reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @HatsOffff
@HatsOffff - HatsOff
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu: ‘We will make it to the return of the Messiah’ https://t.co/DCN17vCkrm
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Iran is no longer the same as in the past, describing it as no longer a regional strong-arm. Israel is portrayed as stronger now than in the past, and the speaker states that they are working against Iran in many ways, with some actions to be revealed at a later stage. The claim is also made that Israel is much stronger, greater than it has been previously. The speaker notes a belief that they would reach to the kingdom and make it to the return of the messiah, but specifies that this will not happen next Thursday. They describe the life of nations as precarious and surrounded with threats, attributing survival and endurance to alliances forged for greater strength. The speaker emphasizes that, from one battle to another, Israel has become stronger than ever through the current operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Falls, then the problem would be solved, but Iran is no longer Iran of the past. Iran is no longer that big nation, that regional strong-arm. We are working against Iran in many ways and in ways that would be revealed at a later stage. And I can say that Israel is much stronger, much greater than it has been in the past. We need to recognize this.
And I believe we all recognize the fact that we would reach to the kingdom. We will make it to the return of the messiah, but this will not happen next Thursday. The lives of nations is always precarious and surrounded with threats. Our survival, our endurance is a result of alliances that we forge for our existence to be stronger. No doubt we are moving from one battle to another from the establishment.
And and with this battle now, with this operations, Israel has become stronger than ever.
@HatsOffff - HatsOff
The last Shah’s son, Reza Pahlavi, is on Fox News begging for someone - anyone - to bomb Iran: ‘It could be an American strike. It could be an Israeli strike. It could be whatever’ https://t.co/Qy4Zy3NVVG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that there must be a change of direction, which is exactly what the Iranian people are demanding. He suggests that if the Iranian people receive support from the president for that idea, it would encourage them to take to the streets in even greater numbers and apply more pressure on the regime from within.
He identifies the decisive factor as the instrument of repression that has been unleashed against the people and states that overcoming this obstacle is what could tilt the odds in favor of a movement that could push toward a complete collapse of the regime. He asserts that a decisive strike could alter the balance, describing it as the mechanism that would enable the people to prevail.
Speaker 1 asks whether such decisive actions would involve American strikes, and whether Israeli strikes could play a role, implying that the Iranian people might view external intervention as cavalry coming to aid them. Speaker 0 confirms that it could be an American strike, an Israeli strike, or any force willing to act; he emphasizes that the cavalry is seen as necessary because the regime has to be confronted in ways that the regime cannot be confronted through ordinary means, and that the nation’s defenses can only be sustained up to a point without such intervention.
Speaker 0 notes that the regime is so desperate that it has to import elements from Lebanon, Afghanistan, and Iraq to act as instruments of repression, indicating that the regime is running out of its own capable personnel to carry out the dirty work. He asserts that the regime is on its last leg and on the verge of collapse, and that it will try every other means to survive. That is why a definitive strike could completely reverse the odds in favor of the nation and defenseless people, and such support is what is needed.
Speaker 1 asks what should be struck: whether to target command and control facilities of the IRGC, or to launch a decapitation strike against the Ayatollah, and what either the United States or Israel, or any willing party, should do. Speaker 0 responds that from the perspective of the people on the streets, the priority is to neutralize every element that has been unleashed against them. He says anything connected to the regime’s mechanism of control or violence should be targeted, and that such action cannot be achieved through diplomacy or negotiation. He notes that the president’s promises have been heartening to the people of Iran, and if those promises are carried out, they would change the entire complexion of the situation.
Speaker 1 then asks what would happen if the regime topples.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When he says there has to be a change of, direction. And that's exactly what the Iranian people are asking.
Speaker 1: But if the Iranian people now had the support of the president on that idea, will that encourage them to take to the streets in even greater numbers and put more pressure on the regime from within?
Speaker 0: Yes. And I think that the the decisive factor would be the instrument of repression that has been unleashed against our people is what is the ultimate obstacle to overcome. What changes the odds in favor of the people that can finally take over the system and push to a complete collapse depends on calculated strategic strikes against this
Speaker 1: And those would be American strikes?
Speaker 0: It will be it could be an American strike. It could be Israeli strike. It could be whatever the Iranian people now are looking as the cavalry coming because we can only hold the fort up to a point. Yep. The cavalry can help us overcome the odds.
Look. This is a regime so desperate that it has to import elements from Lebanon, from Afghanistan, from Iraq as instrument of repression because they are running out of elements of their own doing the dirty job against them. This is what's at stake. So the regime right now is on its last leg. It's on the verge of collapse.
It's going to attempt every other means to yet again survive. That's why a definitive strike is going to completely reverse the odds in favor of the nation and defenseless people. That's what we need in terms of actual support.
Speaker 1: So what do you strike? Do you strike command and control facilities of the IRGC? Do you launch a decapitation strike to take out the ayatollah? What would you suggest? Either The United States or Israel or whoever is willing to do it take on?
Speaker 0: I think if you're asking from the perspective of the people on the streets is you have to neutralize every element that has been unleashed against them. So anything that ties to the regime mechanism of Well, justice to it it could be at first been targeting, of course, IRGC, which is the main culprit here, or any other instrument of state apparatus of control or or or or violence. That's already a big plus, and that cannot cannot come across by diplomacy or by negotiation. This is where the promise that the president has given has been very heartening to the people of Iran. And if that is carried out, then it changes, as I said earlier, the whole complexion.
Speaker 1: So if the regime topples.
@HatsOffff - HatsOff
Ron DeSantis tells an Israeli American audience that Palestine never existed, claims all the land was divinely promised to Jews, and equates “From the river to the sea” with a second Holocaust. He told critics to “read your Bible” as the crowd chanted “USA.” https://t.co/UFymiyMJUk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that chanting “from the river to the sea” is in favor of a second holocaust. He suggests some students are ignorant and do not understand what they’re talking about, noting they talk about “end the occupation of Palestine” and needing a history lesson.
He states that there has never been a Palestinian Arab state. Before World War I, the land experienced centuries under the Ottoman Empire and was not a Palestinian Arab state. Then came the British mandate for Palestine, followed by a UN partition plan that proposed a Jewish state and an Arab state.
The Jews accepted the state and founded Israel, while the Arabs rejected the state and went to war to try to eradicate Israel, and they lost. He says they went to war again and lost in 1967 and 1973 and throughout the Intifadas. Consequently, he asserts that the land historically has “no stronger connection” than any group of people except the Jewish people, and that connection goes back thousands of years.
He concludes with a call to “Read your bible.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you say from the river to the sea, you are chanting in favor of a second holocaust. That's what that means. Now I do think some of these students are just ignorant. I don't think they understand even what they're talking about. You hear some of them talking about end the occupation of Palestine, and I just think they need a little history lesson.
There has never been a Palestinian Arab state. Prior prior to the first World War, you had hundreds of years of occupation under the Ottoman Empire. It was not a Palestinian Arab state. Then you had the British mandate for Palestine. Then you had a partition plan from the UN, Jewish state and Arab state.
The Jews accepted the state and founded Israel. The Arabs rejected the state, and they went to war to try to eradicate Israel, and they lost. And they went to war again, and they lost in '67 and '73 and throughout the Intifadas. And so, no, that land historically has no stronger connection than any group of people except the Jewish people. It goes back thousands of years.
Read your bible.
@HatsOffff - HatsOff
Samsung is under fire after findings that AppCloud comes pre-installed at firmware level on Galaxy A and M phones, with users unable to uninstall it. https://t.co/xC4lz2BaZG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Israel is not permanently isolated and can break out of a siege despite claims to the contrary. They note that some actors have halted shipments of weapon components, yet assert that Israel is capable of producing weapons and that intelligence and weapon systems are shared with the United States. The speaker expresses gratitude for bipartisan support in military matters for Israel, both in historical times and today, and emphasizes that this support persists across political boundaries.
They highlight the ubiquity of Israeli-made goods, pointing out that many everyday items—cell phones, medicines, foods, including cherry tomatoes—are produced in Israel, illustrating a tangible contribution to global products. The speaker acknowledges that Israel can make things and cherishes the continuity of American support, vowing to work to ensure that support continues on both sides of the aisle.
Further, the speaker asserts that Israel will eventually achieve the independence it needs so that Western European nations, which they say might deny Israel, will not succeed. They claim the capability to break the siege and to become independent of external restrictions or pressure. The passage ends with an incomplete thought: “And the last thing,” suggesting there was more to be said.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just said this in another meeting and they said, Oh, Israel is isolated. Israel can't break out of the season. I said, We will. Some of them have stopped weapon component shipments. Can we get out of this?
Yes, we can. We're pretty good at producing weapons. Like intelligence, we share both with The United States, a good chunk of your intel. And our weapons systems. We share with The United States.
We're tremendously appreciative of the bipartisan support in military matters to Israel in previous years and today as well. But do you have cell phones? Any you have cell phones here? No. You're holding a piece of Israel right there.
Do you know that? I mean, a lot of the cell phones, the medicines, the foods, you eat cherry tomatoes. You know where that was made? I don't like cherry tomatoes, but it's an what can I do? It's an Israeli product, as are so many other things.
And I think this serves the betterment of for the betterment of all mankind and womankind. I think that is Israel's unknown contribution. But we are we can make things. We can produce things. We cherish the fact that we have the constancy of American support despite the attempts to erode it.
And we'll continue to work to make sure that that continues on both sides of the aisle. It's very important for us. But equally, we will eventually create the independence that we need so those in Western Europe who think they can deny us things will not succeed. We can break this siege, and we will. And the last thing
@HatsOffff - HatsOff
Ali Shamkhani, a senior Iranian official, declared last week: “We are ready to never have a nuclear weapon... We want better relations with the U.S.” He was slated for negotiations on Sunday. Israel reportedly assassinated him on Friday. https://t.co/H7Rs3BZB3K
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shamhani stated that Iran is willing to commit to never having nuclear weapons. In exchange for the immediate lifting of all sanctions, Iran would get rid of its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium and only enrich to a level needed for civilian use. Iran would also allow inspectors to oversee these activities. Shamhani said Iran would accept that deal tonight. He is one of the few people in Iran authorized to speak about the sensitive negotiations. He also stated that better relations with the U.S. are possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are ready. Shamhani is one of the few people in Iran authorized to speak about the sensitive negotiations. We can definitely have better relations with The US. Shamhani said that Iran is willing to commit to never having a nuclear weapon, to getting rid of its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium, to only enriching to a level needed for civilian use, and to allow inspectors in to oversee it all in exchange for lifting all sanctions immediately. He said Iran would accept that deal tonight.