reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Furbeti
@Furbeti - grizzy
A 2009 email shows a redacted sender forwarding a message to Jeffrey Epstein after it ‘didn’t go through’ to Prince Andrew. The original note references her 19-year-old daughter and her friend visiting London and asking about a possible palace tour. https://t.co/6czpnQm8hA
@Furbeti - grizzy
"Jeffrey Epstein had sex with Melania a full year before Trump" - Michael Wolff https://t.co/47li4mDIh9
Video Transcript AI Summary
A new book published yesterday in the US and UK, entitled The Rise and Fall of the House of York, is by British journalist Andrew Loney. The book centers on the pathetic life of Prince Andrew, but it also addresses his connection to Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Melania Trump. A notable passage in the hardcover edition quotes Epstein from an interview apparently conducted in 2007, in which he says that he had sex with Melania a full year before Donald Trump commenced his relationship with Melania.
The hardcover copy of the book was widely available yesterday, and it contains that passage, but the e-book and the audiobook, released yesterday as well, do not contain the passage. The sequence of events is that between printing and distribution, Melania Trump began sending threatening legal letters to anyone who might connect her directly to Jeffrey Epstein.
The publishers are difficult to classify in terms of what they believed they had accomplished. They published the book and had it vetted by lawyers and decided it was legally sound. Yet in the face of Melania Trump’s threats, they reportedly ran and hid. The summary convention of the situation is that the printed book contains one passage, while the other formats do not, but more broadly, the point is described as panic.
At this moment in time, information about Epstein, Trump, and the Trumps is emerging, while at the same time the White House is taking steps to stop it from coming out. This is cited as an example in which they are succeeding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new book was published yesterday in The US and UK called entitled The Rise and Fall of the House of York. It's by a British journalist by the name of Andrew Loney, And it's about the pathetic life of Prince Andrew, but it is also about his connection to Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Melania Trump. And in fact, it contains a passage in which Epstein is quoted, and this is from an interview apparently in 2007, where he says that he had sex with Melania a full year before Donald Trump commenced his relationship with Melania. Now, the hardcover copy of the book was widely available yesterday, and it contains that passage, but the e book and the audio book, which were also released yesterday, do not contain that passage. So what happened here is that between the printing and the distribution of the book and its release is that Melania Trump started to send threatening legal letters to anyone who might connect her directly to Jeffrey Epstein.
So the publishers, and this is hard to figure out exactly what they believe they have accomplished here. But clearly, they published the book and clearly had it vetted by by lawyers and decided it was it was it was legally sound. But then in the face of Melania Trump's threats, they they they they ran and and hide. I mean, it's kind of ostrich like to think that they could put the book out and that the printed book can contain one thing and the other versions another, but that's not the point. The point is just panic.
So we're at this moment in time when this information about Epstein and Trump, and the Trumps, is coming out, and yet at the same time, the White House is doing everything to stop it from coming out. And, this is certainly an example in which they are succeeding.
@Furbeti - grizzy
Back in 2014, Ghislaine Maxwell was celebrated as a TED Talk host and environmental philanthropist through her nonprofit, TerraMar Project. In this video she explains how unregulated, unmonitored, and lawless the ocean actually is. She was highly informed on the subject. https://t.co/6xlvXhpE1H
Video Transcript AI Summary
64% of the ocean lies outside of any single country's jurisdiction and, under the law, forms the global commons. This means that, in theory, it belongs to everyone. The speaker asserts that the reality today is that the current law of the seas rests on an outdated mindset. The high seas are described as an area that can be exploited by the few, and, in practice, they are being exploited by the few, under the condition that everyone still maintains the right of access. The implication is that the high seas are not governed by a single, cohesive authority.
The speaker characterizes the legal framework governing the high seas as a “mess”—a mix of incoherent laws, unenforced laws, and sometimes no laws at all. This situation is presented as representing half of the planet, emphasizing the vastness and importance of the region that lacks effective governance. The consequence highlighted is that activities in this zone are largely unregulated and unmonitored, suggesting a lack of oversight, accountability, and standardized practices.
A specific ecological concern is raised by noting that if keystone species—such as big sharks or tunas—were removed or materially affected, there would be a knock-on, massive problem. This point underscores the potential ecosystem-wide consequences of unsupervised exploitation and the fragility of marine networks.
Throughout the summary, the speaker connects the lack of robust governance with practical outcomes: unequal exploitation, insufficient regulation, and the potential for severe ecological disruption. The overarching message is a call to recognize that a substantial portion of the planet’s marine environment is not adequately governed, leading to exploitation by a few and a need to address the governance gap to prevent unmonitored impacts on global biodiversity and ecological stability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 64% of the ocean lies outside of any single country's jurisdiction and under the law forms the global commons. That means it belongs to you. The reality today though is that the current law of the seas is based on an outdated mindset. It says that the high seas can be exploited by the flu by the few, and by the way, it is being exploited by the few, so long as we all still have the right of access. It's an area that's not governed by a single entity.
It's a mess of incoherent laws, unenforced laws and no laws. That's half our planet we're talking about. Activities are largely unregulated and unmonitored. You cannot take out keystone species or the big sharks or the tunas and expect there not to be a knock off massive problem.
@Furbeti - grizzy
In an interview trailer before his arrest Jeffrey Epstein revealed he was ‘always a strong advocate for women’s thinking’ He also foreshadows and suggests at his own ‘suicide’ near the end of the video. https://t.co/Tvt2n9qLtY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two islands and a literary reference open the dialogue: "The Islands Of Doctor Moreau? Correct." The speaker claims, "I make bad living from old thinking," signaling a critique of traditional or outdated ideas. The conversation then pivots to a provocative assertion about gender and the future: "But the future is for the way women think. The way women think. That's correct." This statement positions women's thinking as central to what lies ahead.
The dialogue then shifts to a critique or challenge: "Is that not a SOP because of all the depravity you've done against young women? Your new SOP is that women's thinking is the future?" The questions imply skepticism about the claim and accuse the speaker of past wrongdoing related to young women, suggesting a moral or ethical conflict tied to the supposed future oriented by women's thinking.
In response, the speaker denies a purely negative evaluation of their past and asserts a belief about women's capabilities: "No, I've always believed that women would be in fact be able to take over." They further articulate their stance by declaring, "I'm a firm believer and supporter of Time Zone," which signals an ideological or organizational alignment, possibly a term or concept associated with their worldview.
A subsequent line introduces a separate, stark observation about human psychology under confinement: "The greatest threat to people put in solitary confines, they try to kill themselves." The speaker elaborates with a concrete example: "Imagine that. You're only in a room for twenty four hours, you start to go crazy." This remark emphasizes the intense mental strain and potential self-harm risk associated with solitary confinement, highlighting the fragility of the human mind when isolated for a day.
Overall, the exchange moves from a literary allusion to a critique of outdated thinking, to a bold claim that the future depends on how women think, to a defense of the speaker’s beliefs tied to an entity called Time Zone, and finally to a stark remark about the mental health dangers of solitary confinement. The core themes hinge on the legitimacy of changing intellectual paradigms (especially regarding women's role), the speaker’s claimed consistency about women's takeover, and a sobering observation about confinement's psychological impact.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two islands. The Islands Of Doctor. Moreau? Correct. I make bad living from old thinking.
But the future is for the way women think. The way women think. That's correct. Is that not a SOP because of all the depravity you've done against young women? Your new SOP is that women's thinking is the future?
No, I've always believed that women would be in fact be able to take over. I'm a firm believer and supporter of Time Zone. The greatest threat to people put in solitary confines, they try to kill themselves. Imagine that. You're only in a room for twenty four hours, you start to go crazy.