reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @GubbaHomestead

GubbaHomestead
Posted - February 9, 2026 at 6:16 PM
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe schools are government facilities to brainwash the rising generations. School photos just catalog kids. That's just the surface. Schools are prison for children.

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Why I would NEVER send my children to school… Schools are just government facilities used to brainwash the rising generations. And it’s come to the surface that school photos are to catalog children. That’s just scratching the surface. Schools are prison for children. https://t.co/DDvZdvxpKH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that sending children to a government-run school system at age five resembles an institution that trains obedience rather than independent thinking. They describe schools as places with eight-hour days under flickering lights, processed cafeteria food, purportedly fake history, and a focus on memorization over critical thought, urging students to raise their hands, stand in line, and not question rules. The speaker draws a parallel between schools and prisons, suggesting both restrict questioning and enforce authority. They claim the Rockefeller family, historically associated with shaping the medical system, also funded and shaped the modern education system. The assertion is that this influence was intended not to empower children but to create obedient workers who serve the system without question. The speaker cites John D. Rockefeller, saying, "I don't want a nation of free thinkers. I want a nation of workers," and asks whether the school system was created for the benefit of children or for the power and control of its creators. The overall message is a cautionary view of education as a tool for conditioning conformity and maintaining systemic control, rather than fostering independent thinking. The speaker concludes with the disclaimer, "I'm just a conspiracy theorist."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me get this straight. We're supposed to send our children, our most precious gift off at just the age of five to a government institution, where they sit in a desk for eight hours a day under flickering fluorescent lights, eating processed slop in a cafeteria while being taught fake history, forced to memorize useless facts, and punished for thinking differently. It's almost as if they aren't being taught to think but are being trained to obey. Raise your hand to speak, stand in line, don't question the rules. That sounds a lot like another place where inmates are locked in cells all day, told when they can eat, and silenced if they question authority. That other place is prison. And here's the uncomfortable truth. The Rockefellers, the same family that hijacked our medical system a hundred years ago, also helped fund and shape our modern day education system. Not to empower our children, but to create obedient workers that serve the system without question. And don't just take my word for it. John D Rockefeller said it himself. I don't want a nation of free thinkers. I want a nation of workers. So ask yourself, was the school system created for the benefit of our children or for the power and control of those who created it? I don't know. I'm just a conspiracy theorist.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - January 21, 2026 at 4:06 PM
Saved - January 21, 2026 at 10:19 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

A conspiracy theory I 100% believe? That root canals can lead to long term chronic health conditions and wisdom teeth are harvested for profit. No one is putting the pieces together that our mouth is connected to the rest of our body. Be careful what you have done. https://t.co/hX8o14zptB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 highlights that root canals and wisdom teeth removal are common procedures but alleges there are important things not disclosed. The speaker argues that teeth are not separate from the rest of the body; they are living organs with nerves, blood supply, and communication with the body. If you had a dead organ inside you, you wouldn’t leave it there, yet the speaker claims that with a root canal, that is exactly what happens. The speaker references traditional Chinese medicine, stating that each tooth is connected through meridians to specific organ systems in the body. Therefore, when a root canal is performed and a dead tooth remains in the mouth, some believe that those entire meridians become compromised, and chronic health issues can sometimes bubble up. The speaker asserts that no one is connecting those health issues with a dead organ sitting inside the mouth. Regarding wisdom teeth, the speaker says you’re not just getting teeth pulled when they’re removed. Those wisdom teeth contain powerful stem cells that are harvested, researched, and sold for massive profit. The speaker notes the irony in how this is not typically disclosed when people are having their teeth removed and billed. The speaker contends that people are left wondering why chronic issues never resolve, emphasizing that the mouth is not separate from the body and is one of the main gateways. The speaker suggests that nothing about this feels accidental, though acknowledges the possibility of being labeled a conspiracy theorist. Finally, the speaker invites viewers to learn how to support the whole body outside of the system and states, if you want to learn, to comment “heal now.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever had a root canal or your wisdom teeth removed? If so, you might want to listen closely. Root canals and wisdom teeth removal are some of the most common procedures in modern dentistry. They're routine, normal, and barely questioned. But here's what they don't tell you. Your teeth are not separate from the rest of your body. They are living organs just like your thyroid or your liver. They have nerves, blood supply, and communication with the rest of your body. If you had a dead organ inside of you, you wouldn't just leave it there. Yet, with a root canal, that's exactly what happens. According to traditional Chinese medicine, each tooth is connected through meridians to specific organs systems in the body. So, when a root canal is done and a dead tooth is left sitting inside your mouth, some believe that those entire meridians become compromised, and chronic health issues can sometimes bubble up. Yet, no one is connecting those health issues with a dead organ sitting inside your mouth. And it doesn't end there. When wisdom teeth are removed, you're not just getting teeth pulled. Those wisdom teeth contain powerful stem cells that are harvested, researched, and sold for massive profit. Funny how they never tell you that when they're yanking your teeth out and sending you a bill. And then people are left wondering why chronic issues never resolve. Your mouth is not separate from your body. It is one of the main gateways. Nothing about this feels accidental, but maybe I'm just a conspiracy theorist. If you wanna learn how to support your whole body outside of the system, comment heal now.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - October 23, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Saved - October 24, 2025 at 2:18 AM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

This was Buffalo, NY. They say these buildings were built out of wood and plaster in a short amount of time for a world fair then destroyed shortly after… Or maybe our history is a complete lie. What do you think? https://t.co/XvDn8PloTa

GubbaHomestead
Posted - October 3, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 1:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Digital ID is on the horizon, and it's essential to prepare. I recommend sourcing food locally by growing a garden and connecting with local farmers, while also building food storage. Avoid locking all your money in a bank account that could be frozen. It's important to learn practical skills. True strength lies in community sufficiency rather than just self-sufficiency, so focus on building a strong community and using cash for transactions. Remember, mandatory doesn't always mean it's lawful. Stay calm and assertively say no when needed.

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Digital ID is coming, whether you like it or not. Here is how to prepare: Make your food source as local as possible. Grow a garden. Seek out local farmers. Build a food storage. Don’t tie all of your money up in a bank account that can be frozen at any time. Learn SKILLS. Real strength isn’t in being self-sufficient, but it is found through being community-sufficient. Focus on building a strong community. Pay cash. Know that mandatory does not equal LAW. Don’t be scared, and just say NO.

Video Transcript AI Summary
They're rolling out digital ID even when people don't want it? In The UK, over 2,000,000 people said no. We don't want it. The government's response? We're gonna do it anyway. And now the line is no digital ID, no jobs. They said you will not be able to work in The United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It's as simple as that. Just a reminder, pilot programs always start somewhere and then scale to the rest of the world. Today, it's The UK. Tomorrow, it's where you live. They will market it as if it's for your convenience or your safety, like they are doing now by saying it's to tackle illegal immigration. But once your likelihood is tied to a QR code or a government app, your freedoms can be taken away with the flip of a switch. Now it's just for a job. Soon it will be banking, travel, grocery shopping. You will be completely under control.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me get this straight. They're rolling out digital ID even when people don't want it? In The UK, over 2,000,000 people said no. We don't want it. The government's response? We're gonna do it anyway. And now the line is no digital ID, no jobs. They said you will not be able to work in The United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It's as simple as that. Just a reminder, pilot programs always start somewhere and then scale to the rest of the world. Today, it's The UK. Tomorrow, it's where you live. They will market it as if it's for your convenience or your safety, like they are doing now by saying it's to tackle illegal immigration. But once your likelihood is tied to a QR code or a government app, your freedoms can be taken away with the flip of a switch. Now it's just for a job. Soon it will be banking, travel, grocery shopping. You will be completely under control. So the question isn't, will it happen here? The question is, how can I prepare for this? But I don't know. Let me know what you think.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - September 12, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Saved - September 12, 2025 at 12:44 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Here is an intro to being a conspiracy theorist for those who don’t know where to start: https://t.co/s0IRxVWPtx

Video Transcript AI Summary
"for years before nine eleven, TV shows and movies were dropping what looks like hints of nine eleven." "In The Simpsons, a magazine cover shows a big nine next to the Twin Towers, which looks like nineeleven." "In the movie The Matrix, Neil's passport expired on 09/11/2001." "three buildings actually collapsed that day? This is Building 7, which housed extensive financial records and federal agencies." "It fell in a free fall and news anchors even reported about it falling before it even happened." "Larry Silverstein, the lease holder of the World Trade Center had just taken out a multi billion dollar insurance policy which included terrorism and he got $4,500,000,000 roughly."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me get this straight. For years before nine eleven, TV shows and movies were dropping what looks like hints of nine eleven. In The Simpsons, a magazine cover shows a big nine next to the Twin Towers, which looks like nineeleven. In the movie The Matrix, Neil's passport expired on 09/11/2001. Things like this in movies and TV shows just seemed to pop up and we were told they were just coincidences. And did you know three buildings actually collapsed that day? This is Building 7, which housed extensive financial records and federal agencies. It fell in a free fall and news anchors even reported about it falling before it even happened. Speaker 1: Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse? Well, only really what you already know. Details are very, very sketchy. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, Larry Silverstein, the lease holder of the World Trade Center had just taken out a multi billion dollar insurance policy which included terrorism and he got $4,500,000,000 roughly. Oh, and he also breakfast every day in the World Trade Centers, but on 09:11, he happened to not be eating breakfast there. Speaker 1: Where were you on September 11? You know, I was home. My my mornings were spent, usually at a breakfast meeting at windows, an 08:00 breakfast meeting, windows, the top of That the particular morning, my wife, God bless her, had made an appointment for me at the doctor. Speaker 0: Just ask yourself, when's the last time so many coincidences lined up perfectly with one of the biggest events in our lifetime? Maybe we're the ones living in the matrix, but I don't know. Let me know what you think.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Saved - June 29, 2025 at 2:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the Mayo Clinic published a study indicating raw milk can help with allergies, skin issues, asthma, and digestive problems. It seems Big Pharma wanted it banned because they can't profit from something natural that can't be patented. Raw milk, rich in enzymes and beneficial bacteria, was once seen as medicine, unlike pasteurized milk, which loses its nutrients and requires added vitamins. It's concerning that raw milk is labeled "dangerous" while unhealthy processed foods are widely available. I question who benefits from this fear of real food.

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Your doctor won’t tell you this… But the Mayo Clinic once published a study showing raw milk helped patients with allergies, skin issues, asthma, and even digestive problems. No wonder Big Pharma wanted it banned! How can they profit off of a natural food when they can’t patent it? Spoiler alert…they can’t! Before the rise of ultra-pasteurization and Big Dairy, raw milk was trusted as real medicine. It’s rich in enzymes, beneficial bacteria, and bioavailable nutrients…all things that are destroyed in the pasteurization process. Pasteurized milk is NOT the same nutrient-wise as raw milk. That’s why pasteurized milk has to have vitamins added back in…because all of the good stuff was eliminated. Today, raw milk is labeled “dangerous” while soda, seed oils, and processed foods line the shelves of our grocery stores and are marketed to our children. Ask yourself…. Who benefits from keeping you scared of real food?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Raw milk's restricted access contrasts sharply with alcohol's legality and widespread availability, despite alcohol contributing to over 100,000 deaths annually in the U.S. This disparity suggests health and safety are not the primary concerns driving raw milk regulations, implying ulterior motives behind its prohibition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's wild to me that raw milk is illegal or hard to come by in a lot of places, but alcohol is legal, easy to come by, and is related to more than one hundred thousand deaths a year in The United States alone. It's almost as if it isn't about your health or your safety and the system doesn't want you to drink raw milk for a whole other reason.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Saved - June 28, 2025 at 10:46 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Hey @RobertKennedyJr let’s talk! You’ve got millions listening. So do I. We don’t agree on everything, and the people have questions. If you’re serious about unity, come on my podcast. No media filters. No corporate gatekeepers. Just a real conversation. Do you accept? https://t.co/DknKhUf5uK

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video is addressed to Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr., regarding his statements about wearables. The speaker believes wearables are key to "MAHA," making America healthy again, with a vision of universal wearable use within four years. The speaker claims that Kennedy and his former running mate, Nicole Shanahan, shared a conspiracy reel of the speaker's in their group chat. The speaker invites Kennedy to an unedited, unfiltered discussion on the Gabba podcast to clarify his positions and allow the public to decide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This video is for our secretary of health, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I made a video calling out some of your positions, specifically what you said about wearables recently. Diet, about their physical activity, about the way that they live their lives. We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA agenda, making America healthy again, and we are gonna my vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years. A lot of people had opinions about what you really meant, but here's mine. I don't back down from asking real questions. When I did a podcast with your former running mate, Nicole Shanahan, she told me off camera that you guys shared this conspiracy reel of mine in your group chat. So I know I'm not that far off with the things I say and the patterns I see. But again, you are welcome to prove me wrong. So let's have a discussion, unedited, unfiltered, you talk, I talk, and we let the people decide. So this is my invitation to you to join me on the Gabba podcast.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - June 9, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Saved - June 9, 2025 at 6:38 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Your sunscreen could be sabotaging your pregnancy. Avobenzone, a common sunscreen ingredient, has been shown to disrupt placental development in early pregnancy which can impair fetal development. This isn’t the only ingredient wreaking havoc on your health. Listen to this: https://t.co/wz9UWvJEmd

Video Transcript AI Summary
In May 2019, the FDA reported that sunscreen chemicals penetrate the bloodstream after just one day of use, exceeding FDA standards. Oxybenzone reached that level after only two hours. These chemicals alter metabolic machinery, burden the liver and kidneys, and cause sickness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't use sunscreens. Still, millions of people use sunscreens, so somebody's not listening. They even slather sunscreen on their children. In May of twenty nineteen, the FDA issued a report saying that sunscreen chemicals, when used just one day, penetrated the bloodstream, reaching levels that exceeded FDA standards. One ingredient, oxybenzone, reached that level exceeding the standards after only two hours of use. This is not good. These chemicals change your complex metabolic machinery, they put a load on your liver and your kidneys, and they make you sick.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:21 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

What is one ingredient you absolutely avoid in your food? I have many, but a main one is folic acid.

GubbaHomestead
Posted - January 15, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 12:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question the authenticity of platforms like Joe Rogan's podcast, especially after Mark Zuckerberg's appearance. It seems like these "alt" spaces might just be another way for the mainstream narrative to present itself under the guise of tough discussions. With significant funding behind them, such as a $250 million investment, I wonder if they're really just tools for shaping public perception rather than genuine forums for debate. As a homesteading conspiracy theorist, I’m curious about others' thoughts on this.

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Do you believe these “cool guys”? Mark Zuckerberg just joined Joe Rogan on his “alt” podcast. You know, the podcast people think is based because it supposedly tackles hard topics and asks difficult questions… But does it really? It’s almost as if news media has taken a new form where it makes you think it’s “alt” but in reality it’s exactly the message the system wants you to hear. A few truths here, a few truths there… When you dive in, see the symbolism, or see who is funding who and realize…a $250,000,000 podcast may not simply just be a podcast. Maybe it’s a platform to shape and maintain the image of our world’s main stage actors? But who knows, I’m just a homesteading conspiracy theorist…. What do you think?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't trust his explanation for silencing the truth with fact-checking. He deflected blame, claiming he faced pressure from the Biden administration. Now we're expected to overlook that? I also question why there was no inquiry into his ties to DARPA and its LifeLog project, which aimed to create a comprehensive digital record of individuals for surveillance. Interestingly, LifeLog was discontinued just before Facebook emerged. Why isn't there more scrutiny on Facebook and its true nature? It's concerning that these figures may not have our best interests at heart and are merely manipulating the narrative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I simply do not believe this guy when he says why he silenced truth with fact checking. He simply shifted the blame. These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and, like, scream at them and curse. So now all of the sudden, we're supposed to forgive him. He's just a cool guy, and he silenced truth just because he got some scary phone calls. And what I wanna know is why this other cool guy didn't question Mark about his connections to DARPA, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense or LifeLog. What is LifeLog, you may ask? It was a research project by DARPA that aimed to create a digital record of an individual's life. So their communications, their interactions, their activities for surveillance. And it just so happens when this project, Lifelog, was disbanded, Facebook popped up. Popped up right after. So why doesn't Joe wanna get to the bottom of that one and what Facebook really is? And you still think these guys have your best intentions in mind and are on your side and not simply just shifting the narrative before your eyes. Okay?
GubbaHomestead
Posted - December 23, 2024 at 6:16 PM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 4:15 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Honey for infants is a red herring. NPCs are going insane over the fact I questioned why it’s “safe and effective” to give babies toxic baby formulas and 25 brain-swelling heavy metal pokes in their first year….but not raw honey. You see the disconnect right? https://t.co/FSK7hehrBj

GubbaHomestead
Posted - December 21, 2024 at 8:06 PM
Saved - December 23, 2024 at 1:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's important to speak up about the truth regarding pets and veterinary care. I've shared my concerns with many, but they often dismiss them. A person I know lost their dog after vaccinations, yet they refuse to connect the dots. The vet industry feels more like a corporate scam than a caring service.

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

You speak truth. Louder for those in the back. I’ve told sooooo many people about this regarding their pets and they just can’t believe it - “vets know best” Person I know got their dog’s shots. Night of had seizures and died. They still didn’t believe it was the shots… Also, most vets are not small family businesses anymore. They are nationally owned by domestic and foreign corporations. Vet industry is such a scam, much like our own. Makes me sick.

GubbaHomestead
Posted - December 21, 2024 at 5:11 PM
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 11:57 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

This post got hit with a community note. People are in an uproar over simply questioning the authorities who tell us honey is dangerous for babies under one year, but magically safe after 12 months. Why isn’t this same energy used for questioning 25 shots during that same time?

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

It’s considered normal to feed babies actual garbage in formulas and inject them with 25 mystery ingredient shots all within the first year of life… But honey is considered a dangerous substance during this time period? And everyone just follows along… INSANE https://t.co/8JFZYPxIYO

GubbaHomestead
Posted - December 5, 2024 at 3:26 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 6:53 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

How to preserve eggs for up to two years with the water glass method - No refrigeration required. A food preservation thread 🧵 https://t.co/4nYqZJFE2w

GubbaHomestead
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 7:38 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 6:43 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Does anyone have an answer to this? https://t.co/bHYKMTjPR7

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2024, you can observe the sky filled with haze, particularly on sunny days, and attribute it to airplane condensation trails.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to know how you can live in 2024. Go outside and see this in the sky and then watch it haze over the whole sky, especially on a sunny day, and be like, yep, those are just some airplane condensation trails.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - December 5, 2024 at 3:27 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 6:42 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

Learn how to secure your family’s future with time-tested food storage strategies inspired by our ancestors. I’ve helped thousands create reliable food storages—now I can help you get started today with my Homestead Prepper's Guide To Food Storage: https://shop.gubbahomestead.com/products/the-homestead-preppers-guide-to-food-storage

The Homestead Prepper's Guide To Food Storage Unlock Your Food Storage Success With My Ultimate Bundle! Are you ready to embark on a journey towards comprehensive food storage preparedness? Look no further! My exclusive bundle brings together the essential items and top-notch tips gathered from years of experience. Within this 36-page digital guide, you'll discove shop.gubbahomestead.com
GubbaHomestead
Posted - August 2, 2024 at 12:10 AM
Saved - August 2, 2024 at 2:45 AM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

I got fact-checked for sharing TRUTH about sunscreen. They claimed I was misleading people, when in reality these “fact-checks” are doing the misleading. It’s time to fact-check the fact-checks! https://t.co/eM6quEOCga

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am being fact-checked for discussing sunscreen ingredients, but the fact check is misleading. It lacks scientific evidence and only includes opinions from dermatologists. Research shows harm from approved sunscreen ingredients, like avobenzone and octinoxate affecting pregnancy and reproductive systems. These toxic chemicals can enter bodily fluids like breast milk. I will launch my own fact-checking system to counter biased fact checks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am being fact checked for supposedly misleading people about sunscreen and its toxic ingredients. But how am I misleading people when everything I say is backed by scientific research? I decided to dig deeper into this fact check and funny enough, this fact check is the one misleading people. The fact check states, quote, medical experts say the post take these comments out of context and that there is no evidence of harm from approved sunscreens. End quote. First of all, what medical experts? In this fact check, all I see is opinions from dermatologists and professors. There is no scientific research cited. None. 2nd of all, because this fact check failed to disclose scientific evidence that does show harm from approved sunscreen ingredients, let me break it down for you. 73% of the commonly used sunscreen ingredients listed on the FDA website have research suggesting adverse effects such as avobenzone leading to abnormal placentation during early pregnancy, octinoxate affecting reproductive systems, and how these toxic chemicals don't just stay on our skin, they can go systemic and end up in bodily fluids like breast milk, so our babies are potentially being exposed to these toxic chemicals. Since the fact checks are clearly biased, I've decided to launch my own Gubba Homestead stamp of approval to fact check the fact checkers, and this fact check does not receive the Gubba Homestead stamp of approval.
GubbaHomestead
Posted - May 20, 2024 at 9:09 PM
Saved - May 21, 2024 at 10:05 PM

@GubbaHomestead - Gubba Homestead

I poked the bear, and I’m paying for it. I shared how sunscreen is more dangerous than the sun and that made the pharmaceutical cash cows ANGRY. They banned me on TikTok and had to publish a @WSJ article refuting my claims with opinions from PhDs. Here’s the full story: https://t.co/cNCnaJyH1u

Video Transcript AI Summary
I angered big pharmaceutical companies with my claims on sunscreen dangers, leading to being deplatformed and accused of spreading misinformation. Scientific evidence shows 73% of sunscreen ingredients are linked to hormone disruption, pregnancy risks, and cancers. Despite providing evidence to the Wall Street Journal, they didn't share it, possibly to maintain their narrative. I believe in sharing truth and facts objectively without censorship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that I made the big pharmaceutical cash cow so angry? They had to deplatform me and publish an article in the Wall Street Journal refuting my claims. It's true. Recently, I was banned on another large platform. Why? Because I was accused of misinformation, specifically about sunscreen. I shared about the dangers of sunscreen because there is scientific evidence that more than 73% of the commonly used ingredients in sunscreen are linked to hormone disruption. They're linked to risks in pregnancy, breast cancer, and other cancers. Now, how is this misinformation if it's scientifically backed? Is it just that it doesn't fit a narrative? The Wall Street Journal reached out to me for a comment on this and I sent them all of this scientific evidence plus more, but they didn't share it. Why? Because it blows the lid off of their narrative. I'm no expert. I just look at the facts objectively and let logic do the rest, but I don't think truth should be silenced. Do you?
View Full Interactive Feed