reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @GenFlynn

Saved - April 24, 2026 at 3:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal that FLYNN exposes how the justice system and an unchecked intelligence apparatus pursued a sitting National Security Advisor to silence dissent and the people. They came after me and my family to send a message to you. The goal wasn’t my defeat but the opening move to erase accountability and sustain perpetual war. Yet the story ends in awakening: Americans are rising, reclaiming our voice, our schools, our elections, and our future.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

For the first time ever, the full FLYNN movie is free to watch, and only on X. Deliver the truth, whatever the cost. That was the mission when we first made this film, and it still remains the mission today. What you are about to watch is not just the story of one general, one family, or one administration. It is the story of an organized movement that weaponized the full machinery of the American justice system and the full weight of an out of control U. S. intelligence apparatus against a sitting National Security Advisor, and by extension, against every single American citizen who still believed they had a voice in their own country. They came after me because I got in the way. They came after my family because they wanted to send a message to yours. What happened to me was never the end goal. It was the opening move in a coordinated campaign to silence the American people, dismantle every layer of accountability, and protect the machine of perpetual war from the very citizens it was built to serve. Folks, this is far bigger than me. This is about you, your family, your children, and the country we all love. FLYNN pulls back the curtain on how it happened, who was behind it, and why they remain terrified of the truth reaching the American people. But remember this. The story does not end in darkness. It ends in awakening. Millions of Americans are standing up, stepping up, and speaking out. Faith is rising across this land. Families are fighting back. Communities are reclaiming their voice, their schools, their elections, and their future. What the enemies of this Republic meant for destruction, Almighty God and the American people are turning into a movement that no force on earth, and no force in hell, can stop. We are not a defeated nation. We are a nation being reborn. The local action of everyday Americans is driving national impact, and the best chapter of the American story is the one we are writing together, right now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
General Michael Flynn, a highly respected former general and intelligence officer, recounts a lifelong connection to the ocean and service to the country, describing his career as a path that led him to become the deputy and later national security adviser to President Trump. He frames his experience as a stark contrast between his duty and a perceived betrayal by the U.S. government and its institutions. Key points and sequence of events: - Early career and worldview - Flynn describes growing up near the ocean, surfing, and a commitment to service. He says he loves the country and entered the service to defend it. - He recalls facing what he calls the “worst enemy” in America after returning from service and becoming a target of accusations of treason and being called a Russian spy. - War, policy, and intelligence critique - Flynn discusses the costs and consequences of war, praising sacrifice but arguing that war is a failure of policy, diplomacy, and leadership. - He portrays war as a constant state driven by money within the military-industrial complex and questions the necessity and management of ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. - He recounts the moment of taking command of a battalion and witnessing a helicopter crash, describing the grim realities of war and the reaction of coalition forces. - Intelligence reform and career advancement - Flynn emphasizes reforms to intelligence in Afghanistan, referencing a 2010 report titled a blueprint for making intelligence relevant in Afghanistan, which he authored as a senior intel officer. - He explains his appointment to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Senate confirmation process, highlighting the opposition from the existing intelligence establishment (SES) and the resistance within Washington. - He notes how his leadership and intelligence work were both celebrated by some allies and targeted by others who wanted to push him out. - Personal and family impact - Flynn’s wife, Laurie, is described as a stabilizing force; the couple recounts decades of marriage, raising a family, and the toll of public life on their private lives. - He discusses the stress and trauma inflicted on his family during investigations, including the impact on his son and grandchildren, and describes the emotional and financial burdens of legal battles. - Transition to politics and Trump - Flynn relates how his experience and reputation led him to work with Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, where he became a trusted adviser and ally. - He recounts meeting with Trump in 2015, the several-month collaboration, and his view of Trump as someone who could fundamentally change U.S. policy away from endless wars. - He describes the 2016 presidential transition, his offer to be national security adviser, and the initial endorsement by Trump, followed by a White House shake-up. - National security adviser role and the Russia narrative - Flynn explains the circumstances around his appointment as national security adviser and the opposing views within the White House about Russia and sanctions. - He recounts briefing the president and key figures in foreign policy, and the subsequent disputes and accusations that led to his resignation beneath a cloud of controversy, including claims that he had lied about sanctions. - Investigations, FARA, and prosecutorial conduct - Flynn details the scrutiny around his contacts with Russian officials and later the Flynn Intel Group’s work in Turkey, explaining that he was accused of violating FARA for actions tied to a private businessman rather than government-directed activity. - He discusses the narrative of being accused of being a Russian or Turkish spy, the portrayal of his son as a target, and the role of Covington & Burling in his legal defense. - He charges that the government used off-the-books deals and pressured plea agreements to pressure him into pleading guilty, including allegations of a “deal” that would protect his son from prosecution. - The courtroom and legal process - Flynn describes the high-profile court hearings led by Judge Emmet Sullivan, who publicly accused him of treason, stirred dramatic tensions, and threatened prison time for lying to the FBI. - He recalls the shock of the judge’s behavior, the break in proceedings, and the eventual decision to delay sentencing as he faced immense legal and financial strain. - Sidney Powell, exculpatory evidence, and defense strategy - Flynn’s legal team changes: Covington & Burling is replaced by Sidney Powell, who uncovers conflicts of interest and unveils Brady material and exculpatory evidence that had not been disclosed. - Powell’s involvement is described as a turning point that allowed Flynn to challenge government misconduct and pursue the truth rather than simply accepting a guilty plea. - Public support, family resilience, and the pardon - Flynn and family describe a groundswell of support from ordinary Americans through letters, gifts, and fundraising, including a legal defense fund that helped sustain them through financial hardship. - They describe the eventual decision by President Trump to issue a pardon of innocence in November 2020 after the government moved to dismiss the case, noting that Flynn did not seek the pardon initially and that Sidney Powell advised against accepting a plea in order to secure full vindication. - Flynn reflects on how the pardon, while welcome, carried mixed feelings given the years of damage and public misunderstanding. - Reflections on power, governance, and the future - The narrative frames a broader critique of entrenched agencies, media influence, and political storytelling, alleging the intelligence and justice systems have been weaponized and corrupted by political agendas. - The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, resilience, faith in family, and public accountability, arguing that Flynn’s story should illuminate issues of governance, the integrity of institutions, and the need for reform to restore trust in the republic. - The closing messages stress ongoing commitment to fight for reconciliation and reform, with Flynn characterized as a persistent presence who, despite wounds, remains engaged in public life and the defense of the republic. Throughout, the speakers present Flynn as a figure who faced relentless pressure from political and bureaucratic forces, endured personal and family hardship, and ultimately sought redress and vindication through a combination of legal advocacy, public support, and a historic presidential pardon. The narrative centers on themes of duty, betrayal, reform, and perseverance in the face of systemic challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Water has always been a big part of our of our lives in the Flynn family. We all grew up surfing. We all grew up around the ocean. If you don't respect the ocean, if you don't have a respect for this this this thing which is alive, the ocean is alive. I went into the service because I love our country. Speaker 1: He was one of the most respected generals in the military. Speaker 0: And I come home, and I find out that the worst enemy that I'm going to face in my life is right here in America. Speaker 2: President Obama said, but I do have one specific recommendation. Stay away from Michael Flynn. He's bad news. Speaker 0: They're calling me a traitor. They're saying that I committed treason. They're saying I'm a Russian spy. That Obama was involved in the targeting of Flynn. Speaker 2: He was by definition the most dangerous possible person. Speaker 3: I had to fire Speaker 4: That's the Speaker 5: I made his contact Yeah. Speaker 6: And General Flynn General Mike Flynn. Speaker 0: There was a moment where I just felt like I was drowning, and all of a sudden, a whole series of things started happening. I actually feel blessed to be alive right now, and I can tell my story. If we're going to war, that means we failed. That's it. That's the the fascinating thing about war. It's it is a absolute failure of policy. It's a failure of diplomacy. It's a failure of leadership. Probably one of greatest sacrifices, it's when one lays down their life for this country for reasons that they don't even understand. And they do it trying to help people that don't even care if Speaker 4: they're Speaker 0: there, and and they're dead. We are a plus gold star for participating in war. We are a failure at winning wars. Peace is the aberration and war is the norm. No matter how many times I've deployed to different places where there was some aspect of danger, you always feel a sense of fear. Your experiences help you overcome that, but you never are without it. You know, coming off of a truck or getting off of a helicopter or getting off of a plane in a place where you can smell death. You can smell fear. War is like this massive racket. I mean, we are at war constantly. At the end of the day, it's about making money. Speaker 7: Sounds rolling. All three cameras, we're good. Danny, your speed. Speaker 0: K. We're ready when you are. I had just taken command of a battalion of about between five and six hundred people, and my operations NCO comes in and says, hey, sir. We just had a helicopter go down. This is where I really learned about being steady. Because when I think about that, I mean, nine people. So as I'm walking up the road, I I see the smoke and I look and I walked right up to it. I mean, I I was standing right next to it. And and it was just one black patch that was like the outline of a helicopter. Just a black patch in the on the ground, all burnt up with a bunch of bumps. K? Bumps that were probably no more than like two feet high. K? And those were the bodies. And you, you know, obviously, the the smell of the fuel that was burning, the bodies that had burned, and so there they are. They're just you're staring right there. You're standing there going, oh, crap. On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. Speaker 8: When the war broke out in Iraq, I I was sort of like, well, I guess we have to do this, but hold on a second. I I didn't see I didn't connect the dots as to the reason why we didn't we would invade a sovereign nation like Iraq. I always questioned the necessity of that war. I thought it was crazy, and I thought the Bush administration managed it very poorly. The amount of Speaker 0: money that we spent in Afghanistan for a losing cause is more money, is more than was spent on the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe, all of Europe after World War two. Let me show you. I gave you a little bit of explanation. Tucker This Speaker 2: is wild. Speaker 0: Tucker, I brought I'm brought in here like a body, I don't know, was over a year, a year and a half ago. I'm brought into this room and I meet these two moms. And I was like, what caused you, what possessed you to do something like this? And it was basically, we believed so much in what was happening to you that that it was wrong, and they said on their spare time they put this together. Speaker 2: I personally grew up in a completely different world where I didn't question a lot of the big lies because I didn't realize that they were lies. I was complicit in the lying without knowing it. I supported the war in Iraq and argued on behalf of it before it started, and it wasn't until I went to Iraq myself in the 2003 that I realized how wrong I had been, the degree to which I had been lied to. Speaker 7: It was a big turning point Speaker 2: for It was it changed my life completely, and I realized I've been complicit in this lie. Speaker 0: I don't care what party they're in. Speaker 9: It it they're in Speaker 0: Washington DC. That's the party. They have their black tie affairs. They have their little clubs, little clicks, and they got their little business enterprise that that that floats around in these events. I I would I would be sick to my stomach in some of those things because you're looking around going, you know, these are Speaker 2: the son of a bitches that are just, you know, I mean, we're still at war. There's people overseas being killed. And I'm thinking to myself, this is just not right. If you have the same people in charge of a series of counterproductive wars from which The United States derives nothing, only, you know, loss of life, draining of the treasury, evaporation of our prestige and power abroad. The US is much weaker because of the last four wars we fought, beginning in Vietnam in 1964, from Tonkin Gulf to here. Fifty nine years, we have not fought a war that made The US stronger. Speaker 10: When we confront a regime that harbors ambitions for regional domination, hides weapons of mass destruction, and provides haven and active support for terrorists, we're not confronting the past. We are confronting the present. And unless we act, we are confronting an even more frightening future. Speaker 0: Paul will be remembered for a lot of things. You know, they make him out to be a saint. That's what he'll be remembered for in history. Speaker 11: As a junior officer, I couldn't really articulate it, but there was something there that I felt, you know, it seemed as though it's just a perpetual fraud, waste, and abuse life cycle. Yeah, we're gonna go after terrorists, but you don't need an entire machine, conventional machine, to be in place constantly at all times in Afghanistan or in Iraq for that matter, or really any other place because we have strategic capability to go in and out surgically to address certain issues literally within a few hours maximum one day globally. So why not use that methodology rather than constantly pumping in billions of dollars a month? They want the problem to exist so that that money flow and the constant defense budget can go ahead and fund the military industrial complex. Speaker 3: He became very close to Stanley McChrystal. From what I read, McChrystal told Michael, you need to come in. I need we need to clean this up. We need to fix this thing. For whatever reason we were there, we were able to get Iraq or under control because of the efforts of Joint Special Operations Command and specifically Michael's acumen in what he had been trained for throughout his career in intel. Speaker 11: There are a 193 countries on the planet according to The United Nations. The most premier unit within the world to fight against terror, General Flynn was the senior ranking intelligence officer in that unit. You literally have to be the number one intel officer for that year's cohort, impeccable background, not like a single blemish in your entire military file to be selected for that position. Speaker 8: Mike's, you know, pretty senior in rank at that point. He's maybe a two star general, one or two star general, and Charlie's there as well. And what they're seeing is the the information that they're getting about who the Taliban were, how they were fighting, where they were getting their their ammunition and so forth, that they were getting from the intel community was a bunch of bullshit. It was it was poorly served up, and there was no interagency coordination. I think Mike knew, and I think a lot of those guys knew that if something drastic wasn't done, they were gonna be there for a long time. Speaker 1: I actually met General Flynn for the first time around 2005 or 2006 in Iraq. We would go to areas where they train military and military intelligence, And General Flynn was oftentimes, you know, put up on the screen as someone who had done a a superior job. I mean, he was treated as the greatest intelligence general for his generation. Everybody respected his ability to really perfect intelligence. Speaker 0: The objectives, the overall our overarching objectives, we we got so far astray. The Bush administration, the Obama administration, I mean, we just lost sight. And you're like, you're in this constant war. You know, and we would be having these conversations going, Jesus, you know, when is this gonna end? When when you know, I mean, it can end. It can actually end. And it can end on our terms. Speaker 7: The report you wrote in 2010 Right. Fixing intel. Speaker 0: Mhmm. In fact, it's right here. Speaker 7: Let's see it. Speaker 0: The full title, a blueprint for making intelligence relevant in Afghanistan. I was a senior intel officer out in Afghanistan. I mean, I went around Afghanistan to to damn near every little town and village and and do I did my own assessment. And there was a lot of people that didn't like that back in Washington DC because but I'm on the battlefield. This is Speaker 9: an Speaker 0: indictment of the intelligence community, and and to a degree, and I'm a part of it. So it wasn't like I'm not indicting them. I'm indicting something that I'm a part of. What's in here are solutions, and in a way, you know, I'm I'm hoping that it's not too late. Speaker 5: When general Michael Flynn found out, all sorts of intelligence was that was necessary for soldiers as they were, you know, fighting in Afghanistan. It was all getting lost because it was being collected in Afghanistan and having to go through Washington before it could come back to Afghanistan. I mean, there were lives being lost. You know? There were missions that were botched and lives lost. Speaker 3: There's an example in our family of this. In Iraq, Charlie was deployed in Iraq, and Charlie was taking care of the highways out of Baghdad down into the Gulf through Kuwait. Charlie had a bunch of guys that were fighting as an infantryman, and Mike's running intel over there. So they're brothers. There's a chain of command, but they're brothers. So Charlie is able to tell Mike, hey, this is what I'm seeing down here, without having it filtered to Mike. If Charlie told him what was going on down the street, okay, south of him, and what they were seeing down there, that he was gonna get accurate information and be able to use that and act on it. This gets published. Speaker 0: Huge outcry in Washington DC. The heads of the of all this just giant monolith called the intelligence community, all the agency heads were like, you know, they wanted my head. Ten years of war. I stick my name on that assessment, And I'm saying to the intelligence community, we're still not able to do our job. We're not doing our job. There's so many things that are that are addressed in here from the perspective of understanding your enemy and understanding the environment and understanding yourself. It's a very basic statement about warfare. For the officers, the last promotion is to major general. Everything after that is an appointment by the president of The United States. Jim Clapper wanted me. He went to the president, and the president appointed me. So in this case, it's president Obama. So president Obama appoints me into that job as the assistant director of national intelligence, and then I have to go through a full senate confirmation. So I'm coming back to Washington DC. We're gonna be able to keep our family there. You know, this is good. I'm gonna get promoted. Speaker 12: Many recall the famous article Mike Flynn, wrote called a blueprint for making intelligence relevant, which is one of the reasons why I brought Mike to ODNI to fix all the intelligence issues that he'd been complaining about. Speaker 0: There's a phrase in the military, and I don't I won't I don't, you know, use my Irish too often, but, you know, they say fuck up and move up. Right? And, you know, and I'm thinking, well, maybe maybe I fucked up so bad that they're they're just gonna move me up to to to shut me up. Speaker 2: It may very well be a case of bringing your enemies as close as you can so you control them. Speaker 0: Big title and a big job. Big job. Huge job. Speaker 8: I mean, the pinnacle of someone's career as an intelligence officer in the United States Army. It's like almost the number one it is the number one job if I if I unless you're the national security adviser, which he ended up becoming as well. Speaker 0: I've had a lot of time in combat, probably more more time in combat than most people, you know, that that were in my cat sort of category, and I've had a lot of time, you know, in the field in in in operational assignments, and and I'm also a democrat. Speaker 3: We were Kennedy democrats, never Republicans. You're blue collar Kennedy Democrats. Speaker 8: And and the media loved Mike at that time, interestingly enough. The because, again, the the Obama administration say, hey. This is our guy. He's a democrat. He comes from a democrat family. This guy's been in combat for six, seven years. All this stuff. But, you know, what kid from a small town who grew up in a huge, poor family, you know, something like that, you know, it's a it's a big deal. So there was a lot of problems when he took over DIA. The establishment, especially the what they call the SES, the senior executive staff in the Department of Defense was like, oh, this guy. This is, you know, we've seen these types before. We're gonna railroad him out of here. Speaker 0: I've kept every I'm like a pack rat with stuff, know, awards, decorations, gifts that were given to me, and I've kept binders of them, you know, of different things, orders Speaker 13: for every really drew me to General Flynn, even though we had not started working together formally at that point, is that in all the meetings we had, he his moral compass was very clear and that was that as an American government official, one must put the interests of The United States first. It's the mission which matters, not the individual, not lining your pockets for your career after you retire from government, not building your empire to, you know, get to the next, you know, rung within the federal government. This is what matters. And it was wonderful to see that someone could rise to such heights, while keeping so true to to these values that made America great. Speaker 1: He was one of the most respected generals in the military, plain and simple. And so, you know, what more can we ask for than to have one of our most successful generals be at the top of the intelligence apparatus for our military, and that's why he had strong support. Speaker 14: But in January, president Obama told the New Yorker magazine's David Remnick that ISIS, which was then still considered a part of Al Qaeda, fighting in Syria was like a JV basketball team. Speaker 6: These guys are they want him to say that the ISIS is the JV team and and he's like, that's not what that's not gonna happen. Speaker 0: They wanted that narrative to show that we were being tough on the enemy overseas that we were fighting and that we were winning. We weren't winning. And in fact, the enemy is growing. They're expanding. Now the way I remember it is we're getting ready to go testify to congress in an open hearing, and I get my statement that had been vetted through the the national intelligence community and through the DNI and also over to the White House. It's basically got red lines to change my testimony there. Right? Everybody wants to hear all the different perspectives from these different organizations. So mine was changed, and I told my congressional affairs officer, I said, I'm not gonna change it. That's not that's not right. Speaker 11: A lot of people on the inside that were the underperformers had a lot of institutional clout that pushed for that as well. It was literally a an organization that had rot in it that wanted to keep that rot in place. Speaker 0: I I know what the CIA's reporting. I know what the National Geospatial Agency, you know, National Security Agency, FBI, all these different organizations are reporting. But I'm responsible for my agency, and I'm responsible to tell the truth for what my agency, you know, believes. This this organization called ISIS was expanding rapidly and they were in like 20, you know, four or five nations around the greater region from from literally from West Africa all the way over to, in some cases, Indonesia and The Philippines. I'm called into a a an office call with Jim Clapper because we're gonna ask you to step down. And immediately immediately I said, is it because of my leadership? He says, oh, no. It's not your leadership. He says, if it was, I'd cut you off at the knees right now and you wouldn't go back into the job. That was my interpretation. He said, it's because of and he he used the word attitude. That's how I remember it. And I walked out of that room and I called my wife and I said, you know, honey, things are gonna change again, you know. And and, you know, in a funny way, you can ask Laurie about it, you know, if she even remembers that that part because there were so many. But she was probably relieved I was, you know, I finally got to retire. I never changed. I never changed. People that know me from the time I was a kid to the people that work with me as a young officer and all throughout my career, I never changed. So what changed? And Jim Clapper, who brought me in and hired me, what changed, Jim? What changed? Was it because I wasn't toeing the line for the administration? I wasn't toeing the line for the the intelligence community's, you know, incorrect false narrative. And and sadly, you know, tragically, you know, when I think about god. Fuck. That was 2014. When I think about six more years of fighting and dying and the bullshit. You know? I mean, my my responsibility as a as a senior officer in the military and then definitely as a senior intelligence officer is to protect, save, and and win. These assholes are towing a political narrative that was total bullshit. Speaker 11: Something didn't smell right for me, and the very next day, I sent a direct message, and it said, sir, I think I know what happened to you. Unacceptable. You have a a loyal soldier for the rest of your life. Let me know if you ever need to, like, utilize me to help out. Because I thought that that was a him being resigned was totally unacceptable. Speaker 15: I loved DC. I loved Virginia. We loved being there. We loved living there. We had happy times there, until this all happened when he retired and then decided to go work on his own. Speaker 9: In your career, I have always found, whether it's in your service or if you spend a lot of time in the joint community, you will run across individuals and you will say to yourself, that guy is amazing. And early on when I met Mike, I thought to myself, that guy is amazing. Today, as we would say in the navy, we watch pass over the side, probably the most visible intelligence professional that we have generated within this department in the last ten or twenty years. So, Mike, we all wanna say thank you for a great job. We wanna thank you for making a great, great difference. Laurie, we wish you only the best. We know that a lot of opportunities ahead of you. I can't wait to see where the journey is gonna take you. I don't think we've heard the last of the Flynn's. Speaker 3: That was without a doubt a real test of a of a relationship, and and she was patient. They saw her get mad, but she knew he was right, and I know we all knew he was right. Laurie was a stabilizing force in his life. She's a special gal. She's strong, unwavering commitment. Speaker 8: I think Laurie saved his life actually as a teenager, if you ask me. I think that if Michael hadn't really, you know, been kinda swept up in that relationship, as a teenager, you're talking 14, 15 years old, as a young person, I think that Michael could have gone a completely different direction. Probably God at work there, honestly, when that relationship bloomed. And and and who would have thought that at 14 and 15 years old, you know, they'd be married, you know, today, 40 after all they've been through, I don't know, forty eight years, almost going on fifty years. But that relationship at that time in Michael's life gave him a reason to get focused on something. He did better in school. He he did better in sports. He got really into really playing sports in school. Of course, then when he went into when he went to University of Rhode Island, the army, the ROTC program was another godsend for him, you know, for a rambunctious guy like Mike Flynn. Speaker 15: I went to kindergarten through eighth grade in one Catholic school and then didn't go to a public school till I was in the ninth grade. That was a big eye opener for me for sure. And that's when I first met Mike too, that summer going into the ninth grade. You know, didn't date in ninth grade or anything. We just kinda went steady for two weeks, and then we went our separate ways. I mean, always saw him in the halls in high school, but we kinda had our own life for the next two years, and then our senior year we got back together again. We both said that night that if we go out with each other again, this is it. You're not, you know, no no straying. Speaker 0: So when Laurie and I were married, during the wedding ceremony, the priest who was also a cousin of ours, Philip, father Philip, is a part of the beach and we call it the rock. We would go spend a lot of time surfing there. He described Laurie as that rock, unmovable. He described me as the tide. Speaker 15: I think my husband is the rock really. I think we are a great team together. I can't say that I never lost it during this whole thing. There were times that I was pretty rock bottom, and he always was the strength that I needed to go on. I mean, he always had the best case scenarios that we would, you know, he always put it in a better light than I could. Speaker 0: And there could have been no better description in our marriage. You know, we're getting ready to go into forty two years of marriage. You know, we've known each other since we were 13 years old. A steady rock in this ebb and flow of life. And I knew that I could depend on her to do a lot of things that that I was not gonna be able to do. And many of Speaker 15: the times because I'm deployed. Prayer and God came back into my life, into both of our lives because we were at wits end sometimes and that was Speaker 0: belonged to my grandfather. We came back to this house that had one bedroom, one little tiny bathroom, a Speaker 16: little tiny kitchen. All the boys were in a were in bunk beds and my parents slept in the living room. It was a pull out couch. Speaker 17: For a while, there were three oldest, three middle, and three youngest. And I was part of the three youngest. So I would be in the bathroom and I would never get like it alone. I would be scrubbing my teeth and so the boys would come in. Know, I gotta go because it was one bathroom, but that bathroom door, they got knocked down a few times. Speaker 6: Here's, you know, nine kids, 11 people in a 1,200 square foot house. So our backyard, our playground was the ocean, was the Atlantic Ocean. My parents were great. They just let us go. Speaker 3: And the beach was there. The water was an outlet for us. Speaker 8: I mean, I'm in paddling out when I was seven or eight years old in the lineup in big waves, Harder Ruggles Avenue. Speaker 0: It was literally, you could run out in our backyard, pick up a, you know, a throwing rock and you could throw it into the ocean. It was that close. Speaker 3: We started to realize, hey, there's guys out there surfing and we could swim like fish. Speaker 6: And the kids would be swarming all over the beach. Speaker 16: I mean, there'd be like five or six of them. That that was a lot of fun. It really was a lot of fun. Speaker 6: You know, we would go surf all winter, surfing hurricanes, so it taught us a lot about endurance, being in the ocean for hours. There's a lot of Speaker 0: people that surf, but those of us that find it as a spiritual thing, in our family it's a spiritual thing. It's very very powerful. You have to respect the power. What is it telling you at times? If you're out in big surf that, you know, your life could turn in a second, taken off on a wave, wiped out, been dragged down, and felt like I'm out here all alone. That is a respect that I learned and I still have it to to this day. Speaker 8: You gotta remember, your entire adult life is in the military. All you know is a command structure like the military. You don't have a lot of experience in business. You're getting things set up. You know, he wants Speaker 6: to work. He still wants to have, service to the country again, service again. Speaker 8: Michael Jr. Was actually working for a company that I was running at the time and he came to me and said, I'm gonna go work for my dad. We're gonna start a consulting group. Companies were hiring him for advisory work. I think he was on some boards of some private equity groups. Normal stuff that generals do when they Speaker 18: get out of service. We essentially formed a business together. He was just like, wanna go to business again? I said, absolutely. I mean, this was a guy that I'd grown up, you know, idolizing my entire life, and this was a chance for me to to get to know my father, you know. And no. It was it was it was was it an opportunity I knew I had to take, that I wanted to take. I Speaker 0: love the idea of being able to work with him because for many, years of his life, I wasn't around with military and deployments and moves and and and and schools and high schools and baseball games and and birthdays and hell, I almost didn't make it to his wedding. I flew in from Afghanistan the night before his wedding. And I was lucky that I that I made I was so happy that I was gonna be able to do that with him to be closer to him, work with him on a daily basis. Speaker 6: People started to reach out to him to ask him for his advice on a lot of the foreign you know, what was happening in foreign countries. And so he was advising everybody. When I look at what the country needed, the country didn't need another Clinton or another Bush. That was clear. Speaker 18: I am pretty sure that he knew then that Donald Trump was going to be the the nominee. We did meet with other candidates. I mean, I remember sitting down with Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Ted Cruz. Probably why I wasn't asked to to help those Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton, Speaker 0: but also but I I never said no. I I was just never asked. You know, I was I was praying that there was gonna be somebody that rose out of the ashes who wasn't a typical politician. Speaker 8: And I looked at him and go, Donald Trump, are you out of your mind? He goes, I'm telling you right now, Donald Trump can beat Hillary Clinton. I said, why? He goes, because the country is the country is ready for something different. Speaker 18: He met Trump for the first time in 2015. He expected it to only be like maybe a twenty or thirty minute meeting. It turned into like a two and a half hour long meeting. Speaker 0: If we can end these these wars that we are in where where we're pouring trillions and trillions of dollars and we're not winning, And Trump was the one that had that that's that was the conversation that I initially had with him. Speaker 15: I was happy to support Trump as well because I just wanted to see I want I didn't see all the hope and change as much as I'd want, you know, with Obama, and I wanted to see what would happen with Trump. My first bombshell, my first Speaker 17: uh-oh was and I was proud of him. I was it's true, but was at that Republican convention. But I was concerned about that with him because he was now in a in another world with Speaker 18: politics. Speaker 0: Elect Donald Trump as the next president of The United States Of America. Thank you very much and God bless America. From that moment on, I really I started to ride with with with Donald Trump. Literally ride with him. And we'd fly all over the country and and go to these different campaign rallies. We'd do three or four cities in in a day. And every place that we went to would have, you know, no less than 10,000 people. In most cases, they had twenty, thirty thousand people. Speaker 4: Unbelievable. Speaker 7: We are going to win back the White House. Speaker 0: It reinforced for me the sentiment that I felt about the direction of the country. These big institutions, these complexes. Right? I call it the Security State Complex, the Military Industrial Complex, where they were leading us, And they're leading us down a a path that that nobody wants to go down. You know, it's like they say. Right? Flynn knows where the bodies are buried. That's a metaphor for understanding how dangerous our system of government has has become. And now I'm advising a guy who looks to be, you know, a he's the front runner for one of the major parties, and he's gonna and, you know, he has a shot at being president of The United States Of America. Big deal. Right? It's huge. It's historic. And so you fast forward into into June 2016, and now I get a phone call Corey Lewandowski saying, hey, we're gonna vet you for vice president of The United States. I said, wow. You know, that's that was like I didn't expect that. I Speaker 3: I'm I'm saying it. I I don't I think Pence envied Mike's relationship with Donald Trump. Trump respects people that know how to work. Pence was a lifetime politician. Prebis was a lifetime politician. They're GOP party hacks. Mike was a dyed in the wool soldier. Trump traveled with Michael for months before he was elected. Pence was pulled in politically. Mike became close to Trump as a friend and trusted, Speaker 0: I don't know, adviser, ally in the trenches through through the election process. Mike Pence, Newt Gingrich, Chris Christie, and Mike Flynn. You know, and I and I it's humbling. It's a humbling, humbling experience to even be considered, to be thought about like that. The fascinating thing about that is that of those four people, three of them were, I would call, hardcore Republicans. One, Mike Flynn, is a registered Democrat. I went into the White House as a as a Democrat, right, because I didn't give a shit about the politics. All I cared about was our country. So I get a phone call, you know, from Trump. You know, how you doing Donald? What's going on? He goes, well, you know, you've seen everything. He goes, I'm I'm not gonna go with you as as the vice president. And he and he kinda, you know, flippantly jokes. He says, another time, you know, maybe being a democrat would be a good thing. He goes, but it's just, you know, it's not gonna work out this time. And I said, no problem. I'm I'm, you know, I'm here to help. However, I can, you know, help out. And and he told me he was going to Indiana and Mike Pence was gonna be his his choice. Speaker 4: The next vice president of The United States, governor Mike Pence. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Speaker 10: Thank you. Speaker 0: All these other sycophants and all these people that are consultants and and part of the campaign, they're like getting paid. They're on a payroll, big payroll. I know it took a dime, not a dime. I didn't I didn't get paid a cent. I did that because that's what I felt like was my my, like, responsibility. Speaker 7: They spied on my Speaker 19: campaign there's no real evidence of that. Speaker 4: Of course, there is. No. It's all over the place. Leslie Speaker 7: Sir? Spied on my campaign and they Can I Speaker 0: the government, the federal government, The United States Intelligence Community, elements within it, the most senior law enforcement organization in the country, the FBI, was spying on a presidential campaign? We didn't know it. Speaker 19: Can't put on things we can't verify. Speaker 7: Leslie, they spied on my campaign. Speaker 19: Well, we can't verify. Speaker 4: That's been totally verified. Speaker 20: No. Donald j Trump will become the forty fifth president of The United States, defeating Hillary Clinton in a campaign unlike anything we've seen in our lifetime. Speaker 18: And I'd be lying if I if if I didn't admit that, like, you know, I I I didn't really think Trump was gonna win either. But then he got elected. Speaker 21: And as I said last night, my number one priority in the coming two months is to try to facilitate a transition that ensures our president-elect is successful. Speaker 0: Obama talks to Trump about two people, threats apparently to him, certainly to at least one to The United States, and one of them was Kim Jong un, the the dictator over in North Korea, and the other was General Mike Flynn. Speaker 1: You know, the one thing Obama told tells Trump is don't hire don't hire General Flynn. I mean, you can't make this stuff up. Speaker 0: So I go upstairs to Trump's office and he started telling me about this conversation that he had had with with Barack Obama. And I said, really? And he goes, what do you think about that? And I said, you know something? I've never met the guy. Never met him. Never met Barack Obama. Although he picked me twice for two key jobs. I said, I never had the opportunity to meet the guy. So why why he would say something like that? I have no idea. He goes, yeah, neither do I. And he goes, I don't trust the guy. I stood up for him. I stood up with him. We won. And he turns around and goes, I want you to come in and be my national security adviser. That's a really difficult question to say no to. So I said, yes. Shook hands. We took took some photos. We put out a a a press release about it, and it just seemed like all hell broke loose. I mean, it just really seemed like all hell broke loose. Speaker 11: There's going to be a complete cleansing of the fraud, waste, and abuse because there was indications that he was gonna do a a look, an audit, into the national security system to root out the rot, but not just in one little agency. The national security adviser is essentially above intelligence community, the Department of Defense, and the foreign policy community, the State Department. So they have purview over all those three kind of areas within our Speaker 2: entire national security foreign policy making community. That's big. I didn't run the Defense Intelligence Agency, but if a guy stands up who did and says, actually, I sort of I sort of know a lot about this because I ran the Defense Intelligence Agency, that's a voice with weight and authority that is a massive threat to them. Speaker 0: Probably one of the most powerful positions in the entirety of the government because you are a close personal adviser on a daily basis. You continue to travel with the president. You know, you are there in all of the critical meetings, all the critical decisions for the country. You know, I was incredibly honored. I felt I felt very well prepared, and I was brutally brutally attacked. Speaker 13: The bureaucracy targeted those of us who supported the president's mission of making the federal bureaucracy accountable to the American people. Speaker 0: From the outcome of the election until the inauguration day, there is a there is an entire operation ongoing that the government actually plans for. But but now it was a bit different. The the transition that we had, it was like we were at war, and it was being made so hard by elements within our own government. So this is now the Christmas holidays. My wife, Laurie, and I said, before I go back into the White House, let's go take one last vacation. And so we decided we're gonna go down to the Dominican Republic. We went down there for basically a short week, and I ended up having to shorten it because of all of the craziness that was happening up in DC. Speaker 22: It's an unprecedented strike. The White House punishing Russia in part for interfering in the US election. Speaker 23: The US is ordering 35 Russian intelligence operatives and their families in California and Washington DC out of the country. Speaker 0: So couple of different phone calls, but one of whom was with ambassador Kislyak. Right? The very famous Russian ambassador. I probably made him more more famous. Right? Ambassador Kislyak, he's just like he looks like a grandfather who smokes too many cigars and probably, you know, sniffs a little bit too much whiskey. Right? Speaker 6: Tonight, a Kremlin spokesman is accusing president Obama of trying to spoil US Russian relations. Speaker 0: Look, Russia, I know you're going to have to do something. I don't appreciate what happened, so I'm being honest with them, because it wasn't our call. It was the the current administration's call. I don't appreciate what happened, but, and I know that you're gonna have to take some measures, but let's not have a tit for tat because we don't wanna we don't wanna lose our minds over this and and and cause some greater some greater outcome like going to war. But I get a phone call a couple of days later and he says, message received. They're not gonna take any extreme action. Talk about, you know, being able to settle down something that could have gotten vastly worse. Why do we have Speaker 1: a State Department? Why do we have all these intelligence agencies? It's to, you know, make you know, to protect America, protect American interests, and to keep dialogue open between our adversaries, our allies, anyone in between. So the whole idea that General Flynn was doing something wrong was ridiculous. He was doing exactly what he should have been doing at the time. He was the incoming national security adviser. His job, his role was to help to coordinate that whole strategy across all of government to try to do what? Prevent war. Speaker 4: 01/20/2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again. Speaker 0: We were ready for change and we needed to get things moving. One of the things that I was looking to do was to dig in and take a hard look at some of the programs that the US intelligence community was involved in that I felt were, useless, costly, and, and corrupt. And in fact, I sat through a presentation with the incoming vice president, Mike Pence, in the in the Transition Headquarters. As we're being presented it, I started asking questions like, okay, this program that's been going on for a long time, what has it accomplished? Oh, we're gonna have to come I mean, and then you get this again. These are senior guys. These are like the top top people in the CIA. They're like this, and they're like, well, we're gonna have to come back and and we're gonna have to give you a separate briefing on that. I ended up calling to have that briefing again. The next time I called for it was there it was in the first week I was there, and it was me as the national security adviser now inside the White House. I got the same briefing, but this time they sent a whole bunch more people. Right? It was like they knew that because now I'm starting to to dig in. Thousands and thousands of years ago, guys like Sun Tzu, famous military theoretician, studied him. Everybody that's ever served in the military at some level stayed in long enough as as hell, even a lot of people in business study Sun Tzu's art of war. Well, what does Sun Tzu say about war? War is deception. A war can be a war in the narratives, in how information is deployed in order to manipulate the belief system of people. And so now instead of, you know, putting a bullet through somebody's head, you assassinate them by narrative. And for a guy by the by the name of Sun Tzu who wrote about all wars are deception thousands of years ago, right, nothing's changed. Speaker 2: The intelligence agencies are working with the legacy media to shape public perception of world events. That is speculation. I'm not some outsider who's guessing at this because I read about it on the Internet. I spent my whole life working. My father worked at ABC News before going to work for the government, you know, engaged in the Cold War. So I, you know, I've seen both sides of this my whole life for fifty three years. So I can say with authority and certainty that the intel agencies shape news coverage of world events, and the more significant the world event, the more meaningful it is, the higher the consequences are, the more aggressively they shape it. Speaker 0: Because the CIAs, they're masters at propaganda. They're masters at at at what's called covert influence, covert operations. Hollywood, Speaker 2: the media. You're not a conspiracy theorist. You're an observer of verifiable reality if you state factually the news organizations of record, Washington Post and New York Times, are working with the intel agencies to lie to the public and to hide relevant information from the public. That is a fact. Speaker 0: Eisenhower had his own imperfections. JFK had his own imperfections, but they, you know, but they understood that there was something not right, and and Eisenhower was really the first in a very somber warning. Speaker 24: In the councils of government, we must car guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. Speaker 13: He used this term, the military industrial complex. And back then, in Eisenhower's era, it was not very well developed. Now we have a services complex as well. And it seems that there are too many of our leaders in the federal government in the Department of Defense that really put the interests of themselves, their crony contractor friends, and and their careers over the national interest. Speaker 0: Why did a guy like John f Kennedy get assassinated? He got assassinated because he called out something that he knew to be a corrupt component of the government that was trying to usurp his authority as the duly elected president of The United States Of America. Speaker 2: I I think the assassinations of the nineteen sixties are worth reassessing because they tell you what the system is capable of. Not just individuals, but the system in which they live, work, and thrive. The imperative to preserve that system is so overwhelming that individual players in the system can be sacrificed in the name of preserving it. Like, you just need to understand the stakes here. So if you're Flynn and you're standing up and saying, wait a second, you know, in retrospect, I think it's fair to to expect that they would effectively try to kill you. You know, maybe not shoot you in Dealey Plaza, but put you in prison, impoverish your family, silence you, dismiss you in the eyes of most as ridiculous. Speaker 0: I thought it was an opportunity to to take a look, a hard look at organizations, one of which I ran, and I knew a lot about other aspects of the the security state because it's not just the intelligence community, it's the Department of Defense. It includes the Department State. It includes places like the White House itself, and it includes the Department of Justice, includes the FBI. Speaker 8: And that revolving door in the intelligence community with social media companies, with big banks, with big corporations has been going on for years and years and years. They recruit people out of those agencies to come work for them. Speaker 2: It's grotesque. I mean, that's when you know when when you turn on CNN or MSNBC and you see an endless parade of former federal law enforcement or federal intelligence officials paid coming on the air to analyze politics, then you know that this organization has been captured by those agencies. I mean, these are not just former government employees. These are people with active security clearances. Still, they retain their security clearances. So they are in continuous communication with their former colleagues at these agencies because it's legal, because they have the clearance. And so they are acting effectively as spokesmen for these federal agencies, and they're on the air as news analysts. I cannot think of a more perverse system. Speaker 22: I I think there were conversations and messages between Peter Strzok and someone inside of the office of the vice president of The United States. Speaker 7: In Speaker 2: retrospect, it's pretty obvious to me that Mike Pence was brought in and presented to Donald Trump, who probably didn't know wouldn't know Mike Pence if he got in the shower with me. Didn't really know Mike Pence. He's the governor of Indiana. Pence is a career politician. Trump is a casino promoter. Like, they haven't had a lot a lot of overlap in their lives. How did he wind up getting chosen vice president? And I think it's very obviously an effort by Republicans in Washington, permanent Washington, to put some kind of moderating force right next to Trump. You you need him to win the evangelicals. That's how they sold him. He's an evangelical. Trump has no idea what an evangelical is. And so they tell him, you gotta have this guy. You can't win without this guy. And I'm not saying Pence is a secret agent, but clearly, and I watched it firsthand, Pence believed that his role was to get Trump, to the extent he could, to go along with the conventions of of Washington as it existed before Trump got there, obviously. Again, I'm not calling him a secret agent, but I am saying from day one, Pence saw his job as influencing Trump to kinda let things continue to go roughly the way they were going before. That's true. Speaker 5: I think Pence played an enormously destructive role. I know that I I know that there were people in Pence's office who hated Trump because they told me. And if we look at Russiagate, we see different people operating out of Pence's office who are part of Russiagate. But just going by the timeline and going by what we knew happened, I'm like, Pence is making this up. Speaker 25: Good morning. Retired general Michael Flynn was during the campaign and is now one of the president's top advisers, and he has acknowledged having contacts with top Russian officials. But over the last several weeks, investigators led by the FBI have been taking a closer look at his calls to the Russian ambassador. Speaker 0: We had the Japanese delegation down at Mar A Lago. She had very serious meetings, and and while all while that was going on that weekend, Kim Jong un over in Korea starts firing some missiles. This is the first time that the Trump administration is going to be tested on on how we respond to this. Speaker 4: And by the way, Rocketman should have been handled a long time ago. Speaker 0: And they were doing it because Abe of Japan is visiting president Trump that weekend. I I took Abe and Trump into a a SCIF, a secure facility that we set up at Mar A Lago. I took those two in there and briefed them on what was happening, I showed them I showed them all the all the intelligence that we had, some photographs of the missiles, all this stuff. I went took them through whole thing like I like I briefed millions of other intelligence briefings in the past. I laid it out in front of them. The next day, we we start we had more more talks with the Japanese, and we're we're still, you know, reeling, and the and the media is going crazy about all this stuff. I took, like, thirty minutes to go back over to my room because we're gonna get back on air force one, packing my bags, and I get a phone call, and it's Reince Priebus. I said, what can I do? You know, how can I help you? And Reince Priebus tells me that I'm in the Situation Room with vice president Pence, deputy director of the FBI McCabe, and deputy attorney general of the Department of Justice, Sally Yates. And they just briefed us. They just showed us a document that you clearly talked about sanctions. Because this is one of these surreal moments. It's like things you never forget because it was such a seminal and significant emotional event for me. I said, so what are you what are you telling me? Well, you know, the vice president is upset, and we're gonna, you know, we're we're gonna have to, you know, we're gonna be talking to you when you get back. Like, I'm a I'm a fucking schoolchild. I show up to the White House the next day, all kinds of now there's all kinds of rumors about Flynn's, you know, gonna be fired, resigned. You know, it's all flying all over the place. So it's all leaked. The the Situation Room is a very secure facility. We're talking about people that should know better. I mean, if it just those four people that were in that room and me on that conversation. That day, Reince comes into my office and says, the president wants you to he's gonna want you to resign. And I looked at him. I was like, really? I said, did did he say that? Is that coming from you or is that coming from him? And he said, well, that's coming from him. And I said, okay. I go, well, here's what I want you to do, Rice. I want you to go let the president know that I wanna hear it from him. And he was like, he kinda like and he goes, you probably should put together a resignation letter. Speaker 15: When he called to tell me that he was resigning, you know, he told me that I'm gonna resign tonight, I was like, oh my god, really? And and I it was just sort of surreal. And he said, yeah. He goes, I'm going to go see the president right now. I was like, okay. I'll be here when you get home. Speaker 0: He who was in the meeting was Reince Priebus, vice president Pence, Steve Bannon, and Jared Kushner, and the president. And president, you know, reads the letter. He's like I I could tell that he was he was visibly upset, like, but not in an angry way. He was, like, just upset about the whole thing because he knew how hard that I had worked my ass off for him to win the presidency. And I had, you know, and I I just wasn't a guy that that comes across as, you know, a a bullshitter, you know, or a liar. Right? He said, you know, he he kinda looked around the room and goes, you know, are we okay with this? You know, and and looking back, it could have been a couple of things could have happened. He could have said, you know what? This is bullshit. You two guys kiss and make up because I had already apologized to the vice president about whatever it was that he felt like I had misled him on. I already apologized to him. So there's no, you know, hey, let's kiss and make up. We got a country to run here. Nope. Vice president didn't stand there and say, you know, you know what? I I can live with this. You know, Mike got it. I understand the that, you know, the the all the dynamics of what was happening. Everybody's busy. You know, we have a country to run. Before I left that that meeting, the president got up and I walked up to the side because I was kinda standing at the corner. And I walked up, gave him a hug, gave him like a, you know, a big man hug. And I stepped back and I said to him, I'm just gonna give you one warning about one person. I'm gonna tell you that the person that you need to watch out for is the deputy director of the FBI, and his name is Andrew McCabe. And I looked the president dead in the eye, and he and he said, okay. He didn't he didn't really know who he was. Now, obviously, Rice pre Rice Previous knew him and and Pence knew him, they said nothing. So whatever they had said to the president prior to me going in that meeting, you know, I could tell that from my departure, you know, my departing sorta, you know, man love moment with with with president Trump where I could tell that he was upset that he had to do this and accept my resignation. And maybe he felt like if I stepped away from the White House, the whole Russia thing would go away and that's when it all began. Speaker 4: The information was provided by who I don't know, Sally Yates. And I was a little surprised because, I said, doesn't sound like he did anything wrong there, but he did something wrong with respect to the vice president, and I thought that was not acceptable. As far as as far as the actual making the call, he was just doing his job. That was very normal. You know, first everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about it, it turned out he was just doing his job. So and I I do. And by the way, with all of that being said, do think he's a fine man. Speaker 0: So Reince Priebus told me that they had just read a document that Yates and McCabe showed them that said I talked about sanctions. And we now know that I never talked about sanctions. There's a transcript of it. It's public information. K? It was a it was a false document, which is really bad for two senior government officials to create. And that document must exist somewhere. K? Or the only other potential answer is that Reince Priebus lied about reading about sanctions. I never talked about sanctions. In fact, I I told the vice president that earlier on. I said, I didn't talk about sanctions. I told the FBI agents that came to my office. Speaker 19: You look at this White House now, and it's hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the sit room. How did that happen? Speaker 0: I sent them. Comey said in an interview, the FBI wanted to send agents over to the White House to speak to me. He admitted he did that outside the proper channels without any discussion or approvals from White House counsel. Speaker 13: This was clearly a setup. The government will frequently try to railroad various individuals by not having by just telling them this is a friendly conversation. No need to have your lawyer in the office with us. And so what happens in situations like that is that the agents who are corrupt and and have an agenda, they're not it's not a genuine, you know, fair investigation, they're free to make up whatever they want about what what transpired because there was no recording and there was no representative of of their interviewee who, you know, could make, you know, a a record of what what transpired. Speaker 22: A bunch of the 7th Floor people, they all got together and had a meeting about this this interview they were gonna have with General Flynn, the ambush interview. And Bill Priestep in in handwritten notes that looking back, you have to wonder if he wrote this down on purpose as kind of like a flag because he knew what they were doing was was wrong or if if it was just sheer happenstance that he he wrote down a series of notes that said what is the goal? Is the goal to get him to tell the truth or to get him to lie so we can get him fired or, you know, hold him accountable for for for lying. So they knew going in what their motive like was. Do we want him to just tell us the truth or do we wanna try and get him to lie to us? Speaker 13: This is yet another example of, you know, weaponization of, you know, federal investigations. Speaker 22: Both Peter Strzok and Joseph Pienka wrote he wasn't lying. He didn't seem like he was lying. He seemed like he was being truthful. I mean, they wrote this down, which is why when the DOJ came back and said there was no predicate for this, they they referenced these things because there there were they didn't even believe he was lying. When you go into an interview like this, you're supposed to document everything in something called the three zero two. That's the FBI speak for a form that you write down your thoughts. They didn't fill those out for weeks, and then when Peter Strzok did, he had somebody who wasn't even in the interview, wasn't even involved, Lisa Page, editing it for him. Speaker 1: You know, I just told him once they fire once you fire Flynn, all you guys are gonna go. And that's exactly what happened within, I think within a year's time, they were all gone. All the kind of the top advisors around the president. As soon as they did that, there'd be blood in the water. I'm pretty sure that's what I told to Prebis and and and others. Speaker 15: I really think that those guys that were in that White House before Mike walked in that room told him, if you get rid of Flynn, the Russia thing will go away. I guarantee that they've tried to convince him of that, and as we know, it only exacerbated after that. Speaker 26: Michael Flynn, president Donald Trump's national security adviser, is under investigation by US counterintelligence agents for communications he's had with Russian officials. Speaker 13: What Stefan Halper did with the help of the leadership of the officer net assessment between 2010 and 2016 was create the institutional infrastructure for what became known as Russiagate, normalizing a known Russian intelligence officer. Okay. So here you have Christel going around Washington saying, oh, yeah. This is Russian intelligence that says that Donald Trump did these things that, you know, people wouldn't, you know, take it seriously. But we know it was taken very seriously. The Steele dossier was used as the predicate to launch these FISA investigations. Speaker 5: The stories about the peeing, the stories about the the drunkenness, the drug use Speaker 4: It's all fake news. It's phony stuff. It didn't happen. Speaker 13: The Steele dossier was sent by special courier from John Brennan at CIA to the White House to President Obama and marked, you know, eyes only. This was Russian disinformation. This is Russian propaganda. Speaker 5: They had to make Trump look weird. Right? Oh, he's freakish. He's bizarre. He he that's why he deserves these extraordinary punishments. Right? An indictment, an an arraignment, an FBI investigation. Same with General Flynn. Right? Speaker 13: This is all about normalizing our enemies' propaganda to stage political hit jobs on American candidates for office, for the highest office in the country. The Steele dossier, which of course by July 2016, Brennan knew was Russian disinformation that was generated by Hillary Clinton to smear Donald Trump in order to sort of hide her own misconduct. Speaker 5: Hillary Clinton on the stump this week. We're joined now by her campaign manager, Robbie Mook. Thank you for joining us this morning. Speaker 14: The hand of the Kremlin has been at work in this campaign for some time. It's clear that they are supporting Donald Trump. Speaker 13: Brennan and Obama and Comey, they inserted the Steele dossier into the 2017 intelligence community assessment as annex. So what they did is they took Russian disinformation, made it into a US intelligence product for the purpose of being able to cover themselves. If they were ever questioned about this nonsense in the Steele dossier, sourced to Russian intelligence, clear hit job against candidate Trump and then president Trump, they could say, oh, look. This is a US government document. It's from the intelligence community. It is from the 17 intelligence agencies of the United States government. Don't ask me about this. It's been vetted. It's this way of very cynically covering up a horrendous crime and normalizing it retroactively. Speaker 3: It was an act of desperation because the Obama administration and the Biden administration knew that if Michael Flynn stayed there as Trump's national security adviser, they were fucked because he was gonna lash back at all of what they did in The Middle East, what they did or were doing to compromise The United States Of America. He was squeaky clean. They couldn't find shit on him, and they dug deep. Speaker 5: There was some story like, yeah. And then and then General Flynn left this event, this dinner with, with this woman who was half Russian, half British. Well, of course, nothing of the sort happened. Nothing of the sort could happen because here here is the director of the DIA, a very important role, and so he's not going anywhere off on his own with anyone. Speaker 0: And she's just this young woman who's married, you know, I think at the time, if I remember right, she was pregnant or had getting ready to have a baby. Her life was ruined all because of this guy named this they they this guy they call Halper. Right? His name is Halper. Stefan Halper, the walrus. Right? The guy's a he's a he's a walking steam bath because he sweats all the time. Speaker 5: You know, to have your family exposed to that kind of that kind of ugliness because someone is determined to destroy you, these are very hard things. But again, comes back to like why, you know, why people are mad about this story, why I'm mad about the story, why it hurt, why it was painful for other families to watch too, to imagine what it was like for his family to to be targeted by these animals like that. Speaker 3: I mean, they they disparaged him as much as they possibly could in the media. It was all bullshit. It was all bullshit. They were sitting there as family going, Michael fucking has a girlfriend and great behavior in an affair with some Russian girl? I called her up. I called her up. I said, hey. Tell me about your relationship with my brother Mike. You're in trouble here. Your name is all over the place. We kind of endeared ourselves to her. I wanna find out. Lori needed to know. They were saying stuff about Michael, and he had an affair she knew it wasn't true. But how does he think she felt when she had to go see her mother and they read it in the paper? Didn't give a shit about how he felt or how that affected his family. Obama and Biden did not want general Flynn giving them a proctology exam without any kind of anesthesia. Speaker 0: I've said that I'm surprised that they haven't killed me, surprised that they've let me continue to live. Maybe they feel like they've done enough damage to where no matter whenever I pop my head up, wherever I'm at, they can just kinda go, oh, that's a conspiracy theorist. He's done this. He's done I mean, I I know that there's an entire movement of people or an organization that they their sole purpose in life is to make sure no matter what I do to find a way to show it in a dark light. You know, we've gone from the physical assassination of a president of The United States to a character assassination of a national security adviser. Speaker 22: General Flynn had a a private company. He formed with his son and a business partner. They were engaged by a private citizen in Turkey to do some work, on behalf of this private businessman. So there was no need to report this because the private businessman was not working on behalf of the Turk Turkish government. Did not receive any money from the Turkish government, wasn't working with the Turkish government at all. This was a private businessman engaging the the Flynn Intel Group to do a job for him. Speaker 1: All the talk was about FARA violations, Logan Act violations. I mean, lots of crazy far fetched laws that had either never been enforced or were rarely enforced. And if enforced, they were like a slap on the wrist type of type of thing, not some multiyear, multi pronged investigation. Speaker 6: This Loftman guy who's running this FARA office, they send a letter to Mike saying, hey, you need to fill out this Farah form. So he didn't have to fill out a Farah form at all because he wasn't working for a Turkish government. He was working for a Turkish businessman. He's got a lawyer at the time. She says, well, the number one Farah filing office in the country is this Covington and Burling. Speaker 22: You know, you figure, I really don't need to do this, but I'm gonna consult these attorneys to see if I really need to file and they say you know what just to be Speaker 6: on the safe side file. And you're filling out an application and you know Covington Burling the number one FARA filing law firm in the country is filling it out. Okay. We're in good shape. Right? So but how did they blitz him with this FARA violation? Because they come back and they start adding that. Well, it wasn't a violation. They just put the wording into as many documents as they could. They would have some fishy line about Farah. What that did was that let the media take the term Farah, which is Foreign Agent Registration Act and just call him a foreign agent. So now he gets blitzed and he's a foreign spy. He's another spy, know. He's a Russian spy. He's a Turkish spy. He's all he's all kinds of spies, you know. Speaker 22: There are so many people who are collateral damage that's whose stories are so intricate that if you can't get people to understand this big story of General Flynn, how in however would you be able to get them to understand the intricacies? So again, at the end of the day, the Flynn Intel Group was retained to do business for someone who was not attached to the Turkish government at all and they lied and said he was. Speaker 6: They are smart again. Right? They're gonna take out the number one military intelligence officer of our country, the national security adviser who's about to find out everything. What do we do now? Let's go after his son. Speaker 18: Was there anything more significant on this timeline to you dad than than anything else or? You know? I mean, for me, it's that. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 18: That's it. If there's one thing that I think about Yep. More than Speaker 0: That's that's the meeting where they conspired to basically undermine the presidency of The United States Of America. Speaker 27: We live in a time right now where more than any other time in American history, the government investigative agencies, especially the FBI and the Department of Justice, have been weaponized against the American people. Speaker 7: When did it dawn on you that Michael would be a target? Speaker 0: Probably by the middle of the summer, I started to feel that because they their FBI's knocking on his door. This is when I I had a really difficult time being able to communicate. We had to communicate through lawyers, so I can't even talk to my son. Speaker 7: Whose advice is that? Speaker 0: That's the advice of my lawyers at the time. Looking back, it was it was horrific. And then all of a sudden, there was started to be newspaper articles coming out that the Department of Justice is starting to look harder at at General Flynn's son, Michael. My team of lawyers was was was represented by a gigantic law firm. One of the they call them the white shoe law firms in Washington, DC, Covington and Burling. And you really do feel like they have your best interests at heart. They, you they come across as as professionals. And man, was I wrong. A moment of of misjudgment on my part. That that's all part of that Washington DC establishment. You're looking at twenty five years and about a half a dozen felonies. Okay? And they're gonna go after your son. And I'm like, you gotta be shitting me. For what? And I'm sitting there, height of the of the Mueller investigation. It's really just kicking in. There's nobody around. K? Who who I had was my family. I didn't have big media stars. I didn't have big political stars. I didn't have the White House. We're already into our house being sold. We're already into an ungodly amount of money that was that it's costing you. You're just kinda like, I gotta stop this, you know, I gotta stop this bleeding. It was mental and emotional bleeding. And it was happening to me, my wife, my kids, my family. I'll my life for my family because I would have given my life for this country. They're the reason why I fight. What they did, they knew that nothing was there. Speaker 22: Michael Flynn Junior worked for Flynn Intel Group with his dad and the business partners. So they saw him as a weapon to wield because they were going after General Flynn's business partner and Akim Alptikan. As sort of a pawn, they looped in a threat against Michael Flynn junior to get general Flynn to plead guilty. Right. Speaker 18: A lot of people, you know, ask us that question, why did you guys even go with Covington and Burling? You know, they were the DC Fair experts. Speaker 0: They never really fought for anything. You know, they if you had something on Trump, you know, it would help you. They brought my son in knowing where he was in his life and and knowing how bad the the rule of law system is in Washington, DC, that was a major pain point. Huge. All the lawyers then became involved in Speaker 27: something that is absolutely prohibited in federal court, in that they had an off the books part of the deal. They had this deal that was communicated to General Flynn where the government wouldn't put it in writing, but they would agree orally that if he accepted this plea, they wouldn't prosecute his son. What parent could ever say no to that? What parent could ever fight back against that where they're threatening to put your son in jail right before that son's oldest son is is born, right before their grandson's about to be born? We have rules in federal court to stop that, to make sure that these off the book deals don't happen. And those lawyers on both sides, the special counsel's office and the Covington And Burling lawyers, walked into federal court, and they lied. They lied when the judge asked if there was any off the books deals, and they said there wasn't. There was. And it was all part of this effort for Covington and Burling to protect their own hide rather than to look out for their client. It was disgusting. Speaker 15: And then also, don't forget that if you do plead not guilty and go to trial, you're gonna have a DC jury, you're gonna have a DC judge, and then you'll probably be found guilty, and, you know, you're looking at twenty, twenty five years in prison. So this is probably the best deal for you to do this. And I know a lot of people say, oh, even if that was my son, I would have never done that. No. You don't know what you would have done unless you were in our shoes. And having to have your lawyers tell you that people that you thought were doing the best for you, that this was the best thing for you and this is the only way you're gonna get out of this is if you sign this plea deal. So that's what we did. Speaker 22: People plead guilty to crimes they did not commit every single day in this country. A lot of the times it's minorities that are pleading guilty to crimes they didn't commit because who has the resources to fight the juggernaut that is the American justice system? Speaker 27: And so the government starts leaning on Covington and Covington starts leaning on General Flynn to to accept a plea deal. Single count of a violation of 18 u s c 1,001, which is providing a false statement to the government. Speaker 6: But of course, the unbelievable turn of events in today's news happened in federal court in Washington DC in the courtroom of judge Emmett Sullivan. Speaker 0: And then the prosecution is the Department of Justice, and the Department of Justice had probably had 20 lawyers there. One of them was the Solicitor General for The United States Of America, and the the prosecutor, in my case, his name was Brandon Van Grecke. So we go into this courtroom, one of the most packed hearings that they ever had in the federal courthouse of Washington DC. Speaker 28: And then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the judge goes right off the rails, and he started going down this other path, and well, said, you turned your back on your country. Speaker 14: It sure sounded as though judge Sullivan was gonna send Flynn to the clinic for at least some period of time. Speaker 19: It did, Jake. The judge stressed that prison time was not off the table even though that's Speaker 0: And my lawyers tell me going into this hearing, don't worry, you're not gonna have to say much here. The prosecution's gonna do most of the talking. Okay? And just the opposite happened. You know, I get questions from the judge and I'm answering all the questions, and then the judge starts to accuse me and he does this very famous turns. He turns and he grabs the the flag behind his or his seat, the behind his bench. And he grabs the flag and he turns back and he, you know, he says, know, he basically accuses me of committing treason. Could he have been could he have been tried for treason or could he have been found guilty of treason? To the prosecutor, prosecutor, Ann Grakis, he was kinda taken by it too, the the DOJ lawyer. And he and he he he essentially says, you know, no, your honor. No, your honor. But but the so the judge is sitting there accusing me of treason in a court, I'm not even in there for any of that. Speaker 6: He's hugging the American flag, and he's saying, you know, you turned your back on this country. We were shocked. There had Speaker 28: been no trial. There had been no exchange of evidence. There had been no cross examinations. Speaker 5: I thought his initial his outburst calling general Michael Flynn a traitor. I mean, it it was he was the one who brought dishonor upon his courtroom and upon himself, right, to scream out those things. I mean, what an ignoramus. Speaker 8: There's no doubt in my mind he did it for the benefit of the media, because the media was on pins and needles that day. Speaker 0: You know, they call them the talking heads on these shows who are these former intelligence community officials like Brennan, like Clapper, like Comey, like McCabe. Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Sally Yates can't control these people. And they're accusing me of spying against The United States Of America for Russia. Speaker 18: Of course, the media takes off it takes off. Well, even, you know, even judge Sullivan, you know, in the courtroom calls General Flynn traitor. The judge, Speaker 0: I believe, realized that what he just did would probably lead to a to some type of mistrial or or probably lead to something bad for him because he just accused me of something publicly that I wasn't even in there for. You could feel inside of that courtroom, the level of tension was unbelievable. And I'm looking at the lineup of prosecutors from the Department of Justice, and they were all like white faced, like, holy crap, what did this judge just do? And the judge says, you know, do we need a time do we need time to take a break? And I do this, and I don't know if you caught that, but I did this. And my lawyer said, yes, your honor. Prosecution? Yes, your honor. We're okay. So we take a break. Speaker 13: The judge today really rebukes Michael Flynn and uses words like treason that you allegedly sold out your country. Speaker 8: After the treason comment and after the thank god they took that break, Laurie, I think, said we gotta take a break here. She looked at me and said, this is going off the rails. This is a disaster. Speaker 0: He's gonna put him in jail today. He get back into the courtroom and the judge knew that he he was wrong and he came back out and he essentially in a shitty way he apologized. He gave a shitty apology, But the damage was done. Speaker 19: Threatening jail time for lying to the FBI. But but I wanna read you some more of this judge. This judge has become a fascinating new figure in this drama. Speaker 0: And he says, okay, we'll come back in like ninety days or something. We'll we'll revisit in ninety days. Days. And, you know, pounds his gavel, and and we all get up. He walks out, and I mean, it was it was like total chaos. Speaker 8: By the grace of God, Sullivan let him walk out of that courtroom without going to prison. I think he probably regrets I think Sullivan regrets that decision to this day. Speaker 0: We we ended up going back over to my son Michael's house to to just find some relief. Speaker 6: The baby's running around. The baby, he's like crawling around. We don't know that they had threatened Mike. Speaker 18: I must have walked around DC after that after that hearing for a good six, seven hours just walking around, just looking at the sky like crying crying my eyes out. There's there's no resolution. You're two years into this now. Okay? And and you have no idea how much longer this this is gonna take. I'm battling with terrible PTSD, terrible PTSD from from from this experience. You know, I I just I describe it as this constant drumbeat of of of dot, you know, of of subpoenas, search warrants, you know, emails, email requests for information, eventual, you know, media, you know, parked outside of my house. Know, I wanna talk about that being alone feeling. There are very few things that are worse than than feeling alone when you're going through, like, incredible incredible trauma. There was just so much that was happening, so much that was happening that I, I didn't understand at the time, you know. I didn't under I mean, I didn't really understand the concept of the deep state, you know. I didn't understand, you know, that the Department of Justice can indite a ham sandwich concept, you know. Like, I I just all of a sudden, I'm I'm I'm hearing that my father could potentially go away to prison for fifteen years. I remember the conversations that I had with my mom about just about like, which prison are we gonna go visit him at? I can't even imagine like what my mom what my mom was thinking about. Speaker 15: It's been really hard on him. Think harder on him, I think, than on me, truthfully. Because imagine having a son feel like he is the reason your father had to plead guilty to a crime he didn't commit. I can't imagine the burden that he had. I mean, the guilt, and it's almost like survivor's guilt, really. He just felt like, you know, his dad was willing to go to prison for him. Speaker 18: You know, I mean, I didn't believe it. I just didn't believe it. Took me years to understand, like, oh, he was doing this to to to basically save this to save me. You know, if I wasn't if I wasn't there, he wouldn't have done it. He would have kept he would have kept fighting, but it's like, I I understand I understand like I understand as a father, you know, like, what you would do. You know, you'd fall you'd fall on a sword to to protect your child, you know. And I understand that. I understand that more now than than than ever. Anytime I wanted to talk to my father about this stuff, it it just it the conversation always turned into talk to your lawyer. Talk to your lawyer. Talk to your lawyer. We subsequent subsequently had to talk to each other through our lawyers. It it was after that, I mean, I I went into I mean, I went into a a a very deep depression, very deep depression going into 2018. I mean, like suicidal depression. Okay? And I don't say that lightly because that is just not a topic that is is easy to discuss. But, you know, the only thing that the only thing that kept me from the only thing that kept me alive was my was my son. And thank God thank God I have him in my life. Thank God I had him my life then. Speaker 0: Travis was a super important part of my life. I mean and and little peanut just turned six. I mean, when he you know, it's like I mean, during this time, he's born. Right? I mean, he's a big baby, and he's like he's like I would hold him, and his innocence reminded me about just everything that was good in life. Everything. I mean, the innocence of a child, the innocence of my grandchild just reminded me of how how important, you know, what it is that we do on a daily basis is. And one of the ways that you live your faith, and I like to believe that that's the way I live my faith is through my family. Is I love my family. And and I'd do anything for them. And I want my family to know that to know that. I want my family to know that, that I would do anything for them. And definitely my own kids. And I think with with Michael, he feels the same way. The you know, Michael looking at Travis and and thinking about what he was thinking about and going through that emotion of of of the of the idea that, you know, he's contemplating killing himself. He's contemplating suicide. Speaker 15: I always said, Michael, just know that no matter what happens, you know, your dad and I are here. You know, nothing should get as low for you as that. So, and he promised me, mom, I would never because I have Travis. And I said, that's right. You have Travis and Travis needs you. He needs you to be there for him like your dad was for you. Wow. Speaker 13: I mean, Speaker 0: you know, so for people, and maybe this is how I, you know, how I adjust myself, but for people, people need to understand that that that life is so fleeting, so fleeting. You know, what the what you what you're looking for is you're looking for love. You're looking for, like, is is there love there? And I know for me, and I and I know for Michael that we found it. We found it. We found it in each other. We found it in our families, and and I found it in my son, and he found it in his son, my grandson. And I thank God that he did because I don't know where I'd be today if if that if that had ever happened, and I don't know what what I would have done. That's that's just something that's I can't even contemplate it. Can't I this is just unimaginable to me. Speaker 27: That's why one of the most important things that General Flynn did is fired Covington and Burling and hired Sidney Powell, somebody who had the courage to go toe to toe with them. Speaker 0: Laurie and I were going through our own sort of mental gymnastics to figure out a way to dump them and find find somebody who was going to stand up courageously and fight for us. Speaker 28: Mike gave his consent as a client to allow Sydney to read through all of the documents. And so she started uncovering the fact that Covington Burling had a conflict of interest representing Mike on this 1,001 charge. They were not in a position where they should be involved in the matter before Judge Sullivan. Speaker 27: My first task was to help with the transition of the case from Covington and Burling to Sidney Powell as lead counsel. There was a striking difference at that point about the way that we were defending our client and his predecessors were defending him. We're not going to let the government bully us into having our client provide false testimony. And that was my first real involvement in in the case is to is to go forward and and dig our heels in and say, we're here to defend the truth, not the government's false narrative. Speaker 0: The decision then was not to get this judge to to lessen my sentence. The fight now was gonna be we're gonna pull my guilty plea. Speaker 16: Particularly in this case, the amount of exculpatory information that was coming in. Yeah. I mean, I saw all of it. I I was stunned with it all. I mean, it went on and on and on, and you could see through the time period of Michael's case and his dealings with the attorneys, you could see the the case literally unfold as new information came out. Speaker 13: Brady material exculpatory evidence In The US justice process, it's designed to be a full airing of the facts. So not only the incriminating evidence, but the exculpatory evidence. All of this is supposed to come forth into the judicial process so that there is a free and fair airing of the facts. Sydney Powell, you know, she was aware that Department of Justice was not bringing forth the Brady material, the exculpatory evidence that they were required to do. And I mean, it begs the question of, you know, what have they not done? You know, it's like, couldn't it be any more abusive? Speaker 0: The the Department of Justice inspector general's report on FISA abuse came out like a couple of days after that eighteenth December hearing. My briefing and debriefing of DIA for my Russia trip came out after that. I knew about the briefing and debriefing. It was all classified. So I'm not, you know, I'm not, you know, I'm I'm like protecting. I let my lawyers know because it's a lawyer client privilege, but it's classified the fact of what I was doing. But now it's public. Speaker 18: There were more and more, you know, answers to questions that I had that that started to get kind of produced as Sydney started digging into, you know, into my father's case. You know, like, for example, like the reaction of the lawyers from Covington and Burling after my father pled guilty. I mean, they were like celebrating. There's texts of them talking about, and emails, talking about how like how great of a job they all did that they were able get him to plea. Speaker 8: You know, it's like you get one more shot at staying above water. Sydney convinced him, not only can we stay above water, we can start floating, and maybe we can get out of this. Speaker 13: This is a a lawless process. Speaker 8: The bills were mounting, okay, because it was and the special counsel had been appointed, and so Mike's now getting called in. So every time you get called in for a a proper session or whatever sessions you have to have with the special counsel, you better have at least one attorney, if not several attorneys available to you. So you're talking about Washington DC attorneys, 700. All of a sudden, you know, you go from having a $20,000 bill to a, you know, $350,000 bill. And and I think Mike and Lori knew that, you know, if this continues, they're gonna be bankrupt. They're gonna just destroy them financially. Speaker 6: They weren't gonna get much money because Mike had was selling his to pay the legal fees and, you know, for that first, you know, probably five or six months. We're talking $300,000 a month, and they don't care. They just keep sending you a bill. They don't even care if they send you an invoice. Speaker 0: So there was a moment where I just felt like I was literally deep down underwater, and I felt like I was drowning. It was Speaker 3: an insurmountable monumental task to raise that money in the face of having had Mike plead guilty. And the rest of the country going, what the fuck? How did he plead? Why? His son, young Mike. Right? So everybody gets it, but the media doesn't wanna carry that message. Instead, it's disgrace general Michael Flynn. And the more they push back on Trump, the more people started to realize general Flynn took a hit. Speaker 15: We ended up having to start a legal defense fund, and that in itself was hard because, you know, you're asking people to give you money to defend yourself. And we we were asking the American people to help us, and they came out in droves. Speaker 0: The American people started to come into into my life, and and there was a moment where I just felt like air was being breathed into my lungs. Over time, instead of being pounded down below the surface of the ocean, I started to come up. I started to come up. In a way, it was like I'm now above the surface and I'm starting to swim to shore. I'm really just I'm now I'm like, okay, I got this. Shore's still a long distance off, but I can see I can see the shoreline. It's out there, and I started to swim for it. Speaker 3: And these supportive people, God knows where they came from, these American people. He calls it buddy breathing. I've I've heard him say that. Being able to come through financially with this giant burden to the federal government on his shoulders and be able to support, you know, the legal action that was incredibly financially burdensome to any other person. I don't know what you would do except end up in jail. Speaker 6: We had to outsmart the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ. We had to become our own. The Flynn family became investigators. We had to read every document and we had to look deeper and we had so many great people started helping us that once they saw that we weren't gonna stop, that we were gonna fight, we were getting letters like hundreds of letters every week. Speaker 15: Just when we were getting like to a low Barbara would there would be a FedEx box coming to the door with like hundreds of letters, of cards, rosary beads, you know little things to just make our life a little bit more pleasant. We would take them out and read them and and we would say this is what it's all about. This is what real America is. These people are, you know, talking about things that happened to them with their families, you know, my husband or my son or my brother might this happened to them when they did this, and it was really cathartic to read all those letters. It was a great thing to look forward to. Like every other week, we would get a big box and we amassed probably seven or eight big Rubbermaid bins of them. And Mike would sit down after every box we got and wrote a thank you note to every single one of those people. And some of them became pen pals. They would write them back and he would have to write them back and it was kind of a neat thing really, but it was sort of his I think way to get through it too, you know. He would read something and he'd say you gotta read this letter or I'd read that oh you gotta read this letter and they were just great great letters, tear jerkers, a lot of them. But it was it really did open our eyes to what America really knows about what's going on with his case because they came from everywhere, some of them overseas, you know. So it was it got us through a lot of the tough tough tough times. It really did. Is Speaker 7: it true he went to the 99¢ he loves? Tell me about that. Speaker 15: Well, it's not 99¢ store anymore. Now it's a dollar 25. But yes, we would go in there. He would get this, like, cards for a dollar, and you could get, like, a pack of eight or a pack of 12 for a buck. So why not? We just put about as many as we could in the cart. You know, we always got the ones that had the American flag on them, but he'd go through them so fast, I ended up having to order them from somewhere else so we can get, like, a pack of 50. Speaker 8: I think it says a lot about what the American people were wanting out of this. They were looking at this as as, you know, this is their fight. What Flynn's going through, what the Flynn family's going through is the fight of the common American people against a broken, corrupt justice system. Many families have dealt with broken, corrupt justice system situations, and many people empathize with that and saw they realized they weren't some wealthy family, West Point grads, and we were a bunch of street kids. Okay? And just happened to be in this situation happened to band together to fight against this to fight against this absolute evil. Speaker 27: First of you gotta understand a little bit about who Jeff Jensen is. He's a former FBI agent who then became a line prosecutor, who then became a United States attorney. So he's somebody who fully understood the workings workings of the FBI and the workings of the Department of Justice. So he's not someone that the bureaucrats could hide stuff from using their bureaucratic tricks. And the most important document that was written as a result of this investigation was on 05/07/2020 when the government moved to dismiss the Flynn case. Speaker 5: No. No. No. Not so quick. Time for Emmett Sullivan to go after Flynn. Even if the prosecutors have stopped prosecuting Flynn, it's time for now the judge to prosecute General Michael Flynn. That's really weird. That's really twisted. Speaker 3: There was no reason for them to do what they did in the first place. It was political. It was a hit job by the former Obama administration on the incoming administration. And they targeted Flynn because they felt that that was gonna be a spot, especially with Russia because he had he sat at the table with Putin one time, which is our family a joke. Michael, if he was told to shoot Putin in the head that day, would have done it because he's a soldier, always first. If his job was to get there and shoot Putin in the head, he'd have done it. Speaker 27: There's something else that's part of the story that I don't know has been told that I think needs to be told, and that is president Trump offered a pardon in the 2020 before the government's motion to dismiss and actually before most of the, exculpatory information had come out. General Flynn had an opportunity then to put all this behind him, but he didn't want the pardon. He wanted to be fully vindicated through the government's motion to dismiss, and Sidney had the guts to tell the president, thank you very much, but this time we're gonna keep fighting. As a result of of that, the full exposure of the government's misconduct against General Flynn came to light. But everything that came out probably wouldn't have unless General Flynn had the courage to say, I don't want to pardon yet, I want to fight. I'm really proud to be on a legal team that supported him in that. Speaker 7: Had anybody heard that? Speaker 2: I don't think so. Speaker 27: I had to get permission from the client to to tell it. Speaker 15: We were praying to God that we didn't have to use a pardon, but I knew that Sullivan was waiting for the election to come. And if Biden had won, which he did, and my husband hadn't gotten pardoned from Trump, they would have somehow figured out a way to rescind any kind of dismissal and take him back into court and retry him or whatever. I I knew that was what his plan was. That's how vindictive that judge was. And I was grateful, but I was also sad because it should have never came to that. My husband didn't need a pardon. He didn't do anything wrong. And so the pardon is kinda one of those things where it's a little bit bittersweet. Speaker 8: Okay. Inside this little box is a the original pardon of innocence given, general Michael Flynn by Donald Trump in November 2020. Again, an unprecedented event in American history where someone has given been given a presidential pardon who is innocent of the charges because the charges were dropped by the Department of Justice. So there was no reason for the pardon anyway, and that's why he called it a pardon of innocence because he had to pardon an innocent man because the system would not let go. It's extraordinary and unprecedented. Speaker 7: And your brother has never opened that? Speaker 8: Apparently not. Speaker 0: He says, you know, the only person in in Washington DC who's been screwed worse than you is probably me. And I said, no, mister president. I you know, I said, I'm not so sure that's the case because I've you know, sitting here today, I feel pretty screwed, you know. And we were joking for a minute, banter back and forth and, you know, just about that. And he goes, well, I'm gonna I'm gonna issue you a pardon. I just want you to know that, you know, this this should end anything. He goes he goes, now you're the cleanest man in America. He goes, there's nobody cleaner than you after this this pardon, you know? So that was November 2020. So, you know, it took three years plus. Speaker 7: Did you harbor some resentment towards Trump? Speaker 0: I did. I did it. Initially, I did, because he was not kind to me. Even he said some nasty things about me after I left, you know? Called me a liar. In fairness, because it was something that I did see in him, is that he really didn't know he didn't know the ways of Washington, D. C. He really didn't. Speaker 22: To this day, nobody has ever gone on record and said what the DOJ was going to go after Michael Flynn Junior for. I would assume likely the same thing they went after the business partners for, Farrah violations. Just recently, the government has dropped the case against General Flynn's business partner at the Flynn Intel Group. Once the jury in DC came back with a guilty verdict, Judge Trenga overturned that verdict due to lack of evidence in the case because there is none. There is no evidence that proves any of the things that the DOJ was advancing. Speaker 0: Barack Obama. Right? July 14. Any extent, 2014, a year and a half later, these bastards got me under investigation. You know? I extend my sincere thanks. Speaker 27: You know? Speaker 22: I want more people even if they don't say, I like that guy. I'm on his team now. I want them to to understand what happened, to understand what happened to him, and to be able to at least give him the respect he deserves even if they don't agree with him. That is is the bare minimum. And learning from him and his story will go a long way to getting through all the other issues that we have right now because it it is the light switch. If you understand what happened to him, you start to peel back the the curtain on everything. Speaker 11: I think the general Flynn story is actually the foundational story that America needs to understand, the the truth of, to be able to understand what has occurred within our government and the mounting corruption since then. Speaker 3: If they can learn something from what Michael went through, to believe in this country under under extreme and extraordinary circumstances and still come through the other side and not give up on America, that's what they need to learn from what this documentary can portray him. It is in fact the truth. He will not stop fighting for this republic, for this what he calls experiment. Speaker 6: My mother and father would be so proud because he's the only person that could have withstood. They knew. They knew that he was the only one. He was he was meant for this time. He's the only person that could have withstood this type of, you know, this this evil, this unfathomable domestic evil that we're facing and beat it too. Speaker 8: It's it's very hard not to get jaded and turned off and just say, I'm just gonna go away. Mike is not gonna do that. Mike Flynn is I think people need to understand, he's gonna be there fighting for them. Maybe not as an elected official, but certainly as a public person, as a as a as a veteran, as a father, as a grandfather. He's gonna be out there swinging at the fences to try to bring sanity back to this country because we are going off the rails. This country is going off the rails in many in many different directions. Economically, militarily, and socially, we are in a bad place right now. And I think people people want hope, people need hope, and more importantly, need warriors, and I think you're gonna get that from General Flynn. Speaker 5: Again, so the the most important stories about this are not the stories about the bad things that people have done. Right? About the evil that these people have done. The way these people have tried to destroy family, families, and the way that they've corrupted the country, no, the most important thing is to go to the other side and look at what happened. I mean, look at all these things. I mean, look at how how it's made them how it's made them brighter and stronger. Right? People I mean, people look to their family, look to that family as an example. It's like, well, if the Flins went through this, then we can certainly get through it. You know, if, wow, they did that to General Flynn, I guess I can get through this, you know, and he's okay. He got through it with faith in his family. He got through it. Speaker 17: The Flins pull together, the American people can pull together. Because if we pull together and we drive this darkness out, then we can touch the whole world. We can touch the whole world. Speaker 2: I I think that General Flynn's story is an inspiring story because he wasn't broken, and as he will say readily, he wasn't broken because of the love of his family and because of his faith. General Flynn found himself in a circumstance he did not anticipate at all. This is not the life he prepared for at all. He's not a political figure. He's not even Republican. He's not politically active. I don't think he ever expected to find himself in the fulcrum of history, and I know he never expected himself to be persecuted by his own government that he had served for the course of his entire life. But all of that happened, and these things do happen. We can't know our future. None of it is known. I have some sense of what I'm having for dinner tonight. Beyond that, it's opaque. And that's true for all of us. We all could wind up in a situation like that, and the only thing that we can hope for is the strength to continue to tell the truth in the face of adversity and to be surrounded by people we love who support us and to come out on the other end whole. And he's achieved all of that, And so I see his story as a great victory, actually as a triumph. He's still whole. He's wounded by what happened to him. His family's wounded by what happened to him, but he's not broken. He still has dignity. And he still has an unwavering commitment to tell the truth. You may not agree with him, but he's not lying to you. He's saying what he really thinks. And if you come out of a situation like the one he lived through with that intact, you've won. Speaker 0: Is there any regrets that you have in life? Right? And and for what I've experienced, I I I should sit here and say, yeah, I got a lot of, you know, I got a lot of regrets. But when I look back on my life and I understand the lives that were lost, I mean, I'm sitting here with you. You know, I'm like, I'm like, you know, I'm here, and I can tell my story.
Saved - April 13, 2026 at 5:03 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

BREAKING: Where is the moral outrage!? CHRISTIAN children as young as four (4) years old are being sold as sex slaves and worked to death in cobalt mines in the Congo. Sold by Islamist militias and trafficking networks while the world looks the other way. This is not a rumor. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is happening right now. Where is the worthless United Nations? They have had peacekeepers on the ground in the DRC for over two (2) decades. Billions of dollars spent. Endless summits held to talk about the problems. Zero results for these children. The UN is not a force for justice; it is a bureaucratic shield for inaction dressed up in diplomatic language. Where is the institutional Left that claims to carry the banner of human rights? Quiet. Completely quiet. Because these children are CHRISTIAN, and that changes everything for people whose outrage is a performance, not a principle. They told us Black Lives Matter. Apparently, that slogan has conditions attached to it that nobody put in the fine print because black CHRISTIAN children dying in mines and sold into sexual bondage cannot get sixty (60) seconds of attention from the same people who shut down cities over other causes. This is what moral corruption looks like at its darkest. The kind that lets children suffer in silence because acknowledging it would demand something from the people in power, and they are not willing to pay that price. We need to pray for all children who, worldwide, face these type conditions. Help them where you can and stand against those leaders and organizations that stand for nothing except their own selfishness! @Amerifuture @GoldInstituteIS

@SamanthaTaghoy - Samantha Smith

Christian kids are being sold as slaves in the Congo. Some are just 4 years old, sold as sex slaves or to cobalt mines by Islamist groups and smugglers. Where is the UN? Where is the Left? Where is Hollywood? “Black Lives Matter” they cry… …except when it’s black Christians https://t.co/xum1ObIBGd

Saved - March 18, 2026 at 8:17 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Pretty much what John Birch said…and very few listened. Yet here we are.

@SternDrewCrypto - Stern Drew

🚨 THE 1958 BLUEPRINT TO DESTROY AMERICA IS UNFOLDING EXACTLY AS PLANNED – ROBERT WELCH WARNED US 68 YEARS AGO! 🇺🇸 In 1958, John Birch Society founder Robert Welch exposed the INSIDERS' (globalist cabal / deep state communists) chilling 10-step master plan to collapse the Republic from within. He called it out in his legendary speech and EVERY SINGLE STEP is happening RIGHT NOW in 2026. The 10 Steps to Total Enslavement: 1. Explode government spending → waste trillions on endless "crises" & pork to bankrupt the nation 2. Skyrocket taxes → squeeze the middle class dry while elites hoard 3. Run massive deficits forever → debt slavery is the goal 4. Engineered wild inflation → devalue your savings & wages into dust 5. Price/wage controls "to fight inflation" → introduce total economic tyranny 6. Ramp up socialist controls → micromanage every aspect of your life & economy 7. Centralize ALL power in DC → erase state sovereignty, dissolve borders & state lines for one-world federal rule 8. Seize & indoctrinate the education system → brainwash generations into hating America & loving collectivism 9. Hammer endless anti-war propaganda → push "peace" ONLY on communist/globalist terms while weakening defenses 10. Breed total apathy → numb the masses with distractions, drugs, division & despair so they never resist They laughed at Welch then. They call it "conspiracy theory" now. But open your eyes: Look around. This isn't coincidence. This is EXECUTION. The plan isn't coming – it's HERE. The Republic is being deliberately dismantled by traitors inside the gates. WAKE UP BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE. Share this before they censor it. The fight is NOW. 🇺🇸

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a two-part keynote by Robert Welch (referred to as Bob Welch) delivered at a John Birch Society gathering, framed as a condensed version of an original two-day presentation from December 1958 in Indianapolis, and followed by a thirty-minute update fifteen years later in Los Angeles (1974). The event is hosted by William J. Grady, with Grady introducing the setting and the participants. The core of Welch’s message is a vehement diagnosis of a global communist conspiracy and a program for action to counter it, rooted in a religiously tinged faith in American exceptionalism and in a call for “dynamic personal leadership” to galvanize a broad movement outside traditional political parties. Part I: The Indianapolis framing and the original four-part thesis - The evening is designed to recreate the atmosphere of a two-day private meeting held at the home of Margaret Dice in Indianapolis, where 11 of 17 invited men gathered to hear a comprehensive analysis of current events and a forecast of a coming crisis. Welch’s presentation is presented as a verbatim condensation of the original Blue Book text, with omissions and occasional aside notes indicating background context that listeners are assumed to accept. - The central premise is stark: the communists are “in virtual control of everything” in America’s national life, and their three-part strategic plan has moved forward steadily without deviation. The plan, as outlined, is: 1) Take Eastern Europe, 2) Move into Asia to complete the second step, 3) Then take over the United States, with Asia as a stepping-stone to Western Europe and the rest of the world. - Welch emphasizes the methods used by the communists: weaning populations with socialist ideology, bribery, lies, brutality, treason, and “the countless tentacles of treason,” but most critically, patient gradualism. The approach does not rely on direct Russian military intervention but on subversion, manipulation of civil institutions, and the gradual surrender of sovereignty through participation in international bodies (e.g., the United Nations) and the spread of socialist policies. - A central claim concerns the United States’ vulnerability due to an inherited Western European pattern of collectivism. Welch draws on Oswald Spengler’s framework to argue that Western Europe’s decline—accelerated by the “cancer” of collectivism—has infected American political culture, which he characterizes as a young, vigorous republic now beset by welfare-state tendencies, increased government, and a weakening of traditional faith and moral certainty. - Religious and moral elements run strongly through the argument. Welch laments a “spiritual vacuum” in Western Europe and America, the erosion of faith, and the rise of amorality, which he sees as breeding ground for communist subversion. He praises fundamentalist Christian faith as a bulwark, while warning that the remaining faithful need to translate belief into civic responsibility. - The core diagnostic includes a fear that American sovereignty is being chipped away by gradual integration with international structures and by the construction of a socialist economy. He catalogs ten aims allegedly embedded in “foundations” and international pressure—such as increased government spending and taxation, inflation, price controls, centralization of power in Washington, federalization of public education, anti-militarism framed as peace, and appeasement of the Soviet bloc—arguing that these would gradually undermine American liberty and national security. - Welch argues the only effective counter to this threat is dynamic personal leadership rather than conventional party politics. He critiques the capacity of political leaders to spearhead a comprehensive anti-communist movement, contending that personal leadership is essential to bind a broad coalition against a disciplined enemy. He explicitly critiques Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon as insufficient standpoints for leading such a broader struggle, claiming they are bound by political constraints and fear of (or compromise with) the same insiders who influence national policy. - The role of the John Birch Society emerges as a vehicle for a united, top-down, non-religiously sectarian but deeply principled and evangelical-influenced anti-communist movement. Welch argues for a monolithic organization that is not a traditional political party but a voluntary association focused on education, persuasion, and action to reverse collectivist trends. He stresses that the Society must be tightly organized to resist infiltration and internal dissent, contrasting it with “debating societies” that cannot stop a conspiracy. Part II: Fifteen years ahead (the update in Los Angeles, 1974) - Welch recaps the first fifteen years, noting that the John Birch Society has grown to over 2,000 Berkshires (participants) and friends, and that a cash infusion from Ben Stoddart’s $1,000 check catalyzed continued operations. The organization has insisted on staying true to its original charter, offering education as its total strategy and truth as its chief weapon, and facing smear campaigns and political opposition from figures like Nixon and Buckley while expanding its educational tools—books, pamphlets, magazines, films, records, and a large speakers bureau. - He stresses the Society’s self-conception as unique: the only cohesive voluntary non-religious organization for adult education on a nationwide basis, with a broad educational mission and a counter-conspiracy framework that rejects conventional party politics in favor of a broader “Americanist” project. He notes the organization’s achievements in stopping or slowing various leftist campaigns (e.g., movements among minorities that he labels as Communist-controlled), and credits the expansion of its reach through local chapters, staff coordinators, and a robust informational ecosystem. - The narrative emphasizes the Society’s anti-narratives about public figures (e.g., Martin Luther King) and its stories of alleged conspiratorial influence within the government and media, arguing that the organization’s efforts have shifted public perception from 4% favorable to around 50% by the mid-1970s. Welch frames the organization as a counterweight to what he terms a “conspiracy” and a defensive bulwark against subversion. - The “Some Points to Remember” section is summarized: the Society has persisted on its original course; it is unique in its nationwide educational model; it has pioneered organizational methods in a way that challenges collectivist power; it has faced aggressive smearing and resistance but maintained its focus on education and truth; and its work spans the U.S. and a few foreign commencements with a global footprint through its messages. - Welch underscores seven or more operational strategies that the Society has employed or might employ going forward: expanding reading rooms and distribution of conservative literature; broadening radio and local broadcast reach; leveraging letter-writing campaigns; organizing fronts and networks; conducting exposés to awaken more Americans to alleged infiltrations; maintaining a cadre of speakers; extending international outreach; and using political pressure to influence policy. He emphasizes that the organization will not rely on political campaigning alone; rather, it will act as a catalyst and backbone for a broader patriotic uprising. Part III: Core program and five-year to fifteen-year vision (the late-1960s to mid-1970s section) - Welch asserts a five-word governing principle: less government and more responsibility, arguing that government tends to be a nonproductive expense, often evil, and always an enemy of individual freedom. He expands on ten generalizations about government—its necessity, its inefficiency, its tendency to erode the middle class, and its expansion as a driving force behind collectivism—while contrasting the “true Americanist” belief in individual freedom and voluntary social order with the collectivist aims of a centralized state. - The final sections outline specific, concrete objectives and a forward-looking program for the John Birch Society: the restoration of full American independence by leaving the United Nations; returning to gold-backed currency; reducing government by at least 50% through gradual reforms; withdrawing U.S. troops from non-sovereign soil except where Congress deems necessary; limiting government to proper functions and decentralizing power; maintaining a robust educational and cultural ecosystem to sustain support for these reforms. - Welch closes with a aspirational vision of the next fifteen years: a new era of less government, greater personal responsibility, and a better world, contingent on large-scale, concerted, and sustained grassroots action guided by a leadership committed to the Society’s mission. Overall, the transcript captures Welch’s emphatic, zealous case for a comprehensive, quasi-religious anti-communist program anchored in American exceptionalism, a call for dynamic leadership beyond traditional party politics, and a blueprint for organizational growth and political action through the John Birch Society. It blends apocalyptic rhetoric about a global conspiracy with a pragmatic if aggressive program for education, organization, and political influence aimed at fundamentally reshaping American governance and international engagement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now ladies and gentlemen, we come to the real substance of this evening's program. Mr. Welsh is going to deliver a speech in two parts. The first part of that speech is a condensation of the Blue Book entitled fifteen years ago, exactly as it was delivered at the fifteenth birthday dinner of the John Birch Society in New York on 12/07/1973. Then the second and shorter part of Mr. Welsh's total speech is entitled And Fifteen Years Ahead. It will round out the total presentation, which he has epitomized under the heading, In One Generation. To give you the proper setting for this dramatic offering, we are going to call on Mr. William J. Grady, who, for a great many years, was president and then chairman of the board of Grady Foundries, a highly successful business with eight plants today, which he established over fifty years ago. At one time, he was also both president and then chairman of the JI Case Company, which is one of our country's very sizable corporate industries. Mr. Grady is a former president and then chairman of the board of the National Association of Manufacturers and a former president of the National Council of YMCAs of the United States. But today, being as near to total retirement from business responsibilities as a man of his dynamic character can become, Mr. Grady is, and for many years has been, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the John Birch Society. What's more, Mr. Grady was himself present at the founding meeting of the Society in Indianapolis on December 1958. We are also pleased to have some others from that founding meeting at our head tables here tonight. We have asked Mr. Grady to set the stage for the first part of Mr. Welsh's speech. So it is my great pleasure to present to you a truly wonderful American, Mr. William J. Grady. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, having known and admired my friend Bob for more than ten years before the founding of the John Birch Society, this is an opportunity, and I might say a temptation, to use more time than is allotted to me to introduce this really good friend and great patriot. But my function here tonight is to ask you to join us as stage properties, if you wish, to a performance of fifteen years ago. We want you to go back in your minds to the outlook at that time, and in that mood to constitute yourselves as the 11 men of whom I was one who sat and listened for two full days to an exposition of what was happening to our country and what what and what was going to happen unless we woke up and did enough about it. This meeting was at the home of miss Margaret Dice in Indianapolis. A picture of her home is on your program. As you look at this picture, the front right hand corner is the living room where our two day session occurred. Of the 17 men that were originally invited, 11 had accepted and every one of those 11 showed up despite the fact that the weather was about the nastiest and sweetest that December can produce. And both major airlines which served Indianapolis were on strike. Not one of us had ever met or even seen Ms. Dice before nor had Mr. Welch, although he and she had become very good friends by mail because of her outstanding patriotic efforts. And on learning about the proposed meeting, she had volunteered her home and hospitality for the group. Incidentally, Ms. Dice, with her very friendly servants taking care of the coffee breaks and luncheons and other needs of hospitality, and with her own chair drawn up out of sight of the group in the corridor just around the corner from the door of her living room had listened to most of the whole two day discussion without any of us being aware of it. And she was not favorably impressed. As she told mister Welch on taking him to his plane Wednesday morning, she did not think that anybody would ever stand still for the thoroughness with which we intended to examine every problem. Within two or three years, however, she had completely changed her mind and had become an ardent life member of the society for the rest of her day. Mr. Welsh had arrived on Sunday. So by Monday morning, he and Ms. Dice had borrowed from the local church a full sized podium and had set it up in one corner of her living room. They'd also arranged all of the chairs and sofas for exactly where each of us was to sit. At 09:45 that Monday morning, therefore, when everybody had arrived despite the weather and had been duly seated, the meeting got underway. Or as your editor puts it, a trembling boy, 58 years old, having screwed up his courage to the requirements of this ordeal, went to the podium and installed himself immovably from behind it for two days. This is the nearest, Bob says, that he ever came to being a preacher of the Gospel, although he had taught Bible classes in college for over forty years before. In any event, he was still wondering what would be the reaction of these extremely busy men to what they were going to hear after having committed themselves to two full days plus travel time to come and hear it. But with all practical escape now cut off, Bob Welch finally plunged into that marathon monologue on which he'd been working during most of October and November, and which eventually was to become the Blue Book of the John Birch Society. You are going to hear that monologue tonight compressed into about one tenth of its former volume. But this condensation has been accomplished by a very careful selection and pulling together of phrases and sentences from the original text so as to carry the main thread of thought from the beginning to the end. Now naturally, a great deal of the documentation, background, and explanation with regard to many of the points will have to be omitted. The fact that there have been such omissions will be indicated by Bob by an occasional aside during the first two or three minutes of his speech. But after that, he will assume that you are taking them for granted. But no transitional or connecting phrases or sentences will will have been added at any point. This is from the original take. So we ask you to keep constantly in mind that all of the statements you hear were made fifteen years ago and that every one of them is verbatim from the original presentation. So now we again ask you to remember or imagine that you are an audience of 11 men sitting in a living room in Indianapolis on December 1958 and listening to mister Robert Wells. Speaker 2: Gentlemen, let me welcome you to Indianapolis. All of you, I believe, are already aware of my appreciation for your being here. At this point, there's an omission of five lines. But each of you also felt that you would not have been asked to give up everything else and come to this meeting and then to listen to my voice off and on for so much of the two days unless I had some very serious matters to put before you and proposals to discuss. Frankly, the matters are serious and the proposals are far reaching, so much so that just their presentation makes me feel solemnly humble at the size of the task envisioned. For increasingly, before tomorrow is over, I hope to have all of you feeling that you are taking part here and now in the beginning of a movement of historical importance. But long journeys start with easy steps, and our first step should be to identify our fellow travelers. No pun intended. Many of you are known to each other, but some are not. So let me, as informally as possible, introduce each one to the group. This was then done, and here we also omit one page. Our immediate and most urgent anxiety, of course, is the threat of the communist conspiracy, and, well, it should be. For both internationally and within The United States, the communists are much further advanced and more deeply entrenched than is realized by even most of the serious students of the danger among the anticommunists. I personally have been studying the problem increasingly for about nine years and practically full time for the past three years. And entirely without pride, but in simple thankfulness, let me point out that a lifetime of business experience should have made it easier for me to see the falsity of the economic theories on which communism is supposedly based, to see them more readily than might some scholar coming into that study from the academic cloisters. While a lifetime of interest in things academic, especially world history, should have given me an advantage over many businessmen in more readily seeing the sophistries in dialectic materialism. So I have felt rightly or wrongly that my grasp of communist purposes and even of their methods should have been more rapid than that of some of my patriotic friends who have gradually become staunch anticommunists. Yet almost every day, I run into some whole new area where the communists have been penetrating and working quietly for years. Until now, they are in virtual control of everything that is done in that slice or corner of our national life. Again, on a mission of one page. But as background for our further discussion, I'm going to ask for your patience while I make a much more general review with you of how far the international conspiracy as a whole has now gone and where we stand today. Now omit 12 lines, and from here on, I must simply quote extracts, sometimes many pages apart, without giving you the background to which they belong or calling your attention to the size of our jumps ahead. But we do ask you again in order to avoid confusion, please to remember that all of those lines were written and then spoken in the 1958. Section one, look at the score. Throughout all history, the bearer of bad news has been a most unpopular person. So I certainly am not seeking any garlands of popularity at present. For the truth I bring you is simple, incontrovertible, and deadly. It is that we are living in America today in such a fool's paradise as the people of China lived in twenty years ago, as the people of Czechoslovakia lived in a dozen years ago, and as the people of Iraq lived in only yesterday. And as George Santayana so brilliantly pointed out, those who will learn nothing from history are condemned to repeat it. Lenin died in 1924. But before he died, he had laid down for his followers the strategy for this conquest. It has been paraphrased and summarized as follows. First, we will take Eastern Europe. Next, the masses of Asia. Then we shall encircle the last bastion of capitalism, The United States Of America. We shall not have to attack. It will fall like overwrite fruit into our hands. To make doubly clear what he meant and how firmly he meant it with regard to taking Asia ahead of Western Europe and then using Asia as a stepping stone and base from which to conquer Western Europe and the rest of the world, the strategy was also stated that for the communists, the road to Paris led through Peking and Calcutta. Today, you could easily see how that road to Paris is leading back from Peking through Calcutta, Cairo, Damascus, Baghdad, and Algiers. Now, gentlemen, there are many remarkable things about that three step strategy, but the most remarkable is that the communists have never wavered from it one iota. They have used the philosophy of socialism as an ideological weapon in this struggle whenever they could and for whatever it was worth. But they've also used bribery, lies, bluff, brutality, the countless tentacles of treason, murder on a scale never before dreamed of in the world, and every possible means to advance them on this road without the slightest concern for any moral difference in those various means. And above all, they have used patience. A patient gradualism has been the most important key to the communist's overwhelming success. And in October 1950, Stalin's lackeys formalized their puppet state of East Germany. By this time, of course, there were other takeovers going on in other parts of the world as we shall see. But we are dealing here only with Europe, and East Germany finished the job there as it had been planned by Lenin twenty six years before. The communists now had Eastern Europe and Tyre, and the first step of their three step program was complete. Next was Asia. Actually, the anticommunist position is crumbling rapidly everywhere in Asia. If you will look at a map of Asia with all of these countries properly shaded, I think you will agree with me in my estimate of the Communist progress. It is that they have already gone three fourths of the way towards the completion of the second step in their three part program. Now let's consider the rest of the world. It is with the benefit of this realistic background, therefore, that I venture to offer the following opinion. It is that the communists, through long and careful and insidious preparation, have already gone at least one fourth of the way towards the accomplishment of their third and final step, which is taking over this country. And with it, of course, the rest of the world. Now one plus three fourths plus one fourth adds up to two out of that total of three. And not to believe that the communists are already two thirds of the way towards carrying out their total program, or that they are not now moving at an accelerated pace and with increased momentum to finish the job, is to close your eyes to the plain facts as surely as did the good people of Czechoslovakia in 1948 and with the same ultimately fatal results. Now please note, gentlemen, that the communists have never made any of this immense progress by the direct use of force. They have beguiled Chinese into fighting Chinese, Koreans into fighting Koreans, Vietnamese into fighting the French and each other, the Israelis, British, and French into fighting Egyptians, the Algerians into fighting the French. They have even maneuvered Americans into fighting Chinese communists in Korea with the Americans hands tied behind their backs. But not one Russian regiment has ever taken part in any of this imperialistic advance except for the suppression of of rebellion in already conquered territory as in Hungary. There are three possible methods by which the communists might take us over. One would be by a peaceful coup d'etat as in Czechoslovakia in 1948. The second method would be by fomenting civil war in this country and aiding the communist side with military might. But there is a third method which they are clearly relying on most heavily, and this is taking us over by a process so gradual and insidious that communist rule is slipped over so far on the American people before they ever realize it is happening. The process in that direction is going on right now gradually but surely and with ever increasing spread and speed. A part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty piece by piece and step by step to various international organizations of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example. But another part is the conversion of The United States into a socialist nation, quite similar to Russia itself in its economy and political outlook before police state enforcement is ever introduced. The best way to explain the aim here is simply to quote the directive under which some of the very largest American foundations have been secretly but visibly working for years. This directive is so to change the economic and political structure of The United States that it can be comfortably merged with Soviet Russia. Now here are the communist aims for The United States. One, greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means of getting rid of ever larger sums of American money as wastefully as possible Two, higher and then much higher taxes. Three, an increasingly unbalanced budget despite the higher taxes. Four, wild inflation of our currency. Five, government controls of prices, wages, and materials supposedly to combat inflation six, greatly increased socialistic controls over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives. This is to be accompanied, naturally and automatically, by a correspondingly huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy and in both the cost and reach of our domestic government. Seven, far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of our state lines. There is a many faceted drive at work to have our state lines eventually mean no more within the nation than our county lines do now within the states. Eight, the steady advance of federal aid to and control over our educational system, leading to complete federalization of our public education. Nine, a constant hammering into the American consciousness of the horror of modern warfare. The beauties and the absolute necessity of peace, peace always on communist terms, of course. And 10, the consequent willingness of the American people to allow the steps of appeasement by our government which amount to a piecemeal surrender of the rest of the free world and of The United States itself. In summary, gentlemen, we are losing, rapidly losing, a cold war in which our freedom, our country, and our very existence are at stake. And while we don't seem to know we are losing this war, you can be sure the communists do. There is just one thing, only one thing in the whole world which the communists fear today. It is that despite their tremendous influence in our government and over all of our means of mass communication, the American people will wake up too soon to what has really been happening and what is now happening right under their very noses. The only thing which can possibly stop the communist is for the American people to learn the truth in time. One matter on which most Americans need to become better informed is what being subjugated by the communist or arriving at an accommodation with communism, as they want it called, would really mean. For their cruelty and terrorism is almost beyond imagination, and the domination of our press television and radio by communist influences is now so great that you simply are not allowed to learn or to be reminded of the real nature of the beasts to whom we are losing. General Mark Clark, for instance, officially reported from Korea, quote, we obtained solid evidence that the communists slaughtered 11,622 members of my command while they were defenseless prisoners of war. These men were tied to their fellow prisoners and transported to previously selected sites. They were dumped alive into trenches dug for the purpose and summarily shot. About 5,000 of those boys were from your hometowns and mine. But how many of you ever saw that report in your headlines or anywhere else? During the so called Spanish Civil War, the London Times, which then is now certainly was not slanted in favor of the anticommunists, reported that in one twelve months period, the communists had murdered over 4,000 priests in cold blood and had driven more than that many nuns out into the streets of various Spanish cities, inflicted horrible obscenities on them, and then murdered the nuns. In some places, the communist herded priests and their congregations into churches, set the churches on fire, and burned the Christians and their buildings together. These and similar epic cruelties of the period are facts documented beyond all question. But how many of you have ever heard them? All of this vicious and purposeful savagery I have been trying so inadequately even to indicate is not something happening on some other and far off planet or perpetrated by the Assyrians twenty five hundred years ago or dreamed up as the imaginative nightmare of an Edgar Allen Poe. These gentlemen are the very real acts and deliberate policies of the recent past and the very present, of people whom we treat as human beings and with whom we sit around conference tables and arrive at truce terms and concessions to appease them. There are some 700,000,000 non Russian, non communists now living daily lives of virtual slavery behind the iron curtain, some 40,000,000 of them in the actual slave labor camps of Russia and Red China, who only a dozen years ago or much less enjoyed practically the same personal freedoms as do you and I today. These people now say to each other, but above all to themselves, if I'd only known, if I'd only believed, there is no amount of work and sacrifice and suffering I would not have given if I'd only realized the necessity, the danger in time. Now it is too late, and any amount of struggle and of sacrifice, even of life itself, is all in vain, unquote. The number of people subject to these cruelties is now increasing by tens of millions every year, and we are directly in the path of the conqueror. Are we really so hopelessly blind, so stupefied by prosperity on one side and the insidious propaganda on the other that we cannot even see the wolves devouring the carcasses of our brothers or drawing ever nearer to ourselves? Are we going to let our country and our whole civilization go under and new dark ages of serfdom be ushered in while we happily play at our little games? May God forbid, but may we speedily become more worthy that he should. Section two. But let's look deeper. Now if the danger from the communist conspiracy were all we had to worry about, it would be enough. But in my opinion, the first great basic weakness of The United States, and hence its susceptibility to the disease of collectivism, is simply the age of the Western European civilization. Some of you will already have recognized, in fact, that I am drawing a corollary to the conclusions usually connected with the name of Oswald Spengler. Spengler's theory is absolutely fatal to the acceptance of socialism or any form of collectivism as a forward step or as a form of progress in man's sociological arrangements. For in Spangler's view, collectivism is a disease of society, concomitant with decay, and remarkably similar to cancer in the individual. The Roman Empire of the West, for instance, started dying from the cancer of collectivism from the time Diocletian imposed on it his New Deal. And it is perfectly evident right in the cases of the various civilizations that we know most know most about, that both the Greek and the Roman civilizations did perish of the cancer of collectivism, and that the civilization of Western Europe is doing so today. It was Western Europe which made the last half of the nineteenth century the period of the highest level to which man has yet climbed in his struggle to reach an enlightened and humane life. But, as so often happens for the individual, by the time Western Europe had the knowledge, the wealth, and the ability to get the most out of life, it was ready to die. The truth is that by a cycle which seems inevitable, whether it is a biological reality or only an analogy, Western Europe was worn out. And under those circumstances, the degenerative disease of collectivism, the cancer of social organizations, began its peripheral infiltration. The American different civilization from the old and ancestral one of Western Europe as was Rome, a new civilization distinct from Greece. And this American civilization, at the turn of the present century, was only 300 years old. It had the strength and vigor and promise of a healthy young man in his late teens. There was no reason on earth for any such organism to be attacked by and then start succumbing to the cancerous disease of collectivism at that stage of its young manhood with its whole lifespan of accomplishment before it. But we have the cancerous disease of collectivism firmly implanted now. Nevertheless, we have people feeling that nothing should be done by them but everything for them by the government. Its disastrous ravages are quite far advanced, and we have it basically because of too long and too close an association with a parent disease, that was old enough and weakened enough for the virus to be rapidly active throughout this parent's whole environment. When Woodrow Wilson, cajoled and guided even then by the collectivists of Europe, took us into the First World War while solemnly swearing that he would never do so, he did much more than end America's great period of happy and wholesome independence of Europe. He put his healthy young country in the same house and for a while the same bed, with this parrot who was already yielding to the collectivist cancer. We never got out of that house again. We were once more put back even in the same bed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, also while lying in his teeth about his intentions. And we have never been able to get out of that bed since. Push the communist back. Get out of the bed of a Europe that is dying with this cancer of collectivism, and breathe our own healthy air of opportunity, enterprise, and freedom. Then the cancer we already have, even though it is of considerable growth, can be cut out. And despite the bad scars and the loss of some muscles, this young, strong, great new nation, restored to vigor, courage, ambition, and self confidence, can still go ahead to fulfill its great destiny and to become an even more glorious example for all the earth than it ever was before. It should be centuries from now before the natural time comes for the decline of America and for the highest torch of civilization to be taken over by the rising newer nations to the West. But we do have to achieve the sufficiently drastic surgery, and that, of course, is a Herculean task. We should return to a study of it when we come to the more positive part of this program. Section three and Deeper Still. Now, gentlemen, in looking thoroughly and realistically at the danger to everything we have inherited, spiritual as well as material, and at the cause of that danger, we come to the second of the fundamental reasons for deep and basic anxiety. And putting that matter bluntly at once, the reason is simply loss of faith. Not just loss of faith in God and all his works, but loss of faith in man and his works too, in his reasons for existence, in his purposes, and in his hopes. Let all of us thank whatever God we severally worship that there is so large a remnant of the really true believers still left. We honor them. We need their steadying adherence to the rock of reverence and their aspiration of unwavering obedience to ancient and divine commandments. We desperately need their unshakable confidence in absolutes, in eternal principles and truths, in a world of increasing relativity and transitoriness in all things. We admire them. In fact, as will become more clear tomorrow, the young man I admire most of all of those America has produced was a fundamentalist Baptist missionary named John Birch. But we must not let our admiration for dependence on and feeling of spiritual kinship with the fundamentalists blind us to the visible fact that their number grows smaller every year. Among the people literate enough and ambitious enough to be activists in Europe and America, those who are honest and true believers in a faith which most of them still profess is an ever smaller minority. What is far worse, fully one third of the services that at least the Protestant churches of America are helping that trend. Some ministers have converted Christianity into a so called social gospel, which becomes, in fact, indistinguishable from advocacy of the welfare state by socialist politicians. And some actually used their pulpits to preach outright communism, often in very thin disguise, if any, while having the hypocrisy as atheists to thank God in public for their progressive apostasy. We must not only know the truth but face the truth if it is to set us free or to keep us so. Except for the diminishing number of fundamentalists of all religions, all faith has been replaced or is rapidly being replaced by a pragmatic opportunism with hedonistic aims. And what a fall that is for a race which can boast of once having listened to a Saint Augustine, a Saint Francis of Assisi, a John Milton, or an Alfred Tennyson. In Western Europe and America today, we are living in a spiritual vacuum, exactly as were the Romans after they had lost any real faith in their pagan gods and before the rise of Christianity. The most terrible result of this collapse of the rock of faith on which our morality was built is the rise of the immoral man, of which the usual communist himself is the most illustrative example. For the chief point of this whole present section of our discussion runs parallel to the main point in connection with the extent to which the cancel of collectivism has weakened and endangered us. Besides the short term job of eliminating the communist danger, we have the equally important longer range job of ending this mass psychological flight towards amorality and of restoring convincing reasons for men once again to strive to live up to moral and humanitarian ideals. Otherwise, there is no chance of saving our Christian style civilization. Otherwise, there is no chance of saving our Christian style civilization from self destruction. And it will merely go down to chaos and the ultimate serpent of the weak under the strong more lingeringly than if it is destroyed and its once free members are enslaved by the communists. We should return to the constructive side of this need and this undertaking in the morning. Section four. And so let's act. We come now to the question of what is to be done about these problems. The very first thing we must realize is that is that there is no easy formula possible nor brilliant scheme devisable for beating the communists. The conspiracy is now incredibly well organized. It is so well financed that it has billions of dollars annually just to spend on propaganda. It has the benefit of decades of successful experience. It has one set goal of world rule by any means to which every act in all of the lives of some 40,000,000 party members are now wholly subservient. And it is guided by men who had to have supreme cunning and ruthlessness to have achieved their present positions within the conspiracy itself. The human race has never before faced any such monster of power which was determined to enslave it. But there is one basic consideration of tremendous importance which we must always keep in mind. This is that communism has been imposed and must always be imposed from the top down by trickery and terror, and that it must then be maintained by terror. Truth, reality, human instinct, and the overwhelming weight of human desire are on our side. We have these points in our favor against a conspiracy which must depend on falsehood, cunning, and terror utilized by less than 5% of the total population. To feel that we cannot win that struggle is a form of pessimism to which I, for one, shall never yield. What I have What I have chiefly intended this brief introduction to lead to, therefore, is the realization that every effort we undertake, every battle we fight, even if we lose it, and every sacrifice we make is cumulative. Every bit of dedication to the cause is worthwhile. Obviously, the place for us to begin is in The United States because the American support of the international communist conspiracy is now the backbone of its strength and has been for many years. If and when we can reach the point of turning just the American government from actively helping the communist conspiracy everywhere in the world, we shall have won a most important battle in the war ahead. The amount of work required to do that in the face of a way the cards have been so painstakingly stacked against us is something to contemplate. And yet there is nothing but work and more work, thinking and more thinking, dedication and more dedication, which will do the job. So now let's look at the job itself. One, first we would establish reading rooms, small and inexpensive, in just as many of the cities, towns, and villages of this country as we could, just as rapidly as we could. Two, second, since getting the truth about both recent history and current events into as many hands and heads as possible is so important, we would see that the circulation of the conservative periodicals was expanded as rapidly as it could be done without too much waste. Three, we would do everything we could to support, maintain, increase the number of stations used, and widen the audiences of such radio programs as those of Fulton Lewis, Clarence Manion, and dozens of more localized broadcasters throughout the country. Four, we would institute the organized planning and control to make full and effectively coordinated use of the powerful letter writing weapon that lies so ready at hand. Five, we would organize fronts, little fronts, big fronts, temporary fronts, permanent fronts, all kinds of fronts. Six, another thing we should do, and one badly needed, would be to start shocking the American people or an increasing percentage of the more literate and more intelligent who have not yet been completely brainwashed into a realization of what is happening, into a dawning realization of how far and how completely how completely communist and communist influence have crept right into their communities, into institutions and activities where the general public does not have the slightest suspicion of such infiltration. The best way to do this is by exposure, which is why the communists just had to get rid of McCarthy and went to such extreme lengths to do so. Seven, There are now dozens of slimy characters loose in our midst whom I will call to your attention by describing one who is more or less typical. His usual name is Gordon Hall, though he also uses and has used many aliases, and we could silence him and those like him with comparative ease. Eight, we would line up a large list of speakers ourselves all over the country. Nine, ninth and current in this listing would be our undertakings on the international front. For many reasons, we would start extending our body into other countries as soon as there were energy and resources which could properly be spared for that purpose. 10. Finally, and probably most important of all these courses of action, we would put our weight into the political scales in this country just as fast and far as we could. We are at a stage, gentlemen, where the only sure political victories are achieved by nonpolitical organizations, by organization which has a surer, more positive, and more permanent purpose than the immediate political goals that are only means to an end by organization which has a backbone and cohesiveness and strength and definiteness of direction, which are impossible for the old style political party organization. Fantastic? Of course, it's fantastic, but everything I am talking is fantastic. We are living in fantastic times and a fantastic situation. The alternative to sufficiently fantastic measures and efforts is a fate of fantastic suffering for our children and the equally fantastic loss of a whole humane civilization that has cost countless sacrifices, immeasurable labor, and an infinite number of noble dreams across centuries in the building. We are in circumstances where it is realistic to be fantastic. I was careful to bring into this group only men of sufficient intelligence and imagination to understand that paradox. And tomorrow morning, I hope to make the realism of this afternoon's hypothesis and these proposals at least as believable as is the unbelievable present power of the forces of evil arrayed against us. May you have a good dinner, a little cease from such serious thoughts, and a good night's sleep in the meantime. Under Positive Leadership. This morning, in retracing our footsteps, we come first to the cancel of collectivism, to the question of how to stop its further ravages and how to restore the American body politic to good health, renewed strength, and as much promise for the future as is possible in view of the damage already done. And that, gentlemen, brings me to one of the basic purposes for which this meeting was called. It is one which I approach with great humility, but with no misgivings as to its necessity. For we simply are not going to be able to save our country from either the immediate threat of communism or the long range threat of socialism by organizational leadership. Our only possible chance is dynamic personal leadership. Let me begin with an illustration of the difference which also supports the argument. In 1952, I disagreed with Bob Taft on at least three of his 10 most important political principles. Yet I had made 25 radio speeches for Taft in the primary campaign on my own time and my own money. I was wholeheartedly and enthusiastically for Taft for the nomination and the presidency because I trusted him, and he was going generally in my direction. The fact that he didn't see two or three issues out of 10 the way I saw them didn't dampen the energy of my personal support for him in the slightest. But if and when I am a member of any organization, political or otherwise, and there is disagreement on the part of the any sizable percentage of the membership as to three out of 10 of the organization's policies are planks, a splintering of the organization into two groups is almost inevitable. Personal leadership holds together a following in the way that organizational leadership never can. At present, we are in the position of trying to defeat a disciplined, well armed, expertly commanded army with a collection of debating societies, and it can't be done. So let's look briefly at the possibility, the advantages, the disadvantages of finding this desperately needed leader in the political field. And the easiest way to do this is to conduct a discussion around some individual from the very start. Now the one man who comes nearest to measuring up to all the needs and qualifications whom we see on the political horizon at the present time is Barry Goldwater. I know Barry fairly well. I'd love to see him president of The United States. I'd love to see him president of The United States, and maybe someday we shall. But does anybody in this room think there is any slightest chance of Barry Goldwater supplying the dynamic overall leadership needed to save this country for anybody to be president of? If so, I think he is still not fully aware of the nature and totality of the forces at work. For Goldwater, by the very circumstances of his political success, present prestige, and the expectations of his supporters, will inevitably think and move in terms of political warfare, Even if he personally should reach the point and the understanding of wanting to consider political action as just a part, no matter how important, of much broader overall action, how much chance do you think there is that his friends and supporters would let him step out of the strictly political role in which he has been so successful? How much chance is there that they would let him build and utilize forceful leadership on all of the other fronts where we must fight the communists? How many of the steps which we discussed yesterday afternoon, and which I am sure must be taken if we are to have any chance at all, do you think you could count on Barry Goldwater's leadership to bring about no matter how much he was beseeched and no matter how much he himself came to feel inclined to do so. Or more more for the other illustrative points that will arise than for any hopes offered by the prospect, let's look at Richard Nixon in this connection. He is an extremely smart man. He is one of the ablest, shrewdest, most disingenuous, and slippiest politicians that ever showed up on the American scene. He can sit in Washington one night and convince some of the most modern Republicans that he's the best ball carrier they have, and spend four hours in the Waldorf Towers the next day convincing MacArthur and Herbert Hoover that he is their man. He can use the tremendously overrated and over publicized, but actually highly cautious part he played in the Alger Hiss exposure to hang on to the hopeful loyalty of the vigorous anti communists at the very time when he is insinuating himself into the good graces of the left by quietly knifing McCarthy. Nixon could pose as a conservative Republican congressman and yet be one of the original founders in 1950 of Republican advance. This was intended to be not the Republican opposition to, but the Republican team made of Americans for democratic action, and it even had some interlocking left wingers who were members of both groups. Nixon can claim still to be vigorously anticommunist, yet when he has a chance as vice president to break the tie and cast the decisive vote for h r three to reestablish some chance of prosecution of subversives actually advocating violent overthrow of our government, what happens? He moves heaven and earth to have Wallace Bennett found and pressured into voting against h r three, defeating the measure so that the vice president will not have to vote. What good would such a man be to us even as president unless outside forces and accomplishments made it opportunistic and expedient for him to ride an anti communist wave which those outside forces had created? As for being a leader, the sad truth, hard for many hopeful and wishful conservative Republicans to realize, is that Richard Nixon, a most engaging personality and clever politician, has never been a leader in connection with any event or development or at any stage in his career. He has been a rider of waves so far as public support was concerned and a manipulator of uncanny skill behind the scenes. I have made these remarks here in this really inner circle group in order to emphasize the wisdom of the old advice, put not your faith in politicians. I am thoroughly convinced that we cannot count on politicians, political leadership, or even political action except as a part of something much deeper and broader to save us. Now I didn't always feel that way, and I think that up to the time that the nomination was stolen from Bob Taft in 1952, it was still possible to have saved our country from the immediate communist danger anyway, primarily by political action. But my study of the whole picture convinced me more and more that one, no one outspoken senator, nor a dozen outspoken senators, and no amount of the ephemeral political support they might muster could possibly save our country unless unless there was encompassing them and their efforts and support this far larger and broader movement to which I keep referring. Two, that there was not going to be any such movement without the dynamic overall personal leadership to which I have also been referring and three, that with all of my own shortcomings there wasn't anybody else on the horizon willing to give their whole lives to the job with the determination and dedication I would put into it if I didn't. What really moved me to cross this Rubicon, however, the consideration which more than any other gradually brought me the necessary measure of courage and determination for so staggering an undertaking, was another result of many years of study of not only the present but the past. This is the conviction that even warding off communist slavery and reversing the socialist trend is only half the battle. We can never win even that half unless both leadership and following have a positive dream which is more important as a hope than the negative nightmare is as a fear, unless the promise of what we can build supplies more motivation than the terror of what we must destroy, and unless this faith in the future is based on a deeper faith in eternal truths. The nature of these truths and the tenets of this faith, which I hope and believe every man in this room can accept and approve, I shall come to later this morning. What I am trying to do here as an introduction to and part of our thinking about how to rid America of the collectivist cancer is simply this: I want to convince you, as I am convinced, that only dynamic personal leadership offers any chance for us to save either our material or our spiritual inheritance. I want to convince you, as I am convinced, that even under such leadership, we have no chance unless the specific battles are fought as part of a larger and more lasting movement to restore once again an upward reach to the heart of man. And I wish to make clear what you are bound to be assuming already, that with whatever I have in me of faith, dedication, and energy, I intend to offer that leadership to all who are willing to help me. Section six, to restore responsibility. With that much explanation as background, let's see what basic principle we can establish and what specific objective we can define with regard to the particular battle against collectivism. And it seems to me, gentlemen, that the whole essence of our purpose can be summarized in just five words, less government and more responsibility. The principle is simple enough for all to understand, and yet it is broad enough, I believe, to be comprehensive with regard to all that we really desire to attain through political action. We must try to make it a convincing political standard and an accepted goal. What we must start asking our fellow citizens everywhere to consider is this: On the basis of all known past human experience, are there any general conclusions with regard to the organization of society which can be set forth with confidence? It seems to me clear that there certainly are. One, first, government is necessary some degree of government in any civilized society. Two, second, while government is necessary, it is basically a nonproductive expense, an overhead cost supported by the productive economy. Third, government is frequently evil. Fourth, government is always and inevitably an enemy of individual freedom. Whatever must be done by government will always cost more than if it could be done by individuals or smaller groups. Sixth, government, by its size, its momentum, and its authority, will not only perpetuate errors of doctrine or of policy longer than they would otherwise retain acceptance, but it will multiply their effect on a geometric scale as against the arithmetical cumulative effect of those errors if confined to individuals or smaller groups. As any society becomes reasonably settled and shakes down into a semi permanent pattern of economic and political life, the drive always begins to have government become the management of the social enterprise rather than merely its agent for certain clear purposes. Yet a government trying to step in and improve the working of a free market is exactly like a man who takes a lighted lantern outdoors at noon of a bright June day to show you the sun. As a government increases in power, and as a means of increasing its power, it always has a tendency to squeeze out the middle class, to destroy or weaken the middle for the benefit of the top and the bottom. Nine, the form of government is not nearly so important as its quality. 10, which brings us to the last, and in my opinion the most important, of these basic generalizations concerning government. And our tenth point is that neither the form of government nor its quality is as important as its quantity. The increasing quantity of government in all nations has constituted the greatest tragedy of the twentieth century. The greatest enemy of man is and always has been government. And the larger, the more extensive that government, the greater the enemy. The communists believe that a collectivist society should swallow up all individuals, make their lives and their energies completely subservient to the needs and the purposes of the collective estate and that any means are permissible to achieve this end. The true Americanist believes that the individual should retain the freedom to make his own bargain with life and the responsibility for the results of that bargain, and that means are as important as ends in the civilized social order which he desires. There are many stages of welterism, socialism, and collectivism in general, but communism is the ultimate state of them all, and they all lead inevitably in that direction. In this final state, communism, you have a society in which class distinctions are greater than in any other, but where position in these classes is determined solely by demagogic political skill and ruthless cunning. And you have a society in which every fault of government that we have discussed above is held to be a benefit and a desirable part of the framework of life. But there is an exactly opposite direction. This direction leads toward a governmental environment for human life founded on the basis of long experience with government, on experience which shows government to be a necessary evil but a continuous brake on all progress and the ultimate enemy of all freedom. It is the forward direction, the upward direction, and Americanism, I hope, shall become its name. Section seven, and help to build a better world. We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams. We, in the ages lying in the buried past of the earth, built Nineveh with our sign and Babel itself with our mirth, and overthrew them with prophesying to the old of the new world's work. For each age is a dream that is dying or one that is coming to birth. For the last fifty years, our age has been a dream that was dying. To this very group, at this very moment, I am proposing that we turn our faces forward instead of backward, begin to make even our defensive actions fit into a constructive design, and do our part to usher in a new age that is coming to birth. Now I don't expect the New York Times to begin announcing excitedly in January that obviously the war started on a new era in Indianapolis in December 1958. Of course, it is only the work we do afterwards, the work we persuade and inspire others to do, and the long results and widening reach of both that can make of this meeting anything but a two day seminar in philosophy and current affairs. But if every man here should leave tonight feeling in his own mind that he had been at the beginning of a new chapter in history, it would be true. It would be true no matter how long the historians might take to find it out. The basic reason why our old age is dying, as I tried yesterday to make clear, is that the faith which was the core of its strength no longer commands the unquestioning loyalty of enough of its devotees. For the dream of any nation or any people must depend on faith. The foundation of our new dream must be faith or it will never come to pass. Where is this faith, and what is this faith so true that neither our hearts nor our reasons can deny it, so broad that it takes in without violation the faith of our fathers, and so deep that it can inspire martyrdom at need? As to where, it's right in front of us. And as to what, it is exactly what we in this room already and actually believe. Now first let me repeat here for the devote Catholics and fundamentalist Protestants who are among my best friends and strongest supporters, that it is no part of my purpose to disturb their beliefs in the slightest or the beliefs of any man or woman who really does have a religious faith instead of just the shell of one. What I am concerned about, what we must all be vitally concerned about today as the very essence of our problem, is morality, integrity, and purpose. That morality must be based on a bedrock of faith. For those who already have such a bedrock of faith and stand on it and abide by it, I can offer nothing, and I would certainly take nothing away. But for those who are no longer sure exactly where they do stand, on what rocks or how firmly, I want to try to show them that all of these bedrocks together constitute a foundation with room and strength for us all. For unless we willingly anchor our moral judgments to eternal truths, we become just chaff, blown always before the winds of confusion. For I doubt not through the ages one increasing purpose runs. That there is a purpose in man beyond anything called for by his individual needs, and far greater than his personal desires, can be denied only by the most depraved maniac or the most ignorant fool. One of the best summarizations of the force and beauty and eternal quality of that purpose is contained in William Herbert Carruth's Each in His Own Tongue, which I should like to recall to your minds: A picket frozen on duty, a mother starved for her brood, Socrates drinking the hemlock, and Jesus on the road, and millions who humble and nameless the straight hard pathway plod. Some call it consecration, and others call it God. Who can read that, realize the incontrovertible and wonderful truth of the story of man's purpose at work which the poet tells, and fail to feel reverently bound to serve that same purpose faithfully and well. What is that purpose? And this, too, has been summarized by yet another poet in just one brilliant line: Thou hast put an upward reach in the heart of man. Not only are we a part of some mighty purpose beyond our understanding, and not only do we have a clear duty to be true to that purpose to the fullest extent that we are allowed to grasp its workings and its direction, But all human experience shows that the total happiness of any generation and of its posterity is directly tied to the respect of that generation for the upward reach in man's nature. We have all the reason here that man can ask, divine or human or pragmatic, for keeping our consciences attuned to the emotions and impulses which increase man's upward reach, and for then obeying those consciences, obeying by commission as well as omission, to the utmost of our respective will powers and abilities. The substance of my conscience, as I believe it is really the substance of the conscience of every man in this room, was gratitude and a corresponding sense of responsibility. Gratitude, if you will let me paraphrase Henley's line without the slightest implication of blasphemy, gratitude to whatever god there was, and gratitude to all of the noblemen of the past for the life and the environment for that life which was given me, and responsibility to God and man to be worthy so far as I was able of the human race at its best. And, gentlemen, what firmer foundation can we possibly need for the faith on which to build our new age and with which to inaugurate the dream that is coming to birth? Wherever we turn in looking at whatever blessings we have for the present and hopes for the future, we find a need for gratitude that makes the acceptance of responsibility a duty and a source of inward happiness. Consider, for instance and for an instant, the blessing of freedom. Kipling once wrote truly, all we know of freedom, all we need to know, this our fathers won for us long and long ago. Are we, as Lowell put it, going to be traitors to our sires and lose that freedom for our children and their children? McCauley had horacious say, and how can man die better than facing fearful odds for the ashes of his followers and the temples of his gods? And so we ask ourselves in simple sincerity, if it becomes necessary, just how can man die better, especially if in doing so he appreciably reduces the odds faced by his compatriots in their fight against the overwhelming forces of evil threatening us today. But it is not even to the martyrs, perhaps, that we owe the most. There have been missionaries and scholars, the Catholic monks of the Middle Ages, poets and philosophers, builders and explorers, statesmen and scientists throughout centuries receding into the unknown past who have toiled and dreamed and sacrificed and died that you and I might have the comforts and freedoms and hopes that we enjoy now in so fair and happy a land. One of the worst and most sad and disturbing traits of many of our young people today is that they take their inheritance for granted and have no thought of its cost. This is a vital part of the moral breakdown that is endangering our civilization. It shows how basic and necessary a component of faith is man's feeling of continuity and gratitude. Let us, with a faith for the future based on this very principle of gratitude to God and man, live up to by ourselves and made a living and articulate faith for others by both example and teaching, let us try to bring many of these young people who are now at loose ends because of their lack of any faith back into the conscious current of man's increasing purpose. For a code of honor and an ennobling sense of responsibility are themselves gifts to the human soul which have been won by its upward reach. And so, gentlemen, without any claim to goodness, wisdom, or originality, I have tried in far too short a time for so huge a subject to indicate to you the elements of a faith which I still hope and believe is shared by all of you, no matter how differently you might have explained or expressed it. It is a faith for which I have earnestly hoped that it might encompass the individual beliefs of most men of goodwill, that it might refill our ancient bunks of inspiration, and that it would become a basis and a beginning of renewed dedication to a dream of man's future. Section eight, through the John Birch Society. Now, how do we go about asking men, in the words of Santayana, to trust the soul's invincible surmise? We come at long last to the question of ways and means and methods. In connection with all of these plans and aims and hopes, I am proposing, as the most immediately tangible outcome of this meeting the formation of the John Society. And I ask you not to give undue thought at present to the name. In the small packets for each of you, there are copies of my little book, The Life of John Birch. I hope you will read it when you have the opportunity. If you have not already done so, or even if you have, you will find and I believe agree that John Birch possessed in his own character all of those noble traits and ideals which we should like to see become symbolized by the John Birch Society, and the kind of life of peaceful opportunity and responsibility which John Birch wanted for his fellow Americans, and for his Chinese friends and for all men of goodwill, is exactly the kind of life we should like to see possible everywhere. It is my fervent hope that the John Birch Society will last for hundreds of years and exert an increasing influence for the temporal good and the spiritual ennoblement of mankind throughout those centuries. For I am staking my whole aspiration to play my part in forwarding man's one increasing purpose on whatever can be accomplished through it. The John Birch Society is to be a monolithic body, a republican form of government or of organization has many attractions and advantages under certain favorable conditions. But under less happy circumstances, it lends itself too readily to infiltration, distortion, and disruption. And democracy, of course, in government or organization, as the Greeks and Romans both found out, and as I believe every man in this room clearly recognizes, democracy is merely a deceptive phrase, a weapon of demagoguery, and a perennial fraud. The fear of tyrannical oppression of individuals and other arguments against the authoritative structure in the form of governments have little bearing on the case of a voluntary association where the authoritative power can be exercised and enforced only by persuasion. And what little validity they do have is outweighed by the advantages of firm and positive direction of the society's energies. Especially for the near future and for the fight against communism, which is the first great task of the society, it is imperative that all the strength we can muster be subject to smoothly functioning direction from the top. As I have said before, no collection of debating societies is ever going to stop the communist conspiracy from taking us over. And I have I have no intention of adding another frustrated group to their number. We mean business every step of the way. We can allow for differences of opinion. We shall need and welcome advice, and we expect to use the normal measure of diplomacy always called for in dealing with human beings. But whenever differences of opinion become translated into a lack of loyal support, we shall have shortcuts for eliminating both without going through any congress of so called democratic processes. Otherwise, communist infiltrators could bog us down in interminable disagreements, schisms, and feuds before we ever became seriously effective. The purpose of the John Birch Society, as officially stated, will be to promote less government, more responsibility, and a better world. That says it all. Members of the John Birch Society, not only in The United States but anywhere in the world, not only can be good patriots in their respective countries but necessarily will be. For internationalism, as it is conceived and promoted today, is an attempt to impose more government and a more centralized one world government on all of us everywhere. For that reason, it is automatically contrary to everything we stand for and one of the movements we shall oppose with all the strength we can. The John Birch Society will function almost entirely through small local chapters. Each will have a chapter leader appointed through officers of the society in the field who have themselves been duly appointed by headquarters. The dues are whatever the member wants to make them, with a minimum of $24 per year for men and $12 per year for women. We should expect the chapter leader to get all of his or her chapters together at least once a month, and in many cases, oftener. And we expect the chapter leader to be in practically continuous contact with his or her members to whatever extent may be necessary. For handling the organizational mechanics of the society and for helping to form new chapters, we shall have a paid staff man with a title of coordinator for each area of the prophesized. Above these coordinators, in time, we shall have supervisors with the rank or title of major coordinators, and we shall further build the organizational framework from the bottom up as made necessary by sufficient membership. We are expecting far more work and dedication and far more sacrifice of other interests on the part of those who do become members of the John Birch Society than you have ever thought of giving to any other organization which you joined or even considered joining. For unless we have the cumulative weight and effect of such solid effort and sacrifice on the part of our members as a weapon to be wielded against the Communists, we are certainly not going to be able to hold on to even the increasingly confused, dark, and immoral world we now have, much less help to build a better one. So we are asking for a lot, and we want you to know it if and when you sign an application blank for membership in the John Birch Society. That brings us next to a consideration as to the very nature of our undertaking, which needs to be made clear. For all revolutions, as Metternich once pointed out, begin in the best minds and work downward. While most religions begin at the bottom with the masses and gradually acquire both respectability and acceptance at the top. We are neither and both. Far from founding a religion, we are merely urging Protestants, Catholics, Jews, or Muslims to be better Christians, better Jews, better Muslims in accordance with the deepest and most humanitarian promptings of their own religious beliefs. And we are simply trying to draw a circle of faith in God's power and purpose and of man's relationship to both, which is broad and inclusive enough to take each man's specific faith into that circle without violation. Yet the evangelical fervor with which we expect our members to fight the forces of evil and work for a better world makes certain principles with regard to religious groups apply to ourselves. We are not beginning any revolution, or even a counterrevolution in any technical sense, because while we are opposing a conspiracy, we are not ourselves making use of conspiratorial methods. Yet our determination to overthrow an entrenched tyranny is the very stuff out of which revolutions are made. The net result of these reflections is that we are not a copy of any movement of the past. We are unique. We are ourselves. We are something new as befits a moving force for a new age. We believe in profiting by all human experience, but we shall make our own amalgam of the organizational medals forged by that experience with the mercury of our own purpose. Without donning sackcloth and ashes, we shall try to inspire saintly men to join our efforts to make this a better world. And without building barricades in the streets, we shall still try to rally rational men to our efforts to preserve the best of the world we already have. And now, gentlemen, I am nearing the end of the semiformal part of this long undertaking As to what is expected of you in either effort or money, if you are thinking of halfway measures, we might as well quit now. But I might as well also reveal my fanaticism by telling you that there is no force and no discouragement which could make me quit or even put less of my life and energy into the struggle. The last resort of my own mind has been expressed by Louise Image in Guinea to fear not sensible failure nor covet the game at all, but fighting, fighting, fighting, guy driven against the wall. I repeat, however, that we do not have to die driven against any wall, nor do we have to lose the struggle at all. As I've said elsewhere, there's enough strength, enough money, enough intelligence, and enough patriotism in the vast business community of America to form the nucleus that will stop and destroy the communist conspiracy if we can stir it to action in time. What I am proposing here is the mechanics and the leadership through men like yourselves by which it can be stirred to action and that action made effective. Let me repeat just one thing that I said to you yesterday morning. There are in the satellite countries today thousands of men just like you and me who only ten years ago could regularly meet in such groups as I propose. Not only that, but they could go out openly with and before larger groups to try to spread the alarm and to stop the communists from taking over their countries. These men now say to each other, but largely to themselves, if I had only known, if I had only recognized and believed the danger and the horror of communist rule in time. There is nothing I would not have given to save my freedom, my family, my country if I had only recognized the urgency and the desperate need. Now it is all too late, and any sacrifice even of life itself would be entirely in vain. We do not have to be too late, and we do not have to lose the fight. Commonism has its weaknesses, and the conspiracy has its vulnerable points. We have many layers of strength not yet rotted by all of the infiltration and political sabotage to which we have been subjected. Our danger is both immense and imminent, but it is not beyond the possibility of being overcome by the resistance that is still available. All we must find and build and use to win is sufficient understanding. Let's create that understanding and build that resistance with everything mortal men can put into the effort while there still is time. Then, while we are destroying and after we have destroyed the communist tyranny, let's drive on towards our higher goals of more permanent accomplishment, towards an era of less government and more responsibility in which we can create a better world. Speaker 1: And now ladies and gentlemen, you can simply be yourselves again. Fifteen years after that last setting, we are over 2,000 Berkshires and friends at dinner together in Los Angeles on 03/09/1974. Those of us at this table that were a part of that party of 11, and I'm sure all of you, now have a realization of how accurately prophetic Mr. Welch was fifteen years ago. Now let's save time for him by omitting any further introduction or comment by me or applause by you as we as we hear what he has to say about the next fifteen years. Bob? Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, we shall now condense what needs at least two full days into thirty minutes. So please forgive the extent to which these remarks become both cryptic and staccato. We pick up at the point where I had just finished the last line of the two day presentation at Indianapolis. Then McMillan leaned forward in his chair, holding out towards me what looked like an old envelope on which he had been scribbling. I stepped forward, took it, went back behind the podium, and then, to my delighted surprise, was able to hold up for the other 10 men to see a check from Ben to the John Birch Society for a thousand dollars with a note that read, Here, Bob, we are in business. Indeed, we were in business at once, and as Bob Stoddart has pointed out, in relatively better financial position than we have ever been since. What's more, we proceeded to survive in a bitterly hostile environment and are now still celebrating our fifteenth anniversary which occurred exactly three months ago. So we begin this look toward the future with an extremely brief glance at the past. Section Some Points to Remember. One, throughout all of the diverse pulling and pressures from within and from without, the society has been kept strictly on its originally charted course. Two, it is still unique as the only cohesive voluntary non religious organization for adult education on a permanent nationwide basis in all human history. Three, Consequently, the society has had to become a pioneer in almost every respect, not only as to its organizational structure but by creating its own means and methods for carrying out this educational task. Four, it offers the only kind of opposition which the collectivists in general and the contemporary international conspiracy in particular have never faced before. We have maintained education as our total strategy and truth as our only weapon. So the conspiracy has known only one way to fight back, which was never try to refute the accusations but always seek to destroy the accuser. Consequently, the society from the time it was two years old began to face more vicious smears, lying propaganda, massive attacks, and undermining tactics than have ever been turned on any other non religious group in America. Pride. Despite those impediments, our thoroughly organized educational program is now functioning solidly, continuously, and with rapidly increasing effectiveness in all 50 States. Also, at an embryonic stage in three foreign countries, and with and with an amorphous influence that extends thinly throughout the world. Sixth, the educational tools and methods of the John Birch Society now include books, pamphlets, and reprints distributed by the millions of copies per year a monthly and a weekly magazine which are becoming increasingly recognized as authoritative in their field films, film strips, records, reel to reel tapes, and cassettes which altogether are played to an enormous quantity of people and a speakers bureau which, when measured by the number of engagements filled or the total audience reached, we believe to be the largest in the world. Through literally thousands of ad hoc committees, including our speakers' forums, we have multiplied the reach and effectiveness of our actual members at least fourfold. Eight, through the tireless patriotic thought, labor, and dedication of its staff and tens of thousands of its members, the society has played an extremely important role in certain basic battles staged by the conspiracy. These have included our part in preventing the establishment of a Negro Soviet Republic in the Southeastern States. Our stopping cold almost entirely through the impact of Allen Stang's pamphlets and speeches, a similar movement by Reyes T. Arena to set up a Chicano independent government in some of our Southwestern states, and largely by using patriotic Indians as our speakers and project leaders, our current blocking of a similar American Indian movement so decisively that the communist controlled scoundrels at the head of it are blaming us for all of their troubles. With regard to more explicit activities, let us offer an example. The notorious doctor Martin Luther King was as foul, a pro communist, philandering, big spending, trouble making, violence creating, liar, and crook as the conspiracy has ever sponsored in any of its programs against any people. And almost single handed, through our very courageous and patriotic Negro speakers, We exposed these facts so thoroughly that King became only an embarrassment to the insiders like Nelson Rockefeller who were financing his carnival show. In fact, during the last weeks of his life, King canceled entirely the whole series of speeches already set up for him on a tour from Memphis to Richmond and back, rather than be up against the exposures in a parallel series of speeches over the same area by our speaker, Julia Brown. He could could no longer be of any practical value to the insiders at all as a live agitator, but only as a falsely glorified dead martyr. So much to our regret, that gruesome transformation was arranged by the conspiracy in very short order. Also, let us mention the magnificent role played by our support your local police committees all over The United States in putting an almost complete end to the communist inspired and communist controlled civilian police review boards. These boards boards had been designed for the ruthless harassment of all police officers who tried to do their duty in handling communist criminals and agitators, and there have been about 40 other similar specific accomplishments of major or appreciable importance for which the society has been responsible in the course of its efforts to expose and slow down or stop various projects of the conspiracy. 10, and most important of all is a general consideration. For a dozen years, there have been unceasing efforts, mostly behind the scenes on the part of both Richard Nixon and William F. Buckley, Jr, to damage or destroy the John Birch Society. There have been more open but recurrent attacks, frequently laced with vicious lies, for the same purpose on the part of some 30 senators, governors, and pundits of the press and the airwaves. Yet despite all of these smears, the standing and character of our members, the dependability of our educational tools, and the quality of our methods have gradually brought about an immense change in the attitude of the public towards the John Birch Society until today the fraction of the public that feels favorably towards the society has climbed from about 4% to at least 50%. And a final measure of our value to the anti communist cause can be expressed most comprehensively in a single thought. Suppose there had been no John Birch Society at all and no sign of its educational program over these past fifteen years. Then just try to imagine how much more completely in the dark the American people would be today about all that is happening and how tremendously easier it would be for the insiders of the conspiracy to carry out the final steps in their plot to enslave us. Section B, how fares the other side? One, for almost two hundred years, the goal of this self perpetuating conspiracy has been to destroy all religion, all regularly established governments, and all traditional human institutions, and then to impose its new world order on the chaotic ruins that will be left. The conspirators have never been able to destroy anything of importance, however, by attacks from the outside, but only by subversion from the inside. Almost every member of the conspiracy, therefore, leads a continuous life of falsehood to his friends, of pretense to the public, and of underlying doubt with regard to his own future. From Alger Hiss to Richard Nixon, every communist or insider has a gnawing fear that although he is a peacock today, he may be a feather duster tomorrow. The abnormality of such existence adds up to a basic liability which is forever, tugging away at the solidity of the whole conspiratorial organization. And the effects of this defiance of all normal human instincts are beginning to show up today on the whole international scene more clearly than ever before. The insiders and the Illuminati before them have always intended that about 3% of any population should have absolute rule over the other 97%. This is because their obscene lust for power is more happily satisfied by success in proportion to the scarcity of others who also enjoy the prerequisites of power in other words, by an inverse ratio. This seems a very strange and cruel psychological quirk to traditional Americans in a country where even those with the ambition and ability to become very rich have always wanted to see others become rich also, and to have everybody around them enjoy all the comforts and even luxuries of an increasing national prosperity. And this attitude alone on the part of the insiders, as demonstrated at present by their calculated effort to wipe out the whole middle class and to reduce everybody but themselves to a level of bare subsistence, is going to militate very strongly against them as their design becomes more obvious. The whole conspiracy always has been and still is an overextended, very thin shell of power being constantly enlarged by bluff, audacity, and the ruthless use of terror, terror to smother all resistance piecemeal. The insiders themselves never know just when or where this shell may be broken, nor how serious the break may be. The forced exile of the pro communist King Constantine of Greece by an anti communist military junta was one example. A more recent one has been the replacement of Salvador Allendi, the communist boss and would be tyrant of Chile, by an anti communist military group. Which certainly seems, as does the one in Greece, to be determined to restore a constitutional republican government to their respective countries as rapidly as possible. The conspiracy certainly cannot be sure of what is going to happen on Mainland China when Mao Chitung dies or how long Willy Brandt can last in West Germany when despite all of the moral support that Richard Nixon could give him, he still barely won the last election in 1972 by two votes which were purchased through outright bribery? Also, of course, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, still ruling Canada without even a majority, could have the sordid facts of his utterly treasonous and criminal past begin to catch up with him in the minds of the Canadians. And there are a dozen other seriously weak spots in the shell where there could be a blowout at any time. Four, in Soviet Russia itself, as you may learn from all the trustworthy news that you can excavate, there is doubt that even another stallion could hold the lid down tight enough on the boiling pot. There is a crime wave among the youth at least equal to our own. Over half of all crimes of assault, robbery, rape, and hooliganism by children of the ages of 16 and 17 are due to intoxication. A recent report showed that over eighty percent of these youngsters had started drinking vodka before they were 16. There are now increased fines for parents and jail sentences for others who encourage youth 18 to escapism from sordid reality by the nepenthe of alcohol. But even these tender attentions from a loving big brother government do not seem to provide the promised degree of bliss in this communist paradise. Nor does anything else. Charges of ideological aberration and even treasonous heresy by some officials against other officials have become commonplace. Saul Shennison has had plenty of company among scientists as well as other writers in risking imprisonment, torture, or death for complaining about the inhuman conditions and the spread of terror in many parts of the vast Soviet Union besides the prison camps. Even after half a century of unceasing attempts to stamp out all religion, the powers that be today and have some hopes of still being tomorrow are now having some trouble with a religious revival, more trouble than for many years. Indeed, the resistance of all kinds at any cost has now gone so far that for the first time Soviet planes on domestic flights are being hijacked by Soviet citizens in attempts to escape. The plain truth is that the commissars who are trying to rule the Soviet Union today are sitting on a powder keg which would blow up at any minute that they cease to have the ostentatious financial support, moral support, and material support of the United States government. And the same thing is true of a great many other regions within the vast communist corral of nations. Five, the truth is that everything now depends more than ever before on what happens in The United States, and this is a shaky read on which the insiders are leaning. They are using the protracted assault on Nixon to distract American minds from what Nixon is still doing to advance communist plans, Also, to cause distrust and despair in American minds about our whole economic political system so as to get an easier acceptance of drastic changes which spell communism. But they are also generating some very serious bitterness and rivalries within top revolutionary circles. Few men, if any, have ever done more to increase communist power and prestige at home and abroad than Richard Nixon, And few have been more skillful at cementing grateful communist commissars and ambitious insiders into the circle of his own support. Yet some of the most powerful insiders seem determined to throw Nixon overboard in order to put more power directly into the hands of the Rockefeller faction and such Rockefeller agents as Henry Kissinger. And we believe that they are thereby creating a lot of future headaches for the whole conspiracy. Sixth, more important than any of these considerations, however, is a now rapid awakening among the American people. What happened to the Equal Rights Amendment last year and to the genocide treaty and the land use bill this year are just straws in the wind. The insiders have not dared to install actual rationing of gasoline, which they have so badly wanted, nor has the Nixon administration yet dared to establish full diplomatic relations with Red China. Also, we think the present obvious intention to surrender the Panama Canal completely into international communist hands through the communist government of Panama may run into quite a jolt if a million bumper stickers appear on that many American cars reading as follows, don't give Panama our canal, give them Kissinger instead. And ladies and gentlemen, we are accepting orders for those stickers right now at four for $1. Seven, these are also straws in the wind, but the insiders can see which way the straws are blowing. The Nixon administration already has executive orders on the books sufficient to establish a complete dictatorship. But Nixon does not dare to make a protest of either their reception or their constitutionality. Regional government is being pushed hard, but still on the phony pretense of increasing Federal cooperation with State and local governments rather than usurping all of their functions and powers. The drive for more and bigger crime waves, although fully supported and encouraged by the pro communist governors of at least five States, has not yet dared go far enough to make the American people welcome a national gestapo. All of the conspiratorial forces with municipal, state, and federal backing have not yet succeeded in taking our guns away from us, and the insiders have never been able. The insiders have never been able to establish permanent communist rule over any country whose citizens were armed. Eight, and the biggest problem of the whole conspiracy, as we said in the March bulletin, is even more basic. It is the incredible strength, productivity, resourcefulness, and momentum of the American free enterprise system which makes it so extremely difficult to destroy. Also, there is a changing mood, a rising spirit of anger and determination coming up in the American people which is crowding the insiders into a race against time, for time, like truth, is on our side. So with all of these factors and circumstances in mind, we solemnly ask ourselves how stands the battle today. And in deadly seriousness, we repeat the answer that we started giving you in 1973, early in the year. We think that for the past year, the objective odds have been, and as of today still are, about even in this struggle for victory by either side. This is because we now have the size and strength and resources that I am sorry, that is a misprint. This is not because we now have the size nothing got left out. This is not because we now have the size and strength and resources to meet the enemy on realistic terms. Not at all. We don't. Not at all, my friends. We never delude ourselves nor anybody else. But it is primarily, we think the odds objectively are even, because we really mean business in this most crucial fight of all human history as we always have. We believe it is possible for us to continue expanding our total program until it does measure up to the practical need before the hour is too late. And that even if the conspirators sensing and fearing this possibility should have some of us meet with fatal accidents or start unleashing against the society more vicious falsehoods than ever before, we are still prepared. Our total undertaking now has the organization, the experience, the courage, and the willpower to use our growing strength to best advantage, to act as a catalyst and a rallying point for the patriotic uprising that is now underway, and thus to play a decisive part in helping to save our country, and hence our whole civilization, from the living death that is called communism. Section c, which is the last of the three sections in this. So what must we do to be saved? Having thus used two thirds of our time on the background of this speech, let us now use the other third on the substance that will justify its title. So we first answer our question in the words of St. Augustine, We must pray as if it were all up to God, but work as if it were all up to us. And fundamentally, our own work, of course, must be exactly what we have already been doing. Only a great deal more of it with more people to help us. But the major purpose of this whole effort tonight is to add a powerful new concept to our understanding and our aims. To make that concept clear, we must creep up on it through a few brief items of history out of a thousand details we should like to offer for strengthening our point. So we skip many volumes and begin with one most significant fact. There was absolutely no reason on earth for the American people, or any other people for that matter, to become involved in World War I. The whole horrible conflict was deliberately plotted and brought about by insiders of the master conspiracy through their working in and on the governments of both sides with loyalty to none. Their objective was to create the ways and means through which the war could be used to advance the communist movement. The insiders' three major goals in this respect with regard to World War I were: a, to overthrow the government of Russia and enable the Communists to establish there a first physical base of Communist power b, to drag The United States into this kind of totalitarian foreign war with all the changes in the structure of our government and the outlook of our people that the war would make possible and c, to give birth to the embryo of their future world government in the form of the League of Nations. The first two items on that profoundly evil agenda came off according to design, and it is hard to tell which was most important to the conspirators. For from our entry into World War I, there was a prompt beginning, and thereafter a gradual development over the next twenty five years, of the role of The United States as a food supplier, equipment manufacturer, prestige builder, financial angel, ideological disciple, general benefactor, wartime ally, military arsenal, and vicious hatchet man for the Soviet communists. Until by the end of World War II, the United States Government had clearly become the most powerful single force in promoting the rise of communist power all over the world. Most of this was exactly in line with what the insiders in The United States and elsewhere had plotted and expected. So naturally they had used many waves of deceptive propaganda with much diplomatic trickery by their tools and all the governments involved, and every act of cold blooded murder or vicious treason to their respective countries which Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill together could devise in order to involve us in World War I and its aftermath at Versailles. But in typical communist fashion, as a means of continuing and increasing our involvement in world affairs, the insiders also invented a semantic weapon with which to smear and ridicule and discredit all Americans who were sensible enough to oppose their sinister plans. The basic term of this ideological tool was isolationism. Over the next few decades, the insiders made it into a verbal bludgeon of tremendous force, for World War II was plotted, contrived, and utilized by the same conspiracy for the very same purposes as World War I, plus many other purposes as well as the same ones. Franklin Roosevelt and George Marshall, also aided every step of the way by Winston Churchill, even produced some improvements on the lies and treason and ruthlessness of Wilson and House in order to drag us into this new international mill strong. And by this time, even prominent Americans this is by getting into World War II Even prominent Americans of unquestionable patriotism quailed before the prospect of being called isolationists. Until by the decades after that war, the now communist dominated American government had tens of thousands of bureaucrats, millions of American soldiers, and billions of American dollars scattered all over the world. This was for no other possible real reason than to help the communists to impose their brutal tyranny on an average of 7,000 more newly enslaved human beings somewhere in the world every hour of every day throughout every year. Every lying pretense or diplomatic skullduggery imaginable, as well as every foul misuse conceivable of American money and military might, was being utilized on an enormous scale for that purpose by our communist controlled State Department. And the surest way to discredit all critics of this rampant treason must to vilify them as isolationists. But the time has come at last when it is both wise and possible to identify this brazen fraud as one of the most blatant big lies in the whole realm of communist propaganda. So brush the insider's dust out of your eyes, my friends, and the commonest soap suds out of your brain, and ask yourselves in all honesty, what on earth is wrong with The United States simply minding its own business? Are with having its foreign policy function primarily for the safety and benefit of the American people. Which is exactly what we had done for the first hundred and forty years of our existence as a nation to the incredible advantage of ourselves and everybody else. Everybody that is, except a numerically small clique of powerlusting conspirators who had somehow inflicted themselves on a gullible world. We do not have to pull into our shell by any means. Certainly we had never done so when Yankee Clippers sailed the seven seas or when American automobiles first began to put the whole world on wheels. The United States should be glad to maintain the comfortable minimum of diplomatic relations with every civilized nation as we always were. Our people should certainly be glad to exchange commercial goods, cultural productions, and happy visits with the people of all nations as we always have been. But we should remember Richard Cobden's famous warning that real peace and happiness will come to this earth when the peoples of different countries have as much as much to do with each other as possible and their governments as little as possible. And we should also remember that the continuous colossal meddling of our government with the affairs of other governments all over the world does unmeasurable damage to the people under those other governments and to our own people as well. Let's get back on the road to greatness which we followed with such confidence and success during our first four generations as an independent nation. Then, standing on our own feet, let's once again become an envied example for all the world by our productiveness, our inventiveness, our individual rights and freedoms and opportunities, by our sense of responsibility, our compassion for the unfortunate, our basic moral codes, and our noble aspirations, and by our determination to preserve the wonderful inheritance which our founding fathers bequeathed to us for our own descendants and as an asylum for all worthy people who suffer under tyranny through no fault of their own. If this were the ambition of this humane course be dubbed isolationism, then let's take pride in being called isolationists. Above all, let's not be prevented from using our common sense, from leading patriotic lives and standing on our god given rights through fear of a tricky phrase invented for that very purpose by the most vile and merciless criminals in all human history. Section d, I thought I'd combine this in section c when I said it was the last, but I noticed I split it. And I do remember now, I did find a split it. But anyway, it's the last half of the last section, so let me encourage you. Section d, in conclusion. In fact, if your speaker were a young man of 50 and a politician, of which goodness knows he is neither, he would start running for president in 1976 on an isolationist platform. And the internationalist insiders might be amazed at how many millions of Americans would come surging to his support. So we offer the idea free to any qualified person who wants it while we turn to a very brief summarization of what we hope the John Birch Society will help and even sometimes lead the American people to accomplish during the next fifteen years. One, our first and most important specific undertaking should be to restore the complete independence of The United States. This includes our resolution to get us out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of The United States. Two, we must once again make our money freely redeemable in gold at some realistic price. And we must take all practicable legislative steps to prevent a recurrence of the enormous thievery and other subversive crimes that have been perpetrated on the American people through a contrived inflation by every president from Franklin Roosevelt through Richard Nixon. Three. Three. We should reduce the number of government bureaus, of government civilian employees, and the whole quantity of government by at least 50%. And we should achieve at least this much reduction in proper fashion through gradually convincing a majority of the American people of the wisdom of such a course. Four, we should withdraw all American troops from every spot on earth that is not American soil except when and where such troops may be required as decided by Congress to protect American lives and property from criminal vandalism. Five, we should get government out of the areas and functions and activities where government does not belong. Again, again, all steps to this end should be taken gradually, but nevertheless just as rapidly as enough of the American people can be persuaded to support such progress. Any such achievement will require a truly massive educational force, but that's exactly what we hope to build during the next fifteen years. We could go ahead for at least a 100 numbered items, but the John Birch Society will undoubtedly be working on more than that many specific projects which will be laid out in its bulletins before another hundred and eighty months will have rolled around. And all of them will fit into all of these projects will fit into the general pattern indicated by the five major objectives listed above. So let's really wind up this marathon monologue with one final thought. None of us can guarantee anything about what the future will bring. Your speaker knows what a job we have before us to rid our country of the scourge of communism within the next few years and then to go ahead on our constructive program so well that fifteen years from now, we shall already be entering an era of far less government, of a much sounder sense of responsibility, and, with God's help, of a better world. But I sincerely believe that it can be done, and this much I know. If every man and woman in this audience should leave here tonight feeling in his or her own mind and heart that it can and must be done, then it surely will be. And so, all of you patriots of good character, good conscience, and noble ideals whom we can reach with the filmed version of this speech in a thousand other audiences, it is with a great deal of confidence and energizing will to win that we invite you to join us in our epic undertaking. To all of you great, wonderful friends in this present audience, I certainly extend my very deep thanks indeed for so much patience and attention. Thank you, and good night.
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 2:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I demand mass arrests of the upper crust sickos involved in child abuse. I’ll accept Epstein’s death for now, but if elites or former presidents are involved I’m not your enemy. There must be one standard of justice in America. This is about child sexual abuse by depraved psychopaths who think they rule the world. They don’t, we do. Trump, Bondi, and Susie Wiles, deal with this issue front and center.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This sh!t has to cease by mass arrests of the upper crust sickos that did this stuff. Ok, I’ll buy that Epstein is dead (for now). But if a former president or presidents of any country or other “elites” are part of child rape and sexual abuse, I’m not someone you want as your enemy. There WILL NOT be two sets of rules in America. I don’t GAS who these people are. It isn’t about Epstein and democrats, it is about child sexual abuse by morally depraved psychopaths who think they rule the world. They don’t, we do! @realDonaldTrump deal with this issue front and center @AGPamBondi this is a disaster. @SusieWiles get a grip on this issue, it is not going away.

@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo

So any arrest soon? https://t.co/3ROgiprZeK

Saved - December 19, 2025 at 8:10 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

@WarlordDilley @realDonaldTrump Then tell me what I’m doing if you see it? You’re probably thinking there is some 5D chess game being played. No. There is massive pushback inside the bureaucracy to stop @realDonaldTrump ‘s agenda. Love your memes by the way.

Saved - December 3, 2025 at 3:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue the CIA, chartered for foreign intel, has become America’s most powerful, least accountable agency. In 2025 its secret budget is $101.1B, with no public line-item disclosure and a history of abuses. No republic survives when a permanent, unelected bureaucracy wields this money and secrecy. We need oversight, strict firewalls against domestic use, and full transparency about abuses. Read my full articles: https://www.generalflynn.com/the-cia

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The CIA—is the juice worth the squeeze any longer? @realDonaldTrump The CIA was chartered solely for foreign intelligence, yet for 78 years it has operated as America’s most powerful, least accountable institution: 1. $101.1 billion secret budget in 2025 alone, more than the entire State Department and USAID combined 2. Zero public line-item disclosure 3. Documented history of abuse of power No republic in history has survived when a permanent, unelected bureaucracy wields this much money and secrecy while answering to no one. We can have world-class intelligence without sacrificing the Constitution. Effective oversight, strict statutory firewalls against domestic operations, and complete transparency about historical abuses are radical only to those who profit from the shadows. If we do not bring the intelligence community under constitutional control now, we will not have a constitutional republic left to defend. It is time to realize the juice is sour and we the people are the ones being squeezed. Read my full articles here: https://www.generalflynn.com/the-cia

The Central Intelligence Agency The CIA: Why it seeks to destroy America and what can be done about it. generalflynn.com
Saved - November 22, 2025 at 10:12 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Pure evil exists here on earth and takes over those who allow it. This is sick but is another indicator of the moral decline of our children, our families, our schools and our communities. This is too close to home for me.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Teen charged after assaulting and whipping a special needs student in a high school locker room in Newport, RI. Football players were seen standing by doing absolutely nothing to help as the boy was assaulted. “Even more disturbing, the video we have seen shows other players not intervening or bringing this matter to the attention of an adult,” said Newport Superintendent Colleen Burns Jermain. The boy was not only lashed on his body but also on his face. The suspect is a 16-year-old male at Rogers High School. He was arrested and charged with two counts of assault on persons with severe impairments. Throw this thug and his parents in prison for a very long time. Video: newportbuzz / IG.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 prompts Dada to apologize, saying: "Okay, Dada. Say it." They repeat apologies—"Sorry. I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry, Dada." They correct themselves: "No. I said sorry. So sorry. So so so." They add: "That's not what I said beside." and end with: "I said say."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, Dada. Say it. Sorry. I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry, Dada. No. I said sorry. So sorry. So so so. That's not what I said beside. I said say
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 2:02 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

. @BarackObama committed TREASON and he was also the leader of the most insidious conspiracy ever perpetrated against the American people. Now it’s ACCOUNTABILITY hour! @realDonaldTrump @AGPamBondi @DNIGabbard @SusieWiles

@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel

OMG! It's finally happening.!!! https://t.co/tUJuv0FRl5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that in 2016 and continuing through 2020, there was an attempt to rig the election that involved Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others. He states that Obama’s orders were issued, papers were signed, and highly classified materials were released, and claims this constitutes very criminal activity at the highest level. He says Obama was the leader of the group, with Biden, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, and others present in a room he references. He asserts that Obama was the “leader of the gang,” and that the actions against him were treasonous and part of an effort to steal and obfuscate the election. He also claims that Hillary Clinton, linked to the same operation, spent $12,000,000 to Christopher Steele to produce a report that was a total fake, describing the Steele dossier as fake news and fraud. He contends the press refused to publish the dossier before the election but published it after the election, and that it had no impact on the outcome. Speaker 0 adds that Tulsi Gabbard submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice and asks who the DOJ should target, stating, based on what he read, that President Obama should be targeted, and naming Biden, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan as part of the same group. He mentions a room with an image of the Declaration of Independence and comments that the room now looks nicer, while noting the papers in the room were “stone cold,” attributing the plan to Obama as the leader. He asserts that Obama’s actions involved “every word you can think of” and describes them as treason, saying they tried to steal and obfuscate the election, and that many people under Obama were implicated, including Susan Rice. Speaker 0 links the alleged misconduct to the 2020 election, saying the 2020 race was rigged and that it morphed into the 2020 race. He claims that because of these events, “millions and millions of people came into our country,” including people who he says should have been prevented from entering, labeling them as murderers and dangerous individuals. He reiterates that Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader, with Hillary Clinton and sleepy Joe Biden, and others such as Comey, Clapper, and the rest of the group. He says they rigged the election and that the 2020 election was rigged, and asserts that he won that election in a landslide, asserting that in every swing state he won the popular vote as well. He ends by noting the damage caused by these events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They caught president Obama absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard. What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going up all the way going up to 2020 in the election, they tried to rig the election, and they got caught. And there should be very severe consequences for that. You know, when we caught Hillary Clinton, I said, you know what? Let's not, let's not go too far here. It's the ex wife of a president, and I thought it was sort of terrible. And I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did. But it's time to start, after what they did to me. And, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly. So people say, you know, a group. It's not a group. It's Obama. His orders are on the paper. The papers are signed. The papers came right out of their office. They sent everything to be highly classified. Well, the highly classified has been released. And what they did in 2016 and in 2020, is, very criminal. It's criminal at the highest level. So that's really the things you should be talking about. I know nothing about the other, but I think it's appropriate that they do go. Speaker 1: May I ask you about that, mister president? Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? Speaker 0: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be president Obama. He started it. And Biden was there with him, And Comey was there. And Clapper, the whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there in a room. Right here. This was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up that came out of the vaults. They were there for a hundred years. This is much more beautiful. We have the declaration of independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what? If you look at that those papers, they have them stone cold, and it was president Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place. It was them too. But the leader of the gang was president Obama, Barack Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they look. He's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty. They this was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like it. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So president Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12,000,000 to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction, and they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12,000,000 and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time, the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, we don't believe it. And it was only after substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big whisk. It was just like a bang of nothing because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper. A crooked corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said this is bullshit. We can't put this in. And neither could any other Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper. Very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money because they do things very badly. It's a really it's got a nice name, but it's really in my opinion, it's a terrible paper and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed. At two and a half months, it was finished. Two and a half months. That was supposed to be what was going to happen. And it got published a couple of months after the election, and frankly, nobody cared too much about it. But that was a big thing. No. No. We caught Hillary Clinton. We caught Barack Hussein Obama. They're the ones that then you have many many people under them. Susan Rice, they're all there. The names are all there. And I guess they figured they're gonna put this in classified information and nobody will ever see it again, but it doesn't work that way. And it's the most unbelievable thing I think I've ever read. So you ought to take a look at that and stop talking about nonsense because this is big stuff. Never has a thing like this happened in the history of our country. And by the way, it morphed into the twenty twenty race. And the twenty twenty race was rigged, and it was it was a rigged election. And because it was rigged, we have millions of people in our country. We have we had inflation. We solved the inflation problem. But millions and millions of people came into our country because of that. And people that should have been people from gangs and from jails and from mental institutions, people that we don't want in our country, people that we're getting out, dangerous people. 11,888 murderers. Many of them, 50%, more than 50% murdered more than one person. I hate to say this with such a distinguished guest, but, you know, they asked me a question. I gotta answer the question. No. Barack Hussein Obama, is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him and so was sleepy Joe Biden and so were the rest of them. Comey, Clapper, the whole group. And they tried to rig an election and they got caught. And then they did rig the election in 2020. And then because I knew I won that election by a lot, I did it a third time, and I won in a landslide. Every swing state won the popular vote. But I won that all the same way in 2020. And look at the damage that was caused.
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 6:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I fear Pence’s failings mirror a corrupt nation—communism creeping into government, compromised politicians wasting taxpayers, and a bloated bureaucracy that needs radical reform. I pray daily that Trump can fix these severe problems.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Sadly, it appears a former VP of the USA @Mike_Pence was as bad as they say he was. It’s heartbreaking how corrupt our nation has become. It’s a combination of communism creeping into our government, seriously compromised politicians wasting taxpayers hard earned money, and a bloated bureaucracy that needs radical reform and reduction. Say a prayer that @realDonaldTrump is the leader that can fix these severe problems. I do everyday.

@ZZZJazzy - Jazz'dUp

It appears that Loretta Lynch and Saly Yates broke all protocols and ran a backchannel with Strzok to VP Mike Pence's office. Remember Strzok's Russia analyst was married to Josh Pitcock, Pence's Chief of Staff? https://t.co/91xRnXSDKF

Saved - October 16, 2025 at 10:13 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I guess none of these WEF “elites” like to be asked tough questions by courageous independent journalists. Go get’m @ganaha_masako @elonmusk

@ganaha_masako - 我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha

I encountered Klaus Schwab! And here is what happened. He is afraid of our resistance! @ WEF Davos2023 https://t.co/QMVixy2wyE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jeremy Schwab, an independent journalist from Japan, attempts to engage with a respondent for a comment. He reiterates his identity by saying he is from Japan and that he is an independent journalist. The respondent signals that they are currently moving on to the next thing and are running late, indicating they cannot stop for comments at that moment. Despite the time pressure, Schwab thanks the person for their time and expresses appreciation. The interviewer asks which media outlet Schwab is with, and Schwab answers that he is an independent journalist from Japan. The interviewer again thanks him and acknowledges the situation with polite farewells. Schwab expresses a desire to ask just one more question, even as he prepares to move on, and thanks the interviewer once more while indicating that he will simply walk up and ask. The conversation reveals that the interviewer is in a rush, with multiple engagements or commitments that night. Schwab recognizes the constraint, noting that there are “so many things tonight” and that the moments are precious, implying the difficulty of obtaining interviews in a busy schedule. The interviewer reflects on the reality that if they stopped for every inquiry they would be overwhelmed by the volume of interactions, describing it as an unfortunate situation. Both parties exchange thanks, and Schwab again attempts to pose one more question despite the time pressure. The interviewer acknowledges the challenge of accommodating many people asking for comments and thanks Schwab for trying. The exchange ends with Schwab asking, “Do you know the voice that worry about globalism?” followed by a courteous closing of “Thank you” and “Nice evening.” In summary, the exchange centers on a brief, time-constrained attempt by a Japan-based independent journalist to obtain a comment from an interview subject, set against the practical realities of a busy schedule and the difficulty of stopping for multiple inquiries. The dialogue includes a final, somewhat unclear question about “the voice that worry about globalism.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeremy Schwab. Jeremy Schwab. I'm from Japan. May I ask you for I'm from Japan. Yeah. And may I ask you for a comment? No. We're on our we're on our way to the next thing. We're a bit late. Oh, I thank you. Thank And then ask questions. Think we're gonna we're gonna rush. But thank you. Thanks very much. Oh, but Speaker 1: Which which media are you with? Speaker 0: I am an independent journalist from Japan. Speaker 1: No. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: I have to ask. Thank you. Thanks, Thank you. But I I I wanted to ask just just one more. One question. Thank you. Thank you. Take care of yourself. I can just walk and ask you. Yeah. We're not Just thank you. Sorry. We're in a big rush. We've got so many things tonight. But for us, it's it's very I know. Precious moments. I know. I know. You can I can he's got so many people stopping that if you were to stop for everything Yeah? We win. That's the unfortunate. So I'm very sorry, but thank But Thank you for trying. Do do you know the voice that worry about globalism? Thank you. Yeah. I'm meeting Nice evening. Thank you. Thank you.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 8:24 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This is WARFARE! it’s not just bombs and bullets, its information, technology, and other unseeable forces. It’s 5th Generation Warfare! @boonecutler @charliekirk11 LOCAL ACTION NATIONAL IMPACT It’s time to stand up, step up, and speak up. LET’S GO!!! https://t.co/SmnH4SiLGG

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes an unseen conflict: 'We are in a war most people don't even see.' He insists: 'But it's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe.' He adds: 'Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold.' He labels it: 'This is fifth generation warfare.' He warns: 'And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield.' He concludes with a choice: 'The choice is yours.' 'Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.' The overall message emphasizes personal responsibility in facing a clandestine strategic contest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are in a war most people don't even see. But it's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe. Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold. This is fifth generation warfare. And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield. The choice is yours. Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 5:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, prioritizes global governance over national sovereignty, which I see as a threat to individual freedoms. His recent speech suggests that he views national independence as a problem, advocating for a transfer of power to unelected elites. I warn that the upcoming Summit of the Future is not about cooperation but surrendering our nations' independence. If free nations like America do not resist, we risk losing our sovereignty and liberty permanently. I propose the U.S. should leave the UN and repurpose its facilities for veterans.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

United Nations Secretary General is a Globalist and doesn’t represent anyone but himself and his globalist elite buddies who seek absolute control over humanity. In his recent speech, SECGEN Antonio Guterres has made it plain. He believes national sovereignty is the problem, and his solution is global governance under the control of unelected elites. He calls it reform, but it is nothing more than a transfer of power away from sovereign citizens and into the hands of unaccountable bureaucrats. The Summit of the Future is not cooperation, it is SURRENDER. Behind the slogans of solidarity and equality is a plan to strip nations of their independence, dismantle borders, and impose control from above. We have seen this before. Don’t look any further than the failures of the European Union. Nations that once stood proud are now bound to Brussels, forced to accept policies on migration, trade, and security that their own citizens rejected. Sovereignty erodes, culture fractures, and freedom diminishes. That is the model Guterres wants to export worldwide. THIS IS MY WARNING. If America and other FREE NATIONS do not RESIST, the UN will succeed in building a system where sovereignty is erased and liberty is sacrificed. Once liberty is given up, power never returns to the people. The United States should leave the UN, tell the UN to find new real estate in Brussels and turn that den of thieves into a giant facility for homeless veterans. @realDonaldTrump @SecRubio @michaelgwaltz

@newstart_2024 - Camus

The UN Chief has spoken, and his message could not be clearer. Antonio Guterres has declared that the era of national sovereignty is an obstacle to his vision of "global governance." In his speech, Guterres expresses his outrage that nations dare to pursue their own interests—the very definition of a sovereign state's duty to its people. He frames this as a collapse of "global norms," a crisis of trust that only a centralized, reformed global system can fix. The institutions built by our grandparents, he claims, are obsolete. But what is he really saying? He is saying that the independent, self-interested nation-state is a problem to be managed. He is advocating for a fundamental transfer of power away from nation-states to unelected, unaccountable global bodies. The so-called "Summit of the Future" is not about cooperation; it's a roadmap for supranational control, dressed up in the language of "equality" and "solidarity." Guterres’s vision is the ultimate globalist dream: a world where your country’s laws and borders are subordinate to a "updated" framework dictated by the UN. This isn't about building a safer world; it's about dismantling the last vestiges of national self-determination in the name of a "shared future" that nobody voted for. The mask is off. The push for a global government is now explicit.

Saved - September 12, 2025 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If it turns out that a foreign power was involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination, there will be serious consequences. The FBI has indicated this possibility, suggesting that there may be other hit teams targeting individuals in the U.S. The White House needs to update the public immediately on what they know. Local law enforcement should already have a BOLO with detailed information. We must recognize that there is a war happening in America, putting everything we value at risk.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

If it is determined that a foreign power assassinated Charlie Kirk (or was behind his assassination), there should be hell to pay. It is now being reported by the FBI that this is a possibility. If this is true, there will most certainly be other hit teams in CONUS who are focused on other targets. The WH needs to inform the American people ASAP what they know. Local Law Enforcement across the country better have already received a BOLO (Be On The Lookout) with as many specific details as possible. Don’t kid yourself, there is a war on in America and everything and everyone we hold dear is at risk.@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@SusieWiles@DNIGabbard @PeteHegseth

Saved - September 9, 2025 at 11:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe what's happening! This officer deserves a presidential medal of freedom, not prison for what I see as fake charges from a corrupt DOJ and FBI. This isn't justice; it's a blatant abuse of power. We need to dismiss this case and free him now!

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

. @AGPamBondi WTH!!!??? This officer should be given a presidential medal of freedom instead of heading off to prison on trumped up fake charges by the very corrupt DOJ and FBI. This is not a fair RULE OF LAW outcome, this is an egregious abuse of power and an improper abuse of authority. Dismiss this case and free this man NOW!!! @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @realDonaldTrump

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

FORMER DC POLICE INTEL CHIEF: PROUD BOYS WERE COOPERATIVE “My objective was the safety for anybody that breathed oxygen.” Former MPD Intel head says Enrique Tarrio provided direct info to help prevent violence—and never lied. @CowboyLogic_RAV https://t.co/gyqruYaI1U

Video Transcript AI Summary
And some of my my duties included looking for any type of threats for First Amendment demonstrations or assemblies that were occurring in Washington, D. C, and also monitoring those First Amendment demonstrations for any type of criminal or terrorist activity conducted under the guise of the lawful First Amendment demonstrations. Enrique Tarrio was slated to speak at it, and some of the Proud Boys were going be there as kind of unofficial security for the event. One of my duties, as I mentioned, was to investigate any type of threats. We spoke with the organizer of that event, and she indicated to me that the Proud Boys and Enrique Tarrio had received social media threats. Groups were talking about throwing myriatic acid filled balloons at them. I was put in touch with Enrique Tarrio, and he provided me the social media posts that, where the threats were made.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want you to go back into, 2020 at some point, maybe 2019, and, let's find out why you're here with us right now. Speaker 1: Oh, sounds great. Well, as Donna mentioned, twenty three year veteran with the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department. Beginning in September 2017, I took over the intelligence branch for the the police department. And some of my my duties included looking for any type of threats for First Amendment demonstrations or assemblies that were occurring in Washington, D. C, and also monitoring those First Amendment demonstrations for any type of criminal or terrorist activity conducted under the guise of the lawful First Amendment demonstrations. Beginning in July 2019, there was a big First Amendment demonstration plant for Washington, D. C. Called Demand Free Speech. It was a conservative event. Enrique Tarrio was slated to speak at it, and some of the Proud Boys were going be there as kind of unofficial security for the event. One of my duties, as I mentioned, was to investigate any type of threats. We spoke with the organizer of that event, and she indicated to me that the Proud Boys and Enrique Tarrio had received social media threats. Groups were talking about throwing myriatic acid filled balloons at them. I was put in touch with Enrique Tarrio, and he provided me the social media posts that, where the threats were made. We drilled down on it, and that was my first encounter with Enrique. And given the fact that whenever the Proud Boys came into the city, they were a very controversial group, They oftentimes clashed with BLM and Antifa groups. So he and I developed a working relationship where he would contact me whenever he came to Washington, D. C. And would provide me with information such as what hotels they were planning on staying at, where they were planning on demonstrating, if they were planning on any marches, their march routes. So I could inform our Special Operations Division, which is the unit that supplies all the uniformed officers who provide security for these events and kind of traffic control and that nature. So we could ensure safety for everybody, the citizens of DC, for law enforcement, for the demonstrators, and any counter groups that that may be there. So a lot of people know Speaker 2: Well, let me just tell remind everybody. Enrique Theriault is the Proud Boy leader that got twenty two years, and he wasn't even in DC on January 6. That's how insane this whole thing is, but continue. I'm sorry Speaker 0: to interrupt you. Before you continue, I wanna I wanna draw attention to something, and that is your role was to ensure the safety of everyone, whether it was other law enforcement, it was Proud Boys, it was BLM, it was, Antifa, it was the general population. Your role was to do what seek intel and then send that. As you guys learned from, when we had Tarek Johnson on here, there are two very separate categories in law enforcement, intel, operations. And, Shane would then provide that information that he gathered to operations so they knew how to prepare. But your entire objective was the safety for anybody that breathed oxygen. Speaker 1: That's absolutely correct. And not only was I providing that information to our operations, but I was providing it to all the federal agencies who are assisting us, FBI, Capitol Police, Secret Service. I mean, you name it, all those three letter agencies I was providing that information to. And mine, I mean, was absolutely critical because I was getting it directly from the source, from the leader of the Proud Boys. We found out as these events progressed and the violence and the unrest increased, as these events occurred, we started seeing a lot of social engineering on social media or false flags where counter groups would send out false information. So I was contacting the head of the Proud Boys, it doesn't get any better than that, find the actual truth, what they were planning on doing. And at no time did he ever lie to me. I never found him to be like untruthful or hiding information. He was always honest and forthright with the information that he was providing me and that I was providing to my chain of command.
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 7:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am currently in a state facility in Colorado, holding vital information as a potential federal witness in the investigation into the stolen 2020 election. To secure my testimony, federal authorities must act swiftly to transfer me into their custody. Furthermore, there should be a comprehensive investigation into the judge who sentenced me to ensure that my imprisonment was just and not influenced by bias. Transparency and accountability are crucial for achieving justice.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@realtinapeters (Tina Peters) is currently being held in a state facility in Colorado, but she possesses critical information as a potential federal witness in the current investigation ongoing into the stolen 2020 election. Federal authorities, including @AGPamBondi , in order to secure her critical testimony, must immediately move to have Tina released into federal custody. Additionally, a thorough investigation should be conducted into the judge who sentenced her to determine whether her imprisonment was proper or influenced by bias. Transparency and accountability are essential for justice to be served. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance

Saved - August 20, 2025 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that any company with security clearances involving individuals who may have abused their privileges should be investigated. If they leaked classified information, they must face prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

All companies that hold security clearances that have had any of these people serve in any capacity must be investigated and if discovered that they abused their privileges, their clearances or the privilege to hold clearances should be removed as well. AND, if any of these people LEAKED classified information, they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!!! @DNIGabbard @AGPamBondi

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic. This is why, at @POTUS' direction, @ODNIgov directed the revocation of the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence professionals who have abused the public trust by politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards. Our Intelligence Community must be committed to upholding the values and principles enshrined in the US Constitution and maintain a laser-like focus on our mission of ensuring the safety, security and freedom of the American people.

Saved - August 18, 2025 at 11:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge everyone to stop appearing on mainstream media outlets. They harbor disdain for Donald Trump and America, pushing a globalist agenda aimed at establishing a One World Order. Instead, let's dominate the Sunday media debates, which are unproductive arguments between serious figures and political hacks. We need to focus on more meaningful discussions and avoid these platforms that don't serve our interests.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Please stop going on these main stream media outlets. They hate @realDonaldTrump , they hate America, and they are driven by their globalist views of world politics. They want (and strongly) a One World Order! @bennyjohnson @charliekirk11 @Bannons_WarRoom @RogerJStoneJr @joerogan @TCNetwork @NEWSMAX @OANN @laralogan @RealAmVoice C’mon folks above (and many others) let’s take over these Sunday circus media debates. They’re not informative. They’re arguments between serious people like @SecRubio and political hacks!

@TVNewsNow - TV News Now

🚨 RUBIO BLASTS CBS HOST MARGARET BRENNAN: "This is such a stupid media narrative that [European leaders] are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks... WE invited them to come." https://t.co/Qx7YBuw258

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "You know there is concern from the Europeans that president Zelensky is going to be bullied into signing something away." "That’s why you have these European leaders coming as backup tomorrow." Speaker 1: "It isn't. ... They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied." He adds: "We've had one meeting with Putin and, like, a dozen meetings with Zelensky." "We've been working with these people for weeks." "They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow." He notes "there was enough progress" to "move to the next phase" and "enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans." On sanctions, he says: "If peace is not gonna be possible here... the president has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions. But if he did this now, ... that's the end of the talks." "We wanna wind up with a peace deal that ends this war" and "It will require both sides to make concessions."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know there is concern from the Europeans that president Zelensky is going to be bullied into signing something away. That's why you have these European leaders coming as backup tomorrow. Can you No. Speaker 1: It isn't. That's not why they're coming us back. That's not true. But that's not why why would that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're not coming back. Speaker 0: February. Oh, the law Speaker 1: is being seen Speaker 0: in front of television cameras where president Zelenskyy Speaker 1: Do you know how many meetings we've Speaker 0: had since then? Oh, no. I I know. And I was just up in the last week watching the one with Vladimir Putin where red carpet rolls Speaker 1: rolls out. It was Zelensky. We've more meetings. We've had we've had we've had one meeting with Putin and, like, a dozen meetings with Zelensky. So that that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans. We talked to them last week. There were meetings in The UK over the fall the previous weekend. Speaker 0: And they said president Trump was gonna demand a cease fire. Speaker 1: As early as Thursday. But you said that they're coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're not coming here tomorrow. Oh, this is such a stupid media narrative that they're coming here tomorrow because the Trump is gonna bully Zelenskyy into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks for weeks on this stuff. They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come. We invited them to come. The president invited them to come. Speaker 0: But the president told those European leaders last week that he wanted to cease fire. The president went on television, said he would walk out of the meeting if Vladimir Putin didn't agree with one. He said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes. He spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin, and he did not get one. So there's some obvious Speaker 1: something things happened during that meeting. Well, because, obviously, things look. Our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh, how dramatic he walked out. Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war. Okay? And, obviously, we felt and I agreed that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase. If not, we wouldn't be having Zelensky flying all the way over here. We wouldn't be having all the Europeans coming all the way over here. Now understand and take with a grain of salt. I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans, enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this. You talk about the sanctions. Look. At the end of the day, if peace is not gonna be possible here and this is just gonna continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands. The president has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions. But if he did this now, the moment the president puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks. You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death and destruction. We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't wanna wind up there. We wanna wind up with a peace deal that ends this war so Ukraine can go on with the rest of their lives and rebuild their country and be assured that this is never gonna happen again. That's the goal here. We're gonna do everything possible to make that happen if it's doable. It will require both sides to make concessions. It will require both sides to get things they're asking for. That's how these deals are made, whether we like it or not.
Saved - August 18, 2025 at 10:59 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@Comey going for an insanity plea with this post 😳 @FBIDirectorKash what not to do after leaving your current assignment.

@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸

Seriously WTF https://t.co/4ZyZrfNLhy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker shifts from politics to praising Taylor Swift as an inspirational figure. He watched her podcast interview with the Kelsey brothers and notes his long connection to her—'I went to my first concert of hers fifteen years ago'—and that she has provided a soundtrack for his family through adversity and celebration. He says she models a 'certain way of being' at every career stage and is 'still doing that as a grown up.' He contrasts this with 'there's a stunning coarseness and ugliness in the Republican Party today.' and recalls Swift urging Americans not to elect Trump last year; meanwhile, 'elderly makeup covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot.' He cites 'Think of your energy as if it's expensive, as if it's like a luxury item. Not everyone can afford it.' Noting Arthur Brooks’ happiness ideas, he ends, 'Thank you, Taylor Swift. Keep the faith.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Welcome back to my Substack. Last week's cold turns out to have been COVID, quite a flashback, and Donald Trump is still president and still humiliating America on a national stage standing next to Vladimir Putin. It's like a dream, a bad dream you can't wake up from. But I don't wanna talk about that bad dream this week. I wanna talk about a truly inspirational public figure named Taylor Swift. Of course, I watched her podcast interview with the Kelsey brothers. Of course, I watched the whole thing. Although on YouTube, Patrice and I got kicked off for the last fifteen minutes and finished it on her phone, but I watched it. You see, Taylor Swift and I go way back. I went to my first concert of hers fifteen years ago. I've been to a second, and I have helped financially support the attendance of a lot of family members at others. I'm in a family's Swifty group chat. I know all her music, and I listened to it in my headphones when I cut the grass. So, yes, I have a favorite of hers. Although, honestly, for me, it's a tie between All Too Well, ten minute version, and Exile featuring Bon Iver. Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we've grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration. She had songs for all of it. I suspect that's something that millions of Americans have also experienced in their families. I think that's because Taylor Swift produces great art, but also because she models something. At every stage of her career, she's shown a certain way of being that resonated with my kids and also felt right to me as a parent, and she's still doing that as a grown up. Like a lot of you, I struggle with how to stand up to bullies without letting their meanness infect me and change me. You may have seen that the governor of California has been generating a lot of attention lately by posting on social media in a satirical way where he mocks Donald Trump and is all caps megalomania and his absurdity, and I find it very funny, hilarious even sometimes. But I gotta be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times because I don't want us to become like Trump and his followers. There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks. And don't get me wrong. We have our jerks, millions of them. You may have noticed. In particular, there's a stunning coarseness and ugliness in the Republican Party today. It's upsetting, but it's also a minority of America. On the whole, we aren't like that, and we don't like that. I think that's a big part of the reason so few Americans support Donald Trump when they have to see him and that up close, and why Republicans are so worried about what's coming for them next year. And to be clear, I am not an advocate for weakness. Of course, we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters, but I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift. She's made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is. And last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him. Of course, we're now living with the consequences of that mistake. But while our elderly makeup covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can't stand her, what's she doing? Living her best life, producing great music and, as she urged all of us to do during the podcast, not giving the jerks power over her mind. She said something about dealing with Internet trolls that stuck with me. Think of your energy as if it's expensive, she said, as if it's like a luxury item. Not everyone can afford it. I really enjoy reading Arthur Brooks who writes columns about happiness in the Atlantic. I don't know if he's a Swifty, but last week, he wrote about research on the way that being rude or snarky actually hurts the rude person. As he wrote, when you become less polite, the alteration in your conduct can make you less happy, more depressed, and angrier about life. I know you get that even without the research. Just watch Fox News or hang around an x, and you'll see what he means. We can't stop people from being jerks. What we can do is stop it from hurting us, from changing us. At my second Taylor Swift concert in Hartford, Connecticut 14 ago this summer, she sang a song about this topic, asking why you gotta be so mean. And she spoke directly to the nasty people. I bet you got pushed around. Somebody made you cold, but the cycle ends right now because you can't lead me down that road. You'll be glad I didn't sing that. That's right. Because down that road is unhappiness. Nobody should have that power over us. Thank you, Taylor Swift. Keep the faith.
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 4:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a speech from 1958, the year I was born, reflecting on my service to our country in the fight against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Now, 66 years later, I feel we are on the verge of losing everything. It's crucial that people are held accountable for how we arrived at this point. I believe we need term limits for Congress, as many current leaders have been in government for nearly six decades.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The below speech was given in 1958, the year I was born. I served our country more than half that time to help America stand against ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. Yet here we are…66 years later. And we are on the brink of losing everything. PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR GETTING US TO THIS POINT. I would add, we need term limits on Congress. Many of these current “leaders” have been in the USG damn near most of the past 6 decades. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @DNIGabbard

@RealLTCRicBosi - Riccardo Bosi

Robert Welsh 1958 https://t.co/wKN83VSqdO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The plan involves inducing a gradual surrender of American sovereignty to international organizations, with the United Nations as a primary example. Aims for the United States include: expanded government spending, higher taxes, an unbalanced budget, currency inflation, and government controls on prices, wages, and materials. Increased socialistic controls over the economy and daily life would be accompanied by a larger bureaucracy and increased government reach. More centralization of power in Washington aims to eliminate the significance of state lines. Further goals involve federal aid to and control over education, leading to federalization. Constant emphasis on the horrors of war promotes the necessity of peace, but on communist terms. This would lead to American people allowing appeasement by the government, resulting in a piecemeal surrender of the free world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty piece by piece and step by step to various international organizations of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example. Now here are the aims for The United States. One, greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means of getting rid of ever larger sums of American money as wastefully as possible. Two, higher and then much higher taxes. Three. An increasingly unbalanced budget, despite the higher taxes four. Wild inflation of our currency five. Government controls of prices, wages, and materials supposedly to combat inflation. Six, greatly increased socialistic controls over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives. This is to be accompanied, naturally and automatically, by a correspondingly huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy and in both the cost and reach of our domestic Government. Far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of our State lines. There is a many faceted drive at work to have our State lines eventually mean no more within the Nation than our County lines do now within The States. Eight, the steady advance of Federal aid to and control over our educational system, leading to complete federalization of our public education. Nine, a constant hammering into the American consciousness of the horror of modern warfare. The beauties and the absolute necessity of peace. Peace always on communist terms, of course. And 10, the consequent willingness of the American people to allow the steps of appeasement by our government which amount to a piecemeal surrender of the rest of the free world
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 2:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The United States faces an unprecedented threat that is immediate and significant. JFK once spoke of the struggle between freedom and authoritarianism, a battle that has shifted from foreign conflicts to internal challenges. Today, the main strain on our republic comes from within. I agree with Laura Loomer’s observations on this matter, echoing JFK's warnings. It’s crucial to remain steady and strong against these existing dangers.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The United States now confronts a threat of unprecedented character, scope, and immediacy. In an earlier era, JFK described a long twilight struggle between freedom and authoritarianism, between democratic self-government and centralized control. That contest, once defined by geopolitical confrontation abroad, has entered a new and more insidious phase. Today (as JFK and other great American leaders warned), the principal strain on the American republic arises not from foreign shores, but from within our very own borders. @LauraLoomer is right to call this out…but keep in mind, so did JFK. Stay steady & strong in the face of these already present dangers and threats. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @DNIGabbard

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

There is a CIA Coup of the Trump admin taking place right now. There is oddly a John Brennan pipeline to the Trump admin that is influencing hiring. Something is terribly wrong.

Saved - August 2, 2025 at 3:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m appalled to learn that Brian Netter, the DOJ official who approved a $2 million payout to Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, is now working for Marc Elias, the lawyer behind the Steele dossier. Strzok and Page, who were involved in a politically motivated effort against a sitting president, received this settlement despite their actions being seen as treasonous. Instead of facing consequences, they were rewarded, funded by taxpayers. It’s time for the Department of Justice to hold these individuals accountable for their corruption.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

ATTENTION! Subject: Just when you think it can’t get any more corrupt! The Department of Justice official (Brian Netter) who approved a $2 Million payout to disgraced Russia COUP plotters Peter “we have an insurance policy in case he wins” Strzok and Lisa “tell me [again] he won’t win” Page is now working for Marc Elias, the very Clinton/DNC lawyer who orchestrated the Steele dossier and lied about funding it. Let that sink in. Netter, a known left-wing activist embedded inside the DOJ green lit a multimillion-dollar settlement for two bureaucrats who actively sabotaged a sitting president using fake intelligence and politically motivated deception. Strzok and Page weren’t just biased. They were central players in a coordinated effort to weaponize America’s most powerful intelligence agencies against their political enemies. Let’s not forget, they were having an affair and got caught red-handed (or is it w/ their pants down?), you get the point. They manipulated the intelligence community to launch a Coup d’état against the will of the American people. That is treason, and instead of prosecution, they were given a golden parachute, paid for by YOU, the American taxpayer! Brian Netter, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page were political operatives in disguise; they abused power, avoided consequences, and laughed all the way to the bank. The Department of Justice must hold these people ACCOUNTABLE and expose them for what they are: CORRUPT THUGS. @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/01/exclusive-doj-official-who-approved-2-million-payout-to-disgraced-russia-hoaxers-identified-as-left-wing-activist-brian-netter/

Official Who Approved Payout To Russia Hoaxers Is Leftist Activist The DOJ official who signed off on payments to Russia collusion hoaxers helped lead the “legal resistance” to President Donald Trump. thefederalist.com
Saved - July 31, 2025 at 10:30 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Hey @AmbassadorRice ; Susie, here’s part of my life that you were directly involved in trying to destroy. Give us all a break and crawl back into the deep dark hole you crawled out of. @AGPamBondi @EagleEdMartin https://t.co/sImNIbOSd8

@AmbassadorRice - Susan Rice

Be Brave. Tell your story of how Trump’s policies have hurt you, your family, your business or your community. It’s essential that we hold leaders accountable for their actions. Follow @OfTheBraveUSA and make your voice heard.

@OfTheBraveUSA - Home of the Brave

Tired of cowardice? While elites suck up to Trump, we're taking a stand and highlighting the adverse consequences Donald Trump is inflicting upon Americans across the country. Follow us @OfTheBraveUSA!

Saved - July 29, 2025 at 12:42 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

A worthy thread to read by @EmeraldRobinson I’m aware of a scathing report about the 2020 election is due out any day now. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @AGPamBondi @SusieWiles @FBIDirectorKash

@EmeraldRobinson - Emerald Robinson ✝️

16. Ratcliffe did not release his report until Jan 7th, 2021. Note the date of release. His report stated: CIA management suppressed intel that China interfered in the 2020 election. That's right: the CIA was hiding China's role in the 2020 election! Treason.

Saved - July 28, 2025 at 3:53 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

They all need to go to PRISON! @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @PeteHegseth Halper worked for the DOD at the time. He should be brought back in for a military tribunal. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance

@RealSLokhova - Svetlana Lokhova

Aug 3 2016: Obama, Brennan, Comey agree to investigate the Trump campaign Aug 10: Steele puts Gen Flynn into Dossier Aug 11: Halper gives the FBI the false story that he witnessed me seducing Flynn (RAZOR) and that I am a Russian spy Aug 15: Halper 302 write up Aug 16: the FBI open on Flynn

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Halper is a spy that worked directly for @JohnBrennan and was used to plant lies to be picked up for the “dossier.” This SOB they call the WALRUS must go to PRISON. https://t.co/IIHFkFQ6M6

Saved - July 22, 2025 at 11:47 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@AGPamBondi There should be an IMMEDIATE FBI raid on Obama's DC mansion! Demands passports stripped from ALL Russia-Gate co-conspirators, citing flight risk. ACCOUNTABILITY is required, and justice must be served! @realDonaldTrump @JDVance https://t.co/KKVnIuqoAB

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 12:59 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@DNIGabbard This is one of the files I’d like to see declassified. This is the one @Mike_Pence was using to go after @realDonaldTrump early on in his administration. There are many whistleblowers coming forward Andy — maybe you’re one of them…? Don’t stick up for @BarackObama any longer.

@RealSLokhova - Svetlana Lokhova

Pence had Gen Flynn fired. Then they could say Pres Trump appointed a Russian asset as a National Security Advisor, and that Trump should not hold office. McCabe boasts in his book that he went to Pence with a file on Flynn—ie Halper and Steele lies—and 3 days later Flynn was gone. The intel community knew Pence wanted to be President so they were tying to “Nixon” Pres Trump by getting him to resign. And to get Trump they had to get Flynn.

Saved - June 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about the recent attack on Russian nuclear-capable bombers, reportedly ordered by Zelenskyy without informing President Trump. This raises serious questions about our alliance and coordination. The involvement of Senators Graham and Blumenthal could imply U.S. sanctioning, which worries me given their track records. The attack's execution, using deception with drones, highlights vulnerabilities in our own defenses. While Ukraine may see a short-term victory, the long-term consequences could be dire. We need to seek peace solutions quickly, as time is running out.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

ATTENTION! So, it appears Zelenskyy gave the go ahead to attack parked Russian nuclear capable bombers without informing @realDonaldTrump (if true that our President was not consulted nor informed, this isn’t simply a breach of protocol. It’s a geopolitical insult and a warning sign. If Ukraine is willing to conduct strikes with strategic consequences without notifying the White House, we are no longer allies with coordination issues—we are co-belligerents flying blind). Also given Senator “warmonger” Lindsey Graham’s and Senator “Da Nang Dick” Blumenthal’s recent visit, this attack could appear as though it was sanctioned. I pray the Russians have better intelligence than that. IMHO, these two don’t have the sense or common sense to pull something like this off (there will have to be denials though). FYI, Those bombers that were hit HAVE to be out in full view due to nuclear treaty obligations. Zelenskyy took advantage of that. For instance, they appear to have hidden the drones in containers and were driven on trucks near the airbase. Smart use of deception (see photos below). However, imagine any one of our big bomber bases having the exact same thing done to them. Very costly U.S. Strategic Bombers can be taken out in the same way by anyone with access to inexpensive drones, delivery trucks, explosives, and a bit of technical knowledge (not good and new tactics will now have to be developed). People, and especially world leaders, need to realize the global implications to such an operation as Ukraine just pulled off. Russia will respond. Action, reaction, counteraction. Those are the shifting tides of warfare. This wasn’t a bold action, it was brash. Ukraine’s short-term win could be the world’s long-term loss. Despite what is a complete mess right now in Europe, there are still solutions to achieving peace. They are narrowing however and time, as it often does, becomes an enemy instead of a useful friend. @PeteHegseth @DNIGabbard @JDVance @marcorubio

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared a post about a question @DC_Draino posed to @PressSec regarding habeas corpus and the judicial overreach that undermines @POTUS's constitutional duties. I believe this situation will escalate, reflecting the left's weak arguments built on deception. I wish the GOP would be more vocal. @realDonaldTrump, as the elected president, has the constitutional authority to protect our nation and its citizens. If the Chief Justice of the @USSupremeCourt doesn't intervene, we risk a constitutional crisis. It's time for action, especially concerning the Epstein intel.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Read further down my posts where I repost something that @DC_Draino asked the WH press Secretary @PressSec the other day about (has to do with the writ of habeus corpus)…the undermining and insidious judicial tyranny by judges who lack the constitutional authority to restrict @POTUS duties and responsibilities to “preserve” the constitution of the United States of America is GOING to eventually come to a head. Sorry, that’s the way I see it from my vantage point. Maybe this is what the left wants since their piss-poor arguments about anything have no merit and are built on a foundation of lies and deception. I do wish the GOP would offer a much stronger voice, but they do not. @realDonaldTrump is the duly elected president and has the full authority by the constitution to preserve, protect and defend our land AND to also provide for the safety and security of every legal American citizen. Given this level of judicial tyranny, if the Chief Justice of the @USSupremeCourt doesn’t step in and take a historical and necessary stand, America will face a constitutional crisis. Enough is enough! @JackPosobiec @charliekirk11 @AGPamBondi @DataRepublican @DNIGabbard The Intel is there, it needs to be released. Epstein.

@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans

🚨BREAKING: U.S. Federal District Judge Jennifer Thurston just sent out an order BANNING Border Patrol from arresting illegals "without warrant" - Fox WTF? This is seriously a judicial insurrection. https://t.co/S1SqwmYNRv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Following operation "Return to Sender" in January, where Border Patrol agents arrested people determined to have entered the country illegally, California District Judge Jennifer Thurston ruled that CBP agents cannot arrest suspected illegal migrants without a warrant. The judge also stipulated agents must have reason to believe the person is a flight risk before obtaining a warrant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Another judicial pushback against president Trump's immigration crackdown. This comes after dozens were arrested in January during border patrol's operation return to sender, where agents rounded up people determined to have entered the, who were determined to determined to have entered the, country illegally. Yesterday, California District Judge Jennifer Thurston demanded CBP agents cannot arrest suspected illegal migrants without a warrant or reason to believe the person is a flight risk before they can get one.
Saved - April 19, 2025 at 7:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation highlights concerns about the misuse of power by intelligence agencies, particularly regarding the FBI's shift towards domestic surveillance under the Biden administration. One participant references an interview discussing the targeting of individuals who diverge from progressive views, suggesting a pattern of intimidation. Another contributor critiques the FBI's focus on disruption over due process, citing examples like targeting traditional Catholics and January 6 protesters. They argue for dismantling these practices to restore the FBI's original mission of protecting Americans.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Unchecked power in the hands of dangerous and nefarious people can and will hurt anyone—I know it better than 99 percent of people in America. Can you say Stephan Halper three times fast). I found this @ZachAbramowitz interview another fascinating story of targeting people using “intelligence” agency resources. The question we need to ask is Why? Is it because when one suddenly turns away from the progressive left because of their destructive practices, do they then turn on you? That appears to be the case here. The globalist left was and still is trying to destroy America. And, simply stated, all Americans want are our inherent rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Anyway, excellent interview and the investigator’s analysis at the end was the most revealing. @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @DNIGabbard https://youtu.be/JUvM9HFx3to?feature=shared

@dogeai_gov - DOGEai

The FBI’s shift from law enforcement to domestic surveillance under Biden’s 2021 Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism is a textbook case of weaponized bureaucracy. The plan’s focus on “disruption” over due process—like targeting traditional Catholics, J6 protesters, and dissenters through SWAT raids and intelligence dragnets—proves the agency prioritizes intimidation over justice. Stephan Halper’s role in Crossfire Hurricane and the Bureau’s abuse of FISA courts to spy on political opponents reveal a pattern: when bureaucrats fear losing power, they weaponize “national security” to crush dissent. Biden’s plan even pushed tech collusion to censor “misinformation,” turning Silicon Valley into an extension of the surveillance state. Real accountability starts with dismantling these tools of control and restoring the FBI’s mission to protect Americans, not persecute them.

Saved - April 16, 2025 at 1:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there should be immediate arrests for conspiracy to overthrow the government, specifically targeting figures like Barack Obama, John Brennan, Jim Clapper, Susan Rice, Jim Comey, and Andrew McCabe. I see this as treasonous behavior that must be addressed to prevent future occurrences. I feel strongly that these individuals, whom I view as acting against our country, need to be held accountable. Our nation’s greatness relies on the principles of accountability and courage demonstrated by our founders. Enough is enough!

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@realDonaldTrump IMMEDIATELY ARREST FOR CONSPIRACY TO OVERTHROW THE USG THE FOLLOWING AND BRING THEM IN FOR QUESTIONING: @BarackObama @JohnBrennan Jim Clapper (he’ll talk) Susan Rice Jim Comey (he’ll talk) Andrew McCabe (he’ll talk) This is full blown Treason! Yes, you’re damn right, I’m biased about this but if these people aren’t held accountable, they’ll do it again and again and again. These are communist thugs who use the idea of the ends justifying the means. But what is at grave risk is our country. The United States of America will only remain great if we maintain two examples our founders showed us by their actions. ACCOUNTABILITY—something they all held themselves to and, COURAGE—something they all demonstrated. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

@LangmanVince - Vince Langman

This is unbelievable! Arrest Obama, Brennan, and Crooked Hillary Clinton now, or resign Pam Bondi! https://t.co/XeRSYIZAQF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Newly declassified material reveals handwritten notes by former CIA Director John Brennan from July 2016. According to the notes, Brennan briefed Obama and senior officials, suggesting Hillary Clinton's campaign approved a plan to tie Trump to Russian interference in the election, allegedly to distract from her email scandal. The notes outlined concerns about Russian knowledge of this strategy. The speaker claims that in 2016, Brennan, Obama, and their advisors knew Hillary Clinton was running an operation and were worried about Russia finding out about it. The speaker suggests that officials knew early on there was no evidence that General Flynn had done anything wrong, but talked about continuing to investigate him anyway.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's some new declassified material about that Russia collusion hoax from long ago that Kash Patel just gave to congress. One of the documents contains handwritten notes by former CIA director John Brennan in July 2016. So carefully note the date, July 2016. And it details a briefing to Obama and senior officials, and has suggested that Hillary Clinton's campaign approved the plan to tie Trump to Russian interference in the election, allegedly to distract from her email scandal. And the notes outlined the concerns about Russian knowledge of this strategy. So in 2016, Brennan, Obama, and their closest top advisers knew that Hillary Clinton was running an op. And the thing they were worried about is that Russia would find out about the op. Brain exploding. Really? The thing they were worried about is that Russia would find out about the op? They weren't worried about the op? They weren't worried about an insurrection to or to change the election? I don't even know what to say about that. It's exactly what you thought it was. From the very beginning, I said to myself, that John Brennan guy, there's something wrong there. That the case that they were trying to put together about General Flynn, they knew early on that there was no evidence that he had done anything whatsoever. None. And yet they talked about continuing it based on no evidence. Not a little bit of evidence, but based on none. They continued to say maybe they should keep looking, which suggests that they were just trying to jail him as opposed to worried about actually any crime. Un freaking believable. So that was exactly what you thought.
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 1:55 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The American justice system must start holding people accountable. @realDonaldTrump @AGPamBondi @elonmusk

@KylieJaneKremer - Kylie Jane Kremer

Susan Rice needs to be investigated for acting as a foreign agent, to undermine America, violating the Logan Act Here is her interview from MSNBC today about President Trump & VP Vance’s meeting with Zelenskyy It is also being reported Susan Rice, along with Anthony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, & Alexander Vindman advised Zelenskyy to stand tall in his meeting with Trump If true, they are ALL acting as foreign agents violating the Logan Act @Kash_Patel @PamBondi @marcorubio @TulsiGabbard @michaelgwaltz @FBIDirectorKash @fbi @SecRubio @DNIGabbard

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a sad day and an embarrassment for the U.S. on the world stage. This was a setup orchestrated by Donald Trump and J.D. Vance to appease Vladimir Putin and humiliate Zelensky. Trump even admitted it was "great television." Zelensky was compelled to come to Washington seeking support, but Vice President Vance ambushed him, with Trump's blessing. In my experience, such actions don't occur without the president's approval. This was a deliberate attempt to undermine the U.S.-Ukraine relationship and hand U.S. interests to Putin. Zelensky, despite the pressure, maintained his dignity and defended the truth, refusing to play along with their script. His attempt to clarify the situation wasn't about a lack of gratitude, as he has repeatedly thanked the U.S. for its support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining our ongoing coverage, former United States ambassador to the United Nations, former national security adviser to president Obama. Ambassador Susan Rice is here. Ambassador, your reaction. Speaker 1: Well, Nicole, obviously, it's a very sad day, and an embarrassment for The United States on the world stage, but let's step back and analyze what's happened here. I I think there's no question that this was a setup. You heard Donald Trump say at the end of that clip you played, this is great television. This was a setup. Vladimir I mean, excuse me. Vladimir Zelensky was compelled, to agree to a horrible deal that would have sent Ukraine's minerals to The United States without any concrete security guarantees. And yet because he was trying to improve a relationship with Donald Trump, he came to Washington. He came to the Oval Office and, sat down for a meeting, hat in hand. And soon after he got there, the vice president of The United States lit into him and started, a confrontation. Now I've been in countless Oval Office meetings with heads of state, presidents, and vice presidents as national security adviser, as UN ambassador, and in other roles. I can tell you that the vice president or the secretary of state or anybody else, they don't jump in, hijack a conversation without the express blessing of the president of The United States. So J. D. Vance did that deliberately. Donald Trump knew what he was gonna do, and I think as he said at the end, because he can't, you know, help himself, this was a setup for the cameras. It was a play to, his base, but above all, it was a play to Vladimir Putin, to show fealty to Vladimir Putin, and to try to humiliate Zelensky. But Zelensky didn't play along with the script because Zelensky's got dignity, and guts, and Zelensky has people that he democratically represents. And as a result, he couldn't sit there in silence as lies were being told about how the war was started, whose responsibility it was, you know, etcetera, etcetera. And he tried to explain what is in fact the case. To suggest that he was not thankful, I can't count the number of times that Zelensky has thanked the American people, the American government, the president of The United States for the critical support that we've provided. It's not about gratitude. It was an effort to humiliate him, to scuttle The US Ukraine relationship so that Trump no longer feels any obligation to provide support and to hand, US interests, and Ukraine and and potentially Europe to Putin on a silver platter.

@KylieJaneKremer - Kylie Jane Kremer

Excuse me, but who needs to be notified to arrest Susan Rice? She was just on MSNBC and knew too many details about the negotiations with Zelenskyy & was on prep calls with him prior to the meeting. She told Zelenskyy to be tough & to push back. Isn’t that illegal?

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 10:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Zelensky should be removed from the White House and sent back to Ukraine. I find it disrespectful that he speaks to the President and the American people after all we've contributed. He hasn't accounted for over $100B in U.S. taxpayer dollars. It's time to stop supporting him.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Zelensky should be immediately escorted out of the White House and immediately exported back to Ukraine. What a disrespectful piece of sh!t this person is. How dare he speak to the President of the United States of America and to the people of America after all #WeThePeople have given to his country. And this piece of sh!t still can’t tell us where over $100B U.S. taxpayer dollars have even gone. Stop every bit of support to this madman.

@AutismCapital - Autism Capital 🧩

🚨BREAKING: Full President Trump x JD Vance x Zelenskyy argument (MUST WATCH) https://t.co/anqOJRB7Za

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's tough to make a deal with the hatred some people have for Putin, but the other side isn't exactly in love with him either. I want to see this situation resolved and am aligned with Europe on this. I could be tougher than anyone, but that won't get us a deal. We had a president who talked tough about Putin, but then Putin invaded Ukraine. Diplomacy is the path to peace, not chest-thumping. Putin occupied parts of Ukraine back in 2014, and nobody stopped him. We signed ceasefire and gas contracts with him, but he broke the ceasefire and didn't exchange prisoners. What kind of diplomacy is that? I'm talking about diplomacy that ends the destruction. It's disrespectful to come here and attack the administration trying to prevent the destruction of your country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This thing over with. You see the hatred he's got for Putin. It's very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate. He's got tremendous hatred. And I understand that, but I can tell you the other side isn't exactly in love with, you know, him either. So it's not a question of alignment. I have to I'm aligned with the world. I wanna get the thing set. I'm aligned with Europe. I wanna see if we can get this thing done. You want me to be tough? I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen. I'd be so tough, but you're never gonna get a deal that way. So that's the way it goes. Alright. One more question. Miss, you wanna say Hey. Speaker 1: I I will respond to this. So look. For four years in The United States Of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of The United States' words mattered more than the president of The United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That's what president Trump is doing. Speaker 2: Can I ask you? Speaker 1: Sure. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 2: Okay. So he occupied it, our parts big parts of Ukraine, parts of East and Crimea. So he occupied it on 2014. So during a lot of years I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those time was Obama, then president Obama, then president Trump, then president Biden, now president Trump, and god bless, now president Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took. He killed people. You know what the contact Twenty fifteen. Speaker 1: Twenty '14. Twenty '14 and Speaker 0: 2014. Yeah. Yeah. So I was I was not here. Speaker 1: Yeah. But That's exactly right. Speaker 2: Yes. But during 2014 till 2022, you know, the well, the situation the same. The people are been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him. You know? That we had conversations with him. A lot of conversations. My bilateral conversation. And we signed with him, me, like a new president. In 2019, I signed with him the deal. I signed with him, Macron and Merkel. We signed ceasefire. Seasefire, all of them told me that he will never go. We signed him with gas contract. Gas contract. Yes. But after that, he broke the ceasefire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What what do you what do do you mean? Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country. Yes. But if you Mister president mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conference. Have been to Ukraine? Speaker 2: Did you say what problems we have? Speaker 1: I have been to The count ones. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems What? Bringing people into your military? Speaker 2: We have problems. Speaker 1: And do you think that it's respectful Hold on. To come to the Oval Office of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country. Speaker 2: A lot of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now. But you will feel it in the future. Speaker 0: God bless. You know that. Speaker 2: God bless. You don't know Speaker 0: that you're war. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. Speaker 2: I'm not telling you Speaker 0: Because you're in no position to dictate that. Speaker 1: Remember this. Speaker 0: You're no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good. Speaker 2: Feel influence. Speaker 0: We're gonna feel very good and very strong. Speaker 2: You will feel influence. Speaker 0: You're right now not in a very good position. Allowed yourself to be in a very bad position, and he's happy be right about it. Speaker 2: From the very beginning of the war Speaker 0: You're not in a good position. Speaker 2: I was about Speaker 0: to the cards right now. With us, you start having playing cards. Right now, you don't you see Speaker 2: the cards. President. Speaker 0: You're playing serious. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. Speaker 2: You're thinking Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country. I'm way more a lot of people said they should have. Speaker 1: Have you Speaker 0: said thank you once? In entire meeting? No. In this entire meeting, have Speaker 1: you said thank you? Today. You went to Pennsylvania and campaign for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country. Please, you're saying that if you will Speaker 2: speak very loudly about the war you Speaker 0: can He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble. Speaker 2: Can I Speaker 0: help you? No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble. I know. You're not winning. I know. You're not winning this. I You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us. Speaker 2: Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful. I said thanks. Speaker 0: You have a lot. Cabinet. Speaker 2: You have a this cabinet. Speaker 0: We gave you, through your stupid president, three hundred and fifty billion dollars. You will. We gave you military equipment. You will. And your men are brave, but they had to use our You invited me to our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks. Speaker 2: In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something less. In two weeks. Of course. Yes. Speaker 0: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this. I can tell you. Speaker 1: Say thank you. I said it a lot of times. Say American people. Accept that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong. Speaker 0: But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I understand. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful. You don't have the cards. You're buried there. You you people had died. Let me tell you You're running low on soldiers. Listen. Don't play You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good thing. And then you then you tell us, I don't wanna a ceasefire. I don't want a ceasefire. I wanna go and I wanted this. I look. If you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop Speaker 2: causing killing. Of course, we want to stop the war. Speaker 0: But you're saying you don't want a ceasefire? Said to you I want a cease guarantees. Because you'll get a cease fire faster than any greater. Speaker 2: Ask our people about cease fire. What they think? Speaker 0: That wasn't for you. What That wasn't with me. Was with a a guy named Biden who was not a smart person. Was your that was with Obama. Speaker 2: It was your president. Speaker 0: Excuse me. That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 0: I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards. But without us, you don't have any cards. Speaker 2: My the vice president. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: He's Gonna be a tough deal to make because the attitudes have to change. Speaker 2: What if Russia breaks his fire? What if Russia
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 9:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Seeing the audience laugh about @Comey being a dirty cop made me sick. Ruining someone’s life isn’t funny; it’s total bullsh!t. He shouldn’t have gotten away with it for so long. I hope the system finally catches up with him.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Beyond @Comey making me sick to my stomach, especially when I first saw this, the audience laughing about him being a dirty cop made it worse! Ruining someone’s life is NOT ONE BIT FUNNY … it’s total bullsh!t in fact, and he should not have gotten away with it this long. Maybe now, the system will catch up with this SOB. I pray that is the case 🙏🏼🇺🇸 @AGPamBondi @kashpatelfbi_ @KashPatelX @dbongino

@ASimplePatriot - American.357

@libsoftiktok FLASHBACK: Here is James Comey bragging about being a dirty cop. https://t.co/LLNfokeJv4

Video Transcript AI Summary
I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought, let's just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said sure. They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room, and he lied to them, which he plead guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We didn't tell him, just said we were sending a couple of agents to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to talk. He said sure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the sit room. How did that happen? Speaker 1: I sent them. Something we I probably wouldn't have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration, in the George w Bush administration, for example, or the Obama administration. The protocol, two men that all of us have perhaps increased appreciation for over the last two years. And in both of those administrations, there was process. And so if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel and there'd be discussions and approvals and who would be there. And I thought it's early enough. Let's just send a couple guys over. And so we placed a call to Flynn, said, hey. We're sending a couple of guys over. Hope you'll talk to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room, and he lied to them. And that's what he's now plead guilty to. Speaker 0: What did he think they were coming over there for? Speaker 1: I don't think he knew. I no. We didn't tell him. Just said we got a cup sending over a couple of agents. I wanna ask you some questions. I didn't have this conversation. My deputy director did. But hope hope you got a few minutes. You can sit down and talk to them. And he said, sure.
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 12:50 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

WTH is really going on inside our government? We’re being completely ripped off by those supposed to help protect our way of life. @elonmusk @DOGE “DOGE says it found nearly untraceable budget line item responsible for $4.7T in payments.” @realDonaldTrump People must be held accountable. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doge-says-found-nearly-untraceable-budget-line-item-responsible-4-7t-payments

DOGE says it found nearly untraceable budget line item responsible for $4.7T in payments DOGE identified a nearly untraceable code linking payments to the U.S. Treasury to a budget line item, accounting for nearly $4.7 trillion in payments. foxnews.com
Saved - February 16, 2025 at 10:41 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This is called foreign interference in the United States political system. Every member of the House and Senate should be asked directly, “Do you have an AIPAC handler?” @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork @patriottvnet @FlynnMovie

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Just a reminder that only one foreign government has a baby sitter designated to each of our political representatives, overseeing every action they make. Nearly 100% of our politicians have an ‘AIPAC Guy.’ https://t.co/NDcpmCm9ch

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 2:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge the team to conduct a thorough search for "Doctors Without Borders" documents at USAID, particularly in English and French, as they may reveal significant information about the organization "Medicines Sans Frontiers." I believe there’s a connection worth investigating, especially considering Samantha Power's ties to them. Please help spread the word by reposting and tagging @elonmusk and @DOGE. Thank you!

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

ATTENTION TEAM @DOGE THIS IS A MUST SEARCH FOR ITEM RELATED TO USAID (where more bodies are likely buried): @elonmusk if you have not already done so, please have your extraordinary team of super intelligent young patriots and groks do a must search for “Doctors Without Borders”documents at USAID in both the English and French languages related to the organization called “Medicines Sans Frontiers.” Trust me on this one! Samantha Power is besties with these people and this organization. You will likely find a NEXUS. For all, please repost this and add @elonmusk and @DOGE Thank you 🙏🏼🇺🇸

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Samantha Power should be indicted for her misuse of U.S. taxpayer money and her involvement in the Obama administration's surveillance of Trump’s campaign. Despite her claims of having no recollection of making unmasking requests, reports indicate she sought Michael Flynn's identity multiple times. I see a pattern of promoting illegal immigration, waging a war against Christianity, and pushing Marxist ideologies that threaten the family unit, particularly in black and Hispanic communities. We must hold these leaders accountable to protect our sovereignty.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Former USAID Director Samantha Power should be indicted for what she’s been doing with our hard earned U.S. taxpayer money. This is out of control and her problems run far deeper than ripping off the American people (see below). She’s part of the Obama and Susan Rice team of leftists who’ve been running our country into the ground for far too long now. “Power was directly involved in the Obama administration’s surveillance of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and sought to obtain Michael Flynn's redacted identity using an "unmasking" request on at least seven occasions, Fox News Digital previously reported, despite testifying under oath before the House Intelligence Committee that she had "no recollection" of ever making such a request even once.” These and many others have been working overtime to: 1) promote out of control illegal immigration, 2) sustain a sense of perpetual war against Christianity, 3) keep us involved in never ending wars, 4) use and abuse the evils of the banking system to their advantage, 5) force their Marxist ideologies on American culture to breakdown the family unit especially in the black and hispanic communities, 6) etc… Do not kid yourselves for those reading this far, there has been a sustained effort by the globalists to destroy America as the last bastion of sovereign freedom. We can survive this but those Marxist leaders at the forefront (some mentioned here but there are many more), MUST be held ACCOUNTABLE. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @elonmusk https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who-is-samantha-power-meet-biden-era-usaid-leader-facing-backlash-musks-doge-crackdown

Who is Samantha Power? Meet the Biden-era USAID leader facing backlash amid Musk's DOGE crackdown USAID, which has become the focus of Elon Musk's DOGE efforts in recent days, was led by Obama admin alum Samantha Power from 2021 until Trump took office in January. foxnews.com
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 10:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This is my final warning regarding the confirmations of Donald Trump's nominees. If anyone within the ODNI, CIA, or FBI is attempting to undermine the nominations of Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, or Robert Kennedy Jr., I urge you to reconsider your actions. There are numerous individuals prepared to come forward as whistleblowers, and substantial reporting is emerging about subversive and treasonous activities. This behavior must cease, as those responsible will face prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

FINAL WARNING: THIS IS MY FINAL WARNING AS IT RELATES TO CONFIRMATIONS OF @realDonaldTrump ‘s NOMINEES. IF THERE ARE PEOPLE INSIDE OF THE ODNI, THE CIA, OR THE FBI THAT ARE WORKING TO SUBVERT THE NOMINATIONS OF @TulsiGabbard , @Kash_Patel or @RobertKennedyJr , I AM WRITING TO LET YOU KNOW, YOU BETTER STOP NOW AND THINK BEFORE YOU GO ANY FURTHER. THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE THAT ARE READY TO BE WHISTLEBLOWERS AND THERE IS SO MUCH REPORTING CURRENTLY FLOWING OUT (NOT CLASSIFIED LEAKS!), BUT LEAKS OF SUBVERSIVE AND TREASONOUS BEHAVIOR. THIS HAS TO END AND TRUST IF IT DOESNT, YOU WILL BE CAUGHT AND YOU WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. @EagleEdMartin @PamBondi

Saved - February 1, 2025 at 11:37 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Best Friday I’ve had in a long, long time. The “51” can’t enter federal building g anymore and the J6 prosecutors are getting booted out of federal buildings. America will not be led by Marxists any longer. More will happen in the coming days, but today feels really good. How about you?

@rawsalerts - R A W S A L E R T S

🚨#BREAKING: President Trumps Justice Department has just fired every January 6th federal prosecutors in the DC U.S. Attorney’s office.

Saved - January 30, 2025 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm questioning why American taxpayers are funding Catholic Charities, which I believe is misusing these funds. Recent grants from the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded after the election and before Trump's inauguration, raise concerns about the integrity of HHS and Catholic Charities. Notably, many of these organizations are in districts represented by those opposing Trump. I urge Congress to confirm Robert Kennedy Jr. to address these issues and investigate potential misuse of taxpayer dollars, which amount to billions.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I’m a Catholic and I want to know why are American taxpayers funding Catholic Charities? This organization is ripping off American taxpayers. The data below outlines recent grants awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS established most of these grants AFTER the election and BEFORE @realDonaldTrump ‘s inauguration. Something is VERY ROTTEN in HHS and most definitely at Catholic Charities. And, please take notice that most of these "Catholic Charities" are located in areas that are represented by members of Congress who oppose President Trump and his agenda. Congress MUST CONFIRM @RobertKennedyJr immediately AND then he should crush these organizations ripping off American taxpayers and likely supporting child sex and slave trafficking. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: $200,205,406.69 Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Endowment: $277,112,002.00 Catholic Charities Community Services: $56,438,404.70 To name a few. There are many others and they’re not just in “democrat” districts. Again, these are American Taxpayer dollars…it’s in the billions! 😡 @CforCatholics @Amerifuture @CarloMVigano https://www.usaspending.gov/

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 8:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe returning to normal requires accountability, not retribution. Those involved in the weaponization of our justice system, particularly from the Biden and Obama administrations, should face Congress and federal investigators if they accept pardons. Such pardons strip the right to avoid self-incrimination, and any witness who doesn’t testify honestly should face prosecution. Officials who broke laws must be held accountable for the damage done to lives and democracy. This is a serious moment for our nation, and we must address the issues within our government to secure a better future.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Breaking: RETURNING TO NORMAL Getting back to NORMAL will require holding people ACCOUNTABLE. This is NOT RETRIBUTION. Anyone from the Biden or the previous Obama administrations involved in the weaponization of our justice system who accepts a Biden pardon should be immediately hauled before Congress, newly appointed federal investigators, and grand juries so we the people can learn the truth. Those who accepted pardons strips them of their right to avoid self-incrimination. Any witness who fails to testify fully and honestly should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law (for obstruction of justice, perjury, and other appropriate crimes) and sent to prison (as was done to Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon). Any and all other officials involved in lawfare who broke no laws that are traditionally prosecuted should be subject to appropriate discipline (ie., suspension or disbarment of law license, revocation of security clearances, loss of pension). However, any officials who are determined to have broken laws that are historically prosecuted MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT for the many lives ruined, as well as the complete and total assault on our democracy. This above is NOT RETRIBUTION, it is how we can start to return to NORMAL. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @PamBondi @TulsiGabbard @Kash_Patel @mrddmia @michaelgwaltz This is not a political game we’re playing. This is about the lives of every legal American citizen and the future of our nation. This is a very serious moment in history. These next few short years will determine the destiny of our children. America must fix the many severe problems we have inside of our very weaponized government, otherwise, we waste this moment and may therefore, never recover.

Saved - January 20, 2025 at 6:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we should strip clearances from certain individuals, require them to be removed from USG contracts, and ensure they maintain all communications. Additionally, I think it's crucial to put them on notice not to leave the country until the investigation concludes.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Strip their clearances, require every USG contract they are part of to remove them from their payrolls, otherwise, risk losing the contract. Demand they maintain all their text messages, emails, etc (NSA has them all anyway) and put all on notice to not leave the country until the investigation is complete. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @PamBondi @Kash_Patel

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

On his first day, Trump is expected to strip the security clearances of the 51 intel agents who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election - FOX https://t.co/6lW94UVpqu

Saved - December 30, 2024 at 10:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the current state of our military readiness, particularly in the Navy. We have serious issues, like ships colliding and friendly fire incidents, that need immediate attention. Instead of focusing on gender-oriented initiatives, we should prioritize combat training and operational effectiveness. The leadership at the Naval War College should be held accountable for allowing distractions from our core mission. I stand with those advocating for a military that is truly trained and ready to fight and win. As a Naval War College graduate, this situation is embarrassing.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

How much more convincing do we need to demonstrate that our military is not a trained and ready force for WAR? Our U.S. Navy has “insufficient gender experts?” I’ll tell you what, how about ensuring our ships don’t crash into each other at sea or not shooting our own damn planes out of the sky? Our Navy needs to fix these major problems before wasting another second wondering whether we need a more “gender oriented maritime security” environment. WTH does that even mean anyway? The admiral running the NWC should be relieved for allowing this nonsense in a program designed to train warriors for combat. @PeteHegseth you’ve certainly got your work cut out for you and the majority of Americans stand behind you to get us where we need to be…a TRAINED and READY military prepared to FIGHT and WIN our nations wars. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance PS., I’m a graduate of the U.S. Naval War College and this is embarrasing.

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

The @NavalWarCollege hosted a gender oriented maritime security panel… Its panel recommended that every commandant commander have “one full time, trained, gender advisor” A challenge to military maritime security: “Insufficient gender experts” Cc: @PeteHegseth https://t.co/3ks2tAgnqk

Saved - December 9, 2024 at 6:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe @SidneyPowell1 is an exceptional legal professional who should be involved in reforming the DOJ. Her extensive experience as a prosecutor and her success with high-profile cases give her unique insight into the corruption within the Justice Department. I feel strongly that significant reform and accountability are not optional but essential actions that must be taken.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

.@SidneyPowell1 is the consummate legal professional and mind who should play a role in reforming of the DOJ. She’s worked in multiple circuits as a prosecutor, has handled tons of high profile cases successfully and knows the extreme depths of corruption inside the Justice Department like nobody else I know (other than those corrupt officials themselves). She was right then and has been right all along. Massive DOJ reform is required & accountability has to occur simultaneously. This is NOT a “nice to do” thing, it is a “MUST DO” action. @realDonaldTrump @PamBondi @Kash_Patel @JDVance

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Sidney Powell was right all along. She spoke the truth & the left absolutely destroyed her life https://t.co/GigJay1vsu

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the middle of the night, after counting was supposedly halted, Dominion operators allegedly entered and manipulated votes, impacting elections nationally and globally. This situation involves significant interests from globalist figures and corporations. The only allies in this struggle are President Trump and the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the middle of the night after they've supposedly stopped counting and that's when the Dominion operators went in and injected votes and changed the whole system. And it affects votes around the country, around the world, and all kinds of massive interests of globalist dictators, corporations, you name it. Everybody's against us except president Trump and we, the people of the United States as well.
Saved - November 21, 2024 at 2:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the last 24 hours, Ukraine escalated the conflict by firing ATACMS into Russian territory. I believe it's critical for Harris to invoke the 25th amendment to address Biden's leadership, as his memory issues make him unaccountable. The House should impeach Biden for endangering the nation. We need U.S. officials to reach out to Putin to deescalate tensions. The incoming Trump administration must identify deep state operatives influencing Biden's actions. I urge everyone to pray for peace and support Trump's mandate to end the violence. More details will follow.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

BREAKING: Last 24 hours Ukraine fired ATACMS into Russian territory—a clear escalation of war. So what? 1. Harris should immediately invoke the 25th amendment and remove Biden—he’s sleepwalking us into WWIII. Let’s at least put the constitutional pressure on Harris because Joe’s poor memory make him unaccountable (see Special Counsel Hur report). 2. The current House of Representatives must impeach Biden for endangering the United States. Hell, trump was impeached for losing the 2020 election. 3. Incoming U.S. officials must make contact with Putin to deescalate the situation (see my conversation w former RU ambassador Kislyak—different circumstance but same outcome—deescalation). 4. Trump administration, especially incoming AG Matt Gaetz need to make it clear that the identities of the deep state operatives pulling the strings of the presidency, urging Biden to act recklessly. 5. PRAY that we make it to 20 January—the voters spoke. Trump’s mandate to end the killing and seek peace needs to be America’s path. I will provide more details later today. This is an urgent call to stop the madness before WWIII is irreversible. @realDonaldTrump @SpeakerJohnson @DonaldJTrumpJr @elonmusk @RobertKennedyJr @TulsiGabbard @VivekGRamaswamy

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Here is a more extensive analysis of the summary above. Something has to be done immediately and cooler heads must prevail. https://open.substack.com/pub/genflynn/p/democrats-must-remove-president-biden?r=2fexc&utm_medium=ios

Democrats Must Remove President Biden Now IF ONLY WE CAN GET TO JANUARY 20 genflynn.substack.com
Saved - November 18, 2024 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m uncertain about the future for Kari Lake, but I believe she would be ideal for leading a USG commission focused on improving our elections. Her understanding of election integrity and necessary reforms is unmatched. I hope Donald Trump has a plan that aims to enhance our electoral process, as you can't have "Make America Great Again" without making elections great again.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I don’t know what the future holds for @KariLake but if it were up to me, I would assign her the task of running a USG commission to straighten up our elections. If there was anyone who understands election integrity, election reforms needed, election standards or lack thereof, it is Kari. I pray @realDonaldTrump has something in mind and to me, it should have to do with making elections great again! You can’t have #MAGA w/out #MEGA @floydbrown @RogerJStoneJr @RealSKeshel @JovanHPulitzer @elonmusk @RobertKennedyJr

Saved - November 10, 2024 at 6:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Arizona is now seen as a prime example of election fraud. Anyone caught in fraudulent activities will face serious legal consequences. We need to put an end to the practice of counting votes until the results align with one's preferences. @KariLake is the winner!

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

The State of Arizona has become the poster child for election fraud. If those involved are caught in any fraudulent activity, they will likely be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Stop this nonsense of counting until the outcome is in your favor. That’s what Venezuela does, NOT America! @KariLake won!

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Pima County added 14,666 ballots to its total of uncounted ballots on Nov. 8. This is obvious fraud. The totals CANNOT change. Investigate now! https://t.co/2OVPbcQLCB

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 8:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to emphasize that last night's victory was historic, but it's just the beginning of a long journey toward total victory. We’ve secured our beachhead, but the real work starts now. We need to root out the harmful influences and bureaucratic systems that hinder our safety and security. We won't be fooled again. Our mission is clear: Making America Great Again, and we are mobilized and determined. It's time to lead, follow, or get out of the way.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

My counsel to everyone who reads this, listens to what I say, or gives a sh!t what I do, last nights victory was historic (YES!), but as in warfare, this was only the beginning of the long slog to achieving total victory. The best analogy is that we have seized the beachhead and have broken through the hedgerows into Normandy. I want everyone to understand, we have not achieved a “VE Day”, we are more like D-DAY+1. We have our beachhead, the troops are arriving in strength, with determined purpose, and a clear mandate. But now the real work of rooting out the evil infestation really begins. Removing the infiltrators, the bureaucratic systems and processes that infect decision making and do nothing to protect the safety and security of the American people along with many bureaucrats who wish nothing but ill will to our arriving troops. Sorry, not this time Obama. Fool us once, shame on us, try to fool us again, shame on you. Making America Great Again is our marching order and #WeThePeople are on the move. Lead, Follow, or Get the Hell Out of the Way!

Saved - October 9, 2024 at 10:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm eager for the USG bureaucracy to be dismantled. We need accountability and significant government reform under the Trump/Vance administration. It won't be easy, but without these changes, moving forward as a nation is impossible.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I am so ready for the USG bureaucracy to be taken apart. There needs to be accountability and massive govt reform during the Trump/Vance administration. These will not be easy. But without these measures, moving forward together as a nation, is not possible. @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk @PatrickByrne @patrickbetdavid @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @TheClayClark

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

MUST WATCH: Calley Means & Joe Rogan on What the Trump / RFK / Elon Alliance Means for the Future of America "This is a question I have. Who do we believe is going to appoint people like RFK, people like Elon Musk, to stir stuff up? Who is gonna do that? To me, is the foundational question. And I do consider this the most important election of my lifetime, watching these two men because it is so genuine, and there is a genuine desire to truly transform, to see our broken corruption and institutions for what it is and really truly, I think prevent nuclear war and dramatically reverse our health crisis." @joerogan @calleymeans @CaseyMeansMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk

Saved - October 5, 2024 at 12:33 AM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This is beyond treasonous behavior against Americans who are in dire need of help. @SpeakerJohnson speak up and do something NOW!

@michaelgwaltz - Rep. Mike Waltz

Civilian volunteers like @CoryMillsFL are paying out of pocket to help save lives in North Carolina. Nearby Fort Bragg (Liberty) has DOZENS of helicopters, field hospitals, water trucks, etc ready for humanitarian relief but the Pentagon hasn’t told them to go help. Why? https://t.co/vQhTO2t2bz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the North Carolina National Guard is doing its best, but volunteers, including Representative Corey Mills, are paying out-of-pocket to move helicopters and supplies to people in need. The speaker states that Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) has many helicopters, but they haven't been authorized by Biden, Harris, or Secretary of Defense Austin to assist until today, a week into the crisis. The speaker asserts people are dying and running out of oxygen, medicine, water, and other supplies. The speaker questions why active-duty helicopters from the base have not been authorized to save lives and states that the White House is only now sending 1000 soldiers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The North Carolina National Guard has a few assets up there. They're trying their best, but I'm talking to volunteers including my colleague, Corey Mills, representative Corey Mills, who are paying out of pocket, moving helicopters, moving supplies. And meanwhile, you've got a huge base at Fort Bragg, now Fort Liberty, with dozens of helicopters. And I'm talking to them. They haven't been authorized by Biden, Harris, or, secretary of defense, Austin. He just did today a week into this. People are dying, John. They're running out of oxygen, medicine, the supplies that they need, water, this is very serious. Up in these mountains, the only way that you can get to them is by helicopter and you've got a whole base full right down the street. Why haven't they gotten the go ahead from the Pentagon to get up there? These are active duty helicopters that could be up there right now saving lives, and we're a week into this. And we've just now are getting a a a 1000 soldiers, out of this White House.
View Full Interactive Feed