TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @FrontlineFlash
@FrontlineFlash - Frontline⚡️Flash™
Tucker Carlson DISMANTLES the Jan 6 hoax, piece by piece. J6 is not only a grotesque series of lies…it is the most brazen assault by the U.S. government against innocent citizens in modern history. It is pure evil. https://t.co/tyFM0tBnuN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Byrd had a history of firearm negligence but faced no consequences for the shooting. Instead, he was celebrated, while Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, leading to false claims, such as the deaths of five police officers, which are untrue. Officer Brian Sicknick, initially reported to have died from violence, actually suffered a stroke later. Key events, like the pipe bomb incident and the role of Ray Epps, have been obscured, raising questions about federal agency involvement. Despite evidence of orchestrated actions, Epps faced no charges, highlighting inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding that day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An anniversary. 2 years ago today, a Capitol Hill police officer called Michael Byrd shot an unarmed woman in the neck. At the time of that killing, Byrd had a documented history of gross negligence with a firearm. He left a loaded Glock pistol in a public men's room at the capitol which for a law enforcement official is a firing offense. But for some reason, Michael Bird was still in the force that day.
Woman he killed was called Ashley Babbitt. Babbitt was a married 14 year veteran of the US military. She ran a pool cleaning company with her husband in San Diego. Physically, she was tiny. She was also unarmed.
Michael Byrd later admitted he had no indication at all that Babbitt was carrying a weapon. She posed no visible threat. He killed her anyway. Under normal circumstances, Byrd would have been fired immediately and charged with murder, which he clearly committed. But that's not what happened.
After doing essentially no investigation into the shooting, Nancy Pelosi's congressional police force declared Byrd a national hero and the media strongly agreed. Byrd went on television to accept accolades and to complain about racism. He was never punished for killing Ashley Babbitt. He was rewarded for it. Ashley Babbitt's mother meanwhile got a very different sort of treatment.
Babbitt's mother was arrested today in Washington by the Capitol Police. Her crime trying to hold a memorial service for her daughter. 2 years later, it's clear that Ashley Babbitt is her death is by far the most significant thing that happened at the US Capitol building that day. But at the same time, it is the least talked about event of January 6th. Why is that?
Well, because the facts about what actually happened on January 6th disrupt the lies. What they told you happened on January 6th. And those lies have proven very useful to the Biden administration and to permanent Washington. On the basis of a wholly created myth about what happened that day, the Biden Pentagon conducted an unprecedented political purge of the entire US military. The FBI and various intel agencies increased their control over the American media.
And most obviously, the DOJ has been allowed to prosecute and jail hundreds of nonviolent political protesters whose crime was having the wrong opinions. Lies about January 6 which have been relentless have enabled some of the most unscrupulous people in our country to make a mockery of our bill of rights and to steal our core freedoms. So they can't talk about Ashley Babbitt. Talking about Ashley Babbitt makes it very clear who the real culprits are and who the real threats to this country continue to be. And they're not the January 6th protesters.
So instead they lie about what happened that day and they do it in the boldest possible ways without shame and with maximum aggression. Here's Hakeem Jeffries leader of the Democrats in the house telling you that 5 police officers were killed on January 6th when in fact the real total is 0.
Speaker 1: We are gathered here to honor their memory and acknowledge with deep gratitude the tremendous bravery of the hundreds of officers who defended us at this citadel of democracy, that faithful day. As a result of the events, on January 6th, the lives of 5 heroic officers were lost.
Speaker 0: Five heroic officers were lost. He said, it's almost impossible to believe that adults could stand behind him as he said that because everyone in the picture you just saw knows that is not true. It's not a stilted interpretation of events. It's a flat out lie. No police officers were killed on January 6th period.
Ashley Babbitt was killed on January 6th. But chances are your grandchildren will not know that because history will likely record the lie you just heard as true simply because it's been repeated so often everyone in authority has said the same thing in unison for 2 solid years. As our thoroughly dishonest attorney general recently put a quote, we will never forget the 5 officers who responded selflessly on January 6th, who do have and who have since lost their lives. His boss, Joe Biden, repeated that lie today from the White House.
Speaker 2: These people and the people representing those who couldn't be here because they gave their lives for this did is incredibly consequential. Because that's not political talk. That's historical fact.
Speaker 0: That's historical fact, says Joe Biden as he manufactures history as he tells lies. They've been doing this telling these same lies since the very first day January 6, 2021. Almost like it was a coordinated operation. Remember when they told you that Brian Sicknick, officer Brian Sicknick was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher?
Speaker 3: Officer Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the hours long attack. They beat a capitol police officer to death with a fire extinguisher.
Speaker 0: Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight.
Speaker 2: He died at the age of 42 after he was bludgeoned, the fire extinguisher.
Speaker 0: That's not true. And in the end, thanks to the medical examiner in the District of Columbia, we learned the fact, which is that Brian Sicknick died of a stroke well after the January 6th protest. He was not beaten to death with a fire extinguisher, but that did not stop their lying or even slow them down. Joe Biden just awarded one of this country's highest civilian honors the presidential citizens medal to officers working on January 6 and that would include the officers who opened the doors of the capitol building to the so called Insurrectionist the officers who let them inside and then were rewarded for it by the president of the United States. What's going on here?
You may wonder well don't ask you're not allowed to know what's going on here nor can you know about the very obvious clandestine role of federal agencies that encouraged the events of January 6th that happened, but its details have never been explained. A lot has still not been explained from that day despite a committee that was impaneled for more than a year. For example, you remember the pipe bomber who planted explosives outside the Democratic National Committee? Well those explosives it turns out were under a bench at the same moment that Kamala Harris who had secret service protection with her who swept the building was there. So how did the US Secret Service miss a bomb sitting in plain sight during its security sweep?
Well, we can't answer that because the FBI still to this day refuses to release all the security footage. Why? What's going on here? Almost unique among media outlets, Revolver News asked that question.
Speaker 4: The pipe bomber even looks at camera to head on for some reason. It's very frustrating because we can't see the moment the pipe bomber plants the pipe bomb, but the FBI can. That's because the whole scene should be captured on camera 1 as well and much more clearly than camera 2. Camera 1 has a clear shot of both benches. If the FBI released the full tape from camera 1, we could see the pipe bomber planting the bomb.
Speaker 0: So somebody planted bombs outside the headquarters of this country's 2 main political parties. That would seem to be a big story and yet no one ever mentions it again, including the FBI. In fact, the bureau won't disclose any information about the suspect. Not his height, weight, shoe size, anything. So if they wanted to catch this person wouldn't they be telling you all they can about who it is?
But they're not. Why aren't they? And what was Kamala Harris doing there? Why did she lie about being there? We can answer those questions.
We should be able to nor does anyone in authority want to talk about Ray Epps. Ray Epps, of course, is the man who was caught on tape encouraging the crowd outside the Capitol both on January 5th 6th to commit felonies by rushing inside. Now what's interesting is that the January 6th committee under public pressure did in the end interview Ray Epps. Now we don't have all of the committee's records about that interview. We should but we don't but some have been released and what they tell is a remarkable story.
In the testimony that we have the committee coaches Ray Epps on how to answer questions about his involvement quote. I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it. I helped get people there. End quote.
Now Epps admitted that in a text message to a relative on January 6th. He's admitting crimes. He's never been even charged for those crimes. But what's so fascinating is it when those facts came up in his interview with the committee, someone on the committee responds this way and we're quoting. I just want to understand a little more your use of the word orchestrated.
It sounds to me like at this point when you sent this text you had turned away in part because of seeing some things you didn't agree with is that right? Like when you sent this you are already on your way from the capitol because it concerns of people taking it in a different direction. Is that the most leading question ever asked in the history of a congressional hearing? Probably. And the whole interview goes on like this.
Keep in mind, Raheb's is one of the only people caught on camera that day encouraging others to break the law. He's one of the only ones. And then he's never been charged.
Speaker 2: And
Speaker 0: the January 6th committee was
@FrontlineFlash - 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐄⚡️𝐅𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐇
“I’m about to go to prison for almost 3 years…I did nothing wrong…I was denied the Constitutional guarantee of a fair trial by a jury of my peers” @JohnStrandUSA testifies before Congress, informing @RepMattGaetz + @RepMTG & others of government fraud. https://t.co/nh4PvQcLmv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 describes being blacklisted by various platforms and services following the events of January 6th. They mention being permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, and Patreon, as well as being banned by multiple email services. Speaker 1 also discusses how Bank of America allegedly turned over records of individuals who bought coffee in Washington, DC on January 6th, expressing concern about privacy violations. They emphasize the need for legal reforms to prevent people from being barred from the financial world based on their nonviolent politics. The conversation then shifts to the topic of venue reform, allowing defendants to face charges in their own jurisdiction. Finally, Speaker 2 believes they were framed by the January 6th select committee and accuses Bill Barr of suppressing evidence of election fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. I'm going to record myself for questions. Mr. Straka, you were describing some of the blacklisting that you encountered in your life following these events. Is there can you elaborate on that?
Speaker 1: Sure. Do you want me to go back to the statement?
Speaker 0: Yes, sure.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, where I'd left off, I'd said that, I'd been permanently banned by PayPal, Venmo, Stripe, Patreon, my donor, and I was in, D. C. On January 6th as a private citizen, not on behalf of any of my organizations. Nonetheless, my organization, the WalkAway Foundation and the Walkaway campaign pack, both were permanently banned by PayPal and Stripe, a number of payment processors as well as donor portals. We were first banned by Mailchimp as an email service because it was said that we were using the email service to send and receive emails about planning violence sort of fundraising for political violence, Constant Contact then banned us.
And after that, we were banned by 4 more email services, including SendLane and MailerLite. We Let
Speaker 0: me stop you there. We have developed evidence indicating that Bank of America turned over all of their records regarding anyone who bought a cup of coffee in Washington, DC on January 6. I want to know what your perspective is on that, on the fact that such a large private company would, of their own volition, turnover so much stuff and seemingly violate people's privacy?
Speaker 1: Well, I think it's horrifying and obviously, I think that there is an attempt here to try to understand, who's funding whom, certainly there was an interest in who gives to my organization, things like that. I'm personal Friends since January 6th with a fellow J6 defendant named Derek Evans, who's running for Congress in West Virginia. A major bank told him that they were canceling his bank mortgage and that he had 30 days to find a new bank to finance his bank mortgage. I mean, while going through the most high profile criminal case in American history.
Speaker 0: Does January 6 open the door to the need for the Congress to look at legal reforms so that we don't see people of any political stripe barred from the financial world by virtue of their nonviolent politics?
Speaker 1: I mean, somehow, we, the defendants of January 6, need to be able to have some sort of a voice. I mean, even I am probably one of the most high profile people who was arrested in conjunction with January 6. Filed people who was arrested in conjunction with January 6th. Nonetheless, I felt like it was a David versus Goliath situation. I mean, I could not keep up with the amount of banning and cancellation, I mean, payment processors, e mail services, donor portals.
The government put me on a terrorism watch list along with every other j6er. We all have a designation of what's called quad s. So, when we go to the airport now, we have to go through hours of special screening. It's literally TSA told me this is the highest level terrorism list you can be on and still be allowed to fly. They follow you around the airport, with teams of agents.
Sometimes they have dogs. They station themselves all around you at the gate. They bring there's multiple times when you're flying, people with misdemeanor charges, misdemeanor disorderly conduct charges.
Speaker 0: Well, this is very helpful because during the appropriations process, we can put riders to prohibit the use of funds on some of the things that would seemingly violate people's due process. Mr. Strand, I wanted your advice on a legislative concept I've been talking about some of my colleagues and it's on the matter of venue because we've seen a number of defendants drug into the jurisdiction of Washington, DC, and then they face a different jury dynamic than they would otherwise face elsewhere in the country, what would be your advice to the Congress about looking at some venue reform to give defendants the ability to face these charges where they're from.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, Congressman, and I couldn't stress the importance of that more. I'm going to take it back from the future and say, right now. I'm about to walk in I'm about to go to prison for almost 3 years. I did nothing wrong. And the only reason that happened, Not the only reason, but the main reason it happened so easily is because I was denied the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial by a jury of my peers.
Not only that, but my sentence was worsened by a judge who's explicitly said from the bench on the record read the transcript that he was furious at me for criticizing the government publicly, specifically he was furious at me for making the claim, which is my First Amendment protected right to do, but the evidence bears Now that Washington D. C. Juries are entirely biased, flagrantly so. If I could tell the short The story of my experience during my 8 day trial, the most interesting part was day 1, which was jury selection. And this was not a random assortment of citizens Fulfilling their civic duty to participate in a jury trial, these were people that were hanging on every moment hoping to get chosen so that they could Experience the personal gratification of crucifying someone that they politically despise.
Speaker 0: Very important venue issue. Mr. Clark, I have a question for you specifically, do you believe you were framed by the January 6th select committee? Absolutely, Congressman, I do. I think that, I was the only person at the Justice Department at level, you said it confirmed spot who was interested in investigating the election?
Well, I know that to be the case, Mr. Clark. And the reason I know that to be the case, and I'm glad I get to say it here in a public forum is because I became aware of evidence that US attorneys were developing, showcasing fraud in the election and perhaps that evidence would lead nowhere, perhaps it would lead to the crime of the century, but it should not have been squelched. And Bill Barr was suppressing evidence and stopping it from being developed that showcased irregularities and not just irregularities, fraud, where people were fraudulently requesting those ballots. And I told my friend, Scott Perry that on the floor that I was aware of that evidence.
And now I believe, we see you and we see our colleagues, Scott Perry, unfairly targeted and I want you and the world to know that if you had a willingness to stop the US Department of Justice from rat hole in cases and squirreling away information that would have been helpful to learn on that day, you were acting your patriotic duty to do so. And I am deeply ashamed as a member of this government, particularly, at the way you've been treated.