TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Holden

Posted - March 9, 2026 at 11:24 PM

Saved - March 10, 2026 at 3:03 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I was taken at nine to a mind-control facility and groomed as an elite sex slave, trained to become a famous actress-singer. A man described as a Nazi ran it. I met elites like David Rockefeller and Pierre Trudeau. In Summer 1972 I trained in Germany, then was deployed on weekends, using a persona to attract powerful men while I reported back to my owner. I believe the network is ancient, with Nazi-era experiments continued.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“At nine years old, I was taken to a mind control facility.” “I was an elite sex slave.” “They created a persona that I was going to become for them.” “I was going to be made famous.” “And it was done by a man who was a Nazi.” Anneke Lucas revealed that an elite sex trafficking ring programmed her to become a famous actress-singer from the age of nine. She encountered people as elite as David Rockefeller and Pierre Trudeau. Now, she is sharing her shocking story with the world: “Summer of 1972, I spent … the second month in mind control training in Germany.” “Then I went back to school, but I was taken out a lot, and on weekends, I was taken either for more training, or … to be deployed with a man, with a politician or something.” “I was trained to become that persona, which was gonna be an actress-singer in France.” “That platform was really only to attract a certain type of men that I was then gonna be involved with.” “And then I could just also bring in information and report back to who was then my owner.” Andrew Gold: “Do you have an idea of how deep this goes, this elite circle?” Lucas: “I think it’s old.” “And I think the experiments from the Nazi camps were continued.” @AnnekeLucas @AndrewGold_ok

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a long-standing, elite network believed to have roots in Nazi-era experiments. Speaker 1 recounts being taken at age nine to a mind control facility described as a villa in Heidelberg, with the basement as the training area. The training there is described as extremely precise and effective, forming a persona that Speaker 1 was to become as an elite sex slave. Based on innate ability and bloodline, she was groomed to gain fame in France, under the direction of a man described as a Nazi, who was reportedly used by a powerful family for their special project. The training was highly professional, and Speaker 1 says she noticed a clear change in herself. A plan emerged to use her platform to attract a certain type of men, with her role serving to bring information back to her owner. Speaker 0 probes whether the aim was for Speaker 1 to resemble famous French figures such as Édith Piaf or Françoise Hardy-esque icons, specifically referencing Edouard Piaf (Édith Piaf), Gainsbourg, and Jane Birkin. Speaker 1 confirms the direction toward a “cool genre” akin to those figures in France. Speaker 1 adds a highly distinctive, previously unreported detail: during a holiday period, she spent a week or two in a basement in France with an entourage, where she had to be naked to become accustomed to being object of adoration and worship, anticipating being filmed naked extensively. The entourage consisted of adults who dressed and prepared her—doing her hair and makeup—aiming for a natural look that appeared effortlessly beautiful, described as “looks natural, but a little more beautiful, like it was just accidentally so pretty.” The overarching objective was for her to embody a “natural look” and become a public figure in France, aligning with the referenced artistic milieu. Speaker 1 notes that the training and program would be used to attract men and to gather information for the owner, emphasizing a system designed to blend celebrity identity with control and surveillance. The conversation touches on the emotional intensity of the topic, with Speaker 0 expressing anger and Speaker 1 acknowledging the sentiment without further commentary. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 often encounters anger in listeners, to which Speaker 1 responds with thanks for the observation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Do you have an idea of of how deep this goes, this kind of elite, these circles? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think it's old. And I think the experiments from the Nazi camps were continued. In fact, at nine years old I was taken to a mind control facility actually a nice villa in Heidelberg, but the basement, mostly the basement of that villa. And so what I received there, that mind control training was extremely precise and effective. And so there was a plan. So based on my innate ability and based on my bloodline, which I wasn't aware of myself, I was you know, they created a persona that I was going to become for them as an elite sex slave. And to be an elite sex slave I needed a platform myself and so I was gonna be made famous in France. And so that training was so specific and so precise and it was done by a man who was a Nazi and who was used, I think, by this family as, you know, for their special project, I don't know exactly, but it was extremely professionally done. Like I was impressed to see myself change. And what changed there that was so significant is from six to nine, I didn't think I knew they were wrong. When I was nine years old and I went through a year really of intense training and meanwhile I was gone from home the whole 1972. I spent the first month, July, in The United States and the second month in that training in Germany, in that mind control training. And that whole year, was taken and then I went back, I went back to school, but I was taken out a lot and I was taken on weekends, I was taken either more training or I was taken to be deployed like with a man, you know, with a politician or something. So I was used already and I was also kept trained to become that persona which was gonna be, you know, a known actress singer in France. And then that was used really, that platform was really only to serve to attract a certain type of men that I was then gonna be, you know, involved with and then I could just also bring information and report back to who was then my owner. Speaker 0: So they wanted you to be a kind of Edouf Piaf or someone or a Yeah. Yeah. Female Gainsbourg or something or France. Speaker 1: It was, yeah, it was really in in that that it was really going towards that. Like, for example, I spent and this is very unique. I've never heard anyone else describe this, but it happened to me. But I was I spent a week or maybe two during some holiday in a basement in France with an entourage where I had to be naked because I had to get used to being naked and also having my body be an object of adoration, of an object of worship even, because I was gonna be filmed naked a lot. And so I just had to be used to that. And then I had these very adoring, flattering people around me, adults all, that were dressed. And then they were doing my hair, they were doing my face, but the idea was that I was gonna look natural, and so they did my hair. So I have my natural hair, and then they would do my hair, and it would look still very natural, but a little more beautiful, like it was just accidentally so pretty how it felt. So the idea was the natural look and sort of roll out of bed beauty. That was what I was supposed to become for France, which is very much fits into that cool genre with Ganse Bour and and Jane Birkin and so forth. Speaker 0: Jane Birkin. Yeah. Okay. Bloody hell. And I I feel so angry. I keep getting, like, flashes of anger listening to this, and you must have that a lot when you speak to people to when you tell them they must they must get angry around you. I don't know. Do you find that? Speaker 1: I don't know, but thank you for saying it.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 4, 2026 at 9:39 PM

Saved - March 6, 2026 at 2:10 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Thomas Massie argued against a Iran war, saying no declaration, statutory authorization, or emergency justifies US involvement and urged a clear mission and accountability. He warned the fight would cost families, worsen safety, and destabilize the region, citing casualties and debt. In reply, supporters said both parties push endless wars and that real change must come from local, independent organizing. Culotta agreed local organizing may be the last best hope.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thomas Massie just went nuclear on Trump’s war in Iran. “Have we learned nothing from the wars … we sparked in the Middle East that racked up $8 trillion of debt in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan?” “The Secretary of State said that Israel forced … us into this war.” “And for what?” “The Constitution is clear.” “Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 … provides Congress initiatory powers of war.” “The 1973 War Powers Resolution states plainly that the President may only introduce US armed forces into hostilities pursuant to three conditions.” “One, declaration of war.” “Two, specific statutory authorization.” “Or three, a national emergency created by an attack.” “None of those conditions exist today.” “American families in my district wanna know how this is gonna help them pay for groceries.” “How does this make them any safer in their schools or in their neighborhoods?” “How does this help them pay for housing?” “A sustained war with Iran will not stabilize the region.” “It’s already ignited the region.” “It will radicalize new generations of terrorists.” “And it will send more swarms of refugees into Europe and the United States.” “We’ve already expended billions of dollars and, more solemnly, six American families must now lay to rest their sons and daughters.” “To the men and women who are engaged in combat, I sincerely thank you and I pray for your safety.” “It is for you that I wrote this resolution.” “It is for you that all of us are here on this floor working so hard to force this vote so that you will have a clear mission .. so that you will know when you achieve it, you can come home.” @RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker opens by citing James Madison, who wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1789 that “the constitution supposes what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the executive branch of power is the most interested in war and most prone to it,” and notes that the constitution itself vests in the legislature the question of war (Article I, Section 8, Clause 11) while giving the president operational powers of war (Article II, Section 2, Clause 1). Even if one claimed the 1973 War Powers Resolution supersedes the constitutional language, the speaker argues the president has not met its conditions: the president may only introduce U.S. armed forces into hostilities under three circumstances—declaration of war, specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency created by an attack on the United States—none of which exist today because Iran has not attacked the United States, Congress has not declared war, and Congress has not granted specific statutory authorization. Beyond this constitutional framing, the speaker asks why the United States would go to war with Iran and emphasizes that servicemembers deserve a clear mission. He questions how such a war would help American families with groceries, housing, or safety in schools and neighborhoods. He cautions against past interventions in the Middle East, arguing they have produced a debt of at least $8 trillion from wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan, and contends a sustained war with Iran will not stabilize the region but will radicalize new generations of terrorists and generate more refugees to Europe and the United States. The speaker argues Iran is not Venezuela, and that Ayatollah Khomeini was not a president but a religious leader in a region notorious for radical Islamists; he asserts that the United States and Israel turned him into a martyr, contributing to broader conflict and casualties, including six American families who have lost loved ones. He claims the administration cannot provide a straight answer for why the preemptive war was launched, noting contradictory statements about imminent Iranian strikes and the rationale of stopping a nuclear program. A candid answer, he says, came from the Secretary of State, who said Israel forced the United States to act, implying that Congress must decide war. If American lives are to be risked, that decision must be debated and voted on by representatives, and the debate should be arduous with a hard vote. He offers a theory that colleagues do not want to go on record due to a poor track record of meddling in the Middle East and a desire to avoid their names being associated with an unfavorable outcome. The speaker asserts Congress is not here to declare war today; the vote on the War Powers Resolution is to reassert that Congress must decide questions of war. Some say war is authorized by paying for it through the budget, but the speaker asserts that defining the mission for the troops is not included in the budget and has not been done. He thanks the men and women engaged in combat, prays for their safety, and states that the resolution is written for them—to ensure they know when they achieve their mission and can come home.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Mister speaker, James Madison wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 1789, the constitution supposes what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the executive branch of power is the most interested in war and most prone to it. It has accordingly, with studied care, vested the question of war in the legislature. The constitution is clear. Article one, section eight, clause 11 of our constitution provides congress initiatory powers of war. Article two, section two, clause one of our constitution gives the president operational powers of war to wage that war. Even if this body were to pretend that the 1973 War Powers Resolution supersedes the clear language of the constitution, the president still has not met the conditions required by that law itself. The 1973 War Powers Resolution states plainly that the president may only introduce US armed forces into hostilities pursuant to three conditions. Either one, declaration of war, two, specific statutory authorization, or three, a national emergency created by an attack upon The United States. None of those conditions exist today. Iran has not attacked The United States. Congress has not declared war, and Congress has not granted specific statutory authorization. Beyond the constitutional question, here lies an even more important one. Why are we going to war with Iran? We owe our military service members a clear mission. And American families in my district want to know how this is going to help them pay for groceries. How does this make them any safer in their schools or in their neighborhoods? How does this help them pay for housing? Have we learned nothing from the laundry list of wars and regime change experiments we sparked across The Middle East that have racked up a total of at least $8,000,000,000,000 of debt in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan? A sustained war with Iran will not stabilize the region. It's already ignited the region. It will radicalize new generations of terrorists, and it will send more swarms of refugees into Europe and The United States. Iran is not Venezuela. The Ayatollah was not a president. He was a religious leader from a region notorious for radical Islamists, and The United States and Israel turned him into a martyr. And in the process of doing so, we've already expanded billions of dollars and more solemnly, six American families must now lay to rest their sons and daughters. And for what? This administration can't even give us a straight answer as to why we launched this preemptive war. The president says we had to strike first because an Iranian strike was imminent. Meanwhile, the Department of Defense conceded there was no evidence of an imminent Iranian strike. Some told us this war was about nuclear weapons. But six months ago, we were assured our last strike on Iran decimated their nuclear program. So which is it? I think the most candid answer came from the Secretary of State who told the press that Israel forced our hand and dragged us into this war again. And that truth is the very reason why it is congress that must decide war. If American lives are to be risked and American blood is to be shed, that decision must be debated and voted on by the representatives of the American people, and that debate is meant to be arduous, and that vote is meant to be hard. I have a theory. I think my colleagues don't wanna go on record because we have a terrible track record of meddling in The Middle East. They don't want their name associated with this when it doesn't turn out well. But Congress cannot be bothered with its constitutional duty because for many in this chamber, it's easier to simply allow someone else's sons and daughters to be sent to combat without their vote. And to be clear, we aren't even here to declare war today. All we're voting on is a war powers resolution to reassert the constitution that congress must decide questions of war. And if congress wants war, then the speaker should hold a vote to declare it. Some say congress authorizes war when we pay for it, when we pass the budget bill. Here's the problem. We haven't taken on the hard work of defining the mission for our sons and daughters who are gonna fight. That's not in the budget bill. It never is. And to the men and women who are engaged in combat, I sincerely thank you, and I pray for your safety. It is for you that I wrote this resolution. It is for you that all of us are here on this floor working so hard to force this vote so that you will have a clear mission that you deserve, so that you will know when you achieve it, you can come home.

@wtpnational - We The People Party

Both corrupt parties deliver endless war with every new President. Washington will never change. It’s up to We The People to build an Independent movement in our local and state governments to build a wall of resistance to Washington’s corruption and tyranny. That is where we can make a real impact. And that is how we can build a decentralized revolution across our country.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@wtpnational Local organizing seems like our last, best hope to resist the tyrants in Washington

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 2, 2026 at 10:27 PM

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 10:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m furious. MTG says we’re in another war and American troops are being killed, calling for a serious look at what’s happening to this country. She cites dire facts—health, car insurance unaffordability, debt, paycheck-to-paycheck living, and back taxes—plus broad opposition to the war. She argues “America first” isn’t Israel first, warns Trump may deploy troops, and recalls promises to end foreign wars.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

MTG just went absolutely nuclear on Trump’s war in Iran. “We’re in another fucking war, and American troops are being killed.” “We need to have a serious conversation about what the fuck is happening to this country.” “72% of Americans can’t afford health insurance.” “58% of Americans can’t afford car insurance.” “67% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck.” “31% of Americans can’t afford their back taxes.” “50% of Americans are in credit card debt.” “We are nearly $40 trillion in debt.” “Most Americans are completely against this war.” “Make America Great Again was supposed to be America first, not Israel first.” “And our President is saying that the Iranian people are all of a sudden going to topple their regime.” “Well, I don’t think the Iranian people are going to be toppling their regime when they’re getting blown apart by the US and Israel in an unprovoked attack.” “I am furious.” “We have seen enough of our American troops dead and murdered for foreign countries.” “Now, we have four more dead … for Israel.” “Trump already said … today that he doesn’t care about the polling.” “He doesn’t care about what the American people think.” “And he may put troops on the ground.” “The man that I supported … denounced what happened in Iraq, said no more foreign wars, no more regime change.” “JD Vance promised it.” “Tulsi Gabbard promised it.” @FmrRepMTG @mtgreenee @megynkelly

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 argues that most Americans oppose the war, citing polling and the president’s failure to make a case for it. The speaker asserts that people don’t feel threatened by Iran and don’t fear an Iranian ballistic missile landing in the United States. The speaker lists a set of American concerns: 72% can’t afford health insurance, 58% can’t afford car insurance, 67% live paycheck to paycheck, 31% can’t afford back taxes, and 50% carry massive credit card debt. They state they campaigned with the president and were among the few Republicans supporting Donald Trump when others opposed him in a primary, emphasizing a “America first” stance focused on American problems rather than foreign countries or foreign peoples. The speaker expresses concern for the Iranian people and hopes for a government that treats women fairly, but asserts that “we have seen over 100 little girls killed at a school from a bomb,” and claims that “America and Israel attacked Iran,” implying this is not good for Iranian women. They criticize the president’s claim that the Iranian people will topple their regime, saying the Iranian people won’t topple their regime while being bombed by the United States and Israel in an unprovoked attack, which the speaker claims is true. They reference Pete Hegseth’s comment that the U.S. did not start the war, but the speaker counters that America and Israel definitely started it and states, “you can’t lie that away to the American people.” The speaker declares being irate and furious about the situation, noting the national debt approaching $40 trillion and questioning the war’s cost. They argue that American troops have been killed and murdered for foreign countries, and that four Americans have died for Israel and the Iranian people, not for Americans. The speaker laments the loss of American military members and acknowledges the families who may be grieving. They mention Trump’s past statements that he doesn’t think he will go to heaven, and question what that implies about his decision-making, given that the president has said he may place troops on the ground and that what began as “a few day war” could extend to four weeks or more. The speaker recalls prior commitments by JD Vance and Tulsi Gabbard to end foreign wars and regime change, but notes that “we’re a year in” and yet “we’re in another fucking war” with Americans killed. The speech ends with a call for America to “rip the Band Aid off” and to have a serious conversation about who is making these decisions and for whom.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What I do know is most Americans, and it's being proved in polling that's coming out, most Americans are completely against this war. Because like you said, the president has made no case for it. We live our ordinary lives, and we don't feel threatened by Iran. We don't walk around thinking that in any moment an Iranian ballistic missile is going to land on our head. We don't. Here's what Americans and I I wanna read off this list. This is this is what Americans are focused on. 72% of Americans can't afford health insurance. 58 of Americans can't afford car insurance. 67% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. 31% of Americans can't afford their back taxes. 50% of Americans are, are in credit card debt, massive credit card debt. That's where we are in America. And I campaigned with the president. As a matter of fact, I was one of the only Republicans that was out there for Donald Trump when the rest of the neocons, by the way, that are just cheering him on now, had abandoned him and were trying to beat him in a primary and stop him from being president again. I was out there on the front lines for make America great again. And make America great again was supposed to be America first, not Israel first, not any foreign country first, not any foreign people first, but the American people first in our problems. And the you know, God bless the Iranian people. I hope to God that they can have a government that that is for them and that treats women fairly. But what we have seen happen right now is we have seen over 100 little girls killed at a school from a bomb. And I don't know whose bomb it was, but they're dead today because America and Israel attacked Iran. So that's not really good for, Iranian women. And our president is saying that the Iranian people are all of a sudden going to topple their regime. Well, I don't think the Iranian people are going to be toppling their regime when they're getting blown apart by The United States and Israel in an unprovoked attack. And, yes, it was unprovoked. And Pete Hegseth said this morning, Megan, he said that we didn't start this war. But I hate to argue with the secretary of the department of war. America and Israel definitely started this war, and it you can't lie that away to the American people. And so you know how I feel right now? I am irate. I am furious about this. We are nearly $40,000,000,000,000 in debt. How much is this war going to cost us? We we have seen enough of our American troops dead and murdered for foreign countries. And now we've had four dead and murdered, just like you said, for Israel and and for the Iranian people, not for the American people. And and I don't wanna see any more dead and murdered. Our military is filled with some of the greatest people from our country, and God bless their families who are probably losing their minds right now, terrified that their son or daughter or their husband or wife or brother or sister may come home in a flag draped coffin. And then we have the president who, by the way, Megan, this really needs to be said. Donald Trump has said repeatedly on camera and in interviews, he doesn't think he's going to heaven. Well, I wanna ask a question, a serious question. What is in his mind? What is his mental state? If he doesn't think he's going to heaven and he is a man towards the end he's in the fourth quarter. He's towards the end of his life. How does that pan out for the rest of us when we have a president of The United States who doesn't think and is convinced he's not going to heaven. What does that mean his decision making is? He already said to the New York Post today that he doesn't care about the polling. He doesn't care about what the American people think, and he may put troops on the ground. He took a, oh, this is gonna be a few day war to now it's gonna be maybe four weeks or more. I I wanna say, what is happening to the man that that I supported, you supported, the man that that denounced what happened in Iraq, the man that said no more foreign wars, no more regime change, promise it on the campaign. JD Vance promised it. Tulsi Gabbard promised it. All of them promised it. And we're a year in. A year in, and we're in another fucking war, and we've got American troops being killed. I I I think it's time for America to rip the Band Aid off, and we need to have a serious conversation about what the fuck is happening to this country and who in the hell is is are these decisions being made for and who is making these decisions.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 2, 2026 at 5:17 PM

Saved - March 2, 2026 at 8:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I hacked top secret US Navy files while smoking weed in my basement and found evidence of a secret space program. There was an Excel spreadsheet titled “Non-Terrestrial Officers,” listing ship names, materiel, and ship-to-ship transfers of exotic chemicals between off-world fleets. I downloaded the spreadsheet; after arrest, ONI took my data, and they still have my hard drives. Michels notes the ONI’s role and a deathbed confession from Harold Malmgren.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Gary McKinnon hacked into top secret US Navy files while smoking weed in his basement. And he uncovered evidence of a secret space program. It named 40 “non-terrestrial officers.” It listed “exotic materials” and chemicals being transferred between off-world fleets. Then, the US government tried to send him to prison for the rest of his life. But the UK refused to extradite him. McKinnon just sat down with Jesse Michels to break down his wild story: “There was an Excel spreadsheet, and it … was titled Non-Terrestrial Officers.” “And it was incredible.” “It had ship names, it had materiel … and it had transfers of weird chemicals … ship-to-ship transfers and fleet-to-fleet transfers.” Michels: “What are the names of these chemicals?” McKinnon: “Molybdenum, barium, they were very exotic.” “They’re used in … lots of very exotic industrial processes.” “A lot to do with … metallurgy, like you make an alloy and it makes it stronger than the original two components.” Michels: “So you see a list of how many non-terrestrial officers?” McKinnon: “Maybe like 30, 40 names.” Michels: “You don’t remember any of the last names?” McKinnon: “No, sorry.” “This is one of the main criticisms of me: why didn’t you take a bloody screenshot?” “But I did actually.” “I downloaded the Excel spreadsheet, and when I got arrested, all my data was taken to ONI—Office of Naval Intelligence.” “They still have my hard drives.” Michels: “Office of Naval Intelligence is the oldest intelligence agency in the US.” “I think it’s 1882.” “It’s often deeply implicated in UFOs.” “And you had Thomas Townsend Brown doing a lot of spooky science work for the Navy.” “And then you have this guy, Harold Malmgren, who kind of ended up giving me … a deathbed confession at the end of his life.” “He was like: the Office of Naval Intelligence knows the most about this issue.” @AlchemyAmerican @AmericanALCHMY @realGMcKinnon

Video Transcript AI Summary

In the conversation, the interviewee describes finding intriguing material in his girlfriend’s aunt’s flat during a search. Among items, he recalls an Excel spreadsheet titled non terrestrial officers. He explains that his search terms included UFOs, ET, terrestrial, and anything spacecraft, noting the document might not use those words in the title. The spreadsheet reportedly listed ship names, materials (with military spellings rather than civilian terminology), and transfers between ships and fleets. It also contained references to exotic chemicals, including molybdenum and other hard-to-pronounce substances. The interviewee notes that, at the time, he checked the ship names thinking they would be US Navy vessels, but found nothing that matched seagoing ships. He does not remember any individual names, only a long list with initials or surnames, and the ship names did not resemble typical navy hulls like USS Lincoln. He recalls using AltaVista rather than Google and finding no seagoing vessel matches. Regarding the chemicals, he recalls molybdenum, barium, and other exotic items, and reflects on what these imply. The discussion then shifts to related topics the researchers had explored later, such as biofilm brown stuff, dielectrics, and nano deposition of thin layers, with mention of materials engineered in layers thinner than a human hair (microns or sub-micron thickness). A participant describes a sample of multilayered bismuth and magnesium, with bismuth layers thinner than a human hair, allegedly recovered from the crash retrieval of an advanced aerospace vehicle, noting there was no evidence that anyone had manufactured such a sample. The interviewee estimates the spreadsheet’s size on an old 800x600 monitor, suggesting about 24 lines and roughly 30 to 40 names overall. He admits he did download the Excel file but, when he was arrested, all data were taken to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), and his hard drives remain with ONI as part of an ongoing investigation, with attempts to retrieve them blocked. The discussion broadens to historical context: the Office of Naval Intelligence is described as the oldest U.S. intelligence agency (authentically predating the CIA and OSS), with a brief mention of Thomas Townsend Brown’s work for the Navy and Harold Malmgren’s claims. Malmgren purportedly said ONI “knows the most about this issue,” and that entering that door can lead to a closed system with no exit. Another participant notes that Naval Intelligence may approach researchers with special access if they show substantial knowledge, but such access constitutes a closed system. Overall, the dialogue centers on a hidden spreadsheet linking non terrestrial officers, unusual materials, and clandestine naval intelligence dynamics, with implications of restricted access and ongoing investigations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You also found some other pretty crazy things while you were while you were searching in your girlfriend's aunt's flat. And so, yeah, what else did you what else did you find besides this TikTok? Speaker 1: I think I was on a navy system at the time. I can't remember, cloud of weed, etcetera. But, there's a spreadsheet, excel spreadsheet and it was called because I was saying earlier about my search terms, so it was UFOs, ET, terrestrial, anything spacecraft, anything I could think of which probably wouldn't be in the in the title of the document. But this spreadsheet was titled non terrestrial officers. So not on the earth, which isn't necessarily alien. It could just mean space based marines or, know, secret space force. And that was incredible. It had ship names. It had material, the material the military spelling, not material. And it was transfers of weird chemicals like molybdenum and other weird things that are hard to pronounce. Ship to ship transfers and fleet to fleet transfers. And at the time, I looked up the ship names thinking US Navy, must be boats, Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Speaker 0: What do you remember the names of the people? Speaker 1: No. I remember I don't remember any of the names of the people, but the the long list, you know. I think it was just initial surname. I don't think they were first names. And the ship names, was expecting like USS Lincoln or, you know, navy ships, but there was none of that. Everything I and it wasn't Google at the time. I think it was Alta Vista, the biggest search engine at the time. None of it was seagoing vessels. Speaker 0: So you see a list of non terrestrial officers, and then you also see chemicals. What are the names of these chemicals? Speaker 1: Yeah. Molybdenum, barium, something was in there. They were very exotic. So what does that imply? Speaker 0: Do you remember the exact so what is is Molybdenum? Have you looked up what the uses are of this? Speaker 1: Yeah. I remember Molybdenum, can't say it now, they're very exciting. They're used in like, magnetics. Lots of very kind of exotic industrial processes. A lot a lot to do with metal hardening, if I remember rightly, like metallurgy. Like you make an alloy and it makes it stronger than the original two components. So again, that time now years later with the research you've done, the people you've interviewed, it's all making more sense, especially when we when we come to the biofilm brown stuff and dielectrics and Speaker 0: Yeah. We'll get to that. Speaker 1: And like nano deposition of thin layer Speaker 0: materials. Yes. Yeah. Thinly layered, thinner than a, you know, a human hair or whatever. Micron This Speaker 2: one sample is engineered in layers thinner than microns through a process unknown on Earth and for a purpose we can only guess. Speaker 3: Multilayered bismuth and magnesium sample, bismuth layers less than a human hair, supposedly picked up in the crash retrieval of an advanced aerospace vehicle. Nowhere could we find any evidence that anybody ever made one of these. Speaker 0: Okay. This is fascinating, though. So you see a list of how many non terrestrial officers? Speaker 1: Oh, man. So my screen at the time was the old, like 800 by 600 monitors. I think I might have had ten twenty four by seven sixty eight resolution at the time. So your typical Excel spreadsheet without zooming in when you just load it up was probably 24 lines, and I think it was about one and a half or two pages, so maybe like thirty, forty names. You don't remember any of the last names? Speaker 0: No. Sorry. You're killing me. No, you're not kidding me. You gotta give us a little breadcrumb. Speaker 1: Yeah, this is one of the main criticisms of me. Why didn't you take a bloody screenshot? Just an old print screen, old print. But I did actually, I downloaded the Excel spreadsheet. Uh-huh. And when I got arrested, all my data was taken to ONI, Office of Naval Intelligence. So they still have my hard drives. I've tried to get them back for years, and they said, no, it's still an ongoing investigation, you can't touch it. Speaker 0: Office of Naval Intelligence is the oldest intelligence agency in The US, I think it's 1882, and it's often deeply implicated in UFOs. Speaker 1: 1882. Speaker 0: 1882. So the National Security Act, which created the CIA, was 1947. And, you know, and then you had the OSS before that, which was kind of this wartime, foreign intelligence Yeah. No, Office of Naval Intelligence well predates all of that, and you had Thomas Townsend Brown doing a lot of spooky science work for the Navy. Yeah. And, yeah, and then you have this guy Harold Malmgren, who kind of ended up giving me kind of a, turned into kind of a deathbed confession at the end of his life, and it was wild. I mean, he was like, the Office of Naval Intelligence knows the most about this issue and once you go in that door, the door shuts and you can't get let out. Speaker 4: But he said, one other thing, Naval Intelligence are going to be around asking you questions about your study. They really got curious and if they talk to you for any length of time, they'll say, holy shit, you really know a lot. They're gonna offer you special access. That's how they operate. I said, does that mean? They'll open the doors, you'll have full entry, the doors will shut and there will be no exit the rest of your life. That is a closed system. Speaker 0: And he kind of implied that they approached him in certain cases and because of the fact that it was this closed system, he didn't want to engage. Wow.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - February 18, 2026 at 7:39 PM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 10:36 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that a CIA historian reveals elite American families—Du Pont, Astor, Forbes—held a 1952 séance. Nine members summoned a UFO and were told they’d be instrumental in controlling the planet’s fate. Andrija Puharich organized several secret séances, with an Indian channeling a force. Nine threads appeared for the nine attendees, said to be in a saucer in low Earth orbit—aliens of some kind.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This CIA historian just revealed that some of the most elite families in America held a secret séance in 1952. Nine members of the Du Pont, Astor and Forbes families summoned a UFO. And they were told: “You’re going to be instrumental in controlling the fate of this planet.” Hear Peter Levenda break down this wild story with Danny Jones: Andrija Puharich, who weaponized paranormal phenomena for US intelligence agencies, organized and led the séance. And this wasn’t the only one. He led several secret, elite séances. “Arthur Young, Ruth Forbes Young, plus an Astor and a Du Pont, and all these other names from American financial history, they’re all at a farmhouse in Maine.” “There’s an Indian gentleman conducting the séance, and … he’s causing things to materialize.” Suddenly, nine threads materialized out of thin air. “One for each of the nine people that are at this particular seance.” “He’s channeling a spiritual force, and the spiritual force says, ‘we are nine, and you are nine, and you’re going to be instrumental in controlling the fate of this planet in the future.’” “And in case anybody doesn’t believe me, Andrija Puharich … openly published the notes of this meeting and … everything that happened.” Danny Jones: “A lot of it was recorded on audio, too.” Levenda: “Yeah, you can download it.” “The one main séance was this one about the Nine, and as it transpires … we understand from whoever’s channeling them that they’re actually in a saucer in low Earth orbit.” “These are aliens of some kind.” @JonesDanny

Video Transcript AI Summary

This discussion centers on a group of American financial and industrial figures—Arthur Young, Ruth Forbes, Paine Young, along with Aster, a DuPont, and others—gathered in a Maine farmhouse for a seance. An Indian gentleman conducts the seance, causing things to materialize as apports. One apport appears for each of the nine people present. The spiritual force channeled during the session states, “we are nine and you are nine, and you're going to be instrumental in controlling the fate of this planet in the future.” Andrea Puharich, who chairs the operation and leads what is referred to as The Nine, publishes the notes of the meeting, and much of the discussion was recorded on audio and is downloadable. The seance is not a one-off event; it is repeated, with the main seance focusing on the nine. As more is learned about The Nine, the channeling indicates that they are actually in a saucer in low Earth orbit—aliens of some kind. When Puharich brings Uri Geller to the United States for testing, Geller claims contact with The Nine and identifies them as being in a spacecraft orbit around the Earth. This material ties into Puharich’s broader work, as he is described as being deeply involved in discovering ways to weaponize the paranormal—telepathy, ESP, and related phenomena—for intelligence purposes. Puharich had lectured on these topics at Edgewood Arsenal during the Korean War era, around 1952 and 1953, when he held a captain’s rank in the Army. He actively promoted the use of the paranormal in military and intelligence contexts, including remote viewing and teleportation. He is presented as a major figure in the New Age occult movement in the United States. In summary, the narrative links a high-profile group in Maine who conduct a repeated seance with a nine-person circle, claiming materialized objects and channeling a message about their future influence on the planet. The Nine are described as being in a spacecraft in orbit, a claim reinforced by Uri Geller’s involvement. Puharich’s work is framed as pioneering efforts to harness paranormal phenomena for military and intelligence applications, situating him as a central figure in mid‑20th-century New Age occult and related research.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This cast of characters, Arthur Young, Ruth Forbes, Paine Young, plus an Aster and a DuPont and all these other names from American financial history, they're all in one room in Maine in a farmhouse in the middle of nowhere. And they're having a seance. And there's an Indian gentleman conducting the seance, and in the midst of the seance he's causing things to materialize, what they call apports. So all of these threads materialize out of nowhere. One for each of the nine people that are at this particular seance. And he's channeling a spiritual force, and the spiritual force says, we are nine and you are nine, and you're going to be instrumental in controlling the fate of this planet in the future. That's what they're told. And in case anybody doesn't believe me, Andrea Puharich, who was the chairman of this operation, he was the leader of this group that we're now calling The Nine, he's published all this. He's openly published the notes of this meeting and everything that was being said and everything that A lot of it was recorded on audio too. And it was, yeah. You can download it. This is weird stuff, right? So this seance is being held not once but several times. The one main seance was this one about the nine. And as it transpires, as we know more and more about the Nine, we understand from whoever's channeling them that they're actually in a saucer in low Earth orbit. These are aliens of some kind. And when Puharich brings Uri Geller over to The United States to be tested and everything else and all of this, Uri Geller claims also to be in contact with the nine. And he's the one who identifies them as also being in a spacecraft of some kind in orbit around the earth. So all of this is, this is Andrea Puharich. He was very much involved in finding ways to weaponize telepathy, ESP, and the paranormal in service of the intelligence agencies. Right. He had actually given lectures on this at Edgewood Arsenal during the Korean War era, 'fifty two, 'fifty three, around the time he was doing this in Maine. He had, I think, a captain's rank in the army, and he was really actively promoting using the paranormal, essentially what we would call today remote viewing and that kind of stuff, teleportation, all of this. He's a major figure in the sort of the New Age occult movement in The United

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - February 11, 2026 at 8:22 PM

Saved - February 12, 2026 at 3:04 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I claim a theory that Luciferians cast a spell and Hollywood normalizes Moloch through predictive programming. Avary cites Colbert skit about handing a baby to Moloch, says audiences laugh, conditioning us. Rogan asks if a grand design exists; Avary agrees—thousands manipulate media and everything. He mentions coded emails about “pizza” and alleges daily sacrifices in LA, including a high‑level female musician sacrificing chickens.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“I think the Luciferians cast a spell on the world.” “They’re manipulating everything.” “Reality as we know it is fake.” “They’re eating babies.” “There’s sacrifices going on every day in LA.” This Hollywood director just dropped massive red pills on Joe Rogan. Pulp Fiction co-writer Roger Avary told Rogan that Hollywood normalized Moloch worship to Americans through predictive programming. “Like, Stephen Colbert did a little skit on his show where … ‘I’m gonna take this baby, and I’m gonna give it to Moloch,’ and he goes into a cloudy red furnace and hands the baby over, and says ‘the baby’s gonna be fine.’” “They make a joke about it, and the audience laughs.” “We’re all now conditioned to it.” Rogan: “You think that’s on purpose, that this is some sort of a grand design to get us to be desensitized to the idea of demons eating babies?” Avary: “Yeah, for sure.” Rogan: “Okay, but there has to be a person or some group of people—” Avary: “About 8,500 people.” Rogan: “That are manipulating The Colbert Show?” Avary: “They’re manipulating everything.” Rogan: “The thing about the emails is … some of it is in code.” Avary: “For all this pizza they’re talking about, you never see any pizza.” “They’re eating babies.” Rogan: “You think that is real?” Avary: “Yeah, not only that, I think that there’s sacrifices going on every day in Los Angeles.” “Allegedly … let’s say, high-level female musician is killing chickens every day, doing sacrifices.” @joerogan @AVARY

Video Transcript AI Summary

A: The conversation opens with references to the Epstein files and a sense that people are ignoring shocking information, including an incident at the Atlanta Airport involving a well-dressed Black man who freaks out, which they say they saw on social media. B: They discuss reading the Upstate files and criticize others for going on with their lives as if nothing is happening, describing the public as “zombies” and likening society to invasion of the body snatchers. They mention revelations such as a global pandemic and aliens, and claim that “Miles have been released,” yet people act normal. C: They express a belief that a small group of about 8,500 people is manipulating events, including media such as the Colbert show, and that reality as they know it is fake. They discuss the idea of predictive programming and insist that by presenting certain material or jokes, the public becomes desensitized and complicit. A: They argue there is a grand design behind these phenomena to desensitize the public to the idea of demons or occult wrongdoing, including references to Luciferian influence and spells cast on the world. They discuss a Colbert skit in which a baby is handed to Moloch and a dramatic red furnace, claiming the audience’s laughter signals hypnosis or conditioning. B: They claim there is a coded language in the Epstein emails, where references to “pizza” and “beef jerky” are used as code, and that such codes exist even if others dismiss them as paranoia. They note that some language is cryptic and argue that there is a recognizable code, contrasting it with the public’s dismissal of such interpretations. A: They mention the Epstein indictment and a claim about sulfuric acid: right after he was indicted, he allegedly ordered large quantities of sulfuric acid (six hundred and fifty-five-gallon containers, with figures like 8,000 or 50,000 gallons discussed) to process bodies. They repeat the claim that “they’re eating babies,” underscoring a belief in extreme horrors behind coded communications. B: They expand the discussion to alleged ongoing sacrifices in Los Angeles, suggesting high-level musicians are involved in daily sacrifices, including claims about killing chickens as part of those activities. They hedge about naming individuals, expressing concern about legal risk and safety, and reaffirm their position that such activities occur at a high level. A: The conversation repeats the sense of omnipresent manipulation and secrecy, emphasizing that a hidden group is controlling information and that people are afraid to confront it, with ongoing claims about decoding messages and real-world horrors behind public narratives.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Did you see the thing in the Epstein files? Oh, yeah. Like, the the order Speaker 1: Epstein files. In fact, I can't believe that, like, everybody just kinda like, okay. And they're moving on with their lives. Did you see that guy at the Atlanta Airport flipping out the well dressed black dude who just freaks out at in the Atlanta just, like, a couple of days ago on I saw it on YouTube no. I saw it on Twitter or X. And this guy is just freaking out in the Atlanta Airport. He's like, you know, Speaker 2: I've read the Upstate files. Like, all of you, you're going about your lives like nothing's happening. Look at your Speaker 1: old zombies. And he's right. It's like invasion of the body snatchers. Everybody is just numb to everything. Like, dudes, we had a global pandemic, aliens, you know, all these, like, revelations. People are, you know, eating babies. Here's This Speaker 0: is a guy. Speaker 2: Miles have been released, and all of y'all are acting normal. Speaker 1: All of y'all. And there's a longer version of that where he's but he's basically like, you're all acting like nothing's happening. Like, what the fuck? You know, you're all just pretending you're just drones going on in your normal life. Speaker 0: Waiting for a condensed version that lays out all the facts. It's the people that are, like, really interested in reading all the emails. Speaker 1: I think the Luciferians cast a spell on the world. Speaker 0: And For real? Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely. You're like you know, it's just like how vampires can't go into a house unless they're invited. They tell you, you know, what's going on ahead of time. It's predictive programming. And once you say it out loud and you put it out there and make fun of it and do a little skit like they like, Stephen Colbert did a little skit on his show where, oh, here's a baby. I'm gonna take this baby, and I'm gonna give it to Moloch. And he goes into, like, a cloudy red, you know, furnace and hands the baby over. He's, oh, the baby's gonna be fine. And they make a joke about it, the audience laughs. Okay. We're all now conditioned to it. We've all seen it. And by laughing at it Oh, wait a We were complicit. Speaker 0: You think that that's a that's on purpose that this is, like, some sort of a grand design to get us to be desensitized to the idea of demons eating babies? Speaker 1: Yeah. For sure. Really? For sure. And and by the way, nobody's doing anything about it. We know what's happening. Speaker 0: But that has to take like, there has to be a person or some group of people Speaker 1: Yeah. Like, about eight about 8,500 people. Speaker 0: Yeah. That are manipulating the Colbert show? Speaker 1: They're manipulating everything. It's all an illusion. Like, reality as we know it is fake. That's that's the revelation that that guy is having. And he's looking around, and he's like, it's like invasion of the body snatchers. Speaker 0: Well, it's sir see, I don't the thing about the emails is one of the things is it's just stuff written down. And so that's sort of hard to digest. Like, what is this? Like, what are they saying? Like, some of it is in code, like walking over beef jerky. Like, saying talking about jerky. Could you walk beef jerky over to this person? Like, what does that mean? Speaker 1: For all this pizza they're talking about, you never see any pizza. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. Yeah. They're ordering pizza. Speaker 1: I'm gonna get some rape soda. It's like with my cheese pizza. Yeah. And, like, there's all this coded language, and everyone's like, you know, oh, that's you're just you just have periola. You know, the you're just seeing things where you wanna see them. Speaker 0: No. There's clearly a code. Well, that was the thing about pizza game. Speaker 1: A code. And in fact, It's a long known concept. And so in Latin, means the world wants to be deceived. Therefore, it is. We want to be deceived. We we don't want to believe the horrors that are actually behind the veil. Speaker 0: Well, I think with the Epstein files, people are because of these emails that have been released, people are just now starting to be aware of the bizarreness of the code and some of the thing like, facts. Like, let's just talk about the sulfuric acid. So this was, like, right after he was indicted Mhmm. In 2000 Speaker 1: Yeah. You gotta get rid of some bodies. Speaker 0: Yeah. I gotta How much do you Speaker 1: dissolve up some bodies. Speaker 0: What did it say he ordered? Like, let's Like, Speaker 1: 8,000 gallons 50,000 gallons. Speaker 0: Sponsor Perplexity to process this and give us a synopsis of what exactly happened, some sort of a breakdown. Because one of the things they're saying is, like, he was indicted and then right after he's indicted, he orders how many gallons? Six fifty five gallon containers full of sulfuric acid. Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ. What Speaker 1: What? They're eating babies, man. Like, that's the Speaker 0: So that that you think is real. Speaker 1: So Well, yeah. Not only that. I think that there's, you know, sacrifices going on every day in Los Angeles. I mean, you know, allegedly, like, you know, high level musicians, let's say, high level female musician is, like, you know, killing chickens every day, doing sacrifices. Like, you know High level. Well, I I don't wanna say I don't wanna say names because I don't wanna get sued. And I I I don't wanna be dead either.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - February 5, 2026 at 6:28 PM

Saved - February 5, 2026 at 11:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m citing claims that Epstein worked for the Rothschilds, that elites worship Baal, and that this isn’t a conspiracy theory. Candace Owens discusses Rob Skiba on the Book of Enoch, the Tower of Babel, and the elites’ obsession with the Antichrist. Skiba says the Tower was a technology to return to heaven; Satan is cast out by Michael; fallen angels mate with humans to make Nephilim; Nimrod’s Tower leads God to confuse language; elites see Nimrod/Gilgamesh as the resurrected Antichrist.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“Jeffrey Epstein worked for the Rothschilds.” “The elites are obsessed with Baal worship.” “None of this is a conspiracy theory.” Candace Owens just broke down Rob Skiba’s research on the truth about the Book of Enoch, the Tower of Babel, and the elites’ obsession with the Antichrist. Bookmark this post. “Rob Skiba posits that the Tower of Babel was actually … was a technology, because they wanted to get back into the heavenly realm.” “Here’s the biblical recap: Satan is struck down by the archangel Saint Michael after a battle of good vs. evil in heaven, because Satan is leading this rebellion against God.” “The rebellion fails. He is obviously expelled, and as a result, he no longer has access to God.” “This is our true history.” “These fallen angels, also known as demons, then mate with humans.” “They produce Nephilim, giants, and their demonic pursuit never actually ends.” “They are still seeking to triumph God.” “That enters in the story of Nimrod building this Tower of Babel as a return to heaven.” “The biblical story is that as Nimrod is constructing this tower, God confuses language amongst the people, forcing them to abandon the project, because they can’t communicate with one another.” “Rob Skiba’s theory is that at the moment that that languages were confused, Nimrod became known as different names.” “He believes that the elites view Nimrod, or Gilgamesh, as the Antichrist that they are trying to resurrect.” @RealCandaceO

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 discusses Rob Skiba and his book Babylon Rising, noting that Skiba is alleged to have been murdered for research connected to an “ultimate project of the elites.” He mentions being grateful that Skiba’s son’s work continues and that Skiba’s speech on Babylon Rising is being shared. The conversation centers on the elites’ obsession with Babylon, and Skiba’s theory about the Tower of Babel. Speaker 1 introduces extra-biblical texts such as the Book of Enoch, which state that 200 fallen angels, the Watchers, landed in a location described as Mount Hermon in southern Lebanon. The clip highlights that the land’s topography resembles a goat, and associates the fallen angel Azazel with a goat, referencing Leviticus 16’s scapegoat. David Flynn is cited as noting that Mount Hermon’s coordinates are 33.333 degrees north by 33.333 degrees east from the Paris Prime Meridian, and that this location aligns with a “devil’s line” when connected to the Paris Meridian. Speaker 0 asserts that the elites are obsessed with goat heads and ball worship, stating that this is not a conspiracy. He references Jeffrey Epstein and the Rothschilds, noting recurring imagery of goat heads in occult and pan worship contexts, including Dionysus and related cults. Speaker 0 then provides a biblical recap for listeners who may be new to the text: Satan is cast out of heaven after a battle with archangel Michael, leading to his expulsion and loss of access to God. Fallen angels, or demons, mate with humans, producing Nephilim giants, and their pursuit to triumph over God continues. This frames Nimrod’s construction of the Tower of Babel as an attempt to return to heaven. God confuses human language, causing the project to fail, and Nimrod becomes known by different names—Baal, Tammuz, Gilgamesh, Dionysus, Bacchus—suggesting a link between these cults and the elites’ practices. Skiba’s theory, as presented, posits that the elites view Nimrod and/or Gilgamesh as the antichrist they seek to resurrect for that reason. The speaker notes that Gilgamesh, per the epic, is two-thirds god and one-third man. The discussion ties these elements to a broader occult narrative connecting ancient figures, the Tower of Babel, and contemporary elite symbolism around goat heads and sacred geometries, with Mount Hermon as a focal geographic anchor.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I mentioned to you guys this man named Rob Skiba yesterday. He wrote a book entitled Babylon Rising. This came to me from an email tip interest. It was immediately interesting. Well, this man, it is alleged was actually murdered for some of the research and the pieces that he were putting together because he was perhaps getting too close to the ultimate project of the elites. By the way, son emailed me yesterday thanking me for bringing up his father and grateful that his father, father's work is still carrying on. I've not had time to email him back but I did receive that email and I know that you are watching. And I'm also grateful that the work that your father did is getting new meaning. Anyway, I started watching the speech that his father Rob Skiba gave on the topic of his book Babylon Rising. I explained to you that all of the elites are obsessed with Babylon and any research that I do. It's all about Babylon, Babylon, Babylon. And I wanna share to you some of these clips. It's it's Rob Skiba, and and he's speaking about his book. Now to tee this up, let's just get into a little bit of the history. He is positing a lot about the Tower Of Babel. Obviously, we know this was built up that this angered God. And Rob Skiba posits that it wasn't actually the height of the tower that was problematic. He believes that or or this is again, this is a theory. So don't be offended. Please don't send me emails about, woah, this is not the teaching. This is not the doctrine. We're trying to not get to what is true or what you believe. We are trying to actually get to what the elites believe. Okay? We know we actually don't believe we should harm children. So if we're speaking about the elites belief, you don't have to send send me a lecture about what's wrong about it. The entire purpose of this podcast is to tell you that the elites are satanic. Anyway, back to, Nimrod building this Tower Of Babel. Well, Rob Skiba posits he's like, I don't think it was because the tower was high. We know that he built this to get back to heaven. He thinks that actually this tower that was being built was a technology because they wanted to get back into the heavenly realm. Now if you have read Gilgamesh, there was a lot of astro astro theology that's in it. Stargates, we know that the elites worship stars. We've covered that extensively. Well, in this particular clip, you're going to see Rob Skiba discuss the book of Enoch, the one that I mentioned to you, going back to the beginning, the story of fallen angels and he brings up something that is of geographical interest. Take a listen. Speaker 1: There are extra biblical texts like the Book of Enoch and others that go into more detail about what happened in Genesis six. The Book of Enoch says that 200 fallen angels, a class of angels known as the watchers landed in this location right here. This is the center of a mountain range in Southern Lebanon known as Mount Hermon. Now, keep your eye right there as camera pulls back and just kind of look at the outline of the topography right there. It's very interesting that it actually forms the shape of a goat. And one of the worst of the fallen angels was one by the name of Azazel. And Azazel is always associated with the goat. You see that in Leviticus chapter 16. The scapegoat is a reference to Azazel. I find it interesting that the land itself actually kind of looks like a goat head. This gentleman depicted here is David Flynn. He recently passed away, but he turned the world upside down with some of his research and he was able to figure out that that location is thirty three point three three degrees north by thirty three point three three degrees east from the Paris Prime Meridian. Very interesting. What's one third of a 33.3333%. Right? How interesting that the fallen angels that participated in what I call the Genesis six experiment landed on the geographical location that fits their number, on the crosshairs of thirty three point three three. Something else David Flynn pointed out is that if you take put a little marker there and you can do this for yourself that what I showed you there is from Google Earth. I did it for myself to check it out. But you can put a marker there and then draw a line from there to the Paris Primeridian. We go by Greenwich today but originally it was the Paris was kind of the standard for a long time there. And that is in the occult is referred to as the devil's line. Speaker 0: So something that is a fact is that the elites are obsessed with goat heads, ball worship. None of this is a conspiracy. Jeffrey Epstein worked for the Rothschilds. You were looking at a picture of the Rothschilds at their surrealist ball. The more research you do, you just sort of see this appearance over and over again of goat heads, even if you get into pan worship, Dionysus, all of these, yeah, occult orgiastic cults that they've had since the beginning of time, so to speak. And just to give you guys a biblical recap, I should never assume I know a of people are kind of now just going to church or just starting to pick up a bible. So I I can back back this up for you. The story of man, just so you guys know, you're not an ape. You can throw away that chart. The biblical recap here, Satan is struck down by the archangel, Saint Michael, after a battle of good versus evil in heaven. Because Satan is leading this rebellion against God, the rebellion fails. He is obviously expelled. And as a result, he no longer has access to God. That's your this is our true history, our true heritage. This is what actually happened. Like I said, you're not a monkey. That middle school charts of, oh, here's what happened. And then you were like, oh, the Australopithecus, and then it was a homo sapien. That's just nonsense, quote, unquote, Now these fallen angels, so to speak, also known as demons, then mate with humans. They produce Nephilim giants, and their demonic pursuit never actually ends. They are still seeking to triumph God. So that enters in the story of Nimrod and him building this Tower Of Babel as a return to heaven. So like I said, the biblical story is that as Nimrod is constructing this tower, God confuses language amongst the the people, forcing them to abandon the project because they can't communicate with one another. So can't speak. We can't build this tower. So Ron Skiba's theory, if you're suspending, again, theological debate for a moment, I'm just telling you because we're looking into what he is saying the elites are after. His theory is that at the moment that that occurred, once languages were confused, Nimrod became known as different names, Baal, Tammuz, Gilgamesh. And like I said, he is positing this, you can see this whole list Dionysus, Bacchus. Yes, there is synergy between those cults and the practices without question, historically speaking. Now he is discussing this because he believes that the elites view Nimrod and or Gilgamesh as the antichrist that they are working to try to resurrect for exactly that reason. And he reminds audiences that Gilgamesh per the epic was two thirds god and one third man.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - February 3, 2026 at 12:08 AM

Saved - February 3, 2026 at 2:44 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m told AJ Gentile claims free-energy tech has existed since the 1930s but was blocked by the 1951 Invention Secrecy Act, which bans discussing or selling devices more than 20% efficient unless to the military. The post recounts inventors—Pogue, Ogle, Meyer, Brown, Sparky Sweet—whose breakthroughs vanished after government intervention, with UFOs as distraction.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“The US government has unlocked zero point energy.” AJ Gentile from The Why Files just blew Tucker Carlson’s mind. He revealed that many people have invented free energy tech since the 1930s. But a 1951 law classified all of it. And it mandated that this tech can only be sold to the US military. AJ suspects that UFO videos released by the military since 2017 are actually examples of this top secret tech, not extraterrestrial crafts. Bookmark this post. This will shock you: “There’s a man named Charles Pogue, who in the ‘30s tinkered with his carburetor and was able to get 200 miles a gallon.” “Once the news of his engine got out, the oil stocks crashed.” “So the oil industry lobbied the US government … and in 1951, the Invention Secrecy Act was passed.” “If you patent any device that is more than 20% efficient, that’s instantly classified.” “You can’t talk about it, you can’t build it, and you can’t sell it unless you sell it to the US military.” “Then there was a man named Tom Ogle … in the ‘70s.” “He accidentally rewires his lawnmower engine to take the exhaust and pump it back into the carburetor, and this thing runs on a gallon of gas for 78 hours or something.” “So he reconfigures his car … and he’s getting 200 miles to the gallon.” “Suddenly, Tom, without a history of drug use, stumbles out of a bar, he’s drunk, and he’s killed.” “You might remember Stanley Meyer and the water car … this is the 1990s now.” “Stanley’s figured out how to take tap water, put it into his car, and run his car on water.” “It works, and he drives it all over the place.” “It’s all over the news.” “I think he’s sitting at a Cracker Barrel with his brother and some investors, and they raise a glass to toast.” “Stanley suddenly doesn’t feel well.” “He runs outside, he starts vomiting, his brother chases after him … and Stanley says, ‘they poisoned me,’ and he dies.” “He had another invention that most people don’t know about before his water car, which was this toroid ring.” “This donut-shaped ring that he invented that created energy out of nothing, and levitated.” “But he patented it, and it got hit with the Secrecy Act, and they made his life miserable.” “There are other inventors in between, T. Townsend Brown invents this antigravity technology.” “And we get to Floyd ‘Sparky’ Sweet.” “He videotaped all of his stuff.” “He’s a garage tinkerer, but he’s an engineer.” “You see him running a fan at high RPMs, and then he’s got light bulbs … and it’s all running off this little box the size of a deck of cards.” “It’s a device that no matter what you attach to it … it will give you the energy.” “He gets a visit late one night, two men in suits come talk to him … he has a heart attack, ambulance comes, they grab Sparky … he dies.” “Soon after, a couple of black vans pull up. They take all his notes, every piece of equipment, and it just disappears.” @TuckerCarlson @OMGTheWhyFiles

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses alleged suppressed breakthroughs in energy, claiming the US government has unlocked zero-point energy or something close to it by drawing energy from the vacuum, with inventors repeatedly proving energy can be produced from apparently nothing. They begin with Charles Pogue, who in the 1930s tinkered with his carburetor and allegedly achieved 200 miles per gallon; engineers, investigators, and scientists reportedly proved it worked. The oil industry allegedly lobbied the government after news of Pogue’s engine, leading to the 1951 Invention Secrecy Act, which supposedly classifies any device more than 20% efficient as a state secret from patent to production and sale unless sold to the US military. The narrative moves to Tom Ogle in the 1970s, who allegedly rewired his lawnmower engine to recycle exhaust into the carburetor, creating a car that achieved about 200 miles per gallon on a 1976 Ford Galaxy. Shell Oil purportedly offered him $25,000,000 for the patent, but the invention would be shelved. Ogle then supposedly died after leaving a bar, described as drunk, with the case said to be linked to his disappearance of research. Next comes Stanley Meyer in the 1990s with a water-fueled car using electrolysis to split tap water into hydrogen and oxygen, running on hydrogen. The claim is that electrolysis requires energy and purified water, but Meyer allegedly solved this by using tap water and running the car on water. Meyer’s car was reportedly featured in the news as an invention of the century; he was offered a billion dollars and millions of dollars in investments. At a Cracker Barrel with his brother and investors, they toasted to new investment, then Meyer allegedly felt unwell, ran outside, vomited, and said they had poisoned him. The medical examiner’s report cites an aneurysm, but the narrative suggests foul play and notes Meyer previously had another invention—a toroid ring (a donut-shaped ring) that purportedly created energy from nothing and levitated, which Meyer patented but whose secrecy act harmed him and limited discussion. The speaker then mentions T. Townsend Brown and his antigravity work, claiming his research faced break-ins, gun threats, and disappearances. Floyd Sparky Sweet is highlighted as a personal favorite because his garage-work experiments allegedly show a device producing energy: a box the size of a deck of cards that, with 0.03 milliwatts input, purportedly outputs as many watts as needed, allegedly connected to UFO technology. Sweet reportedly received help from military physicists, but one night a visit from men in suits preceded a heart attack and his death; shortly after, black vans allegedly confiscated his equipment and notes, and the story ends without further details. The overall arc is of repeated claims of revolutionary energy inventions, their suppression by powerful interests, and the disappearance or death of the inventors and their research.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I think the US government probably has unlocked zero point or close to zero point energy, which would be pulling energy out of the vacuum. We have inventors that have done that over and over and over. Making energy of apparently nothing. Well, could start with there was someone there's a man named Charles Pogue, who in the thirties tinkered with his carburetor and was able to get 200 miles a gallon. It was proven. This it was engineers, investigators, scientists. It was totally proven. It worked. He was gonna be a zillionaire or whatever. He's just gonna transform society. And the problem was once the news of his engine got out, the oil stocks crashed. They just crashed. So the oil industry lobbied the US government. We have to do something about this. And in 1951, the Invention Secrecy Act was passed. So now if you patent any device that is more than 20% efficient, that's instantly classified. That is now a state secret. What? It's vital to national security. You can't talk about it. You can't build it, and you can't sell it unless you sell it to the US military. You cannot do it. That went on for a while. And there was a man named Tom Ogle, and Tom is the seven this is the seventies now. He accidentally rewires his lawnmower engine to take the exhaust and pump it back into the carburetor. And this thing runs on a gallon of gas for seventy eight hours or something like that. So he reconfigures his car. Was like a 1976 Ford Galaxy, you know, like a boat, and he's getting 200 miles to the gallon on the thing. He's offered a billion dollars from an oil producing country. Shell Oil offers him $25,000,000 for the patent that he considers, but they're going to shelve it. So he says, no. It's considered, you know, maybe one of the biggest inventions of the century. Suddenly, Tom, without a history of drug use, stumbles out of a bar. He's drunk and he's he's killed. And that's the end of the Tom Ogle story. And that all disappears. All that research goes away. And this repeats over and over and over again till we get to Stanley Meyer. And you might remember Stanley Meyer and the water car because it goes this is the nineteen nineties now. So now we have a vehicle that doesn't even we're not even talking about fuels and protecting a multi trillion dollar industry. We've got a car that runs on water using electrolysis, which has been around since the seventeen hundreds. But electrolysis requires a lot of energy and perfect water without impurities. But Stanley's figured out how to take tap water, put it into his car, and run his car on water. And what it does is splits the water into hydrogen. Oxygen runs on hydrogen. Hydrogen is a fuel that works, and it works. And he drives it all over the place. It's all over the news. Engineers look at it. They say, this is the invention of the century. This changes everything. He's offered a billion dollars and millions of dollars, and everyone wants his engine. And he's sitting at I think he was sitting at a cracker barrel with his brother and some investors, and they raise a glass to toast new investment and go into the future. And they take their toast, and Stanley suddenly doesn't feel well. He runs outside. He starts vomiting. His brother chases Ephraim and says, what's going on? And Stanley says, they poisoned me, and he dies. And in the medical examiner's report, it says he died of an aneurysm. But if you read the report, you can tell the medical examiner didn't really like that because he wrote some other stuff like, Oh, he said he was poisoned, but toxicology doesn't really show it, it says he died of an aneurysm. And that technology is now gone. The patent's useless because Stanley faked the numbers because he didn't trust the government because he had another invention that most people don't know about before his water car, which was this toroid ring. A toroid is a donut. This donut shaped ring that he invented that created energy out of nothing and levitated. But he patented it. It gets and and he got hit with a secrecy act, they made his life miserable. But people started to learn about that. And that brings us there other inventors in between T. Townsend Brown, who invents this antigravity technology. He runs into all kinds of bad luck. All these men have their research stolen. They're broken into. They're carrying guns. They're threatened. They're disappearing. It happens over and over and over again. I have an episode on this. It's very sad. And we get to Floyd Sweet, Floyd Sparky Sweet, who's he's my favorite because his inventions, he videotaped all of his stuff. And you see him in his workshop and Sparky, he's an engineer. He's a garage tinkerer, but he's an engineer. And this was supervised by the military physicists. Maybe it was a mistake. And you see him running a fan at high RPMs, and then he's got light bulbs, all of this energy, and it's all running off this little box the size of a deck of cards. And he puts in point zero three milliwatts, and he gets out all the watts you want. It's a device that no matter what you attach to it, it just whatever the need is, it will give you the energy. This is Sparky Suite. This actually connects to UFO technology. I don't know if we'll go there, but it but it does connect. So Sparky's got this invention. He gets some help from military physicists, Gets a visit late one night to men in suits to come talk to him, say goodnight. He has a heart attack. Ambulance comes. They they grab Sparky. The wife is not allowed in the ambulance. He dies. Soon after, a couple of black vans pull up. They take all his stuff, all his notes, every piece of equipment, and it just disappears. And that's the last we hear of

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 19, 2026 at 9:24 PM

Saved - January 20, 2026 at 3:10 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I see Hancock arguing that a secret elite knew and survived the ancient flood, and they’ve steered civilization for thousands of years, preparing to guide us after the next flood. Across Enoch, Plato, Sumer, and Atrahasis, a hidden advisory group preserves knowledge to endure catastrophe while others are left to struggle. Carlson and Hancock say we’re living in the aftermath, in a continuity echoed by Atlantis traditions.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Graham Hancock reveals that a secret society of elites knows the truth about an ancient flood that wiped out civilization. But they don’t just know the truth. They survived the flood. They’ve controlled civilization for thousands of years. And they’re preparing to control civilization after the next flood. Ancient stories from Enoch, Plato, Sumer, and Mesopotamia reveal the truth about this secret society: “The mysteries in our past that remain to be exposed do concern secret societies.” “They do concern a behind-the-scenes organization that is somehow involved in making civilizations.” “There are so many traditions, for example, from ancient Sumer, which speak of the role of these particular advisors who seem to be part of a secretive group which is there to guide and advise societies over very, very long periods of time.” Randall Carlson: “There’s a legend of Enoch knowing that the flood was gonna come, and so he took steps to preserve the ancient science and stories.” Hancock: “And of course, it’s the same story with Atrahasis in Mesopotamia.” Carlson: “And then Plato says right there in Timaeus, those who survived by the luck of the draw are gonna be wholly preoccupied with continuing to survive in aftermath of a flood or a catastrophe, whereas those who took steps to prepare are going to be the ones who are preserving the knowledge to pass it on.” Hancock: “That’s what I think we’re living in.” “We’re living in the times that followed.” “And that’s what the ancient Sumerians also believed.” “This is ultimately the same story that Plato is telling us in the Atlantis tradition as well.” @Graham__Hancock @randallwcarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary

The dialogue centers on the idea that mysteries from humanity’s past involve secret societies or behind-the-scenes groups that guide civilizations over long periods. The first participant argues that traditions from ancient Sumer describe particular advisors who are part of an esoteric or secretive circle, and that the disbelief of scholars in such ideas is, in their view, nonsense. They suggest these ideas survive through a highly structured oral tradition and could endure indefinitely. The second participant raises the question of foreknowledge amid catastrophes. They ponder where such foreknowledge comes from, noting that divine revelation is an insufficient explanation. They point to stories of individuals with foresight preserved in myths, such as the legend of Enoch in relation to the flood and the Masonic craft. They mention Atrahasis in Mesopotamia, who, warned by the god Eyah or Enki, prepares for the flood and buries tablets with knowledge in Sippar to be recovered later. The first speaker adds that Plato, in the Timaeus, suggests that survivors of a catastrophe are typically those who survive by luck and focus on immediate survival, while those who prepared preserve knowledge to pass on. They deem this view not exotic or esoteric, noting that modern prepper movements reflect a similar mindset. They argue that when something threatens human existence, humanity is innovative and capable of preserving and transmitting knowledge through a catastrophe to the times that follow. The conversation concludes by linking ancient beliefs to the idea that we are living in the postdiluvian era, the era after the flood. They align this with Plato’s Atlantis tradition, suggesting a continuity of the same underlying narrative: civilizations are guided and knowledge preserved by a hidden or special group across cataclysmic events, with the postcatastrophe era relying on those preserved knowledges to rebuild. The thread ties together Sumerian traditions, biblical and Mesopotamian stories, Platonic philosophy, and Atlantis lore to assert a consistent motif of guarded, long-term knowledge preservation through crises.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I think actually that that some of the the mysteries in our past that that remain to be exposed, do concern secret societies and do and do be do concern a behind the scenes organization that is somehow involved in making civilizations. I go too far into that, but there are so many traditions, for example, from ancient Sumer, which speak of this, which speak of the role of these particular advisors who seem to be part of a esoteric or secretive group, which is there to guide and advise societies over very, very long periods of time. And the academic disbelief that such ideas could be retained for thousands of years is, in my view, nonsense. Mhmm. Passed on within a within a highly structured oral tradition, the ideas can survive potentially forever. Speaker 1: Potentially, yes. And and it brings to an something, a question that I've intrigued me for a long time, which is that given catastrophes, you know, one of the one of the details of myths over and over again is that there was some group, some individuals that had foreknowledge. Yeah. Now how where did that foreknowledge come? I mean, we can kick it upstairs and say it was some kind of divine revelation, but that doesn't really explain anything. Speaker 0: Lost ancient science. Speaker 1: Right. Right. Somebody it consistently, somebody had foreknowledge. They were able to prepare, again, referring to, like, the Masonic craft. There's a legend of Enoch knowing that the flood was gonna come, and so he took steps to preserve Mhmm. The ancient science and and and stories by Speaker 0: And, of course, it's the same story with Atrahasis in in Mesopotamia. Yes. You know, warned by the god Eyah or Enki of the coming of the flood, takes steps, makes preparations and even buries tablets with knowledge upon them in the city of Sippar. Speaker 1: Yes. And To Speaker 0: be recovered later by mankind after the disaster. Speaker 1: Well, and then like Plato says right there in in Timaeus, he says, well, those who, survive are gonna typically be, who who essentially survived by the luck of the draw are gonna be wholly preoccupied with continuing to survive in the aftermath, in the in the desolation of in the aftermath of a flood or a catastrophe, whereas those who took steps to prepare are going to be the ones who are preserving the knowledge to pass it on. Yeah. And that to me does not sound so so exotic or esoteric or ridiculous that, I mean, even today we have prepper movements, people who are Sure. Speaker 0: Sounds perfectly reasonable. You know, when it comes down to something that threatens the existence of the entire human race, we are an innovative and inventive species and we would find a way around it. We'd find a way to keep the seed of knowledge going, to keep it to keep it coming through through the catastrophe to the times the times that followed. And that's what I think we're living in. We're living in the times that followed. And that's what the ancient Sumerians also believed, that we're living in the post diluvian era. And this is the same, ultimately the same story that Plato is telling us in the Atlantis tradition as well.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - November 13, 2025 at 9:19 PM

Saved - November 14, 2025 at 5:12 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report Tiffany Cianci’s claim that Susie Wiles crushed MAHA. She’s a huge lobbyist who negotiated Pfizer’s Covid demands, then used appointments—HHS with Bobby Kennedy, EPA with agrochemical lobbies, USDA with industrial food lobbyists—to placate donors and block clean meat. She says costs rise, monopolies block clean meat access, and we buy from Argentina. If MAHA-aligned leaders were at USDA, huge differences could be made. It’s horrifying.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Tiffany Cianci is the second person this week to allege that Susie Wiles has crushed MAHA. “She was a huge lobbyist and negotiated all of Pfizer’s demands during Covid.” “To pacify the donor base, [Susie Wiles said] we’re going to give Bobby Kennedy HHS, we’re going to plant a bunch of … people around him to roadblock him, then we’re going to put agrochemical lobbyists in charge of the EPA, and we’re going to put a bunch of lobbyist darlings for industrial food companies in charge of the USDA.” “Then we’re going to consolidate more power, which is why our food costs are skyrocketing.” “Nobody’s talking about doing anything about the monopoly that is limiting our ability to have access to clean meat in this country.” “And now we’re going to buy it from Argentina.” “If we had put somebody that was actually MAHA-alined and wanted us to have access to clean, healthy eating over at the USDA … we could be making massive differences right now.” “Instead, we gave the people a carrot in Bobby, and then cut him off at the knees with the agencies he needed to work with.” “It’s horrifying to watch.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

In order for MAHA to actually function, we needed all of the health agencies to buy into MAHA. What happened was, I think that Trump's team very clearly saw that there was immense popularity on both sides of the aisle for the idea of making our children healthy again and making our food supply clean again. Hard to argue against that. Yeah. How do you not want to see our children healthy? We are sicker than any nation on the planet. Right. But it would have required us to get buy in at the EPA and the USDA. And instead what happened was to pacify the donor base. We got, in my opinion, probably a Susie Wiles negotiation because she was also remember, she was a huge lobbyist and negotiated all of Pfizer's Yep. Demands during COVID. Right? Susie Wiles made the trade off. We're going to give Bobby Kennedy HHS. We're going to use Doge to plant a bunch of, like, darlings of CEO, Accent Healthcare, people all around him to roadblock him. But then what we're going to do we're gonna put in agrochemical lobbyists in charge of the EPA. Right. We're going to put a bunch of lobbyists, darlings, for for industrial food companies in charge of the USDA. And then we're gonna consolidate more power, which is why our food costs are skyrocketed. Mhmm. Right? They're they're talking nobody's talking about doing anything about the monopoly that is limiting our ability to have access to clean meat Right. In this country. Our our and and now we're gonna buy it from Argentina. That's that's the next thing we're gonna do is buy it from Argentina. But if we had put somebody that was actually Maha aligned and wanted us to have access to clean, healthy eating over at the USDA, and we had not stripped all of the programs that were actually furthering that agenda, we could be making massive differences right now. And instead, we gave the people a carrot in Bobby, and then and then cut him off at the knees with the agencies he needed to work with them. Right. And it's horrifying to watch.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In order for MAHA to actually function, we needed all of the health agencies to buy into MAHA. And what happened was, I think that Trump's team very clearly saw that that there was immense popularity on both sides of the aisle for the idea of making our children healthy again and making our food supply clean again. Hard to argue against that. Yeah. How do you not want to see our children healthy? We are we are sicker than any nation on the planet. Right. Right? But it would have required us to get buy in at the EPA and the USDA. And instead what happened was to pacify the donor base. We got, in my opinion, probably a Susie Wiles negotiation because she was also remember, she was a huge lobbyist and negotiated all of Pfizer's Yep. Demands during COVID. Right? Susie Wiles made the trade off. We're going to give Bobby Kennedy HHS. We're going to use Doge to plant a bunch of, like, darlings of CEO, Accent Healthcare, people all around him to roadblock him. But then what we're going to do we're gonna put in agrochemical lobbyists in charge of the EPA. Right. We're going to put a bunch of lobbyists, darlings, for for industrial food companies in charge of the USDA. And then we're gonna consolidate more power, which is why our food costs are skyrocketed. Mhmm. Right? They're they're talking nobody's talking about doing anything about the monopoly that is limiting our ability to have access to clean meat Right. In this country. Our our and and now we're gonna buy it from Argentina. That's that's the next thing we're gonna do is buy it from Argentina. But if we had put somebody that was actually Maha aligned and wanted us to have access to clean, healthy eating over at the USDA, and we had not stripped all of the programs that were actually furthering that agenda, we could be making massive differences right now. And instead, we gave the people a carrot in Bobby, and then and then cut him off at the knees with the agencies he needed to work with them. Right. And it's horrifying to watch.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - October 20, 2025 at 10:51 PM

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 12:25 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read that five or six cancers are linked to the Covid vaccine, and conspiracy theorists were right again. Dr. Andrew Huff claims a new Korean cohort study found five or six cancers associated with mRNA vaccines, arguing the writing’s on the wall for mRNA. He says many pharma firms banked on it, and this study looked at all cancers, unlike others that looked at a single type.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“A recent study found five or six cancers associated with the Covid vaccine.” The conspiracy theorists were right—again. Dr. Andrew Huff just REVEALED that a new study confirms the link between Covid-19 shots and cancer: “The writing’s on the wall for mRNA technology.” “A lot of corporations in the pharmaceutical or biotech industry have banked on mRNA being the future of vaccine technology.” “If you look at the rise in cancers associated with mRNA technology in the [Covid] vaccine, there’s a recent study that came out in Korea, which is a massive cohort study with a lot of statistical power, found five or six cancers that were associated with the vaccine.” “Many of these other studies looked at one type of cancer—for example, lymphoma in Sweden, they didn’t find an association—but this Korean study looked at all types of cancers, and they’re now finding these associations.” @AGHuff @TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses mRNA technology and its anticipated role in vaccines, noting that many corporations have banked in the biotech industry with mRNA as the presumed future vaccine technology. They reference a recent Korean cohort study that reportedly found five or six cancers associated with the vaccine, highlighting that this study had large statistical power and evaluated all cancer types. In contrast, they mention that studies examining a single cancer type, such as lymphoma in Sweden, did not find an association. The speaker says the Korean study’s broad analysis is leading to “writings on the wall for mRNA technology,” and asserts they do not believe it will be the future vaccine technology. They shift to a broader threat landscape, arguing that the traditional focus on emerging infectious diseases is outdated. They claim the real threat is not old-world diseases but synthetic pathogens and synthetic life, noting that gain-of-function technology has evolved rapidly in the last two to three years. The speaker states that “the future threat we need to be mitigating against and protecting against is actually synthetic pathogens and synthetic life.” Finally, they assert a provocative claim about life creation, saying, “we've actually already created single cell life. It exists.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If you look at mRNA technology and its future, a lot of corporations have banked in the pharmaceutical or biotech industry and mRNA being the future vaccine technology. And I think if you look at the rise in cancers associated with mRNA technology in the SARS CoV two vaccine, and there's a new study, recent study that came out in Korea, which is a massive cohort study with a large large has much has a lot of statistical power, found five or six cancers that were associated with the vaccine. Okay? And then when many of these other studies looked at one type of cancer, for example, lymphoma in in Sweden, they didn't find an association. But this Korean study looked at all types of cancers, and they're now finding these associations. So the writings on the wall for mRNA technology, I don't do not think that it's gonna be the future vaccine technology. And and, frankly, I'm not so concerned anymore with the old way of thinking that the emerging infectious disease threat that we should be concerned about are old world diseases. So bacillus anthracis being weaponized, for example, a coronavirus being weaponized. Gain of function technology has evolved within the last two to three years at such a rapid pace. The future threat we need to be mitigating against and protecting against is actually synthetic pathogens and synthetic life. And I don't think and I know for a fact that most of the world isn't aware that we've actually already created single cell life. It exists.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - September 11, 2025 at 3:12 PM

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:43 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I feel like the First Amendment has been under attack. I believe something extraordinary is on the horizon. In videos, we often miss the essence of our country—debate, disagreement, and the exchange of ideas. I admire Charlie Kirk for entering a challenging environment; it took bravery. I can't help but wonder if he felt fear or if he pushed through it regardless.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Mike Rowe: “It feels like somebody … shot the First Amendment.” “I think something extraordinary is going to happen in the days and weeks ahead.” “Something that never comes through on those videos—you see a guy in a tent … you see somebody on the other side, and you see the very thing the country was built on.” “Debate, disagreement, and exchange of ideas.” “[Charlie Kirk] went into the lion’s den. He was brave.” “I wonder if he was fearless. I wonder if he was scared. I wonder if he just did it anyway.” @mikeroweworks

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: 'it's it's like somebody put the constitution up on a wall and and shot the First Amendment,' noting portentous signs and mentioning Mary, his partner. Speaker 1 recalls 'the health care CEO get shot. The two people in Minnesota,' calling them assassinations and saying, 'the First Amendment got shot today.' They reference Butler as 'a game of inches' and that 'the country dodged a bullet' before. The slain was 'a friend' and 'a supporter of Microworks' who 'called me a couple of times' and who was 'pushing a boulder up a hill.' Online backlash is acknowledged; condolences to 'his wife Erica and their kids' are offered, with belief that 'he'll be remembered for a long time.' 'He had a future ahead of him. He was only 31 years old.' 'Four years from now, he could have run for president.' He faced 'lion's den'; fearless; he did it anyway.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: To me, it kinda feels like and I I I I said this to Theo too. It's it's like somebody put the constitution up on a wall and and shot the First Amendment, you know? I mean, people who Mary, my partner. She's she's very she's she's never met him. Yeah. You know? And I think I think maybe something extraordinary is going to happen in the days and weeks ahead. I don't know what it is, but it feels portentous. Speaker 1: Look, you had the the health care CEO get shot. The two people in Minnesota Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Get shot. These are assassinations. This wasn't a murder today. This was a a political assassination. This is this is you're right. The First Amendment got shot today. Maybe too. I think a lot of people on both sides of the aisle, I I I don't wanna paint with too broad a brush, but what happened in Butler a year or so ago, Speaker 0: that was a game of inches, maybe an inch. Yeah. And so, you know, people were just like, wow, that the country the country dodged a bullet. Literally and figuratively? Yeah. But they didn't today. Yeah. And I don't wanna turn this into a eulogy so much as an acknowledgement of he I consider him my friend. We only met twice in real life. The last time I saw him was here. He interviewed me a month ago and he was such a supporter of Microworks. Yeah. He he called me a couple of times in the past just to say, hey man, I'm just, you know, I'm out here doing my thing and it's easier for me to do what I do knowing that people like you are doing what you do over there. Mhmm. And we might not agree on everything. We might not see the world the exact same way. But, you know, we're we're pushing a boulder up a hill as best we can. And he was he was actually joyful about it too. It didn't always come across in his videos, but he he was you said kind, but he he was Speaker 1: a happy sort of warrior. Warrior, yeah. You know? I Speaker 0: can see when he that. Latched onto this cause Mhmm. Right? And this is what really breaks my heart. I am I socially, I don't try. I mean, I've been on MSNBC, I've been on CNN Sure. I've been on all of them. But I knew when I shared this and you can you can go my Facebook page and and find the post. It's a month ago. I knew there'd be hell to pay in the comments and it is. And I want I want the people I want the people who were unkind in those comments. I want those comments to stand. I want their names to stand next to them. I want the cheap shots to be there. So I'm not gonna take that down, but but I am gonna say to his wife Erica and their kids, it's just a grief that can't be spoken. I'm just so sorry for it and I believe he'll be remembered for a long time. Speaker 1: Well, I I mean, he had a great future ahead of him. He was only 31 years old. And, you know, four years from now, he could have run for president. And I think a lot of people might have voted for him. Did you see the size of the crowd? It's massive. Speaker 0: Massive. That's another thing that never comes through on those videos. You see a guy in a tent Yeah. With a little bit of security. Right. You see a rope and you see somebody on the other side and you see the very thing the country was built on. Debate, disagreement, and exchange of ideas. Yeah. You know, he went into the lion's den. He he was, you know, Speaker 1: he was brave. Fearless. Yeah. Speaker 0: I wonder if he was fearless. I wonder if he was scared. I wonder if he just did it anyway.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - September 2, 2025 at 9:33 PM

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 8:20 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

There's a significant effort underway to oust RFK Jr., backed by a $2 million plan from the pharmaceutical industry. A leaked memo revealed that former CDC Directors, Senators, and public health experts are targeting him due to his stance against vaccines, which they view as a threat. Critics, including Senator Bernie Sanders, have called for his resignation, citing concerns over his views. Meanwhile, former CDC Directors defend their record, but many argue that public trust in these authorities has eroded. The situation is escalating as RFK Jr. prepares to testify before the Senate.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is a $2 million effort to get RFK Jr. ousted happening right in front of us. A leaked memo EXPOSED the whole plan. Now, it’s happening—and Pharma is holding NOTHING back. CDC bureaucrats are subverting Kennedy. Senators are demanding his resignation. The vaccine industry is lobbying to get him fired. And it’s all about to reach a fever pitch: 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, bookmark this thread above. There is concerted effort from Pharma to get RFK Jr. OUSTED. 2 months ago, a leaked memo EXPOSED the plan. Former CDC Directors, Pharma, Senators, public health “experts,” and the media just launched an all-out assault on MAHA:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In July, the Brownstone Institute EXPOSED a leaked memo from BIO, the lobbying arm for Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson. The memo made their goal clear: “It’s time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go.” Why? Because RFK Jr. and MAHA are a threat to the corrupt vaccine industry. Vaccyte EVP/COO Jim Wassil allegedly stated there is “no opportunity to raise capital in the current environment.” “Investors are sitting on the sidelines for next 6-9 months.” “Vaccine pathway to approval is unpredictable.” @brownstoneinst

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

BIO’s leaked memo REVEALED that they set aside $2 million—half of its $4 million cash reserve—to stop RFK Jr. They planned to target legislators and influencers. The Brownstone Institute noted that the plan “reveals a timeline racing toward” September. It’s now September, and we’re now seeing an all-out PR war from Senators like Bernie Sanders, former CDC Directors, and the media to try and get RFK Jr. ousted from the Trump Administration. Read the Brownstone Institute’s full article exposing this memo here: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-plot-to-get-rfk/ @brownstoneinst

The Plot to Get RFK ⋆ Brownstone Institute On the eve before US Senate reconvenes, a memo plotting removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. leaked. brownstone.org

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

On August 30, Senator Bernie Sanders called for RFK Jr. to resign. His whole argument revolves around Kennedy’s “anti-vaccine views.” He cited the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the World Health Organization to make his case. What do these organizations have in common?🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The American Academy of Pediatrics has received $50K+ from Pfizer, Moderna, Merck, and Sanofi, between $25K - $49K from Eli Lilly, and tens of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The American Medical Association has received $1M+ from Pfizer, between $500K - $999K from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, between $250K - $499K from Novo Nordisk and GSK, and hundreds of thousands more from other Pharma companies. The heart of RFK Jr. and MAHA’s argument against these “expert” public health organizations is that they’re corrupted by Pharma. But Sanders made no attempt to address these concerns. He just regurgitated their talking points.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Now, 9 former CDC Directors just wrote an article slamming RFK Jr. for “endangering every American’s health.” It’s your typical appeal to authority—despite the total collapse of trust in public health authorities since 2020. “Collectively, we spent more than 100 years working at the CDC, the world’s pre-eminent public health agency.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Guess what they held up as a “shining example” of success at HHS and CDC? Operation Warp Speed. But the American people have woken up to the TRUTH: The Covid-19 shots are an unmitigated disaster that ruined countless lives. Even President Trump, who spent 5 years touting Operation Warp Speed as a “brilliant” success, is now listening to RFK Jr. and questioning the lies he was told by Pfizer and Moderna.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The evidence against the safety of Covid-19 shots is now overwhelming. Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared they are “not fit for human use.” Bookmark the thread below—he EXPOSED the TRUTH that no “expert” dares to study:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Florida is going to WAR with Pfizer and Moderna. Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo just declared Covid-19 shots are “not fit for human use.” He EXPOSED the truth—and held nothing back. “They should NOT be going into human beings.” And he has a warning for the Republican Party: “Trying to protect President Trump is not a reason to not take care of MILLIONS of people who have been injured by these mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Next, these 9 former CDC Directors credited the CDC with several major public health accomplishments. This is worth breaking down point by point—because they’re all lies, coverups, or half-truths:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, they claim that US life expectancy rose from 66 years to 78 years since the CDC was created in 1946. Here’s what they didn’t tell you: They’re using outdated numbers. Since 2020, US life expectancy has taken a sharp downward turn, erasing 25 years of slow progress—and it still hasn’t recovered, 5 years later.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Second, they credit the CDC with significantly reducing smoking rates. But there is a much darker side to this story … RFK Jr. has EXPOSED that tobacco companies are responsible for turning our food into addictive “poison.” When smoking rates dropped, tobacco companies started buying up food companies. Then, they engineered our food into the chemical-laden, poisonous, addictive catastrophe that it is today. Kennedy: “By the mid-1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.” “They transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.” “They developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature, that make food more attractive.” “It doesn’t give you nutrition, but you want to eat more and more, so you get obese.” “But at the same time, you get malnourished.” So, while Americans don’t smoke at the rate we did 50 years ago … The same companies that were responsible for that public health issue just turned around and created a much, much larger public health crisis by mass poisoning us with food. That is hardly a “success” for the CDC or public health.

Video Transcript AI Summary

And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And we have something that is unique in human history. We have people who are obese who are at the same time malnourished because the food that we're eating does not is is not nutrient dense anymore. I was involved in tobacco litigation back in the 1980s, late 1980s, and the tobacco companies at that point were the most cash rich companies on earth and they saw the writing on the wall. They saw the regulatory headwinds, and their consumers were were walking away from their product, and they decided to diversify. So they started buying up the food companies. By the mid nineteen nineties, the two biggest food companies in the world were RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris, and they transferred thousands of scientists that were engaged in making tobacco more addictive to do the same thing with food. And they developed in the lab all of these chemicals that are unknown in nature that make food more attractive. It's not food. It's food like substances. So they'll put a strawberry flavor in the food but there is no nutrients that you'd find in a strawberry. Your body is craving that and but it doesn't get filled up and it doesn't give you nutrition, but you wanna eat more and more so you got obese, but at the same time you get malnourished. And they put addictive substances like sugar and sodium and others, monosodium glutinate in our foods and make use so that you don't get satiated and that you constantly want to have more. They realized at some point through all these you know that they could hijack the human brain and different all these nefarious ways, but one of them is that they realize that one of the ways that your brain tells your stomach that it's full is how many times you chew. Oh, they began adding food softeners to our food so that your your brain would be under the illusion that you weren't full. You can inhale 20 Twinkies and still want more as you're not chewing them. And so they've they figured out all these things and they changed our food system in this country. So it is poison to us, and it is poisoning the American people.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Third, they held up the East Palestine chemical spill by Norfolk Southern as a success. This one is SHOCKING. East Palestine is an unmitigated disaster—and top health officials regurgitated Norfolk Southern’s LIES. Reporter Jordan Chariton called it Flint, Michigan 2.0. “They brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride.” “That’s linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women.” “We’re starting to see cancers including male breast cancer, which is fairly rare.” “I’ve talked to fathers who their daughters as young as 7 or 8 are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles … and young boys are starting to get hair that you wouldn’t get until you’re 12, 13, 14.” “The EPA, the federal government, and the state agencies are basically saying, all good, nothing to see here—but the proof is in the residents.” “They’re sick.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

EPA official in East Palestine said, "the railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies." He cited "over a million pounds of vinyl chloride" detonated, "linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women." He argued the EPA should have offered temporary relocation "pretty much right away," noting it’s "totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner." He has visited twice in six months and says, "I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania." We're "already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer," with fathers reporting daughters "as young as seven or eight" starting early puberty and menstrual cycles, and boys getting hair earlier. "Flint two point zero," the agencies are saying, "All good, nothing to see here," but the residents are sick and not getting help.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Yeah. And here is the top EPA official who's been on the ground in East Palestine basically saying, yeah. The railroad company that chemically nuked the town was lying to you, but the EPA echoed those lies. They they said the same thing. So it's very illuminating because they brought people back to town within days of chemically detonating over a million pounds of vinyl chloride that's linked to all sorts of cancers, leukemia, reproductive issues in women. So he's saying, Yeah, when I saw that, I was like, Oh my God, you never say that. But the EPA was echoing the same things. He also acknowledged that the EPA should have offered temporary relocation pretty much right away. Waited a So it's totally unknowable how many people got sick unnecessarily because they weren't relocated sooner. And I'll just say, I mean, I could speak for myself. I've been there twice in the last six months. I've gotten sick both times, and residents are sick, both in Ohio and Pennsylvania. We're already starting to see cancers, including in men, male breast cancer, which is fairly rare. I've talked to fathers who their young daughters, as young as seven or eight, are starting to have early puberty and menstrual cycles, and young boys are starting to get, you know, hair that you wouldn't get until you're like 12, 13, 14. There's all sorts of health issues, but we're seeing kind of, I think, Flint two point zero, where the EPA and the federal government and the state agencies are basically saying, All good, nothing to see here, but the proof is in the residents. They're sick and really they're not getting much help.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Meanwhile, Calley Means just EXPOSED that corrupt CDC bureaucrats are circulating a memo on how to “SUBVERT” RFK Jr. They think the bureaucracy can just overrule the MAHA agenda that Americans voted for. “There is a memo going around at the CDC and HHS about how to subvert President Trump and Secretary Kennedy.” “They are saying that we’re gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.” @calleymeans

Video Transcript AI Summary

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When you get past the rhetoric and actually look at why these people are resigning, look what they're listing that Bobby Kennedy did, it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. So when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. I want everyone watching to know this. There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. They are saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan. The American people have a very, very clear choice. Do you accept their argument that the status quo when it comes to health care in this country is acceptable, or do you support president Trump and Bobby Kennedy who are fighting for reform?

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

There is more evil under the surface of the CDC’s history than you can imagine. This is not just a fight to reform a misguided system—it’s a spiritual war:🧵

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 Is the CDC a DEATH CULT? RFK Jr.’s firing of Susan Monarez exposed what’s been hiding in plain sight for 100 years: A much darker agenda of eugenics, sterilization, and depopulation. The mask is finally DOWN. This is war — and it’s spiritual. 🧵 THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr. is set to testify before the Senate on Thursday. The firing of CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez opened the door to the CDC adopting Kennedy’s vaccine reforms—meaning that Pharma’s push to get him ousted is about to reach a fever pitch. This is a make or break moment for MAHA. Kennedy’s biggest and boldest reforms are finally on the table—and Pharma is throwing millions of dollars into blocking them.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for making it to the end. Before you go, follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for $3/month to support my work! I’m a Gen Z Independent who covers everything from MAHA and health freedom to UFOs and ancient civilizations. https://t.co/ocRnXE30Du

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@Fynnderella1 @RobertKennedyJr Thank you 🙏

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - August 14, 2025 at 11:33 PM

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 8:43 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Nicole Shanahan hosted Leslie Manookian, a former Wall Street executive who left her career after witnessing pharmaceutical corruption. Manookian exposed how companies prioritize profit over safety, particularly regarding mRNA vaccines. She founded the Health Freedom Defense Fund to combat medical mandates, achieving significant victories, including the repeal of federal mask mandates. Manookian criticized a Ninth Circuit ruling that disregarded the effectiveness of vaccines in stopping transmission, and she plans to appeal to the Supreme Court. In 2025, she succeeded in passing Idaho’s Medical Freedom Act, banning most medical mandates.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Nicole Shanahan just hosted the most censored woman in America. This Wall Street executive abandoned her career after a Pharma CEO told her that he knew their new drug would kill people—but “we can still make $7 billion” from it. Now, she is Pharma’s worst nightmare. 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, you’ll want to bookmark this thread above. Ex-Wall Street executive Leslie Manookian just EXPOSED the corruption at the heart of our healthcare system. And she didn’t stop there. She has now dedicated her life to destroying medical mandates:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Leslie Manookian spent years working for Goldman Sachs and Alliance Capital. But she abandoned the finance world after hearing something that felt like “someone had kicked me in the stomach.” Manookian: “The big breakthrough moment for me was when the CEO, the CFO, the head of investor relations, and the head of R&D of one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world came into our office to reassure us about their stock.” Their stock was plummeting. Why? “Rumors were trickling out from their phase three trials—which is the last phase of clinical trials that a drug goes through before it can apply for licensure from the FDA—that this drug was killing people.” “The CEO comes in and he says, ‘a few people have died. It’s very, very rare … the bad news is the FDA is going to make us put a black box warning on our packaging. The good news is, we still think we can do $7 billion in peak sales.’” “I felt like someone had kicked me in the stomach … ” “He knows they’re gonna kill people—but he thinks that I should be happy because the stock’s gonna go back up, and we’re gonna make money.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

An ex-Wall Street executive who worked at Goldman Sachs in New York and London, and later a director at Alliance Capital in London, left his finance career at its peak after seeing health issues in our nation and deciding to act. The breakthrough moment came when the CEO, CFO, head of investor relations, and head of R&D of one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies visited to reassure investors as their stock fell 25–30% amid rumors from phase three trials that the drug was killing people. The CEO said, "a few people have died. It's very, very rare." "the bad news is the FDA is going to make us put a black box warning on our packaging." "The good news is we still think we can do 7,000,000,000 in peak sales." I felt like someone had kicked me in the stomach, knowing they might die while expecting the stock to rebound.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You started as a successful Wall Street executive. You worked at Goldman Sachs in New York and London. And later, you were director at Alliance Capital in London. And you left your finance career at its peak really because you saw something was wrong. You saw something going on with health in our nation, and you wanted to do something about it. What were kind of your first I mean, you're living a pretty good life in New York. What why would you leave to do something that really puts your career livelihood and life itself at at risk? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's it's a crazy story, but there were many things that happened over a period of years. But the really, I would say, big breakthrough moment for me was when the CEO, the CFO, the head of investor relations, and the head of r and d of one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world came into our office to reassure us about their stock. So their stock was plummeting in the stock market. It was down 25 or 30%, and they were going and visiting with their biggest investors to reassure them that their new blockbuster drug was okay. The problem was that rumors were trickling out from their phase three trials, which is the last phase of clinical trials that a drug goes through before it can apply for licensure from the FDA, that this drug was killing people. So the CEO and this whole team, his whole management team comes in, and they're sitting there. And we have I'm in my office in London. I was responsible for essentially interviewing the CEOs and the management teams of these multinational corporations and then deciding whether or not Alliance should put money into those stocks in their European portfolios, international, and global portfolios, and sometimes in our domestic US portfolios. And so the CEO comes in, and he literally with this as the backdrop, there's a speakerphone to New York, our pharmaceutical analyst in London, other portfolio managers, our traders. And he looks across the table at me, he says, a few people have died. It's very, very rare. And he said, without missing a beat, the bad news is the FDA is going to make us put a black box warning on our packaging. The good news is we still think we can do 7,000,000,000 in peak sales. Speaker 0: Wow. Speaker 1: I felt like someone had kicked me in the stomach. I was like, oh my gosh. Like, he knows they're gonna kill people, but he thinks that I should be happy because the stock's gonna go back up and we're gonna make money.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Leslie started the Health Freedom Defense Fund in 2020. Why? She already knew what millions of Americans would learn over the next 5 years: Covid-19 was a planned “operation in order to mandate vaccines and lockdowns.” She saw that authorities had spent 20 years setting to stage to “facilitate an authoritarian response to a so-called public health emergency.” “I wanted to be able to fight back.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

"Let me just say that the reason that I started Health Freedom Defense Fund was because, you know, going way back, I'd been in the Health Freedom space for twenty five years now or twenty years at that point." "And so I founded Health Freedom Defense Fund because I wanted to be able to fight back." "the biggest case, the first huge case that we won well, first, we stopped the Los Angeles Unified School District from mandating the EUA shot for their employees in March 2021." "The day after we filed it, they rescinded their mandate and said, oh, it wasn't really a mandate. It was just a suggestion."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let me just say that the reason that I started Health Freedom Defense Fund was because, you know, going way back, I'd been in the Health Freedom space for twenty five years now or twenty years at that point. And as soon as 2020 opened, I was absolutely certain as much as I could be that what was happening was some kind of an operation in order to mandate vaccines and lockdowns and all these other things. It was a, you know, it was a perfect script given everything they'd put in place for over twenty years to facilitate an authoritarian response to a so called public health emergency. And so I founded Health Freedom Defense Fund because I wanted to be able to fight back. And the biggest case, the first huge case that we won well, first, we stopped the Los Angeles Unified School District from mandating the EUA shot for their employees in March 2021. That was our very, very first lawsuit that we filed. The day after we filed it, they rescinded their mandate and said, oh, it wasn't really a mandate. It was just a suggestion. So that was huge.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

🚨“This is how you make statistics lie … ” Leslie EXPOSED that Pharma was lying about the mRNA shots long before the rest of MAHA caught up. “They were only assessing suppression of symptoms.” “They were using what’s called relative risk instead of absolute risk in order to deem these products safe.” “When you look at absolute risk, you want to know … do you have a 3% chance of getting something after taking the shot, and you had a 30% chance before taking it?” “Relative is before you took the shot, you had a 2% risk, and now you have a 1% risk.” “And they say that’s a 50% improvement.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

"Did you know then that the mRNA vaccine was dangerous? Absolutely. How did you know? So this is 2021. If you read anybody who had looked at the actual data that had been released or understood what they were assessing, they were only assessing suppression of symptoms." "And there were tremendous and they were using what's called relative risk instead of absolute risk in order to deem these products safe." "So when you look at absolute risk, you wanna know how much in percent. So do do you have a three percent chance of getting something after taking the shot and you had a thirty percent chance before taking it? That's absolute relative is before you took the shot, you had a two percent risk, and now you have a one percent risk, and they say that's a 50% improvement. That's how you make statistics lie."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Did you know then that the mRNA vaccine was dangerous? Absolutely. How did you know? So this is 2021. If you read anybody who had looked at the actual data that had been released or understood what they were assessing, they were only assessing suppression of symptoms. And there were tremendous and they were using what's called relative risk instead of absolute risk in order to deem these products safe. So when you look at absolute risk, you wanna know how much in percent. So do do you have a three percent chance of getting something after taking the shot and you had a thirty percent chance before taking it? That's absolute relative is before you took the shot, you had a two percent risk, and now you have a one percent risk, and they say that's a 50% improvement. That's how you make statistics lie.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Since 2020, HFDF has won MAJOR victories on behalf of the health freedom movement. They got the federal travel mask mandate struck down in 2022. Leslie Manookian: “You don’t wear a mask on an airplane because of Health Freedom Defense Fund.” They got the federal mandate for green card applicants to take the Covid shots struck down in 2023. Now, they have a case winding through the courts against the Los Angeles Unified School District’s 2021 Covid-19 shot for employees. The most recent appeal in the Ninth Circuit Court ruled against them—but Leslie promised “it’s not over yet.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Let me just say, first of all, that you don't wear a mask on an airplane because of Health Freedom Defense Fund. We're the organization that challenged and defeated the federal travel mask mandate in 2022, so that's another one of our big cases. And then we have a huge case that's still underway. We just lost the final the last round of our second case against the Los Angeles Unified School District, but it's not over yet. And we defeated the federal mandate that, green card applicants from abroad get the COVID shot just earlier this year. We've had many, many, many, many wins. So I just wanted people to understand, you know, have a little bit of context of who I am.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let me just say, first of all, that you don't wear a mask on an airplane because of Health Freedom Defense Fund. We're the organization that challenged and defeated the federal travel mask mandate in 2022, so that's another one of our big cases. And then we have a huge case that's still underway. We just lost the final the last round of our second case against the Los Angeles Unified School District, but it's not over yet. And we defeated the federal mandate that, green card applicants from abroad get the COVID shot just earlier this year. We've had many, many, many, many wins. So I just wanted people to understand, you know, have a little bit of context of who I am.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

I posted a thread breaking down why the Ninth Circuit’s ruling should terrify you last week. Bookmark the thread below to read next—this ruling will shock you. Now, back to the podcast … 🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

8 California judges just green-lit sweeping medical mandates. Covid-19 was only the beginning. This ruling opens the door to drug mandates, dietary mandates—even mandates on your behavior. One judge dissented and delivered this shocking warning: “I fear we are giving the government a blank check to foist health treatment mandates on the people … ” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Nicole Shanahan: “Can they even be called a vaccine if they don’t stop the spread?” Leslie Manookian: The Ninth Circuit Court ruled that “it doesn’t matter whether or not the shot stops transmission or infection.” “All that matters is that the school district could have assumed that it did.” Even the CDC and CMS admitted that Covid shots do not stop transmission or infection back in 2021. So Leslie and HFDF argued that “they are not a public health issue—they are a therapeutic.” Shanahan: “That’s a terrifying precedent … ” Leslie and HFDF can appeal to the Supreme Court—and they’re considering it. Shanahan: “It seems worthwhile, because that’s a precedent that other lawsuits are going to follow, that it doesn’t matter that the vaccine doesn’t stop spread.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

"we sued them twice in 2021 because first, we sued them over mandating the shot when it was EUA." "The case is no longer ripe. We're not gonna deal with it. We're dismissing the case." "Seventeen days later, LAUSD implemented a new mandate saying that employees could not test, and it fired a couple of weeks later, 500 employees." "we argued that the shots do not stop transmission or infection, and we knew this because CDC said that in 2021. CMS confirmed that in I believe it was October 2021." "All that mattered was that there was a public health emergency." "We can appeal to the Supreme Court, and so we're considering." "It's worthwhile because that's a precedent that other lawsuits are going to follow, that it doesn't matter that the vaccine doesn't stop spread."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And by definition, can they even be called a vaccine if they don't stop the spread of a Speaker 1: right? Well, did you hear about what happened in for Health Freedom Defense Fund last week? I don't know if you're aware of this. Speaker 0: No. I'm I'm not too familiar with your organization. I've I've heard a Speaker 2: little bit about it, but, yeah, tell us. Share. Speaker 1: So, I mentioned that we had sued the Los Angeles Unified School District in 2021. Well, we sued them twice in 2021 because first, we sued them over mandating the shot when it was EUA. And then they basically duped the court into believing that they weren't going to issue a mandate because they had repealed their first one, rescinded it. And then so the court dismissed the case and said, you know, look. There's nothing for us to adjudicate at this point. The case is no longer ripe. We're not gonna deal with it. We're dismissing the case. Seventeen days later, LAUSD implemented a new mandate saying that employees could not test, and it fired a couple of weeks later, 500 employees. It went on to fire or displace more than a thousand in total, and it denied, it said, well, we we accept your religious accept your religious exemption or your medical exemption, but they refused to accommodate them. So they pushed them out. People were pushed out. No pensions. They lost their seniority. They lost everything. They were fired. They lost their jobs. I mean, it was really outrageous. So we filed another lawsuit in November 2021. And in this case, we argued that the shots do not stop transmission or infection, and we knew this because CDC said that in 2021. And CMS confirmed that. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services confirmed that in I believe it was October 2021. And so if they don't stop transmission or infection, we argued, then they are not a public health issue. They are therapeutic. They are a private matter, and they must be treated as such. We also argued that natural immunity is real and that the supreme court case from nineteen o five called Jacobson versus Massachusetts doesn't apply because Jacobson was predicated on the Supreme Court's assumption that the smallpox vaccination was safe and effective because it had been in use for many, many years. Now I will leave that aside because I don't think it was safe or effective, but that's what people claimed, and that's what the court accepted. Speaker 0: That's great. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, we ended up doing super well. At first, it got dismissed, then we had a fantastic argument in front of a three judge panel in the Ninth Circuit on appeal, and they found in our favor. And then there was what's called an en banc review, meaning a broader review of the ninth circuit. And usually, it takes nine to ten, twelve months to get a ruling an opinion or a decision out of the ninth circuit. It took three months to get their decision this time, and they ruled against us last Thursday, July 31. And they said that all that mattered was that there was a public health emergency. I don't think that's true. We are actually argued that COVID was not smallpox. Smallpox had a thirty percent death rate. We knew already by the the time when LUSD mandated their shot that the death rate was in line with the seasonal flu. It was, absurd. It was not a man you know, it was not an emergency anymore. We knew from the 2020 that four percent of Los Angeles County residents had already been exposed and recovered. Literally four percent in in April, April, May 2020. This was known a year in advance. It means everybody's been exposed practically at that point by by, August 2021. And so we argued it's not the same thing, and therefore, Jacobson does not apply. And the court said it doesn't matter whether or not the stop the the shot stops transmission or infection. All that matters is that the school district could have assumed that it did. Speaker 0: Oh, that's terrifying. Speaker 1: Yes. It is, Nicole. Speaker 3: That's a terrifying precedent. Are there any appeals available? Speaker 1: We can appeal to the Supreme Court, and so we're considering. Speaker 0: It seems worthwhile because that's a precedent that other lawsuits are going to follow, that it doesn't matter that the vaccine doesn't stop spread.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Then, Leslie EXPOSED that the Ninth Circuit even “broke their own rules” in their ruling against her. “At the pleading stage … when a plaintiff files a complaint, the court is required to accept all of their plausible claims as true, and to give them the opportunity to prove their case in court.” “What’s happened is the Ninth Circuit has completely violated that precept of the court.” “There is nothing that we have said that is implausible.” “In fact, we have all the evidence that we need.” “They just don’t want the truth to come out, and so they are breaking their own rules.” “We can appeal to the Supreme Court.” “I think we’d get three justices for sure. I’m not sure we would get five.” “I think that the same political pressure that exists on those Ninth Circuit judges may very well exist at the Supreme Court.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

'What Benedict has now left us with is is very, very scary for the entire American judicial system.' 'they broke their own rules' at the pleading stage, noting that 'when a plaintiff files a complaint, the court is required to accept all of their plausible claims as true and to give them the opportunity to prove their case in court.' 'The Ninth Circuit has completely violated that precept of the court' and that 'There is nothing that we have said that is implausible.' In fact, we have all the evidence that we need. They just don't want the truth to come out, and so they are twisting their own in fact, they're just breaking their own rules in doing so. 'We can appeal to the Supreme Court. We absolutely can.' 'I think we'd get three justices for sure' but 'I'm not sure we would get five.'

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And what Benedict has now left us with is is very, very scary for the entire American judicial system. Nicole, I have to insert too here. They broke their own rules. So at the pleading stage, which means you know this, but for your listeners and and viewers, at the when when a plaintiff files a complaint, the court is required to accept all of their plausible claims as true and to give them the opportunity to prove their case in court. What's happened is the Ninth Circuit has completely violated that precept of the court. It's required to do that, and it's not allowing us to prove our case in court. There is nothing that we have said that is implausible. In fact, we have all the evidence that we need. They just don't want the truth to come out, and so they are twisting their own in fact, they're just breaking their own rules in doing so. Now, yes, you're right. We can appeal to the Supreme Court. We absolutely can. And I think we'd get three justices for sure. I'm not sure we would get five. And I think that the same political pressure that exists on those Ninth Circuit judges may very well exist at the Supreme Court, and I see no reason why not.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In April 2025, Leslie Manookian achieved the biggest win for health freedom in modern American history. 🔥 “It’s the first legislation of its kind … in this nation.” Idaho’s Medical Freedom Act BANS almost all medical mandates. No business or school can require ANY medical mandate for employment or attendance. Manookian: “People said there’s no way you’re gonna get a state legislature to ban all mandates of medical interventions.” “We did that with a very few exceptions.” “If you can be forced to take a medical intervention …. why can’t they force you to get pregnant for the greater good if there’s too little population growth?” “Why can’t they force us to take benzos?” “Why can’t they force us to take ADD medication so … we can be more productive at work?” “Why can’t they make us take antidepressants so that we feel happy?”

Video Transcript AI Summary

I brought Idaho Medical Freedom Act this past spring; the governor signed it into law on August 5. It's the first legislation of its kind anywhere in the world, certainly in this nation. People thought it was impossible to ban all medical interventions, with only a few exceptions. I've thought about it for fifteen or twenty years. I looked to a bill banning COVID shot mandates in Idaho and adapted it to craft this legislation. I believed I had moral authority: "Who in the heck believes that they can tell me what to put in my body? Who believes that they can tell me whether or not to carry a baby?" If you can be forced to take a medical intervention, why can't they force you to get pregnant for the greater good if there's too little population growth? This is about having control over our own bodies and the insanity of it.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I think you know that this past spring, I brought legislation in Idaho called the Idaho Medical Freedom Act and ended up getting it passed. The governor signed it into law on August 5, I think it was. Yeah. That was huge. Yeah. It's the first legislation of its kind anywhere in the world that I know of, certainly in this nation, but I've never heard of anything like it in the in the world. But, people thought that it was impossible. People said it'll never happen. People you know, like, there's no way you're gonna get a state legislature to ban all medical of all medical interventions. And we basically did that with a very few exceptions. And what's interesting is when I first started thinking about this well, I've been thinking about it for fifteen or twenty years. But when I really started thinking about how to craft the bill and what to do with it, I looked to existing bills, and there was a bill that banned COVID shot mandates in Idaho. And I thought, I'm just gonna take that. It's already passed. Like, they have to be o okay with that. If they don't think that COVID shot should be mandated, why should anything be mandated? And so I took that, and I just, you know, reoriented, adapted to my needs, and crafted this beautiful piece of legislation, I believe. But what I did was I just believed because I had the moral authority. Who in the heck believes that they can tell me what to put in my body? Who believes that they can tell me whether or not to carry a baby? You know, like I mean, think about it. If you can be forced to take a medical intervention for the greater good, why can't they force you to get pregnant for the greater good if there's too little population growth? Right? This is what happens in brave new world. They decant babies. They grow them for you know, to keep the population going and to create certain strata of of children. I'm not talking about abortion. I'm not talking about anything like that. I'm just saying that it's about having control over our own bodies. If they can force us to take a medical intervention, why can't they force us to take benzos? Why can't they force us to take ADD medication so we're more focused and we can be, you know, more productive at at work? Why can't they make us take antidepressants so that we feel happy and cheery and it benefits society? Right? Like, this is the insanity of it.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for making it to the end. I post all kinds of threads, from MAHA and health freedom to UFOs and ancient civilizations. Follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for just $3/month to support my work! If you want to support Leslie and @theHFDF, you can donate here: https://secure.anedot.com/health-freedom-defense-fund-hfdf/x-donations

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) Join me in supporting Health Freedom Defense Fund Inc secure.anedot.com

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - July 16, 2025 at 12:07 AM

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:47 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m excited about the MAHA Revolution sparked by Thomas Massie's new bill to repeal the PREP Act, which has shielded pharmaceutical companies from liability for Covid-19 vaccine injuries. This act, established in 2005, allowed for legal immunity during public health emergencies, leading to significant issues for those harmed by vaccines. The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program has proven inadequate, with a massive backlog of claims. Massie's bill aims to restore accountability and public trust in health emergencies, challenging the legal protections that have benefited manufacturers at the expense of individual rights.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This is the real MAHA Revolution. Thomas Massie just proposed a bill to repeal Pharma’s liability shield for Covid-19 vaccine injuries. The 2005 PREP Act didn’t just give Pharma a liability shield. It laid the groundwork for Covid-era tyranny. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/nSHbzLEkCh

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, bookmark this thread. This bill would be the most revolutionary pro-MAHA move yet, and it would undo one of the most disastrous laws of the 21st century:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

What is the PREP Act? The PREP Act was passed in 2005. It gives the HHS Secretary the authority to declare a public health emergency, and it provides a liability shield for the manufacture, distribution, and use of “medical countermeasures”—such as vaccines. https://t.co/QWKuq5700U

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In 2020, Trump’s HHS Secretary Alex Azar used the PREP Act to declare a Covid-19 emergency. Covid-19 shots and tests were thus given legal immunity from the harms they cause under the PREP Act. https://t.co/yecnSNasiu

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Instead of legal recourse, Americans injured by Covid-19 shots must apply for compensation through the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). As of June 2025, the CICP has paid out just over $600K to Americans injured by Covid-19 shots, plus one outlier of $2.5 million to an individual who likely got thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Kyle Warner, who was himself injured a Covid-19 shot, revealed that the CICP is totally broken last year. “Every vaccine dose that’s given … $0.75 gets taken out and put into that program.” “Right now, it has a $4.3 billion surplus ready to help vaccine-injured Americans.” “However, that program is very broken.” “There’s 8 judges called special masters. Right now, they have 5,000 claims outstanding.” “So they’re just getting this massive backlog.” @patrickbetdavid @KyleWarnerX

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) are taxpayer funded. The VICP currently has a $4.3 billion surplus to aid vaccine-injured Americans. However, the VICP is struggling with a backlog of 5,000 non-COVID related claims, which are reviewed by only eight special masters. HR 5142, a bill aiming to modernize the program and update compensation, is projected to cost $10-20 billion. Democrats are hesitant to support the bill due to its vaccine association, while Republicans are unwilling to allocate the necessary funds. This leaves those seeking compensation in a difficult position, as pharmaceutical companies are protected and the government is reluctant to take responsibility.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The CICP is taxpayer funded, so the countermeasures program is taxpayer funded. The vaccine injury compensation program, every vaccine dose that's given to people in America, 75¢ gets taken out and put into that program. Right now, it has a $4,300,000,000 surplus in that program ready to help vaccine injured Americans. However, that program is very broken in the sense that there's eight judges. They're called special masters. So right now, they have 5,000 claims outstanding for non COVID related ones, and there's only eight people that hear those cases. And so they're just getting this massive backlog. So that's the bill, HR five one four two, from, Doggett, who's a house representative. They've been working on trying to remodernize that program and update the compensation, but that's a projected 10 to $20,000,000,000 cost. And, essentially, the Democrats that we've talked to don't really wanna be associated with it because it's vaccine related, and it's kind of iffy. And then the Republicans don't wanna spend the money. So we're just kinda stuck in this zone where the government has no accountability or no reason to help us. The pharma companies are protected, and, basically, no one wants to touch a hot potato, so we're just stuck in the middle.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Now, Thomas Massie has introduced the PREP Repeal Act. “Liability shields granted under [the PREP Act] have undermined public trust and accountability during public health emergencies.” “The ability of citizens to seek redress for injury or harm is a fundamental principle of justice and due process.” “The PREP Act has enabled regulatory capture and legal immunity for pharmaceutical manufacturers at the expense of individual rights.” @RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In 1986, Congress also gave vaccine manufacturers a legal liability shield for any harms caused by their products. This law, like the 2005 PREP Act, has had disastrous consequences—including the introduction of mRNA shots. Dr. Suzanne Humphries: “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” @joerogan @DrSuzanneH7

Video Transcript AI Summary

The National Child Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 followed the 1976 swine flu vaccine situation, where vaccine companies sought government indemnification due to numerous injury lawsuits. The 1986 act shifted lawsuit coverage to taxes, initially promising compensation for those who "take one for the team." Over time, eligibility for compensation narrowed. This indemnification led to increased wealth and creativity for vaccine companies, allowing the addition of adjuvants to stimulate the immune system, which made messenger RNA vaccines possible. Vaccine trials are now considered a joke, with no accepted vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies using a saline placebo. Existing studies often compare vaccines against other vaccines. Saline placebo studies allegedly reveal that vaccines can make individuals more susceptible to the disease.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Do you think it's the immunity to any legal consequences that has allowed them to sort of operate like this? Speaker 1: Well, we certainly saw an explosion of their creativity since 1986. So '19 actually, in 1986, you're you're referring to the National Child Vaccine Injury Act that was passed in 1986. But before 1986, we had 1976, which was the swine flu vaccine fiasco. And that was that was a situation where there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance. And so they went to the government and they said, we need you to indemnify us, and they did. And so the government absorbed all the lawsuit cases that happened as result of the Guillain Barre that happened from then. And so that kinda set a precedent for 1986. So back then, vaccines were just kind of, you know, pieces of microbe or maybe a live attenuated virus, and then they would put a background of all kinds of hard things inside of it and tell you it was just a clear, beautiful, pure solution, but that's beside the point. So then 1986 comes along because there's so many lawsuits happening because of the diphtheria pertussis tetanus vaccine that, again, the vaccine companies couldn't continue to go on the way they were because they were being sued so much. So then this this horrible act was passed, which to some people seemed like a good idea. And this is always how it goes is we're gonna make you this promise. Yes. Yes. Yes. We're gonna we're gonna cover all the lawsuits now out of taxes, but it's gonna be okay because we're gonna we're gonna pay out these lawsuits, and you're gonna be fine. If you if your kid takes one for the team, you're gonna be okay. And what happens is after time, after they get their foot in the door, they narrow down the they they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you're eligible. And so the qualification tables got narrowed down because in the beginning, they were paying out so much of this. So not only did it make the vaccine companies very, very wealthy and indemnify, but as you alluded to just a minute ago, ago, the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded. So after that, they could add different, what we call, adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine works better. Then they start that's why we're able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today, which which that wouldn't have happened if it weren't for this indemnification that, you know, the vaccine trials have always been a bit of a joke, but they're even more of a joke today than they were in the beginning. I mean, we've never seen a vaccinated, unvaccinated, study that that is accepted by the powers that be as, you know, good enough. The the the vaccinated, unvaccinated studies that they have, they use another vaccine for. You probably know that. So if you're testing a measles vaccine, you know, you could test it against a diphtheria vaccine or a flu shot vaccine is tested against a hepatitis a vaccine. There's no saline placebo because the few studies that exist with saline placebos show how bad the vaccine actually is and how it makes you not only not respond to the disease when it comes around, but more susceptible to it in many cases.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for reading—I post all kinds of threads on MAHA, UFOs, ancient civilizations, and more. Follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for just $3/month to support my work and access exclusive threads—coming soon! https://t.co/DRXINhZaZn

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - June 21, 2025 at 1:05 AM

Saved - June 21, 2025 at 4:13 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m concerned about the push for a liability shield for pesticide manufacturers, similar to the one for vaccine makers in 1986, which had disastrous public health consequences. Experts like Chuck Benbrook warn that reliance on pesticides hasn't improved over decades, and glyphosate is now linked to serious health issues, including leukemia. Despite organic diets, glyphosate exposure is pervasive. We need to rethink our agricultural policies to avoid further harm to public health and the environment. The situation feels dire, and the implications for future generations are alarming.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Nicole Shanahan just exposed something that worries her as much as mRNA shots—and it threatens RFK Jr.’s entire legacy. Big Agriculture is lobbying D.C. to give them a liability shield for causing cancer and other harms with pesticides. “It feels like a concerted effort to destroy this country.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Bookmark this thread—RFK Jr.’s entire legacy could be on the line if this liability shield passes. Monsanto/Bayer is hitting back after being forced to pay billions to Americans harmed by glyphosate:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Chuck Benbrook has dedicated decades to fighting against pesticide use. So Nicole Shanahan asked him: “Are things getting better or worse?” His answer was blunt—“Unfortunately, I don’t think they’re getting better.” “I think American farmers are as reliant on pesticides for pest control as they were 30-40 years ago … and the adverse effects of pesticides on the pests themselves has really become a huge problem.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

Chuck Benbrook states that American farmers are as reliant on pesticides as they were 30-40 years ago. Pesticides seem like a simple solution for farmers dealing with weeds, insects, or plant diseases and have created a profitable industry. Farmers have become overly reliant on them, and the adverse effects of pesticides on the pests themselves has become a huge problem.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Chuck Benbrook, thank you so much for joining me today on Back to the People podcast. You are an American agricultural economist, researcher, consultant. You are an advocate for organic agriculture. And our topic today, I think our primary topic is going to be glyphosate, the most popular pesticide used in The United States. But before we get into that, you've dedicated your whole career to this work fighting against pesticide use, knowing the risk to human health, the risk of cancer. You've been involved in multiple litigations as an expert. But, you know, you've you've been doing this for decades. Are things getting better or worse? Speaker 1: That's a good question. Unfortunately, I don't think they're getting better. I think American farmers are as reliant on pesticides for pest control as they were thirty years ago, forty years ago when I started my career working on national pesticide law and regulation and science. The pesticides have a They're very seductive for farmers. They seem like a simple solution to dealing with weeds or insects or plant diseases, and they've certainly created a profitable industry that provides a wide range of products. And unfortunately, farmers have become overly reliant on them and the adverse effects of pesticides on the pests themselves has really become a huge problem.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The pesticide industry is trying to get Congress to pass a liability shield so you can’t sue them for harms caused by their products. Sound familiar? Congress passed the same liability shield for vaccine manufacturers in 1986—and it was catastrophic for public health. Shanahan: “Glyphosate, to me, is … just as bad as the mRNA vaccine in terms of human health and lack of government accountability.” “The 1986 vaccine safety Act gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers such that if you’re injured by a vaccine, you can’t directly sue the manufacturer.” “And they’re trying to do that same thing with glyphosate right now.” Benbrook: “The pesticide industry is working very hard to try to change federal and state laws so that pesticide companies can’t be sued in state court over harms from pesticides that weren’t properly disclosed.” “Consumers need to understand that under federal law, the pesticide manufacturers are responsible for what goes on the label.” “A lot of people think EPA writes those labels. That’s not true.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

The MAHA movement highlighted organic food. Glyphosate is considered as harmful as the mRNA vaccine, citing a lack of disclosures and government accountability. The 1986 Vaccine Safety Act gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers, requiring those injured by vaccines to go through a special government court process. The pesticide industry is trying to change federal and state laws to prevent pesticide companies from being sued in state court for harms from pesticides that weren't properly disclosed on the label. Pesticide manufacturers are responsible for what goes on the label, not the EPA. The companies must provide use directions, precautionary statements, and warnings on the label so users can use the product safely.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, and so here comes the MAHA movement where organic food was highlighted. And, you know, glyphosate to me is is one of these things that's just as bad as the mRNA vaccine in terms of human health and lack of disclosures and also lack of government accountability. The 1986 Vaccine Immunity Act, or it was called the Vaccine Safety Act, gave immunity to vaccine manufacturers such that if you're injured by a vaccine since 1986, you can't directly sue the manufacturer. You have to go through this special government court process, which is very slow, much more difficult than going through a typical superior court or state or federal court. And they're trying to do that same thing with glyphosate right now. Isn't that right? Speaker 1: Well, pesticide industry is working very hard to try to change federal and state laws so that pesticide companies can't be sued in state court over harms from pesticides that weren't properly disclosed and prevented through the provisions that go on a pesticide product label. Consumers need to understand that under federal law, the pesticide manufacturers are responsible for what goes on the label. A lot of people think, oh, well, EPA writes those labels. That's not true. EPA establishes what has to be covered in the labels and often will specify the size of an information box and the font and etcetera. But it's the companies that have to put the use directions, the precautionary statements and the warnings on the label in order to provide users with the knowledge that they need to use the product safely and not apply them in a way that's gonna either harm themselves or animals that live in and around the fields or their neighbors.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The 1986 vaccine law was a catastrophe. Dr. Suzanne Humphries EXPOSED its dire consequences to Joe Rogan—including the introduction of mRNA shots in 2021. “Before 1986 … there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance.” “So they went to the government and said, we need you to indemnify us.” “After they get their foot in the door, they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible” for compensation. “The qualification tables got narrowed down, because in the beginning, they were paying out so much.” “Not only did it make the vaccine companies very wealthy and indemnified, but the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.” “After that, they could add different adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine ‘works better.’” “That’s why we’re able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today.” “That wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for this indemnification.” @joerogan @DrSuzanneH7

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that the 1986 National Child Vaccine Injury Act led to an explosion of creativity in vaccine development due to the immunity from legal consequences it provided to vaccine companies. Before 1986, the 1976 swine flu vaccine fiasco, which resulted in numerous lawsuits and the government indemnifying vaccine companies, set a precedent. The 1986 act, passed due to lawsuits related to the diphtheria pertussis tetanus vaccine, shifted lawsuit coverage to taxes. Over time, the qualifications for compensation narrowed, enriching vaccine companies and allowing them to add adjuvants to stimulate the immune system. This indemnification paved the way for mRNA vaccines. Vaccine trials are now considered a joke, with accepted vaccinated-unvaccinated studies using other vaccines as placebos. Saline placebos are avoided because existing studies allegedly reveal the vaccines' ineffectiveness and increased susceptibility to disease.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Do you think it's the immunity to any legal consequences that has allowed them to sort of operate like this? Speaker 1: Well, we certainly saw an explosion of their creativity since 1986. So '19 actually, in 1986, you're you're referring to the National Child Vaccine Injury Act that was passed in 1986. But before 1986, we had 1976, which was the swine flu vaccine fiasco. And that was that was a situation where there was so much injury that the vaccine producing companies were no longer able to get insurance. And so they went to the government and they said, we need you to indemnify us, and they did. And so the government absorbed all the lawsuit cases that happened as a result of the Guillain Barre that happened from then. And so that kinda set a precedent for 1986. So back then, vaccines were just kind of, you know, pieces of microbe or maybe a live attenuated virus, and then they would put a background of all kinds of hard things inside of it and tell you it was just a clear, beautiful, pure solution, but that's beside the point. So then 1986 comes along because there's so many lawsuits happening because of the diphtheria pertussis tetanus vaccine that, again, the vaccine companies couldn't continue to go on the way they were because they were being sued so much. So then this this horrible act was passed, which to some people seemed like a good idea. And this is always how it goes is we're gonna make you this promise. Yes. Yes. Yes. We're gonna we're gonna cover all the lawsuits now out of taxes, but it's gonna be okay because we're gonna we're gonna pay out these lawsuits, and you're gonna be fine. If you if your kid takes one for the team, you're gonna be okay. And what happens is after time, after they get their foot in the door, they narrow down the they they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you're eligible. And so the qualification tables got narrowed down because in the beginning, they were paying out so much of this. So not only did it make the vaccine companies very, very wealthy and indemnified, but as you alluded to just a minute ago, the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded. So after that, they could add different, what we call, adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine works better. Then they start that's why we're able to be in a messenger RNA vaccine situation today, which which that wouldn't have happened if it weren't for this indemnification that, you know, the vaccine trials have always been a bit of a joke, but they're even more of a joke today than they were in the beginning. I mean, we've never seen a vaccinated, unvaccinated study that's that is accepted by the powers that be as, you know, good enough. The the the vaccinated unvaccinated studies that they have, they use another vaccine for. You probably know that. So if you're testing a measles vaccine, you know, you could test it against a diphtheria vaccine or a flu shot vaccine is tested against a hepatitis a vaccine. There's no saline placebo because the few studies that exist with saline placebos show how bad the vaccine actually is and how it makes you not only not respond to the disease when it comes around, but more susceptible to it in many cases.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr. famously won billions of dollars in settlements against Monsanto over glyphosate non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Now, a new study links glyphosate to leukemia. Benbrook: “There’s a new study coming out in just a matter of days linking glyphosate … to leukemia.” “When spray solution falls on human skin, it moves through the skin into the bloodstream.” “About 10% of cardiac output at all times is being pumped through bone marrow.” “Bone marrow is where all of our very specialized cells called hematopoietic stem cells are.” “These are the cells that make our new white blood cells, our red blood cells, our platelets.” “So when glyphosate is in the bloodstream, it flows right into bone marrow and it can come in contact with these hematopoietic stem cells right as they begin to differentiate and either become a white blood cell or a red blood cell.” “What scientists have now shown very clearly is that glyphosate causes a mutation in that change in DNA as a stem cell begins to become a white blood cell.” “So it’s really the ability of glyphosate to disrupt DNA replication.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook @RobertKennedyJr

Video Transcript AI Summary

Glyphosate exposure, particularly from Roundup, is strongly linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and a new study suggests a link to leukemia. Other blood cancers and cancers may also be related to glyphosate exposure. When glyphosate-based herbicides contact skin, surfactants facilitate glyphosate's entry into the bloodstream. Because 10% of cardiac output flows through bone marrow, glyphosate can then contact hematopoietic stem cells, which are responsible for producing new blood cells. Glyphosate disrupts DNA replication in bone marrow as new blood cells are formed. Scientists have demonstrated that glyphosate causes a mutation in the DNA of stem cells as they differentiate into white blood cells. This mutation triggers abnormal cell growth, potentially leading to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and leukemia.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The non Hodgkin's lymphoma that's popping up in so many people that have glyphosate poisoning. What are the pathways that this cancer travels? Like, what is it about glyphosate that causes this cancer? Is it just this cancer or are there others? Speaker 1: The evidence is strongest linking exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate based herbicides like Roundup, which is the best known trade name, with non Hodgkin's lymphoma. But there's a new study coming out in just a matter of days linking glyphosate and glyphosate based herbicides to leukemia. And it's certainly possible that there are other blood cancers and perhaps other cancers that where exposure to glyphosate, especially relatively high exposures over a long period of time, contribute to new cases of cancer. The mechanism through which Roundup and glyphosate causes cancer, it's actually fairly simple. When spray solution falls on human skin, it moves through the skin into the bloodstream. And really for the same reason that when farmers spray a glyphosate based herbicide on weeds, it has to move through the epidermis of the weed to get inside of the plant to kill it. And so the so called surfactants or inert ingredients that are used to manufacture a glyphosate based herbicide actually accelerate the movement of the glyphosate that lands on an applicator's skin into their bloodstream. Once it's in their bloodstream, about 10% of cardiac output at all times is being pumped through bone marrow. Bone marrow is where all of our, a very specialized cell called hematopoietic stem cells, These are the cells that make our new white blood cells, our red blood cells, our platelets. They're manufacturing in our bodies every day we're alive literally billions of new cells. So these are very active tissues with a lot of DNA replication going on and a lot of differentiation. And so when glyphosate is in the bloodstream, it flows right into bone marrow and the glyphosate then can come in contact with these hemato poetic stem cells right as they begin to differentiate and either become a white blood cell or a red blood cell. And that differentiation, it actually requires a mutation in the DNA of that cell. And what scientists have now shown very clearly is that glyphosate causes a mutation in that change in DNA as a stem cell begins to become a white blood cell that triggers abnormal cell growth that can lead to non hodgkin's lymphoma. So it's really the ability of glyphosate to disrupt DNA replication in people's bone marrow, as their new blood cells are being formed. That's where nonhondrosophoma and leukemia start.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Benbrook revealed that glyphosate is so common now that it’s almost impossible to avoid—even if you eat an all-organic diet. Shanahan: “I’m hearing from a lot of parents who are on all-organic diets … and their family members have really high levels of glyphosate coming back in their urine analysis.” “What’s going on?” Benbrook: “It’s certainly possible that there could be some glyphosate in the tap water.” “It’s possible that there could be some in the air if they’re in an area where there’s a lot of spraying going on.” “Glyphosate is so ubiquitous in the environment and in the food supply now, it’s very hard to completely avoid.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

Parents who eat all organic diets are showing high levels of glyphosate in urine analysis. It is unclear how glyphosate is getting into people who buy all organic at the grocery store, especially when they do not use Roundup. Glyphosate could be in the water system from tap water or baths, or in the air if they live in an area where there is a lot of spraying. It is difficult to avoid glyphosate completely through the American diet. Glyphosate is ubiquitous in the environment and in the food supply, making it hard to completely avoid.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So I'm hearing from a lot of parents who are on all organic diets, eat super clean, and their family members have really high levels of glyphosate coming back in their urine analysis. What's going on? How is it? Where is it getting into people who are going to the grocery store buying all organic? You know, where where is it coming from? And if their yards are, you know, I I know some of these families, their yards are all natural where they use they for sure don't use any Roundup. But like, is it coming in through the water system? Like, if they're taking baths or drinking tap water? Speaker 1: It's certainly possible that there there could be some glyphosate in the water. It's possible that there could be some in the air if they're in an area where there's a lot of spraying going on. But, you know, it's very difficult to avoid glyphosate completely through the American diet. Now, I suppose that there are some people that are able to find all of their food organic. And when they go to a restaurant, they also only will seek out organic food. But glyphosate is so ubiquitous in the environment and in the food supply now, it's very hard to completely avoid.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

No—Americans will not starve without widespread pesticide use. Benbrook: “Farmers in Europe that grow basically the same varieties of corn and soybeans as farmers in America, but in Europe, they don’t use genetically-engineered seeds and they don’t spray Roundup at anywhere near the rate and volumes that are common in the US.” “Farmers can manage weeds with far less herbicide.” “Organic farmers manage weeds without any herbicides. Do they have to do some different things? Yes, they spend less money on herbicides and more money on other practices that are known to also be effective.” “We need a substantial reboot in our agricultural policies and agricultural subsidies and research priorities.” “This is not going to happen overnight, and it’s only going to happen if the leadership in the country, in the Congress, in the executive branch, in the universities, and in the commodity groups comes to accept the fact that things aren’t going all that well in parts of American agriculture.” “What farmers are being forced to do to keep up with weeds that are increasingly resistant to herbicides is spray more herbicides.” “And spraying more herbicides is just accelerating and worsening the degradation of soil health and the productivity of our soils.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

Farmers in Europe achieve similar corn and soybean yields without the heavy use of genetically engineered seeds and Roundup common in the US. While Roundup is among the least toxic herbicides, alternatives exist, though many are not safer. Organic farmers avoid herbicides altogether, opting for different, effective practices. The US's reliance on herbicides is a choice sanctioned by regulatory agencies, but it's not the only way to control weeds. Reducing herbicide dependence, restoring soil health, and diversifying crop rotations require a significant overhaul of agricultural policies, subsidies, and research priorities. Despite agricultural innovations, weed management is failing, leading to increased herbicide use, which degrades soil health and exposes people to potentially unsafe chemicals. A shift in mindset is needed across government, universities, and commodity groups to acknowledge and address these issues.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So, Chuck, the question that members of Congress are being forced to ask themselves is, do we allow a segment of the population a small, reasonably small, there's been about a 180,000 glyphosate lawsuits, probably many more hundreds of thousands seriously impacted by glyphosate. But the risk reward is that without glyphosate, people will starve. That's the argument. How do we argue if you had to go before a senate hearing tomorrow? How would you argue that it is much more important for us to farm healthy and maybe produce less than it is to continue on course as we are today. Speaker 1: Well, I I think one really important thing is to point out that farmers in Europe that grow the same, basically the same varieties of corn and soybeans as farmers in America. But in Europe, they don't use genetically engineered seeds and they don't spray Roundup at anywhere near the rate and volumes that are common in The US. And corn and soybean farmers are just as productive in Europe. The fact of the matter is, I mean, farmers that want to use herbicides, there are many alternatives. Unfortunately, not many of them are any safer than Roundup. I mean, if you're going to use a herbicide, Roundup is one of the least toxic ones, and there's certainly far more toxic ones, including Paraquat, which is clearly implicated in Parkinson's disease in The US and around the world. Farmers can manage weeds with far less herbicide. There's no question about it. Organic farmers manage weeds without any herbicides. And, you know, do they have to do some different things? Yes. They spend less money on herbicides and spraying them and more money on other practices that are known to also be effective. So the degree of dependence on herbicides in The United States, it's a choice that we've made, and it's an agricultural technology that's been approved by the government and sanctioned by regulatory agencies, And unfortunately, it's the only way a lot of farmers know how to control weeds. So to substantially reduce reliance on herbicides in The United States and to really begin to restore soil health and get farmers growing more diverse rotations, are needed for lots of different reasons, we need a substantial reboot in our agricultural policies and agricultural subsidies and research priorities. This is not gonna happen overnight. And it's only gonna happen if the leadership in the country, in the Congress, in the executive branch, in the universities, and in the commodity groups comes to accept the fact that things aren't going all that well in parts of American agriculture today, the tremendous successes that have been achieved by agricultural innovation and technology. Weed management's falling apart and what farmers are being forced to do to keep up with weeds that are increasingly resistant to herbicides is spray more herbicides. And spraying more herbicides is just accelerating and worsening the degradation of soil health and the productivity of our soils. And it's leading to exposures to most people the country on a near daily basis to a broad class of chemicals, some of which are not safe.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Then, Benbrook dropped a bombshell. He revealed that in Europe, glyphosate products were already forced to switch to safer formulas—just like food companies already use natural ingredients in Europe instead of the chemical dyes they use in America. “They did it in 2017.” “The glyphosate-based herbicides, including Roundup, being sold in the 28 countries of the EU is much safer than the Roundup that’s still being sold in the US.” “They can be regulated much more safely.” “For example, one of the initiatives that I know the MAHA advocates in DC are hoping to be able to bring into regulation is ending the spraying of Roundup and other herbicides right before the harvest of grain crops and bean crops.” “It’s called pre-harvest crop desiccation. That’s what accounts for most of the dietary exposure for the general public.” “By reducing the use of glyphosate-based herbicides by maybe 2% or 3%, we can eliminate 95% of the exposure across 330 million Americans.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

Other companies may reformulate Roundup to be safer, as Bayer has done in Europe due to EU regulations in 2017. Glyphosate-based herbicides sold in the EU are allegedly much safer than those in the US, with adequate warnings. Roundup and similar herbicides can purportedly be used and regulated more safely. A key initiative involves ending the pre-harvest spraying of herbicides on grain and bean crops, which is said to account for most dietary exposure. This practice allows farmers to harvest earlier but is barely economical. Crop insurance could cover potential losses from inclement weather, negating the need for pre-harvest spraying. Eliminating this practice could reduce glyphosate-based herbicide use by 2-3% and decrease exposure across the US population by 95%. The USDA and EPA are being urged to end these pre-harvest uses, as potential farmer losses can allegedly be covered in other ways, significantly reducing public exposure and risk.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And then the other companies will say, well, we are going to reformulate Roundup to make it safer, just as Bayer has done in Europe, forced by the European Union regulators. They did it in 2017. So the glyphosate based herbicides, including Roundup being sold in the 28 countries of the EU, is much safer than Roundup that's still being sold in The US. They'll put adequate warnings on. They'll not tell people that it's so safe that you can drink it. Roundup and glyphosate based herbicides can be used much more safely than they have been. They can be regulated much more safely. For example, one of the initiatives that I know the MAHA advocates in DC are hoping to be able to bring into federal law and regulation is ending the spraying of Roundup and other herbicides right before the harvest of grain crops and bean crops. It's called pre harvest crop desiccation. That's what accounts for most of the dietary exposure for the general public. But it's a very small portion of overall glyphosate use. And for the farmers, it's, you know, it's kind of an insurance payment. It allows them to harvest their wheat crop or their oat crop sometimes a week or more before they otherwise would be able to so that they avoid a fall rain, but it it's it's a barely economical application. And frankly, we we have crop insurance programs that pay farmers when inclement weather comes and knocks a crop down. And I think, you know, I hope that the the policymakers, you know, working with the MAHA community in in Washington understand that it would be a very simple thing to cover farmers who are worried about these early fall rains knocking their wheat crop down and and, reducing the yield and reducing the quality, which would cost them some income. Yes, it would. But crop insurers can pay for that, can cover that. And probably for many farmers, it already would. So there's really there's no economic argument that there's a benefit to farmers that is in play with this. And just think, you know, reducing the use of glyphosate based herbicides by maybe two or 3%, you know, we can eliminate 95% of the exposure across three thirty million Americans. To me, that seems like, you know, kind of a no brainer. And so I know that Secretary Kennedy and some of the other folks that are working on the MAHA agenda are trying to get the USDA and the EPA to buy into this idea and end these pre harvest uses of herbicides because it's really not that important for farmers. The potential loss can be covered in other ways, and it would be a significant reduction in exposure and risk for the entire American public.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Nicole Shanahan: “It almost feels like a concerted effort to destroy this country … ” Benbrook: “There are some people that are very concerned about the impact of pesticides and other toxic chemicals on reproductive outcomes.” “Some scientists have predicted that if the trend in degradation of sperm quality continues for another 20 or 30 years, live births will become rare.” “The Handmaid’s Tale—maybe it’s not just science fiction or a basis for a compelling TV series.” Shanahan: “It was a warning. It was a prediction.” Benbrook: “The pesticide industry [has] been successful in muting that message and undermining that science so that the US is not doing really anything substantive to improve reproductive outcomes, despite the fact that we’re on this slippery slope heading to where we won’t be able to replace our population.” @NicoleShanahan @chuckbenbrook

Video Transcript AI Summary

Some people are concerned about the impact of pesticides and toxic chemicals on reproductive outcomes. Some countries' birth rates are insufficient to maintain their populations. Trends indicate declining sperm quality in developed countries, particularly in Europe and the US. Some scientists predict that if sperm quality degradation continues for 20-30 years, live births will become rare. The speaker suggests that "The Handmaiden's Tale" may not just be science fiction, but a warning. They claim the pesticide industry and farm groups have muted the message and undermined the science. The speaker asserts that the United States is doing nothing substantive to improve reproductive outcomes, and is on a slippery slope toward not being able to replace its population, potentially becoming dependent on immigration.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It almost feels like a concerted effort to destroy this country. There are some people that are very concerned about the impact of pesticides and other toxic chemicals on reproductive outcomes. You know, there are countries in the world where the birth rate is not sufficient to maintain their population. And the trends in the decline in sperm quality in developed countries, and particularly Europe and The US where the data is very good, some scientists have predicted that if the trend in degradation of sperm quality continues for another twenty or thirty years, live births will become rare. I mean, The Handmaiden's Tale, maybe it's not just science fiction or a basis for a compelling TV series. I mean, just- It was a warning. It was a Yeah, it is a warning, and somehow, you know, pesticide industry and the farm groups that believe in their souls that pesticides are safe, they've been successful in muting that message and undermining that science so that The United States is not doing really anything substantive to improve reproductive outcomes despite the fact that we're on this slippery slope heading to where we won't be able to replace our population, and heaven forbid, we'll be dependent on immigration. I mean, isn't that going to be a tough one?

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Thanks for reading—I post all kinds of threads on MAHA, UFOs, and much more. Follow me @Holden_Culotta and Subscribe for just $3/month to support my work! https://t.co/nFDdABnnrb

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - June 1, 2025 at 12:13 AM

Saved - June 1, 2025 at 10:07 AM

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A secret government program found an extraterrestrial civilization on the dark side of the Moon in 1975. They saw “towers, machinery, lights of different colors, strange-looking buildings” … … and humanoids that “looked exactly like us.” Allegedly. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/rFjQdaDUog

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - April 7, 2025 at 10:47 PM

Saved - April 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been following the intense discussions surrounding RFK Jr.'s recent posts about the MMR vaccine and its alleged links to autism. There's a lot happening behind the scenes, including the resignation of the FDA's top vaccine regulator. Kennedy's campaign is focused on exposing hidden data about vaccine injuries and revamping CDC policies. Meanwhile, significant legislative changes are occurring, like Idaho's Medical Freedom Act, which bans medical mandates, and Iowa's push to end vaccine manufacturers' immunity from lawsuits. The movement is gaining traction, but challenges remain.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

𝕏 is losing it over RFK Jr.’s measles post. Meanwhile, FDA’s top vaccine regulator just resigned. Turns out Kennedy plans to EXPOSE hidden data on MMR injuries. There is a lot more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye … 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK’s own 2024 campaign was touched by tragedy over the MMR shot. Nicole Shanahan revealed that her daughter was diagnosed with autism after the shot. “I swear to God, I gave birth to a healthy baby girl.” “And then she got a shot at 7 months of age, and by 10 months she was a different kid.” @NicoleShanahan @TuckerCarlson

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker, an early AI developer and techno optimist from Silicon Valley, discusses how her daughter's autism diagnosis led her to a different understanding. Her daughter was healthy until she received a shot at seven months old, after which she changed. The speaker experienced grief and confusion, compounded by the inability to discuss the possibility of a vaccine reaction due to societal constraints. She mentions Andy Wakefield, who was canceled for suggesting the MMR vaccine causes gut inflammation in some children, leading to autism-like symptoms. The speaker felt isolated, especially during COVID, and this isolation, combined with the challenges of raising her daughter, brought her to a point of utter destruction. She states that this experience either leads to isolation or transforms one into a "warrior mom."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: How did that suffering bring you to an understanding of God? You know, I think that we are all put on this planet to learn things and see things in a very unique perspective. I was living a very comfortable life in Silicon Valley. I was an early AI developer. I was a techno optimist. And my daughter was diagnosed with autism when she was 18 of age. And I swear to God, I gave birth to a healthy baby girl. It was all I ever wanted was this healthy baby girl and she was healthy. I mean, she smiled, she did all these things. She was healthy. And then she got a shot at seven months of age and by 10, she was a different kid. And I had an enormous amount of grief, but then sudden the confusion because I was not allowed to consider the fact that the shot caused anything. Andy Wakefield is here guys. He's right there. Andy Wakefield, if you don't know him, was canceled twenty five years ago for pointing out that the MMR causes gut inflammation in certain children, which leads to symptoms like autism. He's a big deal. So my grief was also a very lonely period because no one around me could be someone I could trust with even this notion that perhaps the shot caused an adverse reaction. This is a no go for progressives. You cannot talk about these things amongst these communities. And the loneliness plus COVID, because this happened around COVID too, led me to a place of utter destruction. And I was alone in that, process. And, we don't have to talk about my ex husband. It's very therapeutic to be here. It's kind of like therapy right now. You know, coming out of that completely alone with a child that you feel helpless to help is a position that either leads you to total hermitage or makes you a warrior mom.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The process of licensing the MMR and the data behind it was deeply disturbing. RFK Jr. spent years sounding the alarm about this. He did not forget all of it overnight. There’s more going on here than you think.🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In the 1950s, top CDC scientists had reached a consensus that measles was a “self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low fatality.” Severe measles cases were only caused by malnutrition, lack of Vitamin A, or a weakened immune system. https://t.co/N0rDygseLr

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This consensus was upended for two key reasons. 1. Pharma realized the enormous profit potential in mass-vaccinating Americans for measles. 2. American scientists wanted to beat Soviet scientists, who were also working to develop a vaccine. Fear-mongering about measles by the media and politicians only began in earnest after the vaccine was licensed and Pharma stood to lose an enormous profit center.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The MMR shot was licensed without a clean placebo-controlled study. The trials that did happen only tracked adverse events for 42 days after vaccination and discounted a host of chronic diseases and adverse events. https://t.co/SaRurYchFW

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Despite RFK Jr.’s 𝕏 post endorsing MMR vaccination … There is more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye.🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

FDA’s top vaccine regulator Dr. Peter Marks just resigned over RFK’s attempts to revive MMR vaccine safety studies. “Kennedy’s team requested data on cases of brain swelling and deaths caused by the” MMR vaccines. https://t.co/ovIWZplMGn

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr. just pledged “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy. He pledged to fix VAERS, restore “gold standard science” and expose the truth about vaccine injuries. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “We’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” @SecKennedy @michaeljknowles

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states that vaccine policy will change due to better information. They claim that none of the vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine, which a study linked to issues, but was dismissed due to problems with the CDC's surveillance system. The speaker asserts the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system to capture vaccine injuries, with their own study showing it captures less than 1% of injuries. They plan to fix this by implementing a functional surveillance system, using data management, and providing answers to the public. The speaker promises to follow the science, use gold standard science, publish all datasets, replicate studies, and publish peer reviews, which they claim the CDC has never done, to provide real answers.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I know the, the question that you've been asked throughout your confirmation hearings, of course, was about the public's, I think, justifiable concern with the growth of vaccines. And the senators, asked you enough questions about that, but I don't think you need to rehash a lot of it. But for the people who are asking questions about whether or not they'll vaccinate their kids or whether they should vaccinate their kids, will anything change about vaccine policy? Speaker 1: Everything's gonna change because because we're gonna have good information. And, you know, none of the vaccines that are given you know, people said to me during the hearing, oh, well, that this link between autism and vaccines has been disproven. None of the vaccines that are that are given during the first six months of life have ever been tested for the only one was the DTP vaccine. And that one study that was done, according to the Institute of Medicine, the National Academy of Science, found that there was a link. They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC's surveillance system, theirs, and they said that system is no good. I think it begs the question is why doesn't CDC have a functional surveillance system? We're gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system. Right now, surveillance system is the system that because they don't do pre licensing safety testing for vaccines. They're the only product that's exempt. So what they say is if there are injuries, we'll capture them afterward. They have a system that doesn't capture them. In fact, CDC's own study of its own system said it captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. It's worthless, and everybody agrees it's worthless. But but why have we gone for thirty nine years and nobody's fixed it? Speaker 0: Without a functional system. Right. Speaker 1: We're gonna fix it, and we have, you know, we have Doge, you know, knows how to manage data. And so we're gonna be able to get into these databases and give answers to the American public. And and we're gonna fix the problems. If there are problems, we're gonna fix them very quickly, but we're gonna follow the science. That's what we're gonna do. We're gonna have gold standard science, and we're gonna follow the science. We're gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done. We're gonna do replicate replication of all of our studies, which CDC has never done. We're gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done. So people are gonna have real answers for the first time.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Behind the scenes, RFK Jr. is taking steps to expose the truth of MMR and other vaccine injuries. But Big Pharma is the most powerful force in American politics. This is not a fight that can be won overnight.🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

One key Senator is working to block MAHA on behalf of Big Pharma. Senator Bill Cassidy revealed that he voted to confirm RFK Jr. only after extracting concessions on vaccine policy. If MAHA wants to direct our anger at anyone in DC for standing in our way, it’s Senator Cassidy. You won’t believe what he said about the vaccine-injured in Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s confirmation hearing. @SenBillCassidy

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In response to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s pledge to find the truth about skyrocketing autism rates … Senator Bill Cassidy mockingly compared the belief in a link between vaccines and autism to the belief that the world is flat and Elvis is still alive. “There's people who disagree that the world is round—and I say that not to minimize these people’s concerns—but people still think Elvis is alive.” How could this be interpreted in any way other than insulting and minimizing these MAHA moms’ concerns? @DrJBhattacharya @SenBillCassidy

Video Transcript AI Summary

Some people disagree with me, but people disagree that the world is round and some think Elvis is still alive. If we allocate limited taxpayer dollars to address every disagreement, instead of issues like obesity, heart disease, and cancer, we lose due to opportunity cost. The question is whether we should devote resources to something just because someone is upset about it, especially when the issue has already been well-examined.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There are people who who might disagree with me. I wanna make sure that this Yeah. I mean, there's people who disagree that the world is round. That's true. And I say that not to minimize these concerns, but but people's people still think Elvis is alive. And so if you just say someone disagrees with me, so therefore, I'm going to put precious limited taxpayer dollars to this and not to addressing issues of obesity, heart disease, cancer. We've lost. There's an opportunity cost there. You're the economist. What am I doing talking about opportunity cost? So, I'm pressing you on this because I think that that kind of is a framework if just because somebody is upset about something, do we do we have the opportunity cost of devoting resources? It's something which has already been pretty well examined. I mean,

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

MAHA is bigger than RFK Jr. While 𝕏 lost their minds over Kennedy’s MMR comment, we just got our biggest win yet in Idaho.🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Idaho’s Medical Freedom Act 2.0 was just signed into law. 🔥 It BANS businesses and schools from requiring ANY “medical mandates” for employment or attendance. Businesses and schools were already banned from requiring the Covid-19 vaccine for attendance or employment based on a 2023 law, but this bill expanded that provision to ALL medical interventions. @LeslieManookian

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Iowa Republicans want to END vaccine manufacturers’ immunity from lawsuits for vaccine injuries. “A vaccine shall not be distributed, sold, or administered in this state unless the manufacturer … waives any immunity from suit for an injury arising from a design defect of the vaccine.” Bills like this would be MAHA’s biggest wins yet, and they would pave the way for RFK Jr. and federal leaders to follow suit.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 20, 2025 at 10:22 PM

Saved - March 22, 2025 at 1:06 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A declassified CIA document reveals that in 1988, the agency used remote viewing to explore an extraterrestrial civilization's headquarters inside a pyramid in Egypt. The subject described impressions of a round structure, high peaks, and a significant body of water, later identified as Lake Titicaca. Upon arriving in Egypt, the viewer detailed a dimly lit corridor leading to a large room with a polished stone platform and white-robed entities. The experience felt sacred and familiar, culminating in a moment of illumination and a sense of forgotten knowledge.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A declassified document reveals the CIA secretly used astral projection/remote viewing in 1988 to visit an extraterrestrial civilization’s headquarters … … inside a pyramid in Egypt. They saw “white-robed entities.” The remote viewer said “I’ve been here before.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

On January 13, 1988, the CIA tasked a subject with remote viewing a “Galactic Federation Headquarters.” The Galactic Federation is an alleged interstellar alliance of advanced civilizations. It is believed to be a coalition of benevolent extraterrestrial species from the Pleiades star cluster 440 light-years away, the Sirius binary star system 8 light-years away, the Arcturus red giant star 36 light-years away and several others. They allegedly have bases here on Earth, one of which appears to be the focus of this 1988 remote viewing session, since several locations on Earth come up in the session notes.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The subject began with broad impressions of his targeted location. “Impression of a round structure … located on the flat top of what seems to be something like a mess.” “There are streaking rays emanating from, or going into this structure like sun streaks.” “Inside this structure it is dark, cool, rough, stone … cavern-like.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“Upon descending we get the impression of very high, rugged peaks.” “There is a flat, plateau-like area, and below this is a blue body of water that seems to be surrounded by a flat, open, grassy plain.” Session notes indicate that the subject is describing Lake Titicaca, the largest freshwater lake in the Andes Mountains and one of the highest lakes in the world at 12,000 feet in elevation.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“From 200 miles up, I find myself moving up an inclined causeway with rough, stone walls on both sides.” “At this time I sense a presence nearby.” Session notes indicate that the subject is now somewhere in Egypt—half a world away from Lake Titicaca. “At the end of the causeway is a long, dimly-lit, rectangular corridor constructed of smooth, dressed stone on all sides.” “At the end of the corridor is a steep incline with a very high ceiling, also constructed of smooth stone.” The structure being described is like a pyramid, according to session notes. “At the end of this inclined corridor is a large room with a very high, vaulted ceiling.” “There is a large, polished stone platform in this room.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“There is a feeling of something sacred, holy … almost religious about this place.” Session notes refer to the platform “like an altar.” “There are white-robed entities in a semi-circle to one side. Their attention seems to be focused on the platform.” “The room is dimly lit.” “This place seems familiar … as if I’ve been here before.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The subject described an “almost religious” experience after climbing atop the altar and lying down. Not only that—he felt that this was a “familiar place.” “I was then illuminated by a brilliant shaft of white light from head to toe.” “A robed figure then moved from behind the group and stood next to me with a hand out-stretched over my solar plexus.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In the final line of the session summary, the subject reported that he “broke away from the session with a feeling that I should have remembered something … ” https://t.co/TXpVPaQs8s

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 20, 2025 at 4:44 PM

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 3:36 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I came across a crucial video featuring RFK Jr. where he discusses the alarming presence of chemicals in our food. He explains that the FDA's original safety designations have been exploited, allowing countless new chemicals to be deemed "generally recognized as safe" without proper review. This has led to over 10,000 ingredients in our food, compared to just 400 in Europe, contributing to our nation's chronic disease issues. He emphasizes the need to reassess these ingredients to ensure their safety.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This is the most important video on 𝕏 today. RFK Jr. just exposed why our food is full of chemicals … … and revealed his plan to get rid of them. “When FDA was created to regulate food, there were foods that were ‘generally recognized as safe’ … like flour, dairy, eggs.” “But that designation was expanded by an industry that began taking advantage of it so that any new chemical that they want to add to our food is ‘generally recognized as safe’ and gets no review.” “That’s why we have 10,000 ingredients in our food in this country. In Europe, they only have 400, and we have the worst chronic disease burden of any country in the world.” “We’re gonna go back and review all of these old ingredients to make sure that they are safe.” @SecKennedy

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker says they want dyes removed from food, noting that products like Froot Loops contain dyes in the US but not in Canada or Europe. They are launching a review of Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) standards, which were adopted in 1958 to avoid testing common foods like flour, dairy, and eggs. The speaker claims industry took advantage of GRAS to add chemicals to food without review, resulting in 10,000 ingredients in US food compared to 400 in Europe. They state the US has the worst chronic disease burden globally. The plan is to eliminate GRAS standards for new products, review old ingredients for safety, and encourage companies to remove harmful ingredients.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We told them that we wanted the the dyes out of the food. The the science on the dyes is so overwhelming. They're making products now in this country that have the dyes in them like Froot Loops, for example. And you buy the same product in Canada and it doesn't have the dyes. You buy the same product in Europe and it doesn't have the dyes. So there are a lot of ingredients. And one of the one of one of the things that we're doing is we've launched a review of the GRAS standards, and we're going to get rid of the GRAS standards for most products. The GRAS standards is a standard that was adopted in 1958. It is a it was adopted because when FDA was created to regulate food, there were foods that were generally recognized as safe. G R A S generally recognized as safe, like flour, like dairy, like eggs. And they didn't want to make companies test those products. So they created that designation. That designation was expanded by an industry began taking advantage of it so that any new chemical that they want to add to our food is generally recognized as safe and gets no review. That's why we have 10,000 ingredients in our food in this country. In Europe, they only have 400. And we have the worst chronic disease burden of any country in the world. So we are going to get rid of the grass standards for new products. We're going to go back and review all of these old ingredients to make sure that they are safe. And we're gonna encourage these companies to get rid of them as quickly as possible.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - March 3, 2025 at 12:27 AM

Saved - March 3, 2025 at 1:38 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe this video highlights the critical issue of peace for Ukraine, emphasizing that it transcends individual leaders like Trump, Putin, or Zelenskyy. RFK Jr. reflects on the military-industrial complex's impact since 1963, recalling JFK's struggle to keep the U.S. out of war. He discusses pivotal moments in history, including JFK's National Security Order 263 to withdraw from Vietnam, and the subsequent tragedies surrounding his family and civil rights leaders. I see a warning about NATO's expansion potentially leading to a catastrophic conflict.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This is one of the most important videos on 𝕏. Peace for Ukraine is about more than Trump, Putin, or Zelenskyy. RFK Jr: “We are the military-industrial complex.” “Washington ... is like a Kabuki theatre of democracy.” It’s about ending the trauma that the US military-industrial complex has put the world through since 1963. RFK Jr: JFK’s 1,000 days in office were a “constant fistfight with the military-industrial complex to keep the country out of war.” “Three days before [JFK] took office, President Eisenhower gave what I think we should today regard as the most important speech in American history.” “He warned Americans against the domination of this emerging military-industrial complex that would turn us into an imperium abroad and a security state at home.” “[JFK] takes office three days later.” “They tried to get him to go into Laos, he refused.” “They tried to get him to go into Cuba in ‘61 and again in ‘62 during the missile crisis, and he wouldn’t.” “They tried to get him to go into Berlin in ‘62, and he wouldn’t.” “They tried to get him to go into Vietnam … and he said it can’t be our fight.” “In October 1963 … [JFK] signed National Security Order 263 ordering all military personnel out of Vietnam.” “Thirty days after he signed that order, he was murdered. And a week after that, President Johnson remanded the order and then sent 250,000 troops in.” “My father ran against the war in ‘68. He wins the California primary, meaning he’s on his way to the White House, and he’s shot that night.” “Martin Luther King had become a peace activist two months before he was shot.” “These traumas—my uncle’s death, my father, King’s death, the Vietnam War itself, 9/11, and Covid—pushed us a little farther down that road that Eisenhower warned us against.” “Today, we are the military-industrial complex.” “Washington ... is like a Kabuki theatre of democracy.” “Part of unraveling that and going back to our original idealism … means going back and looking at the original trauma and exposing what actually happened to my uncle.” NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe towards Russia’s borders is marching humanity towards World War 3, a trauma that would be greater than any war humanity has ever known.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Eisenhower warned us against the emerging military industrial complex that would turn us into an imperium. My uncle's thousand days in office were a constant fight to keep the country out of war. They tried to trick him into the Bay of Pigs invasion, but he refused to send in the military. He realized he'd been tricked and later fired those involved in the deception. They tried to get him to invade Laos, Cuba, and Berlin, but he wouldn't. In Vietnam, he only sent advisors, but when he found out about the casualties, he ordered everyone home. Thirty days after signing that order, he was murdered. Johnson then reversed the order and sent in troops. These traumas, including my uncle's death, pushed us down the road Eisenhower warned against. Today, we are the military industrial complex, and nobody believes their voices are heard in Washington. To go back to our original idealism, we must look at the original trauma and expose what happened to my uncle.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When when three days before my uncle took office, the outgoing president, president Eisenhower, gave what I think we should today regard as the most important speech in American history, where he warned Americans against the domination, this emerging military industrial complex that would turn us into an imperium abroad and a national security state at home and destroy our role as the world's exemplary democracy, and he would have been the commander in chief in World War II, so his words were very important, and then my uncle, that was on my birthday in 1960, January '17 '60 '1, my uncle takes office three days later, and then his thousand days in office are just a constant fistfight with the military industrial complex to keep the country out of war, they kept trying to trick him into war. They did it at the Bay Of Pigs, 3 Months in they tell him you gotta send these guys over, and he said I'm not using the military to invade a country, and, you know, I don't like communism, I don't like cash flow, but the Cubans have to have to make their own determination about what kind of government they're gonna have. The US can't go into all these other countries and change governments around, and he said I don't want the US military involved, I don't think we should be involved in any part of it, and they said don't worry, we'll use United Fruit Company boats to get the men there, and he said I'm not giving air cover, I just want you to know that. They said don't worry, you won't need it, and he said, why, cash flow has 200,000 soldiers in the best intelligence agencies, and why do you think 2,000 men are going to be able to win this battle? And they said because we have the whole thing wired and rigged, and there's going to be a big uprising in Cuba, and it's all done. This is what Alan Dulles told him, Richard Bissell, Charles Cabello was the military general of the CIA, he suspected that, but he couldn't believe they just lied to him, and you know when those men were dying on the beach and they were telling him, now you've got to send in air cover, you've to send in the Essex, the aircraft carrier, he said I'm not, and he realized he'd been tricked and they thought a young president would cave in to avoid humiliation. It was the lowest point of my uncle's presidency that those men were dying because of his bad decision, and he took the blame publicly, but privately he said, I want to take the CIA and shatter it into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds, then over the next couple months he fired Dulles, he fired Cabell, he fired Bissell, and he tried to clean up the agency. Then they tried to get him to go into Laos, he refused, they called him a traitor for that. They tried to get him to go into Cuba in '61 and again in '62 during the missile crisis, and he wouldn't send it. He wouldn't, you know, go invade. They tried to get him to go in Berlin in '62, and he wouldn't they tried to get him to go in Vietnam. He said he need 250,000 troops, his closest advisor, people he trusted like Max Taylor, Averyl Haram and Dean Acheson, they said if you don't send in 250,000 troops, the Vietnamese government is going to collapse, and he said it's their government. It can't be our fight. You know, we can help them the way the French helped us during the revolution, but we cannot fight. This cannot be the American war, and he did send in 16,000 advisors, they were not under the rules of engagement allowed to participate in combat, they were mainly Green Berets, and then they were fewer people than he sent to the University of Mississippi to Ole Miss to get one black man in, right, to college. There was a few people, but then he found out in March, he found out a Green Beret had died, and he asked Walt Rosdahl for a casualty list, and Walt Rosdahl came back and said, there's 75 Americans who already died over there. My uncle said, that's too many. We're bringing them all home, and that afternoon he signed National Security Order two sixty three ordering all military personnel out of Vietnam, with the first thousand coming home in November and the last one coming home the following December. He thirty days to the day after he signed that order, he was murdered. And a week after that, president Johnson remanded the order and then sent 250,000 troops in. Nixon came in in after him sent 560,000. 50 six thousand never came home of our guys. We killed a million of them. 56,000 of ours never came home, including my cousin, George Scacow, who died in the Tet Offensive. And then my father ran against the war in '68, he wins the California primary meaning he's on his way to the White House and he's shot that night. Martin Luther King had become a peace activist two months before he was shot. These traumas, my uncle's death, my father, King's death, the Vietnam War itself, 09/11 and COVID, each one of these traumas pushed us a little farther down that road that Eisenhower warned us against, where today, you know, we are the military industrial complex, our democracy, nobody in this country believes that their voices are audible in Washington, you know, everything is rigged and everybody knows it, it's like the Kabuki theater of a democracy, it's not real, it's a Hollywood stage set with people pretending to have elections that are already chosen and advanced and everything else, I'm not being paranoid, just look at what's happening right now. Think part of unraveling that and going back to our original idealism and the other view of an American future America is the exemplary nation and the moral authority around the globe means going back and, you know, looking at the original trauma and exposing what actually happened to my uncle.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 22, 2025 at 6:39 PM

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 7:37 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Four months ago, I warned Joe Rogan that mRNA technology is Big Pharma's "ultimate cash cow," representing a trillion-dollar invention that couldn't normally be marketed due to its dangers. The aim was to normalize gene therapy for a population unaccustomed to the idea. If doctors had been allowed to do their jobs, they would have found inexpensive and safe treatments, including the link to vitamin D. The emergency allowed for the mRNA platform's rollout, but I believe we've hindered their plans for future applications.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

4 months ago, Bret Weinstein warned Joe Rogan: mRNA tech is Big Pharma’s “ultimate cash cow.” “We’re talking about a trillion-dollar invention that could not be brought to market normally, because it’s way too dangerous.” “Their real goal was to normalize the use of a gene therapy on a population that had never had that idea placed in its mind.” “Had doctors been enabled to simply do what doctors are supposed to do, they would have discovered that there were treatments—inexpensive ones, one of them extremely safe, the other one comparatively safe—that were highly efficacious.” “They would have discovered the connection to vitamin D.” “The mRNA platform, which can be used to reformulate every vaccine they’ve got, to create a bunch of new vaccines. We’re talking about a $1 trillion invention that could not be brought to market normally, because it’s way too dangerous.” “The emergency made it possible not only to bring it to market, but to get nearly everybody on board with it.” “The mRNA platform itself is the ultimate cash cow that couldn’t be brought to market under anything but the most extraordinary emergency circumstances.” Joe Rogan: “Do you think that the blowback from all of this … makes it more difficult for them to roll out that platform for other things?” Weinstein: “Yes, I think we got in their way.” @joerogan @BretWeinstein

Video Transcript AI Summary

The emergency use authorization (EUA) was crucial for normalizing the mRNA platform, which was seen as a significant advancement in vaccine technology. The fear surrounding COVID-19 helped facilitate acceptance of this new approach, despite existing treatments that could have mitigated the pandemic's impact. If doctors had been allowed to explore effective treatments, the reliance on mRNA vaccines would have been diminished, creating a control group that could reveal potential harms. While the EUA was important, it wasn't strictly necessary; they could have navigated around it. The rollout of the mRNA platform aimed to reshape public perception, and the legal complexities surrounding the EUA provided a layer of immunity for those involved. The backlash and discussions about vaccine injuries may complicate future implementations of this technology.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We were at the emergency use authorization. Yeah. And you think that that wasn't necessary and they could have gotten it through anyway? Speaker 1: I think it's yes. It's logical enough. There's truth in it. They, you know, having a viable preventative for for SARS CoV 2 in theory should have prevented in the UA, but I don't think that that was an obstacle they couldn't have overcome. I think the problem was their real goal was to normalize the use of a gene therapy on a population that had never had that idea placed in its mind. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And so they called it a vaccine. That was one thing. But they also needed the disease to be frightening enough that people would accept something radical in order to get through it. And had doctors been enabled to just simply do what doctors are supposed to do, they would have discovered that there were treatments, inexpensive ones, one of them extremely safe, the other one comparatively safe, that were highly efficacious. They would have discovered, the connection to vitamin d, all of these things. And that would have that would have meant 2 things. 1, it would have meant that the degree to which the mRNA platform got normalized would have been much reduced, and it also would have created a massive control group. People who didn't take the shots, which would make the harms that much less obvious. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So I suspect the reason I say that a $100,000,000,000 isn't a lot of money when it obviously is a lot of money is that it's not a lot of money compared to what was at stake in their minds, which is the mRNA platform which can be used to reformulate every vaccine they've got, to create a bunch of new vaccines. This we're talking about a $1,000,000,000,000 invention that could not be brought to market normally because it's way too dangerous, and the emergency made it possible not only to bring it to market, but to get everybody or nearly everybody on board with it. And I don't know how deep this rabbit hole goes. I do think there is something remarkable about the early days of the so called pandemic where doctors were primed for the horror of this disease, so that they were already in the mindset of radical interventions, which meant that they did a lot of harm with things like ventilators that didn't need to be done. They killed a lot of people because they thought they were rescuing them. So the EUA story is good enough, it more or less explains it but I don't think it it obscures the bigger picture which is that the mRNA platform itself is the ultimate cash cow that couldn't be brought to market under anything but the most extraordinary emergency circumstances. And so they took a virus that shouldn't have existed in humans at all and wasn't that terrifying, when it was really released into the population, and they turned it into something frightening enough that people would contemplate things that they ordinarily would have rejected. Speaker 0: But doesn't that also make sense that the emergency use authorization would have to be in place in order for them to implement this? Because you're always gonna like you said, the the lack of a control. Right? Right? If everybody gets vaccinated, you don't know what the hell happened. You blame it on COVID. Yep. Which is why people who've been hit with the shots say they have long COVID. Mhmm. But if you have no emergency use authorization and then people are allowed to make their own decisions and doctors are allowed to make their own decision. There's a lot of it's way easier to do it with this emergency use authorization. It's way easier to slip it through. Oh. And the only way you could stop that is if all of a sudden if so emergency use authorization is supposed to only exist if there's not some sort of a medication that currently exists that treats it. Right? Otherwise, you're gonna have to go through all the trials. If there's another medication that exists so you demonize the medications, you sneak it through, you make everybody take it, therefore, you lose the control, and now you've got this platform rolled out. Do you think that they didn't know to the extent of the damage that it was gonna cause? Speaker 1: I think they knew. Speaker 0: You think they knew it was gonna harm that many people? Speaker 1: Yeah. Because so much I mean, I'm not arguing that the EUA wasn't important. I think it was important. I just don't think it was necessary for them to they they could have overcome that obstacle the way they overcame. I see Speaker 0: what you're saying. Speaker 1: Many others. Speaker 0: But the most important thing was rolling out this platform. And Speaker 1: normalizing it, getting people to accept the idea that they were gonna take an mRNA shot. Right? That was a big leap. And so the EUA was important, and we know that because of the shenanigans around. They ultimately did get a shot that they said was the same, non emergency use authorized, but I'm now forgetting the term when the FDA actually, is another term. It's not authorized, but it's a synonym. But anyway, they did go approved. They did get one approved, and you couldn't get it. They kept giving the one that had the EUA. They did that for legal reasons. Mhmm. It gave them a layer of immunity. Right? They had been given the license to deliver an experimental drug, and then they got approval for a nonexperimental drug, and they kept giving the experimental one even though they said they were the same thing. There's something very deep there around the legal status of that emergency use authorized pharmaceutical. Speaker 0: And so do you think that the blowback from all of this and the amount of people that are reporting vaccine in injuries and the amount of discussion that's happening, especially online about these things makes it more difficult for them to roll out that platform for other things. Speaker 1: Yes. I think we got in their way. I think we outed them.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NOW — Oracle CEO Larry Ellison says AI will be able to detect early stages of cancer and develop personalized mRNA vaccine therapies https://t.co/ZAX7skKWSq

Video Transcript AI Summary

We're developing an exciting cancer vaccine utilizing AI tools. Tumor fragments circulate in the blood, allowing for early cancer detection through a simple blood test. By applying AI to analyze these tests, we can identify the most threatening cancers. Once we gene sequence the tumor, we can create a personalized mRNA vaccine for the individual, which can be produced robotically in about 48 hours. This approach promises not only early detection but also tailored vaccines for each person's specific cancer, showcasing the potential of AI in revolutionizing cancer treatment.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One of the most exciting things we're working on, you again, using the tools that's that that Sam and Masa are providing, is our is a cancer vaccine. It's very interesting. Early diet it turns out, I'll be quick, All of our cancers, cancer tumors, little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood. So you can do early cancer detection. If you can do it using a you can do early cancer detection with a blood test. And using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person. So we can again, cancer cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test. Then beyond that, once we gene sequence once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer, and you can make that vaccine, the that mRNA vaccine. You can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours. So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for the for your particular cancer aimed at you and have have that vaccine available in 48 hours. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future. Great. Thanks.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:36 PM

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 1:34 AM

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

President Trump has UFO/UAP disclosure Executive Orders ready to sign. Dr. Steven Greer just met with Trump officials in D.C. “I’ve seen drafts. They’re real.” UFO crash retrievals, anti-gravity, telepathy, reverse-engineered tech … Trump could reveal EVERYTHING. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/3fg5bE5ENH

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 18, 2025 at 3:38 AM

Saved - January 18, 2025 at 6:19 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Steven Greer asserts that UFO/UAP disclosure is imminent, with new whistleblower Jake Barber revealing significant information about recovered UFOs. Greer emphasizes the credibility of these whistleblowers, who have firsthand experience with current operations. He discusses the potential for a shift in human-extraterrestrial relations and the need for international cooperation to prevent aggression towards ETs. Greer warns against the dangers of secrecy surrounding advanced technologies and calls for public activism to ensure proper disclosure and protection for whistleblowers.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Steven Greer just doubled down—UFO/UAP disclosure allegedly starts TOMORROW. New whistleblower Jake Barber has personally recovered crashed UFOs. “For all the people who say this is a conspiracy theory … ” “You’re about to have the wake-up of your life.” 🧵THREAD

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

New whistleblowers led by Air Force veteran Jake Barber “who have worked at black sites out west in sensitive operations” are coming forward to take the first step towards UFO/UAP disclosure. Dr. Greer: “There will be more that will be coming out Saturday” on NewsNation with Ross Coulthart. @rosscoulthart

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer explained why Barber’s upcoming testimony to NewsNation on his involvement in UFO crash retrievals is a game-changer: “They decided to unmask themselves.” “Their bona fides are extremely high, they’re going to be established in terms of their long-term involvement with these operations—decades.” “They’re adding the credibility of having … boots on the ground at these facilities. It’s not like they were there in the 60s or 80s or something, these are current operations.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

President-elect Trump will take office just two days after the crash retrieval footage is revealed on NewsNation. Dr. Greer is “cautiously optimistic” about UFO disclosure. He revealed that late last night, he received several “Executive Order drafts” related to disclosure: “One of them … is to establish a coordination office on UAPs/UFOs in the White House.” “Order number two is … having all different agencies coordinate it—and they keep using the word disclosure.” “Every one of these Executive Orders mentions the word disclosure.” “There’s one … that’s enhanced protections for the whistleblowers.” “That is something that we’ve been asking for for 30-some years.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer is confident the new whistleblowers are “very supportive of … reversing the dynamic between humans and extraterrestrials.” Currently, that dynamic is “either a total denial that they exist or an aggressive, covert, unsupervised, illegal … targeting, shooting the craft down with electromagnetic pulse weapons.” “The team coming forward have been part of those operations and know how they operate … including the weapons systems used.” “I have been out there and I’ve seen the facilities.” “One site I was over, one or two ET/NHI craft a year are downed.” “How much of that will come out has a lot to do with US government support for these [whistleblower] protections.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer warned that “not every bit of illegal secrecy is unwarranted.” “The illegal part is totally unwarranted and unconstitutional, but there are certain things that have to be kept secret.” “Some of these technologies that allow for the manmade craft to go from point A to B at several hundred thousand miles per hour—manmade—if that technological capability were released in the current world where there are t***orist cells, where there are unstable regimes, where there are nations that sponsor t***orism, those technologies would absolutely be turned into a missile delivery system and it would be catastrophic.” “Those have to be kept secret for a while until humanity gets to some level of collective security.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A first step towards peaceful relations with ETs, Dr. Greer says, is an “international effort with Russia, America, China, other nation-states … to agree to cease and desist from any aggressive, violent actions against ET craft or their persons.” “The second would be to initiate a global peaceful outreach to them.” “The massive breakthroughs in technology—those are all things we have paid for as taxpayers, and those would be the ultimate peace dividend.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The UFO that crashed in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947 was taken down by an “early electromagnetic, directional energy weapon,” Dr. Greer alleged. “Given their technological superiority … the proof that they’re not [hostile] is that we’re still here.” “I have said this many times at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and at the Pentagon.” “They have been very, very patient with us in tolerating this aggressive behavior that has resulted in the downing of their craft, the k***ing of their people, and then the reverse-engineering of their technology, which we have then flipped around and used against them.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer alleged that what Jake Barber will reveal with Ross Coulthart on NewsNation is the “tip, tip, tip, tip of a very big iceberg of evidence and materials.” https://t.co/lCYv4fXRDX

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer alleged this covert group “deepened the secrecy” of their UFO/ET operations after they “mastered gravity control” in October 1954. “Folks like Allen Dulles and others pretty much began to push the President—never mind members of Congress—out of oversight.” “Eisenhower warned of this when he said beware the military-industrial complex and it’ll be a threat to our democracy.” “He knew that because on his watch, unfortunately, the whole matter went sideways.” “He was betrayed by people he trusted, and they seized the levers of control over these reverse-engineering and other operations dealing with UFOs, UAPs, NHI, extraterrestrials.” “That happened around the time they had the eureka moment in October 1954 and we … mastered gravity control: the ability to control gravitational fields through very high-voltage electromagnetic systems that reach trans-dimensionally.” “That’s the way it’s been since the late 50s, unfortunately.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

President Eisenhower explicitly warned that “public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite” in his 1961 farewell address. This new phenomenon, he said, was “akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture.” “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.” “As we peer into society’s future, we must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow.” “We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage.” “We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer alleged the fact that UFO conferences and documentaries are “replete with all kinds of frightening encounters known as abductions and mutilations” is a psyop. “It’s a psyop trying to be sure that people are afraid of the aliens, because the long term agenda that was hatched in the mid-50s was to create this specter of a threat from outer space that would unite the whole world fighting them.” “As this comes out, one of the biggest tasks we’re gonna have is managing the legacy of disinformation and frightening portrayals of NHI … with what the truth is.” “People have had already 70 years of psychological brainwashing and prejudice built in about all things alien.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: “There’s the actual UFOs that are extraterrestrial, and there’s the manmade ones.” “They look very similar superficially. But at close range, they’re very different.” “A manmade one back from the 50s and 60s had rivets and bolts in the interior of the ARV … from the Norton Air Show in 1988, where there were three of them in a hangar.” “Those were … Mercury-era, so that’s late 50s, early 60s, and they had a little bit of scorch marks, they had been out in our solar system.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

If this covert group could fly ARVs through the solar system in the 1950s, “what do you think they have now, two-thirds of a century later?” Dr. Greer alleged “they have continued to down and capture these craft.” “Trillions have been spent on reverse-engineering them, and there have been massive breakthroughs in propulsion, material sciences, AI … all manner of developments that sound like science fiction.” “Now, imagine a group that has the malicious intent to hoax a threat from outer space so that they can consolidate global power around fear and control.” “Look at the responses to Covid and 9/11. It results in people suspending their intellect and their rational mind.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: UFO “disclosure needs to be part of an activist program where We The People ask the President and the Congress to take these specific acts.” The new Trump Administration may present a rare chance for disclosure to move forward. Dr. Greer: “Number one: extend full immunity and amnesty to people willing to come forward so that the maximum number of people come forward and it won’t be a violent encounter.” “Secondly, you have to provide protection for the whistleblowers much stronger than it exists currently, which is in the Executive Order I just referred to.” “On top of it, you’ve got to be able to put the funding in place to do a proper investigation of the subject that’s clean.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: President-elect Trump and Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi can “really get to the bottom of this” themselves if they want to. https://t.co/HanAQFAZv2

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The anomalous drones spotted over New Jersey and the US recently are not alien, Dr. Greer said. “Some of these are just obviously drones.” “There are some other weird things going on with orbs and spheres and energy fields and weird fog—all of that phenomena, we have the capabilities to hoax as humans.” “Whatever you imagine in terms of technological capability, it’s more than that.” “All of those technologies could all be repurposed to healing, gathering knowledge, scientific investigation, travel, clean energy, using very advanced technology to reverse the damage we’ve already done to the Earth.” “Currently, these technologies are in the hands of people who are more about consolidating power through fear and manipulation.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In his briefing for President-elect Trump, Dr. Greer included illustrations to highlight the differences between ET craft and manmade ones. “This has illustrations, you’ll see on the left side ET craft and on the right the manmade ones.” “There are certain people out there who are embedded counter-intelligence officers and disinformation functionaries who go to members of Congress, the White House and the media and say, ‘We don’t have anything like that, therefore anything that looks alien is alien.’”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: Many of the “great geniuses of the last 70 years” were plucked by this covert group to reverse-engineer UFOs. “And nobody knows their names.” “You then have a brain trust—and I would call it a brain drain for general society, because it’s all covert.” “Those are guys who are often plucked out of high school and college who have IQs north of 200, who are absolute engineering and physics geniuses, and they live most of their lives working on these projects in a compartmented operation.” “We’re now 70-80 years into an era of secrecy that’s been a mistake.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: “Wernher von Braun, in the last years of his life … ” “He said, ‘They’re gonna hoax a threat, they’re gonna send objects that are gonna look alien and they’re not’—this is 1974, 50 years ago—he said, ‘it’s all a lie, but that’s how they can consolidate power, and that’s always been the long term plan, since the 50s.’” “The only way that doesn’t happen is that our eyes are wide open, like we just pull the curtain back on the Wizard of Oz behind the curtain, pulling all the levers, scaring the hell out of everyone.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: “For all the people who say all this is conspiracy theory, you’re about to have the wake-up of your life in the next couple of months.” https://t.co/ukyJLOqmla

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Follow me/Subscribe for more of these in-depth threads as UFO disclosure heats up! Here is a recap of Dr. Greer’s first podcast, launched earlier this week in preparation for disclosure:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Steven Greer just declared UFO/UAP disclosure is happening—NOW. New whistleblowers want to expose EVERYTHING. Gravity control, UFOs attacked with exotic energy weapons, reverse-engineered alien crafts … The next 72 hours could change the course of human history. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/pksIpT3qBg

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer: “Now, it’s a bigger problem … outside the continental United States.” “For example, we have the whistleblower, in summer 2023, Mr. Hecker, who was down at the South Pole working for Raytheon, described this huge neutrino light array technology a mile under the ice at the South Pole.” “Similarly, we have a whistleblower who came forward in the first disclosure project effort in 2001 who was at the facility at a base near the Bolivian-Peruvian border, when we knocked down an ET craft and it crashed, and he and his Sergeant were the first people there.” “This is gonna have to quickly go from a US disclosure and operation to a global one … and a global, official outreach from humans—not just one nation, but all of humanity—to these extraterrestrial civilizations, and extend a side of ourselves that is our higher angels, instead of just a bunch of warmongering apes running around k***ing everything we don’t understand.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Dr. Greer closed with a reminder that “our eye needs to be on the prize.” “The prize is making a pathway forward to create a new civilization on Earth that’ll be amazing, beautiful, transformed.” What do you think of Dr. Greer’s claims? Watch his FULL podcast here: https://t.co/S3UgrSoNJl

@DrStevenGreer - Dr. Steven Greer

The Dr. Steven Greer Podcast - Episode 2 https://t.co/J0IA0bZS4E

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 5, 2025 at 1:16 AM

Saved - January 5, 2025 at 1:01 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared insights about President Jimmy Carter's alleged encounters with UFOs, including his personal sighting in 1969. I discussed the secretive MJ-12 organization, formed in 1947, which purportedly briefed Carter on UFOs, revealing that aliens have visited Earth for 5,000 years and even planted humans here. I detailed various projects aimed at studying and communicating with aliens, including the recovery of alien crafts and technology. The government’s reasons for secrecy included fears of public panic and potential threats to national security.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

President Jimmy Carter was allegedly told the truth about UFOs. In 1949, one Alien survived a UFO crash. In 1959, two Aliens met with a US official. Aliens have visited Earth for 5,000 years, and they come from the Zeta Reticuli star system, 40 light-years away. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/DgPVUJoaA6

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

First, why was Jimmy Carter interested in UFOs? In 1969, he saw a UFO himself. It was in Leary, Georgia, a town where “numerous UFOs” were being reported at that time. Carter reported observing a “disc-shaped object” for 5-10 minutes. After he spotted it, the UFO moved towards him, then stopped and began to change color, from white, to blue, to red, then back to white. It soon receded into the distance.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

As President, Carter was allegedly told the truth about UFOs by MJ-12. MJ-12 is an organization alleged to have been created by President Harry Truman in 1947 via Executive Order to investigate, recover, and study crashed UFOs. Researcher Lee Graham said he received a transcript of the briefing on June 13, 1991 from fellow researcher William Moore “with the permission of a Defense Intelligence Agency official.” Further research by Robert Collins based on government intelligence sources estimated that the document may be a reconstruction of the briefing made by “sources who attended it” rather than an officially classified transcript, but that it appeared authentic.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

On June 14, 1977, the briefing began with a reminder that the information being provided was of the highest level of secrecy. “NO other government agency, to include the military, has access to the information contained in this briefing.” “This document will be destroyed after the briefing.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

American involvement with UFOs allegedly began in 1947—the same year that President Truman allegedly ordered the creation of MJ-12, the Air Force was established, and the CIA was established. “In June 1947, a civilian pilot flying over the Cascade mountains of Washington State observed nine flying discs.” This, according to the briefing, was the first officially recorded interaction between the US and UFOs. Later on that same year, “an aircraft of extraterrestrial origin crashed in the desert of New Mexico.” “The craft was recovered by the military. Four Alien (non-homo-sapiens) bodies were recovered in the wreckage.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In 1949, everything changed. “In late 1949, another Alien aircraft crashed in the US and was recovered partially intact by the military.” This time, “one Alien of extraterrestrial origin SURVIVED the crash.” https://t.co/V8qcPMnKWi

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Extensive research into the surviving Alien’s biology, origins, and language was allegedly conducted during the next three years. He called himself “EBE,” and he “came from a planet in the Zeta Reticuli star system, approximately 40 light-years from Earth.” “The Alien’s language was translated by means of picture graphs.” “EBE lived until June 18, 1952, when he died to an unexplained illness.” “During the time period EVE was alive, he provided valuable information regarding space technology, origins of the Universe, and exobiological matters.” No further details regarding new information about the “origins of the Universe” were provided.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This document reveals that “the original mission of the Air Force program”—also formed in 1947—“was to collect and analyze all reported sightings or incidents involving UFOs.” Out of approximately 12,000 UFO reports, the Air Force determined that 10%—or approximately 1,200 cases—were “legitimate Alien sightings and/or incidents.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In 1958, everything changed—again. “The US recovered a third Alien aircraft from the desert of Utah.” This one “was in excellent flying condition … apparently abandoned by the Aliens for some unexplained reason.” “The aircraft was stored in a top security area and analyzed throughout the years by our best aerospace scientists.” “The US gained a large volume of technological data from the recovered Alien aircraft.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Notably, “the Aliens have been extremely interested in our nuclear weapons and nuclear research.” “Many reported military sightings and incidents occur over nuclear weapons bases.” CIA investigators were “assigned to military and other governmental agencies” to investigate UFO/IAC sightings, and “these agents are presently operating at various locations throughout the US and Canada,” as of 1977.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The briefing answers why the truth about UFOs was kept secret. They cited fear of “nationwide panic” and that “public awareness of these projects would have jeopardized the future space program of the US.” They also said the US had already “established communication with the Aliens” and “felt relatively sure the Aliens’ exploration of Earth was non-aggressive and non-hostile.” Furthermore, MJ-12 believed that “technological facts regarding Aliens’ medical matters, the fact that an Alien was captured alive and survived for three years, can not be released to the public for fear the information would be obtained by SHIS”—potentially a foreign intelligence agency.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Reminder: In 1963, one month after JFK’s assassination, President Truman wrote in the Washington Post, “There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position.” “For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment” as the “intelligence arm of the President.” “It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

EBE revealed that Aliens have been visiting Earth for 5,000 years. Even more shockingly, “EBE reported that 2,000 years ago, his ancestors planted a human creature on Earth to assist the inhabitants of Earth in developing a civilization.” The potential for “worldwide religious panic” was allegedly another key reason for keeping the truth about UFOs secret. This document also confirmed a plan for the government to gradually release information “over a period of time to condition the public for future disclosures.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

America’s top scientists “estimated that the Aliens’ technology was many thousands of years ahead of US technology.” They believed that “We cannot understand the large volume of scientific information the US has already gained from the Aliens” until our technology evolves to their level. “This advancement of US technology may take many hundreds of years.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The last page of the briefing names four sub-projects of Project Aquarius. First, Project Bando: “Originally established in 1949. Its mission was to collect and evaluate medical information from the surviving Alien creature and the recovered Alien bodies.” EBE was examined under this program, and it allegedly “provided US medical researchers with certain answers to the evolution theory.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Second, Project Sigma: “Originally established as part of Project Gleem in 1954 … its mission was to establish communication with Aliens.” “This Project met with POSITIVE SUCCESS, when in 1959, the US established primitive communications with the Aliens.” https://t.co/zOuLAhfEt1

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

“On April 24, 1964, a USAF officer met two Aliens at a prearranged location in the desert of New Mexico.” “The contact lasted for approximately THREE HOURS.” “Based on the Alien’s language given to us by EBE, the Air Force office managed to exchange basic information with the two Aliens.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Third, Project Snowbird: “Originally established in 1972. Its mission was to test fly a recovered alien aircraft.” Lastly, Project Pounce: “Originally established in 1968. Its mission was to evaluate all UFO/IAC information pertaining to space technology.” https://t.co/d7RNG4bH0H

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

What is your reaction to this story? This briefing was only the beginning of the story—Follow me/Subscribe for more UFO rabbit holes! By the 1990s, a living extraterrestrial believed to be a “future human” named Chi’el’ah was alleged to be kept at a secret base in Nevada:

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

This 2010 report revealed the truth about UFO crash retrievals. Two Presidents were involved. One secret base in Nevada has the 1947 Roswell/1953 Kingman UFOs, an alien craft that looks like “black, liquid mercury,” and a “future human” named Chi’el’ah. Allegedly. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/SQn0F1JAMj

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - December 18, 2024 at 2:22 AM

Saved - December 19, 2024 at 11:22 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A secret campaign to undermine the MAHA movement has been revealed, exposing food lobbyists' strategies against RFK Jr.'s agenda. In a recent meeting, industry representatives discussed tactics to limit Kennedy's influence, suggesting they might leverage the appropriations process to block his priorities. Additionally, a new group, Conservatives for Lower Health Care Costs, is misrepresenting H.R. 6283, a bill aimed at reforming pharmacy benefit managers, as a "Big Pharma Bailout." This reveals the strength of the MAHA movement and the lengths to which opponents will go to maintain control.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A secret campaign to disrupt and co-opt the MAHA movement was just EXPOSED. It already goes much deeper than you think. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/kloDq2d7Bv

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

In November, Independent Journalist Lee Fang exposed strategies cooked up by food lobbyists to thwart RFK Jr.’s MAHA agenda. Their first alarm bells sounded in October. @lhfang https://t.co/kvcV1LtgkH

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@lhfang Invariant, a “powerful government relations firm that advises many food companies,” had a warning for their clients in October: RFK Jr.’s influence over Trump and the Republican Party was growing. @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/e85kUyiSql

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@lhfang @RobertKennedyJr Since Trump’s victory and selection of Kennedy as HHS Secretary, Fang reported, “those initial alarm bells have become a SIREN.” In November, food lobbyists met once again to discuss the rise of the MAHA movement:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

One participant in the November meeting was Danielle Beck. Beck represents “PepsiCo, makers of Doritos and Cap’n Crunch, and the Corn Refiners Association, a trade group for the largest producers of corn-based seed oils.” She suggested in this meeting that during the Senate confirmation process, RFK Jr. could be forced to trade away key MAHA priorities in order to secure the 50 votes he needs: “Commitments can be made to secure those votes that might end up resulting in some shifts in RFK’s overall agenda.” She then went on to say that “Congress could limit Kennedy’s abilities” to enact his MAHA agenda even if he is confirmed by the Senate to lead HHS.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Beck floated that “agriculture and food stakeholders might look to leverage the appropriations process” to block Kennedy’s MAHA agenda. This is not unprecedented. It happened 13 years ago. In 2011, the House voted to continue classifying frozen pizzas as a vegetable in dietary guidelines as long as it contained at least two tablespoons of tomato paste. Reuters reported in 2011: “According to a USDA report from November 2007, pizza and french fries were among the most commonly consumed lunch foods by participants in the national school lunch program.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The industry’s rapid moves to counter RFK and MAHA reveal this movement’s strength. Populism is more alive in America today than it has been in a long time. Fang: “The farm and processed food lobby must contend with a sea change within the Republican Party, which now relies on populist vigor increasingly receptive to the idea of reforming the way American food is produced and sold.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Lastly, Invariant credited RFK Jr.’s rise to the “growing prominence of podcasts and independent media.” Most notably, RFK appeared on Joe Rogan in 2023 and Trump appeared just before the election. Jenny Werwa, a strategic communications consultant with Invariant, suggested that food companies “partner with non-traditional media for content” instead of advertising exclusively on legacy media outlets. This would open the door for food companies to influence and corrupt the content of Independent media outlets with advertising dollars the same way that they have with legacy media outlets. @joerogan

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@lhfang @RobertKennedyJr The next part of this will shock you. There is a massive psyop happening right now trying to confuse and splinter the MAGA-MAHA coalition. Lauren Lee just uncovered a psyop to hijack the MAHA message and block a landmark PBM reform bill:🧵 https://t.co/mvP7xGrLcA

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 EXPOSED: Healthcare middlemen are stealing billions from everyday Americans. Now they’re launching a massive PSYOP —hijacking MAHA talking points—to trick you into thinking HR 6283, which would END their kickbacks, is a “payday for Big Pharma.” Here's the shocking truth 🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) is a middleman between pharmacies, pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, and insurance providers. PBMs generate $300 billion+ in annual revenue. In July 2024, the FTC concluded after two years of investigation that the three largest PBMs—owned by UnitedHealth, CVS, and Cigna, which manage 79% of all US prescription drug claims—exercise “outsized influence over prescription drug prices.” Infographic from RxSafe

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

The FTC concluded these three largest PBMs “greatly enriched themselves at the expense of smaller pharmacies and consumers.” President Trump agrees. “They don’t do anything, except they’re a middleman. We’re gonna knock out the middleman. I’m gonna be very unpopular after that.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

We're paying too much for drugs compared to other countries, and existing laws make it hard to lower costs. The middlemen in the drug industry are profiting significantly without adding value. We're going to eliminate these middlemen to reduce drug prices to unprecedented levels. This topic dominated our discussions with executives and others involved.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What came out of that meeting is that we're paying far too much because we're paying much more than other countries. And we have laws that make it impossible to reduce, and we have a thing called the middleman. You know the middleman. Right? The horrible middleman that makes more money, frankly, than the drug companies, and they don't do anything except they're a middleman. We're gonna knock out the middleman. I'm gonna be very unpopular after that statement. Mister president. Mister president. What about the I don't know who these I don't know who these middlemen are, but they are rich as well. You know what? They are. And we're gonna knock out the middlemen. We're gonna get drug costs down at levels that nobody has ever seen before. And that really I tell you, we spent more time talking about that with Bobby and with the executives and Oz, all of them. We spent more time talking about that than anything else.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

H.R. 6283, or the Delinking Revenue from Unfair Gouging Act (DRUG Act), was introduced in the House of Representatives in November 2023 by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks. The bill proposes that: “A pharmacy benefit manager shall derive no remuneration from any entity for services, benefit administration, or any other activities related to prescription drugs.” The bill would allow PBMs to charge an entity a “bona fide service fee” only in a flat dollar amount NOT based upon a prescription drug price. The bill would also prevent PBMs from: 1. Charging a different amount for a prescription drug than the amount that the PBM reimburses a pharmacy for the drug’s ingredient costs or dispensing fee. 2. Reimbursing a pharmacy for less than the PBM would reimburse a pharmacy owned, controlled by, or affiliated with the PBM. 3. Steering participants to a pharmacy owned, controlled by, or affiliated with the PBM. @RepMMM

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

But a group called Conservatives for Lower Health Care Costs (CLHCC) is calling H.R. 6283 a “Big Pharma Bailout.” They say it’s a “major trap for President Trump.” Several MAGA-friendly pages and outlets ran with this narrative in recent days. Now, who created CLHCC? The national association that represents PBMs—Pharmaceutical Care Management Associated (PCMA).

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@lhfang @RobertKennedyJr Dr. Karam Asmaro discovered today that CLHCC was created by Pharmaceutical Management Care Associated using the Internet Archive. @AsmaroMD https://t.co/97Ffp8pRtl

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

@lhfang @RobertKennedyJr @AsmaroMD CLHCC makes wild claims about H.R. 6283. But they don’t back those claims up with details about the bill. They use vague language designed to evoke an emotional response that pits Republicans against Democrats and obscures the truth about this legislation. See for yourself: https://t.co/SAQ0tUhgkR

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Why would PCMA—which represents PBMs—call H.R. 6283 a Big Pharma Bailout? To hijack the MAHA message and trick us into blocking a PBM reform bill. A silver living is that all of this means that MAHA is winning. The corrupt healthcare industry can’t win a fair debate, or even an unfair debate. RFK Jr. is winning over Republican Senator after Republican Senator while several Democrats even hint at voting for him—Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Kirsten Gillibrand. Kennedy is on track to be confirmed, and the corrupt healthcare industry is ready for any possible scenario. MAHA has to be just as ready.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

To recap: 1. Food companies will try to force RFK Jr. to trade away key MAHA priorities to earn the 50 Senate votes needed for confirmation. 2. Food and Ag companies will try to use the House Appropriations process to block MAHA priorities. 3. Food companies will try to sponsor MAHA-friendly podcasts, shows, and journalists in order to influence their coverage, just like Big Pharma did with cable news. 4. Industry insiders are hijacking MAHA messaging to try and trick us into opposing genuine reform bills. Stay vigilant. 🫡

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - November 19, 2024 at 2:31 PM

Saved - November 20, 2024 at 4:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Today marks the second UAP/UFO hearing in a week, highlighting the growing momentum for disclosure. Michael Shellenberger submitted extensive evidence, revealing a secret program called 'Immaculate Constellation,' which consolidates UAP observations. Whistleblowers and former officials, including Luis Elizondo, confirmed government involvement in UAP crash retrievals and suggested that some UAPs may be intelligently controlled. The hearings are making UAP information accessible to millions, with Congress and experts demanding transparency on these phenomena.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Today is the second UAP/UFO hearing in just one week. UAP/UFO disclosure has more momentum than EVER. Before any BOMBSHELLS drop in today’s Senate hearing, here’s a recap of the KEY takeaways from last week’s groundbreaking House hearing:🧵 https://t.co/JHNMTlsz3t

Video Transcript AI Summary

Oh, do it! Woo hoo! Roger, that's troubleshooting. Can you box where they target? No, I took an auto drive. Wow, look at that! There's a whole fleet hooked on the ASA. They're going against the wind, which is blowing 100 to the west. I'll take it. That's not LNS, though, is it? It's not LNS.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh, do it. Woo hoo. Roger, that's troubleshooting. Yeah. Yeah. Can you box where they target? 2 or 2. No. I took an auto drive. Oh, okay. Oh my gosh, dude. Wow. Look at the. There's a whole fleet of them hooked on the ASA. My gosh. Oh, going against the wind. The wind's a 100 and plain out to the west. Oh, I'll take it. That's not LNS, though, is it? It's not is LNS. Yeah. But if there's a

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Journalist Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger submitted written testimony including a summary of the current state of UAP/UFO disclosure and 200+ pages of evidence, which I summarized here and linked at the bottom of the thread:🧵

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Michael Shellenberger just sent *212 pages* of UAP/UFO evidence and government cover-ups to Congress. Today’s UAP/UFO hearing is going to be a BOMBSHELL. Here are the most shocking and important parts of @shellenberger’s written testimony:🧵 https://t.co/YK6CGtIM9W

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

A whistleblower revealed a secret UAP program called ‘Immaculate Constellation’ that you’ll reportedly get placed on a watchlist just for mentioning. Shellenberger: “A current or former US government official acting as a UAP whistleblower … says the Executive Branch has been managing UAP/NHI issues without congressional knowledge, oversight, or authorization for some time, quite possibly decades. These individuals have revealed the name of an active and highly secretive DoD Unacknowledged Special Access Program, or USAP. The source told … me that the USAP is a strategic intelligence program that is part of the US military family of longstanding, highly-sensitive programs dealing with various aspects of the UAP problem. The new UAP whistleblower claims that the US military and IC database includes videos and images using infrared, forward looking infrared, full-motion video and still photography. Immaculate Constellation serves as a central or parent USAP that consolidates observations of UAPs by both tasked and untasked collection platforms. Immaculate Constellation includes high-quality imagery intelligence and measurement and signature intelligence, the whistleblower’s report adds. The report to Congress detailed various UAPs, including spheres/orbs, discs/saucers, ovals/triangles, boomerang/arrowhead and irregular/organic. Since my reporting on Immaculate Constellation last month, another source cane forward who told me that they saw a roughly 13-minute long, high-definition, full-color video of a white orb UAP coming out of the ocean approximately 20 miles off the coast of Kuwait.” @shellenberger

Video Transcript AI Summary

We have a right to know about UAPs, yet current and former US officials claim the Pentagon has unlawfully withheld significant information, including military intelligence on UAPs. A whistleblower's report indicates that the executive branch has managed UAP issues without congressional oversight for possibly decades. This report mentions a secret DOD program called Immaculate Constellation, which consolidates UAP observations from various military and civilian sources. It details various UAP shapes and incidents, including orbs surrounding an F-22 and a sphere descending near a Navy aircraft carrier. Additionally, a source reported a high-definition video of a UAP emerging from the ocean off Kuwait. Despite efforts to obtain information through FOIA requests, the government has increasingly restricted access to UAP-related documents since 2017.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We have a right to know what UAPs are no matter what they are. However, we now have existing and former US government officials who have told congress that Arrow and the Pentagon have broken the law by not revealing a significant body of information about UAPs, including military intelligence databases that have evidence of their existence as physical craft. 1 of those individuals is a current or former US government official acting as a UAP whistleblower. This person has written a report. This is the report that says the executive branch has been managing UAP, NHI issues without congressional knowledge, oversight, or authorization for some time quite possibly decades. Furthermore, these individuals have revealed the name of an active and highly secretive DOD unacknowledged special access program or USAP. The source of that document told public, me, that the USAP is a strategic intelligence program that is part of the US military family of long standing highly sensitive programs known with various aspects of the UAP problem. The new UAP whistleblower claims that the US military and IC database includes videos and images taken using infrared, forward looking infrared, full motion video, and still photography. The report that was just shared with the Congress says immaculate constellation serves as a central or parent USAP that consolidates observations of UAPs by both tasks and untasked collection platforms. Immaculate constellation includes high quality imagery intelligence and measurement and signature intelligence of UAPs, the whistleblower's report adds. The sources of this intelligence are a blend of directed and incidental collection capacities, capabilities, position in low earth orbit, the upper atmosphere, as well as military and civilian aviation altitudes and marine time environments. The report to Congress details in detail various UAPs, including spheres, orbs, discs, saucers, ovals, triangles, boomerang, arrowhead and irregular organic. Report describes various incidents found in the human intelligence databases. One involved orbs surrounding and enforcing an F 22 out of its patrol area. In another incident, the crew of a Navy aircraft carrier watched a small orange red sphere rapidly descend from a high altitude of 102 100 yards directly above the flight deck of a of the CVN or aircraft carrier. And since my reporting on this immaculate constellation last month, another source came forward who told me that they saw a roughly 13 minute long, high definition, full color video of a white orb UAP coming out of the ocean approximately 20 miles off the coast of Kuwait. It was filmed from a helicopter. Then halfway through the video, the person said the orb is joined by another orb that briefly comes into the frame from the left before rapidly moving again out of the frame. The person discovered the video on SIPR, the secure Internet protocol router network, which the DOD uses to transmit classified information. A leading UAP researcher who utilizes the Freedom of Information Act to find out what the government knows, John Greenwald, told me last year that the US government had been increasingly denying his respect his request for UAP information. He has been doing FOIA requests for 27 years and has an archive of 3,000,000 pages. The government has, for decades, denied any interest in UFOs, he told me, but the documents that he has assembled show that behind the scenes, it was a completely different story. Contrary to the hopes of many advocates of transparency, the government has been restricting more information since the leak of 3 UAP videos in 2017. The DOD organization Aero has been labeling many documents with a b 7 exemption which Greenwald says does not make any sense.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Rep. Nancy Mace: “Rep. Luna just told me if I say ‘Immaculate Constellation,’ I’ll be on some list, maybe a FISA warrant.” “So, come at me bro.” @RepNancyMace @realannapaulina https://t.co/E7J5zdbPqv

Video Transcript AI Summary

I will enter into the congressional record a 12-page document from Michael Shellenberger detailing the Immaculate Constellation Government Program. All committee members have a copy. The first section covers an unacknowledged special access program called Immaculate Constellation, while the second section discusses USG imagery intelligence. Representative Luna humorously warned me that mentioning "Immaculate Constellation" might land me on a list, but I’m not concerned. Without objection, the document will be entered into the record.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And I would now, committee staff asked me to go ahead and I will do it, to enter into the congressional record. This 12 page document that Michael Shellenberger brought today that describes the Immaculate Constellation Government Program. So we will do that now. Every member up here has a copy of it. The first section talks about the unacknowledged special access program called Immaculate Constellation and the second section about USG imagery intelligence and Representative Luna just told me if I say immaculate Constellation, I'll be on some list, Maybe a Pfizer warrant, so, come at me bro. I guess, but, without objection entered in the record.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Former military intelligence officer Luis Elizondo CONFIRMED that the US government has conducted UAP crash retrieval programs and worked to reverse-engineer crafts. Rep. Nancy Mace: “Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs?” Luis Elizondo: “Yes.” Mace: “Were they designed to identify and reverse-engineer alien craft?” Elizondo: “Yes.” @RepNancyMace @LueElizondo

Video Transcript AI Summary

Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs? Yes. Were these programs designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft? Yes. Do any US contractors have similar programs? I prefer to address that in a closed session. In your book, you mention government employees injured by UAPs who are on leave and receiving compensation. Is that correct? Yes. How can the government deny recovering craft if they are compensating injured individuals? That's a great question. I've seen documentation from the US government regarding individuals who sustained injuries from UAP incidents.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs? Yes or no? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft? Yes or no? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Does the US government have any reverse, okay. We've already said that question about retrieval programs. Do any US contractors have the same? Speaker 1: I would prefer to address in a closed session, ma'am. Speaker 0: Okay. In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government compensation for their injuries. Is that correct? Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: How can the government deny we have recovered craft if they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft? Speaker 1: Ma'am, that's a great question. That's why I think we're here again because I've seen the documentation by the US government for several of these individuals who are sustained sustained injuries as a result of a UAP incident.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Luis Elizondo testified that the US government already has, in a sense, communicated with the UAPs. “There’s verbal communication, like we’re having now … you also have non-verbal communication. So, I would say definitively yes, but non-verbal. When a Russian reconnaissance aircraft comes into US airspace, we scramble two F-22s and we are certainly communicating intent and capability. I think the same goes with this. We have these things that are being observed over controlled US airspace, and they’re not really doing a good job hiding themselves. They’re making it pretty obvious that they have the ability to even interfere with our nuclear equities and our nuclear readiness.” @LueElizondo @RepLaTurner

Video Transcript AI Summary

There has been communication with nonhuman life forms, though it's not always verbal. Nonverbal communication is significant; for example, when a Russian reconnaissance aircraft enters US airspace, we respond with F-22s, signaling our intent and capabilities. Similarly, unidentified objects observed over US airspace are not well-concealed and demonstrate their ability to interfere with our nuclear readiness.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Has there been any, to your knowledge, any communication with a nonhuman life form? So the term communication is a bit of a trick word because, there's verbal communication like we're having now. The problem is you also have nonverbal communication, and so I would say definitively, yes. But from a nonverbal meaning, when a Russian reconnaissance aircraft comes into US airspace, we scramble 2 F 22s, and we are certainly communicating intent and capability. I think the same goes with this. We have these things that are being observed over controlled US airspace, and they're not really doing a good job hiding themselves. They're making it pretty obvious they have the ability to even interfere with our our nuclear equities and our nuclear readiness.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

If you’re already a UAP enthusiast, this information isn’t exactly new or groundbreaking. What is truly HISTORIC about this is that UAP disclosure is no longer a third rail issue. Members of Congress, the military, the intelligence community and journalists are now demanding answers in the halls of power. These hearings are exposing MILLIONS of Americans to all of this UAP information for the first time.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Luis Elizondo testified: “I think it is safe to presume here that [UAPs] are being intelligently controlled, because some cases seem to anticipate our maneuvers, and in other cases they seem to—I came across an email where the word ‘stalked’ was used … discussing their ships being pursued by a UAP.” “The vehicles we’re talking about are performing in excess of 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 Gs.” @realannapaulina @LueElizondo

Video Transcript AI Summary

Mr. Elizondo, regarding the aircraft potentially piloted by non-human entities, it’s reasonable to assume they are intelligently controlled, as they often anticipate our maneuvers. In a secure email among Navy officers, the term "stalked" was used to describe UAPs pursuing ships. While some suggest these could be interdimensional beings, I can only analyze from a scientific perspective. For instance, human bodies can endure about 9 g forces, and our best aircraft, the F-16, can handle around 17-18 g forces before structural failure. In contrast, these UAPs reportedly perform at over 1,000 g forces. I’m not ready to declare if these vehicles are alive, as our definitions of life are evolving. Science has shown us that life can exist in forms previously thought impossible, challenging our understanding of what constitutes life.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Mr. Elizondo, in regards to these aircraft being piloted by whatever they might be non human biologics, are you would you agree that it's likely that they are being piloted by some mind body connection? Speaker 1: Ma'am, I think it is safe to presume here that they are being intelligently controlled because they some cases seem to anticipate, our maneuvers and in other cases they seem to, and I I came across an email where the word stocked was used in a, in a it's very secure email between navy officers discussing their ships, being pursued by a UAP. Speaker 0: In our previous panel, we had Gresham, he had testified to say that some of these were interdimensional beings. Can you speak on that at all? Speaker 1: Ma'am, I'm not qualified, certainly as a scientist or otherwise to speculate points of origin. I looked at everything from a scientific perspective. So if you look at it, for example, instantaneous acceleration, which was one of the observables of the program that I belong to, ATIP, the human body can withstand about 9 g forces for a short period of time before you suffer negative biological consequences, blackouts and ultimately redouts and even death. Comparison, our best technology, the F16 which is one of its older platform, but one of our most highly maneuverable aircraft, manned aircraft made by General Dynamics can perform about 17 or 18 g forces before you start having structural failure. Meaning that the airframe begins to disintegrate while you're flying. The vehicles we're we're talking about are performing in excess of 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 g's. Speaker 0: So are you I guess, would it be safe to infer that they're living craft? Speaker 1: You know, I'm not prepared at this point to state for the record, is something alive or not because even that definition is right. There was a time in science we we thought that, life required oxygen and we now know that's not true. There are anaerobic bacteria that's thriving in oxygen, environments that had black oxygen, and also same with photosynthesis. When I was in in college, I was told every everything is derived from photosynthesis, as a form of energy. In reality that's not true. There are things that live off of chemosynthesis. So we're constantly have, having to reevaluate our understanding of what what the definition of life is.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Tim Gallaudet, retired rear admiral in the Navy, said in his written testimony: “UAP, NHI [non-human intelligence], and their technology of unknown origin (TUO) represent a new realization … ” “We are NOT the only advanced intelligence in the universe. Unelected officials in the U.S. government do not have an exclusive right to this knowledge about the nature of reality. The American people have a right to that knowledge.” @GallaudetTim

Video Transcript AI Summary

Tim Gallaudet, a former rear admiral and acting director of NOAA, will testify today. He will discuss credible whistleblower statements indicating that UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) suggest the existence of nonhuman intelligence, highlighting that we are not alone in the universe. These revelations are expected to be impactful and reflect Congress's serious approach to addressing this issue as a matter of national defense.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Another witness today, Tim Gallaudet, who at one time he's a former rear admiral in the Navy, at one time was acting director of NOAA, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration. He's gonna say in part, we know from last year's hearing and recent statements, publications by credible whistleblowers that UAP nonhuman intelligence represent a new realization that we're not the only advanced intelligence in the universe. Again, Marni, these statements certainly are gonna shake people, but that is what we will hear today. And, again, we mentioned congress taking this issue seriously as something that national defense needs to really be accountable for.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

NASA UAP Independent Study Team member Michael Gold said in his written testimony: “NASA has a VAST archive of data, much of which could be relevant to unraveling the mystery of UAP.” “NASA could create an … algorithm that would review all agency archives to search for anomalous phenomena in the air, space, and sea.”

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

What do you think the UAPs are? https://t.co/IqoZD6drrO

Video Transcript AI Summary

Oh, do it! Woo hoo! Roger, that's troubleshooting. Can you box where they target? No, I took an auto drive. Wow, look at that! There's a whole fleet hooked on the ASA. They're going against the wind, which is blowing at 100 to the west. I'll take it. That's not LNS, though, is it? It's not LNS.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh, do it. Woo hoo. Roger, that's troubleshooting. Yeah. Yeah. Can you box where they target? 2 or 2. No. I took an auto drive. Oh, okay. Oh my gosh, dude. Wow. Look at the. There's a whole fleet of them hooked on the ASA. My gosh. Oh, going against the wind. The wind's a 100 and plain out to the west. Oh, I'll take it. That's not LNS, though, is it? It's not is LNS. Yeah. But if there's a

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Shellenberger testified that the “US military and intelligence community are sitting on a huge amount of … still photos, video, other sensor information” on UAPs/UFOs, and they’re “high-resolution.” Rep. Mace: “How many?” Shellenberger: “I’ve been told hundreds, maybe thousands.” @shellenberger @RepNancyMace

Video Transcript AI Summary

The key takeaway about the Immaculate Constellation document is that the US military and intelligence community possess a vast amount of high-resolution visual information, including still and video images, that has not been disclosed to the public. This goes beyond the unclear photos previously shared. Estimates suggest there could be hundreds to thousands of these visuals. Concerns have been raised about revealing sources of this information, but some visuals are simply taken from helicopters using standard cameras, which shouldn't compromise any secret technology. It's unreasonable to withhold such evidence, especially when it involves photographing unidentified objects off the coast of Kuwait.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What's the key takeaway, just a few seconds, about the Immaculate Constellation document you provided us today? Speaker 1: I think that what the American people need to know is that the US military and intelligence community are sitting on a huge amount of visual and other information, still photos, video photos, other sensor, information, and they have for a very long time. And it's not those fuzzy photos and videos that we've been given. Those very clear Speaker 0: High res. Speaker 1: High resolution. Speaker 0: How many how many visuals, graphics, videos, photos? Speaker 1: I mean, I've been told 100, you know, maybe 1,000. I mean, I also wanted to say because there was some there was some conversation around concern around, the the revealing of these materials, revealing the source collections. But some of these are shot from helicopters using normal videos of oceans. I just think that's absurd that somehow you're gonna be revealing some secret US technology by revealing that you've you've photographed orbs off the coast of Kuwait.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Rep. Robert Garcia asked the four witnesses what they think the UAPs are. Gallaudet: “Strong evidence that they are non-human higher intelligence.” Elizondo: “I echo my colleague’s comments.” Shellenberger: “Genuinely do not know.” Gold: “Don’t know, but we must find out.” @GallaudetTim @LueElizondo @shellenberger @RepRobertGarcia

Video Transcript AI Summary

UAPs could potentially indicate non-human higher intelligence. While there is strong evidence suggesting this, I genuinely do not know what they are. It’s essential that we investigate further to find out the truth.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I've already said this, but just for the record again, just briefly, what do you believe UAPs could be or are? Strong evidence that they are non human higher intelligence. I echo my colleague's comments, sir. Genuinely do not know. Don't know, but we must find out.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - October 14, 2024 at 9:13 PM

Saved - October 14, 2024 at 11:54 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I express concern over a recent development where the US military has been authorized to use lethal force against Americans on US soil, which I believe poses significant dangers. Daniel McAdams clarifies that this is not a law but a Department of Defense Directive, specifically 5240.01, re-issued on September 27, 2024. This directive governs intelligence activities and introduces provisions for lethal force, replacing the previous version from 2016 that did not include such measures.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Ron Paul warns that the US military was just “authorized to kill Americans on US soil … I think it’s very, very dangerous.” Daniel McAdams: “It’s not a law, it’s a DoD Directive. So, this is the administrative state, where they take over, they don’t pass laws. It’s a DoD Directive that was re-issued September 27, 2024. It governs the Department of Defense intelligence activities, and now includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances, and it supplants the 2016 version which did not mention that.” The DoD Directive is 5240.01, for those who want to read it themselves. @RonPaul @DanielLMcAdams

Video Transcript AI Summary

The US military is now allegedly authorized to kill Americans on US soil, according to a headline from Zero Edge, which cited Armageddon Pros. This claim is based on a reissued DOD directive from September 27, 2024, concerning Department of Defense Intelligence activities. The directive purportedly includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances, superseding the 2016 version. DOD Directive 5240.01, Section 3, addresses assistance to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities. Section 3.3 outlines levels of authority, stating that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement when lives are in danger. It highlights "responding with assets with potential for lethality" or any situation where the use of force is likely to result in death or serious bodily injury.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We wanna start off with, a headline from 0 Edge. It's pretty hot hot headline. US military now is authorized to kill Americans on US soil. That's that can't be possible. Yeah. This would open up the door for the careless, use and it's more frequent and legal. It'll be legal now, so nobody will have to worry about that. Send in the troops. We need you to shoot a couple of these people. Yeah. They they they are opposing our policies. They're demonstrating against COVID rules or something they'll come up with. So I think it's very, very dangerous. Speaker 1: So here it is. Now the XerEggs picked it up from Armageddon Pros, which is a, which is a substack which they often run. It says, US military now authorized to kill Americans on US soil just ahead, intriguingly, of November elections, and that was my second thought. The military has granted itself permission to unleash unleash lethal force on the civilian population. Again, I thought this has got to be an exaggeration. So, I went and looked and actually go to the next one because this this explains what it is. Now, it's not a law, It's a DOD directive. So this is, you know, the whole the administrative state where they take over. They don't pass laws. They are laws unto themselves. Go to the next one if you can because this is what they're talking about. And I went and I read this secondly, and it talks about a reissued DOD directive that was reissued just on September 27, 2024. It governs the Department of Defense Intelligence activities and now includes provisions authorizing lethal lethal force in circum certain circumstances. And it supplants the 2016 version, which did not mention that. So I read all of this too, which is someone else's analysis. I said, okay. This sounds even more troubling. I wanna go look at the document itself. And so go to the next one. I actually went and looked at the DOD directive. It's DOD directive 5240.01. Now go to the next one. I'm just gonna get to this really quick, so I can just show people this is on their own website. Now this is section 3 of that directive, assistance to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities. Now go to the next one. Now this is levels of authority. This is section 3.3. Defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist a federal department or agency, including a federal law enforcement agency or a state or local law enforcement agency when lives are in danger in response to such a request for such assistance in accordance with the following approval authorities. Now here are the authorities. I'm sorry to get so far into the woods here, but go to the next one. Responding with assets with potential for lethality, and I underline this. I I highlighted it. Or any situation where it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. I'm I'm sorry to bog the discussion down with that talk about, but I really wanted to hone in on this as their actual document. It's not just someone's analysis.

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - September 8, 2024 at 2:02 AM

Saved - September 8, 2024 at 3:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I discussed the issues within the medical and food industries on the RFK Jr. Podcast. I highlighted how the Pharma industry heavily influences medical education, noting my sister's experience at Stanford Med School, where she learned little about nutrition despite extensive training in pharmacology. I criticized the narrative that American patients are lazy, emphasizing the stark differences in obesity rates between the U.S. and countries like Japan. I also pointed out how food companies manipulate our diets and behaviors, contributing to a widespread addiction crisis.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Calley Means on the RFK Jr. Podcast: “It’s not the free market when the system’s been rigged” “It’s not the free market when the Pharma industry pays five times more than the oil industry on lobbying and rigging the system. My sister, who’s my hero, top of her class at Stanford Med School … quit 11 years after training when she was doing her third sinusitis surgery of the day and didn’t know why the patient below her had so much inflammation that they had to get surgery. She did not learn in 11 years at Stanford Med School what caused inflammation, she only learned how to cut it out. When she traced the money, 50% of Stanford Med School’s funding somehow touches Pharma. 90% of my sister’s classes focused on pharmacology. Not a single class on nutrition. Doctors are trained at Stanford, Casey says, from the first day of Medical School, they are told that the American patients are lazy, that they’re gonna be addicted to their ultra-processed food, that they don’t want to exercise. They’re basically inoculated with this idea that their only job is to stand ready with the scalpel and the prescription pad when these lazy American patients come to them and it’s inevitable that people are going to get sicker and sicker. That’s shameful. The differences between what’s happening in America and other countries are not marginal. The childhood obesity rate in Japan is 3%. It’s well over 20% here, and overweight or obese it’s close to 50%.” “Time and time again, social justice issues and hot button issues on the left and the right are weaponized to keep us sick, to keep us addicted, to keep us in fear, and to rig our dopamine, which is very profitable. Coke lobbies to have 75% of food stamps go to ultra-processed food, and then they hired thousands of scientists from the tobacco companies and literally rigged this ultra-processed food to be addictive. Food companies are one of the greatest employers of scientists in the world. We have the smartest minds in science working to make that ultra-processed food addictive. These are science experiments to hijack our evolution, to hijack metabolism. We effectively have an addiction crisis, at the lower income and higher income levels.” @calleymeans @RobertKennedyJr

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - August 31, 2024 at 11:42 PM

Saved - September 1, 2024 at 4:09 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe there needs to be accountability for the Covid response. The mainstream media hasn't fully acknowledged the science that shows Ivermectin could have been a significant treatment, and its suppression led to unnecessary deaths. There were effective remedies from the start, but the focus was solely on the vaccine, which was rushed and inadequately tested. This has resulted in serious health issues, including myocarditis in young athletes, with alarming rates of sudden deaths on the field. Join our MAHA coalition discussion on Monday for more insights.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr: “There still has to be a reckoning” for Covid “The mainstream media hasn’t caught up with the science, but the science is out there now and it’s devastating.” “Yesterday, the chief attorney for FDA admitted, because he lost a case in court against a doctor, that there was no reason to discourage people from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very devastating cure for Covid. It literally obliterated Covid. By depriving people of Ivermectin, millions of people around the globe died. There were cures for Covid from day one … but they didn’t want that, they wanted the vaccine only. There’s a little-known federal rule that they were all aware of which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use. If they admitted that any of them were effective, the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They gave people a product that was not properly tested. Now, we have a whole generation of kids that got myocarditis, these terrible heart problems in young athletic boys. You’re seeing so many kids now drop dead on playing fields. We never saw anything like this before. The average, I think, was 29 a month globally athletes who died on the field, and we’re getting to hundreds a month now.” From the Limitless Expo

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker wrote a book about Fauci with 2,200 footnotes and claims all sources are verifiable via barcode. The speaker invited readers to identify errors, and despite 27 editions, none were reported. The book allegedly details immoral and criminal behavior, accusing Fauci of imposing totalitarian controls without scientific basis. The FDA's chief attorney allegedly admitted there was no reason to discourage Ivermectin use, which the speaker claims was a cure for COVID, and that millions died because it was withheld. The speaker asserts that emergency use authorization for vaccines could not have been issued if existing remedies were acknowledged. They claim officials pretended there was no cure besides the vaccine, resulting in myocarditis and deaths among young athletes. The speaker states that athlete deaths have risen from 29 to 100 per month. They believe a reckoning is coming as the science is now available.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I wrote a, you know, I wrote a a book about Fauci. Great. There's, you know, there's a 2,200 footnotes in the book and I invited people at the beginning of the book. All all my sources in the books are, I did something that had never been done before which I put them on a bar code next to them. So you can actually, as you read, you can look up the the sourcing. And I invited people to find problems with the book. I said tell me what they are and we will correct them. We had 27 editions. Oh, we had the capacity to correct anything any bit. And we never nobody ever told us any any actual error in that book. And if you read that book, it's hard to, it's you know, I don't look into Anthony Fauci's head. I don't look into Bill Gates head. I don't say he did this because he was greedy or because he was manipulative. I just lay out what they did and the story speaks for itself. And you know, it's a story of really of people involved in really terrible terrible immoral homicidal criminal behavior. And, and using a position in government that that he had for 50 years without any election, to clamp down these totalitarian controls that were not science based and that everybody now admits. There was no science. In fact, yesterday, the chief attorney for FDA admitted that there was no reason. He admitted because he lost the case of court against the doctor but there was no reason to discourage people from taking Ivermectin. Ivermectin was a very very devastating cure for COVID. It literally obliterated COVID and, you know, by depriving people of Ivermectin, we many many people, millions of people around the globe died and they didn't need to. There were cures for COVID from day 1 and very effective cures and but they didn't want that. They wanted the vaccine only and there was a rule. There's a rule of, you know, little known federal rule that they were they were all aware of which said that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an existing remedy that has already been approved for any use. So if they admitted that hydroxychloroquine or famtitabine or ivermectin or any of the 25 existing therapeutic drugs that were very effective against COVID. If they admitted that any of them were effective, the whole vaccine project would have fallen apart. They couldn't have done it. And, and so they decided that they were going to pretend that there was no cure except for the vaccine. And, and they gave people a product that was not properly tested and then now if all generation of kids that has now, you know, got myocarditis, these terrible heart problems and young athletic boys. You're seeing so many kids now drop dead on playing fields. Right. And that we never saw anything like this before. On average, it was, I think, 29 a month globally. Athletes who died on the field and we were getting down to 100 a month now. Right. And it's, you know, and there there still has to be a reckoning. The mainstream media hasn't caught up with the science. But the science is out there now and it's devastating.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

Set a reminder to join our MAHA coalition 𝕏 Space on Monday at 12pm EST: https://t.co/3wmygTwy6h

@Holden_Culotta — Holden Culotta

Posted - January 13, 2024 at 5:23 PM

Saved - January 20, 2024 at 9:20 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

If elected, RFK Jr plans to pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, while also issuing an executive order to prevent federal employees from colluding with media or social media companies to censor political speech.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

RFK Jr: “I’m going to give a civics lesson to the American public by pardoning Julian Assange and Edward Snowden my first day in office. The same day, I’m going to sign an executive order ordering all federal employees, including the FBI and the CIA, to refrain from colluding or communicating with media or social media companies to censor political speech.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

In this video, the speaker announces their campaign plans, which include pardoning Julian Assange and Edmondson on their first day in office. They also mention signing an executive order to prevent federal employees from colluding with media or social media companies to censor American political speech. The speaker emphasizes the need for a large army of supporters and mentions the cost of their campaign. They highlight the presence of 50,000 volunteers and the establishment of a ground army in every state and county. The speaker believes this will give them an advantage over other candidates during the general election.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: As part of that as part of that campaign, I'm going to I'm gonna give a civics lesson to the American public by pardoning Julian Assange and Edmondson, my first day in office. And the same day, I'm gonna sign an executive order ordering all federal employees, including the FBI and the CIA, to refrain from colluding or communicating with media or social media companies to censor American political speech. Oh, I know that I can do it. You give me a sword and some ground to stand on, and I'm gonna take your country back for you. But I can't do it alone. I need a big army of people, and this is a an army that I'm looking at in front of me today. President Biden and president Trump can get on the ballot for free. And I need to spend about $15,000,000 to do it. And that's in the long run, it's gonna help because we already have 50,000 volunteers in the field. We're building out a a ground game, a ground army in every state and in many cases, in every county. And it that is gonna be that's forcing us to do that, to get on the ballot, but what that means. And when the general election comes, I'm ever gonna have a better army on the street, in the neighborhoods than any other candidate.

TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Holden_Culotta