TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @GhostofBPH

GhostofBPH
Posted - June 16, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Saved - June 18, 2025 at 7:08 AM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

Reminder that these two helped John McCain create ISIS in 2011. Here they are in Libya meeting with the man who would overthrow Gaddafi on behalf of NATO, then torture and mutilate him on livestream. https://t.co/tlE0krhqNz

@LindseyGrahamSC - Lindsey Graham

If a terrorist regime is stockpiling weapons-grade uranium, it’s not for leverage. It’s for a nuclear bomb. https://t.co/Glk4DN0Zz2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker clarifies that while Iran possesses enough nuclear fuel for approximately 10 bombs, the US assessment indicates they haven't made the political decision to weaponize it. The speaker questions the purpose of 900 pounds of 60% enriched uranium if not for weapon production, referencing a question posed to the Senate Intel Chair. The response received was "leverage," which the speaker seems to find insufficient.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And just to clarify, when you say close to 10 bombs, you mean they would have enough nuclear fuel. But as far as we know from The US assessment, they hadn't made the political decision to turn that into a weapon. What purpose to hear that from the senate intel chair when I asked What purpose is there for enriched uranium at 60% other than making a weapon? Leverage. Why do you have 900 pounds of this stuff if you don't wanna make a weapon? Well, you know, the the assessment was they wanted the leverage. Right? Yeah. Right. Whatever.
GhostofBPH
Posted - December 15, 2024 at 5:15 AM
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 12:01 AM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

This is the crux of everything we are up against. The real question is who controls the Federal Government? What if the answer to that question is a foreign/transnational cartel? Would that make those in our government who serve them guilty of treason?

@ChanelRion - Chanel Rion OAN

CIA Officer declares the American people are here to serve the Federal Government. YOU exist to serve THEM. Pay more taxes, slave. Fmr. CIA Station Chief Brad Johnson on how to fight back. Fine Point 115 | @OANN https://t.co/ddBwB5UqdZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today's CIA has become politicized and weaponized, posing a threat to America. Trump, wary of the intelligence community after being spied on, chose to fund his own transition team. Former CIA officials express a belief that the government exists to serve itself rather than the people, reflecting a troubling mindset within the agency. The top 20% of the CIA is described as malignant narcissists, while the majority are seen as patriotic but constrained by leadership. Fixing the CIA requires significant personnel changes, as current leaders are entrenched in a culture that prioritizes their agenda over serving the public. Effective oversight and the inclusion of experienced, conservative voices are crucial for reforming the agency and ensuring it fulfills its intended purpose of national defense.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today's CIA has a god complex, and that complex is going to destroy America if Trump doesn't get a hold of it in the next 12 months. The CIA and its mockingbird press, of course, can't allow you to even go down this road. They need you in the dark, the darkest of darks. But everything wrong with today's CIA is grounded in this basic problem. It has been weaponized. Weaponized by Democrats who have a fundamentally anti American view of America. Trump knows this. That's why when he was offered all the resources available to him as president-elect to help his transition team as is tradition, Trump politely said, no thanks. Trump chose to internally fund his own transition team. Why? Because last time, the intelligence community not only spied on him at Trump Tower, and there's some questions about whether the UK was involved. Partly, they used the guise of transition help to do that. But they worked to sabotage nearly every member of Trump's initial team to take Trump down. But even knowing then that they were working against him, Trump found out too late just how deep the rot is within our intelligence community. Hence, the way that Democrat majority leader Chuck Schumer smiles in this interview he gives. The way he tells Rachel Maddow the power of the intelligence agency he helped to politicize is great. Speaker 1: To take on the intelligence community, they have 6 ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this. Speaker 0: And when Trump called out the likes of John Brennan and other traders within our intelligence community as agents of a deep state, they laughed. Here's former CIA director John McLaughlin. Speaker 2: It Speaker 0: feeds the president's concern and often used term about a deep state being Speaker 2: there to take him out. Thank god for the deep state. Speaker 0: And then you wonder, who is cheering the deep state? It's a people with whom we will never unite. It's the people who have made government their god. They are servants to that god. And you, you the people, you are the slaves to them and the god of government they serve. Case in point, this is a conversation between 2 ex CIA agents. Speaker 3: Say that again. You believe that the government is there to support you? Is that what you said? No. I believe the government should be responsive to me. It works for me. They shouldn't be able to target me. That's where we're that's where we're fundamentally opposed to. Speaker 2: Oh, I'm sure. Speaker 3: Because the government does not work for us. That is not what I'm saying it should. It should not. The gover the government is there to ensure the continuation of the American ideal. That's the purpose of the government. It is not there to serve you. Speaker 0: It is not there to serve you? This moron, who is he? No one of consequence, surely. Well, actually, after some cursory investigating, his name is Andrew Bustamante. Claims to be a former spy. He runs a podcast with his ex CIA wife, and together, they promote what I view as very clear cut CIA propaganda. He's a typical prototype of the mid level tyrants who've become who have come hurling out of the Obama age intelligence community. My opinion, this guy's a sigh up. If this guy's a reflection of our modern CIA, we need to understand what Trump is walking into with his CIA director, Radcliffe. Right? So through this lens, I listened a little more. It gets worse. Speaker 3: America is defined not by its people, by its government. That's that's what we went to war with the British about. We could have been colonists. We could have been communities. We could have been people. We could have been collections. But the right to sovereign independence is a government thing. The government exists to serve to survive and serve the continuation of the government of the United States, not the American people. Speaker 2: Wow. Speaker 3: That's part of the ideological hogwash that we were all taught in elementary school civics that just isn't true. They're not there to serve us. That's not what the purpose of government is. You swore an oath is to protect and serve the constitution of the United States. Speaker 0: Is anyone going to tell double o Bustamante here what the first three words of the constitution are? We, the people? Does Bustamante have some alternative definition of people? Lester Monte is no idiot. Some might call him the profile of a traitor. I wouldn't go that far. He's a reflection of our modern day politicized CIA. A CIA that views itself as the god of the world, of the universe. They certainly see themselves as holders of special and secret knowledge, which they are. They see themselves as ubiquitous and all powerful, arguably they are. The CIA, though, in reality, has a god complex. So when you view yourself as a god, what is the presidency to you? What is the people? What is the constitution? Trivial details. CIA whistleblower Kevin Shipp put it this way. Speaker 4: The top 20% of the CIA, especially at the highest levels, they're malignant narcissists. They do not care about human life. Now the the 80% below, there's a lot of good patriotic, you know, America loving people just doing their job. Speaker 0: But when the top is in command and they are the gatekeepers upon whom the rest of the 80% relies on for their careers and their ambitions, what result? An echo chamber of the very mindset I just showed you. CIA at the top has a god complex, and that complex will use any and all means to push their agenda. Even and maybe especially at the expense of the truth in our sacred constitution, and you, the American people. In the words of the great John Le Carre, by repetition, each lie becomes an irreversible fact upon which other lies are constructed. Do that long enough, and the result is a tyrannization of America beyond repair. Joining us to weigh in on some of this, someone who's been on the inside at those top levels, former CIA station chief Brad Johnson, founder of Americans For Intelligence Reform. Brad, it's good to see you again. Speaker 2: Thank you, Chanel. It's wonderful to see you as well. Speaker 0: I want your reaction to some of those conversations you heard. That mentality, correct me if I'm wrong, seems to be that of a very modernized, politicized CIA, one that feels very righteous in what they're doing. Speaker 2: Well, absolutely. They do. I mean, I think you described liberalism, fairly widely with that definition, and that's, of course, who's in control of the CIA. At the top, certainly, the top 20%, the narcissist definition, I think, is very apropos. It's it's precise. And however, that 80% below is is not, you know, patriotic people who are trying to do the work of the nation and so on. They're about the same. I would say the rank and file, the hiring practices for a long time, the promotion, the way promotions are handled and all of that. Now it's if if you're not liberal, basically, it's very, very, very difficult to move up from the CIA, and that's not who they're hiring anyway. If you were to wander around the hallways today of the of the CIA headquarters in Langley, what you're gonna be hearing from the people wandering those halls is, you know, we have to do everything possible to stop Trump. That's not their job. That shouldn't be what they're thinking about, but that is who they are at this day and age. And, it's it's a pity because as you're pointing out, they're no longer doing the business of the people because they don't view that as their job. As you're kind of the long haired guy was saying, I won't do any favor of repeating his name, but he he, you know, he he thinks everyone's there to serve him. But the purpose of the of the CIA is to go out and find information to advise the United States government so that they can make intelligent decisions for national defense. That's the purpose. That's serving the people. Whatever it is that he thinks he's doing, I don't know. But it's certainly a twisted rendition of of what it should be, and I would have to agree with you completely. He's most assuredly never read the constitution and doesn't know what it says and wouldn't know about free speech or rights to bear arms and those sorts of things. Because what the what the constitution does is it bestows rights upon the people. That's what the constitution is. So you can just see the the he is is actually a fairly, light example. I would say the people that have run the CIA are far more radical than he is, and he's he's kind of middle of the road as as to what's out there this day and age. Speaker 0: Oh, that's terrifying. And and to imagine that John Brennan, another former CIA director, is running around still advising CBP, advising DHS, advising top agencies within the Biden administration, essentially villainizing everyday Americans. I saw one memo circulated by Brennan's group, urging d o DHS to label certain Americans, everyday Americans, namely Christians, as terrorist entities or entities to watch for because they are particularly dangerous. That to me is horrifying. How do you fix this culture when it's so inundated top to bottom? Speaker 2: Well, I mean, certainly, that's the the the central question of all of this. And that's what Trump is faced with. And and make no mistake, having information is very dangerous. The CIA back in 2014, speaking of John Brennan, he had to go back to Congress and apologize because he had to come back and admit that they were spying on Congress. Now that was never dug down into. So nobody knows publicly, how deep that penetration of Congress and the other agencies in the government have been penetrated by the CIA. But I think it's a question that should be asked, and it's not being even discussed at this point. But I'll have to say the bottom line is for fixing the CIA is you cannot fix it with who's there. As you say, John Brennan is still roaming the hallways, and all of his cronies are either also roaming the hallways or are still there. There has not been a change of of personnel, and the same people that were there as, call it, major lieutenants under John Brennan are still there in positions of of control and command within the agency. So it's it's a mess. You cannot fix it with who's there. There's good. They've got to to revamp it by changing only the 4 positions that the president is entitled to do. He's gonna do nothing. And if I may say the people he's picking, well, I have no complaints about them. I think they're fine individuals, Ratcliffe and some of the people he's talking about to be deputy director are are fine people, but they don't have the wherewithal and experience to come into that culture and and even understand what's going on. They're just too easy to fool. And, that that's what they're gonna be faced with. Right now, there's no chance of fixing it with what we're doing. Speaker 0: What is your recommendation then if you're walking in? I mean, you mentioned Ratcliffe. He's a congressman. He has been involved in very, sensitive matters, but he's a he's a he's a policy guy. I imagine CIA, as broad as it is, as, as compartmentalized as it is, is going to certainly try to pull some things over him? Speaker 2: Oh, it's child's play. It doesn't require a a great deal of ability to to pull something over on a a guy like Ratcliffe coming in. Like I said, there's nothing wrong with him. I'm not disparaging him in any way, but you've got this whole organization. You mentioned earlier, truth and and whether truth is reported. Well, just look at it from the intelligence perspective. In intelligence, there's lots of truths. And what you do is you handpick the truth that you want to emphasize. So what what he will see and anyone in the Trump administration will see is what they want him to see. And so, you know, he's not gonna see everything. He's gonna see what's picked out for him. And so that's why it's just so easy to control, especially if you know what he's thinking, who he's talking to, and his perspectives on things. You can easily manipulate someone like that because you feed them the things that they wanna see and, the most at least the majority of the time and and lead them the way that you need them to go. So it's it's not difficult to do. And that's one of the problems with bringing in people like this that are non career professionals, which is why it doesn't happen at the FBI, for example. Everyone put in the directorship of the of the FBI has almost always been a a career professional, but that's almost never been done at the CIA. And so that's why it's it's so difficult to get a handle on what's going on in there because they don't understand. I mean, you take a an old guy like me, I would go sit down. They would start calling that nonsense on me. I immediately see through it because I I know how to do all that. I've done all that sort of stuff. Well, they have not, and they don't understand it. Ratcliffe, like I said, I have no negative comments on Ratcliffe as an individual. I think he's a fine man, but he's got 8 months at the DNI. He's been basically a policy and consumer of intelligence. He's never run intelligence. He doesn't know anything about operations, hasn't done them, and what's what who is going to be work you know, working against him from within, if you will, and it's gonna be the operators. And so these are the guys that know how to do that. It's bread and butter for a guy that even like myself. It'd be bread and butter to lead somebody around by the nose like that. It's just not a challenge. And, and I would say they've become very adept at it over the years by doing it with every administration. Speaker 0: Well, it's certainly going to be a team effort. And, you know, for the sake of the country, I hope he taps people like you to help see through the wool that the CIA is certainly going to try and pull over not only him, but the American people. Speaker 2: I hope so too. And, you you asked earlier what some of the things that could be done. I mean, a reduction in force and things like that that they're already talking about in government efficiencies is the way to do it. But what John Ratcliffe needs to do is bring in at least a dozen or 20 people or so, like myself, who've got the background who can come in and sit down and help him. The problem is, I'm not sure if he can find, you know, 15 or 20 people with my background who are also conservative and be would be willing to help him and tell him what's actually going on. I think that might be the crux of the problem for him. Speaker 0: And that is the crux of the problem. Well, Brad Johnson, always a pleasure to visit with you. Thank you for the time and the insight, and godspeed. Speaker 2: Thank you so much, and I'll have a good evening. Speaker 0: Tear down that wall as long as the Biden administration's selling off parts of the Trump's Trump wall, and they're racing to do it. Find out why up next.
GhostofBPH
Posted - December 16, 2024 at 12:54 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I issued a formal statement regarding my refuge at the Russian airbase in Latakia, which was attacked. This indicates that Israel targeted Russia. Due to security concerns, a communications blackout will last for 10 days. It seems I'm still a player in this ongoing situation.

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

Formal statement issued by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. He says that he took refuge at the Russian airbase in Latakia, and that the base came under attack. That means that Israel attacked Russia. He also said that due to security concerns, a communications blackout for 10 days was necessary. Ten days of darkness. @truestormyjoe @RealAbs1776 Sounds like Assad is still in play on the chessboard.

GhostofBPH
Posted - September 20, 2024 at 2:34 AM
Saved - September 21, 2024 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I listened to Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson discuss a concerning situation where a Combatant Commander seems to have taken control of U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East, effectively sidelining the White House, State Department, and CIA. He mentioned that this commander has warned Netanyahu that if he invades Lebanon or elsewhere, he would be on his own. This raises questions about the authority of a single combatant commander. I also recommend checking out Jon Herold's Devolution Series for more insights.

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

Take a listen to what [retired] Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson told Judge Andrew Napolitano yesterday. A Combatant Commander has effectively usurped the White House, State Department and CIA and has taken control of US diplomacy in the Middle East? Telling Netanyahu that if he invades Lebanon (or anywhere else) he's on his own? How could a single combatant commander possess the authority to do something like this? How many of you have read Jon Herold's (@patel_patriot) Devolution Series? (https://devolution.link) If you haven't, perhaps it's time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Netanyahu is attempting to provoke Hezbollah into a conflict, but the U.S. will not support an Israeli war with Hezbollah or Iran if Israel provokes it. General Kurilla was sent to deliver this message. Biden was furious when the Pentagon said "no dice" on Ukraine and Gaza. The Pentagon has taken over diplomacy and military action in both theaters of war. Austin is listening to Pentagon insiders and informing Biden, who is taking the advice despite his anger. The Defense Department engages in diplomacy every day through 4-star generals in various regions. A Japanese prime minister told the speaker that these military leaders carry more weight than State Department officials. Austin likely told Kurilla to inform Netanyahu that Israel is on its own if it invades Lebanon, after convincing Biden to allow the message to be conveyed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think what we're seeing here is another attempt because a 100 plane strike didn't do it, by Netanyahu to provoke Hezbollah to some sort of action that he can then declare is, warlike to the extent that he can do what he wants to do with them. Even though I'm told with great confidence in the source source says that the latest two visits by the central command unified commander were to tell him that we would not be with him in in the event of his going to war with Hezbollah that he provoked, nor would we be with him, going to war with Iran that he provoked. And we made it quite clear that we we would know if he provoked it. So I have to declare that Speaker 1: speaking of general Kurilla. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Speaker 1: So, Scott Ritter agrees with you. Doug McGregor says he can't imagine, Austin and Blinken letting general Kurilla do that. It's very, very interesting. Is this, forgive me, general, colonel. Is this speculation on your part, or is it based on sources? Speaker 0: Promotion accepted. Speaker 1: I wanna be there for it. Speaker 0: It's it's based on some pretty reliable sources, and here's the bigger picture. And I I hope the others told you this too. Biden's fury and you could see it. He was seething when he met with the British prime minister. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. We have that clip. He was out out of control with anger. Speaker 0: And and what he just been told, apparently, was by the Pentagon, no dice, mister president. No dice on Ukraine and no dice on Gaza. Speaker 1: And we're in charge now. No dice you're talking about no dice on the long range missiles reaching deep into Russia even though Tony Blinken intimated all week in Kyiv Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: With his British counterpart that this was happening. And, sir, Keir Starmer, the British prime minister, had every reason to believe as he's flying across the Atlantic that Joe Biden's answer would be yes. Speaker 0: He was embarrassed. He was embarrassed. But but in fact, he was pulling out his maps with target data, and and Biden told him don't even don't even pull them out. We're not gonna talk about that. I've been told, again, by fairly reliable sources that Blinken and Sullivan, Blinken primarily, but Sullivan too, have been sidetracked. And what's happened is the Pentagon has taken over essentially diplomacy as well as any action, militarily speaking, with regard to both theaters of war. And so they're now in charge. I I have to change my evaluation of secretary Austin if that's the case because it means he listened finally to the people in the bowels of the Pentagon who know the truth, and he's reacting to that. And he's told president Biden that. And to Biden's credit, even though he was furious, he finally took that advice. Speaker 1: Colonel, you once ran the state department. How does the defense department engage in diplomacy? Speaker 0: They dig they engage in diplomacy every day every day. They're 4 stars in the various synchdoms, the regions that they control, the AORs, are the true US diplomats. And some of them are very good at it. I saw some of them. I work with some of them who are very good at it, better than any secretary of state, but it shouldn't be that way. That's a parenthetical remark. We shouldn't have the military leading diplomacy, but we often do. And Japanese prime minister once told me why to my face. He said, Larry, when your East Asia and Pacific assistant secretary comes out here, he's not got anything but his briefcase. When the man from Honolulu comes out here from Camp Smith in Hawaii, comes out here, he's towing air wings, submarines, battle groups, marine amphibious groups, army divisions. I listened to him. This is the prime minister of Japan. Speaker 1: Who told general Kurilla to tell prime minister Netanyahu if you invade, Lebanon, you're on your own? Speaker 0: It was, I think, Austin. That's the chain of command. Austin conveyed that message to him, but I think it was Austin that convinced Biden to give him that command so he could transmit it to Sorel.
Home - Devolution by Patel Patriot Welcome to Patel Patriot’s Devolution Series by me, Patel Patriot. Doing my best to show you how Donald Trump used Devolution to defeat the election theft. devolution.link
GhostofBPH
Posted - March 30, 2024 at 6:22 AM
Saved - March 30, 2024 at 8:24 PM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

Everyone should watch this.

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

Free Speech Fridays: THE FORBIDDEN FBI FILES https://t.co/kCYIkADjWW

GhostofBPH
Posted - March 1, 2024 at 12:06 PM
Saved - March 1, 2024 at 3:11 PM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

Hey @LindseyGrahamSC is this you with John McCain in Ukraine in 2014, meeting with CIA-proxy militia forces preparing to overthrow a lawfully-elected government? https://t.co/Pf7oonmjkv

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Every one of the dozen CIA bases they just admitted to creating in 2014 on the border with the Donbas was a staging point for the Operation Gladio Neo-Nazi werewolf units going into the Donbass to commit war crimes against the population there. As retaliation for Donbas refusal to bow the knee to the newly installed CIA/NATO puppet regime in Kyiv. Eight years these werewolf unit attacks on ethnic Russians went on while Putin attempted to use diplomacy to get the CIA/NATO to stop. With this new knowledge in mind, go back and watch that video of No Name and Graham in their panic trip to Ukraine in December of 2016. https://youtu.be/bmaakY-PIAc?si=sWerMJely_zGVke_

GhostofBPH
Posted - February 28, 2024 at 1:45 AM
Saved - February 28, 2024 at 3:53 AM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

The CIA. Matt and I will be covering Gladio tomorrow on Breaking History.

@SunTzusWar - Sun Tzu

As I’ve said before, we are witnessing the largest and most organized child trafficking network operated by the US government that this world has ever seen.

GhostofBPH
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 5:00 AM
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 2:24 PM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

The elections are rigged. Anybody who refuses to discuss election integrity is either stupid or a schemer.

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

The 5 minute summary of how DHS rigged the 2020 election through mass censorship of Joe Biden's political rivals. https://t.co/L0RN4MBSSW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council were used as a front by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to manipulate social media during the 2020 election. The goal was to censor posts containing misinformation about mail-in ballots and other election-related topics. DHS lacked the legal authority to directly censor, so they set up the Election Infrastructure Partnership (EIP) to fill the gaps. These outside organizations received federal funding and worked closely with DHS to ban or throttle millions of posts and accounts. The entire operation was orchestrated to rig the election. The question now is whether there will be political accountability for these actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, and their service as a cutout to get, to do through the backdoor what Department of Homeland Security and the rest of these alphabet soup, national security, law enforcement agencies couldn't do through the front door. Speaker 1: That's exactly right. So you had this never Trump cabal within the Department of Homeland Security, by the way, I'm not even saying To be partisan, if it was a Bernie Sanders who had won, they would have, they would have, done a deep state coup from the populous left. I mean, this is they they're sensitive about their right and their left populous blank. So basically you had this, this early period in 2020 where they were afraid Trump was going to win the election And they decided they need to rig social media because Trump won in 2016 on the basis of the social media strength. And so you had this foreign policy cutout coup within this cybersecurity, this obscure little cybersecurity sub agency within DHS. This is what we just talked about in the previous segment. They defined social media posts, if they contain misinformation as being an attack on critical infrastructure sure of the US Federal Government. Cause they defined elections to be critical infrastructure. So CS, this, this little, This little cybersecurity sub agency called SISA, it developed a long arm jurisdiction over your opinions about the election on social media by saying if you speak misinformation about mail in ballots, if you say that they are not safe and effective, then then you are committing a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of American elections and so DHS has the ability to censor you. Now they knew they couldn't pull this off directly because of the First Amendment. And in fact, the head of the IP, Alex Stamos was, is on tape and my foundation, Foundation For Freedom Online ended up catching this and clipping it saying that DHS at the time knew that they lacked the legal authorization to censor directly. So they set up EIP in order to fill the gaps of what government could not do itself. And so you had these outside organizations that were given not just, federal funding in large part of the Atlanta Council, the Digital and, and Graphica are both federally funded, both the universities involved, Stanford The new w ended up getting a joint $3,000,000 grant shortly after the election. And they essentially got paid off for, for doing the, for getting the administration into office. And what they did is DHS worked closely with this outside cut out consortium of those 4 entities in order to get essentially hundreds of millions of posts and tens of thousands of counts either banned or throttled this massively rigged the entire election cycle. This is started in June, 2020. They got 22,000,000 tweets Labeled misinformation because they bragged on tape about coercing the tech companies through inducing crisis PR and threatening to have the government break them up on both antitrust and other regulatory grounds if they did not censor Trump supporters in, ahead of the 2020 election. Now they didn't use the phrase Trump supporters. They said, anyone who questions mail in ballots, Anyone who question who talks about ballot harvesting, anyone who talks about ballot trafficking and anyone who's got a problem with vote tabulation on election day. I mean, this is the perfect Cover up, if you were doing dirty deeds, by the way, they basically had the people, in charge of administering the election were also in charge of Sensoring all questions about the administration of the election. If this happened in a third world country, the state department would, immediately pass international sanctions on such a country and declared its elections to be invalid, but this was architected within the bowels of our own Department of Homeland Security, who is a final note I should add, was deliberately set up to model a domestic CIA, the Stanford, Internet observatories, Renee de Resta, who started her career in the CIA It was, they were the primary, leader of the EIP partnership bragged on tape at a DHS This information conference shortly after the election that they knew that they couldn't set up a DHS censorship cell inside the The CIA because the CIA is foreign facing and they couldn't do it within the FBI because the FBI requires a law breaking predicate because it's attached to the justice department. So they created base, they gave DHS the foreign facing dirty tricks powers of the CIA with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI, but evading the FBI restrictions by putting it at DHS. So this whole thing was orchestrated top to bottom. They knew it was dirty, from jump street and now they're getting caught. But question is, is there a political will to hold them accountable?
View Full Interactive Feed