reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @HerbsandDirt

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - June 2, 2025 at 5:34 AM

Saved - June 3, 2025 at 3:49 AM

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

If you’re relying on Grok, you’re a dummy. That is all. https://t.co/Kan881EqMz

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - October 31, 2024 at 4:40 AM

Saved - October 31, 2024 at 1:18 PM

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

This would NEVER have been allowed to air in 2021, or 2022. CNN getting schooled on vaccines, and her inept attempts to discredit him FAILED. Absolutely worth the watch! https://t.co/LO3l4oewT9

Video Transcript AI Summary

RFK Junior recently discussed his potential role in the administration, claiming Trump promised him control over public health agencies like HHS, CDC, and FDA. He shared his views on vaccines, noting that when he was born, autism rates were 1 in 10,000, and now it's 1 in 34, attributing this to the increase in vaccines and the lack of product liability since 1986. He insists he wants access to data to prove vaccines are unsafe, arguing that if he can demonstrate this, it could lead to changes in vaccine availability. Despite skepticism about his claims and past controversies, he maintains that his goal is to improve public health by examining the data.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One other person who who was on stage recently and was talking about coming into the administration is RFK Junior. He said that Trump has promised him control of the public health agencies, HHS, which would be also, you know, CDC, FDA, USDA, all of these agencies. Is that true? Has Trump promised him basically the HHS job? Speaker 1: So I spent, two and a half hours this week with Bobby Kennedy junior, and it was the most extraordinary thing. Because let's face it. We've all heard on the news all sorts of sort of snarky comments about him. And I said, so tell me, how's it gonna go? And he said, why don't you just listen to me explain things? And what he explained was when he was born, we had 3 vaccines, and autism was 1 in 10,000. Now a baby's born with 76 vaccines because in 1986, they waived product liability for vaccines. And and here's the best one. They started paying the people at the NIH. Right? They pay them a piece of the money for the vaccine companies. Wait a minute. Let me finish. And so all of these vaccines came out without product liability. So what happened now, autism is 1 in 34. Speaker 0: Okay. Amazing. Neither of us are doctors. Vaccines are safe. RK I mean, he Why Speaker 1: do you think vaccines are safe? There's no product liability anymore. They're not proven. Speaker 0: Kids get them, and they're fine. Speaker 1: Why do you think they're fine? Speaker 0: But because they're proven scientifically to these cells. Speaker 1: There was 1 in 10,000 people who were autism. We all know so many more people with autism than added when we were young. Oh, come on. Okay. I mean, his point is really interesting. Speaker 0: So here's what he said. Cause autism Okay. Which is what RFK push why people are concerned that he could get a job like HHS. And I don't even think he could Speaker 1: get job for HHS. What he's trying to do here's what he wants to do. He said, I want data. I just want data because they Speaker 0: blocked the data. Out there. Speaker 1: Wait. It it's not. They don't want it. Just wait. Speaker 0: Look at it. It's all white. Speaker 1: Wants the data so he can say, these things are unsafe. He he says, if you give me the data, all I want is the data, and I'll take on the data and show that it's not safe. And then if you pull the product liability, the companies will yank these vaccines right off off of the market. So that's his point. He's not trying to do anything but things that made sense. And look Speaker 0: This is not where I thought this was going because Well, Speaker 1: I spent 2 and a half hours Speaker 0: RK Junior is a vaccine skeptic. He pushes lies about vaccines. And I don't even think if Republicans pushes lies. Speaker 1: Why you said do what you said. I'm not a scientist than you are. So he just Speaker 0: wants scientists say he pushes lies. Oh, there's scientists Speaker 1: who are not paid to say he pushes lies. I mean, let's give him the data. I think it'd be pretty cool to give him the data. Let's see what he comes up with. Speaker 0: Okay. I Speaker 1: think it's pretty fun. Speaker 0: He he pushed conspiracies about COVID. He had to apologize for tying vaccine questions to to what happened in Germany during the Holocaust. Speaker 1: I promise you. I haven't looked at all the things you Speaker 0: said. Anyone's looking at Speaker 1: for for an hour. Said Roundup. Remember Roundup? But Speaker 0: you're saying he would not be in charge of HIV? Speaker 1: No. Of course not. Speaker 0: Okay. So he's not gonna be, Speaker 1: like, acting secretary? No. Speaker 0: Well, he couldn't get someone charged. Would he be in an acting position or anything like that? I Speaker 1: just told you what he wants. He wants to help get data. Speaker 0: You're saying he wants access to data, but that would Speaker 1: be wants data, and he wants to prove things are wrong. And he says if I can't prove they're wrong, that's fine. But if I can, I can save millions of Americans' lives and make their lives better? And I think that's pretty cool. Speaker 0: I'm not sure any data trying Speaker 1: to do it. Speaker 0: I I don't think any data would back that up, but

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - June 10, 2024 at 1:46 AM

Saved - June 10, 2024 at 9:21 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Pfizer vaccine's first listed adverse event is 1p36 Deletion Syndrome, a congenital genetic disorder causing severe intellectual disabilities in fetuses. This raises questions about the prioritization of adverse events. Pfizer's efforts to conceal information for 75 years are not surprising. A 38-page document reveals the extent of adverse events and other side effects from the vaccine. Thanks to a courageous judge, the truth is now being revealed.

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

Did you know that the VERY FIRST adverse event listed in the Pfizer vaccine is: 1p36 Deletion Syndrome This is a congenital genetic disorder that affects fetuses & DELETES part of their chromosomes, causing them to be born with SEVERE intellectual disabilities. Seriously? This is their FIRST adverse event listed? Not fever. Not rash. Not irritability. Is it any wonder that Pfizer fought so hard to keep information buried for 75 years? “Safe & effective.” This 38 page document is the motherload. 👇🏽 It details how many people have suffered adverse events from this vaccine. What kinds of other side effects they suffered as well. Had it not been for a judge with balls, they’d still be gaslighting us. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - May 29, 2024 at 4:06 AM

Saved - May 29, 2024 at 9:09 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A man left strawberries outside for animals, but after a week, no animals touched them. Even my chickens, who used to love strawberries, wouldn't eat them. It's strange and confusing.

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

Yesterday, I saw a post about a man leaving strawberries out for the animals…one week later, after being left outside (they still looked fresh), not one animal touched them. Interesting. My chickens, who used to love strawberries, wouldn’t even touch them today. (It’s been a while since I gave them any. ) My “mama”, who eats most things, pecked once, turned on a dime and walked away. WTH?

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - May 21, 2024 at 4:46 AM

Saved - May 22, 2024 at 4:08 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

CVS and Walgreens received over $2 billion from the government during COVID, allegedly for pushing vaccines and not prescribing Ivermectin. California institutions were also paid over $9 billion. This raises questions about their motives.

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

It’s only Monday, and we’re learning that CVS and Walgreens were paid over $2 BILLION dollars from our government during COVID. For shamelessly pushing the vaccines, and going along with not prescribing Ivermectin? If not, then for WHAT exactly? California institutions were also paid over $9 billion for doing “their” part. (Pic credit: @stkirsch.) Perhaps this is a tipping point. It certainly should be. https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-government-cartel-paid-billions-to-walgreens-and-cvs-not-to-fill-ivermectin-the-question-is-why/

The Government Cartel paid billions to Walgreens and CVS not to fill Ivermectin - the question is why Drug dealing, it seems, has always been a lucrative business, especially when the drug lord of your cartel is the federal government. Why in the world would any supplier want to promote or prescribe a cheap and readily available drug – like Ivermectin – if doing so would throw a wrench into potential billion-dollar cash-cow contracts with the federal government? The simple answer: If the supplier values its profits over patients, it wouldn’t... americaoutloud.news

@HerbsandDirt — Carole Mac

Posted - April 5, 2024 at 5:22 AM

Saved - April 5, 2024 at 5:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Andrew Wakefield's study suggested giving the MMR vaccine separately, but it did not conclusively prove a causal effect between the vaccine and autism. Other researchers have replicated his findings, and a whistleblower from the CDC revealed data on the vaccine's impact on African American boys. Studies showing a correlation between the vaccine and autism are being buried or debunked, raising questions about their validity. The high number of diagnosed children and the evidence presented suggest further investigation is needed.

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

“Wakefield is a fraud!” “His study has been debunked!” Ah, the battle cry of every vaccine bootlicker on the planet. Bashing Wakefield is their mothership. So let’s break it down: Dr. Andrew Wakefield was never an antivaxxer. Not even a little bit. His biggest suggestion was to give the mumps, measles and rubella vaccines separately. In 1998, he along with 12 other co-authors published a paper in the Lancet, which showed a possible correlation between the MMR and gastrointestinal dysfunction along with developmental delays and autism. The paper never stated a conclusive causal effect. It DID state that further research was needed into the MMR connection to rule it out completely. After the Lancet publication, all hell broke loose. Most of the co-authors were pressured to retract their findings. (Not suspicious at all.) And they annihilated Wakefield in every possible way that you can. Never mind that 14 months prior, 2 researchers; Professor Walker-Smith & Dr. Amar Dhillon had found and documented the same issue in children, which included autistic characteristics. And let’s not forget Dr. William Thompson, (Chief Scientist for the CDC), who became a whistleblower after he and his team were asked to falsify & bury THEIR data regarding the MMR, and how it exponentially affected young African American boys. (Autism.) Or how in 2001, Dr. John O’Leary, Professor of Pathology at St. James Hospital in Dublin replicated Wakefield’s findings. Or how in 2006, a team from Wake Forest University School of Medicine in NC examined 275 children with REGRESSIVE autism & bowel disease. Of the 82 children who had been tested at the time of the interview, 70 had tested positive for the measles virus. According to Dr. Stephen Walker, “Of the results we have so far, ALL ARE VACCINE STRAIN, & none are wild measles.” Oops. “What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr. Wakefield & published in 1998, is correct. It didn’t draw any conclusions specifically on what it means to find measles in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine.” The children in every study had ZERO exposure to the measles with the exception of through the live virus IN THE VACCINE. It’s not exactly asymptomatic, which is always the convenient excuse when things like this are presented. It can’t be both wildly contagious, or hiding in the bushes. These children were all developing normally until they regressed, and now suffer from autism & bowel disease. Why are these studies being buried, or cut short all together? Are all these experts just wrong? Even though 1 out of 32 of our children have been diagnosed? All I’m saying is, that’s a lot of smoke for no fire. And the studies that are “debunked” or buried by the pharma gatekeepers are the ones we need to pay REALLY close attention to.