reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @GovloverMD256

GovloverMD256
Posted - August 7, 2024 at 4:20 AM
Saved - August 7, 2024 at 11:47 PM

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD⚡️

Supremacist rabbi says “we Jews start wars and send Christians to fight for us”. https://t.co/LdvvnJRzka

Video Transcript AI Summary
The origins of Christianity are seen as a gift given by Yaakov Avinu to Esav, according to Yitzchok. Esav will serve his brother, which could mean cleaning the house or worshiping Hashem. Yitzhak's prophecy is that the Christian world will worship Jews as their god. Antisemitism stems from a lack of identity and self-confidence, leading Esav to worship Jews. This is the root of antisemitism, as stated by Ramesh Dovid Vavad. Translation: The origins of Christianity are viewed as a gift given by Yaakov Avinu to Esav, according to Yitzchok. Esav will serve his brother, which could mean cleaning the house or worshiping Hashem. Yitzhak's prophecy is that the Christian world will worship Jews as their god. Antisemitism stems from a lack of identity and self-confidence, leading Esav to worship Jews. This is the root of antisemitism, as stated by Ramesh Dovid Vavad.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The origins of Christianity and how it wasn't an accident, but it was a gift, possibly a mistaken gift, that Yaakov Avinu gave Esav. You will live by the sword. You will serve your brother. This is what Yitzchok tells Esav. Yitzchok tells Esav. You'll live by the sword. You'll serve your brother. Literally, that means that, you know, the Jews will have the shul, will have the house. And if you need someone to clean it, you call one of Esav's descendants to clean it. What is the meaning that Esav hated Yaakov because of the? Again, we translate it literally. You will serve your brother. The word serve has another meaning as well. You will worship Hashem. What does avoidda mean? Avoidda means service, but avoidda means worship also. And this is the prophecy of Yitzhak Avino, That the Christian world will worship Klaswel as their god. And the older brother- not will serve the younger brother. The older brother will worship the younger brother as a religion. That shame predicted from the beginning of time that Esav will worship a Jew as their religion. That's the Nevuah of Yitzvak Avinu. That's the nivuah of shame. What an astounding nivuah. And if you wanna know why Eisav hates Ya'akov, it's not because we're socialist, capitalist, Bundists, Yiddishists. The Aesop hates Ya'akov because they suffer from a lack of identity and self confidence and that they have to worship us. That's the root of antisemitism, says Ramesh Dovid Vavad.
GovloverMD256
Posted - May 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM
Saved - June 8, 2024 at 11:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss various reasons to avoid miscegenation, including the risk of infertility and the genetic dissimilarity between different racial groups. They argue that mixing races can lead to negative outcomes such as outbreeding depression and the potential extinction of certain races. The posts also mention the importance of considering intelligence and racial achievements. Additionally, statistics are referenced regarding interracial relationships and violence.

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

Reasons to avoid miscegenation. A collection of posts 🧵

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

The risk of infertility.

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

🚨CDC (2020): Black Americans were nine times more likely to have gonorrhea, and six times more likely to have chlamydia than White Americans. These are both important causes of infertility in women. Both of these STDs can be asymptomatic, which means that they are often untreated, which substantially increases the risk of infertility (due to PID). These patterns hold up around the Western world. Infertility is devastating. Please educate your loved ones. Men and women need to be smart. Don't risk your fertility, or that of your future partners. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/std/std-us-2020.html https://archive.is/eavId

Page Not Found | CDC Page Not Found | CDC cdc.gov

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

Race is so much more than skin deep. These infographics are from an excellent Keith Woods article (linked in his post below).

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: If there is such thing as a White race, who exactly is included in White? How light does their skin have to be? I have a friend from Iran with light features, is he White? 𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿: White just refers to people of European descent – the European race. It isn’t merely a description of skin colour. So Italians, French, and Germans are all White, but Persians and Arabs are not, regardless of differences in complexion. The easiest way to visualise this is to look at scatter plots generated from the application of principal component analysis (PCA) to human genetic clusters. This is a statistical procedure that allows us to identify and visualise patterns of variability within a large dataset on a simple two dimensional graph. Take a look at this graph in the image attached. As you can see, we can identify distinct ethnic groups of shared ancestry. There is also a larger cluster of European or White groups, noticeably distinct from Middle Eastern ethnic groups. While you can find some “white” looking people outside European ethnic groups, they would not be included in this White genetic cluster. Of course, this genetic mapping alone does not capture what it means to be White, Europeans have a shared history and many shared cultural practices which mark them as distinct from other racial groups. But this is not just an “imagined community”, it maps on to an objective genetic reality. From my latest essay responding to frequently asked questions about race. Read in full: https://keithwoods.pub/p/frequently-asked-questions-about

Frequently Asked Questions About Race A dialogue about controversial topics keithwoods.pub

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

Outbreeding depression. Notice that Europeans are very genetically dissimilar to Africans, and, despite their admirable qualities, also East Asians. It’s odd that these pairings are extremely common in advertising.

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

The ideal mate is actually genetically similar to oneself - stray too far, and negative results occur (see link). If a tall man breeds with a short woman, do they get some kind of hybrid vigor result, and produce an extra tall child? No, they get an average of their heights (firstborn being the tallest, usually). Likewise with intelligence. A smart parent and a dumb parent will produce average children, on average. Whichever way you want to quantify it, Whites have clearly produced the greatest civilizations, art, technology, and anything else you can think of. East Asians are clear competitors for the top, but we are so genetically dissimilar that mixing also results in outbreeding depression. Thats not to say they can’t go on to do great things; it’s only to say that mixing should be avoided. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression

Outbreeding depression - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

It’s morally wrong if you are part of a dwindling subspecies (perhaps even species). Europeans are as genetically distinct to sub-Saharan Africans as North American Gray Wolves are to coyotes, a different species!

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

If you are White, miscegenation is morally wrong because we are dying out. Most people agree that it is immoral to cause a species or subspecies to go extinct. If it is immoral to allow a specific kind of animal to go extinct, then it is surely as bad (or far worse) to allow a subspecies of humans, i.e., a race, to go extinct. Intermixing will get rid of us just as surely as not having children at all - our paltry numbers will be totally erased by the overwhelming tide of other subspecies (races).

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

Any behavior associated with all of these negative attributes is surely worth avoiding.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Whites who racemix are on average dumber, poorer, fatter, less honest, more promiscuous, more mentally ill, more neurotic, and more prone to risk-taking behavior. Source: https://mankindquarterly.org/archive/issue/64-2/8

Predictors of Engaging in Interracial Dating Research suggests that mixed-race adolescents are more likely than monoracial adolescents to use drugs or engage in violent behavior, and that interracial relationships contain more conflict than monoracial ones. However, it is not clear whether these outcomes are caused by racial conflict and identity or by self-selection. To determine this, we used data from the NLSY97 and Add Health datasets to explore what characteristics predict whether an individual is engaged in an interracial relationship. Our investigation suggests that assortative mating occurs between races, where individuals who date individuals of other races tend to be more similar to them. The standardized difference in intelligence between those interracially mated and those who didn’t varied by race (White d = -0.22, p < .001; Black d = 0.31, p < .001; Hispanic d = 0.73, p < .001). Also, there is a difference in height between Hispanics who interracially dated and those who didn’t (mean d = 0.29, p < .001). Interracial daters tended to engage in a broader range of risk-taking behaviors (White d = 0.18, p < .01; Black d = 0.42, p < .01; Hispanic d = 0.53, p < .001) regardless of their race. The available evidence supports that the behavior of mixed-race adolescents is a product of genetic transmission, and that some of the increased divorce and inter-partner violence observed within interracial relationships may be a product of self-selection instead of racial conflict or social pressure. Keywords: Assortative mating, Intelligence, Race, Psychopathology mankindquarterly.org

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

As I alluded to earlier, intelligence and racial achievements are also very important to consider. Jared Taylor goes over this topic in the video below (from the American Renaissance channel on btchute). https://t.co/Tj57E9brhr

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

🚨White people are over twelve times more likely to be killed by a Black spouse than by a White spouse. Article with several key stats:

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

x.com/i/article/1788…

GovloverMD256
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 6:50 PM
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 6:06 AM

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

@WallStreetSilv This historian has observed a few massive holes in the official story. https://t.co/Li7DMI5TPV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the labeling of a gas chamber as a fake, arguing it's a reconstruction. They question the scale and feasibility of mass cremations in Auschwitz, highlighting the lack of evidence in archives supporting gas chamber claims. Eyewitness testimony is deemed unreliable without corroborating evidence. The speaker challenges the historical narrative surrounding Auschwitz, emphasizing the need for thorough archival research to uncover the truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on to this reader's editor to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference in a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald 3 days ago to which my to which my response is to which my response is a fake like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned in this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for 50 years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews, and if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fine $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why did they show the school children the fake building here when at allegedly there was genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road 3 or 4 miles away. Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins in a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen, this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. 4 crematorium in Auschwitz, because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing an injustice, because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale, we're arguing about intent, we're arguing about the how, and the why and the where for. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz? If cremating 1 person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are these 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the bringing in the the wagon loads of coke. So that is prima paci by itself improbable. And, anyway, these 4 crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time. We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops 70, 80, 90,000 people in the 4 or 5 years that the camp is in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, well, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. The end of World War 2, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for 50 years in the archives, and those archives are still not being properly researched. They're still in total disarray, and believe me, it would not have been possible in the last 1 or 2 weeks of the collapsing 3rd Reich for somebody to go around all the archives, taking out all the references to gas chambers if there were any, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying them. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz concentration camps sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many have died. We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz. We know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume 2 of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz concentration camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. Then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. That is why when people say, well, what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence. Tell that to John about eyewitness evidence. The man, the Cleveland auto worker who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, Israeli supreme court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Netanyahu admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough and that the eyewitnesses had and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence. Yeah. Auschwitz record
GovloverMD256
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 6:34 AM
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 11:27 AM

@GovloverMD256 - Govlover MD

@Lucas_Gage_ Looking for the original clip, with no added music and no overlay. https://t.co/Oo1TyJhhA6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the authenticity of a reconstructed gas chamber at Auschwitz, arguing that it should be labeled as such. They suggest that the existence of a genuine gas chamber nearby raises doubts about the purpose of the reconstructed one. The speaker acknowledges the crimes committed against Jews during the Holocaust but questions the scale and intent. They argue that the lack of physical evidence, such as large quantities of coke for cremation, challenges the official narrative. The speaker emphasizes the importance of archival research and dismisses eyewitness testimony as unreliable. They reference intercepted code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, which make no mention of gassing. The speaker concludes that there is a lack of collateral evidence to support the existence of gas chambers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He then goes on and he read his letter to say, and it's also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So he said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald 3 days ago To which my to which my response is, if this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for 50 years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuttering schoolchildren from all over Europe, them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews. And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it is a reconstruction, which makes it a fake. Mine find $22,000 for pointing this back out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, Why did they show the school children the fake building here when at allegedly, there were genuine gas chamber ruling just down the road 3 or 4 miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins in a gas chamber, but I think, of what is the maps I've seen, this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. For crematoria in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problem. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing an injustice. Because there was undoubtedly A crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the high, how, and the why, and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. If cremating 1 person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to create 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs nor are there truckloads of code being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the bringing in the the wagon loads And anyway, these 4 crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at the time. We know they couldn't have cremated More than tops 70, 80, 90,000 people in the 4 or 5 years that the camp is in existence. These are the technical The end of World War 2, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for 50 years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last 1 or 2 weeks of the collapsing third right for somebody to go around all the archives, taking out all the references to gas chambers if there were any or all the references to the final solution if there were any and destroying. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have All the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives In Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British Reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz concentration camps message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the count of Right? How many have died? We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz. We know what reported. And the chief historian in the British Secret Service who printed this in volume 2 of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz concentration camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. Then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegram to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams in the top secret SAS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. That is why when people say, well, what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John about eyewitness evidence. The man, the Cleveland autoworker who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Daniel, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here, we have to say, there is no such evidence.
View Full Interactive Feed