TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @GodsRiddles
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Breaking...A Billion Dollar Class Action against United Airlines over its treatment of employees seeking a religious accommodation to the COVID-19 Shot got the green light from the Northern Federal court in Texas. Details are: (1) CEO intentionally applied excessive punitive acts to those seeking a religious exemption, (2) CEO engaged in coercive acts, (3) United ignored its own safety officer stating the mandate was not needed, (4) court only allowing employees that had a religious exemption to move forward, (5) Plaintiffs have until july 5th to fight for all employees to move forward, (6) United required only "certain" employees to wear the suffocating N95 masks and not other employees to apply maximum punitive measures to employees. Not looking good for the future stock price of this airline.
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Please note I'm aware of the multitude of lawsuits but that does not mean I'm involved in all of them, which I am not. I am in 17 lawsuits now but not this one. Just sharing the joy.
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
WOW....just astounding...The FDA, the authoritative body responsible for ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, issued a legal notice to Shriners. This notice informed Shriners Hospitals for Children in PA that they shall "clearly and conspicuously shall state that: [Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine] has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA". This notice WAS AFTER the FDA approved Comirnaty to inform Shriners that nothing legally changed with the existing investigational drug. Now, in federal court, Shriners is audaciously arguing that the drug was actually approved because Comirnaty was approved. In other words, the law firm and Shriners are showing no fear of the federal judge when injecting an outrageous false claim despite the Plaintiffs providing that FDA notice as an exhibit. The FDA, CDC, HHS, and Pfizer all treated the drug as investigational at all times and issued legal notices of that fact. Only Shriners is arguing the approval of Comirnaty applied to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, which, according to law, it cannot, and Shriners knows that fact. LEGAL FACT: A drug, biologic, or device is licensed or investigational according to its labeling, and no other factor determines its legal status. Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine shared formulations have no bearing on each other's labeling and the laws applicable to them. Moreover, there are 19k licensed drugs, of which thousands have investigational versions, and Shriners is asking the court to change the laws applicable to those drug labels to avoid a nasty lawsuit by healthcare workers they subjected to investigational new drug use outside of the workers' free consent. Such an action was a violation of the healthcare workers' rights. A drug is either under EUA or it is not and the HHS said the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine drug was under EUA. How can this fact even be argued in court? If a drug is under EUA it is not licensed for its emergency use according to federal law.
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Not only did Shriners violate their agreement with the federal government to comply with "any EUA" they are violating even in a court of law by not "clearly and conspicuously stating that: [Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine] has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA".
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Within days, I am providing a "free" legal complaint (template form) to anyone still under a COVID-19, influenza, testing, or masking mandate. Any lawyer could take this legal complaint, understand it within an hour, and effectively challenge the mandate's legality by seeking a Declaratory Judgment and injunctive relief action on behalf of their client. The template truly represents 2,000 hours of my life and is irrefutable by the Constitution, statute, regulation, or any other law. A lawyer could also take the contents and repurpose it for a successful lawsuit, seeking monetary damages under appropriate conditions. It was and still is illegal to require any person to inject an unlicensed drug or a licensed drug under the PREP ACT into their body as a condition for ANYTHING. Participation is your autonomous choice 100% of the time! I will start my official fundraising this week to see the complaint filed in fed courts across the nation to establish court precedent. You can join in on the "soft opening" should you desire :) - https://www.givesendgo.com/Covidpenalty
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Here is how state AGs, private employers, and hospitals conspired against the American people to rob them of their Equal Protection and Due Process rights guaranteed under the 14th Amendment. You're not ready for this! (1) The federal government purchased all COVID-19 drugs whether they were licensed or under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). (2) The CDC created the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program Providers Agreement for the express purpose of distributing the federal property. (3) YOUR STATE had to agree to allow the CDC to use its existing immunization program to distribute federal COVID-19 drugs, biologics, and device property. (4) The state required hospitals to be authorized by them first, the CDC second, and to abide by all federal and state laws. The state at this moment owed you 14th Amendment Constitutional obligations. They were required by law to treat those who accepted the product in the same manner as those who refused. Moreover, if a person was deprived of their liberty or property for choosing one of the two legally protected options, then due process was the mechanism by which that deprivation occurred. The hospital acted on behalf of your state government to distribute the federal government's property. The hospital was, therefore, a state actor owing you the same constitutional obligations as the State. (5) The hospital signed the CDC Contract but turned around and created a mandate in defiance of 12(a) of that contract. The State's HHS director (or equivalent) knew the mandate violated the contract and also the state's Federal Wide Assurance agreement whereby the State promised HHS that it would never allow a person to come under a sanction for refusing to participate in a 21 CFR 312.3 investigational clinical drug such as Pfizer's BioNTech COVID-19 EUA drug. (6) The State AG knew that 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 option to accept or refuse was under the Supremacy Clause, and no private employer had lawful authority to interfere with a person's option by using the state's at-will employment doctrine as the means to interfere. (7) The State HHS Director, hospital CEO, and state AG all remained silent in hopes that all of you were too stupid to know your legal rights and would submit to modern tyranny without disputing their abuse of powers. (8) The Hospital committed fraud if they billed the US Govt for employee shots. The hospital and or private employer misrepresented their authority when issuing the mandate because the Supremacy Clause and express language of the PREP Act denied them the right to create mandatory conditions. 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3(l) even informed the State AG that not even the HHS Sec can mandate participation. He is the ONLY Person authorized to establish conditions for access to the unlicensed medical product. (9) The State AG engaged in a dereliction of duty by not protecting your equal protection rights and denying you due process when you were precluded from selling your labors in the marketplace for exercising a legal right conferred upon you by a valid act of Congress (the option to refuse). (10) The state HHS director should be under criminal prosecution along with the hospital CEO and CMO for violating a signed contract with the CDC, leading to severe physical and financial injuries and deprivations of Constitutional rights. Yet, your state AG, like Jeff Landry of Louisiana, had the gall to tell people there was nothing he could do when he could have always protected 100% of his state citizens. The same scenario applies to all 50 US States and Territories and their Attorneys General. NO PERSON can be required to inject an unlicensed drug into their body as a condition to enjoy a privilege of the State or a benefit to which they were otherwise entitled. NO Constitution, statute, treaty, or regulation can refute such a statement. Now you know why state AGs are remaining silent for fear of losing their political careers over protecting your rights. BONUS: Products under the PREP Act are precluded from being under mandatory conditions because such a requirement deprives you of your Due Process rights. SHARE to protect your rights.
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
Legal Fact: Defendants in the lawsuits I'm consulting on do not attempt to argue they had the right to mandate the use of the EUA drugs. They do not dispute that Congress prohibited them from issuing such a mandate. They do not dispute they subjected plaintiffs to unlawful investigational drug use. In other words, they do not argue in court that which they argue in public. NOW that we have that settled, what we have planned for November will be historic. You're going to want to see it, so follow.
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
BREAKING....Florida Baptist Health mandates medical partitioners, vendors, volunteers, and students to inject an emergency medical countermeasure into their bodies by November 15th, or they will lose access to living wages. Baptist executives are fraudulently concealing the material fact that persons injecting these products into their bodies are precluded from seeking judicial relief from injuries, even by Baptist staff. If Baptist Health is earning revenue from these shots, then this is a clear case of unjust enrichment. Baptist Health CAN NOT coerce persons to participate in an emergency medical countermeasure under the PREP Act, EUA, or EUI by law, and it is up to Attorney General Ashley Moody to put a stop to this medical tyranny. Enough is Enough!
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
All Influenza vaccines are labeled as emergency medical countermeasures this year. Baptist has dropped its COVID-19 MCM but now requires the influenza vaccine. If you participate in one of the PREP ACT influenza vaccines, you are prohibited from seeking judicial relief in most circumstances from resulting injuries. Baptist is not informing staff of this legal consequence. Moreover, no person can be required to forfeit their federal legal rights under threat of penalty. This is a federal law that preempts Florida laws completely, and as such, federal law states that all persons must be involved only under voluntary conditions. This includes persons administering the product and those receiving the product. The State has legal responsibility for ensuring MCMs (medical countermeasures) are administered legally. You can't absolve yourself from liability and earn a profit by mandating ppl take the jab. This is not China! What is wrong with Florida politicians????
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
BREAKING... A class action lawsuit was filed in federal court against Gilead Sciences, Inc. for injuries sustained by individuals using Remdesivir. "The complaint seeks restitution, injunctive relief, disgorgement (return of all profits made by Gilead from the sale of Remdesivir), and other relief for Gilead's alleged wrongdoing that resulted in countless personal injuries and wrongful deaths." NOTE: I had nothing to do with this case but felt the nation needed to know about it. 40 page complaint here: https://myerandscher.com/_files/ugd/7e444c_e4fa77961ba34af4a60979b6541e3319.pdf
@GodsRiddles - Brian Ward
BREAKING MUST READ: The new PIfzer/Moderna shots coming out are under the PREP Act, which requires only voluntary participation. Moreover, "it appears" these shots will be the first licensed product vials to hit the shelves. The FDA told these companies in JUNE to make a shot, and they did in less than 60 days. However, despite 361,000,000 potential contraindications between the two drugs and 19,000 other licensed drugs, the FDA actually licensed them for commercial marketing, which is why they will not let them outside of the PREP Act's absolute immunity. NURSES, all seasonal influenza shots are also under the PREP Act for this year, which means you are not required to take the shot under a mandate. However, the HHS Sec has brought ALL child vaccines under the PREP Act to provide absolute immunity for all damages, bringing into question the vaccine injury fund and how it might not be available to new victims. HHS ALSO is providing PREP Act immunity for ALL seasonal influenza "vaccines," which means that no one can be required to participate, and I am releasing a video explaining the legal reason why. AMERICA - EVERY child vaccine administered this year is under absolute immunity, and every seasonal influenza vaccine is under absolute immunity. Additionally, many masks, testing articles, and protective equipment are still under EUA and the PERP Act. Here is what is covered: Any antiviral, any drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, any respiratory protective device, or any vaccine manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured: To diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom; or to limit the harm that COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom, might otherwise cause; (b) a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in paragraph (a) above; (c) a product or technology intended to enhance the use or effect of a product described in paragraph (a) or (b) above; or (d) any device used in the administration of any such product, and all components and constituent materials of any such product. WAIT, you're not ready for this: HHS Sec extended the disease categories under the PREP Act, which could be 100% of all diseases and medical treatments. "The category of disease, health condition, or threat for which I recommend the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is not only COVID–19 caused by SARS–CoV– 2, or a virus mutating therefrom, but also other diseases, health conditions, or threats that may have been caused by COVID–19, SARS–CoV–2, or a virus mutating therefrom, including the threat of increased burden on the healthcare system due to seasonal influenza infections occurring at the same time as COVID–19 infections, which will lead to an increase in the rate of infectious diseases." In other words, if you go to the hospital due to an auto accident and the hospital uses a respirator that is under the PREP Act in a manner causing you significant harm, the hospital can claim PREP Act immunity because they were under an "increased burden" to attend to all the other patients in the hospital for COVID-19 even though you did not go to the hospital for COVID-19 treatment. The PREP Act is the most unconstitutional piece of legislation ever to come out of Congress. Don't believe me? Congress wrote into the PREP Act that the judicial branch of government can not issue a writ of mandamus nor review the legality of the HHS Sec's actions. In other words, the legislative branch provided one person with god like authority that they said that no person in America can touch including the President or the Supreme Court. An authority overriding the U.S. Constitution, state's sovereignty, and our Due Process rights. No person can require any other person to participate in a "covered countermeasure" under PREP Act immunity and I intend to get that ruling from courts around the nation.