reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @FromKulak

Saved - April 9, 2024 at 9:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In ancient times, Germanic women displayed fierce determination by threatening to kill their children if their men failed in battle. At the Battle of Vercellae, the Romans emerged victorious, resulting in a devastating loss of 160,000 lives. However, the surviving descendants of these Germanics eventually halted Roman conquest and conquered the empire. This historical event serves as a reminder that despite challenges, perseverance can lead to victory. The author reflects on this when facing societal concerns and urges readers to consider the sacrifices made by their ancestors. The event is well-documented in Roman history, appearing in various historical texts. The selection of such women was influenced by a culture of human sacrifice.

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

🧵In ancient times Germanic women refused to be taken slaves and attended battles threatening to murder their children if their men failed. Then one day they failed. At the battle of Vercellae 101 bc the Romans won, the line broke, and the Teutonic women in the rear cut down or ran their fleeing fathers, brothers and husbands through with spears before butchering their babes and killing themselves. 160,000 dead in a single day, over 3 times total US war losses in Vietnam for an ethnicity totalling maybe 500k-2 mil. The Modern American Equivalent might be 20-40 million dead in a single day. They won in the end. The surviving descendants and cousins of those Germanics would be the ones to hold back Roman Conquest at the Rhine and eventually conquer the empire, their unconditional refusal to be slaves outlasted the Greatest empire in history. I think about this when people try to "blackpill" about some new snide policy, or mass migration, or Central Bank Digital Currencies, or how it's the end of freedom, or the west, or white people.... Your ancestors lost 10-20% of their entire ethnicity, in a single day, on several occasions... And they still won in the end. Their WOMEN were so committed to liberty or death that they'd murder their own fathers and babies. And you intend to pay the income tax for the rest of your life? So foreign criminals can be housed next to your daughter's school?

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

This is one of the most documented events in Roman history. Appearing in both Plutarch's life of Marius, Livy's History of Rome, and Orosius' Historiae Adversus Paganos

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

Now if you wonder how they selected for such women, wouldn’t life naturally select for Women who wouldn’t murder their children? The answer is LOTS of human sacrifice read my deep dive 👇👇👇 https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/feral-aryan-femininity-blonde-women

Feral Aryan Femininity: Blonde Women as Bioweapons on Valkyrie, Amazons, Camp Followers, Goths, GirlBosses, and EGirls anarchonomicon.com
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 8:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Holocaust's use of gas chambers is questioned due to inefficiency and the availability of alternative methods used in other genocides. The authenticity of a door from Auschwitz is debated, with claims of censorship and anger towards its display. The hypothetical scenario of Japanese Americans in internment camps during wartime hardships is raised. The emotional toll on German soldiers is discussed, questioning their inability to assign prisoners to be shot. The belief that Hitler refused to use nerve gas due to moral conviction is contrasted with his use of discount delousing agent on women and children. The role of the Allies in causing starvation and horror in the camps is mentioned, challenging the perception of liberation. A book recommendation is given for a deeper understanding of World War II.

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

🧵The thing no one's ever been able to explain to me about the holocaust is... Why use gas chambers at all? It's labour intensive (have to remove the bodies), location restrictive, slow, and then you have a body in your camp attracting disease. "They cremated them" Wasting scarce fuel in a country that never reached the baku oil fields and couldn't gass its tanks?! No genocide before or since has needed gas chambers. You know how the Armenian, Chechen, Bangladeshi, and Cambodian genocides were carried out? They shot them and put them in a ditch. peak efficiency: Single bullet in material, instantaneous, and you already have them at gunpoint to make them walk to the ditch. You don't want to be discovered? You put up a sign "Unexploded mines, keep out" Hell the Hutus pulled off a genocide with Machetes. Is the conceit that this was one of the most inefficient examples of German over-engineering in history? Or are we to believe the average German is just so conscientious and moral that Russians, Turks, Japanese, Chinese, Cambodians, Pakistanis, Hindus, Africans, and Americans can all commit genocide with basic tools... but the lily-livered Germans needed elaborate rituals to emotionally distance themselves because they couldn't find enough people to man firing squads? Again 6 million bullets fired (even assuming ALL of them died in gas chambers as opposed to any disease or hunger) is a very small number compared to what's put out in war. there are Individual Americans who own 20-50k bullets (I've know guys to buy 10k at a time during sales)

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

According to Auschwitz Museum, This is the airtight door that was used to hold in 1.5 million people who were killed Community notes called me a liar without a valid source when I posted this door Will they call the Auschwitz museum liars too? Why are people so angry for me showing these doors? This is so well accepted history you will go to jail in 30 countries for denying this

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

What do you think would have happened to Japanese americans in their internment camps if America's rail network was bombed and even the families of US soldiers were starving?

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

"It was emotionally draining, the Germans had breakdowns" So you have penal unit of disobedient soldiers who you can force to clear landmines, by hand, under artillery fire, in -40, on the eastern front... or they'll be shot. But you can't assign them to shoot prisoners?

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

https://t.co/BcSzEB67Ug

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

This is what westoids literally believe. That Adolf Hitler had a massive tech advantage in Nerve Gas. Refused to use it during the entire war, even to defend Berlin, out of moral conviction since he'd been gassed in WW1. But he gassed women & children w discount delousing agent https://t.co/uBBIu3GJ21

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

https://t.co/ofUB2CqMqW

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

"My Grandfather liberated the camps. Couldn't believe what humans do to each other" Look up a map. Every camp the Americans liberated were labour camps, only the soviets found death camps. The starvation and horror your grandfather saw were caused by allied blockade and bombing of logistics. Your grandfather was the one who'd done it to them. I wonder what Americans think would have happened to the Japanese Americans in their concentration camps if America lost the war and suddenly all US rail connections and food logistics were bombed?

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

If you want the real history of WW2, Putin-esque deep dive into the geostrategics of everything Read Iron Curtain over America by Beaty. A US Army Intelligence Lieutenant-Colonel and University professor wrote the dark truth in 1951 and dozens of US generals endorsed it. https://t.co/8FjtzpY9PG

Saved - December 9, 2023 at 2:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
All political orders, from the Italian Mafia to modern welfare systems, are governed by the Iron Rule: "Those who resist will be shot." Whether it's taxes or loyalty to a political vision, violence is used to enforce compliance. This universal axiom has been seen throughout history, from the American Revolution to post-Napoleonic Europe. Political outcomes are always enforced with violence. This is why libertarianism emphasizes the use of violence to maintain liberty. Resistance to political authority is met with unlimited violence, a reality that remains unalterable in any political order.

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

🧵The Iron Rule🧵 Every regime of Sovereignty is governed according to a very simple principle: "THOSE WHO RESIST WILL BE SHOT" You lose to Tony Soprano in a game of cards and can't afford to pay him? He sets an interest rate. Still won't Pay? He'll show up to bust out your business make you take out other loans you can't pay so as to pay him, make you purchase good online for him to resell, and make you destroy your life in fraudulent loans, til nothing is left... And if you refuse or lie to him he'll get violent. He'll beat you, and if you offer violence in turn and resist... maybe even win the fistfight with him and his goons... He'll either shoot you then and there, or he'll leave and you'll be shot by a henchman who can't be tied to him. . By contrast, if you fail to pay your taxes to the IRS... They'll set an exorbitant interest rate on the outstanding amount. Still won't pay? They'll show up with agents and put a lien on your home or business... And if you still won't pay the expanding amount?Armed men will show up to take your home or business... And if you get violent with them they'll taser, mace, and beat the crap out of you before dragging you to a cage to lose years of your life getting sexually assaulted by another prisoner. And as we've seen countless times on police procedural these very cops act as advisors on, they'll mock you and extort confessions with the threat of those sexual assaults. And if by some miracle you defeat the police officers who come to confiscate your home and chase them off with a gun or your superior unarmed martial arts... they'll shoot you or come back with a tactical team who will. They'll maybe give you one last chance to surrender and accept prison and sexual assault for a term of decades or life now. But any continued resistance can only end in death. Those who resist will be shot. . This is, of course, the exact same process. Right down to the individual steps. The IRS and the Mob only differ in their perceived "Legitimacy", which is a largely bullshit concept. The Mob and wiseguys think of the Mob as legitimate... and of course if you go back enough most nation states evolved out of protection schemes little different... It was just they called their regional bosses "Lords" and "Knights" or instead of Capos and enforcers. . This is how school Lunch programs are funded! Every democratic policy is funded by the threat that if anyone refuses to pay up, an infinitely escalating amount of violence will be used to overcome any and all resistance or avoidance. Old men are shot every year because the US forest Service's bureaucracy needs more committee meetings. Grandmothers are raided and lose their houses to fund the Gender Study departments at Montclair State University. This is what all politics is. Violence and the terror of violence. this is how the sausage gets made. . And yet you'll hear from Moderates and "Conservatives" that firing the bureaucracy or shutting down universities or cutting welfare programs, merely giving the biggest leaches in modern life less of other people's stolen money... That's MEAN! that's heartless! That's uncharitable and un-Christian. Yet dragging the elderly out of their homes and shooting their dogs in front of their grandchildren over back taxes... that's just the normal price we pay for civilization. All politics! All Governance! Every government that has ever formed or ever will be formed, every policy that will ever be advocated, every welfare program or regulation that will ever be enacted is backed-up by an eternal universal commitment to escalate to unlimited violence in the face of any and all resistance to pay. Hell the current US president has even hinted he'd use nukes and drone strikes to put down tax revolts or state declarations of independence. . Simply put, if you are unwilling to escalate to unlimited violence to enforce your political vision... you are not only unwilling to enforce your political vision, YOU DON'T HAVE A POLITICAL VISION. That is what a political vision is! A vision you are willing to enforce with unlimited violence. A political vision or movement you aren't willing to enforce with violence is not political... It is an art project or a service club... It's an old women's sewing circle. After the French Revolution those who continued to espouse loyalty to and advance the interests of Bourbons were shot or guillotined. And after Napoleon's coup, those who continued to advance the interest of the Thermidoians suffered the same fate. And likewise when the Bourbons were restored in 1815, they made numerous examples, famously Marshall Ney. Even on the Battlefield of Waterloo, when the old guard, out of ammo and unable to fight, still refused to surrender... They were cut to pieces by cannister shot. Likewise, every Usurpation and restoration of Ancien Regime Europe was accompanied by surrenders and oaths of loyalty, or killings for those who continued to resist. Likewise the American revolution.... You thought your forefathers were better than this? This is what British/Canadian Army Surgeon and later Lieutenant Colonel William "Tiger" Dunlop wrote after interviewing Dutch Refugees who'd settled in Canada after the revolution In his "Recollections of the War of 1812" (On Guttenburg): "Among these good, kind, simple people, I spent a month or six weeks very pleasantly. Loyal and warmly attached to the British Crown, they followed our standard in the Revolutionary War, and obtained from government settlements in Canada when driven from their homes on the banks of the Hudson. From what I could learn from them, the Americans had persecuted them and their families with a rancour they displayed to no other race of mankind. When prisoners were taken in action, while the British were treated by them with respect, and even with kindness, the Dutch were deliberately murdered in cold blood. Men without arms in their hands, but suspected of favouring the British cause, were shot before their own doors, or hanged on the apple trees of their own orchards, in presence of their wives and families, who without regard to age or sex, were turned from their homes without remorse or pity. And one old dame told me that she was for six weeks in the woods between Utica and Niagara, unaccompanied by any one but her two infant children, looking for her husband, who she luckily found in the fort of the latter place; at one time she and her poor babes must have perished from hunger, but for some Mohawk Indians, who came up and delivered them, and conducted them to the Fort. The Dutch themselves ascribe this very different treatment of the two races to the fear of the Americans that the British would retaliate in case they were ill-used, while the Dutch could not." This is what goes into establishing a political order... This is how the American republic was formed and a large part of how soldiers and revolutionaries were compensated by states and the federal government after the war. This is why I find it laughable when people (and even some misguided moderate Libertarians) will say libertarianism is too bloodless or too unwilling to use violence to enforce political outcomes, or that it should be unwilling. Enforcement with violence is the Libertarian definition of a political outcome! This is what the state IS in Libertarian theory! and if you ask an anarcho-capitalist steeped in the theory how a post-state society could resist the reimplementation of a state, or maintain the existence of Liberty without a centralized superstructure to enforce that Political Outcome... They will not appeal to some vague notion of kumbaya hippy non-aggression, but a Decentralized social and property-structure that would enforce that Political Outcome with violence. Because a political outcome IS an outcome enforced with violence. The Iron Rule, what becomes in Republics of those who remain loyal to other political orders, what happens to those who resist "political authority", Ie. Authority backed up by unlimited violence... That is unalterable in any place at any time, from the Italian Mafia, to modern Welfare America, to Napoleonic and Post-Napoleonic Europe... To Medieval Europe, to Rome and Troy... And Back to the American Revolution... and into the future after the republic has fallen and whatever political order that arises cannot even be called a state, but something else entirely. Whether it is Religion, the Divine Right of Kings, the Republic, Equality, The Race, Ancient Rights, Welfare, or an Anti-Tax conception of Liberty itself that motivates an order.... It will remain unalterable universal axiom of ALL political orders: Those who Resist will be Shot.

Saved - October 10, 2023 at 2:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gaza's blockade involves two countries, often forgotten. Hamas smuggles arms with support from sympathizers in Egypt. If Israel starts a war, Egypt may stop blockading, leading to potential conflicts with Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Alternatively, Israel would face a flow of goods and arms to Gaza, similar to the Ho Chi Minh trail in Vietnam. Sustaining their threats may pose geopolitical challenges for Israel.

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

People just straight up forget Gaza has two borders, and it takes two countries to maintain the blockade. There’s a reason Hamas has been able to smuggle so many arms in, they receive tacit backdoor support from sympathizers in Egypt. If Israel “opens the gates of hell” or commits the warcrimes they’re threatening, then Egypt can just stop blockcading their side of the border completely… and would probably have to with the outcry in the Arab world. That’d leave Israel the option of starting a war with Egypt, a nation of 100m and giving the signal to Syria, Lebanon and maybe Jordan to declare war…. Or they’d be stuck with a gaping flow of goods and arms going to Gaza like the US in south vietnam with the Ho Chi Minh trail through Cambodia and Laos. Its not really clear Israel can sustain anything like what theyre threatening for any signifigant length of time without major geopolitical complications

Saved - October 9, 2023 at 9:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Truckers' Freedom Convoy was a highly successful protest in Canadian history. Despite initial crackdowns, the government eventually caved on all demands. The convoy led to political shifts, resignations, and a change in conservative leadership. Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, but the Senate demanded more influence. Trudeau withdrew the act, and lockdown measures were quietly lifted. Within months, all domestic restrictions were gone. The convoy achieved a total reversal in culture and policy, making it a significant threat to the governing class. The regime wants to downplay its success, but it was a premonition of a looming class war.

@FromKulak - CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

The Truckers won I keep encountering this misconception from people who don't follow Canadian politics... That somehow the Trucker convoy was defeated. The Freedom Convoy was the most wildly immediately successful protest in Canadian history, maybe WORLD history. People remember Trudeau's crackdown, old ladies having their skulls cracked with batons, Disabled indigenous grandmothers trampled by police horses, Bank accounts frozen and public employees investigated for mere donations... And there's a big reason people remember this: It was dramatic, and the media and the regime certainly wanted you to think resistance was futile. What people don't remember is what happened in the immediate aftermath: The government caved on absolutely everything! Within a week for the most important things, and then a month or so for the rest. First off there was the massive political shift that happened as the convoy was occurring: Jason Kenny, the pro-lockdown Premiere of Alberta (Canada's most conservative province) was forced to announce his resignation, and Alberta immediately lifted all its lockdown impositions. Erin O'Toole the pro-lockdown leader of the conservative party was likewise forced to resign, his temporary replacement Candice Bergen (not to be mistaken with the actress) being a longtime rival opposed to lockdowns, and his main rival who replaced her after party elections were @PierrePoilievre , the Politician after @MaximeBernier who was quickest to embrace the Truckers and their cry for freedom. As the convoy was ongoing Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act (the Act which replaced the War Measures Act for invoking Martial Law)... Now these grant the government almost unlimited powers, famously the War Measures Act was invoked by Trudeau's Father to detain Quebecers and raid hundreds of homes without warrants during the FLQ separatist crisis of 1972...the catch is while the follow on Emergencies Act can be invoked by a prime minister parliament has to sign off on the act's continued use within one week. Well, skulls were cracked, accounts were frozen, and as the week passed things came down to the deadline... On the very last night... Trudeau managed to get sign-off (without the conservative opposition) from the House of Commons, but it had to go to the Upper House, the Canadian Senate. NOW. The Canadian Senate is a shameful institution. It's like the British House of Lords but without the nobility. A senate seat is a lifetime appointment, by the prime minister... and that's it. Little to no review, no democratic input, and this is supposed to be equivalent or superior to our elected House of Commons... Naturally, the go-to use of the Senate is as a spoils system for cronies. Do some shameful favour for a prime minister, raise a lot of money for the party, and be politically connected to a provincial gov the PM wants to buy off... Get a Senate seat. One of the longest-standing political agreements in Canada is how badly the Senate needs to be abolished... but can't be because Quebec is nominally overrepresented in the Senate, and abolishing it would cause a constitutional crisis. So mostly the Senate keeps its head down and tries to avoid the news... because it will never be sympathetic. So this nursing home for cronies, criminals, fall guys, and connected activists past--people whose names haven't been spoken aloud since 1996, an institution that was last in the news 10 years ago for an expense scandal whose essence was "Wait we're paying these leeches expenses!?" That body was called upon to sign off on the Emergencies Act... And all these self-important losers smelled blood in the water. . Did they have some principled stand on civil liberties grounds? Absolutely not. They had a principled objection that they weren't being treated as more important! Sure they'd consider signing off on Trudeau's abuses, but they wanted an ongoing senate committee to continuously review the abuses, with cabinet-level briefings for the committee members, regular pressers, inclusion on the forming of policy... Juicy Juicy INFLUENCE. The exact thing these shameful roaches had been denied ever since their real political careers flamed out in '92 and they'd been forced to become lost souls in the senate. The speeches these delusional 70-year-old nobodies gave...MY GOD barely coherent gibberish from geriatrics convinced they were great statesmen... convinced their wisdom might now be included in great volumes of Canadian oratory next to Laurier, Macdonald, and Pearson... With mere hours left to the deadline and no passage in sight... Trudeau voluntarily withdrew the act. . In the preceding week, his Finance minister Crystia Freeland had given press statements and interviews to the effect that they planned to hunt down everyone who donated to the convoy, and create an expansive new system of financial control... with hints that would extend not only to the protesters but all the unvaccinated...none of this would happen. Instead, Trudeau weekly tried to claim victory... There were no protestors in Ottawa or on bridges! But in the week that followed lockdown measures were quickly and quietly pulled back. Alberta had already rescinded their measures, and other provinces were following suit. By June almost all domestic restrictions were gone the regime was desperately afraid that if the Protesters were able to shut down the capital and cross-border trade in minus 20 to minus 40-degree weather...what might they do in the Summer? Canada Day (July 1) was approached with fear. By August I traveled to the US for a wedding... Unvaccinated. The greater barrier was the risk the US would refuse me entry than Canada would hassle me. The US border guard didn't ask. And on the way back the Canadian border guard, obviously over with this stuff, told me "Now because you're unvaccinated you do technically have to quarantine, and they could possibly call, and if you say you haven't been quarantining they might do something..." I received one email from public health and immediately deleted it. There was no enforcement. I traveled again in October and was not even asked on return. The last measures had been withdrawn. The Greatest barrier to travel was US border restrictions and requirements... which technically only ended in May this year. . WITHIN 1 month the trucker convoy had effected a hostile overthrow of the Governments of Alberta and the official opposition, the Conservative Party of Canada, from pro to anti- lockdown, and crushed the moderate wing of the conservative movement. At Multiple points Trudeau was nearly forced out by his own party and his government was humiliated with most of its perceived power destroyed, it now exists as a rump failing to pass gun control bills (IN CANADA!) against moderate opposition. Within 2-4 months all domestic restrictions were gone and within 8 months even the pantomime of international restrictions didn't exist, Canada had fewer covid restrictions than the US. COMPLETE CONSENSUS had been totally destroyed such that in less than a year the national consensus was the polar opposite. And all the actual action took place in 1 month, on the coldest days of the year, with a movement whose key members had to drive 4000-5000km (~3000 miles) along treacherous northern roads being greeted roadside by supporters who stood out in minus 40 to give them coffee food and support. . This was at once the most logistically challenging protest in human history involving the volunteering of tens of millions of dollars of equipment, weeks of time, tens of thousands of people, across a continent... And it might just have been the most successful individual protest in human history. The most successful violent revolutions have not achieved such total reversals in culture and policy across so many levels of government, in such few short months. . THERE IS A VERY GOOD REASON THE REGIME WANTS YOU TO THINK OF IT AS A FAILURE. The same reason things like Brexit, the Yellow Vests in France, or Jan 6th, or the Dutch Farmers protest freaked out the elite so much. The greatest possible threat to them is that the mass of the Suburban and rural Middle-class: Flyover country, the Petite Bourgeoise, the small business owners, the farmers, the truckers, the Kulaks... The greatest possible threat to the regime is that this mass will realize its incredible power both in coordination, logistics, and initiative... And that it will overthrow the governing class of Bureaucrats, Regulators, Lawyers, DEI Administrators, and leeches who've gotten rich surviving off their tax cattle who actually work and produce things. They HAVE to play off the Truckers as a failure... Trudeau had to declare victory and then cave on every single individual policy.... because they can't let people see what it was: A premonition of the great Class War to come.

View Full Interactive Feed