TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @HansMahncke

HansMahncke
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 6:06 PM
Saved - March 7, 2026 at 6:32 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

It’s hard to believe that 11 years have passed with zero acknowledgment, let alone accountability, for the cover-up of the Hillary Clinton email fiasco. There were four days between the Inspector General referring Clinton for FBI investigation and the actual opening of the probe, and what happened during those four days was that the FBI hired CrowdStrike on a no-bid contract for some so-called emergency work. No one has ever confirmed, and no one has ever been pressed to reveal, what they actually did. But it doesn’t take a genius to see that they were brought in to scrub the evidence and erase the trail, just as they were later used at the Democratic National Committee to obscure the truth about the Wikileaks emails and pin the blame on Russia.

@15poundstogo - 🇺🇸FoiaFan🕍🇮🇱

Now I’m TOTALLY convinced (of what I knew already) that Crowdstrike’s emergency no-bid FBI contract on 7/8/15 was for the purpose of covering up for Hillary’s crimes. Despite denials and redactions of foia responses. h/t the great .@walkafyre for MYE document. https://t.co/hGR8t6IQ15

HansMahncke
Posted - February 27, 2026 at 2:07 AM
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 5:25 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

The media had a gigantic meltdown when President Trump tweeted this nine years ago. He was proven absolutely right. But because no one was ever held accountable, the spying simply continued as if nothing had happened.

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!

HansMahncke
Posted - January 25, 2026 at 1:32 AM
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:19 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

It is worth remembering that Moderna, Fauci and Ralph Baric (who had a blueprint together with the Wuhan lab for engineering Covid-like viruses) had an agreement to create mRNA “vaccines” immediately after Covid leaked from the Wuhan lab, but before anyone knew about it. https://t.co/Wydkyc3TCb

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Moderna exits vaccine market?!! Bancel ‌said ‌regulatory delays and little support from the authorities make the market size "much smaller." Translation: We lost control of our "regulatory department"

HansMahncke
Posted - November 6, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Saved - November 7, 2025 at 8:50 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Link to newly unearthed PowerPoint: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/lettertoDNI.pdf Link to congressional briefing: https://youtu.be/BE_H7dTqJXU?si=g7l5NMxu1NuR8wI4

Page not found - Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs hsgac.senate.gov
HansMahncke
Posted - August 21, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Saved - August 25, 2025 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today's FBI document release reveals a troubling pattern of corruption that ensures accountability remains elusive. It starts with Comey directing his chief of staff to leak information to the New York Times. The chief of staff then instructs General Counsel Baker to execute the leak. Although Baker is caught, he claims he thought Comey had authorized it. Durham chooses not to prosecute Baker, instead making him a key witness in the Russiagate trial of Sussmann, where Baker conceals crucial text messages, allowing everyone involved to evade consequences.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Today’s FBI document drop shows how corruption is engineered to guarantee no one is ever held accountable: 1. Comey orders his chief of staff to leak to the New York Times. 2. The chief of staff instructs General Counsel Baker to carry out the leak. 3. Baker is caught leaking but claims he “believed” Comey had authorized it. 4. Durham declines to prosecute. 5. Durham then makes Baker his star witness in the Russiagate trial of Clinton campaign lawyer Sussmann. 6. Baker derails the trial by concealing key text message evidence. 7. Everyone walks away as if nothing ever happened.

@mindnotforrent - DIY

Comey authorizing leaks to NYT. https://t.co/U7evmX8U36

HansMahncke
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 7:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
As Trump and Putin prepare for their meeting in Alaska, I reflect on their last one-on-one encounter at the Helsinki summit in 2018. During that meeting, a journalist pressured Trump to denounce Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 election, a narrative later revealed to be fabricated by Obama operatives, with no evidence from the FBI or NSA. Seven years later, it's clear that Trump was right, while the political-media class was wrong. He faced accusations of treachery for questioning intelligence agencies, but it was they who attempted a coup against him. I anticipate similar sabotage this week.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

As Trump and Putin prepare to meet in Alaska, and as new hoaxes are already being spun to derail that meeting, it’s worth recalling the last time they met in a purely one-on-one setting. That was the Helsinki summit in 2018, when a so-called journalist demanded that Trump publicly denounce Russia’s supposed 2016 election interference. That story, as Tulsi Gabbard just revealed, was fabricated by Obama operatives, and even the FBI and NSA admitted they had no evidence. Looking back seven years later, it’s striking how Trump was 100% right and the entire political-media class was 100% wrong. He was smeared as a traitor for daring to question the intelligence agencies, yet he had every reason to. In reality, the reverse was true. They were the traitors, waging a years-long coup attempt against him. Keep that in mind, because they will try to sabotage him again this week.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaking about 2016 events, the speaker questions why the FBI never took the server and why they were told to leave the DNC office: 'Haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee?' He says: 'Where is the server? I wanna know where is the server, and what is the server saying?' 'I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months, and I've been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media.' He adds: 'My people came to me. Dan Coats came to me and some others. They said they think it's Russia.' 'I have president Putin. He just said it's not Russia.' 'I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I do wanna see the server.' 'With that being said, all I can do is ask the question.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you denounce what happened in 2016, and would you warn him to never do it again? So let me just say that we have two thoughts. You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee? I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months, and I've been tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I wanna know where is the server, and what is the server saying? With that being said, all I can do is ask the question. My people came to me. Dan Coats came to me and some others. They said they think it's Russia. I have president Putin. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I really do wanna see the server.
HansMahncke
Posted - August 7, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Saved - August 8, 2025 at 12:23 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This document ranks among the most disgraceful and infamous records in U.S. history. An acting FBI director launched an investigation into a sitting president based not just on zero evidence but on a lie he knew was a lie. McCabe deserves his long-overdue reckoning. https://t.co/Z9H2xskiPR

@mazemoore - MAZE

2019. While hawking a book, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe discusses why he chose to open an investigation into President Trump in 2017. Trump fired Comey in May of 2017. McCabe became acting FBI Director and immediately opened a new, two-pronged investigation into Trump. Was Trump working on behalf of the Russians (while President) and did he obstruct justice by firing Comey. Pay attention to how McCabe carefully uses the word "may" in this clip. Also notice that while he peddles the Russiagate lies and smears Trump, he can't give any concrete evidence at all to back up his claims or to justify his actions. Apparently Trump speaking out against the first bogus Russiagate investigation was a good reason for McCabe to start a second bogus investigation. It's obvious now that putting Trump directly under investigation was just a continuation of the Russiagate plan to undermine his presidency. McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, Comey. Evil henchmen. Books, TV appearances, speeches...they trafficked lies and profited off of their treachery. It would be a great day in America if any of them are ever held accountable.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI investigated Donald Trump due to concerns about his ties to Russia, based on observable facts indicating a potential threat to national security and the possibility of a crime. The decision to investigate was made because the FBI is obligated to open a case when there's an articulable basis to believe a threat exists, regardless of the subject's position. Contributing factors included Trump publicly undermining the investigation, referring to it as a hoax, and the intelligence community's assessment of Russian support for his campaign. By May 2017, there were ample facts suggesting potential obstruction of justice. The speaker couldn't explain Trump's repeated leaning towards the Russians and defense of Vladimir Putin, but noted that his actions and words were concerning. The investigation grappled with a president who may have committed a federal crime and posed a national security risk. The national security risk related to the counterintelligence case, specifically Trump's potential obstruction of justice to negatively impact the investigation into Russian interference and potential connections with his campaign.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't believe the FBI and you had concerns about Donald Trump's ties to Russia, but that you were investigating him. What can you tell us about that? Speaker 1: That's right. So, you know, an important part of that very dramatic step of initiating investigation, certainly getting that recommendation from my team, considering it very closely, approving it for the reasons that I've detailed, and we had observable observable facts that indicated that a threat to national security may exist and a crime may have been committed. You were specific. Speaker 0: We are investigating the president of The United States because we are concerned that there may be something, something amiss regarding his relationship with Russia. Speaker 1: I was perfectly clear of that point. On that point. Speaker 0: Yep. Perfectly clear to that point. Speaker 1: The basis upon which we made that decision was perfectly clear. We were in possession of facts that made it abundantly clear that we had an articable basis to believe that that threat might exist. And under those circumstances, the FBI is obligated to open a case. If we don't open a case because the subject happens to be the president of The United States, we're not doing our job. Can you tell us what the facts were that led you to believe that there should be an investigation? I can tell you sure. So some of those things that were adding to that conclusion were, at the very first mark, the president had made it perfectly clear publicly, as you've said, Joe, that he did not like what we were doing. He'd been undermining the case, referring to it as a hoax, just constantly communicating through his Twitter feed that he was not happy with the investigation we were pursuing. He was aware of our concerns about Russian involvement in not just Russian involvement in the election, but Russian support to what we and the intelligence community confidently believe was support to his campaign, particularly when we briefed him on the intelligence community assessment. That took place on January 6. It was before he was actually inaugurated. I was confident in May 2017 that we had ample facts to indicate that the president may have committed obstruction of justice. That's the point that the FBI is in. Right? We just decide when and what we investigate. And we do it not based on politics, not because we like the guy or we don't like the guy or we think this case would be interesting or fun. We do it because of the facts we have at the time. And at that time, it was abundantly clear to me, that we had enough facts to indicate that that crime may have been committed. Speaker 2: Does that mean you leave open the possibility that the president of The United States was taking direction from Russia? Absolutely. What's your best explanation for why president Trump has seemed again and again and again to lean toward the Russians, to defend Vladimir Putin in cases when no one else would? Speaker 1: I wish I could explain that for for you this morning. Right? That's something that I think anyone either involved in this investigation or simply watching the results of what director Mueller is doing, you know, sits back and scratches their head over day to day. The facts are we have it doesn't take a surreptitious recording. It doesn't take extreme investigative techniques. All you have to do is watch the president. Watch what he does. Listen to what he says, and you can't help but escape those We were grappling with the issue of what to do about a president who you think may have committed a federal crime and might present a national security risk. This is not easy stuff. Speaker 2: Stop you there. What is the national security risk you believe the president posed? Speaker 1: That relates to the counterintelligence case. Right? We felt like if the president has obstructed justice for the purpose of negatively impacting our ability to investigate Russian interference with a campaign and Russian potential connections with his with his own campaign effort, why would any president do that? Why would a president not want the FBI to understand exactly what the Russians have been up to in our political process? I know how I served. I know that I served this country honestly and with integrity. That is what I've tried to represent in this book.
HansMahncke
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 8:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Four years ago, Fauci openly contradicted President Trump at the White House, using the Proximal Origin paper to claim Covid came from nature, while feigning ignorance of its authors. In reality, he had commissioned that paper himself.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Four years ago today, Fauci stood at the White House podium and brazenly contradicted President Trump—citing the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper as proof that Covid came from nature, while pretending not to know its authors. In truth, he had commissioned the fake paper himself. https://t.co/vTDpPES29u

Video Transcript AI Summary
Evolutionary virologists analyzed viral sequences from the current outbreak and in bats. They determined that the mutations required for the virus to jump from an animal to a human are entirely consistent with its evolutionary path. A paper detailing this research will be made available, although the authors are not currently named.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in, bats as they evolve And the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. So, I mean, the the paper will be available. I I I don't have the authors right now, but we can make that available too.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

*five years

HansMahncke
Posted - March 31, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media's portrayal of the Marine Le Pen situation as "embezzlement" is misleading. It's really a convoluted campaign finance issue. Le Pen paid her assistants from her EU account, which is standard practice, but a judge ruled it illegal simply because they also worked in France.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

The Marine Le Pen witch hunt is even worse than you think. What the media is breathlessly calling “embezzlement” is nothing more than a ludicrously contrived campaign finance dispute. Le Pen, as both an EU and French politician, paid some of her assistants from her EU account—perfectly normal since EU politicians still serve constituents in their home country. But the judge arbitrarily claimed that because her assistants also worked in France, that somehow made it illegal.

HansMahncke
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Saved - March 22, 2025 at 3:36 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

The Ignatius leak took down @genflynn and set off the four-year coup against Trump—it was the foundation of the entire operation. Yet the leaker was never caught, likely never even pursued. Find the leaker, and you’ll uncover a lot of answers—and resolve a lot of problems. https://t.co/2KmGkI9M1v

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The New York Times is pure propaganda. Also, I look forward to the prosecutions of those at the Pentagon who are leaking maliciously false information to NYT. They will be found. https://t.co/xANvLMOH5j

HansMahncke
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Saved - March 22, 2025 at 2:30 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

One revealing oddity is that when Kevin Clinesmith—who falsified evidence against Carter Page—was assigned Boasberg, he should have been deeply worried, given that Boasberg sat on the same FISA court which he'd defrauded. But instead, Clinesmith was perfectly happy with Boasberg.

@Cernovich - Cernovich

“Judge” Boasberg protected the DOJ and FBI officials who committed fraud when filing a FISA court warrant. He personally ordered that their names be redacted from public disclosure. We have no idea if these liars still work in sensitive positions. Boasberg made sure of that.

HansMahncke
Posted - March 15, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Saved - March 16, 2025 at 7:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Operation Arctic Frost involved the FBI's wrongful seizure of government cell phones from President Trump, Mike Pence, and other officials, led by rogue agent Timothy Thibault. Thibault has been central to numerous scandals, including his role in the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, overseeing the Hunter Biden laptop investigation which he prematurely closed, and managing the 2020 election fraud inquiry while investigating the Trump campaign instead. The FBI kept Thibault's name hidden from the public, claiming privacy, but it appears to have been an effort to shield the agency from scrutiny over his actions.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Operation Arctic Frost, the FBI’s fraudulent seizure of government cell phones belonging to President Trump, Mike Pence, and other Trump administration officials, was orchestrated by rogue FBI agent Timothy Thibault. If his name sounds familiar, it’s because Thibault is like the evil Forrest Gump of FBI anti-Trump operations, consistently appearing at the center of every major scandal: –At the start of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, Thibault traveled to Prague with Fusion GPS operative Nellie Ohr and corrupt DOJ official Bruce Ohr. –Thibault was in charge of the Hunter Biden laptop investigation, alongside Russiagate’s notorious Brian Auten. Thibault shut down the investigation under the false pretense of Russian disinformation. –After the investigation was closed, Thibault marked the FBI systems in a way that would prevent the case from being reopened. –Thibault oversaw the investigation into allegations made by Hunter Biden whistleblower Tony Bobulinski—and conveniently shut that down as well. –Thibault was in charge of the 2020 election fraud investigation, but instead, he opened an investigation into the Trump campaign and individuals linked to 2020 electors. –For years, the FBI concealed Thibault's name from the public under the pretext of "privacy," when in reality, they were protecting the agency from scrutiny regarding his corruption.

HansMahncke
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 9:01 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

I've always wondered how the person who leaked the Nuland-Pyatt attaboy call must feel. They likely thought exposing a taped conversation of U.S. officials openly discussing the Ukraine coup—before it even happened—would stop it in its tracks. But no, the coup went ahead anyway. https://t.co/lnC4qOhT8m

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's move quickly and try to get the jelly setup going. I'll focus on Klitschko. We should aim to get someone with an international profile to support this. We also need to consider reaching out to Yanukovych, but let's hold off until tomorrow to see how things develop. Regarding that, Sullivan got back to me saying we need Biden involved. I suggested tomorrow would be good for encouragement and to solidify the details. Biden is on board.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anyway, we could we could land jelly set up on this one if we move fast. So let me work on let me work on Klitschko. And if you can just keep I I think we wanna try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing. And then the other the other issue is some kind of outreach to Yanukovych, but we probably regroup on that tomorrow as we see how things start to fall into place. Speaker 1: So on that piece, Jeff, when I wrote the note, Sullivan's come back to me, VFR, saying you need Biden. And I said probably tomorrow for an attaboy and to get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 0: Okay. Great. Speaker 1: Alright. Thanks.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Still very few people know about this

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

In 2014, Senator Chris Murphy bragged about the United States successfully overthrowing Ukraine's government: "I think it was our role, including sanctions and threats of sanctions, that forced, in part, Yanukovych from office." "We have not sat on the sidelines. We have been… https://t.co/BEXlKlFJas

Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe our sanctions and threats played a role in Yanukovych's departure. We've been actively involved in Ukraine, and our clear stance has aided the change in regimes. If this transition is peaceful, the U.S. will be seen as a great friend. This is about supporting Ukraine's self-determination. While some see it as a U.S.-Russia struggle, it's about supporting Ukraine's wishes. We also have an economic interest, as Ukraine's potential inclusion in the EU could boost trade with the U.S. Yanukovych was elected, but he lost legitimacy by using force against peaceful protests. Our presence, like that of foreign ministers, was to defend human rights. While radical elements exist within the opposition, the movement largely rejects them. We'll work to ensure these elements don't dominate the new government.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it was our role, sanctions and threats of sanctions that forced, in part, Yanukovych from office. Now, the question is what can we do to support this new government? There's gonna be a lot of talk about an assistance package. With respect to Ukraine, we have not sat on the sidelines. We have been very much involved, members of the senate who have been there, members of the state department who have been on the square, the administration the Obama administration passed sanctions. The Senate was prepared to pass its own set of sanctions. And as I said, I really think that the clear position of The United States has in part been what has helped lead to this change in regimes. So I know that there is merit in the claim that The United States sort of has these principles, and then we selectively apply them. We get involved in certain places, then we don't get involved in other places. But I think if ultimately this is a peaceful transition to a new government in Ukraine, it'll be The United States on the streets of Ukraine who will be seen as a great friend in helping make that transition happen. This is really about supporting one of the biggest, most important countries in the Eurasian region, be able to determine for themselves what their future is. And it looks to people like this is The United States and Russia once again fighting, maybe not in military terms, but on economic terms, in a country that we both care about. But really, ultimately, I think this is about us supporting the wishes of Ukraine. And, you know, the there is a US interest here. We are in the middle of negotiating a new trade agreement with Europe. To my state, it's enormously important. We do 40% of our trade in Connecticut with Europe. If Ukraine is part of the European Union, and thus is part of this new trade agreement with The United States, that could result in billions of dollars in new economic opportunities for The US. So we do have an economic interest in the Ukraine being part of the European Union, and we shouldn't be shy about making clear that interest. Speaker 1: Isn't it true that Unikovich was elected for the first time in 02/2010 for January term, that elections were scheduled for 02/2015? The second point is, why is it okay for foreign ministers from other countries to show up during protest movements, let's say, Ukraine, like the foreign ministers of Poland and and Germany, and support the protesters against the the current government there? Wouldn't it be something similar to the foreign ministers of, let's say, Mexico and Canada showing up during the Occupy Wall Street movement and saying, yes. We agree that your government is corrupt. And the third point is, why isn't the West and America talking about the fact that a large or significant portion of the Ukrainian opposition right now is made up of far right politicians, including from the party, which openly is fascist and xenophobic. And they said that they don't wanna join the EU because they considered the EU to be a bunch of gays and Jews, just as well as they say that they don't want to join the imperialist Moscow regime. Speaker 0: Let me me take take all those very quickly one at a time. You're right. Yarukovich was elected, and I mentioned this before, I understand the difficult position here, which is that Yanukovych was elected, and we are not in the business of encouraging, rebellions and revolutions on the streets against elected leaders, because we ultimately think that elections, as you mentioned, are the place in which you should settle your differences. The the issue here is that Yanukovych lost his legitimacy to govern when he used force to try to break up these protests. And The United States didn't go on to that square in any meaningful way, until, the president tried to break up the peaceful protests. That's why Senator McCain and I went. And we certainly got a lot of grief from people asking why two US senators are going to the square to support a protest movement against an elected government. We did that because we think that there were human rights and civil rights that were violated there, we've always stood up for that, for that concept. And and again, think that answers your second question as to why you had foreign ministers and foreign leaders who were on that square. It was because we're standing up for the idea that people should be able to lodge protests against their government. You are right that there is an element of the opposition that has some real radical ideas, and there is an element of anti Semitism, that was present on that square. I will tell you from having been there, if there were 500,000 people there, maybe a couple thousand of them represented that viewpoint. And so by and large, this movement completely rejects those radical and prejudicial ideas, and I have confidence that this new government is going to be inclusive and going to be tolerant. And it will be part of our job, think, as members of the Foreign Relations Committee to make sure that those kind of more radical elements don't have a seat at the middle of the table as the coalition government goes forward.
HansMahncke
Posted - February 28, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 11:37 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

OMG, scroll through this. All these Europeans who’ve freeloaded off U.S. security guarantees are now piling on like a pack of teenagers spamming the same cringe-worthy social media post—completely oblivious to the fact that Zelensky’s wounds are self-inflicted and that he's done.

@sentdefender - OSINTdefender

The Prime Minister of Norway:

@jonasgahrstore - Jonas Gahr Støre

We stand by Ukraine in their fair struggle for a just and lasting peace. 🇺🇦🇳🇴

HansMahncke
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 1:47 PM
Saved - October 12, 2024 at 3:51 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Thirty-three years ago today, Clarence Thomas delivered one of the most remarkable statements ever made in Congress. (If you have developed a soft spot for Joe Biden in recent weeks, the first few seconds of this clip will quickly dispel that sentiment.) https://t.co/9uQz5gbAxf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator, I deny every allegation against me today that suggests I had sexual conversations or harassed anyone. This hearing is a travesty and should never occur in America. Staffers searched for sleaze and leaked it to the media, and this committee validated and displayed it at prime time. No one would want dirt dredged up and displayed in this manner. The Supreme Court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I'm here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. Something is dreadfully wrong when any person is subjected to this circus and national disgrace. As a Black American, this is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who think for themselves. It's a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, you will be lynched, destroyed, and caricatured by a committee of the US Senate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Judge, it's a tough day and tough night for you. I know. Let me, ask, do you have anything you'd like to say before we begin? I understand that, your preference is, which is totally and completely understandable that we go 1 hour tonight, 30 minutes on each side. Is am I correct in that? Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Do you have anything you'd like to say? Speaker 1: Senator, I would like to start by saying unequivocally, uncategorically, that I deny each and every single allegation against me today that suggested in any way that I had conversations of a sexual that I, Speaker 0: in Speaker 1: any way, ever harassed her. Or that I in any way ever harassed her. A second, and I think more important point, I think that this today is a travesty. I think that it is disgusting. I think that this hearing should never occur in America. This is a case in which this sleaze, this dirt was searched for by staffers of members of this committee, was then leaked to the media. And this committee and this body validated it and displayed it at prime time over our entire nation. How would any member on this committee, any person in this room, or any person in this country would like sleeves set about him or her in this fashion Or this dirt dredged up in this gossip and these lies displayed in this manner? How would any person like it? The supreme court is not worth it. No job is worth it. I'm not here for that. I'm here for my name, my family, my life, and my integrity. I think something is dreadfully wrong with this country when any person, any person in this free country would be subjected to this. This is not a closed room. There was an FBI investigation. This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed environment. This is a circus. It's a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the US US Senate rather than hung from a tree.
HansMahncke
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 11:13 PM
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 7:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hans Mahncke highlighted a warning from Ron Fouchier, a key figure in gain-of-function research, who cautioned that public awareness of COVID-19's origins in the Wuhan lab could lead to scrutiny of other outbreaks. Jude_62 responded by questioning why Anthony Fauci has not faced prosecution for allegedly lying to Congress or funding illegal gain-of-function experiments, referencing Rand Paul's previous statements on the matter.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

The day after Fauci's secret teleconference, Ron Fouchier, one of the godfathers of gain-of-function experiments, warned/threatened everyone on the call that if the public became aware that Covid came out of the Wuhan lab, they would begin to question other outbreaks. https://t.co/wrqPstgt95

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

Hmmm...The Wuhan Institute of Virology may have leaked the poliovirus before they got around to leaking COVID-19.

@Jude_62 - We the People | Populism is Democracy 🇺🇸

@HansMahncke Has Fauci been prosecuted for lying to Congress or funding illegal gain of function experiments? Nope. @RandPaul https://t.co/3DTkMg8sQa

HansMahncke
Posted - August 10, 2024 at 3:13 AM
Saved - August 11, 2024 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that multiple sources mentioned Walz's military service, highlighting his tours in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It makes me wonder if they all independently reported this or if they were influenced by Walz's own accounts.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

"Walz...served a tour of duty in Operation Iraqi freedom" "Walz is one of at least 14 servicemen and women from the recent Iraq and Afghanistan wars" "Walz, a veteran of the war in Afghanistan" "He served...during the the early portion of the war in Afghanistan" Did all these papers just happen to invent the same false story of did they hear it from Walz himself?

@TruthNinja316 - Truth Ninja

Tim Walz let the media call him a combat veteran for YEARS and never once corrected them... #StolenValor #TimAWALz https://t.co/JjLza0dpIl

HansMahncke
Posted - July 27, 2024 at 1:24 AM
Saved - July 27, 2024 at 7:50 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This might be a good time to remind everyone that the release of the text messages between Strzok and Page (for which Strzok just received $1.2 million), crucially revealed that the FBI was secretly going after Trump *before* they initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. https://t.co/b6HC2pq67s

@willchamberlain - Will Chamberlain

The regime takes care of its own Strzok and Page conspired against President Trump and Merrick Garland is writing each a 7-figure check

HansMahncke
Posted - June 1, 2024 at 12:05 PM
Saved - June 1, 2024 at 4:33 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Here, Brad Smith, the former FEC Commissioner, explains what he was not allowed to tell the jury. TLDR: It is factually and logically impossible for Trump to have tried to hide the Stormy Daniels payment due to the way FEC reporting works. There was never a case to begin with.

@CommishSmith - Brad Smith

In another thread, https://t.co/IYC2ndwncV, I explain why payments to Stormy Daniels were not a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). In this thread, I'll explain why no FECA reporting obligations were violated, and why the prosecution's theory makes no sense. /1

HansMahncke
Posted - March 9, 2023 at 1:44 AM
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 7:02 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This is from June 21, 2021. Putin was more honest about the J6 protesters than the entire US media establishment. https://t.co/hTVaKbIfdF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker denies ordering the assassination of Alexei Navalny and argues that their country does not have a habit of assassinating people. They also question whether the arrest and detention of 450 individuals who entered the congress with political demands is a form of persecution for their political opinions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you may I just ask you a direct question? Did you order Alexei Navalny's assassination? Of course not. We don't have this kind of habit of assassinating anybody. That's 1. Number 2 is I want to ask you, did you order the Assassination of the woman who walked into the congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman. Do you know that 400 And 50 individuals were arrested after entering the congress, and they didn't go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. You're talking about a capital They're looking at jail time Between 15 25 years, and they came to the congress with political demands. Isn't that persecution for political opinions?
HansMahncke
Posted - February 6, 2024 at 10:54 PM
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 12:45 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Two and a half years ago, NBC interviewed Putin. It didn't go too well. That's why they've been trying to sabotage Tucker's interview. https://t.co/hTVaKbIfdF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker denies ordering the assassination of Alexei Navalny and criticizes the assumption that they have a habit of assassinations. They question whether the person asking the question ordered the assassination of the woman who was shot in the US Congress. They highlight that 450 individuals were arrested for entering the Congress with political demands, facing potential jail time. The speaker suggests that this could be seen as persecution for political opinions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you may I just ask you a direct question? Did you order Alexei Navalny's assassination? Of course not. We don't have this kind of habit of assassinating anybody. That's 1. Number 2 is I want to ask you, did you order the Assassination of the woman who walked into the congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman. Do you know that 400 And 50 individuals were arrested after entering the congress, and they didn't go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. You're talking about a capital They're looking at jail time Between 15 25 years, and they came to the congress with political demands. Isn't that persecution for political opinions?
HansMahncke
Posted - January 29, 2024 at 5:13 AM
Saved - January 29, 2024 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Chinese Communist Party arranged for a property conglomerate to promise Harvard $115 million in exchange for connecting a CCP official with Fauci. However, the company has now filed for bankruptcy and reneged on their promise. This occurred on February 2, 2020, right after Fauci's secret teleconference on Covid's origin.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This is one of the strangest stories of the entire Covid origin cover up. The Chinese Communist Party organized for a property conglomerate (Evergrande) to promise to give Harvard $115 million if Harvard put a CCP official in touch with Fauci.

@quay_dr - Dr Steven Quay

In March 2020, a Chinese real estate company pledged $115 MM to Harvard so 80 scientists could study the COVID outbreak a/k/a suppressing the lab origin of the virus. Unfortunately, they filed bankruptcy today. They quietly reneged on HU long ago. https://www.science.org/content/article/115-million-more-80-boston-researchers-will-collaborate-tackle-covid-19

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Btw this happened on Feb 2, 2020, the day after Fauci’s secret teleconference on Covid’s origin.

HansMahncke
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 6:28 PM
Saved - December 18, 2023 at 2:14 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This is so bad. @nytimes doctored what Hunter said today, leaving out the key word. Wow. NYT: “Let me state as clearly as I can: My father was not involved in my business.” Hunter: “Let me state as clearly as I can: My father was not *financially* involved in my business.” https://t.co/cDQEnShr6n

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to clarify that my father had no financial involvement in my business.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am here. Let me state as clearly as I can. My father was not financially involved in my business.
HansMahncke
Posted - September 29, 2023 at 4:28 AM
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 6:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
117 House members voted against funding the Ukraine War. Notable names include Gaetz, Greene, Jordan, and Pence. The final tally was 311-117.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

These are the 117 House members who voted against funding the Ukraine War (the final vote tally was 311-117): Allen Arrington Babin Banks Bean (FL) Biggs Bilirakis Bishop (NC) Boebert Bost Brecheen Buchanan Burchett Burgess Burlison Cammack Carey Carl Carter (GA) Cline Cloud Clyde Collins Comer Crane Crawford Curtis Davidson De La Cruz Donalds Duncan Edwards Estes Ezell Fallon Feenstra Finstad Fischbach Fitzgerald Franklin, C. Scott Fry Fulcher Gaetz Garcia, Mike Good (VA) Gooden (TX) Gosar Graves (LA) Green (TN) Greene (GA) Griffith Guest Hageman Harshbarger Hern Higgins (LA) Hinson Houchin Hunt Jackson (TX) Johnson (LA) Jordan Joyce (PA) Kelly (MS) Kelly (PA) LaHood LaLota Langworthy LaTurner Letlow Loudermilk Luttrell Mace Mann Massie Mast McClain Meuser Miller (IL) Miller (WV) Miller-Meeks Mills Moolenaar Mooney Moore (AL) Moran Murphy Nehls Norman Nunn (IA) Ogles Owens Palmer Pence Perry Pfluger Posey Rosendale Roy Santos Self Smith (MO) Stauber Steube Tenney Tiffany Timmons Van Drew Van Duyne Van Orden Weber (TX) Webster (FL) Wenstrup Williams (NY) Williams (TX) Wittman Zinke

HansMahncke
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 8:32 PM
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 8:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden fired Ukraine's chief prosecutor, Shokin, who was investigating Hunter's corrupt energy company. Hunter then wrote to Shokin's successor, demanding the investigations be shut down or his dad would fire him too. Later, the prosecutor shut down the investigations into Burisma. Biden should resign.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

After Joe Biden fired Shokin, the chief prosecutor of Ukraine who was investigating Hunter's corrupt energy company, Hunter wrote Shokin's successor, demanding that the investigations be shut down. It was either shut it down or my dad will fire you as well. Biden should resign. https://t.co/MntlKuQTBP

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Editor's note: A few months later, the prosecutor who got the letter from Hunter shut down the investigations into Burisma. https://t.co/ZdHWMuowVy

HansMahncke
Posted - November 1, 2020 at 2:29 PM
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 2:47 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Bao Jiaqi (it's been suggested that's not her real name), told Hunter to just take the money. "nobody will care whereabouts of nobody's money" More blackmailabilty right there.

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

@KSantal Hunter split the embezzlement with Jim Biden (and perhaps Joe), as he passed $1.4 million on to Jim Biden for non-existent services. At the time, CEFC was disintegrating due to insolvency, so the Hudson West IV assets should have gone to creditors, not Bidens.

HansMahncke
Posted - June 20, 2023 at 1:51 AM
Saved - June 20, 2023 at 7:08 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Turns out this was a big fat lie. Walensky was privately discussing breakthrough infections right at the start of the "vaccine" rollout in January 2021. (notice also that Covid origin fraudsters Collins and Fauci were entangled in this and then lied about it) h/t @ZackStieber https://t.co/8M4RzO1MRp

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky tells Congress COVID vaccines “initially” stopped infection and transmission, so what she said in 2021 wasn’t a lie. Somehow, even after losing her job, she still manages to embarrass her whole profession. https://t.co/UnUNfQtmLO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the vaccine did not completely stop the spread or infection, but clarifies that initially it did for the Wuhan strain and the alpha strain. Early data and literature published in the New England Journal showed that those who were vaccinated and didn't get infected were not transmitting the virus to others. The vaccine had a high efficacy of up to 96% early on and this efficacy did not change over time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine did not stop spread or infection. I'm not saying it was completely bad, but it did not stop the spread or infection. I think actually, if I could actually, just Correct that point. And that is initially it did. For the Wuhan strain and for the alpha strain, all of the early data and the literature published in the New England Journal Demonstrated that for those who worked, if you didn't get infected, that you were not transmitting it to other people. And it had very high efficacy early on up to 96%. So it didn't change over time.
HansMahncke
Posted - June 8, 2023 at 5:14 PM
Saved - June 14, 2023 at 8:56 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

So it was Burisma all along and we don't have to take @repMTG's word for it. We have the evidence. On Nov 2, 2015, the director of Burisma's board wrote Hunter demanding "deliverables", specifically to get "high-ranking US officials" to "close down" the cases against Burisma. https://t.co/971gQggFlL

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I just read the FBI’s FD-1023 form implicating Joe Biden in a political bribery pay-to-play scheme. Here’s what the American people deserve to know.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a paid informant who provided information separate from Giuliani's claims in 2020. The informant advised Burisma against buying a US company while under investigation. Hunter Biden suggested that hiring him would help resolve their legal problems. The informant revealed that the owner of Burisma paid $5 million each to two Bidens as bribes to get the prosecutor investigating them fired. The owner claimed this was common practice in Russia and Ukraine. The informant also mentioned evidence of payments to Hunter and Joe Biden. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the FBI's cooperation and expresses frustration that the unclassified information is not being shared with the American people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reading this form today, shows the pure distinction. This this information, this source that came forward, it's a paid informant by the FBI. This has nothing to do with Giuliani. This has has nothing to do with the information that he brought forward in 2020. It's totally separate, and it's extremely incredible because he's a paid informant, I made some notes after I left the skiff, based on the information, and I'll I'll share that with you guys right now. Simply what was happening there is back in 2015, 2016, Burisma was looking to buy, a US based oil and gas company. And this came from being advised by Hunter Biden and his partners. Biden had told Biden said Shokin was corrupt. That was around the time of this meeting was when Joe Biden as vice president had said that the prosecutor's shogun was correct. They hired Hunter on the board to make the problems go away. That's what they specifically said. Hunter advised that they could raise more money if they bought a US company. So the the informant was trying to do the right thing and trying to advised barisma that they shouldn't go this route. They should hire an attorney, work out their problems that they were in being investigated for were because they were having other legal problems, and that's why they were being investigated by this prosecutor, Shokin. The informant was advising them, don't go this route. Why would you buy another US company while you're under investigation? That's not a good idea. So he's trying to tell him to do the right thing. The owner, Grisema, said that Hunter was stupid and that his other business partner was smart. He also said that he paid 5,000,000 to 1 Biden, and he paid 5,000,000 to another Biden. And it was all a bribery to get Shokin fired and end the investigation into Burisma. That he also told the informant this is common practice in Russia and Ukraine. It's common practice. Is part of business there, that's how their culture works. That they will pay bribery money in order to get business deals done. And that many business is, they they take that into account. They put it in their budget, basically, when they're preparing to buy another company or start another their company, that that's just normal. And so over in Ukraine, for them to consider hiring Hunter Biden on the board, in order to make their problems go away, which was the prosecutor's shokin, who was investigating Burisma for for corruption and and and legal problems, this was definitely illegal for a vice president of the United States and their family members. This informant had asked the the owner of Bruce Smith if he was happy that Trump won, and he said no. He was not happy. Remember, he had invested a lot of money into the Bidens to make his problems go away. But he did say that it would take 10 years for all of us to find out the payments made to the because of how many bank accounts there were. He said at the time, there were no direct payments made to the big guy. But in a meeting later, after he had become more upset as things were unfolding, he told the informant that that he has 2 pieces of evidence showing proof of payment to Hunter and specifically Joe Biden. You see, I think what everyone needs to understand is is that business owners place most smart ones whether they're good or bad, whether they perform their business in a legal manner or a corrupt manner. They always keep records of their business payments, accounts and receivables, that's how it's done. And this owner of Marissa Mac kept a record, especially of the bribes. And if you're in an industry where you have to pay bribes to get your business deals done, then you always wanna keep keep a record and keep proof of your brides because that's how you make sure you get people to follow through on what they're done with. What I read today is is, again, shocking. Just as what I read in the treasury department with all the SARs report is shocking. But we year, going to continue following this investigation. We're gonna going to continue to look into every single thing that we can uncover. We need the FBI to keep cooperating with us. That's extremely important. And I have very high expectations of Christopher Wray that will do the right thing and continue, showing the that's the information that we're asking for. What I'm upset about though is the FBI, doesn't think the American people are worthy of this unclassified information. I certainly do. I think the American people deserve to see it and know every single bit of it. That's why when I left the skiff, I made all my notes on on this piece of paper here so that I could explain everything to the American people.
HansMahncke
Posted - June 13, 2023 at 2:25 PM
Saved - June 14, 2023 at 1:19 AM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

TLDR: Poroshenko is the Ukrainian president whom Biden extorted. Right after Trump won in 2016, a Poroshenko aide offered to give DOJ incriminating information about Biden's calls with Poroshenko. As fate would have it the aide's info went to Weissmann who probably buried it all. https://t.co/NFvIpKJBhw

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

a few months ago, I discussed the Biden-Poroshenko during 2016 transition in which Biden re-assured Poroshenko not to worry about FBI doing anything about Onyshchenko (Poroshenko's fugitive bagman who had the tapes) meeting with FBI. https://t.co/CBfMjNyIId

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

Biden re-assured Poroshenko that the FBI had "stopped" and there was "no reason [for FBI] to talk to him again". Biden undertook to "check that [with FBI] and confirm that with you".

HansMahncke
Posted - June 13, 2023 at 4:14 PM
Saved - June 13, 2023 at 6:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a call with Poroshenko, Biden assured him that the FBI wasn't pursuing a whistleblower complaint made by Poroshenko's aide. This was shortly after the aide blew the whistle. Strangely, the official readout of the call doesn't mention this. #politics #Ukraine #Biden #whistleblower

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

If you thought this was bad, here's the real shocker. Shortly after Poroshenko's aide blew the whistle, Poroshenko asked Biden whether the aide was now cooperating with the FBI. Incredibly, Biden assured Poroshenko that the FBI wasn't pursuing it. How would Biden have known? https://t.co/FdkBQEdQMY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wants to know if the FBI is working with someone. They are told that the FBI concluded that person had nothing and stopped working with them. The speaker will check and confirm this information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If it if it is true that FBI working with him, I at least I wanna know that. No. No. They are not. I told you the the FBI concluded he had nothing, and they stopped. That that was it. There's no reason to talk to him again. Okay. I I will check that and confirm that with

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

TLDR: Poroshenko is the Ukrainian president whom Biden extorted. Right after Trump won in 2016, a Poroshenko aide offered to give DOJ incriminating information about Biden's calls with Poroshenko. As fate would have it the aide's info went to Weissmann who probably buried it all. https://t.co/NFvIpKJBhw

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

a few months ago, I discussed the Biden-Poroshenko during 2016 transition in which Biden re-assured Poroshenko not to worry about FBI doing anything about Onyshchenko (Poroshenko's fugitive bagman who had the tapes) meeting with FBI. https://t.co/CBfMjNyIId

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

Biden re-assured Poroshenko that the FBI had "stopped" and there was "no reason [for FBI] to talk to him again". Biden undertook to "check that [with FBI] and confirm that with you".

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

Strangely, the official readout of Biden's call with Poroshenko doesn't mention anything about Biden's assurances that the FBI won't pursue the whistleblower complaint.

View Full Interactive Feed