TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @GBNEWS
@GBNEWS - GB News
'It's about time we stopped calling this "Asian" grooming gangs. It's not, it's a Pakistani problem.' Aman Bhogal argues that Labour's proposed inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal is just a 'follow-up' on the 'cover-up' that's been going on for the last three decades. https://t.co/M0ntIwlguL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process.
- Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse.
- Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race.
- Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it.
- Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out.
- Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties.
- Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today.
- The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now joining us to go through what's making the news, former Labour adviser, Scarlett Maguire, political commentator, Amon Bogle. Very nice to see you guys as usual. Where do you want to begin?
Speaker 1: Aman, should we start this front page of the telegraph? The grooming inquiry, the grooming gang inquiry, sabotaged by labor. This is a claim by survivors
Speaker 2: Indeed. Detainers. Indeed. I mean, I would argue that this inquiry from the outset was nothing but a follow-up of the cover up that's been going on for the last three decades, simply because let's break this down a bit. Kyrstheimer and Labour Party refused a national inquiry in the first place, that was a contending of the cover up, and now this government is manipulating this inquiry by refusing the victims and the survivors of this horrid grooming, Pakistani grooming gangs, to name and shame the perpetrators as Pakistanis, and also it's been, they've been stopped from looking into the religious aspects of what went on in all these.
Speaker 0: As a man of Asian descent or whatever, what do you make of this?
Speaker 2: Well, first of all, I think it's about time that we stop calling this Asian grooming gangs. It's not. It's a Pakistani problem in The UK.
Speaker 0: Very brave of you to do that, so that's going above a step beyond what the government would do there.
Speaker 2: Well, absolutely. I mean, let's be honest, the vast majority of these perpetrators in fact are from a very one simple area of Pakistan called Mirpur. So it is a Pakistani problem. It's about time that these two ladies who have removed themselves from the inquiry have done so exactly because of that, because they were being silenced by the government into looking into the race What
Speaker 0: is the big fear about us? I mean as I say this, I know I'm party to people who have been subjected to all of this. I I know where this exists, and and people talk about how it exists and then the shops, the corner shops, the off licenses, the gyms. Yes. Gyms are a big thing for grooming these girls and people know where to bring these girls and what goes on and it goes on and it doesn't stop and everybody knows it goes on and no one is doing anything about it.
Speaker 2: Well because as a country I think we've been far too scared of simply talking about them and how many times have we heard that the police, the social workers, that even the care workers that were in charge of a lot of these vulnerable young girls were scared of being labeled racist if they even talked about or bought this up.
Speaker 3: Yeah hold on, think we have to we're conflating timelines, mean I think that happened at the beginning and what was worse
Speaker 2: And what was That's why these these these victims have come off the inquiry.
Speaker 3: Hold on.
Speaker 2: I think Silas Hill.
Speaker 3: Hold on. Let me let me say. What what was worse was that that that when the victims went to the police, the police then that, I mean, we we've heard that the police were then became the perpetrators. Right?
Speaker 2: In some cases.
Speaker 3: As well. In in some cases. But they but they certainly did. But actually, what we have to remember is the person who first brought the grooming, some of the grooming gags to court was Kirsty Dahmer, that he reopened cases that had been closed and that any inquiry is very difficult. And the last inquiry into child sexual abuse, I think they went through three chairs before we finally found one.
I mean, is, it is very difficult. Now, I agree with Lauren who was on here earlier that it should be judged like this, you cannot have, you can't have a social worker and you can't have police. But it's very, very difficult how you have an inquiry and you listen to everybody and that that's what has got to happen.
Speaker 0: I mean to anybody. I'd just be going into the gyms and the and the shops and whatever and say, knock knock, who's here? What do you got? Who do got out the back there?
Speaker 2: Well, I
Speaker 0: It goes on. And don't laugh at it. It's it goes on.
Speaker 3: No. Just minute. I am not laughing at it. I I think I mean, you know, what happened was we had the most vulnerable young women because they were in care. Right?
Nobody was looking after them, And and it was a poor and they were abused by everybody. Right? They were abused by social workers to to to turning to looking elsewhere. They were abused by the men who did it. And they then found they went to the police and the police behaved just as badly.
What happened was appalling. And is I mean, it's
Speaker 0: the What's happening? I think a man just said there we keep saying, what happened? It's happening. It's happening now. It's happening every day.
Read that girl's book. It would break your heart. Absolutely break your heart.
@GBNEWS - GB News
'Antifa nearly killed me, and no one was held accountable.' Journalist Andy Ngo says Democrat-run cities treat Antifa like shock troops, ignoring their violent attacks: 'The judge dismissed my lawsuit because Antifa isn’t a registered entity. How convenient.' https://t.co/m3DgysfzsL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 has reported on Antifa for nine years, noting the prior administration didn't acknowledge it and the current one pledges to treat the militant violent extremists as the domestic terrorists that they are. They “organize under the banner of Rose City Antifa,” are decentralized and not a singular organization, with autonomous chapters and propaganda encouraging direct action. In 2019, while reporting on a Portland protest, he was ambushed in a beating and suffered a brain bleed. In 2021, he was chased through downtown, tackled, in a choke hold, as a mob pounded hotel windows and drivers drove away. No one was held responsible; a judge dismissed Rose City Antifa as not a registered entity, and Portland police closed cases for lack of identification. He says Democrats control Portland and Antifa act as shock troops for them; “I wasn't the first to be beaten” and “somebody... assassinated in 2020.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For many years, I've been report reporting on Antifa for about nine years now. For much of that, I did feel that I was just reporting into the ether. I mean, we the prior administration didn't acknowledge that it existed at all, and now we finally have an administration that does and is pledging to treat the militant violent extremists as the domestic terrorists that they are.
Speaker 1: So when you say you were before been reported on them for that long period of time, how do you define who they are? Because this is one of the issues, isn't it? And this is why I think they've been able to escape scrutiny for such a long time because they are quite hard to define.
Speaker 0: Yes. Although in Portland, it's easier to define because they organize under the banner of Rose City Antifa. Those were the militants who were involved in beating, assaulting me, nearly killing me before. They have other autonomous chapters themselves. You can think of them across The US, but they are extremely nebulous.
They're hard to define in that. They're decentralized. It's not a singular organization. You can't just take out the leader and the whole thing falls apart. You can think of it much similar to radical Islam in that there's an idea of violent militant anarchism, communism, and that their propaganda is put out in the and individuals are encouraged to organize or if needed take direct action at the individual level.
Speaker 1: And what happened to you Andy and I'm so sorry you had to go through that as a journalist just trying to do your job and shine a light on something that is really dark. Just if you mind can you talk us through what did happen to you?
Speaker 0: In 2019 I was reporting on one of the many Antifa protests in Portland and I was ambushed in a beating and they beat me so severely on the head that I suffered a brain bleed, I nearly died from that. Two years later I returned on the ground and that's the footage that's being shown now and that was when I was chased through the streets of downtown and tackled to the ground. I was screaming for help and all of the drivers just drove away, people walked around and I was held in a choke hold and nearly was passed out from that. I managed to escape from that choke hold to run into a nearby hotel and a mob amassed outside the hotel and were pounding on the windows trying to break in to get me.
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. We're seeing the footage here and apologies if it's very distressing at how we probably should have given this a a warning, so we apologize for this. Did anybody get held responsible for that?
Speaker 0: No. Not in 2021, not in 2019.
Speaker 1: And why was that? Is it because the police will say we have no idea who they are. We can't see their faces. They're completely covered up. Could you have identified them?
Speaker 0: Identified some people who I sued in a civil lawsuit. The difficulty with trying to hold Antifa, for example, Rose City Antifa accountable is a judge in Oregon dismissed Rose City Antifa from my civil lawsuit because they said they're not a registered entity. How convenient. Portland police closed the cases in my beating attacks because they said they couldn't identify anyone.
Speaker 1: Do you think there was political will behind some of those decisions?
Speaker 0: Yes. Unfortunately, in Portland, it's one of those jurisdictions completely run by Democrats, and anti folk function in many ways as shock troops for Democrats. Their goals are different, but their targets of violence and opposition are the same. And when you have a prosecutor who is compromised and judges and potential jurors, police departments who are under political leadership, I think it's why I was not the first to be beaten by Antifaan. I wasn't the last.
It was somebody who was assassinated in 2020.
@GBNEWS - GB News
'Pubs are over, free speech is over, this whole bill is a disaster for employers and needs to be scrapped.' Renee Hoenderkamp says proposals suggesting pubs should ban customers from discussing controversial topics are 'madness'. https://t.co/ISA5LNqPdz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Can we discuss the implications of free speech in pubs? The proposed employment bill from Angela Rayner is concerning, as it could restrict conversations in public spaces. If discussing sensitive topics like transgender issues leads to complaints, it might result in people being silenced or even removed from pubs. This situation feels reminiscent of a dystopian reality where only approved speech is allowed. While the intention behind the bill is to prevent workplace harassment, its wording could lead to overreach, stifling open dialogue. Existing laws already address harassment; instead of adding more regulations, we should focus on teaching respect and politeness to foster a more open environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Can we talk about this free speech in pubs, Brenna? What's going on here? Brenna?
Speaker 1: Well, just madness I think. Just more of this madness employment bill from Angela Rayner which really needs to be scrapped because if we're getting to the point where people are not able to talk about anything they want to talk about in the pub, which is where you talk about anything you want to talk about, it's over. Pubs are over. Free speech is over. This whole bill is a disaster for employers and needs to be scrapped.
Speaker 2: And because the Equality Human Rights Commission is saying that the way this bill could be interpreted, if you start giving your view on the transgender issue, for instance, someone can say, that's out of order, conversation over.
Speaker 0: Your words offend me in my workplace and therefore And
Speaker 2: the public can then maybe be required to end the conversation or throw them out the pub. I
Speaker 1: mean, it really is 1984. We are living it now, isn't it? It's news speak. This is what you're allowed to say. Nothing else.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: I I think that that when it comes to the pub's bit, it common sense would probably prevail. And I I think it'd be very unlikely there would be any action taken in the pub. It could happen, but I think it's it's unlikely
Speaker 2: But the fact it could makes it wrong.
Speaker 3: But the the intention the intention of this is is to stop harassment in the workplace.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 3: So that's that's the idea. What seems to have happened, according to the, Equality and Human Rights Commission is that's now being literally interpreted by employers, which means in the workplace, you couldn't discuss you just mentioned transgender issues. That would be a good example, but couldn't discuss basically contentious issues in case someone overhears you. So what started us to being able to protect em employees either from being, intimidated by other employees or by customers or clients or something like that, has gone one stage too far because of the wording.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Can I just give you the actual wording? I think it might be useful. So so it's the quote is unwanted conduct that has the purpose or effect of violating the recipient's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment.
Speaker 3: That's the point. Yes. I mean and so so, effectively, that's stopping harassment. So the intention
Speaker 0: stopping your feelings being hurt?
Speaker 3: Well, it goes a bit further than that. I mean I mean, hostility could be more than just feelings hurt. Intimidation Offense? Intimidation would be bullying, and creating any environment which is uncomfortable for another another worker to opt in. We have
Speaker 1: we have these laws. We have law upon law upon law in the workplace to stop this. We seem to be holding on to the tail of the dog and hoping the dog won't move when, really, we should just go back to school and teach our kids to just be polite and respectful to people rather than bringing in yet another law that can be misinterpreted to stifle free speech.
@GBNEWS - GB News
'In Sharia Law, a rapist is the victim of the story because he was tempted to sin. Child marriage is allowed too.' Iranian Human Rights Campaigner, Lily Moo, almost drives @MartinDaubney to tears in her response to Pakistani grooming gangs raping white girls. https://t.co/P7qmXkpDgD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion highlights the severe issues of sexual abuse and victimization of young girls, particularly within certain cultural contexts. A 13-year-old girl named Scarlett was drugged and abused, yet no perpetrators have been held accountable. There is a concern that authorities fear confronting the Muslim community, influenced by a culture of victim blaming and extremist ideologies. The existence of Sharia law is criticized for its treatment of victims and acceptance of practices like child marriage. Personal experiences of bullying and harassment are shared, illustrating the dangers faced by those outside the dominant culture. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of support for victims and the silence surrounding these atrocities.
Thank you for sharing your insights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By the fact that we have 12 year old girls being gang raped, being given contraceptives by the police. We had a girl atrocity. We had a girl yesterday, Scarlett, who was 13 at the time. Her father used to go trying to find her, across the town. She'd been force fed drugs, force fed alcohol.
There are multiple men abused. He didn't didn't even remember it, and yet not a single person has ever been committed for any of those atrocities. Why is it do you think, Lily Mu, that the authorities are so terrified of the of the Muslim community and they just don't seem to have the guts to tackle it?
Speaker 1: I believe the whole culture of victim blaming and pushing the sin of being a woman is an embedded cultural, reality in the Muslim ideology or in at least not the not all practicing Muslims have this ideology and belief, of course, but the extremist politicized Islam that's fully embedded into the country. Now, I mean, we have 85 Sharia laws in this in this country. There is no need for a Sharia law. In a Sharia law, a rapist is basically in, is the victim of this story because he was tempted to sin against the young girl. Child marriage is allowed under Sharia law.
What is happening to the UK when a white British girl is raped and killed and then they call that a honor killing? What is happening to the UK? I mean, if if there is not going to be a national inquiry, what is going to happen? Because the politicians who are already in power right now today, our prime minister, he was in power 10 years ago when he could have done something about it. And today, he has the audacity to say he did something about it.
Well, it's truly showing otherwise. There are victims who have no supports. There are families who are ashamed of even speaking up about this. There are girls who don't believe this even happened to them because they are so afraid of their reality of accepting such horrors that they've endured. They want to believe they were in a relationship.
It's it's appalling. It's heartbreaking. See, my brother was bullied in school, because I come from Iran and we were not Muslims. After I left my high school, my face was cut out on a picture and put on a porn website. And the Muslim boys in school were passing this picture around to each other to the point that we had the police involved, all of this record is there.
And they had my teenage brother's nose was broken and beaten, because he wouldn't stand for such rudeness and foul behavior. Everywhere my sister and I were were to go living in the mid in in the West Midlands at the time, was always with an escort so that we would not be preyed upon. It was not a safe place, and nobody wants to talk about that.
Speaker 0: Well, thank you very much for coming in and sharing. This is incredible. I I often find myself, you know, just just like lost words. Lady Mou, thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 0: Coming up. God, I've gotta stop doing this. It's not about me. I'm just sorry. I'm just so moved by all this.
Now coming up, data exclusivity seen by TV news reveals that the pensioner vote for a Labour Party
@GBNEWS - GB News
'He followed me into the hallway, grabbed my face and pushed the pill into my face to swallow. He said it was for my own good.' A victim of rape gangs in Oldham has told Charlie Peters she was forced to take emergency contraception by a police officer after she reported abuse. https://t.co/dbrE3tiMXZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2006, a 12-year-old girl reported being molested to police, who dismissed her. After being abducted and raped multiple times, she sought help from the Saint Mary's Rape Crisis Center. Initially uncomfortable taking the emergency contraceptive pill, she later faced aggression from a police officer who tried to force her to take it at home. Despite her complaint, the police stated they could not identify the officer involved. She expressed frustration over the lack of action from authorities and the absence of a government-led inquiry into the abuse scandal in Oldham. Survivors, including her, feel their voices are ignored, and they seek accountability for the past failures in protecting victims. The Greater Manchester Police acknowledged their shortcomings and committed to improving child protection and pursuing justice for survivors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1 evening in 2,006, a 12 year old girl went into this police station. She reported that she had been molested in a local graveyard. The police officers here told her to sober up and come back later. As she left, she was accosted by 2 further men who took her away in a car and raped her. They gave her money for a bus fare and dropped her in the streets in this town in Greater Manchester.
She was picked up by another man. He also raped her. He then abandoned Sam again in another street in this town, and another man picked her up, Shakeel Chaudhry. He also raped her. It was an appalling ordeal.
Now she eventually did receive some action from the police some days later. She reported her incident to the Saint Mary's rape crisis center. But we can reveal today is that one of the first actions the police took was to try and force a contraceptive pill into her mouth. I've known Sam for many years. Yesterday, I spoke with her about this traumatizing ordeal.
Speaker 1: After you were abused by a gang, so many members on one day, what happened to you when you sought support from the police?
Speaker 2: The police did a referral to Saint Mary's Rape Crisis Center who, after a couple of days, finally managed to fit me in. From there, they did examinations, took photographs, of all the bruising and trauma that I had received. And from that, I received the emergency contraceptive pill. At the time when I had was at the appointment, I didn't feel comfortable taking it, so I did request to take it home and just some have some time to take it all in. It wasn't that I was not gonna take it.
It was just I needed to come to the conclusion and acceptance myself.
Speaker 1: Then you got home, but there was an incident with a police officer about that pill quite soon after?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I put the pill in my room, and then I went out. The following day when I came home, from being with friends, there was an officer sat in my mom's living room, and my parents were in the kitchen. And he was quite locally aggressive telling me how important it was, to take it. He had already gone through my room and found it and produced it in the living room to me.
He popped it out the box and tried and passed it to me to take. I refused and said, I'm not ready and walked off to go upstairs. He followed me into the hallway, and he grabbed my arm and then grabbed my face and pushed it into my mouth to swallow and said it's for your own good. I then went upstairs and spat it out and took it out the window.
Speaker 1: You were just 12 years old when this happened. It must have been the most appalling experience. I'm very sorry.
Speaker 2: As a 12 year old, we're we're still at an age where we're a lot more mature and being treated like we're a child. It it doesn't work. We need that respect equally and an understanding. And if nobody's talking us through what it is, what it means, why we need to take it, then you're not gonna have that trust.
Speaker 1: How did you feel knowing that you have police officers in your house using force against you to try and force you to take medicine and a pill while your abusers were out on the streets?
Speaker 2: I didn't feel safe. So it fell out.
Speaker 1: Great to mention the police have, assessed this complaint as you've raised it quite recently. But they've come to no conclusion as to who was behind this incident in your home. How did it feel when you got that response back from your complaint?
Speaker 2: It feels like the same old excuse, but due to a passage of time, they can't they can't investigate it any further and refuse to look into who that officer was at the time.
Speaker 1: And in 2022, you were basically the only survivor voice in the original review conducted into Olden into the abuse gang scandal. But this wasn't included in that. This incident is a brand new revelation from that appalling period of abuse. How much information do you think has been missed from the investigations into Oldham?
Speaker 2: I'd say quite a lot. And given the fact that I was one of the only ones that were part of that review, it concerns me why they didn't involve more and is there a cover up?
Speaker 1: Now last week, we revealed that Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, had denied a request led by survivors, including you, for a government led inquiry into the abuse in Oldham because they didn't trust the council to do a proper job. How did you feel when you found out that Jess Phillips had turned down that request?
Speaker 2: Upset because after each review, they always say, we've learned from our lessons. We've learned from past mistakes, but I don't see any action any every time. And if they wanna prove to us that they do care about our survivors and want to give us a voice, then listen to us. This is what we want.
Speaker 1: A government led inquiry?
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, Jess Phillips has said and the labor government has said that they'll support more local reviews. Is that good enough for you?
Speaker 2: It's not gonna lead to any prosecutions from any official body. It'll lead to recommendations that won't be listened to. And what does that actually unless except those getting answers, it doesn't achieve anything for us.
Speaker 1: Now, obviously, the grooming gang scandal is is back in the headlines now. There's been a surge in interest after Elon Musk and other influential figures started speaking about it again in the last week. Are you happy about that surge in interest?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Because it should be a topic that should be spoken about openly. People shouldn't be afraid or disgusted that this does happen. And to stop it, we need to fight it now.
Speaker 1: Also as part of the reaction from the government to all the attention that's going on, Today, Sequir Starmer referred to the far right and their poison and how some people could be amplifying the far right in their discussions and call for a national public inquiry. What was your reaction as a survivor to this abuse when you heard that statement from the prime minister?
Speaker 2: I feel like it's a bit of a cop out. We're always gonna get people that are gonna turn it negative in one way or another, whether it's from far right people or whoever. You know? But this isn't about a certain ethnicity or a certain kind of person. This is about abusers, rapists of any person, any nationality, any color.
They're all out there, and this needs to be sorted now.
Speaker 1: Are you on that government led inquiry to finally expose the true extent of the crisis? Yeah.
Speaker 2: I do. Do you
Speaker 1: have any hope that the slave government might change its mind and listen to you and other survivors calling for more public investigations?
Speaker 2: Personally, I don't. Because labor was in government when all this was happening.
Speaker 0: Now in the police complaint seen exclusively by GB News, it says that the force does not dispute that a police officer was at her house and did robustly encourage her to take the pill, but it said that it cannot confirm the alleged use of force that we are revealing today. I would just like to refer back to Sam's comments at the end there that she has little hope that a national public inquiry will be launched because Labour was in power during the time of so many of these cover ups and all this corruption going on in local authorities. Here in Oldham, it was revealed in 2022 that a Labour Party member and a senior welfare officer from the council was one of the grooming gang abusers. Now Sam has also told us that she does not have confidence in a local a local inquiry being launched by Oldham Council as ordered by Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, because like the information we're revealing today, so much was missed. The conservatives in their opposition to the government have said that a national public inquiry is needed because only at that level can you force people to come and give evidence.
Local inquiries, they say, have no power to ensure that evidence is heard, victims are protected, and accountability is delivered. And most importantly of all, justice is finally given to so many thousands of survivors around the United Kingdom.
Speaker 1: Charlie Peters, thank you so much for bringing us that live from, from Greater Manchester. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Yes. The assistant chief constable for Greater Manchester Police, Steph Parker, has said, we wholeheartedly apologize to all victims of child sexual exploitation who we badly let down, including Sam, for the hurt and ongoing trauma caused by what happened. We've accepted our actions fell far short of the help that they had every right to expect from us. Child protection is the priority for the GMP of today. Our approach to protecting victims and pursuing perpetrators is significantly improved to that of 2 decades ago, with his majesties inspector of constabulary recently finding us to be good or adequate in all areas of protecting children across GM.
We continue to work with Sam and the abuse she suffered is one of a number of ongoing victim focused investigations by a specialist unit investigating non recent CSE, which has 100 dedicated detectives working at a pace survivors are comfortable with when the time is right for them. This has seen more than 100 arrests, with suspects continuing to be taken to court to face justice. We are wholly focused on working with partners to listen to survivors of non recent child sexual exploitation and ensure that they are believed we are determined to bring offenders to justice for their crimes no matter how long they were committed. Time is no barrier to justice.
@GBNEWS - GB News
‘There is no public order threat in here whatsoever.’ Nigel Farage argues that opposition to the National Conservatism Conference is 'about closing down alternative opinions' to the European Union. https://t.co/2fOnJbVA4m
Video Transcript AI Summary
This new form of communism doesn't allow any differing opinions. The speaker believes the events in Brussels show why Brexit was the right choice. The police may close down the conference, but the speaker won't resort to violence. There is no public order threat inside.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No alternative opinion allowed. This is the updated new form of communism. And you know what? If anything ever, ever made me think that Brexit was the right thing to do, it's the events here in Brussels today.
Speaker 1: It's the most extraordinary situation, Nigel. As far as you understand, 3 police officers outside right now. Do you have any indication how this, event will develop, whether police will open these doors, and, frankly, how will you respond if the Belgian police try to manhandle you out of this conference?
Speaker 0: Well, you know, Tom, I I'm I'm I'm not given to violence, so I I won't, I won't avail myself of it. But, no, it's pretty clear this will be closed down. They're using public order, but that actually is no excuse at all. There is no public order threat in here whatsoever.
@GBNEWS - GB News
'I want you to look into my eyes Rishi Sunak and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma and the regret I have in my eyes.' An audience member asks the Prime Minister why he and others affected by the covid vaccine 'have been left to rot'. #GBNPeoplesForum https://t.co/HfHOYVcoWL
Video Transcript AI Summary
John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his pain and frustration, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why he had to establish a support group in Scotland for vaccine victims and criticizes the inadequate vaccine damaged payment scheme. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to address them, mentioning the existence of a compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and encourages John to provide his details for further investigation. The Prime Minister expresses surprise at John's claim of being silenced and assures him that his case will be looked into.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Rusty Sounak. I've got so much to say about such a little time.
Speaker 1: My name is John Watt and I'm one of the COVID vaccine injured in this country. I want you to look into my eyes Rashi Shounak and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all. Not only am I in here this vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID 19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs, amputations.
I know people with heart conditions like myself, Richard Sounak. Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that COVID 19 vaccine? Why are the people who are in charge who told us all to do the right thing have left us all to rot and left me and the 1,000 and the tens of 1,000 in this country to rot. But she soon looked me in the eye. When are you going to start to do the right thing?
The vaccine damaged payment scheme is not fit for purpose. In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, There are over 30,000 people who have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine.
Speaker 2: Okay. And due
Speaker 1: to deaths.
Speaker 2: John, thank you very much indeed for your question.
Speaker 1: You've got to start doing the
Speaker 2: injured. You've made a really strong point, John, prime minister.
Speaker 3: John, well, I'm very sorry to hear about Your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by the similar by a similar thing. Now, obviously, I I don't know about the individual situation that you're in. Silent,
Speaker 1: Russia. We're silenced.
Speaker 3: Well, I
Speaker 1: don't media and everything. We are silenced. We are the most silenced people in this country.
Speaker 0: Silenced in
Speaker 2: the press because my
Speaker 3: No. No. No one.
Speaker 2: No one.
Speaker 3: No one. No one is saying. No one is saying.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. How's your wife in a successful career? And, Sir, you raised some very valid points, I'm sure. What I've got to say is, though, we haven't got you on microphone.
And as you know, we've got to get through this. I'm sure we can we can raise your points with the prime minister at a later date. But in the meantime, prime minister, if you
Speaker 3: could cover the issue I'm very happy to. So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place as you alluded to in the NHS. Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases. It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case. I'm sure you'll Appreciate that.
I'm very happy to go and look at the cases, and I'm sure you'll get them to the team here. I mean, I I'm very saddened and shocked To hear that you've been silenced by anybody, that is surprising to me. So please do get your details to Steven and the team, and I will happily take that away. Of course, you should better speak about your experience, What's happened to you? And as I said, we have a compensation scheme in place for that, and I'll make sure that we're working through that.
Obviously, I think you'll appreciate it's hard for me to comment on your Specific circumstances, just not knowing them and those things that
Speaker 2: But forgive me, sir. We haven't got a microphone on you, so our viewers and listeners won't be able
Speaker 3: to I think, look, the last the last thing I'd say is, Yeah. We went through a pandemic like everyone else. At the points when it came to the vaccine, those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice From our medical experts to tell us, as politicians, who are obviously not doctors, about how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, The priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible, that was something that the doctors recommended on, and that's something that we followed. Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out, then that's why we have the compensation scheme in place, and I'll make sure that we follow-up on your cases.
@GBNEWS - GB News
'The “be kind” militia, call everyone they don't like Nazis, except actual Nazis. And now with a twisted and heartless response to the human horrors of October 7th, they have revealed their true nature, the mask has slipped!' @MrMarkDolan https://t.co/Lw5BD6h1Tp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the response of the "woke left" to the recent terror attack in Israel, accusing them of supporting the murder, rape, and torture of innocent civilians. They argue that the left has turned a blind eye to the actions of Hamas and effectively supported their goals. The speaker believes that calling for a ceasefire demonstrates ignorance of the Middle East's history and politics and a lack of empathy for the threat faced by Jews and Israel. They claim that Hamas wants to wipe out all Jews and that the war in Israel is everyone's war. The speaker also criticizes those in Britain who march in support of Palestine, calling it an assault on the values of democracy and tolerance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any crisis reveals someone's true character. We saw it during the pandemic, those who backed common sense, individual liberty, and evidence based science versus dogma, ideology, and ultimately, tyranny. And in just 3 weeks since the horrific terror attack on Israel, the death of over 1400 people, including 260 at a music festival, So the woke left, the be kind crowd, who are much better humans than you and me, have shown their true colors, attending marches and by implication, cheering on the murder, rape, and torture of innocent civilians. Abandoned psychopaths, Our national broadcaster can't even bring themselves to call terrorists even though they have only one goal. Hamas want genocide.
This is rebadged Nazism, to which the liberal progressives have either turned a blind eye or effectively supported. The be kind militia call everyone that they don't like Nazis, except actual Nazis. And now with a twisted and heartless response to the human horrors of October 7th, they've revealed their true nature. The mask has slipped. This is the moment that wokeism jumped the shark and truly lost the plot.
The historian Niall Ferguson points out in today's mail newspaper, that the response progressives have made to the kidnapping of holocaust survivors, the burning alive of bodies, the gouging out of eyes, the rape of women, the parading of corpses on the back of pickup trucks, and the beheading of babies has dramatically increased awareness of this toxic brand of leftism. With its de facto support for these medieval murderers in the Middle East, wokeism has both revealed itself and overplayed its hand. Now it may well be true that Israel has a case to answer for its treatment of Palestinian people and a two state solution in which Israelis and Palestinians can live in harmony must be the Holy Grail. But calling for a ceasefire is another chilling maneuver from those caring, sharing types because it demonstrates a total ignorance of the history and politics of the Middle East, and a total lack of empathy for the existential threat that Jews and Israel now face. Hamas don't have a strategic goal in the region.
They don't want a 2 state solution. They want a no state solution. They want to wipe all Jews off the planet. And what these idiots marching in Western cities don't realize is that the people who hate Jews and hate Israel, hate us, too. So Israel's war is our war.
If Hamas and their ilk cannot be eliminated, We will be next in line for their murder spree. Take those queers for Palestine. Have you ever seen anything more ridiculous in your life? If Hamas got hold of these gay and trans people, they would be eliminated faster than you can say vegan sausage roll. This talk of ceasefire is a total red herring and up there with the appeasement of Hitler in the 19 thirties.
Nazism had to be defeated, and so does this. A ceasefire is effectively asking Israel to be a sitting duck to more terror. A ceasefire is snake oil language. It's doublespeak for Israel, suck it up. Now I have a bit of sympathy for Keir Starmer who believes in Israel's right to self defense, whilst many in his party do not.
Starmer is between a rocket and a hard place. But what's clear is that the thousands of people in Britain marching on the streets every weekend, some of whom are calling for a holy war, is a direct assault on the values of this country, of democracy, of the rule of law, of tolerance and of decency. Those woke idiots don't realize that by cheering it on, they'll be next. They are turkeys voting for Christmas, and, eventually, they'll get
@GBNEWS - GB News
🗞️ 'Iranian girl dies after being "beaten by morality police" for not wearing hijab' 🗞️ | The Telegraph @Paulcoxcomedy @Lewisschaffer @LeoKearse https://t.co/1DtPqPpmph
Video Transcript AI Summary
An Iranian girl died after being beaten by morality police for not wearing a hijab at a Tehran metro station. This incident is similar to the murder of another girl last year for the same reason. The morality police, who are men, enforce the mandatory hijab rule in Iran. While some argue that this is a cultural practice that should be respected, many people in Iran oppose the oppressive regime and would prefer to live in a free country. It is important to condemn such violence, even though the exact details of this incident are not confirmed. Iran serves as a warning of how a free country can turn into an authoritarian nightmare. Additionally, in Gaza, school officials have voted to require young girls to wear head coverings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The telegraph now and a year on from Iranian police murdering an Iranian girl for not wearing a hijab, it's happened again, Paul.
Speaker 1: Yes. I've got to be honest, this story really does is horrible. There's no other word for it. Iranian girl dies after being beaten By morality police for not wearing a hijab. So Armita Gerevand was hospitalized with head injuries following an alleged assault at a Tehran metro station.
So just in English, just for a minute, for those who didn't quite get the cultural nuance here. This was a teenage girl who forgot to wear a garment of clothing and then was beaten to death In a public train station.
Speaker 0: And it's an unnecessary garment of clothing. It's a religious covering for your head that, you know, a lot of people, especially young people in Iran, don't want to wear.
Speaker 1: So I don't care how that's construed by the wider public out there, but to me, that is abhorrent. Nothing justifies that. Nothing at all. And what's worse to me is there would have been men doing that, and there would have been men watching that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. Absolutely. The morality police are men.
Speaker 2: No. The point the point is is that she didn't just forget to wear it. No one in a row just forgets to put on this thing. It's like you I I left the house without putting my pants on. I mean I get it.
Again. I get it. I got no pants. No. It really means something to those people, and I think and I think a case could be made That their that their society needs to be respected if this is what they want to do.
Speaker 1: I don't think
Speaker 0: you mean this. I think that's that's ridiculous. We've seen the the mass public revulsion at the murder of Masa Amini, the the girl who was killed last year, and the the protest that went on. I mean, they've got an Islamic theocracy, an absolutely barbaric authoritarian state that controls every aspect of people's lives. It's hugely unpopular.
It's probably the future for Western Europe the way we're going, but, I mean, I'd say the people don't like this. They'd rather live
Speaker 2: You don't.
Speaker 0: In a free country.
Speaker 2: No. You do not live in Iran. We don't know what a what Iran is like. I don't know. And the it's quite possible that the majority of the people in Iran support this thing.
And it may see and, personally, I'm in favor of women not wearing hijabs or have to wear hijabs. If they wanna wear it, they could wear it.
Speaker 0: And the rest.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And the rest. The president You
Speaker 1: would condemn the baiting, though, wouldn't you?
Speaker 2: Well, first of all, as with all of these stories, it's in the newspaper. We don't know what's true. But I would if it was True. I do condemn it. But at the same time,
Speaker 0: but it's in the Telegraph, which is you know, that's a very reputable paper. I'm sure they checked their sources. I'm sure it's been verified and confirmed from different from different sources. And it's it's not out of character for the morality police, And they've been they've been targeting protesters in really, really horrible ways Yeah. Particularly shooting at their eyes to blame them.
So, yeah, I mean, Iran I don't know. Iran should be a warning sign to the rest of the world as as to this is what can happen. A free country can become, you know, an absolute authoritarian nightmare.
Speaker 2: And it's it's in Gaza. School officials voted to require young girls to wear head coverings. So that's Gaza.
Speaker 0: There you go. What's the common
@GBNEWS - GB News
'This will be remembered as the first day of war between Israel and Iran.' @SharrenHaskel joins @CamillaTominey to discuss the latest from Israel as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared war on Hamas following their terror attacks against Israel.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The military has called in reserve forces to ensure the safety of Israeli citizens. They are working to liberate two remaining towns and protect those living near Gaza. Hamas has forced Israel to take action in Gaza, despite Israel's previous evacuation of the area. The Western world should unite against Iran, who is believed to be behind the surprise attack. This is not just an attack on Israel, but on the values of democracy and freedom that the Western world holds. If Iran succeeds, Europe and other countries may be targeted next. This is a larger conflict that Iran has initiated against Israel and the Western world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are people trying to leave as they've been a rush on the airport? I happen to have a friend who's got a relative in Israel he's coming trying to come back via Jerusalem. What's the situation on the ground? One would imagine that Israelis are now living in fear of their lives.
Speaker 1: So the military have recruited, the reserve, forces in order to go down to the south to bring back the safety and the security of the citizens in our country. It means that they're probably going to go and they they find out to, still, liberating, 2, I think, towns left, in order to bring those citizens into safety. The army moves to the citizens around the Gaza Institute in order to go into a full on military defense move that is needed in order to liberate, you know, children that are in women that are being taken hostage and are being held captive in Gaza. Unfortunately, Hamas forced us to go into Gaza again. This is something that wasn't anticipated because in 2005, Israel completely evacuated the strip of Gaza from every single living jew.
They were given an autonomy that were declared by the United Nations, And, unfortunately, instead of building a beautiful Singapore, from this area, people have voted, democratic elections and have turned it into a nest of 0 while investing all their funds, money, and energy on hatred, on violence, on arms, to fight against this realm.
Speaker 0: Sharon, what should the Western world do now we've had some commentary in our papers this morning, questioning Joe Biden's international leadership. Also, of course, the question of Hammas managed to carry out this surprise attack in the first place.
Speaker 1: Well, Camilla, this will be remembered probably as the 1st day of war between Israel and Iran, Hamas doesn't have the capability of creating such an attack we're talking of a whole battalion of terrorists running towards offenses, getting infiltrating 22 sounds and massacring family act for family. We have technological capabilities. We have a strong army, and you need to understand who is standing behind this attack and it's Iran. The international community has to join forces together. They have to single out Iran and take them out of the United Nations, any kind of form, and any kind of membership because they are sending the behind one of the worst massacre that came.
This is not just Kamila and attack on Israel. This is an attack of premise Islam, a radical Islam on the western world. This is if if they will prevail, against a country who values the values of democracy, freedom of liberty. The next one in the line will be Europe and more countries follow-up. This is a pool war that Iran has opened against Israel and against the western world and the values that we share in various domains.
@GBNEWS - GB News
ICYMI ‘Rachel Levine is a man, and he will not tell me how to refer to men posing as women!’ @MegynKelly blasts Joe Biden’s trans health secretary Dr Rachel Levine for praising a clinic that wants the word ‘mother’ replaced with the phrase ‘egg producer’.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of using proper pronouns and addressing transgender individuals. They argue that using incorrect pronouns undermines the argument against allowing transgender individuals in certain spaces. They mention Rachel Levine, a transgender individual in a high position, and criticize the use of gender-neutral terms like "egg carriers" to refer to women. The speakers assert their right to use factual language and express concern for the safety of women. They emphasize the need to speak out against these issues to avoid further losses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is so great to have you back. You have thought a lot about this. I mean, I love the message on your t shirt. And you have made a big decision, haven't you, in terms of how you are going to, address personal pronouns and trans folk going forward.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I got this Kelly from, this t shirt from Kelly J. Keane who's been really leading the way on a lot of these issues and is brilliant. And it reads, female, the real thing, which is obvious, but it isn't in some cases. And people need to be clear.
Speaker 2: And one of the ways we're clear is by using the proper pronouns. And Kelly and others have argued that pronouns are a gateway drug. If if how can I keep you out of my locker room if I'm referring to a man as a she? She can't come into my locker room. She can't come into my bathroom.
You've already lost the argument. You've already ceded the debate. The reason he cannot come in is because he's a he. So if I'm required to refer to him as a she, I've already lost. That's why they're so insistent that we use their terms.
And over and over and over again, what we see is biological girls and women getting hurt, getting the short end, in fights With biological men, these are like I'm arguing, you know, via surrogate with people like Rachel Levine, who's the HHS secretary, one of the Administration officials within the Department of Human Health and Human Services here, it's a man. He lived as man for 54 plus years. He got married. He had children. He went through medical school as a man, and then in his mid fifties, he declared himself a woman.
Now he's an admiral. He's, in the high up in the administration, and And he keeps calling himself the 1st woman to do to do this, the 1st woman to no. You're not. You're not. You're a man.
And the reason you probably became a doctor with such ease and had such a brilliant career At a time when women were struggling in the medical profession, it's because you're not a woman. They had to climb a very different mountain than you did. So language does matter, but not in the way they think. So we can't see the debate. So this Rachel Levine, for one example, goes out now and tries to push this gender madness on our children at every turn And just went to a clinic in Hawaii and praised this clinic because they are now referring to women as egg carriers.
They are getting rid of the the term women altogether, just egg carriers. To be inclusive. And so, you know, I sent out a tweet about this guy saying, here's a man, meaning Rachel Levine, posing as a woman who's trying to tell the world to refer to Us, actual women, as egg carriers, it's a no. And then you get these left wing reporters all over Twitter saying, Look at how Megyn Kelly refers to trans people. Oh, my god.
You're damn right I do. That Rachael LaVine is a man, And he will not tell me how to refer to men posing as women trying to get into our spaces or men posing as women trying to pretend that they can have babies. I will decide for myself what that language is, and I will stick to factual reality because the more I engage in taking that drug, Right? That that that pronoun drug, the the gateway drug. Mhmm.
The the less powerful my argument is, the less Safe my daughter is and I am and my fellow women are. And until we find our strength And our willingness to speak out on this, we're gonna keep losing.