils on the skin and end with amputation. Just to make sure the CIA put tuberculosis bacteria in the breathing part. The suit thing never went through nor did the plan to use exploding seashells or a midget submarine loaded with bombs.
The CIA hated Castro so much they even conceived a false flag operation called Operation Northwoods in which they commit a violent act of terrorism against the American people and blame it on Cuba. If that happened, the public would support going to war with Cuba. President Kennedy, not the CIA's favorite person, rejected it. Number 10. Have you heard of the 1962 book, Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess?
It's about an out of control youth that gets his brain fried after committing crimes. The authorities make him watch terrifyingly violent movies to condition his brain to be averse to violence. In real life, a navy staff psychologist named Lieutenant Commander Thomas Narut had actually done work related to this. He wrote a paper asking if violent images and videos were played to men who were predisposed to violence, would they become violent? He wanted to know if you could condition a man to maim or kill.
He said his experiments showed passive aggressive personalities worked best. He said he proved that in experiments at the Naval Neuropsychiatric Laboratory Center in San Diego. The films used in the experiments were extremely violent. He also used movies that dehumanized the enemy. But after a British journalist wrote an article about this in 1975 for the Times newspaper in England, So many US journalists contacted Narut that he suddenly went quiet.
The New York Times picked up the story and citing The Times said, Narut sometimes used convicted murderers from military prisons. Still, that was pretty much the last thing anyone heard of the Clockwork Orange experiments. Okay. Now for something very important. Number 9.
On August 16, 1951, at a village in France called Pont Saint Esprit, something incredibly strange happened. Arguably, one of the strangest things that's happened in human history. It was a quiet day, a normal day in the town, but then people suddenly started walking around babbling to themselves. Lots of people. 1 man then started running, screaming as if wiping invisible bees from his body.
People were taken to doctor Jean Viu. He couldn't believe what he was seeing. People were cracking up in front of him, screaming, fighting monsters that weren't there. His assistants had to hold them down. A local politician took off all his clothes and danced in the town square totally naked.
1 man screamed, my belly is full of snails. They're burning me to death. I am in the water. People were falling in the street shouting at hallucinations. An 11 year old boy tried to strangle his mom.
People had to be tied down, but they ripped off the binds. One person shouted, I am now sending out radio messages everywhere. Get me an x-ray and you can see. Another delirious person screamed, tigers are going to eat us all. They're going to rip us to pieces.
She pointed to the ceiling. She cried out, blood is dripping down on everything. Can't you stop the bleeding? Pets were also dropping dead. Cats, dogs just went crazy and died on the spot.
One guy chewed so hard on the straight jacket they put him in that his teeth fell out on the floor. A 12 year old ran through town screaming that he'd been to the cemetery and the dead had risen from the graves. He shouted, they're coming to eat us, to eat us alive. He told people this who were walking around on all fours now thinking that they were animals. It was described as hell on earth and it went on for 3 days.
A French journalist wrote, doctors are beside themselves with work. The rumors are wild and contradictory. Fear hangs over the town everywhere. No one knows when they'll end. Hundreds of people had gone totally mad.
Some jumped out of windows running from something, breaking bones as they landed. 32 were taken to the insane asylum. Some stayed there for many years. They totally broke down. 3 men and 1 woman died from whatever they'd accidentally ingested.
Many years later, a former postman named Leon Armigner said he would rather die than experience that again. He told the BBC, it was terrible. I had the sensation of shrinking and shrinking and the fire and the serpents coiling around my arms. The New York Times called it a medical mystery. Nothing like this had ever happened in modern times.
Although it was similar to those dancing manias in the Middle Ages where whole towns just danced, sometimes dancing themselves to death. So the theory was that this was caused by bread. Ergot in the bread which as you know LSD can be derived from. That was the conclusion. It was the ergot in the food that did it.
The end. But not for people who looked a little harder. What happened in that town is exactly what the CIA had been working on. The exact same time they were doing it to foreign prisoners and American citizens. Imagine if the CIA had just visited that small town.
No way that happened, you're thinking. Number 8. At the time of the French mass madness, the CIA was conducting experiments under MK Naomi. Part of this operation was to come up with sprays that could fall down like a mist and poison people, or could they poison say the water supply? A CIA consultant and Harvard scientist had thought a lot about this.
His name was Henry k Beecher. He did a lot of work with the CIA in Germany relating to terrifying drug experiments by interrogators nicknamed Rough Boys. It's ironic he also wrote about medical ethics. And guess what? In 1951, Beecher met with Frank Olson and Vincent Ruett.
This is according to an investigative journalist who obtained the records from the US National Archives. The journalist said they were working on something called project span. One of the places they met was a village and its name was Pont Saint Esprit. The file began and F Olsen files. S O span France operation file.
Inconclusive Olsen, intel files. Hand carried to Berlin. Tell him to see to it that these are buried. Using freedom of information legislation, the same journalist found a CIA report from 1954. It says an agent reported a conversation with a representative of the Sandoz Chemical Company in Switzerland.
That's where all the LSD was made back then. It's not far from Pont Saint Esprit. The document shows the agent had some drinks with the sandals representative, and he told the agent, the secret is that it wasn't the bread at all, it was not the grain ergot. Number 7. Many critics of the theory say this couldn't have happened since the effects of LSD don't last that long.
But as you know, the CIA and the SOD had worked on potions that were way stronger than LSD. The records show the CIA worked with many different hallucinogens, including Ibogaine from Africa, which can last a long time. The psychedelic ganesha can last 24 hours and has the same terrifying effect for those unaware that they've been drugged. Also, DMT often lasts just 15 minutes, but when the Amazonians mix in other plants and change the structure to create the brew Ayahuasca, it lasts for hours. CIA documents show they mix drugs together all the time.
Drugs found in all found in all four corners of the world. Beecher wrote a paper saying it would be possible to poison an entire town with LSD. He said, it should not be a difficult trick to sink a small container of LSD near the main outlet of water storage reservoirs. He said this could excrete a steady flow of material over many hours or days. The whole point of this research was to see if the military could take out a town without necessarily killing anyone.
We don't know what happened with any of this, but we do know Beecher met with many of the people you've heard about today, including a meeting with George White at the Statler Hotel. That investigative journalist uncovered a letter by Beecher that mentions the Bedford safe house and also pharmacological lobotomies. A colleague of Beecher's, doctor John M Vaughn Feldsinger later admitted that they'd done a lot of human testing with drugs in Haiti. He said you could get away with pretty much anything there. In Operation Sea Spray, the CIA sprayed a biological weapon over the San Francisco Bay area.
No one died but some people got severely ill. Number 6, After Beecher died, a poem he'd written was found. It went, a shy little snail from Toulouse who was normally quite the recluse went out on the town and acted a clown singing out LSD's my excuse. Number 5, many people sued the government after the mind control experiments were He then started hallucinating. He ran out onto the street and ended up holding up a bar.
He was only given a suspended sentence, but spent the next few decades having terrible flashbacks of the night. He was in and out of mental hospitals suffering from anxiety and depression. Ritchie found out through George White's diaries that he'd spent a lot of time where White used to hang out and spike people. When he was 75 years old, Ritchie sued the CIA for $12,000,000. He lost, appealed, and lost again.
But the courts expressed that it was possible that he'd been part of those experiments. As we say, many people came forward and said they'd also gone mad one day after being completely sane. Number 4. 20 year old Stanley Glickman was driving in Paris in 1952. He was an up and coming artist at the time.
He got into an argument with some American men and his left wing views didn't go over so well. So far, Glickman had only drunk coffee, but one of the men offered him a shot as a peace offering, telling Glickman with a smile on his face that he would perform miracles. Glickman drank it and his life changed forever. He spent the next 2 weeks wandering around Paris tripping, not knowing what was real. He later said he was in a state of madness, delusion, and terror.
This just doesn't happen to people with no history of mental illness. He never got well again. He returned to the US where he spent the next 25 years hardly leaving the house. He was treated by a psychiatrist, but he never found out what had happened to him. But he had an idea when one day his sister was watching the MK Ultra trial news on TV.
In 1985, he sued. The trial document reads, plaintiff Stanley Glickman brings his lawsuit against the defendant United States of America and against defendants Richard Helms and Sydney Gottlieb in their individual capacities and in their official capacities as former officials of the CIA. Glickman died without anyone ever being found guilty. His sister later said he didn't want 1 penny from the government. She explained, he wanted the American people to know there was an agency that could act so arrogantly, so irresponsibly toward one of its citizens.
He was terribly concerned that the story get out. Number 4. These experiments happened to many thousands of people all over the world. There are convincing theories that Charles Manson was a part of these experiments, but that is speculation. We know for sure that Ted Kaczynski AKA the Unabomber was part of CIA's mind control experiments, but the Atlantic called purposefully brutalizing psychological experiments.
The professor doing the experiment, Henry A Murray had previously worked at the office of strategic services, another precursor to the CIA often working on experiments related to brainwashing. Number 3. Olson's family didn't know what Frank had gone through until the Rockefeller Commission investigated MK Ultra in 1975. Prior to that, journalist Seymour Hersh had investigated and accused the CIA of being a domestic gestapo. Eric Olson said he found out about his father being spiked by watching it on TV.
No one had even bothered to tell the family. The family always believed that the CIA was responsible for their father's death. Eric even interviewed Ruett and Lashbrook. He said Lashbrook was unbelievably nervous. The family later sued for wrongful death and received an out of court settlement of 1,250,000 reduced to 750,000 or about 3 900,000 today.
They also got a personal apology from president Gerald Ford and the then CIA director William Colby. But they still knew something was being kept secret. Eric was sure his father had been pushed out of a window, but by whom and why? Was there more to this story than just their pop watching people getting tortured and killed in Vietnam and Germany? Number 2, assistant Manhattan district attorneys Steven Sirocco and Daniel Bibb later investigated the case to once and for all get to the bottom of it.
During their investigation, they discovered a White House identity sheet listing names and places related to Olson. One of the names was Pierre Lafitte and number 11 on the sheet was the town of Pontsin Esprit. They never could prove that Olson was murdered, but they thought it was likely the case. At one point in their case, they were contacted by 2 former CIA agents named Albert and Neil, fake names. They said Olson had indeed been involved with project span at Point Sinasprit, but the experiment had gone wrong.
Someone had made a terrible mistake. The attorneys also found documents saying that before the Deep Creek Lake spiking of drinks, doctor Abramson had written that its purpose was trapping Olson. But why did they want to trap him? Olson knew they were after him. He said too much, says one theory.
Indeed, after witnessing torture in Germany, an army sergeant reported that Olson seemed deeply disturbed over what he had seen in CIA safe houses in Germany and displayed symptoms of not wanting to keep secret what he had witnessed. The CIA received that report. Deep Creek Lake then might have been to see if Olson would talk about what happened in either Germany or France when under the influence of LSD. Again, this is theory, not proven fact, but the evidence is compelling. If he had talked to outsiders about points in a spree, the USA would have looked very, very bad.
It was almost an act of war. The whole world would have condemned the US and rightly talked about breaching the Nuremberg Code. The US would have been said to be no better than the Nazis. The attorneys discovered that after Olson's visit to France, he had spoken out of line with several colleagues about the town. He opened his mouth in a place where you were not supposed to do that.
The investigative journalist we mentioned before, HP Albirelli junior, interviewed former SOD staff about Poinsettia Spree. According to one interview, point sinusapri was mentioned in the same sentences as aerosol LSD and contaminating food sources. But Albert and Neil would not testify under their real names. That was way too dangerous. They supplied the information.
That was enough. Albirelli junior confirmed that they were definitely ex CIA, but they wouldn't testify. Number 1. The night Olsen died, Lafitte was working undercover with one of false names at, have a guess, the Statler Hotel. According to Albert and Neil, Sperto was also there.
They've been told to watch over Olson. According to Albert and Neil, the plan had been to take Olson to Chestnut Grove which you'll remember was the CIA sponsored mental health facility and home to many of their cruel experiments. They said Olson became unhinged that night. They attempted to move him from the room and get him in a car, but something went wrong. They said, Olson resisted and in the ensuing struggle was pitched out of the window.
So was that what really happened? Like with so many CIA stories, you could say it seems likely, but despite all the circumstantial evidence, you still can't join all the dots with absolute certainty. If anything, the CIA is pretty good at its job. For our sake, let's just hope it's learned some ethics since those dark days. If not, you might wonder what is it up to today.
Now you need to watch how they finally caught the Nazi butcher. Or have a look at real reason why Nazi officers fled to Argentina after World War 2.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Gov. Abbott in border battle with the Biden Administration. #BorderCrisis #CivilWar2 https://t.co/OrloIY5QDF
Video Transcript AI Summary
A border showdown is happening in Eagle Pass, Texas, a major spot for illegal border crossings. The federal government wants Texas to remove the razor wire it installed for state protection, but Texas Governor Greg Abbott refuses. The Biden administration has given Abbott until tomorrow to grant border patrol access to Shelby Park. This could lead to a confrontation between federal agents and the Texas National Guard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A border showdown is brewing in Eagle Pass, Texas right now. A huge hub for illegal border crossings. There is a standoff that is underway between the federal government, which wants the razor wire air that Texas put in place there to protect its own state. They say it has to go, and Republican Texas governor Greg Abbott says he will not. The Biden administration has now given him a deadline of tomorrow to allow border patrol access to the area.
It's called Shelby Park. Essentially, setting up a confrontation potentially between federal agents and the Texas National Guard.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 2002 Alex Jones warned about the New World Order. And diseases...worth a listen. https://t.co/CktDHo9Lv5
Video Transcript AI Summary
There have been corrupt empires, secret societies, and oligarchies throughout history. In 2002, a tyrannical organization called The New World Order emerged, pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, and open borders. They believe there are too many people and want to reduce the population by 80%. The globalists have convinced some liberals and conservatives that this is the intelligent thing to do. They promote a radical form of social Darwinism, where the state controls healthcare and releases diseases to control us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Facts and common sense are in. Yes. There have been corrupt empires. Yes. They manipulate.
Yes. There are secret societies. Yes. There have been oligarchies throughout history. And, yes, today, in 2,002, there is a tyrannical organization calling itself The new world order pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, Open borders.
Total and complete tyranny where human beings are absolutely worthless. There's 6 and a quarter +1000000000 of us, and the globalists have said it many times. There's too many of us. We're causing a problem. We need to be called at the tune of 80%.
It's amazing to talk about that, but it's the globalist, the UN, their own public statements, and they've convinced a lot of Liberals and elitist conservatives and others, that by going along with this, that we're intelligent members of society. It's the ultimate mouthless world view. It is, this radical virulent form of social Darwinism. It's the excuse of tyrants. And by creating open borders where there's no national sovereignty and only global bodies that control all the resources.
By centralizing and socializing health care, the state becomes God, basically, when it comes to your health, and then by releasing diseases and viruses and plagues upon us, we then basically get shoved into their system.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Oprah segments concerning satanic rituals. 🧵 https://t.co/C9hgKEIseK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the victims of a cult, stating that they target vulnerable individuals such as runaways and paperboys. They describe how the victims are prepared for a ceremony by having their throats slit and their blood collected in a chalice. When questioned about their involvement, the speaker claims to have practiced these rituals and mentions that Sharon Tate, who they allege was a witch, wanted to leave the cult. They also suggest that the Illuminati sent Charles Manson to kill her. The speaker concludes by stating that Manson is one of the most powerful wizards alive today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ones. The victims are easily picked up. They are wandering teenagers looking for a good time, runaways, skid row bums, paper boys, paper girls. You can go out to the street the day before or the day doing, pick up that child, drag him or whoever you want to, Get them ready for the ceremony. And at that time, they will slice the person's throat open.
Oh. Pick up the blood in a chalice because they believe that the power can in the blood will add to them. How do you know this?
Speaker 1: How do you know this?
Speaker 0: I wasn't the only one who practiced this.
Speaker 1: So have you have you practiced in going out and picking up people off the street and slicing them?
Speaker 0: The easiest way to get what you do. Wait a minute. And I wanna have to say it. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: they'll go. Kill And why aren't you in jail? Please let him speak.
Speaker 0: Sharon Tate loved Bianca's murder, okay, was a was a witch's hitting. Sharon Tate wanted out but the thing is, the Illuminati
Speaker 1: What do you mean she wanted out? She was a witch? She want Yes.
Speaker 0: She was tired of it. She wanted to get out but the thing is Oh. But the thing is You based those allegations on what? On when I was in myself. I'm not the only one who knows this information.
Anybody who was in witchcraft during that time has had the same thing. What happened was
Speaker 1: That Sharon Tate was a practicing witch? Yes. Okay.
Speaker 0: As a matter of fact, the Illuminati
Speaker 1: I have no information to refute it, so
Speaker 0: I'm only going on what you're saying. The Illuminati sent Charles Manson in to kill her. If you remember, she was, she was killed, 1 leg was strung up from the rafter, her hands behind her, her throat slashed open. There was a tower, 78 cards and a tower deck. You look at the 12th major arcana one, it's looked it looks like the hand man.
That's exactly how Sharon Tate Lavianca was left. Charles Manson did not go into prison. He volunteered to go in.
Speaker 1: So you're saying that Charles Manson came from this this group, the Aluma? He's one of
Speaker 0: the most powerful wizards alive today. Okay. And
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
George Soros talking about replacing the Soviet Empire with the Soros Empire. https://t.co/jKToORXZF9
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
1982 60 Minutes documentary: CIA and Nazi connections. https://t.co/fALaYLrbdx
Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War II, hundreds of Nazis and their collaborators were brought to the United States and given citizenship in exchange for information about the Soviet Union. This was done by the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC), a covert spy agency that preceded the CIA. Despite explicit orders from Presidents Roosevelt, Truman, and Carter, these war criminals were allowed to enter the country. The government knew about their presence and even recruited some of them. The OPC also sent Nazis to South American countries. Many of these individuals are still living in the US today, some even working for government agencies. The truth about this operation is only now coming to light.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Close to 200,000 Americans lost their lives fighting the Nazis in World War two, and yet, hundreds of those Nazis and their collaborators eventually wound up living comfortably here in the United States, becoming US citizens. How did it happen? That is the story we shall tell in the Nazi connection, a story you have never heard till now of how highly placed US officials, despite the express orders of 2 presidents of the United States, invited Nazi collaborators, killers, to these shores to trade what they knew about the Soviet Union for sanctuary here.
Speaker 1: Several 100 Nazi Collaborators from Eastern Europe and Russia were smuggled into the United States for intelligence purposes.
Speaker 0: Smuggled by whom?
Speaker 1: State department intelligence, specifically The Office of Policy Coordination. It was the 1st covert spy agency set up in the United States that predated the CIA by several months.
Speaker 0: Who is this man making these charges, and what gives him the right to say what he has just said? His name is John Loftus, And for 2 years, he was a prosecutor with the Office of Special Investigations in the Department of Justice, responsible for weeding Nazis and Nazi collaborators out of the United States. His security clearance went 3 levels above top secret. But this young Irish Catholic attorney, now in private practice in Boston, Has decided that his conscience demands that he bring to light what he says remained for too long, a dark and sinister top secret.
Speaker 1: We had 1 unit of the government out trying to prosecute the Nazis and other units of the government trying to secrete the information. We later established that the files pertaining to the Nazi immigration had been withheld from congress, From the courts, from the CIA, and from the local agents of the immigration service.
Speaker 0: Didn't president Roosevelt, didn't president Truman, say specifically that war criminals were not to be brought into the country.
Speaker 1: That's Absolutely true.
Speaker 0: And Jimmy Carter went even further in 1980 when he said that any Nazi war criminal who had gotten into the United States should be rooted out.
Speaker 2: The world must never forget the lessons of the Holocaust. That is exactly the reason why after 40 years Of government inaction, I set up a special unit in the Department of Justice to root out Nazi war criminals who may be in hiding in the United States.
Speaker 0: That was the unit John Loftus worked for, a unit that is still trying to denaturalize and or deport Nazi war criminals living in the United States. We asked Loftus who it was who had run the old OPC, the Office of Policy Coordination, that was responsible for bringing Nazi collaborators into the United States.
Speaker 1: A man by the name of Frank Whisner, he was, a former intelligence operator during World War 2.
Speaker 0: With the OSS?
Speaker 1: That's Correct. His boss was Alan Dulles in Germany.
Speaker 0: The office of strategic services, was it called?
Speaker 1: Yes. It was.
Speaker 0: Was there nobody in the state department at a higher level who knew what was going on and and okayed it. Did Frank Wisner have no boss?
Speaker 1: There were 3 men who principally were Eisenhower's representative for Cold War affairs during the early fifties. C. D. Jackson, Undersecretary of HEW Nelson Rockefeller and vice president Richard Nixon.
Speaker 0: Would they have known That former Nazi war criminals were being employed by US military intelligence and were being invited into the country given US citizenship despite what they had done?
Speaker 1: I read some classified information That indicated that a number of these programs were approved at the highest levels.
Speaker 0: Whether Richard Nixon, the late Nelson Rockefeller, and the late CD Jackson, former publisher of Time Life, whether they knew is still an open question. But if they didn't know, then they too were being lied to, as was the case with the Congress later on. The story begins here when the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union in 1941. Just a few months after the invasion began, the Nazis had huge tracts of territory that extended from the Ukraine to. Was to be the Nazis' highway to Moscow.
At first, the Nazis were welcomed as liberators by the people, scarred by the purges of Stalin. But that changed when the Einsatzgruppen, The Nazi mobile killing squads entered. These units recruited collaborators from among the Soviet people to massacre hundreds of thousands of civilians. The Russian collaborators with the Nazis served so faithfully and so well that the Germans made the collaborators into their own SS division known as the Belarus SS.
Speaker 1: We're talking about The leaders of an SS division that fought against Americans and the leaders of a Nazi puppet government in of their civilian population, including nearly all of the country's Jewish population, some 3 quarters of a 1000000 Jews. I decided to pick 1 of the regions of Balorussia and see if we could find how many Nazi officials from that region were in the country. All of them. They knew that the entire Nazi government of Beilorussia, the president, the vice presidents, cabinet ministers, Governors, mayors, police chiefs were all living in America. They knew that.
Speaker 0: Who's they?
Speaker 1: The FBI, army counterintelligence, army foreign intelligence, the Department of State, They knew and they recruited them because they were Nazis.
Speaker 0: As early as 1946, the major espionage of the United States and the Soviet Union, were engaged in a clandestine conflict. The demand for intelligence was so great that a seller's market sprang up. Hundreds of former Nazis and Nazi collaborators found employment in one intelligence service or another. A few of the boldest worked for both sides. According to, emigres with intimate, if dated knowledge of Eastern Europe and former Nazi intelligence officers competed to peddle fabricated reports to any intelligence service gullible enough to buy them.
And OPC was a willing buyer. But I still wanna make this clear. Did US military intelligence know the kind of people they were bringing in?
Speaker 1: Beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Speaker 0: Shortly after being apprised of what Loftus had learned, Alan Ryan, head of the office Loftus worked in, sent a top secret report in October 1980 to then attorney general Benjamin Civeletti, saying that this was the single most important matter his office was engaged in. That report said, quote, it should be apparent that the matters discussed in this report are extremely sensitive, both because of the number of who entered this country and the extent to which US government agencies apparently assisted that entry, possibly in violation of the law. John Loftus also gave a set of classified documents on the matter to Massachusetts congressman Barney Frank of the House subcommittee on immigration. When you first heard this tale, congressman Frank, what'd you think?
Speaker 3: I thought it couldn't possibly be true. I thought it was the kind of thing that The paranoid type people make up and, it really wasn't true. To think that within a year or 2, after discovering the death camps, that the top officials of the American government could have been Working with with with butchers, Nazi butchers to kind of sneak them into the country. No. I didn't believe it.
Speaker 0: Are you convinced now the story is true?
Speaker 3: I'm convinced it's true. Yes. What is convinced? The documents I've read, either someone has done for purposes I couldn't fathom the most massive Set of forgeries in history or, the the documents, make it very clear. What documents have you seen, congressman Frank, that convinced you?
One that I have right here, which is a page on Emmanuel Joschuck who was one of the Nazi leaders in Byelorussia, who was guilty of the worst kinds of crimes smuggled over here, allowed to become a citizen. What's
Speaker 0: it saying?
Speaker 3: It says, for instance, that In approximately February 1942, he was appointed mayor of Stolcsee. 2 months later, he was raised to position of the head of the district of Stolcsee, Which he held until 1944. People should understand that he was appointed to these positions in occupied Russia by the Nazis.
Speaker 0: By the
Speaker 3: German Nazis. By the German Nazis and where he was in fact promoted because of his good work.
Speaker 0: What was his good work?
Speaker 3: His good work was to help, 1, murder innocent Jewish people. 2, to fight the allies.
Speaker 0: Why was US intelligence so interested in bringing these people into this country? What did these Belarusians have to offer?
Speaker 1: They convinced OPC and military intelligence to fund their operations, that they could provide the Americans With the secret army behind the iron curtain, it was a tragic lie. Every one of their operations had been penetrated by the Soviets.
Speaker 0: During 19 fifties, according to Loftus, the OPC dropped the yellow Russians inside the Soviet Union by parachute.
Speaker 1: The parachute teams that were sent in had an astounding fatality rate. Nearly all the paratroopers were caught and killed within minutes after they landed.
Speaker 0: Ostensibly there to set up a network, to set up a listening post, a watching post.
Speaker 1: Oh, there was more to it than that. The program was assassination. These these were hit teams? That's correct. They were to start a civil war behind the iron curtain.
Speaker 0: Apparently, they were not very successful. On the contrary, it was a botch.
Speaker 1: It was worse than a botch. Many of the Beilorussians were Later identified as having been double agents. They didn't have much difficulty. The Soviets had penetrated both the British and the German intelligence services. As a matter of fact, the assistant to the German intelligence service, an ex Nazi himself, was working for the Soviets since just after World War 2.
He had access to virtually every NATO document And pass them all to the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: That person was Heinz Felfe, who worked for West German intelligence after World War 2. Felfa and Kim Philby of British Intelligence helped convince the Americans of the value of the former Nazis, a group the Soviets had heavily infiltrated. It was not till several years later that it was learned Kim Philby was really a mole working for the Russians.
Speaker 1: I read one top secret state department A report that said that there were 22 different intelligence agencies interrogating the emigres and the Displaced persons camps all competing with each other, all fighting over for the same Nazis.
Speaker 3: That was part of the problem. No. It wasn't just 1 group bringing in These Nazis, they engaged in a competition, so they began to spy on each other. We seem to have had more intelligence agencies than there were countries to spy on.
Speaker 0: Not only were Nazis brought to the United States, but US military intelligence also sent a number of them to South American countries, according to Loftus. And we have learned that at least 1 South American country told the United States it refused to take any more Nazis.
Speaker 1: And I would say that as a conservative estimate, There are more than 300 Beilorussian Nazis living in America today.
Speaker 0: Still alive. Still alive. Still operating, American citizens. That's correct.
Speaker 1: Some are still working for the government.
Speaker 0: Some are working for quasi governmental agencies like Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty. William Cratch is New York Bureau Chief and Gene Sosin head of programming for Radio Liberty. Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty was once funded by the CIA. Is that correct? Yes.
How come? It would
Speaker 4: have been embarrassing, to admit that this was an official government function. The worst kept secret, of course, of the Cold War because the Soviets knew about it. But it was always possible to say on the diplomatic level, this is a private organization and
Speaker 0: Crusade for Freedom publicly supported? Precisely. The Crusade for Freedom was the way most Americans learned about Radio Free Europe. Although money for it was solicited from the American people, Radio Free Europe was funded almost entirely by the CIA. Radio Free Europe broadcast the news to the Soviets and was also used to transmit secret messages behind the Iron Curtain.
It would seem That the people who worked for Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, should be people, if you will, beyond reproach. Am I wrong? Like Caesar's wife. Right. Did you have a man named Stanislav Stankiewicz who worked here?
Yes. He was a freelancer for a number of years with our Belarusian service. Who was Stanislav's Donkiewicz? It was a Byelorussian who received secret orders from the German SS to kill every Jew in his county.
Speaker 1: In order to save ammunition, They had the Jews lie on top of each other in 2 rows, and they shot through the bodies. The blood seeped up through the sand at the end of the day, and the ground was still quivering. So they had to post guards on top of the graves until everyone had suffocated. The worst part wasn't found out until after the war When Soviet doctors conducted autopsies, they could find no bullet wounds on on any of the infants. Apparently, the Belarusian police decided that the babies were too small to climb onto the grave, and so they wouldn't waste a bullet on They were buried alive.
Speaker 0: And this was done under the command of Stanislas Stankeyevich?
Speaker 1: That's correct.
Speaker 0: Now we've we've heard tales, God help us, like this before. Question, what happened to Stanislas Stantayevich?
Speaker 1: He was recruited by American intelligence, given a good job with Radio Liberty, and became a citizen of the United States.
Speaker 0: In 1948, in a displaced persons camp in Germany, Sankiewicz was apprehended by US Army counterintelligence. After investigating his background, the US army concluded
Speaker 1: that Stankovich is a security risk to the United States because he worked first for the Soviets, Then for the Nazis, and then the Soviets again. And he will work for anyone who pays him.
Speaker 0: But rather than prosecute him, US military intelligence recruited as an informant and as a propagandist in America's cold war effort against the Soviets. Was smuggled into America, And he moved into this quiet Queens, New York neighborhood where he lived in relative obscurity for over 20 years until John Loftus began his investigation.
Speaker 1: We had prepared a case against Stankovich, containing his confessions, his admissions of Nazi background, and were ready to prosecute.
Speaker 0: As a last Stepp, the justice department asked their Soviet counterparts to provide some eyewitnesses for the case.
Speaker 1: We received a cable from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Soviet Union that Slost Dankovich had just died.
Speaker 0: Well, he died in the United States.
Speaker 1: And the Soviet government knew about it almost immediately.
Speaker 0: This is a man brought into the States to work for Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty. The security clearance would have been done by the agency in those days. So By CIA. By CIA, indeed. You had another man who worked here, Vilis Hasners?
Yes. The Immigration and Naturalization Service tried to deport mister Hausner's. Correct? That's correct. Failed.
Correct? Yes. Did you read the record against Hasner's, the witnesses who testified? Yes. Yes.
We did. And you know that among other things, here is one thing said about Hausner's. One of the witnesses testified that on another occasion in July Of 1941, he saw the respondent, Hausner's, and other Latvians force a number of Jews into a synagogue, which they then set on fire. Does he still work for Radio Liberty, Radio Free Europe? I believe he still contributes, or he now again contributes Freelance programs.
Yes. The justice department told us they had botched the case against Hasner's. Mister Hasner's would not talk to us on or off camera, But Anton Adamovich, currently a staff writer for Radio Liberty, agreed to. We read, mister Adamovich, Some of the information the justice department had gathered on him. Were a propagandist over the Nazis.
Then you became An informer for the US army Yes. Intelligence. Yes. And then it was as a result of that That you were brought into the United States.
Speaker 5: Yes. That's that's Okay. Generally, that's right.
Speaker 1: Yes. That's correct.
Speaker 0: And you know that Both president Roosevelt and president Truman said that Nazi collaborators
Speaker 5: Yes. I knew.
Speaker 0: Were not supposed to come into the United States.
Speaker 5: I knew. I knew.
Speaker 0: So that you knew that you came into the United States illegally?
Speaker 5: Yes. Yes. You don't know. I came legally, and I told everything about my background when I was admitted to USA.
Speaker 0: To the FBI?
Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course.
Speaker 0: And the FBI said?
Speaker 5: The FBI said, alright. We'll do this. And
Speaker 0: We knew you were a Nazi collaborator. Yes.
Speaker 5: And it's
Speaker 0: We knew that you helped armed the intelligence. We'll reward you in spite of the fact that you are a Nazi collaborator.
Speaker 5: That's right. That's right. We had no choice. Yes. We had on we we could We only collaborate with Soviet, with Bolsheviks, which we hate.
7 years, I was persecuted by by by Bolsheviks.
Speaker 0: Right?
Speaker 5: Yes. Or with these Nazis.
Speaker 0: Doctor Vito Thumash, who lives in this house in the Bronx, also made that choice And had his past history kept secret by US intelligence services. Tomas was, for 3 months, the Nazi appointed mayor of Minsk, The capital of Byelorussia during World War 2. On several occasions, we tried to talk with doctor Tomasz about his reported role in recruiting the local police force, which massacred 45,000 persons, but he refused to appear on camera. You let us into your home, and then you say you were unwilling to talk about these Allegations.
Speaker 4: I'm very sorry. I
Speaker 0: did not talk. I did not talk. Off camera, he admitted he was indeed the Nazi mayor of Minsk, But he denied having anything to do with the extermination of Jews. By the late 1970s, with stories continuing to surface about Nazi war criminals in the United States, a house congressional committee chaired by then congressman Joshua Ilberg requested files on 111 alleged Nazi war criminals living in America. Among those on the list were 2 BLO Russians, Franz Khuschow and Emmanuel Josiuk.
Speaker 3: In 1978, congress Specifically asked the general accounting office to get information on these 2 people. The general accounting office asked The army about it, and they were lied to. The army They were. Said we lied to the general accounting office in 1978 and said we don't have files on these people. They had the files.
Speaker 1: The army sent a letter through channels to congressman Ilberg stating that they had searched Certain very specific vaults for all files pertaining to crucial and had found no others. That information was a lie. I went down to the identical vaults and retrieved the army intelligence files for crucial. 1 year later, after Eilberg had been told that no such files existed.
Speaker 0: What would be the motive of the army
Speaker 1: to lie. If congress had been given either the Kusal or the Dossiers, it would have inevitably unraveled The entire smuggling operation. The information had to be suppressed at all costs.
Speaker 0: In 1978, the congress was finally trying to get To the bottom of the Nazi connection. On behalf of Congress, John Tipton, a GAO investigator, requested all intelligence files on alleged Nazis living in America. After a careful review, he wrote this report for the G. A. O.
Entitled Widespread Conspiracy to Obstruct Probes of Alleged Nazi War Criminals not supported by available evidence. But now Tipton says that apparently he didn't get all the available evidence. We then showed mister Tipton a note that had been inserted into the file he requested. Defense material not cleared for review by GAO. Do not disclose to GAO until notified to do so.
So the Department of Defense was covering up material that the congress asked for concerning Nazi war criminals and their admission into the United States.
Speaker 6: Unless there's another reason for it.
Speaker 0: We then read to mister Tipton from the FBI file on Emmanuel Jasiuk, another file he had been told did not exist. Subject, name of the man that we're talking about, who was allegedly a war criminal and caused deaths of people in Poland, now resides, gives his address, Passaic, New Jersey. Were you informed about all that when you asked about that in 1978?
Speaker 6: I was not aware of that aspect of it.
Speaker 0: That information was in the hands not just of the defense department, but of The FBI at the time you asked for it.
Speaker 6: It appears to be that way. That, I think, is the first time I've seen that document.
Speaker 0: And there can be little doubt from this document and From defense department documents that they lied to you and said they had nothing on this individual.
Speaker 6: That seems to be the case.
Speaker 0: So the congress was misled back in 1978.
Speaker 6: That's correct. And the information that, John Loftus has showed to me and you've shown me here today, I would have to say that that appeared so.
Speaker 0: Here in the top secret vaults in Maryland, John Loftus discovered how the army had been able to keep the Nazi smuggling operation secret for so long a time.
Speaker 1: They routinely were deleting all documents showing that the government had assisted their entry, and I caught them at it. We went down and confronted the army officials, and they said that they thought that we knew all about the sanitizing program. Apparently, it's a routine procedure with them. And, the procedure was established many years ago, and they were just following routine orders. And for one day, I was allowed to look through the dossiers with no deletions.
And of the 10 Dosses I looked at, 3 have letters evidencing government assistance in entering the United States.
Speaker 0: And these 3 were Belarusian war criminals.
Speaker 1: 2 were Belarusian, and the third was Hans Svelte, the Soviet spy working in the German intelligence service. He had been assisted in coming to the United States.
Speaker 3: These people had a mission, which was to defeat the Soviet empire in in Eastern Europe, a very admirable mission, one that was clearly in our national interest. The trouble was that they went out and did it on their own with no weighing of consequences, with no sense of what harm they might be doing to other interests, to our moral fiber. I don't impugn Wissner's motives, but his operation almost from start to finish, as documented here, was a disaster for the United States.
Speaker 0: But it is a disaster that might still be continuing. Loftus had yet another example of a mass murderer coming to the United States. Because the information is still classified, he cannot reveal the subject's name. Are criminals, are undesirables in the context of which we're speaking, still being brought in today.
Speaker 1: The person whose file I read, there was substantial evidence that he had Persecuted. Hundreds of thousands of civilians.
Speaker 0: And he was brought in how Recently. And he was brought in because?
Speaker 1: He had been working for OPC.
Speaker 0: Way back then?
Speaker 1: That's correct.
Speaker 0: Some place along the line, I get the feeling that you got rather frustrated by your experience in Washington at the office of Special investigations and inside the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: Very much so. Federal judges are extremely reluctant to strip someone of his citizenship Unless there's an actual proof of murder, of blood on their hands. Did you ever try and prove a murder trial 30 year after the fact With all the witnesses behind the iron curtain and none of that evidence available to him, the most infuriating part was that these people had confessed over and over again to the intelligence agencies. We had all the information on their war crimes And there were atrocities, and we couldn't use 1 piece of that material in court. It didn't comply with the rules of evidence.
Speaker 0: Was there the desire to do the job? I mean, the fact of the matter is that this has gone on for 35 years, and nobody until this moment has had the, desire to tell the story?
Speaker 1: The office of special investigations bent over backwards To spare as much staff and money and resources as they could.
Speaker 0: I get the impression that nobody really wants to handle this. Why have you gone public?
Speaker 1: Wouldn't you? We have to let it be known that we will never allow people who kill babies to go free. No matter How long it takes us or how well they hide, no matter how well connected they are, someday, the truth is going to come out. There is no statute of limitations for mass murder. And sooner or later, someone like me or someone else will come along and find out The
Speaker 0: truth. A couple of footnotes. Richard Nixon's office said that he would have no comment on his knowledge of what we have reported. And the FBI told us that due to the classified nature of the information we've detailed, they too would not
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Listen to how Barbara Walters responds to Corey Feldman revelations. https://t.co/QuMXNMjyLS
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are powerful people in the entertainment industry who have harmed both the speaker and Corey. The speaker believes that these individuals are still active in the industry and are pedophiles. When asked about parents who want to involve their children in the business, the speaker advises caution and warns against naivety. They emphasize that the industry is not all positive and highlights the seriousness of the issue. The speaker mentions that Michael Jackson was one person in the industry who did not take advantage of them and was not a pedophile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm saying that there are people that were the people that did this to both me and Corey that are still working. They're still out there, and they're some of the richest, most powerful people in this business. And they are And they do not want me saying what I'm saying right now. Are are you saying that they're pedophiles? Yes.
And that they're still in this business? Yes.
Speaker 1: That's what yeah. And that's what you're saying in your book. When you talk to about
Speaker 0: it. Yeah.
Speaker 1: When you talk to parents
Speaker 0: me here right now. Trust me.
Speaker 1: They're dead. There are a lot of out here who want to put their kids in this in this business. They their kids are cute. They're great actors. What would you say to a parent who just has The best of intentions is coming here with their child.
Mhmm. If you're saying that there's a lot of predators in this industry.
Speaker 0: It's a many feathered bird. Okay? Be careful what you wish for. That's what I'll tell you. You know, don't go into it with naivety.
Don't go into it thinking that it's all roses and sunglasses. Entire industry. I'm sorry. I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: say that.
Speaker 0: I'm just trying to say that it's a very important serious topic.
Speaker 1: You said that there was 1 gentleman in the industry who did not take advantage of you. He was not a pedophile. You said it was Michael Jackson.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Trump 2024 for justice! Listen. https://t.co/UeFz74e8js
Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden's opponents could have used Barack Obama's hot mic incident with Russia to their advantage, but they failed to do so. They fear that if a MAGA candidate wins and the Republicans gain control of the House and Senate, they will face intense scrutiny and investigations. They believe that Joe Biden is corrupt and that they will find evidence against him. They are also concerned about the potential investigations into Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas. They are worried that the danger is not over and that the Republicans will take aggressive actions in 2024. All of this could have been avoided if they had simply acknowledged that Donald Trump should not be president and refrained from attempting to change voting laws, pack the court, admit new states, or abolish the Senate filibuster.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joe Biden, they could have really made something out of the fact that Barack Obama had a hot mic expose where he told the president of Russia, you tell Vladimir that I will be flexible on missile defense. That's the security of the United States of America. If he gives me space in my last election and Putin did do that, that's an impeachable offense if a phone call to Ukraine is. So they don't understand that, that the light could have done that to them. And they understand now the right probably will do that to them for their own survival and they are scared.
They're saying that if a MAGA candidate wins and they win the house and the senate were cooked because they're gonna get special prosecutors and they're gonna go after the Biden family like they've never gone after anybody and they're going to find stuff because we know Joe is crooked and then they're going to go after Mary Garland and they're going to go after Majorcas and they're not gonna stop and that's why they're scared and they're gonna do any everybody thinks that the danger passed, they got what they wanted. No, no, no, no, no. You're we're gonna see anything like what they're gonna do in 2024. All this could have been reconciled. All they had to do was say, Donald Trump should not be president if that's what they believe and we're not going to do any lawfare.
We're not going to try to change the voting laws. We're not gonna pack the court. We're not gonna let in 2 states. We're not gonna try to abolish the senate filibuster, we're not gonna try to change the
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is a very informative account of the legacy belonging to Donald J Trump. Worth the time to understand why the Deep State has put so much time and effort into throwing a wrench into his administration. Catch more of this series on #ForgottenHistory YouTube. https://t.co/YOR1XQ4kDz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump, a businessman turned president, faced controversies, a campaign against him, and media lies. He focused on his businesses before running for president and campaigned on issues like job creation, immigration, and rebuilding the military. Despite media criticism, he won the 2016 election and implemented policies such as tax cuts, deregulation, and energy independence. He faced opposition from Democrats and the media, who spread false narratives about Russian collusion. Trump also faced legal challenges and criticism for his handling of issues like healthcare and the national debt. He appointed conservative justices to the Supreme Court and implemented immigration policies. This is a summary of the video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Donald j Trop went from businessman to president in 2016. However, his controversies as president, The illegal Democrat campaign against him, the deep state conspiracies to remove him from office as well as the proven lies that were perpetuated by the mainstream media will be covered and disproven, citing published sources and firsthand accounts from those persons who were there. Why was there such a concerted effort to fabricate lies and create a smear campaign against Trump? Why was there so much effort put into the major media outlets to promote falsehoods? Why did the Various federal agencies also climb on board to assist in creating these fabrications to include officials and various former directors Committing perjury and sworn testimony to both houses of congress.
Hello. I'm Colin Heaton, military veteran, historian, author, and welcome to this episode of forgotten history. Donald John Trump was born on June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York. His father was Fred Trump, born in 1905 to German immigrant parents. His mother was born in Scotland in 1912 and immigrated to the US in 1930, Becoming a naturalized citizen in 1942, she and Fred had 5 children, Fred Trump junior, who died in 1981, Mary Anne and Elizabeth and younger brother Robert.
Donald Trump received a bachelor of science degree in economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1968, Following which his father named him president of his real estate business in 1971, Trump then renamed it the Trump Organization. Trump never appeared to have any serious interest in national politics and was a registered Democrat and Republican at various times, But his focus was on his own businesses in construction and renovation of skyscrapers, public buildings, hotels, casinos, and golf courses worldwide. But in 2000, Trump ran for the presidential nomination as the reform party candidate in the California and Michigan primaries against Republican nominee George w Bush and the likely Democrat nominee Al Gore, but he withdrew from the race in February of 2000. In February 2011, Trump suggested that he would challenge president Barack Obama in the 2012 general election during his appearance At the Conservative Political Action Conference or CPAC giving speeches in early primary states, The media did not take him seriously. And in May 2011, he announced he would now run, and instead he endorsed Mitt Romney In February of 2012, in June 2015, Trump again announced his candidacy for president against the Democrat front runner, Hillary Clinton.
Once again, his campaign run was not taken seriously by the media or political analysts, but he rapidly climbed above the other Republicans in the national opinion polls. His position of being a political outsider, not owing allegiance to the lobbyists, big corporations, and his announcement that he would fund his own campaign without taking major corporate contributions in order to not owe anyone anything struck a chord. Trump outlined all that he saw wrong with the DC swamp to include the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, American businesses going overseas to avoid high tax rates and operating costs and the promises of bringing corporations and jobs back to the United States resonated with the population. Many blue collar workers whose livelihoods had been crippled as a result of offshoring their jobs, And Trump pointed out the high cost and financially devastating impact of the Affordable Care Act upon individuals and businesses. Trump also campaigned on rebuilding the military, stopping taxpayer funding for programs that harm the economy, Ending the war on terror, securing the southern border, enforcing immigration laws, rebuilding the military structure in total, and protecting coal, oil, and natural gas jobs, and that saw him become the front runner in March 2016.
The media had been very friendly to Trump over the decades until his announcement that he would run as a Republican in the 2016 presidential election. After that, they always tried to portray Trump as a business failure, racist, and misogynist. Yet despite These setbacks, the majority of his businesses continued to thrive in varying degrees depending upon the national and the global economics. Trump also pointed out the fact that NATO was being paid for by the American taxpayer. For decades, NATO countries had failed to pay their 2% GDP dues, yet still expected US protection, and he said that NATO was obsolete.
He stated that he wanted to address the US China relationship and strike down the free trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Trans Pacific Partnership and get the US out of the Iran nuclear deal, Clean Power Plan, and the Paris Climate Accords, Also called the Paris Agreement, which did not pertain to China and India, but was targeting Western Europe and the USA. Trump campaigned on modernizing and expediting services for veterans, repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, abolishing the common core education programs, Investing in infrastructure, simplifying the tax code, while reducing taxes for all economic classes and imposing tariffs on imports by companies that Offshore jobs. Many of those jobs came back. Trump also wanted an extreme vetting process or a complete ban on immigrants from Muslim majority countries that had ties to terrorism to reduce Islamic terrorism in this country. Due to the policies of Barack Obama and the rise of the ISIS caliphate, he proposed aggressive military action against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
The media hit Trump hard after he was endorsed by former Ku Klux Klan imperial wizard and grand dragon David Duke who Agreed with Trump's policies on the border and immigration, Duke stated that he enthusiastically supported Trump and said He and like minded people voted for Trump because of his promises to take our country back. Trump was slow to disavow the endorsement from David Duke after he was questioned about it during a CNN interview on February 28, 2016, But he stated that he would not support hate groups. The media never mentioned the fact that his opponent, Hillary Clinton, openly admitted that She, as well as vice president Joseph Biden, were great friends and were mentored by the former KKK recruiter, Segregationist and open racist Democrat senator Robert c Byrd of West Virginia. Trump then hired Steve Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart News, in August 2016 as his campaign CEO and Kellyanne Conway as his campaign manager. The alt right movement, as it was called by the media, supported Trump for his make America great again Platform.
Unlike previous candidates, Trump did not release his tax returns, which became standard practice since James Earl Carter released his in 1976. He said his tax returns were being audited and that his lawyers had advised him against releasing them, And there is no law mandating that process. In October 2016, portions of Trump's state Filings for 1995 were leaked to a reporter from The New York Times. They show that Trump had declared a loss of $916,000,000 that year, including accounting for depreciation, which allow him to avoid paying taxes legally for up to 18 years. In a roller coaster political campaign season, Hillary Clinton led Trump in the national polling averages, if they could be believed.
But as more of her illegal activities are becoming known and the fact that she promised to put coal miners out of business and attack the fossil fuel industry, She had lost the lead in early July 2016. That was when Trump selected Indiana governor Mike Pence as his vice presidential running mate. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton had 3 presidential debates in September October 2016. During these, Trump twice refused to say whether he would accept the results of the election stating that he would have to see how it goes, alluding to certain areas that always had problems with voting integrity. Republican Trump won the 2016 presidential election in the electoral college with 304 to 227 electoral votes, while Democrat Clinton Won the popular vote with Trump receiving nearly 2,900,000 fewer popular votes than Clinton, making him the 5th person to be elected president while losing the popular vote.
The majority of those votes were from New York and California reinforcing the need for the electoral college. The loss to Trump was a political shockwave as the media, the pollsters, and the Democrat establishment had believed their own propaganda and underestimated the power of Trump's message and the desires of working class Americans. Clinton had made many severe strategic errors, which Trump pounced upon during his campaign and even during the debates. Trump won 30 states, including the energy and industry states Clinton threatened and had suffered under Obama such as Michigan, Texas, Kentucky, West Virginia, Wyoming, Oklahoma, South Dakota, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Wisconsin, With some states being considered reliable democratic strongholds since the 19 nineties, Trump's message of bringing back jobs, national Security and energy independence were powerful, and the victory also had a republic controlled house of representatives and senate. His tough on crime posture saw him receive the vast majority of support from the various local state and federal law enforcement agencies and departments.
In order to divest himself of anything connecting him personally to new foreign deals, Trump moved his businesses into a revocable trust run by his sons, Eric and Donald Junior, and one of their business associates. He also took only $1 instead of the 6 figure salary as president donating the money to charities. Since the Trump Organization expanded business operations in Dubai, Scotland, Saudi Arabia, and the Dominican Republic. Trump's businesses continued to profit, which was not illegal and expected to continue. Orders during his 1st week in office, which authorized procedures for repealing the Affordable Care Act known as Obamacare, withdrawal of the Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations, bailing out of the Iran nuclear deal, the reinstatement of the Mexico City policy that blocked US Federal funding for nongovernmental organizations that provided abortion counseling or referrals advocated to decriminalize abortion or expanded abortion services.
He also used his executive power to expand the Keystone XL and Dakota access pipeline projects, reinforcement of border security, and a plan to design and construct the wall along the US southern border with Mexico. The Democrats have been plotting to remove Trump as a candidate even during the campaign and then after he became president. Hillary Clinton and Jake Sullivan, in conjunction with Fusion GPS and their friends within the Obama established Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, and Federal Bureau of Investigation started breaking a lot of laws. Anti Trump Republicans initially started opposition research against Trump during the 2016 GOP primaries to remove him, the dangerous outsider, But the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee took over the operation. Then more than $1,000,000 flowed from the Clinton campaign and DNC to the law firm Perkins Coie, which then hired the opposition research company Fusion GPS Who hired former British MI six agent Christopher Steele who got involved?
Hillary Clinton and the DNC had h steel an estimated $168,000 to gather information on Trump that could be used as political leverage against him. That became the famous Steele dossier, which was taken by the DOJ and FBI director James Comey personally, who certified the document as verified to the FISA court To get wiretap and surveillance warrants against the Trump campaign and continue to practice into his presidency, Comey and others in the DOJ even touted the dossier claiming that without the Steele dossier, there could have Never been any request for Pfizer warrants. All the mainstream media outlets claimed that the proof that Trump colluded with Putin to steal the election supported by Charlotte and Democrats such as California Democrat house representative Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton speaker Nancy Pelosi and others who all knew the truth yet continued to lie to the American people about the so called evidence in plain sight. However, after the FBI through director James Comey was caught with their pants down, they offered Steele $1,000,000 if he could verify anything in the document. But only after the 4 purged submissions to the Pfizer court came to light, and he admitted that he could not verify the data.
CNN even had to report that senate judiciary committee chairman Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina, released A declassified FBI document showing the bureau misled the FISA court 4 times, committing 4 felonies, And Comey also lied to the senate intelligence committee in 2018 about the Steele dossier's primary source and, therefore, the reliability of this deal dossier. To be clear, Multiple US government inquiries uncovered dozens of contacts between Trump campaign associates and Russians, which have since been acknowledged, And those were proven to be legitimate business contacts. But CNN, in order to try and save face, stated, The candidate himself and his closest advisers even welcomed the Kremlin's interference in the election. Still, None of it added up to the collusion suggested in Steele's memos. What they referred to was Trump openly asking Russia To give him Hillary Clinton's 33,000 emails that were under subpoena by Republicans in congress due to the fact that she violated federal law, including the National Security Act by having a private server to bypass congressional scrutiny of her nefarious activities.
It was also proven that the server had been hacked by Russia, North Korea, and China, and perhaps others. It is also speculated that Iran may have hacked it, thus assisting in the planning in the 2012 The Benghazi Libya attacks on the US diplomatic compound and nearby CIA annex on September 11th through 12, 2012 resulting in the deaths of US ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans. See our video on Benghazi for more information. Part of Clinton's loss of public support were her actions of destroying the phones and computers to avoid the evidence of her activities coming to light during the campaign, And Trump exposed this to the public during the debates. Even CNN once again had to admit, the indictments secured by John Durham, the special counsel appointed during the Trump administration to investigate the FBI's Russia probe.
Durham alleges Bastille's primary source, a US based foreign policy analyst, repeatedly lied to the FBI about where he got his information. The revelation of the criminal fraud perpetrated by Clinton, the DOJ, FBI, and the Democrats on Capitol Hill against Trump becoming public knowledge sent the liberals over the edge. They had won Pulitzer Prizes for their falsified investigative journalism, and many of the secured high paying jobs as analysts discussing the great crime of Russia collusion, which were proven to be lies, which they knew to be lies all along. So as a result, Trump was sued as a result of his businesses still making money for violating the domestic and foreign emoluments clauses of the US constitution. This was the first time that the clauses had been invoked against a president with any serious determination.
One case was dismissed in a lower court and 2 others were dismissed by the US Supreme Court as moot after the end of Trump's term. There was nothing illegal for a man's companies to conduct a business, unlike the Biden crime family, which made over $30,000,000 in foreign as an effort provided a legitimate service. In addition, all of Trump's business bank accounts were long standing, solid, and verified with federal EIN numbers and a track record of filing tax returns, unlike the Bidens who hid and laundered their illegal foreign money through 24 Shadow Limited Liability Corporations and never declared the illegal income or paid their taxes until Hunter Biden's attorney paid $4,000,000 in delinquent taxes for him. Trump also supported traditional marriage between a man and a woman, But he considered the nationwide legality of same sex marriage as a settled issue and no action was warranted. In March 2017, his administration rolled back key parts of the Obama administration's workplace protections, Especially transgenders serving in the military, this was considered discrimination against LGBTQ people, but it was upheld by the US Supreme Court.
The media that loved Trump before he ran for president turned rabid and totally lost all credibility, But they began running fake news stories, creating lies, using unnamed sources to support unsubstantiated allegations, and supporting unwarranted conspiracy theories while creating conspiracies of their own. Also stated by the fake news, During the 2016 campaign, Trump promised to protect funding for Medicare and other social safety net programs. But in January 2020, he suggested he was willing to consider cuts to such programs. What this statement fails to state is that Trump's plan was to ensure that illegal aliens and noncitizens would not have access to legitimate taxpayer funded programs, thereby reducing costs. Trump also barred organizations that provided abortions or abortion referrals from receiving federal funds, which fell under the Hyde Act, which Biden has supported.
He did not believe taxpayers should pay for abortions, which he also believed should be an individual state issue under the 10th Amendment and not a federal issue. Trump was always a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment and did not believe that law abiding citizens should be punished due to the criminality of others that all Americans had the right to self defense. However, Trump was in favor of capital punishment and his administration. The federal government executed 13 prisoners more than in the previous 56 years combined after a 17 year moratorium. Trump supported the use of enhanced interrogation methods such as waterboarding, but he encountered serious opposition from defense secretary general James Mattis.
In December 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which had been passed by both the Republican house and senate without any democratic votes. The law reduced tax rates for businesses and individuals with business tax cuts to be permanent an individual tax cut set to expire after 2025, and it eliminated the Affordable Care Act tax penalty for those who did not buy it, Removing the burdensome individual mandate. The Trump administration claimed that the act would either increase tax revenues or pay for itself by prompting economic growth. Instead, revenues in 2018 were 7.6% lower than projected. But that statement by the liberal media was not exactly true.
Yes. It reduced tax income received from the tax mandate As people were no longer forced to buy the ACA, but the corporate tax cuts started bringing companies back to the nation and allowed companies to hire more workers due to lower operating costs, thereby increasing the taxpayer base. Under the policy, unemployment would be at around 3.6% by July 2019, down from 4.7% when he took office. It would not be until the COVID nineteen pandemic unleashed by China that unemployment would start rising again. Trump did not agree completely with the scientific consensus on climate change and the global warming agenda.
Hence, is pulling out of the nonsensical Paris Accord. He reduced the budget for renewable energy research by 40%, Preferring to focus upon fossil fuel exploitation or proving leases, creating energy independence, and in the process, he reversed Obama's policies on climate change. This was another reason unemployment dropped and inflation rates fell to 1.40% by 2020 before the pandemic. In fact, interest rates remained at about 2.4% until the Biden administration when they rose to 9% and are currently at 7.93%. Rates declined throughout 2019.
When January 2020 came around, the average rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage was about 3.7%. Under Biden, the average mortgage interest rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage has been above 6% throughout 2023 soaring above 7% in mid August. In June 2017, Trump announced the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement making the US the only nation in the world to not ratify the agreement, And the Democrats and progressive climate anarchists went berserk. Trump wisely explained that India and China were getting a pass not forced to adhere to the accord and increasing their coal field industries while expecting the rest of the world Trump aimed to boost the production and exports of fossil fuels. Natural gas expanded under Trump, but coal production fell Probably due to less need for coal as natural gas production exploded, but Trump did not chill the coal industry, which is what Hillary Clinton campaigned on doing.
Trump also rolled back more than 100 federal environmental regulations under the domain of the EPA, which the progressives claimed would increase greenhouse gas emissions, air and water pollution, and the expanded use of toxic substances. Actually, Trump's energy policy did nothing of the kind, and these assertions were refuted by the fact that the increase in natural gas production, which is clean, Never harmed the environment. Air quality continued to increase under Trump. Other progressives still turned a blind eye to China and India. In response to the opioid epidemic, Trump signed a legislation in 2018 to increase funding for drug treatments, But he was widely criticized by the mainstream media for failing to make a concrete strategy, but Obama had not addressed that issue effectively either.
US opioid overdose deaths were reduced in 2018, but rose to a record 50,052 Deaths in 2019. The progressives also claimed that Trump weakened protections for animals and lowered the environmental standards for federal infrastructure projects, which was not true. They used the same argument to fight him on building the border wall, that it was environmentally unsound. They were appalled that he expanded the permit for drilling and resource extraction, such as the lobbying drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, also known as the Anwar. In contrast, Joe Biden's expensive China windmills have killed more wildlife such as birds, dolphins, and whales and done nothing to lower energy costs.
By late 2018, the US was exporting oil and gas to Europe, undercutting the same product supplied by Russia at an even better price And with a higher quality product, domestically, gasoline averaged $2.26 and then down to $1.80 7¢ per gallon in most states by 2020, down $1 per gallon under Obama. Under Trump, oil production reached its all time peak of 12,300,000 barrels a day just before the pandemic. In 2022, the highest price under Biden was $5.7 per gallon, which finally fell after he sold the federal oil reserves to China and other nations and released it for domestic consumption While still begging for oil from Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, under Trump, the strategic oil reserve was filled at below $21 a barrel. Although the price of crude oil in the United States did fall to less than $25 a barrel during Trump's time in the White House, It still fluctuated up and down, but under Biden, oil surged over $120 a barrel. The most important part of Trump's energy plan was to successfully reduce the value of foreign crude oil.
And when he imposed the oil export sanctions upon Iran, that nation's economy was crippled. The Arab Gulf states were also thrown back on their heels as we no longer needed imports received at previous levels. In June 2018, the Trump administration, along with 18 republic from led states, argued before the Supreme Court that the elimination of the financial penalties associated with the individual mandate had rendered the ACA unconstitutional. The media claimed that if they succeeded, he would have eliminated health insurance coverage for up to 23,000,000 Americans. What this biased report does not say is that the Trump plan was to allow people already on the ACA plan to remain on it if they wished while removing the penalty for those who did not want it and desired to go back into the private health care industry and have the doctors of their choice.
Trump promised while campaigning to eliminate the national debt in 8 years, but he approved large increases in government spending that democrats voted for order to avoid a government shutdown, increase the military, and to build the border wall along with providing the 2017 tax cut. The media reported mostly correctly later that the federal budget deficit increased by almost 50% to nearly $1,000,000,000,000 in 2019. Under Trump, the US national debt increased by 39% reaching 27 point $75,000,000,000,000 by the end of his term, and the US debt to GDP ratio hit a post World War two high. Trump's argument was that by completing the law, preventing millions of illegal aliens from draining resources, Reducing crime, taking American jobs, and reducing drug and human traffickers would in time pay off. Trump made the claim that Mexico would pay for the wall.
Of course, the Liberals laughed at that. And as the Democrats scoffed at that statement, they knew that if he completely secured the border, it would doom future Democrat political arguments, which was why they fought him all the way to stop him from completing the border wall despite his securing and funding The Bordo, after the appellate court, ruled that he could use Department of Defense money already allocated as it was in fact in the interest of national defense. In fact, Mexico did pay for a large part of the cost of building the wall. Trump implemented the remaining Mexico policy for illegals After reminding president Pinanieto that tariffs could be issued against the Mexican imports if he did not comply, This forced the Mexican government to put 30,000 soldiers on their northern border with the US and also secure their southern border with Guatemala, formed where most migrants entered Mexico. This process continued under the next president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
Immigrants were then forced to file their asylum claims in Mexico to be heard by American immigration judges later if approved, but not on US soil until president Joseph Biden ended remain in Mexico, stopped the wall construction despite the materials already being paid for and deposited on location, And then he opened the southern border in violation of federal immigration law, national security, and his oath of office. The liberal media also reported that Trump had failed to deliver the $1,000,000,000,000 infrastructure spending plan on which he had campaigned. What they did not report was that the Democrats took congress and they would not act, kept the money from infrastructure to include completing the border wall, Wasn't to save infrastructure funding for their own party and many rhinos who were anti Trump supported the subterfuge. The ultimate shockwave to Democrats was when he appointed and had confirmed Mia Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, Three conservatives during his presidency to the US Supreme Court. In part 2, we will examine Trump's foreign policy, Foreign and domestic perceptions and the continued media attacks on the Trump administration proving the lies planted by the media and his political opposition, Thanks for watching today's episode of forgotten history.
If you like this episode, please consider becoming a channel member or joining our Patreon page. This would help us offset the ever increasing cost of production. As always, please like, share, and comment. And if you have any show ideas, please contact us, and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Medical journal articles are disappearing. This is very disturbing. https://t.co/B69FUJ9epB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Scott Jensen discusses two concerning articles that have caught his attention. The first article discusses the concept of physician moral injury, where doctors feel betrayed by those in authority, causing them to compromise their commitment to patients. The second article highlights the disappearance of over 300 scientific papers related to COVID-19, suggesting potential substandard research and manipulation of narratives. Dr. Jensen raises concerns about the motives behind these disappearances and emphasizes the need for vigilance in the medical field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Doctor Scott Jensen here. Over the last 3 years, we have together talked about a lot of issues. We have talked about masks and modeling. We have talked about lockdowns and social distancing.
We have talked about vaccines and mandates. We have talked about parental rights and a whole lot of other things including natural immunity, herd immunity, and what happened in nursing homes. Those issues will continue to be discussed as well they should, but I need to sound the alarm. I read medical journals all the time. And 2 articles that had an odd connection over the last week Came across my desk.
1st, Chris Mazzolini, editorial director of medical economics, Has an article about a book written by Wendy Dean, a physician, who talks about physician moral injury. You might ask yourself, what does that mean? Doctor Wendy Dean says that moral injury is this sense of feeling as if you're betrayed by somebody in a position of authority in a high stakes situation. And that situation causes you to transgress You're deeply held moral beliefs and expectations. And in medicine, those beliefs and expectations are the oaths that we took to put our patients first.
This is what's happening to physicians when we feel that people in authority who we thought had our back and were doing the right thing. That they controlled us and didn't perform. And that caused us to potentially compromise our commitment to our patients. That has happened across the land, across the globe. Let's turn to the 2nd article.
An article in Jazz Shaw called the medical field is erasing its own COVID era history. Here's what it says. Pfizer and the rest of the big pharma companies assured the government that everything was just fine with the vaccines because they had been doing super serious testing. And the government dutifully reported the cheerful news to us while using all of that data to impose lockdowns, mask mandates, and immunity passport systems. And now according to 1 group that tracks publications in scientific journals, A lot of the original research and test results are mysteriously disappearing.
More than 300 papers and scientific articles have vanished in the past year. We have to be on red alert. What we're seeing is potentially substandard medical publications used to push forward, promote a narrative, and squash all other narratives. And now that some of the dust is settling, we're seeing these articles withdrawn, disappearing. You won't find them potentially on Internet.
This is problematic. We knew during the pandemic that several specific instances occurred where high quality journals such as Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, published articles that a short time later required a retraction or a revision or a redaction. We're seeing this happen in spades now. We're seeing 300 plus articles disappearing, and I think you and I both know why. In many situations.
It was shoddy research. It was shoddy analysis. It wasn't peer reviewed or the conclusions drawn from the data were clearly spurious. And we asked the question, Was this born of a nefarious agenda? My friends, I don't remember any time in my 40 years of medical history.
We're in a short span of time. Journal articles in the 100 and 100 We're disappearing. This feels like people are covering their tracks, and we need to pay attention. When medical journals that were used at one time to push a narrative and squash another narrative are now disappearing. My profession has a big problem.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Remember when the media gave a huge middle finger to the Constitution and peoples right to decide for themselves to be vaccinated? Never ever forget this. These people should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. https://t.co/JpGarh5ykU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video consists of various speakers expressing their frustration and blame towards the unvaccinated population. They argue that the unvaccinated are the problem and should be shamed for their choices. The speakers emphasize the need to prioritize the greater good of society and suggest measures such as taxing the unvaccinated and treating their choice similarly to driving while intoxicated. They also highlight the consequences of not getting vaccinated, including preventable deaths and overwhelming hospitals. The video concludes with a call to stop spreading misinformation and a plea for empathy towards those affected by COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story.
Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame the only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks.
Speaker 1: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as well the rest of us who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated.
Speaker 3: Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think
Speaker 4: it's Time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat.
Speaker 5: All these vaccinated folks Are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. They're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated.
Speaker 3: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well.
Speaker 4: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, We don't care. We're living free and so forth.
Speaker 6: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin.
Speaker 7: The unvaccinated, A group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. Feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry.
Speaker 6: This is not about freedom or personal choice.
Speaker 4: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom.
Speaker 5: The other day, Howard Stern weighed in with A much different approach. Take a look.
Speaker 8: When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country and just say you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated? Their freedom.
Speaker 5: But you're treading on our freedom, and you're making other people sick. Really, you're killing other people. The anti vaxxers, they seem to have a thing For death and home remedies.
Speaker 1: The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are not just putting their own lives at risk.
Speaker 4: If that was the key issue, we could just say that We
Speaker 1: can watch them compete to win place their show in the Darwin Awards. We have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take any of the COVID Scenes
Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is Helping people worldwide.
Speaker 9: Maybe you're doing it because,
Speaker 10: you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, But maybe you're just being antisocial.
Speaker 1: Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are.
Speaker 6: Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price.
Speaker 2: The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care.
Speaker 3: We need to start looking at the Choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated.
Speaker 2: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. Two types of America.
Speaker 11: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU bet. I don't that choice doesn't seem so Up to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you.
Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse coo, Rest in peace, Wheezy.
Speaker 0: Pointing back to the unvaccinated who are really creating a problem in this country, every death that we are seeing from COVID could have been prevented.
Speaker 7: Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at night.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Madison Cawthorn told us. https://t.co/gTjQahW7kU
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Washington, the speaker, a young person, observes the sexual perversion among older politicians. They are shocked when invited to a sexual gathering that turns out to be an orgy. The speaker also witnesses hypocrisy among leaders who advocate against addiction, as they openly use cocaine. The speaker finds these experiences to be wild and unexpected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sexual perversion that goes on in Washington. I mean, being kind of a young guy in Washington, where the average age is probably 60 or 70. And I look at all these people, a lot of them that I I you know, I've looked up to through my life. I've always paid attention to politics, guys that you know? Then all of a sudden, you get invited to, like, well, hey.
We're gonna have kind of a a sexual get together at one of our homes. You should come. And I'm like, what what what did you just ask me to come to? Yeah. And then you realize they're asking you to come to an orgy.
Or the fact that, you know, there's some of the people that are leading on the movement to try and remove, you know, addiction in our country. And then you watch them do, you know, a key bump of cocaine right in front of you. Man, it's like, wow, this is wild.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Oh hell no. This is infuriating. https://t.co/oK9GAocO9h
Video Transcript AI Summary
An expert conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker mentions that vaccines may shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker also claims that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study. They argue that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and explaining the mechanism of action involving aluminum.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hired an outside expert. We got every single data point for every patient born in my practice, 2,700 variably vaccinated, 560 some unvaccinated, and we age matched them and compared them. And this is what we found. This should go on t shirts. I'm just not organized enough to do it.
But you'll see vaccinated in orange, blue are the unvaccinated kids, and it speaks for itself. Atdoctorsandscience.com. All the slides I'm presenting here are available, so don't worry about trying to catch them all on pictures. But here we go. We're gonna go fast because I only have 15 minutes.
I want you to see these slides. Here's asthma. Blue line, unvaccinated, yellow vaccinated. Allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis. Those are eye infections.
Wait a minute. I thought vaccines prevented infections. What's going on here? Disease shift the immune system to allergy and autoimmunity, and you have more and more infections of other kinds. Here's other infections.
Here's breathing issues. Here's behavioral issues. ADD, ADHD. There was none in the unvaccinated patients for 10 years in my practice. That's unbelievable, folks.
So what was the response of the medical board to this landmark study? They yanked my license. I wanna tell you something. You'll hear, oh, association does not mean causation. Have you heard that?
That's the reason your story of your vaccine injured child doesn't count. It was just a coincidence. It's not a coincidence that we have multiple other studies and we have a mechanism of action. I've already explained the aluminum mechanism. There's another some
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Is there a link between autism and vaccines? Listen. https://t.co/Tl2BaiRUy9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the misconception that vaccines are always beneficial and highlights the lower under-five mortality rates in other countries with fewer vaccines. They question why certain vaccines, like flu and varicella, are not widely adopted in other countries and raise concerns about the correlation between vaccines and autism. Another speaker emphasizes the need for an open debate on this topic and criticizes the limited number of vaccines and ingredients studied in relation to autism. They express frustration with doctors who dismiss the potential link between vaccines and autism without thoroughly examining the research. The speaker urges for a more collaborative approach to help children and criticizes those who antagonize the medical community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The devil is always in the details. And one of the problems with vaccines is they've been so great that people overly generalize about them as if they're only great. We looked at other first world countries. We're 34th in under five mortality behind such luminaries as Cuba and Slovenia. However, we have 36 vaccines, the top five which include countries like Finland, Norway, Iceland, average 11 and 13 vaccines.
From 1994, we added 8 vaccines to our schedule. There are vaccines like flu, rotavirus, varicella that have only been picked up by 2 or 3 of the other 30 countries. So what do they know that we don't? Why are they picking up vaccines that have been around for 15 years? And why are their autism rates 1 in a 1000, 1 in 1500, 1 in 2000.
It doesn't take a brain surgeon or an ER doctor to figure out there might be a correlation.
Speaker 1: We don't want to narrow Be too narrow minded and say it's it's only the vaccines and and and and and not and and ignore other potential problems.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, And this is just me wanting to have an open debate about this. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at Yeah. As causing all these disease. I agree with that.
Speaker 0: What is completely bogus?
Speaker 2: That is
Speaker 0: such a bogus statement. How many vaccines have they looked at in these studies? How many? What's the answer? It's 2.
How many ingredients did they study of 35? What's the answer? It's 1, you've looked at 2 of 36 shots and 1 of 35 vaccines and you're going to stand on the stage and say that vaccines and autism are unrelated. It is the most bogus Tobacco science, it's a smokescreen. Anybody who takes the time to read it would agree.
I'm so sick of doctors who don't read the studies, who don't know the details, sitting here telling parents and reassuring them that vaccines don't cause autism. It is irresponsible. And this
Speaker 2: is the biggest problem, the reason that doctors in this country are frustrated because, listen, All you're doing is you're antagonizing a medical community that wants to help these kids. You haven't done the research. You're antagonizing me. You're antagonizing doctor Sears. Why would you do that?
This show is all about his concern. Okay. You know, it is okay. Everyone wants to blame someone. Right?
Yes. This is what it's what we're trying to figure out here is how to help kids. But all you do when you yell at me on my stage, all you do is anger me.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
The Great Replacement. Open borders are part of the globalists plan for the New World Order. Watch. https://t.co/wahfKjUtKp
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual mentions that Caucasian Europeans will become a minority in the United States, but sees it as a source of strength. Another person highlights the significant increase in immigration numbers and expresses concerns about criminals being released into the country. The potential impact of climate change on migration is discussed, with the prediction of a collapse in food production leading to a large number of climate refugees. The belief that the current administration is allowing an open border to change the electorate's demographics is mentioned. The involvement of various groups in drug and human trafficking is brought up, along with accusations of aiding and abetting the invasion of the country. A congressman questions the Secretary about releasing illegal aliens without proper vetting, but faces interruptions and disputes over time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority, fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock.
That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength.
Speaker 1: When I was in office, the numbers were annually about 300, 4 in a 1000 a year. We're now getting that in a matter of 6 to 8 weeks.
Speaker 2: It's so who wants to have open borders where jails and prisons of other countries are being bus loaded into buses and trains and being sent into our country Releasing criminals into the streets. They're releasing prisoners. Helping people with guns. Murderers, rapists, drug dealers into our country. And you say, who would do that?
And they know it's happening, and they just let it happen.
Speaker 3: We're already seeing climate refugees around the world. If you think migration has been a problem in Europe Syrian war, even from what we see now, wait till you see a 100,000,000 people for whom the entire food production capacity has collapsed.
Speaker 1: Asked Sir, why do you think that this administration has allowed virtually an open border?
Speaker 4: I believe that they're trying to change the demographics of the electorate. That's what I believe that they're doing. They know they they wanna stay in power, and the only way to stay in power is continue to get elective. They can't get elected on their policies because their policies are bad.
Speaker 5: And all while they're coming across, we've got groups out in the desert running the drugs, running the child trafficking, sex trafficking, all of that Aided and abetting. Venezuela, Cuba, Colombia,
Speaker 2: all day.
Speaker 5: 100. Every one of them put money in the cartel's and the NGOs in America who are aiding and abetting the invasion of this country in their pockets and the democrat open border leftist that are inviting this into our country.
Speaker 6: Secretary May Hawkins, for the record, are you aware, have you harassed, DBP agents to release illegal aliens into America without identifying, screening, vetting them properly or harvesting even basic biometric data like fingerprints.
Speaker 7: A congressman, our nation's sovereignty stands strong and our brave men and women in the border patrol And throughout US customs Are
Speaker 6: you aware? Have you authorized CBP agents to release illegal aliens into America Without having properly vetted, identified them, or collected at least basic biometric data like fingerprints.
Speaker 7: Congressman And
Speaker 6: you got millions coming across.
Speaker 7: A congressman or
Speaker 6: Gentleman from the
Speaker 8: miss Higgins, allow the secretary of
Speaker 6: the house. It's my time, mister chairman. If I wanna reclaim my time, I will. Well, I'm gonna move on without an answer. Mister chairman, are you asking me for me to yield you time?
Speaker 8: No. You you I'm the chair.
Speaker 6: And I'm gonna reclaim my time. Look. We don't Moving on. No. Secretary Mayorkas.
The gentleman from Are you interrupting my time, mister chairman?
Speaker 1: Not Are
Speaker 6: you requesting me to yield your time? I'm
Speaker 8: trying to make sure that we conduct
Speaker 6: You're interfering with my 5 minutes, Mr. Chairman
Speaker 8: Well, then the gentleman will If
Speaker 6: you request me to yield your time, I'll give
Speaker 8: you time. No. But that's not the procedure.
Speaker 6: But that is the procedure.
Speaker 8: It is not. Yes.
Speaker 6: It is. So Of course, it is. Look. I I reclaim my time, and I want this time back.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Who is this guy? Anyone know? https://t.co/HQQeyNP2cJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in the government policy called Global 2000, authorized by Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. In 1974, Henry Kissinger, the 32nd Secretary of State, stated that depopulation should be a top priority for US foreign policy towards the Third World. The government believes that the population is growing beyond their control and wants to remove billions of people from the planet. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science they present. The government has decided to eliminate those who resist and refuse to conform, regardless of their race.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An adviser to president Jimmy Carter by the name of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Zbigniew Brzezinski said, quote, in earlier times, it was easier to control a 1000000 people than to physically kill a 1000000 people. But in today's time, it is infinitely easier to kill a 1000000 people than it is to control, end quote. Global 2000 was authorized under president Jimmy Carter. In Global 2000, which is a government policy, you can go ahead and look this up, it specifies how to use food as a weapon and how to use reproductive services as a weapon.
If you than back to doctor Henry Kissinger in 1974, who was a 32nd secretary of state under president Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford. He specified, quote, depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the 3rd world, end quote. They specified that the population is outgrowing our ability to control them. And so at than this point. Do you think that a government is interested in having people stand up against them and you think they're not gonna do something about it?
They know the people are rising hang up against the evil that they are committing. So what is the goal? The goal is to remove 3 to 4000000000 human beings from the planet. That is the point. They have lost The control of the masses people are not stupid anymore.
People don't just trust their government anymore. They don't just trust the science, which there's no such thing as these science. Science evolves, changes, and they're different scientists, which means there's no such thing as one science. They are looking. They're studying.
They're reading, and they're asking questions. So because of that, this government has made a decision to get rid than of those people. And again, it don't matter what color you are. If you choose to stand up against us and you don't fall in line, we have to get rid of you.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Just the fact that Media Matters is ok with the MAP crowd (minor attracted persons) posting on social media should be all you need to know about their agenda. https://t.co/le1w4nnSxH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the issue of conservative voices being deplatformed and attacked by left-wing groups and the mainstream media. They highlight the lack of court action against these groups and the importance of investing in legal action. They criticize Media Matters for not addressing the presence of individuals attracted to minors on social media platforms while targeting conservatives. The speakers argue that conservatives are seen as a threat to the upcoming presidential election and to freedom in general. They also mention the biased reporting of CNN and MSNBC, who portray Media Matters as a legitimate watchdog group. The political bias and alleged recklessness of Media Matters are questioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, deplatformed, demonetized, and otherwise assaulted by these left wing groups, and the mainstream media that gives them, you know, oxygen. And no one has been willing to go to court and actually pursue their rights. And so I think this is a big deal, for someone to invest money in the court and in lawyers to actually go after groups like Media Matters?
Speaker 1: No. You never see Media Matters upset that there are, people Posting on these social media platforms that call themselves minor attracted persons. Right? They're they're they're attracted to minors. You know?
Oh, they're not pedophiles, but they're attracted to minors. I mean, so they don't have any problem with stuff like that, but it's a it's a platform that offers conservatives and others A place to speak their mind. I I'm just gonna repeat. That is a threat to them going into this president presidential election cycle, and it's a threat to them beyond. Freedom is a threat to them.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's the whole reason that they they've been done, I think, 20 of these types of complaints against x. You know, they're not doing it against Instagram and Facebook because, you know, they're willing to be, moderated by the left and their their speech code, yeah, and TikTok. But, you know and and also remember, this is just the next step in in the left's, desire, you know, and they kinda lost their truth squads in DHS. Those were exposed.
And so, you know, this is another opportunity. I just can't believe the way CNN and MSNBC or maybe I can believe, but, you know, the the fact that they report media matters as a legitimate, watchdog group. It's not. It's a it's just like crew, and it's like so many of these groups in Washington, DC that are funded by the left and and and and go after conservatives and where they communicate.
Speaker 1: Well and it seems to be reckless recklessness That's being alleged and perhaps, malice here as well given the political bias of media matters. Matt, it's great to see
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Here is 2 minutes of Democrats revealing their distrust for voting machines. https://t.co/EwzkfsyJnC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines in minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in different states, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of voting machines used by American voters. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. For researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.
Speaker 1: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
Speaker 2: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another.
Speaker 0: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
Speaker 3: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
Speaker 2: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are Doing different things, but in fact, 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risks.
Speaker 4: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Speaker 3: Workers were able to easily hack into electronic voting machine.
Speaker 0: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors.
Speaker 5: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
Speaker 4: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues Here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states.
Speaker 1: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack.
Speaker 3: In a close presentary election, they just need to hack 1 swing state. Or maybe 1 or 2. Or maybe just a few counties in 1 swing stayed.
Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Douglass Mackey discusses with Tucker Carlson about being prosecuted for mocking Hillary Clinton on social media with a meme. Watch this and ask yourself whether this country is under a police state. And be sure to catch #PoliceStateFilm by producer @DineshDSouza https://t.co/QA0QBKEAAo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doug Mackey, a man who made fun of Hillary Clinton on Twitter during the 2016 election, shares his shocking story of being indicted and convicted by the federal government. He was arrested by the FBI and faced the possibility of 10 years in prison for a tweet that was deemed a crime. The government claimed that his tweet was an effort to mislead people about voting. However, there was no evidence that anyone's vote was actually subverted. Despite the lack of evidence, Mackey was convicted based on his alleged intent. The media, including the Huffington Post, played a role in his arrest by revealing his true identity. Mackey questions the state of free speech in the country and the dangerous precedent set by his case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If someone had told you even 10 years ago that you could be indicted by the federal government and go to prison for 10 years for making fun of Hillary Clinton on social media, you would not have believed it. It's a free country. We have free speech. But it turns out, not only is that possible, it has likely become much more common because the actual war is over information. One of its first casualties is a man called Doug Mackey, who during the 2016 election made fun of Hillary Clinton on Twitter.
And then a few years later found himself the subject of a federal raid, an indictment, and then a conviction. It's a shocking story. It's hard to believe it's happening in this country, but it is. And to prove it, Doug Mackey joins us now. Doug, thanks so much for coming on.
Thank you, Tucker. So, I've never even seen you in person before. You have not, I don't think spoken about this publicly, or at least very often, since it happened. So give us just a quick background on who you are. I read, I think, in BuzzFeed that you were a dangerous white nationalist militant, are you?
Speaker 1: No. No. Not at all. You don't see it. Where are you from?
I grew up in Vermont.
Speaker 0: In Vermont?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Not a hotbed of white nationalist militancy. And where'd you go to college? What were you doing during the 2016 election, etcetera?
Speaker 1: I graduated from Middlebury College, which is also in Vermont. Yep. And then I moved to New York. I lived there about 6 years. That's where I was at the time of the election, the 2016 election.
What were you doing? So I had
Speaker 2: just left my job, but I was previously an economic researcher.
Speaker 0: Versus like a Wall Street firm or something like that?
Speaker 1: Something like that. Corporate America.
Speaker 0: Yes. So what were you doing during the 2016 election.
Speaker 1: So I was posting a lot of stuff on Twitter under a pseudonym about the election.
Speaker 0: What kind of stuff?
Speaker 1: Pro Trump memes, jokes, All kinds of links, that kind of thing. Why were you doing that? Just purely out of passion.
Speaker 0: Well, so you like Trump?
Speaker 1: I like Trump. That's right. Why? I thought he was a breath of fresh air for the country. I think that his analysis of, you know, the problems with the country, With the ruling class of the country, I liked what he was saying, and I thought he had a positive vision for the country.
Speaker 0: Where were you politically before the 2016 election?
Speaker 1: I was sort of conservative. Previously, I was sort of libertarian. But earlier in my life, I was sort of apolitical.
Speaker 0: So you weren't a lifelong political activist? No. But but you got excited about Trump, and you decided to support him on social media. At the time, did you think that was your constitutional right? Yes.
Absolutely. Why'd you think that?
Speaker 1: Well, I thought that this was America. They thought they were the first amendment. Okay. Due process rights, that we could criticize People in our ruling class.
Speaker 0: It looks like you thought wrong. So let's get specific about what you did, the crimes the felonies that you committed on Twitter. You I want to put this up. You posted this on Twitter. This is a meme.
It says, save time. Avoid the line. Vote from home. And it's got a picture of Hillary Clinton. Text Hillary to this number.
Did you make this meme?
Speaker 1: No, I didn't. Oh, you didn't you didn't create this? No. Where'd it come from? I found it on 4chan.
Okay.
Speaker 0: So it was floating around the Internet?
Speaker 1: Yeah. These kind of memes were floating all over the place.
Speaker 0: And you posted it on Twitter. Why did what was the point of that?
Speaker 1: Well, part of my French food is called a shitpost. Yeah. We talked about this a lot at the trial. I testified. Just sort of a joke.
Rile up everybody. Muddy the waters. And mostly just because I thought my audience would find it funny. Did they?
Speaker 0: Yeah, absolutely. I find it hilarious. You're obviously from Northern England. You have a very dry sense of humor.
Speaker 1: Very dry. Yeah. I noticed that. I noticed that. So,
Speaker 0: did you get a sense when you posted that that that was a crime or that it would be perceived as a crime? No. Absolutely not. So we have to and I want to play this. This is from Hillary Clinton.
This is from this April, so long after you were indicted, long after after you went on trial. And this is Hillary Clinton describing that means.
Speaker 2: There was just a trial in Brooklyn where a guy who had been one of the main, I guess he was one of the main people running memes against me in 2016. He went from what you could consider free speech. I mean, both Nancy and I have pretty thick skins. People say all kinds of things about us. But he went from that To running a very deliberate effort to mislead people about where and how to vote.
So it went from speech To action meant to subvert the election because thousands of people who they targeted through their algorithms, Oh, I can text my vote for Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 0: So Hillary Clinton we I wanna deconstruct that in some greater detail in a minute. But it Hillary Clinton apparently, took that very seriously. You were using using, quote, algorithms to subvert the election with that meme.
Speaker 1: I don't even really know what she means by that. I don't know how, I guess, you post something, and it gets taken up into algorithms. I'm not exactly sure. I was surprised that she said that.
Speaker 0: Did you have personal algorithms that you used? No.
Speaker 1: Okay. Now it's just Copy, paste, and click a button.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So like everyone else on social media, you see something funny, you post it.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 0: Okay. So describe the rest of your career on Twitter. So you're enthusiastic about Trump, I assume. Are you being paid to post these things? No.
Nobody's paying me. You're just a random guy who's amusing the hell out of yourself by pushing your candidate on social media.
Speaker 1: That's that's right. That's exactly right.
Speaker 0: So then what happens? How long were you on Twitter?
Speaker 1: Until 2018, mid-twenty 18.
Speaker 0: Okay. But this criminal tweet is from 2016.
Speaker 1: 16 November.
Speaker 0: So at any point, did you think that you'd committed a crime or
Speaker 2: that others would think that you committed a crime?
Speaker 0: No. When did you discover that you were considered a felon by the U. S. Government?
Speaker 1: Well, I had 8 to 10 Law enforcement agents come and lock on my door at 7 AM. 7 days after Joe Biden was inaugurated. Did you have any warning that this was coming? No. No warning.
So what
Speaker 0: were you doing at 7 in the morning?
Speaker 1: I was sleeping.
Speaker 0: So you're asleep, you hear a knock, and then
Speaker 1: what happens? And then the FBI. Are you Doug Mackey? Yes. What's going on?
Like, I I asked them, they said, you're we have a warrant for your arrest. I said, what for? For what? They didn't tell me till I got to the courthouse.
Speaker 0: Did they cuff you? Yes. The FBI threw handcuffs on you at your home at 7 in the morning and didn't tell you why?
Speaker 1: Yes. Did you have any idea why? No. I had no idea.
Speaker 0: What was going through your mind?
Speaker 1: I knew that politicians could be vindictive, and The federal government sometimes could be influenced by those politicians, but and I know that they can sort of Get very creative with federal statutes. So if I was the enemy of their candidate, then I thought maybe they could cook something up.
Speaker 0: But this was an entire election cycle later.
Speaker 1: That was the weird part. But I knew that we had just had a transition of presidents. So. So 7 days after Biden gets inaugurated, you get arrested for a tweet years ago. Earlier.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: What was your reaction?
Speaker 1: You know, it's crazy. I actually I was a little bit surprised, but I wouldn't put anything past, You know what they can do?
Speaker 0: I don't I mean, I remember reading that and thinking, clearly, I'm missing something. You probably murdered somebody, you know, or put strychnine in the water supply or something. It can't really be that you just tweeted something the previous election cycle and had an there were 10 FBI agents?
Speaker 1: There were 4 FBI agents, and then they had some local cops and that kind of thing.
Speaker 0: But 10 law enforcement officers?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Were you waving a gun and screaming, you'll never take me alive? Not quite. So you're just like some random guy?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. It was shocked. I had roommates at the time. They were in disbelief.
They couldn't believe it.
Speaker 0: They must have assumed you were like a drug kingpin or
Speaker 1: Yeah, pretty much. They thought I had some kind of secret that I was hiding or something. They were really shocked when they found out what it was.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I was too. And it turned out by the way, fast forward to your trial. It turns out your crime was exactly what you said it was, posting, a tweet. So what happened then?
Speaker 1: So they took me to the courthouse and because it was COVID. There were some delays. I just I was in a holding cell. They take off your handcuffs and put you in leg irons, and then you just wait for your arraignment, go for the judge, even then, I still don't know Why I'm being arrested? They got a public defender on Zoom speaking for you.
And then,
Speaker 0: well, you're in a leg irons, and you have no idea why you're arrested.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. And not not until I got the A copy of the criminal complaint. Did I know what was going on? At what point was that?
After the arraignment, and then they let you go. They take leg irons off, and they put you on the streets of West Palm Beach.
Speaker 0: They didn't bring you home?
Speaker 1: No. How far is that from your house? 20 miles. But the worst part is they didn't I was gonna bring my phone, my wallet so I could call a friend or take a taxi home, they said, oh, no. You don't need that.
You know, you don't need that. That's just going to delay things for you. You'll get out. You know, it'll take longer for you to get out. So don't bring that.
So my friends were waiting for me outside, and then They, they didn't know how long it was going to be, so they left. So I get out of there and fortunately, there was a really nice taxi driver that, well, one of the guys I was at a holding cell with, he helped me make it over to the train station where I could grab a taxi. Your new prison friends were helping you. Exactly. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Did you join a gang? No. I'm sorry to make light of it. I just don't know.
I mean, in a in in the old America, this would provoke an uprising. You can't do that. You're not allowed to criticize to arrest people for criticizing you. But the reaction to your arrest was very different. Describe it if you would.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, there was a lot of Support. But, you know, I was on Rachel Maddow that night. I mean, they were, the left was really celebrating this. They were celebrating. They thought it was terrific.
Speaker 0: To arrest you for making fun of Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: I mean, you're from this country. You grew up here. Did that surprise you?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I was pretty surprised. But I got to tell you, after the left has sort of done a 180 since 2016.
Speaker 0: So if they celebrated your imprisonment, why wouldn't they celebrate your execution?
Speaker 1: Some of them would? Clearly? I think so. What kind of support did you get? Well, I got to thank you for, you showcased my, my arrest on your show.
It might have been that night or the next night. And,
Speaker 0: there was just By the way, in the back of my mind, I thought, we're probably going to find out that Doug Mackey works for Al Qaeda. I mean, there's guys telling
Speaker 1: me the story. Yeah. No. I mean, a lot of people felt that way. Well, it would have
Speaker 0: to be. They can't arrest you for making fun of Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Anybody who learns the details of my case says, That's it. You know, what's going on? Like, the people that actually learned the details of the case. But there was a tremendous outpouring of from the American people.
People that maybe are conservative, but not necessarily. People that support free speech? Yes. People that don't support an abusive federal government? So
Speaker 0: you get people opposed to fascism. Speaking of Antifa opposes fascism, did they come to your aid?
Speaker 1: No. Oh, they didn't?
Speaker 0: No. I'm thinking they're not sincere. What about the ACLU?
Speaker 1: They cheered on my arrest.
Speaker 0: The ACLU cheered on your arrest.
Speaker 1: Yeah. On what grounds? Because they said The well, I don't think they care that much about the First Amendment anymore.
Speaker 0: No. It's only the American Civil Liberties Union.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They were more interested in The idea that there was this effort to stop people from exercising their right to vote, So they chose that. They chose to support it on that ground.
Speaker 0: So let's let's so let's get to that claim because that's that's the heart of it. So Hillary Clinton, you know, whatever her faults, who really has become a vicious person, a hater, sort of dismisses out of hand that you have a First Amendment right to make fun of her. And she does that by saying that people say all kinds of things about us. But his went from running a very deliberate effort to mislead people about where and how to vote, an effort to subvert the election because thousands of people who they targeted through their algorithms algorithms thought, oh, I can text my vote for Hillary Clinton. Now just, again, to restate, you had no, quote, algorithms.
No. Hillary Clinton has no idea what an algorithm is, needless to say. So you were a solo operator. You're 1 guy on your on your laptop. But the claim is that you somehow stole people's right to vote.
Is there any evidence that that's true?
Speaker 1: No. And the government said that they didn't have to show any evidence of that at trial. They said that the fact that there was a conspiracy was enough. They went around and interviewed People because they would have loved to put someone on the stand who didn't vote because they thought they could text their vote. They couldn't find a single person.
They couldn't even find people that that they went and looked up people that texted the meme, the number, supposedly, 4 years ago, and they couldn't even remember doing it, or they thought it was silly, and they want to see what would happen. They actually
Speaker 0: interviewed people? How did they know who
Speaker 1: these people were? They subpoenaed their phone numbers. Not really? Yes. And their voting records.
Speaker 0: What did this effort cost?
Speaker 1: I have no idea. But 1,000,000 of dollars. It had to have cost that much.
Speaker 0: So the government couldn't find a single person whose vote was, as Hillary Clinton said, subverted by your tweet?
Speaker 1: No. And they looked very hard.
Speaker 0: How is it a conspiracy?
Speaker 1: So there were some group chats where people were creating these memes. Yes? And, I was a member of some of them. Some of them, I wasn't even a member of. And they said that because these people are in this group chat talking about creating memes that you're a part of the conspiracy.
Even though I wasn't talking in these group chats, really participating in them at all, I wasn't paying any attention to them.
Speaker 0: So your trial And we still live in a country where trials are mostly public. I'm sure that will change, and I'll be a pure military tribunal star chamber, drum head proceeding. But at the at this point, like, your trial was took place in public and we can get the transcript and all that. So the media knew that that there was no actual crime here. Did anybody from the Associated Press or NBC News or The Washington Post, New York Times reexamine this case, or take a close look at the case and say, wait a second.
The guy didn't do anything.
Speaker 1: Not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: And these are crimes through which you could've spent 10 years in prison. Right. It felt to me like the media were cheerleading your
Speaker 1: prosecution. Oh, yes. Definitely. Some of them.
Speaker 0: By calling you a bigot? Absolutely. I don't think you are a bigot, I assume. But even if you were, that you're allowed to have your own views, correct?
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. No. I'm not a bigot, but like I said, this is America. Right.
So why did you get convicted? So I got convicted. That's a great question. They basically put 12 people in a courthouse in Brooklyn and say, it's up to you to decide whether this meme was Satire or whether it was an effort to trick people out of voting. So they get to decide.
12 people, they can drag you into a courthouse anywhere in the country because they say, since it's tweets, they go over wires So they can charge this crime wherever they please. So if you post a joke on the Internet, a prosecutor in Could be the most conservative district or the most liberal district in America, can drag you in and put you in front of 12 people, or are gonna decide whether you were joking. They're going to decide what your intent was. Did you think you were going to be acquitted? To be honest with you, No.
I thought maybe the jury would hang. But I didn't think we would get 12 jurors voting for acquittal. Do do you have any idea why they voted to convict? Well, I don't really have a lot of insight into that. But with this kind of a charge, they don't need direct evidence to convict you.
So, really, unless I'm misinterpreting what you're saying, you were convicted on the basis of
Speaker 0: what they claimed your intent was. That's exactly right. They could not find a single person who was harmed by this. They could find no actual effect of this so called subversion of our democracy. You didn't actually subvert our democracy.
There's no evidence that you did.
Speaker 1: No. But they claimed that you wanted to? They claimed that I wanted to and that I agreed to enter into a conspiracy with other people. Were those people charged? One of them was.
He cooperated. Cooperated? In what way? He testified at trial that we had a silent agreement.
Speaker 0: To subvert democracy? That's right.
Speaker 1: Did you? Well, I don't know how you can have a silent agreement with someone a 1000 miles away over the Internet. Had you ever met this person? No. Never met him.
I didn't even at the time, November 2016, I had never even spoken to him 1 on 1, Or I don't even think in a group chat.
Speaker 0: What role did the Huffington Post play in this case?
Speaker 1: They well, so I was posting pseudonymously. So they doxed me in 2018.
Speaker 0: So you were not using your real name as many people don't, both on the Internet and in literature, and a Huffington Post reporter decided to reveal your true identity?
Speaker 1: Yes. Who was the reporter? Luke O'Brien. Luke O'Brien. How did he find out who you were?
Just through some, basically, people that leaked My name to him, basically? Disgruntled people or whatever you want to call it.
Speaker 0: So because Luke O'Brien did this, you were arrested and faced 10 years in prison.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I mean, their their criminal complaint, basically,
Speaker 0: was just using what Luke O'Brien did. So it sounds like, in effect, Luke O'Brien, like so many journalists, is actually working for the national security state in order to in prison and destroy people who dissent?
Speaker 1: Could be. It does sound that way a little bit? I have my suspicions, I guess. Boy, you are from Vermont.
Speaker 0: I'm all I'm tempted to ask you. How do you get there from here? You have a right to be anonymous on the Internet, obviously. Luke O'Brien's supposed to be, like, a reporter or something. And he's spending his time trying to discover your identity because he doesn't like your politics.
What was the effect other than the federal indictment of being doxxed by the Huffington Post?
Speaker 1: It was very difficult personally for me. Very hard on my family, very hard on myself And very hard on my friends. So it was very difficult. You know, I lost a lot at the time, but I think it was also So
Speaker 0: tell me what you lost.
Speaker 1: So I lost basically just friends. I had difficult relationships with family members. And I just had to restart everything
Speaker 0: because you were revealed to have said naughty things on the internet
Speaker 1: that's right
Speaker 0: yeah does sound kind of
Speaker 1: Soviet, doesn't it? Yeah. Yeah. I think it does.
Speaker 0: Are you afraid to go to prison? I don't think so. How many guys from your class at Middlebury have gone to prison?
Speaker 1: None that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: None that you're aware of, right? I mean, so I guess kind of what I'm saying is you're not from
Speaker 2: a world where it was expected you would wind up facing a prison term?
Speaker 1: No. How has
Speaker 0: this changed your view of the United States?
Speaker 1: Well, I just I don't know if that we're a free country. I'm not sure. I have my doubts, like I said.
Speaker 0: So if you can be thrown in prison for making fun of Hillary Clinton, I mean, does set a precedent, does it not?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, the scary thing is, if they think that you're, you know, conspiring on the Internet, they can subpoena your entire life and dig through everything you've got. So, I mean, it sets a very dangerous precedent. Not only the fact that they can pick you up and and drag you to whatever federal district they want in the entire country because tweets go over wires.
Speaker 0: You know, you made fun of Hillary Clinton in 2016, in a pretty lighthearted way, by the way. It's obvious now that she's evil. I mean, she she would be delighted to see you go to prison. And that's evil, to say it out loud. Did you know that about her when you mocked her in 2016?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I saw what she
Speaker 0: I mean, any politician who roots for her critics to go to prison is, by definition, like, that's Idi Amin territory.
Speaker 1: Well, let me just put it this way. I saw her reaction to to when Gaddafi was murdered. So Yeah.
Speaker 0: I think if anything, we understated, her darkness. Did members of congress come out in support of you?
Speaker 1: Some have, actually. Yes. In a meaningful way, in a way that helped you? I mean, I'm very grateful for it. I don't know what you know, I don't know how much power they have.
I mean, they can Maybe open investigations, that kind of thing. But so far, they there have been some that have been supportive. Have any traditional liberals other than Glenn Greenwald
Speaker 0: come out in support of you?
Speaker 1: Very few and far between. It's been very few and far between. There are a couple and, like, more libertarian types and some liberals, Some who even might say, like, oh, we don't like this. We thought this was a bad thing, rather than just a shitpost or a joke. But should we be charging these things with 10 year federal felonies?
Speaker 0: Should we like, it's an open question.
Speaker 1: Should we really execute him?
Speaker 0: So where does this leave you in life?
Speaker 1: So I mean, like I said, I'm just very grateful. I'm very fortunate to have the support that I've gotten. Family, friends and just regular people who have come to my support. So that, hopefully, this will be an opportunity and not You know, like I said, hopefully, this
Speaker 0: is an opportunity. An opportunity for what?
Speaker 1: Well, there's there's something redemptive about suffering. So we'll find out. Yes, I think that's right.
Speaker 0: But I mean, how so in the past several years since you were indicted? Like, how much of your life has been spent dealing with this case?
Speaker 1: Well, I've got great lawyers that have, handled it a lot of it for me, but definitely a lot of time, a lot of hours, A lot of preparation for trial. And, I think just the stress of it is very difficult, You know? And but at the same time, I think that you learn to roll the punches. But
Speaker 0: does it ever I mean, how much do you fight self pity?
Speaker 1: To be honest with you,
Speaker 0: I don't really I don't like self pity. Good. Doug Mackey, good luck. We're definitely rooting for you, and I'm just I'm sorry on behalf of the country that you had to go through this. It's just one of the worst things I've ever
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Paul Harvey warned us about the climate change hoax. https://t.co/C4g436mUtn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The media and some scientists have claimed that there is a growing ozone hole over the United States, causing an increase in skin cancer. However, recent data shows that the destruction of chlorine around the polar vortex has actually been decreasing since January. Ozone levels naturally fluctuate due to volcanic activity and solar flares. A study by MIT's Technology Review suggests that there has been little to no global warming in the past century. The rise in world surface temperature before 1940 has been reversed since then. Former NASA chief Robert Jastrow and other scientists criticize those who profit from predicting global warming, stating that spending trillions of dollars to repeal the industrial revolution is unnecessary and harmful to the American economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And with the willing complicity of headline hungry media, A recent crisis of the month had to do with global warming. An ozone hole is opening up over the United States we were told, the effects of which were already measurable in an increase in skin cancer. On the contrary, destroying chlorine around the polar vortex has been declining since January. A major objective of a recent shuttle mission was to determine the scope and scale of the so called Ozone Hole, and the silence since has been deafening from those whose livelihood depends on creating crises. Recent data from the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellites affirms that any problem is less, it's not greater.
Ozone levels fluctuate all of the time partly because of volcanic activity and solar flares. But MIT's Technology Review has made an exhaustive study of worldwide ocean temperatures since 18/51 has concluded that there appears to have been little or no global warming over the past century. In fact, the net rise in world surface temperature during the last century, which was about 1%, almost all occurred before 1940, and that was before aerosols, and that has since been reversed. Former NASA chief, Robert Jastrow, and former Scripps director William Nierenberg, past president of the American Academy of Sciences, Frederick Seitz, all have in a scathing rebuke of those who make money by predicting global warming, quote, If we allow ourselves to be influenced by press release. We could spend $1,000,000,000,000 over the next decade destroying what's left of the American economy in an utterly unnecessary attempt to repeal the industrial revolution.