reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @HighImpactFlix
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
. @IanCarrollShow Answers Why He Shilled for Eric Prince's IDF Phone https://t.co/Bfa5efWGDk
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem.
- Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research.
- Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs.
- Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information.
- Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help.
- Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions.
- They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party.
- Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My problem with Alex Jones is the same problem that I have with Owen Shroyer. It's the same problem that I have with Ian Carroll. And they're objective problems that I have. How can you support the Donald Trump presidency when they represent all that you say you're against on this side of the aisle?
Speaker 1: Shill the Eric Prince Blackwater NSO phone. That was kind of an offhanded comment. I've done no research into the Eric Prince phone. Eric Prince is a polarizing figure because when he speaks, he's very informed and very intelligent, but he is from the military industrial complex world. Just because someone is involved in war fighting does not mean that they're an evil person.
And Eric Prince is a good example of someone that you have to do a lot of digging into to really get a full picture because at first glance, he seems evil because Blackwater seemed pretty evil. When you do more research about it, it doesn't seem quite as clear, and I don't mean to say that he's a good guy, I just don't know. And I don't I haven't done any research into
Speaker 0: Maybe he doesn't know, but you got it. Come on. Eric Prince. Look at my last video. Eric Prince has three CEOs for his company.
All of them are have intricate ties with the IDF. Do you think it is coincidence that Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state coming out of Israel and three CEOs from the IDF, and we know Israel hates America because of what they did. Just for one example, what they did with the USS Liberty, do you think it's coincidental that Eric Prince from Blackwater who was outed as doing horrible, horrible atrocities to, Iraqi civilians and others. Do you think Eric Prince could ever, on any plane, be considered a good dude after having done that? Can somebody repent of their evil deeds?
I've never heard Eric Prince say, here's the evil that we've done, and I am so like, I was blinded by money and by power and by prestige, and I I'm turning over another never heard Eric Prince say. I've never seen any documentation that Eric Prince called his own nonsense out. I I this may this right here makes me question the genuineness of of him. That's crazy. Eric Prince is an easy one.
Blackwater's an easy one. BlackRock is an easy one. Did you know BlackRock, with the help of the Trump administration, has purchased two ports in the Panama Canal for 22,800,000,000.0 billion dollars. $22,800,000,000. And during the state of the union address, Donald Trump said a company is going to purchase the Panama Canal.
Well, he didn't mention that that company is BlackRock. Yeah. The BlackRock. Are you going to tell me that Donald Trump is on our side just given that one little nugget of information? Come on.
Seriously? I know it's so obvious. It's painful, but how are these guys missing it?
Speaker 1: Those kinds of phones, and I'm not saying that I would buy one. That's irrelevant. That was an offhanded comment. To nowhere waiting on Trump and Elon to do anything in the interest of people. Actually, I'm specifically not waiting on Trump and Elon to do shit.
That's why I did what I did, and I'm saying what I'm saying, I'm and getting the conversation going. Change starts from the bottom up, seven c's. And you can be down here starting fights among the people that are helping to expose all this or you can continue to be a troll online and do your thing.
Speaker 0: See now he's assuming that Seven Seas is trolling, but what if Seven Seas has a completely different paradigm and perspective than he does? See, this is where we're all missing each other. It's like, I'm just using seven season Ian Carroll as an example, but insert anybody. Insert me, Alex Jones. Insert, Joe Rogan.
Insert whoever. Whoever you might Whitney Webb. There's this gap in between where we are freaking missing each other, and we are treating people who may not be our enemies as enemies. And we gotta fill this gap right here because it's us versus them. And maybe it'd be a good idea to let down this barrier right here and go, hey.
You know what? Okay. I got this I I got this problem with you, man, and you gotta help me resolve this because it seems like it's clear to me. I could be missing something, but let's have a conversation. I think that Derek Brose and Ian Carroll had a a pretty productive conversation, and I'm looking forward to more of a conversation.
I hear they're planning on doing a, a live stream or sit down interview at the March, which I'm looking forward to because I feel like Derek is one of those genuine guys. And I feel like Derek is not just genuine, but well researched, and he has a lot of legitimate questions. Now there have been some heated discussions between them where it seems like they were both reducing themselves to the ad hominem plane, which I I don't I just don't see that as as constructive. Let me give you an example. I don't even remember exactly what I said, but I pissed off Clint Russell to the point where he was following me and then he stopped following me.
Because I I I made a video about something he said, and it escapes me right now, but he felt put out and him and red headed libertarian felt like, I should have contacted them first, and I didn't feel like I should have. But, you know, looking back on it, I feel like Clint Russell, red headed libertarian, Luke Rodowski, Ian Carroll, we should if we're all genuine and honest, we should, like, put the boxing gloves away and maybe take out the clipboards and start learning from each other and go, no. I disagree with you here. Trump is a dangerous individual. Now what I have against Clint Russell, I think you I think it's centered around Donald Trump and his ideology and who he actually backs.
Because I can't, for the life of me, figure out why a libertarian who's supposed to be somewhat of a nonstatist can vote for a guy who still calls himself the father of the VA double x and still says that he saved millions and millions of people by turning billions and billions of dollars over to the big pharma industrial complex. I I don't get that. That that seems like I I don't I don't know. And they also call out even Clint Russell calls out the calls it the biggest power and wealth transfer, and I agree, which means it's the biggest fraudulent single signature scam outside of the creation of the Federal Reserve that I can think of. $6,200,000,000,000.
It was supposed to be 2,200,000,000,000.0, but the Federal Reserve added a $4,000,000,000,000 backstop in that. And when you look at the the cumulative increase of national debt of 8,400,000,000,000.0, because that's what'll be on the books is 8,400,000,000,000.0, you actually have to add 4,000,000,000,000 to that. So on the books, and I'm not saying that there aren't black black box and black records where there's more trillions of dollars that aren't accounted for. But on the books spending and on the books national debt, whatever you wanna call it, is 12,400,000,000,000.0 in four years, and Republicans in MAGA were dogging Obama for increasing the national debt 9,000,000,000,000 in eight years. That's wild to me.
If you're increasing the national debt, you are devaluing the dollar. Prices are increasing, and you're ripping off Americans. I don't care if you're Democrat or Republican. So I don't get what people don't get about this. So, yeah, this thing with Trump and Elon, it sure looks like he's being while he criticizes them, he's still being super supportive of them.
And while a lot of his criticisms are legitimate on Donald Trump and Elon Musk, he still pulls the lever for Zio Don. I don't get it.
Speaker 1: Up to you.
Speaker 0: I'm still gonna reserve me calling him a shill for when I actually know that he's intending to deceive people. Okay? When you're a shield, you're being paid to get out a certain amount of information misinformation and deceiving people.
Speaker 1: Let's see if we can get to some good faith arguments here. Hodgkins have been posting all kinds of shit. Glenn Greenwald, total so much respect for Glenn.
Speaker 0: Wait a second. What did what the Hodgkins post? Oops.
Speaker 1: We can get to some good faith arguments here.
Speaker 0: And that's what I think we should have is a good faith argument. Seven c's, if you're out there, give me your take on what you think about e what Ian Carroll said in his reaction to your post.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Hey Elon...I wonder if I'll lose my job over this post. "Charlie Kirk...has been a friend of the FEDS. I think, probably not a good idea to be a friend of the FEDS, but, whatever, he's been a friend of the FEDS." - Candace Owens Here's the new video...tighten your seatbelts, this is a wild one:
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a heated discussion accusing the government of lying and calling it "a government cover up." They cite "the number 33" with: "In thirty three hours, we have made historic progress for Charlie. In less than thirty six hours, 33 to be precise. 33,000 pages of information to you" and "Thirty third hour after the shoot. Thirty three hours." Candace Owens is cited: "Charlie Kirk was a friend of the feds." The panel repeats: "Sean Hannity, you're a government agent." Michael Savage also says: "Sean Hannity, you're a government agent" and accuses media figures of promoting "the left versus right paradigm lie." They reference "'CIA Infiltrated Operation Mockingbird MK Ultra Media.'" The talk ends asserting "This is a government cover up."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bull from this government is lying to us.
Speaker 1: Have you noticed that the characters involved in this perpetual psychological operation are getting more direct as they bring formerly hidden truths to the forefront, like Cash Patel's open fixation on the number 33.
Speaker 2: In thirty three hours, we have made historic progress for Charlie. In less than thirty six hours, 33 to be precise. 33,000 pages of information to you.
Speaker 1: Even Candace Owens is being vocal about it and mocking it as she ties the number 33 to Freemasonry.
Speaker 3: We don't know why the feds say that it was the thirty third hour after the shooting, like a total Freemason. Thirty third hour after the shoot. Third took us thirty three hours.
Speaker 1: Now before I play this next clip, let me just ask you a question, and I really want an answer. Do you trust the feds? I mean, the dark work and world of federal agents. Is it a good idea to befriend the feds? And would you personally trust and respect a person if you knew they were a friend of the feds?
I think the answer should be obvious. Candice Owens, one of the best friends of Charlie Kirk, decided to tell her massive audience what we've all pretty much known about Charlie, that Charlie Kirk was a friend of the feds. And she says it three times in this clip.
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk, who has been a friend of the feds. Right? I think probably not a good idea to be friends with these people, but whatever. He's been a friend of the feds. Surely, is a big issue.
Speaker 1: Big issue? It's a massive issue because now the guy who you claim is a friend of the feds is being seen as a martyr and is being presented as someone who should be honored, glorified, and exalted as though he were some champion or hero. Can friends of the feds, that is the alphabet soup government agents who incessantly spy on us and trample on our liberties, can such a man actually be seen as a hero? I know people are starting to view this as hate speech, but I think these are legitimate questions. If I was a friend of the Fed, wouldn't you suspect that I was working against the interests of America?
And then there's Michael Savage, also known as Michael Allen Weiner. He says that Sean Hannity is a government agent, and everybody knows it.
Speaker 0: Sean Hannity, you're a hooker in a brothel. I heard you tonight, and I'm gonna point a finger at you. You're a government agent. As sure as I am sitting here. Because someone without your with no talent like yours to get this far and get away with what you've gotten with all your life.
You're a government agent, Sean. Everyone knows this.
Speaker 1: So in this video, we're gonna see these two say some bizarre stuff. And remember, these two spent years trying to get you to vote for Mango Mussolini, just like the people on the left try to get you to vote for Cacklin Cameltoe Harris. Now these two conservative juggernauts have done an about face since it's become obvious to pretty much anybody who's paying attention that Trump has betrayed America and that there's something not quite right about the Charlie Kirk official government story. First, let me give you the whole context of what Candice said about the number 33 and Freemasonry.
Speaker 3: What's really interesting about that, okay, if you consider that they are telling us at 7PM that this is where all the messages started circulating, then we don't know why the feds say that it was the thirty third hour after the shooting, like a total Freemason. Thirty third hour after the shoot. Thirty three hours. That would be inaccurate. Okay?
Thirty three hours would be at 09:23PM. Our person is telling us, and I tend to believe them, that everyone knew at 07:00PM. Okay? And what they tell us took place thereafter, and this is what I confirmed with Lance's family because I said, wait a second. You owned the house.
When did they pick up Lance? When did Lance go in? When did the home that you own get raided by the feds? Did the home that you own get raided by the feds? And what that that family is telling me and what, my source is telling me, it's matching.
Okay? So I'm I'm feeling good about this. We'll say allegedly, but I'm feeling good about this. Okay?
Speaker 1: So lately, Candace has turned investigative reporter on all these vital matters. And from what I can tell, her reporting is valid and clashes with the government's official story. She believes, as do many, that the feds are lying to us. Here's the context of Candace's assertion that Charlie Kirk was a friend of the feds while questioning the feds' timeline regarding the whereabouts of Tyler Robinson after the shooting.
Speaker 3: You should have footage of him in that Dodge Challenger just waiting and salivating. He kept checking. He said, oh, here I am right here just waiting to get that rifle back. I'm waiting to get that rifle back. Where's the footage?
You were on a manhunt. Where is the footage? Surely, during a manhunt, you used drones. I feel like we are tech capable enough that during a manhunt after a murderer of a college student, decides to take out Charlie Kirk, who has been a friend of the feds. Right?
I think probably not a good idea to be friends with these people, but whatever. He's been a friend of the feds. Surely, this is a big issue. And to to put to rest in his conspiracies, you're gonna show us that drone footage, and we're gonna see the Dodge Challenger just sitting there for hours and hours and hours. And we're maybe even gonna be able to see because I'm sure at that point, like, cops maybe set up some barricades or something to see he was going in and out.
And then he decides he's going to leave. Show us the footage. Like I said, every inch of that campus is covered, so we should be able to see. He's wearing maroon, and you're telling us that he went back to his car and he changed. Show us him leaving campus before, he returns back to campus around 11:30 to show us the footage.
Okay? I'm demanding it. You know why? Because I need to be able to fit things into my timeline.
Speaker 1: I agree. We should not be trusting the feds and what they're saying about this situation just like we shouldn't ever believe them about any situation and any official story. These are great investigative questions, Candace, but I have a question for you. How long have you known that Charlie Kirk was a friend of the feds you now distrust? And have you been a friend of the feds too, but you're just not telling us?
And why haven't you told us all this time that Charlie Kirk is a friend of the feds? That's a massive deal. And then we have another diehard influential Trump supporter, Michael Savage, also known as Michael Allen Weiner, who's going off on the Trump administration for lying to us about the government's official story about Charlie Kirk. Fasten your seat belts because this really gets interesting.
Speaker 0: Did anyone see that press conference by the so called FBI? Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard.
I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand.
Now the Mauser does not break down very easily, incidentally, for those of you who know weapons. Something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like, all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. We are not hearing or seeing reality.
And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel, and then he leaves it for us to find the the FBI to find. I don't believe a word
Speaker 1: of it. He says we're not hearing or seeing reality. We haven't been hearing or seeing reality for a long, long time, Michael. Where have you been? And why are you and Candace and Tucker Carlson and Megan Kelly all of a sudden doing this complete one eighty from what you've been talking about and who you've been protecting and the administration you've been promoting.
What's going on here?
Speaker 0: I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government. It's lying to us. Something's wrong.
Something's so wrong. It's sickening. Look at this idiot. They found the rifle, and they're getting the prince. Are you stupid?
Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack.
I just told you, moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily.
Speaker 1: Now there are different schools of thought on that. There are YouTube channel creators who've actually broken down the gun and put it in their pants and showed that you can walk with it. You can go up the steps with it, but that doesn't explain the brisk running across the roof that he jumped down off a little ledge and then he jumped off of the building. Yeah. Where is the gun?
How long did it take him to break it down? Why did he break it down and then reassemble it and then wrap it in a towel and throw it in the woods? None of this makes any sense.
Speaker 0: And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the runway. I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and he the trans anti the trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit.
Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture. I have persona non grata in this White House. I will tell you right now. I flew with Donald Trump in air force one. I consider him close to me.
I have not been able to get near him since this administration took hold.
Speaker 1: So Michael Savage is saying that he was part of the inner circle, Trump's inner circle. And now with this new administration, he's been kicked out of the circle. I don't even know if that's true. What is the psychological operation going on here? Because this guy has been a key player.
He's been instrumental just like Candace Owens has and is, and Tucker Carlson has and is, and Megan Kelly has and is, they've been instrumental in promoting, protecting, and supporting the left versus right paradigm lie, and they still do it to this day. So what's the play here?
Speaker 0: They have thrown me out. They've castigated throw me in the desert. They don't want me near them. They don't want real truth tellers near them. Sean Hannity immediately, that pimp scumbag goes on the air and repeats the government lie that lousy son of a bitch.
How the fuck does Sean Hannity live with himself? What would and he had
Speaker 1: This these glitches are on his side of this. This is this comes from the his original video from his channel.
Speaker 0: Sean, you know what? Animal. You're like a whore. Kept in a Sean Hannity, you've always been a a whore in a brothel. You have hit a new low, Hannity, and something is wrong.
Somebody killed this young guy.
Speaker 1: But Hannity promotes the lie on phone news just like Jakey the snake tapper promotes the lie on the counterfeit news network, just like Rachel Mad Cow promotes the lie on MSDNC, and Michael Savage has lived his entire life promoting political lies.
Speaker 0: And everyone is asking who done it, and we're supposed to believe they think we're this stupid. So Cash Patel is there. He doesn't say a word, and Donald Trump's in the Yankee Stadium. What the hell is going on here? I'm just an American citizen who's been in the business of observing since I'm 18 years old, and I don't buy one word of this narrative, not one single word.
So I'm gonna end in a moment. Before Charlie Kirk was born, I was telling you the truth. I've been a truth teller. I faced many death threats. I had to live in isolation for thirty years.
I've had to live in hiding as a monk almost for thirty years. Speak on. To tell the truth, I'm not gonna stop now. This is a government cover up.
Speaker 1: What is he talking about living as a monk? This guy has been a high profile public figure for decades. What is he saying?
Speaker 0: This is total and absolute bullshit. And I'll repeat it for those of you who are so stupid to keep repeating the big lie.
Speaker 1: You were promoting nine eleven lies. You were promoting weapons of mass destruction lies. You promoted the military industrial complex, and you continue to promote the drug war. You're promoting lies, Michael, every single day while you claim to be now calling out liars.
Speaker 0: They claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fitted the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants leg. That's after he shot Charlie Kirk. He did all of this? Let's see now. I'll remove the receiver and stock, and I'll put it in the backpack.
And I'll jump off the roof. And even though you don't see it in the backpack, it's there because Sean Hannity told you it's there. And Ben Shapiro told you it's there. And Mark Levin tells you it's there.
Speaker 1: He's calling them all out. He's basically saying they're all lying to you about this current official story, just like they've lied to you about all the official stories of the past, including Michael Savage being a liar about past official stories.
Speaker 0: And then he runs in the woods after killing Charlie Kirk, a wonderful young man, and he reinstalled barrel and the stock together and leaves it neatly in the woods for all of us to see in a nice box. You talk about breadcrumbs in the woods. Why would a guy running from the law after killing someone stop to reinsert a barrel? He wouldn't. It's all fake.
None of this makes sense. Who did it? And why did they see, the real question is why did they kill Charlie Kirk? I don't know him. We we approached him several times.
He said, I love your show. We have it in writing. I'd love to be on your show. I'll tell you exactly what happened. We'd love to be on your show, Michael.
Charlie, he wrote back to Karen. It works for me. I'd love to be on your show, and my staff will will arrange it. The staff never got back to Karen no matter how many times she called them. This is a giant deep state cover up from the top to the bottom.
But why? You have to ask yourself, why would they wanna knock this kid off? Something doesn't make sense. Even if this guy jumped off the roof, did it? Why would they kill him, Charlie Kirk?
Why? He was not that radical a guy. He was a middle of the road he was a middle of the road Christian broadcaster in plain English. He said it like it is. Why would they kill him?
Because he was marshaling the youth? You would kill him. Oh, you say the left did it? Are you sure? You shoulda left did it?
See, that's the only question. All the breadcrumbs lead to a leftist. That's why you shouldn't trust the narrative. And I should say goodbye. I don't trust one word of what I'm hearing, not one stinking word.
You don't hear about Epstein today, do you? Not one word about the black crime wave against white people gone. Epstein gone. Charlie Kirk modern. Was he modern to get Epstein?
Do you actually believe it's that cynical that they would kill him to get Epstein off the news cycle? I don't believe that, by the way. Something doesn't make Why was Charlie Kirk murdered?
Speaker 1: I wonder if Michael Savage will say anything about Charlie Kirk's late criticism of Israel and Bibi Netanyahu.
Speaker 0: Charlie was sacrificed by some entity. And this stooge, this Jack Ruby, whoever he is, will be found, and Sean Hannity will and break bricks because he has a brick brain, and he will tell you this is the one who did it. Yay, Sean. Sean, you're a cap dog. You're like a hooker a hooker in a brothel.
Sean Hannity, you're a hooker in a brothel. I heard you tonight, and I'm gonna point a finger at you. You're a government agent as sure as I am sitting here. Because someone without your with no talent like yours to get this far and get away with what you've gotten with all your life. You're a government agent, Sean.
Everyone knows this. You're a dumb bastard with no education. And now you're spousing this lie. And you think your listeners are gonna believe it? Maybe Murdoch will believe it.
I don't.
Speaker 1: So, hey, Michael. Just like the question I asked Candice, how long have you known that Sean Hannity is a government agent? And why have you used your platform to just be silent about things that you know that are destructive? If Sean Hannity is a government agent, and I have no doubt that he is because back in the nineteen seventies, the church committee revealed that all of media, print and televised media, was infiltrated successfully by the CIA. That's why I call it CIA Infiltrated Operation Mockingbird MK Ultra Media.
But how long did you know about it, Michael, And why did you keep silent? What does that say about you?
Speaker 0: Porn vanity, you're a disgrace. So is all of Fox News.
Speaker 1: So you tell me, what do you think is going on here? You got all these high profile social media influencers who were once so pro MAGA, it wasn't even funny, got people involved in this left versus right political divide, and now they're turning and doing something and saying something completely different. Do you think it's a big deal that Charlie Kirk was a friend of the feds? Do you think it's a big deal that Candace Owens has hidden that from us? How do you think Candace Owens is doing right now?
What do you think about her reporting and her investigative skills and her questioning? What do you think about what Michael Savage said about Sean Hannity being a government agent, and why is he kept silent for so long? What's going on here? Leave your thoughts in the comment section below if you haven't done so already. If you like these videos, maybe you'll like some of my others.
Check out my other videos. Like this video. Share this video. Subscribe to the channel. Hit the bell notification icon, and I'll see you in the next video.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Undercover Miami police just shot and killed a father in cold blood (on his own property) in front of his family as his distraught children begged to be by his side during his final moments. WARNING: this is VERY difficult to watch! https://t.co/Dd2LIYrWTP
Video Transcript AI Summary
A family in Miami Dade is grieving after police shot and killed their father, Osvaldo Quelly, on their property. The family claims Osvaldo and his son were trying to protect their property from trespassers when plainclothes police in unmarked vehicles arrived and opened fire.
The son states that officers shot at them without identifying themselves, even as he ran back onto his property. He says his father never brandished his weapon. The family alleges that Osvaldo was left to die without medical assistance from the officers.
Police claim they were responding to a call about a possible stolen car and that a firearm was recovered at the scene. Family members deny this version of events. They are seeking justice and a full accounting of the events leading to Osvaldo's death. Authorities state that the incident is under investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's my dad. The cops shot the cops hurt my dad. The cops hurt my dad. My dad is not breathing.
Speaker 1: Calm down. Calm down. My dad is not breathing. Get down. We're gonna take care of everything.
Speaker 0: You guys hurt my dad. My dad? No. You guys are letting him die. No.
Speaker 2: Aren't we all sick to death by now of American families being terrorized and the perpetrators of that terrorism ending up being the local police department? This video right here, this story comes out of Miami Dade and the blurred victim that you see laying on the ground right here. This is a guy who decided to, with his son, defend his family and his property from trespassers. And you tell me as we watch this who you think the original trespassers were.
Speaker 3: And off the top at eleven tonight and only on Local 10, never before seen video of an officer involved shooting in Southwest Miami Dade. A family says just days after Thanksgiving and without warning, police shot and killed a father of three. Loved ones say it happened while he was with his teenage son trying to protect their property from intruders.
Speaker 4: And now his children are sharing what they saw that day.
Speaker 5: We were on our property trying to protect our property because someone was trying to rob us.
Speaker 6: They're covering up my dad's death.
Speaker 4: They are siblings ripped, they say, by the trauma. My dad.
Speaker 1: You gotta start to step back.
Speaker 4: Of seeing their father, Osvaldo Quelly.
Speaker 5: He was my best friend.
Speaker 6: He was a people person. It was my father. He he was my life.
Speaker 4: Shot dead on their driveway.
Speaker 0: You guys hurt my dad. My dad.
Speaker 6: There's blood coming gushing from his face. He was struggling to breathe.
Speaker 4: Who say what police said about the incident?
Speaker 7: Gives you a great understanding of the dangers that the officers face every single day.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The officers face danger every single day according to this guy. Well, what about the general public who's facing danger? The biggest danger and threat that we face is not international terrorism, it's domestic terrorism by you guys who claim to be serving and protecting, but all you end up doing is harassing and collecting from the rest of us. And in some cases, like this one right here, offing us for defending our own properties.
This this guy is a lunatic.
Speaker 7: His face every single day.
Speaker 5: The only person that didn't make it home was my dad, and he was home.
Speaker 4: Is that friction with what they witnessed?
Speaker 5: There was no hot lights. There was no sirens.
Speaker 0: Someone came into our property.
Speaker 5: He never pulled his gun out.
Speaker 4: And caught on camera.
Speaker 2: We're just trying to figure out what's what's going on. So
Speaker 5: this is like where it happened.
Speaker 4: It is November 29. Osvalde Quilli the third is with his dad managing the family's large Redland property, he says, when they spot two people trespassing.
Speaker 5: We beeped like this, and then as me and my dad were getting closer, they ran, and then they hopped the gate. I hopped
Speaker 2: Now listen very closely to this part. You've got two trespassers on their property. They had to hop the gate to get off their property. He goes after him to see if he can get a license plate number. His dad goes to the house to get a gun.
They go out to the street together and come to find out the plainclothes police and unmarked vehicles are already there?
Speaker 5: The gate after them trying to get a picture of their tag, but I couldn't get it.
Speaker 4: His daddy says returns to the home to arm himself. And then as they approach this area, the 19 year old sees two vehicles approach, he says, and then shots fired.
Speaker 2: Now I want you to remember this truck right here. We're gonna look at this truck. They're gonna have an aerial of this truck. But, apparently, what happened was and I wonder how the cops are gonna spin this. See these there's bullet holes.
I don't know if the cops are gonna spin this as, yeah, those bullets are incoming, but according to this kid, the cops were shooting from inside the vehicle through the windshield.
Speaker 5: Shots fired. I just see, like, two two black Ram trucks come this side, like, against traffic. I hopped the gate, and I ran over there because they were still shooting at me. We could not tell they were police. He says
Speaker 2: So they were still shooting at him while he was on his property running away after having jumped the gate, gone back over into his property. They're still shooting at him on his property without identifying themselves as police officers. So all this kid knows, all his dad knew was that they were getting assailed by just regular armed intruders. Now check out this vehicle right here. Look at this.
You got 12, I don't know if that's 345678910. It looks like 10 holes in the windshield of this ram.
Speaker 4: These bullet holes are from the officer firing at them through the windshield.
Speaker 2: Look at look at this. Look at this. They were so they were frothing at the mouth so badly. They were so intoxicated, so drunk on their own power that they were shooting at these property owners through the windshield for what reason? If the story is true and this guy's dad did not pull his firearm, what was the reason for taking shots at these people?
Let's say that let's say they were trespassers. Let's say they were, you know, engaged in some kind of criminal activity. Was the cop's life in jeopardy to the point where he thought it'd be a good idea to take out his service weapon and start shooting at people through the windshield?
Speaker 4: Of the unmarked police unit.
Speaker 5: This one starts shooting out the window without like putting on any lights. Nothing. There was no cop lights. There was no sirens. He didn't say anything.
Never announced himself.
Speaker 4: We're learning it all stemmed from reports of a stolen car. At the time, police said detectives with their illegal dumping unit responded to a call about a possible stolen car. Shots were fired and a firearm was recovered.
Speaker 2: They just so happened to arrive at that moment in time to respond to a report of a stolen vehicle?
Speaker 4: The gun you mentioned your dad got from the house, was that still in the car? Was it on his person?
Speaker 5: It was on his waist. Like, you could see it. It was, like, here. If he would have reached for it, you would have seen him, like, to reach for it. He never did any of that.
Speaker 4: He says bullets whiz by him as he jumps over the fence back to their house where his older sister Gabriela spots him.
Speaker 2: Hey. Look. So bullets are whizzing by him as he's running away from the fence on his own property. Let's just take a look at some of this video right here.
Speaker 0: No. Mike, someone
Speaker 2: It's pretty disturbing. So if you don't wanna see something like this, you don't wanna ruin your day watching a grave injustice unfold before your very eyes, here's your chance to, you know, walk away or just click off on the video.
Speaker 0: Came into our property, and my dad drove out to chase them.
Speaker 2: Identified ourselves, and he pulled out a gun on us.
Speaker 0: But you he that's my dad.
Speaker 2: They so they said they claim to this guy's daughter that he pulled out a gun on them? I wonder what the truth is. I wonder who the initial perpetrators were, the initial trespassers. Were they the cops? Were the cops involved in something, I don't know, trying to plant drugs on this family?
Were they there to try to steal a vehicle so that they could, you know, report that, hey. We we've recovered a stolen vehicle. What were they there for? Why were they there?
Speaker 0: That's my dad. The cops shot the cops shot my dad. The cops hurt my dad. The cops hurt my dad. Dad's on the ground.
They they they hurt dad. They hurt my dad. The dad is fine. Just step back. No.
It's not breathing. My dad is not breathing. My dad
Speaker 2: And this whole time, not one cop on the scene, and there's a lot of them, not one of them take one moment to render any kind of aid. It's almost like they don't care about this guy. They don't care about his family. And it wasn't even enough that they took out the the head of the household here. They took out these kids' dad.
They continued to terrorize both the sister and the brother after the dad was gone.
Speaker 0: Dad is not breathing.
Speaker 1: Calm down. Calm down. My dad is not breathing. Get down. We're gonna take care of him.
Calm down.
Speaker 0: My dad is not breathing. My dad is not breathing.
Speaker 1: Calm down.
Speaker 5: Calm down.
Speaker 0: And my neighbor, be careful. They might shoot you.
Speaker 1: Virgin, where's other guy at?
Speaker 0: Where's my dad? Why is my dad on the ground? They just tried robbing us and why is my dad on the ground? Why? He's not breathing.
Just
Speaker 2: a bunch of thugs. Just a bunch of heartless, cold, calculated thugs. And now they're going to investigate. This happened on 11/29/2023. You're talking about December, January.
February is almost over three months, and this family doesn't have word on what actually happened. Do we have radio traffic? Are there body cams? Are there dash cams? Is there any video evidence as to what really happened here?
Do we have the 911 call? Do we have the call in dispatch saying that they're in the area looking for some kind of stolen vehicle? Do we have any of that? Are we gonna get it? Let's go back to this news report.
Speaker 4: Very scared. Races toward the fence.
Speaker 0: They just tried robbing us and why is my dad on the ground?
Speaker 4: And starts filming with her cell phone.
Speaker 6: They pulled me over. Dad. No. Dad. I was face to face with his body.
I saw his eyes roll back to his head. They never once tried to save him. No lights, no uniform, plain clothing, and a holster, just like my dad was dressed. I'm still in shock. I am still scared.
We just want justice for my dad is all.
Speaker 4: In a statement, Miami Dade police say no information can be disclosed because there is still an open professional compliance bureau investigation.
Speaker 2: We can't talk about it. There's an active investigation going on. In other words, we need time to craft our own lies so we can lay cover for our own. We gotta watch out for the thin blue line gang. We take care of our family.
Speaker 4: Investigation. A spokesperson for FDLE tells us that their investigation remains active and no conclusions have been made.
Speaker 6: He was there with my dad in that moment. He feels like he shouldn't have ever ran away, but if he didn't run away, he would have been dead too. They were shooting to kill.
Speaker 2: No doubt. No doubt. And it does look like they were shooting to kill. So if what these kids are saying, if their story squares, if it lines up, if any of it is true, it looks like this is just a cold blooded murder of somebody that they didn't want to be alive. Now, again, adding insult to injury, it's not enough that the father is gone now.
Now they're gonna terrorize these kids with the father out of the way.
Speaker 0: They're not letting me get they're killing my dad. They're killing my dad. No one's helping my dad. No one's helping my dad. Stop.
No one's helping my dad. My
Speaker 2: dad. My
Speaker 0: dad. My dad. My dad. You guys hurt my dad. My dad.
Speaker 2: It was a sight of it was a sight of
Speaker 0: Where is the what
Speaker 2: is it? Look at this. Now they're gonna treat the family as though they were the criminals when these guys, these undercover police agents were the ones that committed the murder, committed the actual crime. So it's not enough for them to terrorize this family by killing the father. Now they're gonna terrorize the kids?
Now they're gonna treat the kids as though they were the criminals? It's over the top, man.
Speaker 0: I need to close the gate.
Speaker 2: Stop. What's that?
Speaker 0: My kids are inside.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: You guys are letting them die. Can I just please see what's going on? They're not letting me see what's going on. You guys my dad. Are you gathering And then my dad coming
Speaker 2: on it.
Speaker 0: My dad open. Dad.
Speaker 2: Stop. Please,
Speaker 0: can I just go back into the property, please?
Speaker 2: Show
Speaker 0: them the picture of the people that came in.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: Please. They're probably the ones
Speaker 2: the other guys at?
Speaker 5: Oh, I didn't take a picture of the gun. Okay.
Speaker 2: This is reference to
Speaker 5: the truck. They just came and tried to steal our stuff while we're sitting out here outside to see if they passed by.
Speaker 2: So the people who are there stealing the stuff that they didn't get a picture of, I wonder if the cops think that they did get a picture of them. Maybe the cops thought that the guy that they shot had a picture of the cops who were trespassing on the property. I don't know. I'm just spitballing here. I do know one thing.
This family's gonna sue, and rightly so. The taxpayers are gonna foot the bill. The cops will get a paid vacation, or they'll go to another department, and the cycle will continue over and over and over. And it won't change. And it won't change because cops are not interested in changing.
They are interested in grabbing the ring of power and never ever letting go no matter what.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. I wanna see
Speaker 5: my dad's okay. Please. Can I
Speaker 0: sit next to him, please?
Speaker 2: Sit next to him. Can I please sit next to my dad who's dying? Where's the humanity? There's zero humanity here. This is barbarism.
He has nothing on here.
Speaker 5: You can check my pockets.
Speaker 0: He's he's sitting
Speaker 5: in my dad.
Speaker 0: I don't have nothing. I just need to see I need to see what's going on.
Speaker 8: My grandma has heart conditions, and she doesn't like police.
Speaker 0: So please, can I go check on that? Something I need to go I need to get a hold on the situation that's happening. My grandma's probably freaking out inside. My dad's dying on the fucking ground, and you there's no ambulance anywhere. You no.
No. You guys aren't doing anything. Why?
Speaker 2: I'm following this happening. Have to investigation. We're trying to make make sure everything gets taken
Speaker 0: My kids are inside, though. Where's the ambulance?
Speaker 1: They're on the way. They're almost here.
Speaker 0: Can the gate be closed, please, so my kids can't get out?
Speaker 2: A sec. Go on. Let's go close. Hey. What up?
That's your car right here.
Speaker 0: Don't don't leave. No. He has to stay. Please let him know what's going on with the situation. Please.
My dad. Why is why'd you this is his property. My
Speaker 4: my
Speaker 2: And now we just have
Speaker 5: a seat.
Speaker 0: Where is he?
Speaker 2: I agree with this.
Speaker 0: You can have I I need to clear close my gate.
Speaker 5: I'll close it.
Speaker 2: I'll close it. I'll close it for you. Look. I'll close it.
Speaker 0: No. You guys are you're you are you are detaining me against my No. The other my dad's on the ground. He's dying on the ground. Yeah.
Dave, my dad is dying on the ground. Come on. It's time. Close the gate. Don't let my kids out.
My dad is on the ground.
Speaker 2: What are you doing? Get in the car.
Speaker 0: No. Get in the I'm not arrested. I'm not doing anything. Do
Speaker 2: these cops not have fathers? Do they not have people in their lives, lives that they love? Can they not put themselves in an empathetic way into somebody else's shoes and realize, hey, if my dad was laying on the ground bleeding out, I would wanna be by his side. And they're barring these kids' access from their father to be with him in the last moments of his life. I can't think of anything more cold hearted and animalistic and without love, without compassion, and downright ruthless.
Speaker 0: Wrong. I don't have to be in the car.
Speaker 2: You do have to be in the car. I
Speaker 0: don't have to be in the car, sir. And
Speaker 2: that's where that video ends right here. We're gonna just finish with this new story.
Speaker 4: Siblings say what they are seeking.
Speaker 6: You know I love you.
Speaker 4: Is a full accounting of the events leading up to the death of their father on the family's property.
Speaker 6: It's just not right and what they did.
Speaker 4: In the Redland, Christina Vasquez, Local 10 News. Death of their father.
Speaker 2: These cops destroyed this family. These cops who were supposed to be protecting and serving destroyed this family. They killed the head of the household who was there to defend his family and his property. Why? For what reason?
Why did they even pull out their weapons in the first place? Were they the trespassers that they were trying to run off their property? And then they got caught, and because they got caught, they felt like they had to off somebody. I'm gonna leave the link to the Miami Dade. This is this right here is the Miami Dade Facebook page.
I'm gonna leave the link to the Miami Dade Facebook page. It has a public number, (305) 476-5423. You can see it right here. I'm gonna leave this in the description, and I'll leave it in the pinned comment. And you let the Miami Dade Police Department know what you think about this.
Be kind, be courteous, be respectful, but if you want, leave your thoughts on their page. Maybe call their number. Maybe call their number and record your conversation. Because this thing being under investigation for three months and them not coming up with any answers, but probably working feverishly behind the scenes to cover up their criminal actions, this kind of stuff really has to stop. Leave your thoughts about this for the world, the global thought police in the comment section below.
If you haven't done so already, subscribe to this channel, hit the bell notification icon, give it a thumbs up, share it with everybody you know, don't forget to subscribe to my email list through my website highimpactflix.com. If you want to support the channel further, grab a shirt, become a channel member. But more importantly, understand what your rights are, understand what the dangers are. One of the most dangerous things in America today is American police departments, sheriff's departments, local police departments. They're the ones that are jeopardizing our lives.
They're the ones who say they're protecting and serving. They do the exact opposite. The price of freedom is now and will always be eternal vigilance, and indifference to this notion is the means by which the people have and will secure their own oppression. I will see you in the next video.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Heads up for another possible Event 201/Convid1984 scenario. The original link to the document is in the comment below. https://t.co/FZmtH7vFmf
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Here's the link to the Johns Hopkins PDF: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
"I didn't say lock her up." - Donny Trump "Hillary Clinton has to go to jail, okay?" - Also Donny Trump https://t.co/jfLviaj7di
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hillary Clinton should go to jail, and many agree she deserves it. There were calls to "lock her up," reflecting widespread sentiment against her. While acknowledging her past actions, there's a reluctance to pursue legal action against her or the Bidens, as they are seen as good people. Despite the jokes about jail, there’s a sense of respect for Bill and Hillary Clinton, even amidst the criticisms. Ultimately, the discussion revolves around accountability and the contrasting views on justice for political figures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton has to go to jail. Okay? She has to go to jail.
Speaker 1: You should lock them up. Lock up the Bidens. Lock up Hillary.
Speaker 2: They also lock her up. And I felt and I could've done it, but I felt it would've been a terrible thing. And then this happened to me. And so I may feel differently about it. I Hillary Clinton I didn't say lock her up.
Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton has to go to jail. Okay? She has to go to jail.
Speaker 2: But the people would all say, lock her up. Lock her up. Okay. Then we won. And I say and I said pretty openly.
I say, alright. Come on. Just relax. Let's go. We gotta make our country great.
Tell her what for what
Speaker 0: she's done, they should lock her up. She's done. It's disgraceful.
Speaker 3: You called her crooked Hillary, said you wanted to get in jail. Your people and your audiences kept saying lock him up.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But she do you want to
Speaker 3: put some bad things.
Speaker 2: I mean, she
Speaker 3: did some bad things. I know. That's a special prosecutor. I don't wanna hurt them.
Speaker 2: I don't wanna hurt them. They're they're good people. I don't wanna hurt them.
Speaker 3: It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country.
Speaker 2: Because you'd be in jail.
Speaker 0: You should lock her up. I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: Lock up the Bidens. Lock up Hillary.
Speaker 2: Lock them up. Yeah. Lock them up.
Speaker 0: Who said that? Lock her up. Stand up, please. I'll tell you something though. Just right.
Lock them up.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't lock them up. Lock up the Bidens. Lock up Hillary.
Speaker 2: I was very honored, very, very honored when I heard that president Bill Clinton and secretary Hillary Clinton was coming today, and I think it's appropriate to say. And I'd like you to stand up. And honestly, there's nothing more I can say because I have a lot of respect for those 2 people.
Speaker 3: You'd be in jail.
Speaker 2: I have a lot
Speaker 3: of respect for those 2 people. You'd be in jail.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Another bridge struck by a barge. U.S. 59 Bridge in Sallisaw Oklahoma Dayton Holland and her family captured this video as they were fishing near the bridge. https://t.co/Raw9eCqOzr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers witness a loose barge hitting a bridge at US 59 in Kerr Reservoir. They call 911 and report the incident, noting that there are no injuries but the bridge may need to be shut down. The barge appears to have been let go by someone, causing damage to the bridge. The speakers express shock and concern over the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Holy hell. Holy shit. Did you feel it? Yeah. Oh, my god.
That barge is loose. It was moving quick. That barge is loose. There's a man standing right there.
Speaker 1: Just the past few years. No. It didn't knock that bridge in. I don't know. Oh my god.
I feel like I'm about to throw up.
Speaker 0: Look. It's large. It's not hidden. It's large. Take your phone and call, 911.
But they'll shut it they have to shut this bridge down.
Speaker 1: How are we gonna get done? Holy hell. Look at that barge what it did. Did the guy not see it? I don't know.
That was blue.
Speaker 0: It's all those little barge, I think.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, man. I think he's let go of it.
Speaker 0: That would get the
Speaker 1: other side. What bridge is this, dude? US 59.
Speaker 0: Yes, ma'am. My name is Tyler Crawford. This is US 59? US 59. We're
Speaker 1: in Kerr River.
Speaker 0: US 59 at Kerr Reservoir. We we just hit a barge in the river. And and barges are loose.
Speaker 1: Barges are loose in the river right now. No. It doesn't look like
Speaker 0: any injuries or anything, but he's got
Speaker 1: the grid tied. I mean, it's been
Speaker 0: so large. Injuries or anything, but he's got
Speaker 1: the red spot. It's very hard. I mean,
Speaker 0: it's been The bar the bar
Speaker 1: is the 6th 3 from the actual phone.
reSee.it AI Summary
Hitler and Zionist German Jews collaborated through the Haavara Agreement from 1933-1939. This allowed 60,000 German Jews to migrate to Palestine, transferring some assets. The agreement aimed to address the "Jewish problem" by concentrating the Jewish population in a foreign entity. Hitler initially showed indifference but supported the plan from 1937-1939. The program ended after Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Hitler and the Zionists quietly agreed to work together to facilitate the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine between 1933–1939. Signed on Aug. 25, 1933, it was called the Haavara Agreement. Both the leaders of Nazi Germany and the Zionist German Jews agreed that Jews fleeing persecution under the new Nazi regime would be allowed to transfer some portion of their assets to British Mandatory Palestine. Many in German believed that the Haavara Agreement could solve the "Jewish problem." The head of the Middle Eastern division of the foreign ministry, the anti-Nazi politician Werner Otto von Hentig, supported the policy of settling Jews in Palestine. Hentig believed that if the Jewish population was concentrated in a single foreign entity, then foreign diplomatic policy and containment of the Jews would become easier. Initially, Hitler seemed indifferent to the economic details of the plan, but he supported it in the period from September 1937 to 1939. After the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 the program was ended.
Video Transcript AI Summary
American Jews and Jews throughout Europe called for a boycott of German exports, while a group of Zionists secretly negotiated with the Nazis to allow German Jews to immigrate to Palestine. This agreement, known as the transfer agreement, led to an influx of German Jews settling in Palestine and bringing new professions and progress to the country. The settlement of German Jews in Palestine was even promoted by Nazi propaganda minister Josef Goebbels. The Zionists agreed to reject the boycott of Germany, and while Nazis and Jews were marching, diplomacy was quietly working towards the establishment of a Jewish nation state. This story may be difficult for some to accept.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within days, American Jews marched calling for the boycott of all German exports. Jews throughout Europe echoed that call, so did Jews everywhere. But a group of Zionists at the same time was quietly negotiating an agreement with the Nazis to allow the immigration of German Jews and the transfer of their assets to Palestine. That deal, reported in August 1933, was the transfer agreement. Palestine, sparsely settled by Jews at the time, was radically changed as a result.
Speaker 1: I lived in Palestine from 1933 to 1936. And, we saw, every week transports of German Jews coming to settle in Palestine. And many new professions were introduced by them into the country. And they, played a leading role in making Palestine then a more advanced and progressive country.
Speaker 2: Israel Is really what it is because of the foundation laid by the Eastern European group, and then the lift Toward an educated and well organized government that that came with the immigration of the German Jewish group.
Speaker 0: German Jewish settlement of Palestine was for a time official Nazi policy. These photos of Jewish life in Palestine along with a lengthy text appeared in 1934. In the Berlin paper, Der Angrist, the publisher, Hitler's propaganda minister, Josef Goebbels. A Nazi visits Palestine was the title of the multipart series. A medal was struck by Goebbels in commemoration.
On one side, the swastika. On the other, the Star of David. Hitler demanded one concession for the transfer agreement that the call for a boycott of the Reich raised by Jews here and Swear, be rejected by the Zionists. The Zionists made that concession. And so while Nazis marching in Germany, and while Jews were marching here, diplomacy was running a more important story.
In the Mediterranean, where the dream of a nation state for Jewish people came a step closer to reality. The story in this book, some will find hard to accept.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Politics has always been and will always be WWE in suits and ties.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
I don't know if Russell Brand raped anyone but I DO know that he loves and promotes the spokesman for Klaus Schwab's World Demonic Forum. Brand believes Yuval Noah Harari is a "Beautiful Person." The WEF wants to destroy us. Thoughts?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Yuval Noah Harari joins me on the podcast. We express our appreciation for the ability to communicate through podcasts and share a sense of love between us. We compliment each other's appearance. We discuss the importance of love, power, and technological disruption. I mention the three most important issues: nuclear war, climate change, and technological disruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Under the skin is back and look who's with me. It's Yuval Noah Harari. Hello. Hey. Good to be here again.
Isn't it wonderful that we found a way of communicating with each other in the form of podcasts? I think it is. And is there some love between us now? I think so. I feel love.
I feel I look at you. I look at your eyes. I think you are a beautiful person. Thank you. It's Simple, isn't it?
Very. Not gonna say I'm a beautiful person? You are. See? Leaving some beautiful it was aching.
I know that. In this situation. Straight back. Yeah. But your husband looks happy over there.
My husband is very good in this trade. Catch him. Catch him. Look at that, actually. You gotta think on the side, girl.
You gotta be gone, though. Well, me, you, Werner Harari, we are going to be talking about love, power, technological disruption. In fact, I've written down the 3 most important things. Nuclear war, climate change, technological disruption, they weren't written on that bit of paper. I just remembered them using my brain box.
I've been learning.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1969, Woodstock faced flooding, just like Burning Man did recently. Festival-goers blamed government weather manipulation. Operation Popeye, a secret US project during the Vietnam War, aimed to alter weather for military advantage. The government denied and lied about it, but evidence emerged. Declassified documents and international laws now exist to prevent similar projects.
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
Burning Man became Flooding Man overnight. But did you know the same thing happened 54 years ago at Woodstock in 1969. Guess what Festival-Goers were blaming? Government WEATHER MANIPULATION! Check it out: https://t.co/xXxTlFQ0HI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government has admitted to controlling the weather in the past, as seen with Operation Popeye. At the Burning Man Festival in 2023, heavy rain caused flooding, leaving one person dead and around 70,000 people stranded. The area turned into a muddy pit, making it difficult for people to leave or enter. Similar weather incidents occurred in the past, such as at Woodstock in 1969, where concert-goers blamed cloud seeding by unknown entities and questioned why the media didn't report on it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States government has declassified and admitted with Operation Popeye that they could control the weather in the sixties seventies to the point where they could extend the monsoon season to destabilize the enemy and enable U. S. Troops to get the upper hand. August 27 through September 4, 2023. Burning Man turned into Flooding Man when nearly an inch of rain fell on festival goers, creating a sea of mud and causing attendees to have to conserve food and water while they sheltered in place.
Speaker 1: 1 person has died at the Burning Man Festival, And some 70,000 people are stranded. So much water. We are flooded. It is Soaking right here at Burning Down in the pit of this water.
Speaker 2: Thick, tasty mud pit. The ground in some places is almost like quick Sam, with more rain on the way and overnight, we learned at least 1 person has died. There's no way in or out For thousands of people trapped at the Burning Man Festival, it's all because of torrential rainfall that's turned the area into a Giant mud pit.
Speaker 0: Can we chalk this up to natural occurrence, climate change or weather manipulation? Before you answer, it might surprise you to know that 54 years prior back on August 15th through 18th, 1969. Concert goers at Woodstock, who just got hit by over an inch of rain, were laying the blame at the feet of 1 entity. They were blaming the fascist pigs seeding the clouds with airplanes and wondering why mainstream media wasn't covering it.
Speaker 1: I got something to say. I wanna know how come the fastest kids have been seeding the class. Right. The man is out in the airplane. Going over twice with With all with all the smoke coming out of them, Steve McCloud, and I wanna know, you know, why that stuff is going down, man?
Why doesn't the media report that stuff to the people, man? I'm telling you what happened. The planes come over an hour and a half, and they've gone through the blast. People of unknown origins were seeding the clouds over the And the
@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix
From a Popular Science article: "Though it cycled through several names in its history, “Operation Popeye” stuck. Its stated objective—to ensure Americans won the Vietnam War—was never realized, but the revelation that the U.S. government played God with weather-altering warfare changed history. The Nixon administration distracted, denied, and, it seems, outright lied to Congress, but enterprising reporters published damning stories about rain being used as a weapon, and the Pentagon papers dripped classified details like artificial rain. Eventually, the federal government would declassify its Popeye documents and international laws aimed at preventing similar projects would be on the books."