TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Girlpatriot1974
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
MTG - "Israel is the only country I know of that has some sort of incredible influence and control over nearly every single one of my colleagues." https://t.co/vEvFTzsWae
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Israel is the only country I know of that has some sort of incredible influence and control over nearly every single one of my colleagues." "Because APAC are Americans, therefore, they can legally donate to members of congress and senators." "Freshman, member of congress, or first year in congress, they take them on a very special trip to Israel in August." "That's Dems the and Republicans or just Republicans? They take both of them. Yes." "So they take them on this trip to Israel." "They wear the, kippah." "They and even though they're Christians. They're they're not Jewish, but yet they're adorning, Jewish attire, and they're at these Jewish, religious sites." "The Israeli government is secular." "This is not the biblical Israel." "It is the secular government of Israel."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is the only country I know of that has some sort of incredible influence and control over nearly every single one of my colleagues. Because APAC are Americans, therefore, they can legally donate to members of congress and senators. So let's talk about how that works. APAC takes every single that they can. Freshman, member of congress, or first year in congress, they take them on a very special trip to Israel in August.
That's our August is our recess. It's our it's our, month long district work period. That's Dems the and Republicans or just Republicans? They take both of them. Yes.
So they take them on this trip to Israel. They they I I guess they go on tours all around. I didn't go. So I I don't know what they do there. But they take them on tours.
You like the pictures we've seen recently of the speaker and and, other members of congress at the Wailing Wall. They wear the, kippah. They and even though they're Christians. They're they're not Jewish, but yet they're adorning, Jewish attire, and they're at these Jewish, religious sites. Mhmm.
Then they also meet with different members of the Israeli government that are recognized. The Israeli government is secular. This is not the biblical Israel. It is the secular government of Israel.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
Candace says Charlie was under an increasing amount of pressure. Candace shares a video of Charlie talking about Israel and having his "moral character" being put into question. Candace spills the beans... https://t.co/EMpyIti3sc
Video Transcript AI Summary
This segment recounts escalating pressure on Charlie Kirk over Israel debates. A speaker says: "I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian." Kirk says his "moral character is now being put into question" and "I am a bad person if I do this." The piece notes threats to pull funding and that he faced pressure about inviting people, asking "How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place?" It describes a "duress situation" at the Hamptons, with Bill Ackman allegedly pressuring Kirk as Beebe Netanyahu offered "an intervention" and funding. "We just need you to come to Israel and we can make this better" and "We just need you to come to Auschwitz and take a picture." Kirk reportedly "denied that funding" and "Charlie said no to Bebe." Beebe's timing is claimed: "less than twenty four hours after Charlie Kirk was shot."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we bring in a clip of Charlie from a month ago speaking about the kind of pressure that he was under? Because I think that will also help to further contextualize this. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian.
But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some.
Speaker 0: No. It's very irritating.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's been so unfair.
Speaker 0: They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. And you had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented.
Speaker 1: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel.
I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this?
Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter.
Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right?
They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb.
Right?
Speaker 0: No. It's not defensible to be dumb, and he was under an increasing amount of pressure. Not just people telling him, oh, well, you know, I'm upset with who you're inviting, but flat out telling him that he was not allowed to invite certain people to his events. They were threatening to pull out money. Charlie was getting a lot of really nasty text messages.
And many of them pertaining to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. But Tucker Carlson was really the focus when it came to America Fest. How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place? How could he allow Dave Smith, who by the way is Jewish, how could they allow, how could Charlie allow this other position to meet the stage? Because obviously when people start to hear the debates, what Dave Smith is saying sounds so rational, but it was up to Charlie to not allow those things to happen.
And those that amount of pressure towards the end, as you see that conversation you had with Megan was just a month before he lost his life. Really, I would say reached a pinnacle of sorts on the matter of what Tucker Carlson actually said on that stage. Tucker Carlson while he was on that stage at Turning Point brought up Bill Ackman. Bill Ackman is a billionaire, obviously. He is also an extremely litigious billionaire.
And Bill Ackman was on Charlie about comments that Tucker Carlson had made on that stage. Tucker Carlson specifically asked the question, where does Bill Ackman's money come from? Who is this guy? Actually, who is this guy that has this much influence? And like I said, Bill Ackman was not happy about this.
And so I would like to contextualize Beebe again, these are things Beebe brought up publicly, which he didn't have to. He didn't have to bring up the letter. He didn't have to bring up the phone call, but he chose to do this less than twenty four hours after Charlie Kirk was shot. Personally, Beebee, I would have appreciated if you guys used all of your spyware, you'd spying on us for years to maybe track down the killer. But I guess this is where you thought it was best to do a little propaganda for Israel would be better than us helping us track down the killer.
But anyway, so BB Netanyahu in that phone call, what took place was a couple of weeks ago before Charlie lost his life. Charlie was in the Hamptons and he had more than one event, but he had essentially what was staged an intervention was staged by Bill Ackman. Because Charlie's thoughts, Charlie's rational thoughts about Israel were a no no. This is not the route that you should be going on. And Charlie was surrounded by his friends, his quote unquote friends.
Bill Ackman was very upset and threats were made. That is what I am told. And I will tell you that I am very happy for Bill Ackman to dispute this narrative. In fact, he was asked to dispute this narrative. Max Blumenthal went out to him today and Bill Ackman came back and said, I have receipts I can show you.
And he did not provide the receipts. This is not how it went down. I know it went down this way. I'm waiting for one of them to go on record and to say that it didn't go down this way. It was at this time that BB Netanyahu was called and Charlie was invited to Israel.
This was an under duress situation I would say, because I've been in these situations before. When I started asking very sensible questions about Israel, as someone who had dedicated her political life to supporting Israel many times alongside Charlie Kirk, I was met with the very same pressure. And just like Charlie was being invited to Israel, I was invited somewhere else. And when this arrived to me, it felt like a threat. I got it to that.
It felt like a threat. Like not like, Hey, come here and we can educate you because you're my friend. More like, this is your last chance. That's how it felt to me. I can't speak to how it felt to Charlie.
And I know that Charlie was offered a ton of money in this moment. A ton of money. BB would fund it. You know? Spend tons of money.
And Turning Point, I guess, if it needed to go to a higher level, would would have gone to an even higher level than it already was at. And I know for a fact that Charlie denied that funding. That Charlie denied, and what Beebe didn't include there, he declined to go to Israel for I would I would describe this as like, you know, reeducation camp, you know. We've seen it. You made an utt oh, but we can help you.
You know, we just need you to come out to Auschwitz and take a picture. Yeah. We just need you to come to the Holocaust Museum and take a photo. We just need you to go to Israel and we can make this better. Charlie said no to Bebe.
Okay. Bill Ackman, you would like to dispute that, I would love to hear what you say happened because our sources and what we have, it's solid. Okay. There were conversations that took place, messages that were sent at that time and they are solid. So I decided another person that was there, and I am not surprised this person was there.
If you've been listening to my show, Seth Dillon. I was going out to Seth Dillon, and I decided to message him last night about this Hamptons meeting. And Seth Dillon who was normally very quick with a response has not yet been able to respond. I'll show you this text message chain. And I wanna be clear, I am not someone who normally publicizes text messages.
But my friend was shot in the neck. And I'm just not really in in the state right now to be polite when it comes to the answers that I am demanding. Okay. This is me out to Seth Dillon last night. I sent him Bill Ackman's tweets because he tweeted, I feel incredibly privileged to have spent a day and shared a meal with Charlie Kirk this summer.
He was a giant of a man. I said, any comment on this one, Seth? He didn't answer last night. This morning I said, need a comment ASAP, please. He didn't answer.
Then I followed that up and I said, trying again here you were present when Ackman lost his mind on Charlie and when BB invited him to Israel and Charlie refused. Text messages immediately following this meeting are circulating. I find Ackman's statement as though the meeting was somehow cordial to be incredibly disturbing. Are you at all disturbed by that tweet? Do you feel as I do that this tweet significantly betrays the defined purpose and mood of his and I presume your final meeting with Charlie Kirk?
He was unable to speak to me, but he did place some frantic calls to Turning Point USA. Yeah. You see, I went out to Seth, but I also went out to two other people who were at this meeting and nobody is willing to go on record. They're all messaging each other trying to figure out a coordinated response to say that, no, this was all quite cordial, but no one wants to go on record and describe it as cordial because they know someone's leaking, because someone's got a guilty conscience about what happened at the Hamptons. So I will again put it out there, Seth, Bill Ackman, and to the other individuals who I have not yet named, but who are going to be named later this week, who are at the Hamptons when Charlie was put under pressure.
When Bibi Netanyahu called him and invited him to Israel, again in a move that when it happened to me and it wasn't Bibi Netanyahu felt to me like a laced threat. I am inviting you guys, I will give you my platform actually to come clear matters up to tell us what really happened because I think Charlie was definitely on the brink of changing some of his perspectives. And I can tell you factually, Charlie was praying the rosary. Charlie was going to mass. One of my last conversations with Charlie was me joking with him saying, just make the last step.
Said specifically, you're too smart to be a Protestant. Just take the last step, Charlie.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
Radical leftists were fired from their jobs after posting videos celebrating Charlie's death. You can't help but smile as you watch. https://t.co/NUb2SKN8Kp
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was just fired from my job. After six years building the diversity, equity and inclusion department from scratch at Microsoft, I lose my job because a random person reports my posts to my employer and takes my job and security away for a thought, for an opinion. Somebody screenshot all of my TikToks. I made some stupid comments about Charlie Kirk on the day that he was shot, I said some things on blue sky and on threads, and I deleted them when it was requested by my employer. 'and you talk about freedom of speech like you care about it.' 'I felt joy that day.' 'I can't help that. So I don't deserve a job?' 'Fired You from my fucking job.' 'Now I have nothing but this website. I have nothing anymore.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was just fired from my job. I've lost my job and I called into the office yesterday and told me that they could either fire me or I could put a resignation in, and but that would look better but they fired me or they're getting rid of me because of my because of my TikTok. Somebody screenshot all of my a lot of my TikToks. And
Speaker 1: I made some stupid comments about Charlie Kirk on the day that he was shot. I said some things on blue sky and on threads that
Speaker 2: I I'm sorry, not sorry for, but I said them, and I deleted them when it was requested that I do so by my employer. And then today, on
Speaker 1: a weekend on a weekend, I'm told that I am no longer employed at Microsoft. After six years building the diversity, equity and inclusion department from scratch, I lose my job because one of you, some random person reports my posts to my employer goes out of their way to find out where I work and takes my job, takes my security away from me for a thought, for an opinion, and you talk about freedom of speech like you care about it. And you're just gonna take my my money, my life, my food off my plate because I don't like Charlie Kirk. That's not okay. It is not okay to target me because I felt joy that day.
I can't help how I feel. I felt joy. That's me. That's what I believe. That's what I think of of him.
I can't help that. So I don't deserve a job?
Speaker 3: Fired You from my fucking job. I was just fired from my job. I was just fired from my job.
Speaker 2: I was just fired from
Speaker 4: my fucking job. I was just fired from my fucking job. Now I have nothing but this. I have nothing but this website. I have nothing anymore.
I have nothing. I have nothing anymore. I have nothing anymore. I have nothing anymore. I have nothing anymore.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
E. Jean Carroll said she didn't believe she was a victim of her "3-minute" encounter she claims to have had with Donald Trump. "I think most people think of rape as sexy. They think of the fantasies." Let's hope the Supreme Court overturns the civil verdict in this case, too. https://t.co/M1qGku6Hfb
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a dressing room, "the minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me." She laughed to cope: "You started laughing?" It turned serious as he "pulled down the tights" with one hand, and it was "a fight" against her will; she notes he is "six three" and she was "about six one in the massive heels." She confirms "Yes" to penetration and says, "That's the definition" of rape, though she prefers calling it "the fight" and says, "I was not the victim." She adds, "Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of society" and that her incident was short—"three minutes in this little dressing room"—and she "got out. I'm moving on."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me. I just it was so shocking. I couldn't of course, I started laughing again because
Speaker 1: You started laughing?
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: What what why? Well, why, of course?
Speaker 0: Because it was a way of if it was at all ironic in his part, it would if a man is laughed at, it usually will make him and he put his shoulder against me to hold me against the wall. And at that point, I realized that I was in a very difficult situation.
Speaker 1: Did he say anything?
Speaker 0: No. No. It was just like, we're gonna do this thing. We're just so hot for each other. Or I don't why would I even try to think what he was thinking?
Anyway, so he put me you know, he pushed me held me with his shoulder, and I was wearing a a coat dress and tights, and he pulled down the tights. And so that's
Speaker 1: He pulled it with he pulled it with both hands, with one hand?
Speaker 0: One. That was when it turned serious. I realized that this was this was this was a fight. And even though I can talk about it now and put words to it, at the time the adrenaline is pouring through me and all I wanna do right.
Speaker 1: How would you describe what were you you you said you were you were obviously Fighting. Surprised, fighting. Right. Were you scared? Were you No.
I was too
Speaker 0: I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 1: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 0: You know
Speaker 1: Is it and you said adrenaline was pumping?
Speaker 0: I assume it was. Right. Because I got strong enough. He's six three. Apparently, I've looked it up.
I was about six one in the massive heels I was wearing. And so we were even almost even in height. And down go the tights, and it was against my will, and it hurt, and it was a fight.
Speaker 1: And this is not a question I would normally ask. And if if you don't wanna answer, totally understand. But given the prior accusations, which have all been of forms of assault or harassment, you you're saying there was actual penetration?
Speaker 0: Yes. Did you
Speaker 1: which is puts it into a different category of any of these other any of the other act women who have come forward. I think techno I mean, that that is that is the definition of of rape. One definition.
Speaker 0: That's the definition. Yes. How long? Brief. Mhmm.
Brief. Because when a woman is stamping her feet mean
Speaker 1: And what you were doing? You started stamping I her
Speaker 0: always think back and think, I that was the stupidest thing I've ever done. I should never have done it. Then I didn't behave
Speaker 1: When you say I should have never done it, you mean
Speaker 0: That was just a dumb thing to go into a dressing room with a man that I hardly know and have him shut the door and then be unable to stop him. And, I was a competitive athlete, so I wasn't like a I didn't freeze. I I rose to the occasion, and, it did not last long. And that's why I don't use the word you just used. I use the word fight.
Speaker 1: You don't use the word rape?
Speaker 0: Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of of society, and I just feel that so many women are undergoing sexual violence. Mine was short. I got out. I'm happy now. I'm, moving on.
And I think of all the women who are enduring constant sexual violence. So this one instant, this one, what, three minutes in this little dressing room, I just say it's the fight. That way, I'm not the victim. Right? I'm not the victim.
Speaker 1: You don't feel like a victim?
Speaker 0: I was not thrown on the ground in ravish, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotation. This was not this was not sexual. For it just it it hurt. It just what it just you know?
Speaker 1: But I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 1: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 0: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. We've just gotta take a quick break. If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
Speaker 0: You're fascinating to talk to.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
New Orleans Democratic Mayor gets indicted on 18 counts, including fraud, obstruction of justice, and false statements. We're taking OUR country back! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/AMlkBgEP7W
Video Transcript AI Summary
Earlier today, a federal grand jury returned an 18 count superseding indictment charging New Orleans mayor Latoya Cantrell and former New Orleans police department officer Jeffrey Paul Vappi the second. They are charged with a series of fraud, obstruction of justice, and false statement offenses for their role in a nearly three year fraud scheme that we allege exploited their public authority and positions. The indictment alleges that in October 2021, mayor Cantrell and Jeffrey Vappi, a member of her executive protection team, developed a personal, intimate relationship. From that time until mister Vappi's retirement in June 2024, they embarked on a scheme to defraud the city of New Orleans and the New Orleans Police Department by exploiting Vappi's job and Cantrell's authority as mayor to have the city and the New Orleans Police Department pay Vappi's salary and expenses during the times that Vappi claimed to be on duty, But when he he was actually engaged in personal activities, usually with miss Cantrell, but sometimes alone at the Pantalba apartment. The indictment describes the steps Cantrell and Vappi took to hide their scheme.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Earlier today, a federal grand jury returned an 18 count superseding indictment charging New Orleans mayor Latoya Cantrell and former New Orleans police department officer Jeffrey Paul Vappi the second. They are charged with a series of fraud, obstruction of justice, and false statement offenses for their role in a nearly three year fraud scheme that we allege exploited their public authority and positions. The indictment alleges that in October 2021, mayor Cantrell and Jeffrey Vappi, a member of her executive protection team, developed a personal, intimate relationship. From that time until mister Vappi's retirement in June 2024, they embarked on a scheme to defraud the city of New Orleans and the New Orleans Police Department by exploiting Vappi's job and Cantrell's authority as mayor to have the city and the New Orleans Police Department pay Vappi's salary and expenses during the times that Vappi claimed to be on duty. But when he he was actually engaged in personal activities, usually with miss Cantrell, but sometimes alone at the Pantalba apartment.
The indictment further describes the many steps that Cantrell and Vappi took to hide their scheme.
reSee.it AI Summary
Growing up, my life was influenced by family values and education. I started working at my father's company, E. Trump and Son, during summers. After college, I took over in 1971 and renamed it the Trump Organization, marking the beginning of my journey in real estate.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
As a young man, Donald Trump's life was shaped by his family values, his education, and his entry into the real estate business. President Trump worked for his father's company, E. Trump and Son, during the summers and after graduating from college. He took over the company in 1971 and renamed it the Trump Organization.
reSee.it AI Summary
The suspect in the Minnesota shootings, Vance Boelter, allegedly sent a text to his roommate and best friend hours after the crimes, saying, "I didn't want to implicate you." Something feels off about this roommate; they seem suspicious.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
The suspect in the Minnesota shootings Vance Boelter allegedly sent a text at 6:17 am, hours after the crimes were committed to his roommate and best friend. Something is just not right with this. This roommate is so sus. The text should be in the past tense. "I don't want to implicate you" I didn't want to implicate you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a video of a suspect's roommate reading a text message allegedly sent at 6:17 AM. The text says, "I love you guys. I made some choices, I love you choices, and you guys don't know anything about this. You guys don't know anything about this. But I'm gonna be gone for a while." The text also says, "I don't wanna say anything more and implicate you in any way because you guys don't know anything about this." The speaker highlights the repetition of "You guys don't know anything about this" in the message. The text concludes with, "I love you guys, and I'm sorry for all the trouble this has caused." A journalist asks to see a photo of the phone screen. The roommate says reading the text is difficult for him. The speaker questions if the roommate knows more than he is saying, based on his nervousness and body language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the weirdest video I've ever seen. This is the suspect's best friend and roommate reading a text from him that he sent allegedly at 06:17AM. I love you guys. I made some choices, I love you choices, and you guys don't know anything about this. You guys don't know anything about this.
But I'm gonna be gone for a while. Notice his shirt? Shout out Papa John's. Yeah. I don't wanna say anything more and implicate you in any way because you you guys don't know anything about this.
Wait. He said twice in the same text. You don't know anything about this. You're not implicated. You didn't know anything.
You're not implicated. You didn't know anything. Alright, bro. We get it. We get it, bro.
I love you guys, and I'm sorry for all the trouble this has caused. Then one journalist doesn't quite believe his story. Is there a photo of your phone screen left here? Yeah. I just don't want do you have any seeing a splash on them?
Yeah. I mean, we we wanna run it big, but I guess I'll Yeah. I'm sorry. Since I read it, that's Okay. More annoying.
This is the best part. This is the best part of the whole video. Wait for it. Sorry. Just got over here.
What did the text say? I already missed it. I can't read it again. It takes too much out of me. Look how nervous he is here.
Look at his body language here. I wish I could have been there. Does that guy not know way more than he is saying?
reSee.it AI Summary
A user stated that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the State Department can revoke visas at its discretion, suggesting a new era of accountability. Another user questioned the accuracy of this claim, while a third provided a link for further information.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
SCOTUS unanimously ruled that the State Department can revoke anyone's visa at any time, at their discretion. 🔥 "The era of accountability is finally here." 🇺🇸 https://t.co/rgfbCcU4Wi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the mainstream media is falsely framing the issue as a tension between free speech and protecting Jewish students. They state Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian national, abused his student visa and green card status by advocating for the eradication of Western civilization and distributing pamphlets supporting Hamas on Columbia's campus.
The speaker alleges Khalil vandalized property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostage, and sent police officers to the hospital. They question the existence of a "Palestine exception" that allows individuals to cause damage without consequences if done in support of Palestine, Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations. They assert that everyone should be treated equally under the law and that violating visa or green card terms should have consequences. The speaker concludes that this is not just a Jewish or antisemitism issue, but an issue pertaining to the upholding of the American democracy system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the worst things the mainstream media is doing is they're concocting this narrative whereby there's a tension between free speech or protecting Jewish students. This has quite literally nothing to do with free speech. Mahmoud Khalil is not an American. He's a Syrian national. He came to The United States to go to one of the best or former best colleges in The United States, and he abused the privilege that was granted to him.
He abused his student visa. He abused his green card status. He advocated not just for the eradication of Western civilization, but he passed out pamphlets encouraging support for Hamas on Columbia's campus. This is someone who, as I said earlier, vandalized private property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostages, sent police officers and school employees to the hospital. So I don't understand why there's this Palestine exception that you can do whatever damage you would like and suffer zero consequences so long as you do it in support of Palestine and so long as you do it in support of Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations.
Everyone should be treated equally under the law. And when someone violates the terms of their student visa, when someone violates the term of their green card status, then there will be consequences. As I said, the era of accountability is finally, finally, finally here. This is not just a Jewish issue. This is just an anti Semitism issue.
This is an issue pertaining to The United States and our upholding of the American democracy system.
@HeliJoc - Chris ⛵
@Girlpatriot1974 @Steph93065 @grok Is this claim about SCOTUS true?
@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere
@HeliJoc @Girlpatriot1974 @Steph93065 @grok https://t.co/B7Y6LHs0L4
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
It was just discovered that the Biden Administration had been paying the press for the last 4 years. Political received $26 MILLION! 🤬 You can't make this up! SMH https://t.co/xjPCnH669U
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration reportedly paid POLITICO $26 million over four years, including $8 million last year. The government claims this was for subscriptions to Politico Pro, which offers exclusive reporting about the federal government. Subscriptions cost between $10,000 to $75,000 a year.
Politico Pro is allegedly not for government employees but for lobbyists seeking contact information for regulators. The speaker questions why government officials would need to pay for inside information about their own departments. The speaker claims the payments were a bailout and a payoff.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we just found out the Biden administration was paying the press. During the last four years, POLITICO received $26,000,000 from the federal government. $8,000,000 just last year. The Biden administration was paying a DC insider publication that happened to never report anything bad about the Biden administration. But what did they pay for besides good press?
The government says it was for subscriptions to Politico Pro. Well, what's Politico Pro? Supposed to give you inside scoops or exclusive reporting about the federal government. It's been around since 2010, but all of a sudden in 2021, the Biden administration starts buying hundreds of Politico Pro subscriptions, and a subscription runs anywhere from 10,000 to $75,000 a year. Those are like top tier country club dues.
For $75,000, this exclusive reporting must be pretty good. Right? Now, no one ever read in Politico Pro that Biden was brain dead. Now if I'm gonna pay $75 for journalism, I wanna know whose Coke was in the White House. Politico Pro isn't even for people in government.
It's for lobbyists. You pay $75 a year for the name and email address of a regulator at the FDA. So you can email them, wine them and dine them at Cafe Milano, and then grease the regs for Pfizer or Kraft or whoever your client is. You find that when the farm bill's about to pass, so you can send your lobbyists into the backroom and write the bill. It's not for people in the government.
What do people at the Department of Energy need to pay $75 for to find out what's going on in the Department of Energy? Mayorkas needs to know what's going on with the border bill. All he has to do is call Chuck Schumer. The phone call's free. This doesn't make any sense.
The whole thing is a racket. This was a bailout. Biden's government didn't need this. It's a payoff product.
reSee.it AI Summary
SCOTUS has ruled that the State Department can revoke visas at any time without court review. This decision emphasizes that entry into the country is a privilege, not a right, and highlights the importance of accountability in immigration matters.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
SCOTUS unanimously ruled that the State Department can revoke anyone's visa at any time, at their discretion. 🔥 "The era of accountability is finally here." 🇺🇸 https://t.co/rgfbCcU4Wi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the mainstream media is falsely framing the issue as a tension between free speech and protecting Jewish students. They state Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian national, abused his student visa and green card status by advocating for the eradication of Western civilization and distributing pamphlets supporting Hamas on Columbia's campus.
The speaker alleges Khalil vandalized property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostage, and sent police officers to the hospital. They question the existence of a "Palestine exception" that allows individuals to cause damage without consequences if done in support of Palestine, Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations. The speaker insists on equal treatment under the law and consequences for violating visa or green card terms, asserting that an era of accountability is beginning. They characterize this as an issue pertaining to the upholding of the American democracy system, not just antisemitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the worst things the mainstream media is doing is they're concocting this narrative whereby there's a tension between free speech or protecting Jewish students. This has quite literally nothing to do with free speech. Mahmoud Khalil is not an American. He's a Syrian national. He came to The United States to go to one of the best or former best colleges in The United States, and he abused the privilege that was granted to him.
He abused his student visa. He abused his green card status. He advocated not just for the eradication of Western civilization, but he passed out pamphlets encouraging support for Hamas on Columbia's campus. This is someone who, as I said earlier, vandalized private property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostages, sent police officers and school employees to the hospital. So I don't understand why there's this Palestine exception that you can do whatever damage you would like and suffer zero consequences so long as you do it in support of Palestine and so long as you do it in support of Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations.
Everyone should be treated equally under the law. And when someone violates the terms of their student visa, when someone violates the term of their green card status, then there will be consequences. As I said, the era of accountability is finally, finally, finally here. This is not just a Jewish issue. This is just an anti Semitism issue.
This is an issue pertaining to The United States and our upholding of the American democracy system.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
Marco Rubio speaks to students who are here on foreign visas who thought it was a good idea to protest on college campuses against OUR COUNTRY! "You're a visitor. You need to go!" 🇺🇸 https://t.co/718RyTs2T7
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's just common sense. You're a visitor, not an American citizen. We granted you a visa for a temporary stay, and now you're openly supporting Hamas, a known terrorist group? It's time for you to leave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I am saying is common sense. You're a visitor. You're not even an American. You're a foreign national. You're here because we gave you a visa to be here temporarily, and now you're out there defending and supporting Hamas, a terrorist organization?
You need to go.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
WHOA! EVERY U.S. CITIZEN NEEDS TO HEAR THIS!! https://t.co/qTbJLQydrX
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump, I urge you to request reports from the FBI and DEA offices in Colombia covering the last four years. These reports will reveal who financed, moved, and directed the Tren de Aragua, including those who brought them to Colombia and the United States. The reports will show that in Venezuela, we defeated and dismantled this violent criminal group that tried to bring terrorism to Venezuela from Colombia with ties to the previous Biden administration. The extinct Tren de Aragua sought to attack our cities with terrorism, but we prevented it through intelligence and action. Our migrants aren't criminals; they migrated because of sanctions. They are good, hardworking people, and we welcome them back to Venezuela as a productive force with open arms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Querido utilizar la campaña de la administración Biden sobre el tema del tren de Aragua. Yo sobre eso tengo una posición muy clara. Le digo al presidente Donald Trump, con respeto, pida los informes de los últimos cuatro años del FBI y la DEA, de las oficinas en Colombia, para que ustedes vean, presidente Trump, quiénes financiaron, quiénes movieron, quiénes dirigieron al famoso tren de Aragua, quienes lo llevaron a Colombia, quienes lo llevaron a Estados Unidos, y pida los informes verídicos para que sepa que aquí en Venezuela nosotros derrotamos, desmembramos y acabamos con ese grupo delincuencial violento que pretendió utilizarse desde Colombia con lazos profundos con la antigua administración Biden para traer terrorismo a Venezuela. Si algo se puede decir de terrorismo del tren de Aragua, extinto tren de Aragua, es que querían atacar con terrorismo las ciudades del país, y nosotros lo evitamos, mira, con inteligencia, con acción, presidente Trump, pide esos informes para que usted vea, se los digo con sinceridad y con respeto, para que usted vea la verdad sobre el famoso tren de Aragua, nuestros migrantes no son delincuentes, no son gente mala, fueron gente que migró producto de las sanciones, son gente de bien, gente de trabajo, en Venezuela le damos la bienvenida como fuerza productiva, con un abrazo amoroso, bienvenido, vuelta a la patria, reencuentro familiar, bienvenidos todos.
@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot
How cool was this?! Trump is a man after America's heart! 🥰 🇺🇸 https://t.co/daguQYWmwW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Frank, an 11-year-old from Falls Church, Virginia, offered to mow the White House lawn for free, aiming to demonstrate the capabilities of young people. He wrote to President Trump, expressing admiration for his business background and sharing his experience running his own lawn care business. Frank detailed his equipment, including a power mower, push mower, and weed wacker, and offered to provide fuel and charged batteries at no cost. His letter gained national attention when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders read it on live television, highlighting the promise of youth and their contributions to society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: His name is Frank. He's 11 years old from Falls Church, Virginia, and he might put the National Park Service out of a job keeping the White House grounds maintained. You see, Frank, who also goes by the name f x, he wrote to president Donald Trump offering his lawn mowing services at no charge. He got national attention last month when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders read his letter on live television.
Speaker 1: It'd be my honor to mow the White House lawn for some weekend for you. Even though I'm only 10, I'd like to show the nation what young people like me are ready for. I admire your business background and have started my own business. I've been mowing my neighbor's lawns for some time. Please see the attached flyer.
Here's a list of what I have, and you can and you're free to pick whatever you want. Power mower, push mower, and weed wacker. I can bring extra fuel for the power mower and charge batteries for the weed wacker, and he'll do that with no charge. Sincerely, Frank.
Speaker 0: Can we get a photo? Can we get a photo? Future of the country right there. We're lucky. That's the real future of the country.