reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @FuentesUpdates
@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates
We lack substantial evidence for Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and the claim that Israel was responsible doesn't have any concrete evidence or direct connection. "To be honest with you, I think that case is blowing up right now." https://t.co/7aJHzEJ7GX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses claims that Israel is involved in Charlie Kirk's death and reviews the FBI's official narrative that "it was Tyler Robinson, this 22 year old leftist with a transgender boyfriend." He discusses the circumstantial case that "Israel played some role" but admits "we don't really have the information we need" and "we can't trust the FBI." He notes "There have been some tall claims ... not fully substantiated by evidence" and points to Max Blumenthal as "the source of this idea," citing "the article with unnamed sources, anonymous sources that create this narrative that Charlie Kirk was on the verge of flipping on Israel and is effectively implying that the donors wanted him dead." He covers the Bill Ackman meeting, saying "Charlie Kirk walked away from this meeting ... feeling blackmailed, feeling afraid," yet adds "we now have receipts and testimony and names about that meeting" showing "Charlie Kirk organized the event and it was fine." "I don't trust Max Blumenthal... This guy's a left wing Jew." "And you know who's implicated in this killing? The left."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is this phenomenon. People are blaming Israel for Charlie Kirk's death. And last night I laid out the case. I laid out the case in rigorous detail for the official narrative from the FBI that it was Tyler Robinson, this 22 year old leftist with a transgender boyfriend. And I pointed out the strengths and the weaknesses or discrepancies in that narrative.
I also laid out the circumstantial evidence surrounding this argument that Israel played some role. And I laid out rigorously the strengths and weaknesses of that case too. To the extent that there are strengths, I laid out the possible motivation, the timeline, Charlie Kirk's drift, and it confused a lot of people, I could tell. I saw in the replies to some of the clips, people said, Nick said he doesn't believe it's Israel, but then he made a case as though he believed it was. And I said last night, we don't really have the information we need.
We have an official narrative from the FBI, but we can't trust the FBI. I don't trust the FBI. So, can't take that for granted. What's more, there's discrepancies in the official narrative. We need to get those ironed out.
There have been some tall claims made about Charlie Kirk and his state of mind concerning the Israel issue at the time of his death. These claims have not been fully substantiated by evidence. Now we can create a narrative based on hearsay and based on maybe a subjective interpretation of things that he said. And there is private testimony that counts in the record, but I have not seen a ton of receipts or any for that matter. I actually don't see a direct connection in that narrative either.
We have a motive, maybe. We have some circumstantial thoughts about it. We don't have much in the way of concrete hard evidence. We've got some claims, secondhand anonymous sources. We've got this piece for Max Blumenthal.
That does not make the case for me. It's not doing it. And I got to tell you the truth just really quickly before we get into it tonight. I think that case is blowing up right now. And we talked about it last night.
Max Blumenthal seems to be the source of this idea. Max Blumenthal, who is a Jewish leftist, who smeared yours truly, Max Blumenthal, the Jewish leftist created this article with unnamed sources, anonymous sources that create this narrative that Charlie Kirk was on the verge of flipping on Israel and is effectively implying that the donors wanted him dead. That seems to be the insinuation. And they'll run from that and they'll hide from that, but that's obviously the insinuation. Let's not be obtuse.
And to make that case, they told this story about Bill Ackman, which we went over last night. And they insinuated that Charlie Kirk walked away from this meeting with Bill Ackman, a Jewish billionaire in August, feeling blackmailed, feeling afraid. And we now have receipts and testimony and names about that meeting, but from the pro Israel side, from Xavier Deruso, from Bill Ackman, from Seth Dillon. And they all claim that Charlie Kirk arranged that meeting and that it was basically a run of the mill influencer retreat that Charlie helped organize plans, set out the invitations. They have the receipts for it.
And it blows up. If that was supposed to be a piece of evidence in the Israel conspiracy, the evidence that has been provided by Ackman and the other attendees with receipts, which has not been refuted by Blumenthal or Kanis Owens who promoted the story, it just blows up their narrative. And their response to the receipts has not been to refute one thing that they've said, but to say, well, we never claimed that Charlie Kirk was blackmailed. This was what Blumenthal said tonight. In the original piece, Blumenthal said Charlie felt blackmailed after that meeting where he was screamed at and it seemed like there was an intervention, he was ambushed.
Bill Ackman said no, Charlie organized the event and it was fine. Blumenthal comes out and says, well, we what we meant was that Charlie felt morally blackmailed because one of the attendees was mad at him. Okay. So that's pretty disingenuous. I don't trust Max Blumenthal.
I do not trust him. I don't trust his father, Sidney Blumenthal. I do not trust this guy. This guy is another nebish. This guy's a left wing Jew.
And you know who's implicated in this killing? The left.
@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates
One aspect of Charlie Kirk’s murder DOES leave Fuentes questioning Israeli involvement. “The Jewish billionaire who allegedly menaced Charlie Kirk is the same guy who will pay a man $1M for turning in his gay son... Anybody find that a little suspicious?” https://t.co/Ck1dZG6Hbb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker rejects the claim that 'Israel was behind Charlie Kirk's assassination,' calling it 'ridiculous' and noting Kirk 'was supported by pro Israel Jewish patrons until the day that he died' while he 'defended the administration's cover up of the Epstein files' and 'defended the administration's bombing of Iran.' He says Kirk remained in support for Israel. He says Netanyahu offered money, which Kirk refused, and claims Bill Ackman hosted an event with 'Israeli mouthpieces' Seth Dillon and Josh Hammer; Kirk reportedly refused a trip to Israel. When the FBI could not locate the alleged gunman, Ackman offered a '$1,000,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Charlie Kirk's assassin,' to be paid to 'the alleged killer's father' Tyler Robinson, 'a Mormon father' who allegedly turned in his gay son dating a tranny who killed Charlie Kirk. He calls this 'a bit suspicious' and says it requires careful scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's the smoking gun that really brings it all home because and I'm gonna be really honest with you. When people said that Israel was behind Charlie Kirk's assassination, I said, don't be ridiculous. Charlie Kirk and rest in peace. God bless his soul. Charlie Kirk, we all know was supported by pro Israel Jewish patrons until the day that he died.
He never recanted his support for Israel Publicly and openly, he defended the administration's cover up of the Epstein files. He defended the administration's bombing of Iran. In the same interview with Megan Kelly, he said, you're never gonna lose me. I will always support Israel. Be that as it may.
After Netanyahu offered to give him all this money and he refused, Bill Ackman hosted a event at his home where Israeli mouthpieces like Seth Dillon, a Jew, and Josh Hammer, a Jew Israeli mouthpiece working for Ben Shapiro in a previous job listing. Charlie Kirk refused to listen. He was offered a trip to Israel. He refused. When the FBI could not locate the alleged gunman on Wednesday, Do you know who stepped up and offered a $1,000,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Charlie Kirk's assassin?
Bill Ackman. And just who do you think that $1,000,000 will be paid out to? It looks like it will be paid out to the alleged killer's father. Tyler Robinson was allegedly turned into law enforcement by his father. His Mormon father, the Mormon father who turned in his gay son dating a tranny who killed Charlie Kirk is going to get a $1,000,000 payout from Bill Ackman, the man who according to friends of Charlie Kirk menaced him for not taking Netanyahu's money and supporting Israel's war in Iran.
Do you think Bill Ackman is just, generous? He's a vigilante? Put another way, the Jewish billionaire that allegedly threatened Charlie Kirk. The the Jewish billionaire married to an Israeli who took money from Jeffrey Epstein, who is by all credible observations working on behalf of Israel in some context. The guy that apparently menaced Charlie Kirk is the same guy who will pay a man a million dollars for turning in his gay son, implicating him in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
Anybody find that a little bit suspicious? This is a tweet, a real tweet that Bill Ackman put out last week. He said, a number of people have reached out and or posted expressing concern that Tyler Robinson's father may collect a $1,200,000 reward for turning in his son. Which inspires a few thoughts. First, in order for rewards to be effective in finding criminals, the rewards need to be paid even if the recipient is a crook or worse.
That said, in this case, if the father is found to have been involved or otherwise acted negligently in contributing to Charlie's death, civil litigation or criminal prosecution will reverse unjust compensation. I've also seen reports that suggest Tyler's family intends to waive its right to any reward. So yes, we will pay the reward if it is earned to whomever the FBI indicates provided the information that led to Tyler's arrest. To me, that might be the smoking gun. That might be the connection that slipped everybody's attention.
So Bill Ackman allegedly menaced Charlie Kirk over Israel. Now Bill Ackman is paying a million dollars to a Mormon man turning in his gay son dating a tranny, implicating him in the killing of Charlie Kirk. I see a bit of a conflict of interest there. Now, with that being said, I'm not running with that. I'm not stating that as fact.
I'm saying that requires careful scrutiny. It's not the minimum, there is the appearance of impropriety. That's not a good look, and that needs to be investigated. And I credit that observation to Arthur Bloom who's being investigated in Virginia for calling somebody an Israeli spy, go figure. He put me onto this.
I'm not gonna pretend I came up with him myself. But at the minimum that needs to be investigated and I'd be very interested if the father receives that payout. If he doesn't, then maybe there's nothing there, but I find that to be very conspicuous.
@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates
In 1999, Tucker Carlson claimed Pat Buchanan discredited the discussion about immigration and the Israel lobby. Yesterday, he claimed Nick Fuentes is part of a campaign to discredit "non-crazy, right voices." He's been using the same smear tactics for 25 years. https://t.co/MzyWNTrz2X
Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker believes people should be allowed to have differing views on immigration and debate the merits of the Israeli lobby's power. However, Pat Buchanan discredits this conversation because he gives the sense that he has another agenda related to personal dislike, conspiracies, and the belief that Jews are a sinister force trying to affect American politics.
Another speaker questions if a certain individual exclusively targets people in the same group and makes Holocaust jokes. This speaker suggests this individual is like David Duke, who would endorse their shows. They believe David Duke is part of a campaign to discredit people on the right, and that Nick Fuentes is doing the same. They clarify that this doesn't mean everything he says is false, that he isn't talented, or that he's a bad person, but that he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that people should be allowed to have differing views on immigration. I think people should be allowed to point out the fact that there is an Israeli lobby, and, yes, it's powerful and debate the merits of that, I I guess. I don't think they're strictly speaking anything wrong with that. But, again, I think Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his by his presence, because he, gives people who watch him carefully the sense that he has another agenda that has to do with personal dislike and that he believes in conspiracies and and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force, trying to affect American politics. And those aren't discussions I think normal people, sober people should be having because I think they're ludicrous.
Speaker 1: Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly? Mhmm. And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same roughly the same. And then he gets up there and he's, like, you know, making holocaust jokes, and it's, like, is it possible that this is like David Duke? David Duke every time I had a new show, David Duke would endorse my show.
I don't know Dave who the hell is David Duke? Well, David Duke is obviously part of a campaign to discredit people on the right. Obviously. And I think it's very obvious that Nick Fuentes is exactly the same. Doesn't mean everything he says is false.
It's it doesn't mean he's not talented. He's enormously talented. Doesn't mean he's a bad person. I'm not attacking him personally, but he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non crazy right voices. You know That's obvious to me.
I've been around a long time. I know when I see
Speaker 0: it.
@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates
Fuentes tells the history of Israel from 1948 to the present day. You won't hear this anywhere else. This is a MUST WATCH if you want to understand the current situation. https://t.co/ZW7xk7t63u
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conflict with Iran is explained through three tracks: Israel's wars, the arms race, and October 7. The mainstream narrative paints Iran as a radical, anti-Semitic regime seeking nuclear weapons to destroy Israel and America. However, this narrative begins in the middle of the story. The start is Israel's declaration of independence in 1948 and subsequent wars with its neighbors.
Early Zionists used terror to encourage Jewish settlement in Palestine. After WWII, they massacred Palestinians and faced war with Middle Eastern countries. US Jews smuggled weapons to Israel, initiating an arms race. Israel, supported by Britain and France, invaded Egypt in 1956 but was forced to withdraw by Eisenhower.
Later, Israel pursued nuclear weapons, alarming JFK, who demanded inspections. After JFK's assassination, US aid to Israel tripled. Israel launched surprise attacks in 1967 and 1973, leading to the neoconservative movement's rise. The Likud party's doctrine emerged, advocating for the destruction of Israel's enemies.
The US invaded Iraq in 2003, and Libya denuclearized voluntarily, but was still attacked. Israel bombed Syria's nuclear program in 2007. The Arab Spring led to further instability. Iran developed a proxy network to deter Israeli attacks. Post-October 7, Israel aims to eliminate Iranian proxies, potentially leading to total regional hegemony, controlling trade and pivoting the US to the Pacific.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me explain how we got in this conflict with Iran. We'll go all the way back to the very beginning. Okay? And we'll explain a few critical tracks here to explain this. And the tracks are as follows.
One, Israel's wars against its neighbors. Two, the arms race in The Middle East. These things are deeply related, but these are two separate tracks. They're inextricably connected, but they are related. Israel's wars in the region and the arms race.
The third track, I guess it's related to their wars with their neighbors, but it's October 7 and everything that has happened since. So we'll start with the first track and all these things are running parallel with each other. The first track is Israel's wars with its neighbors. We have to create an entirely different narrative to understand the United States war with Iran. Because the prevailing narrative, the mainstream narrative goes something like this.
Iran is a radical, religious, zealot regime. It's run by fanatics. They wanna kill Israel and kill Americans because they're anti Semitic and they hate us. They believe in Islam above all else. They're willing to sacrifice the nation of Iran.
They're racing towards a nuclear device so they can deploy it and kill all the Jews in Israel and destroy America. That's the prevailing narrative. And so under that narrative, with that in mind, well, we have to prevent them from acquiring a bomb by any means necessary. This was totally within America's self interest. It's America first to disarm Iran.
That makes perfect sense. But to begin to unravel that narrative, you really need to go all the way back because that narrative, just like the narrative about Bashar al Assad, just like the narrative about Gaddafi, just like the narrative about Saddam Hussein. It's starting in the middle of the story. It's starting smack in the middle of it where Iran has its nuclear program. They won't give it up.
Why won't they give it up? We have to disarm them. You have to start at the very beginning. You have to go back to the start. And the start is that Israel declares independence in 1948.
And they declare it out of the mandate of Palestine. This entire region was British territory. After World War I ended, in the early twentieth century, Turkey's empire was split up between the French and the British. The French got Lebanon and Syria, the British got Israel and Jordan. And so the area that would become the modern state of Israel and Palestine and Jordan was called the Mandate Of Palestine.
You had modern Israel and Trans Jordan, now what we call Jordan, both under the control of the British Empire. The Zionists had Jewish people moving there throughout the twenties, thirties, and forties. The early Zionist movement that wanted to fill up Palestine with Jews, Ultimately, they wanted Jordan too, some of them. They're called revisionist Zionists. But all the early Zionists wanted the Jews to settle in the land of Israel.
And in order to get Jews to settle there, they terrorized them. They created anti Semitic hoaxes in Europe. They created anti Semitic hoaxes in Iraq, in the broader Middle East, to try to convince world Jewry that the only place that they would be safe is in a country of their own, in Israel. And to go and stake out this project where they were building farms and kibbutzes and cities, and they were going to populate the state of Israel and create their own nation. After World War II, and we're skipping ahead a little bit, 1948, they declared their independence and they start massacring Palestinians.
They start killing Palestinians, driving them from their land. They try to take as much as possible. And a coalition of every Middle Eastern country declares war on them. None of the Middle Eastern countries accept them as a state except for Turkey. But Turkey is an Arab.
At that time, Turkey was secular and Turkey arguably is not really part of the Middle East. Turkey recognizes them right away, but Egypt and Syria being the big players at the time declare war on Israel. So does Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia. They all declare war on Israel. They all go in and they fight to a stalemate.
The United States implements a ceasefire and so do some of the other players. But while there's a ceasefire in Israel, American Jews inside The United States and in Europe are smuggling weapons to Israel. You see after World War II, only The United States had the atomic bomb. But in terms of arms races, you have light arms trafficking like machine guns and things like that, ammunition. And American Jewish gangsters, American Jewish businessmen, and other Jews in Europe, they're trafficking weapons to this early state of Israel to build up their military capability.
This is where the arms race starts. You see how these things are parallel, they're two tracks? In 1948, there's an Arab Israel war, the first of its kind. It's fought to a stalemate, there's a ceasefire. During the ceasefire, you have the beginnings of the arms race, which is US smugglers, Jewish smugglers, businessmen, gangsters, even politicians, they're smuggling light arms from World War II into Israel to help them defeat Egypt and Syria.
And eventually they roll them back. In 1956, there's another Arab Israel war. The president of Egypt, Nasser, takes over the country. He's a nationalist. He's against British occupation and colonization of Egypt.
He nationalizes the Suez Canal, which is this all important waterway that connects the Mediterranean to the Arabian Sea. So Nasser, the president of Egypt, nationalizes the Suez. The British and the French want the Suez Canal back under their control. But The United States doesn't want them to intervene and they don't want to piss off The United States. So they work with Israel to fabricate a false pretext for Israel to invade Egypt and seize control of the Suez from the Egyptians.
The Israelis claim that Egypt was preparing for war, that they're harassing them in the Gulf Of Tehran. Among other things, there's a military buildup in Egypt. So Israel, with the support of the British and the French, invades Egypt to take the Suez Canal. The United States comes in under Dwight Eisenhower, and at that time the United States regime is trying to have a balanced approach towards the Arabs in Israel. Eisenhower comes in in '56 and says, Israel has to leave and the war has to stop.
So Eisenhower overrules the British and the French and forces Israel out of Egypt. And for ten years, things are reasonably quiet between Israel and the Arab coalitions. In the meantime, however, in the mid nineteen fifties, Israel's president David Ben Gurion becomes obsessed with acquiring a nuclear weapon. By the mid nineteen fifties, other countries have nuclearized. The United States has the atomic bomb and a hydrogen bomb.
The Soviet Union tests a weapon in 1949. The French and the British get a nuclear bomb. And so in the 1950s, Israel's leader Ben Gurion becomes obsessed with the nuclear bomb. He says the only way that Israel will ever be safe amidst the threat of Egypt and Syria, this Arab coalition against us, he says the only way that we will be safe is if we acquire a nuclear device. And so Israel begins collaborating with the French in the late nineteen fifties to develop a nuclear reactor at Demona, out in Eastern Israel, Southeastern Israel.
When Dwight Eisenhower leaves office in 1961, he warns JFK, the incoming president, that Israel is acquiring a nuclear bomb and warns Jack Kennedy about this. There's a meeting during the presidential transition between the election and the inauguration. And JFK asks, what do I need to know about? They say Israel is pursuing a nuclear bomb. From 1961 until 1963, JFK is on top of the Israeli Prime Minister demanding inspections of their nuclear reactor.
The same situation that's playing out with Iran right now. Because Israel does not yet have a nuclear device. They have a reactor, but they're working towards a bomb and The United States knows it. So JFK is coming to the Israeli prime minister and saying repeatedly, you need to open up the reactor to US inspections. We need them twice a year.
They need to be comprehensive. You need to let our scientists in. We need to see what you're doing. And Ben Gurion, the prime minister is giving them the runaround. He lets in inspectors but they literally build fake walls to hide what they're doing.
They build a fake facility and walk inspectors through it literally would drawn on and fake knobs and switches and everything. Finally, in the middle of nineteen sixty three, May and June of nineteen sixty three, JFK sends a letter to Ben Gurion and says, listen, I've had enough of your shit. And at this time, this is a tense situation. Ben Gurion is calling JFK a boy, doesn't respect him because he's young. He's he's the youngest president to be elected.
And it's a very tense relationship. JFK won't invite Ben Gurion to the White House. Instead, they meet in New York City. They won't have an official state visit. Finally, JFK puts his foot down.
This is in May and then again in June of nineteen sixty three. He says, listen, we will completely isolate Israel. You can no longer count on our support if you don't open up your reactor to US lead inspections twice a year. The Israeli government receives the letter. The next day Ben Gurion resigns allegedly without reading it.
Now, he read it and then resigned so that he could avoid answering the ultimatum. Now to this day, we don't know why he resigned. He never gave a reason. He was prime minister from 1948 when Israel was declared until 1963. He was the first prime minister after Israel declared independence and then except for a little interim part in the mid nineteen fifties for about a year, he was their prime minister uninterrupted from them until 1963 when he resigned the day after he got the letter with no explanation.
And to the day that he died, never explained why he resigned. This is the founding father of Israel. JFK sends a letter to Ben Gurion's successor in July and says the same thing. Look, I told your predecessor Ben Gurion, I need inspections or else we're cutting you off. This guy shines him on.
Of course, in November, JFK is assassinated. His assassin is assassinated by Jack Ruby, otherwise known as Jack Rubenstein, who is connected to the Jewish mafia, guys like Mickey Cohen, who were running guns to Israel in the nineteen forty eight Arab Israeli war. Why did Jack Ruby kill Lee Harvey Oswald? Well, he says, I did it for my people. In January 1964, Lyndon Johnson is the president.
Israel is believed to have tested their nuclear weapon two months after JFK was killed. According to American intelligence, the earliest timetable that Israel could have acquired a nuclear weapon was in January 1964, just months after JFK was killed. This is when they went nuclear. After Lyndon Johnson becomes the president, the amount of foreign aid to Israel triples. And previously, whereas foreign aid to Israel was almost all humanitarian and economic aid, now it's three times as big and it's all weapons.
It's missiles, it's advanced weaponry, it's tanks, it's all military equipment. And suddenly, the American administration is all in favor of Israel. There's no balance at all. In 1967, Israel launches a surprise attack on Egypt and Syria. Israel pushes and finds that Egypt's air force is completely vulnerable.
They're able to sneak on to one of Egypt's airfields and they find out that they're totally deaf, dumb, and blind, they won't see it coming. So in 1967, Israel starts the Six Day War, another Arab Israeli war. Israel launches a surprise attack on Egypt's Air Force and then Syria's Air Force. Egypt invades the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula which is hang on, I don't have the map in front of me. Egypt invades the Sinai Peninsula here and they they invade the Golan Heights in Syria up to here.
They actually go all the way to Damascus and they're shelling Damascus, but they create a ceasefire line in the Golan and they take the West Bank. And so Israel controls all of this. They control everything from the Golan in the North inside Syria, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and they control all of the Sinai Peninsula. Israel is at its territorial peak. During this campaign, there is an American radar ship, a reconnaissance ship off the coast of Israel, the USS Liberty.
The reconnaissance ship was there to keep an eye on the evolving military situation in the buildup to the Six Day War. Israel believes that if that reconnaissance ship is there, it will detect Israeli troop movements that are moving towards Egypt and it might blow the element of surprise. The United States might know the full extent of their military activities. So Israel launches an all out attack on the USS Liberty off the coast of Israel. They shoot the ship, they bomb the lifeboats, they see the American flag flying on it and they attack anyway.
Later they claim it was a case of mistaken identity. They say they thought it was an Egyptian ship and they shot it down on accident, but it would have been impossible for them to think it was an Egyptian ship. It was waving a giant flag. They shot the lifeboats. It was radioed to them.
This is an American ship. They sunk it anyway. They tried to kill everybody on board because they did not want the US government to know what they were doing in Egypt. Do you know who was a part of the cover up who headed up the investigation on behalf of the Navy a few months later? John McCain senior.
John McCain senior headed up the audit into Israel's attack on the liberty. This is in 1967, that's the Six Day War. Six years later in 1973, Egypt has been humiliated. Syria has been humiliated. These are two military powers in the region thought to be on par with Israel.
They're seeking revenge for what Israel did. And so the president in Egypt, Anwar Sadad comes up with a plan. They're going to do a surprise attack on Israel. And they collaborate with Syria to do it. On 10/06/1973, during Yom Kippur, Egypt and Syria launch an attack on Israel from both sides.
Egypt lands on the West Bank of the Sinai Peninsula and move to take the Sinai from Israel. Syria invades from the North and they take back the Golan Heights near the Sea Of Galilee. Israel is caught totally off guard. About twelve hours before the attack, they begin mobilizing reservists. But it's too little too late.
They appear to be overrun. Golda Meyer, the prime minister of Israel calls up president Nixon and the secretary of state Henry Kissinger. And she says, you need to bail us out otherwise we might take extraordinary measures. At the same time, they take out their nuclear bombs so that they can be detected by US reconnaissance. Israel's pushed to the brink of destruction in a surprise attack.
The United States is reluctant to intervene because we believe that if we go in, the Soviet Union will go in on the side of Syria and Egypt. So The United States is deliberating. Should we bail out Israel? Golda Meier pulls out Israel's nukes and says, well, if you don't come in, we might have to take extraordinary measures. And Nixon gets the message.
They send in a giant airlift of equipment. And by replenishing Israel's equipment, Israel's able to beat back the Syrians and the Egyptians. They route the Egyptians, they land on the West Side, the West Bank Of The Sinai, and they encircle the Egyptian columns that are inside Sinai. They push the Syrians back to Damascus, and the war is over in a few weeks. During the ceasefire, Israel does not keep their end of the bargain.
They keep firing on Egyptians and Syrians. The Soviet Union threatens to get involved. They say that if Israel won't abide by the ceasefire, we'll deploy our troops to the region and this would start World War three. Finally, a deal is made, Israel adheres to the ceasefire, everybody pulls out. But it's after this happens in 1973 that many of the left wing Jews in America move to the right wing.
Many of the American Jews who were all communists at this point, Bolsheviks were all Jews, American communists were all Jews. All these left wing Jews in America who are Trotskyites, they're communists, they're in New York, they're part of this intellectual movement, they see that the Arabs surprised attacked Israel with the help of the Soviet Union. They realize the Soviet Union might destroy Israel, the Arabs might destroy Israel. If Israel goes, Jews will never be safe. So in 1973, the neoconservative movement is born.
And all the neoconservatives are former left wing Jews that got mugged by reality. They saw that their communist utopia wasn't so friendly towards Israel. So they become the biggest cold warriors. They become the biggest foreign policy hawks. They say now we need to destroy the Soviet Union because the Soviet Union backed the surprise attack on Israel that almost destroyed it.
So all these guys like Irving Kristol and John Podhoritz and many others from commentary magazine, all these Jewish publications, they all come aboard the right wing and they become the biggest cold warriors. In 1975 in Israel, there's a big commission that's meant to do an audit on how Israel was caught by surprise, how they didn't see it coming. Because even though they won the war, it's still a major victory morally for the Egyptians and Syrians that they were able to have these military victories and catch Israel off guard. In 1976, the Likud party comes to power in Israel. For the first time, even though Israel was dominated for many decades by the labor party by left wing parties, a right wing party called Likud, which emerges from the revision of Zionists that wanted all of Israel, that wanted Transjordan, they come to power.
And they have a new doctrine. It's promulgated by Oded Ynon. They say the new doctrine of the state of Israel is we have to destroy all of our enemies. Oded Yonon's plan for the nineteen eighties says, the only way that Israel can be safe is if we destroy all of our neighbors. It says that even though our neighbors are strong militarily and our borders are under threat, he says our neighbors are actually weak because they're based on diversity.
Oded Ynon says that Lebanon has five different nations inside of it. It has a Christian nation, a Shiite nation, a Druze nation, all kinds of different ethnicities living inside. It says Syria has Alawites in the West, Sunnis everywhere else, Druze in the South. It says that Egypt has a big Coptic Christian population, a big Muslim population. It says that Iraq has the Kurds and the Sunnis and the Shiites.
Iran has a lot of Turks and Persians and other groups living inside of it. So in the late 1970s when the Likud party comes to power after the failures of the left wing party to anticipate the surprise attack, they say it's time to go on the offensive and blow up all these different countries. In 1978, Israel brokers a peace agreement with Egypt. Israel gives them the Sinai Peninsula. Egypt signs a treaty with Israel.
Egypt becomes the first country to normalize relations with Israel. And that is the year, by the way, that Egypt becomes one of the biggest recipients of US foreign aid. And so does Israel. 1978 is the Camp David Accords. They make this treaty.
It's ratified in '79. It's in that year that Israel becomes the number one recipient of foreign aid, Egypt becomes number two. And they both receive massive amounts of money to make this deal. In 1978, Israel goes to war in Lebanon. In 1979, there there is an Islamic revolution in Iran.
The Ayatollah and the Green Revolution, the Islamic revolution overthrows the Shah. They hold the Americans hostage in the embassy and they declare a revolutionary Shiite caliphate. The Israelis are perturbed by this. In 1982, they invade Lebanon because Palestinians keep doing cross border raids in Israel. Israel invades Lebanon as part of their strategy to go on the offensive.
When they invade Lebanon, Iran comes all the way over and starts training up Lebanese militias, Shiite militias in the South. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the guarantor of the revolution, comes to Lebanon and starts training them up. That becomes Hezbollah. In 1981, Iraq is developing a nuclear weapon. They get a reactor from France.
They start building up a nuclear weapons program. In 1981, Israel launches a strike on it. They bomb the reactor. Iraq and Iran begin a ten year war in the 1980s. Israel and The United States back both sides.
Israel predominantly backs Iran because they view Saddam Hussein in Iraq as the bigger threat, because he's developing a nuclear weapon. In 1990, Iraq invades Kuwait. Iraq threatens to invade Saudi Arabia, launches missiles at Israel. George Bush invades Iraq and he does not topple the government of Saddam Hussein. He oversees the destruction of their nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs.
He demilitarizes Iraq, its missiles, its navy. But he leaves the regime intact. In response to this, Israel almost kills George Bush because Israel wants The United States to topple the Saddam Hussein regime. 1994, Israel makes peace with Jordan. Jordan becomes the second country to normalize relations with Israel.
Jordan becomes the third largest recipient of US foreign aid. In 1996, a new doctrine is put out. This one is by Richard Pearl, Douglas Faith, David Wormser. And this is coordinated by the BB Netanyahu government in Israel. They call it the clean break memo.
They say that for too long, the Israeli government is not right wing enough. They say even though we're we're on the offensive, they say we're still not safe. They say we gave up the Sinai Peninsula for peace with Egypt. They said we gave up the West Bank for peace with Jordan. They say we don't wanna give up Golan for peace with Syria.
We can't keep giving up land in exchange for peace with the Palestinians and our neighbors. They say so we need a clean break with the past. And in order to secure our northern border, because Egypt and Jordan are already taken care of, they say we need to knock out Saddam Hussein in Iraq, we need to take out Syria, and then we need to take out Iran. We need to take out Iraq because Saddam Hussein is too belligerent. We need to take out Syria because they remain fundamentally at war with us and challenging us.
And we need to take out Iran because they have trained up Hezbollah in Lebanon, and they're sponsoring some of our adversaries. 02/2003, the Israelis that drafted that report coming to the George W. Bush administration. After nineeleven, they fabricate intelligence that Saddam Hussein was involved in nineeleven and other terrorist plots. They say that Saddam Hussein is once again building up his nuclear arsenal like they did in '91, their program which was not fully destroyed in 1990, they claim, we need to go in.
The United States invades Iraq and topples the government. But Israel wants more. Israel wants us to invade every country. In 02/2003, Libya voluntarily denuclearizes. Libya sees what has happened to Iraq.
Libya makes an agreement with The United States. We'll give up our nuclear program. You can inspect it, just don't invade us. In 02/2006, Netanyahu is calling for war in Iran, for war in Syria. In 02/2007, Israel bombs Syria's nuclear program because they believe they're getting a weapon.
In 2011, the Arab Spring starts in Tunisia. Pro democracy, pro liberal protests. They spread all across Northern Africa. They spread into Libya, to Egypt, then into Syria and elsewhere in the broader Middle East. They bring down Hosni Mubarak in Egypt.
He's replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood. They threaten to topple Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. NATO airstrikes led by The United States finish the job. They topple Libya's government. They kill Muammar Gaddafi.
In Syria, protests lead to major opposition movements against the regime of Bashar al Assad in Syria. With the Syrian regime and the Iraqi regime weakened, and The United States withdrawing from Iraq in 2011, suddenly there's a radical Islamist group that spawns in the middle of Iraq and Syria. It's called ISIS. And they start ripping through Iraq, ripping through Syria. Now everybody says The United States has to remain in the Middle East.
2013, there's allegations that Assad is using chemical weapons. They say we have to intervene and overthrow the government. Obama declines, but he does eventually get involved in 2014 and 2015. We start bombing pro government forces and we're bombing ISIS. This is the history of the Middle East.
Israel's at war with all of its neighbors. All of its neighbors start to die. There's war in Lebanon. There's war in Iraq. The government of Libya is toppled.
The government of Egypt is toppled. The government of Syria is toppled. Egypt and Jordan are forced to make peace. They become US puppet states. This is the history of the Middle East.
Now why does Iraq and Syria and Libya and even Iran at one point, why do they have nuclear programs? Because Israel at the same time is pursuing regime change against all these different countries. Israel's allied with The United States and one after the other, the dominoes are falling. There's a civil war in Somalia. There's a civil war in Sudan, which splits them into two countries.
Now there's a civil war in Sudan. Everywhere they look, see the governments falling to civil war, regime change, or US occupation. So they want to nuclearize. Iraq, it's a nuclear program, they get bombed. The United States comes in and dismantles it, they get invaded anyway, they didn't even have nukes.
Libya gives up their nukes, they get bombed and replaced anyway. Syria's program gets bombed and they give it up, they get regime changed anyway. This is why Iran wants a bomb. And of course, Israel is protected from all of these conflicts because they're the only ones that have the bomb. They've got The United States in their pocket.
They've got the neocons in the administration. They're protected from any kind of accountability. They've got two aces in the hole. This is why Iran has a nuclear program. And this is why over the past twenty years, Iran has been building up its deterrent capability.
They have a latent nuclear weapons program and they have built up a proxy network in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, inside Yemen. That is to protect themselves from Israel. Israel could always bomb them. The United States could always bomb them. They could always do regime change and invade.
Having a proxy network ensures that Iran has a second strike capability to hit Israel back. Having a nuclear arsenal makes it more complicated and more tricky and serves as a form of a deterrent for The United States getting involved unnecessarily. Then you have the October seventh attacks. That's in response to the new dynamic. After Israel's carried out all these wars, The United States is fatigued.
Iran has spread its influence across the region. Israel recognizes it's time now to end the Middle Eastern conflict once and for all. They say that we've pacified Libya. Libya is a non factor. They're in the middle of a civil war.
Sudan is in the middle of a civil war. Somalia is in a civil war. Yemen is in a civil war. Egypt and Jordan have made peace with Israel. Bahrain and The United Arab Emirates.
And Morocco have made treaties with Israel in the Abraham Accords. Saudi Arabia is talking about making peace with Israel. Iraq was invaded by The United States and is now friendly. Syria is divided and weakened entirely. The same is true of Lebanon.
The only remaining adversary at the time of October 7 in 2023 is Iran and all of its proxies in Southern Lebanon, in Yemen, in Iraq, and the Assad regime, is not totally defeated in Syria. So what happens on October 7? Israel is attacked by Hamas from the Gaza Strip. They see it coming, they let it happen anyway. Hamas is sponsored by Iran.
Israel uses this as a pretext to declare war against Iran and all of its proxies. Israel moves its troops to the North with Southern Lebanon to confront Hezbollah. And they begin their blockade, their bombing campaign and invasion of Gaza. They're killing thousands of people. They're destroying all the infrastructure.
In response to this barbaric campaign, all of Iran's proxies are declaring Israel to defend Palestine. Hezbollah is bombing Israel in the North. The Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria are bombing Israel from the East. And the Houthis are bombing Israel from the South, and they're bombing commercial shipping in the Red Sea. Israel uses this as an opportunity to systematically destroy all of the proxies.
First, they defeat Hamas. By May of twenty twenty four, Hamas is utterly defeated. They have no major strongholds. Then Israel moves their forces to the North. In October of twenty twenty four, they detonate explosive pagers that are held by the leadership of Hezbollah.
They conduct a thousand airstrikes inside Southern Lebanon and then they invade Southern Lebanon and they hold it. In December 2024, they carry out airstrikes against Syria and a Turkish Israeli US backed group from Aleppo begins to invade Syria. First, they launch strikes on Aleppo, then they move further south to Hama, then Homs, then Damascus, they overthrow the government. Israel immediately bombs all of Syria's navy, its air defenses, its air force, everything. Hamas is neutralized, Hezbollah is neutralized, the Syrian government is overthrown, its equipment is destroyed, and the new Syrian regime kicks out the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.
Israel invades the Golan and takes the South of Syria. In March and April of twenty twenty five, Trump is elected. Trump launches a major air campaign against the Houthis in Yemen and significantly degrades them. Bombs their port, bombs their capital. This paves the way for the confrontation with Iran.
In April 2025, Trump announces he's negotiating with Iran. He says they have sixty days to give up their nuclear program. Iran says we're not giving up all of our enrichment capability. We don't trust you. We don't trust Israel.
Israel's chomping at the bit to get The United States to back an attack on Iran. Last week, last Thursday, Israel attacks Iran's nuclear facilities, but says we can't do it alone. Missiles are raining down on them. They say we need help. We're not safe.
We're imperiled. We need The United States to help. Tonight, The United States carries out its attacks on Iran. And as we talked about earlier tonight and throughout the week, the only way this can end is in regime change in Iran. The regime that was put up in '79, they created that proxy network, the nuclear program, it's gonna be gone.
And when that is finished, either sometime this year or next, you can see how the entire Middle East, from Morocco all the way through to Egypt, from Somalia to Sudan, from Yemen all the way up to Syria, from Israel to Iran, the entire Middle East will be under the thumb. The entire Middle East and Northern Africa will be under the thumb of Israel. How? The new Syrian government is talking about normalizing ties with Israel. There will be a puppet regime in Iran.
Without Iran backing Hezbollah, Hezbollah will collapse and there'll be a friendly regime in Lebanon. Iraq was already occupied by The United States. Jordan and Egypt made peace twenty and fifty years ago. Libya has been cut apart by civil war, just like Sudan, just like Somalia. Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and The Emirates all made peace with the Abraham Accords.
Saudi Arabia is the next shoe to drop. Without the support of Iran, the Houthis in Yemen will collapse. There'll be a friendly regime there too. Turkey is a NATO member and a long time ally of Israel. So is Azerbaijan.
The entire Middle East will fall to Israel. And then what will happen is this. The United States wants to pivot to the Pacific to confront China. We recognize that all the action in the twenty first century is gonna happen here. Not here.
All the action in the twenty first century is gonna be India, China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, the Asian Tigers, And to some extent, it's gonna be in Central Africa because that's where the critical minerals are. To some extent, it'll be in South And Central America. That's where a trade war is happening. We want to leave the Middle East. How do we leave the Middle East?
We have to hand off our responsibilities to our allies and partners. So we're going to arm Israel and Saudi Arabia to the teeth. And we're gonna give Israel and Saudi Arabia control over the entire region. But Saudi Arabia is a very fragile state. It's a country of foreign workers.
It's a country of a restive population. It's a fragile hereditary monarchy from a hundred years ago. Saudi Arabia could never resist Israel even if they wanted to. If Israel could take out Iran, they could take out any one of these fragile Gulf monarchies, any one of these countries. That means that Israel will dominate the entire region.
And that means that all the trade that goes through the Red Sea, all the trade that goes through the Persian Gulf, all of the Belt and Road Initiative ports, and highways and rail, all of the India, Middle East, Europe corridor infrastructure, it will all go through a region controlled by Israel. All the trade from Africa, Asia, and Europe that has to go through water or land routes in this region, it's gonna be going over Israeli soil. It's all gonna be going over Israeli clay. That's their endgame. That's the big picture.
They wanna dominate the region, profit from all the trade. They will profit from China and The United States, from BRICS and the Abraham Alliance. That is the next phase of development. That's how they go from not even a country surrounded by enemies to every country has been destroyed and pacified to total regional hegemony over the Middle East. And then they wanna ditch The United States.
Then they wanna say, we don't want your foreign aid anymore. It gives you too much leverage over us. We wanna conduct our own independent foreign policy. And that means we could do whatever we want. We can hedge and work with China if we want, we can work with Russia, we can work with whoever we want.
And that's how we were used to give birth to arrival power. That's how we were used like a like a parasite does to give birth to a rival entity. And so, yeah, if you're completely ignorant, would say, oh, you know, Iran wants nuclear weapons because they just wanna kill everybody. No, Iran wants nuclear weapons because Israel and The United States have destroyed every one of Israel's neighbors. And Israel and Iran doesn't even have a nuclear bomb.
Israel does. And we were brought into Iran not because of the nuclear crisis. The nuclear crisis exists because of what Israel and The United States have done. Now it's being exaggerated to disarm Iran so that Israel can pursue regime change. That's the big picture.
That's the story of the Middle East. And it's a story of the arms race. It's a story of subterfuge, of intelligence operations, of deep influence in The United States. None of it would be possible without The United States. Without the Jewish mafia, whoops, without the Jewish mafia running guns to Israel in '48, without JFK being assassinated to clear the way for Lyndon Johnson to come in and pour conventional arms into Israel, without Jews in America stealing The United States nuclear program to give it to Israel.
Without The US bailing them out in '73, without the neocons giving them their war in Iraq, it would have never happened. So The United States is just as much a part of this and there's subterfuge over the Republican Party, over the American state. It's quintessential part of the plan. And that includes the media and public opinion. So anyway, that's that's why we're here.